<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="rcd1858.0028.653"><!--enter filename without extension for xml:id-->
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc> 
<titleStmt>
<title><!--example, take title from spine-->Record 28 1858 to 1859</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<publisher>Washington University Libraries</publisher>
<pubPlace>St. Louis, MO</pubPlace>
<date>2012</date>
<availability><p><ref target="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/</ref></p></availability>
<availability><p>data are freely accessible</p>
<p>This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.</p>
</availability>
<idno type="dls">rcd1858.0028.653<!--enter filename without extension--></idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<bibl><!-- example, use title-->Record 28 1858 to 1859 prepared by the St. Louis Circuit Court</bibl>
<bibl>The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2012-09-05" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-09-04" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-08-29" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-08-28" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-05-29" who="AGJ"></change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>

<text xml:id="rcd1858.0028.653T">
<body>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0000.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0001.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0002.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0003.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0004.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0005.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0006.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0007.tiff"/>
</div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0008.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10">October Term 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>Be it remembered that at a term of the St Louis<lb/> Circuit Court begun and held at the City of St Louis,<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis on the first<lb/> Monday of October being the fourth day of said month, were present Hon<lb/> <name>James R Lackland</name>, Judge of said Court, <name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk, and<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name> comes and files his official bond, as Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County, <unclear rend="strikethrough">conditioned</unclear> in the sum of fifty thousand dollars, with<lb/> <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry G Soulard</name>, as securities, which is approved by<lb/> the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Greene</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Ira Todd</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs <name>M Nolinetal</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire<lb/> &amp; Marine Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire</name> and<lb/> <name>Marine Ins Co.</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p><name>Cutter</name> vs <name>Waddingham</name>: Continued by consent.</p>
            <p><name>Cutter</name> vs <name>Childers</name>; Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> et al<lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Pother</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Swift</name> et al<lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 176<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> et al<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0009.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gibbon L Ketty</name> et al<lb/> vs 670<lb/> <name>Augustus Muegge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Mo to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Graytrusteere</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>George N Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 111<lb/> <name>The Citizens Savings Inst</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Haskell</name> &amp; <name>Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name> garns &amp;c</head>
            <p>Mo to discharge garnsishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John F Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethriel B Vincent</name><lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>W H Deriar</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court the plaintiff files anamen<lb/> ded petition herein, together with the exhibits therein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Mason</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>George W Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p><name>George W Walker</name>, by his attorneys, ND and GP<lb/> Strongs, comes and enters his appearance herein and<lb/> warives service of process.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Peter Geis</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>F W Black</name><lb/> vs 824<lb/> <name>Frederick Dattelgeveig</name> et al</head>
            <p>Mo for security for costs filed. Demurrer Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McClure</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis &amp; Iron<lb/> Mountain RailRoad co</name> garnss</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hall</name><lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Reply to amended answer filed.</p>
            <p><name>Cortez Crocker</name> vs <name>Eleazer Sherman</name>.......... Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="3" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0010.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Harrington</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>William King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Copy of petition, notice of suit, and affidavit of ser<lb/>vice filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Oliphant</name> et al<lb/> vs 175<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the dependant <name>Henry D Bacon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>Citizens Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>Beste</name> &amp; <name>Grima</name></head>
            <p>Interplea of <name>Charles Deynoot</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 822<lb/> <name>James ED Houseman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Julius H Smith</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C McCausland</name> et al<lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>Richard Foley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Patrick Molloy</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> et al<lb/> vs 131<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mark M Stanfield</name> et al<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pomeroy Benton &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>Amended answer of <name>Renick and Peterson</name> filed<lb/> by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G A Scheidt</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Roy</name> et al<lb/> vs 375<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
            <note>762</note>
            <p><name>William H Nickersham</name> vs <name>Mary E Wickersham</name>:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="4" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0011.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hammond</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cresson Stuart</name> et al<lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laureston R Linvingston</name> et al<lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>L A Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer Lempson</name> et al<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>L A Hall</name> filed. Answer of <name>John W<lb/> Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer G Lamson</name> et al<lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Leonidas Hall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazzard</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoinc Morin</name><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Daniel Perrault</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bowe</name><lb/> vs 813<lb/> <name>Thomas Shehan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Bagging &amp; Rope Co</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James E Yeatman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Tevis</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Charles R Halladm</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 844<lb/> <name>Sands E Sellick</name> garns et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnol</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss and dissolve attachment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A S Thomas</name><lb/> vs 129<lb/> <name>John Gongalis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Dowthett</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Alonzo Cutler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
            <p><name>Henry Overstolz</name> et al vs <name>Michael Connerly</name> garns et al. . . . Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="5" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0012.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Steele</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Henry J Steele</name></head>
            <p>Answer and <name>Cross Bill</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, by their attorney and<lb/> withdraw the answer heretofore filed herein, and, by leave of<lb/> Court file an amended answer and also counterclaim herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Globe Mutual Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>Western Mutual Fired Marine Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Franklin Insurance Company</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William H Chiles</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Edward Mitchell</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>William D H Barnard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard S Pratt</name> et al<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Joseph G Chouteaw</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Edward Mitchell</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Andrew J S Stevens</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mark M Steinford</name> et al<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Andrew I L Stevens</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew I Short</name><lb/> vs 847<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name>, <name>James Patterson</name>,<lb/> <name>Noah M Ludlow</name>, <name>Francis M Ludlow</name>,<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name>, &amp; <name>Andrew Logan</name>, garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> Use of <name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>George N Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Haywood</name> et al<lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>Samuel L Moses</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
            <note>153</note>
            <p><name>Edward K Tryon</name> vs <name>Samuel L Moses</name> et al:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="6" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0013.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name> et al<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Bernard Midas</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Martin O Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order<lb/> of publication heretofore made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lamson, Goodman</name> et al<lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G A Scheidt</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laureston R Livingston</name> et al<lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Roy</name> et al vs 375<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Harrington</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 565<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hammond</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#323, 58.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Martin</name>, <name>J Willis Martin</name>,<lb/> <name>George Martin</name>, <name>Samuel Simons</name>,<lb/> and <name>Caldwell F Rioerras</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Alexander H Wing</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant<lb/> and files a statement duty verified by<lb/> affidavit, whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of three hundred and twenty three dol<lb/>lars and fifty eight cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered against<lb/> him for said sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid as confessed and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution. The above confession was made<lb/> by <name>James E Munford</name>, attorney in fact for defendant, by virtue of a Power of Attorney<lb/> embodied in the statement of the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="7" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0014.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#5,267,34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Pointer</name>, and<lb/> <name>William H Pointer</name>.<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Aeneas McFaul</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment affidavit of plaintiffs filed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, and file a<lb/> statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, where<lb/> by they confess themselves indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of five thousand two hundred and sixty<lb/> seven dollars and thirty four cents, and consent that<lb/> judgment may be rendered against them for said sum. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution, Confefsion made by <name>CC Whittelsey</name> attorney in fact, by power of attorney filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#397,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Kingsland</name><lb/> <name>Leroy Kingsland</name> and<lb/> <name>David K Ferguson</name>,<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Henry C Wright</name>.</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>tive attorneys and consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and<lb/> against the defendant for the sum of three hundred<lb/> and ninety seven dollars and seventy cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon together with interest at the rate<lb/> of ten percent per annum from this date until paid and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. Stipulation of<lb/> parties filed; and by consent executions stayed for three months.</p>
            <closer>
                By order of Court Rule XXiX of the Rules of Court is repealed.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
                The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-05">Tuesday October 5th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>M B Cox</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas C Fletcher</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Nehemiah Holmes</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
            <p><name>The commercial Ins Co</name> vs <name>William Dwyer</name> garns:. . . . Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p><name>The commercial Ins Co</name> vs <name>James M Cord</name> garns:. . . . Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al vs <name>William Gayle</name> &amp; <name>Benj Wilson</name>'s garns. Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p><name>Steam Boat Ben Bolt</name> vs <name>S D Morrison</name>: Plea in abatement filed.</p>
            <p><name>Arthur Vallon</name> et al vs <name>John P Schenck</name> et al: Answer of <name>Helgenberg</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="8" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0015.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenz Shaffler</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name> President of<lb/> <name>Terre Haute &amp; Alton Rail<lb/> Road Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p><name>Lorenz Shaffler</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>L R Sargent</name> Superintendent <name>Terre Haute &amp; AAA</name> garns</p>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemelius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William Grant</name> garns of<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W H Peckham</name> et al<lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Denniston</name> et al<lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Durand</name> et al<lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Collins</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>Henry Brundy</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court, that this suit be dis<lb/> missed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemelius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> an alias summons issue herein for the defendants, <name>William<lb/> C Wagley</name>, <name>Daniel Elifritz</name> and <name>Darius Cox</name>. Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson G Connor</name><lb/> vs 863<lb/> <name>James B Goff</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen H Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Karey</name><lb/> vs 828<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Miles G Moies</name> filed.</p>
            <note>482</note>
            <p><name>Francis M Miller</name> vs <name>George W Miller</name>. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="9" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0016.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> vs 286<lb/> <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney the time for<lb/> answering herein is intended fifteen days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 773<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Miles G Moies</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Miles G Mois</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominick</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>T W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer field</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugine Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>William C Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney the time<lb/> for answering is extended one week.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>Jonathan Wheeler</name> el al</head>
            <p>Demurrer field</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo D Holmes</name><lb/> vs 712<lb/> <name>John Bingham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer field</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre E Brulatour</name><lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>Jonathan Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, by their attorney, the time for<lb/> pleading herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pother, Manson Co</name><lb/> vs 607<lb/> <name>H O Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants by their attorney the time<lb/> for pleading herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Dobyns</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Henry F Mason</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Guenandon</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>The German Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Charles Mick</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, <name>Myerson</name>, by his attorney, ten<lb/> days additional time is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name>'s admn<lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants by their attorney,<lb/> ten days additional time is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs 453<lb/> <name>John H Oglesby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Joseph H Oglesby</name> filed.</p>
            <note>418</note>
            <p><name>Francis Cattinet</name> el al vs <name>Morris RosenheiM</name> et al : . . . Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="10" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0017.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Myers</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Angel S Myers</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Benjamin Lithauer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Angel S Myers</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, the time for<lb/> answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> et al<lb/> vs 477<lb/> <name>Edward B Davis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, the time for<lb/> answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> et al<lb/> vs 592<lb/> <name>William L F Gage</name> et al</head>
            <p> Answer of <name>William L F Gage</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunset</name> all et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al.<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William P Curtis</name>, <name>Julian Bates</name>, <name>M Burchard</name>, <name>J A Brownlee</name>,<lb/> <name>J B Mckay</name>, <name>Fred Haws</name>, <name>Major Bryant</name>, <name>R F Barry</name>, <name>E Gaylord</name>,<lb/> <name>C H Cottman</name>, <name>C L Cummings</name>, <name>John N Morris</name>, <name>J Charles</name>, <name>Jno Wills</name>,<lb/> <name>Alex Ganett</name>, <name>Turner Maddox</name>, <name>N Kelly</name>, <name>H C North</name>, <name>L A Benoist</name>,<lb/> <name>Jas Quinlan</name>, <name>Jno Riffey</name>, <name>H Marston</name>, <name>Geo Hood</name>, <name>J A Christy</name>, <name>A Blakeslee</name>,<lb/> <name>E P Casteline</name>, <name>W Avis</name>, <name>Jno G Prather</name>, <name>Isaac L Garrison</name>,<lb/> <name>Dr Walker</name>, <name>S A Myers</name>, <name>N Bryan</name>, <name>R Ross</name>, <name>W McIndree</name>,<lb/> <name>C H Shaw</name>, <name>C H Shaw</name>, <name>Frank Widler</name>, <name>G R Robinson</name>, <name>W Conley</name>,<lb/> <name>A Lewis Jr</name>, <name>R P Hall</name>. <name>W Garvin</name>, <name>J H Gordon</name>, <name>J Shreett</name>, <name>W W Marsh</name>,<lb/> <name>J H Gordon</name>, <name>A R Levering</name>, <name>B F Beasley</name>, <name>Geo Hutchison</name>, <name>H Finnegan</name>,<lb/> <name>W L Salisbury</name>, <name>L P Sanger</name>, <name>J J Garrard</name>, <name>H Hitchcock</name>, <name>H J McKellops</name>,<lb/> <name>Jas D Leonard</name>, <name>E A Peters</name>, <name>E B Lewis</name>, <name>W H Jones</name>, <name>J C Dennistion</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell &amp; Co</name>, <name>S H Laflin &amp; Co</name>, <name>E G Smith</name>, <name>Geo Hutchinson</name>,<lb/> <name>J M Franciscus</name>, <name>S S Rogers</name>, <name>D Knox</name>, <name>Jno Tighes</name>, <name>W Garvin <unclear>Bros.</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>W Grubb</name>, <name>Jno Bird</name>, <name>Jno T Davis</name>, <name>C B Peterson</name>, <name>A R Levering</name>.<lb/> <name>W H Kelley</name>, <name>Leibig</name>, <name>Jas J Sanger</name>, <name>J G Harper</name>,<lb/> <name>J Westcott</name>, <name>A L Lacroix</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, <name>Geo W Parker</name>,<lb/> <name>E F Smith</name>, <name>Jno B Grey</name>, <name>E D Chandler</name>, <name>R H Obear</name>,<lb/> <name>W A Brown</name>, <name>J P Cuddy</name>, <name>L M Garnsett</name>, <name>W McKee</name>,<lb/> <name>S Keele</name>, <name>Jno Kennard</name>, <name>D Leitch</name>, <name>Ja Glenn</name>, <name>Capt<lb/> Blake</name>, <name>Donl Wolff</name>, <name>Jno Wolff</name>, <name>J B Ruby</name>, <name>R B Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>A Walsh</name>, <name>A Lewis Jr</name>, <name>A E Orme</name>, <name>Geo Orme</name>, <name>H B Merritt</name>,<lb/> <name>H M Lindell</name>, <name>W T Christy</name>, <name>A H McCowen</name>, <name>Capl Glenn</name>, <name>T W<lb/> Hutchinson</name>, <name>Philip Gordon</name>, <name>W Alexander</name>, <name>J C Clark</name>, <name>E H Tobias</name>,<lb/> <name>H K Frirman</name>, <name>Bodikers</name>, <name>J C Selby</name>, <name>Thos A Slaughter</name> <name>D Watters</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Giraldin</name>, <name>C D Lynch</name>, <name>W W Kelly</name>, <name>Thos S Bryant</name>, <name>Burlingame</name>,<lb/> <name>K M Gregor</name>, <name>R H McKay</name>, <name>G M Ferguson</name>, <name>H F Robinson</name>, <name>J How</name>, <name>J Rosenfield</name>,<lb/> Garnsishees of <name>Henry F Cross</name> et al.</head>
            <p>On motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that<lb/> the said garnsishees<lb/> be discharged at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiffs,<lb/> and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="11" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0018.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Co</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J N Alexander</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Ogles</name> by<lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>C D Sullivan Co</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hyancinthe</name> (of color)<lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Hyancinthe Renard</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Letcher</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>Harry J Bodley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Karey</name><lb/> vs 825<lb/> <name>Thomas B Ellis</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Henry M Woodward</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Kingman</name><lb/> vs 401<lb/> <name>John Gates</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A H Menkens</name> et al<lb/> vs 786<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 838<lb/> <name>P Baudey Garesche</name><lb/> garns of <name>Beste</name> &amp; <name>Grima</name>.</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the said garnsishee be discharged<lb/> hence at the costs of the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knapp</name> et al<lb/> vs 709<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Henry M Woodward</name> filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al Exrs<lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Rosse</name> et al<lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>D W Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at the day came the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and dismifs this suit as to the defendant. . . . Sherwood.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brener</name><lb/> vs 229<lb/> <name>John H Heidemann</name></head> 
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeffrey Seymour</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Henry M Woodward</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name> et al<lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="12" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0019.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Dean</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>William L F Gage</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>William L F Gage</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Connor</name> et al<lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sparrow</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 32<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Axel Deorborn</name> et al<lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambsqaust</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Levin Steller</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 351<lb/> <name>Rudolph Brusselbach</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Robert Henning</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her<lb/> attorney and dismisses this suit, at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff. By leave of Court the plain<lb/>tiff withdraws the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> et al<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended<lb/> to the 11th inst.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head> 
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Thomas Sproat</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hall</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> et al<lb/> vs 496<lb/> <name>Patrick Reilly</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="13" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0020.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Binoist</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Charles Tillman</name> garns.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anderson</name> &amp; <name>Watson</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <p>In</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laflin, Smith &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 95<lb/> <name>Grady and Rowe</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>John Christopher</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Isaac T Green</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 677<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Clank J Hooper</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Rose</name><lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>Redmond Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his<lb/> motions, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Casey</name><lb/> vs 339<lb/> <name>John D. Detert</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>English Dickman &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Exhibit sued on withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Garnett S Van Wagoner</name><lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>John O Cannon</name> and<lb/> <name>Lee C Wallace</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and on his<lb/> motion it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Elleard</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Exhibit withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman</name><lb/> vs 475<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mount</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="14" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0021.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry E Warren</name><lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>Theodore F Tunison</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick R Toewater</name><lb/> vs 640<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jocob Bensberg</name> and also of <name>Gerhard<lb/> Bensberg</name> and <name>Joseph C Barlow</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Schluter</name><lb/> vs 397<lb/> <name>Adam Ehrgotten</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Emile B Krausse</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> the use of <name>Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cornet</name><lb/> vs 500<lb/> <name>William Streit</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Charles Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>Joshua V Throop</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Spahr</name> et al<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>C Schaeffer</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Waters</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Swift</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name>, <name>The St Louis Lumbermen<lb/> and Mechanics Ins Co.</name> <name>Citizens Ins Co</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Andrew J L Stevens</name> garn of <name>McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton Flagg</name><lb/> vs 659<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 700<lb/> <name>James R Ricords</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Charles Bourchard</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Richards</name><lb/> vs 778<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="15" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0022.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Tillman</name> et al<lb/> vs 24<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney and file proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication heretofore made herein has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis, Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion to quash Sheriffs return filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 526<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Motion for the appointment of Commissioners to Court<lb/> vote find motion to set cause for trail filed by plaintiff:<lb/> motion to quash notice of contest filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas E Owens</name><lb/> vs 881<lb/> The City of Saint Louis<lb/> garn of <name>James H McClure</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mutual Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 605<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head> 
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Lieber</name><lb/> vs 850<lb/> <name>The St Louis Agricultural and<lb/> Mechanical Association</name>, garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William H Haydon</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William H Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William H Haydon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel H Norcross</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by the defendants.</p>
            <note>M</note>
            <p><name>Samuel Guillaume</name> et al vs <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al:. . . . answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="16" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0023.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 384<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 382<lb/> <name>Thomas M Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Ellis</name> et al<lb/> vs 97<lb/> <name>Thomas R Grady</name> and<lb/> <name>James Rowe</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this suit by dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Henry M Woodward</name> filed.</p>
            <p><name>George R Robinson</name> who is personally known to the Court comes and in open<lb/> Court acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation by him to this negro<lb/> slave named <name>Henry</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Insurance Company</name><lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jacob Ambs</name> filed: Answer of <name>Jacob<lb/> Bensberg</name>, <name>Joseph C Barlow</name>, <name>Peter Ambs</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> C Reuss</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George J Barnett</name> et al<lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>M Primnose</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jacoby</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ferguson</name> et al<lb/> vs 671<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jacoby</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Snead</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Devlin</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>Joseph W Clark</name> et al</head> 
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Answer and offset filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Harsh</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Solomon Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Bt Ben Bolt</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>H A Conant</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="17" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0024.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Steen</name><lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>Wheeler</name> &amp; <name>Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>Jno N Boffinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Nickolay</name><lb/> vs 728<lb/> <name>William Priesmier</name> et al</head> 
            <p>Demurrer and answer of <name>Prismier</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Richardson</name><lb/> vs 323<lb/> <name>Williamson P Howard</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Timothy Regan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1998,00<lb/> set aside<lb/> <date when="1858-12-24">Dec 24 1858</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Ryan</name> and<lb/> <name>Franklin X Louthan</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>James Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he con<lb/>fesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> nineteen hundred and ninety eight dollars and consents<lb/> that judgment may be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and also this costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Lavin</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Charles Pond</name> garn</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McCord</name><lb/> vs 693<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Franklin Bull</name> garn</head> 
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 779<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horace Whittimore</name><lb/> vs 741<lb/> <name>Human Wenin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Myers</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Angel S Myers</name></head>
            <p>Answer of defendant <name>Lithauer</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S Ross</name> et al<lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>D N Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>A Becker</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="18" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0025.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Francis Timmerman</name></head>
            <p>Claim of <name>Woods Christy Co.</name></p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> and exhibits the mandate of the Su<lb/>preme Court and it appearing that the<lb/> order heretofore made by this Court requiring <name>William Meier</name> the assignee<lb/> herein, to allow and classify under said assignment a certain claim of <name>James<lb/> Woods</name>, <name>William T Christy</name>, <name>Robert K Woods</name>, <name>William T Gentry</name>, and <name>Joseph<lb/> Woods</name>, trading as <name>Woods Christy and Company</name>, against <name>Francis Timmerman</name>,<lb/> for the sum of Seventeen hundred and forty dollars and thirty four cents, has<lb/> been reversed by said Supreme Court, it is ordered by the Court, with the con<lb/>sent of all parties, that said assignee disallow said demand of <name>Woods Chris<lb/>ty and Company</name>, as a claim against the effects of the said <name>Timmerman</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> T<name>he Pacific Inc Co</name>, <name>The Saint Louis Lumbermen<lb/> and Mechanics Ins Co</name>, <name>Citizens Insurance Company</name>,<lb/> and <name>Stephens garn of McDowell</name>.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance Company</name>,<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Lumberman and Mechanics Ins Co</name>,<lb/> <name>Citizens Ins Co and Stephens</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sutton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and Offset filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blow and Co</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>The Chicago Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion to quash Sheriff Return filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knapp</name> et al<lb/> vs 709<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Moies</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius Lyon</name><lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Moies</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeffrey Seymour</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Moies</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs <name>337</name> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John S Thomson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="19" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0026.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Guenadon</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>The German Savings<lb/> Institution</name> &amp; <name>Charles Mick</name></head>
            <p>On Certificate of Deposit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the <name>German savings Institu<lb/>tion</name>, and brings into Courts and deposists with <name>Stephen<lb/> Rice</name>, the Clerk of said Court, the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and thirty four dollars and ninety five cents and<lb/> files a prayer that the plaintiff and the defendant <name>Mick</name>, be compelled to interplead<lb/> for said fund.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-06">Wednesday October 6th 1858</date>,</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#209.48</note>
            <note>I hereby acknowledge to have<lb/> received full and entire satis<lb/>faction of the judgement of<lb/> which this the margin<lb/> <date when="1869-08-07">august 7th 1869</date> attest <unclear> <name>Lewis<lb/> Henry Brockmann</name></unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Brockmann</name><lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>John Murphy</name> and<lb/> <name>John G Steininger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants<lb/> are indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and nine dollars and<lb/> forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recov<lb/>er of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2328.10.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Camp</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> &amp; <name>Thomas Brown</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendants <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the<lb/> defendants <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, where<lb/>fore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants<lb/> <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty three hundred<lb/> and twenty eight dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges in this behalf expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1196.83</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles S Rannels</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="20" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0027.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and ninety six dollars and eighty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as formed together with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#346.92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Carpenter</name>,<lb/> and <name>William s Cuddy</name>,<lb/> vs 747<lb/> <name>Eneas McFaul</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the said defendants is indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> and forty six dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#586.38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Carpenter</name>,<lb/> and <name>William S Cuddy</name>,<lb/> vs 748<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Sheppard</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Ward</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Walter E<lb/> Sell</name> and <name>James M Ward</name>, but the defendant <name>Thomas<lb/> Sheppard</name>, although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and eighty six dollars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#229.40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward A Fillerer</name><lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>Henry N Williams</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney,<lb/> and defended, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to the said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dollars and forty cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with interest at the<lb/> rate of ten percent per annum until paid and then costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1052.70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James E Kelso</name><lb/> vs 518<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his at<lb/>torney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="21" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0028.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants<lb/> are indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and fifty two dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#348.80</note>
            <note>The with is judgement<lb/> of which this is the<lb/> margin has beenassigned<lb/> to <name>James Bchan</name> and <name>Dreid</name><lb/> this <date when="1860-01-11">11 january 1860</date><lb/> attest <name>D Reideff</name><lb/> <name>Harris D Booge</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D Booge</name>.<lb/> vs 253.<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name>,<lb/> <name>Leonard R Sargent</name>,<lb/> &amp; <name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered that the petition herein by taken against said<lb/> defendants as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty eight dollars<lb/> and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in firm aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#273.50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Crane</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> said defendants are indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and seventy three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#147.93</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Walters</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the said defendants are indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of one<lb/> hundred and forty seven dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Andrews</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>James J Lampton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Grassmuck</name><lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="22" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0029.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2147.93.<lb/> at aside <date when="1858-12-09">Dec<lb/> 9th 1858</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name><lb/></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but make default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of twenty one hundred and forty seven dollars and ninety three cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with interest thereon at the rate<lb/> of ten percent per annum until paid, and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name>,<lb/> <name>Homer H Dikeman</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>James G English</name>.<lb/> vs 295<lb/> <name>John M Homer</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Homer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2027.38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Hall</name>, <name>Benjamin Brown</name>,<lb/> and <name>Walter C Brown</name><lb/> vs 639<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> &amp; <name>Clark I Morton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff,<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of twenty hundred and twenty seven dol<lb/>lars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#293.45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Theodore Plate</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles C Schottler</name><lb/> vs 799<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> and<lb/> <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attor<lb/>ney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and ninety three dollars and forty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Senshouser</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="23" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0030.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#185.64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs 687<lb/> <name>Robert Peyinhous</name><lb/> and <name>James A Phelps</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants are in<lb/>debted to the said plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty five dollars<lb/> and sixty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2327.08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Jellinghaus</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Julius Prorbsting</name><lb/> vs 638<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of twenty three hundred and twenty seven dollars and eight cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#591.53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Ohio Tool Company</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety one dollars<lb/> and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#566.47</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name>, <name>Homer H Dikeman</name>,<lb/> and <name>James G English</name><lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>William L Boxley</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiff by their attorney, but the de<lb/>fendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and th Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the said defendants are indebted to the said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and sixty six dollars and forty seven cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="24" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0031.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1571.51</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Maxwell</name><lb/> vs 285<lb/> <name>Horace A Conant</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter H Conant</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs petition be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred and<lb/> seventy one dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#217.20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name> <name>Homer H Dikeman</name>,<lb/> and <name>James G English</name><lb/> vs 297<lb/> <name>James A Marsh</name> <name>George W Sherick</name><lb/> and <name>John A Smithers</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars and twenty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#237.30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Manny</name>, <name>George S Drake</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Downing</name><lb/> vs 313<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and <name>Bryant S Stelle</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition here<lb/>in be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and thirty seven dollars and<lb/> thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1843.54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip G Ferqusor</name><lb/> vs 734<lb/> <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name>,<lb/> and <name>John F Long</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants are<lb/> indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and forty three<lb/> dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="25" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0032.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2548.14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dempsey Weaver</name><lb/> vs 658<lb/> <name>Eneas McFaul</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is orde by the count that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confeseed; and the count finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendent is indefted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> twenty five hundred and forty eight dollors, and fourteen cents. It is therfore con<lb/>sidered by the count that said plaintiff recover of said defendent the sum<lb/> aforesaid by the form aforesaid as found, and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therfor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#988.60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name>, and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardslee</name>.<lb/> vs 652.<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name> <name>Franklin Field</name>, and<lb/> <name>Thomas A Simpson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendants al<lb/>though duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and eighty eight dol<lb/>lars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#514.49</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Endres</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 587<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney, but the defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and fourteen dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2203.93</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 526<lb/> <name>A J McDonald</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attor<lb/>ney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of twenty two hundred and three dollars and nine three cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="26" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0033.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#396.72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Herman Kallman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and ninety six dollars and seventy two cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#660.97</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Theodore Cramer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Six hundred and sixty dollars and ninety seven cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1212.77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hasse</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Looke</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and twelve dollars<lb/> and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#423.34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Barlow</name>,<lb/> vs 562.<lb/> <name>Henry W Heisterhagen</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his at<lb/>torney but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty<lb/> three dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="27" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0034.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#343.33</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hawkins Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 667<lb/> <name>Anthony H Menkens</name> and<lb/> <name>Diederick B Menkens</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and forty three dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1761.56</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leicester Babcock</name><lb/> vs 561<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel Pilkington</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but makes default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of seventeen hundred and sixty one dollars and fifty six cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1084.91</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leicester Babcock</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Campbell</name>,<lb/> and <name>George Schaffner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but makes default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten<lb/> hundred and eighty four dollars and ninety one cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#227.09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel W Baldwin</name>, <name>John M Randall</name>,<lb/> and <name>Samuel M Dodd</name><lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>William Palmer</name> and <name>Simeon Oliver</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by his attorney but the defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make<lb/> default wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and twenty seven dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="28" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0035.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#197.86</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley Greenfield</name><lb/> <name>Aaron B Sluder</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Newton L Greenfield</name>.<lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of one hundred and ninety seven dollars and eighty six cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#273.44</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley Greenfield</name> <name>Aaron B Sluder</name><lb/> and <name>Newton L Greenfield</name>.<lb/> vs 522<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> &amp; <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by his attorney but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition here<lb/>in be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy three dollars<lb/> and forty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#546.18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name>, <name>John S McCuny</name>,<lb/> <name>James Collins</name>, <name>Amos How</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Stone</name><lb/> vs 532<lb/> <name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> and<lb/> <name>William D Sanger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and forty six<lb/> dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#641.61</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Marshall</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Richard Wells</name> deceased<lb/> vs 531<lb/> <name>Lewis Dent</name> and <name>Frederick Dent</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Lewis Dent</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Frederick Dent</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the said defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of six hundred and forty one dollars, and sixty one cents. It is therefore</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="29" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0036.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants <name>Fred<lb/>erick Dent</name> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1266.72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 573<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but make default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and sixty six dollars and seventy<lb/> two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#682.55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Samuels</name> and<lb/> <name>George Samuels</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name>, and <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of Six hundred and eighty two dollars and fifty five two cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2465.39</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eben D Jordan</name>, <name>Benjamin L Marsh</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Marsh</name> &amp; <name>Henry W Taylor</name>.<lb/> vs 681<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> and <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the pe<lb/>tition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty four hundred and sixty<lb/> five dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges in this behalf expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reinhardt Larkins</name><lb/> vs 309<lb/> <name>Henry Ossing</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Edward Eisfelder</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out parts of answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="30" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0037.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1169.80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S Pringle</name><lb/> vs 158<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred<lb/> and sixty nine dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#514.90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Mepham</name> and<lb/> <name>William G Mepham</name><lb/> vs 449<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> and<lb/> <name>Sylvester B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their at<lb/>tourneys, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#385.55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles E Hayward</name><lb/> vs 539<lb/> <name>Philip Steubenrach</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Steubenrach</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorneys but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of three hundred and eighty five dollars and fifty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#11,621,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>David D Mitchell</name> and<lb/> <name>Abraham M Pike</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its<lb/> attorneys but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make<lb/> but make default wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Eleven thousand six hundred and twenty one dollars<lb/> and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="31" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0038.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#749.23</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Eneas McFaul</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and<lb/> forty nine dollars and twenty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#866.11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Byrne Jr</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and sixty six dollars and eleven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#441.75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Bleng</name><lb/> vs 3<lb/> <name>Louis Kaiser</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> forty one dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#203.35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Veith</name><lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>George Eberle</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and three<lb/> dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>779</note>
            <p><name>Reider</name> &amp; <name>Kline</name> vs <name>Patrick E Burke</name>. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="32" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0039.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 775<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and<lb/> sixty eight dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyl</name> and <name>George C Greene</name><lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>, <name>John O Brien</name><lb/> and <name>Peter A Ladew</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>The time for answering herein is exten<lb/>ded until the 11th inst.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> and<lb/> <name>August Fritschle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its at<lb/>torney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against this as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighteen dollars and ninety five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Triplett</name><lb/> vs 699.<lb/> <name>William C Anderson Jr.</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended two days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Dean</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Corbin Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against this as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and three<lb/> dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid and<lb/> also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D S Crockett</name><lb/> vs 784<lb/> <name>John S McCune</name> et al</head> 
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Y Basl</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Graham L Hughes</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
            <note>359</note>
            <p><name>L H Simpson</name> vs <name>R M Branch</name> et al: . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="33" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0040.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#218,20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Gauche</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Julius Uhlenhurth</name></head> 
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument of writ<lb/>ing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighteen dollars and twenty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#239,00.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taylor Blow</name><lb/> vs 719<lb/> <name>Charles H Haven</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty nine dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#309,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R E Hill</name>, <name>James B Hill</name><lb/> and <name>William Hill</name>.<lb/> vs 766.<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and nine dollars and seventy five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3048,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Sedgwick</name><lb/> vs 624.<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward W Shands</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and dismisses this suits as to <name>Edward<lb/> W Shards</name>, but the defendant <name>Henry W Williams</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default wherefore on motion of plain<lb/>tiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty eight<lb/> dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found together with interest at the rate of ten percent<lb/> per annum until paid and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="34" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0041.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#4364, 74</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff,<lb/> by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called <unclear rend="strikethrough">but</unclear><lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of forty three hundred and<lb/> sixty four dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#231, 62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Henly</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Powel Sinks</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>Joseph White</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their at<lb/>torney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as<lb/> confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and thirty one dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#851, 27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Donaldson</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>George E Finch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and fifty one dollars and<lb/> twenty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#232, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johns H Garnhardt</name><lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>Martin Haemerle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed: And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty two dollars and<lb/> forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="35" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0042.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johns M Knight</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended until the 16 inst</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#428, 48</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> and <name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>, <name>George W Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> but the defendants although duly sum<lb/> moned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be ta<lb/>ken against them as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and twenty eight dollars and forty eight<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with<lb/> interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#787, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>John Reilly</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#953, 46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Baldwin Locker</name><lb/> vs 182<lb/> <name>William Tyler</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Tyler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and fifty three dollars and forty six cents. It<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten percent from<lb/> this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Petition for alimony and maintenance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> et al<lb/> vs 812<lb/> <name>Charles Fritz</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="36" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0043.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1316, 76.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Baldwin Locker</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> and <name>William Tyler</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and sixteen dollars and<lb/> seventy six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to<lb/> bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#536, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon P Ketchum</name><lb/> vs 765<lb/> <name>William Carson</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Berry</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and thirty six dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#545, 95.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Moses Herdelbach</name>, <name>Arnold Weithimer</name><lb/> and <name>Abraham J Freidlauder</name><lb/> vs 660<lb/> <name>James Michael</name> and <name>Marcus Kaim</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, and
                dismiss this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>James<lb/> Michael</name>, but the defendant, <name>Marcus<lb/> Kaim</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against the said defendant, as confessed; And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and forty five dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant, <name>Marcus<lb/> Kaim</name>, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#374, 05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Louis M Prince</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordan</name>, and<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and, by leave of Court, amends his petition by erasing<lb/> in the caption thereof the word, Samuel, before the<lb/> name of the dependant <name>Wilson</name>, and inserting the<lb/> word <name>Sylvister</name>, in line thereof; but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed; And the Court finds</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="37" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0044.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defen<lb/> dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> four dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of the percent per annum from this<lb/> date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#313, 91</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Murray</name><lb/> vs 655<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name><lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney, and<lb/> by leave of Court amends his petition by erasing, in<lb/> the caption thereof, the word, <name>Samuel</name>, before the<lb/> name of the dependant, <name>Wilson</name>, and inserting the word<lb/> <name>Sylvister</name>, in line thereof; but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and thirteen dollars and ninety one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at<lb/> the rate of ten percent per annum from date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#278, 14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Murray</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Charles J Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney and<lb/> by leave of Court amends his petition by erasing, in the<lb/> caption of the petition, the word, <name>Samuel</name> before the<lb/> name of the dependant, <name>Wilson</name>, and inserting the word<lb/> <name>Sylvister</name>, in line thereof; but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendants as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy eight dollars and fourteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to<lb/> bear ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#536, 70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 698<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty six dollars and seventy<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="37" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0044.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defen<lb/> dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> four dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of the percent per annum from this<lb/> date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#313, 91</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Murray</name><lb/> vs 655<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name><lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney, and<lb/> by leave of Court amends his petition by erasing, in<lb/> the caption thereof, the word, <name>Samuel</name>, before the<lb/> name of the dependant, <name>Wilson</name>, and inserting the word<lb/> <name>Sylvister</name>, in line thereof; but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and thirteen dollars and ninety one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at<lb/> the rate of ten percent per annum from date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#278, 14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Murray</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Charles J Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney and<lb/> by leave of Court amends his petition by erasing, in the<lb/> caption of the petition, the word, <name>Samuel</name> before the<lb/> name of the dependant, <name>Wilson</name>, and inserting the word<lb/> <name>Sylvister</name>, in line thereof; but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendants as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy eight dollars and fourteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to<lb/> bear ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#536, 70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 698<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty six dollars and seventy<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="38" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0045.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 601<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name>,<lb/> <name>Mary L Barret</name>, and<lb/> <name>John S Moore</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, <name>Mary L Barret</name> and <name>John S Moore</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#806, 25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Casey</name><lb/> vs 491<lb/> <name>Jeremiah McCraith</name>, <name>William Murphy</name>,<lb/> <name>James Corney</name> and <name>Thomas Conran</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and six dollars and twenty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1021, 25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Maguire</name> Administrator of<lb/> <name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 633<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>, <name>August Fritschle</name>,<lb/> and <name>George Shaffner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and<lb/> twenty one dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#103, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Maguire</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 635<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of One hundred and three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
            <note>365</note>
            <p><name>Juliette V Reybrun</name> Exrx vs <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name>:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="39" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0046.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#525, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Maguire</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendants as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/> tiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty five dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#318, 03.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter L Vandeventer</name>, <name>Thomas Stringer</name>,<lb/> <name>Levis L D Allen</name> &amp; <name>Jacob Van Nostrand</name>.<lb/> vs 410<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name>, <name>James R Dobyns</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles R Anderson</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed; And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and eigh<lb/>teen dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#606. 27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H W Page</name><lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>Reuben C M Cord</name>, <name>Charles W M Cord</name>,<lb/> <name>G Ganett</name>, <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/>dants as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Six hundred and six dollars and twenty seven cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found, and also their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1917. 67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Goodlett</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>,<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Isaac H Sturgeon</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> said defendants as confessed: And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nineteen hundred and seventeen cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also their costs</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="40" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0047.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear in<lb/>terest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1074, 32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mutual Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 683<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name>, <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>,<lb/> <name>Caspar Schmelter</name> and <name>John Kellner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> its attorney, and dismisses this sent as<lb/> to the defendants <name>Casper Schmelter</name>,<lb/> but the other defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendants as confessed; And the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>Streit<lb/> Diefenback</name> and <name>Kellner</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten hundred<lb/> and seventy four dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>944, 01</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S McKnight</name> and<lb/> <name>James W Richardson</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Joseph B Shearer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; And the<lb/> Court finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and forty<lb/> four dollars and one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#666, 82.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S McKnight</name> and<lb/> <name>James W Richardson</name><lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Bernard L Voorhees</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and sixty<lb/> six dollars and eighty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#401, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Park</name> Administrator<lb/> of <name>Alban H Glasby</name><lb/> vs 594<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/>dant as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument of writing</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="41" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0048.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and one dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#317, 72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 654<lb/> <name>George W Davis</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert F Logan</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed; And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and seventeen dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#844, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Horstman</name>, <name>Segmund H Horstman</name>,<lb/> <name>John G Franklin</name>, <name>George O Evans</name> and<lb/> <name>William S Hassall</name><lb/> vs 469.<lb/> <name>Hiram A Pryor</name> and <name>John S Thompson</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendants as confessed; And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eight hundred and forty four dol<lb/>lars and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found, and also their costs and charges in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#348, 18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name>, and<lb/> <name>Reuben Beardslee</name><lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>Jonathan Wheeler</name> &amp; <name>James H Tooke</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and on motion of the said<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the Demurrer to the peti<lb/> tion be overruled; and the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition be<lb/> taken against them as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and forty eight dollars and eighteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <note>861</note>
            <p><name>Laflin, Smith</name> and <name>Boies</name> vs <name>Marvin Porter</name> garn of <name>Grady</name> et al : Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="42" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0049.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#485, 29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Scott</name><lb/> vs 662<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the defen<lb/>dant as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of four hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1645, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Edwin H Wheadon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendant as confessed; And the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Sixteen hundred and forty five dollars<lb/> and eighty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/> tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#602, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert L M Ghee</name> and<lb/> <name>Culver Hyatt</name><lb/> vs 215.<lb/> <name>Spencer J Ball</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as<lb/> confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> Six hundred and two dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore conside<lb/>red by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#320, 45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Falk</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Charles Fritz</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> and<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry Gronheim</name>,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Fritz</name> and <name>Helgenberg</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants, <name>Fritz</name> and <name>Helgonberg</name>, are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty dollars and forty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein and have thereof execution. Judgment to bear 10 per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="43" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0050.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#245, 46</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Bogus</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Malone</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed; And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and forty<lb/> five dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found, and also their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#656, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Collier White Lead and<lb/> Oil Company</name><lb/> vs 442<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed;<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six<lb/> hundred and fifty six dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#221, 48</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin L Hobart</name><lb/> vs 442<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its at<lb/>torney, but the defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs at<lb/>torney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty one dollars and forty<lb/> eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#449, 98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Winchell</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>Charles F Baker</name> and<lb/> <name>James Moore</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and forty nine dollars and<lb/> ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="44" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0051.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#285, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Butler</name><lb/> vs 68<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the de<lb/>defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court the petition herein be taken against the defendant as<lb/> confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1,111, 67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Leonard</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> said defendant as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and eleven dollars and sixty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#691, 66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Willis Snell</name><lb/> vs 818<lb/> <name>W H Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Isaac Lacasham</name><lb/> and <name>Charles L Hobbs</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and this dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>Isaac<lb/> Lancasham</name> and <name>Charles L Hobbs</name>; but the defen<lb/>dant, <name>W H Smith</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed; And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant,<lb/> <name>Smith</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and ninety<lb/> one dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#904,55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of Tennessee</name><lb/> vs 669<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the defendant as confessed; And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and four<lb/> dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="45" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0052.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#505, 27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Curd</name> and <name>Isaac Curd</name><lb/> vs 168<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> and <name>Edward Wyman</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by<lb/> their attorney, and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the<lb/> defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Wyman</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed; And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and five dollars and twenty seven cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#350,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Adam</name><lb/> vs 704<lb/> <name>August Campe</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#375,67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Chiles</name> and<lb/> vs 658<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed, And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and seventy five<lb/> dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Mills</name><lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>Louis V Bogy</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Mills</name><lb/> vs 623<lb/> <name>The Pilot Knob<lb/> Iron Company</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended ten days.</p>
            <note>767</note>
            <p><name>Parker</name> et al vs <name>William Wade</name> et al: One day further time to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="46" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0053.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1025, 66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac A Letcher</name><lb/> vs 545<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and twenty five dol<lb/>lars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#173,53.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Nulsen</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph J Mersman</name><lb/> vs 643<lb/> <name>Louis Schinner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hun<lb/>dred and seventy three dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found, and also their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#238, 67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Taylor</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty eight dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#177, 62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Canmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Wolden Ranson</name><lb/> vs 539<lb/> <name>Noble Kellogg</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and seventy seven dollars and sixty two cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="47" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0054.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name>, <name>Xavier Dugal</name>, and<lb/> <name>Francis H Dependahl</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files proof that<lb/> the petition herein has been served upon the defendant <name>Defen<lb/>dahl</name>, but the defendants, <name>Dugal</name> and <name>Defendahl</name>, although<lb/> duly notified and called, come not but make default;<lb/> Wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. Reply filed<lb/> to answer of defendant, <name>Wilson</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Card</name> et al<lb/> vs 582.<lb/> <name>Richard S Raymond</name><lb/> and <name>William O Wolff</name>.</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered returnable to the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnsier</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name> and <name>Luther M Kennett</name><lb/> garnss of <name>The City Bank of St Louis</name>.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Tillman</name>, <name>Ferdinand Rozier</name>,<lb/> <name>William Fullger</name> &amp; <name>Amade Berthold</name>.<lb/> vs 24<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name>.</head>
            <p>On note and account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by<lb/> their attorney, and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> heretofore made herein has been duly pub<lb/>lished according to law;</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name> of Pennsylvania.<lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>David Weaver</name>.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> vs 847<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name> et al<lb/> garnss of <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>Answer of <name>John H Sparr</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kirkman</name> and <name>Luke</name>.<lb/> vs 586<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> and<lb/> <name>John O Brien</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended to <date when="--10-11">eleventh of October</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M C White</name><lb/> vs 593<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended to 11th instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter H Miller</name> et al<lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>Callaway Mining Company</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
            <note>466</note>
            <p><name>George Schaffer</name> et al vs <name>Robert Montgomery</name>; . . Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="48" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0055.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lazarus Hallagarten</name> et al<lb/> vs 494<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Rosenthal</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua Benett</name><lb/> vs 496<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name>, <name>Jules C Kingsbury</name>,<lb/> <name>D G Elifritz</name> and <name>D H Cox</name>.</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
            <p><name>Garson</name> vs <name>Joseph Salberg</name>:. . . . Plea in Abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingen Scott</name>,<lb/>&amp; <name>W C Scott</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> Guardian<lb/> of <name>Crawford Porter</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>, &amp; <name>W C Scott</name> garns of <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> Guardian<lb/> of <name>E Porter</name><lb/> vs 855<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>W C Scott</name> garns of <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Aden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>,<lb/>&amp; <name>W C Scott</name> garns of <name>Dick</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Kerzinger</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant <name>Robert Kerging<lb/>er</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Alexander</name><lb/> vs 43.<lb/> <name>James J Todd</name>,<lb/> <name>William Ray</name>, and<lb/> <name>James M Mahan</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes, the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of pub<lb/>lication heretofore made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomerou</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name>,<lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name>.<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name>, <name>John D Mellen</name>,<lb/> <name>Joshua Jackson</name>, <name>John O Mellen</name>,<lb/> and <name>A A K Sawyer</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, and file proof satis<lb/>factory to the Court that the order of<lb/> publication heretofore made herein has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Claghome</name><lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Perry Kennard</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kennard</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5158,02</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clark Wilson and Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Ralph S Hart</name>,<lb/> Esg, and files a Power of Attorney from</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="49" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0056.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the defendants, and by authority of said Power of Attorney, files a Statement<lb/> in writing duly verified by affidavit, and, confesses judgment in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs and against the defendants for the sum of five thousand and one hundred<lb/> and fifty eight dollars and two cents, and consents and agrees that judgment<lb/> may be rendered against them for said sum. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4239, 35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah S Leverett and Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and<lb/> file their petition against the defendants,<lb/> and thereupon, <name>Ralph S Hart</name>, Esg, ap<lb/>peared, in open Court in behalf of the said defendants, and, by virtue of a warrant of<lb/> attorney, executed by the defendants, confesses that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of four thousand two hundred, and thirty nine dollars and<lb/> thirty five cents, and consents and agree that judgment may be entered against<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as confessed, and also their costs and charges herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gibbons L Ketty</name> et al<lb/>670<lb/> <name>Augustus Muegge</name> et al</head>
            <p>Security for costs filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-07">Thursday October 7th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Mason</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>John Warner</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
            <note>394</note>
            <p><name>Andrew Brengard</name> vs <name>Thomas H Cavanaugh</name>:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
            <p><name>Martin Baer</name> vs <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> et al:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
            <note>165</note>
            <p><name>William L Ewing</name> et al vs <name>R J Lockwood</name> et al:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
            <note>27</note>
            <p><name>William McDonald</name> et al vs <name>Charles Chambers</name>:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="50" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0057.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Richard</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>Manhattan Life<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Defendants answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clark</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>George E Cassell</name> and<lb/> <name>George Shaffner</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer of Garnishees filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Liberty Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>Triplett and Sells</name></head>
            <p>Answer of Defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer of defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>A D Stewart</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luttercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Charles Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Madison Miller</name><lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>J B H Jacobs</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to Petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#207.68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cornelius V S Roosevelt</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>, <name>Clark J Morton</name>,<lb/> and <name>Leonidas A Hall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plain<lb/>tiff, by his attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Leoni<lb/>das A Hall</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> said difendanto as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seven dollars and sixty<lb/> eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>John R Ricords</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed for judgment notwithstanding<lb/> answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="51" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0058.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#695,38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Corlies</name>, <name>Jonas G Dudley</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph W Corlies Jr</name> &amp; <name>Frederick</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> &amp; <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiffs in the sum of Six hundred and ninety five dollars and<lb/> thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevere</name> et al<lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed by Garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out parts of answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mutual Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 605<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out Demurrer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for order to examine plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Douglass Axe<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 817<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> and<lb/> <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said<lb/> defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty<lb/> seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also its costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T and C Slevin</name><lb/> vs 812<lb/> <name>C Fritz</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Notice of Dismissal as to <name>Henry Gronheim</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schoenthals</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Charlotte Schoenthals</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="52" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0059.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#392,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Byrne Jr</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Mashall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attor<lb/>ney but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and ninety two dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the Sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Byrne Jr</name><lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name> and<lb/> <name>Christopher W Spalding</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and seventy one dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the Sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Pother</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Inter plea of <name>A Meier</name> filed. Two weeks time given<lb/> <name>Joseph S Hubbard</name> to file an inter plea herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>,<lb/> <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name>.<lb/> vs 541<lb/> <name>George Wood</name>, and<lb/> <name>George J King</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by his attor<lb/>ney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>George Wood</name>, but the defendant, <name>King</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and seventy one dollars and ninety five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendant, <name>George J King</name>, the Sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Robert W Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff into open Court<lb/> and acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment heretofore rendered herein.</p>
            <note>753</note>
            <p><name>John Girard</name> vs <name>Franklin Ins Co</name>:. . . . Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="53" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0060.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#462,98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>,<lb/> <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name>.<lb/> vs 612<lb/> <name>Charles J Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> sixty two dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the Sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Andrew J L Stevens</name><lb/> garns of <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have<lb/> failed to file interrogatories herein within the time<lb/> prescribed by law, therefore on motion of the garnishee<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that he be discharged hence,<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore. Five dollars<lb/> allowed garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Andrew J L Stevens</name><lb/> garns of <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed<lb/> to file interrogatories herein, therefore on motion of the<lb/> garnishee, it is ordered by the Court that he be dis<lb/>charged hence, at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefore. Five dollars allowed garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander B Davidson</name><lb/> vs 659<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and forty three dollars and<lb/> twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha W Brown</name>, <name>Archibald C Goddin</name>,<lb/> <name>James T Johnson</name> &amp; <name>Barton S Wilson</name>.<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William D Sappington</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded, that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and nine dollars and twenty nine cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="54" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0061.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiff to withdraw note sued on,<lb/> on leaving copy. Copy filed and note withdrawn.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charless</name> et al<lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>The Chicago Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> leave is
                given the Sheriff to amend his return<lb/> on the Writ herein, by
                adding, immediately<lb/> after the word St Louis, the words, said<lb/> <name>Brown</name> having charge of said office and the President of said Company being ab<lb/>sent from this State ; which amendment is accordingly made.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Americus V Potter</name> et al<lb/> vs 607<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and dismiss this suit as to the defendant <name>John N Boffinger</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#455, 61</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Harsh</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Solomon Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> and moves the Court to strike out the demurrer to<lb/> the petition herein, and the Court having duly heard,<lb/> and considered the said motion doth order that the same be sustained: and<lb/> thereupon the defendant being duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and fifty<lb/> five dollars and sixty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#847,30</note>
            <note>I acknowledge to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaictaion of<lb/> the judgt of which this is the<lb/> magin <date when="1859-06-25">June 25 1859</date> -<lb/> <name>P. G. <unclear>Monar</unclear></name><lb/> atty for pltff<lb/> attest<lb/> <name>J Rice</name> clk</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sappington</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Robert W Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William McDonald</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and forty<lb/> seven dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Kessler</name><lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> &amp; <name>Hirschfeld</name></head>
            <p><name>Alias Writ</name> ordered returnable to the<lb/> next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="55" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0062.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#171,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Sale</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John M Clarkson</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles S Rannells</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>Clarkson</name>,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Rannells</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant,<lb/> <name>Rannells</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and seventy<lb/> one dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip C Mauro</name><lb/> vs 615<lb/> <name>Anthony H Menkens</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas S Nelson</name>, and<lb/> <name>Francis H Manter</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and fifty<lb/> six dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1466,57</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin W Chase</name><lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>John T Chappell</name> and<lb/> <name>Frank V Valli</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred<lb/> and sixty six dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#272,53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hewett</name>, <name>John J Roe</name><lb/> and <name>Robert V Kerchwal</name><lb/> vs 666<lb/> <name>William E Finch</name> &amp; <name>George E Finch</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant <name>William E Finch</name><lb/> but the defendant, <name>George E Finch</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>George E Finch</name>, is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy two dollars and fifty<lb/> three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="56" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0063.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris L Hallowell</name>, <name>James Fraguair</name>,<lb/> <name>Joshua L Hallowell</name>, <name>Arthur W Little</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas W Sweeney</name>, and <name>Enoch R Hutchinson</name>.<lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Zadock A Rosenthal</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>109,29</note>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/> tiffs, by their attorney,but the<lb/> defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and nine dollars and twenty nine<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2587</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Crawford</name><lb/> vs 688<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry<lb/> D Bacon</name>, but the defendant <name>Daniel D Page</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant, <name>Daniel D Page</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of twenty five hundred and eight seven dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#406,46</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Whitehill</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Hathaway</name><lb/> vs 527<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name> and<lb/> <name>James R Dobyns</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of four hundred and six dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#213,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Renshaw Jr</name><lb/> vs 703.<lb/> <name>William O Wolf</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Boyd</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>William<lb/> O Wolf</name>, but the defendant, <name>Alexander Boyd</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the Court</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="57" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0064.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant, <name>Alexander Boyd</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and thirteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also her costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron Noble</name><lb/> vs 676<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name>, and<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
            <p>On Certificate of Deposit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Page</name>, <name>Brown</name>, and <name>Wyman</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Eight hundred and fifty four dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred E Tilton</name><lb/> vs 674<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty five dollars. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said de<lb/>fendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and char<lb/>ges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Dunbar</name><lb/> vs 553.<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum ten hundred and forty four dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Ross</name> and <name>James Ballard</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>D W Wheeler</name> and <name>A Becker</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendant, <name>D W<lb/> Wheelers</name>, although duly summoned and</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="58" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0065.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/> dant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ishmael Lee</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry<lb/> D Bacon</name>, but the defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum Six hundred and nine dollars and ninety nine<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riggin</name> Junior<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Charles L Hunt</name>,<lb/> <name>William C Woodson</name>, <name>William P Fenn</name>,<lb/> <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name><lb/> <name>Robert A Walton</name>, &amp; <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plain<lb/>tiff, by his attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make<lb/> default; wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum twenty<lb/> six hundred and forty nine dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/> said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Olyphant</name>, <name>George T Olyphant</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robert M Olyphant</name><lb/> vs 175<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs, by his attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Henry<lb/> D Bacon</name>, but the other defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default; wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum twenty five hundred and forty four dollars and sixteen cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <note>752</note>
            <p><name>A F Hummitch</name> vs <name>Franklin Ins Co</name>: . . Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="59" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0066.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Von Phul</name><lb/> vs 732<lb/> <name>Herman H Brocksmith</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum Eight hundred and twenty five dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan S Rannells</name><lb/> vs 780<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name> and<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but make default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> four hundred and twenty seven dollars and seven cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harman Schlegel</name><lb/> vs 335<lb/> <name>Charles Gruner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and seventy six dollars and seventy five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis W Thompson</name><lb/> vs 420<lb/> <name>John Koons</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default; wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and seventy nine dollars and forty<lb/> nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="60" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0067.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Esther Ewing</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>William S Swymmer</name><lb/> and <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but make default; wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and thirteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hendrick Trip</name><lb/> vs 396<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name> and<lb/> <name>Arthur Olshausen</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore;<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven hun<lb/>dred and eighty five dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>De Witt C Brown</name><lb/> vs 686<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the defendant, <name>Page</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant, <name>Daniel D Page</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> twenty one hundred and fifty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>William Streit</name>, <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name>,<lb/> <name>J M Dodge</name>,. . . . <name>Burch</name> and<lb/>.. . . . <name>Couper</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plain<lb/>tiff, by its attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>J M<lb/> Dodge</name>,. . . . <name>Burch</name> and . . . <name>Cooper</name>,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Dieffenbach</name><lb/> and <name>Streit</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default; wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="61" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0068.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty six dol<lb/>lars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants, <name>Streit</name> and <name>Dieffenbach</name>, the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 611<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>George B Field</name>, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>Hassinger</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default; wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instruments of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant, <name>William Hassinger</name>, is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty dollars and sixty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome J Meyer</name><lb/> vs 608<lb/> <name>E K Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of ten hundred and seventy dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Martin</name>, <name>J Wills Martin</name>,<lb/> <name>George Martin</name>, <name>Samuel Simmons</name>,<lb/> and <name>D C Ririnus</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John T Chappell</name> &amp; <name>Frank K V Valle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/>dants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Six thousand and twenty eight dollars and twenty nine cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> and <name>George G Greene</name><lb/> vs 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name> &amp; <name>Thomas Hinton</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> McIndoe, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs it is ordered by<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="62" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0069.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nance Edmondson</name> now Link<lb/> vs 289 Nn T 52<lb/> <name>Francis B Edmondson</name>, Robert H<lb/> Edmondson, Lucinda R R Edmonson,<lb/> <name>Benjamin Edmondson</name>, <name>Mary</name>,<lb/><name> Edmondson</name>, <name>Elizabeth A Edmondson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles A Edmondson</name>.</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by her attorney and file a motion<lb/> for an execution against the defen<lb/>dants for the yearly instalment due to<lb/> the plaintiff, Nancy Link, upon the<lb/> <date when="--05-17">Seventeenth day of May</date> last, in<lb/> accordance with the judgment ren<lb/>dered herein on the <date when="1859-01-29">twenty ninth day<lb/> of January eighteen hundred and fifty five</date>; and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the said motion doth sustain the same, and doth order<lb/> that execution issue against the defendants for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per<lb/> annum and for her costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia A Hicks</name><lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>Charles Carroll Hicks</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, and files a petition and affidavit herein,<lb/> and the Court being satisfied therefrom that<lb/> the defendant is not a resident of the State of Missouri, it is ordered that<lb/> he be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him in this<lb/> Court, the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of<lb/> matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant on the ground of deser<lb/>tion, and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun<lb/> and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the<lb/> fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the Sixth day thereof answer<lb/> the plaintiffs petition, the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Epes Cowan</name><lb/> vs <name>M<lb/>.. . . . Blair</name></head>
            <p>Ten days additional time allowed to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Gray</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended to twenty first instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended to twenty first inst</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out interplead filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="63" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0070.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name><lb/> vs 724<lb/> <name>Charles L Heywood</name>, et al</head>
            <p><name>Alias Writ</name> ordered Returnable to the next term<lb/> of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike and parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al<lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al<lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 755<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J T Greene</name> garns of <name>Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name>, <name>John KirKpatuck</name><lb/> and <name>Eneas McFaul</name>'s garns</head>
            <p>On motion it is ordered that the garnishees herein be discharged<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.<lb/> Five dollars is allowed the garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 526<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of the Contested Elections.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the contestant and defendant by their respective attorneys and having<lb/> argued the motion to quash notice and dismiss proceedings submit the same to the Court,<lb/> and the Court not being sufficiently advised takes time to consider thereof.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-08">Friday October 8th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Outley</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he<lb/> confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> five thousand eight hundred and ninety seven dollars and eighty seven<lb/> cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered against him for that<lb/> sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed, and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy O Riordan</name><lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Henry Brundy</name></head>
            <p><name>Alias Writ</name> ordered returnable to the next term of<lb/> this court.</p>
            <note>213</note>
            <p><name>Judith Barnfield</name> vs <name>John W Barnfield</name>. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="64" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0071.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Muller</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name>,<lb/> <name>Jame A Grant</name> and<lb/> <name>William Nesbitt</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against their as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirty five hun<lb/>dred and seventy six dollars and seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten per<lb/> and per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 690<lb/> <name>Jacob Tamm</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judg<lb/>ment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bruno</name>,<lb/> <name>Herman Weissenborn</name>,<lb/> and <name>Richard Morris</name>,<lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Jacob Nathans</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and twenty one dollars<lb/> and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Orem</name> &amp; <name>William S Hopkins</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name>, <name>Thomas H Simpson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Franklin Field</name>.</head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, where<lb/> fore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of thirty one hundred and nineteen dollars and fifty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="67" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0072.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>A W Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Degenhardt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty nine dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The New Albany Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney, and thereupon comes <name>Nathaniel<lb/> McDonald</name>, Esg, attorney for the defendant,<lb/> and waives service of process, and enters the<lb/> appearance of the defendant herein. And said defendant, by his attorney, wair<lb/> ing all defence hereto by answer or otherwise, this cause is submitted to the Court:<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and eighteen dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Montgomery</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>William Hart</name>, <name>Thomas J Stewart</name>,<lb/> <name>William Willett</name> and <name>Elizabeth Philips</name>.</head>
            <p>On Due Bill.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendants, <name>Willett</name> and <name>Philips</name>,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Stewart</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and thereupon comes <name>Nathaniel McDonald</name>, attorney<lb/> for the defendant, <name>Hart</name>, and waives service of process and enters the appearance<lb/> of the said defendant herein: and waiving all defence hereto by answer or otherwise<lb/> submits this cause to the Court. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>Hart and Stewart</name>,<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifty one dollars and thirty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also its costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Smith</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J Stewart</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>Stewart</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: And therefor</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="68" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0073.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>comes <name>Nathaniel McDonald</name>, Esg, attorney for the defendant, <name>Hart</name>, and<lb/> waives service of process and enters the appearance of the said defendant herein:<lb/> And said defendant waiving all defence hereto by answer or otherwise, this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and twenty dollars and five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The National Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J Stewart</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Stewart</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed. And thereupon comes <name>Nathaniel McDonald</name>,<lb/> Esg, attorney for the defendant, <name>Hart</name>, and waives service of process and enters<lb/> the appearance of the said defendant herein; and the said defendant, <name>Hart</name>,<lb/> waiving all defence hereto by answer or otherwise, this cause is submitted to<lb/> the Court. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Six hundred and twenty dollars and five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Doardman</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John Giles</name>, <name>William McDonald</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robert W Hunt</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>John Giles</name>, but the other<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants, <name>William McDonald</name> and <name>Robert W Hunt</name>, are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty nine dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 427<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and fifty five dollars and seventy five</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="69" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0074.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and its costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Enoch H Wakefield</name> and<lb/> <name>Nelson Howe</name><lb/> vs 575<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty<lb/> four dollars and sixty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Van Studdiford</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred<lb/> and seventy one dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Louis Magnus</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and consent and agree that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against the defendant in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum<lb/> of two hundred and seventy four dollars and eighty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and<lb/> also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Rodney Montague</name><lb/> vs 717<lb/> <name>John Stickel</name>,<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> and<lb/> <name>Anderson Arnot</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p> Now at this day comes the plaintiff, in his own proper<lb/> person, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and forty four dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="70" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0075.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Nisbet and Co</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhart</name>,<lb/> <name>Sebastian Engert</name>, and<lb/> <name>Theodore Wolf</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default;<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and thirty two dollars and fifteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward C Sloan</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Adam Road</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Field</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Road</name>, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default; wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Road</name>, is indebted to the plain<lb/> tiff in the sum of three hundred and one dollars and twenty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and also his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Dauglass</name>,<lb/> <name>James B Gazzam</name> and<lb/> <name>James E Breading</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Thomas E Mason</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a<lb/> Statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit,<lb/> whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of twenty five hundred dollars, and<lb/> consents and agrees that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that sum. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 749<lb/> <name>John A Smithers</name>, and<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Smithers</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default;<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. On mo<lb/>tion of said plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias<lb/> Writ issue for the defendant, <name>Sherrick</name>, returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
            <note>450</note>
            <note>320</note>
            <p><name>Henry Heper</name> vs <name>George Jackson</name>:. . . . Answer and Counter claim filed.</p>
            <p><name>James G Human</name> et al vs <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> et al: Answer and counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="71" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0076.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus awarded.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a<lb/> dedimus issue to the State of Jowa to take depositions of<lb/> witnesses to be read on the trail of this cause on behalf of,<lb/> said plaintiff. Leave is given plaintiff to withdraw Exhibits herein, on leaving,<lb/> copies. Copies filed, Exhibits withdrawn.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald C Goddin</name>, <name>James T Johson</name>,<lb/> <name>Barton</name> &amp; <name>Wilson</name> and <name>Elisha W Brown</name><lb/> vs 16.<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publica<lb/>tion heretofore made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 53<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication heretofore made herein has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication heretofore made herein has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Appointment of Guardian ad litem.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that <name>William R Biddlecome</name> be, and he<lb/> is hereby appointed guardian ad litem of <name>Elizabeth B<lb/> Powell</name> and <name>Julia R Wilgus</name>, infant defendants herein, Whereupon, the said <name>William<lb/> R Biddlecome</name> files his consent to act as such guardian ad litem.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loch</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name>.</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer, filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzpatrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 706.<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>James George</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 836<lb/> <name>The Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Motion filed by garnishee to quash service.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Emerson</name> and <name>Nathan Johnson</name>,<lb/> vs 234<lb/>. . . . . <name>Jones</name>, . . . . . <name>Covell</name> and<lb/> <name>Morison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that <name>J D Jones</name>, <name>J Covell</name>,</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="72" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0077.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and <name>G W Morris</name>, the principals, and <name>Wilson G Larimore</name>, the security, in<lb/> the bond given for the production and delivery of the property herein attached,<lb/> produce and deliver said property, to wit: fifteen young America born <name>Mills</name>,<lb/> fifteen extra grinders, two washing machines, one writing desk, one stove and<lb/> pipe, and five chairs. to the Sheriff of St Louis County, at his office, in the City<lb/> of St Louis. It is further ordered that <name>James Castells</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, assign the forthcoming bond herein to plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Yeatman</name> and <name>Lucretia</name> his wife,<lb/> and <name>Thomas Yeatman, Jr</name>, by <name>James E<lb/> Yeatman</name> his next friend<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Pope</name>, <name>Douglass</name>, <name>Pope</name>,<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name>, and <name>James H Lucas</name>.</head>
            <p>Proof of Pub_Appointment of Guard ad litem &amp;c</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, and file proof satis<lb/>factory to the Court that the order<lb/> of publication heretofore made<lb/> herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law; therefore the<lb/> Court appoints <name>John T Douglass</name>, guardian ad litem for <name>Nathaniel Pope</name>,<lb/> <name>Douglass</name>, <name>Pope</name>, <name>Cornelia Pope</name>, <name>John Pope</name>, who files his consent to act as<lb/> such: And by consent and agreement of parties filed herein, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be transferred to the St Louis Land Court for<lb/> trail, and that the Clerk of this Court make out a full and complete trans<lb/>cirpt of the record and proceedings herein and deliver the same duly certified to<lb/> the Clerk of said Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-09">Saturday, October 9th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esg, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in open Court,<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him,<lb/> as Sheriff, to <name>William S Hillyer</name> of all the night, title, interest, claim, estate<lb/> and property of <name>Alonzo Cutler</name> in and to the following described property, to wit:<lb/> Beginning at a point in the South front line of Olive street, distant Westwardly<lb/> one hundred and fifty feet from the North East corner of Block no 505 of the city<lb/> of St Louis, State of Missouri, thence Westwardly with the said South line of<lb/> Olive street forth eight feet, thence Southwardly and parallel with Thirteeth<lb/> street one hundred and nine feet and one inch to an alley, thence Eastwardly<lb/> with the North line of said alley forty eight feet, thence Westwardly and with the<lb/> same parallel as before one hundred and nine feet and one inch to the place of<lb/> beginning: bounded North by Olive street, South by an alley, East by lot formerly<lb/> of <name>James J Sanger</name>, and West by lot now or formerly of <name>Lucas</name>. Sold by virtue of<lb/> an execution issued from the Office of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of<lb/> <name>William R Calladay</name> and against <name>Alonzo Cutler</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Doegan</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Thomas T Doegan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 223<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="73" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0078.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of pub<lb/>lication made by the Clerk, in Vacation, has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#195, 85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Matthews, Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name><lb/> and <name>William H Matthews</name><lb/> vs 883<lb/> <name>Seth Johnson Jr</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, and files astate<lb/>ment duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses him<lb/> self indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One hun<lb/>dred and ninety five dollars and eighty five cents and<lb/> consents to that judgment may be rendered against him<lb/> and in favor of the plaintiffs for that sum. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satiafaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Peoples Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>Herman Grundt</name>, <name>Corneluis D<lb/> Sullivan</name> &amp; <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction acknowledged</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by <name>James Taussing</name>, its attorney,<lb/> comes in open Court, and acknowledges to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the judgment rendered <date when="1858-05-04">May 4 1858</date><lb/> for the sum of ten hundred and seventy five dollars and thirty five cents, against<lb/> the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#176, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah Cadmus</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and seventy<lb/> six dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found, and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#556, 37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V Bryan</name>, <name>Addison L Hardcastle</name>,<lb/> and <name>George T Hardcastle</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Henry S Martin</name> and <name>Charles W Irwin</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney but the de<lb/>fendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> fifty six dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges in this behalf<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="74" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0079.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George F Fein</name><lb/> vs 874<lb/> <name>Jeannett Brooks</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>Garns discharged. No allegations filed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the garnishee, by<lb/> his attorney, and on his motion it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that he be discharged hence<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs, and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor. Five dollars allowed garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Long</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Southern Hotel Company</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Fredk W Heitheman</name></head>
            <p>Garns on <name>Exon</name>, Garns discharged.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file in<lb/>terrogatories within the time prescibed<lb/> by law so to do, it is on motion of the<lb/> garnishee by its attorney, ordered that it<lb/> be discharged hence at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion, ten days further time given the defen<lb/>dant, Sherrick, to file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Crow McCreery and Company</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Conrad Raith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al.</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition, Demurrer to<lb/> the Petition by the City, and Answer of <name>OD Filley</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ludwig Krauss</name><lb/> vs 184<lb/> <name>Adam Krauss</name></head>
            <p>On motion the time for answering herein is extended ten<lb/> days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Fire and Marine,<lb/> Ins Co</name> of Pennsylvania<lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Callaway Mining &amp; Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name> and others.</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by its<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that an alias<lb/> writ issue herein returnable to the<lb/> next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Pate</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>George D Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties ten days further time is given<lb/> the defendant, <name>W Achley</name>, to file an answer hrerin.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Campbell</name> et al<lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Thomas M Wolffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs by their attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that an alias Writ issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Higgins</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>Ellen Higgins</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Leise</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Bernard Raevie</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="75" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0080.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs 585<lb/> <name>Diederick H Lackman</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al<lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>Charles Bonteam</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication hereof made herein<lb/> has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al<lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Charles Bonteam</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication hereof made<lb/> herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver &amp;c<lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Ten days additional time to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, receiver &amp;c<lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William H Haydon</name></head>
            <p>Ten days additional time to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Firemans Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishes of <name>W Hart</name></head>
            <p>Garns discharged.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to fie in<lb/>terrogatories within the time prescribed by<lb/> law so to do, it is, on motion of the garni<lb/>shees, by their attorney, ordered that they be<lb/> discharged hence at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Issac T Vanduzer</name> et al<lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>A S Devin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>W W Morris</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Low</name> et al<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiffs, and that execution issue therefor. Leave<lb/> is given the plaintiffs to withdraw the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Morrison</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>William C Hall</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>William D'Oench</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garneau</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="76" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0081.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
            <p>The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>Volcker</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>John W Ganhantral</name></p>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Clark</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Mick</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenadon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph C Johnson</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>James Adams</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Veil</name><lb/> vs 782<lb/> <name>Peter Gazzala</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Stammeler</name><lb/> vs 509<lb/> <name>William Jrilling</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> vs 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deinert</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Jacob Mussler</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Knight</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>Samuel Hambleton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derris Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Berthoud</name> receiver<lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>Henry F Watson</name></head>
            <p>Answer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 844<lb/> <name>Sands E Sellick</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 838<lb/> <name>M Nolan</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Beste</name> &amp; <name>Grima</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 838<lb/> <name>David McIntire</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Beste</name> and <name>Grima</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer and<lb/> Exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>John Nicholay</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>George Y Bast</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Bt W M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Brown</name>, <name>Goddin &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="77" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0082.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Robertson</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>William R Carson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D S Haslett</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Farmington</name> et al<lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Joseph Meek</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolff</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R Wohlien</name><lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>John Woolf</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Motion filed to set aside judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name>.</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busch</name> et al<lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein is extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>Saint Louis Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Company</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al<lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>The Home Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Western Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>Globe Mutual Ins<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering herein extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="78" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0083.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Lohlein</name><lb/> vs 691<lb/> <name>Joseph Kuntz</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Smith</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>William H Roberts</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended one week. Motion for<lb/> security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Rigele</name> et al<lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>Frederick Sickemeyer</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Philips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>B F Hutchinson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Ansterson</name> et al<lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Benjamin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Waters</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Benjamin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Benjamin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>M Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed to amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name><lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Bernhardt Midas</name></head>
            <p>Interplea of <name>William C Jones</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Lowry</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Lewis A Welton</name>,<lb/> <name>James Moore</name>, and<lb/> <name>Martin O Walker</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, and,<lb/> on his motion, leave is given to amend the petition herein<lb/> by inserting in the caption thereof the Christian name, <name>James</name>,<lb/> of the defendant, <name>Moore</name>, and also the christian name, <name>Mar<lb/> tin O</name>, of the defendant, <name>Walkers</name>; which amendment is ac<lb/>cordingly made. And thereupon the plaintiff, by his attorney, files an additional<lb/> affidavit herein, from which it appears to the Court that the defendants, <name>James<lb/> Moore</name> and <name>Martin O Walker</name>, are not residents of the State of Missouri, it is<lb/> therefore, on motion of said plaintiffs attorney, ordered that they be notified that<lb/> a suit has been commenced against them founded on a bill of Exchange for<lb/> the sum of four hundred dollars, drawn by <name>Moore</name> and <name>Walker</name> on <name>Louis A<lb/> Welton</name>, in favor of <name>T L Parker</name>, of which the plaintiff is now the holders as<lb/> endorsee; and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to<lb/> be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis,<lb/> on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="81" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0084.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against them as<lb/> confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law<lb/> in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the<lb/> City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name><lb/> vs 838<lb/> <name>M Nolen</name> et al<lb/> garns of <name>Beste</name> el al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence Myers</name> et al<lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>William Monroe</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this said be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. Stipulation filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Harper</name> and <name>Lavenia Harper</name>.<lb/> by their curator <name>John Hartshom</name>.<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Andrew Harper</name>, <name>Lavenia Ballas</name>,<lb/> <name>Emily C Holmes</name>, and her husband<lb/> <name>Anthony Holmes</name>, <name>William M Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Smith</name>, <name>Louisa Hopkins</name>, and<lb/> her husband <name>Hopkins</name> and <name>Ann<lb/> E Smith</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs, by their attorney, and file a<lb/> petition and affidavit, from which<lb/> it appears to the Court that the<lb/> defendants, <name>William M Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Smith</name>, <name>Ann E Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Louisa Hopkins</name>, and <name>Hopkins</name>,<lb/> her husband, are not residents of<lb/> the State of Missouri, therefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that they be notified<lb/> that a petition has been filed in this Court, the object of which is to obtain a<lb/> decree of this Court notifying and confirming the acts of <name>Andrew Harper</name>, as<lb/> Executor of <name>Thomas F Harper</name>, deceased, and ordering the said <name>Andrew Harper</name> to<lb/> pay over to said plaintiffs the sum of thirteen hundred and forty five dollars<lb/> and seventy cents the portion of the proceeds of sale of land in Saint Louis<lb/> County made by said <name>Andrew Harper</name>, executor as aforesaid on the day of<lb/> <date when="1857-03">March, 1857</date>, coming to the said plaintiffs; and that unless they be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis,<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next,<lb/> and on or before the sixth day thereof, answer and show cause to the contrary<lb/> the prayer of the said petition will be granted and a decree rendered accordingly.<lb/> It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the<lb/> Missouri Republication, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.<lb/> Answer of <name>Lavinnia Ballas</name>, <name>Emily C Holmes</name> and her husband <name>Anthony Holmes</name>,<lb/> and also answer of <name>Andrew Harper</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Jury, trail progresses.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>tourneys and thereupon come also a Jerry, to wit; <name>Joseph<lb/> Schrik</name>, <name>L D Burke</name>, <name>Edmund Fleming</name>, <name>George Fries</name>,<lb/> <name>Frank Glener</name>, <name>Clemence Mennie</name>, <name>George M Ferguson</name>, <name>A Rice</name>, <name>John<lb/> Bergy</name>, <name>Edmund Dean</name>, <name>W P Shryock</name>, and <name>F W Thompson</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try, the trail progressed, but not being concluded at</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="82" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0085.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the hour of adjournment further proceedings herein are laid over unti to mor<lb/>row morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-11">Monday October 11th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1230, 94</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Barnes</name><lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and thirty dollars and ninety four<lb/> cents: it is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the<lb/> rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#228, 86</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Johnston Jr</name><lb/> vs 663<lb/> <name>Hiram B Long</name> and<lb/> <name>Washington West</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called,come not but make default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> twenty eight dollars and eighty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#392, 08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Whitehill</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Hathaway</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>John V Schenck</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and ninety two dollars<lb/> and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <note>56</note>
            <p><name>Bernard Smith</name> vs <name>William H Roberts</name>:. . . . Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="83" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0086.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#628, 99</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Monks</name><lb/> vs 619<lb/> <name>Isaac T Greene</name> and<lb/> <name>Franklin Weston</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and twenty eight dol<lb/>lars and ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#331, 61</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cortez Crocker</name><lb/> vs 821<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name>,<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Welcker</name>,<lb/> <name>Benjamin Brison</name><lb/> and <name>August Campe</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>Holliday</name> and<lb/> <name>Welcker</name>, but the defendants, <name>Brison</name> and <name>Campe</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants, <name>Brison</name> and <name>Campe</name>, are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and thirty one dollars and sixty one<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#644.62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mc Neilly</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Reard</name> and<lb/> <name>George W. Rearde</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although being duly summoned and called come<lb/> not but make default. Wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred<lb/> and forty four dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#801. y3</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Triplett</name><lb/> vs 699<lb/> <name>William C. Anderson Jr</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although being duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default. Wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and one dollars and seventy three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <note>M</note>
            <p><name>Edward J Gay</name> et al vs <name>A J L Stevens</name> garns. Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="84" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0087.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#192, 92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Tolbert</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Bowman H Peterson</name><lb/> <name>Daniel White</name> and<lb/> <name>William Fine</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Daniel<lb/> White</name>, but the defendants, <name>Fine</name> and <name>Peterson</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants, <name>Peterson</name> and <name>Fine</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One hundred and ninety two dollars and ninety two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#529, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Erastus N Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 542<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name>, <name>Mary T Barret</name>,<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name> and <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and twenty<lb/> nine dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#195, 16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel G Taylor</name> surviving partner<lb/> of <name>Taylor</name> and <name>Harrington</name><lb/> vs 777<lb/> <name>Henry S Green</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One hundred and ninety five dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#384, 07</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis J Rankin</name><lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>William Streit</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hun<lb/> dred and eighty four dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="85" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0088.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#187 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph O Sanger</name><lb/> <name>John M Clarkson</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Sanger</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come, the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed. And the plaintiffs, waiving aJury submit this cause to Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth assess the damages of the plaintiffs by reason of the promises<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and eighty seven dollars,<lb/> and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid afsefsed and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs<lb/> is ordered by the Court the petition herein against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> and<lb/> <name>George G Greene</name><lb/> 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Attachment. Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the<lb/> defendant, <name>Thomas Hinton</name>, cannot be summoned<lb/> herein, it is, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, ordered<lb/> that the said <name>Thomas Hinton</name> be notified that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against him found<lb/>ed on a promissory note for the sum of five hundred and seventy dollars exe<lb/>cuted by the defendants to the plaintiffs and that his property has been attached<lb/> and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the<lb/> fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> the plaintiffs petition, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished, in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2,315, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin F Hickman</name><lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Jules C Kingsbury</name> and<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendanto are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty three hundred and fifteen dollars and<lb/> fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <note>M</note>
            <p><name>John H Swift</name> et al vs <name>A J L Stevens</name> garns of <name>McDowell</name>. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="86" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0089.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#291, 43.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Judd</name> &amp; <name>Ellis N Leeds</name><lb/> vs 631<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name>, <name>Christopher W Spalding</name>,<lb/> <name>John Hogan</name> and <name>Joseph Hodgman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plain<lb/> tiffs, by their attorney, but the de<lb/> fendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and ninety one<lb/> dollars and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>650, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 601<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name>,<lb/> <name>Mary L Barret</name>, and<lb/> <name>John S Moore</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein and have execution therefor. Judg<lb/>ment to bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>254, 52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Corneluis Haywood</name>, <name>Philip Crow</name>,<lb/> and <name>William A Crow</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>James O Hara</name></head>
            <p>On note and account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed. And the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proof, and the Court,<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, doth find that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and fifty four dollars<lb/> and fifty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as as<lb/>sessed and their costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1070, 76</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> and<lb/> <name>John Neff</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and seventy<lb/> dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="87" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0090.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#550, 02</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>James A Marsh</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name> and<lb/> <name>John A Smithers</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court, that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> five hundred and fifty dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#263, 53.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M C White</name><lb/> vs 593<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and sixty three dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expanded<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#381, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Lumbermen and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 677<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>, <name>R M Peay</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip Ganbatz</name> and <name>Isaac T Greene</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/> tiff in the sum of three hundred and eighty one dollars and twenty nine cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein<lb/> expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#527, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Luke</name>.<lb/> vs 586<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> and<lb/> <name>John O Brien</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and twenty seven dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expanded and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="88" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0091.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#387, 13</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pacific Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 648<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>, <name>August Frintschle</name><lb/> an <name>John Shiffman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of three hundred and eighty seven dollars and thirteen cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein<lb/> expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#285, 27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Lumbermen and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 651<lb/> <name>John Pipe</name> and <name>Robertson G Runyan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff,<lb/> by its attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty seven cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein<lb/> expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3974, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laureston R Livingston</name>, <name>William R Copeland</name>,<lb/> <name>James K Moorhead</name>, <name>Calvin Adams</name> and<lb/> <name>David F McKee</name><lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>, <name>Clark J Morton</name>, and<lb/> <name>L A Hall</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>L A Hall</name>,<lb/> and thereupon come the<lb/> other defendants, by their attor<lb/>ney, and withdraw the demurrer to the petition herein, and consent and agree<lb/> that judgment may be rendered against them in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> the sum thirty nine hundred and seventy four dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#373, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hervey Brown</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Lewis Patterson</name></head>
            <p>On Lost note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> defendant as confessed. And the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to<lb/> the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth<lb/> find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned in the sum of three hundred and seventy three<lb/> dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="89" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0092.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expanded and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennet S Aden</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>David Dick</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing the satisfaction of the Court that the de<lb/>fendants cannot be summoned herein, it is therefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney ordered that the said<lb/> defendants be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against them for the sum of sixteen hundred and ninety six dol<lb/> lars founded on five notes execution by the defendants under the name and style<lb/> Dick and McClure, of which the plaintiffs is now the holder, as endorse; and<lb/> their property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term<lb/> of this Court to begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next and on or before the third<lb/> day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against<lb/> them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a<lb/> copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a news<lb/>paper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1500</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hezekiah K Grant</name> and<lb/> <name>Marcus Walker</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Robert J Clay</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>The defendant comes and files a statement duly<lb/> verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of fifteen<lb/> hundred dollars and consents and agrees that<lb/> judgment may be entered against him for that sum. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Welson</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Jesse W Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Irwin</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Atchison Irwin</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by her attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and solemnly called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Woodburn</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Scott</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Human H Brocksmith</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="90" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0093.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Tighe</name> et al<lb/> vs 293<lb/> <name>Joseph Toomer</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Steen</name><lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>John Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Wheeler</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Charleville</name><lb/> vs 695<lb/> <name>Zachauah Moore</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophie Williams</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>William Williams</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L Weber</name> et al<lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Charles Harzig</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johannes Link</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Philippine Link</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> et al<lb/> vs 742<lb/> <name>Horace D Brady</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
            <note>859</note>
            <p><name>James C Converse</name> vs <name>Andrew J L Stevens</name> garns. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="91" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0094.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Black</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Solomon Block</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Black</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>Louis Block</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W McCamant</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>John Todd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof as Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication here<lb/>tofore made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clark</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Zachauah T Coffin</name></head>
            <p>Proof as Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and files proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made herein<lb/> has been duly published according to law.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Johnson</name> et al<lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Proof as Publication.</p>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> et al<lb/> vs 647<lb/> <name>Abraham Depew</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/> dant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Raphaelsky</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Mary Jane Rahaelsky</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Edgerton</name><lb/> vs 407<lb/> <name>Logan Sleeper</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the de<lb/>fendant, <name>Sleeper</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition be taken against him as confessed.</p>
            <note>M</note>
            <p><name>Mark C Stanfield</name> vs <name>A J L Stevens</name> garns; ans of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="92" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0095.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>Elias Marcus</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Hanna</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by her attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> Guardian<lb/> of <name>Cralvford Porter</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>Emma Porter</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name><lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the said plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Louisa Betts</name><lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>Levi North</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Walscheid</name><lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>Levi North</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
            <note>M</note>
            <p><name>John C Potter</name> et al vs <name>A J L Stevens</name> garns: Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="93" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0096.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 824<lb/> <name>Frederick Dattelzweig</name> and<lb/> <name>Leobol Berger</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By Consent of parties ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the costs of the defen<lb/>dants and that execution issue.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Margot</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Mary Margot</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs,<lb/> and that execution issue therefor</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>E Langenheinsacker</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Garns discharged.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file interrogatories<lb/> within the time prescribed by law so to do, it is<lb/> on motion of the garnishee by his attorney ordered by<lb/> the Court that he be discharged hence at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. Five dollars allowed garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name>, <name>James Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> &amp; <name>Henry S Reid</name><lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>D D Michaels</name> &amp; <name>James Clark</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court,<lb/> that the defendants cannot be summoned<lb/> herein, it is, therefore, on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, ordered that they be notified that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against them founded on an account for the sum<lb/> of two hundred and seventy three dollars and eighty two cents, for goods wares and<lb/> merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants; and that their<lb/> property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this<lb/> Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St<lb/> Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof<lb/> answer the plaintiffs petition, judgment will be rendered against them and their<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be pub<lb/>lished, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and<lb/> published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Railroad Co</name></head>
            <p>Ten days additional time give to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Robert Kerzinger</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>Fritschle</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Garner</name><lb/> vs 803<lb/> <name>David B Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>Time for answering extended to <date when="--10-17">October seventeenth</date> on<lb/> motion of the defendant.</p>
            <note>588</note>
            <p><name>Brey ve Barnet</name> &amp; <name>Weber</name>. Ten days further time given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="94" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0097.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> et al<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>The Southern Bank of<lb/> St Louis</name> et al garns.</head>
            <p>Garns discharged.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file interrogatories within<lb/> the time required by law as to do, it is on motion of<lb/> the garnishee, by attorney, ordered by the Court that it<lb/> be discharged hence at the costs of the plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue thereofor. Five dollars allowed the garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kellerman Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 763.<lb/> <name>William Lingo</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Lingo</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Henning</name> et al<lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor. The defendant waives<lb/> all claim for damages on account of the taking and detention of the property<lb/> mentioned in the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Steam Boat <name>Ben Boel</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Horace D Conant</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name>, <name>Charles J Morse</name><lb/> and <name>Addison Boyden</name><lb/> vs 884<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come a file<lb/> a petition, and therefore come the defen<lb/>dant and enters this appearance to this<lb/> action and waives the issue of process herein;<lb/> and by consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be docketed as<lb/> of this term.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respect<lb/>tive attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and thereupon the trail of this cause pro<lb/>gressed, but, not being finished, is laid over until to morrow morning at ten o clock.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 826<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of Contested Election.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and the Court<lb/> being now of said motion sufficiently advised, doth sustain the same and doth<lb/> consider and adjudge that the notice of contest be held for naught and that the proceedings under<lb/> the same be dismissed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="95" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0098.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-12">Tuesday October 12th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#131, 25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Riggin Jr</name><lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Charles L Hunt</name>,<lb/> <name>William C Woodson</name>, <name>Wlliam P Fenn</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert A Walton</name> &amp; <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of twenty one hundred and thirty one dollars and twenty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1189, 53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riggin Jr</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>Walter H Dorset</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard H Stevens</name>, <name>William C Woodson</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>William P Fenn</name>,<lb/> and <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by<lb/> his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Eleven hundred and eighty nine dollars and fifty three cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>670, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Macdougall</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Browns</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants, <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six<lb/> hundred and seventy dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>of the said plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="96" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0099.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#708, 85</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hout</name> and<lb/> <name>George C Greene</name><lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>,<lb/> <name>John O Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter A Ladew</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not, but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Seven hundred and eight dollars and eighty five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#293, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs 696<lb/> <name>William Streit</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name><lb/> and <name>Caspar Schmetter</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not, but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and ninety three dollars and forty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#773, 76</note>
            <note>I hearby acknowledge<lb/> then readet of #309.40<lb/> a full &amp; entire<lb/> satisfaction of this<lb/> judgment a <name>Hall</name><lb/> et al of which this<lb/> is the margin<lb/> <date when="1859-06-25">25 June 1859</date><lb/> <name>Jno H Rankin</name><lb/> atty for Peffs</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lippincott John Lippincott</name>,<lb/> and <name>William F Lippincott</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and consent and<lb/> agree that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against the defendants in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs for the sum of Seven hundred and seventy three dollars and seventy six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid as agreed also their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#291, 69</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>John T Watson</name>.<lb/> vs 53<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name>,<lb/> <name>Orange W M Kinney</name>,<lb/> and <name>J Elliott Duryee</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly notified and<lb/> called, come not, but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and ninety one dollars and sixty nine<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor against the property attached at the<lb/> commencement of suit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="97" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0100.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1420, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name>, and<lb/> <name>John J Watson</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Myson F Renjaiman</name>,<lb/> <name>Frange W M Kenney</name>,<lb/> and <name>J Elliott Duryee</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly notefied and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff attoney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confused.<lb/> And the Court find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of fourteen hundred and twenty dollar and ninty five cent. It is<lb/> thefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in four aforesaid as found and their cent herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefore against the property attached at the commonce<lb/>ment of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bartholomen Rasigalup</name><lb/> vs 100<lb/> <name>Dorminich Fapainn</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summonned and called,<lb/> come not but made default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3,553, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eldridgge G Davall</name>, <name>William H Keighler</name><lb/> <name>William J Rayd</name> and <name>Philip P Fendell</name><lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name> and <name>William M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff<lb/> by their attorney, <unclear>land</unclear> dismiss this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>William<lb/> M Dowell</name>, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiff atoorney, is is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against thim confused: and the Court find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of thirty five hundred and fifty three dollar and eighty four cent. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant, <name>John MDowell</name>, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> cost herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#55170</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name>, <name>John Lyon</name>,<lb/> <name>David Stewart</name>, <name>John Mathias</name>, and<lb/> <name>Jamed R Merray</name><lb/> vs 617<lb/> <name>Water E Sell</name>, <name>James M Ward</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Sheppard</name>, <name>Thomas R Ellis</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry R Ellis</name> and <name>J R Ellis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by<lb/> their attorney and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Thomas B Ellis</name>, <name>Walter<lb/> E Sell</name> and <name>James M Ward</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Thomas Sheppard</name>, <name>Henry</name>.<lb/> <name>B Ellis</name> and <name>J B Ellis</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken gainst them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court ind from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fifty one dol<lb/>lar and seventy cent. It is there considered by the Court that the palintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also ten<lb/>cent and charge herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="98" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0101.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#960,57</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Park of the State<lb/> of Missolini<lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confused; and the Court find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of nine hundred and fifty dollar and fifty seven cent. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1760,41</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Park of the State<lb/> of Missolini<lb/> vs 413<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confused. And<lb/> the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seventeen hundred and<lb/> sixty dollar and forty one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palin<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235700</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Park of the State<lb/> of Missolini<lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confused: and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty<lb/> three hundred and fifty seven dollar. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said palintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4,602,35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Park of the State<lb/> of Missolini<lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confused: and<lb/> the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of forty six hundred<lb/> and two dollar and thirty tive cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also its costs and charges in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="99" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0102.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Park of the State<lb/> of Missolini<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>James</name> <name>R Records</name>, <name>John A Smithers</name>,<lb/> <name>James A March</name> <name>George W Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the count that this<lb/> suit be dismissal at the costs of the aid<lb/> plaintiff and that execution is one therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#689,52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George K Reed</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Ward</name>,<lb/> &amp; <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney but the<lb/> dismissed this suit as to the defendant. <name>Jmaes M ward</name>,<lb/> but the other defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confused: and the Court find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant <name>Ward</name> and<lb/> <name>Shepperd</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and eighty<lb/> nine dollar and fifty two cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also it cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#580,43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenger G Lamoon</name>, <name>Abel F Goodnow</name>,<lb/> <name>William J Element</name> &amp; <name>Bunage B Yale</name><lb/> vs 869<lb/> <name>Emilir F Kraft</name> &amp; <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by<lb/> their attorney but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore on motion<lb/> of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confused: and the Court find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of five hundred and eighty dollarand forty three cent. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also thier cost herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#293,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenger Coleman</name> and<lb/> <name>Philemon Coleman</name><lb/> vs 374 <name>Herein A Pryor</name> and<lb/> <name>John S Thomson</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fussed: and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and ninty three dollar and eighty cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also thier cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#280,24</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Anderson</name>, and<lb/> <name>Napoleon B Nukerk</name><lb/> vs 415<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchage.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by thier attorney but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion<lb/> of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confussed: and the Court finds from</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="100" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0103.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollar and twenty<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#908,78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name> and<lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and eighty dollar and seventy eight cent. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also their cost herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1097,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Brook</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>H M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and ninty seven dollar and twenty<lb/> cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1080,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christopher C M Clere</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and eighty dollar and ten cen. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2067,85</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charlotte Lay</name><lb/> vs 577<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Hiram Inamn</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty seven dollar and eighty five cent.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defen</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="101" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0104.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also her cost herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#278,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charlotte Lay</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Heiam Inman</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney but the defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy eight dol<lb/>lar and fifty cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her cost herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#470,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charlotte Lay</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney but the defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confussed: and<lb/> the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seventy dol<lb/>lar and sixty five cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also her<lb/> cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2517,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charlotte Lay</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confussed: and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two thousand five hundred and seventeen dollar and twenty cent. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#203,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John I Anderson</name>, <name>R L Anderson</name><lb/> and <name>E H Gaylord</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>M Steinbach</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by their<lb/> attorney but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of palintiff attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confussed:<lb/> and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and three<lb/> dollar and sixty cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and<lb/> their cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>294</note>
            <p><name>M Faul</name> etal vs St Louis Alton and Chicago Rauk Road: Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="102" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0105.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1273,83.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Mason</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>George W Walker</name>,<lb/> <name>David I Hancock</name> and<lb/> <name>Joshua W Alexander</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confussed. And<lb/> the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and<lb/> seventy three dollar and eighty three cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also it cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#896,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph F Catheinger</name>, <name>John F Boyd</name>,<lb/> and <name>James S Gibbon</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name> &amp; <name>William M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff<lb/> by thier attorney, and dismiss their suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>William M Dowell</name>,<lb/> but the defendant <name>John M Dowell</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confussed. And the Court find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant <name>John M Dowell</name>, is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and ninty six dollar<lb/> and ten cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their cost and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name> etal<lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name> <name>James M Ward</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by their attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that an alias writ<lb/> is one herein for the defendant, <name>Walter E Sell</name>,<lb/> and <name>James M Ward</name> reurnable to the nest<lb/> turn of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Griffin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>John Griffin</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by her attorney, but the de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#256,84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name><lb/> vs 704<lb/> <name>Joaac W Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary C Scott</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective at<lb/>ttorney and consert and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered against the defendant and in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff fo the sum of two hundred and fifty six dollar<lb/> and eighty four cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and that execution<lb/> issue therfor. By consert of parties execution is stayed till fict of January next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rogers</name> and <name>Matthew</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>George B Lamb</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="103" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0106.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitghatrick</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary Fitchatrick</name><lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanced Block</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Kennedy</name> and<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Dismissed Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the dismise this suit as to the defendant, <name>James George</name>,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Block</name> and <name>Kennedy</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confussed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton</name> and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Co</head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W Faul</name> &amp; <name>Kelly</name><lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Smith</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Mogridge</name> and <name>M Faul</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> Mogridge and m Faul</head>
            <p>Assended answer of <name>Francis M Faul</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warin Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Trial Progrecess.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties and also the<lb/> Jury empanmilled and suon herein and thereupon the<lb/> trial of this cause progressed but not being concluded<lb/> at the hour of adjournament is laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Deregre</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>Orrein Wales</name>, <name>Ducter J Wales</name>,<lb/> and <name>Oliver N Wales</name> garnishess<lb/> of <name>Abijah Whiting</name></head>
            <p>Garnishess discharged.</p>
            <p>On motion of the palintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the said garnishess be discharged hance<lb/> at the cost of said palaintiff and that execution is<lb/>sue therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="104" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0107.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-13">Wednesday October 13th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adhjournament. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Karey</name><lb/> vs 825<lb/> <name>Thomas R Ellis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>Now at his day come tha plaintff by his attoeney, and<lb/> on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the cost of said palintiff and that execution<lb/> herein therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Wise</name> etal<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>R Stout</name></head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the cost of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#113,97</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustu F Shapligh</name>, <name>Thomas D Day</name>,<lb/> and <name>Woodward Crittenden</name>.<lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Charles Ronteam</name> and <name>Point Currey</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palin<lb/>tiff by its attorney but the defen<lb/>dant although duly nitified and<lb/> called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and thirt dollar and ninty seven<lb/> cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their cost herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name>, <name>Solomon A Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Sylvester H Laflin</name>, <name>Fondyee L Laflin</name>,<lb/> and <name>Joseph M Boies</name><lb/> vs 95<lb/> <name>Thomas R Grady</name> &amp; ...... <name>Rowe</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the<lb/> Court that the defendant ... <name>Rowe</name><lb/> cannot be summoned herein it is ordered<lb/> that he be notified that a civil action<lb/> has been commenced against him for<lb/> the sum of eleven hundred and fifty seven dollar and thirty six cent on account<lb/> of good, ware and merchandise, sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defen<lb/>dants; and that his property has been attached, and unless he be and appear at<lb/> the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of StLouis within<lb/> and for the Court of StLouis, on the fourth monday of February next, and on<lb/> or before the third day thereof answer of plaintiff petition, judgement will beren<lb/>deid against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further or<lb/>dered that a copy here ofbe published, according to law, in the Missouri Demount<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of StLouis</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pacific Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>August Koch</name><lb/> <name>Louis C Garmier</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>John Simond</name> garn of City Bank</head>
            <p>Exception to fourth interogatory filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="105" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0108.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Roger</name><lb/> vs 1190<lb/> <name>Lopolt Mayer</name></head>
            <p>Order fo Publication, Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appeating to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant<lb/> cannot be summoned herein, it is, therefore, on motion of plain<lb/> tiff attorney, ordered that the be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against herein for the sum of six hundred and sixteen dollar and<lb/> three cent founded on a promisory note executed by the degendant to the plaintiff<lb/> and also in an account for good ware and much and is sold and dilivered to the<lb/> defendant by the plaintiff; and that his property has been attached, and unless he<lb/> he and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City<lb/> of StLouis within and for the Court of StLouis, onn the founrth Monday of Fubry<lb/>arty next, and on or before the third day there of answer the plaintiff petition judgement<lb/> will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is fur<lb/>ther ordered that a copy here of be published, according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of StLouis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron S W Gooduin</name> etal<lb/> vs 800<lb/> <name>Domirich J M Laughlin</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this come the plaintiff, by their<lb/> attorney, by the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herin be<lb/> taken against him as confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund D Jaylor</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>James F Sweringer</name></head>
            <p>Dafault.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore on motion of palintiff<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennard</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kennard Jr</name><lb/> VS 735<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore on motion of palintiff<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Angelina Lotze</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>John Christoher Lotze</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James R Eads</name> and<lb/> <name>William S Neloon</name><lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injuction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition and on motion said<lb/> palintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant to and his sewant agent and atoorney are<lb/> hereby enjoined and restrained from tearin down and re<lb/>moring the fence and and ficture as in the petition is described and moreparticularly<lb/> set forth. The palintiff file a bond conditioned according to law which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="106" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0109.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Templeton</name><lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Clay Jaylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by their attorney, is is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the time for pleading extended five days</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustis N Berthoud</name> receiver &amp;<lb/> vs 709<lb/> <name>Henry W William</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by his at<lb/>torney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of the palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confussed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Bethoud</name> Receiver &amp;c<lb/> vs 770<lb/> <name>John Nichol</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of said attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confussed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Humon</name> etal<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>H J Cuneffe</name> etal</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Cord</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>William Fulthon</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Patridge</name> etal<lb/> vs 864<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Interogation to garnishee and answer of garni<lb/>shee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Neree Valli</name> etal<lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>John J Chappell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissed</p>
            <p>By convert of parties; it is ordere by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the cent of the plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therfor. The defendant waive<lb/> all calim for damages on account of the takin and detention of the property.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#226,37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Auguster F Shopleigh</name>, <name>Thomas D Day</name>,<lb/> and <name>Woodward Crittenden</name><lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>Charles Bonteam</name> and <name>Point Currey</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff<lb/> by its attorney, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the palintiff attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confussed: and the Court find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollar and thirty seven cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also their cost herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name> to use of &amp;c<lb/> vs 394<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court defendant with draw the release<lb/> made by <name>Martin R Hindric</name> for the perspose of<lb/> takin deposition to be used on the trial of this cause</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="107" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0110.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wakelan</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>Charles H Valentire</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for Judgment against Valentire filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Olesby</name><lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Mayerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Myerson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wanen Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Trial progresses.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come gain the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and also the Jury empannelled and suon herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed, but not being fanished<lb/> but not being finished further peoceeding herein are laid over until to morrwo morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Casey</name><lb/> vs 491<lb/> <name>Jezemiah McCraith</name>, <name>William Murphy</name>,<lb/> <name>James Corney</name> and <name>Thomas Connan</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction acknd.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff in proper puson, come and in open<lb/> Court acknowledge to thave received full and<lb/> until satisfaction of the judgment rendered on<lb/> the <date when="1858-10-06">Sixth day of October, 1858</date>, for the sum of<lb/> Eight hundred and six dollar and twenty five cents.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at ten O' clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-14">Thrusday, October, 14th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adhournament. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>late Sheriff of St Louis Courty, come and in open Court<lb/> acknowledges the execution by him of a deed to <name>Jared Gage</name>,<lb/> of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property, of<lb/> of in and to the followingf described property, to suit: "Lots No 294 and 295 in<lb/> Block 306, begining at the South West corner of the bolck reunning Northerly with<lb/> the East line of Second Street Sixteen feet four inches, thence Easterly to the alley,<lb/> parallel with Palm street, there Southerly with the alley to the outh line of<lb/> Palm street, one hundred and sixty feet foure inches, thence with the street to the<lb/> Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of The St Louis Building and Savings<lb/> Institution gainst <name>James L Gage</name> and <name>Jachera Fine</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff attoney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that an alias writ issue herein returnable<lb/> to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="108" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0111.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Green</name> and <name>Nancy Ann Green</name> his wife<lb/> vs 815<lb/> <name>Sarch V Hanington</name>, <name>Eugene C Hanington</name>,<lb/> and <name>James H Conrnfort</name> administrator of <name>George<lb/> Hanington</name>, deceaced.</head>
            <p>Deeree.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the peti<lb/>tion, by their attorney, and<lb/> thereupon come also the defendant<lb/> and file their answer, and by<lb/> concert this caucis is submitted to<lb/> the Court upon the pleading and proof, and it appearing to the Court there from<lb/> that the real estate and leacehold in the petition f the palintiff described was con<lb/>veyed to the said <name>George Hanington</name>, is trust, for the sole and separate use of the<lb/> said <name>Nancy ann Green</name>, wife of the said <name>Henry S Green</name>, as is in said petition<lb/> alleged: and it also appearing to the Court that said <name>George Harrington</name> has de<lb/>parted this life, and that the interests of said petitions, in the monther of said trusts,<lb/> requite the appointment of a trustee, in the place of said <name>George Hanington</name>, de<lb/>ceased, for and in behalf of said trusts with the same rights, power and obligations,<lb/> Therefore it is ordered and decreed that <name>Francis H Manter</name> be and he is hereby,<lb/> appointed and made trustee, in the palce of said <name>George Hanington</name>, deceased, for<lb/> and in behald of said trusts as is prayed in said petition; and it si further ordered<lb/> and decreed that the titles of in and to the said leasehold and real estate in said<lb/> petition decribed be rested in and held by the said <name>Francis H Manter</name> to the same<lb/> content and for the same purpose as the same were rested in and held by the said<lb/> late <name>George Harninton</name>, during his lifetime, by virtue of the conveyance in said peti<lb/>tion mentioned, and that the said <name>Francis H Manter</name>, as such trustee, with such<lb/> invectment of the titles of sid leasehold and real estate, have the same rights<lb/> and prower, and subject the same duties and abbigation, in every and all respects as<lb/> the late said <name>George Harington</name> has and was subject to in his lifetime, by virtue<lb/> of said conveyances, and that all and every of the act and doing of the said<lb/> <name>Francis H Mangter</name>, as such trustee, in the premises, shall be forever beriding up<lb/>on the parties hereto and each of them, their and each of their herein and assign<lb/> forever. The said leasehold and real estate is described as follow, to wit: "the follow<lb/>ing described premises, the same being a leasehold estate, towit: a certain lot of<lb/> ground, with all the inprovement thereon, situated in the City of St Louis and<lb/> State of Missowri in Block No sixty four containing nineteen fect and one eighth<lb/> of a fact fronting on third stut by one hundred and fifty two but three inches in depth<lb/> to an alley, and bounded on the North by preoperty of <name>Graham</name> on the East by an<lb/> alley, South by property of Boyee, and West by third street;" also, "a lot of twenty<lb/> five feet in Block number five hundred and forty one of the said City and in<lb/> Bolck number twenty one of Christys addition to said City, founded as follows,<lb/> commencing at a point on the North line of Morgan street seventy eight feet from the<lb/> intersection of Seveteenth and Morgan street, running thence Eastwardly with<lb/> said Northern line of Morgan street twenty five feet, thence running Northwardly<lb/> paralled with Seventeenth street one hundred and forty four feet and seven inches<lb/> to an alley, thence with the Southern lilne of said alley Westwardly twenty five feet,<lb/> and thence Southwardly parallel with Seventeenth street to the begining, bounded<lb/> or the South by Morgan Steet. East by lot of <name>D J Morrow</name>, on the North by said<lb/> alley and on the West by lot of <name>Charles Having</name>, said Seventeenth street is accoding<lb/> off <name>J C Brown's</name> Survey." It is further ordered that said petitioners pay the cost<lb/> of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>205</note>
            <p><name>Felix Coste</name> etal vs <name>George W Sherrick</name> etal: Answer to petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="109" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0112.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1105,00<lb/> Set aside Oct 18-1858</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Gray</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>Joseph B Hooland</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore on motion of the palintiff attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confussed:<lb/> and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Eleven hundred and five dollar. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Jodd</name>, <name>Charles Jodd</name><lb/> and <name>Washington Jodd</name><lb/> vs 733.<lb/> <name>Egra O English</name>, <name>John Burner</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confussed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John E Coock</name><lb/> vs 364<lb/> Steam boat "<name>F X Aubrey</name>"</head>
            <p>Default.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendant although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> said attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken gainst<lb/> the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary A Banker</name><lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>William W Banker</name></head>
            <p>Desmissed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day cause being called for trial and the<lb/> plaintiff failing to appear and procecute the same it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the cost ordered<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Bell</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>William Bell</name></head>
            <p>Dissmiseal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day cause being called for trial and the<lb/> plaintiff failing to appear and prosecute this action it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the cost said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert De Straclee</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name></head>
            <p>Dismiseal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day cause being called for trial and the<lb/> plaintiff failing to appear and prosecute the same, on motion<lb/> of the defendant attorney, it is ordered that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the cost of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Fansworth</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Dorathea Fansworth</name></head>
            <p>Default</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the palintiff by its attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore on motion of the palintiff attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="110" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0113.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Bailey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>John H Bailey</name></head>
            <p>Deafult.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of said plaintiff attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petetion herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David S Bengham</name><lb/> vs 801<lb/> <name>Dietrich Nirman</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that an alias Writ issue herein returnable to the next<lb/> term of this Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E G Burkam</name> etal<lb/> 725<lb/> <name>James F Aglar</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that an alias Writ issue herein returnable to the next<lb/> term of this Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hughes</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William C Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff by his attorney, come and in open Court acknowledge<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered herein on the <date when="1855-01-25">twenty fiffth day of January, 1855</date>, for<lb/> the sum of five hundred dollar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Camilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Christopher</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedionus issue to New York on the<lb/> part of the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautter</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a determines issue to Illinois on part of plaintiff<lb/> Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> etal<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>George Frowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendant cost.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenge P Sanger</name> etal<lb/> 222<lb/> <name>The North Missouri Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Continued, Leave guien plaintiff to file an amen<lb/>ded petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Muller</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name>,<lb/> <name>James A Grantand</name><lb/> <name>William Nesbitt</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, come and in open Court ack<lb/>nowledge to have rucured full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-18">Eighth day of October<lb/> 1858</date>, for the sum of thirty ifve hundred and seventy six<lb/> dollar, and authorige the entry off satisfaction thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Wood</name> etal<lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Reuben Hanington</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August N Bethoud</name> receiver &amp;c<lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William N Naydon</name></head>
            <p>answer filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="111" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0114.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Foy</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John Wsson</name> etal</head>
            <p>arrended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Green</name> etal<lb/> vs 111<lb/> <name>The Terre Naute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Co</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Franklin Filed</name></head>
            <p>Garnishee discharged.</p>
            <p>On motion of the palintiff, by their attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the garnishee be<lb/> discharged at the cost of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Waren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day coem again the perties by their respective<lb/> attorney and also the Jury empannelled and swom herein,<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed but not<lb/> being finished at the hour of adjournament is laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#613,63<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson</name> &amp; <name>Larimore</name><lb/> security</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Emerson</name> and <name>Nathan Johnson</name><lb/> vs 234<lb/> ... <name>Jones</name>, .... <name>Covell</name> &amp; .... <name>Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Judgment on Forth Bond.<lb/> Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their<lb/> attorney, and move the Court to render judg<lb/>ment in their fovor against <name>Wilson G Lari<lb/>more</name>, the recurity in the forth coming bend taken by the Sheriff in this cause: abd ut<lb/> appearing to the Court that the Sheriff on the <date when="1855-12-14">Fourteenth day of December eightten hun<lb/>dred and fifty seven</date>, took a forthcoming bond for the property attached executed by<lb/> <name>I D Jones</name>. <name>J Covell</name> and <name>G W Morris</name> as principal and <name>Wilson G Larimore</name> as their..<lb/> security, agreeably to law, and that plaintiff heretofore, towit: on the twenty <date when="1858-04-01">first day of<lb/> April eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> in the original attachment suit, recovered judgment<lb/> against the said .... <name>Jones</name> .... Covell and ... <name>Morrison</name> for the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and ninty five dollar and ninty three cent, and that execution was issued on said..<lb/> judgment and duly returned by the Sheriff with his return of no property found endorsed<lb/> thereon, and that in pursuance of an order herefore made by this Court the Sherifff duly<lb/> assigned said forthcoming bond to the plaintiff and that the value of the propery for the<lb/> forthcoming of which said bond was given is Six hundred and thirteen dollar and sixty<lb/> three cent and that the amount due an said execution is Six hundred and thirty two<lb/> dollar and forty eitht cent, therefore it is concidered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of said <name>Wilson G Larimore</name>, the security in said forthcoming bond, the sum of<lb/> Six hundred and thirteen dollar and sixty three cent together with their cost in the<lb/> original suit and in this proceeding expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at ten o clok.
                <signed>
                    <name>Jamed R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="112" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0115.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-15">Friday, October, 15th 1858.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met purseuant to adhournament Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anoon G Phelps</name> etal<lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>Edward Rowe</name></head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their attorney, and<lb/> on their motion it is ordred by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the cost of the said palintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shaw</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>On note </p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make dafault, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff attorney, it is<lb/> ordred by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and sixty six dollar and ten cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> of aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#405,44</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mass</name> and <name>Frederick Mass</name><lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>Jocob Bersch</name>, <name>Adam Richschied</name>.<lb/> and <name>Philip Kraft</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>On note.</note>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make dafault, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff attorney, it is ordred by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of four hundred and five dollar and forty four cent. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and their cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wanen Rud</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respec<lb/>tive atoorney, and the Jury emparnelled and swam herein<lb/> and therefor the trial of this cause progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jury retire to consider of their vardict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Rainey</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Michael Burk</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendat costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> etal<lb/> vs 477<lb/> <name>Edward B Davis</name></head>
            <p>Me for security fot cost filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Henry Murphy<lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Joseph G Shand</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="113" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0116.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cstello</name><lb/> vs 826<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#503,28</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clark</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Bachaish F Coffin</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly notified and called, comes not but<lb/> makes dafault, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordred by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and three<lb/> dollars and twenty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form of aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs in this suit expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of M<lb/> <name>Frederick Jackson</name></head>
            <p><name>Habeas Corpus</name>.</p>
            <p>On petition of <name>Federick Jackson</name> duly verified filed herein, it is<lb/> ordered by the Count that a writ of <name>Habeas Corpus</name> issue<lb/> herein directed to <name>Charles Roderman</name>, Jailar of Saint Louis<lb/> County, commanding him to have the body of said petitioner before this Court on<lb/> to morrow morning at ten O'clock.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> etal<lb/> vs 167<lb/> Washington West and<lb/> <name>John L Narlison</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and in open Court<lb/> acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgement for the sum of two hundred and fifty<lb/> three dollars and seventy four cents, rendered herein on the <date when="1858-03-12">twelfth of March, 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#283,87</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clark</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>George E Cassell</name>, and<lb/> <name>George Shaffner</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Bachaiah T Coffin</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment. Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the said plaintiff as the<lb/> said garnishees, and it appearing to the Court from the<lb/> answer of said garnishees that at the time they were sum<lb/>moned herein as such they had in their possesion belong<lb/>ing to the original defendant the sum of two hundred<lb/> and eighty three dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the sum aforsaid as<lb/> confessed and that out of said sum he pay the costs as weel of the original procee<lb/>dings as of this and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>Charles Wendemerth</name>,<lb/> <name>August Fritschle</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiffs and that execution issued therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmiston Mellellan</name><lb/> vs 24<lb/> <name>Stephen M Whitchouse Warner</name><lb/> <name>W Oglesby</name> &amp; <name>John Whitehouse</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dis<lb/>missed and the garnishees summoned herein</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="114" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0117.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>discharged at the cost of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Bill of Exchange withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Gaylord Jr</name> &amp; <name>Benjamin B Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Frank P Carley</name> <name>B F Ossing</name> &amp; <name>M D Dow</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the cost of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. Exhibit withdrawn<lb/> by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August N Berthoud</name> receiver &amp;c<lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gray</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Reply to Offset filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> etal<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Interplea filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name> and<lb/> <name>Loury Mathurs</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Charles B Lamb</name></head>
            <p>Trial.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendant and files an amended<lb/> answer herein and the plaintiff come and file a motion to<lb/> strike out parts of said amended answer, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered said motion and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth overuled the same; and thereupon come also a Jury, to writ<lb/> <name>A G Srritger</name>, <name>William Thornhill</name>, <name>Charles Sulthon</name>, <name>James</name>, <name>W P Shryock</name>,<lb/> <name>Edwin Dean</name>, <name>JJ Calvert</name>, <name>John Wahoff</name>, <name>William Lump</name>, <name>W N Tasker</name>, <name>George</name><lb/> <name>Pickles</name>, &amp; <name>Jno Zimmerman</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried<lb/> and swan the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury retue to consider of theri verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Houseman</name>, <name>Julies N Smith</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robert B Bowler</name>.<lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>James Hewitt</name> and <name>Robert M V Kercheval</name></head>
            <p>Trial.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by<lb/> their respective attorney, and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, towit: <name>Wyllys S king</name>.<lb/> <name>N A Miller</name>, <name>William Simonds</name>,<lb/> <name>William Flint</name>, <name>S H Jackson</name>, <name>Edward Berry</name>, <name>Peter Ganett</name>, <name>William Gayon</name>,<lb/> <name>William Mllelland</name>, <name>Samuel Water</name>, <name>H Gredestine</name>, and <name>William Q Wolff</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawfull men, who being duly elected, tried and suan the issue<lb/> herein joined well and truly to by the trial progressed but not being finished at the<lb/> hour of adjournament further proceedings are laid ova until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adhorned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="115" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0118.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-16">Saturday October 16th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournament present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of M<lb/> <name>Frederick Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Habeas Corpees.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come <name>Charles Roderman</name>, the respondent herein<lb/> with the body of sadi <name>Jackson</name>, and also the writ of <name>Habeas<lb/> Corpees</name> to him directed with his return there on endorsed, and the<lb/> Court bere, after an examination of the matter herein doth order that said <name>Jackson</name><lb/> be remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of St Louis County and the said Sheriff<lb/> in hereby commanded to thake the said <name>Jackson</name> before some magistrate of the<lb/> County of St Louis for an examination of the charge against him for an atttempt<lb/> to commit a rape that being the offence for which he the said <name>Jackson</name> is now<lb/> detained in custody.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aermilies K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name>, <name>Daniel Elifritg</name>,<lb/> <name>Davis Cox</name> &amp; <name>Jules C Kingsbury</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication Attachemnt.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court<lb/> that the defendant, <name>William C Wagley</name>, <name>Daneil<lb/> Elifritg</name> and <name>Davis Cox</name>, cannot be summoned<lb/> herein, it is therefor on motion of plaintiff<lb/> attorney, ordered that they be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> agaomst them founded on a fill of exchange for the sum of thirty three hundred<lb/> and eighty two dollar and fifteen cent drawn by <name>William Wagley &amp; Co</name> on <name>Wagley Kings<lb/>bury</name> also favor of the plaintiff?; and that their property has been attached and unless<lb/> they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis, within and for the County of StLouis on the fourth Monday of February<lb/> next and on or before the third day therof answer the plaintiff petition judgment<lb/> will be rendered against them and theri property sold to saticfy the same. It is <lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the StLouis Evening<lb/> News, a newspaper printed and published in the City of StLouis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#6,584,88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hirarn Mill</name><lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>Lewis V Bogy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and the plaintiff<lb/> having failed to file an anser within the time allowed him as to do<lb/> therefore, on motion of said plaintiff attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken gainst the said defendant as confessed: and<lb/> the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six thousand five hundred and<lb/> eighty four dollar and eighty eight cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aofresaid as found and his<lb/> cost herein expended and have execution therfor. Judgement to bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#552,66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Southern Bank of<lb/> StLouis<lb/> vs 768<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make dafault, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff<lb/> attorney, it is ordred by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and the Court find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two five<lb/> hundred and fifty two dollar and sixty six cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="116" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0119.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#641,72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gibbon L Ketty</name> and<lb/> <name>Dudley M Ferqueson</name><lb/> vs 070<lb/> <name>Augustus Muegge</name> and<lb/> <name>Fredirick Meregge</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respiective<lb/> attorney, and submit the motion herein to dismiss<lb/> this suit to the Court and the Court being fully,<lb/> advised of and concerning the same, doth order that<lb/> said motion be overuled; and the defendant failing<lb/> to answer herein, on motion of plaintiff attorney, it is ordred by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and forty one dollar and seventy<lb/> two cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the palintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their cost herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#6584,88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Mills</name><lb/> vs 623<lb/> <name>The Pilot Knob<lb/> Iron Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, having failed to file an answer within the time<lb/> alloved as to do, on motion said attorney for the palintiff, it<lb/> is ordred by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed: And the Court find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/> tiff in the sum of Six thousand five hundred and eighty four dollar and eighty<lb/> eight cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the palintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten per cent interest until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#430,00<lb/> I hereby acknowledge full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgement is afforde<lb/> this in margin Jofeek<lb/> attst Peff<lb/> attest</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fredirick W Noel</name><lb/> vs 727<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>Augustus Fritschle</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore on motion of plaintiff<lb/> attorney, it is ordred by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty dollar. It is therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that the palintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#576,45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Dollar Saving<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>John A William</name>,<lb/> <name>Ren F Reasley</name>,<lb/> <name>Wesley Conney</name>,<lb/> <name>Roberty Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>James H Whitelaw</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their attorney,<lb/> and consert and agree that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of five hundred and seventy six dollar and forty<lb/> five cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> palintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as agreed upon and its cost herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>F Myers</name> etal</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Priat</name> etal<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Barton Bate</name></head>
            <p>Alias Writ ordered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="117" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0120.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#438,52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles G Morse</name> and<lb/> <name>Addison Boyden</name><lb/> vs 884<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attorney but<lb/> the defendants although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but make default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and fifty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Rud</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Mistual. Jury discharged.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their attorneys,<lb/> and therefore come also the Jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, and, upon their oaths, say they cannot agree upon a<lb/> verdict; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the Jury be discharged and this cause<lb/> continued to the next term of the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John E Cook</name><lb/> vs 560<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Thomas Brown</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. Alias Writ ordered for the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance Company<lb/> of Cincinnati Ohio</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>William Hart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Appearance entered.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, <name>William<lb/> Hart</name>, and waives service of process and enters<lb/> his appearance to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Caddington</name><lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>Morris Caddington</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver &amp;e<lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Ten days given plaintiff to reply to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver &amp;e<lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William H Hayden</name></head>
            <p>Ten days given plaintiff to reply to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Farnsworth</name><lb/> 118<lb/> <name>Dorothea Farnsworth</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be set for<lb/> trail on Monday next.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="118" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0121.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogus</name> and<lb/><name>Lowry Mathews</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Charles B Lamb</name></head>
            <p>Verdict for defendant.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also<lb/> come, and the Jury aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this<lb/> behalf, but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plain<lb/>tiffs his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Louderbach</name><lb/> vs 586<lb/> <name>The North Missouri<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Keokuk Packet Company</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> The Steamboat "<name>William S Nelson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#757, 38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Houseman</name>, <name>Julius H Smith</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robert B Bowler</name><lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>James Hewitt</name> and <name>Robert M V Kercheval</name></head>
            <p>Trail finished verdict.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the<lb/> parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the Jury, empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, also come, and thereupon the<lb/> trail of this cause progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Seven hun<lb/> dred and fifty seven dollars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/> said as apessed and their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August J Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzgerald</name> et al<lb/>706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name>, and<lb/> <name>Henry Kennedy</name></head>
            <p>The defendants file a motion to set aside the default<lb/> herein and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> said motion doth order that the same be sustained and<lb/> that said default be set aside and for nought held.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sparrow</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>The Time Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> confesses and admits the truth of the demurrer herein,<lb/> and by leave of Court files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="119" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0122.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Steam boat <name>Ben Bolt</name>.<lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>S D Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this suit<lb/> be dismissed, and the attachment dissolved and rendered null<lb/> and void and the garnishee herein, <name>N A Conant</name>, discharged<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. The defendant waiver<lb/> all claim for damages under the attachment bond herein, and on account of the<lb/> attachment. Ten dollars is allowed the said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1904, 26</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josephus W Hall</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Edwin R Mason</name></head>
            <p>Motion for Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come <name>Josephus W Hall</name>, by his attorney, and moves the<lb/> Court to render judgment in his favor against said <name>Edwin R<lb/> Mason</name>, and it appearing to the Court that judgment was ren<lb/>dered in this Court against said Hall and Mason in favor of the Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri, on the <date when="1858-02-24">24th day of February 1858</date> for the sum of eight hundred and<lb/> forty five dollars and fifty eight cents, and that the liability on which said judgment was<lb/> obtained grew out of a certain bond executed by said Masonas principal and said <name>Hall</name><lb/> as security and that the said <name>Hall</name> on the <date when="--10-02">2d day of October</date> instant paid the said<lb/> judgment and interest thereon amounting to twenty seven dollars and seven cents and costs<lb/> amounting to twenty seven dollars and ninety cents, and that the interest thereon from<lb/> date of said payment to this date is three dollars and seventy one cents, making in all<lb/> the sum of nine hundred and four dollars and twenty six cents, therefore it is con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said <name>Hall</name> recover of the said <name>Edwin R Mason</name> the said<lb/> sum of nine hundred and four dollars and twenty six cents together with interest thereon<lb/> from this date at ten per cent per annum and his costs herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-18">Monday October 18th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs 98<lb/> <name>Christian Vogler</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant<lb/> cannot be summoned herein, it is, therefore, on motion of plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, ordered that he be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against him for the sum of one hundred and thirty two dollars and<lb/> sixty seven cents for goods wares and merchandise sold and delivered by <name>Schuerman</name><lb/> and <name>Keferstein</name> to the defendant and by said <name>Schuerman</name> and <name>Keferstein</name> assigned to<lb/> the plaintiff; and that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at<lb/> the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for<lb/> the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next and on or before the<lb/> third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published, according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and<lb/> published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Munger</name><lb/> vs 879<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Bacon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="120" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0123.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Leverette Mills</name>, <name>John G White</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Leverette Mills</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. <name>Alias Writ</name> ordered for<lb/> the defendant, <name>John G White</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Leverett Mills</name>,<lb/> <name>John G White</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Watkins</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant, <name>Francis<lb/> Watkins</name>, cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that<lb/> process cannot be saved upon him, therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that he be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against him founded on a<lb/> note for the sum of One hundred and sixty dollars, and that unless he be and<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and<lb/> on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein the same will be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a day hereof be published,<lb/> according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2533, 45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Alexander</name><lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>James J Todd</name>,<lb/> <name>William Ray</name> and<lb/> <name>James McMahan</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly notified and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for<lb/> the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed: And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty five hundred<lb/> and thirty three dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#866, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Railroad Company</name><lb/> vs 343.<lb/> <name>J Richard Barrett</name></head>
            <p>On agreement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: And the plain<lb/>tiff, waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the Court, upon the petition and proofs,<lb/> and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of eight hun<lb/> dred and sixty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaint<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David S Bigham</name><lb/> vs 801<lb/> <name>Dietrich Niermann</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>George Gletzinger</name>.</head>
            <p><name>Christian Kribben</name>, attorney for the defendant,<lb/> comes and enters the appearance of the said de<lb/>fendant, and waives the service of process.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="121" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0124.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#25, 00</note>
            <p><name>James H Turner</name>, a Juror, empanelled in the case of <name>Rogers</name> and <name>Mathews</name><lb/> versus <name>Charles B Lamb</name>, having absented himself from said<lb/> panel, without a sufficient excuse, is fined twenty five dollars for contempt of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Gray</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name>.</head>
            <p>Judgment set aside. Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-14">fourteenth<lb/> day of October, 1858</date>, be and the same is hereby set aside<lb/> and annulled: and, by consent of parties, it is ordered further by the Court that this<lb/> suit be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#798, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Louis Winkelmeier</name></head>
            <p>On agreement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default wherefore, on motion of said attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the Court,<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in<lb/> the petition mentioned at the sum of Seven hundred and ninety eight dollars. It<lb/> is therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#394, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph Heinecke</name> and <name>John M Estel</name><lb/> vs 452<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but<lb/> the other defendant, although duly sum<lb/> moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of said<lb/> attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendants as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum three hundred and ninety four dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said as found and their costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1279, 36</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Hake</name> and <name>Herman Hake</name><lb/> vs 183.<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the<lb/> other defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> twelve hundred and seventy nine dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="122" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0125.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#3811, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Templeton</name><lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Clay Taylor</name>, <name>Francis T Ryan</name><lb/> and <name>Edmonia Bryan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> but the defendants having failed to file an answer<lb/> herein within the time allowed by the Court for them<lb/> so to do, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirty eight hundred<lb/> and eleven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#462, 05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Americus V Potter</name>, <name>Nathan F Mason</name>,<lb/> <name>John D Potter</name> &amp; <name>Arthur M Potter</name><lb/> vs 607<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> &amp; <name>John N Boffinger</name></head> 
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, and dismiss this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>Boffinger</name>,<lb/> but the other defendant, although duly<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> the said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of four hundred and sixty two dollars and five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendant, <name>William<lb/> O Wheeler</name> the sum aforesaid as found and their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theophile Schaefer</name><lb/> vs 415<lb/> <name>John G Mack</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel Killion</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Fitzgerald</name><lb/> vs 209.<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Nonsuit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, by their attor<lb/>ney, but the plaintiff, although duly called, comes<lb/> not, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> defendant, it is ordered that the said plaintiff be<lb/> nonsuited. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing<lb/> by his suit in this behalf but that said defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the said plaintiff its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O'Cannon</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="123" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0126.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Howison</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martha Faris</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Jonathan J Faris</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files<lb/> proof, satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication, here<lb/>tofore made herein, has been duly published according to law;<lb/> but the defendant, although duly notified and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Seal</name><lb/> vs 259<lb/> <name>Lucy Ann Seal</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication here<lb/>tofore made herein has been duly published according to law<lb/> but the defendant, although duly notified and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs 100<lb/> <name>John Matthews</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, in his own proper person, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmine Reichard</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of New York</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attor<lb/>ney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Greener</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Alias Writ ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 790<lb/> <name>Patrick Hart</name></head>
            <p>Alias writ ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Foy</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John Wasson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out answer and for judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Clure</name><lb/> vs 840<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> and Pilot Knob Rail Road Company</name><lb/> garnishee of <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Morrison</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>William C Hall</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="124" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0127.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Kramer</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph Loth</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>David P Kramer</name></head>
            <p>Motion for order on Sheriff to pay over money<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethriel B Vincent</name> et al<lb/> vs 845<lb/> <name>The St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain and Pilot<lb/> Knob Rail Road Company</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Answer of Garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Dorothea Farnsworth</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> on his motion, and the defendant having heretofore made<lb/> default, the Court proceeds to heav the proof herein, and<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good<lb/> conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth<lb/> order adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of<lb/> matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the nights<lb/> and privileges of an unmanied person. It is further ordered that the said plain<lb/>tiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>277, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Granville Beeler</name><lb/> vs 268<lb/> <name>John McFaul</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submits, this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same, doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages sustained by rea<lb/>son of the premises mentioned in the petition at the sum of two hundred and seventy<lb/> seven dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Verdict for peff for<lb/> property, except grey<lb/> horse, and 1 cent dams.<lb/> Verdict for deft for<lb/> grey horses or #150<lb/> dams vs peff &amp; secy<lb/> #40 dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Judgment. Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and also a Jury, to wit: <name>E Dobyns</name>, <name>Henry L Bramble</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles F Stewart</name>, <name>Joseph M Ilwaine</name>, <name>F Wm Fenneborn</name>,<lb/> <name>George Selden</name>, <name>Timothy Kirth</name>, <name>Patrick Greffin</name>, <name>Chas Roemer</name>, <name>J P Herman</name>, <name>James<lb/> Hartiz</name> and <name>John Sells</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, and<lb/> sworn the income herein joined well and truly to try the tual progressed, and being<lb/> finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff as to all of the prop<lb/>erty mentioned in the petition, except the gray horse and assess his damages at the sum of one cent, and<lb/> the Jury further find that the and grey horese is the property of the defendant and assess the value of<lb/> said property at the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, and assess the damages for the taking<lb/> and detention of the came at the sum of forty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff retain possession of the property mentioned in the petition, except the said grey horse,<lb/> and also recover of said defendant the sum of one cent as assessed by the Jury and the costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore, and that the said plaintiff return to said defendant the said grey horse or that the<lb/> defendant recover of said plaintiff and of <name>Samuel Middleton</name>, the security in the replevin bond, the value of said<lb/> property as assessed by the Jury, at the election of the defendant, and also the damages assessed for the taking and detention of the<lb/> the said grey horse, and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="125" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0128.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-19">Tuesday, October, 19th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#184, 96</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Foy</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John Wasson</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Timberlake</name>,<lb/> and <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and submits the motion herein to the Court to strike out parts<lb/> of the answer of defendants, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being fully advised of and con<lb/>cerning the same doth order that said motion be<lb/> and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the Plea<lb/>dings and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess his damages sustained by reason of the premises in<lb/> the petition mentioned at the sum of one hundred and eighty four dollars and ninety six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form of aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in open Court and ack<lb/>nowledges the execution of a deed by him as such Sheriff, to<lb/> <name>Calvin McMentry</name> of all the night, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>William<lb/> Mentry</name> of, in and to the following described property to wit; "a certain lot of ground in<lb/> block number five hundred and eighty seven of the City of St Louis, bounded and described<lb/> as follow, to wit: beginning at the Eastern line of Eleventh street where the same is<lb/> interested by the North line of United States Survey number three thousand and three<lb/> thence South along the East side of Eleventh Street forty eight feet, thence East and<lb/> parallel with the North line of said survey one hundred and twenty seven feet six inches<lb/> to a fifteen feet alley, thence North along said alley forty eight feet to the North line of said<lb/> Survey, number three thousand and three, and thence to the place of beginning: "sold<lb/> by virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of St Louis Circuit Court<lb/> in favor of <name>John Carlisle</name> against <name>William McMentry</name> and <name>John McClelland</name> returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1858-10">October Term. 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#302, 70<lb/> Special</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name>,<lb/> <name>Homes H Dikeman</name> and<lb/> <name>James G English</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for<lb/> the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and two dollars and seventy cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as assessed by the Court and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore against the property attached herein at the commencement of suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Levy</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="126" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0129.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1368, 81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name>,<lb/> <name>William White</name>, and<lb/> <name>Hiram A Pryor</name>,<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account and note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly notified and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: And the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, doth asses the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of thirteen hundred and sixty eight<lb/> dollars and eighty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/> tiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed by the Court and also their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefore against the property attached at the<lb/> commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#773, 36</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard P Hanenkamp</name> and<lb/> <name>William B Hynes</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; And the<lb/> plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court, upon the petition and proofs,<lb/> and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth asses the plain<lb/>tiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the<lb/> sum of Seven hundred and seventy three dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore<lb/> against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#135, 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Mepham</name><lb/> <name>William G Mepham</name><lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; And the plain<lb/>tiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court, upon the petition and proofs, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth asses the plaintiffs damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hun<lb/>dred and thirty five dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore against the<lb/> property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#148, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>De witt C Sandford</name><lb/> and <name>James C Crane</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly notified and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for<lb/> the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; And the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court, having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same, doth asses the plaintiffs damages sustained by</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="127" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0130.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and<lb/> forty eight dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs record of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property at<lb/>tached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#439, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald C Goddin</name>, <name>James T Johnson</name>,<lb/> <name>Barton S Wilson</name> and <name>Elisha W Brown</name>,<lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by<lb/> their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this<lb/> cause to the Court, upon the pleading and proofs, and the Court, having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same, doth asses the plaintiffs damages sustained by rea<lb/>son of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of four hundred and thirty<lb/> nine dollars and eighty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefore against the property attached<lb/> at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#339, 77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name> trustee<lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court, upon the petition and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth asses the<lb/> plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the<lb/> sum of three hundred and thirty nine dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said as assessed by the Court and have execution for said amount, together with his<lb/> costs herein expended, against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#538, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Globe Mutual Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of St Louis Missouri<lb/> vs 328.<lb/> <name>Alonge Cutler</name>, <name>Sands E Selleck</name><lb/> and <name>Coomwell Sage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its at<lb/>torney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the Sum of five hundred and thirty eight dol<lb/>lars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as assessed by the Court and<lb/> also its costs herein expended and have execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Paul Rohrev</name> et<lb/> vs 308<lb/> <name>Frederick Wales</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Vandwyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>A S Dweier</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Depositions for defen<lb/>dants opened and filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="128" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0131.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#590, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Ceary</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>James J McBride</name>,<lb/> <name>John Riley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph P Marley</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety dollars and fifteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1333, 85</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron P Brainard</name><lb/> vs 398<lb/> <name>Job Stockton White</name> and<lb/> <name>George Hulme</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>White</name>, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant, <name>White</name>, is in<lb/> debted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and thirty three dollars and<lb/> eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#111, 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Goldsmith</name> and<lb/> <name>Ernest Klingstein</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorney, and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to<lb/> the Court, upon the pleadings and proofs, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> doth find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of Eleven hundred and eleven dollars<lb/> and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion for new trial filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Wicker</name><lb/>60<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A McDowell</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Barclay</name> et al<lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>William B Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and on motion of said attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="129" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0132.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1993, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Meyer</name> and <name>Joseph Sachs</name><lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>Equitable Fire Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit: <name>J P Hermann</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Dobynx</name>, <name>Louis Howard</name>, <name>John N Spen</name>,<lb/> <name>John Whitesides</name>, <name>J McIlwaine</name>, <name>Samuel McNeilly</name>, <name>George Watson</name>, <name>James Harty</name>,<lb/> <name>William Fuerbourn</name>, <name>Charles F Stuart</name> and <name>Henry Bramble</name>, twelve <unclear rend="strikethrough">and</unclear> good and<lb/> lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues<lb/> herein joined, the trail progressed, and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess the damages at the sum of Seventeen hun<lb/>dered and ninety three dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August J Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 49.<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Trail.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> submit the motion herein to strike out the defendants answer to<lb/> the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> said motion, doth order that the same be overruled; and therefore come also a Jury, to wit:<lb/> <name>Patick Griffin</name>, <name>Moses Pfeiffer</name>, <name>C D Roemen</name>, <name>John Sells</name>, <name>Simethy Reith</name> and <name>W M<lb/> Clexton</name>, six good, and lawfulmen, who being, by consent, duly elected, trid, and sworn<lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trail progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#611, 42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Balmer</name><lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>Philip Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the de<lb/>fendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and eleven<lb/> dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#282, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name> and<lb/> <name>Herman H Laumeier</name><lb/> vs 700<lb/> <name>Joseph B Sherer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not, but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty two dollars and seventy five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name> and<lb/> <name>Herman H Laumeirer</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Samuel Schmidt</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="130" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0133.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfreid Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
            <p><name>Chirstian Knibben</name>, attorney for the defendant, <name>Helgenberg</name>,<lb/> comes, and, by leave of Court withdraws the answer of the<lb/> said defendant filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Miller</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>Thomas Laurenson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at his costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S McKnight</name> and<lb/> <name>James W Richardson</name><lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Bernard L Voorhees</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement, from which it appears,<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense be<lb/>fore the probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is there<lb/>fore ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make<lb/> a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al<lb/> garns of <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed to answer of garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Franklin Bull</name> garns<lb/> of <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Reply and Denial of garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Fuller</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>David Rees</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the defendant to withdraw the depositions taken in<lb/> his behalf and filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to strike out the defendants answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtney</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw the depositions<lb/> filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kellermann Jr</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Kellermann Senior</name><lb/> vs 763<lb/> <name>William Lingo</name> and<lb/> <name>William McDonald</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>Lingo</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and on motion of said attor<lb/>ney for the plaintiffs it is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>William McDonald</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="131" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0134.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacoch</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of Endorsement of <name>A G Perry &amp; Co</name>, <name>A G Peck<lb/>ham</name> and <name>J Jacobs</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name> to use of<lb/> <name>M B Hendricks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Stinkle</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Septimus Levering</name><lb/> vs 394<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Phineas J Thompson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2000, 00 per<lb/> annum.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Munday</name> by her next<lb/> friend <name>Jared M Hottel</name><lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>James Munday</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce. Alimony.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly notified, by publication,<lb/> and solemnly called, comes not but makes, default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed: and therefore, on motion of said attorney, the Court proceeds to hear<lb/> the proof herein, and having duly heard and considered the same, and being satis<lb/>fied therefore of the good conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person.<lb/> And It is further ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant<lb/> pay the plaintiff the sum of two hundred and dollars per annum, for her alimony, upon<lb/> the <date when="--10-19">nineteenth day of October next</date> and on the <date when="--10-19">nineteenth day of October</date> of each and every<lb/> year thereafter, during the natural life of the said plaintiff, or until the further order of<lb/> this Court, to be charged upon and paid out of the property of said defendant; and that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Fenner</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Maria D Fenner</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against her as con<lb/>fessed: and, on motion of said attorney, the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein,<lb/> and having duly heard and considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom of the<lb/> good conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured<lb/> party doth order adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the said defendant and be restored<lb/> to all the right and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff pay the costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="132" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0135.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-20">Wednesday October 20th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernest Brey</name><lb/> vs 585<lb/> <name>Barnett</name> and <name>Weber</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Smith</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew A Van Zeyst</name><lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Illinois Central Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of M<lb/> <name>William Wade and Company</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>On the petition of the assignee, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that said assignee proceed to sell,<lb/> after giving twenty days public notice, the <name>St Louis<lb/> Planing Mill</name> together with the patent rights for the machinery therein and said ma<lb/>chinery and the lease of the ground on which the same is located, upon the following<lb/> terms; one half of purchase money to be palid in six months after the day of sale and<lb/> the balance twelve months after the day of sale, the payments to be secured by satis<lb/> factorily endorsed notes and duds of trust on the property sold: And it is further<lb/> ordered that said assignee proceed to sell the residue of the property assigned upon<lb/> such terms as may to him sum good, provided, that the payments for the same<lb/> shall be fully made within twelve months from the date of this order.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Taylor</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>Joseph Stockdale</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be<lb/> found, and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be<lb/> sewed upon him, therefor, on motion of the attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him for the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars found on a<lb/> draft; and that his property has been attached, and unless he be and appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be holden at the City of St Louis, within and for the Coun<lb/>ty of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day<lb/> thereof answer the person herein judgment will be rendered against him and his prop<lb/>erty sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published,<lb/> according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the<lb/> City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2509, 88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt Van Evera</name> and<lb/> <name>Hallet Kilburn</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>Heyman Levin</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange. Judgment by consent.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and the said defendant withdraws his plea in<lb/> abatement filed herein and consents that judgment<lb/> may be rendered against him in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for the sum of twenty five hundred and nine dollars and eighty eight cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the own aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> And by like consent of parties it is further ordered by the Court that the property attached<lb/> herein and claimed by <name>John Levin</name> be released, and the garnishees summoned herein<lb/> discharged. Ten dollars allowed garnishee, <name>L W Patchin</name> for answering.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="133" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0136.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2080, 59</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George L Nickolls</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert E Campbell</name><lb/> 120<lb/> <name>Heyman Levin</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange. Judgment by consent.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney<lb/> and agree that he petition herein may be amended by ad<lb/>ding on additional count on a draft for three hundred<lb/> dollars, dated <date when="1857-09-14">September fourteenth, eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty seven</date>; which amendment is accordingly made; and thereupon the said defendant with<lb/> draws his plea in abatement feled herein, and convents that judgment may be rendued<lb/> in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of twenty hundred and eighty dollars and<lb/> fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the and defendant the sum aforesaid as agred upon and this costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
            <p>And by like consent of parties, it is further ordered by the Court that the personal<lb/> property attached herein and claimed by <name>John Levin</name> be and the same is hereby re<lb/>leased, and the garnishees summoned herein discharged.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parities, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> The defendant by his attorney, waives all claim for damages on account<lb/> of the taking, and detention of the property mentioned in the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Heyman Levin</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>George S Nicholls</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert E Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazzard</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>Layman W Patchin</name></head>
            <p>Dismissed</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. The defendant, by his attorney, waives all claim for<lb/> damages on account of the taking and detention of the property mentioned in the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#801, 21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfreid Klinmann</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, and<lb/> <name>Frederick Reichard</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Richard</name>, and the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Helgenberg</name>, having withdrawn his answer leaving this<lb/> action undefended, it is, therefore, on motion of said attorney,<lb/> for the plaintiff, ordered that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and thereupon comes the defendant, <name>Boerstein</name> and also a<lb/> Jury, to wit; <name>Edward Dobyns</name>, <name>J P Human</name>, <name>Louis Howard</name>, <name>J H Sparr</name>, <name>John Whitesides</name>,<lb/> <name>J McIlivaine</name>, <name>Samuel McNeilly</name>, <name>George Watson</name>, <name>James Hary</name>, <name>W Furerborn</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles F Stuart</name>, and <name>Henry Bramble</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly<lb/> elected, tried and swom the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed<lb/> and assess his damages at the sum of Eight hundred and one dollars and twenty<lb/> one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="134" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0137.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed, together with interest<lb/> thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#300, 00<lb/> Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Pate</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>George D Moore</name>, <name>Thomas Clarke</name>,<lb/> <name>William Shaw</name>, <name>William Ackley</name><lb/> and <name>Ross W Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their respect<lb/>tive attorneys, and file an agreement herein, and<lb/> consent the judgment may be rendered herein<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of three<lb/> hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as<lb/> agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Thereupon, <name>Aylett Bunkner</name>, attorney for said plaintiff, here, in open Court, ack<lb/>nowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>One cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August J Carpenteir</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Judgment Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein, and the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess the damages sustained by reason of the premises in<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff retain possession of the property mentioned in the petition and<lb/> also recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> together with his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trail filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Michael Plunkett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sanguinette H Benoist</name> and<lb/> <name>Patrick H Donnelly</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Solomon H Robbins</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attouney for the plaintiff it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit<lb/> at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name> et al<lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>Albright</name> and <name>Moore</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affi<lb/>davit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name> President &amp;c<lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Michael A O'Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>W B Watson</name></head>
            <p>Continued as an affidavit at<lb/> plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs 876<lb/> <name>Charles D Coleman</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="135" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0138.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-21">Thursday October 21st 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Michael Plunkett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Cannon</name><lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#521, 48</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos R Little</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward D Stokes</name><lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> and<lb/> <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> twenty one dollars and forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/> said as found their costs herein expended and have execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1063, 09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Earl Matlack</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William A Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>Anderson Arnot</name>,<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name>, and<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of said<lb/> attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of ten hundred and sixty three dollars and nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf and<lb/> have execution thereofor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten percent per<lb/> annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#302, 59</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Schaeffer</name>, <name>Eberhard Anheuser</name>,<lb/> <name>James Reilley</name> and <name>Adolf Krauss</name><lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> notified by publication and solemnly called<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court, having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages, sustained by<lb/> reason of the premises in the petition mentioned, at the sum of three hundred and two dollars<lb/> and fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor against the property attached herein at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="136" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0139.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#544, 85</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S M Nair</name><lb/> vs 694<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Lorgue</name>, but the defendant<lb/> <name>Hunt</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant, <name>Hunt</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and forty four dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs herein expended have execution thereofor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1141, 99</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maturin Linvingston</name>,<lb/> <name>William S Livingston</name>,<lb/> and <name>Francis A Linvingston</name>,<lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>The defendant comes and files a statement in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of Eleven hundred and forty one<lb/> dollars and ninety nine cents, and consents that judment<lb/> may be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary L Tarr</name><lb/> vs M<lb/> <name>William Tarr</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly notified and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court after hearing the proof herein, being satisfied that the plaintiff is an innocent<lb/> and injured party, doth order adjudge and decree that the said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony, by her contracted with the said de<lb/>fendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and<lb/> that the plaintiffs maiden name, <name>Mary L Perry</name>, be restored to her, and be dumed<lb/> and taken as her only true and lawful name. It is further ordered that the defendant<lb/> pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Clarke Jr</name> and<lb/> <name>Almond L Richardson</name><lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>A S Roberts Jr</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>ney, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>J McJlvaine</name>,<lb/> <name>George Watson</name>, <name>James Harty</name>, <name>William Fuerbom</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> F Stuart</name>, <name>Henry Bramble</name>, <name>Patrick Griffin</name>, <name>Moses Pleiffer</name>,<lb/> <name>C D Roerner</name>, <name>John Sells</name>, <name>Timothey Keith</name> and <name>William M Clexton</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the matters I controversy,<lb/> upon the plea I abatement well and truly to try the trial progressed, and being fin<lb/>ished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmine Richard</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of New York</head>
            <p>Default set aside.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the default<lb/> herein on the <date when="1858-10-18">eighteenth of October, eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty eight</date> was wrongly taken,<lb/> therefore, on motion of the attorney for the defen<lb/>dant, it is ordered that the same be sit aside and for naught held.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="137" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0140.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 631<lb/> <name>Addison G Bragg</name>, <name>Oliver T Bragg</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Burrowes</name>, <name>Gerhard H Timmerman</name><lb/> and <name>William Palm</name></head>
            <p><name>C F Burnes</name>, attorney for the plaintiff,<lb/> comes in Open Court and acknowledges to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein on the<lb/> <date when="--04-19">nineteenth day of April</date> last past for the<lb/> sum of twenty seven hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty two cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 631<lb/> <name>Addison G Bragg</name>, <name>Oliver T Bragg</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Burrowes</name>, <name>Gerhard<lb/> H Timmerman</name></head>
            <p><name>C F Burnes</name>, attorney for the plaintiff,<lb/> comes in Open Court and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--04-19">nineteenth day<lb/> of April</date> last past for the sum of thirteen<lb/> hundred and thirty nine dollars and thirty cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Tevis</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Charles R Hall</name> admr<lb/> of <name>Joshua Tevis</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the amended petition herein, and being thereof fully advised,<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson G Connor</name><lb/> vs 865<lb/> <name>James B Goff</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>B H P Butler</name></head>
            <p>Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Haslett</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G McPhuters</name><lb/> vs 877<lb/> <name>J A Barret</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McCord</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Thomburg</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ja Foy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Wasson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new<lb/> trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzpatrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed<lb/> by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Clark</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>David G Hatch</name> and <name>David P Buckner</name><lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> &amp; <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement,<lb/> from which it appears that the keeping<lb/> of the property attached under the writ<lb/> herein will be attended with much expense before the probable termination of this suit,<lb/> and is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit; it is</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="138" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0141.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>therefore ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said property, according to law, and<lb/> that he make a report of his proceedings under this order before the first day of the<lb/> next term of this court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>David G Hatch</name>, and <name>David P Buckner</name>,<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esg, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement in<lb/> writing from which it appears, that the<lb/> keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense before the probable termination of this<lb/> suit and if likely to depreciate in value; it is, therefore, ordered, that said Sheriff sell said<lb/> proputy, according to law, and that he make a repot of his proceedings under this order on<lb/> or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name>, <name>Nimrod H Sinclair</name>,<lb/> <name>Joel Baker</name> and <name>James P Garvey</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement from<lb/> which it appears, that the keeping of the<lb/> property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with much expense before the probable termination of this suit and is likely<lb/> to depreciate in value; it is, therefore, ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property according<lb/> to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel G Nowell</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the writ<lb/> herein will be attended with much expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit and is likely to depreci<lb/>ate in value; it is, therefore, ordered that said Sheriff sell said property according to law<lb/> and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Pittman</name>, <name>Albert Tenant</name><lb/> and <name>George H Kerr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E S Castle &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is, therefore<lb/> ordered that said Sheriff sell said property according to law and that he make a report of<lb/> his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning to ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="139" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0142.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-22">Friday October 22nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Burke</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Edward T Dix</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Fredrick Myers</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Caddington</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Caddington</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Heniretta Myers</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Henry Myers</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at<lb/> plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Calhoun</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>George Fredericks</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>George<lb/> Elbert</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mount</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry E Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Cornelius H Tunison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D S Haslett</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike<lb/> out Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State to use of <name>Ipold</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Wilgus Noble and Co</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Oliver</name><lb/> vs 379<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed<lb/> by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfreid Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition herein, it is, on motion of plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, ordered that said plaintiff and said defendant and<lb/> they, and each of them, their servants, agents and attorneys, be and<lb/> they are hereby enjoined and restrained from selling or disposing of the partnership property<lb/> of said parties and from collecting or receiving the debts of the partnership over any wise<lb/> intermeddling with the affairs of the partnership of said parties until the further order of<lb/> this Court. The plaintiff files a bond in the sum of Six thousand dollars which is approved<lb/> by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayman Levin</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Dewitt Van Evera</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at his costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zachavah W Tinker</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Tinker</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against her as confessed; and therefore, on motion of said attorney the<lb/> Court proceeds to have the proof herein, and having duly heard and considered the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="140" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0143.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff and that the<lb/> plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and decree that he be<lb/> absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted<lb/> with the defendant and be restored to all rights and privileges of an unmarried<lb/> person. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution is<lb/> sue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200 per annum<lb/> &amp; #100 counsel fees</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Wilson</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Jesse W Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and on<lb/> motion of said attorney, and the defendant having made de<lb/>fault, the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good<lb/> conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth or<lb/>der adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of<lb/> matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and<lb/> privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court that the said defen<lb/>dant from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the case and<lb/> control of the infant children <name>John Wesley Wilson</name> and <name>Luther D Wilson</name>, mentioned<lb/> in the petition, it is therefore further ordered that said plaintiff have the case custody<lb/> and control of the said infant children, and that the said defendant be restrained and<lb/> enjoined from interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf until the further order of<lb/> this Court. And it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant pay<lb/> the plaintiff the sum of four hundred dollars per annum for her maintenance and<lb/> support and the maintenance, support and education of the infant children aforesaid,<lb/> payable on the <date when="--10-22">twenty second day of October</date> next and on the <date when="--10-22">twenty second day of October</date><lb/> of each and every year thereafter until the further order of this Court; and further that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant her costs herein expended and also the sum of One<lb/> hundred dollars for her counsel fees to be taxed against said plaintiff as costs and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2140, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore E Dickerson</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumbermen and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury to wit:<lb/> <name>George Selden</name>, <name>Edward Dobyns</name>, <name>Louis Howard</name>,<lb/> <name>John Whitesides</name>, <name>J McIlivaine</name>, <name>Samuel Mcneilly</name>,<lb/> <name>George Watson</name>, <name>James Harty</name>, <name>William Fuerborn</name>, <name>Charles F Stuart</name>, <name>Henry Bramble</name>,<lb/> and <name>Patrick Griffin</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished<lb/> the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the dam<lb/>ages at the sum of twenty one hundred and forty dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforeasaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bacon Hyde and Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John T Chappell</name> <name>V Frank Valli</name>,<lb/> <name>John B Valli</name> and <name>Neree Valli</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come in open<lb/> Court and acknowledge to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="141" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0144.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Crinnion</name><lb/> vs 886<lb/> <name>Daniel O Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition, and on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered that the said defendant<lb/> <name>Daniel O Brien</name>, his servants, agents and attorneys, be<lb/> and they are hereby enjoined and restrained from selling<lb/> and from further advertising for sale a certain parcel of land situated in the<lb/> township and county of St Louis known as the South half of Block number fifteen<lb/> as designated in parcel nember one upon the plat of the subdivision of the <name>Benito<lb/> Vasgues</name> now usually known as the <name>Penrose</name> tract, containing one acre and thirty<lb/> two hundredths of an acre, bounded north by the north half of the same block<lb/> West by Block Sixteen East and South by streets and being the same acquired<lb/> by <name>Richard Crinnion</name> by dud of <name>Henry B Hoffman</name> guardian and of <name>Mary<lb/> Ann Penrore</name> recorded in Book D number six page eight in the Recorder's Office<lb/> of St Louis County Missouri. The plaintiff files a bond in the sum of twelve<lb/> hundred dollars, condition according to law, with <name>Thomas Crinnion</name>, as security, which<lb/> bond is approved by the Court. Thereupon come the defendants by <name>PB Garesche</name><lb/> their attorney, and waive survive of the above order and also waive the issue and<lb/> service of process and enter their appearance to this action, wherefore, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court this cause be set for trail at the present term of this Court. Ten days<lb/> is given the defendants to file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#210, 18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Logan</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Uriel Wright</name> and<lb/> <name>William A Lyn</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes, the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits this cause<lb/> to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth access<lb/> the plaintiffs damage sustained by reason of the promises in the petition mentioned<lb/> at the sum of two hundred and ten dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum of aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent dams</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernardine Florez</name><lb/> vs 313<lb/> <name>Able S Merritt</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name><lb/> and <name>Lee C Wallace</name></head>
            <p>Injunction rendered perpetual.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find for the plaintiff and that he has sustained<lb/> damage by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned in<lb/> the sum of One cent. It is therefore considered adjudged and decreed by the Court<lb/> that the injunction heretofore granted herein be and the same is hereby rendered per<lb/>petual and absolute as therein recited and that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assesses and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Cresta</name><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>Emanuel Cresta</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly notified and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="142" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0145.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the Court after hearing the proof herein, being satisfied of the good conduct of the<lb/> plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge<lb/> and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges<lb/> of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court that the said defendant from<lb/> his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care, custody and con<lb/>trol of the infant children <name>Mary</name> and <name>Theresa</name>, mentioned in the petition, who are of<lb/> tender years, it is therefore further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff have the care custody, control and maintenance of the infant<lb/> children aforesaid, and that the said defendant be restrained and enjoined from interfering<lb/> with the plaintiff in this behalf until the further order of this Court. It is further<lb/> ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Cradan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Catharine Cradan</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, by her attorney, but the<lb/> plaintiff although solemnly called comes not, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of said attorney for the defendant, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff be nonsuited and that the defendant go hence without day<lb/> and recover of the plaintiff her costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#681, 42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Blaksley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Keller</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> make herein has been duly published according to law, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly notified and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; And the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits<lb/> this cause to the Court, upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in his petition mentioned at the sum of Six hundred and eighty one dollars<lb/> and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached at the<lb/> commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Clarke Jr</name> and<lb/> <name>Almond L Richardson</name><lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>A S Roberts Jr</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for<lb/> the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant was not about to remove out of this state with the intent to change his<lb/> domicil and that he was not about to remove his property and effects out of this State<lb/> with the intent to defraud, hinder, or delay his creditions; wherefore, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the attachment herein be dissolved and that the defendant go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1318, 23<lb/> Set aside <date when="1858-11-06">Nov<lb/> 6 1858</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name>, and <name>George H Chase</name>.<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name>, <name>John D Mellen</name>, <name>Joshua Jackson</name> and<lb/> <name>A A K Sawyer</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, having failed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="143" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0146.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>to appear and answer the amended petition herein, whereby this suit remains undefended,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the said amended petition be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of thirteen hundred and eighteen dollars and twenty three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/> dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Philips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to Counter claim filed by leave of Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-23">Saturday, October 23rd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in Open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a Deed by him, as such<lb/> Sheriff, to <name>Louis A Benoist</name>, of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property<lb/> of <name>Louis T Curtis</name>, of in and to the following described premises, to wit:- Lots nineteen and twenty<lb/> in Block one of <name>P M Dillon</name>'s third addition to the City of St Louis being in Block<lb/> four hundred and seventy nine of said City, beginning in the East line of Dillon<lb/> street, one hundred feet South from the South line of Hickory street, thence East<lb/> parallel with Hickory street One hundred and twenty seven and one half feet to an<lb/> alley fifteen feet wide, thence South with the West line of said alley fifty feet, thence<lb/> West parallel with Hickory street One hundred and twenty seven and one half feet<lb/> to Dillon street, thence North with the Eastern line of Dillon street fifty feet to<lb/> the place of beginning; also Lot in Saint Louis County to wit; number thirty three<lb/> in Block number ten of the East Union Addition to the City of Saint Louis being<lb/> thirty feet on Lucas Street by one hundred and sixty feet nine inches in depth and<lb/> bounded South by Lucas Street, West by lot thirty four of said Block number ten<lb/> North by an alley and East by lot thirty two in said block number ten. Sold by<lb/> virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court in favor of <name>Louis A Benoist</name> to <name>Louis T Curtis</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in Open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a Dud by him, as such<lb/> Sheriff, to <name>Alfred H Wing</name> of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property<lb/> of <name>Charles W Woodworth</name> in and to the following described property, to wit;<lb/> a certain leashold estate situated in the City and County of St Louis State of Mis<lb/>souri, in Block number eighty seven of said City beginning at a point in the East<lb/> line of Fourth Street where the North line of Pine Street interests said East line</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="144" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0147.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of fourth Street thence Eastwardly along, the North line of Pine Street forty nine<lb/> feet five inches where the East of the Saint Louis Common, Field lots intersects said<lb/> North line of Pine Street, thence Nothwardly along said East line of St Louis Common<lb/> Field Lots to the South Lot of <name>Mary Moser</name> in parallel to Pine Street fifty four<lb/> feet three inches Westwardly to the East line of Fourth Street, thence Southwardly<lb/> thirty two feet to the point of beginning: bounded West by Fourth Street, South by<lb/> Pine Street, East by said East line of Saint Louis Common Field Lots which Sepa<lb/>rates the lot from the property of <name>Blanchand</name>'s representatives; Sold by virtue of an<lb/> execution issued from the Office of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of <name>James<lb/> B Neil</name>, <name>Samuel Black</name> and <name>Alfred H Wing</name> against <name>Charles W Woodward</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D'Oench</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hessy</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiffs, by their attorney, come in Open Court and<lb/> acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the Judgment rendered herein <date when="1858-01-28">January 28 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Patterson</name> and <name>Ferguson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Solomon Block</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>Louis Block</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburn</name>'s Executrix<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Tevis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C Tevis</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer to amended<lb/> petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Richards</name><lb/> vs 775<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>Exhibits filed by defendant and also motion to strike out parts<lb/> of defendants answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Elizabeth B Powell</name> and <name>Julia R Wilgus</name> filed<lb/> by <name>William R Biddlecome</name>, guardian ad litem.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Asa T Rolf</name><lb/> vs 569<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue for <name>H D Bacon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cerf Veil</name><lb/> vs 782<lb/> <name>Peter Gazzall</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws the Demurrer filed herein and by<lb/> leave of Court files and answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert W Johnson</name> et al<lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>John C Ivory</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer<lb/> to the Petition herein, and being thereof fully advised,<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled. Three days time<lb/> is given the defendant to answer. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="145" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0148.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis F Bompart</name>, <name>Louis B Bompart</name>, <name>Henry Bompart</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Bompart</name>, <name>Aurore Bompart</name>, <name>Catharine Theresi<lb/> Bompart</name>, <name>John Boptiste Bompart</name>, <name>Celestin Prerry</name>, and<lb/> <name>Theresi</name>, his wife, <name>John W Tooley</name>, <name>Edward M Haydel</name>,<lb/> and <name>Ann C</name>, his wife, and <name>Stephen Rice</name>, al of age<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Phillips</name> and <name>Robert Phillips</name>, minors by <name>Louis<lb/> F Bompart</name>, their guardian, <name>Bernard M Rice</name>, <name>Rose Rice</name>,<lb/> and <name>Edmund Rice</name>, minors, by <name>Edward M Haydel</name>,<lb/> their guardian.<lb/> vs.<lb/> <name>Charles Rodermann</name>, and <name>Celeste</name> his wife, <name>Mary Madeline<lb/> Delorier</name>, <name>Melinda Bompart</name> and <name>John W Rice</name>.</head>
            <p>Decree.</p>
            <p>And now again come<lb/> all the parties aforesaid,<lb/> and it appearing to the<lb/> Court that pending this<lb/> suit the defendants, <name>Me<lb/> linda Bompart</name> and <name>John<lb/> W Rice</name>, have become of full<lb/> age, and now move the Court<lb/> that they be made plaintiffs<lb/> herein, which is according by<lb/> done; Whereupon, the defen<lb/>dants confess the allegations<lb/> of the petition to be true, and the plaintiffs and defendants submit the cause to the<lb/> Court upon the facts set forth in the petition, and the Court, being fully advised of and<lb/> concerning the premises, doth ascertain and find that the plaintiffs are entitled to the<lb/> relief prayed for by them in their said petition; and the Court doth therefore, by the con<lb/>sent of said parties, order, adjudge and decree that the title to the subdivisions of the lot<lb/> first described in said petition, viz; a certain lot of ground fronting on the cast side of<lb/> Second Street in the City of St Louis, County of St Louis, South of and adjoining the<lb/> Green Tree Tavem, having a front of sixty feet by a depth of One hundred and fifty<lb/> feet, French measure, be established and fixed as follows, viz: that whatever title the<lb/> plaintiffs or the defendants, <name>Charles</name> and <name>Celeste Rodermann</name> have in and to a lot, part<lb/> of the lot aforesaid, having a front of twelve feet on Second Street by the depth<lb/> aforesaid being the Northernmost twelve feet of said larger lot, and also all the title<lb/> which they or either of them have in and to another lot, in said larger lot, having<lb/> a front of twelve feet on Second Street by the depth aforesaid, bounded South by the<lb/> Southernmost lot of twelve feet front in said subdivision, be divested out of them,<lb/> without any act by them to be done, and vested in the said <name>Mary Madeline De<lb/>laurier</name> and her heirs and assigns in fee forever; that whatever title the coplaintiffs<lb/> of said <name>Louis B Bompart</name> or the other defendants have in and to the lot immediately<lb/> South of the lot of twelve feet front first above described, which lot has the same extent<lb/> of front and depth, be divested out of them and be vested without any act by them<lb/> to be done in said <name>Louis B Bompart</name>, and his heirs and assigns, in fee, forever; that the<lb/> title of the lot lying next South of the lot last above described and having the same ex<lb/>tent of front and depth be vested in the heirs at law of Baptiste Bompart, deceased,<lb/> and in the said <name>Celeste Rodermann</name> and <name>Mary Madelaine Delaurrier</name>, they taking<lb/> the same interest therein as they would have taken if both had been full sisters<lb/> of the said <name>Baptiste Bompart</name>, deceased, and that whatever title the said defendants<lb/> and the said plaintiffs, <name>Louis F Bompart</name>, <name>Louis B Bompart</name>, <name>Henry Bompart</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> Bompart</name>, <name>John Bapiste Bompart</name>, <name>Aurore Bompart</name>, <name>Catharine Therese Bompart</name>, <name>Celestin<lb/> Prerry</name>, and <name>Therese</name>, his wife, <name>Elizabeth Philips</name> and <name>Robert Philips</name> and <name>Melinda<lb/> Bompart</name>, have in and to the Southernmost lot of said subdivision having a front<lb/> of twelve feet on Second street by the depth aforesaid, be divested out of them without<lb/> any act by them to be done and vested in the plaintiffs <name>Ann C Heydel</name>, wife<lb/> of <name>Edward M Heydel</name>, <name>Stephen Rice</name>, <name>Bernard M Rice</name>, <name>Rose Rice</name>, <name>Edmund<lb/> Rice</name> and <name>John W Rice</name>, and their heirs and assigns in fee forever.</p>
            <p>And the Court doth further order, adjudge and decree that the titles to the tract of<lb/> land, second described in said petition, to wit; a certain tract of land situate on the<lb/> River dis Peris, in said County, containing one hundred arpents, being in the east</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="146" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0149.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>part of Survey no 1930 of the United States and being part of a concession by<lb/> the Spanish Government to <name>Therise Barois</name> and <name>Francis Brageaw</name>, be established and<lb/> fixed as follows, viz; that all the title of the plaintiffs and of the defendant, <name>Mary<lb/> Madeline Delaurier</name>, in and to the lots designated by the letters A and B in said<lb/> petition, having an extent of four arpents on the South line of said Survey 1930 by a<lb/> depth, together Northerwardly of ten arpents, and bounded East by land now or formerly<lb/> of <name>Louis Bompart</name> and West by land now or formerly of <name>John C Marshall</name>, be divested<lb/> out of them and without any act by them to be done be vested in <name>Celeste Rodermann</name>,<lb/> wife of said <name>Charles Rodermann</name>, and her heirs and assigns in fee forever; that all the<lb/> title of said plaintiffs and of <name>Mary Madelaine Delaurier</name>, co defendant of said<lb/> <name>Charles</name> and <name>Celeste Rodermann</name>, in and to the lot designated by the letter, C, in<lb/> said petition, having an extent of four arpents on the North line of said lot B and<lb/> a depth Northwardly of five arpents, bounded North and South by the same lands<lb/> as said lots A and B, be divested out of them and without any act by them to be<lb/> done, be vested in the said <name>Celeste Rodermann</name>, and her heirs and assigns, in fee,<lb/> forever; that all the title of the defendants and of the co-plaintiffs of said <name>John U<lb/> Tooley</name> in and to said lot designated by the letter D in said petition, having an<lb/> extent of four arpents on the Northern line of said lot C by a depth Northwardly<lb/> of five arpents, bounded East by lot, E next hereinafter described, South by lot, C<lb/> West by land now or formerly of said <name>Marshall</name> and North by land formerly of<lb/> <name>Louis Bompart</name>, be divested out of them and without any act by them to be done<lb/> rested in said <name>John W Tooley</name>, and his heirs and assigns, in fee, forever, and that<lb/> all the title of the plaintiffs, <name>Louis F Bompart</name>, <name>John Baptiste Bompart</name>, <name>Celestein<lb/> Prerry</name> and <name>Thereise</name>, his wife, <name>Elizabeth Phillips</name>, and <name>Robert Phillips</name> and of the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Charles Rodermann</name> and <name>Celeste Rodermann</name>, his wife, and <name>Mary Mad<lb/>eline Delaurier</name>, in and to the said lot designated by the letter, E, Having an extent<lb/> of five arpents on the East line of said lot D by a depth Eastwardly of four ar<lb/> pents and bounded North, East, and South by land formerly of <name>Louis Bompart</name>, and<lb/> West by said lot D, be divested out of them and without any act by them to be<lb/> done vested in the plaintiffs <name>Louis B Bompart</name>, <name>Henry Bompart</name>, <name>Joseph Bompart</name>,<lb/> <name>Catharine Therise Bompart</name>, and <name>Melinda</name> and their heirs and assigns, in fee, forever,<lb/> Subject, however, to the dower of <name>Aurore Bompart</name> and in the said <name>Aurora Bompart</name><lb/> is vested the undivided one third of said lot, E, for life.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Harsh</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Solomon Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> filed herein to the petition and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J Tunstall</name> et al<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Joseph Shinkle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Homans</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>Adolphus Schoenhous</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs and also that<lb/> garnishee summoned in this action be discharged.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="147" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0150.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the late <name>Bank<lb/> of<lb/> the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The Charter of the <name>Bank of the State of<lb/> Missouri</name> having copied by the acceptance of<lb/> the New Charter, on the <date when="1857-05-23">twenty third day of<lb/> May, A, D, 1857</date> <name>James M Hughes</name>, President of said <name>Bank of the State of<lb/> Missouri</name>, by <name>C F Burnes</name>, attorney, comes and files an application, in pursuance of Sec<lb/>tion 10 of chapter X of article IV of an act of the Lsgislature of the State of Missouri,<lb/> entitled, "An act to regulate Banks and Banking Institutions, and to create the Offices<lb/> of Bank Commissioners", approved <date when="1857-03-02">March 2rd, 1857</date>; and, on his motion, the Court<lb/> doth order: that all demands against the <name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name>, under its<lb/> old charter, shall be presented at the counter of the present <name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> at St Louis, or its branches at Palmyra, Fayette, Springfield, or Cape Girardean, prior to<lb/> the <date when="1860-01-01">first day of January, A, D, 1860</date>; and unless thus presented previous to said <date when="1860-01-01">first<lb/> day of January, 1860</date>, such debts and demands of every kind whatever shall be forever<lb/> barred. And it is further ordered by the Court that notice of such limitation and of<lb/> this order shall be given to the creditors of said <name>Bank</name>, by publication in the Weekly<lb/> Missouri Republication, Weekley Missouri Democrat and Weekley St Louis Evening<lb/> News, three newspapers printed and published in the City of St Louis; said notice to<lb/> be so published from the <date when="1858-11-01">first day of November, 1858</date>, until the <date when="1860-01-01">first day of Jan<lb/>uary, 1860</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#261, 26</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William R Martin</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles G Martin</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Jacob Clearwater</name> and<lb/> <name>Hardin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendants, although duly warned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> said attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> sixty one dollars and twenty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominick</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the de<lb/>murrer to the petition herein, and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth sustain the same. Leave is given the<lb/> plaintiff to amend. Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Eimer</name> et al<lb/>839<lb/> <name>M Nolin</name> et al garnishees<lb/> of <name>Beste</name> and <name>Grima</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the answers of the<lb/> garnishees, <name>Prerre A Berthold</name>, <name>Juluis H Smith</name>, <name>Alfred<lb/> C Bernoudy</name>, <name>M Nolan</name> and <name>Daniel McEntire</name>, that<lb/> they are not indebted to the original defendants in any<lb/> sum whatever, it is therefore on motion of the attorney<lb/> for said garnishee, ordered that they be discharged hence at the costs of the plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor. Ten dollars allowed each garnishee for an<lb/>swering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion herein to dismissed and dis<lb/>solve the attachment herein and being thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="148" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0151.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>Withelm Sinisheuer</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> filed herein for additional security on the attachment bond<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth sustain the same.<lb/> Ten days is given the plaintiff to file additional security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Dowthett</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Alonzo Cuther</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> filed herein to the petition and being thereof fully advised, doth<lb/> overrule the same. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>James R Ricords</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> herein for judgment notwithstanding the answer, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same. By leave of<lb/> Court the defendants amend their answer, by striking out the word, "recoupment" wherev<lb/>er the same occurs, and inserting the word, "counterclaim", in lieu thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henritta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John Frederick Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the de<lb/>murrer to the petition herein, and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, doth sustain the same.<lb/> Ten days is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mutual Savings Instutition</name><lb/> vs 605<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer to the petition herein and also the<lb/> motion to strike out said demurrer, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motions, and each of them, be and<lb/> they are hereby overruled. Three days is given the defendants to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Hening</name> et al<lb/> vs 447<lb/> <name>William H Rice</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> for the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Christopher</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, <name>John Christopher</name>,<lb/> by his attorney, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the application and motion of the defendant for<lb/> a rule upon the plaintiff to answer upon oath the interrog<lb/>atories filed herein, doth sustain the same, and doth order that said plaintiff do, on<lb/> or before the first day of the next term of this Court, answer the said interrogatories<lb/> upon oath, and that a Commission to take the oath and signature of said plaintiff<lb/> to the answers he may make, issue herein to the State of New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Corneluis D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion, to strike out parts of the answer herein and<lb/> being fully advised thereof, doth sustain the<lb/> same. Ten days is given the defendants to amend.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="149" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0152.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Myersonal</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by leave of Court, withdraws the motion filed<lb/> herein to strike out parts of the defendants answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>M T W Black</name><lb/> vs 824<lb/> <name>Frederick Dattelwing</name> et al</head>
            <p>On moton of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-25">Monday October 25th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John B Evans</name> having been regularly licensed to practice law in the several Courts<lb/> of this State, it is, on motion of <name>Joseph Jecho</name>, ordered that he be<lb/> admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name> Esquire, Sheriff of St Louis County comes in open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him, as such<lb/> Sheriff, to <name>Lucister Badcock</name> of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property<lb/> of <name>Edward S Wheaton</name> of in and to the following described promises, to wit: a certain<lb/> lot of ground in the City of St Louis containing thirty feet front on the South side of<lb/> Washington Avenue by about one hundred and fifty six feet deep to St Charles, street,<lb/> beginning at a point in the South line of Washington Avenue 31 8-12 feet West of North<lb/> corner of lot sold by <name>John</name> and <name>William Firiney</name>, to <name>Joseph Rowe</name> by deed of <date when="1856-10-11">October 11<lb/> 1856</date>, thence running, West thirty feet, thence South at right angles with Washington av<lb/>enue 156 feet to St Charles street, thence East thirty feet, and thence North to the<lb/> beginning; bounded, North by Washington Avenue, South by St Charles street, East and<lb/> West by property of <name>John</name> and <name>William Finney</name>, together with a new two story dwelling<lb/> house and improvements erected thereon, being the same promises occupied at present<lb/> by said <name>Edward S Wheaton</name>: sold by virtue of six executions, two of which issued<lb/> from the office of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October<lb/> Term, 1858</date>, one in favor of <name>James A Monks</name> and <name>John B Ghio</name> against <name>Edward S<lb/> Wheaton</name> and the other infavor of <name>Joseph Charles</name>, <name>Taylor Blow</name> and <name>William T Blow</name><lb/> against <name>Edward S Wheaton</name>, and the other four issued from the Office of the<lb/> St Louis Circuit Court, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, 1858</date>, three in favor of <name>Henry<lb/> Blakesly</name> against <name>Edward S Wheaton</name> and the other in favor of <name>Leicester Babcock</name><lb/> against <name>Edward S Wheaton</name> and <name>Joseph L Papin</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esquire, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in<lb/> open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> by him, as such Sheriff, to <name>Ewald Massaw</name> of all the right, title, interest, claim,<lb/> estate, and property of <name>Edward Boneau</name> in and to the following described premises,</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="150" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0153.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>to wit: Lots four, five and nineteen (45 and 19) as represented in plot of Belmont<lb/> Place, on file in the Recorders Office of St Louis County, containing each four (4)<lb/> arpents; Sold by virtue of seventeen issued from the Office of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, 1858</date>, in favor of <name>Ewald Massaw</name> against<lb/> said <name>Edward Boneaw</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>George M Moore</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court,<lb/> and acknowledge the execution of a deed of emancipation<lb/> by him to his negro slave, <name>Louisa Overton</name>, of dark mulatto color, eleven years of<lb/> age on the <date when="1858-06-12">twelfth of June eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Patrick T McSherry</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes in open<lb/> Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of eman<lb/>cipation to his negro Slave <name>Charlotte Overton</name>, of dark mulatto color, aged about<lb/> seventeen years and three months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James A Baumgartner</name>, who is known to the Court, comes in open<lb/> Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of<lb/> emancipation to his negro Slave <name>Sarah Overton</name>, of dark mulatto color, aged<lb/> about fourteen years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 163.<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed by defendants <name>John O Mellen</name> and <name>A A K<lb/> Sawyer</name> and also by defendants <name>John D Mellen</name> and <name>Theodore<lb/> Betts</name> to set aside judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> vs 644<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> vs 645<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vital Jarrot</name><lb/> vs 794<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Waters</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Heper</name><lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>George Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominisk</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion, leave is given plaintiff to amend the petition herein<lb/> by changing plaintiffs given name from "<name>John</name>" to "<name>James</name>";<lb/> which amendment is accordingly made; leave is also given to<lb/> plaintiff to withdraw note and protest and same withdrawn. Dedimus awarded<lb/> plaintiff to take depositions in the State of Illinois to be used on the trial<lb/> of this cause.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="151" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0154.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Hamerle</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent<lb/> at defendants consts</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Natala Kahn</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat Orion</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>Thomas Wall</name>, Constable, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that these proceedings be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Lewis</name> et al<lb/> vs 416.<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpin</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> suit be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Washington F Adams</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>Frank V Valle</name> and<lb/> <name>John T Chappell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Daniel</name><lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Thomas F Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Lutee</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> filed herein to strike out the defendants answer and for<lb/> judgment and being thereof fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to<lb/> the petition filed herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same. Ten days is given the defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Car Wheel<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also come a Jury to wit: <name>Charles Harris</name>,<lb/> <name>William Schroeder</name>, <name>William Hunt</name>, <name>William Freiding</name><lb/> <name>Philip Meissinger</name>, <name>Elkanah English</name>, <name>H G Williams</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Tillman</name>, <name>Jacob Lambert</name>, <name>Thomas B Strode</name>, <name>Jacob Blinn</name>, and <name>R H Westcot</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try, the trail progressed and being concluded the Jury return to<lb/> consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="152" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0155.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Davis</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Margaret Davis</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of pub<lb/>lication heretofore made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law; but the defendant, although duly warned and solemnly called<lb/> comes not but makes default, whereof, on motion of said attorney for the plaintiff, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition be taken against her as confessed. Dep<lb/>sitions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#265, 43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Matthews</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph R Matthews</name><lb/> vs 795<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by his attorney<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, whereof, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and sixty five dollars and<lb/> forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Denial of Garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name> et al<lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Charles B Lamb</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Fisher</name><lb/> to<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name></head>
            <p>Assignment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazzard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>B W<lb/> Henley</name> a witness.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="153" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0156.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-26">Tuesday October 26th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gill</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchnan</name> et al<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J Richard Banet</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Philip W<lb/> Snyer</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ira N Stout</name><lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>Edward S Holliday</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Brusmeyer</name><lb/> vs 513.<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> vs 363<lb/> <name>John Bean</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mutual Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 605<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritshle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer to Cross Bill filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emelia Jungst</name> by her next friend<lb/> <name>William Hasslinger</name><lb/> vs 403.<lb/> <name>Albert Jungst</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication heretofore<lb/> made herein has been duly published according<lb/> to law, but the defendant although duly notified and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court, after hearing the<lb/> proof herein being satisfied of the good conduct of the plaintiff and that she is<lb/> an innocent and injured party, doth order, adjudge and decree that she be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> said defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried<lb/> person. It is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs herein and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="154" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0157.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#118, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Prerre Choutean Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>James Harrison</name> and<lb/> <name>Felix Valle</name><lb/> vs 904<lb/> <name>James Rutherford</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, whereof, on motion of said attorney<lb/> for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and eighteen<lb/> dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#364, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brewer</name><lb/> vs 229<lb/> <name>John H Heidemann</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, whereof, on motion of the said<lb/> attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and sixty four dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#136, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekiel W Parsons</name><lb/> vs 236.<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, whereof, on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained<lb/> by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hun<lb/>dred and thirty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#464,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name>, <name>John Pipe</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robinson G Rnenyan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attor<lb/> ney but the defendant <name>Louis A Welton</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, whereof, on motion of the attorney for<lb/> said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and thereupon come the<lb/> defendant, Pipe and Runyan, and waiving a Jury, submit this come the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of<lb/> four hundred and sixty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed, and also its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="155" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0158.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#3791, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name><lb/> <name>William P Finn</name>, <name>William C Woodson</name>,<lb/> <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Philip S Lanham</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert A Walton</name> and <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, and dismisses this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>Robert A<lb/> Walton</name>, and therefore come the other<lb/> defendants, by their attorney, and<lb/> withdraw their answer, and consent<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> the sum of thirty seven hundred and ninety one dollars and fifty cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Cement T Mallory</name></head>
            <p>Trial</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and also a Jury to wit: <name>Ferdin</name> and <name>Schuland</name>,<lb/> <name>F Sesmanns</name>, <name>J W Harris</name>, <name>J B Coursman</name>, <name>H H Sleeth</name>,<lb/> <name>Haudson Vodin</name>, <name>James Wilkinsons</name>, <name>Philips Crow</name>, <name>Henry Dennis</name>, <name>Hartman Herable</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert S Forsythe</name>, and <name>Henry Prirce</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> commenced and being conclude the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Amended answer of <name>Joseph G Shands</name> filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>David Crone</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Joseph W Greene</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security<lb/> for costs in accordance with the order of<lb/> Court heretofore made herein, it is on mo<lb/>tion of the attorney for the defendants, ordered<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Receiver.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that <name>Jacob Drew</name> be and he is hereby ap<lb/> pointed Receiver in this cause to adjust the matters<lb/> involved, subject to the further direction and orders of this Court: and the defen<lb/>dant is hereby required to surrender on oath all the copartnership property books<lb/> notes, accounts, dues, moneys, credits and papers of every description, now in his possession,<lb/> belonging to the firm of <name>Hudson</name> and <name>Pack</name>, to the receiver hereby appointed, and<lb/> to rendered, whenever called upon, a first account of all business transactions of such<lb/> above mentioned firm, as far as the same may have come within his knowledge.<lb/> It is further ordered that said Receiverm before entering on his duties, fil a bond<lb/> with sufficient securities, in the sum of Six thousand dollars, conditioned for<lb/> The faithful performance of his duties.</p>
            <p>The Receiver files a bond conditioned according to law, which is approved<lb/> by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="156" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0159.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Elizabeth Louis</name><lb/> vs 603.<lb/> <name>James C P Lewis</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the return of the Sheriff herein<lb/> that said defendant cannot be served with process, it is on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, ordered that said defendant be<lb/> notified of the commencement of this suit, the object of which is to obtain a divorce from<lb/> him on the grounds of desertion and habitual drunkenness, and that unless he be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for<lb/> the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the Sixth<lb/> day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against him as<lb/> confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the<lb/> Missouri Republication, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis. Amen<lb/>ded petition filed by leave of Court, and cause continued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-27">Wednesday October 27th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p><name>Henry N Hart</name>, assignee, files an Inven<lb/>tory herein, and, on his motion the Court<lb/> appoints <name>Thomas Ryan</name>, <name>Kinneth McKenzie</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry B Belt</name>, and <name>Charles Snell</name> appraisers to appraise the property and effects<lb/> assigned herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Elleard</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons<lb/> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McPheeters</name><lb/> vs 617<lb/> <name>William Wible</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Horst</name><lb/> vs 841<lb/> <name>T W Graewe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#842, 00<lb/> vs<lb/> plaintiff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Car Wheel<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respect<lb/>tive, attorney and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> also came, and the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths afore<lb/>said, find as to the cause of action set out in the petition,<lb/> in favor of the defendant, and as to the counterclaim set out in the answer, find<lb/> against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant and assess the damages at the<lb/> sum of eight hundred and forty two dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said defendant recover of the said plaintiff the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="157" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0160.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>One cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Owens</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and therefore come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Charles Harris</name>, <name>W<lb/> Schroeder</name>, <name>William Hart</name>, <name>William Freiding</name>, <name>Phil Mussinger</name>,<lb/> <name>E English</name> <name>H G Williams</name>, <name>James Shea</name>, <name>Alex Tyler</name>, <name>Charles Duval</name>, <name>Daniel<lb/> Heller</name>, and <name>Jacob Lambert</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial commenced<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of One cent. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff retain possession of the personal<lb/> property delivered to him at the commencement of this suit and also recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#561, 09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> 100<lb/> <name>John Matthews</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and waiving<lb/> a Jury, submits this cause to the Court, and the Court, having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the<lb/> sum of five hundred and eighty one dollars and nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#329,88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> and <name>John D Taylor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name>, <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name>,<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Sullivan</name> and <name>James Waugh</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the parties, by<lb/> their respective attorney, and waiving a<lb/> Jury, submits this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleading and proofs, and the<lb/> Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth find for the plaintiffs and<lb/> assess their damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned<lb/> at the sum of three hundred and twenty nine dollars and eighty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. Motion for new trial and motion in<lb/> arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#487, 54<lb/> Special</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Tillman</name>, <name>Ferdinand Rozier</name>,<lb/> <name>William Fullager</name> and <name>Amadi Berthold</name><lb/> vs 24<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On Note and account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their respective attorney, but the defendant, although,<lb/> duly warned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submits this cause to<lb/> the Court and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition men<lb/>tioned at the sum of four hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifty four<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor<lb/> against the property attached herein at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="158" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0161.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Triplett</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>William C Hull</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Dobyns</name><lb/> 789<lb/> <name>William C Hull</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Baumgarden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick E Baumgarden</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons<lb/> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons<lb/> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3714, 45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Sedgwick</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandemale</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, whereof, on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of thirty seven hundred and fourteen dollars and forty five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 957<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Christopher</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant,<lb/> <name>Joseph Christopher</name>, cannot be found, and the Court being<lb/> satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with pro<lb/>cess, it is, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, ordered that the<lb/> said <name>Joseph Christopher</name> be notified of the commencement of this suit the object of<lb/> which is to recover of the defendants the sum of two hundred and five dollars and<lb/> sixty two cents on account of a certain promissory note executed by the defendant<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name>, dated Rochester <date when="1848-02-19">February 19th, 1848</date>, payable on the <date when="--07-01">first day of July</date><lb/> next thereafter to the order of the said <name>Joseph Christopher</name>, at the <name>Bank of Monroe</name> in the<lb/> City of Rochester, New York, and by said <name>Joseph Christopher</name> endorsed and delivered to<lb/> the plaintiff; and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to<lb/> be begun and holden at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis<lb/> on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> the petition herein the same will be taken against him as confessed It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the Missouri Democrat,<lb/> a newspaper, printed and published in the City of St Louis. Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Catharina Weber</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Christian Weber</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant<lb/> cannot be found, it is therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, ordered that said defendant be<lb/> notified of the commencement of this action the object of which is to obtain a decree<lb/> of divorce from him on the ground of desertion and adultery and that unless he<lb/> be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and hold at the City<lb/> of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of Febru<lb/>ary next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the<lb/> same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis. Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="159" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0162.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#135, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Cement T Mallory</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorney, and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> and the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of one hundred and thirty<lb/> five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney,<lb/> and therefore come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Charles Harris</name>, <name>Wm<lb/> Schreoder</name>, <name>William Hunt</name>, <name>William Freiding</name>, <name>P Meissinger</name>,<lb/> <name>E English</name>, <name>H G Williams</name>, <name>Alexander Tyler</name>, <name>Charles Duval</name>, <name>Daniel Heller</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Lambert</name>, and <name>Jacob Blin</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the issue joined upon the plea in abatement well and truly<lb/> to try, the trial progressed but not being finished at the hour of adjournment further<lb/> proceedings are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Davis</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Margaret Davis</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> on his motion, and the defendant having made default,<lb/> the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, and having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good<lb/> conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party,<lb/> it doth order, adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from the<lb/> bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and be restored to<lb/> all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered that<lb/> the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall Jr</name><lb/> 269<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Now suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Charles Harris</name>,<lb/> <name>William Schreoder</name>, <name>William Hunt</name>, <name>William Freiding</name>,<lb/> <name>Meissinger</name>, <name>E English</name>, <name>H G Williams</name>, <name>James Shea</name>, <name>Alexander Tyler</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> Duval</name>, <name>Daniel Heller</name> and <name>Jacob Lambert</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try<lb/> the trail progressed but before the conclusion thereof the plaintiff says he will not<lb/> further prosecute his suit in this behalf; Wherefore it is ordered that the Jury aforesaid<lb/> be discharged and that said plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf<lb/> but the said defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion to set aside non<lb/> suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to strike out<lb/> parts of the petition and being thereof fully advised doth order that the<lb/> same be overruled. The defendants file a bill of exceptions. The defen<lb/>dants file a motion to compel plaintiff to elect cause of action and submit the<lb/> same to the Court and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same and being<lb/> thereof fully advised doth order that said motion be sustained. Bill of Exceptions filed by plaintiff. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="160" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0163.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Atreas J McCreery</name>, <name>William H Brown</name>,<lb/> and <name>Richard H Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B B Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this suit<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence Wessells</name><lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood</name> and <name>Lynch</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Burke</name> and <name>Walsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wittig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
            <p>Motion filed to dissolve and discharge the order staying execu<lb/>tion filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Devin</name>, <name>Nicholas Butterly</name><lb/> and <name>George Foroyth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> and the garnishees summoned herein be discharged<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue for the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman</name> administration of<lb/> <name>Berson Calvert</name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William F F Denny</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs 918<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpin</name>,<lb/> <name>George J Barnett</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney, and consent and agree that this suit may be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the defendants. It is therefore<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at this costs<lb/> of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Malloy</name><lb/> vs 810<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Mangum</name><lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Michael Mangum</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication Default.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her attorney, comes and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication make herein has been duly pub<lb/>lished according to law; but the defendant although duly warned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="161" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0164.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lessack H Simpson</name> and<lb/> <name>Solomon L Simpson</name><lb/> 706<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Hall</name><lb/> vs 919<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>, <name>John Burnes</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name>, <name>Thomas B Ellis</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry B Ellis</name> &amp; <name>James B Ellis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their re<lb/>spective attorney, and consent and agree that<lb/> this suit may be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> defendants. Wherefore, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at this costs of the<lb/> said defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to Petition filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Frank Carter</name>, (a free man of color) whose identity is proven by the testimony<lb/> of <name>John F Darby</name> and <name>N D Strong</name>, two credible witnesses<lb/> examined on oath, comes and in open Court acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> of emancipation to his slave <name>David Carter</name>.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morro morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-28">Thursday October 28th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in open Court and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as such Sheriff<lb/> to <name>Thomas Rogers</name> of all the right, title, interest, claim estate and property of <name>Paul<lb/> Carlin</name>, <name>Herny Gronheim</name> and <name>John Helgenberg</name>, or either of them, in and to the fol<lb/>lowing described real estate situate lying and being in the County of St Louis,<lb/> State of Missouri, to wit: a certain lot of land situated in block number forty<lb/> one, in the City of St Louis and containing a front on Second Street of forty<lb/> two and a half (42 1/2) feet, and a depth Eastwardly of one hundred and fifty feet<lb/>(150) French measure, bounded on the North by lot now or formerly of <name>Geneviere<lb/> Gates</name>; South by lot now or formerly of one Kleim; West by Second Street,<lb/> and East by lot now or formerly of one <name>Guerette Dument</name>. Also, lying and<lb/> being in <name>Julia C Soulard</name>'s Third addition to the City of St Louis being part<lb/> of lot No 6 in block 117 of said addition; the whole of said lot No 6 containing<lb/> a front of 30 feet in the East side of Washington or Rosatti street, running East<lb/>wardly with the same width 100 feet to an alley 20 feet wide; the past hereby inten<lb/>ded to be conveyed embraces all of said No 6 except 15 feet front on said Washing<lb/>ton or Rosatti street, next adjoining the line of said lot No 6, and running with<lb/> the same width 48 feet, which parcel, together with the privilege to the use of the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="162" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0165.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>well on said lot No 6. Also, a certain price or parcel of land being lot number<lb/> six(6) in block number six(6) of <name>Mary F Glasgow</name>'s subdivision of a portion of <name>Thomas<lb/> Wrights</name> addition to St Louis, reference being had to a plot of said subdivision, on<lb/> record in the County Recorders Office of St Louis County, for a more particular<lb/> description thereof; containing twenty five feet front on Benton street by one hundred<lb/> and twelve feet six inches in depth; bounded South by said Benton street, West by<lb/> lot number seven(7) of said block, north by an alley, East by lot number five(5)<lb/> of said block. Also, the North half of the East half of the North west quarter<lb/> section numbered eleven, in township forty three North, range six East, being in St Louis<lb/> County State of Missouri, and containing forty acres. Also a certain lot of land<lb/> situate in block No forty one of the City of St Louis, and containing a front on Second<lb/> street of forty two and a half (42 1/2) feet and a depth Eastwardly of One hundred<lb/> and fifty feet (150) French measure, bonded on the North by lot now or formerly of<lb/> <name>Genevisve Gates</name>; South by lot now or formerly afone Kleim; West by Second street<lb/> and East by lot now or formerly of one <name>Guerette Duneont</name>, taken as the property<lb/> of <name>Christian Schaffler</name>. Also a certain piece or parcel of ground in City Block 711 and<lb/> described as follows; Beginning at a point in the Northern edge of Emmett street<lb/> sixty five feet Westwardly from the Southeast corner of the aforesaid block; thence<lb/> paralled with Jackson street Northwardly sixty feet; thence Westwardly and parallel<lb/> with said Emmett street fifteen feet; thence Southwardly and parallel with Jackson<lb/> street sixty feet to the Northern edge of said Emmet street; thence Eastwardly<lb/> with the said Northern edge of Emmett street fifteen feet to the place of beginning.<lb/> Also, lot of ground lying and being in the City of St Louis, State of Missouri<lb/> to wit; fronting on Clark Avenue as the same has been extended under the author<lb/>ity of the County Court, beginning at a point in said Avenue one hundred and<lb/> fifty feet West of the West line of Weaver street in block number two; thence West<lb/> wardly with the North line of Clark Avenue fifty feet, thence Southward at right angles<lb/> with said Avenue one hundred and forty two feet six inches to any alley; thence East<lb/>wardly with the North side of said alley fifty feet; thence Northwardly one hundred<lb/> and forty two feet six inches to the place of beginning, and recorded in the Recor<lb/>der's Office of St Louis County in book 160 page 522. Also all the right title interest<lb/> and estate of the said <name>John Helgenberg</name> in and to the following described lot or par<lb/>cel of ground in the City of St Louis and County of St Louis, to wit: a lot of ground<lb/> in said City and County described as follows: Lot numbered one, in block number<lb/> eighty two(82) as mentioned on a plot filed in the Probate Court of St Louis County<lb/> with the report of <name>Philip Tippett</name>, administrator, de bonis non, of the estate of <name>Alex<lb/>ander McAlister</name>, deceased, and situated on the South East corner of said block and<lb/> on the corner of Third and Myrtte streets, being twenty two feet three and a half<lb/> inches in front on Third street, by a depth of one hundred feet to an alley five feet<lb/> in width, and bounded as follows, to wit: on the West by Third street, on the North<lb/> by lot numbered two in said block as returned on said plot on file in said Probate<lb/> Court, and on the East by said alley five feet wide, and being the same property<lb/> which was acquired of said <name>Helgenberg</name> from the said <name>Philip Tippett</name>, administra<lb/>tor as aforesaid by deed dated the <date when="1852-12-15">15th day of December, 1852</date>, as recorded in Book<lb/> T No 6, page 219. Also a certain lot of ground situated in the addition to the<lb/> City of St Louis, in the State of Missouri, made by <name>Thomas Biddle</name>, <name>W C<lb/> C Carr</name> and others, containing about thirty one and a half feet front by one hundred<lb/> and twenty seven and a half feet in the rear; bounded on the South by the line of<lb/> <name>Edward Coles</name>, on the West by Seventh Street, on the North by a part of lot number<lb/> seventeen, and on the East being the rear of an alley fifteen feet wide, being in block</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="163" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0166.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>number one hundred and forty, on the plot of said addition. Also Lots numbered<lb/> thirty six (36) thirty eight (38) and thirty nine (39) in block number two<lb/> (2) of said subdivision; said lots containing an aggregate front on Lux street of<lb/> one hundred (100) feet by a depth each of one hundred and twenty feet to an alley.<lb/> Also a lot of ground described as follows, to wit; Ten certain lots, pieces of parcels of<lb/> ground, situate lying and being in the City of St Louis, State of Missouri, in Kings<lb/>bury's Addition to the City of St Louis, a plot of which said addition is on record<lb/> in the Office of the Recorder for the County of St Louis; said lots are designated on<lb/> said plat as lots numbered one and two, in block one (1) of said addition fronting<lb/> together fifty feet on the Eastern side of Jule street, and running back one hundred<lb/> and twenty six feet and three inches to an alley fifteen feet wide; also, loto twenty<lb/> six, twenty seven, twenty eight, twenty nine, thirty, thirty one, thirty two, thirty three<lb/> in block No one (1) of said addition and fronting together two hundred feet<lb/> on the Western side of McNair Avenue, and running back one hundred and<lb/> twenty six feet and three inches to an alley fifteen feet wide. Sold by virtue of thirteen<lb/> executions, ten of which issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, 1858</date>, of said Court, four of which are in<lb/> favor of <name>Joseph Farrell</name>, one in favor of <name>Charles Balmer</name>, one in favor of <name>David B<lb/> Hill</name>, all against <name>Paul Garlin</name>, <name>John Melgenberg</name> and <name>Henny Gronheim</name>, one other<lb/> of said executions in favor of <name>Joseph Farrell</name> and against <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>John Hel<lb/>genberg</name>, <name>Theodore Wold</name> and <name>Sabastian Erigert</name>; one in favor of <name>David Rokohl</name><lb/> and <name>Jameo Kinkead</name> against: <name>Paul Garlin</name>, <name>John Nelgenberg</name>, <name>Henny Gronhaim</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name>; the other in favor of <name>Stephen Haskell</name> and <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> against <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>Charles Fritz</name> and <name>John Helgenberg</name>. The other three of said<lb/> executions issued from the Office of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, 1858</date>, of said Court one in favor of <name>Learder Laurence</name><lb/> against <name>Paul Garlin</name>, <name>Charles Fritz</name>, <name>John Nelgenberg</name> and <name>Samuel Myenson</name>: one<lb/> in favor of <name>Waldemar Fischer</name> against <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>Henry Gronheim</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> Fritz</name>, and the other in favor of <name>Henry Gildhaus</name> against <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>John Helgen<lb/>berg</name> and <name>Henry Gronheim</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>George N Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benard S Pratte</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Choutean</name> and <name>Edwards</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name> et al<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Replication to Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="164" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0167.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/>vs 161<lb/> <name>Langford</name> &amp; <name>Stephenson</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>Clement P Mallony</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Answer and six Exhibits filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Western Mutual Fire &amp;<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Answer and<lb/> Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sartori</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Samuel T Jacoby</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants<lb/> cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that process<lb/> cannot be served upon them, therefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that they be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against them founded on a note<lb/> for the sum of five hundred and forty six dollars and forty cents, and that their<lb/> property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this<lb/> Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day<lb/> thereof answer the petition herein judgment will be rendered against them and their<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be pub<lb/> lished, according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius Garson</name><lb/> vs 326<lb/> <name>Joseph J Salberg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Ellis</name> and<lb/> <name>John S Cavender</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Henry Almstedt</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>Lafayette Nuckolls</name> and<lb/> <name>Columbus Nuckolls</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Columbus<lb/> Nuckolls</name>, but the defendant, <name>Lafayette Nuckolls</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and sixty six dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant, <name>Lafayette Nuck<lb/>olls</name>, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Peter Wonderly</name> et al vs <name>Jacob Wonderly</name> garns of <name>Gordon</name> et al: Answer of Garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="165" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0168.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Poepping</name><lb/> 781<lb/> <name>Francis Sarignac</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw note sued on, or<lb/> leaving copy. Note withdrawn copy filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#478, 34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph O Sawyer</name>, <name>John M Clarkson</name><lb/> and <name>William H Sawyer</name><lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name> and <name>William Carson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and seventy<lb/> eight dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2655, 92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 744<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> and consent and agree that judgment may be<lb/> rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for the sum<lb/> of twenty six hundred and fifty five dollars and ninety two cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#8602, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 778<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>William C Woodson</name>,<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name>, <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H<lb/> Dorsett</name>, <name>Robert A Walton</name> and <name>John<lb/> McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plain<lb/>tiff, by his attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Robert<lb/> A Walton</name>, and thereupon come<lb/> the other defendants, by their attor<lb/>ney, and withdraw their answer<lb/> and consent and agree with the plaintiff that judgment may be rendered<lb/> herein in favor of said plaintiff for the sum of Eight thousand six hundred<lb/> and two dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered be the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Roy</name> et al<lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Emilius F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attor<lb/>ney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="166" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0169.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respect<lb/>tive attorney, and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come, therefore the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning to ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-29">Friday October 29th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>P G Stiver Perkins</name> having been regularly licensed to practice law in<lb/> the several Courts of this State, it is therefore on<lb/> motion of <name>William C Jamison</name>, ordered that he be admitted and enrolled<lb/> a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Louis G Picot</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Johannes Lorenz</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>Amos Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Charles C Kubler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburg</name><lb/> vs 1030<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Replication to Supplemental answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire &amp; Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer and two exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matilda McDowell</name><lb/> vs 853<lb/> <name>George H McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>George Sparrow</name> vs <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis R R Co</name>: Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="167" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0170.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>John H Fox</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>William M Flaherty</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Richard P Barada</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>Frederick Gelfort</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>Anton G Sell</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 363.<lb/> <name>J D Layton</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Adolph Abeles</name> and <name>J L Taussig</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 434<lb/> <name>J A Ross</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>Thomas C Meyer</name> and <name>Meyer</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>George Lobenhofer</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John W Koeckell</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>T E Robinson</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>Gottfreid Ettman</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 768<lb/> <name>Mattias Kessler</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 427<lb/> <name>Daniel R Garrison</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the above suits be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Francis H Manter</name>.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the defendant and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name> vs <name>D H Armstrong</name>: Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="168" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0171.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Thomas Sproat</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demur<lb/>rer to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>The Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until fourth of November<lb/> next is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until <date when="--11-04">fourth of November</date><lb/> next is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until <date when="--11-04">fourth of November</date><lb/> next is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al<lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until <date when="--11-04">fourth of November</date><lb/> next is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dandridge S Crockett</name><lb/> vs 784<lb/> <name>John S McCune</name> et al</head>
            <p>Statement of <name>T P Shaffner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clark and Bros</name><lb/> vs 791<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name><lb/> vs 553<lb/> <name>Francis Hafelman</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons<lb/> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antomic R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed to substitute <name>T F Smith</name> party plain<lb/>tiff in Lieu of <name>A R McNair</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Car Wheel Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial and affidavit of <name>Sheldon<lb/> Tomlinson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L H Simpson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Branch</name> and <name>Lee</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morris</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Stephen Lee</name>, <name>Peter Lee</name>,<lb/> and <name>Stephen Lee, Junior</name>.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Ryan</name><lb/> vs 971<lb/> <name>Roger C McAllister</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="169" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0172.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Koerner</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Engleman</name><lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>John P Harley</name> and<lb/> <name>Elias Wilmot</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the<lb/> defendants cannot be summoned herein, it is therfore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs attorney ordered that said<lb/> defendants be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commences against them for the sum of four hundred<lb/> and ninety four dollars and forty nine cents on account of professional sevices<lb/> as attorneys at law rendered by the plaintiffs in the years 1855 and 1856 for the<lb/> defendants at their instance and request, and that their property has been attached<lb/> and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth<lb/> Monday of February next and on or before the Sixth day thereof answer the peti<lb/>tion of said plaintiffs judgment will be rendered against them and their prop<lb/>erty sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the St Louis Daily Herald a newspaper printed and<lb/> published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Joseph Ipold</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Albert J Noble</name>, <name>James S Wilaus</name><lb/> <name>Samuel H Smith</name> and <name>George Peisch</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants by<lb/> their attorney, and by leave of Court file<lb/> an amended answer herein thereupon comes<lb/> the plaintiff by his attorney and moves<lb/> to strike out said amended answer, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth overruly the same: and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>William Hart</name>, <name>Thomas B Strode</name>, <name>Fred Schuchard</name>, <name>F Lusman</name>, <name>J W Harris</name>,<lb/> <name>J B Consinau</name>, <name>H Vodin</name>, <name>Jas Wilkenson</name>, <name>Philip Crow</name>, <name>Robert Forsy</name> the<lb/> <name>Henry Price</name> and <name>Henry Dennis</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected, tried and seven the issues herein well and truly to try the trial pro<lb/>gresses but not be finished at the hour of adjournment further proceedings<lb/> herein are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#480, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pennsylvania Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 688<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name>, <name>George Harvey</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin H Wheadon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendants<lb/> by their attorney, and withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein, and thereupon<lb/> comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendants <name>Harvey</name> and n; but the defen<lb/>dant <name>Sanderson</name> failing further to appear and plead herein, it is on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff, ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars and twenty<lb/> nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Crinnion</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel Q Brien</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="170" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0173.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#480, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name>, <name>George Harvey</name><lb/> and <name>Edwin H Wheadon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendants,<lb/> by their attorney, and withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein, and thereupon comes the<lb/> plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Harvey</name> and <name>Wheadon</name>, and the defendant <name>Sander<lb/>son</name> failing to appear and plead further herein, it is, on motion of the attorney for<lb/> the plaintiff, ordered that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and eighty dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant, <name>Sanderson</name>,<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#480, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Fire and Marine Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of Pennsylvania<lb/> vs 690<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name>, <name>George Harvey</name>,<lb/> and <name>Edwin H Wheadon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendants,<lb/> by their attorney, and withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein, and thereupon comes<lb/> the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendants<lb/> <name>Harvey</name> and <name>Wheadon</name>, and the defendant, <name>Sanderson</name>, failing to appear and<lb/> plead further herein, it is, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, ordered that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars<lb/> and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant <name>Sanderson</name> the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#480, 29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Luaker City Insurance Company</name><lb/> of Philadelphia<lb/> vs 691<lb/> <name>Edwin H Wheadon</name>, <name>George Harvey</name>,<lb/> and <name>Samuel S Sanderson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants,<lb/> by their attorneys and withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein, and thereupon comes<lb/> the plaintiff, by its attorney, and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendants,<lb/> <name>Harvey</name> and <name>Wheadon</name>, and the defendant, <name>Sanderson</name>, failing further to appear<lb/> and plead further herein, it is therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred<lb/> and eighty dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant <name>Sanderson</name> the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respect<lb/>tive attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come, and the Jury aforesaid upon their</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="171" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0174.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendant had fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property so as to<lb/> hinder or delay his creditors, at the commencement of this suit. It is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the defendant plead further herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Conway</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Lucinda Hempstead</name>, and <name>Joseph C<lb/> Hempstead</name>, by his guardian, <name>Joseph<lb/> Conway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> <name>Stephen<lb/> Hempstead</name> and <name>John K Hempstead</name>,<lb/> administrator of <name>John Hempstead</name></head>
            <p>In Partition</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit, <name>William Hart</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas B Strodes</name>, <name>R H Westcot</name> <name>Fer<lb/>dimand Schuchand</name>, <name>F Lesman</name>, <name>J W<lb/> Harris</name>, <name>J B Consinaw</name>, <name>H H Sluth</name>,<lb/> <name>H Vodin</name>, <name>Joseph Wilkinson</name>, <name>Philip<lb/> Crow</name>, and <name>Henry Dennis</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly<lb/> to try the following issue submitted to them by consent of parties, to wit:<lb/> "Was <name>John K Hempstead</name> the owner of the slaves <name>George</name> and <name>Jane</name> at the<lb/> commencement of this suit," the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, find the following verdict, to wit;" Upon the<lb/> issue submitted to us we the Jury find that <name>John K Hempstead</name> was not<lb/> the owner of the slaves <name>Jane</name> and <name>George</name>, <name>P Crow</name> foreman". And thereupon<lb/> the Court, from the pleadings and proofs, doth find that <name>John K Hemp<lb/>stead</name>, <name>Stephen Hempstead</name>, <name>Joseph C Hempstead</name>, and <name>Joseph Conway</name> as<lb/> administrator of <name>Lucinda Hempstead</name> are each entitled to one undivided<lb/> fourth parts of the property described in the petition as follows, to wit: <name>Priscilla</name>,<lb/> aged about forty three years, <name>Charles</name>, aged about twenty seven years, <name>George</name>,<lb/> aged about seventeen years, <name>Jane</name>, aged about thirteen years, <name>Mary</name>, aged<lb/> about eleven years, <name>Sarah</name>, aged about nine years, <name>Louisa</name>, aged about eight<lb/> years, <name>David</name>, aged about six years, <name>Henry</name> aged about four years, <name>Lewis</name>,<lb/> aged about ten months. It is therefore considered by the Court that parti<lb/>tion of said property be made amongst the said parties according to their re<lb/>spective rights as ascertained and determined by the Court: and the Court<lb/> appoints <name>William D Sappington</name>, <name>Olley Williams</name> and <name>Edward Lanham</name><lb/> Commissioners to make such partition according to this judgment, and<lb/> they are hereby required to make report of their proceedings to this Court<lb/> without delay.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow<lb/> morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="172" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0175.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-10-30">Saturday October 30th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>Citizens Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Indiana for defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion filed at quash affidavit of <name>Alfred Hall</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Andrews</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>James J Lampton</name></head>
            <p>Replication to answer and counterclaim filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>William H Kelly</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes and in<lb/> open Court acknowledges the execution of a deed of eman<lb/>cipation to his negro slave named <name>Sarah</name>, of black color, surppresed to be<lb/> about fifty five years of age.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sparrow</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion filed at set aside verdict of Jury on plea in<lb/> abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Motion filed to set aside verdict of funny on plea in<lb/> abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rirder</name> and <name>Klein</name><lb/> vs 779<lb/> <name>Patrick E Burke</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Texas for defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Thomas Sproat</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> et al<lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and file<lb/> a petition and thereupon come the defendants, by<lb/> their attorney and enter their appearance to this<lb/> action and waive the issue and service of process,<lb/> wherefore it is ordered by the Court that this cause be docketed as of this<lb/> term. By agreement of parties filed until the <date when="--11-20">twentieth day of November</date><lb/> next is given the defendants to plead herein, and this cause is continued to<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="173" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0176.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Bartlett</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> Steamer Philadelphia</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 875<lb/> <name>John S McCune</name> et al<lb/> garns of <name>City Bank</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file interroga<lb/>tories against <name>John S McCune</name> summoned<lb/> herein as garnishee, it is therefore on motion<lb/> of the attorney for said garnishee, ordered that<lb/> he be discharged hence at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the appli<lb/>cation of the plaintiff for an allowance against the defen<lb/>dant of money to enable her to employ counsel and to pay the costs of<lb/> her suit and also for the temporary support and maintenance of herself<lb/> and her two infant daughters, also children of the defendant, during the pen<lb/>dency of her suit and being thereof fully advised, doth sustain the same,<lb/> but not being sufficiently advised as to the amount to be allowed plaintiff,<lb/> leave is given the parties to file affidavits with reference thereto.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#563, 44</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Taylor</name> and <name>Oscar W Collett</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>George W Morris</name>, <name>August P Guibert</name>,<lb/> <name>Rockwell</name> and <name>J A Inslee</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, and dismiss this<lb/> suit as to the defendants, <name>Rockwell</name><lb/> and <name>Inslee</name>, but the defendants, <name>Morris</name><lb/> and <name>Guibert</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants, Morris and Guibert, are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of five hundred and sixty three dollars and forty four cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in firm aforesaid as found together with interest<lb/> thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2330, 32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name>, <name>Alexis Mudd</name>,<lb/> and <name>Graham L Hughes</name><lb/> vs 493<lb/> <name>William Gayle</name> and <name>Benjamin Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty three hundred and thirty dol<lb/>lars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="174" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0177.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Joseph Ipold</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Albert J Noble</name>, <name>James S Wilgus</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel H Smith</name> and <name>George<lb/> Peisch</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> and being finished, the Jury retire to<lb/> consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-01">Monday November 1st 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peckham Barker and Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of copartnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Fuller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Rees</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff withdraws the depositions<lb/> filed in this cause in his behalf.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Woardman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>,<lb/> <name>August Fritschle</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Vilkington</name></head>
            <p><name>James S Dougherty</name>, Esg, comes in open<lb/> Court and files a Power of Attorney from the<lb/> plaintiff to him, and, by virtue of the authority<lb/> thereby confessed, acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment ren<lb/>dered herein for the sum of Six hundred and forty dollars and fifty five cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Guillaume</name> et al<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiffs to withdraw the note sued<lb/> on, on leaving copy. Note withdrawn, copy filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cottinet</name> et al<lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiffs to withdraw the note sued on,<lb/> on leaving copy. Note withdrawn, copy filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh McKelvy</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff amends his petition herein by chang<lb/>ing plaintiffs given name from "<name>Henry</name>" to "<name>Hugh</name>." Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="175" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0178.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Assignment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward C Sloan</name><lb/> vs 883.<lb/> <name>James C Parks</name> et al</head>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this suit it is ordered that<lb/> it be continued at the costs of the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Sturdy</name> et al<lb/> vs 913.<lb/> <name>Lewis Palmer</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Hauel</name><lb/> vs 927<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J King</name><lb/> vs 1028<lb/> <name>Findley Robb</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Charles Harpikh</name> et al</head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the answer of the gar<lb/>nishee herein that he is not indebted to the defendants<lb/> in any sum whatever, wherefore, on motion of the attorney<lb/> for said garnishee, it is ordered that he be discharged<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. Ten dollars is<lb/> allowed garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Ombray</name> or <name>Soulouyue</name><lb/> vs 687<lb/> <name>Joseph Vanelaine</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, and<lb/> the plaintiff having failed to file security for costs<lb/> as he was required to do, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and the execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Olden</name><lb/> vs 99<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiff and the execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>Carl Glaenzer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by its attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties <name>Mary B Stewart</name> is substituted<lb/> as a party plaintiff in lieu of <name>Adam D Stewart</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="176" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0179.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#163, 17</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley J Alkire</name>, <name>Norwell J Calhoun</name>,<lb/> and <name>Josiah Alkire</name><lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>James Reed</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, sub<lb/> mit this cause to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth find for the plaintiffs and assess<lb/> their damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at<lb/> the sum of One hundred and sixty three dollars and seventeen cents. It is<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also their also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name>, <name>Tresten Polk</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph O'Neil</name>, <name>Peter B Garesche</name>,<lb/> and <name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>William Provost, Senior</name>, <name>William<lb/> Provost Junior</name>, <name>Toussaint Racine</name>.<lb/> Guardian of <name>William Provost, Junior</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Gamache</name>, and <name>Thomas<lb/> Leitensdofer</name>, his guardian, and<lb/> <name>Peter Delore</name> and <name>Marie</name>, his wife</head>
            <p>In Partition.</p>
            <p>And now at this day, the Court, being fully<lb/> advised of and concerning the premises, this<lb/> cause having been heretofore submitted to the<lb/> Court, doth ascertain and determine that the<lb/> parties plaintiffs and defendants are the owners<lb/> of the real estate described in plaintiffs petition<lb/> in this cause as follows, to wit; situate lying and<lb/> being in the County of St Louis aforesaid, to wit:<lb/> first, a tract of land of one and a half arpens in<lb/> front from North to South and twenty arpens in<lb/> depth from East to West situate in the Common Fields of Carondelet being the<lb/> East half of the tract confirmed to <name>John Baptiste Gamache, Jr</name>, under <name>Gregoire Sarpy</name><lb/> and known as United States Survey number eighty eight, (88). Secondly, a piece of<lb/> land situated in the Commons of St Louis in front of and adjoining the tract first<lb/> above described on the East containing one acre and forty three hundredths of an<lb/> acre and being the same piece or parcel of ground which was conveyed by the City<lb/> of St Louis to <name>John Baptiste Gamache</name> under the name of <name>Baptiste Gamache</name>, by<lb/> deed dated <date when="1839-01-19">February 19th, 1839</date>, recorded in the office of the Recorder of St Louis<lb/> County in book H 2 pages 582 &amp;e; and the Court doth further ascertain and de<lb/>termine the respective rights and interests of said parties and their shares and pro<lb/>portions in said real estate as follows, to wit: the plaintiff <name>Peter J Hurck</name> is entitled<lb/> to two undivided one hundred and forty fourths of said two pieces of land; that<lb/> the plaintiff <name>Trusten Polk</name> is entitled to one undivided one hundred and forty fourth<lb/> part of said two pieces of land; that the plaintiffs <name>Peter B Garesche</name> and <name>Joseph<lb/> O Neil</name> are together entitled to four undivided one hundred and fort fourths there<lb/>of; that the plaintiff <name>John C Ivory</name> is entitled to fifty three undivided one hun<lb/>dred and forty fourths thereof, in fee, and to a life estate for the life of <name>Frances<lb/> Vrin Gamache</name>, she remaining a widow, in the remaining eighty four one hundred<lb/> and forty fourths thereof; and that, subject to the said life estate in said <name>Ivory</name>,<lb/> the defendants <name>Marie Delore</name>, wife of <name>Peter Delore</name>, and <name>Edward Gamache</name> are<lb/> each entitled to twenty eight undivided one hundred and forty fourths thereof; and<lb/> that, subject likewise to said life estate, the defendant <name>William Provost, Senior</name>, as<lb/> coheir with <name>William Provost, Junior</name>, in the interest of his deceased children is<lb/> entitled to eight undivided one hundred and forty fourths thereof; and, subject<lb/> to the same life estate, the said <name>William Provost, Jr</name>, is entitled to twenty undivided<lb/> one hundred and forty fourths thereof.</p>
            <p>The Court doth therefore order adjudge and decree that partition of said two</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="177" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0180.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>tracts of land be made among said owners according to their respective rights<lb/> and interest as above ascertained and determined.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#232, 34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs 533.<lb/> <name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the pleadings and proofs<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and thirty two dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#140, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Joseph Ipold</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Albert J Noble</name>, <name>James S Wilaus</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel H Smith</name> and <name>George Peisch</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the Jury em<lb/>pannelled and sworn herein also come, and<lb/> the Jury aforesaid upon their afths aforesaid<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess the damages<lb/> at the sum of One hundred and forty dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#141, 52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> and <name>Frederick Welcker</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hun<lb/> dred and forty one dollars and fifty two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#255, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester Harding Jr</name><lb/> assignees of <name>Charles Rogers</name>, <name>James S Anderson</name>,<lb/> and <name>William L Salisbury</name><lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name>, <name>Christian Pullis</name>, <name>John<lb/> Pullis</name> and <name>Thomas R Pullis</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and thereupon come<lb/> also a Jury, to wit: <name>George Muller</name>, <name>James<lb/> Kary</name>, <name>Joseph Gocken</name>, <name>Charles F Holsle</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Fox</name>, <name>A McLane</name>, <name>Henry Thole</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter Geiner</name>, <name>Robert M Cormick</name>, <name>Christian<lb/> Schaeffer</name>, <name>F Dickman</name> and <name>John Betts</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the tual<lb/> progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for<lb/> the defendant Watson and further fine for the plaintiffs and against the other<lb/> defendants and assess the damages at the sum of two hundred and fifty five<lb/> dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf against the defendant <name>William B</name></p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="178" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0181.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Watson</name> but that the said defendant go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiffs his costs herein expended, and that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendants, <name>Christian Pullis</name>, <name>John Pullis</name> and <name>Thomas R Pullis</name>, the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#192, 99</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Barkley</name><lb/> vs 941<lb/> <name>Henry Wiesen</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of One hundred and ninety two dollars and ninety nine cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James H Carlisle</name>, Esq, announces to the Court the death of <name>Robert<lb/> H Richards</name>, later a member of the St Louis Bar, and<lb/> on his motion it is ordered that the following Resolutions passed at a meeting held<lb/> by the members of the St Louis Bar be spread upon the record of this day and<lb/> that the Court do now adjourn in respect to the memory of the deceased:</p>
            <p>"Whereas, the members of the St Louis Bar have this day heard with deep regret of<lb/> the death of their brother, <name>Robert H Richards</name>, and are desirous of paying a just<lb/> tribute of respect to his memory; therefore,</p>
            <p>Resolved, That in the death of <name>Robert H Richards</name> the Bar has lesta worthy and<lb/> intelligent member, the community a good citizen and his family and his family<lb/> and friends a kind and affectionate and companion.</p>
            <p>Resolved, That during the sojurn of the deceased among us, we witnessed in him or<lb/> bright and shining example before his young brethren of the Bar, that did honor to his<lb/> profession, which by his sudden death has been to us an irreparable loss.</p>
            <p>Resolved, That in this afflictive dispensation we recognize one of the most mysterious<lb/> workings of Divine Providence, who doeth all things well.</p>
            <p>Resolved, That we deeply sympathize with the family of the deceased in this severe<lb/> affliction, which has so suddenly overtaken them.</p>
            <p>Resolved, That as a mark of respect we will wear the usual badge of mourning for<lb/> thirty days, and as a further mark of respect to the deceased we will attend the funeral in a body".</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="179" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0182.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-02">Tuesday November 2nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dissolve injunction filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ricords</name> and <name>Smithers</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name> et al<lb/> vs 898<lb/> <name>Charles W Herbert</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loring P Hawes</name> et al<lb/> vs 1027<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name> garns<lb/> of <name>James H Parker</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A C Paxson</name><lb/> vs 1031<lb/> <name>J P M Howard</name> garns<lb/> <name>J S Haskell</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Wright</name><lb/> vs 1029<lb/> <name>Charles K Dickson</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Danl D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall Jr</name><lb/> vs 1025<lb/> <name>The St Louis &amp; Iron<lb/> Mountain R R Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T M Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 1021<lb/> <name>John Arnold</name> et al garns of<lb/> <name>Rockwell &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley J Alkire</name> et al<lb/> vs 1024<lb/> <name>Frederick Nagel</name> et al<lb/> garnishees</head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al<lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>John Baker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Merrick</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order of<lb/> Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Auferheife</name><lb/> vs 968<lb/> <name>Caspar Auferheide</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name> et al<lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>St Louis Floating Dock &amp; Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs 635<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matilda McDowell</name><lb/> vs 853.<lb/> <name>George H McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs 966<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel C Meyers</name><lb/> vs 920<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Collier White Lead and<lb/> Oil Company</name><lb/> vs 1023<lb/> <name>Charles Blow &amp; Co</name> garns of <name>Keller</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thompson Stout</name><lb/> vs 830<lb/> <name>Anthony L Knapp</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Witting</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="180" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0183.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the plaintiffs<lb/> motion to strike out parts of the answer herein and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phabe Broadley</name><lb/> vs 95<lb/> <name>Samuel Broadly</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plain<lb/>tiif and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucinda Hempstead</name>'s adm et al<lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#86, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William R Martin</name> and <name>Charles G Martin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert P Hall</name> and <name>Eustace H Smith</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Clearwater</name> &amp; <name>Hardin</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come as well<lb/> the plaintiffs as the garnishees,<lb/> and it appearing to the Court<lb/> from the answer of said garni<lb/>shees that at the time they were summoned herein as such they had in their<lb/> possession belonging to the said defendants the sum of Eighty six dollars and fifteen<lb/> cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> garnishees the sum aforesaid as confessed and have execution therefore, and the out<lb/> of said sum of the plaintiffs pay the costs as well of the original suit as of this proceeding.<lb/> Ten dollars allowed garnishees for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1685, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name>,<lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name>.<lb/> vs 285<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Johnson</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/> debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Sixteen hundred and eighty five dollars<lb/> and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as founded and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1171, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name>, <name>Francis Webster</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry T Darrah</name>, <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name><lb/> and <name>Charles W Hebert</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff,<lb/> its attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Hebert</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; thereupon come the other defendants, by their attorney, and neither party<lb/> requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court finds from<lb/> the pleadings and proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="181" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0184.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the sum of Eleven hundred and seventy one dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the form aforesaid by the Court found and also its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#681, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name>, <name>Augustus S Mermod</name><lb/> and <name>D Constant Jaccord</name><lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>Alexander M Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Six hundred and eighty<lb/> one dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#276, 74</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Franklin Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 923<lb/> <name>Samuel Sides</name>, <name>John Valentine</name>,<lb/> and <name>Sigismund Hirschfeld</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Samuel Sides</name>, but the other defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and seventy six dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said as founded and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#387, 66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis V Bogy</name>, <name>Eugene Mithenberger</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Poultherer</name><lb/> vs 877<lb/> <name>William M Tompkins</name> and <name>David D Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and eighty seven<lb/> dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as founded and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 974<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Holmes</name></head>
            <p>This Court having no jurisdiction in this cause, it is, on mo<lb/>tion of <name>Charles G Mauro</name>, Circuit Attorney, ordered that<lb/> the transcript herein be returned to the Clerk of the St Charles Circuit Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 973.<lb/> <name>Margaret Holmes</name></head>
            <p>This Court having no jurisdiction in this cause, it is, on motion of<lb/> <name>Charles G Mauro</name>, Circuit Attorney, ordered that the transcript<lb/> herein be returned to the Clerk of the St Charles Circuit Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="182" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0185.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al assignees of<lb/> <name>Rogers Anderson and Company</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Stipulation of parties filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thounburgh</name><lb/> vs 1030<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> and <name>R P Voorhies</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Andrew L Whitley</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff<lb/> the garnishees by their attorneys and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the pleadings<lb/> and proofs that the garnishees are not indebted to the defendants in any sum what<lb/>ever. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his<lb/> suit in this behalf but that the said garnishees go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor<lb/> Twenty five dollars allowed garnishees for answering and appearing herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-03">Wednesday November 3rd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Rainey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Christy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for plantiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws the motion for security for costs<lb/> filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh McKelvy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the continuance herein be set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Phillips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="183" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0186.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>Beard</name> and <name>Brother</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State to use of <name>Peter J Peters</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>Luther M Shreve</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al assignees &amp;c<lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al assignees &amp;c<lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teerteberg</name><lb/> vs 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> security for costs herein doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Sinisheuser</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file additional security in<lb/> the attachment bond herein within the time required for him<lb/> as to do, it is therefore on motion of the defendant by his<lb/> attorney, ordered by the Court that this suit be dismisses at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion, leave is given the plaintiff to amend the petition<lb/> herein by erasing the words "and before the maturity of said<lb/> note." on the first page of the petition. Amendment made.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Dowthett</name><lb/> vs 503.<lb/> <name>Alonzo Cutler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, <name>Alonzo Cutler</name>, <name>Henry T Darrah</name> and <name>Chester W<lb/> Pomeroy</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs 668<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> and <name>Washington<lb/> M Olmstead</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Louis Olmstead</name>.</head>
            <p>Default. Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, <name>Halliday</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Sheriff having made<lb/> return that the defendant, <name>Washington M Olmstead</name>, cannot be found, and<lb/> the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon him, it is therefore<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, ordered that he be notified that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against him founded on a note for the sum</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="184" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0187.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of three hundred dollars, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the Coun<lb/>ty of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third<lb/> day thereof answer the petition herein the same will be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the<lb/> Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name> of Pennsylvania<lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>The Court, having duly heard and considered the<lb/> plaintiffs motion to strike out the answer and for<lb/> judgment, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza M Perry</name> et al<lb/> vs 73.<lb/> <name>Mason Frissell</name> et al</head>
            <p>In Partition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles D Drake</name>, and files his<lb/> Sixth Report as Commissioner herein showing the payments<lb/> made by him to the parties herein, in pursuance of the order<lb/> of payment made on the <date when="1857-05-18">Eighteenth day of May, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>,<lb/> and also the payment by him into the St Louis Court of Common Pleas as garnishee<lb/> of <name>John P Malquire</name>, of the sum of three hundred and thirty eight dollars and<lb/> six cents, due to said <name>McGuire</name>, as stated in said <name>Drake</name>'s First Report herein;<lb/> and the said <name>Drake Mores</name> the Court to confirm his said Sixth Report, and the<lb/> Court having examined said Report and the vouchers therewith filed, doth ascertain<lb/> and adjudge that said <name>Drake</name> has paid the sums of money to the several parties<lb/> named in said order of payment as therein directed, and also the said sum due<lb/> to said <name>McGuire</name> as aforesaid; it is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court<lb/> that said Sixth Report of said Commissioner be approved and confirmed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> In 299<lb/> <name>Partition</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles D Drake</name>, and files<lb/> his Fourth Report as Commissioner herein showing the<lb/> payments made by him to the parties in this cause, of the<lb/> several amounts due to them, as stated in his Third Report filed herein on the<lb/> <date when="1857-03-23">twenty third day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, and moves the<lb/> Court to confirm said payments, and the Court having examined said Report<lb/> and the vouchers therewith filed, doth ascertain and adjudge that said <name>Drake</name><lb/> has paid the sums of money to the several parties named in said <name>Drake</name><lb/> has paid the sums of money to the several parties named in said Third Re<lb/>port: it is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that said Fourth Report<lb/> of said Commissioner be approved and confirmed: and it appearing to the Court<lb/> that said <name>Drake</name> has fully performed his duty as Commissioner in this cause,<lb/> it is further ordered that he be discharged as such Commissioner.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="185" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0188.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-04">Thursday November 4th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>Globe Mutual Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccord</name> et al<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>Alexander M Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Whiting</name> and <name>Hitchcock</name><lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumbermen and<lb/> Mechanics Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 32<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Terre Haute<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phils C Calhoun</name> et al<lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>John W Burd</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> suit be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luttercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of the defendant to refer this cause to a referee and being<lb/> thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p><name>Henry N Hart</name>, Esq, assignee herein files<lb/> a bond in the sum of Eighty four thousand<lb/> dollars with <name>James Signiago</name>, <name>Samuel Hale</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Winkelmaier</name>, <name>William O Shands</name>, <name>Josephus W Hall</name>, and <name>John A<lb/> Watson</name>, as securities, which is approved by the Court. And, on motion of said<lb/> assignee, the Court doth order that the personal property and effects assigned be sold<lb/> by said assignee at private sale during the next thirty days and that the<lb/> balance of said personal property and effects remaining unsold at the expira<lb/>ton of thirty days be sold at public sale for cash. It is further ordered that<lb/> the real estate assigned be sold at public auction, on the following terms, to wit:<lb/> One third of the purchase money to be paid in cash, and the balance in equal<lb/> instalments payable in one and two years from the date of sale; deferred pay<lb/>ments to bear six per cent interest from the date of sale, to be secured by deep of<lb/> trust on the real estate sold.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="186" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0189.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion herein to strike out parts of the defendants an<lb/> swer and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> the same be overrulled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator of the<lb/> estate of <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and <name>Susan<lb/> Bernicker</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>The application of the plaintiffs petition having<lb/> been considered by the Court and the Court<lb/> being fully advised thereof, it is ordered, that<lb/> the said <name>John L Bernicker</name> and <name>Susan Ber<lb/>nicker</name>, and each of them, their servants, agents,<lb/> and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined from collecting or in any wise dispo<lb/>sing of any interest in and to any part of the note due from <name>Dietrich Schuh<lb/>macker</name> to said <name>Susan Bernicker</name>; and from collecting or receiving any rents and<lb/> profits whatsoever from the following described leasehold property or any part thereof,<lb/> to wit: a certain leashold estate granted to the said <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased by <name>John<lb/> O Fallon</name> for ten years with the right of renewal for ten years more at its expiration,<lb/> sometime in the end of the year Eighteen hundred and forty two, in and to a certain<lb/> parcel of ground in the City of St Louis situated on Franklin Avenue between Eighth<lb/> and Ninth streets on the North side of the avenue having a front of ninety eight feet<lb/> on the Avenue to about one hundred feet in depth Northwardly, and to be in<lb/> Block Number two hundred and fifty four of said City of St Louis, and to be the<lb/> South West corner of the East half of said block; and also from collecting or receiving<lb/> any rents or profits upon two brick houses situated on the premises herein described<lb/> from any tenant or tenants thereof, and also from in any wise interfering or inter<lb/>meddling with said leasehold property or disposing thereof in whole or in part by sub<lb/>vided, however, that the said <name>George Lock</name> first execute a bond to the said <name>John L<lb/> Bernicker</name> and <name>Susan Bernicker</name> in the sum of one thousand dollars with sufficient<lb/> security conditioned according to law. The plaintiff files a bond with <name>George Werner</name>,<lb/> as security which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann J Hasebrock</name><lb/> vs 119<lb/> <name>Hubertine F Hasebrock</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of pub<lb/>lication heretofore made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law; but the defendant although duly warned and solemnly called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against her as confessed: and<lb/> the Court after hearing the proof herein, being satisfied of the good conduct of the<lb/> plaintiff and that be is an innocent and injured party doth order adjudge and<lb/> decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by him contracted with the said defendant and be restored to all the rights and<lb/> privileges to an unmarried person. It is further ordered that the said plaintiff pay<lb/> the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#173, 62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> and <name>Daniel Killion</name><lb/> vs 476<lb/> <name>Patrick Reilly</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and submit to the Court</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="187" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0190.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the motion of the plaintiffs to strike out the answer herein and for judgement, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth sustain the same: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of One hundred and seventy three dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten 0'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-05">Friday November 5th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Augustus W Alexander</name> is, on motion of <name>James C Jones</name>, admitted and en<lb/>rolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lissack H Simpson</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Branch</name> and <name>Lee</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress deposition of <name>William B Langley</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use of use <name>Ipold</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Albert J Noble</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Richardson</name><lb/> vs 323.<lb/> <name>William P Howard</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Bt W M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Brown Goddin and Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R Thornburg</name><lb/> vs 1030<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial and to retax costs allowed garnishees<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs by their attorney, come and withdraw their<lb/> motion to strike out the answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> vs 879<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to<lb/> the petition herein and being thereof fully advised, doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="188" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0191.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Louis Engle</name> decd.<lb/>76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and<lb/> <name>Susan Bernicker</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Receiver.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, <name>Frederick<lb/> W Engel</name> is appointed Receiver of the rents and profits<lb/> accruing and to accrue upon the property mentioned and<lb/> described in the plaintiffs petition; and the said receive<lb/> is hereby required, before entering upon the discharge of<lb/> his duties, to file a bond in the sum of five thousand dollars, with good and suf<lb/>ficient security, conditioned according to law. The said Receiver files an affidavit and<lb/> also a bond with <name>George Lich</name>, as security, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Foy</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John Wasson</name> et al</head>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new<lb/> trail herein and being thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D S Haslett</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> strike out the reply herein and bring thereof fully advised, doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Phillips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>The court having dual heard and considered the de<lb/> murrer to the counterclaim herein and being thereof fully<lb/> advanced, doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> et al</head>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to strike out the answer of the defendant, <name>Alexander</name>, and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer to the<lb/> petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth sustained the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Goldsmith</name> et al<lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trail herein and being thereof fully advised,<lb/> doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 09<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, comes and confesses the truth of<lb/> the demurrer herein, and by consent of parties, ten days is<lb/> given said plaintiff to file an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Cannon</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> submit to the Court the motion to strike out the answer, herein,<lb/> and the Court, having duly heard and considered the said<lb/> motion, doth sustain the same; and the defendants failing further to<lb/> plead herein, it is, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney, ordered that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="189" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0192.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Kramer</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph Loth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David P Thomas</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs for an order on the Sheriff to pay over<lb/> money, and being thereof fully advised doth order that said<lb/> motion be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Richards</name><lb/> vs 778<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> strike out parts of the answer herein doth sustain the same. Six<lb/> days is given defendant to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name> et al<lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Charles B Lamb</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled. Agreement as to costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2651, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 888<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendant and file a state<lb/> ment in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby they<lb/> confess themselves indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> twenty six hundred and fifty one dollars and eighty four<lb/> cents. and authorize the Court to render judgment against them for that amount.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Order of Production of Papers.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit wherein he prays<lb/> for an order on the defendant to produce certain papers therein<lb/> named, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the come, doth order<lb/> that the said defendant produce forthwith, to be used in the trail of this cause,<lb/> the following papers, to wit: a certain deed made and executed on the <date when="1857-05-15">fifteenth day<lb/> of May, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, between <name>Zebb Ward</name> and <name>Mary E<lb/> Ward</name>, his wife and <name>J J Page</name> and <name>Martha C Page</name>, his wife, of the first part, and<lb/> <name>A Becker</name>, of the second part, being a conveyance from said parties of the first part<lb/> to said said party of the second part of "the North West half of the first part<lb/> in block sixty five fronting twenty five feet on Main Street and running back<lb/> one hundred and forty feet on Sixth street in the City of Keoruk, County of Lee<lb/> and State of Jowa;" also a letter from <name>H R Reeder</name> to said <name>A Becker</name> bearing<lb/> date <date when="1858-02-27">February twenty second, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1990. 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McCord</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of plaintiff to strike out the answer herein and for judgment</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="190" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0193.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>doth sustain the come: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Nineteen hundred and ninety dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#478, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton</name>,<lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> vs 657<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name>, <name>George Smizer Jr</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Smizer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney<lb/> and dismiss this suit as to <name>William Smizer</name>, but the<lb/> other defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and seventy eight dollars and ten cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest<lb/> at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#265, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Mohrman</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>George Ridinour</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>Thomas Lumley</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Peyinghous</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and solemnly called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the attor<lb/>ney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#372, 83</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 749<lb/> <name>John A Smithers</name><lb/> and <name>George W Sherick</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant <name>Sherrick</name>, but the defendant, <name>Smithers</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is or<lb/> dered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant, <name>Smithers</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> two dollars and eighty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="191" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0194.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-06">Saturday November 6th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>William Carey Jones</name> is, on motion of <name>Chester Harding, Jr</name>, admitted and enrolled<lb/> as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry E Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Corneliues Tunison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>Lydia M Rector</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Hogan</name> and <name>Garnier</name> to second amended<lb/> petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Charles D Colman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Q Cannon</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion of set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Jessee Arnol</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion herein<lb/> for security for costs and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained. Ten days is given the plaintiff to file<lb/> such security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>Alexander M Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> herein for a new trial and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sparrow</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion herein to strike out parts of the answer herein<lb/> and being thereof fully advised doth sustained the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the mo<lb/>tion for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambsgaust</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Garnishees discharged.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has failed<lb/> to file interrogatories herein against the garnishee the <name>United<lb/> States Savings Institution</name> and the <name>Peoples Savings Institu<lb/>tion</name> within the time prescribed by law, it is therefore, on motion of <name>Henry N Hart</name>, their<lb/> attorney, ordered that they be discharged at the costs of said plaintiff and the five<lb/> dollars be allowed each garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="192" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0195.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that<lb/> the Clerk of this Court file the affidavit of <name>Albert Hall</name><lb/> and the copy of the petition served on <name>Albert Billings</name>, "nunc pro<lb/> tune", as of the <date when="1858-08-13">thirtieth day of August eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, which is<lb/> accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfried Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the mo<lb/>tion herein for a new trial and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Domnick</name><lb/> vs 362.<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer herein to the amended petition and<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William McDonald</name> et al<lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Bathimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bod Kins</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> herein to strike out the defendants answer and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cortez Crocker</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Eleazer Sherman</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants<lb/> motion to dismiss this suit and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth overrule the same. By leave of Court the defendants files<lb/> an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lissack H Simpson</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>Robert M Branch</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, comes and withdraws the<lb/> motion to suppress depositions herein, and by consents of<lb/> parties the cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the de<lb/>murrer to the petition and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth overrule the same as to the first Court of the peti<lb/>tion and doth sustain the same as to the second Count of the petition. On mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given to amend the petition herein<lb/> by striking out all that part around which black lines are drawn, which includes<lb/> all after words "said contract and said report of said <name>Wentz</name> as such engineer<lb/> are herewith filed" down to signature of counsel; which amendment is made.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Steinacker</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come <name>R D Van Nostrand</name><lb/> and <name>James Clark</name>, assignees of <name>Joseph Steinacker</name></p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="193" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0196.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and present to the Court their application in this behalf and pray the Court<lb/> that they be relieved from their bonds and to surrender their trust as such<lb/> assignees; Whereupon it is ordered by the Court that said application be referred<lb/> to <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, Esquire, an attorney of this Court, as a Commissioner<lb/> appointed by the Court for this case, to examine the merits of the said appli<lb/>cation and report to the Court with all convenient speed thereon. Report of<lb/> Commissioner filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1320, 02.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name><lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> vs 163.<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name>, <name>John D Mellen</name>, <name>Joshua<lb/> Jackson</name>, <name>John O Mellen</name> and <name>A A<lb/> Sawyer</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> and the defendants, <name>Theodore Betts</name>,<lb/> <name>John D Mellen</name>, <name>A A K Sawyer</name>, and<lb/> <name>John O Mellen</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and submit to the Court<lb/> the motions of said defendants to set<lb/> aside the judgment herein and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the said motions and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same be<lb/> sustained; thereupon the plaintiffs dismiss this suit suit as to the defendants<lb/> <name>John D Mellen</name>, <name>Joshua Jackson</name> and <name>A A K Sawyer</name>, but the other defendants<lb/> having failed to answer the amended petition herein, it is on motion of the<lb/> attorney for said plaintiffs, it is ordered that the said amended petition<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instu<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>Theodore<lb/> Betts</name> and <name>John O Mellen</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of thirteen<lb/> hundred and twenty dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>William White</name><lb/> and <name>Hiram A Pryor</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of <name>Thompson</name>, <name>White</name> and <name>Pryor</name><lb/> against <name>James Castello</name> late Sheriff of the County of St Louis.<lb/> Upon reading the affidavit of <name>John S<lb/> Thompson</name> and hearing the counsel of both parties,<lb/> It is ordered that the said <name>James Castello</name>, late<lb/> Sheriff of the County of St Louis, shall on the thirteenth instant pay over to the<lb/> said plaintiffs <name>Thompson White</name> and <name>Pryor</name>, or their attorney of record, out of the<lb/> proceeds arising from the sale of the property attached in this case the amount of the<lb/> judgment recovered by said plaintiffs against said defendant at the present term of<lb/> this Court, with interest, damages and costs, or that on the said day the said <name>James Castello</name><lb/> show cause to the contrary.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard P Haren Kamp</name> and <name>William B Hynes</name>.<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of <name>Herenkamp</name> and <name>Hynes</name> against<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> late Sheriff of the Court of St Louis.<lb/> Upon reading the affidavit of <name>William R Hynes</name> and<lb/> hearing the counsel of both parties, It is ordered that the said <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County shall on the thirteenth instant pay over to the said plaintiffs, <name>Herenkamp</name> and <name>Hynes</name>,<lb/> or their attorney of record, out of the proceeds arising from the sale of the property attached in this<lb/> case the amount of the judgment recovered by said plaintiffs against said defendant, at the<lb/> present term of this Court, or that on the said day the said <name>James Castello</name> show<lb/> cause to the contrary.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="194" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0197.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Rogers and Company</name> assignees<lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>Christian Pullis</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-08">Monday November 8th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al<lb/> garns of <name>McDonald</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exceptions to answer of <name>Charles D Colman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Gearhart</name> et al<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>State Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Durand Carter and Co</name><lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan and Co</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of part<lb/>nership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> et al<lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given the<lb/> Sheriff to amend his return on the Summons issued<lb/> in this cause so as to conform to the facts; which amend<lb/>ment is accordingly made immediately after the first<lb/> return of the said Sheriff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer<lb/> herein to the petition and being thereof fully advised, doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the moton<lb/> herein for a new trial and also the motion in arrest of<lb/> judgment, and being thereof fully advised, doth order<lb/> that the said motions, and each of them, be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Hall</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that leave be given him to withdraw the note<lb/> sued on, on leaving copy. Note withdrawn and copy filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="195" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0198.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitor for<lb/> #231, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Car Wheel<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, by his attorney,<lb/> and remits the sum of two hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--10-27">twenty<lb/> seventh day of October</date> last past; and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hout</name> and<lb/> <name>George Cotton Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Lansing</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears that<lb/> the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein<lb/> will be attended with much expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered<lb/> that said Sheriff proceed to sell said property according to law; and that he make<lb/> a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garnesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name> et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administration of<lb/> <name>James Brenon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs it is ordered that the Judge of<lb/> the Probate Court for St Louis County pro<lb/>duce, forthwith, to be used in the trial of<lb/> this cause a certain paper purporting to be the Will of <name>Michael Brennon</name>, deceased<lb/> and thereupon come a Jury, to wit: <name>J C Cathin</name>, <name>John Mensman</name>, <name>H C Cuniffe</name>,<lb/> <name>J A Krueger</name>, <name>H L Carson</name>, <name>George Corning</name>, <name>Phil Ewald</name>, <name>John Ferguson</name>, <name>P<lb/> Lamert</name>, <name>J Bolinger</name>, <name>S Decker</name>, and <name>Jas Wasson</name>, twelve good and lawfull men,<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to<lb/> try the trial progressed but not be finished at the hour of adjournment further<lb/> proceedings herein are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="196" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0199.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-09">Tuesday November 9th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Solomon Block</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>Louis Block</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Charleson</name> et al<lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Edward St Michel</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Gearhart</name> et al<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>Theftale Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>Louis Magnus</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent. Agreement of parties filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hyacinth</name> (of color)<lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>H Renard</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate motions to set aside judgment filed by<lb/> defendants <name>Betts</name> and <name>Mellen</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O'Cannon</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit supplementary to motion to set aside<lb/> judgt by default filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith Barnfield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Barn</name> field</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Charles D Col<lb/>man</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius Lyon</name><lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>Moies</name> and <name>Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw notes on leaving<lb/> copy. Notes withdrawn and copies filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Allen</name><lb/> vs 672<lb/> <name>Catharine L Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw exhibits herein.<lb/> Exhibits withdrawn and copies filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Mason</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>John Warner</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendants <name>Boomer</name> and <name>Pride</name>.<lb/> Demurrer to petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name> et al<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name></head>
            <p>Answer to Interplea filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="197" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0200.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name>, <name>Franklin Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas A Simpson</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Leverett Bell</name>, the<lb/> Receiver appointed in this cause, and files<lb/> his Report, and thereupon, on motion, of the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the said Report be confirmed:<lb/> And it is further ordered that said Receiver<lb/> be allowed out of the funds in his hands the sum of One hundred dollars for his<lb/> services, together with the sum of ten dollars and seven cents, the amount paid out<lb/> by him for expenses, and that after paying the costs of this cause, and retaining the<lb/> sum of One hundred dollars for contingent expenses, he pay the balance of the<lb/> funds in his hands to said plaintiffs, and that he proceed to make such further<lb/> collections as may be in his power until the further order of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver Bennett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name>,<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Anthony Bennett</name></head>
            <p><name>Charles C Carroll</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes and, in<lb/> open Court, acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered in this cause on the<lb/> <date when="1850-04-25">twenty fifth day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Fanell</name> et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administration of<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and the Jury<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein also come,<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause pro<lb/>gressed, but not being finished further<lb/> proceedings are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion herein<lb/> to quash the affidavit of <name>Albert Hall</name> and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnott</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer to<lb/> the petition herein doth overrule the same.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="198" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0201.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-10">Wednesday November 10th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Levi Durst</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes and in open Court<lb/> and acknowledge the execution of a deed of Emancipation to his<lb/> negro slave <name>Heniett Robin Pointer</name> a negro child of the age of one year and nine months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Four notes filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Richards</name><lb/> vs 778<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 32<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Terre Haute<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tauntor Locomotive Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Terre <name>Haute Alton</name> and St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bod Kins</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John K Brettele</name><lb/> vs 29<lb/> <name>Patrick Malloy</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund D Taylor</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>James T Swearinger</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">City of Carondelet<lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Liberty Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Triplett and Sells</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Tandy</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>Wheaton</name> and <name>Papin</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment to Hypolite Papin filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 111<lb/> The Citizens Savings Institution et al</head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <div2>
            <pb n="199" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0202.tiff"/>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 112<lb/> <name>James C Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name> et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administratix of<lb/> <name>James Brnnon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties again by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the Jury em<lb/>paneled and sworn herein also come and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors retire to consider<lb/> of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the judgment by<lb/> default rendered herein on the <date when="--10-06">Sixth day of October</date><lb/> last past is erregular and erroneous, it is therefore,<lb/> on motion of the defendant, by its attorney, ordered<lb/> that said Judgment be set aside and for naught held.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Commissioner.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> referred to <name>William H Osborn</name>, as Commissioner herein<lb/> to take and state the respective accounts of the plaintiff and defendant with the<lb/> firms of Houseman and <name>Smith</name> and Houseman <name>Smith and Company</name>, and<lb/> that he report therein as early as practicable, and that the Receiver heretofore appointed<lb/> herein allow the said Commissioner to have access to the books and accounts belon<lb/>ing to said firms.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cynthia Ann McCoy</name><lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>William McCoy</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of<lb/> publication heretofore made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law, but the defendant although duly notified and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the<lb/> Court, after hearing the proof herein being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct<lb/> of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth<lb/> order adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the<lb/> bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to<lb/> all the rights and privileges of and unmarried person, and that her maiden<lb/> name, <name>Cynthia Ann Crow</name>, be restored to her and be hereafter deemed and<lb/> taken as her only true and lawful name. It is further ordered that the said<lb/> defendant pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophie Williams</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>William Williams</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and on her mo<lb/>tion, and the defendant having made default, the Court proceeds<lb/> to hear the proof herein, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="200" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0203.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and<lb/> decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her<lb/> contracted oath the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an un<lb/> married person. It is further ordered that the said defendant pay the costs herein<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to strike<lb/> out the defendants answer and being thereof full advised<lb/> doth order that the said motion be sustained: and the Court<lb/> having also duly heard and considered the motion to strike out the inter plea herein<lb/> and being thereof fully advised doth order that the said motion be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#579,68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mount Vernon Company</name><lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Henry B Merritt</name>, <name>William Risley</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Merritt</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its<lb/> attorneys and waiving a Jury, submits this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the petition and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of five hundred and seventy<lb/> nine dollars and sixty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and also its costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#669,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rower</name> and<lb/> <name>Hermann H Laumeier</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Samuel Schmidt</name></head>
            <p>On account</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court,<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damage sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at<lb/> the sum of Six hundred and sixty nine cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew Rippey</name><lb/> vs 36.<lb/> <name>Meyer Friede</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>C E P Johnson</name>, <name>John Auer</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter Parle</name>, <name>Patrick Sully</name>, <name>P C Hovacer</name>, <name>L Schmidt</name>, <name>Jacob<lb/> Klein</name>, <name>J H Ditmer</name>, <name>J B Clemons</name>, <name>J W Beven</name>, <name>R F Dailey</name> and <name>P Taylor</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and seven the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being concluded at the hour of<lb/> adjournment further proceedings are continued until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="201" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0204.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-11">Thursday November 11th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Herman</name> et al<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Agreements as to notice to take depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Meyer</name>, <name>Koug</name> and <name>Meister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Citizens Savings Institution</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Taylor</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>Joseph Stockdale</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wonderly</name> et al<lb/> vs 898<lb/> <name>Jacob Wonderly</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Gordon</name> and <name>Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Garnishee discharged.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the answer of said garnishee<lb/> that he is not indebted to the defendants in any sum what<lb/> ever, it is therefore on motion of the attorney for said garni<lb/>shee orderd that he be discharged at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Pfau</name> et al<lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>H C G Heinncks</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administratix of<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties again by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and the Jury<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say<lb/> they cannot agree upon a verdict herein,<lb/> wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the Jury aforesaid be discharged and this<lb/> cause be continued until the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A Thumway</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to New York for the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="202" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0205.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrews</name> and <name>Sides</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to New York for the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry E Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Cornelius Tunison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw the notes sued<lb/> on, on leaving copy: Notes withdrawn and copies filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#239,43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew Rippey</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Meyer Fride</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and thereupon the trail of this cause progressed and being fin<lb/>ished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess<lb/> his damage at the sum of two hundred and thirty nine dollars and forty three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#500</note>
            <p>The Court imposes a fine of five dollars upon <name>J R Scott</name> for failing to attend as<lb/> a Juror after having been summoned so to do.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Andersons</name><lb/> vs 876<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter E Bland</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>McDonald</name> and <name>Lingo</name></head>
            <p>Order of Citation.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court from the answer of <name>Charles D<lb/> Colman</name>, one of the garnishees herein, that at the time he<lb/> was summoned herein as such he had in his possession<lb/> a certain sum of money amounting to Eight hundred<lb/> and ninety nine dollars and sixty five cents, to be accounted for to the said defen<lb/>dant Lingo, or his assignee; and it further appearing to the Court from such answer<lb/> that the said sum of money has been assigned by the said defendant, <name>Lingo</name>, to<lb/> <name>John D Hooper</name> and <name>Nathaniel Phillips</name>; and the said plaintiff disputes the ex<lb/>istence force, or validity of such assignment, the Court, doth, therefore, in puroer<lb/> ance of the Statue in such case made and provided, order that the aforesaid assignees<lb/> appear before this Court on Wednesday, the first day of December next, at ten<lb/> o'clock A M to sustain their said claim, if any they have to the said sum of<lb/> money.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S Stamps</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Jane Foster</name><lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Joseph H Locke</name> Executor of <name>Legrand<lb/> F Rucker</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>John Auer</name>, <name>J R Scott</name>, <name>Peter<lb/> Parle</name>, <name>Patrick Scully</name>, <name>P C Hovacker</name>, <name>L<lb/> Schmidt</name>, <name>Jacob Klein</name>, <name>J H Detinur</name>, <name>J B Clemens</name>,<lb/> <name>J W Bevens</name>, <name>B F Dailey</name>, and <name>H P Taylor</name>, twelve good and lawful men,<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly<lb/> to try the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished at the hour<lb/> of adjournment further proceedings herein are laid over until to mor<lb/>rrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="203" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0206.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#10th per month<lb/> for two years.</note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rosanna Johnson</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>James N Johnson</name></head>
            <p>For maintenance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and submit to the Court the Demurrer to the Petition herein<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> and being thereof fully advised doth order that the said demurrer be overruled and<lb/> the defendant by leave of Court files an answer herein; and thereupon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed, and after some progress therein the parties consent and agree<lb/> that the Court may allow the plaintiff the sum of ten dollars per month for her<lb/> maintenance and support, payable on the <date when="--12-11">Eleventh day of December</date> next and on<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said defendant pay the said plaintiff the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, and that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant her costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1464,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick W Treudenthal</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> and<lb/> <name>Felix Grima</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendants although duly called come not, nor have<lb/> they pleaded further to the petition herein, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said petition be taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition men<lb/>tioned at the sum of fourteen hundred and sixty four dollars and thirty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-12">Friday November 12th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Robert H Buck</name> is on motion of <name>George Denniston</name> enrolled as a member of<lb/> this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew Rippey</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Meyer Friede</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="204" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0207.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Davenport</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles H Heywood</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for defendant <name>Morris</name><lb/> and cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> Demurrer to the petition herein and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo D Holmes</name><lb/> vs 712<lb/> <name>John Bingham</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 95<lb/> <name>Thomas R Grady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Mangum</name><lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Michael Mangum</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney<lb/> and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the proof<lb/> herein and the Court, having finished the hearing of the<lb/> proof, and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff, and<lb/> that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and<lb/> decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matri<lb/>money by her contracted with the plaintiff and be restored to all the rights<lb/> and privileges of an unmarried person, and that her maiden name <name>Ellen<lb/> Kennedy</name>, be restored to her and deemed and taken hereafter as her only<lb/> true and lawful name. It is further ordered that the said plaintiff pay the<lb/> costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johannes Link</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Philippine Link</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and thereupon<lb/> the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, and having finished<lb/> the hearing of the proof and being satisfied therefrom of the good con<lb/>duct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party it doth<lb/> order, adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of<lb/> matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and<lb/> privileges of an unmarried person, and further that the said plaintiff pay<lb/> the costs of these proceedings and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="205" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0208.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Raphaelsky</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Mary Jane Raphaelsky</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein and<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same and being<lb/> satisfied therefrom that the said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it<lb/> doth order adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the said defendant and be re<lb/>stored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered<lb/> that said plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2021,47<lb/> set aside<lb/> and <date when="--01-24">Jany 24</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William</name> &amp; <name>Stamps</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Janie Foster</name><lb/> no 90<lb/> <name>Jaoeph H Locke</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Legrand F Rucker</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and also the Jury<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiff assess the damage at the sum of two thousand<lb/> and twenty one dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the estate of <name>Legrand F Rucker</name> in the hands<lb/> of <name>Joseph H Locke</name> his Executor, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and that a copy hereof be certified to the St Louis Probate Court there to be<lb/> proceeded on according to the statue in such case made and provided and that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the said estate his costs herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L Weber</name> and<lb/> <name>Sebastian Felter</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Charles Harzig</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the default taken herein on<lb/> the <date when="--10-11">Eleventh day of October</date> last past is irregular therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that the same be set aside and for naught held.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L Weber</name> and<lb/> <name>Sebastian Felter</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Charles Harzig</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, file an additional affidavit<lb/> herein, from which it appears to the Court that the defen<lb/>dant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, it is<lb/> therefore, on motion of said plaintiffs attorney, ordered that<lb/> he be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum<lb/> of One hundred and eighty eight dollars for services rendered by the plaintiffs,<lb/> at the request of the defendant in the transportation of wood and that his prop<lb/>erty has been attached, and unless he be and appear at the next term of this<lb/> Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third<lb/> day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against him<lb/> and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#52,41</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Hanna</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney and<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="206" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0209.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damage sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of fifty two dollars and forty one<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#222,31</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Mcneil</name> Guardian<lb/> of <name>Crawford Proter</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his at<lb/> torney, and waiving a Jury, submits this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth assess the plaintiffs damage sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred and twenty two dollars and<lb/> thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#327,24</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Mcneil</name> Guardian<lb/> of <name>Emma Proter</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney<lb/> and waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/>age at the sum of two hundred and twenty two dollars and twenty four cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter, Jr</name>, <name>Lewis W Nute</name>,<lb/> <name>Franklin B White</name>, and <name>James<lb/> C Bayley</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respect<lb/> tive attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>J C Catlin</name>, <name>Ins Mersman</name>, <name>J A Krueger</name>,<lb/> <name>H S Carson</name>, <name>George Coming</name>, <name>P Ewald</name>, <name>P<lb/> Lomert</name>, <name>J Bobinger</name>, <name>S Decker</name>, <name>James Wasson</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter Parle</name> and <name>Patrick Scully</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy upon the Plea in Abatement<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished at the hour of<lb/> adjournment further proceedings are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hatter</name><lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>William Hatter</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant, by <name>Samuel T Ballard</name> his<lb/> attorney, and enters his appearance to this action.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="207" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0210.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-13">Saturday November 13th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff and defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>Virginia Barnhurst</name><lb/> formerly <name>Virginia Green</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attor<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#80 perann<lb/> in equal quarter<lb/> by inqtalents.<lb/> #50 maintance during sait.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Irwin</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Atchison Irwin</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce. Alimony allowed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and thereupon<lb/> the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, and having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being satisfied therefrom that the<lb/> plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth order, adjudge and decree that<lb/> she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contrac<lb/> ted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried<lb/> person. And it appearing to the Court that the defendant from his habits and<lb/> course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care and control of the child<lb/> <name>Isabella</name>, mentioned in the petition, who is of tender years, it is ordered adjudged<lb/> and decreed that the plaintiff here the care, custody and control of the infant<lb/> child aforesaid, and that the said defendant be restrained and enjoined from<lb/> interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf until the further order of this Court.<lb/> And it is further ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff the sum of Eighty<lb/> dollars per annum payable quarterly in equal instalments on the <date when="--01-01">first day of Jan<lb/>uary</date>, <date when="--04-01">April</date>, <date when="--07-01">July</date> and <date when="--10-01">October</date> in each and every year, during the natural life of<lb/> the said plaintiff or until the further order of this Court commencing on the first<lb/> day of <date when="1859-01-18">January eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>, and that the defendant give<lb/> security for the payment of the said sum of Eighty dollars per annum payable<lb/> given to pay the said several sums or either of them at the times the same may<lb/> fall due as above directed, that the plaintiff have leave to apply to this Court to<lb/> award an execution for the collection thereof, or to enforce the performance of this<lb/> decree or order by sequestration of the property of the defendant, or by such other law<lb/> ful ways and means as may be according to the practice of this Court and to the<lb/> statute in such case made and provided. And it is further ordered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of fifty dollars for her main<lb/> tenance and support during the pendency of this suit together with her costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haaskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>William Forsyth</name>, <name>Cornelius</name><lb/> <name>D Sullivan</name>, and <name>Jeremiah</name><lb/> <name>T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come plaintiffs by their attorney, and<lb/> on their motion it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed to <name>William Forsythe</name> and <name>Jeremiah T Sulli<lb/>van</name>. Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="208" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0211.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1094.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name>, <name>Augustus Mermod</name><lb/> and <name>D Constant Jaccard</name><lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>William C Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney, and waiving a Jury,<lb/> submit this cause to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the pleadings<lb/> and proofs that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten<lb/> hundred and ninety four dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution thereofor. Motion for a new<lb/> trial and motion in arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter, Jr</name>, <name>Lewis W Nute</name>,<lb/> <name>Franklin B White</name> and <name>James C<lb/> Bayley</name><lb/>vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney, and also the Jury<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed, but not being<lb/> finished at the hour of adjournment further<lb/> proceedings herein are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-15">Monday November 15th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Felix Christopher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for Defendants Opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Foster</name> administrator<lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Legrand F Rucker</name> Executor</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for Execution filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs 726<lb/> <name>Lyman Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons and attachment ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="209" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0212.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>William White</name>,<lb/> and <name>Hiram A Pryor</name><lb/> vs 9 <lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of said plaintiffs against <name>James<lb/> Castello</name>, late Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis.<lb/> Upon reading the rule made in this cause<lb/> on the sixth instant, and no cause being<lb/> shown to the contrary on motion of the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiffs, It is ordered that the said <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of the<lb/> County of St Louis, do forthwith pay over to the said plaintiffs, or to <name>Alexander Ham<lb/>ilton</name>, their attorney of record in this cause, out of the proceeds arising from the sale<lb/> of the property attached in this cause, and in his hands, the sum of thirteen hun<lb/>dred and sixty eight dollars and eighty one cents, being the amount of the Judg<lb/>ment recovered by said plaintiffs against the defendant, <name>John Nevison</name> on the<lb/> <date when="--10-19">nineteenth day of October</date> last past together with interest thereon and costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Spec K</name> et al<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Peter Geis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Liberty Insurance Company<lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>John Triplett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Hanenkamp</name> and<lb/> <name>William B Hynes</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of said plaintiffs, against <name>James Castello</name>,<lb/> late Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis.</p>
            <p>Upon reading the rule made in this cause on the<lb/> Sixth instant, and no cause being shown to the contrary<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs, It is ordered<lb/> that the said <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of the County of St Louis, do<lb/> forthwith pay over to the said plaintiffs, or to <name>Alexander Hamilton</name>, their attorney<lb/> of record in this cause, out of the proceeds arising from the sale of the property attached<lb/> in this cause, and in his hands the sum of Seven hundred and seventy three and thirty six cents, being the amount of the Judgment recovered by said plaintiffs against the<lb/> defendant, <name>John Nevison</name> on the nineteenth day of October last past together with in<lb/>terest damages and costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Pather, Jr</name>, <name>Lewis W Nute</name>,<lb/> <name>Franklin B White</name> and <name>James<lb/> C Bayley</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled<lb/> and sworn herein and thereupon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed but not being finished<lb/> at the hour of adjournment further procee<lb/> dings herein are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>Ja R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="210" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0213.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-16">Tuesday November 16th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and Offset filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Sinisheuser</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside dismissal and affidavit of <name>John W<lb/> Sharp</name> in support thereof filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas McAdams</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>McAdams</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Caroline C Rustin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>John<lb/> W Burd</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate Answers of <name>Frederick <unclear>Blessing</unclear></name> and of <name>Christian<lb/> Roselius</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Denniston</name> et al<lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit for continuance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Ather</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria L Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> et al<lb/> vs 647<lb/> <name>Abraham Depew</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the default taken herein<lb/> is erregular, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that the same be set aside and<lb/> that an alias Writ of attachment and summons issue herein, returnable to the<lb/> next time of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment to <name>Samuel A Bennett</name><lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Motion for appointment of Receiver with drawn, Leave is<lb/> given the plaintiff to file an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="211" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0214.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#984,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann Boker</name>, <name>Hermann<lb/> A Schleicher</name> &amp; <name>Hermann Frincke</name><lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> &amp; <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Nine hundred and eighty four dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#994,82</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand A Reuss</name> and<lb/> <name>Constanz J Peipers</name><lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name>, <name>James H Gordon</name>,<lb/> and <name>S B Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Nine hundred and ninety four dollars and<lb/> eighty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#344,09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Humann W Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto Igel</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Otto<lb/> Igel</name>, but the defendant Bensberg, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said de<lb/>fendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty four<lb/> dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant, <name>Bensberg</name>, the sum aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#6613,92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottieb Lribke</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>Charles H Schrage</name>,<lb/> <name>Christian Liebke</name>, and<lb/> <name>Christian E Letzig</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants and file a statement<lb/> in writing, duly verified by affidavit, whereby they confess<lb/> themselves indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six thou<lb/>sand six hundred and thirteen dollars and ninety two<lb/> cents and consent that judgment may be rendered against<lb/> them for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as confessed, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="212" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0215.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#256,54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and thereupon<lb/> comes also the defendant by his attorney and withdraws his<lb/> answer herein, whereby this suit remains undefended, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifty six dollars and fifty<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#191,54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward K Tryon</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Samuel L Moses</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius L Moses</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys and the defendant withdraws their answer herein<lb/> leaving this suit undefended, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and ninety one dollars and fifty<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#175,55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hayward</name> and<lb/> <name>Jonathan R Briggs</name><lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>Samuel L Moses</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius L Moses</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and thereupon come also the defendants, by their attorney<lb/> and withdraw their answer herein, leaving this suit<lb/> undefended, wherefore, on motion of the attorney for<lb/> the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and seventy five dollars and<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#211,78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>Elias Marcus</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth assess the plaintiffs Damages sus<lb/>tained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of two<lb/> hundred and eleven dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expend and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua W Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court duly heard and considered the motion to strike<lb/> out the amended answer of <name>Renick</name> and <name>Peterson</name> doth<lb/> overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="213" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0216.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 844<lb/> <name>Sands E Sellick</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Garnishee discharged.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the answer of the garnishee<lb/> that he is not indebted to the defendant in any sum<lb/> whatever, it is therefore ordered that the said garni<lb/>shee be discharged at the costs of the said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Receiver.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dennis Murphy</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Ellen Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> her as confessed; and the Court, after hearing the proof herein, being satisfied that<lb/> the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and decree that<lb/> he be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him con<lb/>tracted with the said defendant and be restored to all rights and privileges<lb/> for an unmarried person. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>De Witt C Sandford</name><lb/> and <name>James C Crane</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>In the matter <name>Sandford</name> and <name>Crane</name> against <name>James Castello</name><lb/> late Sheriff of the County of St Louis.</p>
            <p>Upon reading the affidavit of <name>Robert S Voorhis</name>,<lb/> attorney for the plaintiffs, and hearing the counsel of<lb/> both parties, It is ordered that the said <name>James Castello</name><lb/> late Sheriff of the County of St Louis, shall on the twentieth instant pay over to the<lb/> said plaintiffs, or their attorney of record, out of the proceeds arising from the sale<lb/> of the property, attached in this cause, the amount of the judgment recovered by said<lb/> plaintiffs against said defendant, at the present term of this Court, with interest<lb/> damages and costs, or that on said day the said <name>James Castello</name> show cause<lb/> to the contrary.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent and<lb/> property</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Juluis E Walsheid</name><lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>Levi North</name></head>
            <p>Judgments. Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and waiving<lb/> a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the petition and<lb/> and proofs, and the Court doth find from the petition and<lb/> proofs that the plaintiff is the owner of the property mentioned in the petition and<lb/> doth assess his damages for the unlawful detention o the same at the sum afore</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="214" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0217.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff retain the possession<lb/> of the said property and that he recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as assessed, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>One cent and<lb/> property</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Louisa Betts</name><lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>Levi North</name></head>
            <p>Judgment. Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney and<lb/> waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the plaintiff is the owner of the property mentioned in the petition<lb/> and doth assess her damages sustained by reason of the unlawful detention there<lb/> of at the sum of One cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff retain the possession of the property aforesaid and that she recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156,32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Schluter</name><lb/> vs 397<lb/> <name>Adam Ehrgottsen</name> and<lb/> <name>Emille B Krausse</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Ehrgottsen</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Krausse</name>, although duly notified and called,<lb/> comes not, whereupon the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, sub<lb/>mits this cause to the Court upon the petition and answer, and the Court doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendant, <name>Krausse</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of One hundred and fifty six dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1092,09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cortez Crocker</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Eleazer Sherman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and also the defendant<lb/> by their respective attorney, and the plaintiff orally moves the<lb/> Court to strike out the answer of the defendant and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said motion and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be sustained; and the defendant failing further to plead<lb/> herein, it is therefore on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, ordered that the pe<lb/>tition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and ninety two dollars and nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore considerd by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date till paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter, Jr</name> <name>Lewis W Nute</name>, <name>Franklin</name><lb/> <name>B White</name> and <name>James C Bayley</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective at<lb/>tourneys, and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed and being finished<lb/> the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendant had not, at the commencement of this suit, fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property<lb/> or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditons; wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed and<lb/> that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and hence execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="215" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0218.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-17">Wednesday November 17th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> et al</head>
            <p>Amended Answer of <name>J H Alexander</name> filed by<lb/> leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Liberty Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>Triplett</name> and <name>Sells</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Erving</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Reilly</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiffs delivered by Notary and<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p><name>William B Watson</name>, receiver, files a bond in the sum of<lb/> Six thousand dollars with <name>Jesse Arnot</name>, as security, which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">St Bt <name>W M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Brown Goddin and Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> et al</head>
            <p>Agreement filed and cause continued, as per agreement,<lb/> as upon the affidavit of defendants at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas C Fletcher</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Nehemiah Holmes</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Steele</name><lb/> vs 251<lb/> <name>Henry J Steele</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Snead</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>On motion leave is given the plaintiff to amend his<lb/> petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Rosenthal</name><lb/> vs 248<lb/> <name>Joseph Rosenthal</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Pub. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> heretofore made herein has been duly published according to law;</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="216" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0219.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>but the defendant although duly warned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#262.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 223<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/>and the defendant withdraws his answer herein, whereby<lb/> this action remains undefended, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant ad confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty two dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#104.57</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On contract.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of<lb/> the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and four<lb/> dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum of aforesaid as assessed and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#542,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name>,<lb/> <name>Xavier Dugal</name>, and<lb/> <name>Francis H Dependahl</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant,<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name>, by their respective attorneys and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Jacob Frichell</name>, <name>F Bi<lb/>choff</name>, <name>David Naylor</name>, <name>H HirKnir</name>, <name>Charles Ensler</name>, <name>John<lb/> Stumpf</name>, <name>Frederick Miller</name>, <name>Edward Bicking</name>, <name>John Roper</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas McCabe</name>, <name>Louis Smith</name>, and <name>S H Robbins</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, tried, and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trail progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider<lb/> of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="217" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0220.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-18">Thursday November 18th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> no 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> et al</head>
            <p>continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward D Hill</name><lb/> no 64<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A S Thomas</name><lb/> no 129<lb/> <name>John Gonzales</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al<lb/> no 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> no 231<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> no 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> no 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> no 312<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail Road Co</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of endorsement on notes filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Edward A Bates</name>, is on motion of <name>Sandford R Kellogg</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brownoonio</name></head>
            <p>on motion of a <name>A Bakewell</name>, admitted and enrolled<lb/> as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Daniels</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Solcoth</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert McDonald</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff comes and acknowledges to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein<lb/> on the <date when="1858-05-27">twenty seventh day of May eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty eight</date> for the sum of Six hundred and sixty seven dol<lb/>lars and seventy seven cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> no 387<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Copy of Order for production of papers and Sheriffs return on<lb/> same filed.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="218" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0221.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> et al<lb/> no 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> and <name>Felix Grima</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the Order of Pub<lb/>lication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>De Witt C Sandford</name> et al<lb/> no 15<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Notice of application to pay over money filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to file depositions in case of <name>Billings</name> versus <name>Fink</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">St Bt <name>Wm M Morrison</name><lb/> no 290<lb/> <name>Brown Goddin and Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#542.70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> no 40<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name>,<lb/> <name>Xavier Dugal</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis H Defendant</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and also the jury empanelled and sworn herein, <lb/> and the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid return the<lb/> following verdict, to wit: "We the jury find for the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of five hundred and forty two dollars and<lb/> seventy cents and find against the defendant as to his counterclaim. <name>Starles Enslin</name>,<lb/> foreman." It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer Higgins</name> et al<lb/> no 34<lb/> <name>Cushman Caldwell</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Craw</name> et al<lb/> no 123.<lb/> <name>Herman S Allen</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney and<lb/> file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publica<lb/>tion made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Craw</name> et al<lb/> no 124<lb/> <name>Herman S allen</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Booth</name><lb/> no 210<lb/> <name>Claudies B Lassall</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by his attorney and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made<lb/> herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="219" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0222.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Bailey</name><lb/> no 245<lb/> <name>John H Bailey</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorneys and files a<lb/> request to have her maiden name restored to her, and, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff, by her attorneys and the defendant having heretofore<lb/> made default, the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, and having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff,<lb/> and that the plaintiff is in an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and<lb/> decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her<lb/> contracted with the defendant, and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an<lb/> unmarried person and that her maiden name of <name>Elizabeth Grimes</name> be restored to her<lb/> and be deemed and taken as her only true and lawful name. It is further ordered<lb/> that the defendant pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Smith</name><lb/> no 56<lb/> <name>William H Roberts</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a jury, submit this cause to the Court thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause commenced and after some progress<lb/> therein the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute this suit. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff take nothing by his suit herein, but that the<lb/> defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of <name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 115.<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> <name>George W Billings</name>, and <name>Charles B Hubbell</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury<lb/> to wit: <name>J F gray</name>, <name>john Brod</name>, <name>August Gaste</name>,<lb/> <name>Meyer Deter</name>, <name>j Hatton</name>, <name>Jacob Wather</name>, <name>R M<lb/> Hubbard</name>, <name>Thomas Carey</name>, <name>J C Marshall</name>, <name>August<lb/> Twillman</name>, <name>Anton Tafort</name>, and <name>John Corkery</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and after some progress the plaintiff, by leave of Court, amends<lb/> his petition, by striking out, on the third page thereof, the words, "and also by the loss of<lb/> time and being thrown out of employment," and thereupon the trial further progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#205,66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bartholomew Dassgalupo</name>.<lb/> no 150<lb/> <name>Dominick Fopann</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> waiving a jury submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred and five dollars and<lb/> sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as aforeside and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="220" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0223.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-19">Friday November 19th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elias Lyon</name><lb/> no 152<lb/> <name>Moses Cohn</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> no 388<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Guillarme</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cottinet</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> no 289<lb/> <name>William Sinishenser</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the dis<lb/>missal of this cause be set aside and for naught held. The plain<lb/>tiff withdraws his motion to set aside the dismissal.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha W Brown</name>, <name>Archibald C Goddin</name>,<lb/> <name>Barton S Wilson</name>, <name>James J Johnson</name> and<lb/> <name>John P Hopkins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M Barron</name> and <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and<lb/> affidavit according to law, claiming the pos<lb/>session of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendants deliver the property specified in<lb/> said petition to the <name>Coroner</name> of St Louis County, and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed<lb/>, if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver it<lb/> to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#250.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernhard Nidas</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement in<lb/> writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifty<lb/> dollars. and consents that judgment may be rendered against him for that amounts.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#162.92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Tighe</name> and <name>Thomas Fox</name><lb/> no 293.<lb/> <name>Joseph Toomer</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly notified and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth assess the damages sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the premises mentioned in their<lb/> petition at the sum of one hundred and sixty two dollars and ninety two cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="221" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0224.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman</name><lb/> no 475<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Leave is given the defendants to amend the answer herein<lb/> by inserting the names "<name>Henry</name> and <name>Augustus Boernstein</name>"<lb/> immediately after word "defendant" and before word<lb/> "aver" on the second page of said answer, which amendment<lb/> is according by made.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1179.14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgments.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the petition, ex<lb/>hibits and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of Eleven hundred and seventy nine dollars and<lb/> fourteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2608,36</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> no 286<lb/> <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, <lb/> and the defendant withdraws his answer herein whereby this suit<lb/> remains undefended, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty six hundred and eight dollars and thirty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein exp<lb/>ended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate of two per<lb/>cent per month from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#132,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Maillot</name> and <name>John G Benson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Hynson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement<lb/> in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One hun<lb/>dred and thirty two dollars and fifty cents and consents that<lb/> judgment may be rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Count that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth A Warren</name><lb/> no 300<lb/> <name>Alonzo L Warren</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law, but<lb/> the defendant although duly notified and called comes not but makes default; <lb/> wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Rosenthal</name><lb/> no 248<lb/> <name>Joseph Rosenthal</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>69</note>
            <p><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al: Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="222" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0225.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#100,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 115<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name>, <name>George W Billings</name><lb/> and <name>Charles B Hubbell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, and also the jury empannelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and the Jury aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and<lb/> assess the damages at the sum of One hundred<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also him costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion for a new trial filed by<lb/> the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name>, <name>William H Harding</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph H Gray</name>, <name>Edmund W Converse</name>, and <name>Nathan Day</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Trial on plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>Jacob Fritschell</name>, <name>F Bischoff</name>,<lb/> <name>David Naylor</name>, <name>Charles Ensler</name>, <name>John<lb/> Stumpf</name>, <name>Fredrick Miller</name>, <name>Edward Bick<lb/>ing</name>, <name>John Brod</name>, <name>Augustus Gaste</name>, <name>H Thare</name>, <name>J A Smithers</name>, and <name>Thomas Freaney</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the matter in<lb/> controversy upon the plea in abatement well and truly to try the trial progressed but<lb/> not being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> no 96<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjoined until tomorrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-20">Saturday, November 20th, 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Domnick</name><lb/> no 362<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Reply to Offset filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert McDonald</name><lb/> no 463<lb/> <name>Allison Stickney</name></head>
            <p>answer and Counter claim filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Terrteberg</name><lb/> no 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new<lb/> trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="223" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0226.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Actua Ins Co</name><lb/> no 191<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> et al<lb/> no 235.<lb/> The Citizens Savings Inst</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> no 303.<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Citizens Savings Institution<lb/> no 318<lb/> <name>Charles Meyers</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Barnhurst</name><lb/> no 133.<lb/> <name>Virginia Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> no 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>agreement filed and twenty days additional time<lb/> given to answer by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> no 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Sinisheuser</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties plaintiff gives <name>Adam Hindricker</name> as<lb/> additional security on the attachment bond herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#575,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Luke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel K Hall</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the defendant and files a state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he<lb/> confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five hundred and seventy five dollars, and consents<lb/> that judgment may be rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleazer Sherman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David Caughlan</name> and <name>Nathaniel</name> Constable</head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit<lb/> according the law claiming the possession of certain per<lb/>sonal property therein described; wherefore, it is ordered<lb/> that the defendants deliver the property specified in said<lb/> petition to the Sheriff of St Louis Country, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if<lb/> said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver<lb/> it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> no 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff and<lb/> suggests to the Court the death of <name>Caspar Kraeling</name>, one of</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="224" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0227.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the plaintiff herein since the commencement of this suit, and the Court being satisfied<lb/> of the decease of said <name>Kracling</name>, it is ordered that this suit proceed in the name of<lb/> the other and surviving plaintiffs. Demurrer filed by City to amended petition. An<lb/>swer of <name>O D Filley</name> to petition withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> <name>William H Harding</name><lb/> <name>Joseph H Gray</name>, <name>Edmund W Converse</name>,<lb/> and <name>Nathan Day</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed but not<lb/> being finished further proceedings herein<lb/> are laid over until Monday morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjoined until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-22">Monday November 22nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin G Owens</name></head>
            <p>is, on motion of <name>Samuel H Gardner</name>, admitted and en<lb/>rolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Mick</name><lb/> no 208<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenandon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name> et al<lb/> no 614<lb/> <name>Conrad Weith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> no 299<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Waterman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Page</name><lb/> no 306<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Waterman</name> filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> no 304<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
            <p>answer of <name>Waterman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="225" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0228.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Claim of <name>John D Cooper</name> as assignee of Gings<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#263,75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Thornburgh</name><lb/> no 746<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and it ap<lb/>pearing to the Court that the defendant has failed to answer<lb/> the amended petition herein, it is therefore on motion of the<lb/> attorney for the plaintiff, ordered that the said amended petition be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth assess the plaintiff damages sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in said amended petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred and sixty three<lb/> dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name>, <name>William H Harding</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph H Gray</name>, <name>Edmund W Converse</name>,<lb/> and <name>Nathan Day</name><lb/> no 131<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement. Now at this day come the again the<lb/> parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further procee<lb/>dings are continued until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-23">Tuesday November 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leverett Bell</name></head>
            <p>is, on motion of <name>William R Biddlecome</name>, enrolled as a mem<lb/>ber of this Bar</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Robertson</name><lb/> no 211<lb/> <name>William Carson</name></head>
            <p>amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer of Louis a La Beaume filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>North</name> and <name>Scott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Pluries Summons ordered for <name>Henry D Bacon</name> and<lb/> cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Seal</name><lb/> no 259<lb/> <name>Lucy Ann Seal</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <div2>
            <pb n="226" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0229.tiff"/>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Plahto</name><lb/> no 202<lb/> <name>Albert Jacoby</name> and <name>Jeannette Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants <name>Al<lb/>bert Jacoby</name> cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied<lb/> that process cannot be served upon him, therefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff attorneys, it is ordered that he be notified that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against the defendants for the sum of one thousand<lb/> and eighty two dollars and thirteen cents for money advanced to them by the plain<lb/>tiff, and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be holder at the<lb/> City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of Feb<lb/>ruary next and on or before the Sixth day thereof answer the plaintiff petition, the<lb/> same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Republication a newspaper<lb/> pointed and published and published in the City of St Louis. cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name> as administrator<lb/> of mason converse deceased.<lb/> no 348<lb/> <name>Phebe Bassett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the<lb/> defendant cannot be found and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that process can<lb/>not be served upon her, therefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiff attorney, it to ordered by the Court that she be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against her to recover the possession of two<lb/> negro slaves <name>Harriet</name> and <name>Isabel</name>, or to recover their value, to wit seven hundred dollars;<lb/> and also to recover the sum of one hundred dollars damages, and that unless. She be<lb/> and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next<lb/> and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiff petition the same will be<lb/> taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> no 453<lb/> <name>Joseph Oglesby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>John H Oglesby</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according<lb/> to law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the<lb/> property specified in said petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is<lb/> hereby directed, if said property be not delivered to him to take from the defendant and<lb/> deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name>, <name>William H Harding</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph H Gray</name>,<lb/> <name>Edmund W Converse</name>,<lb/> and <name>Nathan Day</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid find for the defendant.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant had not fraudulently<lb/> conveyed or assigned his property or effects, at the commencement of this suit, so as to</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="227" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0230.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>hinder or delay his creditors; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the said de<lb/>fendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiffs his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name> et al<lb/> no 217<lb/> <name>Reuben Harrington</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Dennistown</name> et al<lb/> no 166<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#210,731/3.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Andrews</name><lb/> no 159<lb/> <name>James J Lampton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the defendant withdraws his answer herein leaving this suit undefended<lb/>, wherefore on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ten dollars and<lb/> seventy three cents and on third of a cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#300,66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Dowthett</name><lb/> no 503.<lb/> <name>Alonzo Cutter</name>, <name>Henry J Darrah</name>,<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> Shelly</name></head>
            <p>On note. Final judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, Shelly; <lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants <name>Cutter</name>, <name>Darrah</name> and <name>Pomeroy</name> are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred dollars and sixty six cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. By leave of Court the plaintiff withdraws the note sued on and<lb/> files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#114,85<lb/> Set aside<lb/> <date when="1858-11-24">nov 24 1858</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><lb/><name>Frederick Lauman</name><lb/> no 41<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name> Executrix of <name>John Lay</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly called comes not, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the judgment of the St Louis Probate<lb/> Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the estate of the said <name>John Lay</name> in the hands of<lb/> his Executrix <name>Charlotte Lay</name> the sum of One hundred and fourteen dollars and<lb/> eighty five cents, being the amount of the judgment of the Probate Court and also<lb/> his costs herein expended; and it is further ordered that the foregoing judgment<lb/> be certified to the Probate Court of St Louis County.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name> Judge
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="228" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0231.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-24">Wednesday, November 24th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> no 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> no 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>George W Sherrick</name> to amended<lb/> petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, <lb/> and files a petition; thereupon comes the defendant by<lb/> his attorney and waiving the issue and service of<lb/> process, enters his appearance to this action; wherefore it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be docketed as of this term answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name><lb/> and <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to file in this cause the Depositions taken in the case of<lb/> Billings against Fink and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> sustain the said motion; and the Court having also duly<lb/> heard and considered the motion to strike out parts of the defendants answer and<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth order that the said motion be sustained. The defen<lb/>dants file a Bill of Exceptions. Depositions in the case of Billings against<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> et al<lb/> no 131<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Henry N Hart</name>, <lb/> the assignee herein, and on his motion it is<lb/> ordered that the order of sale heretofore made<lb/> herein be so changed and amended as to direct the said assignee to proceed, <lb/> after the expiration of thirty days from the date upon which said order of sale was<lb/> made, to sell the goods wares and merchandise to him assigned, at publica<lb/>tion to the highest and best bidder, upon the following terms, to wit: all sales for<lb/> sums of two hundred and fifty dollars and under to be cash sales, and on all<lb/> sales made for sums above two hundred and fifty dollars a credit of three months<lb/> to be given, the purchaser giving a note with good and responsible endorser or en<lb/>dorsers to the satisfaction of the assignee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Mcneil</name> and<lb/> <name>John B Gray</name><lb/> no 82<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and thereupon come also a jury to wit: <name>George<lb/> Bokenkamp</name>, <name>Jacob Rubel</name>, <name>William Clarke</name>, <name>Chistopher<lb/> Blager</name>, <name>J A Griffin</name>, <name>G Miller</name>, <name>Wm C Meyer</name>, <name>Henry</name></p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="229" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0232.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Westerman, A Walsh</name>, <name>Thomas Brockner</name>, <name>M Gleason</name> and <name>Charles Brooks</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined upon the plea in abatement well and truly to try the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#112,220</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Lauman</name><lb/> no 41<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name> Executrix of <name>John Lay</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court. <lb/> Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and, by their consent, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the judgment rendered herein be set<lb/> aside and for naught held: and neither party<lb/> requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of One hundred and twelve<lb/> dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the estate of the said <name>John Lay</name> in the hands of his executrix, <name>Char<lb/>lotte Lay</name>, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court assessed and also<lb/> his costs herein expended; and it is further ordered that the foregoing judgment<lb/> be certified to the Probate Court of St Louis County.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1281,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W Mclamant</name><lb/> no 236<lb/> <name>John Todd</name> and <name>Edward G Atkinson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the petition answer and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find for the<lb/> plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of twelve hundred and eighty one dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#243.28</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> no 243<lb/> <name>Hiney Lyon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty three dollars and<lb/> twenty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                His Excellency, the Governor of the State of Missouri, having by procla<lb/>mation set apart tomorrow, <date when="--11-25">November, twenty fifth</date>, as a day of thanks<lb/> giving humiliation and prayer, "it is ordered that this Court adjourn<lb/> until Friday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name> Judge
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="230" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0233.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-26">Friday November 26th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Connor</name> and<lb/> <name>Hercules O Connor</name><lb/> no 524<lb/> <name>Samuel Gatry</name> and<lb/> <name>John S Mclune</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Leave is given the plaintiffs to withdraw Bill of Exchange.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Ohio for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> no 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Deed from Ward and Page and wives to <name>A Becker</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel Horning</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit accor<lb/>ding to law, claiming the possession of certain personal property<lb/> therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant<lb/> deliver the property specified in said petition to the Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed, if said property be not delivered<lb/> to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Mcneil</name> and<lb/> <name>John B Gray</name><lb/> no 82<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name></head>
            <p>Mistrial. Jury discharged.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and the<lb/> Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they are unable<lb/> to agree upon a verdict; wherefore it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the Jury aforesaid be discharged and that this cause be continued until the<lb/> next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#250,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name> of<lb/> Pennsylvania<lb/> no 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find for the plaintiff and assess its damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of twelve<lb/> hundred and fifty dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and also its costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas R Robertson</name><lb/> no 211<lb/> <name>William Carson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="231" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0234.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and <name>George Billings</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: <name>John Newcomb</name>, <name>N L handler</name>, <lb/> <name>P L Simons</name>, <name>J W Bell</name>, <name>John Henry</name>, <name>M Little</name>, <name>J M<lb/> Feldman</name>, <name>Henry Hug</name>, <name>H Chatelian</name>, <name>B B Burr</name>, <name>D R Roach</name><lb/> and <name>George Perrvis</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline>Saturday November 27th 1858.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation<lb/> to his negro slave, name <name>Henry</name>, aged eighteen years, of a mulatto color, about five<lb/> feet seven inches in heights.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his ne<lb/>gro slave, name John, twenty two years of age, of a brown color about five feet<lb/> seven and one half inches in height, has a mark under the right ear and stutters in<lb/> his conversation.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a Deed of emancipation<lb/> to his negro slave, name Delia, twenty nine years of age, of a mulatto color, about five feet<lb/> in height, and her son Andrew, ten years of age, of mulatto color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a Deed of Emancipation<lb/> to the following named negro slaves, to wit: <name>Evelina</name>, twenty five years of age, of a<lb/> light brown color, five feet three inches in height, and has a scar about an inch in<lb/> length under the left jaw; and her son <name>Frank</name> seven years of age of a mulatto color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court <lb/>and acknowledges the execution of a Deed of Emancipation to<lb/> his negro slaves, <name>Maria</name>, twenty four years of age, of a light brown color, about<lb/> five feet three inches in height, and has a scar in her right ear, and her three<lb/> children, <name>Sophia</name>, Eight years of age, of mulatto color, <name>Emma</name>, seven years of age, <lb/> of mulatto color, and <name>George</name>, aged four years, of mulatto color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court and ack<lb/>nowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his negro slave<lb/> <name>Bill</name> or <name>William</name>, aged twenty four years, of a light brown color, about five feet seven in<lb/>ches in height, rather heavy made.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="232" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0235.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Meshack H Carroll</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes in Open<lb/> Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of<lb/> emancipation to his negro slaves, <name>Sophia</name> aged forty five years, of black color, about<lb/> five feet one inch in height, and crippled in two fingers of the right hand, and her<lb/> three children, <name>Emma</name> aged about Sixteen years of mulatto color, angetine aged about<lb/> fourteen years of mulatto color, and <name>Caroline</name> aged twelve years, of mulatto color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>J S Newhouse</name> whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>A F W Webb</name> and<lb/> <name>E Longuemare</name>, two credible witnesses, in open Court acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed of Emancipation to <name>Mary Woodson</name>, thirty two years of age, of dark<lb/> copper color and of medium height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Person G Connor</name><lb/> no 355<lb/> <name>Benjamin H P Butler</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant can<lb/>not be found, and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon him, therefore on motion of plaintiffs<lb/> attorney, it is Ordered-That he be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him for the seen of thirty nine hundred and sixty nine dollars and twenty four<lb/> cents, founded on a note, and that his property has been attached, and unless he be and<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis with<lb/> in and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or<lb/> before the third day thereof answer the plaintiff petition, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published according to law in the Saint Louis Evening News a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Error see Chorncerry<lb/> Record no 4.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F J Wright</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Howard F Christy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order of Publication as to Nelson and wife.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the attorney for the complainants<lb/> and suggests to the Court that since the order for scire<lb/> facias to being in the widow and heir of <name>William F Wright</name><lb/> deceased, made at a former day, <name>William J Wright</name>, only heir at law of said <name>William<lb/> F Wright</name>, has departed this life, leaving <name>Emma F Wright</name>, widow of <name>William F Wright</name>, <lb/> his only heir at law and it being satisfactorily shown that the said <name>Emma F</name> has in<lb/>termarried with <name>Rensselaer R Nelson</name>, and that they are non residents of the State of<lb/> Missouri, it is on motion of said complainants attorney, ordered that they be notified<lb/> that a suit is now pending in the St Louis Circuit Court, the object of which is to obtain<lb/> a decree passing the title of certain land described in complainants bill from the<lb/> heirs of <name>Edmund J Christy</name>, deceased, to the said complainants as heirs at law of <name>Thom<lb/>as Wright</name>, deceased, and for other and general relief in the premises; and that unless<lb/> they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February<lb/> next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the bill of complaint herein the same<lb/> will be taken against them as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published according to law in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and<lb/> published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Eliza Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, and files<lb/> herein her petition and affidavit, from which it appears<lb/> that the defendant is not a resident of the State of Missouri</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="233" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0236.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>wherefore, on motion it is ordered by the Court that the defendant be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced him in this Court, by the plaintiff, the object of<lb/> which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted<lb/> with the defendant; and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held in the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis<lb/> on the fourth Monday of February next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said action, the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published according to law in the St Louis Evening News a newspaper<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1650.00<lb/> vs<lb/> Sparr<lb/> and satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name>.<lb/> no 847<lb/> <name>Andrew Lorgan</name> <name>John H Sparr</name> et al garnishees of <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the garnishees, <name>Andrew</name><lb/> <name>Logan</name> and <name>John H Sparr</name>, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court from the answer of the garnishee, <lb/> <name>Andrew Logan</name>, that he is not indebted to the defendant <name>John<lb/> D Ludden</name> in any sum whatever, it is therefore ordered that<lb/> he be discharged at the costs of the said plaintiff and that the sum of ten dollars<lb/> be allowed him for answering herein; and it appearing to the Court from the answer<lb/> of the said garnishee <name>John H Sparr</name> that at the time he was summoned herein as<lb/> such he had in his possession belonging to said defendant, <name>John D Ludden</name>, the<lb/> sum of sixteen hundred and fifty dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> have execution therefor, and that out of said sum he pay the costs of this proceeding. <lb/> The sum of forty dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein. Thereupon<lb/> the plaintiff, by his attorney acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the foregoing judgment, and the said garnishees, by their attorneys acknowl<lb/>edge the receipt of their respective allowances above made.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter H Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled. Bill of Excep<lb/>tion filed. Application of defendants filed to have defendants share set off in<lb/> one lot together.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Steinacker</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication of assignees notice to<lb/> creditors filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W McLamant</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Todd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Mick</name><lb/> no 208<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenadon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Alexander Guenadon</name> Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> no 289<lb/> <name>William Sinishenser</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="234" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0237.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed but not<lb/> being finished further proceedings are laid over until Monday Morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-29">Monday November 29th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presburry</name><lb/> no 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Motion to quash Sheriffs Return on amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> no 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Until the <date when="--12-04">fourth day of December</date> next is given to<lb/> answer the amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> no 96<lb/> <name>Bernhardt Midas</name></head>
            <p>Interplea of <name>William C Jones</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William J Mathir</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas E Owens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis garnt<lb/> of <name>James H McClure</name></head>
            <p>Motion to discharge garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name> of Pennsylvania<lb/> no 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial, affidavit in support<lb/> of motion for a new trial, and also transcript of<lb/> judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name> assignee &amp; c<lb/> no 829<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name></head>
            <p>Notice served on <name>Joseph Conway</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties again by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein and thereupon the<lb/> trial of this cause progressed but not being finished further procee<lb/>dings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="235" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0238.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#332.10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Williams C Booth</name><lb/> no 210<lb/> <name>Clandius R Lassall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and thirty two dollars and ten cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefore against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#317.50<lb/> vs<lb/> Ludwig</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Booth</name><lb/> no 1026<lb/> <name>J Ludwig</name>, and <name>E W Crapstar</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Claudius B Lassell</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and dismissed this proceeding as to <name>E W Crapstar</name><lb/> but the other garnishee although duly called comes<lb/> not nor hath he answered the interrogatories herein, <lb/> wherefore, on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the interrogatories be taken against him as confessed: and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this cause to the Court upon the interrogatories and proofs, and the Court<lb/> doth find therefore that the said <name>J Ludwig</name> was indebted to the defendant <name>Claudius<lb/> R Lassell</name> it the time he was summoned herein as garnishee in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and seventeen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum the plaintiff<lb/> pay the costs of the original suit as well as of the proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred W Lamb</name><lb/> no 137<lb/> <name>Joseph H Brotherton</name>, <name>Francis Webster</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel D South</name>, <name>Richard Martin</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Chase</name> and <name>Thomas Harris</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff by his attorney, comes and files<lb/> a petition herein and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the application in the<lb/> petition for a restraining order, doth order that the defen<lb/>dants <name>Brotherton</name>, <name>Webster</name>, <name>Chase</name> and <name>Harris</name>, <lb/> and each of them, their servants agents, and attorneys be restrained and enjoined, until<lb/> the further order of this Court, form selling or offering for sale and from making any<lb/> deed for a certain tract or parcel of land situate lying and being in the County of<lb/> Marion State of Missouri, beginning at the lower corner of the town of Portscipio<lb/> as designated by the plat of the same, and running up and with the boundary of the<lb/> Mississippi River to a point where a crack or branch crosses said tract of Portscipio<lb/> and running up said branch in the middle of the same with a straight line<lb/> commencing at a point at the edge of the water on the Mississippi River and running back from said river until it strikes near boundary of said town of<lb/> Portscipio, thence with said boundary to a diagonal line and with said line to the<lb/> point of beginning on the Mississippi river; Provided however that the said<lb/> <name>Alfred W Lamb</name> first execute a bond to the defendants in the penal sum of Eight<lb/> thousand dollars with good and sufficient security conditioned according<lb/> to law. The plaintiff files a bond with <name>Albert Pearce</name>, as security which<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="236" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0239.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles McCormick</name><lb/> no 207<lb/> <name>Henry W Tracy</name> and<lb/> <name>Eugene Papin</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the affidavit of the<lb/> plaintiff that the defendants are not residents of the State of<lb/> Missouri, therefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that they be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against them founded on two notes for the sum of sixteen hundred and nine<lb/> dollars and seventy one cents, and their property has been attached and unless they be and ap<lb/>pear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third<lb/> day thereof answer the plaintiff petition, judgment will rendered against them and their<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, accor<lb/>ding to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-11-30">Tuesday November 30th 1858</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p><name>William R Riddlecome</name> assignee herein files<lb/> an application for further time to file an inven<lb/>tory herein, and on his motion fifteen days further<lb/> time is given him to file such Inventory.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> no 683<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p><name>Alias Summons</name> ordered for defendants <name>Thomas L Moore</name><lb/> <name>John G Glenn</name> and <name>Albert Becker</name> and cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Purvis</name><lb/> no 288<lb/> <name>Eliza Ann Purvis</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the affidavit<lb/> of the plaintiff that the defendant is a non resident of the State of<lb/> Missouri, therefore on motion of said plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that she be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against her to obtain a decree of divorce, and that unless she be and appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next and on or be<lb/> before the Sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken<lb/> against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the St Louis Morning Herald a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="237" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0240.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Attachment. Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff by his attorney, comes and files a petition and<lb/> affidavit from which it appears that the defendant is a non <lb/>resident of the State of Missouri; therefore, on motion of plain<lb/>tiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against him for the sum of four hundred and eighty six dollars<lb/> and fifty cents, founded on two notes, and that his property has been attached and<lb/> unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and hed at<lb/> the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of<lb/> February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judg<lb/>ment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. <lb/> It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>St Louis Lumberman</name> and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name><lb/> no 536<lb/> <name>William O wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by its attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Gaus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Goulby</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Goulby</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff by his attorney comes and files a petition and<lb/> affidavit from which it appears that the defendants are<lb/> non residents of the State of Missouri, therefore on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered that they be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of One hundred and<lb/> eighty two Dollars and ten cents on account of work done for and goods wares and<lb/> merchandise sold and delivered to them and one <name>Thomas Goulby</name> by the plaintiff and<lb/> that their property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term<lb/> of this Court to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment<lb/> will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Dem<lb/>ocrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess<lb/> his damages at the sum of twenty five hundred dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> no 96<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> and <name>Manilius Carl</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>John Triplett</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name>, <name>R J Webber</name>, <name>F Wise</name>, <name>J Watchtel</name>, <name>F W<lb/> Ustick</name>, <name>Henry Spuler</name>, <name>John Mcjinnis</name>, <name>George King</name>,</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="238" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0241.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>J G Zackler</name>, <name>H. Bartold</name>, and <name>Issac White</name>, twelve good and lawful men, <lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue joined upon the Plea in abate<lb/>ment well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished at the<lb/> hour of adjournment further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-01">Wednesday December 1st 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sausser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J T Grane</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>S F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, and it appear<lb/>ing to the Court from the answer of said garnishee that at<lb/> the time he was summoned herein he was not indebted<lb/> to the defendant in any sum whatever, it is ordered that<lb/> he be discharged at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issued therefor. <lb/> Ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Scott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F Hodgle</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment by default and affidavit in support thereof filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Farmington</name> and <name>Blizzard</name><lb/> no 225<lb/> <name>Meek</name> and <name>Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Jeffries</name><lb/> no 69<lb/> <name>D D Denton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> no 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith Barnfield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Barnfield</name></head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit for continuance filed by defen<lb/>dant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al grant of <name>McDonald</name> et al</head>
            <p>Until the sixth instant is given Phillips to file<lb/> claim under assignment of <name>Wm Lings</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#25,00</note>
            <p><name>Henry N Hart</name>, Esq, an attorney of this Court, is fined twenty five dollars for a contempt of Court<lb/> by him committed in speaking to <name>Charles G Mares</name>, another attorney of this Court, in the presence<lb/> and during the session of the Court the following words to wit: "if you state that again I will knock you down."</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="239" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0242.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name>,<lb/> <name>Cornelius W Small</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas W Wells</name> and<lb/> <name>John G Wells</name><lb/> no 133<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County comes<lb/> and files a statement from which it appears that the kee<lb/>ping of the property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with much expense before the probable termi<lb/>nation of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is<lb/> therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property accor<lb/>ding to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Kribben</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Volland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Frahin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that Execution issue against the<lb/> plaintiff for the amount of the judgment obtained by<lb/> the defendant against the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> no 96<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> and <name>Manilius Carl</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-02">Thursday December 2nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> et al</head>
            <p>motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> no 299<lb/> <name>Alfred M waterman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Issac W Mitchell</name><lb/> no 304<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfication</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandemale</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
            <p><name>William M Cooke</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes<lb/> and in open Court acknowledges to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on<lb/> the <date when="1858-05-15">fifteenth day of May, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date><lb/> for the sum of five hundred and thirty dollars and sixty six cents, nunc pro tune as of<lb/> the <date when="1858-03-06">sixth day of March 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William T Matter</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and counterclaim filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="240" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0243.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#311.80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Beste</name> and<lb/> <name>Felix Grima</name><lb/> no 204<lb/> <name>Joseph T Tourville</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolphe S Leone</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and dismiss this suit as to the defendant <name>Adolphe S<lb/> Leone</name>, but the defendant, <name>Tourville</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, <lb/> wherefore on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> eleven hundred dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> no 96<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> and<lb/> <name>Manilius Carl</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come, and the Jury aforesaid upon their on the<lb/> aforesaid find for the defendants. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that at the commencement of this suit the defendants had<lb/> not fraudulently conveyed and assigned their property and effects, and that they had<lb/> not fraudulently concealed removed and disposed of their property and effects, and<lb/> that they were not about fraudulently to convey, conceal remove and dispose of their prop<lb/>erty and effects so as to hinder and delay their creditors: wherefore it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of the said plain<lb/>tiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#389.55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">Pacific Rail Road<lb/> no 285<lb/> <name>August Koch</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess its damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of three<lb/> hundred and eighty nine dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and also its costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of <name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> trustee under the <name>Will of Ann</name><lb/> <name>Biddle</name> deceased</head>
            <p>Order for Production of Papers.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>Louis G Picot</name> trustee under the Will<lb/> of <name>Ann Biddle</name>, it is ordered that the Judge of the<lb/> St Louis Probate Court produce forthwith the<lb/> following papers on file in the Clerk's Office of said Probate Court, to wit: all the<lb/> inventories filed by <name>John O Fallon</name>, as Executor of <name>Ann Biddle</name>, deceased; also, all the<lb/> several annual statements accounts, and the final settlements; also, the vouchers and<lb/> receipts charged by said Executor against said estate and all other documents, exhib<lb/>its and papers touching the administration of said estate remaining in the Clerks Of<lb/> fire of said Probate Court to be used in the trial of this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Brungard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas H Cavanaugh</name></head>
            <p>Motion to enter judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="241" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0244.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>One cent<lb/> damages.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Farrington</name> and<lb/> <name>Ephraim S Blizard</name><lb/> no 225<lb/> <name>Joseph Meek</name> and <name>Clemens</name>.</head>
            <p>Judgment. Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>J C<lb/> Conner</name>, <name>D B Tayer</name>, <name>S Samelson</name>, <name>E K Woodward</name><lb/> <name>R Sibold</name>, <name>R Huber</name>, <name>F Gelfort</name>, <name>J McIntire</name>, <name>R K<lb/> Woods</name>, <name>Wm Murdock</name>, <name>George Schuer</name>, and <name>W Smith</name>, <lb/> twelve goods and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the<lb/> sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> retain the possession of the property mentioned in the petition and delivered to them by<lb/> the Sheriff and that they recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> no 222<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name>, <name>Thomas L Rives</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles F Meyer</name> and <name>John E Liggett</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their re<lb/>spective attorneys and thereupon come also a<lb/> Jury to wit; <name>H Speeler</name>, <name>J McGinnis</name>, <name>G Zackler</name><lb/>, <name>J C Connor</name>, <name>D P Thayer</name>, <name>R K Ober</name>, <lb/> <name>F Gelfort</name>, <name>J McEntire</name>, <name>Wm Murdock</name>, <lb/> <name>J C Gilmore</name>, <name>C Crone</name> and <name>George King</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and after some progress therein the plaintiff, by leave of Court, <lb/> withdraws all claim for damages on bond for the sum of five hundred dollars, <lb/> and elects to proceed on bond for the sum of Six hundred and thirty dollars and<lb/> thereupon the trial further progressed but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John K Brettlle</name><lb/> no 29<lb/> <name>Patrick Malloy</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>Henry N Hart</name>, assignee herein, the<lb/> time for selling the goods wares and merchandise<lb/> assigned is extended thirty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Marshall</name> and <name>James McHughes</name><lb/> no 574<lb/> <name>Clay Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="242" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0245.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-03">Friday December 3rd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name> this day appoints <name>Warren Montfort</name> as deputy clerk of this Court<lb/> which appointment is approved by the Court, and thereupon the said <name>Warren<lb/> Montfort</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> no 776<lb/> <name>James N Stephenson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dedimus to Illinois for defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Farington</name> et al<lb/> no 225<lb/> <name>Joseph Meek</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al<lb/> garnt of <name>McDonald</name> et al</head>
            <p>Claim of <name>N Phillips</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Mcphectus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J A Barrett</name> garnt of Sigerson et al</head>
            <p>Answer of Garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Richards</name><lb/> no 778<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Clark</name><lb/> no 224<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name> and<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, by their attorney, and<lb/> file a petition for a change of venue, and the Court, hav<lb/>ing duly heard and considered the same, doth order that<lb/> this cause be transferred to the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk of this Court make out a full true and<lb/> complete transcript of the record and proceedings herein and deliver the same<lb/> duly certified to the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#648,58<lb/> plff remeits<lb/> #107,23</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> no 222<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name>, <name>Thomas L Rives</name><lb/> <name>Charles F Meyer</name> and <name>John E Liggett</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empanelled and sworn herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at<lb/> the sum of six hundred and forty eighty dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as<lb/> assessed, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Thereupon the<lb/> plaintiff by his attorney, remits the sum of one hundred and seven dollars and twenty three cents of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="243" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0246.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo D Holmes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Bingham</name> et al</head>
            <p>This Court having no jurisdiction in this cause it is<lb/> ordered that the same be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al<lb/> no 260<lb/> <name>William King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi J North</name><lb/> no 283<lb/> <name>Anton Wiseman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by order<lb/> of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Forsythe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#923,10<lb/> St Louis <date when="1863-10-23">Oct 2nd 1863</date><lb/> I hereby acknowledge full<lb/> and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment of which<lb/> this is the margin<lb/> attest S <unclear>Rea cll</unclear><lb/> <name>M. L. Gray</name> <unclear>ally word</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Steen</name><lb/> no 298<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>John Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>On note Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defen<lb/>dant, <name>John Boffinger</name>, by their respective attorneys and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find<lb/> therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine<lb/> hundred and twenty three dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schoenhals</name><lb/> no 247<lb/> <name>Charlotte Schoenhals</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> and being finished the Court takes the same under<lb/> advisement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hyacinthe</name> (a free woman of color) no 210<lb/> <name>Hyacinthe Renard</name></head>
            <p>Now at this come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit<lb/> <name>John Triplett</name>, <name>Thomas Wall</name>, <name>R J Webber</name><lb/>, <name>F Wise</name>, <name>J White</name>, <name>Jacob Zachtel</name>, <name>T W Ustick</name><lb/> <name>H Rartold</name>, <name>L Samelson</name>, <name>E K Woodward</name>, <name>S Sibold</name> and <name>Robert K<lb/> Woods</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> take nothing by her suit in this behalf but that the said defendant go hence<lb/> without day recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Burchanan</name> et al<lb/> no 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on<lb/> account of the absence of <name>Philip Fisher</name>, as witness.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="244" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0247.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-04">Saturday December 4th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George w Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>James C Moody</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Nulsen</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Koser</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>William Koser</name> and<lb/> <name>William Reinhart</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use of <name>Jno Decker</name><lb/> no 222<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside verdict filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert McDonald</name><lb/> no 463<lb/> <name>Allison Stickney</name></head>
            <p>Demurer to Counterclaim filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> no 1034<lb/> <name>Thomas Nelson</name> garnt</head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the garnishee herein be discharged at the costs of the<lb/> said garnishee and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> no 40<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate affidavits of <name>William K Wilson</name> and <name>William H Knowlton</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>Elliott</name><lb/> no 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion to strike out parts of the petition and being<lb/> thereof fully advised doth sustain the same. Leave is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Heisch</name><lb/> no 809<lb/> <name>John G Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> strike out parts of the petition and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McThompson</name> et al<lb/> no 258<lb/> <name>Wm D W Barnard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> no 86<lb/> <name>M C Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> no 145<lb/> St Bt <name>James E. Woodruff</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue for the plaintiff to the United States<lb/> Consul at Leipoic, Sapony, and also to United States Consul at<lb/> City of <name>Bremen</name> in <name>Holland</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="245" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0248.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D S Haslett</name><lb/> no 185<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent. &amp;<lb/> property</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Russell</name><lb/> no 196<lb/> <name>Sylvester Laflin</name></head>
            <p>Judgment. Relpevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and file a statement of agreed facts, and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and agreed<lb/> facts and the Court having duly considered the same doth find that the plain<lb/>tiff is the owner of the property mentioned and described in the plaintiffs petition<lb/> and doth assess his damages for the taking of the same at the sum of one cent.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff retain the possession<lb/> of the said property and that herecover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schoenhals</name><lb/> no 247<lb/> <name>Charlotte Schoenhals</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties again by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the Court being now fully advised of and<lb/> concerning the premises doth order adjudge and decree that<lb/> the crop bill herein be dismissed, and being satisfied from the proof of the good<lb/> conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party<lb/> it doth further order adjudge and decree that he be absolutely and forever divorced<lb/> from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and berestored<lb/> to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that he pay the costs<lb/> herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Brengard</name><lb/> no 394<lb/> <name>Thomas H Cavanaugh</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> enter up judgment by default being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside verdict filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten O clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="246" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0249.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-06">Monday December 6th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Arthur w Elliott</name><lb/> no 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al</head>
            <p>amended petition filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick R Toewater</name><lb/> no 640<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>agreement of parties filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W McLamant</name><lb/> no 236<lb/> <name>John Todd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial withdrawn by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> no 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Heisch</name><lb/> no 809<lb/> <name>John G Jonesetal</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius A smith</name><lb/> no 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Report of Commissioner and four Exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A Reilley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants Opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Cashman</name> and<lb/> <name>James L Brickey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Durrell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction. The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and file a petition<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> application contained therein and the plaintiffs having<lb/> filed abond in the sum of One thousand dollars con<lb/>ditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court, it is ordered that the de<lb/>fendant, his servants, agents and attorneys, and each of them, and all other persons, be<lb/> and they are hereby restrained and enjoined from removing out of this State a certain<lb/> negro slave named <name>Jane</name>, about eighteen years of age, until the further order of this Court. <lb/> And it is further ordered that the Sheriff of St Louis County seize and take into<lb/> his possession said slave wherever and in whose hands so ever found: and on the<lb/> defendants giving bond to the plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand dollars with<lb/> good and sufficient security the said Sheriff is hereby ordered to redeliver said<lb/> slave to the defendant; but if said defendant fail to give said bond then the said Sheriff is ordered to deliver said slave to the plaintiffs upon their giving like<lb/> bond to the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="247" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0250.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1700,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> no 299<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name><lb/> <name>Steven Lee</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter Lee</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchanges.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant<lb/> Waterman by their respective attorneys, but the defendant<lb/> to <name>Steven</name> and <name>Peter</name> <name>Lee</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and thereupon<lb/> come a Jury to wit; <name>S Wessells</name>, <name>C Burke</name>, <name>J Rosenthine</name>, <name>A Erckeberger</name>, <name>S Mills</name>,<lb/> <name>P Carson</name>, <name>Henry</name>, <name>Wiessenfeld</name>, <name>L Garnier</name>, <name>John Fowley</name>, <name>Charles Able</name>, <name>Frederick</name><lb/> may, and a Line, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and<lb/> assess the damages at the sum of Seventeen hundred dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-07">Tuesday December 7th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit C filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> 140<lb/> The St Bt <name>James C Doodruff</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Louisiana for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1112,06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> <name>William Blow</name><lb/> and <name>Taylor Blow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> 311<lb/> <name>The Chicago Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> withdraws its answer herein and consents<lb/> and agrees with the plaintiff that judg<lb/>ment may be rendered herein against<lb/> the defendant for the sum of Eleven hundred and twelve dollars and six cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as agreed upon and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>Alias summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="248" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0251.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1048,32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sparrow</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and<lb/> <name>St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court doth find there from that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and forty eight dol<lb/>lars and thirty, two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#137,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Meriden Brittania Company</name><lb/> vs 403.<lb/> <name>Julius Uhlenreeth</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its<lb/> attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default wherefore on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibit<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition men<lb/>tioned at the sum of One hundred and thirty seven dollars and sixty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel G Carnes</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Haskell</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Champion</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defen<lb/>dant, Champion, cannot be found, and the Court<lb/> being satisfied that process cannot be served<lb/> upon him, therefore on motion of Plaintiffs<lb/> attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that he be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against for the sum of two<lb/> hundred and fifty dollars and ninety cents, founded on a bill of exchanges,<lb/> and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to begun and held<lb/> at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday<lb/> of February next and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs<lb/> petition the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered<lb/> that a copy, hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#311, 10<lb/> <name>D. J Hancock</name> and <name>W N<lb/> Chappell</name>, says</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Coocke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Steamboat <name>F X Aubrey</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> complaint and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth assess the damages sustained by reason of the premises in the complaint men<lb/>tioned at the sum of three hundred and eleven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of <name>Daniel Hancock</name>, the principal, and <name>William<lb/> H Chappell</name>, the security, in the bond given for the release of the said defendant,<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="249" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0252.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Mick</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Alexander Gwenadon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this suit be dismissed as to<lb/> the defendant <name>Alexander gwenadon</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#593,06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Arthur Vallon</name> and <name>Leon Vallon</name><lb/> vs 446<lb/> <name>John P Shenk</name> and <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the<lb/> defendants, <name>John Helgenberg</name>, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and the said defendant with<lb/>draws his answer herein, leaving this suit undefended, but the other defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, It is therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and ninety three dollars<lb/> and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants to the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#713, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Dean</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>William M Barron</name>, and <name>Walter L F Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>William M Barron</name>,<lb/> and the defendant, <name>Gage</name>, by his attorney, also comes<lb/> and withdraws, his answer herein and consents and<lb/> agrees with the plaintiff that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the<lb/> said plaintiff for the sum of Seven hundred and thirteen dollars and ninety<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum a aforesaid inform aforesaid as agreed upon and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen K Houser</name></head>
            <p>On application of <name>Charles G Mauro</name>, Circuit attorney, this<lb/> cause is laid over to the <date when="--01-10">tenth day of January</date> next; and<lb/> thereupon <name>John Falks</name>, <name>Frank Richardson</name>, <name>Francis Sullivan</name>,<lb/> <name>Matilda Jorench</name>, and <name>Mary Ann Byles</name> severally acknowledge themselves to over the<lb/> State of Missouri the sum of two hundred dollars to be levied of their respective goods<lb/> and chattels lands and tenements, Yet upon condition that if they shall personally<lb/> appear before this Court on the Second Monday of January next, being the tenth day<lb/> of said month, to testify as a witnesses on behalf of the State in this case upon a charge<lb/> of murder in the first degree, and shall not depart the Court without leave thereof<lb/> then this recognizance, to be void else of full force and effect.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Robert W Scott</name> and <name>Henry Berry</name>, two credible, witnesses, who are personally Known<lb/> to the Court, come in open Court, and upon their oaths, prove the acknowledgment<lb/> and execution of a Deed of Emancipation by <name>George R Robinson</name> to his negro slave<lb/> <name>Henry</name>, aged thirty five years, of a dark copper five feet ten inches and three<lb/> fourths of an inch in height, has a light scan on left eye one inch from root of hair,<lb/> and a skin mark under right cheek bone.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="250" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0253.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Henry Peckham</name>,<lb/> <name>Abram Barker</name> and<lb/> <name>Byardy Oackley</name> for<lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jumiach J Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court doth find therefrom that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and twelve dollars and ninety eight<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> this costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#226, 31</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Y Bast</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Graham L Rughes</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>O P Koegnig</name>, <name>O<lb/> Michael</name>, <name>B Meroman</name>, <name>Miller</name>, <name>John Momill</name> <name>K Picker</name>,<lb/> <name>R Schneider</name>, <name>Louis Wisc</name>, <name>J Cunningham</name>, <name>Human Bergisch</name>, <name>C Bernicker</name>,<lb/> and <name>H Bakerwell</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and<lb/> assess the damages at the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars and thirty one<lb/> ants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Alberton</name></head>
            <p>Replication to Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gray</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> The Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Louis Walker</name>,<lb/> <name>R S Rua</name>, <name>Henry Hasebrock</name> <name>C H Smead</name>, <name>C Deal</name>,<lb/> <name>William R Harland</name>, <name>Charles Grabell</name>, <name>C Burke</name>, <name>J Rosenthine</name>, <name>J Eichelber<lb/>ger</name>, <name>L Mills</name>, and <name>Pleasear</name> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected,<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="251" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0254.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-08">Wednesday December 8th, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah J. Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiff costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Jigh</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Francis Jigh</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martha Faris</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Jonathan J Faris</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert McDonald</name><lb/> s 463.<lb/> <name>Allison Stickney</name></head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antorine Morins</name> Executive<lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Daniel Perreault</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburn</name> Executive<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer Higginsetal</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Cushman Cadwell</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver J Bragg</name>.<lb/> vs 322<lb/> <name>Alexander Lowry</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The St Louis <name>Bagging D Ropeles</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James E Yeatman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> Trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiff at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Y Human</name> et al<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cunife</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Coph Jr.</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> St Louis County</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Heper</name><lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>George Jackson</name></head>
            <p>continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Ehlert</name><lb/> vs 897<lb/> <name>Johanna Stiefrater</name> admrx</head>
            <p>Note used on filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="252" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0255.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name>, <name>Sarah A Collier</name>,<lb/> and <name>Alfred Chadwick</name> Executors of<lb/> and Trustees under the last Will of<lb/> <name><name>George Collier</name></name>, deceased.<lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Jane Powell</name>, <name>John, C Powell</name>, <name>Elizabeth<lb/> B Powell</name>, <name>Julia R Wilgus</name>, and the<lb/> unknown heirs and legal representatives of<lb/> <name>William Rector</name>, deceased.</head>
            <p>Decree.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the said parties<lb/> plaintiff, by their attorney, and the said<lb/> defendants <name>Jane Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name><lb/> by their attorney of record, and the said minor defendants <name>Elizabeth B Powell</name> and<lb/> <name>Julia R Wilgus</name> by <name>William R Bid<lb/>dlecome</name>, their guardian and literm in this behalf;<lb/> whereupon said plaintiffs dismiss this<lb/> their suit as to the unknown heirs and legal<lb/> representatives of <name>William Rector</name>, deceased; and neither party requiring a Jury the<lb/> said cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs therein; and the<lb/> Court having considered the same and being fully advised thereof doth find that the<lb/> tract of land in the petition mentioned, to wit; "the Southwest quarter of Section fifteen in<lb/> township forty six North, Range nine West," and situate in the County of all away<lb/> State of Missouri, was by <name>William Rechtor</name> in his life time conversed to Peter Powell in<lb/> trust for the purposes mentioned in the deed from said <name>Rechtor</name> to said <name>Powell</name> as<lb/> Trustee of <name>George Collin</name>, dated the <date when="1824-01-14">fourteenth day of January, Eighteen hundred<lb/> and twenty four</date> and recorded in the Recorders Office of said Callaway County in<lb/> Book B page One hundred and eighty seven and following; that the said that of<lb/> land was thereafter and in pursuance and by authority of the provisions of said deed<lb/> of trust sold by said <name>Peter Powell</name> as such Trustee to said <name>George Collier</name>, the testator<lb/> of the plaintiffs; that said <name>Peter Powell</name> thereafter executed and delivered to said<lb/> <name>George, Collin</name> the deed mentioned in plaintiffs petition dated the <date when="1826-09-27">twenty seventh day<lb/> of September, eighteen hundred and twenty six</date>, recorded in the Recorder Office of<lb/> said Callaway County in Book B, folios twelve, thirteen, and fourteen, by which deed<lb/> it was intended to convey to said <name>George Collin</name> in fee simple as purchaser thereof<lb/> the said tract of land, to wit; "the South west quarter of section fifteen in Township<lb/> forty six North Range nine West;" that in and by said deed the said tract so sold and intended to be conveyed to said <name>George Collin</name> was by mistake wrongly des<lb/>cribed therein; and that in the description of property purporting to be conveyed in and<lb/> by said deed last mentioned, the following description, to wit: "the South West<lb/> quarter of section fifteen in Township forty four Change nine West," was erroneous<lb/> and was intended to mean designate and convey the tract herein before mentioned,<lb/> and sold to said <name>George Collin</name> as aforesaid: and further that since the execution<lb/> of said deed last mentioned the said <name>George Collin</name> in his life time was and<lb/> the said plaintiffs executors and devises of said <name>Collin</name> since said colliers death have<lb/> been and still are in the undisturbed possession of said "South West quarter of section<lb/> fifteen in Township forty six North Range nine West:" It is therefore decreed ordered<lb/> and adjudged that the said erroneous description in said last mentioned deed con<lb/>tained be and the same is hereby reformed and corrected in accordance with the<lb/> facts so found by the court: and it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed<lb/> that the fee simple title to the said "South West quarter of section fifteen in Town<lb/>ship forty six North Range nine West" be and the same is hereby as against the<lb/> defendants heirs of <name>Peter Powell</name>, deceased nested and confirmed in the said plaintiffs,<lb/> levisuis thereof under the Will of the said <name>George Collin</name> under and pursuant to the<lb/> trusts in the said Will continued and declared, and that the said defendants, heirs<lb/> of said <name>Peter Powell</name>, deceased, be forever divested of all night, title, clain and interest in and the<lb/> said last described track by through or under him said Powell, and that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover their costs herein expended and that they have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="253" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0256.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Clement P Mallory</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Perewal Plat</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer to<lb/> the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth that the same<lb/> be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Y Gaylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Frank P Corley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#328, 68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob P</name> faw and <name>John M Pfaw</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>C Y Heinichs</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and by leave of Court amends their petition by inserting in the caption thereof the given name "Jacob",<lb/> of the defendant: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> twenty eight dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#241,39</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Grassmuck</name><lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Charles F Roelzle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the<lb/> Court having duly considered the application for a continuance herein<lb/> doth overrule, the same, and the defendant failing further to appear,<lb/> the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court upon the petition and answer and the<lb/> Court doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and forty one dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#285, 26</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garnean</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighty five<lb/> dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="254" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0257.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#743, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gray</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> The Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and being finished<lb/> the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess his dam<lb/>ages at the sum of Seven hundred and forty three dollars and eighty four cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rebecca Myers</name> by her next<lb/> friend <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>Charles Myers</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the de<lb/>fendant cannot be summoned in this action, therefore on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that he be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him to obtain a decree of divorce, and that unless he be and and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next and on or before<lb/> the smith day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against him<lb/> as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy, hereof be published according to law<lb/> in the Missouri Republication a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#904, 46</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the motion and<lb/> affidavit for a continuance herein doth overrule the same, and<lb/> neither party requiring a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court doth find Therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of nine hundred and four dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1224, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>William L Ewing</name></name>, <name>Albert H Edwards</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name> and <name>Philip N Hermans</name>.<lb/> vs 165.<lb/> <name>Robert A Reilly</name>, <name>Richard J Lackwood</name>,<lb/> <name>Ralph</name>, <name>P Voorhies</name> and <name>William H Pearson</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury,<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages by reason of the premises in the petition<lb/> mentioned at the sum of twelve hundred and twenty four dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Little</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles H Olcott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Walter S Dann</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="255" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0258.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rosinsky</name><lb/> vs 105<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> vs 107<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph L Kornick</name><lb/> vs 106<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Harris</name><lb/> vs 109<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halstead</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezror Easterly</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <p><name>Henry Blaksley</name>, assignee of judgment, acknowledges<lb/> in open Court to have received full and entire sat<lb/>isfaction of the judgment rendered herein for the sum<lb/> of four hundred and ten allow and thirty three cents on the <date when="1856-11-12">twelfth day of November<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty six</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward S Chase</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra Easterly</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>Henry Blaksley</name> assignee of judgment, comes in open<lb/> Court and acknowledges to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein for the<lb/> sum of One hundred and twenty three dollars and sixty four cents, on the <date when="1856-11-12">twelfth day of November eighteen hundred and fifty six</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halstead</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra Easterly</name></head>
            <p><name>Henry Blakoley</name>, assignee of judgment, comes in Open Court<lb/> and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and seventy four dollars and eighty three cents on the <date when="1856-11-12">twelfth day<lb/> of November eighteen hundred and fifty six.</date></p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halstead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra Easterly</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>Henry Blaksley</name> assignee of judgment, in open Court acknowledge to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of judgment rendered Eleven hundred and seventy<lb/> four dollars and sixty seven cents on the <date when="1856-11-12">twelfth day of November eighteen hundred and fifty six</date>:</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halstead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm D W Barnard Rudolph Adams</name><lb/> and <name>Chat H Peck</name> garni, of Easterly</head>
            <p><name>Henry Blaksley</name> assignee in open Court acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of judgment for three hundred and<lb/> three dollars and sixty five cents, rendered on the twenty <date when="1857-12-01">first day<lb/> of December eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>,</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="256" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0259.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1000,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Page</name><lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Alfred M Walterman</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry J Darah</name>,<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles W Herbert</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defen<lb/>dant <name>Waterman</name> by their respective attorneys, but<lb/> the other defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff by his attorneys, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds that the defendants <name>Darrah</name>, <name>Pomeroy</name>,<lb/> and <name>Herbert</name> are indebted to the plaintiff, on account of the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded, in the sum of One thousand dollars; and the<lb/> defendant, <name>Waterman</name>, consents, and agress with the plaintiff that judgment may<lb/> be rendered herein against him for the same amount, above mentioned. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and agreed upon<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Issac J Wise</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court the plaintiff amends his amended petition<lb/> herein by inserting on the first page thereof the words and before<lb/> the commencement of this suit: and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the demurrer to the amended petition and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Plagie Morin</name> Administratrix of<lb/> <name>Antoine Morin</name> deceased<lb/> vso 332<lb/> <name>Jermain Pettier</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>James Mclung</name>, <name>Thomas Slevin</name>, <name>R Bakwell</name>,<lb/> <name>C Brinker</name>, <name>H Bergisch</name>, <name>J Cunningham</name>, <name>R<lb/> Schneider</name>, <name>John Momill</name>, <name>Josiah Miller</name>, <name>B Mersman</name>, <name>P Michael</name> and <name>L Wessells</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try the trial, progressed and being finished the Jury retire to<lb/> consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="257" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0260.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-09">Thursday December 9Th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gray</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name>. assignee &amp;c<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John F Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krantler</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Devlin</name> et al<lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Morris D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeffrey Seymour</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>Miles g Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit a and also an agreed statement of facts filed.<lb/> The defendant <name>Miles G Moies</name> comes and withdraws his answer filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J Reynolds</name><lb/> vs 380<lb/> <name>Thomas J Albright</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver T Bragg</name><lb/> vs 322<lb/> <name>Alexander Lowry</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Reynolds</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>Horace E Dimick</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>Timothy Dwight</name> Turner et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defen<lb/>dants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="258" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0261.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#137,72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pelagie Morin</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Antoine Morin</name> deceased<lb/> no 332<lb/> <name>Jermain Pethier</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and also the jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein and the jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum<lb/> of One hundred and thirty seven dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#453,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominick</name><lb/> no 362<lb/> <name>Frederick W Hackman</name><lb/> and <name>George Reimann</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not land the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the<lb/> Court doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of four hundred and fifty three dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#191,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George I Barnett</name> and<lb/> <name>Mahlon Weber</name><lb/> no 327<lb/> <name>M Triner</name> and <name>Samuel Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the defendants,<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name>, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiffs<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendant premier; and neither<lb/> party requiring a Jury this cause in submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find<lb/> therefrom that the defendants, <name>Jacoby</name>, is indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and ninety one dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion for<lb/> a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#172,15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Durand</name> <name>James J Carters</name>,<lb/> and <name>Michael C Doremus</name><lb/> no 461<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for the sum of One hundred and seventy two<lb/> dollars and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. By consent of parties execution is stayed for three months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh McKelvy</name><lb/> no 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties so much of answers as puts in issue note<lb/> dated <name>W Louis</name> <date when="1855-07-10">July tenth, eighteen hundred and fifty five</date> for<lb/> fourteen hundred and fifty eight dollars is withdrawn<lb/>. Stipulation of parties filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name><lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="259" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0262.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2235,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> no 354<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, <lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to set aside the judgment herein and being there of fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be sustained; and the dependant by his attorney, orally<lb/> moves the Court for a continuance herein and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the said motion doth order that the same be overruled; thereupon the attorney<lb/> for the defendant withdraws his appearance herein, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court doth find<lb/> therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty two hundred<lb/> and thirty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found together with interest thereon<lb/> at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#468,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Brungarl</name><lb/> no 394<lb/> <name>Thomas H Cavanaugh</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly called comes not, wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court doth find therefrom that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and sixty eight<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#663,68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Harrington</name><lb/> no 325<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>, <name>Clark J Morton</name> and<lb/> <name>Leonidas A Hall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendant<lb/> <name>Leonidas A Hall</name>; thereupon the other defendants with draw<lb/> their answer herein leaving this suit undefended, wherefore on<lb/> motion the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants <name>John H<lb/> Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and<lb/> sixty three dollars and sixty eight ants. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1138,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hall</name><lb/> no 416<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the Pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> No 143<lb/> <name>James Dhuseman</name></head>
            <p>One motion ten days time is given the plaintiff to file ex<lb/>ceptions to the commissioneries Report.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="260" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0263.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1533.03</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> no 384<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, <name>Todd</name><lb/> and <name>Atkinson</name> <name>Thomas M Taylor</name><lb/> and <name>Oscar W Collett</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Todd</name> and <name>Atkinson</name>, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but, makes default.<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the defendants, <name>Thomas M Taylor</name> and <name>Oscar W Collett</name>, although duly notified<lb/> and called come not, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the<lb/> Court doth find therefrom that the defendants <name>Frost</name>, <name>Taylor</name>, and <name>Collett</name>, are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred and thirty three dollars and three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1030,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> no 382<lb/> <name>Thomas M Taylor</name> <name>Oscar W<lb/> Collett</name> and <name>John M Chambers</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly called come<lb/> not; and the plaintiff, waiving a Jury, submits this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs,<lb/> and the Court doth find therefrom that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and thirty dol<lb/>lars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2108,16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezir G Lamson</name>, <name>Abel F Goodnow</name>,<lb/> <name>William T Clement</name>, and <name>Buriage B<lb/> Yale</name><lb/> no 373.<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>, <name>Clark J Morton</name> and<lb/> <name>Leonidas A Hall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the demuner to the petition herein and being<lb/> there of fully advised doth overrule the same; thereupon the plaintiffs dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Leonidas A Hall</name>, but the other defendants failing fur<lb/>ther to appear and plead herein it is, on motion of the said plaintiffs, by their attorney<lb/> ordered that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty<lb/> one hundred and eight dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Oberteuffer</name> et al<lb/> no 301<lb/> <name>John P Bermel</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Robyn</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this suit be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="261" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0264.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#305,05<lb/> value<lb/> 1 cent damp.<lb/> Vs pltff and<lb/> secys.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> no 363.<lb/> <name>John Bean</name></head>
            <p>Judgment Replurins.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney, but the<lb/> plaintiff although duly notified and called comes not, and<lb/> the defendant waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same and being thereof fully advised, doth find for the defendant and assess<lb/> the value of the property mentioned in the petition at the sum of three hundred and<lb/> five dollars and five cents, and assess the damages for the taking and detention of<lb/> the same at the sum of One cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff return said property in the petition mentioned and described<lb/> as follows, to wit: "two certain carriages called rockaways." to said defendant or<lb/> that said defendant recover of said plaintiff and of <name>George Horez</name> and <name>John J<lb/> Kiburg</name>, the securities in the replevin bond, the value of said property asssessed by<lb/> the Court, at the election of the said defendant and also that he recover the<lb/> damages assessed for the taking and detention of the said property together with<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#465 60<lb/> For value received we assignee and transfer the<lb/> judgment ended opposite this margin to <name>John<lb/> Watson</name>, this <date when="1868-08-25">25 day of aug 1868</date>.<lb/> <name>HasKell &amp;co</name><lb/> Attest <name>Jno Levis</name> clk.<lb/> By. <name>Jas M Francis</name> clk</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> no 421<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to strike out the demurer herein and for judgment and<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same; and on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, leave is given to amend the petition herein by in<lb/>serting immediately after word, "protest," and before word, "wherefore," the words, "plaintiffs<lb/> further states that said note be due and remains unpaid," and the Court having also duly<lb/> heard and considered the demurrer to the petition and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same; thereupon the defendant files a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement<lb/> herein and orally moves the Court for a continuance and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the said motion and being thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same,<lb/> and the defendant thereupon with draws his plea in abatement herein and files an answer<lb/> and this cause being then called for trial, and the defendant having been duly summoned<lb/> as a witness and failing to appear, the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, orally move the<lb/> Court to strike out the defendants answer and for judgment, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth order that said motion be sustained: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and sixty five dollars<lb/> and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Motion to tax costs against plaintiffs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#240,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Murphy</name><lb/> no 393.<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant Shands, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>C Burke</name>, <name>Isaac Ro<lb/>senthine</name>, <name>A Eichebberger</name>, <name>L Mills</name>, <name>Samuel Jacoby</name>, <name>M Washburn</name>, <name>A T<lb/> Abner</name>, <name>Louis Walker</name>, <name>H S Reed</name>, <name>H Kersbrock</name>, <name>C H Smead</name>,<lb/> and <name>C Deal</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished<lb/> the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants, <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> and <name>Joseph G Shands</name>, the sum</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="262" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0265.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1164,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Sulton</name><lb/> no 405<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although duly called, come not, and plaintiff waiv<lb/>ing a Jury submits this this cause to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs, and the Court doth find therefrom that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven<lb/> hundred and sixty four dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#515,36</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Roy</name> and <name>John Knower</name><lb/> no 375<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name><lb/> and <name>Leonidas A Hall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the demuner to the petition<lb/> and being thereof, fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same; thereupon the plaintiffs, by their attorney, dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Leonidas A Hall</name>, but the other defendants failing further to appear and pleas<lb/> herein it is on motion of the plaintiffs ordered that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark<lb/> J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and fifteen<lb/> dollars and thirty six cents. It is there fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid a found and also then<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#114.75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Roy</name> and <name>John Knower</name><lb/> no 377<lb/> <name>Emilies F Kraft</name> and <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their at<lb/>torney and waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the petition and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/>ages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One<lb/> hundred and fourteen dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as as<lb/>sessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 612<lb/> <name>Andrew McMeechan</name> and<lb/> <name>James Ballentine</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>Charles Maxwell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes in<lb/> open Court and acknowledges to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of judgment rendered against the<lb/> garnishees for the sum of three hundred and six<lb/> dollars and thirty seven cents, on the <date when="1857-12-21">twenty first day<lb/> of December eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer G Lawson</name> et al<lb/> no 376<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="263" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0266.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 607<lb/> <name>Thomas Ryan</name>, and <name>F K Louthan</name><lb/> garnt. of <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>Mcmullen</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes<lb/> in open Court and acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment ren<lb/>dered herein on the <date when="1857-12-15">fifteenth day of December,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date> for the sum of One hundred and ninety seven dollars and twenty nine cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 611<lb/> <name>J P Hanen Kamp</name> and <name>W R Hynes</name><lb/> garnt. of <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>Mcmullen</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes<lb/> in open Court and acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered herein on the <date when="1857-12-15">fifteenth day of December,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date> for the sum of four hundred and three dollars<lb/> and fifty six cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 604<lb/> <name>Mark Hamilton</name> grant. of <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>McMullen</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes in<lb/> open Court and acknowledges to have recovered full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein against the said garnishee on the <date when="1857-12-05">fifth day of December eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifteen seven</date> for the sum of One hundred and twenty four dollars and fifty cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 600<lb/> <name>Sydney Shackelford</name>, <name>John L Finney</name>,<lb/> <name>William R Finney</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>McMullen</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, Esq, attorney for the plaintiff,<lb/> comes in open Court and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered against the said garnishees on the <date when="1857-12-04">fourth<lb/> day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date><lb/> for the sum of One hundred and thirteen dollars and twenty four cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 599<lb/> <name>George W Thomas</name> and <name>Raymond A<lb/> Papin</name> garnt of <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>McMullen</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes in<lb/> open Court and acknowledges to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment against<lb/> the said garnishees on the day of <date when="1857-12">December,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date> for sixty six dollars and sixty cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> no 546<lb/> <name>James F Small</name>, <name>C W Wells</name>,<lb/> <name>T Wells</name>, and <name>JG Wells</name> garnt. Of<lb/> <name>Maxwell</name> and <name>McMullen</name>.</head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p> 
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, comes<lb/> in open Court and acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> against the garnishees on the <date when="1857-12-04">fourth day of<lb/> December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date> for<lb/> four hundred and seventy nine dollars and eighty three cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria L Brooks</name><lb/> no 440<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs on account of the<lb/> absence of <name>James O Alter</name> and <name>William F Alter</name>, witnesses.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="264" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0267.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hart</name><lb/> no 388<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion to dismiss<lb/> this suit for want of security for costs and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth order that the same be sustained and that this suit<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> <name>John Mudgett</name><lb/> and<lb/> <name>William C James</name></head>
            <p>Upon the claims of <name>A L Hardcastle</name> and be against the assignment.<lb/> By consent of parties the objections filed against the claims of<lb/> <name>A L Hardcastle</name> and company and the demand for a Jury trial<lb/> before the St Louis circuit court are withdraw. And by like<lb/> consent it is ordered by the court that the said claims be<lb/> referred back to the trustees for allowance, and that the notes and claims be<lb/> delivered to <name>John R Shepley</name>, attorney for said <name>A L Hardcastle</name> and Company for<lb/> that purpose. Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John Mudgett</name> and <name>William C James</name></head>
            <p>Upon the claims of <name>William Mudgett</name> and<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Chadwick</name> against said assignment.<lb/> By consent of parties the objections filed against<lb/> the claims of <name>William Mudgett</name> and <name>Elizabeth</name><lb/> <name>Chadwick</name> and the demand for a Jury trial before the St Louis Circuit Court are<lb/> withdraw. And by like consent it is ordered by the court that the said claims be<lb/> referred back to the trustees for allowance, and that the notes and claims be delivered<lb/> to <name>Samuel glover</name>, attorney for said <name>William Mudgett</name> and <name>Elizabeth Chadwick</name>,<lb/> for that purpose. Agreement filed. Notes and claims withdraw by said attorney.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hatter</name><lb/> no 341<lb/> <name>William Hatter</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly called, comes not nor hath he answered<lb/> herein, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the court after heaving the proof herein being satisfied that the plaintiff is an innocent<lb/> and injured party doth order adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever di<lb/>vorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be re<lb/>stored to all the right to and privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the<lb/> court that the defendant, from his habits and course of life, is an unsuitable person to<lb/> have the care and control of the child, <name>Thomas</name>, mentioned in the petition, who is tender<lb/> year, it is further ordered and adjudged that the said plaintiff have the care, custody<lb/> control, and management of the infant child aforesaid, and that she recover of the<lb/> said defendant her costs herein expended and the execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Kingman</name><lb/> no 401<lb/> <name>John Gates</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney but the plaintiff,<lb/> although solemnly called, comes not; wherefore, on motion of the de<lb/>fendant, by his attorney it is ordered by the court that the said<lb/> plaintiff be nonsuited, and that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said<lb/> plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="265" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0268.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-10">Friday December 10th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Susan Muldoon</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes Many <name>Muldoon</name>, by her attorney, and files<lb/> a petition praying for a Writ of <name>Habeas Corpus</name> to be directed to<lb/> <name>C Bain</name>, Whereupon the Court doth order that said Writ issue in<lb/> accordance with the prayer if said petitioner, returnable forthwith.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#229,24</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel Killion</name><lb/> no 477<lb/> <name>Edward B Davis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney, and<lb/> the defendant withdraw his answer herein and agrees with the plain<lb/>tiffs that judgment may be rendered herein in favor the plain<lb/>tiffs and against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and twenty<lb/> nine dollars and twenty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore. By consent of parties the<lb/> issue of execution is stayed until the <date when="1859-02-01">first day of February eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> no 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> no 849<lb/> <name>Daniel J Wright</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> no 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> no 849<lb/> <name>Daniel J Wright</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benneth S Aden</name><lb/> no 853<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah W Kennedy</name><lb/> no 471<lb/> <name>John C Coock</name></head>
            <p>Continued by order of court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State to use of <name>Julius Voelker</name><lb/> no 431<lb/> <name>John H Garnhart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#151,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Killion</name> and <name>Daniel Killion</name><lb/> no 478<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and warning a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the petition, exhibit and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by<lb/> reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of one hundred and fifty<lb/> one dollars. It is therefore considered by the court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Angelina Lotze</name><lb/> no 310<lb/> <name>John Christopher Lotze</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now a this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, and thereupon<lb/> the court proceeds to hear the proof herein and having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being satisfied there from that<lb/> the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that she<lb/> be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and he restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that her<lb/> maiden name, <name>Angelina Mahr</name>, here stored to her. It is further ordered that the defendant pay<lb/> the costs herein and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="266" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0269.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#464,16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Kellogg</name><lb/> no 565<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>Lewis A Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney<lb/> and the defendants <name>John Ho Hall</name> and <name>Clark. J Morton</name><lb/> withdraw their answer herein, whereupon the plaintiff dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Lewis A Hall</name>, but<lb/> the other defendants failing further to appear and plead<lb/> herein, it is, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys ordered that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> sixty four dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#349,64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hammond</name><lb/> no 566<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name><lb/> <name>Lewis A Hall</name>,<lb/> and <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney<lb/> and the defendants, <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, with<lb/>draw their answer herein, thereupon the plaintiff dismissed this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>Lewis a Hall</name>; and the after de<lb/>fendants failing further to appear and plead herein, it is there<lb/>fore an motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, ordered that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants <name>John H Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty nine dollars and eighty four<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#912,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Edgerton</name><lb/> no 407<lb/> <name>Logan Sleeper</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Lindley</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by of his attorney, and<lb/> on his motion leave is given <name>Rufus Swain</name> to amend the return<lb/> of service on the defendant, <name>William M Lindley</name>; which<lb/> amendment is accordingly made; but the said defendant<lb/> <name>Lindley</name> although duly notified and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the plaintiff, warning a Jury submits<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned, at the sum of nine hundred and twelve dollars and eighty<lb/> one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants, <name>Logan Sleeper</name> and <name>William M Lindley</name>, the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfreid Kleinmann</name><lb/> no 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name></head>
            <p>Appeal to the Supreme Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, by their attorney, and file<lb/> an affidavit for appeal, and the Court having duly consid<lb/>ered the same doth order that an appeal to the Supreme Court<lb/> be allowed said defendants from the judgment herein rendered.<lb/> Thereupon the said defendants file an appeal bond, conditioned according to law, which<lb/> bond is approved by the Court.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="267" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0270.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#5038,.21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emma McCawley</name><lb/> no 481<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name>,<lb/> <name>William McDowell</name> and <name>George W McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>William McDowell</name>, but the other<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by her attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendants as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>John McDowell</name> and <name>George<lb/> W McDowell</name>, our indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand and thirty<lb/> eight dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also her costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#550,95.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman</name><lb/> no 475<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>,<lb/> <name>Augustus S Boernstein</name>,<lb/> and <name>Francis P Blain</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by there respective attorneys,<lb/> and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendants <name>Francis<lb/> P Blain</name>, and the other defendants consent and agree with<lb/> the plaintiff that judgment may be rendered in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff and against the defendants for the sum of five hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as agreed upon together with<lb/> interest there on at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore. By consent of parties execution<lb/> is stayed until the <date when="1857-08-01">first day of August, eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1722,55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry E Warren</name><lb/> no 38<lb/> <name>Cornelius H Junison</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore J Junison</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and agree that judgment may be rendered herein<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for<lb/> the sum of seventeen hundred and twenty two dollars and<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Valentine</name> to the use of<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard B Bratt</name> <name>Edward Bredell</name> and<lb/> <name>Alfred Chadwick</name> Executors and <name>Farah A<lb/> Collier</name>, Executors of <name>George Collier</name>, deceased.<lb/> <name>Jerome Mulliken</name>, &amp; <name>Napoleon B Mulliken</name>,<lb/> Executors of <name>Charles Mulliken</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>George K McGunnegle</name>, president of the<lb/> <name>St Louis Insurance Company</name>, comes in open<lb/> Court and acknowledge to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction at the judgment ren<lb/>dered <date when="1855-05-17">May, seventeenth, eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty five</date>, for the sum of thirteen hun<lb/>dred and seventy five dollars.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac J Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Maguire</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now t this day comes the plaintiff in proper person, and ack<lb/>nowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment by confession herein on the <date when="1853-06-14">fourteenth day of June,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>, for the sum of three thousand seven hundred<lb/> and fifty three dollars and twenty two cents.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="268" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0271.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> no 312<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> rail road Company</name> and<lb/> <name>Joshua W Alexander</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and the defendant,<lb/> <name>Joshua Alexander</name>, by their respective attorneys, but<lb/> the defendant the <name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail Road<lb/> Company</name>, although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/>dant as confessed: and thereupon come a Jury, to wit. <name>Philip reason</name>; <name>H Weissenfeld</name>,<lb/> <name>L Gravier</name>, <name>John Fowler</name>, <name>Charles Able</name>, <name>J May</name>, <name>A Leisse</name>, <name>O P Koenig</name>, <name>P Michael</name>,<lb/> <name>Isaiah Miller</name>, <name>John Morrill</name> and <name>john Cunningham</name>, twelve good and lawful men,<lb/> who being duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try<lb/> the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until to<lb/>morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Fisher</name><lb/> no 428<lb/> <name>Henry Kattleman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff and sug<lb/>gests to the Court that service the commencement of this suit the<lb/> said plaintiff has departed this life, wherefore on motion of<lb/> said attorney it is ordered that this cause be continued until the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenn</name><lb/> no 38<lb/> <name>William E Sattmarsh</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that an alias Scire Facias issue herein to bring in <name>J E<lb/> Thompson</name> administrator of <name>Charles H Sattmarsh</name> deceased, Cause continued to next term.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bauemann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Boultinghous</name></head>
            <p>Attachment.</p>
            <p>Order of Application.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, files a petition and affidavit from<lb/> which it appease that the defendant is a non resident of the State<lb/> of Missouri, therefore, on motion of said plaintiffs attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that he be notified that civil action has been commenced against him<lb/> founded on a note for the sum of four hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty<lb/> four cents, and that his property has been attached, and unless he be and appear at the<lb/> next turn of this Court to be begun and held at the city of St Louis within and for<lb/> the country of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the<lb/> third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition, judgment will be rendered against him<lb/> and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and Pub<lb/>lished in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jermina A Crisman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Crisman</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her attorney, comes and files a petition and<lb/> affidavit from which it appears that that the defendant is a non<lb/> resident of the State of Missouri, therefore, on motion of said<lb/> plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered that he be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him to obtain a decree of divorce and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this court to be begun and<lb/> held in the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or be<lb/>fore the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Daily Express a newspaper prin<lb/>ted and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="269" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0272.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe Mutual Ins Co</name><lb/> no 404<lb/> <name>William P Davis</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the appli<lb/>cation of the defendant for a continuance herein doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sartori</name><lb/> no 79<lb/> <name>Lucian H Fuller</name> garn., of <name>Samuel T Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-11">Saturday December 11th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> no 257<lb/> <name>Thimothy Ryan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Bast</name><lb/> no 250<lb/> <name>David Jamison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> no 354<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> no 363<lb/> <name>John Dean</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> no 21<lb/> <name>William C Anderson</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same, and the Court having also heard and considered<lb/> the motion in arrest of judgment doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3814,69</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G A Scheidt</name><lb/> no 551<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>L A Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>One Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the demurer to the<lb/> petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same<lb/> thereupon the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendant <name>L A Hall</name> but the other defendants failing further to plead herein it is<lb/> therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney ordered that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants <name>John N Hall</name> and <name>Clark<lb/> J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirty eight hundred and<lb/> fourteen dollars and sixty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="270" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0273.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name>, <name>Truster Pock</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph O'Neil</name>, <name>Peter B Garesche</name>,<lb/> and <name>John C Ivory</name><lb/><lb/> no 787.<lb/> <name>William Provost, Senior</name>, <name>William<lb/> Provost, Junior</name> and <name>Jourissant<lb/> Racine</name>, guardian of <name>William<lb/> Provost, Junior</name>, <name>Edward Gamache</name>, and <name>Thomas Leitenodorfer</name> his guardian and <name>Peter Delore</name>, and <name>Marie</name> his wife.</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard, and considered<lb/> the motion to have the shares of the defendants<lb/> set off in one lot and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised doth order that the same be and is<lb/> hereby sustained. It is therefore ordered that<lb/> the decree therefore rendered herein be and the<lb/> same is set aside and for naught held and<lb/> thereupon come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and submit this cause to the Court,<lb/> and the Court, having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, and being fully advised of and concerning the premises, doth ascertain<lb/> and determine that the parties plaintiff and defendant are the owners of the real<lb/> estate described in the plaintiffs petition in this cause as follows, to wit: situate be<lb/>ing and being in the County of St Louis aforesaid, to wit; first a tract of land of one<lb/> and a half arpens in front from north to South and twenty arpens in depth<lb/> from East to West situate in the Common Field of Carondelet being the East<lb/> half of the tract confirmed to <name>John Baptist Gamache Jr</name> under <name>Gregoire Sarpy</name>, and<lb/> known as united States survey member eighty eight (88). Secondly a piece of land<lb/> situate in the Commons of St Louis in front of and adjoining the tract first above<lb/> described on the East containing one acre forty three hundred this of an acre<lb/> and being the same price or parcel of ground which was conveyed by the City of<lb/> St Louis to <name>John Baptist Gamache</name> under the name of <name>Baptist Gamache</name> by<lb/> deed dated <date when="1839-02-19">February nineteenth, eighteen hundred and thirty nine</date> in the Office<lb/> of the Recorder of the St Louis County in book H 2 pages five hundred and eighty<lb/> two; and the Court doth further ascertain and determine the respective rights and<lb/> interests of said parties and their shares and proportions in said real estate is<lb/> follows, to wit; the plaintiff, <name>Peter J Hurck</name>, is entitled to two undivided one<lb/> hundred and forty fourths of said two pieces of land: that the plaintiff, <name>Trusten<lb/> Polk</name>, is entitled to one undivided one hundred and forty fourth part of said two<lb/> pieces of land: that the plaintiffs, <name>Peter B Gareschi</name> and <name>Joseph O'Neil</name> are to<lb/>gether entitled to four undivided one hundred and forty fourths thereof: that the<lb/> plaintiff, <name>john Ivory</name>, is entitled to fifty three undivided one hundred and<lb/> forty fourths thereof in fee, and to a life of frances <name>Vien Gamache</name><lb/> she remaining a widow in the remaining eighty four one hundred and forty fourths<lb/> thereof, and, that subject to the said life estate in said <name>Ivory</name> the defendants <name>Marie<lb/> Delore</name>, wife of <name>Peter Delore</name>, and <name>Edward Gamache</name> are each entitled to twenty<lb/> eight undivided one hundred and forty fourths thereof: and that subject likewise<lb/> to said life estate, the defendant <name>William Provost, Senior</name>, as Coheir with <name>William<lb/> Provost, Junior</name>, in the interest of his deceased children is entitled to eight undivided<lb/> one hundred and forty fourths thereof: and subject to the same life estate the said<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> for is entitled to twenty undivided one hundred and forty fourths<lb/> thereof. And the aforesaid shares of the defendants are hereby ordered to be set<lb/> apart in one lot together. The Court doth therefore order adjudge and decree that<lb/> petition of said two tracts of land be made among said owners according to their<lb/> respective rights and interests as above ascertained and determined.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Oliver</name><lb/> no 379<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiff at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="271" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0274.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> no 270<lb/> The City Bank of St Louis</head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the Sheriff has made a<lb/> return of the execution in this cause that no goods chattels<lb/> lands and tenements can be found wheron to levy said execution, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court on the application of the plaintiffs attorney, that a writ of attachment issue<lb/> against the rights and credits of the defendants, reciting the judgment, execution and return<lb/> and directed to the Sheriff of St Louis County.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name> and<lb/> <name>Luther McKennett</name> garn<lb/> of City Bank of St Louis</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said garnishees be discharged at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#530,69</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cottinett</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry L Atherton</name><lb/> no 418<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> and<lb/> <name>Martin Collins</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find there from that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> five hundred and thirty dollars and sixty nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#810,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Guillaume</name> <name>Amadee</name><lb/> <name>C Fargis Anthony</name>, <name>Margaret</name>,<lb/> and <name>Sebastian Dupont</name><lb/> no 370<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> and<lb/> <name>Martin Collins</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find there from that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> Eight hundred and ten dollars and eighty one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor. Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4117,48<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>O &amp; M R Riles</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> no 312<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> and<lb/> <name>Joshua W Alexander</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> leave is given the Sheriff to amend his return herein by<lb/> erasing, in the fifth line thereof, the words, "<name>Isaac L</name>," before<lb/> the name of "<name>Garrison</name>," and interlining "<name>Daniel R</name>" in lien<lb/> thereof, which amendment in accordingly made; thereupon come also the Jury empan<lb/>nelled and sworn herein, whereupon the trial of this cause progressed and after some<lb/> progress the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>Alexander</name>, wherefore it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the Jury aforesaid be discharged: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant the <name>Ohio and<lb/> Mississippi Rail Road Company</name> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four thousand<lb/> one hundred and seventeen dollars and forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found,<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="272" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0275.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#200,73</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cresson</name>, <name>Stewart</name>,<lb/> and <name>Peterson</name>.<lb/> no 554<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>L A Hall</name> and <name>Morton J Clark</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, and on their motion leave is given to<lb/> amend the petition herein so as to make the name<lb/> of the defendant," <name>Morton J Clark</name>, read <name>Clark<lb/> J Morton</name>, which amendments is accordingly<lb/> made; thereupon the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendants, <name>L A Hall</name>, but the<lb/> other defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants, <name>John H<lb/> Hall</name> and <name>Clark J Morton</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> dollars and seventy three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#803,66</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Richard</name><lb/> no 778<lb/> <name>Joseph Foster</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> the plaintiff withdraws his motion to strike out the amended<lb/> answer herein and the defendant withdraws his amended answer<lb/> herein, and thereupon the parties agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of Eight hundred and three<lb/> dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. By consent of parties<lb/> the plaintiff withdraws the Exhibit a filed with the defendants answer. Copy of said<lb/> Exhibit A filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Bolton</name><lb/> no 40<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the law<lb/> of <name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> no 115<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name>, <name>George W Billings</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles B Hubbell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>L M Shreve</name>, plaintiff attorney, comes in open<lb/> Court and acknowledges full and entire satis<lb/>faction of the judgment rendered herein on the<lb/> <date when="1858-11-19">nineteenth day of November eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty eight</date> for the sum of one hundred dollars.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Scott</name><lb/> no 602<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set<lb/> aside the judgment herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> et al<lb/> no 647<lb/> <name>Abram Depew</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the said plaintiffs avid that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="273" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0276.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Alexanderson</name><lb/> no 876<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> et al<lb/> garn of <name>McDonald</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion leave in given the garnishee to amend his answer<lb/> by interlining on the second and third pages thereof the words<lb/> but never was nor has been accepted by him in writing. The<lb/> plaintiff withdraws his Exceptions to said answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> no 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to dis<lb/>solve the injunction herein doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Wakelam</name><lb/> no 128<lb/> <name>Charles H Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney leave is<lb/> given to amend the amended answer by striking out the<lb/> words <name>Alexander</name> and <name>Brown</name>, impleaded with <name>Charles H<lb/> Valentine</name> and <name>B W Carter</name>," wherever the same occur, and making it the answer of<lb/> the defendant <name>Valentine</name>, also: and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for judgment against the defendant <name>Valentine</name>, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Y Presbury</name><lb/> no 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> quash the Sheriff return on the amended petition and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of Louis of Picot trustee under the Will of <name>Ann Biddle</name></head>
            <p>Copy of order for production of papers and Sheriffs return<lb/> on same filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of 899<lb/> <name>Susan Muldoon</name></head>
            <p><name>Habeas Corpus</name>, On Petition of <name>Mary Muldoon</name>. Now at this day come as well the petitioner as the respondent with<lb/> the body of <name>Susan Muldoon</name>, and also the Writ of <name>Habeas<lb/> Corpus</name> to him directed with his return endorsed thereon, and the<lb/> Court after an examination of the matter herein being of opinion that said <name>Susan<lb/> Muldoon</name> is illegally restrained of her liberty doth order that she be discharged from<lb/> the custody of said respondent and be delivered forthwith into custody and charge<lb/> of the said petition and that the said petition pay the costs of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> no 773<lb/> <name>Moies</name> and <name>Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Agreement of parties filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="274" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0277.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-13">Monday December 13th,1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Mudd</name> et al<lb/> no 498<lb/> <name>George Y Bast</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Millen</name><lb/> no 482<lb/> <name>George W Millen</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> no 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Doogan</name><lb/> no 537<lb/> <name>Thomas J Doogan</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmady Stevens</name><lb/> no 523<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Richardson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Joseph Richardson</name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas B Banderson</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The Plaintiff comes and files a petition and<lb/> affidavit according to law claiming the possession<lb/> of certain personal property therein described; wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that the defendant deliver the<lb/> property specified in said petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff<lb/> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#325,52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, and <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> no 533<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein in favor of the plain<lb/>tiffs and against the defendant for the sum<lb/> of three hundred and twenty five dollars and fifty two cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also their costs herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#325,14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Hawk</name><lb/> no 550<lb/> <name>Charles F Tracy</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and no Jury being<lb/> required this cause in submitted to the Court upon the petition exhibit and proofs and<lb/> the Court doth find there from that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of three hundred and twenty five dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Mephaim</name> et al<lb/> no 17<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that <name>James<lb/> Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County pay over to said plaintiffs or<lb/> to <name>Francis Minor</name>, their attorney of record, out of the funds in his hands whatever amount said plaintiffs<lb/> may be entitled to upon the execution issued in their favor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="275" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0278.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1373,73</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> no 304<lb/> <name>A M Waterman</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry J Darrah</name>, and<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchanges.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant<lb/> <name>Waterman</name>, by their respective attorney, but the defendants <name>Darrah</name> and <name>Pomeroy</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants <name>Darrah</name><lb/> and <name>Pomeroy</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and seventy<lb/> three dollars and seventy three cents; and the defendant <name>Waterman</name> agrees with the<lb/> plaintiff that judgment may be rendered against him for the amount above<lb/> mentioned. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and agreed<lb/> upon and also his costs herein his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2329,93</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Lyon</name><lb/> no 488<lb/> <name>Miles Y Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>H M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Moies</name>, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the defendant <name>Moies</name> withdraws<lb/> his answer herein leaving this suit undefended, but the<lb/> defendant <name>Woodward</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, It is therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, or<lb/>dered that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty three<lb/> hundred and twenty nine dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Seaverson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication- Attachment</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that Therefore defendant cannot<lb/> be found and the Court being satisfied that process cannot<lb/> be served upon him; Therefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him for the sum of five thousand one hundred and thirty six dollars and<lb/> thirty three cents, for goods, waves and merchandise sold and delivered to the<lb/> defendant by the plaintiff, and that his property has been attached; and unless he<lb/> be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday, of February<lb/> next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiff petition judgment<lb/> will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is fur<lb/>ther ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Republication a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O'Cannon</name><lb/> no 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to set aside the default herein doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mount</name><lb/> no 579<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="276" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0279.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Waugh</name><lb/> no 514<lb/> <name>Leon Papin</name>, <name>Alphonse Dupre</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert Waugh</name>, <name>William W Waugh</name>,<lb/> <name>James C Waugh</name>, <name>Eugene Papin</name><lb/> and <name>Josephine Papin</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants<lb/> <name>Eugene</name> and <name>Josephine Papin</name> cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that process cannot<lb/> be served upon them, therefore, on motion of peti<lb/>tioners attorney, it is ordered that they be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> them, the object of which is to obtain a decree ratifying and confirming the original pro<lb/>ceedings in partition and sale of a certain lot in the City of Carondelet, and to quiet<lb/> the title to said premises and nest the same in the petitioner, and unless they be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the<lb/> sixth day thereof answer the petition herein, the same will be taken against them as confessed.<lb/> It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Rigele</name> etal<lb/> no 511<lb/> <name>Fredrick Sickemeyer</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to<lb/> the petition and being thereof fully advised doth sustained the<lb/> same. Leave is given the plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph K Oglesby</name><lb/> no 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Order for Production of Paper.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> files a petition for an order on the defendant, <name>Samuel Myerson</name>,<lb/> to produce a certain paper therein mentioned and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said petition doth order that the said <name>Samuel<lb/> Myerson</name> produce on the trial of this cause a certain bill of sale of a negro Slave named<lb/> <name>Mary</name> made by the plaintiff to said <name>Myerson</name> on or about the <date when="1858-08-15">fifteenth day of august<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, to be used as evidence herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#585,81<lb/> We hereby acknowledge<lb/> filed <unclear>Dutile</unclear> Satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment entered opposite<lb/> this margin. Witness our<lb/> lands <date when="1853-07-03">July 3.1863</date>.<lb/> of <name>Krum</name> &amp; <name>Harding</name> <name>The Rail Road Inc.</name> <name>Krumm</name></note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester<lb/> Harding Jr</name> assignment of the <name>Charles<lb/> Rogers</name>, <name>James Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>William L Salisbury</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name>, <name>Eleager<lb/> Beard</name> and <name>George W Beard</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>Watson</name>; and neither party requiring<lb/> a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, in accordance with the<lb/> stipulation heretofore filed herein; and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find there from that the defendants, <name>Eleager</name><lb/> of <name>Beard</name> and <name>George W Beard</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and eighty five dollars and eighty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion for<lb/> a new trial filed and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> order that said motion be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bernheimer</name> etal<lb/> no 94<lb/> <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the suit be dismissed at the costs of the defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="277" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0280.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 513.<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name></head>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 512<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name> and <name>Fritz Pittman</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion to consolidate these<lb/> actions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Fainsworth</name><lb/> no 284<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> execution herein and being thereof fully advised doth over<lb/>rule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#633,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cornet</name><lb/> no 500<lb/> <name>William Streit</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the defendant withdraw his answer herein, and the parties consent<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered herein favor of the<lb/> plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of six hundred and thirty three dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">SteamBoat <name>Wm M<lb/> Morrison</name><lb/> no 290<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants, by their attorney withdraw their motion to<lb/> strike out parts of petition. The Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the motion to strike out parts of answer<lb/> doth overrule the same. Amended answer filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> no 421<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial and affidavit in support of same<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> et al<lb/> no 499<lb/> <name>Thomas Ratcliffe</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Cadien</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>Ratcliffe</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default wherefore on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed. On motion of the said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias summons issue herein for the<lb/> defendant <name>John Cadien</name>, returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Guenadon</name><lb/> no 331<lb/> The German Savings<lb/> Institution and <name>Charles Mick</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleading and proof and thereupon the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute<lb/> his suit herein but voluntarily taken a non suit. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff take nothing by his suit herein but that the said defendants go hence without<lb/> day and recover of the said plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> On motion of the defendants, by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that the sum</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="278" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0281.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>deposited in this Court with the Clerk thereof be repaid to the defendant the <name>German<lb/> Savings Institution</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 513<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered that this cause be referred to<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name> to hear and determine the matters in contro<lb/>versy herein, and that he report thereof as early as practicable.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard S Pratte</name> etal<lb/> no 549<lb/> <name>Gilman Chouteau</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress deposition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Jarvis</name><lb/> no 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmina Richard</name><lb/> no 408<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of New York</head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>N Beck</name>, <name>William Provost</name> <name>H Rives</name>, <name>J T Greene</name>,<lb/> <name>M Sifart</name>, <name>J S F Bernard</name>, <name>J E Shorb</name>, <name>James S<lb/> Little</name>, <name>Levi Block</name>, <name>L X Perrin</name>, <name>Henry Meyer</name>, and <name>M Becker</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are continued<lb/> until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> no 787<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> etal</head>
            <p>Appointment of Commissions.</p>
            <p>On motion of the defendants by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that <name>Sullivan Blood</name>, <name>James Y Barry</name>, and <name>George</name><lb/> <name>Knapp</name> be appointed Commissioners to make partition of the<lb/> property recording to the judgment heretofore rendered herein and the said Commissioners<lb/> are hereby required to make report of their proceedings to this Court without delay.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="279" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0282.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-14">Tuesday December 14th,1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John D Champion</name>, Who is personally known to the Court, comes in open Court and<lb/> acknowledge the execution of a deed of emancipation to his negro<lb/> slave named <name>Jane</name>, thirty four years of age, about five feet in height of a bright mulat<lb/> to complexion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius R Smith</name><lb/> No 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties leave is given the Commissioner to with<lb/>draw the deposition taken in the state of Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> No 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs. Leave given to file<lb/> an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucinda Hempstead</name> admr etal<lb/> Vs<lb/> <name>John K Hemstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>Report of Commissioner filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Guenadon</name><lb/> No 331<lb/> The German Savings Institution etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suit filed by defendant<lb/> <name>Micke</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Rigele</name> etal<lb/> No 511<lb/> <name>Frederick Sickemeyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> et al<lb/> No 861<lb/> <name>Marvin Porter</name> et al<lb/> garn of <name>grady</name> etal</head>
            <p>answer of garnishees filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1406,73</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Bogark</name><lb/> No 673<lb/> <name>Robert M O Blenis</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, <lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and six dollars<lb/> and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff <lb/>recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> etal<lb/> No 95<lb/> <name>Thomas R Grady</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs by their attorneys, leave is given the<lb/> Sheriff to amend his return herein so as to conform to the facts; <lb/> which amendment is accordingly made by inserting in the fifth<lb/> line thereof the word <name>Marvin</name>, and in the ninth line thereof the word <name>Kirkwood</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="280" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0283.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#924,10.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizen Insurance Company</name><lb/> of Missouri<lb/> no 649<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name>, <name>Otho Igel</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name>, <name>Joseph C Barlow</name>,<lb/> <name>J Peter amba</name>, <name>Jacob Amba</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles C Reuss</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>otho Igel</name>, and the other defendants<lb/> withdraw draw their answers herein and consent and<lb/> agree with the plaintiff that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the<lb/> defendants for the sum of nine hundred and twenty<lb/> four dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and also its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. By consent of parties, and according to<lb/> agreement filed, it is ordered that execution be stayed for eight months from this date, <lb/> and that the above judgment be paid in monthly installments of One hundred dollars<lb/> each until the whole amount is paid, and in case any monthly installment shall re<lb/>main in assess and unpaid for one month after the same shall become due then executive <lb/>may issue for the balance of the above judgment remaining unpaid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#576,04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick R Joe Water</name><lb/> no 640<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph C Barlow</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the defendants withdraw their answers<lb/> herein and failing further to plead herein, it is<lb/> therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, <lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: <lb/> and the Court finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and seventy<lb/> six dollars and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants to the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein, expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#205,77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Woodburn</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Scott</name><lb/> no 661<lb/> <name>Herman H Brocksmith</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court doth find there from<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and five dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1469,19</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>William R White</name>,<lb/> and <name>Hiram a Pryor</name><lb/> no 686<lb/> <name>James H McCullough</name> and <name>Charles Webb</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find there from that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of fourteen hundred and sixty nine dollars and nineteen unto. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="281" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0284.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#558,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reinhardt Lurkens</name><lb/> no 309<lb/> <name>Henry Ossing</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Eisfelder</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the defendant, Ossing enters his appearance herein and consents<lb/> that judgment may be rendered herein against him and in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff for the sum of five hundred and fifty<lb/> eight dollars and twenty cents; and the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Eisfelder</name>, waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find therefrom that the defendant<lb/> <name>Eisfelder</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fifty eight dollars<lb/> and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by that they said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and agreed upon<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#374,49</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Mutual Savings Institution<lb/> no 605<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Pilkington</name> and <name>Samuel B Pilkington</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the<lb/> defendants <name>Henry Pilkington</name> and <name>Samuel S<lb/> Pilkington</name>, by their respective attorneys, but the<lb/> defendant <name>Firtschle</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default; and the other defendants withdraw their <lb/>answer herein leaving this suit undefended. It is therefore on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> by its attorney, ordered that the petition herein be taken against the defendants<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and seventy four dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants to the sum <lb/>aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2039,66<lb/> St Louis <date when="1862-05-07">May 7th 1862</date><lb/> Peff by atty hereby enters<lb/> satisfaction of the judg<lb/>ment of which this is the margin<lb/> <name>Mary</name> atty for Plff.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmina Richadr</name><lb/> no 408<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of New York</head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also the Jury, empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of two<lb/> thousand and thirty nine dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs herein expended and have execution therefor<lb/> motion for new trial field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#289,71</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Luke</name><lb/> no 592<lb/> <name>William M Barron</name> and<lb/> <name>William L F Gage</name> and<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the defendants<lb/> <name>W Y F Gage</name>, by their respective attorneys, and the plain<lb/>tiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Barron</name>, and<lb/> on motion of said plaintiffs leave in given to amend the<lb/> petition herein as to make it read "<name>Walter L F</name>" instead<lb/> of <name>William L F Gage</name>; thereupon the said <name>Walter L F<lb/> Gage</name> withdraws his answer herein leaving this suit undefended but the defendants<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default.<lb/> It is therefore on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney ordered that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: and the Court finds</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="282" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0285.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty nine dollars and<lb/> seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the said plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid asfound and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Leisse</name><lb/> no 480<lb/> <name>Bernard Rawie</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>LL Bates</name>, <name>Peter Fagin</name>,<lb/> <name>DH Hoffmann</name>, <name>R Schuser</name>, <name>Henry Seibert</name> and <name>Bryan Early</name>,<lb/> six good and lawful men, who being by consent duly elected tried and sworn the <lb/>issues herein well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury<lb/> retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> no 244<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>Irwin</name> of <name>Smith</name>, plaintiffs attorneys, acknowledges full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-11-16">sixt<lb/>eenth day of November eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> for<lb/> the sum of two hundred and fifty six dollars and fifty four cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name> etal<lb/> no 294<lb/> Th<name>e St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit of defendant. Costs to abide<lb/> result.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph L Derbin</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward B Isett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name>, <name>Daniel<lb/> Able</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, assignee of<lb/> the judgment herein and submits his motion heretofore<lb/> filed for an execution against the defendant <name>Daniel<lb/> Able</name> to the Court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the said motion order that the<lb/> same be sustained, and that execution issue against the said <name>Able</name> as prayed for<lb/> in said application.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Reynolds</name><lb/> no 625<lb/> <name>Robert L Jones</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard Barry</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Quigley</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, <name>Barry</name> and <name>Quigley</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed, Alias<lb/> Summons ordered for defendant, <name>Jones</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> no 517<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name>,<lb/> <name>Sigismund Hirschfield</name>,<lb/> and <name>Samuel Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant<lb/> <name>Jacoby</name>, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses<lb/> this suit as to <name>Valentine</name> and <name>Hirschfield</name>; and neither party requiring<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and thereupon the trial progressed and being fin<lb/>ished the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute this suit but voluntarily takes<lb/> a nonsuit. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff take</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="283" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0286.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and<lb/> recover of the said plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Cannon</name><lb/> no 588<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the defendants move the Court to set aside the default<lb/> herein and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the said motion doth overrule the same; and thereupon<lb/> come a Jury, to wit: <name>N Bick</name>, <name>W Provost</name> <name>H Rives</name>, <name>J Green</name>, <name>Jisse arnot</name>,<lb/> <name>John Duhn</name>, <name>McJicknor</name>, a Differ back <name>A Wilke</name>, <name>P P Porter</name>, <name>W Robertson</name>,<lb/> and <name>W W Martinade</name>, twelve good and gawful men who being duly elected tried<lb/> and sworn the plaintiffs damages well and truly to assess the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Wittig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to dis<lb/>charge and dissolve order staying execution and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas slevin</name> etal<lb/> No 812<lb/> <name>Charles Fnty</name> etal</head>
            <p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion to strike<lb/> out parts of the answer herein doth overule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of <name>Louis G<lb/> Picot</name> trustee under the Will<lb/> of 58<lb/> <name>Ann Biddle</name>, deceased.</head>
            <p>Copy of Order for production of papers and sheriff<lb/> return on same filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J McKenny</name><lb/> no 251<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Plaintiff, in person, comes and files an assignment to<lb/> <name>J Sr W J Wise</name> of the judgment rendered herein on the<lb/> <date when="1858-02-24">twenty fourth day of February eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty eight</date> for the sum of Eighteen hundred and seventy two dollars and eighty cents.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="284" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0287.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-15">Wednesday December 15th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W F Alter</name><lb/> no 641<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Alter</name><lb/> no 642<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Knight</name><lb/> no 702<lb/> <name>Samuel Hambleton</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> no 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Diemert</name><lb/> no 646<lb/> <name>Jacob Mufsler</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name> et al<lb/> no 714<lb/> <name>Thomas Rutherford</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Ross</name> et al<lb/> no 598<lb/> <name>DW Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael of Dohan</name> and<lb/> <name>John T Tart</name><lb/> no 88<lb/> <name>Andrew of Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes<lb/> and files a statement from which it appears, that the<lb/> keeping of the property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with much expense before the probable ter<lb/>mination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered, that<lb/> said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of his<lb/> proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Hoffheimer</name>,<lb/> <name>Max Hoffheimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Hoffheimer</name><lb/> no 86<lb/> <name>Andrew I Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement from which it appears,<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein<lb/> will be attended with much expense before the probable ter<lb/>mination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is<lb/> therefore ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make<lb/> a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of<lb/> this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="285" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0288.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Hoffheimer</name><lb/> <name>Max Hoffheimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Hoffheimer</name><lb/> no 87<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and<lb/> files a statement from which it appears, that the keeping of<lb/> the property attached under the writ herein will be attended<lb/> with much expense before the probable termination of this suit,<lb/> and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered, that<lb/> said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of his procee<lb/>dings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Locke</name><lb/> no 79<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files<lb/> a statement from which it appears, that the keeping of the property<lb/> attached under the writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore<lb/> ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report<lb/> of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther A Laflin</name>, <name>Solomon A Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Sylvester H Laflin</name>, <name>Fordyce H Laflin</name>,<lb/> and <name>Joseph M Bois</name>.<lb/> no 78<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files statement from which it appears,<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit, and is<lb/> likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property ac<lb/>cording to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before<lb/> the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Schaeffer Eberhardt</name><lb/> <name>Anhauser</name>, <name>James Reilly</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph Krauss</name><lb/> no 80<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears,<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense before<lb/> the probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate<lb/> in value; it is therefore ordered, that said Sheriff sell said property according<lb/> to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first<lb/> day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail<lb/> Road Company</name><lb/> no 83.<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes<lb/> and files a statement from which it appears, that the<lb/> keeping of the property attached under the writ herein<lb/> will be attended with much expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered,<lb/> that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a<lb/> report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Spahr</name> et al<lb/> no 628<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for Fox and cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="286" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0289.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel P Catherwood</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Catherwood</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears<lb/> that the Keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is<lb/> therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he<lb/> make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Goodwin</name>, <name>William H Goodwin</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Murray</name> and <name>William H Sanford</name>.<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement from<lb/> which it appears that the Keeping of the<lb/> property attached under the writ herein<lb/> bill be attended with much expense before the probable termination of this suit and is<lb/> likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property<lb/> according to law and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or be<lb/>fore the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen W Montgomery</name><lb/> <name>Samuel Montgomery</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Montgomery</name><lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears<lb/> that the Keeping of the property attached under the writ<lb/> herein will be attended with much expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit and is likely to de<lb/>preciate in value; it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property<lb/> according to law and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or<lb/> before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2412, 69</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton Flagg</name>, <name>Charles A Savage</name>,<lb/> and <name>Isaac O Woodruff</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, <name>M Wannall</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard F Smith</name> and <name>S G Cabball</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, except the<lb/> defendants <name>Cabball</name>, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to said<lb/> <name>Cabball</name>; and the other defendants consent<lb/> and agree with the plaintiffs that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein in favor of said plain<lb/>tiffs and against said defendants for the sum of twenty four hundred and twelve<lb/> dollars and sixty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phoebe J Allen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Allen</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit from which it appears that the de<lb/>fendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri; therefore on motion<lb/> of the attorneys for said plaintiff, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce, and for other and general relief;<lb/> and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City, of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the sixth day thereof<lb/> answer the petition herein the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat, newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="287" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0290.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#55, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann H Dickmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Hermann H Kreft</name><lb/> no 664<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Judgment. Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court, upon the petition and proofs and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the plaintiffs are the owners of the property mentioned in the petition<lb/> and delivered to them at the commencement of this suit by the Coroner of St Louis<lb/> County, and doth assess their damages for the detention of the same at the sum of<lb/> fifty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> retain the possession of the said property and also recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as assessed together with their costs herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3387,62<lb/> vs<lb/> Moies and<lb/> # 2624,59.<lb/> vs<lb/> Woodward.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knapp</name> <name>Henry Carter</name><lb/> and <name>John H Butler</name><lb/> no 709<lb/> <name>Miles</name> by <name>Moies</name> and <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the defendant, <name>Moies</name>, withdraws his<lb/> answer herein, leaving this suit undefended, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the plaintiffs<lb/> discontinues this suit as to the first note issued upon us to the defendant <name>Woodward</name>; and neither<lb/> party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and<lb/> answer, and the Court doth find thereform that the defendant, <name>Woodward</name> is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty six hundred and twenty four dollars and fifty nine<lb/> cents; and the Court doth further find from the instruments of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant, <name>Moies</name> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of thirty three<lb/> hundred and eighty seven dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1238,96</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ferguson</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard B Wilkinson</name><lb/> no 671<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and their defendant withdraws his answer herein leaving this suit<lb/> undefended, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twelve hundred and<lb/> thirty eight dollars and ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#228,07</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Charleville</name><lb/> no 695<lb/> <name>Zacharia Moore</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find there from<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty<lb/> eight dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="288" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0291.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#152,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> no 520<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of<lb/> the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and fifty two dollars<lb/> and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#228,33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Baer</name><lb/> no 729<lb/> <name>Henry Bursmeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>John Nicolay</name> </head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Busmeyer</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Nicolay</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, It is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and neither party requiring a<lb/> Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find there from that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty eight dollars and thirty three cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#283,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennard</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kennard Jr</name><lb/> no 735<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred and eighty three dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#901,77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe Mutual Insurance Company</name><lb/> no 464<lb/> <name>William P Davis</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the<lb/> defendant, <name>Carson</name> and <name>Springer</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Davis</name>; and neither<lb/> party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find there from<lb/> that the defendants, <name>Carson</name> and <name>Springer</name>, are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of nine hundred and one dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> no 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that <name>William<lb/> H Osborn</name>, the Commissioner herein, be allowed the sum<lb/> of Seventy five dollars for his services and that the Receiver<lb/> pay the said sum to said Commissioner out of the funds in his hands. Agreement<lb/> filed, Depositions from Louisiana returned by Commissioner.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="289" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0292.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1219,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> no 627<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name>,<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name><lb/> and <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: <name>Mo Sifart</name>, <name>J S F Ber<lb/>nard</name>, <name>J E Short</name>, <name>J S Lytle</name>, <name>L Block</name>, <name>L X Perrin</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Meyer</name>, <name>M Bicker</name>, <name>Jesse Amot</name>, <name>Jno Dunn</name>, <name>M Ticknon</name>,<lb/> and <name>A Deffenbach</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected tired and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> for the plaintiff, and assess the damages at the sum of twelve hundred and nineteen<lb/> dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Griffin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Griffin</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, and on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff, and the defendant having made default the Court proceeds<lb/> to hear the proof herein, and having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff<lb/> is an innocent and injured party, it doth order, adjudge and decree that she be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by his contracted with the defen<lb/>dant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further<lb/> ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rebecca A Crewse</name><lb/> no 705<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Crewse</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called comes but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and there<lb/> upon the Court proceeds to hear the proofs, and having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, and being satisfied therefrom of the good conduct of the plaintiff, and that the<lb/> plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth order that she be absolutely and forever<lb/> divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be re<lb/> stored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered that<lb/> the defendant pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#630,42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C McCausland</name>, <name>John W Johnstone</name>,<lb/> and <name>James M Johnstone</name><lb/> no 568<lb/> <name>Richard Foley</name> and <name>Patrick Mulloy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the<lb/> defendant, Mulloy, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Foley</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed and the defendant, <name>Mulloy</name><lb/> files a motion for a continuance herein and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the said motion doth overruled the same; and neither party requiring a Jury this cause is<lb/> submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Six hundred and thirty dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum<lb/> from this date until paid and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="290" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0293.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>One cent &amp;<lb/> property.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O. Cannon</name><lb/> no 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Judgment. Replevin</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties again, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and the<lb/> Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff<lb/> and assess the damages at the sum of One cent. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff retrain the possession of the property mentioned<lb/> in the petition and delivered to him at the commencement of this suit by the Coroner of<lb/> St Louis County, and that he recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#331,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> no 697<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark Hooper</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Hooper</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Joseph M Ames</name>; and neither party re<lb/>quiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendant, <name>Hooper</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and thirty one dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore Judgment to bear interest<lb/> at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Leisse</name><lb/> no 480<lb/> <name>Bernard Rawie</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and the Jury aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid say they are unable to agree upon a verdict; wherefore it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the Jury aforesaid be discharged from the further consideration<lb/> of this cause, and that this cause be continued until the next term of this Court/</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H W Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Reuben C MCord</name>, <name>Charles W<lb/> McCord</name>, <name>G Garrett</name>, <name>Miles G Moies</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>M L Gray</name>, plaintiffs attorney, come in open Court<lb/> and acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-06">Sixth<lb/> day of October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> for<lb/> Six hundred and six dollars and twenty seven cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Myers</name><lb/> no 621<lb/> <name>Benjamin Lithauer</name></head>
            <p>On note. Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs,<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed, and after proceeding<lb/> at some length the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit herein but voluntari<lb/>ly takes a non suit. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff take<lb/> nothing by his suit in this behalf, but that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Stammles</name> et al<lb/> no 509<lb/> <name>William Trilling</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this suit<lb/> be dismissed and that each party pay half of the costs herein<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="291" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0294.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Lohlien</name><lb/> no 691<lb/> <name>Joseph Kung</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knapp</name> etal<lb/> no 710<lb/> <name>Walter C Sell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Walter C Sell</name>.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Derbin</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Span</name> etal</head>
            <p>Notice of motion for leave to issue execution and sheriffs<lb/> return on defendant Hayes filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 512<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name><lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 512<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to consolidate causes of action withdrawn.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> no 573.<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name> and<lb/> <name>Fritz Pillman</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant. <name>Pillman</name> can<lb/>not be found and the Court being satisfied that process cannot<lb/> be served upon him, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney, it is ordered, by the Court that he be notified, that a<lb/> civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of One thousand dollars for<lb/> a balance due on two larges sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants and that<lb/> unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and<lb/> on or before the sixth day thereof answer the petition herein the same will be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in<lb/> the St Louis Herald a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis: and<lb/> it is also ordered that an alias Summons issue herein for the said defendant <name>Pillman</name><lb/> returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Gonsalis</name><lb/> no 604<lb/> <name>Isaac Gearhart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>Seymour Voullaire</name> trustee of<lb/> <name>William Hurd</name><lb/> no 718<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name>, <name>Sheridan</name> C<lb/> <name>Hunt</name>, and <name>James R Wiseman</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>N<lb/> Bick</name>, <name>William Provost</name>, <name>J C Rives</name>, <name>J T Green</name>, <name>J S <lb/>F Bernard</name>, <name>J E Short</name>, <name>Henry Meyer</name>, <name>L D Bates</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter Fagin</name>, <name>David Hoffman</name>, <name>H Sibert</name>, and<lb/> <name>Bryan Carly</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected tired and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until to<lb/>morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="292" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0295.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> etal<lb/> no 7<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to substitute other Commissioners filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria L Brooks</name><lb/> no 440<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Transcript of Judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Carpenter</name> etal<lb/> no 708<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Statement for continuance filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-16">Thursday December 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe Mutual Insurance Co</name><lb/> no 464<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre E Brulatour</name><lb/> no 571<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#145,17</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name>, <name>Charles Todd</name><lb/> and <name>Washington Todd</name><lb/> no 733<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>, <name>John Burnes</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages sustained by reason of the premises<lb/> in the petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and forty five dollars and<lb/> seventeen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> no 86<lb/> <name>M C Walker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to suppress<lb/> the depositions for the plaintiff doth sustain the said motion as<lb/> for as it relates to the depositions taken in the State of Ohio<lb/> and doth overrule the said motion as to the other depositions. On motion leave<lb/> is given the plaintiff to amend her petition herein within thirty days from this dates and<lb/> this cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="293" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0296.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1027,14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard S Pratt</name> and<lb/> <name>George Bond</name><lb/> no 549<lb/> <name>Gilman Chouteau</name> and<lb/> <name>James Edwards</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and submit the defendants motion to suppress<lb/> he plaintiffs depositions to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said motion<lb/> doth overrule the same, thereupon come also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>M Sifant</name>, <name>J S Lytle</name>, <name>L Block</name>, <name>L X Perrin</name>, <name>M Becker</name>, <name>R Schueser</name> <name>John Dunn</name>,<lb/> <name>M Ticknar</name>, <name>A Diffenbach</name>, <name>A Wilke</name>, <name>William Robertson</name> and <name>W W Martindale</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess the damages<lb/> at the sum of ten hundred and twenty seven dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2093,33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Axel Dearborn</name>, <name>Bartlett</name><lb/> <name>Robinson</name> and <name>Thomas Louden</name><lb/> no 721<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louise Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>neys and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same, doth find there from trial<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of twenty hundred and ninety three dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2588,75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri which<lb/> sues to the use of<lb/> <name>Seymour Voullaire</name> Trustee of <name>William Hurd</name><lb/> no 718<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name>, <name>Sheridan</name> <name>C<lb/> Hunt</name>, and <name>James R Wiseman</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein also come, and thereupon the trial<lb/> of this cause progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of twenty five hundred and eighty<lb/> eight dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by<lb/> the Jury assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> no 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to<lb/> set aside the verdict of the Jury upon the plea in the nature of<lb/> a plea in abatement, and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same. On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be set for trial on the twenty first day of December inst.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Caste</name> etal<lb/> no 265<lb/> The City of St Louis etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the amended petition and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised doth order that the same be overruled.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="294" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0297.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall Jr</name><lb/> no 269<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set<lb/> aside the non suit herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Jennings</name><lb/> no 173<lb/> <name>Mary Jennings</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff and sug<lb/>gests to the Court that since the commencement of this<lb/> suit the said plaintiff has departed this life. It is therefore<lb/> ordered that this suit do abate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Nixon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eliza Nixon</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a<lb/> petition and affidavit from which it appears that the defendant<lb/> is a non resident of the State of Missouri; it is therefore on motion<lb/> of plaintiffs attorney, ordered that said defendant be notified of the commencement<lb/> of this suit, the abject of which is to obtain a decree of divorce, and unless she be and<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the<lb/> sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against her as<lb/> confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the<lb/> St Louis Daily morning Herald a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernest Brey</name><lb/> no 588<lb/> <name>George J Barnett</name> and<lb/> <name>M Weber</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>M Sifart</name>, <name>J S Lytle</name>, <name>L X<lb/> Perrin</name>, <name>M Becker</name>, <name>R Schueser</name>, <name>John Dunn</name>, <name>Jesse arnot</name>,<lb/> <name>M Ticknor</name>, <name>A Deffenbach</name>, <name>A Wilke</name>, <name>William Robertson</name>,<lb/> and <name>W W Martindale</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried, and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed, and being<lb/> finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the defendants. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf,<lb/> but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>State Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name><lb/> no 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Aaron McClure's</name><lb/> administrator filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Nicholay</name><lb/> no 728<lb/> <name>W Priesmeier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Bartold</name> filed. Motion and affidavit for<lb/> continuance filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="295" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0298.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <dateline><date when="1858-12-17">Friday December 17th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>James Castells</name>,<lb/> Late Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in Open Court and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by him, as such Sheriff, to <name>Sanford B Kellogg</name>,<lb/> of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>John Sigerson</name> in and to the<lb/> following described property, to wit; situate lying and being in the Common of Carondelet<lb/> South of the River Des Peres, to wit; Lot Number four (4) containing 37 05/100 arpens, Lot<lb/> Number five (5) containing 37 60/100 arpens, Lot number six (6) containing 37 64/100 arpens, Lot<lb/> number thirty seven (37) containing 38 47/100 arpens, Lot Number thirty eight (38) con<lb/>taining 39 10/100 arpens, Lot number forty (40) containing 39 98/100 arpens, Lot number forty<lb/> one (41) containing 39 98/100 arpens, Lot number forty seven (47) containing 40 03/100 arpens, Lot<lb/> number forty eight (48) containing 38 80/100 arpens, Lot number forty nine (49) containing<lb/> 38 86/100 arpens, Lot number fifty (50) containing 39 16/100 arpens, Lot number fifty one (51)<lb/> containing 39 27/100 arpens, Lot Number eighty (80) containing 38 76/100 arpens, Lot number<lb/> eighty one (81) containing 38 80/100 arpens, Lot number eighty two (82) containing 39 121/100 arpens,<lb/> Lot number eighty three (83) containing 49 14/100 arpens, Lot number eighty four (84) containing<lb/> 37 91/100 arpens, Lot number eighty five (85) containing 39 98/100 arpens, also Lot number<lb/> Seven (7) twenty three (23) and thirty three (33) in Block seventy nine (79) in Commons<lb/> of St Louis, the West half of quarter block seventy nine, (79); and also Lots number<lb/> thirty nine (39) and forty seven (47) in the East half of said quarter block which are<lb/> more particularly described by deed recorded in Book 201 page 19 of record in<lb/> Recorders Office of St Louis County, also Lot number Eighty nine (89) of the Survey<lb/> of the Commons of Carondelet South of the River Des Peres; Sold by virtue of<lb/> eight Executions; six of which issued from the St Louis Circuit Court, and all return<lb/> able to the <date when="1858-10">October Term eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>; one in favor of <name>William<lb/> H Smith</name>, <name>Isaac Lankershim</name> and <name>Charles L Hobbs</name> and against <name>Anapias Rice</name> and<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name>, one in favor of <name>Alfred M Waterman</name>, and against <name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> and <name>George Smizer</name>, one in favor of <name>George Rogers</name> and against <name>John Sigerson</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Taylor</name> one in favor of <name>John Dalton</name> against <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>George Smizer</name>,<lb/> one in favor of <name>John Dalton</name>, against <name>John Sigerson</name>, <name>George Smizer</name>, <name>Joseph R Wen<lb/>dover</name>, and <name>Judson Allen</name>, and one in favor of <name>Septrmus Levering</name> against <name>John<lb/> Sigerson</name>; and one of said Executions issued from the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, in favor<lb/> of <name>Samuel</name> and <name>James Hale</name> against <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>Anapias Rice</name>; and one other<lb/> of said executions issued from the St Louis Land Court in favor of <name>George Wilby</name><lb/> against <name>John Sigerson</name>, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>;<lb/> and also one other execution issued from the St Louis Circuit Court returnable to the<lb/> <date when="1858-10">October Term eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> in favor of <name>Peter Haydon</name> and<lb/> <name>Pollock Wilson</name> against <name>John Sigerson</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Castello</name><lb/> Late Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in Open Court and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a Deed by him as such sheriff<lb/> to <name>John F Manntel</name>, <name>Henry Butte</name> and <name>Mathias Booker</name>, of all the right, title,<lb/> interest, claim and estate of <name>Jacob Schneider</name> in and to the following described proper<lb/>ty, to wit: a certain piece or parcel of ground in City Block No 711, and described<lb/> as follows: Beginning at a point in the Northern edge of Emmett street, sixty five<lb/> feet Westwardly from the South East corner of the aforesaid clock; thence parallel<lb/> with Jackson street Northwardly Sixty feet, thence Westwardly and parallel with<lb/> said Emmett street fifteen feet, thence Southwardly and parallel with <name>Jackson</name></p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="296" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0299.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>street sixty five feet to the Northern edge of said Emmett street; thence Eastwardly<lb/> with the said Northern edge of Emmett street fifteen feet to the place of beginning:<lb/> Sold by virtue of Execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court in favor of <name>John F Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Bulte</name> and <name>Mathias Booker</name> against<lb/> <name>Jacob Schneider</name> returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Castello</name><lb/> Late Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes in Court and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by him, as Such Sheriff, to <name>Catherine Ahoonan</name><lb/> of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of Eneas <name>McFaul</name> of in and to<lb/> the following described real estate, to wit: Lots number 8, 9 and 10 of Block no 1 of<lb/> the Second Subdivision in St Louis Commons, in the City and Country of St Louis, State<lb/> of Missouri, containing 77 feet 6 inches front, by a depth of 121 feet; bounded South<lb/> by Cherokee, East by Lot no 7, North by an alley, West by Indiana avenue. Also,<lb/> Lots nos 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 in Block no 2 of same Subdivision, containing 125<lb/> feet front, by a depth of 125 feet; bounded East by Indiana avenue. South by Cherokee<lb/> street, West by an alley, North by Lot no 30, being in the Southwest quarter of Block<lb/> 58 of De Ward's Survey. Also Lots no 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Block no 1 of the same<lb/> Subdivision containing 133 feet 3 inches front, by a depth of 125 feet; bounded South by<lb/> Cherokee street, West by Lot no 6, North by and alley, East by Illinois avenue. Also Lots<lb/> no 25, 26, 27, and 28, of the same Block and Subdivision, containing 102 feet 6 inches<lb/> front, by a depth of 23 feet 3 inches; bounded West by Illinois avenue. North by What Utah street,<lb/> East by alley, South by Lot no 24, and being in the Southeastern quarter of Block 53 of said<lb/> Common, according to the Survey thereof made by <name>Charles Deward</name>, all being the same<lb/> acquired by said <name>Eneas McFaul</name> by deed from the City of St Louis, dated <date when="1854-10-24">24th day<lb/> of October, 1854</date>, and recorded in Book no 161 and 10. Sold by virtue of four executions.<lb/> one of which issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court, returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, of said Court, in favor of <name>Fitz<lb/> Henry Warren</name> and <name>E M Thomas</name> and against <name>Eneas McFaul</name>; and the other three<lb/> of said executions issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Corrd<lb/>mon Pleas, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, one in<lb/> favor of <name>Henry T Chiles</name> and <name>Walter E Carr</name> and against <name>Eneas McFaul</name>, and<lb/> another in favor of <name>Patrick Kelly</name> and against <name>Eneas McFaul</name> and the other infavor<lb/> of <name>Franklin Townsend</name> and against <name>Eneas McFaul</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Castello</name><lb/> Late Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes in open Court, and and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as such Sheriff, to<lb/> Wilson primm of all the right, title, interest, claim, estate, and property of <name>John<lb/> Sigerson</name> of in and to the following described real estate, to wit: situate lying and<lb/> being in the Common of Carondelet, South of River Des Peres, to wit: Lot number 42<lb/> containing 38 90/100 arpens, and lot no 46 containing 38 35/100 arpens, South of said River<lb/> Des Peres. Sold by virtue of nine executions; seven of which issued from the St Louis<lb/> Circuit Court, returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>; one<lb/> in favor of <name>William H Smith</name> <name>Isaac Lankershin</name> and <name>Charles L Hobbs</name>, and<lb/> against <name>Arapias Rice</name> and <name>John Sigerson</name>, one in favor of <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> and<lb/> against <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>George Smizer</name>, one in favor of <name>George Rogers</name> and against<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>John D Taylor</name>, one in favor of <name>John Dalton</name> and against <name>John<lb/> Sigerson</name> and <name>George Smizer</name>, another in favor of <name>John Dalton</name> and against <name>John Sigerson</name>,<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name>, <name>Joseph R Wendover</name> and <name>Judson Allen</name>, one in favor of <name>Septimus Leveing</name><lb/> and against <name>John Sigerson</name>, and one in favor of <name>Peter Haydon</name> and <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> and against <name>John Sigerson</name>; and one of said Executions issued from the St Louis Court</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="297" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0300.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of Common Pleas returnable to <date when="1858-10">October Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, in<lb/> favor of <name>Samuel</name> and <name>James Nale</name> and against <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>Anapias Rice</name>; and<lb/> one other of said executions issued from the St Louis Land Court returnable to the<lb/> <date when="1858-10">October Term eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, in favor of <name>George. Wilby</name> and<lb/> against <name>John Sigerson</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> no 803.<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>Statement of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C McCausland</name> etal<lb/> no 568<lb/> <name>Richard Foley</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> etal<lb/> no 686<lb/> <name>James H McCullough</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Wm Hurd's</name> trustee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#150 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> no 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>J C Rives</name> <name>J T Green</name>; <name>J S F<lb/> Bernard</name>, <name>J E Shorb</name>, <name>Henry Meyer</name> <name>L L Bates</name>, <name>Peter Fagin</name>, <name>D<lb/> Haffman</name>, <name>H Seibert</name>, <name>B Earley</name>, <name>M Ticknor</name>, and <name>P P Porter</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>Michael Nerk</name>, <name>Nicholas Verden</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Kirby</name>, <name>John Kirby</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Henlett</name><lb/> no 584<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name>, <name>Samuel Bonner</name>,<lb/> and <name>William H Barksdale</name></head>
            <p>Petition. Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit; <name>N<lb/> Beck</name> <name>William Provost</name>, <name>M Sifart</name>, <name>J S Lytle</name>, <name>L<lb/> X Perrin</name>, <name>M Becker</name>, <name>Jesse arnot</name>, <name>John Dunn</name>,<lb/> <name>A Diffenbach</name>, <name>A Wieke</name> and <name>W W Martindale</name>,<lb/> eleven good and lawful men, who being by consent<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try trial commenced and after proceeding at some length the plain<lb/>tiff say they will not further prosecute their suit herein but voluntarily take a non suit.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their<lb/> suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> said plaintiffs their costs and charges herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="298" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0301.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 230,13</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Carpenter</name>,<lb/> <name>James Carpenter</name> and<lb/> <name>John Fullerton</name><lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> submit the application of the defendant for a continuance to<lb/> the Court and the Court having duly considered the said<lb/> motion doth order that the same be overruled; and neither party<lb/> requiring a Jury this cause is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Cannon</name><lb/> vs 588 <name>Daniel R Grace</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside default and assessment of damages filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James N Stephenson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-18">Satuday Deccember 18th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met Pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Michael Week</name> etal<lb/> vs 584<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suite and for new trial filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis M Abrams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Ford</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff ofened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Arnelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head> 
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> vs 679<lb/> <name>William F Smith</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="299" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0302.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name>, <name>Daniel H<lb/> Hunnewell</name> and <name>Joseph S Hill</name><lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schimucker</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Attachment. Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, file an additional<lb/> affidavit herein from which it appears that the defen<lb/>dants are non residents of the State if Missouri;<lb/> therefore on motion of said attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that they be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against there for the sum of three hundred and ninety nine dollars<lb/> and sixteen cents, for goods sold and delivered to them by the plaintiffs; and that their<lb/> property has been attached, and unless they be and appear at the next turn of this Court to<lb/> be holden at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday<lb/> of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein judgment<lb/> will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> and<lb/> <name>John Henry</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name><lb/> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Attachment. Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Byplaintiffs, by their attorney, file an additional affidavit<lb/> from which it appears that the defendants are not residents<lb/> of the state of Missouri, therefore motion of said attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that they be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against them for the<lb/> sum of one hundred and sixty two dollars and twelve cents, for twelve barrells of<lb/> Bourbon whiskey sold and delivered to them by the plaintiffs, and that their property<lb/> has been attached, and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be holden<lb/> at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of<lb/> February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein judgment<lb/> will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick K Higgins</name><lb/> vs 21.<lb/> <name>Ellen Higgins</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having heretofore filed a petition and affidavit, sta<lb/>ting that the defendant is a nonresident of the State of Missouri<lb/> now, therefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court, that she be notified that a civil action has been commenced against her to<lb/> obtain a decree of divorce, and unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court,<lb/> to be holden at the city of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth<lb/> Monday of February next, and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the petition herein<lb/> the same will be taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper prin<lb/>ted and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according<lb/> to law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered that there defendant deliver the<lb/> property specified in said petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said<lb/> Sheriff is here by directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from<lb/> the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="300" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0303.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Schneider</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Mahner</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to<lb/> law, claiming the possession of certain personal property therein de<lb/>scribed; wherefore it is ordered the defendant deliver the prop<lb/>erty specified in said petition to the sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is<lb/> hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant<lb/> and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to bond filed by <name>Samuel Brookes</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> etal>lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> etal<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> etal<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objection to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name> etal<lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to Bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hendricks</name>,<lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Objections to bond filed by <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Derbin</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for leave to issue execution against <name>Joseph Conway</name><lb/> filed. Notice of motion for leave to issue execution and proof<lb/> of service on John Hendricks filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 767<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="301" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0304.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 480,28</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank K Derlin</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>Joseph W Clark</name>, <name>Edward Dodge</name>,<lb/> <name>Luther C Clark</name>, <name>jay Cooke</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Chase</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth find for the plaintiff and assess<lb/> his damages at the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars and twenty eight cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzpatrick</name> and<lb/> <name>Many Fitzpatrick</name><lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Kennedy</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>N Bick</name>, <name>JC Rives</name>,<lb/> <name>J J Green</name>, <name>JSJ Bernard</name> <name>Henry Meyer</name> <name>LL Bates</name>, <name>D<lb/> Hoffman</name> <name>R Scheuser</name>, <name>Henry Seibert</name>, <name>M Jickner</name>, <name>Jesse<lb/> Arnold</name>, <name>J S Lytle</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tired and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial pro<lb/>gressed but not being finished further proceedings are continued until Monday morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Carpenter</name> etal<lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E S Aden</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> etal garns<lb/> of <name>Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>John Scott</name> and Exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>Crawford Porter</name><lb/> vs 857<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> etal <name>James of<lb/> Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Separate answers of <name>W C Scott Clingan Scott</name><lb/> and <name>John Scott</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James c McNeil</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> etal <name>James of<lb/> Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Separate answers of <name>W C Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Scott</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>C Porter</name><lb/> vs 855<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> etal <name>James of Dick</name><lb/> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Separate answers of <name>W C Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name><lb/> and <name>John Scott</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="302" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0305.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia A Hanna</name><lb/> vs 838<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> et al <name>James of<lb/> Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Separate answers of <name>W C Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Exceptions to Commissioners Report filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Balmer</name><lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>Philip Helgenberg</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, comes and files a remittitur for the sum<lb/> of three hundred and thirty eight dollars and forty two cents of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered for six hundred and eleven dollars and forty<lb/> two cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for judg<lb/>ment on the demurrer and being thereof fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same. Twenty days is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for judgment<lb/> on the demurrer and being thereof fully advised, doth overrule the same.<lb/> Twenty days is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Cache</name> etal<lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>The City of St Louis</name> etal</head>
            <p>It is ordered that this cause be set for trial on the Sixth<lb/> day of January next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John allen</name><lb/> vs 672<lb/> <name>Catharine L Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> Plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name> Jr<lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys and<lb/> file separate affidavits for an appeal, wherefore, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that an appeal be allowed said parties to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="303" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0306.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-20">Monday December 20th 1858.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 531,87</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 773.<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant<lb/> Moies, by their respective attorney, but the other defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default; and the said defendant, Moies, withdraws his answer<lb/> herein, and consents and agrees with the plaintiff that judgment may be rendered<lb/> herein against him and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of five hundred and<lb/> thirty one dollars and eighty seven cents. And the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, Woodward, is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty one dollars and<lb/> eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> agreed upon, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 723,98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horace Whittemore</name>, <name>Robert B<lb/> Whittemore</name> and <name>John F Carter</name><lb/> vs 741<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name>, <name>Otto Schnuhr</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles Attinger</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by this respective<lb/> attorney, and waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth find therefrom that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and twenty three dollars<lb/> and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with<lb/> interest therein at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1003, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony H MenKens</name>, and<lb/> <name>D Bernard MenKens</name>,<lb/> vs 736<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the name doth find therefrom<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten hundred and three<lb/> dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 4418,36.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road company</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torney and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find there from, that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four thousand four hundred<lb/> and eighteen dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="304" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0307.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 2604, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Luke</name>.<lb/> vs 742<lb/> <name>Horace D Brady</name></head>
            <p>On notes and account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the petition, exhibits, and proof, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages at the sum of twenty six hundred and four dollars and seventy<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the said plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 541, 92.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Freeman Little</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>James R Records</name> and<lb/> <name>John a Smithers</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, leaving this<lb/> action undefended, and failing further to appear and plead<lb/> herein, it is, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> ordered that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action in founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and forty one<lb/> dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 422, 32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Dobyns</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Henry J Watson</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly called, comes not; and the plaintiff<lb/> withdraw so much of petition as relates to two notes dated<lb/> the <date when="1844-10-01">first day of October eighteen hundred and forty four</date>, one for eighty three dollars and<lb/> ninety nine cents, and the after for one hundred dollars, and waiving a Jury submits this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court heaving duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, doth find there from that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty two dollars and thirty two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 100,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Fitzpatrick</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary Fitzpatrick</name><lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Kennedy</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs<lb/> and assess their damages a the sum of one hundred<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants she sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry G Poston</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name><lb/> and <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that an alias Summons issue herein for the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, returnable to the next term of<lb/> this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="305" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0308.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 161,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, receiver of<lb/> the partnership credits and effects of<lb/> the late firm of Houseman and <name>Smith</name>,<lb/> Composed of <name>James D Houseman</name><lb/> and <name>Julies H Smith</name><lb/> vs 769<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Borrowed money.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered<lb/> herein in favor of the plaintiff and against<lb/> the defendant for the sum of One hundred and<lb/> sixty one dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. By consent of parties execution is stayed three moths.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 188, 41</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver of<lb/> the partnership credits and effects of the<lb/> late firm of Houseman and <name>smith</name>,<lb/> composed of <name>James D Houseman</name>,<lb/> and <name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>Henry H Watson</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Borrowed Money.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> attorneys, and agree that judgment may be<lb/> rendered herein against the defendant and<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of One<lb/> hundred and eighty eight dollars and forty<lb/> one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore. By consent of parties execution is stayed for<lb/> Six months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment for want of answer to amended petition<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs 876<lb/> <name>Charles D Holman</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Separate denials of claims of <name>Hooper</name> and <name>Phillips</name><lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>B S Aden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Scott</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>C Scott</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary C Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the defendant files an application and<lb/> affidavit for a continuance herein and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth order that the said application be over<lb/>ruled; thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein, but the hearing thereof not<lb/> being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="306" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0309.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-21">Tuesday, December 21st, 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jackard</name> et al<lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>William C Anderson</name></head>
            <p>Motion for rehearing and affidavit in support thereof filed<lb/> Affidavit of <name>wm J Holland</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers</name>, <name>Anderson</name> and Company</head>
            <p>Petition of <name>James smith</name> and Company for allow<lb/>ance of claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George w Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit for continuance filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State if Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>George Nagel</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Nagel</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nowell J Calhoun</name>, <name>James J<lb/> Small</name> and <name>C W Small</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on Indemnification Bond.<lb/> Agreement of parties this day filed, and in pursuance<lb/> thereof this cause is dismissed at the costs of the plain<lb/>tiffs, amounting to the sum of Sixty two dollars and<lb/> fifty two cents, and in further pursuance of said agree<lb/>ment it is hereby ordered that <name>James Castello</name>, late<lb/> Sheriff of the County of St Louis, do pay over to said <name>George</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick Nagel</name>, or their attorney of record, the balance of the money in his<lb/> hands arising from the sale of the property attached in the suit <name>Alkire, Calhoun and<lb/> company</name> against <name>James Reed</name>, after deducting said costs, which balance amounts<lb/> to One hundred and seven dollars and thirty cents; which casts said Sheriff shall first<lb/> pay out of said proceeds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley J Alkire</name> etal<lb/> vs 1024<lb/> <name>Frederick Nagel</name> etal<lb/> garn of <name>James Reed</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> garnishees he discharges at the costs of said plaintiffs and<lb/> the execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Aden</name><lb/> vs 853.<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>,<lb/> and <name>William C Scott</name>,<lb/> garn, of <name>David Dick</name><lb/> and <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come said garnishees, heaving heretofore<lb/> filed herein their separate answers in this behalf, and it ap<lb/>pearing from the said answers that the said garnishees when<lb/> summoned in this be hall held for and as the property<lb/> of said <name>Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name>, defendants herein, cer<lb/>tain notes and evidences of debt mentioned in the said<lb/> answers, and that the said notes and evidences of debt have been by said garnishees<lb/> delivered into court, and the same being by order of this Court delivered to <name>Henry Hitc<lb/>hcock</name>, appointed Received in this behalf, for the purpose of collecting and setting the same,<lb/> it is ordered that said garnishees be and they are here by respectively discharged of and<lb/> from all further liability on account of the said evidences of debt by them so con<lb/>fessed and delivered into Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="307" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0310.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennet S Aden</name><lb/> vs 103.<lb/> <name>David Dick</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, the Court appoints <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>,<lb/> Esq, Receiver in this behalf, for the purpose and with authority<lb/> as by law in such case provided to receive settle and collect by<lb/> action at law in his own name thereon or otherwise according to law<lb/>, the notes and evidences of debt mentioned in the answer of <name>John Scott</name>, garnishee of<lb/> said defendants and by said garnishee delivered into Court; whereupon the said<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> having qualified by making oath according to law and giving bond<lb/> in the penal sum of five thousand dollars with <name>John R Shepley</name>, <name>John M Krrem</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas H West</name>, as his securities, which bond is approved by the Court, it is ordered<lb/> that the said evidences of debt be delivered by the Clerk to the said Receiver and that<lb/> he proceed to settle and collect the same without delay, and that he make report of<lb/> his proceedings in that behalf.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 97, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Hanna</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>,<lb/> and <name>William C Scott</name><lb/> Garnishees of <name>R W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the plaintiff as the said<lb/> garnishees, by their respective attorneys, and it appearing<lb/> to the Court from the answers of said garnishees that at the<lb/> time they were summoned herein as such they had in<lb/> their possession belonging to the defendant, <name>McClure</name>, the<lb/> sum of ninety seven dollars and seventy five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the sum aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> have execution therefore, and that out of said sum she pay the costs as well of the original<lb/> suit as of this proceeding. The sum often dollars is allowed each garnishee for answering<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 330, 87</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>C Porter</name><lb/> vs 855<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>,<lb/> and <name>William C Scott</name> garni<lb/>shees of <name>R N McClure</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the plaintiff as the garni<lb/>shees, by their respective attorneys, and it appearing to the<lb/> Court from the answers of said garnishees that at the time<lb/> they were summoned herein as such they had in their<lb/> possession belonging to the defendant, <name>McClure</name>, the sum<lb/> of three hundred and thirty dollars and eighty seven cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said garnishees<lb/> the sum aforesaid as confessed, and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum he<lb/> pay the costs as well of the original suit as of this proceeding. The sum of ten dollars<lb/> is allowed each garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 241, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James c McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>Crawford Porter</name><lb/> vs 857<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>, and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name>, garnishees of<lb/> <name>R N McClure</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the said plaintiff as<lb/> the said garnishees, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court from the answers of the<lb/> said garnishees that at the time they were sum<lb/>moned herein as such they were indebted to the<lb/> defendant, <name>McClure</name>, in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and forty one dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum be pay the costs<lb/> as well of the original suit as of this proceeding. The sum of ten dollars is allowed<lb/> each garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="308" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0311.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 142, 43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>R W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the said plaintiff as the<lb/> said garnishees, by their respective attorneys, and it ap<lb/>pearing to the Court from the answers of said garnishees<lb/> that at the time they were summoned herein as such<lb/> they were indebted to the defendant, <name>McClure</name>, in the<lb/> sum of One hundred and forty two dollars and forty three cents, It is considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said of finishes the sum aforesaid in from<lb/> aforesaid as confessed, and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum he pay<lb/> the costs as well of the original suit as of this proceeding. The sum of ten dollars is<lb/> allowed each garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Snead</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Continued by Consent.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac J Vanduzer</name> etal<lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>A S Dwen</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jelly D Bowen</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> et al</head>
            <p>continued as on affidavit at defendants casts.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>Ordered of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, files a state<lb/>ment from which it appears that le has sized the said<lb/> Steam Boat <name>St Mary</name> under a warrant issued from the<lb/> office of the St Louis Circuit Count, and that five days have elapsed since said<lb/> seizure and that no person has given bond according to law for said boat, therefore, it is<lb/> ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said boat at public auction to the highest<lb/> bidden fro cash and that he give twenty days public notice of the time and place of<lb/> sale by publication according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 209, 37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kellerman</name> Jr and<lb/> <name>Francis Kellerman Junior</name><lb/> vs 763.<lb/> <name>William Lingo</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by this attorney,<lb/> and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, doth assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/>ages by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred<lb/> and nine dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum of aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> etal<lb/> vs 837<lb/> <name>Michel Corner</name> by garn,<lb/> of <name>Abraham Depew</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the said garnishee be discharged at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="309" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0312.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William K Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and thereupon the hearing of the<lb/> proof progressed, but the hearing thereof not being<lb/> finished further proceedings further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-22">Wednesday, December 22nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Frederick Ware</name>, whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>John A Shepley</name> and<lb/> <name>A Bruin</name>, comes in open Court and acknowledges the execution of a<lb/> deed of emancipation to his slaves <name>Marry Lee</name>, <name>Humphrey Lee</name>, and <name>Betsey Lee</name> his wife.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Hanna</name><lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name><lb/> and <name>William C Scott</name> garn.<lb/> of <name>M W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by her attorney, comes in open Court, and acknowl<lb/>edges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered on the twenty first day of De<lb/>cember, eighteen hundred and fifty eight.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian<lb/> of <name>Crawford Porter</name><lb/> vs 851<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>A W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, comes in open Court and ack<lb/>nowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment herein rendered on the <date when="1858-12-21">twenty first day<lb/> of December eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name> guardian of<lb/> <name>E Porter</name><lb/> vs 855<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>R W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney comes in Open Court and ack<lb/>nowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment herein rendered on the twenty first day<lb/> of December eighteen hundred and fifty eight.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C McNeil</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>R W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, comes in Open Court and ack<lb/>nowledges to have received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the judgment herein rendered on the <date when="1858-12-21">twenty first day<lb/> of December eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>William r Biddlecome</name>,<lb/> assignee herein, the Court appoints <name>John H<lb/> Watson</name> and <name>Henry T Norcom</name> appraisers<lb/> to appraise the mentioned in the inven<lb/>tory filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="310" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0313.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 2575,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Joshua V Throop</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Kirkman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find there from that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of twenty five hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> etal</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>Platt R Green</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Morrison</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>William C Hall</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this action be dismissed at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon the hearing of proof progressed but not being fin<lb/>ished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-23">Thursday December 23rd 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>John C Gage</name> is, on motion of <name>B A Hill</name>, admitted and enrolled a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Union Line Transportation<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having heretofore filed a petition and<lb/> affidavit, from which it appears that the defendants is<lb/> a corporation whose chief office or place of business is<lb/> out of the State of Missouri; now, therefore, on motion<lb/> of the attorney for said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the said defendant be notified<lb/> that the civil action has been commenced against it for the sum of six hundred and thirteen dol<lb/>lars, on account of the failure of said defendant to deliver to the plaintiff certain goods en<lb/>trusted to the defendant as a common carrier, by the plaintiff: and that the property of the<lb/> defendant has been attached; and unless the defendant be and appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court, to be begun and held at the Court House in the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="311" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0314.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>third day of said term, answer to the said action, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> it, and the property of the defendant sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper<lb/> published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Short</name><lb/> vs 847<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name> etal<lb/> garn of <name>John D Ludden</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the garnishees <name>Henry L Parker</name>, <name>Noah<lb/> M Ludlow</name>, and <name>Francis M Ludlow</name>, composing the firm<lb/> of <name>Parker Ludlow</name> and Company, and <name>James Patterson</name> and<lb/> <name>William B Ferguson</name>, composing the firm of <name>Patterson</name> and <name>Ferguson</name>, be discharged at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed<lb/> each firm for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Nicholay</name><lb/> vs 728<lb/> <name>W Pnismeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon the hearing of the proof progressed<lb/> and being finished the Court takes time to consider<lb/> thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan L Rice</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Berry</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and files as state<lb/>ment herein from which it appears that the keeping property attached under<lb/> the writ herein will be attended with much expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered that <name>Michael<lb/> S Cerre</name> Sheriff of St Louis County sell said property immediately and in such manner as he shall<lb/> deem most beneficial to all parties and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on<lb/> or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="312" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0315.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1858-12-24">Friday December 24th 1858</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshua Throop</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzpatrick</name> etal<lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1164,79</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R Wendover</name><lb/> vs 906<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement in wri<lb/>ting duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and sixty dollars<lb/> and seventy nine cents and consents that judgment may be rendered against him for<lb/> that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed, and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fireman's Insurance</name><lb/> Company<lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>Attachment Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the said defendant can<lb/>not be found, and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be<lb/> served upon him therefore, on motion of the attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil ac<lb/>tion has been commenced against him for the sum of five hundred and fifty one dollars,<lb/> found on a bill of exchange, and that his property has been attached, and unless he be<lb/> and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St Louis,<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the fourth Monday of February next, and on<lb/> or before the third day thereof, answer the petition herein, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him, and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof he published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> etal<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> etal</head>
            <p>Substitution of Commissioners.</p>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the plaintiffs<lb/> motion to substitute other Commissioners and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth order that the same be and is hereby sus<lb/>tained. And the Court substitute and appoints <name>George A Taylor</name>, and <name>C K Dick<lb/>son</name>, in lien of <name>Sullivan Blood</name> and <name>James G Barry</name> heretofore appointed, to act Con<lb/>juction with <name>George Knappas</name> Commissioners to make partition of the property according to the judge<lb/> heretofore rendered herein and they are required to make report of their proceedings to this Court without delay.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="313" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0316.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G McPheeters</name><lb/> vs 877<lb/> <name>J A Barrett</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>John Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the said plaintiff as the said garnishee<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and it appearing to the Court from<lb/> the answer of said garnishee that at the time he was summoned<lb/> herein as such he had in his possession belonging to the defendants<lb/> the sum of five hundred dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said as found the sum aforesaid as confessed, and have execution therefor<lb/> and that out of said sum he pay the costs as well of the original suit as of this proceedings.<lb/> The sum of ten dollars is allowed the garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Ryan</name> and<lb/> <name>Franklin K Louthan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Judgment set aside.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the judgment by confession obtained herein on the<lb/> <date when="1858-10-05">fifth day of October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> be and<lb/> the same is hereby set aside and for naught held. And it is<lb/> further ordered that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 161,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Reider</name>, and<lb/> <name>Francis Klein</name>.<lb/> vs 779<lb/> <name>Patrick E Burke</name></head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney but the defen<lb/>dant failing to appear, although duly called, the plaintiffs waive<lb/> a Jury and submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find therefrom, that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> One hundred and sixty one dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1250,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> vs 776<lb/> <name>James W Stephenson</name> and<lb/> <name>Ferdinand W Stephenson</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find there from that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and fifty dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 209,09.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cerf Veil</name><lb/> vs 782<lb/> <name>Peter Gazzals</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury to wit; <name>B W Alexander</name>, <name>K J Douglass</name>, <name>K Glover</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Krutzer</name>, <name>John Matter</name>, <name>J S Maynard</name>, <name>A Ramder</name>, <name>Jno Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Wolf</name>, <name>J J Mudd</name>, <name>C W Walter</name>, and <name>H Davis</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly<lb/> to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of two hundred and<lb/> nine dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="314" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0317.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>Assignees Bond filed and approved.</p>
            <p>Appraisement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry P Westlake</name><lb/> vs 108<lb/> <name>John Warner</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luttercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Duncanet</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W T Hazzard</name> etal<lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that dedimus issue to Maryland for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 188.50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Bayles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M Wells</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files a petition herein, and<lb/> the defendant also comes and files a statement duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of one hundred and eighty eight dollars and fifty cents and consents that judgment may<lb/> be rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 610.74</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ichabode Washburn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and<lb/> files a statement of the defendant duly verified by affi<lb/>davit whereby the said defendant confesses herself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and ten dollars and seventy four cents and<lb/> consents that judgment may be rendered against her for that sum. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday, <date when="1859-01-30">January 30 1859</date>.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="315" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0318.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-03">Monday January 3rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> etal<lb/> vs 859<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Swift</name> etal<lb/> vs 860<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name> etal grant</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> etal<lb/> vs 861<lb/> <name>Martin Porter</name> et al gains</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 863.<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Partridge</name> etal<lb/> vs 864<lb/> <name>Jno B Carson</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Waters</name> etal<lb/> vs 871<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> etal<lb/> vs 872<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sartori</name><lb/> vs 902<lb/> <name>Lucian H Fuller</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethirel Vincent</name> etal<lb/> vs 845<lb/> <name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain &amp; Pilot knob R R Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McClure</name><lb/> vs 840<lb/> <name>St Louis Iron mountain and<lb/> Pilot Knobb R R Co</name> grant</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 701<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary L Barret</name>.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethirel B Vincent</name> etal<lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias attachment and summons issue<lb/> herein to the Sheriff of Jefferson County.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McClure</name> Jr et al<lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias attachment and summons issue herein<lb/> to the Sheriff of Jefferson County.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas E Owens</name><lb/> vs 881<lb/> The City of St Louis garn.<lb/> of <name>James H McClure</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the City of St Louis,<lb/> the garnishee summoned herein, be discharged hence at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the affi<lb/>davit for a continuance herein and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="316" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0319.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> etal<lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Mary E Wickersham</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the Court being now fully<lb/> advised of and concerning the premises doth order<lb/> that the petition and cross bill be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Mick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eugene Guenadon</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs 797<lb/> <name>Johan Kampeter</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> files a statement from which it appears that he has<lb/> seized the said Steam Boat Polar Star under a war<lb/>rant issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court, return<lb/>able to the <date when="1859-02">February Term, 1859</date>, of said Court, and the five days have elapsed since<lb/> said seizure, and no person has given bond according to law for said Boat, therefore<lb/> it is ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said boat by public auction to the<lb/> highest bidder for cash; first giving twenty days public notice of the time and place of<lb/> sale, by publication, according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 752<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> etal<lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>The Home Mutual Fire and Marine<lb/> Insurance Company of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 755<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance<lb/> Company of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to the<lb/> petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that the<lb/> same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="317" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0320.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Girard</name><lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">St Br <name>Wm M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Job P Doan</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S P Chamberlain</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> file a motion for leave to issue execution on the judgment ren<lb/>dered herein on the <date when="1849-09-12">twelfth day of September, eighteen hun<lb/>dred and forty nine</date>, for the sum of three hundred and seventeen dollars and forty<lb/> cents, the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion, and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth order that the same be sustained and that execution issue in accor<lb/>dance with said motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bowe</name><lb/> vs 813<lb/> <name>Thomas Shehan</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Joseph Trundley</name>, <name>A Meith</name>,<lb/> <name>S D Porter</name>, <name>Charles M Bruester</name>, <name>Henry Dollner</name>, <name>J J Garrard</name>,<lb/> <name>S F Lonergan</name>, <name>J L Schnell</name>, <name>Wm Fine</name>, <name>James McKevin</name>, <name>D B Healy</name>, and <name>E Foster</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid find for the defendant. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>A W Elliott</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Ehlert</name><lb/> vs 897<lb/> <name>Johanna Stiefrater</name> Administratrix<lb/> of <name>Conard Stiefvater</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, but their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>C Herdman</name>, <name>Jo Givens</name>, <name>T Shaw</name>, <name>K Schumacker</name>,<lb/> <name>R Taylor</name>, <name>M Higgins</name>, <name>Green Harrison</name>, <name>C W<lb/> Benson</name>, <name>G A Kehr</name>, <name>E A Burt</name>, <name>W Cahill</name>, and <name>W Rucker</name>, twelve good and lawful men,<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> progressed, but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony H Menkens</name> and<lb/> <name>D Bernard Menkens</name><lb/> vs 736<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney, and<lb/> files and affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that an appeal be allowed him to the Supreme Court from the<lb/> judgment herein rendered, and he thereupon files an appeal bond<lb/> which is approved by the Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="318" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0321.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-04">Tuesday January 4th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>V R Hill</name> is, on motion of <name>Luther M Shreve</name>, admitted and<lb/> enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> etal<lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of St Louis Mo</head>
            <p>On motion of the Plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given<lb/> to amend the petition herein so as to include in the sum de<lb/>manded the whole amount of the policy of Insurance<lb/> alleged to be payable; which amendment is accordingly<lb/> made by striking out on the fourth page of said petition all from word, "twenty," down to<lb/> word "payable" and inserting the words, "four thousand dollars", in lien thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>The St Louis mutual Fire and<lb/> marine insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave<lb/> is given to amend the petition herein so as to include<lb/> in the sum demanded the whole amount of the<lb/> Policy of Insurance alleged to be payable, which amend<lb/>ment is accordingly made by striking out on the fourth page of said petition all from<lb/> the word "four" down to the word, "payable", and inserting the words, "five thousand dol<lb/>lars", in lien thereof, and also striking out on side page the word, "four", and inserting<lb/> "five", on the fourth line from the signature of counsel.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> etal<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the Plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is<lb/> given to amend the petition herein so as to include in the<lb/> sum demanded the whole amount of the Policy of In<lb/>surance alleged to be payable; which amendment is accordingly made by striking out on the<lb/> fourth Page of said Petition all from the word "two" down to the word "appear", and inserting<lb/> "five thousand dollars" in lien thereof; and by striking out on said page in the third line from<lb/> the signature of counsel the word "two" and inserting "five."</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> etal<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>The Home mutual fire and<lb/> marine Insurance company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given<lb/> to amend the petition herein so as to include in the amount<lb/> demanded the whole amount of the Policy of insurance<lb/> alleged to be payable, which amended is accordingly made<lb/> by striking out on the fourth page thereof all from the words "fourteen" down to "payable,"<lb/> and inserting "five thousand dollars" and by striking out on said page the words "fourteen hun<lb/>dred" and inserting "five thousand," on the third line from signature of counsel,</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiran Johnson</name> etal<lb/> vs 783<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> default rendered be act aside and for naught held. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="319" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0322.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#700, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Crescent Manufacturing<lb/> company</name><lb/> vs 909<lb/> <name>James C Denniston</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he<lb/> confesses himself indebted to the defendant in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred dollars, and consents that judgment<lb/> may rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> confessed, and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#707, 73</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name><lb/> vs 876<lb/> <name>Charles D Colman</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter E Bland</name> garnishees of <name>William<lb/> McDonald</name> and <name>William Lings</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the garnishee,<lb/> <name>charles D Colman</name>, by their respective attorneys; and the<lb/> plaintiff dismisses this suit as to <name>Peter E Bland</name>, one of<lb/> the garnishees summoned herein; and neither party requiring<lb/> a jury, this cause is submitted to the court, and the court,<lb/> having duly heard and considered the evidence and the arguments of counsel, doth find that<lb/> the said garnishee, at the time he was summoned herein as such, had in his possession, charge<lb/> and control belonging to the said defendant, <name>William Lingo</name>, the sum of Seven hundred<lb/> and seven dollars and seventy three cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the<lb/> execution therefore, and that out of said sum he pay the costs of this proceeding. The sum of<lb/> twenty five dollars is allowed said garnishee for appearing and answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1981, 93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slavin</name> and <name>charles slavin</name><lb/> vs 812<lb/> <name>Charles Frita</name> <name>Henry Gronheim</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Helyenberg</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the defen<lb/>dants, except <name>Henry Gronheim</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys; and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>Gronheim</name>; and no Jury being required<lb/> this cause is submitted to the court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of nineteen hundred and eighty one dollars and ninety three cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid by the court found together with interest at the rate of ten per cent<lb/> per annum from this date until paid and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#56, 42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Ehlert</name><lb/> vs 897<lb/> <name>Johanna Stiefrater</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Lonrad Stiefrater</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, and the jury empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein also come, and there upon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed and being finished the jury<lb/> aforesaid upon their as oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the<lb/> sum of fifty six dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the Estate of <name>Conrad Stiefvater</name> in the hands of <name>Johanna<lb/> Stiefvater</name> his Administratrix the sum aforesaid by the jury assessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended, and that this judgment be certified to the St Louis probate court there<lb/> to be proceeded on according to the Statute in such case made and provided.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bowe</name><lb/> vs 813<lb/> <name>Thomas Shehan</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="320" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0323.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 1323,19.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>allen grown</name></head>
            <p>On Note and Account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the Parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> there upon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Joseph Trundley</name>, <name>A Meith</name>, to<lb/> <name>M Omester</name>, <name>Henry Dollner</name>, <name>S J Lorergan</name>, <name>J L Schnell</name>,<lb/> <name>William Fine</name>, <name>James McKeon</name>, <name>D B Healey</name>, <name>E Foster</name>, <name>M McClintock</name> and<lb/> <name>S J Garrard</name>, twelve good and lawful mens who being duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed and being finished the jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at the<lb/> sum of thirteen hundred and twenty three dollars and nineteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the jury assessed and also his casts herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemilius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 857<lb/> <name>Wm S Grant</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Wm C Waglery</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said<lb/> <name>Wm S Grant</name>, summoned herein as garnishee, having failed to<lb/> answer the interrogatories filed herein against him, it is, on<lb/> motion of the said plaintiff, ordered by the court that the<lb/> same be taken against him as confessed; and this proceeding is continued to the next<lb/> turn of this court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and there upon come also jury to wit; <name>William Cahill</name>, <name>E A<lb/> Burt</name>, <name>George A Kehr</name>, <name>E W Benson</name>, <name>Greene Harrington</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Higgins</name>, <name>R Taylor</name>, <name>N Schumacker</name>, <name>Isaac Shaw</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph givens</name>, <name>W F Obear</name>, and <name>Henry Ashbrook</name>, twelve good and and lawful men,<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issue joined upon the plea in abatement well<lb/> and truly to try, the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are laid<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambogaush</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>A M Waterman</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>M B Cox</name>, garnishee filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Leiber</name><lb/> vs 550<lb/> <name>St Louis Agricultural and<lb/> Mechanical Association</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Jno B Ganter</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, by its attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that the said garnishee be discharged hence<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="321" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0324.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-05">Wednesday January 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W B Wm M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus P Ladew</name>, <name>Valentine J<lb/> Peers</name> and <name>William J Bright</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>K Clark</name>, <name>Johnson</name>,<lb/> <name>Ross</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cure</name> Esq, Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, comes and files a statement from<lb/> which it appears that the keeping of the property<lb/> attached under the writ herein will be attended<lb/> with much expense before the probable termina<lb/>tion of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered by the Court<lb/> that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of<lb/> his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horatia Clark</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cure</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and<lb/> files a statement from which it appears that the Keeping of the<lb/> property attached under the writ herein will be attended with much<lb/> expense before the property termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value;<lb/> it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that<lb/> he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or he before the first day of the<lb/> next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#106.50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben<lb/> Beardslee</name>, <name>John K Fields</name>,<lb/> and <name>Phireas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Mitchell</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Henry F Crop</name>, <name>Franklin<lb/> Field</name> and <name>Thomas Simpson</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the said garnishee, <name>Edward Mitchell</name>, having field<lb/> to appear and answer the interrogatories herein, it is<lb/> on motion of said plaintiffs ordered that the said<lb/> interrogatories be taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this proceeding to<lb/> the Court, and the Court, having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the evidence, doth find therefrom that the said garnishee at the time he was sum<lb/>moned herein as such was indebted to the said defendants in the sum of One hundred<lb/> and six dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum they pay<lb/> the costs of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorney<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed, but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> and laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="322" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0325.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#119.10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Chiles</name> garnishee of <name>Henry<lb/> F Crop</name>, <name>Franklin Filed</name>, and <name>Thomas<lb/> Simpson</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney, but the said garnishee, <name>William H<lb/> Chiles</name>, having failed to appear and answer<lb/> the interrogatories filed herein, although duly<lb/> summoned so to do, it is therefore, on motion<lb/> of the said plaintiff, ordered by the Court<lb/> that the said interrogatories be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury, submit this proceeding to the Court,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence, doth find therefrom that<lb/> the said garnishee at the time he was summoned herein as such was indebted to the said<lb/> defendants in the sum of One hundred and nineteen dollars and ten cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and have execution therefore, and that out of said sum<lb/> they pay the costs as well of the original suit as this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#367.30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name><lb/> vs 730<lb/> <name>Julia Buchanan</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the defendant files an answer herein, whereby she con<lb/>fesses herself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and sixty seven dollars and thirty cents, and con<lb/>sents that judgment may be rendered against her for that sum. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the defendant<lb/> be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the<lb/> sum of Seven Thousand one hundred and twenty one dollars and ninety<lb/> seven into, on account of goods wares and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant<lb/> by the plaintiff and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County, of St Louis,<lb/> on the fourth Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the<lb/> action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published accor<lb/>ding to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="323" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0326.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-06">Thursday, January 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luthercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dunnanet</name></head>
            <p>Order that a dedimus issue to the State of Tennessee<lb/> for the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loring Shafflen</name><lb/> vs 880<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road</name> garnt of <name>Field</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the said garnishee although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not nor hath be answered the interrogatories filed<lb/> herein; it is therefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney ordered that the said interrogatories betaken against him so confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed, and being finished the Jury<lb/> retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-07">Friday January 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, receiver<lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver<lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Pilcher, Sr</name>, and <name>Henry Pilcher Jr</name>.</head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>William W Wakelam</name>, assignee<lb/> herein, the Court appoints <name>Seth W Paine</name>, <name>Ho<lb/>ratio D Hewitt</name> and <name>John Gass</name>, appraisers, the<lb/> appraise the property and effects assigned.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John B Grady</name> files an assignment of his property and effects to <name>C F Burnes</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and<lb/> <name>Susan Bernicker</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed. Motion to dissolve injunction and<lb/> motion to increase penalty of injunction bond, and also<lb/> motion to require receiver to file additional security on<lb/> Bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="324" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0327.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motoin to quash Execution filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj Leiber</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>St Louis Agricultural and Mechanical<lb/> Association</name> Garns of <name>Ganter</name></head>
            <p>Motion filed to set aside order discharging<lb/> garnishee. Denial of garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fine &amp; Martin Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>St Louis Fine and<lb/> Martin Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busche</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Busch</name> et al<lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>The Franklin Ins Co</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno H Tighe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1375.19</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Sauser</name><lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>Franklin Bull</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>B F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come as well the said plaintiff as the said garni<lb/>shee, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come also a<lb/> Jury, to wit; <name>Jas Trundley</name>, <name>A Mieth</name>, <name>S D Porter</name>, <name>Charles D<lb/> Brewster</name>, <name>H Dollner</name>, <name>J J Garrard</name>, <name>S J Lonergan</name>, <name>J L Schell</name>,<lb/> <name>William fine</name>, <name>James McKeon</name>, <name>D B Healey</name> and <name>E Foster</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues joined between the said parties well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find that the garnishee is indebted to the defendant, S F Cooper, in the sum of<lb/> thirteen hundred and seventy five dollars and nineteen cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid if form<lb/> aforesaid by the Jury found and have execution therefore and that out of said sum he pay the<lb/> costs of this proceeding. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein; <lb/> and the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths find for the defen<lb/>dant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said defen<lb/>dant, at the commencement of this suit, had not fraudulently conveyed or assigned his<lb/> property and effects so as to hinder and delay his creditors; wherefore it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the attachment herein be dissolved and this suit dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="325" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0328.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-08">Saturday January 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Bean</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>John T Witham</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>Order for Production Property.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff by his attorney comes files a motion for an order for<lb/> an order for the delivery of the property attached herein, and the Court, having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth order that <name>J C Miller</name> the<lb/> principal, and <name>Samuel Hager</name>, <name>James Hart</name>, and <name>W G Miller</name>, the securities in the bond<lb/> given for the production and delivery of the said property, produce and delivers the property men<lb/>tioned and described in the said <name>Bond</name> to the Sheriff of St Louis County, at his Office, in the<lb/> County of St Louis, forthwith.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and <name>J Samuel Jett</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>Edward Mead</name> assignee herein<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that <name>Hugh I Mc<lb/>Donough</name> and <name>William D Henry</name> be ap<lb/>pointed appraised to appraise the property mentioned in the inventory.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburg</name><lb/> vs 1030<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> et al garnt</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same; and the Court having also heard and<lb/> considered the motion to retax costs allowed garnishee and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ruedi</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Carl Wittig</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Gardner</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at <name>John Ruedi</name>'s costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, twenty days is given<lb/> him to plead to the amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Penn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney twenty days is given<lb/> him to plead to the amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew Rippey</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Meyer Friede</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new<lb/> trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Dominick</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>Frederick K W Hackman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="326" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0329.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Wilgus</name> et al<lb/> vs 324<lb/> <name>William P Davis</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, leave is given the Sheriff<lb/> to amend his return herein by interlining the figures, "1857" in the<lb/> second line thereof: and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the separate motions of the defendants, <name>Betts</name> and <name>Mellen</name>, and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, doth order that the said motions, and each of them, be overruled. The Sheriff amends<lb/> his return herein in accordance with leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1607.11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Thomas Sproat</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and wai<lb/>ving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hun<lb/>dred and seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial<lb/> herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Hirsch</name><lb/> vs 809<lb/> <name>John C Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that<lb/> the same be sustained, and that this cause be taken from the<lb/> Docket.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George I Barnett</name> et al<lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that said motion be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph L Derbin</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to quash Execution and to set aside order granting<lb/> same against Daniel able filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>'s admir et al</head>
            <p>Supplemental Bill filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to substitute <name>Thomas F Smith</name> party plaintiff in heir of<lb/> <name>Antoine R McNair</name>, and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="327" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0330.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demu<lb/>rer the amended petition herein and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>James S Smith</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 273.<lb/> <name>Caroline C McNair</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1544.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 743.<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant <name>Wood<lb/>ward</name>, by their respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Moies</name> al<lb/>so though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and no Jury being<lb/> required, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition, answer, exhibition and proofs,<lb/> and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth find there from that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred and forty four dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid inform as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore. Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> et al<lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J B Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="328" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0331.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10">Monday January 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants<lb/> affidavit for a continuance this day filed herein and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Costs</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>B D Filley</name> withdrawn <date when="1858-11-20">November twentieth, eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty eight</date>, refilled as an answer to amended petition<lb/> Answer of <name>Hassen deuble</name> and also answer of City of St Louis filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Regile</name> et al<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Frederick Sickemeyer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Penj Leiber</name><lb/> vs 850<lb/> <name>St Louis agricultural and<lb/> Mechanical association</name> garns.</head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> discharge of the garnishee herein be set aside and for naught<lb/> held, and this cause continued until the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> et al<lb/> garnt of <name>Gayle</name> and <name>Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Default</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the said <name>Alfred M Waterman</name>, summoned herein as<lb/> garnishee, although duly called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the interrogatories herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumberman and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Espy</name><lb/> vs 828<lb/> <name>Chas Amos</name>'s admr</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hoger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J Richard Barret</name>,<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Wentworth</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p> 
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and a affidavit according to<lb/> law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein de<lb/>scribed; wherefore it is order that the defendants deliver the property<lb/> specified in said petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said<lb/> Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered the him to<lb/> take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John B Grady</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>C F Burnes</name>, assignee herein, the Court<lb/> appoints <name>Carl Birgan</name> and <name>John C Linton</name> appraises<lb/> to appraise the property and effect assignee.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="329" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0332.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#649, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of Cincinnati Ohio<lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>William Hark</name> and<lb/> <name>J Y Stewart</name></head>
            <p>On note:-</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorneys and<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Stewart</name>, thereupon<lb/> comes the defendant, <name>Hark</name>, by <name>James C Moody</name>, his<lb/> attorneys and enters his appearance to this action; and<lb/> failing to answer herein, it is on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney, ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the said defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hun<lb/>dred> and forty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Lavin</name><lb/> vs 878<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Joseph W Wood</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorneys it is ordered<lb/> that the garnishee be discharged hence at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St B W M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Elisha w Brown</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D Jilley</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Hassenduble</name> and <name>George<lb/> W Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>J Small</name>, <name>Jo Roy</name>, <name>Vincent Gerion</name>, <name>M Haw<lb/>thorn</name>, <name>J D Stedgman</name>, <name>M Mcready</name>, <name>J L<lb/> Wilkinson</name>, <name>N Sprigen</name>, <name>S Roggers</name>, <name>E R<lb/> Norris</name>, <name>G Kayser</name>, and <name>J Chauvin</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed, but not being finished further proceedings are laid<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucind Hempstead</name> admm,<lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>Exceptions to Commissions Report filed by<lb/> defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1168, 13</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>Thomas J Smith</name>, <name>Cornellivs D<lb/> Sullivan</name> and <name>Jermiah J Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendants,<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and <name>Jeremiah J Sullivan</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant smith; and no Jury being required this<lb/> causes submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find therefrom that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Eleven hundred and sixty eight dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="330" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0333.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-11">Tuesday January 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#300,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward F Pitman</name>,<lb/> <name>Williamson H Pitman</name><lb/> and <name>George J Pitman</name><lb/> vs 912<lb/> <name>Collins M Pinkerton</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendants and files a statement<lb/> in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses him<lb/>self indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> dollars, and consents that judgment may be rendered against<lb/> him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#134, 95.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Stachlin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mathias Spore</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement in writing<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confessed indebted to<lb/> the defendant in the sum of one hundred and thirty four dollars and<lb/> ninety five cents and consents that judgment may be rendered against him for that sum.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1401, 05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah N Stain</name><lb/> vs 910<lb/> <name>John M Winer</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, and files a statement<lb/> of the defendant duly verified by affidavit, whereby the said defendant<lb/> confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff the sum fourteen hun<lb/>dred and one dollars and five cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered against him<lb/> for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H Oglesby</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>John R Shepley</name>, plaintiff attorney, comes in open Court and acknowledge<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="1858-10-07">seventh day of October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to the State of New York for<lb/> the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D Filley</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Hassen deuble</name>, and<lb/> <name>George H Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are laid over<lb/> until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="331" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0334.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Continued on amended affidavit.</p>
            <p><name>Samuel G Trower</name>, <name>Edward Luster</name>, <name>William<lb/> J Luster</name>, <name>William McDaniel</name>, <name>John V Davis</name> and <name>Joseph Brown</name> and <name>Solomon<lb/> Keffer</name>, here in open Court severally acknowledges themselves to one the State of Missouri the<lb/> sum of five hundred dollars to be levied of their respective goods and chattels, lands and<lb/> tenements, Yet upon condition that if they shall personally appear before this Court on the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday of February next, and from day to day during<lb/> said term and on the first day of any future term to which this cause may be continued,<lb/> to testify as a witness on behalf of the defendant in this cause of the gate of Missouri<lb/> versus <name>Stephen H Houser</name>, for murderer the first degree, and shall not depend the Court<lb/> without leave thereof then this recognizance to be void else of full force and effect.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-12">Wednesday January 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>E C Sloan</name>, attorney in fact for <name>Joseph S Sloan</name>, and <name>Christina M Sloan</name>, his wife, who<lb/> is personally Known to the Court comes in open Court and acknowledges there execution of a Deed<lb/> of Emancipation by him as such attorney, to a mulatto slave <name>Emma Johnson</name>, aged<lb/> forty years, the property of said. <name>Joseph S Sloan</name> and <name>Christina M Sloan</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry I Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#467, 59</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard L White</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Reinhart E Ulrich</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement in writing<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby, the said defendant confesses<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> sixty seven dollars and fifty nine cents, and consents that judgment may he rendered against<lb/> him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Pilcher</name> and <name>Henry Pilcher jr</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Hazzare</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="332" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0335.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael J Dohan</name> etal<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Motion for additional bond to secure claimants to filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Montgomery</name> etal<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Motion for additional Bond to secure claimants to filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Wilstock</name> etal<lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Robert Welton</name> &amp; <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Motion for additional Bond to secure claimants to filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Deed from <name>Bersches</name> and others to <name>O Fallon</name> trustee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of Saint Louis, <name>Oliver D<lb/> Filley</name>, <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their re<lb/>spective attorney, and also the Jury empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause pro<lb/>gressed but nothing finished further proceedings are<lb/> laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-13">Thursday January 13th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Finney</name><lb/> vs 913.<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name>, Comptroller<lb/> of the City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes said petitioner, and files a petition<lb/> duly verified by affidavit praying for a mandamus to issue<lb/> to said defendant; Upon consideration of which it is ordered<lb/> that an alternative mandamus issue in accordance with<lb/> the prayer of said petition returnable forthwith.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers Anderson and Company</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the appli<lb/>cations of <name>fames Smith and Company</name> for allowance<lb/> of their claim herein and being then of fully advised doth<lb/> order that said application be refused.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Otto Onken</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> petition of <name>William Hanmann</name> for an allowance of his claim herein doth order that the prayer<lb/> of said petitioner be refused and the said petition dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="333" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0336.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio &amp; Mississippi Rail Road Co</name><lb/> vs 894<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Farrington</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Meek</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a men trial herein and being thereof filly advised doth order<lb/> that said motion be overruled. The defendants file a<lb/> Bill of Exception herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah S Leverett</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Motion</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>R S Hart</name> Esq, by virtue of authority satisfactory to the<lb/> Court, comes in open Court and acknowledges full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein On the <date when="1858-10-06">Sixth<lb/> day of October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clark Wilson and Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction</p>
            <p><name>R S Hart</name>, Esq, Comes in Open Court, and by virtue<lb/> of authority satisfactory to the Court, acknowledges full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on<lb/> the <date when="1858-10-06">sixth day of October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer<name></name></name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D Filley</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name> and <name>George<lb/> W Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are said<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="334" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0337.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-14">Friday January 14th 1859</date>.</dateline> 
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horace Whittemore</name> etal<lb/> vs 741<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name>, <name>Otto<lb/> Schnuhr</name> and <name>Charles Attinger</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by their attorney come in Open Court and<lb/> acknowledge to have receives full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--12-20">twentieth day of<lb/> December</date> last past for the sum of Seven hundred<lb/> and twenty three dollars and ninety eight cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and <name>J Samuel Jett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Edward mead</name>, the assignee herein, having caused an<lb/> Inventory of the property effects and things assigned,<lb/> with an affidavit by him that the same was a full<lb/> and complete Inventory of the property effects and things assigned, so for as the same had come<lb/> to his knowledge; the appraisers appointed by this Court to appraise the property, effects and<lb/> things so inventoried having this day filed their appraisement, which shows an appraisement<lb/> of the value of the property effects and things as inventoried as assigned, to amount to the sum<lb/> of nineteen thousand five hundred and eighty four dollars; the said assignee having this<lb/> day given bond with good and sufficient security, in the sum of thirty thousand dollars,<lb/> conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court; and the said assignee having<lb/> applied to this Court for an order of this Court authorizing and allowing him to proceed to sell<lb/> and dispose of the property effects and things so assigned inventoried and appraised, at private<lb/> sale in the ordinary course of trade and business, at the store occupied by said assignors or<lb/> at such other place or places as said assignee may consider most proper in the City of St Louis<lb/> for the period of three months from this date; and mature deliberation being thereupon has, It<lb/> is ordered adjudged and determined by the Court that the said assignee, <name>Edward Mead</name><lb/> be authorized and allowed to sell and dispose of the property, effects and things so assigned<lb/> inventoried and appraised or so much there of and such parts as he may be able and may<lb/> consider advisable, at private sale in the ordinary course of trade and business at the store<lb/> lately occupied by said assignors, <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and <name>S Samuel Jett</name>, or at such other place<lb/> or places in the City of St Louis as he may consider best and most proper, for the period of<lb/> three months from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Pilcher</name> and <name>Henry Pilcher jr</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>And now comes <name>William W Wakelam</name>, the<lb/> assignee herein, and makes his statement, from<lb/> which it appears to the Court that the interests of<lb/> the creditors of said <name>Henry Pilcher</name> and <name>Henry Pilcher, jr</name>, will be best sub served by a<lb/> private sale of the estate and effects assigned; and thereupon the Court doth order that the said<lb/> assignee shall proceed to sell at private sale the said effects and estate for the period of forty<lb/> days next ensuing from the date of this order for cash for all sums less than one hundred<lb/> dollars, and for all sums over one hundred dollars at a credit of ninety days. The purchaser<lb/> to give notes endorsed to the satisfaction of said assignee; provided, however, that said<lb/> assignee shall not dispose of the said effects at such private sale for less than their ap<lb/>praised value, and if at the expiration of the said forty days the said assignee shall not<lb/> have disposed of said effects at private sale he shall after giving ten days public notice of the<lb/> time terms and place of sale by publication in some newspaper printed in the City of<lb/> St Louis sell such balance unsold, at public vendue to the highest bidder, the terms of<lb/> such sale at public vendue to be as above set forth to wit: for all sums under one hun</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="335" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0338.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>dred dollars, cash, for all sums above one hundred dollars, a credit of ninety days, the<lb/> purchaser to give notes endorsed to the satisfaction of the assignee. Said assignee files<lb/> a bond in the sum of forty five hundred dollars with good and sufficient security, con<lb/>ditioned according to law, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garnean</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Steam Boat Sioux City</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes to defendant and files a bond for release<lb/> of said Boat in the sum of One hundred and ninety eight dollars<lb/> and fifty one cents, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis O Bogy</name> etal<lb/> vs 877<lb/> <name>William M Tompkins</name><lb/> and <name>D D Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein rendered on the<lb/> <date when="1858-11-02">second day of November eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> for the<lb/> sum of three hundred and eighty seven dollars and sixty six cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Mathews</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C E La Beaume</name> and<lb/> <name>James Conran</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>Augustus W Lewis</name>, comes in open Court and by virtue of<lb/> authority satisfactory to the Court, acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein rendered on<lb/> the <date when="1855-10-25">twenty fifth day of October, 1855</date>, for the sum of nine hund<lb/>red and thirty one dollars and ninety cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri on the relation of <name>Jos Charless</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H Hackney</name> et al Justices of County Court</head>
            <p>Petition for Certiorari filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Bredell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H Hackney</name> et al Justices of County Court</head>
            <p>Petition for Certiorari filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name>.<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D Filley</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name> and<lb/> <name>George<lb/> W Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> and <name>Frederick W Trendenthal</name><lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> and <name>Felix Grima</name></head>
            <p>On Interplea of <name>Joseph Deynoodt</name></p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and <name>Joseph Deynoodt</name><lb/> interpleader, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this proceeding to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of<lb/> the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said Interpleader take nothing by his interplead<lb/> herein, but that the said plaintiffs go hence without day and recover of the said Interpleader their costs and<lb/> charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>Jar R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="336" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0339.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head type="running"><date when="1859-01-05">Saturday January 5th 1859</date>. Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> etal<lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>Louis Magnus</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Owens</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>Drayton Laventure</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw notes<lb/>. sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178.<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Deposition of <name>Edward E Tower</name> for plaintiff, opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Irvin Z Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition of <name>Edward E Tower</name> for plaintiff, opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Charles W Barr</name> and<lb/> The Marshall of St Louis County</head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Franklin Field</name>, by his attorney,<lb/> and files a petition praying for an order of injunction against<lb/> the Marshall of St Louis County and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the said application, doth<lb/> order that on the plaintiffs filing a good and sufficient bond in the sum of four hundred<lb/> and thirty dollars, conditioned according to law, the said Marshall of St Louis County his<lb/> servants agents and attorneys be restrained and enjoined from all further proceedings<lb/> under two certain executions issued from the Law Commissioners Count in favor of <name>Charles<lb/> W Barr</name> versus <name>Franklin Field</name> until the further order of this Court. The said petitioner<lb/> files a bond conditioned as above directed with <name>Jesse arnott</name>, as security, which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#17517, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Sangnisch</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D<lb/> Filley</name>, <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name>,<lb/> and <name>George W Sherrick</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also the Jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, whereupon the trial progressed, and after proceeding<lb/> at some length, it is on motion of the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney ordered by the Court, that this suit be<lb/> dismissed as to the defendant, Sherrick, thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs and against the defendant the City of St Louis, and assess the damages at the<lb/> sum of Seventeen thousand five hundred and seventeen dollars and eighty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="337" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0340.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-17">Monday, January 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Charles W Barr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Charles W Barr</name> and Marshall of St Louis County<lb/> and also motion to dissolve injunction filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Beste</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed by inter pleader.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Foster</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Stephen M Whitehouse</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-18">Tuesday January 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> etal<lb/> vs 265<lb/> City of St Louis etal</head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed. Motion in arrest of judgment filed de<lb/>bene use, Separate motions filed by <name>Filley</name> and <name>Hassendeuble</name><lb/> for judgment on verdick of Jury. Motion to dismisses to <name>Filley</name> and<lb/> <name>Hassendeuble</name> filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zeb F Wetzel</name> and <name>Otto Wetzel</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Joseph Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement from which it appears that<lb/> the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein<lb/> will be attended with much expense before the probable termination of this suit and is<lb/> likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property<lb/> according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before<lb/> the first day of the next teem of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="338" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0341.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-19">Wednesday January, 19th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 772<lb/> <name>William Juston jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Tillman</name> garn</head>
            <p>Answer of garnishee filed. Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#210. 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Conran</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement duly<lb/> verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ten dollars and fifteen cents.<lb/> And consents that judgment may be rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#21, 00 dams<lb/> vs<lb/> Pltff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Crinnion</name><lb/> vs 886<lb/> <name>Daniel O Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Dissolution of Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find for the defendants and assess their damages<lb/> sustained by reason of the Injunction here to fore granted herein at the sum of twenty one<lb/> dollars, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the said Injunction<lb/> as therein recited be and the same is hereby dissolved and rendered null and void, and that<lb/> the petition of the plaintiff be dismissed, and that the dependants recover of the said plain<lb/>tiff, and <name>Thomas Crinnion</name> security the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Court and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Rhoads</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Moses Perren</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files<lb/> a statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property<lb/> attached under the writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is there fore<lb/> ordered that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of his<lb/> proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136.<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Wil<lb/>mol Cady</name>, <name>J B Saddler</name>, <name>High McGinnis</name><lb/>, <name>M Young</name>, <name>M Stevenson</name>, <name>Charles Higgins</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Packer</name>, <name>J E Brooks</name>, <name>Henry Linhorst</name>, <name>Peter Faster</name>, <name>Henry Herstmeyer</name><lb/> and <name>Simon Pottle</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, trial<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed, but not<lb/> being finished further proceedings herein are laid over until tomorrow morning<lb/> at ten o'clock.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="339" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0342.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#428, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Goodin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a statement in<lb/> writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty<lb/> eight dollars and consents that judgment may be rendered against him for that sum. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Letcher</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>Harry I Bodley</name> and<lb/> <name>Abraham M Mitchell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that<lb/> execution issue therefore. By consent of parties leave is given<lb/> the defendants to withdraw the note sued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for dependant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith Barnfield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Barnfield</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-20">Thursday January 20th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> etal<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Affidavit for continuance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio Tool Company</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff by its attorney comes and in open Court acknowl<lb/>edges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judg<lb/>ment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-06">sixth day of October 1858</date> for the<lb/> sum of five hundred and ninety one dollars and fifty three cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="340" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0343.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thomson</name> Administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed but not being fin<lb/>ished further proceedings and laid over until tomor<lb/>row morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#150.00<lb/> and<lb/> Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name> to use of<lb/> <name>Martin P Hendrix</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name>,<lb/> <name>James Paul</name>, and<lb/> <name>D F Worcester</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys;<lb/> and the defendants <name>James Paul</name> and <name>D F Worcester</name>, enter their ap<lb/>pearance to this action and waive the service of process herein,<lb/> and thereupon the parties consent and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered herein for the plaintiff and against the defendants for<lb/> the sum of One hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as greed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.<lb/> Thereupon the plaintiff, by his attorney, acknowledge to have received full and entire sat<lb/>isfaction of the above judgment agreement of parties filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-21">Friday January 21st, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed but not being<lb/> finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>D R Garrison</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dedimus to New York for plaintiff ordered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="341" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0344.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Ohio for defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Alexander Finley</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the statement of<lb/> <name>Alexander Finley</name> duly verified by affidavit that <name>John L Phillips</name><lb/> trustee in a certain deed trust executed by <name>Hugh McGarry</name> on the<lb/> <date when="1858-08-09">ninth day of August eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, which said deed<lb/> is recorded in the Recorders Office of the County of St Louis Book number two hun<lb/>dred and fourteen page fifty of the records of said County has removed from the State<lb/> of Missouri without having completed the performance of the duties imposed on him<lb/> by said deed of trust. It is therefore ordered by the Court that <name>Michael S Cure</name>, Esquire,<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County, be and he is hereby appointed and substituted trustee in place of said<lb/> <name>John L Phillips</name>, with the like trustees and powers, according to the statute in such case made and<lb/> provided.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>Jas R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-22">Saturday January 22nd, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the judgment rendered on the <date when="--10-07">seventh<lb/> of October</date> last past is irregular it is therefore, on motion of the defendants<lb/> by their attorney ordered that the same be set aside and for naught held: and<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the dismissed<lb/> as to Field be set aside and that an alias summons issue for him.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>George N Beard</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, by their attorney, and file an affidavit for an ap<lb/>peal, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that an appeal be allowed them to the Su<lb/>preme Court from the judgment herein rendered; thereupon the defendants file an<lb/> appeal bond in the sum of four hundred and sixty five dollars conditioned according to<lb/> law, with <name>Philip A Kennedy</name> and <name>Joseph Summers</name> as securities which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are<lb/> laid over until Monday morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hayward</name> et al<lb/> vs 70<lb/> <name>William Prager</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for dependants opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten oclock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="342" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0345.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-24">Monday January 24th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Judgt Now 12 set<lb/> aside judgt for<lb/> #1550.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S Stamps</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Jane Foster</name><lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Joseph H Locke</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Legrand F Rucker</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the parties, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and submit the motion for a new<lb/> trial herein to the Court and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the said motion and<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth order that the<lb/> same be overruled; and by consent of parties it so ordered by the Court that the judg<lb/>ment rendered herein for the sum of twenty hundred and twenty one dollars and forty<lb/> seven cents be set aside and for naught held; and thereupon the parties agree that judg<lb/>ment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of<lb/> fifteen hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the estate of <name>St Legrant</name>, <name>F Kevin</name> in the hand of <name>Joseph H Locker</name><lb/> his executor, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and that this judgment be certified to the St Louis Probate Court there to be<lb/> provided on according to the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri on the<lb/> relation of <name>Joseph Charles</name> et al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H Hackney</name> <name>Philip S<lb/> Lanham</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name>,<lb/> Justices of the County Court of<lb/> St Louis County.</head>
            <p>Petition for Certiorari.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear<lb/> the application for a Writ of Certiorari herein,<lb/> and the hearing thereof being finished, and the Court<lb/> being fully advised of and concerning the premised doth<lb/> order that said application be refused, and that the<lb/> petition herein be dismissed at the costs of the relators<lb/> and that execution issue therefore Opinion of Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri on the relation<lb/> of <name>Edward Bredell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H Hackney</name>, <name>Philip S<lb/> Lanham</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name>, Justices of<lb/> the County Court of St Louis County.</head>
            <p>Petition for Certiorari.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the application for a Writ<lb/> of Certiorari and the hearing thereof being finished, and the Court<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth order that said application be<lb/> refused, and that the petition herein be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the relator and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> Administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial cause progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are laid<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="343" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0346.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-25">Tuesday January 25th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew Rippey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Meyer Fride</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction</p>
            <p>Plaintiff by his attorney, come in Open Court and acknowledges<lb/> to home received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment ren<lb/>dered herein on the <date when="--11-11">Eleventh day of November</date> last past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia A Coover</name>.<lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>M C Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorneys, and waives leave<lb/> to amend the petition herein; and on motion until to first day<lb/> of the next term of this Court is given the defendants to answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment and recall execution filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> Administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and also the Jury empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis County, <name>William<lb/> M Morrison</name>, <name>Rufus J Lackland</name>,<lb/> <name>James R Burtis</name>, <name>Thomas W<lb/> Alexander</name>, <name>Platt R Green</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Charles</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the<lb/> following be made "nunc protune" as of the <date when="1858-10-05">fifth day of<lb/> October eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.<lb/> On reading and filing the petition and the plaintiff having<lb/> filed a bond in the sum of one thousand of one thousand dollars, condi<lb/>tioned according to law, with <name>Thomas J Henley</name> and <name>George<lb/> W Cline</name>, as securities, which is approved by the Court<lb/> it is ordered that <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County his servants, agents and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined form selling the undivided<lb/> half of a certain lot of ground, attached by him an the property of <name>Platt R Green</name>, mentioned and<lb/> described in said petition as follows; to wit; a certain lot of ground in the City of St Louis, County<lb/> of St Louis, State of Missouri, being lot No 23 in Block no there in Beaumonts Addition to said<lb/> City containing 25 feet front on Locust street by 134 feet e inches in depth to an alley bounded<lb/> "North by Locust street East by lot No 24, South by and alley and West by lot No 22;" until<lb/> the further order of this Court.</p> 
            <closer>
                Court adjournment until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="344" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0347.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-26">Wednesday January 26th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Second amended petition filed. By consent of parties twenty<lb/> days time is given the defendants to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Second amended petition filed. By consent of parties twenty days<lb/> time is given the defendants to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2500, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thomas</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and the Jurors aforesaid being agreed upon<lb/> a verdict upon their oaths aforesaid find that the<lb/> defendant had in his possession at the time of the filing of the petition in the Probate<lb/> Court the sum of twenty five hundred dollars, in money, belonging to the estate of <name>Charles<lb/> H Saltmarsh</name>. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and also his costs<lb/> herein expenden.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam Reichlscheid</name>,<lb/> and <name>Philip Kraft</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Wm Mucisk</name>, <name>J F Massman</name>,<lb/> <name>Edwd Burdean</name>, <name>Saml McClung</name>, <name>Larkin Craig</name>, <name>J McHarris</name>,<lb/> <name>Chas Keuhner</name>, <name>Jas Purvis</name>, <name>Sidney Bentz</name>, <name>N Darch</name>, <name>J Bige<lb/>low</name> and <name>Jno Hager</name>. Twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished further then proceedings are laid over<lb/> until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="345" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0348.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-27">Thursday January 27th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William c Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, <name>Wm. M Marrison</name> and<lb/> <name>R J Lackland</name>, by <name>William H Lackland</name>, their attorney,<lb/> and enter their appearance to this action and waive the issue and<lb/> service of process herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D Booge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter S Schyler</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, <name>Abram A Vanworner</name>, by his at<lb/>torney, leave is given <name>Kim</name> to withdraw note seed on. Thereupon<lb/> the said defendant withdraws said not and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name> admr<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elzey G Burkham</name> et al<lb/> vs 725<lb/> <name>James F Aglar</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. Note withdrawn by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Lowry</name><lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>Lewis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, his attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor. Note withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled: and the Court having also duly heard<lb/> and considered the motion to tax the costs herein against the plaintiffs and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth order that the same be overruled. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin G Noyes</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward W Sherbourne</name>.<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Alla Lea</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cure</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and<lb/> files a statement from which it appears that the Keeping of the<lb/> property attached under the writ herein will be attended with<lb/> much expense before the probable termination of this suit, and is<lb/> likely to depreciate in value, it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property<lb/> according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before<lb/> the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Issac H Mason</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>John Warner</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer<lb/> to the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained and that this suit be dismissed, for<lb/> want of jurisdiction, at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="346" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0349.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>,<lb/> <name>Adams Reichslcheid</name>,<lb/> and <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed, but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-28">Friday January 28th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>James S Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Rower</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Caroline Austin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rover</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolph Muir</name> and <name>Jno C Rust</name><lb/> garn. of <name>Wm Silver</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment on Execution.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>S H Gardner</name>, attorney for said garnishees<lb/> and the plaintiff having failed to file interrogatories herein<lb/> it is ordered that said garnishees be discharged hence at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. The sum of five dollars is allowed each garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5103, 33</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam Reichlscheid</name> and<lb/> <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and, assess the dam<lb/>age at the sum of five thousand one hundred and three dollars<lb/> and thirty three cents. It is therefore consider by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed,<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Car Wheel Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Execution filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al<lb/> assignees.<lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>Eleager J Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Stipulation of parties filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="347" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0350.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Fink</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Albert Billings</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Billings</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff person, comes in open Court and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="--11-30">thirtieth day of November</date> last fast for the sum<lb/> of twenty five hundred dollars.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion, leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw the note sued on for<lb/> the purpose of taking depositions to be used herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Saltmarsh</name> admr<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm. E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion is arrest of judgment filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-29">Saturday January 29th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met Pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester Harding Jr</name><lb/> assignee of <name>Rogers Anderson and Company</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants and file an<lb/> affidavit for an appeal herein wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that an appeal be allowed them to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered<lb/> and thereupon the said defendants file an appeal bond conditioned according to law with<lb/> good sufficient security which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph C Johnson</name><lb/> vs 685<lb/> <name>James Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess the damages sustained by reason of the premises in the<lb/> petition mentioned at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid by the Court assessed, and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor and that the said plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a men trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Mason</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Warner</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment of dismissal filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="348" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0351.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#3200.00<lb/> and<lb/> Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph S Hull</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>James M Leon</name>, <name>Anna M<lb/> Lyon</name>, <name>C C Whittelsey</name> and <name>William<lb/> C Jamison</name> administrators de bonis<lb/> non of <name>Robert. N. Moore</name> and <name>C C<lb/> Whittelsey</name> administrator of <name>Alexander<lb/> Moore</name> and <name>David C Hall</name>.</head>
            <p>Foreclosure of Mortgage.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and consent and agree that judgments be rendered herein<lb/> against said defendants for the sum of thirty two hundred<lb/> dollars: whereupon the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> thirty two hundred dollars, and the Court doth further<lb/> find that the statement in said petition made are true<lb/> and that the mortgage made was executed in the manner and for the purpose therein set<lb/> forth. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, and also his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended, and that the equity of redemption in the premises and property in said mortgage<lb/> and petition described be forever foreclosed and the aforesaid debt and damages and costs<lb/> be livid of the said property and premises described in said petition and mortgage as follows:<lb/> to wit" "the undivided two thirds of the following tract or parcel of land situate in the County<lb/> of St Louis, to Wit: the undivided two thirds of one hundred and twenty arpens of land, which<lb/> was purchased by said <name>Robert</name> and <name>Alexander Moore</name> and <name>Elizabeth Moore</name> from <name>M P<lb/> Leduc</name>, <name>Robert Collet</name> and <name>Joseph Charles</name>, Commissioners, appointed by the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court to make parties of certain real estate-and which one hundred and twenty arpens<lb/> was conveyed to said <name>Robert Alexander</name> and <name>Elizabeth Moore</name> by said Commissioners<lb/> by deed dated the <date when="1837-07-29">twenty ninth day of July, at 1837</date>, and for a more particular description<lb/> of which property reference may be had to said Deed from said Commissioners;" and if<lb/> the mortgaged property be not sufficient to satisfy said debt and damage or damages and<lb/> costs then the residue to be levied of other goods and chattels, lands and tenements of said mort<lb/>gagers, and that execution issue therefor. Thereupon the plaintiff, by his attorney, acknowledges<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to Second amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein wherefore it is order that an appeal<lb/> be allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgment<lb/> herein rendered; thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond conditioned according to<lb/> law which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm. E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion for rule on defendant and counsel to show cause why<lb/> verdict should not be amended by the Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John d Wilson</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion until the first day of the next term of this Court<lb/> is given the defendant Biddle to answer the amended bill.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Price Frost &amp; Co.</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>D T Wheeler &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="349" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0352.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Virden</name></head>
            <p>President of the St Louis University, comes in Open Court and acknowl<lb/>edges the execution of a Deed of emancipation, by him as such President, to<lb/> a certain negro slave <name>Samuel Tyler</name>, aged eighteen years, of a copper color and marked with a<lb/> small scar on the centre of the forehead the property of said University. Said <name>Virden</name> being<lb/> personally known to the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Virden</name></head>
            <p>President of the St Louis University, comes in Open Court and acknowl<lb/>edges the execution of a Deed of emancipation, by him as such Pres<lb/>ident, to a negro slave <name>Thos Tyler</name>, aged twenty three years, of copper color, the property of said<lb/> University. Said <name>Virden</name> being personally known to the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Virden</name></head>
            <p>President of the St Louis University, who is personally known to the Court,<lb/> comes into Court and acknowledges the execution of a Deed of emanci<lb/>pation, to a negro slave <name>George Tyler</name>, aged twenty five years, of light copper color, the property<lb/> of said University.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno S Virden</name></head>
            <p>President of the St Louis University, who is personally known to the Court,<lb/> comes into Court and acknowledges the execution of a Deed of emancipation, to a<lb/>negro slave <name>Edmond Tyler</name>, aged twenty seven years, of copper color, the property of said University.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-01-31">Monday January 31st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Madison Miller</name><lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>J B H Jacobs</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurred to the petition<lb/> herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same be sustained and<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno C Patter</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Jno McDowell</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein<lb/> and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 771<lb/> <name>Wm Turton</name> Sr et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>,<name> Adam<lb/> Reichlscheid</name><lb/> and <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and on motion of the defendants, leave is given to amend the<lb/> answer herein by striking out the first six lines thereof which amend<lb/>ment is accordingly made; thereupon come also a jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>E J Meegan</name>, <name>Thos Booth</name>, <name>A Slea</name>, <name>Noah Rives</name>, <name>W J Clendenin</name>,<lb/> <name>Paul Companiot</name>, <name>E H Smith</name>, <name>M L Green field</name>, <name>H B Bryan</name>, <name>S A Laville</name>, <name>Fly Richardson</name>,<lb/> and <name>D Wells</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow mornings.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="350" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0353.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-01">Tuesday February 1st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John P Grady</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>On application of <name>C F Burns</name>, assignee herein, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that he proceed to sell at private<lb/> sale the property and effects assigned upon a credit<lb/> of six and twelve months and at a price not less than the value fixed by the appraisers; payments<lb/> to be secured by endorsed notes.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumberman and<lb/> Mechanics Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the order overruling the demurrer herein<lb/> be set aside, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> demurrer herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that the<lb/> same be sustained. Until the first day of the next term of<lb/> this Court is given the plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Thorp</name> et al<lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>John Paker</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick T M Sherry</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Henry S Strong</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5165.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche Adam<lb/> Reichlscheid</name> and <name>Philip Kraft</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs<lb/> and assess the damages at the sum of five thousand one<lb/> hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="351" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0354.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-02">Wednesday February 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p><name>J R Troxellis</name>, on motion of F C Sharp, admitted and enrolled as a member<lb/> of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Richardson</name><lb/> vs 323.<lb/> <name>William P Howard</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to strike<lb/> out parts of answer herein and being thereof fully advised doth over<lb/>rule the came.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Gartt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Creely</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>John M Krum</name>, attorney, for the plaintiffs, comes in open Court and<lb/> acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judg<lb/>ment herein rendered on the <date when="1853-04-21">21st day of April, 1853</date>.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua B Prank</name> and<lb/> <name>W M McPheeters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition herein, and the plaintiffs having filed<lb/> a bond, in the sum of five hundred dollars with <name>Samuel Gaty</name> as<lb/> security, conditioned according to law, which bond is approved by the<lb/> Court, it is ordered that the defendant, his servants, agents and attorneys,<lb/> be restrained and enjoined from all further proceedings under a certain execution issued by Justice<lb/> Covert on a Judgment obtained by <name>Olley Williams</name> against the plaintiffs and one <name>William<lb/> B Watson</name> for the sum of seventy dollars and seventy cents, until the further order of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Car Wheel Company</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney and files an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that an appeal be<lb/> allowed said plaintiff to the Supreme Court from the judgment<lb/> herein rendered: thereupon the plaintiff files an appeal bond with<lb/> <name>D P Green</name>, as principal, and <name>Thomas Hays</name> and <name>Warren Curries</name> as securites, which bond<lb/> is acknowledged by the obligors and approved by the Court.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Perarial Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <p>Agreement of Counsel filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bern C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Illinois for plaintiff. Depositions for plaintiff opened<lb/> and filed. Agreement of Counsel Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M C Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered of Ohio for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Dismissal. On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="352" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0355.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Girard</name><lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>The Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismisses at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 755<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismisses at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al<lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>The Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al<lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismisses at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5165.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>, <name>Adam<lb/> Richdschied</name>, and<lb/> <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company of St Louis</name>, Mr.</head>
            <p>Petition on Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>A F Keller</name>, <name>B McCarty</name>,<lb/> <name>J R Donohoe</name>, <name>Frederick Sherrick</name> <name>E J McGreen</name>, <name>Alfred<lb/> Sled</name>, <name>N Rives</name>, <name>Paul Companiot</name>, <name>E H Smith</name>, <name>M L Green</name><lb/> field, <name>J S Post</name> and <name>James Link</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of five thousand<lb/> one hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid if form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have executor therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 5165.00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>, <name>Adam<lb/> Richdschied</name>, and<lb/> <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/>vs 751<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>A F Keller</name>, <name>B McCarty</name>, <name>J R<lb/> Donohoe</name>, <name>Frederick Sherrick E J McGran</name>, <name>Alfred Sled</name>,<lb/> <name>N Rives</name>, <name>Paul Companiot</name>, <name>E H Smith</name>, <name>M L Green</name> field,<lb/> <name>J S Post</name> and <name>James Link</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of five thousand<lb/> one hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid if form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have executor therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>The Western Mutual Fire<lb/> and Marine Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>Stipulation of parties filed and cause continued until next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="353" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0356.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam Richdschied</name>,<lb/> and <name>Philip Kraft</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and by leave of Court and defendant amends his answer, filed<lb/> herein, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>A F Keller</name>,<lb/> <name>B McCarty</name>, <name>J R Post</name>, <name>J R Donohoe</name>, <name>Frederick Sherrick</name><lb/> <name>E J McGran</name>, <name>Alfred Sled</name>, <name>N Rives</name>, <name>Paul Companiot</name>,<lb/> <name>E H Smith</name>, <name>M L Green field</name>, and <name>James Link</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed and afterward the plaintiffs saying that<lb/> they will not further prosecute their suit in this behalf, it is, on motion, ordered that they<lb/>be non suited, and that they take nothing by their suit in this behalf, but that the defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff its costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-03">Thursday February 3rd 1859</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co of Pennsylvania</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>Daniel Weaver</name></head>
            <p>The Defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully understood it is ordered that the same be<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Gwenadon</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>The German Savings<lb/> Institution</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, Mick, comes and withdraws the motion to set aside<lb/> the non suit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State of Missouri<lb/> to use of Iowa</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Albert J Noble</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> understood it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shaw</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Futhon</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorneys, comes in open Court and acknowledges to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="1858-10-15">15th day of October, 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Thomas Sproat</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully un<lb/>derstood it is ordered by the Court that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation Co</name></head>
            <p>Order that a dedimus issue herein to Michigan<lb/> for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="354" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0357.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Von Phul</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M McFaden</name>,<lb/> <name>Miles Sells</name> and Samuel<lb/> <name>M Edgell</name> garn. of <name>Edward Mathews</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>William M Cooke</name> plaintiffs attorneys in Open Court<lb/> and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment herein rendered on the <date when="1856-03-11">11th day of March, 1856</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Darlin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new<lb/> trial him and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe Mutual Ins Co.</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants<lb/> motion for a new trial herein doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Williams Hurd's</name> trustee<lb/> vs 718<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully understood it is ordered by the Court that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmine Richard</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>Manhattan Life Ins Co.</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and consi<lb/>dered and fully understood it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue the District of Columbia for<lb/> the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State Missouri use of <name>Julius Voelker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno H Garnhart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <p><name>J P Devereux</name> is enrolled as a member of this Bar on motion of S M Breckinridge.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fine Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire &amp; Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>Franklin Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="355" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0358.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-04">Friday February 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Sport</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip B Hockaday</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Gibson</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Firemans Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>New Albany Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 878.<lb/> <name>Wm Dwyer</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>National Ins Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Dwyer</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ins a Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Dwyer</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sam Montgomery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Dwyer</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Ins Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Dwyer</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chitteck Montland</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, comes and remits forty two dollars of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered: and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the defendants motion for a new trial herein and being<lb/> thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Michael Werk</name> etal<lb/> vs 584<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard<lb/> and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Cannon</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>Daniel R Grace</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside default, final judgment and assess<lb/>ment of damages being heard and fully understood by the Court it is<lb/> ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Luft</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, in person, comes into Court and acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1857-11-27">27th<lb/> day of November, 1857</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Wittig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Auedi</name></head>
            <p>Answer to petition for stay of execution filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> admr,<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Affidavit for continuance filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="356" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0359.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>Clark Hooper</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new<lb/> trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Carpenter</name> etal<lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants<lb/> motion for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> vs 363<lb/> <name>Jno Bean</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the judgment herein being heard and by the<lb/> Court fully understood it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Marcus A Wolf</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the plaintiff motion for<lb/> judgment for want of answer to amended petition and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth overrule the same and it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be striken from the locket.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Finney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> Comptroller</head>
            <p>Defendants Return to Alternative mandamus filed.<lb/> Traverse of Return filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cerf Veil</name><lb/> vs 782<lb/> <name>Peter Gazzalo</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and by the Court<lb/> fully understood it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bowe</name><lb/> vs 813<lb/> <name>Thomas Shehan</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and by the Court fully<lb/> understood it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> etal<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> etal<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> etal<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick Schmucker</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name> etal<lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The objections of <name>Samuel Brooks</name> to the sufficiency of the<lb/> indemnification bond given by the said plaintiffs being heard<lb/> and fully understood it is ordered that they be overruled. The<lb/> said <name>Samuel Brooks</name> files a bill of exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="357" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0360.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2080,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name><lb/> <name>Frederick W Keutgen</name><lb/> and <name>Adolph Reichelt</name><lb/>vs 430<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find there from that the defendant to indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty hundred and eighty dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-05">Saturday. February 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Melvin L Gray</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Solomon P Sublette</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the statement of <name>M<lb/> L Gray</name> duly verified by affidavit that <name>John S Talbott</name><lb/> trustee in a deed of trust executed by <name>Josephus W<lb/> Hall</name> and <name>Mary C</name> his wife has departed this life<lb/> without completing the performance of the duties imposed on him by said deed of trust. It<lb/> is therefore ordered by the Court that <name>Michael S Cure</name> Sheriff of St Louis County be<lb/> and he is hereby substituted trustee in place of <name>John S Talbott</name>, deceased, with the like<lb/> powers and trusts according to the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Snead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael J Dohan</name> etal<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>The motion for additional indemnification bond being heard<lb/> and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Montgomery</name> etal<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>The motion for additional indemnification bond being heard and<lb/> fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> overruled.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="358" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0361.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Wilstock</name> etal<lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for additional indemnification bond to secure<lb/> claim an to being heard and by the Court fully understood,<lb/> it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> admr<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>Jno L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Additional affidavit for continuance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> etal<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial on the inter plea herein being heard<lb/> and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> etal<lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial on the plea in abatement herein being<lb/> heard and fully understood is ordered that the same be overruled<lb/>. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the judgment herein and recall<lb/> execution being heard and fully understood it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucinda Hempstead's</name> admr etal<lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that<lb/> the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Carpenter</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an<lb/> agreement herein, and by consent of parties the Court doth find the<lb/> issue herein joined infavor of the defendant. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said defendant had not at the time of issuing<lb/> the attachment herein fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or<lb/> delay his creditors: wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be dissolved<lb/> and this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="359" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0362.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-07">Monday February 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Pessa</name><lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>August Johns</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> vs 776<lb/> <name>James N Stephenson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to the Territory of Kansas<lb/> for the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Carpenter</name> etal<lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files an affidavit for an<lb/> appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed<lb/> him to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered, and there<lb/>upon the said defendant files an appeal bond, conditioned according to law, with good and suf<lb/>ficient security which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#842, 32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeffrey Seymour</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendant, Woodward by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the defendant, Moies, having withdrawn<lb/> his answer herein, where by this suit remains undefended as to him, it<lb/> is on motion of the plaintiff ordered that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings proofs and agreed facts, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant, Woodward; and the Court<lb/> doth find from the instruments of writing on which this action to founded that the defendant<lb/> Moies is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and forty two dollars and thirty<lb/> two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff take nothing by his<lb/> suit in this behalf against the said defendant, Woodward, and that he recover of the said<lb/> defendant, Moies, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Thompson</name> admr,<lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a rule on defendant to show cause<lb/> why verdict should not be amended by the Court being heard and<lb/> fully considered, it is ordered that the same be overruled: and the<lb/> defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered<lb/> that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Anderson</name> Jr</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for<lb/> a rehearing of motion for a new trial herein and being there of fully<lb/> advised doth overruled the same: and the Court having also heard<lb/> and considered the motion for a rehearing of motion in arrest of<lb/> judgment doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="360" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0363.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/>vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that a Dedimus issue to for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> etal<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> etal</head>
            <p>The interpleader files a Bill of Exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Sausser</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>R F Cooper</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by his attorney, in open Court, acknowledges to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction rendered herein on the <date when="1858-11-19">19th day of November 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Sausser</name><lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>Franklin Bull</name><lb/> garn. of Cooper</head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff by his attorney acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment herein against said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> admr,<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to require the receiver to file additional security<lb/> on bond being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that<lb/> the same be overruled: and the defendants motion to increase the pen<lb/>alty of the injunction bond being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be sustained, and that the penalty of said Bond be increased to the sum of four thousand<lb/> dollars. Three days is given to file additional security. The motion to dissolve the injunction herein<lb/> is continued on affidavit and amended affidavit of the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Charles W Barr</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion to dissolve the injunction herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name>, <name>Albert G Edwards</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name> and <name>Philip W Heermans</name><lb/> vs 165<lb/> <name>Robert a Reilly</name>, <name>Richard J Lockwood</name>,<lb/> <name>Ralph P Voorhies</name> and <name>William H Pearson</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the entry of judgment herein<lb/> made on the <date when="--12-08">eighth day of December</date>, last past, be<lb/> set aside, and the following entered "rune protunc, <lb/>" as of that date in lien thereof.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendants, <name>Lockwood</name>, <name>Pearson</name> and <name>Voorhies</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the defendant, <name>Robert A Reilly</name>, although having been duly summoned and being now<lb/> solemnly called, comes not but makes default, wherefore it is ordered that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and thereupon the plaintiffs and the defendants, <name>Lackwood</name>, <name>Pearson</name>, <lb/> and <name>Voorhies</name>, waive a Jury and submit the issues herein joined to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the plaintiffs also submit to the Court the assessment of their damages as against<lb/> said <name>Reilly</name>; and the Court being fully advised in the premises doth find said issues in favor of<lb/> said plaintiffs, and, doth assess their damages sustained by reason of the premises in their petition<lb/> mentioned at the sum of twelve hundred and twenty four dollars and twenty five cents as against<lb/> said <name>Lackwood</name>, <name>Pearson</name> and <name>Voorhies</name>, and also as against, said <name>Reilly</name>; therefore, it is considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants in this cause the damages afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as assessed, and also their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.<lb/> The defendants, by their attorney, thereupon file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="361" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0364.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A Reilly</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a<lb/> new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing Co</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that dedimus issue to Massachusetts<lb/> for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that dedimus issue to Pennsylvania for plaintiff.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-08">Tuesday February 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Hull</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark J Morton</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>A M Gardner</name> plaintiffs attorney, in open Court acknowledges<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="--10-06">6th day of October</date> last past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1083,35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucien Sinner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtney</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, and files a<lb/> petition herein, thereupon comes the defendant and files his appearance<lb/> herein whereby he waives service of process and enters his appearance<lb/> to this action as if served with process twenty days before the first day of the present term of<lb/> this Court; and the said defendant failing further to appear or plead herein it is, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff, by his attorneys, ordered that the petition herein betaken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and eighty three dollars and<lb/> thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburn's</name> Ex &amp;c,<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>On motion leave is given to file an amended and supplemen<lb/>tal petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Wm. C Woodson</name>,<lb/> <name>Wm. P Fenn</name>, <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H<lb/> Dorsett</name> and <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff in person, acknowledges to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="362" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0365.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riggin</name> Jr<lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Charles L Hunt</name>,<lb/> <name>Wm. C Woodson</name>, <name>Wm P Fenn</name>, <name>Richard<lb/> H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name>, <name>Robt A<lb/> Walton</name> and <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>John Riggin</name>, Sr, agent for plaintiff acknowledges<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--10-12">12th day of<lb/> October</date> last past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riggin</name> Jr<lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>W H Dorsett</name>, <name>R H<lb/> Stevens</name>, <name>Wm C Woodson</name>, <name>Philip S Lanham</name>,<lb/> <name>Wm P Fenn</name> and <name>Kohn McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>John Riggin</name> Sr, agent for the plaintiff, acknowledges to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-12">12th of October 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riggin</name> Jr<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>Wm C<lb/> Woodson</name>, <name>Wm P Fenn</name>, <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H<lb/> Dorsett</name>, <name>Robt A Walton</name> and <name>Jno McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>John Riggin</name> Sr agent for the plaintiff, acknowledges<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-07">7th day of October 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Mason</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>John Warner</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal and to rein<lb/>state this cause being heard and by the Court fully understood it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Joshua V Throop</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fitzpatrick</name> etal<lb/> vs 706<lb/> <name>Emanuel Block</name></head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial herein berg heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Wm Hurd's</name> trustee<lb/> vs 718<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent of parties until the first day of the next term of this Court<lb/> is given the defendants to file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion to quash the execution herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered by the Court that the same be overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="363" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0366.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-09">Wednesday February 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Potter</name> Jr etal<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Devlin</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>Joseph W Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> vs 776<lb/> <name>James N Stephenson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Wm Hurds</name> trustee<lb/> vs 718<lb/> <name>William H Tasker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants, by their attorney, file an affidavit for appeal herein,<lb/> wherefore, it is ordered that an appeal be allowed them to the supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered and they thereupon file an<lb/> appeal bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant Filled, by <name>Cline Jamison</name>, his attorneys, waiving the service<lb/> of process, enters his appearance to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>W H Dorsett</name>,<lb/> <name>WW P Fenn</name>, <name>R H Stevens</name>, <name>Robt<lb/> A Dalton</name>, <name>Philip S Lanham</name> and<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>William M Cooke</name>, plaintiffs attorney, comes into Court<lb/> and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-04-27">27th day of<lb/> April 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucinda Hempstead's</name> administrator etal<lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>Commissioners Report confirmed.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and submit the defendants exceptions<lb/> to the commissioners Report to the Court, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same and being thereof fully advised doth order<lb/> that said exceptions be overruled; and on motion of the petitioners, by their attorneys, and no<lb/> cause being shown to the contrary, it is further ordered by the Court that the said Commission<lb/>ers Report be confirmed as firm and effectual forever. The Court allows <name>Cline</name> and <name>Jamison</name><lb/> petitioners attorneys, one hundred and fifty dollars, as Counsel fee, to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Gooding</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Bean</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment on motion to set aside non suit<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="364" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0367.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, by their attorney file an affidavit for an<lb/> appeal and on their motion an appeal is allowed them to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment of this Court herein, and they<lb/> thereupon file an appeal bond, conditioned according to law, which is approved by the court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-10">Thursday, February 10th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> admr et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>John Biddle</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucinda Hempstead's</name> administrator et al<lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John K Hempstead</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a Bill of Exceptions, and an<lb/> affidavit for an appeal herein, whereupon an appeal<lb/> is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the<lb/> judgment herein, and they thereupon file an appeal bond with <name>John K Hempstead</name>, as principal<lb/> and <name>E Gray</name> and <name>William M Watson</name> as surcties which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Kraus</name> et al<lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Charles S Coxe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Attachment and Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P B Hockaday</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Gibson</name></head>
            <p>answer to motions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gray</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>The Pacific Railroad</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, remits the sum of five hundred and<lb/> seventeen dollars of the judgment herein rendered: and the defendants<lb/> motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> administrator<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files an additional Injunction Bond herein<lb/> in the sum of four thousand dollars with himself as principal<lb/> and <name>Peter Schorner</name>, as security, which said Bond is<lb/> approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="365" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0368.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the verdict herein and grant a<lb/> new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the Court it<lb/> is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C McCausland</name> et al<lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>Richard Foley</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph L Derbin</name> et al<lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>John H Sparr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to quash<lb/> the execution issued against Daniel able and to set aside order<lb/> granting same doth order that said motion be sustained and that<lb/> said execution be quashed and the order granting same at aside and for naught held.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.<lb/> The defendant files a Bill of Exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe Mutual Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and <name>St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Abram A Vanworner</name></head>
            <p>Petition for production of books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name><lb/>vs 31<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and <name>St Louis A A Co</name></head>
            <p>Exemplification of Chanter filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="366" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0369.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-11">Friday February 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#780,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pilot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles Greenwood Moies</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>The defendant files a statement in writing duly verified by affi<lb/>davit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Seven hundred and eighty dollars and authorizes the<lb/> Court to render judgment against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> et al<lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs by their attorney, file an affidavit for appeal<lb/> herein, and on their motion an appeal is allowed them to<lb/> the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered,<lb/> whereupon they file an appeal bond with themselves, as principals, and <name>Irvin Z Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>William D Sedgwick</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/>vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the plaintiff<lb/> to Exceptions to the Commissioners Report herein and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth order that said Exceptions be sustained, and<lb/> that said Commissioners Report be set a said and for naught held: and the Court re<lb/>appoints <name>William H Osborn</name>, as Commissioner, and associates with him <name>John R<lb/> Shepley</name> to examine and audit the accounts, books and papers of the co partnership of<lb/> <name>Houseman</name> and <name>Smith</name> and <name>Houseman Smith</name> and Company, and the said Commis<lb/>sioners are hereby required after heaving the proof that may be offered by the parties to take<lb/> and state the respective accounts of the plaintiff and the defendant with said above men<lb/>tioned firms and to make report of their proceedings under this order with all convention speed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Virginia W Mulhoeffer</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Peter Mulhoeffer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and affidavit from which<lb/> it appears that the defendant is a nonresident of the State of<lb/> Missouri, therefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, by her attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce, and unless he be and appear<lb/> at the October Term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the first Monday of <date when="1859-10">October, eighteen hundred and fifty<lb/> nine</date>, and on a before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be<lb/> taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published ac<lb/>cording to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of<lb/> St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Morttand</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Devlin</name> et al<lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Partnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="367" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0370.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to Second amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hager</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles W Woodworth</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Krum</name> &amp; <name>Harding</name> assignees<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elezzer J Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Transcript from Justice filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-02-12">Saturday February 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Globe mutual Insurance company</name><lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein, whereupon an appeal is allowed them<lb/> to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered,<lb/> and thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond con<lb/>ditioned according to law with good and sufficient security which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Farmer</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files a petition herein against<lb/> said defendant, and thereupon <name>Aylett Buckner</name>, one of the attor<lb/>neys of this Court, appeared in open Court in behalf of said defen<lb/>dant, and by virtue of a warrant of attorney, for that purpose executed by the said defen<lb/>dant, and now produced in Court and duly proved, waived the issuing and service of<lb/> process, and acknowledges that the said defendant is indebted in manner and form as the<lb/> said plaintiff has in his petition mentioned, and confesses that the said plaintiff has sus<lb/>tained damages by reason thereof in the sum of two hundred and sixty six dollars and<lb/> thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore. Judgment to bear ten per cent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Mason</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Warner</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al assignees<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="368" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0371.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Inter pleader files an affidavit for an appeal herein and<lb/> on his motion an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the Judgment herein and he thereupon files an appeal<lb/> bond with <name>Maklot Thompson</name> as principal and <name>Pierre A Berthold</name> and <name>Julius H<lb/> Smith</name> as securities which bond in approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1464, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob H Eimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick W Trendenthal</name><lb/> vs 839<lb/> <name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> and<lb/> <name>Macklok Thompson</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>William Beste</name> and <name>Felix Grima Jr</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment on attachment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the said plaintiff and the said<lb/> garnishees by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this proceeding to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the<lb/> said garnishee, <name>A J P Garesche</name>, and the Court doth further<lb/> find that the said garnishee, <name>Maklot Thompson</name>, at the time he was summoned herein<lb/> as such had in his possession belonging to the defendants the sum of twenty five hundred<lb/> and eighty six dollars and six cents; and it appearing to the Court that the amount of the<lb/> original judgment rendered herein is fourteen hundred and sixty four dollars and thirty<lb/> cents, therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> garnishee the sum of fourteen hundred and sixty four dollars and thirty cents and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore; and it is further considered by the Court<lb/> that the said garnishee, <name>A J P Garesche</name>, be discharged hence at the costs of said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore. Thereupon comes the said <name>Maklot Thompson</name> and<lb/> in accordance with the order of Court days into Court the sum of Seventeen hundred and<lb/> fifty dollars, and it is ordered that the Clerk of this Court deposit said sum in some Bank<lb/>ing Institution of this City at six percent interest, subject to the further order of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#843, 78<lb/> For value received I do<lb/> hereby assign this judgment<lb/> to <name>Peter G. Gerhart</name>. <date when="1860-05-11">May<lb/> 11, 1860</date>.<lb/> Henry Gerhart</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Gerhart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Evermont Randalls</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files a petition herein<lb/> and thereupon comes the defendant and files an answer herein<lb/>, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Eight hundred and forty three dollars and seventy eight cents, and consents that<lb/> judgment may be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten percent her annum. By consent of parties<lb/> the issue of execution herein is stayed for the period of six months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 686<lb/> <name>James H McCullough</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled: thereupon the defendant<lb/> file an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed<lb/> the said defendants to the supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered. Thereupon<lb/> the said defendants file an appeal bond in the sum of three thousand dollars conditioned<lb/> according to law, which bond is approved by the Court. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luttercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="369" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0372.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#185,16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Kessler</name><lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> and <name>S Hirschfeld</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>John Valentine</name> but the defendant<lb/> <name>Hirschfeld</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty five dollars and<lb/> sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Finney</name><lb/> vs 913<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> Comptroller<lb/> of the City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Petition for mandamus.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the said <name>John Finney</name> and the said<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name>, Comptroller of the City of St Louis, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and submit this cause to the Court on<lb/> the pleadings and proofs herein, which being seem and heard<lb/> and by the Court here fully understood; it is ordered and adjudged that a peremptory<lb/> mandamus issue to said <name>Stephen Hoyt</name>, commanding and requiring him, as such Comp<lb/>troller, forth with to countersign the warrant issued by <name>Theodore Papin</name>, auditor of said fifty,<lb/> on the <date when="1859-01-11">eleventh day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>, in favor of <name>J and W<lb/> Finney</name>, for the sum of eleven hundred and ninety dollars and seven cents, in pursuance of<lb/> an Ordinance of said City, entitled, "an Ordinance for the relief of <name>John</name> and <name>William<lb/> Finney</name>:" and it is further ordered by the Court that the said respondent pay the costs herein<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmine Richard</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of New York</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by its attorney, and files an<lb/> affidavit for an appeal, wherefore it is ordered that an<lb/> appeal be allowed it to the Supreme Court from<lb/> the judgment herein rendered; thereupon the said<lb/> defendant files an appeal bond conditioned according to law which is approved by the Court.<lb/> The parties file an agreement herein and in accordance therewith leave is given the defendant<lb/> to file a Bill of Exceptions in vacation.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Devlin</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>Joseph W Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants, by their attorneys, and fi<lb/>ling an affidavit pray an appeal to the Supreme Court from the<lb/> judgment of this Court herein, and the Court having considered<lb/> the same doth grant the said appeal, and thereupon the defendants file an appeal bond<lb/> in the sum of one thousand dollars, conditioned according to law, which bond is approved<lb/> by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 165<lb/> <name>Robert A Reilly</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a Bill of Exceptions herein and an affida<lb/>vit for an appeal, and on their motion an appeal is allowed them<lb/> to the Supreme Court from the judgment of this Court herein,<lb/> and they thereupon file an appeal bond, with <name>Richard J Lockwood</name>, as principal, and <name>Dun<lb/>can S Carter</name> and <name>Addison L Hardcastle</name>, as sureties, which bond is approved by the<lb/> Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="370" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0373.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that an appeal be allowed them to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered, and they<lb/> thereupon file an appeal bond conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Converse</name> et al<lb/> vs 131.<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled: thereupon the plaintiffs file an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein, where fore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed the said plaintiffs to<lb/> the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered: thereupon the said plaintiffs file<lb/> an appeal bond in the sum of five hundred dollars conditioned according to law which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 743.<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dandridge S Crockett</name><lb/> vs 784<lb/> <name>John S McCune</name>, <name>Samuel Gaty</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Whittemore</name>, <name>Kenneth<lb/> McKenzie</name>, <name>William H Hazzard</name>,<lb/> <name>Christopher Rhodes</name>, <name>William H<lb/> Gore</name>, <name>George Knapp</name> and<lb/> <name>Asa Farr</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Corporate Debt.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed, but the said plaintiff<lb/> says he will not further prosecute his suit herein<lb/> but voluntarily takes a now suit. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff be non<lb/> suited and that the said defendants go hence without<lb/> day and recover of the said plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Unseld</name><lb/> vs 776<lb/> <name>James N Stephenson</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit according<lb/> to law and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court from the judg<lb/>ment of this Court herein, whereupon the Court doth grant the ap<lb/>peal as prayed for, and thereupon the said defendants file an appeal bond in the sum of<lb/> twenty five hundred dollars conditioned according to law, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Joshua V Throop</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit for an ap<lb/>peal herein and move the Court to grant them an appeal to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment of this Court herein, and thereupon the<lb/> Court doth grant the appeal as prayed for, and the defendants file an appeal bond con<lb/>ditioned according to law in the sum of five thousand one hundred and fifty dollars and<lb/> forty cents, which is approved by the Court. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>William C Anderson Jr</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions and an affidavit for an appeal<lb/> and on his motion an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the judgment of this Court herein and he thereupon files an<lb/> appeal bond with <name>William C Anderson</name> as principal and <name>Thomas<lb/> V Strode</name> and <name>Charles Scudder</name>, as securities, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="371" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0374.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chittick Mortland</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit for an appeal herein, whereupon<lb/> an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgment<lb/> of this Court herein; thereupon the said defendant files an appeal<lb/> bond conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Gooding</name><lb/> vs 363<lb/> <name>John Bean</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>John T Witham</name> filed. The plaintiffs motion to reinstate<lb/> motion to set aside non suit being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>Henry Pike</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions and an affidavit for an ap<lb/>peal and on his motion an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment of this Court herein, thereupon the said<lb/> defendant files an appeal bond conditioned according to law which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>August Templer</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Saugnisch</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis, <name>Oliver D<lb/> Filley</name>, and <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name></head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial filed by the City being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled: and the plaintiffs motion to dismiss<lb/> this suit as to <name>Filley</name> and <name>Hassendeuble</name> being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled; and the separate motions filed by <name>Hassendeuble</name> and <name>Filley</name> for judg<lb/>ment on the verdict of the Jury being also heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered<lb/> that the same be sustained. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> take nothing by their suit in this behalf against the said defendants, <name>Oliver D Filley</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Hassendeuble</name>, but that the said defendants go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the said plaintiffs their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore. <lb/> Thereupon the defendant the City of St Louis files an affidavit for an appeal, and on its motion<lb/> an appeal is allowed it to the supreme Court from the judgment of this Court herein, and<lb/> the said defendant thereupon files an appeal bond, conditioned according to law which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court. The parties file an agreement herein, and in accordance therewith<lb/> leave is given the defendant to file a bill of exceptions in vacation. Bill of Exceptions<lb/> filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Guillaume</name> et al<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and by<lb/> the Court fully considered it is ordered that the same be<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Cottinet</name> et al<lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Tillman</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>L F Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the said garnishee be discharged<lb/> hence at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="372" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0375.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Peter Richard Keneick</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Walsh</name> and <name>John Withnell</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the application of<lb/> said petitioners that <name>Patrick Keating</name>, trustee in a<lb/> certain Deed of Trust executed by <name>William Fulton</name><lb/> has departed this life without having conflated the per<lb/>formance of the duties imposed on him in said Deed of Trust, it is therefore ordered that<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> Sheriff of St Louis County be substituted and appointed trustee in place<lb/> of said <name>Patrick Keating</name>, Deceased.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mark My Stanfield</name>, <name>Philip H<lb/> Wentworth</name>, <name>Lyman B Jewell</name> and<lb/> <name>James D Leavett</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and file a written agreement herein, and thereupon<lb/> by consent of parties the Court doth find the issue<lb/> herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said defendant had<lb/> not at the time of the issuing of the attachment herein fraudulently conveyed or assigned his<lb/> property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the attachment herein be dissolved and this suit dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Swift</name>, <name>Henry A J Hurlbut</name><lb/> <name>Shuman H Sterling</name>, <name>George Dickenson</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel Shethan</name> and <name>Edward A Nichols</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective,<lb/> attorneys, and file an agreement herein, and thereupon<lb/> in accordance with said agreement the Court doth<lb/> find the issue herein joined in favor of the said<lb/> defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said defendant back not at the time of the issuing of the attachment herein fraudulently<lb/> conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors; wherefore it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be dissolved and this suit be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Gay</name>, <name>William J Gay</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Edwards</name><lb/> vs 175<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective, attorneys, <lb/> and file an agreement herein, and in accordance with<lb/> said agreement the Court doth find the issue herein joined<lb/> in favor of the said defendant. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said defendant had not at the time of the issuing of the attachment herein frau<lb/>dulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors; wherefore it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be dissolved and this suit be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Goldsmith</name> et al<lb/> vs 197.<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by their attorney, acknowledge to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the<lb/> <date when="1858-10-19">19th day of October, 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of held<lb/> vs 573.<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that dedimus issue to New York for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="373" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0376.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> and<lb/> <name>George G Greene</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Daniel J Wright</name> and<lb/> <name>Turner Maddox</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Order of Citation.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the said garnishees, by their attorneys,<lb/> and file an additional answer herein, wherein they declare their<lb/> belief that the notes mentioned in their answers hereto fore filed<lb/> herein have been sold and assigned to <name>Durkee L Bullock</name><lb/> and the plaintiff disputes the existence force or validity of<lb/> such sale and assignment. It is therefore ordered by the<lb/> Court, in pursuance of the statute in such ease made and provided, that the said<lb/> <name>Durkee</name> and <name>Bullock</name> appear before this Court on the first day of the next term thereof to<lb/> be begun and holden at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Mon<lb/>day of February next, and sustain their claim, if any they have, to said noted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Robert L Jones</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes and acknowledges the execu<lb/>tion of a deed of emancipation to a certain negro slave named <name>Martha Ware</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>The Franklin Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of St Louis Mo</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, remit the sum of ten hundred<lb/> and eleven dollars and sixty six cents of the judgment herein rendered.<lb/> The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled,<lb/> thereupon the defendant files an affidavit for appeal herein wherefore it is ordered that an ap<lb/>peal be allowed it to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered; and the said<lb/> defendant file an appeal bond, conditioned according to leave, which is approved by the Court.<lb/> The parties file a stipulation herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>The Pacific Insurance<lb/> company</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.<lb/> Thereupon the said defendant files an affidavit for appeal herein,<lb/> wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed it to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered, and the said defendant thereupon files an appeal<lb/> bond herein conditioned according to law which to approved by the Court, The parties file a<lb/> stipulation herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein and for a<lb/> new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court it is<lb/> ordered that the same be overruled, and it thereupon files<lb/> a Bill of Exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>The Globe Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new<lb/> trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same; there<lb/>upon the defendant files an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that an appeal be allowed to the Supreme Court from<lb/> the judgment herein rendered, thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond conditioned<lb/> according to law which is approved by the Court. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="374" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0377.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bersche</name> et al<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Mutual Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, by its attorney, files an affidavit for an appeal<lb/> wherefore it is ordered that a appeal be allowed it to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered; thereupon<lb/> the said defendant files an appeal bond herein conditioned<lb/> according to law, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Patter Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorneys file an affidavit for an appeal,<lb/> and on their motion an appeal is allowed them to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered, and they thereupon file<lb/> an appeal bond conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>William D Oench</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit for an appeal herein, and on their<lb/> motion an appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court form the<lb/> judgment herein rendered an they thereupon file an appeal bond<lb/> conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court. The par<lb/>ties file an agreement and in accordance therewith leave is given the defendants to file a bill<lb/> of exceptions herein in vacation.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Iowa for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>The Court audits and allows an account of <name>Michael S Cure</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County<lb/> amounting to the sum of two hundred and eight dollars and eighty cents, for his attendance<lb/> on the Court and for stationary finished for the use of the Court during the present term thereof<lb/> and orders that the said account be certified to the St Louis county Court for payment.</p>
            <closer>
                The Court adjourned to term in course.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="375" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0378.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="376" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0379.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="377" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0380.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> Count of St Louis</head>
            <p>ss<lb/> Be it Remembered. That at a Term of The<lb/> St Louis Circuit Court begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis, and State of Missouri, on the Fourth Monday of February, being the Twenty eighty day<lb/> if said month, in the Year of Our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and fifty nine, were present the Honorable<lb/> <name>James R Lackland</name> Judge. <name>Michael S Curre</name> Esquire, Sheriff, and <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clark.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fallina Horman</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>William Harriman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> etal<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> et al<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> etal<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name> etal<lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hendricks</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pilot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road</name><lb/> garnishee <name>Miles H Moies</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="378" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0381.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William J Gaskell</name>, <name>John H Morrison</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert B Clark</name>, and <name>M B Chappell</name><lb/> garn of <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred W Lamb</name><lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Joseph H Brotherton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name> and<lb/> <name>John B Gray</name><lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by this respective attorneys, and file<lb/> herein an agreement, in accordance with which and by consent of parties<lb/> the Court doth find the issues herein joined upon the plea in a abatement<lb/> to be in favor of the plaintiffs, and further doth order and adjudge<lb/> that the inter plea of <name>William C Jones</name> herein be sustained; and doth find that the property<lb/> levied upon under and by virtue of the writ of attachment herein was at the time the said levy<lb/> was made the property of said interpleader; and on motion of said inter pleader the Court<lb/> doth further order and adjudge that <name>James Castells</name>, Esq, former Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> do without further delay pay into the hands of said interpleader <name>William C Jones</name> of the money<lb/> arising from the sale of the property attached under the writ herein the sum of Eight hundred<lb/> dollars, the amount claimed by said Interpleader, and that the said defendant and the said In<lb/>interpleader recover of the plaintiffs all their costs herein expended and thereof have execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#611, 83.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name>, <name>James Patrick</name>,<lb/> and <name>Griswold C Warner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B Lambe</name> and <name>Charles Lambe</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a statement in wri<lb/>ting duly verified by affidavit whereby they confess them<lb/>selves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Six hun<lb/>dred and eleven dollars and eighty three cents and con<lb/>sent that judgment may be rendered against them for that amount. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Steele</name><lb/> vs 251<lb/> <name>Henry J Steele</name></head>
            <p>Amended answer and Cross Bill filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Lent</name> et al<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Indiana for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Reeder</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Henry Redemeyer</name></head>
            <p>Plea in Abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherell</name> et al<lb/> vs 333.<lb/> <name>Herace R Patterson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhaff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John Frederick Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file an amended petition herein<lb/> it is, on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, ordered that this<lb/> cause be dismiss at costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="379" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0382.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#356, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethiel B Vincent</name>, <name>William<lb/> Himrod</name> and <name>David Himrod</name><lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> files an answer herein, whereby be confesses himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and fifty<lb/> six dollars and fifteen cents, and consents that judgment<lb/> maybe rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#356, 15<lb/> vs<lb/> costs.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bethiel B Vincent</name>, <name>William<lb/> Himrod</name> and <name>David Himrod</name><lb/> vs 845<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and From Mountain<lb/> and Pilot Knob Rail Road Company</name><lb/> garnishee of <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the garnishee, by their<lb/> attorneys, and it appearing to the Court from the answer<lb/> of said garnishee that at the time it was summoned<lb/> herein as such it was indebted to the defendant in the<lb/> sum of fifteen hundred dollars, and it also ap<lb/>pearing that judgment has been rendered in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs and against the defendant, <name>Deriar</name>, for the sum of three hundred and fifty<lb/> six dollars and fifteen cents, therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the said garnishee the sum of three hundred and fifty six dollars and fifteen cents,<lb/> and also their costs in the original suit and in this proceeding expended and have execution<lb/> therefore. The sum of ten dollars is allowed the garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#975, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McClure Jr</name> for the use<lb/> of himself and <name>Squire Hall</name>.<lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the said defen<lb/>dant files an answer herein, whereby he confesses himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and seventy<lb/> five dollars, and consents that judgment maybe rendered<lb/> herein in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#975, 00<lb/> &amp;<lb/> costs.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McClure Jr</name> for the use of<lb/> himself and <name>Squire J Hall</name><lb/> vs 840<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Iron Mountain<lb/> and Pilot Knob Rail Road<lb/> Company</name> garnishee of <name>William H Deriar</name></head> 
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the garnishee, by their attorneys,<lb/> and it appearing to the Court from the answer of said gar<lb/>nishee that at the time it was summoned herein as such<lb/> it was indebted to the defendant <name>Deriar</name> in the sum of<lb/> eleven hundred dollars, and it further appearing to<lb/> the Court that judgment has been rendered in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff and against the said defendant, <name>Deriar</name>, for the sum of nine hundred<lb/> and seventy five dollars, therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said garnishee the sum of nine hundred and seventy five dollars and also their<lb/> costs in the original suit and in this proceeding expended and have execution therefore. The sum<lb/> of ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall Jr</name><lb/> vs 1025.<lb/> <name>The St Louis and From Mountain<lb/> Railroad Company</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>W H Deriar</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the said garnishee<lb/> be discharged hence at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="380" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0383.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Squire</name> et al<lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Russell Scarrett</name> et al<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles I Gibertetal</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Kinsey</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lucking</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owens</name><lb/> vs 440<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Gist</name><lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Note filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>M O Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of the <name>Thos Thomas</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 151.<lb/> <name>Daniel E Bryan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and Counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Building and Saving Association</name><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Joseph H White</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>White</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Whitcher</name> et al<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson king</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Ohio &amp; Mississippi Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson king</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Braun</name> garnishee of <name>Ohio and<lb/> Mississippi Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> City of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>The parties file a stipulation herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilhelmine Richard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Manhattan Life<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties the defendant files a Bill of Exception<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="381" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0384.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C Brooks</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>George N Goodell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival J Drown</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S K Hitchison</name> garn<lb/> of <name>Francis Lancaster</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen HasKell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel M Breckinridge</name> and <name>John Y Page</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>P A Papin</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">St Louis <name>Wm M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-01">Tuesday March 1st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>P B Johnson</name> is, on motion, admitted and enrolled a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob L Lavinski</name><lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>Erastus Wells</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Kraus</name> et al<lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Charles S Cox</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Franks</name> et al<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>Charles Boswell</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lusk</name> admr<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James B Colt</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>George Snizer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Semple</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Wodell</name> et al<lb/> vs 584<lb/> <name>Rufus B Benedict</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P A Deceva</name> et al<lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="382" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0385.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reynolds</name> et al<lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Locke</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Patrick Hunt</name></head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Schaeffer</name> et al<lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Langhoff</name><lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Berthold Vennevitz</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eben Goodwin</name> et al<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bussmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Joseph Kanfer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 83.<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel P Catherwood</name> et al<lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Salomon Hoffheimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Weisenfels</name><lb/> vs 574<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Salomon Hoffheimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name><lb/></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Cox</name><lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Dohan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dissolve attachment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brown</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen W Montgomery</name> et al<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Jackson</name><lb/> vs 219<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn Burt</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn Burt</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Marine Bank Chicago</name><lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>A J Tunstall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Lunch</name><lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="383" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0386.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L M Bond</name> et al<lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>P Lang</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J McNamara</name><lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>P Lang</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R Guillon</name> et al<lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>J L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed. Plea filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>W G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Jones</name><lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Henry C Lunch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Baumgarden</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Frederick C Baumgarden</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhanmer</name> et al<lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Sanguinel</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>James M Reilly</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua Levis</name> et al<lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>Heyman Levin</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Chenoweth</name><lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johann J Beckwith</name><lb/> vs 301<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Wilstock</name> et al<lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Robert Hilton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P A Deceva</name> et al<lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Kruse</name><lb/> vs 175<lb/> <name>Thomas B Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Rockwell</name> et al<lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>Robert Hilton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>A Becker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann N Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs 577<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Milburn</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>George W Cable</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry K Sheldon</name><lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Frederick Rower</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Frederick Rower</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Michael Werk</name> et al<lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> use of <name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>William J Kennedy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="384" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0387.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Mueller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David C Tandy</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>R McCldowney</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Peterson</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisbury</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alex B Davidson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Hubbard</name> and <name>Elbridge P Payne</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C McAllister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wood McLamant</name> garn<lb/> of <name>Ephrarin Abbott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Deutelmoier</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>S Hirschfeld</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Kessler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Deutelmoier</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>S Hirschfeld</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Weise</name><lb/> vs 419<lb/> <name>Henry Bartold</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answers filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert C Daniel</name> et al<lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Neill</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>The Red Bud Union Mill Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>James McBride</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund C Charles</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rower</name> et al<lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>August Johns</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name> et al<lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelmann</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss for want of security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>Joseph Garnear</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Anderson</name><lb/> vs 453.<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wittigh</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Peter Bressan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Peter Bressan</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="385" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0388.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> et al<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greens</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 543<lb/> <name>Wm A Bennett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernhard Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 545<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton St Louis R R Co.</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503.<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Edward Wyman</name> Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cairns</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>Leon Block</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Septimus Levering</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>A William Street</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Andrew Reinstaedtler</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Keener</name> et al<lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>A William Street</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Andrew Reinstaedtler</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George R Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>A William Street</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer of <name>Andrew Reinstaedtler</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>W A Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>D P Clay</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>H M Woodward</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Dowman</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to petition filed by <name>R J Sass</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="386" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0389.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Bochtner</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Archie Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burt</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Archie Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Neil</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>W W Singleton</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Red Bud Union Mill Co</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Griffin J Theobald</name> garn<lb/> of <name>Jacob Ringgold</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Meyer Dittenhoeffer</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Sal S Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Meyer Dittenhoeffer</name> garn<lb/> of <name>Sal S Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>James A Raynor</name><lb/> <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>Charles C<lb/> Maurice</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>J A Russ</name><lb/> <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name>, <name>George J Camp</name>, <name>Wm,<lb/> Haight</name>, <name>James Beebe</name>, <name>Nicholas Wall</name>, and<lb/> <name>Henry Butte</name> garnishees of the <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, files sepa<lb/>rate Interrogatories against the said<lb/> garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>James A Raynor</name><lb/> <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>Charles C<lb/> Maurice</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>J A Russ</name><lb/> <name>Crastus H Gaylord</name>, <name>George J Camp</name>, <name>Wm,<lb/> Haight</name>, <name>James Beebe</name>, <name>Nicholas Wall</name>, and<lb/> <name>Henry Butte</name> garnishees of the <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, files separate<lb/> Interrogatories against the said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fred K Spies</name> &amp; <name>Geo Geisel</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben Anderson</name><lb/> and <name>E Henry Gaylord</name> garn. of <name>St Levi</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Quinnebang Bank</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>J L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed<lb/> Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 394<lb/> <name>Delilah Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="387" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0390.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#11,100, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin G Whitney</name> President of<lb/> the <name>Indiana Bank</name>, at Madison,<lb/> Indiana.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Neree Valli</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing <lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven thousand<lb/> one hundred dollars and consents that judgment may<lb/> be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and also this herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#11,150, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of the State of Indiana</name><lb/> (at Madison)<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Neree Valli</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing,<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven thousand one<lb/> hundred and fifty dollars and consents that judgment<lb/> may be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hermann W Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>William L Catherwood</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, ten day additional time is given to answer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, ten days additional time is given the defendants,<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> and <name>John G Glenn</name>, to answer herein. Separate<lb/> answer of <name>Albert Becker</name> filled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, ten days additional time is given the defendants, <name>Thomas<lb/> L Moore</name> and <name>John G Glenn</name>, to answer herein. Answer of <name>Albert<lb/> Becker</name> and <name>Joseph A Fanning</name> filled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Winton</name> etal<lb/> vs 313.<lb/> <name>William King</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, ten days additional time is given to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal<lb/> vs 296.<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>H D</name> and <name>J J Sullivan</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 528.<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court the defendant files a supplemental answer<lb/> and sett and also an exhibit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the order of dismissal be set aside and for<lb/> naught held, and this cause reinstated for trial.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="388" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0391.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 518<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On motion until tenth instants is given the defendant to plead<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ira H Stout</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>Edward S Holliday</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, ten day is given the defendants to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marry Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit for Special Venire filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 248<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal. On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution is<lb/>sue therefor. Note withdrawn by plaintiffs by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue from Gasconade County to St Louis Criminal Court.<lb/> Change of Venue from St Louis Criminal Court.<lb/> On Indictment for Murder in the first degree.<lb/> Now at this day comes the Circuit Attorney, who prosecutes for the<lb/> State, and the said defendant being brought into Court, thereupon come a Jury to wit: <name>Otis<lb/> Breden</name>, <name>Frederick</name>, <name>Jobener</name>, <name>James C Sebby</name>, <name>Henry F Bussy</name>, <name>William S Reeder</name> <name>G B<lb/> Cooper</name> <name>J N Jibson</name>, <name>William Cox</name> <name>Levis Meyer</name> <name>J Moss</name> <name>James Davidson</name>, and<lb/> <name>J N Garnhart</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the<lb/> traverse between the parties aforesaid well and truly to try, the trial of this cause pro<lb/>gressed, but the same not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceedings<lb/> herein are deferred until the meeting of the Court tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>Hon <name>Edward Bates</name> announces to the Court the death of Hon <name>Edward A<lb/> Hannegan</name>, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that the following procee<lb/>dings of a meeting holder by the members of the St Louis Baron the twenty sixth day of<lb/> the present month, be spread upon the records of this court, of this day, to wit:</p>
            <p>"Bar Meeting.</p>
            <p>"In pursuance of previous notice the members of the St Louis Bar conversed in the Court<lb/> Room of the Court of Common Pleas, upon the occasion, of the late <name>Edward A Hannegan</name>.<lb/> Upon motion of <name>C L Whittelsey</name>, Judge Lord was called to the Chain, and <name>D C Woods</name><lb/> was appointed Secretary.</p>
            <p>"The meeting was then addressed by <name>M O G Cates</name>, who thereupon moved that a<lb/> committee of five be appointed to draft resolutions.</p>
            <p>"The Chain thereupon appointed <name>M O G Cates</name>, Judge <name>Krum</name>, Judge <name>Clover</name>,<lb/> Judge <name>Colt</name>, and <name>R J Barret</name>.</p>
            <p>"Said committee, after retiring for a few minutes, reported the following resolutions,<lb/> which were unanimously adopted.</p>
            <p>"We, the members of the St Louis Bar, convened to mourn the sudden death of our<lb/> brother, the Hon <name>Edward A Hannegan</name>, feel constrained in announcing this sad<lb/> event, to assure his many friends, here and abroad, that our hearts are deeply affected by<lb/> this unexpected stroke of Divine Providence.</p>
            <p>"Our deceased brother was no ordinary man. In the Halls of Congress, he proved him<lb/> self an Orator, a Patriot and Statesman and in the Courts of Justice, a profound Lawyer<lb/> and brilliant Advocate.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="389" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0392.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>"To the social circle he brought the charms of a benevolent heart and refined imagination,<lb/> and in his intercourse with all he was kindly disposed and considerate and the true gen<lb/>tleman. Therefore in respect to his memory.</p>
            <p>"Resolved, That the members of the St Louis Bar bear writing testimony to the many<lb/> virtues and worth of our deceased friend, and in his death feel that we have sustained an<lb/>d irreparable loss.</p>
            <p>"Resolved, That we desire to mingle our sympathies with those of the relatives and friends<lb/> of the deceased; and in order that our respect and sympathy expressed on this occasion may<lb/> be perpetuated, we request, that the proceedings of this meeting, and these resolutions be spread<lb/> upon the records of the several Courts of this County.</p>
            <p>"Resolved, That the members of the bar, in a body will attend the funeral of the deceased.</p>
            <p>"Resolved, That the Chair appoint members of the bar to communicate these proceedings to<lb/> the several Courts, and request that the same be spread upon their records.</p>
            <p>"The meeting was then addressed by Major <name>Wright</name> in a feeling and eloquent manner<lb/>. It was moved by Major <name>Wright</name> that the resolution be printed in the several newspaper in<lb/> the City of St Louis, which was unanimously adopted.</p>
            <p>"The Chair then proceeded to appoint the following members of the St Louis Bar to<lb/> present the resolutions to the respective Courts, to wit:</p>
            <p>Supreme Court-<name>M Bary</name></p>
            <p>Circuit Court W S.-<name>M Gantt</name>.</p>
            <p>Circuit Court-Judge <name>Bates</name>.</p>
            <p>Common Pleas Court-<name>M Gates</name>.</p>
            <p>Criminal Court-<name>M Wright</name>.</p>
            <p>Land Court-Judge <name>Krum</name>.</p>
            <p>Law Commissioners Court-<name>M Van Waggoner</name>.</p>
            <p>"Whereupon, the meeting then adjourned.</p>
            <p><name>DC Wood</name> Secretary.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>C B Lord</name> Chairman.
                </signed>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="390" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0393.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-02">Wednesday March 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Sanguish</name> etal<lb/> vs 23.<lb/> <name>Thomas Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Burke</name>, <name>Walsh</name> and <name>Hutchinson</name> filed.<lb/> Answer of <name>Crenshaw</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bassett</name> etal<lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Peter Ambs</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Wright</name><lb/> vs 198<lb/> <name>Peter Ambs</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name> etal<lb/> vs 165<lb/> <name>Chas Lambe</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Pritchardt</name><lb/> vs 309<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>John J Anderson</name> files a demurer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>William Turton Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name>.<lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>William Turton Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Keevil</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>George Demford</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chalmer D Blossom</name><lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>William A Nelson</name> and <name>William C Martin</name><lb/> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name>.<lb/> vs 707<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>William A Whiting</name> files a demurrer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J Barnett</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>W K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name><lb/> garn of <name>Jno Valentine</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John N Johnson</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Squire Johnson</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew M Stephen</name>, <name>Jno D<lb/> Baker</name> garn of <name>N M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Levis M Saunders</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="391" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0394.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Shewalter</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Tucker</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Reinhards</name>, <name>Jacob C Rainhard</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files separate interrogatories herein,<lb/> thereupon the said garnishee file an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Walter M Smallwood</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob M Jubien</name> garns of <name>Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Garcot Tucker</name> gang of<lb/> <name>H M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia A Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>M C Walker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sams S Drysdale</name> garn<lb/> of <name>H M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed. Answer filed.<lb/> Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Porter</name>, <name>Thos Walraven</name>, <name>Isaac<lb/> Stocks</name>, and <name>Peter Galleys</name> garn of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files Interrogatories herein against said<lb/> garnishees; thereupon the said garnishees file separate<lb/> answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos Reyburn</name>'s Exn<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Job M Wing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jos Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Samuel</name> et al<lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Timothy Van Sink</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Connor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm H Pearson</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Simonds</name>, <name>Luther M<lb/> Kennett</name> and <name>Geo B Sanderson</name><lb/> garn of The <name>City Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files separate Interrogatories to<lb/> the said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="392" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0395.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel Able</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Danl M Frost</name> and <name>Eliza G Frost</name> filed.<lb/> Answer <name>Adam D Steward</name> and <name>Marry B</name> his wife and <name>Robert<lb/> Campwell</name>, trustee, filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Building and Savings Inst</name>,<lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Joseph H White</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer of White and for<lb/> judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Conyne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Montz Niedner</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Louis Lange</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lyon</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Masterson</name> and<lb/> <name>Maginnis</name> garn.,<lb/> of <name>Ledlie</name> and <name>Nilam</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elizah G Tuttle</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Wm Whitely</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Cyr</name> garns of<lb/> <name>McIndoe</name> and <name>Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wright Maddox</name> garn</head>
            <p>Claim of <name>Durke</name> and <name>Bullock</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml Goulding</name> etal<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elizah Y Tuttle</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> City of St Louis etal</head>
            <p>Stipulation field, and in accordance therewith until the tenth<lb/> instant is given the City of St Louis to file a bill of Exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="393" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0396.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Boatmens Savings<lb/> Inst</name> garns of <name>L Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> etal<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brown</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levis M Bond</name> etal<lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file security for costs herein. <name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Russell Scarett</name> etal<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Piere A Berthold</name><lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, <name>Marry B Stewart</name> and <name>Robb<lb/> Campbell</name> trustee filed. Answer of <name>Daniel M Frost</name> and<lb/> <name>Eliza Y Frost</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert B Bowler</name><lb/> vs 203<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and wife and also answer of <name>Dan<lb/>iel M Frost</name> and wife filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Jesse arnot</name> etal garnishees<lb/> of <name>Boultinghous</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Papin</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Henry W Tracy</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants by their attorney, until the seventh instant<lb/> is given them to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants by their attorney, ten days is<lb/> given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion ten day further time is given to defendants to answer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="394" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0397.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Overstolz</name><lb/> vs 182<lb/> <name>Moses Perrin</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon him<lb/> therefore on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him founded on an account for the sum of three hundred and ninety eight dollars and<lb/> thirty four cents for goods wares and merchandise sold and delivered to him by the plaintiffs,<lb/> and that his property has been attached and unless to be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and holden at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last<lb/> Monday of September next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein<lb/> judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is fur<lb/>ther ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Republican<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name>.<lb/> vs 326.<lb/> <name>P A Champion</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that process cannot served upon her, there<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that she be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against her founded on a note for the sum of eleven hundred dollars, and that her property has been attached and that unless she be and<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to be holden at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> the petition herein the same will be taken against<lb/> her as confessed, judgment rendered against him as confessed and her property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published according to law in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Gettys</name><lb/> vs 95<lb/> <name>George W Jope</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant can<lb/>not be summoned in this action, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorneys it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of five<lb/> hundred and twenty seven dollars and thirty cents founded on a note, and that has property has been attached and unless he be<lb/> and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next, and on or before the<lb/> third day thereof answer the petition herein judgment will be rendered against him and his<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof published according to law<lb/> in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Rhoads</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Moses Perrin</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant cannot<lb/> be summoned in this action, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that he be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him, by petition and attachment on account of work and labor per<lb/>formed for him by the plaintiff, for the sum of Six hundred and fifty dollars, and that<lb/> his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next term of this court to<lb/> be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the last<lb/> Monday of September to Next and on or before the third day, thereof answer the plaintiff pe<lb/>tition judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered<lb/> that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="395" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0398.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#11,196, 54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah Y McClellan</name><lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but make default<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of clever thousand one hundred and ninety six dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1116, 72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon D Gratiaa</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Commagere</name>,<lb/> and <name>Paul Longis</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> <name>Lorentz Schaffer</name>, and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants<lb/>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs, in the sum of Eleven hundred and sixteen dollars<lb/> and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to leave interest at the rate of<lb/> ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#925, 92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name> and<lb/> <name>William W Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and, on his motion, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>William W Wimer</name>, but the defendant, <name>John M Wimer</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the petition be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant, <name>John M Wimer</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and twenty<lb/> five dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendant the sum aforesaid found and also his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2049, 34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Welling</name>,<lb/> <name>Lemuel Coffin</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph B Altermus</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles B Mount</name>.<lb/> vs 515<lb/> <name>George C Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Gates</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two<lb/> thousand and forty dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Barney Holscher</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>John H Crane</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="396" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0399.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis county, comes in open Court, and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by him, as such Sheriff, of all the right, title,<lb/> interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Charles L Gilpen</name> to <name>William Waddingham</name>, on and<lb/> to the following described real estate, to wit; 1st, a lot in Block twenty three and twenty four<lb/> twenty eight feet front on Second street by a depth of one hundred and forty one feet, bounded<lb/> North by Fox estate, East by alley, South by Blumenthal and West by Second street, also a<lb/> lot in Block number seventeen eight feet front on first street by on hundred and seventeen<lb/> feet in depth, bounded North by Brent, East by Alley, South by Schaeffer, West by first street,<lb/> also a lot eight feet front on first street by ninety feet in depth bounded North by Finney East by<lb/> Front street, South by Von Phul, West by Alley also a lot in Block number two hundred and<lb/> thirty fronting sixty feet on Levis street by a depth of one hundred and forty feet, bounded<lb/> North by Smith street, East Levis street, South by Austin estate, West by alley, also lots<lb/> in Blocks twenty three and twenty four having one hundred and eleven feet front by one hun<lb/>dred and twenty five feet in depth, bounded North by guardhouse, East by first street, South<lb/> by Atchison and West by alley, also a lot in Block no two hundred and forty one having<lb/> a front of one hundred and thirty seven feet by one hundred and ninety feet in depth, North by<lb/> alley, East by first street, South by Mullanphy street West by Willi, also a lot in Block<lb/> Seventeen having a front of thirty feet by a depth of ninety feet bounded North by Finney,<lb/> East by Front Street South by Rogers, West by alley, also lot twenty four feet front by ninety<lb/> feet deep bounded North by Rogers, East by front street, South by Finnley, West by alley; sold<lb/> by virtue of two Executions one of which issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Land<lb/> Court in favor of <name>Charles S Gill</name> and <name>George H Gill</name> and against <name>Charles L Gilpen</name>, one<lb/> issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas in favor of <name>Daniel<lb/> P Woods</name> against said <name>Gilpen</name> both returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March Term, 1859</date> of said Courts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis county, comes in Court, and acknowledges<lb/> the Execution of a deed by him, as Sheriff as aforesaid to <name>Levis Ashley</name><lb/> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Adolph Dapron</name>, <name>Amable Dapron</name>,<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Dapron</name>, <name>Bridget Dapron</name>, minor heirs and children of <name>Nicule Dapron</name>, deceased,<lb/> and <name>Louis Dapron</name>, their guardian, of in and to the following described real estate, to wit;<lb/>a tract of land containing about sixty acres and being the most Eastern part of the West<lb/> half of the North West quarter of section nineteen in township number forty four North<lb/> range six East bounded North by land of <name>Thomas Eddy</name> East by land former by of <name>Michael<lb/> Conore Jesson</name>, South by the South West quarter of said section nineteen and West by lands<lb/> sold by <name>Amable Chartland</name> and wife to <name>Enos Pipkin</name> by dated respective <date when="1847-04-06">6th day<lb/> of April 1847</date> and <date when="1851-10-26">26th day of October, 1851</date>, and being the same land conveyed by <name>Amable<lb/> Chartand</name> and wife to <name>Ursule Dapron</name> and others by deed dated the <date when="1854-06-18">18th day of July 1854</date><lb/> of record in the Recorders Office of St Louis County in deed book no 154 page 278. Sold by<lb/> virtue of an order of sale made by the St Louis Land Court on the <date when="1858-11-18">18th day of November, 1858</date>,<lb/> in the partition suit of <name>Levic Ashley</name> against said above named parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes into Court and acknowl<lb/>edges the execution of a deed by him as Sheriff as aforesaid in favor of<lb/> <name>Charles A Mantz</name> for all the right, title, interest claim estate and property, of <name>True Worthy<lb/> Hoit</name> of in and to the following described real estate, to wit; Lots number four and nine in block<lb/> one of Carpenters Subdivision of Block three of <name>Page</name> and <name>M Pheeters</name> subdivision in front<lb/>ing fifty feet on grand Avenue. Sold by virtue of two executions fevered from the office of<lb/> the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit court one in favor of <name>William B S Gray</name>, against said<lb/> <name>Hoyt</name> and the other in favor of <name>Frederick Sweetzer</name>, <name>Samuel H Gooken</name>, <name>Reuben Suran</name> against<lb/> said <name>Hoyt</name> returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March Term, 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="397" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0400.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes into Court and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by them as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Louis Roever</name> &amp; <name>Human H<lb/> Laumeier</name> for all the right title, interest, claim estate and property of <name>Samuel Schmidt</name><lb/> of in and to the following described real estate, to wit; Lot numbers thirty six and thirty<lb/> seven of West Union Addition to the City of St Louis according to the recovered plat thereof be<lb/>ginning at a point on the South line of Davis street, West wardly one hundred and seventy<lb/> two feet from the point where the South line of said street interests the West line of Bridge<lb/> street thence Westwardly with the South line of Davis street one hundred feet, thence<lb/> Southwardly at right angles to Davis street one hundred and fifty one feet to an alley;<lb/> thence Eastwardly, with the North line of said alley, on hundred feet, thence Northwardly<lb/> with the West line of an alley one hundred and fifty one feet to the place of beginning bounded<lb/> North by Davis street, East by an alley and west by lot number thirty six. Sold by<lb/> virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court in<lb/> favor of <name>Louis Roever</name> and <name>Herman H Laumier</name> against <name>Samuel Schmidt</name> returnable to<lb/> the <date when="1859-02">February Term, 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1050, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Givens</name><lb/> vs 335<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Beehler</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and fifty dollars and forty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the side defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#738, 92.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Givens</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Beehler</name> and<lb/> <name>John Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> doth finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and thirty<lb/> eight dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the side defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200, 55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua P Richards</name><lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>William Hassingen</name> and <name>Henry Patterson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and<lb/> on his motion it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed as to the defendant <name>Patterson</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Hassigner</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, the court<lb/> doth order that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the said<lb/> defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred dollars and fifty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="398" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0401.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#417, 02</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, receiver<lb/> vs 565<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, in proper persons,<lb/> but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> seventeen dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the said plain=<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#524, 77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha B Greene</name>, <name>John Campbell</name>,<lb/> <name>Edwin H Griswold</name>, <name>George P Rogers</name>,<lb/> <name>James Kirker</name> and <name>Mendall Churchill</name>,<lb/> no 566<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs, in the sum of<lb/> five hundred and twenty four dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#263, 63.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Wilson Kelly</name><lb/> no 234<lb/> <name>Emilies Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs, in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and sixty three dollars and sixty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1720, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name>, <name>Taylor Blow</name>,<lb/> and <name>William J Blow</name><lb/> no 379.<lb/> <name>D M Frost</name>,<lb/> <name>Todd</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Atkinson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Todd</name>, and on their<lb/> motion, leave is given them to amend their petition by in=<lb/>serting in the caption thereof the given name <name>Daniel</name>, of<lb/> the defendant, Frost, which amendment, is made; but<lb/> the defendants, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, and <name>Edward</name> and <name>Atkin<lb/>son</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seventeen hundred and twenty dollars<lb/> and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="399" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0402.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#360, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name>, <name>Taylor Blow</name>,<lb/> and <name>William S Blow</name><lb/> no 363<lb/> <name>Rockwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Augustus P Guibert</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, Rockwell, but the defendant<lb/> Guibert, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> sixty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#415, 09.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mason County Mining and Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> no 365<lb/> <name>The America Iron Mountain<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchanges.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called: comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against it as confessed: And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and fifteen dollars and nine cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3000, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elevin H Hunger</name><lb/> vs 879<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name>, and<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, although duly summoned and called: comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1798, 94.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Shands</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Beehler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seventeen hundred and ninety eight<lb/> dollars and ninety four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the Court found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et al assignees<lb/> of <name>Rogers Anderson</name> and Company<lb/> no 4<lb/> <name>J M <unclear>Omebeny</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="400" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0403.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#347, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman W Brockemann</name><lb/> no 508<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty seven dollars and eighty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#327, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Buse</name><lb/> vs 585.<lb/> <name>Sigismund Hischfeld</name></head>
            <note>On note.</note>
            <p>Now out this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty seven dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#770, 43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Reider</name><lb/> vs 586<lb/> <name>Sigismund Hischfeld</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy dollars and forty<lb/> three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#689, 52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 560<lb/> <name>Levi V Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Kerzingen</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and eighty nine dollars<lb/> and fifty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover<lb/> of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#202, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Dormitzer</name><lb/> vs 559<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion the Court doth order that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and two<lb/> dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="401" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0404.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#432, 54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name>,<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty<lb/> two dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plain=<lb/>tiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#107, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Minor</name>, <name>K Johnson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Derrick L Boardman</name><lb/> vs 119<lb/> <name>Edward Hale</name> Jr</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seven dollars and eleven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#388, 65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Schirmer</name><lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Joseph A Enghauser</name>,<lb/> <name>Leonhard Enghauser</name>,<lb/> and <name>Louis Heninger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and eighty eight dollars and<lb/> sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#687, 22</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> and<lb/> <name>George Heitz</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, the Court doth ordered that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court doth finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of six hundred and eighty seven dollars and twenty two cents: and the Court doth thereof<lb/> consider that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#792, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>John <unclear>Halsall</unclear></name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas W <unclear>Ustick</unclear></name></head>
            <note>On note.</note>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the said<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed: and the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="402" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0405.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>hundred and ninety two dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum of aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten percent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#355, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James d Leonard</name><lb/> vs 438<lb/> <name>Mathias Spoeri</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, by the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#844, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi M Bond</name> and<lb/> <name>K Albert Denckla</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>John K Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called; comes not but makes default <lb/>wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eight hundred and forty dollars, It is therefore<lb/> considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#231, 25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James McFranciscus</name><lb/> vs 295<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name>,<lb/> <name>J L Brindell</name>, and<lb/> <name>John T Andrews</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, <unclear>and the</unclear><lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendants, <name>Brindell</name> and <name>Andrews</name><lb/> but the defendant the Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail<lb/> Road Company, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition be taken<lb/> against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and thirty one dollars and twenty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have there of execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1510, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald Bryan</name><lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>Daniel D page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Baron</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred<lb/> and ten dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges in this<lb/> behalf expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="403" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0406.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#930, 99</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S Malony</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Malony</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and thirty dollars and<lb/> ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent<lb/> per annum from this date until paid and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1050, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James McFranciscus</name><lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name>, and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, where<lb/> fore, on motion of the plaintiffs, the Court doth order that the peti<lb/> tion herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of ten hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain=<lb/> tiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1065, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McFranciscus</name><lb/> vs 297<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1060, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James McFranciscus</name><lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, the Court doth order that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument in writing on which this action as foun=<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of ten hundred and sixty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as founded also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#680, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Thornburgh</name><lb/> vs 494<lb/> <name>Thomas Rutherford</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing in which this action is founded that</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="404" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0407.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and eighty dollars<lb/> and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the de<lb/>fendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#367, 92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Wright</name><lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward P Johnson</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al=<lb/> though duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty seven dollars and ninety<lb/> two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#226, 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elzey G Burkham</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Burkam</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>The Valentine Freight<lb/> Express Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against it as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and twenty six dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#243, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Matthews</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>George B Field</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry S Clarke</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas H West</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, Filed, but the defendants, Clarke and West, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#233. 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Koester</name><lb/> vs 23.<lb/> <name>John Durand</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty three dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found together with<lb/> interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid and also<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="405" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0408.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 39.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Darius Hunkins</name><lb/> vs 436.<lb/> <name>John Stickel</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court doth find from the instru<lb/> ment of writing on which the action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and sixty six dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/>ed together with interest herein at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#527, 25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wendelin Kiemel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the in<lb/> strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty seven dollars and twenty five cents. It is there=<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants to the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1681, 04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George F Hill</name><lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Wiley J Stratton</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Sixteen hun=<lb/> dred and eighty one dollars and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2117, 82</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David H Copp</name><lb/> vs 527<lb/> <name>David Caughlan</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> twenty one hundred and seventeen dollars and eighty two cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found together with interest therein at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until<lb/> paid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#326, 85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>Edward W Tracy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: And the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty six dol=<lb/> lars and eighty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="406" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0409.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1071. 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rufus J Lackland</name><lb/> vs 304<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name>, and<lb/> <name>John Shiffman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al=<lb/> though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and<lb/> seventy one dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain=<lb/> tiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#554, 32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward de <unclear>Saureal</unclear><lb/></name> vs 276<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>,<lb/> <name>John O Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>George I King</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fifty four dol=<lb/> lars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex=<lb/> pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#250, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Taylor</name><lb/> and <name>Oscar W <unclear>Collet</unclear></name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Christian Scheffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, al=<lb/> though duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court,<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein ex=<lb/> pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#633, 28</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Saler</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>William W Musick</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Musick</name>,<lb/> and <name>John V Olhausen</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Olhausen</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>William W Musick</name> and <name>James M Musick</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of six hundred and thirty three dollars and twenty eight cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore=<lb/> said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to<lb/> her interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 541<lb/> <name>Peter Lang</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="407" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0410.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#427, 07.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name><lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Lorenzo Schaffler</name>,<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> and <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and twenty seven dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#918, 63</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 322<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Charles Belcher</name>, but the defendant, <name>William M<lb/> Belcher</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>William M Belcher</name>,<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#736, 55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alton Long</name><lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name> and<lb/> <name>John Schiffman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and thirty six dol<lb/>lars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1381, 63.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Ellis</name> and<lb/> <name>John S Cavender</name><lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Joseph B Sherer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/>s petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of thirteen hundred and eighty one dollars and sixty<lb/> three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor. Judgment ot bear ten per cent interest from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name> receiver<lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>,<lb/> <name>John Burnes</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendants, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name>, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="408" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0411.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#528, 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Atlantic Mutual<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> twenty eight dollars and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#256, 33</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Machinists Bank</name><lb/> vs 364<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by its attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Page</name> and <name>Brown</name>, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and fifty six dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants to the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its<lb/> costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#364, 89</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Faulds</name> and<lb/> <name>James H Fisher</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>Benjamin Worley</name> and<lb/> <name>S E Worley</name> his wife</head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of three hundred and sixty four dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#367, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Snowden</name><lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>Corbin Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and sixty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found together with interest herein at the rate of ten per cent per annum<lb/> from this date until paid and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard B Gilpen</name><lb/> vs 375<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpen</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at his costs and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="409" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0412.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W W Farmer</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against it as confessed:</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Mepham</name> et al<lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, <name>Robert H<lb/> Campbell</name>, <name>Henry B Merritt</name>,<lb/> and <name>George W Kidd</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed; and it is further ordered that<lb/> an alias Summons issue herein for the other defendants returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Boyse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Daniel M</name> and <name>E G Frost</name> filed. Answer of <name>Adam<lb/> D Stewart</name> and wife and <name>Robert Campbell</name> trustee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson E Bridge</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>Joseph Brunner</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Farmers Bank of Orwell</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>Issac W Taylor</name>, administrator</head>
            <p>Stipulation filed. Amended petition filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Geisl</name><lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>, <name>Francis<lb/> Buhler</name> and <name>Charles F<lb/> Blattan</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendants, <name>John<lb/> K Fisher</name> and <name>Francis Buhler</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Betts</name> et al<lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorney, and file a stipulation herein<lb/> and by consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the garni<lb/>shees summoned herein be discharged and this suit dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. The defen<lb/>dants waive all claim for damages herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name> receiver<lb/> vs 562<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> and<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>Default</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendant, the<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name>, although<lb/> duly, summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="410" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0413.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendant, <name>Miles<lb/> G Moise</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid as also the Jurors<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of the cause<lb/> progressed, but the same not being concluded at the hour of ad<lb/>journment, it is ordered by the Court that further proceedings herein be deferred until the<lb/> meeting of the Court tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-30">Thursday March 30 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenny R Hammond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> The Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A McElroy</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>Lyman Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of Service filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Neil</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W W Singleton</name> garn.</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss for want of security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Mead</name> et al<lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>Thomas Winn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of service on defendant, <name>Winn</name>, filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="411" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0414.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#642, 65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William North</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Scott</name><lb/> vs 471<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the pe<lb/>tition herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and forty two dollars and sixty five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, and moves the Court for<lb/> a writ of special venue facias for the summoning of a Jury herein<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion<lb/> and the affidavit of the defendant heretofore filed herein, and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled. The defendant files a Bill of Exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Marine Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of St Louis<lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the garnishees, <name>Issac S Smith</name>, <name>Wm Gore</name>, <name>Shenek</name>,<lb/> <name>Mudd Hughes and Company</name>, <name>Gilbert Mills</name>, <name>Stewart</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry A Homeyer and Company</name>, and <name>R H Davis and<lb/> Company</name> be discharged at the costs of said plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name> et al<lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>D D Michaels</name> and<lb/> <name>James Clark</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfac<lb/>tory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made herein<lb/> has been duly, published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Dodge</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Martin Haemmerle</name>,<lb/> <name>H C Mahnkin</name>, and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendants, <name>Martin<lb/> Haemmerle</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Dodge</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Andrew A Lebeau</name>,<lb/> <name>Erra O English</name>,<lb/> <name>John P McGrath</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed. Motion and affi<lb/>davit to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chalmer D Blossom</name><lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name>,<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name> and<lb/> <name>Jonathan Jones</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendant <name>Jon<lb/>athan Jones</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="412" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0415.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1399, 26.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laureston R Livingston</name>,<lb/> <name>William B Copeland</name>,<lb/> <name>James K Moorehead</name>,<lb/> <name>Calvin Adams</name> and<lb/> <name>David McKee</name>.<lb/> vs 534<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of thirteen hundred and<lb/> ninety nine dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1053, 80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schoffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and fifty three dollars and<lb/> eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2323, 27.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Insurance Company</name><lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 466<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein, be<lb/> taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> twenty three hundred and twenty three dollars and twenty seven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#193, 53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert K Wright</name>,<lb/> <name>Thornton Pike</name> and<lb/> <name>Horace J Smith</name><lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>Robert L McGhee</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and ninety three dollars<lb/> and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name><lb/> and <name>David P Clay</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, <name>William<lb/> A Bassett</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="413" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0416.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#957, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> no 529<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name><lb/> and <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and fifty seven dollars and eighty four cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#611, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alphonso Price</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> six hundred and eleven dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#188, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McNamara</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and moves the Court to strike<lb/> out the demurrer or the defendant filed herein, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the said motion and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth order that the same be sustained; and the defendant failing further to plead<lb/> herein, it is on motion of the plaintiff ordered that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty eight.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#243, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name>, <name>James B<lb/> Gazzam</name> and <name>James E Breading</name>.<lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>John B Grady</name> and <name>Edward S Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and forty three dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#421, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name><lb/> vs 553<lb/> <name>John Schiffman</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in sum of four hundred and twenty one dollars and<lb/> twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear<lb/> ten percent interest until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="414" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0417.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#374, 44</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mitchell A Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> and<lb/> <name>John K Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in sum of three hundred and seventy four dollars and forty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found together with his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#609, 06.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Seymour Straight</name><lb/> vs 273.<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in sum of six hundred and nine dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#398, 38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Seymour Straight</name><lb/> vs 398<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in sum of three hundred and ninety eight dollars and<lb/> thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#499, 89.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 397<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in sum of four hundred and ninety nine dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1406, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>William Sailsbury</name></head>
            <p>On note and due bill.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in sum of fourteen hundred<lb/> and six dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James McBristou</name><lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, until the fifteenth instant<lb/> is given it to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="415" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0418.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#342, 32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter T Wright</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles W Wright</name><lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>Robert Phillips</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in sum of three hundred and forty two dollars and thirty two cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#509, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name>, <name>Samuel N<lb/> Kellogg</name>, <name>Eliab B Kirby</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles B Kirtland</name>, and<lb/> <name>Barnard Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Willaim P Fenn</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of five hundred and nine dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until<lb/> paid and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#598, 42.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Sowers</name><lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Heinecke</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety eight dollars and forty two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#7303, 05.<lb/> For Value need<lb/> <unclear>assignee</unclear> this<lb/> judgment to<lb/> <name>S L M Barlow</name><lb/> <unclear>vs chot ueonne</unclear><lb/> <date when="1870-01-15">Jany 15, 1870</date>.<lb/> <name>Vital Jarrot</name><lb/> <unclear>Test of Lem's an</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vital Jarrot</name><lb/> vs 70<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven thousand three hundred<lb/> and three dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and interest thereon<lb/> at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Consolidated Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of Philadelphia<lb/> vs 343.<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name>, <name>John B Mears</name><lb/> and <name>George W Scollay</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but <name>John B Mears</name>,<lb/> and <name>George W Scollay</name>, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="416" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0419.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#548, 86</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph L Page</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Andrew A Lebeau</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and forty eight dollars<lb/> and eight six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. Thereupon comes the defendant, <name>Ezra O English</name>, and files a motion<lb/> and affidavit to set aside the judgment by default.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#579, 31</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Belt</name><lb/> vs 220<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and seventy nine dollars and thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5342, 66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Caldwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Gustavus English</name><lb/> vs 99<lb/> <name>George M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>On notes</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of five thousand three hundred and forty two dollars and sixty six cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The plaintiffs<lb/> by leave with draw the notes sued on and file a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#526, 96.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name><lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>Herman Wiener</name>,<lb/> <name>Otto Schnuhr</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Altinger</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty six dollars and<lb/> ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#329, 47.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On Notes. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and twenty nine dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="417" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0420.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#365, 14<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rutherford</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas West</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>James Rutherford</name> and <name>David</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, land dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendants <name>Davis</name>, but the defendant, <name>Rutherford</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him go confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>James Rutherford</name>, is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty five dollars and fourteen cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment<lb/> to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1115, 06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Coleman</name>, <name>James W<lb/> Hailman</name>, <name>Allen Kramer</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Rahm</name> and <name>Frank Rahm</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>John D McMurray</name>, <name>Louis<lb/> Winkelmaier</name> and <name>James Smith</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to plaintiffs on account of the instrument in writing on which action is founded in<lb/> the sum of eleven hundred and fifteen dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered, by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Paul Mohr</name>, <name>August Mohr</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Solomon</name><lb/> vs 449<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> and<lb/> <name>S P Clay</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorneys, and dismiss<lb/> this suit at their costs, and it is ordered that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#237, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Koester</name><lb/> vs 24<lb/> <name>Peter Durand</name> and<lb/> <name>Nicolai Durand</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum form<lb/> this date until paid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#923, 41</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Knoedler</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>James Spore</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but make default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, by his<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and twenty three dollars<lb/> and forty one cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum of aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="418" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0421.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2170, 82.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P A Decevce</name> and<lb/> <name>J S Walker</name><lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, and the defendants, by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and the plaintiffs withdrawn all allegations of fraud contained<lb/> in the petition and affidavit and the defendant also withdraws the<lb/> plea in abatement herein, and the parties agree and consent that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for<lb/> the sum of twenty one hundred and sixty dollars and eighty two cents. It is in therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as agreed, upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore. The parties consent<lb/> this judgment bear no interest until the <date when="--04-17">seventeenth day of April</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#489, 06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amasa S Foster</name><lb/> vs 200<lb/> <name>Emilius F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore; on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of four hundred and eighty nine dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered, by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#773, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Davis</name><lb/> vs 455<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, land dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, but the defendants, <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but make default,<lb/> wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Daniel D Page</name>, is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy three dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#377, 24</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Christy</name><lb/> vs 53<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>On Due Bill.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore; on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> seven dollars and twenty four cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#469, 56.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi Reynolds</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants one plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and sixty nine dollars and fifty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum of aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="419" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0422.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#240, 13</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles B Fallenstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles W Gauss</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>John B Grady</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and forty dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have thereof execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#889, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>Willett Seaman Jr</name><lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and eighty nine dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#713, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burns</name><lb/> vs 475<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name><lb/> <name>John Burns</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore; on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and thirteen dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#340, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Henry Jones</name>, <name>Alexander M<lb/> Wallingford</name>, <name>Alexander Nimick</name><lb/> and <name>William K Nimick</name><lb/> vs 473<lb/> <name>H G Bilstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Heinecke</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty<lb/> dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#127, 76.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name> and<lb/> <name>John B Gray</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>George Simzer</name>, <name>John W<lb/> Smizer</name> and <name>George<lb/> Smizer Jr</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and dismiss this suit<lb/> as to the defendant <name>George Smizer, Jr</name>, but the defendants, <name>George<lb/> Smizer, Jr</name>, and <name>John W Smizer</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore; on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed and the Court finds from the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="420" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0423.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and twenty seven dollars and seventy six cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found together with interest therein at the rate of ten percent per annum<lb/> from this date until pain and also their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#206, 34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Davis</name><lb/> vs 339<lb/> <name>Miles G Moils</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore;<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and six dollars and thirty four cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#201, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bridget Noonan</name><lb/> vs 32<lb/> <name>James H Haydon</name> and<lb/> <name>Eulalie H Haydon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and one dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found together with interest there on at<lb/> the rate to ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>James Boultinghouse</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to files interrogatories against <name>C<lb/> S Haydon</name>, summoned as garnishee herein it is ordered that<lb/> he be discharged hence as such.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United State<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name>,<lb/> <name>James C Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, and<lb/> <name>Thomas M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="421" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0424.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Lynch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phoebe J Allen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm. Allen</name></head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name></head>
            <p>Motion for an order bringing in parties defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid to also the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid and therefore the trial of the cause progressed but the<lb/> same not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that further proceedings herein be deferred until the meeting of the Court to<lb/> morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-04">Friday March 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James S Thomas</name> who is personally known to the Court, comes and in open Court acknowl<lb/>edges the execution by him of a deed of emancipation to <name>James Neil</name>, his<lb/> negro slave of black complexion, aged about thirty six and about five first nine inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Hienrich Bornstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert B Clarke</name> garns of<lb/> <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Matthew B Chappell</name> garns<lb/> of <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Mueller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David C Tandy</name> garns<lb/> of <name>R M Eldowny</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William J Gaskell</name> garns<lb/> of <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George W Clarke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="422" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0425.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 536<lb/> <name>Nyllys King</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Nyllys King</name>, <name>Geo P King</name>, <name>W A Doan</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles E King</name>, file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel M Breckinridge</name> and<lb/> <name>John Y Page</name> garns of <name>P A Champion</name></head>
            <p>The garnishees file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for security for coasts, with <name>George Bailey</name><lb/> as security. Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Boyse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Daniel M Frost</name> and <name>Eliza G Frost</name> withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein by consent file an amended answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> et al<lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name></head>
            <p>On motion until the fourteenth instant is given to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jackson</name>'s trustee<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Ohio for defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Kinsey</name><lb/> vs 523.<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name>,<lb/> <name>Mortz Meyer</name>,<lb/> <name>Manning R Roll</name> and<lb/> <name>H Wernicke</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by the attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendants, <name>Manning R Roll</name> and <name>H Nernicke</name>.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Card</name> et al<lb/> vs 152<lb/> <name>Richard S Raymond</name><lb/> and <name>William O Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>William O Wolf</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him against<lb/> him as confessed: it is further ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein for the defendant <name>Richard S Raymond</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Toll Co.</name><lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>Miles G Moiss</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Toll Co.</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>Miles G Moiss</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="423" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0426.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas H McNicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel M Wolf</name>.<lb/> 42<lb/> <name>Wm M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Answer and set off filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>James H Morrison</name> garns<lb/> of <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dietz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual Fire<lb/> and Marine Ins Co</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>The defendants files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#106, 55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name>, <name>William T Christy</name><lb/> <name>Robert K Woods</name>, <name>William T Gentry</name>,<lb/> and <name>Andrew Woods</name><lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name> and <name>Clarissa Shands</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred of one hundred and six dollars<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by, the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Terre Haute, Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Abraham A Van Wormer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorneys,<lb/> and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="424" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0427.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#58, 24</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin M Bosswell</name><lb/> vs 353.<lb/> <name>George Taylor Jr</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, where<lb/>fore; on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of fifty eight dollars twenty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#310, 50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Duffy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against it as confessed<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and ten dollars fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#247, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jackson Benson</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and forty seven dollars eleven cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail road Company</name> and <name>John Bop</name></head>
            <p><name>John Bass</name>, one of the defendants, files an acknowl<lb/>edgment of service of writ and petition in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William N Loker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Arthur T Hollister</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, in person, and acknowl<lb/>edges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judg<lb/>ment rendered in this cause on the <date when="1858-05-25">twenty fifth day of may<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph G Braun</name><lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>Michael Huthmacker</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by<lb/> their attorney, and on their motion it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="425" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0428.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid as also the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid and thereupon the trial of the cause progressed<lb/> but the same not being concluded at the hour of adjournment<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that further proceedings herein be defend until the meeting of<lb/> the Court tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-05">Saturday March 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cure</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes into Court and acknowledges the<lb/> execution of a deed by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>John J Anderson</name>,<lb/> <name>Reuben L Anderson</name> and <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate,<lb/> and property of <name>Joseph A Barrett</name> and <name>Mary L Barrett</name> of in and to the following de<lb/>scribed real estate, in said Deed described as follows, to wit: a certain tract of land sit<lb/>uate lying and being in the County of Saint Louis, State of Missouri of which the following<lb/> is a description, vig: beginning at a state, being <name>MacKays</name> old South west corner, on the<lb/> East bank of <name>Mulberry Fork</name>, and running thence (as the magnetic needle now points) North<lb/> twenty nine degrees, East five chains and six links to an elm; thence North Seventy three<lb/> degrees, East eight chains and eighty six links to an ash on the bank; thence North fifty<lb/> degrees, East seven chains and eighty six links to a state; thence North fifty degrees<lb/> West nine chains and nine links to a state; thence North twenty nine degrees, East fifty<lb/> four chains and seventy eight links to a stake in the road; thence North by one degree West<lb/> one chain and ninety six links to a <name>Hickory</name>; thence North seven degrees West along the<lb/> subdivision line of Section eight, township forty four, North range, six East of the fifth<lb/> principal meridian twenty chains and nineteen links to the supposed centre of said section;<lb/> thence North eighty three degrees, East twenty five chains and twelve links to stone;<lb/> thence South seven, degrees East fifteen chains and ninety links, alone the line of <name>R<lb/> Wells</name> lot to a stone corner, thence South six degrees East twenty four chains and<lb/> three links to the corner of sections Eight, nine, Sixteen and seventeen; thence West five<lb/> chains, and thirty one links to a stone; thence South thirty degrees, West twenty five<lb/> chains and three links to a stone; thence sixty three degrees, West seven chains and<lb/> fifty two links; thence South forty degrees, West fifty six chains and seventy one links to<lb/> the beginning, containing three hundred and eighty 76/100 acres, more of less: Sold under and<lb/> by virtue of an Execution issued from the Office of the clerk of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court in favor of <name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>, and <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name><lb/> and against <name>Joseph A Barrett</name>, <name>Mary F Barrett</name>, <name>Anapias Rice</name> and <name>George Smizer</name><lb/> returnable to the <date when="1859-02">February Term A D 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Elliott</name><lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Farmers Bank of Orwell</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>W Taylor Adam</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="426" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0429.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes into Court and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by him as Sheriff in favor of <name>Melvin L<lb/> Gray</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Edwin R Mason</name> in<lb/> and to the following described real estate, to wit: the North half of block number one<lb/> hundred and ninety nine fronting on the West side of Main street one hundred<lb/> feet, and on Rutger street three hundred and fifty feet, more or less. North by<lb/> Rutger street, West by block number two hundred, South by Public School Lands<lb/> and lots four five and six in block number one in Parks addition to the City of St Louis<lb/> bounded East by seventh street, North by lot seven, West by alley and South by<lb/> lot three; with the buildings and improvements thereon. Sold by virtue of two Executions<lb/> one of which issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas and the other from the office of the Clerk, of the Supreme Court of the State of<lb/> Missouri both in favor of <name>William Johnson</name> and against <name>Josiah Dent</name> and <name>Edwin<lb/> R Mason</name> and returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March Term, 1859</date>, of said Courts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court and acknowledges the execu<lb/>tion of a deed by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Peter Foster</name> for<lb/> all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Edwin R Mason</name> of in and to<lb/> the following described real estate, to wit: lots fifteen, sixteen, seventeen and eighteen in block<lb/> number one in park addition, East fronting twenty five feet on the West line of Eighth<lb/> street, running thence Eastwardly one hundred, and twenty feet to an alley; bounded West<lb/> by Eighth street, East by an alley, North by lot fourteen and South by lot nineteen. Lot<lb/> in block number three in said <name>Park</name> addition fronting one hundred and twenty five feet<lb/> on the East side of Ninth street, and running thence Eastwardly one hundred and twenty feet<lb/> to an alley, bounded Westwardly by Ninth street, South wardly and West wardly by an<lb/> abley, and Northwardly, by a line parallel to, and fifty five feet and three and a half inches<lb/> South of Rutger street. Block number eight hundred and eighty two fronting on the<lb/> West side of main street two hundred and fifty feet, and South side of Lafayette street<lb/> three hundred and fifty feet, more or less, and bounded on the East by Main street, North<lb/> by Lafayette street, West by Kosciusko street and South by Lesperance street: Sold by<lb/> virtue of two executions one of which issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas and the other from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of<lb/> the state of Missouri both in favor of <name>William Johnson</name> and against <name>Josiah Dent</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin R Mason</name> returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March term 1859</date> of said Courts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court acknowledges the execution<lb/> of a deed by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Charles L Rogers</name><lb/> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Emil Rebham Milo</name> of in and<lb/> to the following described real estate, to wit: Leasehold estate in the City of St Louis, being<lb/> the rear of two certain lots of ground situated on the North West corner of Seventh and<lb/> Spruce streets fronting about eighty feet on Seventh street and about one hundred and<lb/> twenty seven and a half feet on Spruce street, the portion of the above described property<lb/> in which <name>Emil Rebham Milo</name> has an interest is more particularly described as<lb/> fronting about thirty nine feet on Spruce street by a depth of Eighty feet; and three<lb/> story brick tavern situated thereon: Sold under and by virtue of an Execution issued<lb/> from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas in favor of<lb/> <name>James A Rogers</name> and <name>Charles L Rogers</name> and against <name>Emil Rebham Milo</name>, returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1859-03">March term eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date> of said Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="427" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0430.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed by him as such Sheriff in favor of<lb/> <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> of and to the following described real estate, to wit; a lot in<lb/> block No 710, of the City of St Louis, 150 feet front on Jackson street by 140 feet deep,<lb/> being lots No 1 to 5, included in Block no 41, E, of <name>Soulard</name>'s first addition to the City<lb/> of St Louis, bounded on the South by Lafayette Avenue, on the North by lot No 6, of said<lb/> block 41, E, on the East by Jackson street, and on the West by an alley, 2d. Also a<lb/> lot 30 feet front on Buel street by 114 feet in depth being lot No 8 in block No 114 of sou<lb/>lards third addition to the City of<lb/> St Louis. 3d. Also a lot in block No 717 of the City of St Louis, 20 feet front of Jackson street by 140 feet in depth, being lot no 5 in block no 54<lb/> of Soulards first addition to the City of St Louis, bounded West by Jackson, East by<lb/> alley, North by lot No 6, South by lot No 4. 4th. Also a lot in block 706 of the City<lb/> of St Louis, having a front on Columbus street of 30 feet front by a depth of 140 feet being<lb/> lot No 7 in block 34 of Soulards first addition to the City of St Louis, bounded North<lb/> by lot No 8, South lot No 6, West by Columbus street and East by alley. 5th. Also a<lb/> lot in block 693 of the City of St Louis having a front of fifty feet on Columbus street<lb/> by a depth of 140 feet being lot No 8 of block No 12 of Soulards first addition to the City<lb/> of St Louis, bounded East by Columbus street, South by lot 7, West by alley; Sold un<lb/>der and by virtue of eleven executing four of which issued from the office of the Clerk of<lb/> the St Louis Court of Common Pecos, returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March term 1859</date> of said Court<lb/> one in favor of <name>John H Morse</name> and <name>Henry P Bates</name>, one in favor of <name>David Rokohl</name><lb/> and <name>James Kinkead</name> one in favor of <name>Samuel C Davis</name>, <name>Henry T Tomlinson</name>, <name>Mathew<lb/> Moody</name>, <name>Nathan W Perkins</name> and <name>Charles B Sawyer</name> all against William Street; one<lb/> in favor of the <name>Pacific Insurance Company</name> against <name>William Street</name> and <name>Michael<lb/> Diffenbach</name>, seven issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court<lb/> returnable to the <date when="1859-02">February term, 1859</date>, of said Court, two in favor of <name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> <name>Thomas V Strode</name>, and <name>Andet L Lacroise</name>, both against <name>A William Street</name> and <name>Andreas<lb/> Reinstadtler</name>, one in favor of the <name>Mutual Savings Institution</name> against <name>A William Street</name><lb/> <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name> and <name>John Kellner</name>, one in favor of <name>The First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name> against <name>A William Street</name> and <name>John C Degenhardt</name>, one in favor of <name>John<lb/> D Daggett</name> against <name>William Street</name>, <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name> and <name>Casper Schmetter</name>,<lb/> one in favor of <name>Francis Cornel</name>, one in favor of <name>Louis J Rankin</name> both against <name>William<lb/> Street</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes into Court, and acknowledges the<lb/> execution of a deed by him as Such Sheriff in favor of <name>Augustus<lb/> H Evans</name> for all the right, title interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Edwin R<lb/> Mason</name> of in and to the following described real estate to wit: block number eight hun<lb/>dred and eighty one fronting on the West side of Main street two hundred and fifty<lb/> feet and on Soulard street three hundred and fifty feet more or less, and bounded<lb/> on the East by Main street, North by Soulard street, West by Kosciusko street and<lb/> South by Lafayette. Block eight hundred and eighty fronting on the West side of Main<lb/> Street two hundred and fifty feet, and on Carroll three hundred and fifty feet more<lb/> or less, and bounded on the East by, Main street, and on the North by Carroll street<lb/> and on the West by Kosciusko street and on the South by Soulard street. Block<lb/> number eight hundred and seventy six fronting on the West side of main street two<lb/> hundred and fifty feet, and on Marion street three hundred and fifty feet more or less<lb/> and bounded on the East by Main street, North by Marion street, West by Koscius<lb/>ko street and on the South by Carroll street. Block number eight hundred and seventy.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="428" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0431.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>five fronting on the West said of Main Street two hundred and fifty feet more or less,<lb/> and bounded on the East by Main street, North by Barry street, West by Kosciusko<lb/> street South by Marion street. Block number eight hundred and seventy four fronting<lb/> on the West side of Main street two hundred and fifty feet, and on Miller street<lb/> three hundred and fifty feet more or less; and bounded on the East by Main street,<lb/> North by Miller street, West by Kosciusko street and on the South by Barry street.<lb/> Block number eight hundred and seventy three fronting on the West side of Main street<lb/> two hundred and fifty feet, and on Park avenue two hundred and fifty feet more or less;<lb/> and bounded on the East by Main Street, North by Park avenue, West by Koscius<lb/>ko street and Public School lands, and on the South by Miller street. Lots two and<lb/> three in block number one in Park addition to the City of St Louis, bounded East<lb/> by Seventh street, North by lot four, West by alley and South by lot one; with the<lb/> buildings and improvements thereon: Sold by virtue of two executions, one issued from<lb/> the office of the Clerk of St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and the other issued from<lb/> the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri, both return<lb/>able to the <date when="1859-03">March term 1859</date> of said Courts in favor of <name>William Johnson</name> and against<lb/> <name>Josiah Dent</name> and <name>Edwin R Mason</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court, acknowledges the execution<lb/> of a deed by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Henry L Patterson</name><lb/> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate, and property of <name>Charles L Hunt</name> of in and to<lb/> the following described real estate, to wit; a certain lot of ground, with all the improvements<lb/> thereon, situated in the County of St Louis, City of St Louis and State of Missouri and<lb/> in block no eighty nine (89) of said City containing a front and rear of twenty five feet<lb/> more or less, by one hundred and fifty feet deep, more or less, extending from Fourth street<lb/> Eastwardly to an alley in said block and bounded West by fourth street, East by said<lb/> alley, South by a line parallel to Locust street, and about seventy seven feet North ward<lb/> thereof, the same being the Northern line of the lot belonging to <name>James St Lucas</name>, and North<lb/> by a line parallel to said Locust street and about one hundred and two feet North ward<lb/> thereof, the same being the Southern line of the lot conveyed by <name>Ann L Hunt</name> to <name>Julia M<lb/> Turner</name>, trustee; Sold under fifteen executions, ten of which issued from the Office of the Clerk<lb/> of the St Louis Circuit Court, returnable to the <date when="1859-02">February Tern 1859</date> of said Court, five from<lb/> the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March term<lb/> 1859</date>, of said Court, one in favor of <name>Thomas S McNair</name>, one in favor of <name>George G Presbury &amp; Co</name><lb/> both against <name>Charles L Hunt</name>; one in favor of <name>William C Jameson</name>, one in favor of <name>Alton<lb/> Long</name>, against <name>John Larger</name> and <name>Charles L Hunt</name>; one in favor of <name>Edward Hasse</name>, one in favor<lb/> of <name>Almont Thompson</name>, one in favor of <name>Claim F Burnes</name>, one in favor of <name>Fidelis C Sharpe</name><lb/> all against <name>Charles L Hunt</name> and <name>William M Cooke</name>, one in favor of <name>John J Donne<lb/>gan</name>, one in favor of <name>John C Ivory</name>, one in favor of<lb/> <name>Charles Chester Ford</name>, one in favor of <name>George B Murray</name>, one in favor of <name>Charlotte Lay</name>, one in favor of <name>Christopher C McClure</name>,<lb/> one in favor of <name>George B Sanderson</name>, all against <name>William P Fenn</name> and <name>Charles L Hunt</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, in open Court, acknowledges the execu<lb/>tion of a deed by him as such sheriff in favor of <name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate, and property of <name>Jacob Reinhart</name> in and to<lb/> the following described real estate, to wit; Lots no 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in block No 2 of<lb/> <name>St Ange</name> addition to the City of St Louis, said lots containing together a front of 162 feet<lb/> four inches on Third street, by a depth Westwardly of 122 feet six inches and being bounded<lb/> on the North by Bryan street, on the West by an alley, on the South by property of chambers<lb/> and on the East by said Third street, being the same lots acquired by said <name>Reinhardt</name> of</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="429" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0432.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Felix Coste</name>, by deed recorded in book R No 6 page 514: Also the following lease<lb/>hold estate, to wit; Lot No 1 in block No 68 in <name>Julia C Soulards</name> second addition<lb/> to the City of St Louis, said lot having a front of 30 feet on the West side of Carondelet<lb/> Avenue, and running Westwardly with same width 140 feet to a twenty foot alley.<lb/> Also the Western part of lot No 2 in said block, which Western part contains a front<lb/> of thirty feet on the East side of said twenty foot alley, and extends Eastward by from<lb/> said alley with the same width 63 feet, being the same acquired by said Reinhardt of<lb/> <name>Benjamin A Soulard</name> and wife by lease recorded in book L No 6 page 350. Also lot<lb/> 3 in said block No 68 in said <name>Julia C Soulards</name> second addition to the City of St Louis<lb/> being 30 feet front on the Western side of Carondelet avenue and running in depth<lb/> Westwardly one hundred and forty feet to said twenty foot alley, acquired by said<lb/> <name>Reinhardt</name> of <name>Benjamin A Soulard</name> and wife by lease recorded in book no 151 page<lb/> 143 together with the buildings and improvements on side leasehold premises; and all<lb/> the night, title, interest, claim estate and property of the said <name>Jacob Reinhardt</name>, of in and<lb/> to the above described real estate and leasehold estate, and of in and to the terms of years<lb/> of said <name>Reinhardt</name> yet to come and unexpired in said leasehold property; Sold under<lb/> an alias execution issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Land Court in<lb/> for of <name>Anton Jaeger</name> and against <name>Jacob Reinhardt</name> returnable to the <date when="1859-03">March term, 1859</date>,<lb/> of said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis P James</name> et al<lb/> vs 293.<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Droun</name> et al<lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs 193.<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, the time for answering herein<lb/> is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs 268<lb/> <name>J Richard Barrett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion the time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Fitzgerald</name><lb/> vs 176<lb/> <name>Simon O Connell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution<lb/> issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Fitzgerald</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>Simon O Connell</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kennedy</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>John Decker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D'Oench</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>Seymour Voullaire</name> trustee of <name>W Hurd</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Fasker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="430" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0433.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Schlef</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>John H Jebbe</name> and<lb/> <name>Dorothea Lubbering</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns<lb/> of <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer to the first, second,<lb/> and third interrogatories and also a motion to strike<lb/> fourth, fifth and sixth interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns<lb/> of <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas E Maurice</name> &amp; <name>Geo T Camp</name><lb/> garns of <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>The Peoples Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>On motion the time for answering herein is extended<lb/> eight days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizah G Tuttle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Brooks</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles E Maurice</name> &amp; <name>Geo T Camp</name><lb/> garns of <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishees file an answer to the in<lb/>terrogatories herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz J Schilling</name> use &amp;c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>On motion the time for answering herein is extended six days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua B Brant</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended six days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Schnaider</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Andreas Knehler</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended six days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="431" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0434.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zachariah W Tinker</name> et al<lb/> vs 583.<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended six days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Two weeks time is given to answer herein. Motion for security<lb/> for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name></head>
            <p>Two weeks time is given to answer herein. Motion for security<lb/> for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemilurs K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the defendants file a plea in abatement<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Best</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>William Grassmuck</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>P Grassmuck</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Boatmans Savings<lb/> Inst</name> garns of <name>Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files interrogatories herein against the said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name> et al<lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file interrogatories against<lb/> <name>Joseph Summers</name> and <name>C J Caffrey</name>, summoned as garnishees,<lb/> it is, on motion of their attorney ordered that they be dis<lb/>charged hence as such. Service of summons as garnishee on Summers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Adalbert Lochr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name> Admr<lb/> of <name>Mason Converse</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Phebe Bassett</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files proof satisfactory to<lb/> the Court that the order of publication made herein has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisburry</name> garns of <name>Wm Salisburry</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion, the time for answering herein is extended two<lb/> weeks.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="432" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0435.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>John Stoddard</name> et al<lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney<lb/> until the twenty second instant is given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Jas H Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until the<lb/> twenty second instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>David M Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney until<lb/> the twenty second instant is given to answer herein</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Edward Hogg</name><lb/> vs 423<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until the<lb/> twenty second instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Robert B Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until<lb/> the twenty second instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>William L Weller</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until the twenty<lb/> second instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Same Brooks</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants by their attorney, until the<lb/> twenty second instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>A J Stevenson</name> et al<lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until<lb/> the twenty second is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lyon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H McGinnis</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Ledlie</name> and <name>Ulam</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lyon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rose A Masterson</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Ledlie</name> and <name>Ulam</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Spies</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Trendley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno W Glasford</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton &amp; St Louis Raid Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Elliott</name><lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Woodford W McLamant</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert H Koch</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="433" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0436.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Luke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Singleton</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Samuel K Hall</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file interrogatories against<lb/> the said garnishee it is on his motion by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that he be discharged hence at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiff, and that execution issue therefore. Five dollars<lb/> allowed garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name> et al<lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the Sheriff to amend the execution issued<lb/> herein being no 201 returnable to the <date when="1859-02">February Term 1859</date><lb/> of this Court, which amendment is made at the foot of<lb/> the first return on said execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#268, 55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hager</name>,<lb/> <name>William Hager</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Hager</name><lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Charles W Woodworth</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed: and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> sixty eight dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found together with<lb/> interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373.<lb/> <name>James L Faucett</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Campbell</name> et al<lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Thomas M Wolf</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, <name>Solomon Smith</name> and <name>Hiram Crit<lb/>tenden</name>, by their attorney, until the Sixteenth instant is given them<lb/> to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Burrowes</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Sass</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peravial Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out third amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenn</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Wm. E Saltmarsh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Supplemental answer of <name>William E Saltmarsh</name> and<lb/> <name>Eliza A Raymond</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Charles Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Z W Tinker</name> et al<lb/> vs 583<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="434" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0437.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#716, 42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter T H Miller</name> and<lb/> <name>Solomon Scott</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against it as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and sixteen dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1597, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert A Pearis</name><lb/> vs 506<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of fifteen hundred and ninety seven dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per<lb/> annum form this date until paid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#343, 80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Campbell</name><lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>Robert Knox</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty three dollars and eighty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> inform aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum<lb/> form this date until paid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#220, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walker R Carter</name> and <name>Joseph H Conn</name><lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>Michael Adami</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and twenty dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name><lb/> vs 522<lb/> <name>Edward M Avery</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefore. The plaintiff<lb/> by leave of Court withdraws the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="435" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0438.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#315, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P H Buren</name><lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>John Nichols</name> and<lb/> <name>Philip Pipkin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Philip Pipkin</name>, but the defendant, <name>John Nichols</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifteen dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from<lb/> this date until paid, and his costs herein expended and have therefore execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Parkinson</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Parkinson</name><lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander B Davidson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hubbard</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander B Davidson</name><lb/> vs 659,<lb/> <name>E G Payne</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Rechtner</name> garns of <name>Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>A F Reller</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Weinhagen</name> et al<lb/> vs 561<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer and setoff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Rasweiler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Seiler</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for security for costs and also an<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anne L Hunt</name><lb/> vs 3<lb/> <name>Wm H Scanlan</name>, <name>Philip Scanlan</name>,<lb/> <name>Chas S Abbott</name>, &amp; <name>L D Williams</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their counselors learned<lb/> in the law, on both sides, and submit the application<lb/> for an injunction herein restraining the defendants<lb/> from making any changes or alterations in the buil<lb/>ding and from committing any waste or trespass in the premises in the petition described,<lb/> to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, and the<lb/> arguments of counsel aforesaid learned in the law, doth overrule the said application.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Joseph Widen</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>The Terre Haute Alton<lb/> and St Louis Rail road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file interrogatories<lb/> against the said garnishee <name>Widen</name>, it is on motion<lb/> of <name>F C Sharp</name>, his attorney, ordered that he be<lb/> discharged hence at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefore. Five dollars allowed said<lb/> garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="436" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0439.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Joseph Widen</name> garnishee of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file interrogatories<lb/> against the said garnishee, <name>Widen</name>, it is on mo<lb/>tion of <name>F C Sharp</name>, his attorney ordered that<lb/> he be discharged hence as such at the costs said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefore. Five dollars allowed said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Trendley</name> et al<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Terre<lb/> Haute Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file interrogatories against the<lb/> garnishees <name>N Wall</name> and <name>Joseph Widen</name>, it is on motion<lb/> of <name>F C Sharp</name> their attorney, ordered that they be discharge<lb/> hence at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. Five dollars allowed each garnishee above named.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen N Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now come again as well the parties as aforesaid as also the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> but the same not being finished at the hour of adjournment further<lb/> proceedings herein are deferred until the meeting of the Court on Monday Morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-07">Monday March 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike our answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary C Leonard</name><lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>Algernon S Leonard</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore on motion of the said plaintiff it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Given</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, one month time<lb/> is given him to answer or plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="437" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0440.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#333, 24.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Mead</name>, <name>Henry C Mead</name><lb/> and <name>Benjamin W Mead</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>Thomas Wine</name>, <name>Alex C Wetherill</name><lb/> and <name>Robert Major</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument him writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and thirty three dollars and twenty four cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wittigh</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Peter Bressaw</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney, until the <date when="--03-09">ninth day of<lb/> March</date> is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1591, 20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Grist</name><lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>John G Fisher</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Beshler</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles F Blattan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, <name>Charles<lb/> F Blattan</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of fifteen hundred and ninety one dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1831, 31<lb/> There acknow<lb/>ledge full satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment entire<lb/> appoints the Margin<lb/> <date when="1866-01-23">Jany 23. 1866</date>.<lb/> <unclear><name>In Bu Weissonles</name><lb/> Out fall admired as</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Weisenfels</name><lb/> vs 574<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and waiving damages on<lb/> the notes herein, moves the Court for judgment on the defendants<lb/> answer, and the Court finding from the said answer and from said<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of Eighteen hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars and thirty one cents, doth sustain said motion. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with interest<lb/> on the Sum of four hundred and seventy two dollars and fifty cents, at the rate of ten per<lb/> cent per annum and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#346, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Papin</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Henry W Tracy</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles F Tracy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismissed suite<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Henry W Tracy</name>, but the defendant, <name>Charles F<lb/> Tracy</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty six dollars and eleven cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="438" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0441.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#688, 68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Mead</name>, <name>Henry C Mead</name><lb/> and <name>Benjamin W Mead</name><lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Cora O Vail</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not bur makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs the sum of six hundred and eighty eight dollars and sixty eight cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their as found and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name> et al<lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>D D Michaels</name> and<lb/> <name>James Clark</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly warned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiffs, it is order by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#608, 21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 539<lb/> <name>Robert H Stone</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six<lb/> hundred and eight dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and its costs herein expended and have there of execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#287, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Poepping</name><lb/> vs 569<lb/> <name>Francis Savignac</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> its costs herein expended and have there of execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#525, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Poepping</name><lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>J C G Heinrichs</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Chartrand</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty five dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have there of execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="439" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0442.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W Fenner</name> garns of <name>Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amaranth Crum</name><lb/> vs 323.<lb/> <name>Levi P Crum</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by here attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Bowman</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Louis A Delton</name>, although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that there petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gage</name>.<lb/> vs 486<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by attorney, two days additional<lb/> time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1382, 39</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry White</name><lb/> vs 100<lb/> <name>George J King</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and eighty two dollars and thirty nine cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as formed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer and two exhibits herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P H St Cyr</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyrus Bentley</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>George F Hill</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by attorney, the time for pleading<lb/> herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>John Brookes</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>Horace D Brady</name> and <name>George J Brady</name>, by<lb/> leave of Court file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="440" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0443.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Roseboom</name><lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Oscar Postal</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Postal</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> By like consent the defendants withdraw the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> suit be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John N Boffinger</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>I D Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Nixon</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>Eliza Nixon</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law; but the defendant although duly notified and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Fisher</name> etal<lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Harriett O Van Court</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Schenck</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin G Noyes</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Sherburne</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Ahling</name> and <name>Affs</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendants,<lb/> cannot be summoned in this action, therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against them for the sum of two hundred and fifty four dollars<lb/> and sixty six cents for tea sold by the plaintiffs to them, and that their property has been<lb/> attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St Louis, written and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday<lb/> of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein judg<lb/>ment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is<lb/> further ordered that a copy of this order be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin G Noyes</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward W Sherbourne</name>,<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Alla Lea</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Calvin J Burnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Roever</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="441" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0444.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178.<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sexton N Wilcox</name> etal<lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Wm H Newman</name> etal<lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>Albert Pearce</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J A Ruess</name> garns Of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J A Ruess</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavas Koerner</name> etal<lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>John P Harley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed by <name>John P Harley</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pomeroy Benton &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Renick</name> &amp; <name>Peterson</name> impleaded</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#804, 06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Haynes</name><lb/> vs 532<lb/> <name>Joseph W Ennis</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas H Ennis</name>, and<lb/> <name>Sarah Ennis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and four dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with interest<lb/> thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#844, 77.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 526.<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaeffler</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Bechler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and forty four dollars and seventy seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas S Hodzle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernsteins</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="442" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0445.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#906, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Hughes</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>Clay Taylor</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and six dollars and<lb/> seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together interest thereon at the<lb/> rate of ten per cent per annum form this date and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nicholas Wall</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the said garnishee and<lb/> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nicholas Wall</name> garns of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton &amp; St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the said garnishee and<lb/> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid as<lb/> also the Jurors aforesaid and thereupon the trial of the cause<lb/> progressed but the same not being concluded at the hour of<lb/> adjournment, it is ordered by the Court that further proceedings herein be deferred until<lb/> the meeting of the Court to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="443" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0446.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-08">Tuesday, March 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present and before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Ahrens</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>August Ahrens</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and affidavit from which<lb/> it appears that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri<lb/> and cannot be served with process therefore on motion of the said plain<lb/>tiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil<lb/> action has been commenced against him in this Court to obtain a decree of divorce on the<lb/> ground of desertion, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun<lb/> and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday<lb/> of September next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition, according<lb/> to law, the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a<lb/> copy hereof be published according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Cronin</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Jeremiah Cronin</name><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against herein as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#794, 36.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Austin</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Thorp</name> and<lb/> <name>Augustus of Brown</name><lb/> vs 509<lb/> <name>L C Tapping</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and ninety<lb/> four dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>On application of <name>Edward Mead</name>, assignee herein, filed<lb/> this day, it is ordered by the Court that he proceed to<lb/> all the property remaining undispoad of assigned to<lb/> him, at public auction in the manner such sales are ordinarily conducted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Luther M Kennett</name>,<lb/> and <name>Geo Sanderson</name> garnishees of<lb/> the <name>City Bank</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>The said garnishee, <name>John Simonds</name>, files an answer<lb/> herein. Six days is given the garnishees, <name>Sanderson</name><lb/> and <name>Kennett</name> to answer the interrogatories filed<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a Bond for Costs herein, with <name>J Z Smith</name> as security.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="444" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0447.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Sherman Spencer</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#427, 18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name> and <name>Thomas M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of four hundred and twenty seven dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that their plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#283, 34</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert B Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Manville Seymour</name><lb/> vs 460<lb/> <name>George B Filed</name> and<lb/> <name>Hugh K Wagner</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and eighty three dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>Thomas Ratcliffe</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Cadien</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, also<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#611, 59.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John d Daggett</name><lb/> vs 477<lb/> <name>William Streit</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Diffenbach</name>,<lb/> and <name>Casper Schnoelter</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and eleven dollars and<lb/> fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Rasweiler</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Philip Seiler</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion to strike out the answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="445" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0448.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#480, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs 476.<lb/> <name>George J King</name>,<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>,<lb/> <name>John O Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph McCullough</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as co<lb/>nfessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#276, 13.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name> receiver<lb/> vs 562<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> and<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, in person, the defendant, <name>James L<lb/> Gage</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant as indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy six dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Best</name> etal<lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Brand</name> and<lb/> <name>George M Beards</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2884, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Cook</name><lb/> vs 131<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty eight hundred and eighty four<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe J Allen</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>William Allen</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Close</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>Louisa Close</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="446" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0449.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#528, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 489.<lb/> <name>Joseph King</name> and<lb/> <name>Anton Jacger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy five cents, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1007, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Michael Adami</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter Grassmuck</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and seven dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name> garnishee of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed and cause continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name> garnishee of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis RR Co</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#329, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 491<lb/> <name>Eneas McFaul</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty nine dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garneau</name><lb/> vs 195<lb/> Steam Boat Sioux City</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the complaint<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="447" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0450.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#358, 87</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bayne</name> and<lb/> <name>William Bayne</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and fifty eight dollars and eighty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garneau</name><lb/> vs 173<lb/> Steamboat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Garneau</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the com<lb/>plaint herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#528,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name> and<lb/> <name>Franklin Weston</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and twenty eight dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with interest<lb/> therein at the rate of ten percent per annum, and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Watson</name><lb/> vs 382<lb/> <name>Abraham A Van Wormer</name><lb/> and <name>James C Reed</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein for both<lb/> defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Mortland</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Walker Hegarman</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blevin</name> etal<lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Heinecke</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="448" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0451.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Sowers</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name> and <name>Henry Heinecke</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reese J Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Parkinson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for an Execution filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemilius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name>, <name>Daniel<lb/> Elifritz</name>, <name>Darius Cox</name> and <name>Jules C Kingsbury</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publica<lb/>tion made herein has been duly published according to<lb/> law, but the defendants, <name>William C Wagley</name>, <name>Daniel<lb/> Elifritz</name> and <name>Darius Coxe</name>, although duly notified and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed. Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3548, 99.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Asa J Rolf</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name><lb/> and <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff the Court doth order that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause the Court upon the petition and exhibit herein, and the Court doth find<lb/> there from that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand<lb/> five hundred and forty eight dollars and ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found together<lb/> with interest therein at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Moffitt</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name>, <name>Charles L Hunt</name>,<lb/> <name>William C Woodson</name>, <name>William P Fenn</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard H Stevens</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert A Walton</name> and <name>John M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and ack<lb/>nowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> the judgment rendered in this cause on the <date when="1858-04-13">thirteenth<lb/> day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> for<lb/> two thousand six hundred and eighty one dollars and eighty cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> etal<lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammamann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Jno A McElray</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="449" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0452.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1628, 16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>,<lb/> <name>John Burnes</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, where<lb/>fore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hundred and twenty<lb/> eight dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now come again as well the parties as aforesaid as also the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid and thereupon the trial of the cause progressed but the<lb/> same not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further procee<lb/>dings herein are deferred until the meeting of the Court tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-09">Wednesday March 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#214, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Legrand F Rucker</name><lb/> vs 463.<lb/> <name>George W Rucker</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Force</name> et al<lb/> vs 442<lb/> <name>Emilius F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> etal<lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>William Lansing</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="450" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0453.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Andrew Benson</name> and <name>James Benson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> etal<lb/> vs 260.<lb/> <name>William King</name> and <name>David Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>Emil F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>O C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Higgins</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>Ellen Higgins</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof that the order of<lb/> publication made herein has been duly published, according to law, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly notified and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Pittman</name> etal<lb/> vs 29<lb/> <name>E S Castle and Co</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 518<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gage</name><lb/> vs 486<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fires Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#460, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Americus V Potter</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan F Mason</name>,<lb/> <name>John D Potter</name> and<lb/> <name>Arthur M Potter</name><lb/> vs 385.<lb/> <name>John N Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against herein as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and sixty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella</name> and <name>Lavenia Harper</name> by<lb/> their curator <name>John Hartshorn</name><lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Andrew Harper</name> etal</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and files proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="451" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0454.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, and withdraw their<lb/> motion to strike out the plaintiffs amended petition and by<lb/> leave of Court file an answer to said amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Spahr</name> etal<lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein to the Sheriff<lb/> of Cooper County for the defendant <name>Fox</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#841, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph La Barge Jr</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and forty one dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1612, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Coursin</name><lb/> vs 308<lb/> <name>Alexander Gilham</name> and<lb/> <name>George Bowman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hundred and twelve dollars<lb/> and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Greener</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Picot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail<lb/> Road Company</name> garn. Of <name>Moies</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Joice</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> vs 504<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Moto set aside judgment by default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>James L Faucett</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="452" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0455.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name> etal<lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name> and<lb/> <name>Clarissa Shands</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p><name>Robert K Woods</name>, one of the plaintiffs, in open Court ack<lb/>nowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment rendered herein on the fourth day of the present month.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman W Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William L Catherwood</name></head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>William L</name> and <name>Edwin O Catherwood</name>,<lb/> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Weinhager</name> etal<lb/> vs 561<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to set off filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>On Indictment for Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now come again as well the parties as aforesaid as also the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid, who having heard all the evidence in the cause and<lb/> the argument of counsel upon their oath aforesaid say they find<lb/> the said defendant guilty of murder in the first degree as charged in the indictment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Freedom.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come<lb/> <name>D D Lynch</name>, <name>Frederick Kretzer</name>, <name>William A McDonald</name>, <name>J H<lb/> Evers</name>, <name>Samuel Hale</name>, <name>B Harris</name>, <name>M Mullaney</name>, <name>William C Chan</name>,<lb/> <name>John Kirby</name>, and <name>John Younger</name>, ten good and lawful men, who were duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, but the panel of the Jury being incomplete,<lb/> further proceedings herein are deferred until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="453" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0456.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-10">Thursday March 10th 1859</date>.</dateline> 
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John W Walker</name> is, on motion of <name>Samuel M Breckinridge</name>, admitted and enrolled<lb/> as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#242, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hoffman</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Rudolph Brussellbach</name> and<lb/> <name>John Schiffmann</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty two dollars and ninety cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis W Crane</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>James Hewitt</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert M V Kercheval</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> et al<lb/> vs 582<lb/> <name>James M Winchester</name> alias<lb/> <name>Frank Winchester</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#703, 62.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> and<lb/> <name>George C Greene</name><lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>William King</name> and<lb/> <name>David Taylor</name></head>
            <p>On notes and account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney and the plaintiffs waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibits and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of seven hundred and three dollars and sixty<lb/> two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Trundley</name> et al<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Terre Haute Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file interrogatories against<lb/> <name>Mauntel</name> and <name>Butte</name>, summoned as garnishees, It is ordered<lb/> on motion of said garnishees that the be discharged hence.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Henry P Nortman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="454" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0457.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton &amp; Terre Haute R R Co</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> garnishee of <name>St Louis<lb/> Alton and Terre Haute R R Co</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>William M Morrison</name>, Who is personally known to the Court, acknowledge the execution in<lb/> open Court, of a deed of emancipation to his slave <name>Louis Carries</name>,<lb/> aged about forty five years, of black color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Peterson</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Wm Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>Now come the said garnishees and file separate answers<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Mason Converse</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Phebe Bassett</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default wherefore on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#267, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 701<lb/> <name>Joseph A Barret</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary L Barret</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty seven dollars and eighty<lb/> cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis J Rankin</name>, <name>Thomas J<lb/> Fletcher</name> and <name>Jas M Loughborough</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> et al<lb/> vs 265<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
            <p>By consent of parties until the twentieth day of the present month<lb/> is given the defendant to file a bill of Exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Oliver A Hart</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="455" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0458.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Freedom.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their attorneys, and also the ten Jurors<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon come <name>Joseph<lb/> Leduc</name> and <name>M Osborne</name>, two good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try, and the panel<lb/> of twelve Jurors being completed, thereupon the trial of this cause progressed but not being<lb/> concluded further proceedings herein are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-11">Friday, March 11th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Boegeholz</name><lb/> vs 101<lb/> <name>George Kleberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. Note withdrawn by plaintiff by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Iras H Stout</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>Edward S W D Holliday</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenne</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>William E Saltmarsh</name> and <name>Eliza A Ray<lb/>mond</name> withdraw their supplemental answer herein, and by<lb/> consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed as to the said defendant <name>William E Saltmarsh</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1739, 04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph G Brown</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road and <name>John Bass</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seventeen hundred and<lb/> thirty nine dollars and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="456" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0459.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz Schilling</name> et al<lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#274, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Pavey</name><lb/> vs 434<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy four dollars and fifty eight cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#904, 76</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thomas</name> and<lb/> <name>Raymond A Papin</name><lb/> vs 625<lb/> <name>Francis D Belcour</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement, in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit, whereby he confess himself indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and four dollars<lb/> and seventy six cents, and consents that judgment may be<lb/> rendered against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as confessed together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum from<lb/> this date and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2579, 77.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Meegan</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph LaBarge Jr</name><lb/> vs 624<lb/> <name>Peter Vandervort</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement, in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit, whereby he confess himself indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty five hundred and seventy<lb/> nine dollars and seventy seven cents. And authorizes the Court<lb/> to enter judgment against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Resse J Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Parkinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Notice to defendants and also notice to attorney of<lb/> <name>Parkinson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Kentucky for the<lb/> plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>John G Glenn</name> and <name>Thomas L Moore</name>,<lb/> file separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="457" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0460.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>John G Glenn</name> and <name>Thomas L Moore</name>,<lb/> file separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> et al<lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>S K Hutchinson</name> garns of Lancaster</head>
            <p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Petition for freedom.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished fur<lb/>ther proceedings are deferred until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-12">Saturday March 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Samuel B Tucker</name> is, on motion of <name>Calvin F Burnes</name>, admitted and enrolled<lb/> as a member of this Bar</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name> et al<lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>Reuben Harrington</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1354, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fahnestock</name><lb/> vs 628<lb/> <name>William Hazzeldine</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and fifty four<lb/> dollars and forty cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered against him infavor<lb/> of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as confessed and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Frederick Eschmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Eschmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Schnake</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not make<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="458" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0461.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Reder</name><lb/> vs 451<lb/> <name>Henry Redemeyer</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, leave is given the plaintiff to change the given<lb/> name of the defendant from <name>Henry</name> to <name>John George</name> wherever the same<lb/> occurs: thereupon the defendant withdraws the plea in abatement herein<lb/> and twenty days is given the defendant to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Groves</name><lb/> vs 513.<lb/> <name>John W Groves</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> vs 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proofs satis<lb/>factory, to the Court that the order of publication made herein<lb/> has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Aden</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>David Dick</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>Proofs of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sartori</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Samuel H Jacoby</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Proofs of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been<lb/> duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard H Smith</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>Thomas Seaverson</name></head>
            <p>Proofs of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to<lb/> the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Firemans Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Hart</name>.</head>
            <p>Proofs of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Plahto</name><lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>Albert Jacoby</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeannette Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Proofs of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sylvester V Papin</name> and<lb/> <name>Theophile Papin</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George B Field</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said<lb/> defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="459" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0462.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gage</name><lb/> vs 486.<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2039, 54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name>, <name>Phocion R McCreey</name>,<lb/> <name>William A Hargadine</name>, <name>George D<lb/> Appleton</name> and <name>Hugh McKittrick</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles P Chouteau</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Charles P<lb/> Chouteau</name>, but the defendants, <name>William Wade</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand and thirty nine dollars and fifty four<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear then percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#552, 97</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 531<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>,<lb/> <name>John Brien</name> and<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>William Hassinger</name>, but the defendant, <name>John O Brien</name><lb/> and <name>George J King</name>, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs it<lb/> is rendered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> fifty two dollars and ninety seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#592, 77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J M Campbell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert B Major</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing, duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby he confess himself indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety two dollars and seventy<lb/> seven cents, and consents that judgment may rendered against him for that sum. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> inform aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name><lb/> vs 534.<lb/> <name>Oliver A Hart</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Patrick Hart</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>Solomon Smith</name> and <name>Hiram</name> written den file<lb/> separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="460" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0463.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burt</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Motion for order on claimant of fund garnisheed to appear<lb/> and sustain claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Spahr</name> et al<lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, <name>Frank Fox</name>, and waiving the issue<lb/> and service of process, enters his appearance to this action;<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs the order for the issue of<lb/> an alias summons herein for said defendant is set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Frederick Spies</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>Denial of part of answer filed. Exceptions to general<lb/> answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Cornet</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Howison</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> files a petition for a change of venue herein, that the Court, having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth order that the venue of this cause<lb/> be changed to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court make<lb/> out a true and complete transcript of the record and proceedings herein, and transmit the<lb/> same duly certified, together with all the original papers filed and not forming a part of<lb/> the record, to the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Whitcher</name> et al<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their motion for security for costs<lb/> herein and file an answer and two exhibits.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bassett</name> et al<lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Peter Ambs</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and counterclaim and for judg<lb/>ment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury empan<lb/>nelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid do find as to the first issue herein joined that<lb/> the said defendant is guilty of the trespasses and grievances laid to his charge in manner and form as the<lb/> plaintiff hath in her declaration alleged, and as to the second issue herein joined, do find that at the time<lb/> when said several supposed trespasses were committed the plaintiff was not slave in manner<lb/> and form as the defendants hath in his second plea alledged. It is therefore considered and adjudged<lb/> by the Court that the said plaintiff be liberated and entirely set <unclear>free</unclear> from the said defendant and form all persons<lb/> claiming by through or under him by title derived since the commencement of this suit and that she recover of said<lb/> defendant her costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="461" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0464.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-14">Monday March 14th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Wells</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Joseph Rowe</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Nelson Blodgett</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>The Judge of this Court having been of counsel for the garnishee<lb/> herein, it is therefore ordered that this cause be transferred to the<lb/> St Louis Court of Common Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk of<lb/> this Court make out a full and complete transcript of the record<lb/> and proceedings herein, and deliver the same duly certified to the Clerk of said St Louis court<lb/> of Common Pleas, as required by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Convay</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>Lydia M Rector</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>Wm. Waddingham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M A Childress</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> et al<lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>North Missouri Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Milburn</name> et al<lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas C Reynolds</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V Bryan</name> et al<lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>Edward St Michael</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V Bryan</name> et al<lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>Edward St Michael</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Charleson</name> et al<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Edward St Michael</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hoffman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emelia Riehl</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B Fenner</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Picot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Co</name> garns of <name>Moies</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee withdraws its answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Geo Geisel</name> garns of <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>On motion three days is given said garnishee to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93.<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="462" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0465.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Rodney Montague</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name> garnishee of <name>John stickel</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of court the plaintiff files interrogatories herein. Two<lb/> weeks is given the said garnishee to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hull R Jackson</name><lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Nathan C Covington</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs. Motion to suppress depo<lb/>sition of <name>J W Jackson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschmann</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Magehan</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the court<lb/> that this suit be dismissed acts the defendant <name>Richard Ivers</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson B Powell</name><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>Michael Buckley</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>'s admr et al</head>
            <p>Fifteen days are given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#805, 85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Central Bank</name><lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>George L Marshall</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Smith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a statement in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby they confess themselves indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of eight hundred and five dollars and eighty five cents,<lb/> and consent that judgment may be rendered against them in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#527, 50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger L M Allister</name><lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> and <name>Francis Burke</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly called come not, nor have they answered herein, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty seven dollars and fifty ants. It is therefore<lb/> considered by, the Court that the plaintiff recover of the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Motion to discharge garnishees filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Trundley</name> et al<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Terre Haute Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the garnishees summoned herein be dis<lb/>charged hence at the this suit dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="463" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0466.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#702,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> and<lb/> <name>George Greene</name><lb/> vs 506<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but defendants although<lb/> duly warned and called come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and two dollars and<lb/> eighty one cents. His therefore considered by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found together with interest thereon at the rate<lb/> of ten per cent per annum from this date and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor against the defendant <name>Thomas Hinton</name>, against the property attached, and have<lb/> general execution therefore against, <name>Walter D McIndoe</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1848, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennet S Aden</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>David Dick</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert W McClure</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly warned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and forty eight dollars and thirty<lb/> cents. His therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and have execution therefor against the property<lb/> attached in this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevardo</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, Commissions are awarded him to take<lb/> depositions in Illinois and Muscatine and Burlington, Iowa.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus awarded to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick M Calburn</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Terre Haute, Alton St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Exceptions to answer of garnishees, <name>Chas E Maurice</name><lb/> and <name>George T Lamp</name>, filed. Separate denials of answer<lb/> of garnishees, <name>John S Thompson</name> and <name>Henry Bulte</name>,<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>No comes the plaintiff, and files a petition and exhibit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>The pacific Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Until the nineteenth instant is given the defendant to<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Edward Crely</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mary Creby</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer and set off herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="464" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0467.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick M Collrun</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>Terre Naute Alton St. Louis R R Co.</name></head>
            <p>Denials of answers of <name>Henry Bulte</name> and <name>Johns<lb/> Thompson</name> filed. Exceptions to answer of <name>Charles E<lb/> Maurice</name> and <name>George T Camp</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Oglesby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that apheries summons issue herein for <name>John H.<lb/> Oglesby</name>.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-15">Tuesday March 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>F Kennedy</name> is, on motion, admitted and en rolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1082, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mom's Plahto</name><lb/> vs 202 Oct '58<lb/> <name>Albert Jacoby</name> and <name>Jeanette Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by then attorney, and the defendants file an answer<lb/> herein, and this cause is submitted by consent to the Court upon the petition<lb/> and answer, and the Court doth find there from that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum often hundred and eighty two dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of<lb/> Missouri</name><lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>William Carson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue to the sheriff of Pike<lb/> County for the defendants <name>R Saffarons</name>, <name>J P Rule</name> and <name>E B Rule</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Jeffries</name><lb/> vs 07<lb/> <name>D D Danton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit a filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Grube</name><lb/> vs 04<lb/> <name>F &amp; M Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Jno Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that he be discharged hence at the cost of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefore. The sum of ten dollars<lb/> allowed garnishee for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Human W Brockelsmann</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>William L Catherwood</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, <name>Julius<lb/> Busch</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="465" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0468.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> vs 593<lb/> <name>P H St Cyr</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Walter D McIndoe</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that he be discharged hence at the cost of the plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore. The sum of ten dollars is<lb/> allowed him for an evening herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs 601<lb/> <name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> garns of <name>Lyman Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that it be discharged hence at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiff and the execution issue therefore. The sum<lb/> of ten dollars is allowed for an answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files as motion and notice of motion to shorten time for<lb/> taking depositions and the Court doth grant the plaintiff leave to<lb/> take depositions in the state of Ohio on the twenty second instant<lb/> on serving notice on the defendants to that effect.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5159,55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Meegan</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph La Barge Jr</name><lb/> vs 625<lb/> <name>Taliafero James</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement, in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five thousand one hundred and fifty nine dollars and fifty<lb/> five cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered against him<lb/> for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Smith</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Joseph Mogridge</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defen<lb/>dants for the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wait</name><lb/> vs 266<lb/> <name>John Kinnard</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kinnard Jr</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Edward Crely</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Many Brely</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to Courter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Heavy H Humphrey</name>'s admr<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that the plaintiff file an additional bond of replevin in<lb/> the sum of six hundred dollars, within ten days from<lb/> the date of this order.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="466" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0469.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Elliott</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Woodford W McLamant</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>McLamant</name> and two exhibits A &amp; B Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78.<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#338, 72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Rupell</name><lb/> <name>Nathaniel E Rupell</name><lb/> and <name>Henry B Clapp</name><lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Charles F Baker</name> and<lb/> <name>James Moore</name></head>
            <p>On note and accounts.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by their attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendants, <name>James Moore</name>, but the defendant, <name>Charles Baker</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against him as confessed: and the plaintiffs waiving<lb/> a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find there from that the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Charles F Baker</name>, is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and seventy two cents. It is in therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#876, 16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver W Woodford</name> and<lb/> <name>Jay C Wemple</name><lb/> vs 396<lb/> <name>Theodore Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>Sebastian Engert</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore; on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eight hundred and seventy six dollars and sixteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert W Johnson</name> et al<lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>John C Ivory</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elijah G Tuttle</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Benj F Winchester</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Exhibit withdrawn by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahy</name> et al<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdale</name>'s admrx</head>
            <p>Ordered that a subpoena dues term issue to <name>Dr Stevens</name> for<lb/> certain books.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name> garn. of<lb/> the <name>City Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>Denial of garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="467" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0470.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name>, deceased, <name>Mary<lb/> Farrell</name>, widow, <name>Esther Farrell</name>, <name>Dennis<lb/> Farrell</name>, and <name>Christopher Farrell</name>, minor<lb/> children of <name>William Farrell</name>, deed by their<lb/> next friend, <name>Alexander J P Garesche</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name>, administratrix of <name>James<lb/> Brennon</name>, deceased, and guardian ad litem<lb/> of <name>Wm Brennon</name>, <name>Mary Ann Brennon</name>, and<lb/> <name>Margaret Brennon</name>, minor children of <name>James<lb/> Brennon</name>, decd, <name>James Cox</name>, and <name>Esther</name>, his wife,<lb/> <name>Joseph Larkin</name> and <name>Andrew Larkin</name></head>
            <p>Petition to set aside Will.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Charles<lb/> Ludicke</name>, <name>John Buchanan</name>, <name>A F Meyer</name>, <name>Simon<lb/> Bell</name>, <name>L Benksdorff</name>, <name>W J Reddock</name>, <name>Thomas<lb/> Mason</name>, <name>H Inmann</name>, <name>William H Wittington</name>,<lb/> <name>M Crole</name>, <name>J Shoults</name>, and <name>J D Woodey</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried<lb/> and sworn well and truly to try the issue herein<lb/> joined, the trial progressed, but not being finished<lb/> at the hour of adjournment, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that further proceedings herein be deferred<lb/> until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-16">Wednesday March 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Hugh Humphreys</name> is, on motion, admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Frederick K Spies</name> et al garn.<lb/> of <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>The garnishee, <name>George Geisel</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>Joshua<lb/> Alexander</name>, <name>James Beebe</name>, <name>William<lb/> Haight</name>, <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>James A<lb/> Raynor</name>, <name>Nicholas Wall</name>, <name>Erastus<lb/> H Gaylord</name>, and <name>F A Reuss</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the garnishees,<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>James Beebe</name>,<lb/> <name>William Haight</name>, <name>Robert Hull</name> and <name>James A Raynor</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the interrogatories filed herein be taken<lb/> against them as confessed: on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the garnishes, <name>Nicholas<lb/> Wall</name>, <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name>, and <name>F A Reuss</name>, be discharged<lb/> hence at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars<lb/> is allowed each of said garnishees, <name>Wall Gaylord</name> and <name>Reuss</name>, for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J R Barrett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J R Barrett</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply to Counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="468" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0471.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2521, 59</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 628<lb/> <name>Jacon B Fluno</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendants and files a statement in writing, whereby he confessed<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty five hundred and<lb/> twenty one dollars and fifty nine cents, and consents that judgment may<lb/> be rendered herein in favor of said plaintiff for that sum. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>Joshua H<lb/> Alexander</name>, <name>James Beebe</name>, <name>William<lb/> Haight</name>, <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>James A<lb/> Raynor</name>, <name>Nicholas Wall</name>, <name>Erastus H<lb/> Gaylord</name> and <name>F A Ruess</name> garnishees of<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the<lb/> garnishees, <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>,<lb/> <name>James Beebe</name>, <name>William Haight</name>, <name>Robert Hull</name> and<lb/> <name>James A Raynor</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore; on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the interrogatories herein be taken against them as<lb/> confessed: on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the garnishes, <name>Nicholas Wall</name>, <name>Eras<lb/>tus H Gaylord</name>, and <name>F A Reuss</name>, be discharged hence at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that<lb/> the sum of ten dollars be allowed each of them for answering herein</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Frederick Spies</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>Reply of <name>Spies</name> to denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name></head>
            <p>Motion to make the City of St Louis a defendant to this<lb/> suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garasche</name>, administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name>, decd, et al<lb/> vs 43.<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name>, decd, et al</head>
            <p>Petition to set aside Will.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed, but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> are deferred until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="469" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0472.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-17">Thursday March 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nimrod Beck</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo B. Sanderson</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Ohio for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rufus Bigelow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff can files a petition and thereupon comes the defendants<lb/> and waiving service or process enters his appearance to this action as if<lb/> personally served with process fifteen days before the commencement of<lb/> the present term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and thereupon comes the defendant<lb/> and waiving the issue of summons, enters his appearance to this action<lb/> as if personally served with process fifteen days before the commence<lb/>ment of the present term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Joice</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and by their consent<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the defendant that execution issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#300, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R T Barret</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cynille Benoist</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby he confessed himself indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of three hundred dollars and consents that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Leonard</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>A S Leonard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Mueller</name><lb/> vs 605<lb/> <name>David Tandy</name> garns of<lb/> <name>R McEldowney</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishee, by his attorneys, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that he be discharges hence at the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefore. The sum of Ten dollars is al<lb/>lowed said garnishee for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nicolay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Fritz Pittman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="470" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0473.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Wisconsin for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered to be set for trial for <date when="--06-01">1st day of June</date> next by consent<lb/> of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Louisiana for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Cronin</name><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name></head>
            <p>The defendants files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Motion for order on Sheriff to pay over money filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> et al<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> et al garnishee</head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> et al<lb/> no 555<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> et al garnishee</head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steamboat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the said steamboat has been sold<lb/> pursuant to the order here to fore made by this Court, therefore, it<lb/> is ordered that the creditors of said boat be notified to appear<lb/> before this Court on the <date when="--04-23">twenty third day of April</date> next and exhibit and prove their demands<lb/> against said boat; it is further ordered that such notice be published in the St Louis<lb/> Evening News and the Missouri Democrat.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steamboat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the said steamboat has been sold<lb/> pursuant to the order here to fore made by this Court, therefore, it is<lb/> ordered that the creditors of said boat be notified to appear before<lb/> this Court on the <date when="--04-23">twenty third day of April</date> next and exhibit and prove their demand against<lb/> said boat; it is further ordered that such notice be published in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> and St Louis Evening News.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Ferrell</name> admr et al<lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name> admr et al</head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed and being finished, the<lb/> Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="471" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0474.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-18">Friday March 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use <name>Jackson</name> trustee<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>C W Pomeroy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazzard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73.<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>David Wolf</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bond for security for costs, thereupon the Court<lb/> overrules the motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name>.<lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Bernhard Midas</name> et al</head>
            <p>It is ordered that the motion for a new trial herein be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John T Hatcher</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>John T Hatcher</name> and files a petition for a unit of <name>Habeas<lb/> Corpus</name> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth refuse the said application.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> no 103<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>It is ordered that the demurrer to the plaintiffs petition herein be<lb/> sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>It is ordered that the demurrer to the plaintiffs petition herein be<lb/> sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Poebe J Allen</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>William Allen</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer herein it is ordered that the same be<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name> et al<lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bond for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ins Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="472" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0475.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rupell Scarrett</name> et al<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to strike out the defendants<lb/> answer and for judgment, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi M Bond</name> et al<lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to dismiss this suit for want of<lb/> security for costs it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip B Hokaday</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>Charles Gibson</name></head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the petition being heard and considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs 243.<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>The Plaintiff files a bond for costs, thereupon the dependant withdraw<lb/> his motion to dismiss this suit, and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Quinnebang Bank</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>The Plaintiff files a bond for costs, thereupon the dependant with<lb/>draw his motion to dismiss this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name> et al<lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>Jno L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>The Plaintiff files a bond for costs, thereupon the dependant withdraw<lb/> his motion to dismiss this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Conner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Pearson</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein, it is ordered<lb/> that the same be sustained. Ten days is given plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside discharge of garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to strike out parts of answer of<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> it is ordered that the same be sustained. Ten<lb/> day is given said defendant to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>The defendants withdraws her motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name>, <name>Alexander<lb/> Peterson</name> and <name>Thomas L Anderson</name><lb/> garns of <name>Wm Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files separate denials of the answer of<lb/> said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> The Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="473" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0476.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 611<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> and <name>Wm M<lb/> McPherson</name> garns of <name>The Ohio and<lb/> Mississippi Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said<lb/> garnishee, <name>William M McPherson</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> interrogators herein against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine Fischer</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Adam Fischer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files a petition and also an<lb/> affidavit stating that the defendant is a non resident of the State of<lb/> Missouri, wherefore on motion of t he plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him to obtain<lb/> a decree of divorce on the grounds of ill treatment and desertion, and that unless he be and<lb/> appear before this Court to be begun and held at the Court House in the City and County of<lb/> St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day of said term<lb/> answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published, as the law directs, in the Missouri Republican a<lb/> newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#290, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name>, <name>William T<lb/> Blow</name> and <name>Taylor Blow</name>.<lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>The Chicago Alton and Saint<lb/> Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney and on their mo<lb/>tion leave so given the Sheriff to amend his return on the writ<lb/> herein by adding there to the words, "the President of said<lb/> Company not being found in my County"; which amendment<lb/> is accordingly made; but the said defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the defendant as<lb/> confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and ninety dollars<lb/> and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1281, 71</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building and<lb/> Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Joseph H White</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>White</name>, by their<lb/> attorneys, but the defendant <name>Fisher</name> although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed: thereupon<lb/> by leave of Court the defendant white amends his answer by alleging a payment on the<lb/> <date when="--03-12">twelfth of March</date> last of the sum of three hundred and eighteen dollars and forty four cents;<lb/> which allegation of payment the plaintiff confesses and moves the Court of judgment upon the<lb/> answer of said <name>White</name>, which motion, upon consideration by the Court is sustained; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded and also from the<lb/> answer herein that the defendant <name>White</name> is and indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred<lb/> and eighty one dollars and seventy one cents, and the Court also finds from the said instruments<lb/> in writing that the defendant <name>Fisher</name> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and<lb/> eighty one dollars and seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="474" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0477.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-19">Saturday March 19th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Corbin Thompson</name> and <name>Isaac H Thompson</name>, two credible witnesses, personally known to the<lb/> Court, in open Court, upon their oaths, prove the acknowledgement and execution of a deed of<lb/> emancipation by <name>Charles M Hays</name> to the following named slaves, to wit: <name>Mary Hays</name>, of<lb/> dark copper color, aged thirty six years, <name>Charles Hays</name>, of dark copper color, aged sixteen years,<lb/> <name>Edward Hays</name>, of light complexion, aged eleven years, <name>Francis Victoria</name> aged twelve months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>A Becker</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer herein it is ordered that the same be<lb/> overruled. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#374, 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Brown</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to state out the answer herein and for judgment<lb/> being heard and by the Court fully understood it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled; thereupon comes the plaintiff and waiving damages on the<lb/> bill of exchange sued on, moved the Court for judgment on the answer of said defendant, and<lb/> the Court, on considered of said motion, doth sustain the same; and the Court finds from said<lb/> answer and from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy four dollars and fifteen<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and this costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Jas J McBride</name><lb/> vs 573<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Prichaitt</name><lb/> vs 309<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefore. By leave of Court the<lb/> plaintiff withdraws the exhibit sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>William Sample</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri use of <name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Louis Rower</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the same be sustained. Ten days is given<lb/> the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jermina A Chrisman</name><lb/> vs 168<lb/> <name>William Chrisman</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="475" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0478.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion for security for<lb/> costs and files and answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sallie B Dimick</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>Horace E Dimick</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now Comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff ten days is given him to reply herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Wittig</name><lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
            <p>On Petition for Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and submit the petition of <name>John Ruedi</name><lb/> for an injunction herein to the Court and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same, doth order that the injunction restraining all proceedings under<lb/> an execution mentioned the said petition be an the same is hereby dissolved and vacated.<lb/> It is further ordered that the said <name>John Ruedi</name> pay the costs of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas H West</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition, and thereupon come the defen<lb/>dants and waiving the issue and service of process center their appearance<lb/> to the action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Milburn</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>George W Cable</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion herein and files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name> et al<lb/> vs 330.<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelmann</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion to dismiss this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion for security for costs herein it is<lb/> ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>The Plaintiff files a bond for costs herein with <name>J T Rice</name> as security,<lb/> which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 270<lb/> <name>The City Bank</name> of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer and motion for the<lb/> appointment of a receiver filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="476" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0479.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>William Turton Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer herein, it is ordered that the same<lb/> be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to strike out part of the answer herein it<lb/> is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>William Turton Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out the petition herein being heard<lb/> and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained. Ten days is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> et al<lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>John B Grady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 611<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> et al garns<lb/> of <name>Ohio Mississippi R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Ten days is given the plaintiff to file a denial of the answer<lb/> of the garnishee <name>Thomas Brown</name>, <name>Denial</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Pates</name><lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns of<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>The said garnishees motion to strike out the fourth, fifth<lb/> and sixth interrogatories filed herein, being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to strike out the answer herein<lb/> it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumberman and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by its attorney, and the plaintiffs<lb/> having failed to amend herein, it is on motion of the defen<lb/>dant, ordered by the Court that the judgment on the demurred<lb/> herein be made final and absolute. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf, but that the defendant go<lb/> hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Geisel</name> garns</head>
            <p>Denial of garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillitto</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard J Lockwood</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Pearson</name> garns<lb/> of <name>James Gormley</name></head>
            <p>The said garnishee file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="477" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0480.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Wolff</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W Bracker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reese J Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Parkinson</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin L Shaw</name>.</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and submits to the Court his motion<lb/> for an execution on the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1857-12-11">11th day of Decem<lb/>ber, 1857</date>, to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth order that an execution issue herein in accordance with said motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1927, 35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre A Berthold</name>,<lb/> <name>Julius H Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>Macklot Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of nineteen hundred and twenty seven dollars and thirty five cents,<lb/> and consents that judgment may be rendered against him in favor of<lb/> the plaintiffs for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name> deceased et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Ann Brennon</name> administratix of<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name> deceased et al</head>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their attorneys, and there<lb/>upon come also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein<lb/> and upon their on the say they are unable to agree upon<lb/> a verdict; wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> Jury be discharged and this caused continued until the<lb/> next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="478" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0481.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-21">Monday March 21st, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> and <name>Dexter G Hitchcock</name><lb/> vs 8.<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Contract.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the<lb/> defendant files a motion for security for costs herein, which<lb/> being seen heard and fully understood by the Court, it is or<lb/>dered that the same be overruled; and the parties waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court, and thereupon the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Court takes time to consider what judgment shall be rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jas Ipold</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 258.<lb/> <name>Wm D W Barnard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> et al<lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James</name> et al<lb/> vs 293.<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein it is or<lb/>dered that the same be overruled. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>Geo B Sanderson</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Sanderson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>Claim of <name>Wilgus Noble and Company</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein for defendants<lb/> <name>James A Stockton</name> and <name>Danl W Wheeler</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua Bennett</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm C Wagley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schaeffler</name> et al<lb/> vs 466<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery</name></head>
            <p>Order that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="479" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0482.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Henderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward A Goodrich</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> et al<lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>Jno H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Rainey</name><lb/> vs 23.<lb/> <name>Michael Burk</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Receipt for costs of taking depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sextus N Wilcox</name> et al<lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>Replication and exhibit A filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Ipold</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein, it is ordered<lb/> that the same be sustained. Ten days is given to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> et al<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the petition herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained, amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Facker</name><lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>Henry Fackler</name> admr</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Langhorne Sr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs 145.<lb/> S H W <name>Jas E Woodruff</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> et al<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdale</name>'s admrx</head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Von Phul</name> et al<lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Robert Stevens</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubsdell</name> et al<lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>Jno Cunningham</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="480" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0483.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey H Humphrey</name> admr<lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Whites</name> assignee<lb/> Vs 220<lb/> <name>Jno Murrin</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew A Vanzeyst</name><lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Illinois Central R R &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Danton Gurnee</name> et al<lb/> vs 251<lb/> <name>W W Chappellear</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Louis G Picot</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zebulon F Wetzell</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>Jno Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Merrick</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Wm C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jackson</name>, trustee<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H White</name></head>
            <p>Motion for Execution filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amable Benoist</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Catharine Benoist</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#220, 00<lb/> and<lb/> Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>John Stoddard</name>, <name>Chauncy Stoddard Jr</name><lb/> and <name>Arnold Stoddard</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Michael S Curre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry G Soulard</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and by consent the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendants, <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry<lb/> Soulard</name>; and the plaintiffs and the defendant<lb/> Cure, agree that judgment may be rendered<lb/> herein against said defendant in favor of said<lb/> plaintiffs for the sum of two hundred and twenty dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Thereupon<lb/> the plaintiffs, by their attorney, acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="481" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0484.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousinerry</name> et al<lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousinery</name> et al<lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#600, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Sover</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Six hundred dollars and consents that judgment<lb/> may be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor. The parties consent that the issue<lb/> of execution herein be stayed until the <date when="--10-01">first day of October</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#529, 13.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Ghis</name><lb/> vs 447<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty nine dollars and thirteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as founded and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#625, 57</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Fire and Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name> of Pennsylvania.<lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Callaway Mining and Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name> and <name>Algernon S Roberts Jr</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the<lb/> defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed; <lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and twenty five<lb/> dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as founded and its costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Lindsay</name> et al<lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Edward K Woodward</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Moore</name><lb/> vs 158<lb/> <name>Mary Moore</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="482" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0485.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia M Guitar</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Henry Guitar</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trials and no one appearing to prosecute<lb/> the same it is ordered that the same be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Barrett</name><lb/> vs 225<lb/> <name>Luirt Weed</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Railroad Company</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant by his attorney, but the plaintiff<lb/> although duly called comes not, wherefore on motion of<lb/> the defendant it is ordered that the plaintiff be non suited. <lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that defendant go hence without day and<lb/> recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>Irvin Gamache</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, but the plaintiff<lb/> although duly called comes not, wherefore on motion<lb/> of the defendant, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff be non suited. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff take nothing by its suit in this behalf but that defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Paul Rohrer</name> et al<lb/> vs 308<lb/> <name>Frederick Wales</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Glenny</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>James B Townsend</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="483" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0486.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-22">Tuesday March 22nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia A Hicks</name><lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>Charles C Hicks</name></head>
            <p>Proof of service filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the order of publication<lb/> heretofore made herein has not been published, according to law, therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is again ordered that the<lb/> defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum<lb/> of Seven thousand one hundred and twenty one dollars and ninety seven cents on ac<lb/>count of goods wares and merchandise sold and delivered to him by the plaintiff; and that<lb/> his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the<lb/> last Monday of September next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition<lb/> herein judgment will be rendered herein against him and his property, sold to satisfy the<lb/> same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the<lb/> Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis, Cause con<lb/>tinued until next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>James H Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz J Schilling</name> et al<lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiffs file a bond for costs herein,</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Edward Hogg</name><lb/> vs 423<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Robt W Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Wm L Weller</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>David M Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 420<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Sam L Brookes</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>AS Stevenson</name> et al<lb/> Vs 519<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Richardson</name><lb/> vs 323<lb/> <name>William B Howard</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is dismissed, each party paying his<lb/> own costs; and it is ordered that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Saynisch</name> et al<lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Thomas Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out set off filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="484" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0487.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Coddington</name><lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>Morris Coddington</name></head>
            <p>Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and on her motion and<lb/> the defendant having made default, the Court proceeds to hear<lb/> the proof herein, and the hearing being finished, and the Court<lb/> being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and an injured<lb/> and innocent party, it doth order adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced<lb/> from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the<lb/> rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court from the evidence<lb/> adduced by the plaintiff that the defendant from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable<lb/> person to have the custody and control of the child, <name>Harriet</name>, mentioned in the petition, it<lb/> is further ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have the care custody and con<lb/>trol of the infant child aforesaid and that the said defendant be restrained and enjoined<lb/> from interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf: and it is also ordered that the plaintiff<lb/> pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#450, 73.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B McIlvaine</name> and<lb/> <name>J Banks McIlvaine</name><lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars<lb/> and seventy three cents, and consents that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The parties consent<lb/> that the issue of execution herein be stayed until the <date when="--10-01">first day of October</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name> et al<lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Edward W Williams</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Agreement filed, and in accordance therewith it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name> et al<lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>Benjamin A Albright</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Agreement filed, and in accordance therewith it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#270, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Geist</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Louis Schirmer</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles F Hodzle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy dollars and twenty five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis P Blair</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Dennis Marks</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given him to<lb/> withdraw survey of <name>N F Hyer</name> and also the deposition of the<lb/> said <name>Hyer</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="485" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0488.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>A Becker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>A Becker</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Reder</name><lb/> vs 451<lb/> <name>Jno G Redemeyer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Wicker</name><lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>George I King</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and thereupon come<lb/> also a Jury to wit; <name>F M Wood</name>, <name>James Cochran</name>, <name>Hugh Menown</name>,<lb/> <name>Frederick K Merrill</name>, <name>Jacob Kein</name>, <name>A B Pettis</name>, <name>Joseph Moore</name>, <name>J H Atwell</name>,<lb/> <name>J E Cannon</name>, <name>William Gillespie</name>, <name>George Pheagley</name> and <name>V Ebirle</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by<lb/> his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said<lb/> plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>A J Stevenson</name> et al<lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#571, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendant and file a statement in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of five hundred and seventy one dollars and forty cents and<lb/> consents that judgment may be rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as confessed together with interest thereon from this date at the rate<lb/> of ten percent per annum and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name>,<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Hedenberg</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Scott</name>, by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, but the defendants, <name>William A Whiting</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Hedenberg</name>, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>P Conway</name>, <name>D Douglass</name>, <name>J D<lb/> McAuliff</name>, <name>J G Lare</name>, <name>S Brebaugh</name>, <name>Robert Sparks</name>, <name>Daniel Paulus</name>, <name>J Herble</name>, <name>Alexander<lb/> Lieber</name>, <name>C F Bickers</name>, <name>William Long</name> and <name>Peter Tannot</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected, tried and sworn well and duly to try the <unclear>assiles</unclear> herein joined between the plaintiff and the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Scott</name>, and also to assess the plaintiffs damages against the said defendants, <name>William<lb/> A Whiting</name> and <name>John W Hedenberg</name>, the trial progressed but not being finished further pro<lb/>ceedings herein are deferred until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John M Krum</name>, Esq, announces to the Court the death of the Hon <name>Henry S<lb/> Geyer</name>, late a member of this bar, and on his motion it is ordered that this Court<lb/> do adjourn, in respect to the memory of the deceased, and the following resolutions passed<lb/> at a meeting holder by the members of the St Louis Bar, be spread upon the records<lb/> of the Court of this day, to wit:</p>
            <p>Meeting of the Saint Louis Bar on the death of Hon <name>Henry S Geyer</name>.<lb/> Pursuant to announcement made through the public journals, the members of the St Louis<lb/> Bar met at nine oclock, AM, this day, in the Circuit Court Room, when, on motion of</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="486" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0489.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>Hon <name>John M Krum</name>, the Hon <name>Edward Bates</name> was called to the chair as President<lb/> of the meeting, assisted by Hons <name>Albert Todd</name> and <name>Franklin A Dick</name> as Vice President<lb/> On motion of same gentleman, <name>Francis H Manter</name> and <name>Robert S Voorhies</name>, Esq, were<lb/> requested to act as Secretaries.</p>
            <p>The President in as most appropriate manner, announced the object of the meeting<lb/> to be the expression of fitting testimonials upon the decease of the Hon <name>Henry S Geyer</name>.</p>
            <p>On motion of <name>Charles D Drake</name>, Esq. to appoint a Committee of five to report<lb/> proper resolutions for the adoption of the meeting the President appointed the following<lb/> gentlemen: <name>C D Drake</name>, <name>J M Krum</name>, <name>J R Shepley</name>, <name>C Gibson</name> and <name>T C Reynolds</name> Esqrs,<lb/> who reported the following:</p>
            <p>With profound regret the St Louis Bar are assembled to honor the memory of<lb/> <name>Henry S Geyer</name> the oldest and one of the most distinguished of their associates. In the<lb/> fullness of years he has passed away, leaving an honorable name, which will long be<lb/> cherished, and longest by those who knew him best. For more than forty three years he<lb/> has held his place at our Bar, and the impress of his mind is ineffaceably fixed upon the<lb/> legislation and jurisprudence of Missouri. Few of his contemporaries have held so large<lb/> a place in public confidence and respect as he, and fever have had the ability to win so<lb/> elevated a position as his. We sincerely mourn that we shall see him no more.</p>
            <p>Our deceased senior brother was born at Frederick town, Maryland, on the <date when="1790-12-09">9th of<lb/> December 1790</date>. During the war of 1812, with Great Britain, he was an officer in the<lb/> army of the United States, and at its close removed to St Louis, where, on the <date when="1815-10-02">2d of Octo<lb/>ber 1815</date>, he was enrolled as one of the Bar. From that date until his election to the Senate<lb/> of the United States in 1851, his professional career was laborious and lucrative, embracing<lb/> the whole range of duty as attorney, counselor and advocate, in all of which he was<lb/> preeminent; but after that year he did not engage in general practice. Through a period<lb/> of more that forty three years his Clear, a cute and logical mind-unimpared to the<lb/> last-dealt with all the great questions which have arisen in connection with the peculiar<lb/> jurisprudence of this State, and none has been more distinctly felt by our State and<lb/> Federal Judiciary in their elucidation and final determination.</p>
            <p>His influence upon the statute law of Missouri has been no less marked. When<lb/> he had been but two years in the then frontier town of St Louis, he compiled with rare<lb/> accuracy and system, and published a Digest of the Laws then in force in the Territory<lb/> of Missouri, which still bears his name, and has always held a position of unquestioned<lb/> authority. In 1818, he was a member of the Territorial Legislature of Missouri. In<lb/> 1821, he was elected a representative in the first Legislature of this State, and on taking<lb/> his seat was chosen Speaker of the House. He held the same position with distinguished<lb/> ability, in the second and third General Assemblies. Upon that which convened in<lb/> 1824-5, devolved the difficult duty of making the first Revision of the Statute law of<lb/> Missouri. He had been, by the preceding Legislature, appointed one of the revisers; and<lb/> he thus had an opportunity to do much in moulding the legislation of a young State<lb/> where few men could be found having the peculiar qualities which he possessed in a<lb/> very eminent degree for such a work.</p>
            <p>Again, in 1834-5, he participated laboriously and with great ability, in the<lb/> enactment of the second Revision of the Statutes. His last legislative service was<lb/> in the session of 1838-9.</p>
            <p>In 1843 he was again appointed one of the Revisers of the Statutes but de<lb/>clined the appointment.</p>
            <p>Throughout his legislative career he was distinguished for comprehensive views, for<lb/> independent and accurate judgment, for clear perception of what was required in general<lb/> legislation, and for a remarkable adaptation to the laborious and ill understood work</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="487" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0490.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of framing laws. The influences of such a man upon the Legislation of a State<lb/> cannot be measured by time; it abides from generation to generation.</p>
            <p>In his service as a Senator of the United States, he exhibited the same mental<lb/> qualities which had distinguished him at home; but he entered upon it with im<lb/>paired health, which was never fully restored, and the part he took in national<lb/> affairs, though highly honorable to himself and his State, was less active and less marked<lb/> than it would have been had his physical vigor been unimpaired.</p>
            <p>His mind was logical, acute, fertile, elastic, analytical, and vigorous. His legal<lb/> learning was varied and profound, and he wielded it with a skill and power equaled<lb/> by very few. His forensic efforts, whether before a Court or Jury, were always impressive,<lb/> and often exhibited the highest order of ability. The always rose in power and brilliancy<lb/> with the demands of the occasion. At the Bar, and in private life, he was a courte<lb/>ous and honorable gentleman.</p>
            <p>Such is a brief and faint outline of the life and character of one who name has long held<lb/> an eminent rank among us, and in whose removal from our midst we, as a body, in com<lb/>mon with the hole community, have suffered a loss which we cannot hope soon to see repaired.</p>
            <p>In view of this sad event it is.</p>
            <p>Resolved,-1. That, we tender to the family of the deceased, our sincere sympathy and condo<lb/>lence in the bereavement which has fallen upon them.</p>
            <p>2. That, we will wear the customary badge of mourning for thirty days.</p>
            <p>3. That we will assemble in the Common plea Court Room, this afternoon, at one o'clock,<lb/> and proceed thence, in a body, to attend the funeral of the deceased.</p>
            <p>4. That, a copy of the proceedings of this meeting be transmitted to the widow of the deceased,<lb/> and that the same be published in the papers of this City.</p>
            <p>5. That, committees be appointed to announce to the different Courts the decease, and to<lb/> request that the proceedings of this meeting be spread at large upon their respective records.</p>
            <p>Upon these resolutions Messrs <name>Drake</name>, <name>Wright</name>, <name>Krum</name>, and <name>Reynolds</name> made just<lb/> and eloquent tribute to the character and virtues of the deceased in all the departments of life<lb/> in which he was called upon to act. On motion of <name>Henry N Hart</name>, Esq, the resolutions were<lb/> unanimously adopted; and on motion of <name>Charles D Darke</name> Esq, the President was selected<lb/> by the meeting to present the proceedings of the same to the Supreme Court of the State. To pre<lb/>sent the same to the inferior Courts the following members of the par were appointed by the President<lb/> US Circuit Court, <name>Thomas T Gantt</name>, Esq; US District Court, <name>John G Page</name>, Esq; St Louis<lb/> Circuit Court, <name>John McKrum</name>, Esq; St Louis Court of Common Pleas, <name>Charles D Drake</name>, Esq;<lb/> St Louis Land Court, <name>R M Field</name>, Esq; St Louis Criminal Court, <name>Urie Wright</name>, Esq:</p>
            <p>The meeting then adjourned on motion of <name>C D Drake</name> Esq.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T H Manter</name><lb/> <name>R S Voorhies</name></head>
            <p>Secretaries.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>Edward Bates</name>, President.
                </signed>
                <signed>
                    <name>Albert Todd</name> Vice President.
                </signed>
                <signed>
                    <name>F A Dick</name> Vice President.
                </signed>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="488" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0491.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-23">Wednesday March 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 623<lb/> <name>Jacob B Fluno</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment to <name>Luther Colby</name> Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Amended answer of <name>Thomas Thomas</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburns</name> admrx<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Answer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Lent</name> et al<lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Woods</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs 755<lb/> <name>Joseph H White</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and submits his motion for an<lb/> execution to the Court, which being seen heard and fully understood, it is<lb/> ordered that the same be sustained and that execution issue for the<lb/> amount of the judgment rendered herein and the costs in this suit expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#908, 63</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron Kemp</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Demp</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant, in person<lb/> also comes and files a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit<lb/> whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> nine hundred and eight dollars and sixty three cents and authoriges<lb/> the Court to enter judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> The parties consent that the issue of execution herein be stayed until the <date when="--10-01">first day of Oc<lb/>tober</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="489" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0492.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Shepley</name> and <name>William<lb/> Waddingham</name> Executors of<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> dec'd<lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>H M Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the<lb/> defendant cannot be summoned in this action, it is<lb/> therefore on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney or<lb/>dered that the defendant be notified that a civil<lb/> action has been commenced against him for the sum<lb/> of one hundred and fifteen dollars and fifteen cents founded on a note executed by the defen<lb/>dant, and that his property has been attached, and unless he be and appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and holder at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis on the fourth Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof<lb/> answer the plaintiffs petition, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published accor<lb/>ding to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of<lb/> St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Baumgarden</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Frederick Ernest Baumgarden</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> submit the defendants demurrer to the petition herein to<lb/> the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the said motion doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Neill</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>The Red Bud Union Mill Co</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein it is<lb/> ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Dutcher</name> et al<lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>Dudley R Williams</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at their costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph L Derbin</name> et al<lb/> Vs 25<lb/> <name>Jno H Span</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes, in proper person, <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, assignee of the<lb/> judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs herein, and dis<lb/>misses this application for an execution against the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name>, <name>William A<lb/> Whiting</name> and <name>John W Hedenberg</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Scott</name>, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed but not<lb/> being finished further proceedings herein are deferred until<lb/> tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="490" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0493.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-24">Thursday March 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> et al<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry I Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff and for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemilius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jules C Kingsbury</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> et al<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Oliver</name><lb/> vs 379<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A McDowell</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Joseph Ipold</name><lb/> vs 513<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazzard</name><lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name>, <name>William A<lb/> Whiting</name> and <name>John N Hedenberg</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Scott</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and on motion of the plaintiff.<lb/> it is ordered that the default herein taken against the defendant <name>John<lb/> W Hedenberg</name>, be and the same is hereby set aside, and thereupon the plaintiff dismissed this<lb/> suit as to said defendant, <name>Hedenberg</name>; thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths find for the plaintiff on his claim against<lb/> <name>Scott</name>, and against <name>Scott</name> on his counterclaim against the plaintiff and assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages against <name>Scott</name> and <name>Whiting</name> at the sum of four thousand and nine dol<lb/>lars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="491" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0494.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 543<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name></head>
            <p>Petition replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury to wit; <name>F M Wood</name>, <name>Joseph Cochran</name>, <name>F Miller</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Kern</name>, <name>A Pettes</name>, <name>J E Carson</name>, <name>William Gillespie</name>, <name>Geo Phoegley</name>,<lb/> <name>V Eberle</name>, <name>P Deagerly</name>, ten good and lawful men who being by consent duly elected, tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed, but not being fini<lb/>shed further proceedings are deferred until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-25">Friday March 25th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>W M Davis</name>, whose is proven by the testimony of <name>J W McAfee</name>, and <name>R B<lb/> Garnett</name>, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his slave<lb/> <name>Malinda</name> of mulatto color about five feed nine inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 301<lb/> <name>Joseph Garnean</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Waugh</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Leon J Papin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to<lb/> the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#100, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gill</name><lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant<lb/> for the sum of one hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> agreed upon and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiffs amend their petition herein by stri<lb/>king out on the first and second lines on the third page thereof<lb/> the words the mere overloading of the said wharf boat by. Fifteen days<lb/> given to answer. Cause Continued. Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="492" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0495.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Battimore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiffs withdraw the note suedon and<lb/> file a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Oliver A Hart</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of amended answer of <name>Thomas Thomas</name><lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#562, 79</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sartori</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Samuel T Jacoby</name> and <name>George W Jacoby</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and sixty two dollars and seventy<lb/> nine cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name></head>
            <p>Petition in Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed, but<lb/> the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf but<lb/> voluntarily takes a nonsuit. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by<lb/> his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. The plaintiff files a motion to<lb/> set aside the no suit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Stevens</name><lb/> vs 339<lb/> <name>Brainard Million</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a Pluries Summons issue herein for <name>Jno S Million</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#600, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus W Lewis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nicholas Dausch</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, and files a statement writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, whereby be confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of six hundred dollars and consents that judgment may be rendered herein<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff an against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James</name> et al<lb/> vs 293<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="493" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0496.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Myers</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Henry Myers</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Frederick Myers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wait</name><lb/> vs 266<lb/> <name>John Kinnard</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> etal<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Ersminger</name> surviving<lb/> partner &amp;c<lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>John Baker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>Martin Hamerle</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Burke</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Edward F Dix</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name> President of<lb/> <name>American Express Company</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Michael A O Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiff costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>New Albany Insles and others</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dwyer</name> and <name>M Cord</name> garns</head>
            <p>Reply of garnishees filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Co</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <name>J R Lackland</name>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="494" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0497.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-26">Saturday March 26th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard H Smith</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>Thomas Seaverson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burt</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Order of Citation.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and submits to the<lb/> Court his motion for an order on the claimant of the find<lb/> garnisheed to appear and sustain claim and it appearing<lb/> to the Court that the said garnishee alleges in his answer that<lb/> the fund garnisheed in his hands has been assigned by the defendant <name>Archie Campbell</name> to<lb/> one <name>George Pipe</name>, the existence force or validity of which assignment is contested by the plain<lb/>tiff therefore it is ordered by the Court that the said <name>George Pipe</name> appear forthwith and sus<lb/>tain his claim, if any he have, to said fund.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name> et al garns<lb/> of <name>Terre Haute. Alton &amp; St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the default herein taken against<lb/> him be set aside; Leave given said <name>Alexande</name>r to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#621, 98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Ryan</name> and<lb/> <name>Franklin K Louthan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cunningham</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Six hundred and twenty one dollars and<lb/> ninety eight cents, and consents that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed together with<lb/> interest thereon from this date until paid and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name> etal</head>
            <p>On consideration of the defendants motion for security for costs<lb/> herein, it is ordered that the same be sustained. Ten days to file<lb/> security. Separate answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered that the motion for security for costs be sustained. Ten<lb/> days to file security. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="495" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0498.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Kraus</name> et al<lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Charles S Coxe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Schnaider</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andreas Knehler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and set off filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Mueller</name><lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>R McEldowney</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jermina A Crisman</name><lb/> vs 168<lb/> <name>William Crisman</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Fred K M Colburn</name> et al garns of<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis R R Co</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the default herein taken against<lb/> him be set aside and for naught held. Leave given<lb/> said <name>Alexander</name> to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a bond for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Culter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and submits to the Court<lb/> his motion to make the City of St Louis and certain other par<lb/>ties defendants to the Court, and it appearing to the Court<lb/> that <name>Bryan Mullanphy</name> has departed this life, and that the City of St Louis, as devises<lb/> of said <name>Bryan Mullanphy</name>, is owner of a portion of the interest of said <name>Bryan</name>, is any, in<lb/> the land in controversy in this suit, and that <name>Eliza Clemens</name> has departed this life and that<lb/> <name>James B Clemens</name>, <name>Bryan M Clemens</name>, <name>Jeremiah W Clemens</name>, <name>Catharine J Clemens</name>, <name>Helen J<lb/> Clemens</name>, and <name>Alice B Clemens</name> are the children and heirs at law of said <name>Eliza Clemens</name>, <lb/> and it also appearing to the Court that on the <date when="1858-01-22">twenty second day of January, eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty eight</date>, a scire facias issued out of this Court returnable to the <date when="1858-02">Febru<lb/>ary Term, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date> against said City of St Louis<lb/> and the said children and heirs of said <name>Eliza Clemens</name> requiring them<lb/> to show cause why they should not be made parties to this suit and said sure facias<lb/> has been duly sewed upon the said parties. It is therefore ordered by the Court that the<lb/> said City of St Louis, <name>James B Clemens</name>, <name>Bryan M Clemens</name>, <name>Jeremiah W Clemens</name>,<lb/> <name>Catharine J Clemens</name>, <name>Helen J Clemens</name> and <name>Alice B Clemens</name> be and they are hereby made<lb/> defendants to this suit, and that the plaintiff prosecute the same against the said City<lb/> of St Louis and children and heirs of said <name>Eliza Clemens</name> and the other defendants in this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Heinrich Boernstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants motion<lb/> for security for costs herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> sustain the same, and doth order that the plaintiff file security for costs herein within ten days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="496" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0499.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>The City Bank</name> of St Louis et al</head>
            <p>Appointment of <name>Receiver</name>.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and submits his<lb/> motion for the appointment of a receiver to the Court and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> order that <name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> be and he is hereby appointed <name>Receiver</name> in this cause<lb/> with the power and duty to collect, receive, sue for and recover the subscriptions to the cap<lb/>ital stock of the said <name>City Bank</name> of St Louis and also to take charge of the leasehold<lb/> interest of said <name>City Bank</name> of St Louis mentioned in the plaintiffs petition; and the said<lb/> <name>Receiver</name> is hereby directed to proceed with diligence to settle and collect the subscriptions<lb/> to the capital stock of said City Bank subject to the further orders and directions of the<lb/> Court, and make report of his proceedings herein; and the said <name>Receiver</name> is hereby required<lb/> before entering on the discharge of his duties to file a good and sufficient bond in the sum<lb/> of ten thousand dollars, conditioned according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Adalbert Lochr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants motion<lb/> for security for costs herein and being thereof fully advised doth sustain<lb/> the same and doth order that the plaintiff file security for costs herein<lb/> within ten days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5846, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>S H Bullen</name> Cashier, who sues for the<lb/> use and benefit of the <name>President Directors<lb/> and Company</name> of the <name>Bank of Kentucky</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>Nence Valle</name>, <name>Wilby Powell</name>, and<lb/> <name>Cyrus G Hoyt</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein to taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument inser<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five thousand eight hundred and forty six dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5914, 20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>S H Bullen</name>, Cashier, who sues for the use<lb/> and benefit of the <name>President, Directors and<lb/> Company</name> of the <name>Bank of Kentucky</name><lb/> vs 452<lb/> <name>Nerce Valle</name>, <name>Willy Powell</name> and<lb/> <name>Cyrus G Huyh</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called, <lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five thousand nine hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty cents. It is there fore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of<lb/> the answer herein, it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Chas Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Reply to Supplemental answer filed.</p>
            <p>Motion to strike out reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="497" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0500.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> no 613<lb/> <name>Frederick Spies</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Hofelman</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs exceptions to said garnishees answer being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be sustained. Ten days given to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> et al<lb/> no 849<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> and <name>Turner<lb/> Maddox</name> garns of <name>Hinton</name>.</head>
            <p>The motion to discharge said garnishees being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> no 597<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name> et al<lb/> garns of <name>Terre Haute A St R R Co</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs exceptions to the answer of the garnishees <name>Geo<lb/> T Camp</name> and <name>Charles E Maurice</name> being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained. Ten days given to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> no 598<lb/> <name>Fredk M Colburn</name> et al garns of<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alon &amp; St Louis R R Co.</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs exceptions to the answer of the garnishees <name>George<lb/> T Camp</name> and <name>Chas E Maurice</name> being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.<lb/> Ten days given said garnishees to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> no 73<lb/> <name>William Miller</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws the motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bassett</name> et al<lb/> no 244<lb/> <name>Peter Ambo</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out defendants answer and coun<lb/>terclaim and for judgment being heard and fully understood<lb/> by the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Jas Castello</name><lb/> no 546<lb/> <name>William J Kennedy</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled. Ten days is given defendants to answer.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="498" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0501.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-28">Monday March 28th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Emanuel Block</name>, who is personally Known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of<lb/> emancipation to his slaves <name>Julia</name> a mulatto woman aged about thirty seven,<lb/> and her two children <name>Dora</name> aged about five years, and <name>Eddij</name> between two and three years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>George F Hill</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341.<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Illinois for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name> et al<lb/> vs 898.<lb/> <name>Chas W Herbert</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given them to with<lb/>draw the alias summons issued to Jefferson Country.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name>,<lb/> <name>Oscar N McKinney</name>,<lb/> and <name>J Elliot <unclear>Duryce</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p> <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and on his motion, and it<lb/> appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendants cannot be<lb/> summoned in this action, it is ordered by the Court that they be no<lb/>tified that a civil action has been commenced against them for the<lb/> sum of three hundred and fifty one dollars and eighty seven cents,<lb/> founded on two promissory notes executed to the plaintiff by the dependants, under the name<lb/> and style of Myron F Benjamin and Company, and that their property has been attached<lb/> and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and holder at the<lb/> City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September<lb/> next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be<lb/> rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered<lb/> that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat, newspaper<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis. Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh M <unclear>Kelvy</unclear></name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Allen</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>A A Le Beau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Newman</name><lb/> vs 604<lb/> <name>Jas Mierson</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Johannes Lorenz</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>Amos Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="499" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0502.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Charles C Kubler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Ripper</name><lb/> vs 829<lb/> <name>Jno Ripper</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael J Dohan</name> etal<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given the<lb/> Clerk to affix the Jurat to the affidavit to the petition as of<lb/> the <date when="1858-11-17">Seventeenth day of November eighteen hundred and fifty<lb/> eight</date>, nunc protine, which is done. Thereupon the Court doth overrule the defendants mo<lb/>tion to dissolve the attachment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name>, <name>Solomon A Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Sylvester H Laflin</name>, <name>Fordyce L<lb/> Laflin</name> and <name>Joseph <unclear>McBoies</unclear></name><lb/> vs 183<lb/> <name>Marshall Hays</name>, <name>Robert<lb/> <unclear>Robinson</unclear></name>, <name>William W Martin</name>,<lb/> and <name>Robert Wason</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the de<lb/>fendants cannot be served with the ordinary process of<lb/> law, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court, that they be notified that a civil<lb/> action has been commenced against them <unclear>on account</unclear> of<lb/> the storage of certain powder by the plaintiffs for and<lb/> on account of the defendants, amounting to the sum of<lb/> three hundred and ninety eight dollars and twenty five cents; and that their property has<lb/> been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of<lb/> September next and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judg<lb/>ment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Leopold Mayer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 233,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clemens Buster</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Johannes Weber</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum or two hundred and thirty three dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have there for execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Dobyns</name><lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>Wm C Hull</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Triplett</name><lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>Wm C Hull</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thompson Stout</name><lb/> vs 830<lb/> <name>Anthony L Knapp</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G McPhuters</name><lb/> vs 617<lb/> <name>Wm Wible</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="500" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0503.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Peter J Peters</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>Luther M Shreve</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 239,42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John T Horst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>T W Graewe</name>,<lb/> <name>August Kenne</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob <unclear>Suelser</unclear></name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>Suelser</name>, but the defendants <name>T W Graewe</name> and <name>August<lb/> Keune</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty nine dollars and forty two cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Judg<lb/>ment to bear eight per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Elleard</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. By leave plaintiff withdraws note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Kelly</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>James M White</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. Note withdrawn by plaintiff by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Wilson</name><lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. Plaintiff withdraws note by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo D English</name> etal<lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>Moses F White</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiff costs and that execu<lb/>tion issues therefore. Plaintiff withdraws note by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frances M Miller</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Geo W Miller</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal. Divorce suit.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> etal<lb/> vs 635<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiff costs and that execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name> serving partner<lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>The St Louis Floating Dock and Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="501" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0504.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that a dedimus issue to Pennsylvania for defendant<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>James L <unclear>Faucett</unclear></name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants motion for<lb/> security for costs herein and being thereof fully advised doth sustain the<lb/> same and doth order that the plaintiff file a good and sufficient<lb/> security for costs within ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1825,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Calhoun</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>George Fredericks</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit: <name>J M Marquard</name>, <name>J H Green</name>, <name>William Bowen</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> Gage</name>, <name>Thomas Dame</name>, <name>D Frankmann</name>, <name>J T Bredhoft</name>, <name>O Langan</name>, <name>H Tick<lb/>meyer</name>, <name>F M Meyer</name>, <name>Jacob Hirtle</name>, and <name>M Zeigler</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> plaintiff and asess the damages at the sum of eighteen hundred and twenty five dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-29">Tuesday March 29th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Ulysses S Grant</name>,<lb/> Who is personally known to the Court, comes into Court, and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed of emancipation to his slave <name>William Jones</name> a<lb/> mulatto aged about five feet seven inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel C Myers</name><lb/> vs 920<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matilda McDowell</name><lb/> vs 853<lb/> <name>George H McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward C Sloan</name><lb/> vs 883<lb/> <name>James C Parks</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Wright</name><lb/> vs 1029<lb/> <name>Cha K Dickson</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T M Taylor &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 1021<lb/> <name>Jno Arnold</name> &amp;c garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Aufderheide</name><lb/> vs 968<lb/> <name>Casper Aufderheide</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aug F Shapleigh</name> etal<lb/> vs 933<lb/> <name>James</name> &amp; <name>Lucas</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="502" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0505.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Blackwood</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Miguel A Otero</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillitto</name> etal<lb/> vs 1037<lb/> <name>Richd J Lockwood</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Reuling</name> by guardian<lb/> vs 975<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Holmes</name> &amp; wife</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 566,37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Sturdy</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph W Nicholas</name> and<lb/> <name>John Shepardson</name><lb/> vs 913<lb/> <name>Lewis Palmer</name> and<lb/> <name>William Myers</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and defendant, palmer, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant <name>Myers</name>; and the defendant, <name>Palmer</name>, withdraws his answer<lb/> filed herein, whereby this action remains undefended whereupon<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant, <name>Palmer</name>, is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and sixty six<lb/> dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 957<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Louis</name><lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>James C P Louis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication here to fore made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 412,96 Set aside <date when="--03-30">March 30</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff,<lb/> by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and twelve dollars and ninety six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiff costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="503" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0506.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat Polar Star</head>
            <p>Claim of <name>Boylan</name> and <name>Gettys</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 774<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-30">Wednesday March 30th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out the defendants plea in<lb/> abatement being heard and fully considered by the Court, it<lb/> is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out the plea in abate<lb/>ment being heard and fully considered by the Court it<lb/> is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> etal<lb/> vs 619<lb/> <name>Matthew B Chappell</name> and <name>Robt B<lb/> Clark</name> garn. of <name>A J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishees it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that they be discharged hence at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. Ten dollars allowed each of them for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation Co</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the judgment<lb/> herein be set aside and for naught held and esteemed Coun<lb/>terclaim filed by consent.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="504" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0507.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-03-31">Thursday March 31st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hopper</name> etal<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>Henry N Setzer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">City of Carondelet<lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>Wm M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Waters</name> etal<lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>M F Benjamin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> etal<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Jno S McCune</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John F Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#841,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs 966<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> and <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendant, <name>Lynch</name>, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the said defendant withdraws his answer herein leaving this suit un<lb/>defended and the defendant, <name>Carlin</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default; it is therefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defen<lb/>dants as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and forty one dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1214 12</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry G Poston</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and fourteen dollars and twelve<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L Weber</name> etal<lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Charles Harzig</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the plaintiffs, by their attorney and file proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made herein<lb/> has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 32<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Terre <unclear>Haute</unclear><lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by its attorney, but the plaintiff<lb/> although called, comes not, wherefore on motion of<lb/> the defendant, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="505" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0508.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion to suppress the plaintiffs depositions being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled: <lb/> and this cause is continued on application of plaintiff at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Purvis</name><lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>Eliza Ann Purvis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of Publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Solomon Block</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Block</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>Solomon Block</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1491,13</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer Higgins</name> and<lb/> <name>John H McMillan</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Cushman Cadwell</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the plain<lb/>tiffs submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find<lb/> there from that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of fourteen hundred<lb/> and ninety one dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#11411,23.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund D Taylor</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>James T Swearingen</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find there from<lb/> that that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eleven thousand four<lb/> hundred and eleven dollars and twenty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>The City Bank of St Louis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, the receiver herein, and<lb/> having made oath faithfully to discharge his duties as such<lb/> receiver files a bond in the sum of ten thousand dollars,<lb/> conditioned according to law, with <name>Pierre A Berthold</name> and <name>Joshua B Brant</name>, as securities,<lb/> which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno H Morrison</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of said garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="506" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0509.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#400,00 &amp; Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles <unclear>Jeffnis</unclear></name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>D D Denton</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Weed</name>.</head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> need, withdraws his answer herein and confesses judgment in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff for the sum of four hundred dollars and<lb/> consents that judgment may be rendered herein against him<lb/> for that sum: and the plaintiff and defendant, <name>Denton</name>, waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the said defendant. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this<lb/> behalf against the defendant <name>Denton</name>, but that the defendant go hence without day and<lb/> recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended, and that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant, Need, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as Confessed and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor. Thereupon the plaintiff acknowledges to have re<lb/>ceived full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2158,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hyacinthe O Renoward</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward S Polkowoki</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name>,<lb/> <name>John P S Todd</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward G Atkinson</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a statement in writing<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby they confess themselves<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty one hun<lb/>dred and fifty eight dollars and sixty five cents, and consent<lb/> that judgment may be rendered against them in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs for that sum. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name> etal</head>
            <p><name>Jno Clemens</name> acknowledges himself bound for all costs that may<lb/> accrue herein and files a bond to that effect.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name></head>
            <p><name>Jno Clemens</name> acknowledges himself bond for all costs that may ac<lb/>crue cherein and files a bond to that effect.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name><unclear>N</unclear> P Shryock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that dedimus issue to Indiana and Illinois for<lb/> defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cox</name><lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>William Riley</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant by his attorney but the plaintiff although<lb/> duly called comes not, wherefore on motion of defendant, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac <unclear>Gearhandt</unclear></name> etal<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>State Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="507" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0510.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel C Michael</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and acknowledges to have re<lb/>ceived full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on<lb/> the <date when="1856-12-05">fifth day of December 1856</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M L Hobart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name> assignee<lb/> of <name>Osborn Camp &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein<lb/> on the <date when="1857-05-20">20th day of May 1857</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>St Louis <date when="1863-07-08">July 8th 1863</date><lb/> I hereby acknowledge full<lb/> and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment of<lb/> which this is the margin<lb/> <unclear>attest <name>Rice</name> clk</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive<lb/> manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find the issue herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and<lb/> doth assess the damages at the sum of eleven thousand<lb/> one hundred and forty four dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and its costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3249,47</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aemilius K Sayre</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel <unclear>Elisritz</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>Darius Coxe</name> and<lb/> <name><unclear>jules</unclear> C Kingsburry</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Kingsburry</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also a Jury to wit; <name>J H Marquard</name>, <name>M Zeigler</name>, <name>J H<lb/> Diner</name>, <name>William Bowen</name>, <name>William Warner</name>, <name>JW Beven</name>, <name>J J Genergell</name>,<lb/> <name>P Fein</name>, <name>R E Martin</name>, <name>L H Baker</name>, <name>Richard Smith</name> and <name>J Hirtle</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> the issued herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the defendant <name>Kingsburry</name> at the time of the commencement<lb/> of this suit was a non resident of the State of Missouri: Thereupon the said defendant <name>Kings<lb/>burry</name>, although having been duly summoned and being now solemnly called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of three thousand two hundred and forty nine dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum a foresaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore against the defendant<lb/> <name>Kingsburry</name> and have execution therefore against the other defendants against the property<lb/> attached herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Tevis</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Charles R Hall</name> <unclear>admr.</unclear> of<lb/> <name>Joshua Tevis</name>, decd, <name>John C<lb/> Tevis</name>, &amp; <name>Chastine</name> found us individually<lb/> &amp; as adnr of <name>Jno L Tevis</name> deed</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the defendants costs and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="508" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0511.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Freudenberg</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>John Freudenberg</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff ands files a petition and also an affidavit<lb/> from which if appears to the Court that the defendant is a non resident<lb/> of the State of Missouri, therefore on motion of the said plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce from him on the ground of willful<lb/> desertion and unless he be and appear at the next term if this Court to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next<lb/> and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to<lb/> law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Saturday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-02">Saturday April 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Peter Ambo</name></head>
            <p>Now come the assignees herein, <name>Charles F Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius <unclear>Winkelmerir</unclear></name>, and file an inventory herein and<lb/> also a bond in the sum of twenty eight thousand one<lb/> hundred dollars, which is approved by the Court; and the Court appoints <name><unclear>Aman</unclear> Schneider</name><lb/> and <name>Williams Zeller</name> appraisers to appraise the property and effects assigned. Appraisement<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Wm P Shryock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Doogan</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Thomas Doogan</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issue filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan D Allen</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Andrew A Le Bean</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the plaintiff withdraws the note sued on and<lb/> files a copy therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Neill</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>The Red Bud Union Mill Co.</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that at execution issue therefor.<lb/> note withdrawn by leave Copy filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno O Neill</name><lb/> vs 606<lb/> <name>W W Singleton</name> garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> garnishee be discharged at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="509" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0512.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Wakelam</name><lb/> vs 128.<lb/> <name>Chas H Valentine</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed. Abstract of issues<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the order of dismissed herein be set aside and for naught<lb/> held and esteemed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#207,45</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi M Bond</name> and<lb/> <name>H Albert <unclear>Denckla</unclear></name><lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seven dollars and forty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry <unclear>Kohrhammer</unclear></name> etal<lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer to<lb/> the petition herein and being thereof fully advised doth overrule<lb/> the same. Leave is given plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe Niley</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Thomas Wiley</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant cannot be<lb/> summoned in this action therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from him on<lb/> the ground of desertion and also to obtain the custody and control of the infant child, <name>Vir<lb/>ginia W Wiley</name>, mentioned in the petition, and that unless he be and appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day thereof<lb/> answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is fur<lb/>ther ordered by the Court that a copy of this order be published according to law in the<lb/> Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Schenk</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name>, and<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and fifty the petition and the plaintiffs having filed a<lb/> bond, in the sum of twelve hundred dollars, conditioned according to<lb/> law, with good and sufficient security, which is approved by the Court,<lb/> it is ordered that the defendants and each of them, their servants,<lb/> agents and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined from selling or<lb/> proceeding to sell, until the further order of this Court, the following<lb/> described lots situate in the City and County of St Louis, or any of them, to wit: lots no one,<lb/> two, three, four, five, and six in block number five of a subdivision of <name>Labadie</name> and <name>Lynch's</name><lb/> addition to the City of St Louis, having an aggregate front on the West side of Second Caron<lb/>delet avenue of one hundred and seventy one feet by a depth of one hundred and twenty nine<lb/> feet four inches to an alley bounded North by Lynch Street, East by Second Carondelet avenue,<lb/> South by lot no Seven in said block and West by said alley.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="510" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0513.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#645,72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of Cincinnati Ohio<lb/> vs 867<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>J G Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the garnishees, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and it appearing to the Court form the<lb/> answer of said garnishees that at the time they were<lb/> summoned herein as such they were indebted to the<lb/> defendants in the sum of six hundred and seventy<lb/> five dollars and thirty two cents, and it also appearing<lb/> to the Court that the amount of the original judgment herein is six hundred and forty<lb/> nine dollars, therefore it is considered by the Court that, after deducting the sum of thirty<lb/> dollars which is allowed for answering herein, the plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the<lb/> balance being the sum of six hundred and forty five dollars and seventy two cents and<lb/> have execution therefor, and that out of said sum the plaintiff pay the costs as well of the<lb/> original suit as of this proceedings.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Patrick Hart</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained and that<lb/> the plaintiff file security for costs herein in ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>'s <unclear>adm</unclear> etal</head>
            <p>Agreement file and five days given <name>Wilson</name> to answer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The New Albany Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>J G Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the garnishees, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, sub<lb/>mit this proceeding to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find the issues<lb/> herein joined in favor of the garnishees. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by this proceeding but<lb/> that the said garnishees go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. The Court allows the said<lb/> garnishees the sum of fifty dollars, for their attorneys fees, and also the sum of fifteen<lb/> dollars for appearing herein to be taxed as costs. Motion for a new trial filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The National Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the<lb/> garnishees, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury, submit this proceeding to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find the<lb/> issues herein joined in favor of the garnishees. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by their proceeding in<lb/> this behalf but that the said garnishees go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. The Court al<lb/>lows the said garnishees the sum of fifty dollars, for their attorneys fees, and also the<lb/> further sum of fifteen dollars for appearing and a cuering in this behalf to be<lb/> taxed as costs. Motion for a new trial filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="511" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0514.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>J G Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the garnishees, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit this pro<lb/>ceeding to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find for the garnishees. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by this proceeding but that the said garnishees<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor. The Court allows the said garnishees the sum of fifty dollars,<lb/> for their attorneys fees, and also the sum of fifteen dollars for appearing herein to be taxed as<lb/> costs. Motion for a new trial filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Montgomery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> and <name>James McCord</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Hart</name>, <name>Thomas J Stewart</name>, <name>William Willett</name> and <name>Elizabeth Philips</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now come the plaintiff and the garnishees,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit this<lb/> proceeding to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find the issues herein in favor<lb/> of the garnishees. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by this proceeding but that the said<lb/> garnishees go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff their costs and char<lb/>ges in this behalf expended and thereof execution. The Court allows the said<lb/> garnishees the sum of fifty dollars, for their attorneys fees, and also the sum of fifteen<lb/> dollars for appearing herein to be taxed as costs. Motion for a new trial<lb/> filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Peter Ambo</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>On application of the assignees herein, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that they proceed to sell the property, and effects assignees at<lb/> public or private sale for cash or on ninety day credit, as<lb/> they may deem best; and if sold on credit payment to be secured by a negotiable promissory<lb/> note of responsible parties; provided, however, that if said property and effects be sold at private<lb/> sale, the same shall not be sold for less than the appraised value.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="512" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0515.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-05">Tuesday April 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name> etal<lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress plaintiffs depositions filed.</p>
            <p><name>Basil W Duke</name> is on motion of <name>W J Wood</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of<lb/> this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>In pursuance of Section thirty nine of an act entitled, an act concern<lb/>ing the County of St Louis, approved <date when="1859-03-14">March fourteenth, eighteen hun<lb/>dred and fifty nine</date>, the Court appoints <name>Frederick Hyatt</name>, a discreet,<lb/> Competent and in partial citizen of St Louis County, one of the Commissioners to examine<lb/> into the condition of the affairs if St Louis County and their management during the five years<lb/> next proceeding the <date when="1859-03-14">fourteenth day of March eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>; thereupon the<lb/> the said <name>Frederick Hyatt</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Robinson</name> etal<lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>Joseph A Nyble</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W King</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>C B King</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward D Hill</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas F Laurenson</name><lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Jas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> etal<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus <unclear>Koennuse</unclear></name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Jno P Harly</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael J Dohan</name> etal<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition and affidavit filed by leave of Court. Plea<lb/> in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna C Weber</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Christian Weber</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel N Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Subpoena dues <unclear>teeum</unclear> ordered for <name>Francis Hudson</name> to being certain book.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Northwestern Bank of Virginia</name><lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Robert C Bonham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at its costs<lb/> and the execution issue therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="513" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0516.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas O Hemenway</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>Napoleon B Ellerbe</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Plate</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The defendants demurer to plaintiffs second amended petition herein<lb/> being heard and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be and is hereby sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1403, 26.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> and<lb/> <name>Dexter G Hitchcock</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the<lb/> Court being now sufficiently advised of and concerning the premises<lb/> doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs and assess<lb/> their damages at the sum of fourteen hundred and three dollars and<lb/> twenty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the de<lb/>fendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> etal<lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marry C Norman</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Thomas J Norman</name></head>
            <p>Continued no one appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia A Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>M O WalKer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Amended motion to strike out parts of answer filed by consent and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="514" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0517.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-06">Wednesday April 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>J W Thompson</name> is, on motion of <name>John Decker</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member<lb/> of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jose Dean etal</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Gardener</name> etal<lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>Benj B Barkelow</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Philips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benj J Hutchinson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Spencer</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Spencer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>George J Hill</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the default herein<lb/> taken be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Geo T Brady</name> etal</head>
            <p>Reply to Counter claim of <name>Harace D Brady</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, two weeks additional<lb/> time is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent the plaintiffs file an amended petition herein and the<lb/> defendants <name>Frost</name> and wife and <name>Stewart</name> and wife and <name>Campbell</name> with<lb/>draw their answers to the petition herein and refile the same by con<lb/>sent as answers to the said amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Boyse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent the plaintiffs file an amended petition in this cause, and the<lb/> defendants, <name>Frost</name> and wife and <name>Stewart</name> and wife and <name>Campbell</name>, withdraw<lb/> their answers to the petition herein and refile the same by consent as answers<lb/> to the said amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lefevre</name> etal<lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Daniel J Wight</name> and <name>Turner Maddox</name> garnishee of <name>Thomas Hinton</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> garnishees be discharged hence at the plaintiffs costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. The sum of twenty five dollars<lb/> is allowed each of said garnishees for appearing and answering herein</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name> etal<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>Exceptions to depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="515" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0518.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#365, 47.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Dennistoun</name>, <name>John<lb/> Dennistoun</name>, <name>William Wood</name><lb/>, <name>William Cross</name>, <name>Benjamin<lb/> Franklin Dawson</name>, <name>William<lb/> Crawford</name>, <name>John Cross</name><lb/>, <name>Buchanan Grille</name>, <name>James<lb/> Campbell</name>, <name>John Walter Wood</name><lb/>, <name>Robert Dennistoun</name> and <name>Alexander<lb/> Dennistoun Jr</name><lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah J Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find there from that<lb/> the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of three hundred and sixty five dollars and forty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered b y the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>Virginia Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram A Halstead</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>William W Dale</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elias Lyon</name><lb/> vs 152<lb/> <name>Moses Cohn</name></head>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute the<lb/> same it is ordered by the Court this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip B Hockaday</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>Charles Gilson</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, and the plaintiff<lb/> having failed to amend, it is there fore on motion of the said<lb/> defendant, ordered by the Court that the judgment on the demur<lb/>rer herein be made final. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take<lb/> nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and<lb/> recover of the said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Thos Hempstead</name> admr. etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Richeson</name><lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>Robt W Hunt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="516" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0519.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Baum</name> garden<lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Fred K E Baumgarden</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, and the defendant<lb/> failing to amend, it is therefore, on motion of said defendant,<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by her suit<lb/> in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day. Bill of Exception filed<lb/> by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Congdon</name><lb/> vs 158<lb/> <name>Rodney F Danforth</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the said plaintiff costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#658,31.<lb/> Plaintiff remits<lb/> #43,04 <date when="1859-04-12">April<lb/> 12 1859</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fireman's Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and fifty eight dollars and thirty one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A S Thomas</name><lb/> vs 129.<lb/> <name>John Gonzales</name>]</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, but the plaintiff, although duly<lb/> called, comes not wherefore on motion of said defendant, it is considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but<lb/> that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#959,35<lb/> Set aside<lb/> <date when="--04-07">April 7th</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pittsburgh Life Fire and Marine Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>Richard J Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>, <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, and <name>Thomas M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by its attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and fifty nine dollars and thirty five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#368,35. Set aside <date when="--04-07">April 7th</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Eureka Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Richard J Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>, <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, and <name>Thomas M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and sixty eight dollars and thirty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="517" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0520.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1368,35. Set aside <date when="--04-07">April 7th</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Western Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name><lb/>, <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, and <name>Thomas<lb/> M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by its attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and sixty eight dollars and thirty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis J Rankin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Cornet</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles W Barr</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, leave is given him to with<lb/>draw from the files the deposition taken in his behalf.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Liberty Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>John Triplett</name> and <name>Miles Sells</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>Frederick Schidiz</name>, <name>M Foristell</name>, <name>C Myer</name>,<lb/> <name>Adolph Tenes</name>, <name>R Keiler</name>, <name>Henry Peetz</name>, <name>C Schneider</name>,<lb/> <name>William A Robinson</name>, <name>J A Kelsey</name>, <name>John Cull</name>, <name>Charles Mallett</name>, and <name>James Cuddy</name> twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected, trial and sworn the issues herein jointed well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider of there verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="518" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0521.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-07">Thursday April 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><unclear>Lucretia</unclear> Borgia, of Color) whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>A J P Garesche</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry g Soulard</name>, two credible witnesses, acknowledge the execution of a<lb/> deed of emancipation to her slave Harriet alias <name>Harrick Adams</name>, a mulatts girl, about twenty<lb/> four years old, and marked by a burn on her night arm first above her wrist.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bauman c Baker</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1145, 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name>,<lb/> <name>William J Christy</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert K Woods</name>,<lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>Reuben Harrington</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by this respective attorneys, and the defen<lb/>dant withdraws so much of his answer as sets up a counter claim,<lb/> and the parties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth find there from that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eleven hundred and forty five dollars and fifteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <p><name>Patrick Kelly</name> is fined two dollars for failing to attend as a witness after being duly<lb/> summoned so to do.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pittsburg Life Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard J Sass</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the judg<lb/>ment herein rendered be set aside and vacated, and leave is<lb/> given the defendants to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Eureka Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Richard J Sass</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the judg<lb/>ment herein rendered be set aside and vacated, and leave is<lb/> given the defendants to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Western Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Richard J Sass</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the judg<lb/>ment herein rendered be set aside and vacated, and leave<lb/> is given the defendants to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>The Citizens Savings Inst</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles McCormick</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Henry W Tracy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Collins</name><lb/> vs 219<lb/> <name>Thomas g Collins</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="519" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0522.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Liberty Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>John Triplett</name> and<lb/> <name>Miles Sells</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jurors empanelled and sworn herein, Except <name>R<lb/> Keiler</name>, who is represted to the Court as being too unwell to<lb/> attend, thereupon the parties consent that the remaining eleven<lb/> Jurors may render a verdict herein, and the Jurors being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths<lb/> find for the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by<lb/> its suit in this behalf, but that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> said plaintiffs their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#230, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William McDonald</name> and<lb/> <name>William Lings</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>E R Cooley</name>, <name>O P Turner</name>, <name>M Harrison</name>, <name>John Matthews</name>, <name>L M<lb/> Abbott</name>, <name>S <unclear>Kennerle</unclear></name>, <name>J R Circle</name>, <name>L Baldwin</name>, <name>D Mickey</name>, <name>Jacob<lb/> Koch</name>, <name>Henry Kennedy</name>, and <name>C Y Carr</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of two hundred and thirty dollars. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Rosenthal</name><lb/> vs 248<lb/> <name>Joseph Rosenthal</name></head>
            <p>Petition for devoice. Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorneys, but the defendant, attorneys<lb/> duly called, comes not; thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the proof<lb/> herein and the hearing being finished and the Court being satisfied<lb/> from such proof of the good conduct of the plaintiff and that she is an innocent and injured<lb/> party doth order a judge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds<lb/> of matrimony by the contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the nights and<lb/> Privileges of an unmarried person: and it is further ordered by Court that the plaintiff<lb/> have the care custody and control of the infant child mentioned in the petition; and it is<lb/> also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>A W Elliott</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Augustus J Shapleigh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on account of the<lb/> absence of <name>A J Martin</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J <unclear>Luttercord</unclear></name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Account. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury, to wit; <name>F Schidig</name>, <name>M Foristell</name>, <name>Meyer</name>, <name><unclear>adolphus</unclear> Tenes</name>, <name>W<lb/> A Robinson</name>, <name>John Cull</name>, <name>Charles Mallett</name>, <name>James Cuddy</name>, <name>R C Greer</name>,<lb/> <name>E R Coolidge</name>, <name>O P Turner</name> and <name>M Harrison</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly<lb/> elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings herein are laid until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson H Conner</name><lb/> vs 355.<lb/> <name>Benjamin N P Butler</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been<lb/> duly published, according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="520" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0523.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Robertson</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>William Carson</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.<lb/> Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and says he will not<lb/> further prosecute this suit. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf, but that the<lb/> defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-08">Friday April 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burk</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Proof of service of order of citation filed. On motion of <name>George<lb/> Pipe</name>, by his attorney, ten days is given him to file his claim herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The City Bank of St Louis</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to modify order appointing a Receiver filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Heinrich Bounstien</name> et al</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the<lb/> time allowed him so to do, it is, therefore, on motion of the<lb/> defendants, by their attorney, ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed and that execution issue against the plaintiff for the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Adalbert Loehr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to give security for costs within the time<lb/> allowed him so to do, therefore, on motion of the defendants, by their<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed and that<lb/> execution issue against the plaintiff for the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#332,98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Luthercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>Petition on account. Now again come the parties, by the irrespective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and summon herein, and there upon the trial progressed, and<lb/> being finished the Jurors a foresaid upon their at oaths aforesaid find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess his damage at the sum of three hundred and thirty two dollars,<lb/> and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the damages aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M Mc Donald</name><lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>Chas Chambers</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="521" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0524.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Reply of Thomas L Salisbury to denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith Barnfield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Barnfield</name></head>
            <p>petition for Divorce. Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and thereupon<lb/> the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein but the heaving thereof<lb/> not being finished at the hour of adjournment further proceedings<lb/> herein are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-09">Saturday April 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eureka Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Western Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Richard F Sap</name> e al</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pittsburgh fire and marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>Richard F Sap</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>James L Faucett</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the time allowed<lb/> him so to do, therefore on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered the Court that this causes be dismissed and that execution<lb/> issue against the plaintiff for the costs herein accused.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin J Adams</name> and<lb/> <name>Eli M Bruce</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leland</name>, <name>Leland</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles L Palmer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes<lb/> and files a statement from which it appears, that the<lb/> keeping of the property attached herein will be attached<lb/> with much expense before the probable termination of<lb/> this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore<lb/> ordered that said sheriff Sell said property according to law, and that he make a re<lb/>port of his proceedings under this order on or before the find day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="522" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0525.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Koch</name><lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>John Schoenberg</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes and files a<lb/> statement, from which it appears, that the keeping of the property attached<lb/> under herein will be attended with much expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered<lb/> that said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of his pro<lb/>ceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Moris plahto</name><lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>Joseph James</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cerre</name> Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes and files a<lb/> statement, from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached<lb/> under the unit herein will be attended with much expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit and is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered<lb/> that said sheriff sell said property according to law and that he make a report of his pro<lb/>ceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next them of this Court.</p>
            <p><name>Rudolph Schrocder</name> is fined two dollars and the costs of the attachment for failing<lb/> to attend as a witness after having been duly summoned so to do.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith Barnfield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Barnfield</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> the Court proceeds further to hear the proof herein and the hearing thereof<lb/> being concluded the Court doth take time to consider what judg<lb/>ment shall be rendered in the premises.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Hayden</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irvin Z Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> <unclear>Sedgrvick</unclear></name> and <name>John R Shepley</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond.<lb/> Now come the parties, by the irrespective attorneys, and<lb/> also a Jury, to wit; <name>M Toristell</name>, <name>A Tevis</name>, <name>Henry Puts</name>, <name>Wm<lb/> A Robinson</name>, <name>L M Abbott</name>, <name>S Kennerle</name>, <name>J R Creele</name>, <name>J<lb/> Baldwin</name>, <name>D Mickey</name>, <name>Jacob Koch</name>, <name>Henry Kennedy</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles G Can</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until Monday, morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="523" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0526.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1869-04-11">Monday April 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met Pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Country of St Louis.</head>
            <p>In pursuance of Section thirty nine of an act entitled, an act concerning<lb/> the Country of St Louis, approved<date when="1859-03-14"> March, fourteenth, eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty nine</date>, the Court appoints <name>John Simonds</name> and <name>Edward Haren</name>,<lb/> two discreet, competent and impartial citizens of St Louis Country, as Commissioners, to act in<lb/> conjunction with <name>Frederick K <unclear>Hyatt</unclear></name>, the Commissioners hereto fore appointed, to examine into<lb/> the condition of the affairs of St Louis Country and their management during the five years next pro<lb/>ceeding the <date when="1859-03-14">fourteenth day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>; thereupon the said<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name> and <name>Edward Haren</name> take the oath prescribed by law: and it is ordered that<lb/> the said commissioners make report to this Court as soon as may be.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name> <unclear>admr.</unclear><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W <unclear>Twyman</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 268<lb/> <name>Carey Gratz</name> et al</head>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed and that execution issue against the<lb/> plaintiff for the costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob KuKert</name><lb/> vs 270<lb/> <name>Green Tilley</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed for want of prosecution<lb/> and that execution issue against the plaintiff for the costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander P Davidson</name><lb/> vs 617<lb/> <name>Eldridge P Payne</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hubbard</name> garnt<lb/> of <name>Joseph Kohn</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that they be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefore. The sum of ten dollars is allowed each of<lb/> said garnishees for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Judith <unclear>Barnfield</unclear></name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>John W <unclear>Barnfield</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the Court<lb/> being fully advised of and concerning the premises and being satisfied<lb/> that the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and that she is<lb/> an innocent and injured party, it doth order ad judge and decree that she be absolutely and<lb/> forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be<lb/> restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. Thereupon the plaintiff files a<lb/> petition for the restoration of her maiden name, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that her<lb/> present name be attached and changed to her maiden name of <name>Judith Barrow</name>, and that<lb/> the same be hereafter deemed and taken as her only proper and lawful name. And it<lb/> is further ordered by the Court that the defendant pay the costs herein expended and that<lb/> execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew Krantler</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="524" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0527.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John R Shepley</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-12">Tuesday April 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court that pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Purvis</name><lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>Eliza Ann Purvis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> warned and solemnly called comes not but makes default, wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Rates</name><lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garn.<lb/> of <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that he be discharged hence at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefore. The sum of ten<lb/> dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburn</name> <unclear>Ex</unclear><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Pennsylvania for defendant ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lath</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>James S Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R McNair</name> et al<lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Caroline C Austin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi J North</name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Antoine Niseman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George <unclear>Y</unclear> Bast</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>David Jamison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Manny</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian E Setziq</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the said plaintiffs costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="525" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0528.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Bradford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>Commission awarded plaintiff to take deposition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis B Barnhart</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>Catharine Barnhart</name></head>
            <p>Alias summons<lb/> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levis Garneau</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Joshua Herrington</name></head>
            <p>Alias summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Hinton</name> and<lb/> <name>Caroline Dryden</name><lb/> vs 313<lb/> <name>William King</name> and<lb/> <name>Adam Wetzell</name></head>
            <p>On notes. Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>King</name>, but the defendant, <name>Wetzell</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded, that the defendant, <name>Wetzell</name>, is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred and seventy two dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note><unclear><name>Jack kuara falk</name></unclear> Satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment recorded of front<lb/> this <unclear>margin <date when="1866-08-08">Aug 8. 1866</date>.<lb/> <name>Tarpfan</name> &amp; expended <date when="--08-06">aug 6</date>.<lb/> <name>James</name></unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Peacock</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah J Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Petition on note. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury,<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> seven hundred and twenty two dollars and forty four ants. His therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant to the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as friend and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Mission to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irwin F Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John R Shepley</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and there upon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider<lb/> of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David R Clay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation Co</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant offered and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>Bernard M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff offered and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah N Starin</name><lb/> vs 910<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and acknowledges the entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1859-01-11">11th of January 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remitts # 43,04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Firemans Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>Now comes plaintiff, by its attorney, and remits forty three dollars<lb/> and four cents off of the judgments rendered herein on the 6th<lb/> day of the present month.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="526" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0529.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luttercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C Dumanet</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Heinrich Boernstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit in support of motion to set aside order of<lb/> dismissal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Adalbert Lochr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion set aside order of dismissal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>James L Faucett</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside order of dismissal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Whitcher</name> et al<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-13">Wednesday April 13th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lusks</name> admr<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James B Clot</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to District of Columbia ordered for defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Reynolds</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Robert L Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Separate answer of <name>Jones</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#476,56.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John R Shepley</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the jury empanelled and sworn herein, and the<lb/> jury aforesaid being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum<lb/> of four hundred and seventy six dollars and fifty six cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="527" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0530.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> &amp; <name>J Samuel Jett</name></head>
            <p>On Application of <name>Edward Mead</name>, assignee, this day filed,<lb/> the time for setting the property or effects assigned at pri<lb/>vate sale is extended three months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W McCamant</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>John Todd</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/>that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lemmon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hardy Maratta</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Steele</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Henry J Steel</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and there upon the trial<lb/> progressed and being finished the Court doth find the issues joined upon the<lb/> petition in favor of the defendant and doth also find the issues joined upon<lb/> the defendants cross bill in favor of the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff take nothing by her suit in this behalf and that the defendant take nothing by his cross<lb/> bill herein but that the said parties go hence without day and that the defendant pay the costs<lb/> herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambsgaust</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a jury;<lb/> to wit; <name>Robert J May</name>, <name>Peter Lehman</name>, <name>John Schmits</name>, <name>A Miller</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Perret</name>, <name>Henry Menke</name>, <name>H B Parsons</name>, <name>Sin O Leary</name>, <name>W W Latting</name>, <name>George<lb/> Eversole</name>, <name>G Pearson</name>, and <name>William H Remington</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected, tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to the try the trial progressed,<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <p><name>Arthur G Francis</name> is, on motion of <name>P B Garesche</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member<lb/> of this Bar.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="528" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0531.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-14">Thursday April 14th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name><lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>R Frank Green</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> et al</head>
            <p>Statement of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs 643<lb/> <name>John Kirkham</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment. Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five hundred dollars and consents that judgment may be rendered against<lb/> him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Francois Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas H McVicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the petition herein it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Charles Myers</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha W Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Wm T McMillan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for<lb/> all the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> et al<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been<lb/> duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> et al<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel G Barnes</name> et al<lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made against the defen<lb/>dant, Champion, has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reyburn</name>'s Exrx<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Loner</name>gan</head>
            <p>Reply to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William McDonald</name> and<lb/> <name>William Lings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Charles D Colman</name> filed by <name>William<lb/> Lings</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="529" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0532.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Copp Jr</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> St Louis County</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Knollhoff</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>John Frederick Knollhoff</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come Holmes and Romyn, attorneys for the defendant, and<lb/> withdraw their appearance herein as such; thereupon, comes the<lb/> plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although having been<lb/> duly summoned and being now solemnly, called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on<lb/> motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and after hearing the proof herein the Court being satisfied of the good conduct of the<lb/> plaintiff and that she is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and decree that<lb/> she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with<lb/> the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further<lb/> ordered that the defendant pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martha Faris</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>Jonathan J Faris</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called, comes not; thereupon the trial progressed and being finished and<lb/> the Court being fully advised of and concerning the premises doth find that<lb/> the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and an innocent and injured party, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be absolutely and entirely divorced from the<lb/> bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and<lb/> privileges of an unmarried person, and that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants her costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lissack H Simpson</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>Robert M Branch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 351<lb/> <name>Joseph Gainean</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#158,31</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">Steam Boat <name>William M Morrison</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name>, <name>Archibald C<lb/> Goddin</name>, <name>James T Johnson</name>, and<lb/> <name>Barton S Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> thereupon the defendants withdraw their counterclaim herein<lb/> and the parties, waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court being<lb/> fully advised of and concerning the premises doth find<lb/> for the plaintiff and asses its damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty eight dollars and<lb/> thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and its costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambsgaust</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="530" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0533.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#353,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name>, <name>James Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>, and<lb/> <name>Henry S Reed</name><lb/> vs 443.<lb/> <name>D D Michael</name> and<lb/> <name>James Clark</name></head>
            <p>Petition on account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly called comes not, and the plaintiffs waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibit,<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find there from that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and fifty three dollars<lb/> and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have therefor execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#142,38.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name>, <name>James H Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>, and<lb/> <name>Henry S Reed</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name> garnishee of <name>D D Michael</name> and <name>James Clark</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, as well as the said<lb/> garnishee, and it appearing to the Court from the answer of said<lb/> garnishee that at the time he was summoned herein as such he<lb/> was indebted to the defendants in the sum of one hundred and<lb/> forty two dollars and thirty dollars and thirty eight cents, therefore it is considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as confessed and that out of said sum they pay the costs herein and<lb/> have thereof execution. Ten dollars allowed for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4238,66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson G Conner</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Benjamin H P Butter</name></head>
            <p>Petition on note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly warned and solemnly called comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition herein be taken against herein as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four<lb/> thousand two hundred and thirty eight dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bean interest at the rate of<lb/> ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Koch</name><lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>John Schoenberg</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sam H Bailey</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Isaac T Wise</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the defendants<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefore Leave is given the defendant to withdraw exhibit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Thos</unclear> Reyburn</name> Exn<lb/> vs 365.<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit<lb/> at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Wm Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Third amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out reply and for judgment on counterclaim filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="531" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0534.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-15">Friday April 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Thompson</name> etal<lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>William D W Barnard</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas C Fletcher</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Nehemiah Holmes</name></head>
            <p>Continued on appreciation of plaintiff at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Timothy Ryan</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine Morin</name> <unclear>admrx</unclear><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Daniel Perreault</name></head>
            <p>Continued affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter H Huish</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Thomas B Ellis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E G Lawson</name> etal<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Jno H Hall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Tighe</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Francis Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha W Brown</name> etal<lb/> vs 93.<lb/> <name>Thomas M Barron</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth A Warren</name><lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>Alonzo L Warren</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorces.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not, and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the evidence<lb/> herein and the heaving being finished and the Court being satisfied that<lb/> the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party doth and order adjudge and decree that she be abso<lb/>lutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant<lb/> and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that she recover of<lb/> the said defendant her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert McDonald</name><lb/> vs 463<lb/> <name>Allison Stickney</name></head>
            <p>The demurer to the counter claim herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria L Brooks</name><lb/> vs 440<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorneys, and says that she will<lb/> not further prosecute her action in this behalf but voluntarily<lb/> takes a non suit. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff take nothing by her suit in this behalf but that the said defendant go hence<lb/> without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="532" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0535.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George <unclear>Nambgaust</unclear></name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head><lb/>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein and being agreed upon a verdict upon their<lb/> oaths say they find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendant at the commencement of this suit was not about fraudulently to convey and<lb/> assign his property or effects so as to hinder and delay his creditors: wherefore it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed and that execution issue therefor against the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1000,52.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> and <name>William H Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and Chicago Rail road Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition on account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the motion for a continuance<lb/> filed by the defendant doth overrule the same; and thereupon<lb/> come a Jury to wit; <name>Martin Seifert</name>, <name>J Ludwig</name>, <name>William<lb/> Stevens</name>, <name>J H Timmermann</name>, <name>A <unclear>Hapin</unclear></name>, <name>F <unclear>Scheaveatye</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>Wilson Chamblin</name>, <name>CW Stine</name>, <name>L Preston</name>, <name>Wilmot Cady</name> and <name>A Harington</name> eleven good and<lb/> lawful men who being by consent duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly the try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> for the plaintiffs and assess the damages at the sum of one thousand dollars and fifty two cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#624,90.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Devlin</name>, <name>William Devlin</name>, <name>Jonathan Ogden</name>, <name>Stephen W Jessup</name>, and <name>John Devlin</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day this cause being called for trial the plaintiffs<lb/> come by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly called<lb/> comes not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and twenty four dollars and<lb/> ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S Rannello</name></head> 
            <p><name>Louis V Bogy</name>, President of the <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> in open acknowledge to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered in this cause in<lb/> the <date when="1858-04-09">ninth day of April, 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Oliver</name><lb/> vs 379<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and says here will not further<lb/> prosecute his action in this behalf but voluntarily takes a <unclear>nonsaid</unclear>.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing<lb/> by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plain<lb/>tiffs costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine M <unclear>Cupp</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H <unclear>Cupp</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Motion for maintenance <unclear>pendent elite</unclear> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="533" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0536.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm <unclear>Simsheuser</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>R J May</name>, <name>Peter Lehman</name>, <name>John Schmitz</name>, <name>A Miller</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Berret</name>, <name>Henry Minke</name>, <name>H B Parsons</name>, <name>Jim O Leary</name>, <name>William<lb/> W Latting</name>, <name>George Eversole</name>, <name>G Pearson</name>, and <name>William H Remington</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed but not being further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-16">Saturday April 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennle Platt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Demurer to third amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name>, <name>James O Carson</name> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name> and <name>Louis A Welton</name>.</head>
            <p>Plaintiff in person acknowledges to have received full and en<lb/>tire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-02-24">24th day<lb/> of February 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Seal</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>Lucy Ann Seal</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not, and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the proofs herein<lb/> and having duly heard the same and being satisfied of the good conduct of<lb/> the plaintiff and that he is an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that<lb/> he be also truly and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted<lb/> with the defendant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of announced person. It is<lb/> further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Devlin</name> et al<lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burt</name> garn. of <name>Archie Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Claim of <name>Geo Pipe</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="534" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0537.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of Samuel A Holmes filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although having been duly summoned and being now solemn by<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and being now solemn by called, comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rueben Loeb</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Pehan</name> and <name>John Pehan</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to law, claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is or<lb/>dered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said petition and affi<lb/>davit to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriffs hereby directed if<lb/> said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not<lb/> being finished laid over until Monday Morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="535" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0538.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-18">Monday April 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>George Y Bast</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not prosecute<lb/> their action in this behalf. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah W Kennedy</name><lb/> vs 471<lb/> <name>John E Coock</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zeb F Wetzell</name> and<lb/> <name>Otho Wetzell</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Joseph Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant cannot<lb/> be served with the ordinary process of law, therefore on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said defendant<lb/> be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him and account<lb/> of goods drugs and medicine sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant amounting to<lb/> the sum of six hundred and seventy dollars and twelve cents, and that his property has been<lb/> attached, and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and holden<lb/> at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September<lb/> next and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be<lb/> rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper prin<lb/>ted and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1550 value<lb/> 1 cent dams<lb/>. vs <unclear>pltt</unclear> and<lb/> securities</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert McDonald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allison Stickney</name></head>
            <p>Petition in Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement<lb/> herein and agree that judgment be rendered herein in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff for one cent damages and the restitution of the property men<lb/>tioned the petition and affidavit and that the value of said property be assessed at the sum<lb/> of one hundred and fifty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said defen<lb/>dant return the property mentioned in the petition and affidavit, to wit: me small bay stud<lb/> horse, a <name><unclear>Bett</unclear></name> of single harness, and a one horse himber waggon, or that the said defendant and<lb/> <name>James P Garrison</name> and <name>John C Gilmore</name>, the securities in the bond given for the retention of said<lb/> property pay the plaintiff the value of said property and the damages agreed upon and the<lb/> costs herein expended and that the plaintiff have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Rhoads</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Moses Perrin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name> etal<lb/> vs 182<lb/> <name>Moses Perrin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by their Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Bagging &amp; Rope Co</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James E Yeatman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issue filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="536" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0539.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles A <unclear>Cuno</unclear></name> and<lb/> <name>Ignastius A Day</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit; <name>John Durack</name>, <name>D H Sackman</name>, <name>J B<lb/> Grady</name>, <name>Jacob Moerschal</name>, <name>R B McAuliff</name>, <name>E F Eaton</name>, <name>William<lb/> F Groeschuder</name>, <name>J W Branch</name>, <name>William J S Clark</name>, <name>J H Col<lb/>meyer</name>, <name>B Flemin</name>, and <name>James McArthur</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished further procee<lb/>dings herein are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Holmes</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Augustus G Garrett</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="537" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0540.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-19">Tuesday April 19th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>R Goodridge Woodson</name> and <name>Edward Bates</name>, two credible witnesses, examined under oath;<lb/> prove the execution and acknowledgment of a deed of emancipation by <name>Sarah Bates</name> to her<lb/> slave <name>Angelina</name> (commonly called <name>Ann</name>) about twenty five or twenty six years old.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> etal</name></head>
            <p>The motion made by the Clerk for security for costs, being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.<lb/> Agreement filed and cause continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Kelly</name> etal<lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>B F Tompkins</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney and dismiss this suit and it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that execution issue against the plaintiffs for the costs.<lb/> By leave plaintiff withdraws note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Robinson</name><lb/> no<lb/> <name>Robert Stevens</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an assignment of the judgment herein to <name>Albert N<lb/> Sterling</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Alter</name><lb/> vs 641<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Alter</name><lb/> vs 642<lb/> <name>Daniel J Hancock</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T <unclear>Vanduzer</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>A S Dwen</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs attorney and withdraw their appearance herein<lb/> thereupon the plaintiffs being duly called come not wherefore on motion<lb/> of the defendants by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and<lb/> recover of said plaintiffs their costs herein expended have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H Oglesby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for dependants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 246,47</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh M Thompson</name><lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Ephraim Shirley</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> forty six dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="538" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0541.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> etal<lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> etal</head>
            <p>Agreement filed and cause continued as on affidavit at defendants<lb/> costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Heper</name><lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>George Jackson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rebecca Myers</name><lb/> vs 473<lb/> <name>Charles Myers</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published according<lb/> to law</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierce E <unclear>Brulatow</unclear></name><lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>William Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein for Jno N Boffenjer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths<lb/> find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> defendant at the commencement of this suit was not about fraudulently to conceal remove or<lb/> dispose of his property so as to hinder and delay his creditors and that he had not fraudulently<lb/> removed or disposed of his property so as to hinder and delay his creditors: wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Sate of Missouri both issue<lb/> of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles A Cuno</name> and<lb/> <name>Ignatius A Day</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond.<lb/> Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled sworn herein, and thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings herein<lb/> are laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name> etal<lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Berthold</name>, <name>Julius H Smith</name>,<lb/> and <name><unclear>MacKlot</unclear> Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew Downing</name> and<lb/> <name>Chauncey Rose</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney and file an addition<lb/> affidavit herein from which it appears to the Court that the defen<lb/>dants are non residents of the State of Missouri, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> said defendants be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>menced against them for the sum of one hundred and fifty four dollars and seventy five cents, on<lb/> account of goods sold and delivered to and money laid out and expended for them by the plaintiff and</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="539" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0542.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>that their property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to<lb/> be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the fourth Monday<lb/> of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer demur to or otherwise plead to the<lb/> petition herein the same will be taken against them as confessed judgment rendered against them and<lb/> their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further order that a copy hereof be published according to<lb/> law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Y Bridges</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Hedenberg</name> surviving<lb/> partner of <name>Jno H Russell</name> decd</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and acknowledge to have re<lb/>ceived full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the<lb/> <date when="1857-11-18">18th day of November, 1857</date>.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-20">Wednesday April 20th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Schnaider</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Andreas Knehler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 489<lb/> <name>J W Chenoweth</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Waugh</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Leon J Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Joseph L Papin</name> guardian of the minor defendants, <name>Alphonse Dupre</name>,<lb/> <name>Eugene Papin</name> and <name>Josephine Papin</name>, and enters the appearance of the said defen<lb/>dants to this action and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Statement of <name>R M Funkhouser</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> et al<lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Jacob Schild</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery. The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that<lb/> the defendants deliver the property specified in said petition and affidavit to the <name>Coroner</name><lb/> of St Louis County, and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it<lb/> from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>Continued a son a affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Locker</name> etal<lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Sam Wilson</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="540" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0543.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Teuteberg</name><lb/> vs 679<lb/> <name>Harris Newman</name></head>
            <p>Petition for <name>Slander</name>. Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and consent and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for<lb/> the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> and defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 665<lb/> <name>Delphy Carlin</name></head>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action it ordered that the<lb/> same be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Diemert</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Jacob <unclear>Mussler</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant by his attorney but the plaintiff although called come<lb/> not wherefore on motion of the defendant it is ordered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the said defendant go hence without<lb/> day recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Leopolt Mayer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly waived<lb/> and so lonely called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of he plain<lb/>tiff it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo B Owens</name> etal<lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>D A Winter</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> suit be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name> President &amp; c<lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>M AO Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Geo T Brady</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and<lb/> for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>A J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion to suppress plaintiffs depositions taken in Chicago being head and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained and that<lb/> said deposition be suppressed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> etal</head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and also<lb/> Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider of<lb/> their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow mornings at ten oclock.
            </closer>
            <signed>
                <name>J R Lackland</name>
            </signed>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="541" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0544.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-21">Thursday April 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis P James</name><lb/> vs 293.<lb/> <name>Samuel Fredericks</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiff to withdraw depositions taken in Chicago, Dedimus<lb/> to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence R <unclear>Wohlien</unclear></name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>John Wolff</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Jno M Krum</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name> assignee<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Donaldson</name> etal<lb/> vs 723<lb/> <name>Henry C Martin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Bagging Rope Co</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James E Yeatman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 822<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Popping</name><lb/> vs 731<lb/> <name>Francis Savignac</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 289,39.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel G Carver</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Haskell</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore; on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty nine dollars<lb/> and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered, by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Doogan</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Thomas T Doogan</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce. Now comes the parties by their respective attorney, and thereupon the trial<lb/> progressed and being finished and the Court being satisfied of the good con<lb/>duct of the plaintiff and that she is an innocent and injured party doth<lb/> order adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by her contracted with the defendant and he restored to all the might and privileges of an un<lb/>married person. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>Claim of Carson Springer and Wannell filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="542" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0545.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella</name> and <name>Lavenia Harper</name><lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Andrew Harper</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court appoints <name>Andrew Harper</name>, guardian addition of <name>William<lb/> M Smith</name>, <name>Andrew Smith</name>, and <name>Ann E Smith</name>, thereupon comes<lb/> said <name>Andrew Harper</name> and files his acceptance of said appointment<lb/> and by leave of Court files his answer for said minor defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Marine Bank of Chicago</name><lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Richard J Tunstall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dedimus to Illinois for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Knight</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>Sam Hambleton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by the attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at this costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Co hicks</name></head>
            <p>Continued on a affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of defendants a this costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#302,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mount</name><lb/> vs 529<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name> and<lb/> <name>Fred J Douglass</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come<lb/> also a Jury, to wit; <name>Morris Eisner</name>, <name>Louis Tennet</name>, <name>Albert Fisher</name>, <name>George<lb/> Fischloff</name>, <name>R N Locke</name>, <name>J Teuteberg</name>, <name>T G Burgess</name>, <name>A McCune</name>, William<lb/> Fine, and Henry Tobner, ten good and lawful men who being by consent<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the<lb/> damages at the sum of three hundred and two dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assess<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendants with draw then answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Julius Voelker</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>John H Garnhart</name>, <name>George Walton</name>,<lb/> and <name>Matthew Palen</name></head>
            <p>On account. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit; <name>Morris Eisner</name>, <name>Louis Tennet</name>, <name>John Lay</name>,<lb/> <name>George Fischloff</name>, <name>R N Locke</name>, <name>J Teuteberg</name>, <name>T G Burgess</name>, <name>A McCune</name>,<lb/> <name>William Fine</name>, and <name>Henry Tobner</name>, ten good and lawful men who<lb/> being by consent duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take<lb/> nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of<lb/> the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambogaust</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff withdraw Exhibit seudon.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="543" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0546.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Abuno</name> and<lb/> <name>Ignatius A Day</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come the Jurors empanelled and sworn herein, and says they are<lb/> unable to agree upon a verdict; wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the said jury be discharged and this cause continued until the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 65,54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Espy</name><lb/> vs 828<lb/> <name>Thomas Amos</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles Amos</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys; and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for the sum<lb/> of Sixty five dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the estate of <name>Charles Amos</name><lb/> in the hands of <name>Thomas Amos</name>, his administrator, the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and also his<lb/> costs herein expended; and thereupon the parties agree that each party pay one half the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 317,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron S W Goodwin</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Anderson</name><lb/> vs 800<lb/> <name>Dominick J McLaughlin</name></head>
            <p>On account. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, and the plaintiffs waiving a<lb/> jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibits and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and seventeen dollars and forty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. Plaintiffs withdraw note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name><lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>William B Olmstead</name>,<lb/> <name>Collins D White</name> and<lb/> <name>A C Ketcham</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property<lb/> attached under the writ herein will be attended with much expense<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit, and is likely to depreciate<lb/> in value; it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property<lb/> according to law; and that he make a report of his proceedings under<lb/> this order before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, <name>William d<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John H Rankin</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> a jury, to wit; <name>D H Lackman</name>, <name>J Moerschall</name>, <name>William F<lb/> <unclear>Groesheider</unclear></name>, <name>James W Branch</name>, <name>William J S Clark</name>, <name>J H<lb/> Colemeyer</name>, <name>B Fleming</name>, <name>James McArthur</name>, <name>Louis <unclear>Pournot</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>T G Burgess</name>, <name>John Hartshorn</name>, and <name>William Fine</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until tomor<lb/>row morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="544" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0547.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-22">Friday April 22nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Jesse Weller</name> whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>William Matthews</name> and <name>David<lb/> Anderson</name>, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to slave <name>Ester</name><lb/> aged about fifty years of a bright copper color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name>, <name>Walter H Dorsett</name>,<lb/> <name>William P Fenn</name>, <name>Wm C Woodson</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard H Stevens</name>, <name>Philip s Lanham</name>,<lb/> and <name>John McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and acknowl<lb/>edges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-26">26th day of October<lb/> AD 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>George F Hill</name></head>
            <p>Reply to answer and counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit in support of motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Bartlett McComb and Company</name></head>
            <p>On application of <name>John Brown</name>, assignee, this day filed<lb/> the time for filing an inventory is extended thirty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name><lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>Wm H Haydon</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John H Rankin</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the jury empanelled and sworn herein and there<lb/>upon the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over<lb/> until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="545" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0548.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-23">Saturday April 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>This day having been appointed for the hearing of claims against the<lb/> said Steamboat <name>Polar Star</name> and the Court being satisfied that there<lb/> has been due publication to claimants, proof of which is filed, doth<lb/> proceed to hear and determine the claims filed and doth allow the following demands and<lb/> place the same in the second days, to wit;</p>
            <table>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Joseph Garneau</name> # 135,57</cell>
                    <cell><name>Davis and Co</name> # 232,00</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Jno Williams</name> 790,80</cell>
                    <cell><name>Carson Springer</name> &amp; <name>Wannell</name> # 2300,37.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Henry Ashlrook &amp; Co</name> 287,09</cell>
                    <cell><name>P T McSherry &amp; Co</name> 941,03.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Carter</name> &amp; <name>Bartle</name> 358,78.</cell>
                    <cell><name>Boylan</name> &amp; <name>Gettys</name> 82,50</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Gaty McCune &amp; Co</name> 39,40.</cell>
                    <cell></cell>
                </row>
            </table>
            <p>And the hearing to the demands of <name>Robert</name> and <name><unclear>N</unclear> A Thornburg</name>, <name>Doyle</name> and <name>Corby</name>, <name>Wilgus<lb/> noble and Co</name> <unclear>ace</unclear> laid over until Monday morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>This day having been appointed for the hearing of claims against the said<lb/> Steam boat <name>St Mary</name>, and the Court being satisfied that there has been<lb/> due publication of notice to claimants, proof of which is filed, doth<lb/> proceed to hear and determine the claims filed, and doth allow the following and place the<lb/> same in the second class of liens, to with;</p>
            <table>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Joseph Garneau</name> # 112,94</cell>
                    <cell><name>Henry Ashlrook &amp; Co</name> # 383,40</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Jno Williams</name> 201,93.</cell>
                    <cell><name>Carson Springer</name> &amp;<name>Wannell</name> 1885,96.</cell>
                </row>
            </table>
            <p>And the claim of <name>Carlton J Corwin</name> for # 16,50, is rejected by the Court. And the Court<lb/> appoints <name>Warren Montfort</name> Esq Commissioner to adjust the above allowed demands.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 531,64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Rop</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Ballard</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>D W Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>A Becker</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>Becker</name>, but the defendant <name>Wheeler</name>, although duly called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant, <name>Wheeler</name>, is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and thirty one dollars and sixty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine M Cupp</name><lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name><unclear>N</unclear> H Cupp</name></head>
            <p>Notice of motion for<lb/> allowance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name><unclear>Voelker</unclear></name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>Jno H Garnhart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed but not being finished is laid over until<lb/> Monday morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="546" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0549.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-25">Monday April 25th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hough</name> et al<lb/> vs 843.<lb/> <name>Ira Todd</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>Western Mutual Fire &amp; Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 836<lb/> <name>Home Mutual Fire &amp; Marine Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> et al<lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Pacific Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>The Court now proceeds to hear and determine the claims laid over<lb/> until today and doth allow the claims of <name>Robert</name> &amp; <name>William A<lb/> Thornburg</name> for # 1171,21 and <name>Wilgus noble and Co</name> for # 10,00 and doth<lb/> reject the claim of <name>Doyle and Corby</name> no one appearing to sustain the claim, and the Court doth<lb/> appoint Warren Montfort Commissioner to adjust the claims allowed against said boat.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Michael Werk</name> et al<lb/> vs 584<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 295,00 &amp;<lb/> satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>Union Line Transportation<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent<lb/> that judgment be rendered herein for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and ninety five dollars in favor of the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor. Thereupon the plaintiff acknowledge the receipt of full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 406,38</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>John H Rankin</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond. Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys and<lb/> also the jury empannelled and sworn herein and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed and being finished the jurors empannelled<lb/> and sworn herein upon their oaths find for the plaintiff<lb/> and assess the damages at the sum of four hundred and six<lb/> dollars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants to the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs and charges in this<lb/> behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>W Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>Henry Remour</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mark Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>Jno McCarthy</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="547" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0550.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter H Huish</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Thomas B Ellis</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benn C Platt</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-26">Tuesday April 26th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat Editor</head>
            <p>Order of Sale. <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, files a statement upon<lb/> which it appears to the Court that he has seized the said Steam boat<lb/> Editor under certain warrants and executions and that five days have<lb/> elapsed since said seizure, that no person has given bond according to law for the release of<lb/> said boat; therefore it is ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said boat by publication<lb/> to the highest and best bidder for cash first giving twenty days notice of the time and place of<lb/> sale by publication according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Cornet</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued to May eleventh at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis J Rankin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued to the eleventh day of May next at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Clinton</name><lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>Samuel K Hutchinson</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Francis Lancaster</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the answer of said garnishee<lb/> that at the time he was summoned herein as such he as<lb/> indebted to the defendant, <name>Lancaster</name>, in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and ninety five dollars and fifty cents, therefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the said garnishee pay over to the Sheriff of St Louis County the said<lb/> amount of two hundred and ninety five dollars and fifty cents forthwith.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy Conroy</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Margaret Conroy</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and affidavit according to<lb/> law, from which it appears that the defendant is a non resident of the State<lb/> of Missouri, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="548" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0551.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>against her the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bond of matrimony<lb/> by the plaintiff contracted with the defendant on the ground of adultery and also to obtain the<lb/> possession and control of the child mentioned in the petition, and that unless she be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the<lb/> County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day<lb/> thereof answer demur to or otherwise plead to the petition herein the same will be taken<lb/> against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published as the law di<lb/>rects, in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>I hereby acknowledge <unclear>Sulir<lb/> of faptise</unclear> of this judgment of assist<lb/> the <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Co.</name> <unclear><name>Alitnus</name> my hand</unclear><lb/> and <unclear>fail</unclear> this <date when="1863-09-17">17 Sept 1863</date>.<name><unclear>G Marshall</unclear></name> <unclear>pltf atty</unclear></note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#586,50<lb/> &amp; costs.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenz <unclear>Schafflir</unclear></name><lb/> vs 880<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Franklin Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William G Goodale</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said garnishee although<lb/> duly called, comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a jury submits this<lb/> proceeding to the Court upon the interrogatories and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find that at the<lb/> time it was summoned herein as such was indebted to the defen<lb/>dant Field in an amount greater than the amount of the judg<lb/>ment herein and that the amount of said judgment is five hundred and eighty six dollars and<lb/> fifty cents; therefore it is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum<lb/> of five hundred and eighty six dollars and fifty cents and also his costs in the original suit and in<lb/> this proceeding expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 35,67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor A Sarton</name><lb/> vs 902<lb/> <name>Lucian H Fuller</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Samuel T Jacoby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said garnishee,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the interrogatories herein be taken against the said garnishee as<lb/> confessed; and no jury being required this proceeding is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court doth find there from that the said garnishee at the time he was sum<lb/>moned herein as such was indebted to the defendants in the sum of thirty five dollars and sixty<lb/> seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and <unclear>that take of said</unclear> sum he pay the costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 117,16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Aden</name><lb/> vs 853<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Scott</name>, garnishees of<lb/> <name>Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and moves the Court for<lb/> judgment on the answers of said garnishees and it appearing to<lb/> the Court from said answers that the said garnishees at the time<lb/> time they were summoned herein as such were indebted to the<lb/> defendants in the sum of one hundred and seventeen dollars and<lb/> sixteen cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishees<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and have execution therefor, and that out of said sum<lb/> he pay the costs herein expended, The sum of twenty five dollar is allowed said garnishees for their<lb/> attorneys fees and also the sum of ten dollars each for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 866<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 863.<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="549" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0552.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 271,43.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name> and<lb/> <name>George K Hooper</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Francis Hofelmann</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and being now solemnly called, comes not but make default, where<lb/>fore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and seventy one dollars and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj Leiber</name><lb/> vs 880<lb/> <name>St Louis Agricultural and<lb/> Mechanical Association</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>A M Waterman</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> et al<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-27">Wednesday April 27th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Henry Papin</name> Who is personal known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledge the execution<lb/> of a died of emancipation to his slave Louise of dark color aged<lb/> about seventeen.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine M Cupp</name><lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>William M Cupp</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> files an answer and the parties submit to the Court the motion for<lb/> allowance of alimony, <unclear>pendent lite</unclear>, which being seen heard and<lb/> fully understood by the Court, it is ordered that the said motion be sustained and that<lb/> the defendant pay forth with to the plaintiff or to <name><unclear>Mess</unclear> Bland</name> and <name>Colman</name>, her attorneys,<lb/> the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars for counsel fee and to defray the expenses of the<lb/> prosecution of this action, so far; and also pay the plaintiff the sum of fifty dollars for her<lb/> support and maintenance for one month commencing on the fourth day of the present<lb/> month and the like sum of fifty dollars on the fourth day of each and every month there<lb/> after until the further order of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Virginia W <unclear>Mulhoeffer</unclear></name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Peter <unclear>Mulhoeffer</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof <unclear>satis<lb/>tory</unclear> to the Court that the order of publication made herein<lb/> has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="550" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0553.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 135,37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Beste</name> and<lb/> <name>William McClelland</name><lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name> and <name>George W Beard</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs try their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly called come not, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibits and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> the same doth assess the damages at the sum of one hundred and<lb/> thirty five dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants to the damages aforesaid as foresaid and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 213,97</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sylvester Papin</name> and<lb/> <name>Theophile Papin</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George Field</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys but the defendant although<lb/> duly called comes not but makes default, and the plaintiffs waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibit and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the damages at the sum of two hundred and thirteen dollars and ninety seven cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Berthold</name> et al<lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Andrew Downing</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiffs amend their petition by making <name>Edward<lb/> J Peck</name> codefendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Leonard</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name><unclear>Algunon</unclear> S Leonard</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly called comes not; and thereupon the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Court doth find that the plaintiff is and innocent and<lb/> injured party. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be absolutely and<lb/> forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and<lb/> be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person and that she have the care<lb/> and control of the infant child, <name>James W Leonard</name>, mentioned, in the petition and that she<lb/> pay the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#143,85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Fisher</name> and<lb/> <name>William A Miller</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Harriett O Van Court</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Schenck</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly called come not, and the plaintiffs, waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the petition exhibit and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and<lb/> forty three dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lusk</name> <unclear>admr.</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James B Colt</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah Cronin</name> <unclear>admr.</unclear><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the answer herein be stricken out.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="551" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0554.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1275,21.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly called comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of twelve hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty<lb/> one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#228,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly called comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1128,40.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> and<lb/> <name>George Colton Greene</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>William Lansing</name></head>
            <p>On account. Now come the plaintiff by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly called comes not, and no Jury being required the Court from<lb/> proofs, offered doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of eleven<lb/> hundred and twenty eight dollars and forty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 238,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin G Noyes</name> and <name>Edward W <unclear>Sherbourne</unclear></name> vs 332<lb/> <name>Alla Lea</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly called comes not, and the plaintiffs submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and thirty eight dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 509,18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Pittman</name>, <name>Albert Tennet</name> and<lb/> <name>George A Kerr</name><lb/> vs 29<lb/> <name>E S Castle and Co</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, and the plaintiffs submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duty heard and considered the same doth aleggo the planififf dama<lb/>ages at the sum of five hundred and nine dollars and eighteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs, recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Force</name> et al<lb/> vs 442.<lb/> <name>Emilius F Kraft</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="552" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0555.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amaranth Crum</name><lb/> vs 323<lb/> <name>Levi P Crum</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called, comes not but make default, and thereupon the Court proceeds<lb/> to hear the proof offered by the plaintiff, and having finished the heaving<lb/> and being satisfied that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge<lb/> and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an<lb/> unmarried person, and that she pay the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1295,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> and<lb/> <name>Edgar Ames</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>William Sample</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> called, comes not, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury, submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of<lb/> twelve hundred and ninety five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#109,89</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blevin</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward B Mead</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Heinecke</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> called comes not, and no Jury being required the Court doth from the<lb/> proofs offered by plaintiffs assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of<lb/> one hundred and nine dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the<lb/> damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 164,73</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> and<lb/> <name>Graham L Hughes</name><lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not, and no Jury being required the Court doth from the proofs<lb/> offered by plaintiffs assess their damages at the sum of one hundred and<lb/> sixty four dollars and seventy three cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#348,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschmann</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Joseph Magehan</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly called<lb/> comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the<lb/> sum of three hundred and forty eight dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilsno</name><lb/> vs 823.<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on Policy.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jerry, to wit; <name>John Sellers</name>, <name>Thomas Lucas</name>, <name>Jacob Steinberg</name>, <name>George G<lb/> Gibson</name>, <name>George Geisert</name>, <name>J G <unclear>Koltenthaler</unclear></name>, <name>C A Smell</name>, <name>Jacob Casper</name>,<lb/> <name>John Vultz</name>, <name>James Bailey</name>, <name>James Sutton</name> and <name>James Link</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try<lb/> the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="553" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0556.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-28">Thursday April 28th 1859</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Affidavits of <name>Thomas Wall</name> and <name>Daniel Harvey</name> in support of<lb/> motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>St Louis <date when="--02-02">February 2nd</date><lb/> Thereby acknowledge faced<lb/> deed inture satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment of which this<lb/> is the margin<lb/> active rice ack <name>L M <unclear>Shrmuck</unclear></name> <unclear>ack</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Dodge</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Martin Haemmerle</name>,<lb/> <name>H C Mahnkin</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorneys, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant <name>Mahnkin</name>, but the other defendants although<lb/> duly called come not; wherefore on motion of the said plaintiff, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> two hundred and thirty four dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Tho H M Vicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Steinacker</name></head>
            <p>Report of Commissioner filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip G Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for order on Sheriff to pay over money filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorneys, and waive the issue and<lb/> service of process and enter their appearance to this action and file an<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Brown</name><lb/> vs 469<lb/> <name>Augustus P Ladew</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#153,36.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>Emil F Kraft</name> and <name>O C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Account. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly called, come not, and no Jury being required the Court doth assess<lb/> from the proofs offered, the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one<lb/> hundred and fifty three dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>William R Biddlecome</name>, the assignee,<lb/> and represents to the Court that owing to extreme sick<lb/>ness he is unable further to perform the duties of assignee</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="554" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0557.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>herein and asks that he be dismissed, whereupon it is ordered by the Court that said <name>William<lb/> R Biddlecome</name> be dismissed from the office of assignee: and thereupon the Court appoints<lb/> <name>Josiah G M <unclear>Clellan</unclear></name> to be assignee of said <name>Joseph</name> and <name>John C Powell</name> in place of the said<lb/> <name>William R Biddlecome</name> dismissed; and thereupon comes <name>Josiah G McClellan</name> and ac<lb/>cepts said appointment and files his bond as assignee in the sum of ninety seven thousand<lb/> dollars with <name>Joseph Templeton</name>, <name>George</name>, <name>M Moore</name> and <name>John W Thornburgh</name>, as securities, which<lb/> bond is approved by the Court. And it is ordered by the Court that <name>William R Biddle</name> come<lb/> forthwith deliver to the assignee hereby appointed all the books, papers, effects moneys and<lb/> evidence of debt in his profession belonging to said assignors.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#723,80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name><lb/> vs 823.<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Policy. Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess<lb/> his damages at the sum of seven hundred and twenty three dollars and eighty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages afore<lb/>said inform aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Jas Castello</name><lb/> vs 546.<lb/> <name>William J Kennedy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="555" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0558.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-29">Friday April 29th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>W Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of the<lb/> plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Polar Star</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties interested and the commissioner files his<lb/> report which being seen and approved by the Court is confirmed. And it<lb/> appearing to the Court there from that there remains in the hands of the<lb/> Sheriff arising from the sale of said boat after paying the sum of four hundred and ten dollars and<lb/> twenty five cents, the costs of these proceedings, the sum of seven hundred and thirty nine dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents, and that the proportion of each party whose demand has been allowed is as follows;</p>
            <table>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Joseph Garneau</name> # 15,85.</cell>
                    <cell><name>Davis Co</name> # 27,10.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>John Williams</name> 92,25.</cell>
                    <cell><name>Carson Springer Wannell</name> 268,40</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Henry Ash</name> brook Co 33,50</cell>
                    <cell><name>P J McSherry Co</name> 109,80</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Robt Wm A <unclear>Thornbugh</unclear></name> 136,65</cell>
                    <cell><name>Wilgus Noble Co</name> 1,15</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Carter Bartle</name> 41,85</cell>
                    <cell><name>Boylan</name> and <name>Gettys</name> 9,65.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                    <cell><name>Gaty McCune &amp; Co</name> 3,55.</cell>
                    <cell></cell>
                </row>
            </table>
            <p>It is therefore considered by the Court that the said Sheriff pay over to<lb/> persons entitled thereto the sums due them as aforesaid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Stem Boat <name>St Mary</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties interested and the Commissioner files his report<lb/> herein which being seen and approved by the Court is confirmed. And it<lb/> appearing to the Court there from that the Said boat sold for the sum of<lb/> one hundred and sixty dollars, and that the costs herein amount to the sum of two hundred dol<lb/>lars and eighty five cents, leaving nothing to be applied to the claims allowed, therefore it is<lb/> ordered that the Sheriff apply the proceeds of said boat to the payment of the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William Anelson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit filed by the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas <unclear>McNicker</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3628,33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> vs 803<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the plaintiff<lb/> and doth assess his damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the<lb/> sum of thirty six hundred and twenty eight dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court assessed and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Le Page</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Andrew A Le Beau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside the judgment by default being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Dodge</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Andrew A Le beau</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the default herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="556" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0559.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Page</name><lb/> vs 486<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and Marine Insurance Co</name></head>
            <p>On consideration of the demurrer to the answer herein it is ordered<lb/> that the same be stricken out.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmose</name>r garn.</head>
            <p>On consideration of the motion to set aside the discharge of the said<lb/> garnishee it is ordered that the same be sustained and said dis<lb/>charge be set aside; and three days is given to reply.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs herein is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name> et al<lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of the answer herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.<lb/> On motion of plaintiffs leave is given to file an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel K Hutchinson</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Proof of Service of order to pay over money filed: and it is<lb/> ordered that an attachment issue against said garnishee for<lb/> contempt of Court in failing to obey said order returnable to<lb/>morrow morning at ten o'clock.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 707<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained, ten<lb/> is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of the answer of <name>Thomas<lb/> Thomas</name> being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that<lb/> the same be sustained as to such of said answer as contains a coun<lb/>ter claim and overruled as to the other part of said answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>James H Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants by their attorney, and withdraw their de<lb/>murer herein and on their motion ten days is given them to<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Edward Hogg</name>.<lb/> vs 423<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their demurer, and on their motion ten days<lb/> is given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Robert B Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, by their attorney, withdraw their demurer herein and<lb/> on their motion ten days is given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="557" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0560.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Wm L Weller</name><lb/> vs 425,<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, by their attorney, withdraw their demurer herein and<lb/> on their motion ten days is given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>David M Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 426.<lb/> <name>Michael S. Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer withdrawn by defendants. Ten days given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Samuel Brooks</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their demurrer herein and on their motion<lb/> ten days is given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Abram J Stevenson</name> et al<lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their demurrer herein and on their motion ten<lb/> days is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Wm A Nelson</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of the answer herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained. Ten<lb/> days given to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that <name>Benjamin F <unclear>Fifield</unclear></name>, the principal, and <name>Benjamin</name>, <name>Stickney</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, the securities in the bond given for<lb/> the production and delivery of the property attached, produce and<lb/> deliver said property, to wit; four desks, three cases with pigeon holes, one iron safe, one large<lb/> ticket case, two stoves, eight chairs, two carpets, one clock to the Sheriff of St Louis County at his<lb/> office forthwith; and it is further ordered that, if the said principal and securities fail to deliver<lb/> said property, the Sheriff assign said bond to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Bracket</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that <name>Benjamin F Field</name> the principal, and <name>Benjamin <unclear>Sickney</unclear></name>,<lb/> and <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, the securities in the bond given for<lb/> the production and delivery of the property attached, providence and<lb/> deliver said property, to wit; one desk, one ticket case, one iron safe, one clock and one stove, to<lb/> the Sheriff of St Louis County at his office forth with; and it is further ordered that if the said<lb/> principal and securities fail to deliver said property, the Sheriff assign said bond to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>W, G Webb</name></head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the amended petition being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled. On motion of the<lb/> defendant ten days is given him to answer.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="558" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0561.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-04-30">Saturday April 30th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>William M Crozier</name> is, on motion, admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
            <p><name>Louis Gottschalk</name> is, on motion admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.<lb/> Motion in arrest of judgment filed by the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> et al<lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>Samuel K Hutchinson</name> garnishee of <name>Francis Lancaster</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the Sheriff of St Louis County with the writ is<lb/>sued against said garnishee for contempt together with his<lb/> return thereon and the recognizance taken for the appearance<lb/> of said garnishee, and thereupon comes said garnishee in discharge<lb/> of his recognizance, and files an affidavit, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth order that he be discharged from custody under said writ of attachment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Seaverson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name><lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed. Reply to Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Griffin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E W Warne</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and solemnly called, comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Picot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 550<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpen</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#169,03.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank Winchester</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> and<lb/> <name>D N Hunnewell</name><lb/> vs 582<lb/> <name>James M alias</name><lb/> <name>Frank Winchester</name></head>
            <p>On account. Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and no Jury being required the Court<lb/> doth from the proofs offered by the plaintiffs, assess the plaintiffs damaged<lb/> the sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and three cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="559" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0562.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#149,60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Cronin</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Jeremiah Cronin</name><lb/> vs 279<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name><lb/></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages. Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly called, comes not, but makes default, and the plain<lb/>tiff, waiving a Jury, submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and forty nine dollars<lb/> and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 615<lb/> <name>George J Barnett</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the said garnishee be discharge hence at this costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor. Five dollars is allowed said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2165,80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Dodge</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Andrew A Le Beau</name>,<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>,<lb/> <name>John P McGrath</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
            <p>On notes. Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> called, come not; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and sixty five dollars and<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#396,16.<lb/> Debt.</note>
            <note>St Louis <date when="1863-09-30">Sept 30th 1863</date>.<lb/> Thereby acknowledge full and<lb/> entire oaths if action of the judgment of which this is the margin acted <unclear>u s gray alley for peffs</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Mayer</name>, <name>Adolph G Mandel</name><lb/> and <name>Heyman Nelson</name><lb/> vs 545.<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note. Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and having argued<lb/> the demurer herein submit the same to the Court, and<lb/> the Court being fully advised of and concerning the premises<lb/> doth order that the said demurer be overruled; thereupon the defendant although duly summoned and being now<lb/> solemnly called comes not but makes default, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition herein be taken against said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and ninety six dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Rosweiler</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Philip Seiler</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of the answer herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State use of <name>Edward Crely</name> <lb/> vs 356.<lb/> <name>Mary Crely</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurer to the Counterclaim being heard and fully understood by the<lb/> Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>The City Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the defendants<lb/> motion to modify the order appointing a Receiver be sustained and<lb/> that said Receiver proceed to collect the subscriptions to the capital<lb/> stock of said City Bank of St Louis at such times and for such amounts as the Court may<lb/> direct.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="560" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0563.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> vs 803.<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial and motion in arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name></head>
            <p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> et al<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip G Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 734<lb/> <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name></head>
            <p>Agreed case filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5000,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Martin C Walker</name> and <name>James Moore</name></head>
            <p>Petition. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mitt this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court,<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, doth find for the plaintiff and<lb/> assess her damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned<lb/> at the sum of five thousand dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and her costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry <unclear>Clamorgan</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>The demurer to the petition herein being heard and fully understood it is ordered<lb/> that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of <name>Francis Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas H McVicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained and that the plaintiff file security for costs within<lb/> thirty days. Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="561" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0564.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Radford</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Sarah Radford</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and affidavit Iron which it appears<lb/> to the Court that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said defen<lb/>dant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against her to obtain a decree of divorce from<lb/> her on the ground of desertion and that unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court to begun<lb/> and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September<lb/> next and on or before the sixth day, thereof answer demur or otherwise plead to the amended petition herein<lb/> the same will be taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy, hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bryan Cross</name><lb/> vs 223<lb/> <name>Walter B Carr</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> et al<lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>William Brocker</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Patrick Hart</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to filed security for costs herein within the time allowed<lb/> him so to do, therefore it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed and<lb/> that execution issue against said plaintiff for the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engels</name> administrator<lb/> vs 76.<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that a subpoena <unclear>duces tecum</unclear> issue for <name>Jno O Fallen</name> to bring<lb/> with him lease from him to Louis Engle deceased.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aimelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Eads</name> et al<lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lusk</name> admr<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James B Colt</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions field. The plaintiffs motion to suppress the defendant depositions being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained. Leave given to<lb/> withdraw depositions. Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Winton</name><lb/> vs 313<lb/> <name>King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment by default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Francis M Faul</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="562" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0565.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A E Daniel</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2564, 60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Note and Contract.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find there from that the defendant is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty five hundred and sixty four dollars and sixty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have therefor execution. Judgment to bear ten<lb/> percent interest. Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come also a<lb/> Jury, to wit; <name>J Morrison</name>, <name>George S Day</name>; <name>William F Stacy William Burnes</name>,<lb/> <name>H Myers</name>, <name>William Leighton</name>, <name>P McCann</name>, <name>C Blome</name>, <name>James Givens</name>, <name>E B Fagin</name>,<lb/> <name>W A Delano</name> and <name>J Gibson</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but being finished further procee<lb/>dings are continued until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="563" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0566.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-03">Tuesday May 3rd, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther Laflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writ of attachment against the defen<lb/>dant issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas, it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to<lb/> the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court cause all the original papers<lb/> in this cause to be filed in the office of the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common <unclear>Pleds</unclear> together<lb/> with a certified copy of all the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Locke</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writ of attachment against the defendant<lb/> if and which property was attached issued from the office of the Clerk of the<lb/> St Louis Court of Common Pleas, it is ordered that the venue of this cause be<lb/> changed to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and the Clerk of this Court cause all the<lb/> original papers together with a certified all the record entries herein to be filed in the office of the<lb/> Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Schaffer</name> et al<lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to Court that the same property attached herein has<lb/> been attached by virtue of several writs against the defendant and<lb/> that the first writs issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas and that the Clerk of this Court cause all the original papers and a certified copy of the<lb/> record entries herein to be filed in the Office of the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Ebin</unclear> Goodwin</name> et al<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the property attached herein has been at<lb/>ttached in several suits against the defendant and that the first writs<lb/> issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, therefore it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas and that the<lb/> Clerk of this Court cause all the original papers and a certified copy of the record entries herein to be<lb/> filed in the office of the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Ohis and Mississippi Rail<lb/> Road Company</name><lb/> vs 83.<lb/> <name>Andrew of Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the property attached herein<lb/> has been attached in several suits against the defendant and<lb/> that the first writs issued from the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas, therefore it is ordered that the venue of this cause be changed<lb/> to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas and that the Clerk of this Court cause all the original<lb/> papers and a certified copy of the record entries herein to be filed in the office of the Clerk of said<lb/> St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel P Catherwood</name> et al<lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that a portion of<lb/> the property attached herein has been attached in several suits against<lb/> the defendant in the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, therefore it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the venue of his caused be changed to the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas and that the Clerk of this Court cause the original papers and a certified copy of the<lb/> record entries herein to be filed in the office of the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="564" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0567.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon <unclear>Hoffheimer</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the property attached herein has<lb/> been attached under several other writs against the defendant and<lb/> that the first writs issued from the St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas, therefore it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court<lb/> of Common Pleas, and that the clerk of this court cause to be filed in the office of said St Louis Court<lb/> of Common Pleas, all the original papers and a certified copy of the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Hoffheimer</name> et al<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the property attached herein has been<lb/> attached under several other writs against the defendant and that the first<lb/> writs under which said property was attached issued from the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas, therefore it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed<lb/> to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that the clerk of this court cause to be filed in the<lb/> office of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas the original papers and a certified copy of the record<lb/> entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael J Dohan</name> et al<lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the property attached herein has been<lb/> attached under several other writs against the defendant and that the first writs<lb/> under which said property was attached issued from the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas, therefore it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to<lb/> the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that the clerk of this court cause to be filed in the<lb/> office of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas, all the original papers and a certified<lb/> copy of the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writs of attachment be against<lb/> the defendant issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, there<lb/>fore, it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed<lb/> to the St Louis Court of common Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court cause to decree of be filed in the<lb/> office of the Clerk of said Court, the original papers and a certified copy of the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 619<lb/> <name>William J Gaskell</name> and <name>John H<lb/> Morrison</name> garnishees of <name>Andrew<lb/> J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and a change<lb/> of venue to the St Louis Court of Common pleas having been<lb/> ordered in the original cause, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the papers in this proceeding be transferred to said St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen W Montgomery</name> et al<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction to the Court that the property<lb/> attached herein has been attached under several other writs against the<lb/> defendant and that the first writs under which said property<lb/> was attached issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, therefore it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that<lb/> the clerk of this court cause to be filed in the office of said St Louis Court of Common Pleas, all the original papers and<lb/> a certified copy of the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="565" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0568.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Chenoweth</name><lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writs of attachment be against the defen<lb/>dant issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, there fore, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of<lb/> common Pleas and that the paper herein be transferred to Said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Wilstack</name> et al<lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Robert Hilton</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writs of attachment be against the<lb/> defendant, <name>Morrison</name>, issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas,<lb/> therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, order by the<lb/> Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of<lb/> Common Pleas, and that the papers herein be transferred to said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund C Charles</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the first writs of attachment be against the defen<lb/>dant, issued from the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, therefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this<lb/> cause be changed to the St Louis Court of common Pleas and that the paper herein be transferred<lb/> to Said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Sturges</name> et al<lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>Fredrick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed and that execution issue against the<lb/> plaintiffs for the costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> et al<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to suppress plaintiffs depositions being heard<lb/> and fully understood by the Court it is ordered that the said motion<lb/> be sustained and that the plaintiffs depositions taken in Cincinnati<lb/> Ohio be suppressed, Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> et al<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> et al<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name> et al<lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hendricks</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Co</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="566" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0569.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph <unclear>Graewe</unclear></name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Elizabeth <unclear>Graewe</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be found and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that the ordinary process of law cannot be saved upon the<lb/> said defendant, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that she be notified that a civil action has been commenced against her to obtain a<lb/> decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony contracted with her by the plaintiff on the ground of<lb/> desertion, and that unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and holden all<lb/> the city of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next,<lb/> and on or before the sixth day thereof answer demur or otherwise plead to the petition herein the same<lb/> will be taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy here of be published accor<lb/>ding to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham G Marble</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Mariner</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#295, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony R Bovis</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>Anthony p Vasquez</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein betaken<lb/> against herein as confessed; and the Jerry being required, the Court, from the proofs, doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and ninety five dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis N Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>William M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury, to wit; <name>Ferdinand <unclear>Uda</unclear></name>, <name>J Steinberger</name>, <name>J P Bates</name>, <name>J A Schuetz</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Wasson</name>, <name>A Graham</name>, <name>William Curran</name>, <name>J Smith</name>, <name>R J Lock<lb/>wood</name>, <name>Daniel Casey</name>, <name>Jacob Schwitz</name> and <name>John Storck</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected, trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Atreus J McCreery</name>, <name>William H<lb/> Brown</name> and <name>Richard H McKay</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Eugene Papin</name></head>
            <p>order of Publication, The plaintiffs file a petition and affidavit from<lb/> which it appear that the defendant visa non resident of the State of Mis<lb/>souri therefore on motion of said plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>menced against him founded on a note for the sum of three hundred and<lb/> three dollars and forty two cents, and that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on<lb/> the last Monday of September next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition herein the<lb/> same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy, hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="567" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0570.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-04">Wednesday, may 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Bradford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name>.<lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and counter claim filed by consent. Reply to Counter claim<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#102, 50<lb/> vs Decunritirs</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph garneau</name><lb/> vs 195<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Sioux City</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly called, comes not, and, no Jury being required, the Court form the proofs offered doth asses the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hun<lb/>dred and two dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of <name>Charles K Baker</name>, the principal, and <name>John J Baker</name>, the security in the bond given for the<lb/> release of said defendant, the damages aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> and <name>Wiley J Stratton</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>James Bouthinghouse</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said garnishees,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the interrogatories be taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their attorneys, and also come the Jurors,<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and upon their oaths say they are unable to<lb/> agree upon a verdict; wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that the Jurors be<lb/> discharged and this cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Benton P Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit from whit it<lb/> appear that the ordinary process of law cannot be served upon the defen<lb/>dant, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him<lb/> founded an a note for the sum of twelve hundred and three dollars, and that his property has<lb/> bun attached and unlego he be and appear at the next then ofthis Court, to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September<lb/> next and on or before the third day thereof answer demur to or otherwise plead to the petition<lb/> herein judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Republican,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August J Reller Jr</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and says he will not further prose<lb/>cute this action. It is therefore considered buy the Court that the defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein<lb/> and have execution therefor. Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="568" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0571.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Turner</name><lb/> vs 9.<lb/> <name>Benton P Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit from which<lb/> it appears that the defendant cannot be served with the ordinary proofs<lb/> of law, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/>him for the sum of twelve hundred and fifty dollars founded on two promissory notes and<lb/> that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis in the last<lb/> Monday of September next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition<lb/> judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Republican a news<lb/>paper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo Whitney</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Harry Bonfanti</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears<lb/> that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, therefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him on account of a<lb/> promissory note executed by the defendant and goods sold and delivered to the defendant by<lb/> the plaintiff and that his property has been attached and unless he be appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the<lb/> same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph A Eddy</name>, <name>Joseph A Jameson</name>,<lb/> <name>Anan M Bissell</name>, <name>Amos <unclear>Cotting</unclear></name> and<lb/> <name>Charles C Helmers</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Howard M Livingston</name>, <name>William<lb/> Bell</name> and <name>Charles A KinKead</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the defendant <name>Charles A<lb/> KinKead</name>, be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him for the sum of fifteen<lb/> hundred dollars on account of the failure of the<lb/> defendants to transport and pay over to the plaintiffs<lb/> the said amount of fifteen hundred dollars delivered to them for that purpose by one <name>C<lb/> Voorhis</name>, and that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satis<lb/>fy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the defen<lb/>dant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum<lb/> of two hundred dollars founded on a promissory note executed be the defendant<lb/> and are <name>John M Camerson</name>, and that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next term<lb/> of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of<lb/> September next and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, accor<lb/>ding to law, in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1><div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="569" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0572.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Plahto</name><lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>Joseph Jones</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the de<lb/>fendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum<lb/> of five thousand four hundred dollars on account of money lent and advanced<lb/> to him by the plaintiff and also an account of three promissory notes executed by him to the plaintiff<lb/> and that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday<lb/> of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will<lb/> be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amadic A <unclear>Millier</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>James Richardson</name> and<lb/> <name>William B English</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J W Plummer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him for the sum of three hundred and one dollars founded<lb/> on a judgment recovered by the plaintiffs against the defendant and<lb/> that his property has been attached and unless he be and appear at<lb/> the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer,<lb/> the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against him and<lb/> his property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, accor<lb/>ding to law, in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houser</name></head>
            <p>On Indictment for Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now again comes the Circuit Attorney, who prosecutes for the State, and the<lb/> said defendant being bought into Court in custody of the Sheriff, and his coun<lb/>sel also being present, and the Court here having duly heard and considered the<lb/> said defendants motion in arrest of judgment herein before filed and being thereof fully advised, there<lb/>fore, it is considered by the Court that said motion be overruled: and thereupon the said defendant being<lb/> demanded if he hath or knoweth anything to say why the Court here should not now proceed to<lb/> pays sentence of death upon him, according to law, to which the defendant then and there replies he has<lb/> nothing to say; therefore it is considered by the Court that said <name>Stephen H Houser</name> be taken from<lb/> this Court to the place from whence he came there to remain until Friday the first day of July<lb/> next, thence on that day to be taken to the place of execution, and there between the hours of ten o'clock<lb/> in the forenoon and four o'clock in the afternoon of the day aforesaid be hanged by the neck until he<lb/> be dead; and it is further directed by the Court that the <name>Clark</name> make out a warrant under the seal of<lb/> this Court commanding the Sheriff to carry this sentence into execution: Whereupon the said defendant,<lb/> by this counsel prays an appeal to the Supreme Court from the judgment of this Court herein rendered<lb/> and also prays the Court to stay the execution of said judgment, and the Court here being of opinion that<lb/> there is probable cause for said appeal doth grant the same, but doth refuse to grant a stay of the execu<lb/>tion of said judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Mahlet</name> and <name>Anton Mader</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and agree that judgment<lb/> be rendered herein for plaintiffs for property and one cent damages. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs have and retain pos<lb/>session of the property mentioned in petition and affidavit and recover of the<lb/> defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="570" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0573.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>William M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not<lb/> being finished further proceedings are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-05">Thursday May 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Matthew Rippey</name></p>
            <p>Who is personally known to the Court, in open Court acknowledges the<lb/> Execution of a deed of emancipation to his slave Adeline Thomas of<lb/> copper color, middle size and about thirty two years of age.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#154, 15</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Frederick K Eschmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Eschmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Schnake</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition on account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and no Jury being required,<lb/> the Court from the proofs doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the<lb/> sum of one hundred and fifty four dollars and fifteen cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#262, 40.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James c Griffin</name><lb/> vs 575<lb/> <name>E W Warne</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and no Jury being required,<lb/> the Court from the proofs doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of two hundred and sixty two dollars and forty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua <unclear>Fine</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J T Handlan</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, in person, acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment rendered herein <date when="1857-10-07">October 7th 1857</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Gruner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff filed.<lb/> Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Salie B Dimick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace C Dimick</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73.<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Bigham</name><lb/> vs 106<lb/> <name>Geo Gletzinger</name> admr</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="571" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0574.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Leverett Mills</name> et al</head>
            <p><unclear>Pluries</unclear> Summons for <name>Fro G white</name> and <name>Francis Watkins</name> ordered</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>Charles Boswell</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus to Pennsylvania for defendant ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>William M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed and being finished the Jury<lb/> retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-06">Friday May 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#375, 90.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rector</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the demurrer to the counter claim doth order that the<lb/> same be sustained; and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> five dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#9092, 19.<lb/> Entry set aside<lb/> see<date when="--05-07"> may 7</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr.</name>,<lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> vs 328.<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>Daniel J Hancock</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name>, <name>Charles Valentine</name>,<lb/> <name>John s Dumlass</name>, <name>Robert M Renick</name><lb/> and <name>Alexander Peterson Jr</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the defendants,<lb/> <name>Joshua G Alexander</name>, <name>Daniel J Hancock</name>. <name>William H<lb/> Chappell</name>, <name>Robert M Renick</name> and <name>Alexander Peterson Jr</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and thereupon the plaintiffs<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendants, <name>Valentine</name> and<lb/> <name>Dumlass</name>; and the parties, waiving a Jury, submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings exhibits and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find there form in that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine thousand and ninety two dollars and twelve cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The plaintiffs and the defendants file motions<lb/> for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="572" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0575.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Harper</name>, and <name>Lavenia<lb/> Harper</name>, by their Curator <name>John<lb/> Harts</name> born<lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Andrew Harper</name>, <name>Lavenia <unclear>Ballas</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>Emily C Holmes</name> and her husband<lb/> <name>Anthony Holmes</name>, <name>William M<lb/> Smith</name>, <name>Andrew Smith</name>, <name>Ann E<lb/> smith</name>, <name>Louisa Hopkins</name> and her<lb/> husband <name>Hopkins</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their curator, <name>John<lb/> Hartshorn</name>, and the defendants, <name>Andrew Harper</name>, <name>Lavenia<lb/> Ballas</name>, <name>Emily C Holmes</name>, and her husband <name>Anthony Holmes</name>,<lb/> by their attorney, and the defendants, <name>William M Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Smith</name>, and <name>Ann E Smith</name>, by their guardian ad<lb/> <unclear>litern</unclear>, <name>Andrew Harper</name>, but the defendants <name>Louisa Hopkins</name><lb/> and her husband <name>Hopkins</name>, although duly warned and<lb/> being now solemnly called come not but make default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the matters and things stated in the petition be taken<lb/> against the said <name>Louisa</name> and her husband as confessed: and neither party requiring a Jury this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the being fully advised<lb/> of and concerning the premises, doth consider, order and adjudge as follows;- that the proceeds of the<lb/> estate of <name>Thomas J Harper</name>, deceased, which came to the hands of said <name>Andrew Harper</name> as<lb/> executor or otherwise amounts to the sum of three thousand nine hundred and nine dollars and<lb/> sixty six cents, That with the interest thereof said <name>Andrew</name> supported his father and mother during<lb/> their lives, as required by the will of said <name>Thomas</name>, aided by the private means of said <name>Andrew</name>,<lb/> and in all other matters in the management of said estate and the distribution thereof has<lb/> acted wisely, prudently and in accordance with the best interest of all the parties claiming part<lb/> thereof; that the entire interest of Polly Smith in said estate, being one fifth equal to the sum of<lb/> seven hundred and eights one dollars and ninety three cents, was, at instance and request, invested<lb/> in real estate in the State of Illinois, which she used and enjoined during her life, and at her<lb/> death paged to her children, and the defendants have no further claim therefor against said<lb/> executor; that the one fifth portion of said estate, being the sum of seven hundred and eighty one<lb/> dollars and ninety three cents, due defendant, <name>Emily C Holmes</name>, has in like, manner been ad<lb/>vanced and paid to her, and she and her husband have no further claim or demand against<lb/> said executor therefor; that by prudent investment of the one fifth part of said estate due said<lb/> plaintiffs, as heirs of <name>Robert Harper</name>, being the sum of seven hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> ninety three cents, has now increased to the sum of thirteen hundred and forty five dollars<lb/> and seventy cents, and the same is now held by the said <name>Andrew Harper</name>, under the will of his<lb/> brother, for the use of said plaintiffs, jointly: therefore it is adjudged and ordered that the said<lb/> action of the defendant, <name>Andrew Harper</name>, in the management and distribution of the proceeds of<lb/> said estate, and proceeds thereof, be and the same is hereby ratified and confirmed, as to all par<lb/>ties in this litigation: and it is further ordered that the said <name>Andrew Harper</name> pay to the said <name>John<lb/> Hartshorn</name>, as curator for said plaintiffs, <name>Isabella</name> and <name>Lavenia Harper</name>, the said sum of thirteen<lb/> hundred and forty five dollars and seventy cents, in full of their claims and demand against him as<lb/> executor or otherwise, and the written receipt of said <name>Hartshorn</name> therefor shall forever be valid and<lb/> binding on said plaintiffs, or either of them, for the same. It is further ordered that each party pay<lb/> their own costs in this behalf expended and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Martin C Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret S Evington</name><lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Thomas C Evington</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Company</name><lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Count that this cause be dismissed a tits costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="573" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0576.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 707<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, ten days additional time<lb/> is given him to file an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Quinnsbang Bank</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed and cause continued by consent.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-07">Saturday, May 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name>,<lb/> and <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>Daniel J Hancock</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name>, <name>Charles Valentine</name>,<lb/> <name>John S Dumlass</name>, <name>Robert M Renick</name>,<lb/> and <name>Alexander Peterson Jr</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the entry made herein on the yesterday,<lb/> the sixth, instant, be set aside, and the following entered<lb/> <unclear>munc pro tunc</unclear> as of that date in liar thereof:<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs and the defendants, <name>Alexander,<lb/> Hancock</name>, <name>Chappell</name>, <name>Renick</name> and <name>Peterson</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, thereupon the plaintiffs dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Valentine</name> and <name>Dumlass</name>; and the parties, waiving a Jury, submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find there from that the defendants, <name>Renick</name> and <name>Peterson</name>, are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of six thousand and seventy eight dollars and fifty cents, and that the defendants,<lb/> <name>Alexander</name>, <name>Hancock</name> and <name>Chappell</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine thousand and<lb/> ninety two dollars and nineteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendants the sums aforesaid in form aforesaid as found by the Court and there costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. Motions for a new trial field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 134, 92</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>William M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon<lb/> a verdict upon their oaths find for he plaintiff and assess his damages<lb/> at the sum of one hundred and thirty four dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damage aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Thereupon the plaintiff files an<lb/> assignment of the above judgment to <name>Thomas C Chester</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles J Baker</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the assignee herein, <name>John Tams</name><lb/> and <name>Charles Johnson</name> are appointed appraisers to appraise the<lb/> property and effect assigned.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="574" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0577.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Clinton</name> (of color) commonly called <name>Clinton</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Blackburn</name>, <name>Edward M Blackburn</name>, <name>Martha A Blackburn</name>, <name>Charles A Blackburn</name>, and <name>Rufus C Blackburn</name> and <name>Edward Hall</name> curator of the estates of the said <name>Martha A</name> <name>Charles A</name> and <name>Rufus C</name>.</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition for freedom<lb/> and also an application for case to sue as a poor person, and<lb/> at appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the petition<lb/> contains sufficient matter to authorize the commencement of<lb/> a suit. It is ordered that the said plaintiff be allowed to sue<lb/> as a poor person, and that he have reasonable liberty to attend<lb/> his counsel and the Court, as occasion may require, and that<lb/> he be not removed out of the jurisdiction of this Court and be<lb/> not subject to any swerity on account of this application for freedom.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 263,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs 647<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment. Now come the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and sixty three dollars and eighty five cents, and consents<lb/> that judgment may be rendered against him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 540,58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stillwell</name><lb/> vs 648<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment. Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit whereby be confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five hundred and forty dollars and fifty eight cents, and consents that<lb/> judgment be rendered against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 130,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of <name>Edward Crely</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Mary Crely</name>, <name>Bernard Fortin</name>, and <name>John Crely</name></head>
            <p>On Bond. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by leave<lb/> of Court <name>John Crely</name> is made a codefendant, and the Coun<lb/>terclaim refilled herein, by consent, and a written reply thereto<lb/> waived; and no jury being required the Court from the proofs<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of one hundred and thirty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>William H Osborn</name>, Commissioner appointed<lb/> by the Court to investigate the accounts of the plaintiff and defendant<lb/> with the late firms of <name>Houseman</name> and <name>Smith</name> and <name>Houseman Smith<lb/> and Company</name>, and files his motion for allowance for his services rendered and to be rendered<lb/> herein which motion being seen heard and by the Court fully understood, it is ordered that the<lb/> same be sustained; and in accordance therewith it is ordered by the Court that <name>Augustus N<lb/> Berthoud</name>, the receiver appointed herein, pay to said <name>William H Osborn</name>, out of the funds<lb/> in his hands, the sum of one hundred and eighty two dollars for services by said <name>Osborn</name> as<lb/> Commissioner, up to this time rendered; and further that he pay, to said <name>Osborn</name> from month<lb/> to month, out of the funds as aforesaid, compensation, for his services as said Commissioner,<lb/> as claimed by him.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="575" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0578.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> et al<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until the ninth instant is given the defendant<lb/> to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Wakelam</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>Charles N Valentine</name>,<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff<lb/> withdraws his motion to strike out parts of amended answer herein,<lb/> and the parties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same doth find for the defendant. It is therefore considered<lb/>by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit herein but that the defendants go hence<lb/>without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 303,30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 633.<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>On Check.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendant, although duly called<lb/> comes not nor hath he answered demurred or otherwise pleaded to the plain<lb/>tiffs petition wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and three dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1158, 53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rufus Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 634<lb/> <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called, comes not, nor hath he answered, demurred or otherwise pleaded to the<lb/> petition herein, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the said petition betaken against the defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of eleven hundred and fifty eight dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the<lb/> rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter A Berthold</name> et al<lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Andrew Downing</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and the execution issues therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Saynisch</name> et al<lb/> vs 213.<lb/> <name>Thomas Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out the set off herein being hear and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out parts of the petition herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="576" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0579.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-09">Monday May 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> vs 103.<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> and<lb/> <name>James H Haydon</name></head>
            <p>Now come the defendants by their attorney, and the plaintiff failing to<lb/> amend, therefore on motion of said defendants, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that final judgment for defendants be rendered on<lb/> the demurrer herein. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by her suit herein but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiff their costs herein and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Evelyn A Burt</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> and<lb/> <name>Armelder F Pack</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff failing to amend, therefore on motion of the defendants, by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the defendants go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abram H Marble</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Bt Mariner</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 404, 26.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William North</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Scott</name><lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> four dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and<lb/>have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 128, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L Weber</name> and<lb/> <name>Sebastian Fetter</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Charles Harziq</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly and called, come not but makes default, wherefore it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed; and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs assesses the<lb/> Plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and twenty eight dollars and sixteen cents. It is<lb/> therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 424, 87</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The <unclear>Actua</unclear> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 191<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Kidd</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and no Jury being<lb/> required the Court from the proofs assesses the Plaintiffs damages at the sum of four hundred<lb/> and twenty four dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefor considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid and its costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="577" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0580.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 731,01.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name>, <name>John Lyon</name>,<lb/> <name>David Stewart</name>, <name>John T Mathias</name><lb/> and <name>James B Murray</name><lb/> vs 109<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name>, <name>James M Ward</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Shepperd</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Ward</name>, But the defendants<lb/> <name>Sell</name> and <name>Shepperd</name>, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/>is taken against them as confessed; and the Court doth<lb/> find from the instruments in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hun<lb/>dred and thirty one dollars and one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> et al<lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Peters</name> et al<lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>Alex Finley</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deitz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual<lb/> Fire and Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Scotts</name> motion for a new trial herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 625,21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Rockwell</name> and<lb/> <name>john westervelt</name><lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>Robert Hilton</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent and<lb/> agree that the attachment herein be dissolved and judgment<lb/> rendered herein for the plaintiffs for the sum of six hundred and<lb/> and twenty five dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution, therefor.<lb/> The parties consent that execution be stayed until <date when="--10-01">first day of October</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> et al<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs, by their attorney withdraw their motion to strike out part<lb/> of the answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 151<lb/> <name>Daniel E Bryan</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the defendants motion<lb/> to dismiss this suit doth order that the same be sustained. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> et al<lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>Jno H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Answered filed by the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="578" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0581.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name></head>
            <p>Continued on application of defendant at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wittigh</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Peter Bressaw</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David S Bigham</name><lb/> vs 106<lb/> <name>Geo Gletzinger</name> adm</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent <unclear>Boisanbin</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lazarus Hallgarten</name> et al<lb/> vs 111<lb/> <name>Benjamin Rosen</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent a parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed a defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh <unclear>McKelvy</unclear></name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>amended answer of <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and <name>Robert Campbell</name><lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>John Nicholay</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security<lb/> for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name></head>
            <p>Amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ira H Stout</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>Edward S Holliday</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 374, 92.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>James J McBride</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Jecko</name>, and<lb/> <name>Robert S Macdonald</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and the plaintiff dismisses<lb/> this but the defendants, <name>Jecko</name> and <name>Macdonald</name> although duly called come not suit as to defendant, <name>James J McBride</name>; and the plaintiff waiv<lb/>ing a Jury submit its this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and <lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/>sum of three hundred and seventy four dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Bernard <unclear>Bunutis</unclear></name>, <name>Charles <unclear>Stuever</unclear></name>, <name>James <unclear>Steratt</unclear></name>, <name>S C Cochran</name>, <name>P A<lb/> Goldstein</name>, <name>James Shields</name>, <name>P F Laughran</name>, <name>J H Goddard</name>, <name>Robert P<lb/> Studley</name>, <name>Charles Slevin</name>, <name>P Leibig</name>, and <name>A G Edwards</name>, who being duly elected tied and sworn<lb/> the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid<lb/> over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="579" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0582.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-10">Tuesday May 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Semple</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus awarded to Illinois for the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Duncan S Carter</name> et al<lb/> vs 105<lb/> Steam Boat Florida</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J Lockwood</name> et al<lb/> vs 106<lb/> Steam Boat Florida</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhammer</name> et al<lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and amend the petition<lb/> herein by striking out the name of <name>Mary Korhammer</name>, as a<lb/> co plaintiff, and the defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> 827<lb/> <name>Stephen H Houses</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.<lb/> Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 890,20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman W Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>William L Catherwood</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward C Catherwood</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius Busch</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly called come not; and no Jury being required<lb/> the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and ninety dol<lb/>lars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff is the owner and that he retain the possession of the property<lb/> delivered to him and recover of the defendant the damages as assessed and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Morrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Platt R Greene</name> <unclear>&amp;c</unclear></head>
            <p>On motion of the Sheriff of St Louis County leave is given him<lb/> to amend his return on the execution herein, which amendment<lb/> is accordingly made.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="580" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0583.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia A Hicks</name><lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>Charles Carroll Hicks</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly served and solemnly called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the evidence doth find that the plaintiff is a person of good moral char<lb/>acter, and an innocent and injured party. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted<lb/> with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an un married person and<lb/> that she pay the costs herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1093,16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Linus Jackson</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>Lyman Sherwood</name></head>
            <p>Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and no Jury being required the Court<lb/> from the proofs finds that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of ten hundred and ninety three dollars and sixteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Judg<lb/>ment to bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Job M Wingetal</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Joseph Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A V Patter</name><lb/> vs 129<lb/> <name>E A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> et al<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac T Greene</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Wm A Nelson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew A Van Zeyst</name><lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Illinois Central Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and the plaintiff<lb/> files a bill of specifications and the defendant with draws<lb/> his motion to dismiss; thereupon come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Bernard Bunitis</name>, <name>Frederick Nagle</name>, <name>St Bigelow</name>, <name>E McNeil</name>,<lb/> <name>George Corning</name>, <name>William C Defriez</name>, <name>E C Ketchum</name>, <name>William Rower</name>, <name>George McPhetridge</name>,<lb/> <name>Fleming Crump</name>, <name>Adam Bier</name> and <name>J B Robinson</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, further procee<lb/>dings were laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="581" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0584.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-11">Wednesday May 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John <unclear>Schruider</unclear></name><lb/> vs 191<lb/> <name>Frederick Mahner</name></head>
            <p>Petition Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and by leave of Court<lb/> files an additional affidavit to his petition herein, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs assesses the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff retain the possession of the property mentioned in the petition and affidavit and also<lb/> recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>George T<lb/> Camp</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>,<lb/> <name>William Haight</name>, <name>Charles E<lb/> Maurice</name>, <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>James A<lb/> Raynor</name> garnishees of <name>Terre Haute<lb/> Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> garnishees, <name>Alexander</name>, <name>Camp</name> and <name>Maurice</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned, come not not have they an<lb/>swered the interrogatories herein wherefore, it is<lb/> ordered that the said interrogatories be taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and to Jury being required, the<lb/> Court, on motion of plaintiff, doth assess the amount<lb/> due from the garnishees <name>Colburn</name>, <name>Camp</name>, <name>Alexander</name><lb/> <name>Haight</name>, <name>Maurice</name>, <name>Hull</name> and <name>Raynor</name>, at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said garnishees the sum aforesaid and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>George T<lb/> Camp</name>, <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>,<lb/> <name>William Haight</name>, <name>Charles E Maurice</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert Hull</name>, <name>James R Raynor</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis Rail Road<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> garnishees, <name>Alexander</name>, <name>Campe</name> and <name>Maurice</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned come not nor have they answered<lb/> the interrogations herein, wherefore, it is ordered that<lb/> the said interrogatories herein be taken against them<lb/> as confessed, and the said other garnishees although<lb/> called come not; and no Jury being required the<lb/> Court doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> garnishees, <name>Colburn</name>, <name>Camp</name>, <name>Alexander</name>, <name>Haight</name>, <name>Maurice</name>, <name>Hull</name> and <name>Raynor</name> the damages<lb/> aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore, The plaintiff with<lb/> draws the denials of answers of garnishees <name>Henry Bulte</name> and <name>John S Thompson</name> and<lb/> files motions for judgment on their answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> and <name>John S Thompson</name><lb/> garnishees of the <name>Terre Haute Alton<lb/> &amp; St Louis Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>The plaintiff withdraws the denials of the answers<lb/> of said garnishees and files motions for judgment<lb/> on their answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richd R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to relax Sheriffs costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="582" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0585.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 293,25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Cox</name><lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by consent of<lb/> parties leave is given the plaintiff to amend his petition herein, duly in<lb/>serting the Christian name, <name>Edward</name>, of the plaintiff; thereupon the defen<lb/>dant withdraws his answer herein leaving this suit undefended, wherefore, on motion, it is<lb/>ordered that the petition be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ninety three dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Rebecca Fairman</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Charles M Fairmann</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and affidavit from<lb/> which it appears that the defendant is a non resident of the State<lb/> of Missouri, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff, by her attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the court that said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commend<lb/> against him to obtain a decree of divorce from on the ground of cruel and barbarous treatment<lb/> and desertion, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September<lb/> next, and on or before the sixth day thereof answer, demur or otherwise plead to the plaintiffs<lb/> petition the same will be taken against him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 309,74.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward R Montgomery</name><lb/> vs 165<lb/> <name>Charles Lambe</name> and<lb/> <name>William Lambe</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants with<lb/>draw their plea in abatement herein, and agree with the plaintiffs<lb/> that judgment be rendered herein for the plaintiffs for the sum<lb/> of three hundred and nine dollars and seventy four cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.<lb/> The parties consent that the issue of execution herein be stayed until thirty first day of August next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Winton</name> etal<lb/> vs 313<lb/> <name>Adam Wetzel</name>,</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the judgment by default is on consid<lb/>eratin by the Court, overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a<lb/> new trial filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Jas J McBride</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>Wm M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Boellert</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>Franklin Savings Inst</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> admr of <name>Chas</name> &amp; <name>Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jury em<lb/>pannelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="583" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0586.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-12">Thursday May 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 418,90.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Consolidated Insurance<lb/> Company</name> of the City of Philadelphia<lb/> vs 343.<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name>, <name>John B Mears</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Scollary</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Miller</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and eighteen dollars<lb/> and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Harper</name> and <name>Lavenia<lb/> Harper</name> by their curator <name>John<lb/> Hartshom</name><lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Andrew Harper</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their, attorney, and acknowledge<lb/> to have received the full and entire sum ordered to be paid<lb/> by <name>Andrew Harper</name> to <name>John Hartshom</name> as curator for the<lb/> plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Sal S Sonneborn</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs 600<lb/> <name>Meyer Dittenhoeffer</name> garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that said garni<lb/>shee be discharged at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs 212<lb/> <name>Sal S Sonneborn</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Sonneborn</name><lb/> vs 602<lb/> <name>Meyer Dittenhoeffer</name> garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpke</name> et al<lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Frederick <unclear>Roever</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136.<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal.</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="584" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0587.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-13">Friday May 13th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name> and<lb/> <name><unclear>Eurotus</unclear> W Barnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit according<lb/> to law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the<lb/> property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed is said property be not delivered to him to<lb/> take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kingston Coal Company</name><lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Carter</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed its costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1671,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dubuque Branch of the State<lb/> Bank of Iowa</name><lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>George L Marshall</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Smith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by to attorney, and the defen<lb/>dants, in person, also come and file a statement in writing<lb/> duly verified whereby they confess themselves indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hundred and seventy<lb/> one dollars and forty five cents and authorize the Court to<lb/> enter judgment against them for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 216,15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name> as administrator<lb/> of <name>Francis F Rickman</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>John A McElroy</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, where fore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixteen dollars<lb/> and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the doth aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 347,17</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Nulson</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph J Mersman</name><lb/> vs 249<lb/> <name>William Koser</name>, <name>J G C Heinrichs</name>,<lb/> and <name>Peter Reinhart</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs; by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Koser</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Heinrichs</name> and <name>Reinhart</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this suit<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and forty seven dollars and seventeen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nelson F Beckwith</name><lb/> vs 301<lb/> <name>Lewis A Welton</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the said plaintiffs costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="585" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0588.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Louisa Guerrette</name><lb/> vs 451<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>John Largue</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, <name>P E Burke</name>, and<lb/> acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-04-21">21st of April 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 5,00</note>
            <p><name>Elizah Wells</name> is fined five dollars for non attendance as a witness after having been<lb/> summoned so to do.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>Statement of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Samuel Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias Summons issue herein returnable to the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The parties file a stipulation in these causes.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Statement of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Boyse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Statement of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward &amp;co</name><lb/> vs 536<lb/> <name>Wyllys King</name> etal</head>
            <p>Petition for Production of Books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal</p>
            <p>Now again come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until<lb/> tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="586" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0589.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-14">Saturday May 14th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court mat pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Cormerais</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery. The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit, according to law,<lb/> Claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; where<lb/>fore, it is ordered by the Court that the defendant deliver the property spec<lb/>ified in said affidavit to the <name>Coroner</name> of St Louis County and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed<lb/> is said property be not delivered to him to take if from the defendant and deliver it to the<lb/> plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment. On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of four hundred and eighty six dollars and fifty cents.<lb/> founded on two promissory notes executed by the defendant to the plaintiff; and that his property<lb/> has been attached, and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held<lb/> at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September<lb/> next, and on or before the third day thereof answer demur or otherwise plead to the petition<lb/> herein judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. It<lb/> is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V Bryan</name> etal<lb/> vs 160&amp;161<lb/> <name>Edward St Michel</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Francis A Hunt</name>, inter pleader, by his attorney, and dis<lb/>misses his interplea herein; thereupon come also the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, and acknowledge to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein <date when="1856-01-26">January 26th 1856</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Charleson</name> etal<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Edward St Michel</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Francis A Hunt</name>, by his attorney, and dismisses his inter plea<lb/> herein; and the plaintiffs also come, by their attorney, and acknowledge<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="1856-01-26">26th day of January 1856</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name> etal<lb/> vs 107<lb/> St Bt Sioux City</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>William Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of the plaintiff in support of motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court. Now again come the parties, by their attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial<lb/> of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing<lb/> by his suit herein but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiff his costs<lb/> herein expended.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="587" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0590.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-16">Monday May 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 404,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Spahr</name>, <name>Chester W Brewster</name>,<lb/> and <name>Moses Hillard</name><lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>, and<lb/> <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plain<lb/>tiffs for the sum of four hundred and four dollars and<lb/> fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt as agreed<lb/> upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Judgment to bear interest at<lb/>the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Boellert</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>Franklin Savings Inst</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theresa Pereles</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>Jo Pereles</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Davenport</name> etal<lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Chas H Heywood</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue for James Morris.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Chas W Barr</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Seemuller</name> etal<lb/> vs 153.<lb/> <name>Timothy Van Link</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 534,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and <name>William P Gettys</name>.<lb/> vs 270<lb/> <name>Thomas Owens</name>, <name>H E Block</name>,<lb/> <name>F D Clark</name> and <name>H G Patterson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Patterson</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Owens</name>, <name>Block</name> and <name>Clark</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and no Jury being required the Court from the<lb/> proofs assesses the plaintiffs damages at the sum of five hundred and thirty four dollars and<lb/> sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the damages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1060,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> Vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William T Hollister</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition herein,<lb/> and the defendants, in person, also come and file an answer herein,<lb/> and enter their appearance as if served with process; and the parties<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon said petition and answer,<lb/> and the Court finds there from that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> ten hundred and six dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name><unclear>N</unclear> Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Continue by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="588" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0591.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Wright</name> etal<lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Henry <unclear>Frauenfeld</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue for defendant <name><unclear>Frauenfeld</unclear></name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick A Garlichs</name> etal<lb/> vs 307<lb/> <name>Michael Dieffenbach</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Bassett</name> etal<lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Peter ambo</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 592, 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Jackson</name><lb/> vs 219<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendant withdraws his<lb/> answer herein leaving this suit undefended, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five hundred and ninety two dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 283.<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William McCully</name> etal<lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>Henry A Schuedermann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis J Rankin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name>, <name>Cornelius D<lb/> Sullivan</name>, and <name>Jeremiah T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, <lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed, but the plaintiffs say<lb/> they will not further prosecute this action but voluntarily<lb/> take a non suit. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendants go<lb/> hence without day and recover of said plaintiffs their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. Leave given plaintiffs to move to set aside non suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhammer</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Jno Nicholay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Ohis Mississippi Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Wm G Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Rue</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>The L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="589" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0592.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Sanguinel</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>James W Reilly</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Wm</unclear> Lattimer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F A Hunt</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Pereau</name><lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>Joseph H Pereau</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit form which it appears to<lb/> the Court that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri there<lb/>fore, on motion of the defendant, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a<lb/> decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony by the plaintiff with the defendant, on the ground<lb/> of desertion and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next and<lb/> on or before the sixth day thereof answer the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the<lb/> Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleazer Sherman</name><lb/> vs 97<lb/> <name>David Caughlan</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Cornelius</name>, <name>Tunison</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> <name>Cornelius H Tunison</name>, the principal, and <name>Samuel Knox</name>, the security, <lb/> in the bond given for the production and delivery of the property at<lb/>tached produce and deliver said property, towit: thirteen mulis and two horses, to the Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County, at this office forth with; and it is further ordered that <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis County, assign said bond to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 711,96</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Doan</name>, <name>Wyllys King</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard Bigelow</name>, <name>William A Doan</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard H Bigelow</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles E King</name><lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>A Becker</name> and <name>D W Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendant,<lb/> <name>Wheeler</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the plaintiffs petition is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the defendant <name>Becker</name>, although<lb/> called come not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and exhibit, <lb/> and the Court finds there from that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven<lb/> hundred and eleven dollars and ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execu<lb/>tion therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1219, 73.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert D Glover</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Thomas Thomas</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, and the defendant, <name>Thomas Thomas</name>, and the plain<lb/>tiff dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Wm H Thomas</name>; thereupon come a<lb/> Jury, towit; <name>Henry Ewald</name>, <name>A O French</name>, <name>L Garnett</name>, <name>A Van Leer</name>, <name>A B Sluder</name>, <lb/> <name>Peter Downey</name>, <name>Henry Richter</name>, <name>C D Turner</name>, <name>S Landecker</name>, <name>Wm McNeary</name>, <name>Jno<lb/> Sexton</name> and <name>C W Keiser</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess the damages at twelve hundred and nineteen dollars and seventy three cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="590" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0593.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-17">Tuesday May 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>D M Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Edward Hogg</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> etal<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>John Schiffman</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 634,18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Fire and Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name> of Pennsylvania<lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Callaway, Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing, Company</name> and<lb/> <name>Algernon S Roberts</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--03-21">twenty first of March<lb/></date> last be set aside and this suit dismissed as to the defen<lb/>dant, Roberts; and the parties consent that judgment be<lb/> rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the<lb/> defendant for the sum of six hundred and thirty four dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, the <name>Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name>, the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and its costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1653,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Milburn</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>George W Cable</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of sixteen hundred and fifty three dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Order for Production of Book.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition for the<lb/> production of a certain book, duly verified by affidavit, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth order that the defen<lb/>dant producer on the trial of this cause a certain receipt book containing a large number<lb/> of receipts given by the plaintiff to the defendant for moneys advanced by defendant to<lb/> the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Squire</name> etal<lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue therefor. Note withdrawn</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Keevil</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>George Dunford</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="591" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0594.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>George F Hill</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James</name>, to the use of<lb/> <name>Victor Foerst</name><lb/> vs 293.<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name>, <name>Joseph H<lb/> Garrett Antoine</name> Dehoitre</head>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>A Stanton</name>, <name>Kenneth McKenzie</name>, <name>William Guion</name>, <name>A Lewellen</name>,<lb/> <name>C W Keiser</name>, <name>D Caughlan</name>, <name>Henry Renick</name>, <name>Jacob Emanuel</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Herzog</name>, <name>Gottlieb Vietter</name>, <name>J Montgomery</name>, and <name>William<lb/> McNeary</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed, and by consent<lb/> of parties the Jury herein is withdrawn, and this cause continued at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Edward Creely</name><lb/> vs 356.<lb/> <name>Mary Crely</name>, <name>Bernard Fortin</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Crely</name>.</head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, acknowledge full and entire satis<lb/>faction of the judgment rendered herein on the seventh instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Garnier no City Bank of St Louis et al.<lb/> In compromise of this suit and in full satisfaction of this decree and costs <name>Ino S<lb/> Mclure</name> acting for himself and others on the <date when="1859-05-30">30th day of May, 1859</date> paid me twelve<lb/> thousand and thirty nine dollars and five cents and delivered up to me the house named<lb/> with decree of which this is the margin. <date when="1859-07-22">July 22nd 1859</date>.<lb/> Attest <name>S Rice</name> clk.<lb/> <unclear><name>Sauis P Garnier</name></unclear></note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 6266, 11.<lb/> and<lb/> # 333, 33.<lb/> Monthly till <date when="1862-07-01">1st<lb/> July 1862</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>The City Bank of St Louis</name>,<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Abraham G<lb/> Snitzer</name>, <name>George B sanderson</name>,<lb/> <name>John S M Cune</name>, <name>Ferdin</name> and<lb/> <name>Meyer</name>, <name>Henry J Mudd</name>,<lb/> <name>George R Robinson Morris<lb/> Collins</name>, <name>William Lucas</name>, <name>Luther<lb/> M Kennett</name>, <name>John B S Lemoine</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel B Wiggins</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas A Buckland</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now, at this day, come the parties plaintiff and defendants, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the said City, Bank of St Louis, at the date of the<lb/> lease, described in and made a part of the plaintiffs petition, was<lb/> duly and legally organized as a corporation, under an "act of the<lb/> General Assembly of the State of Missouri, entitled, an Act to<lb/> regulate Banks and Banking Institutions and to create the of<lb/>fices of Bank Commissioners", approved the second day of March,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty seven; and that being so organized the<lb/> said City Bank of St Louis did on the first day of July eigh<lb/>teen hundred and fifty seven, enter into and execute the died of<lb/> lease aforesaid, by which the said City Bank of St Louis became bound to pay to the plaintiff<lb/> as rent for the property described in said deed of lease - which was to commence on the <date when="1857-07-01">first day of<lb/> July eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date> and continue for the period of five years - the sum of thirty<lb/> five hundred dollars for the first year of said lease, and four thousand dollars for every year there<lb/>after, the rent of each year to be paid in equal installments on the first day of every month during<lb/> the said term of five years: and the Court doth further find that, in the organization of said City,<lb/> Bank of St Louis, on the <date when="1857-04-02">second day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, the defendants,<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Abraham G Switzer</name>, <name>George B Sanderson</name>, <name>John S M Cune</name>, <name>Ferdin</name> and <name>Meyer</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry J Mudd</name>, <name>George R Robinson</name>, <name>Morris Collins</name>, <name>William Lucas</name>, <name>Luther M Kennett</name>,<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name>, <name>Samuel B Wiggins</name>, <name>Thomas A Buckland</name>, were duly elected and quali<lb/>fied as directors of the said City Bank of St Louis, and that said <name>John Simonds</name> was on the<lb/> <date when="1857-04-04">fourth day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, duly elected President of said City Bank<lb/> of St Louis and qualified as such: And the Court doth further find that on the <date when="1857-04-02">second day of<lb/> April, eighteen hundred and fifty, seven</date>, subscriptions had been made to the capital stock of<lb/> said City Bank of St Louis for one thousand and twenty one shares of its stock at one hun<lb/>dred dollars per share, amounting, in the aggregate, to one hundred and two thousand one<lb/> hundred dollars, and that between the <date when="1857-04-02">second day of April eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>,<lb/> and the <date when="1857-12-02">second day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, additional subscrip<lb/>tions had been made to the capital stock of said City Bank of St Louis for twenty two shares</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="592" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0595.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of stock amounting to the sum of twenty two hundred dollars; that on the subscriptions afore<lb/>said, there had been paid, anterior to the <date when="1857-12-02">second day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty<lb/> seven</date>, to the said City Bank of St Louis, and subject to the management and control of said<lb/> Directors, the sum of ten thousand six hundred and ten dollars; that there had been paid up<lb/> to said date of the <date when="1857-12-02">second day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, to said City Bank<lb/> of St Louis by <name>James N Lucas and Company</name>, as interest on deposits, the sum of one hundred and<lb/> eighty six dollars and thirty four cents; and that there had been paid by <name>Henry J Glow</name>, for rent<lb/> of office, to said City Bank of St Louis, the sum of two hundred dollars, which said several<lb/> sum of money so received amount in the aggregate to the sum of ten thousand nine hundred<lb/> and ninety six dollars and thirty four cents; and the Court doth further find that the amount of<lb/> money paid out by the said City Bank of St Louis, for expenses up to this date, is fifteen hun<lb/>dred and seven dollars and thirty four cents, leaving a balance of nine thousand four hundred<lb/> and eighty nine dollars: and the Court doth further find that the check which was given, on<lb/> the <date when="1857-12-05">fifth day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, by <name>John Simonds</name>, as President of<lb/> said City Bank of St Louis, to the plaintiff, on <name>James H Lucas and Company</name>, for the sum of<lb/> five hundred and eighty three dollars and thirty three cents, to pay the rent due the plaintiff<lb/> for the months of October and November, eighteen hundred and fifty seven, has never been<lb/> paid and that said plaintiff has a judgment against said City Bank of St Louis on said<lb/> check, which judgment is still due and wholly unsatisfied: and the Court doth further find<lb/> that on the <date when="1857-04-11">eleventh day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, the defendant, <name>Ferdinand<lb/> Mayer</name>, resigned his office of director of said Bank, that his resignation was accepted, and<lb/> that the vacancy occasioned by his resignation has never been filled: and the Court doth<lb/> further find that the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, by an act entitled; an<lb/> act to incorporate the Northern Bank of Missouri, approved november twenty third, eigh<lb/>teen hundred and fifty seven, enacted that unless the cooperators named in chapter four of<lb/> the act of the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, entitled, and act to regulate Banks<lb/> and Banking Institutions and to create the offices of Bank Commissioners, approved the second<lb/> day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty seven, incorporating the said City Bank of St Louis,<lb/> should, on or before the <date when="1857-10-01">first day of October, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, organize and es<lb/>tablish the said City, Bank of St Louis, and commence the business of Banking as therein spec<lb/>ified, that the said chapter should from and after that date be repeated: and the Cour<lb/> doth further find that on the <date when="1857-12-02">second day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, at a<lb/> meeting of the board of directors of the said city Bank of St Louis, at which meeting were present<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Morris Collins</name>, <name>George B Sanderson</name>, <name>Abraham G Switzer</name>, <name>Henry J Mudd</name>,<lb/> <name>George R Robinson</name>, and <name>John S <unclear>M Cune</unclear></name>, the following preamble and resolutions were adopted<lb/> by the said Board of Directors, viz: Whereas, the Board has become satisfied that the charter<lb/> of this Bank has does not hold out sufficient<lb/> inducements to our citizens or to capitalists from abroad to justify their taking an adequate amount<lb/> of stock to enable the Bank to go into operation, and the State Legislature, at its Session in Oc<lb/>tober last, having failed to grant the change and amendments asked for; Therefore, be it resolved;<lb/> that the President is hereby, instructed to retain a sufficient sum to pay <name>M Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> the rent of his room in the Exchange Building for the months of October and November last<lb/> past, and for such other expenses as may exist against this Bank, and then divide the remainder<lb/> prorate among the subscribers for stock by giving them his check, as President, upon the Bankers<lb/> holding said funds and at once give said Bankers a list of his checks so given: Resolved, that<lb/> after the president has complied with the fore giving resolution, he is hereby instructed to give<lb/> notice that no further effort will be made to organize said Bank and that the organization so<lb/> far as here to fore made be and the same is hereby dissolved: and the Court doth further find<lb/> that said <name>John Simonds</name>, as President of said City Bank of St Louis, in accordance with the<lb/> preamble and resolutions aforesaid, and acting by and with the consent and approval of all</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="593" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0596.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of the Directors aforesaid, herein dependants, except <name>Ferdinand Mayer</name>, who had previously resigned<lb/> as aforesaid, did illegally and in fraud of the rights of the plaintiff, as a creditor of the said City<lb/> Bank of St Louis, refund to the stock holders, the said Directors being among the number, the sum<lb/> of eight thousand nine hundred and twelve dollars and forty cents of said paid in capital before<lb/> the commencement of this suit, and that each and every one of said stock holders of said Bank<lb/> did receive and accept his prorate share of the money so refunded under the resolutions aforesaid,<lb/> and that the balance of the money received from stock subscriptions and other sources, amounting<lb/> to the sum of five hundred and seventy six dollars and sixty cents, though admitted to have been<lb/> received by them anterior to the <date when="1857-12-02">second day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty seven</date>, the<lb/> said Directors have wholly failed to account for, and that the said directors, <name>Simonds</name>,<lb/> <name>Switzer</name>, <name>Sanderson</name>, <name>M Cune</name>, <name>Mudd</name>, <name>Robinson</name>, <name>Callino</name>, <name>Lucas</name>, <name>Kennett</name>, <name>Lemorine</name>, <name>Niggins</name>,<lb/> and <name>Buckland</name>, have three illegally misapplied and misappropriated and abandoned assets<lb/> belonging to the said City Bank of St Louis amounting to the sum of nine thousand four hun<lb/>dred and eighty nine dollars: and the Court doth further find that there is now due and unpaid<lb/> to the plaintiff, payable out of the assets of the said City Bank of St Louis, the sum of six<lb/> thousand two hundred and twenty five dollars and one cent for and on account of the several<lb/> installments of rent payable according to the terms of said deed of lease, together with the<lb/> interest on said installments, and that there is also due an sum paid to the plaintiff on account of<lb/> costs in after suits paid by said plaintiff and properly chargeable against the assets of the said<lb/> City Bank of St Louis the sum of forty one dollars and ten cents, making in the aggregate now<lb/> due to the plaintiff the sum of six thousand two hundred and sixty six dollars and eleven cents,<lb/> and further that the said plaintiff is entitled to receive under the said lease assent for the<lb/> premises therein described the sum of three hundred and thirty, three dollars and thirty three<lb/> cents on the first day of every, month hereafter during the time for which said lease was made,<lb/> to wit; until the expiration of five years from the <date when="1857-07-01"> first day of July, eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty seven</date>, and that said plaintiff is also entitled to recover his costs in this suit expended:<lb/> Wherefore, it is decreed by the Court, that the deed of lease described in the plaintiffs petition is<lb/> a valid and binding lease for the whole term mentioned in said deed of lease; that all the prop<lb/>erty, effects, credits, and assets of the said City Bank of St Louis, of every description are bound<lb/> for the payment of the sum of money now due to the plaintiff under the said lease, as well<lb/> as for the costs aforesaid paid as aforesaid by the plaintiff, that is to say for the sum of six<lb/> thousand two hundred and sixty six dollars and eleven cents, and also for the payment of the<lb/> several installments of rent to become due under said lease, each installment being the sum<lb/> of three hundred and thirty, three dollars and thirty three cents, payable on the first day, of every<lb/> month hereafter during the term of said lease, ending on the <date when="1857-07-01">first day of July eighteen hundred<lb/> and sixty two</date>; and also that the unpaid portion of the subscriptions to the capital stock of<lb/> said City Bank of St Louis are a part of the assets of said Bank, and may be collected and<lb/> recovered from the subscribers to said stock in order to pay the several sums of money due to<lb/> the said plaintiff as a foresaid, and to become due under the said lease: and it is further ordered<lb/> and decreed by the Court that the defendants, <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Abraham S Switzer</name>, <name>George<lb/> B Sanderson</name>, <name>John S M Cune</name>, <name>Henry J Mudd</name>, <name>George R Robinson</name>, <name>Marris Collins</name>, <name>William<lb/> Lucas</name>, <name>Luther M Kennett</name>, <name>John B S Lemoine</name>, <name>Samuel B Niggins</name> and <name>Thomas A Buckland</name>,<lb/> on account of their misapplication of the assets of the said Bank, are personally liable to the<lb/> plaintiff in this suit for the sum of nine thousand four hundred and eighty nine dollars to be<lb/> applied in satisfaction of the rents accrued and accruing under the said lease: and it is adjudged<lb/> and decreed that the said <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Abraham G Switzer</name>, <name>George B Sanderson</name>, <name>John S<lb/> M Cune</name>, <name>Henry J Mudd</name>, <name>George R Robinson</name>, <name>Morris Collins</name>, <name>William Lucas</name>, <name>Luther M<lb/> Kennett</name>, <name>John B Lemorine</name>, <name>Samuel B Niggins</name> and <name>Thomas A Buckland</name> do, without<lb/> delay pay to the plaintiff the sum of Six thousand two hundred and sixty sis dollars and<lb/> eleven cents, the sum now due to the plaintiff and also his costs in this suit incurred, and that</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="594" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0597.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>said plaintiff have execution therefor: and it is further adjudged and decreed that said <name>Simonds</name>,<lb/> <name>Switzer</name>, <name>Sanderson</name>, <name>M Cune</name>, <name>Mudd</name>, <name>Robinson</name>, <name>Collins</name>, <name>Lucas</name>, <name>Kennett</name>, <name>Lemorine</name>, <name>Wiggins</name>,<lb/> and <name>Buckland</name> do pay over into the hands of the Clerk of this Court, to be paid to the said<lb/> plaintiff, the sum of three hundred and thirty three dollars and thirty three cents on the first<lb/> day of each and every month hereafter during the continuance of the said lease, until the sum<lb/> of nine thousand four hundred and eighty nine dollars shall be exhausted or until the further<lb/> order of this Court: and upon this failure to pay the said several sums of three hundred and<lb/> thirty three dollars and thirty three cents on the first day of each and every month as aforesaid<lb/> the said plaintiff upon every such failure shall have execution therefore against them: and<lb/> it is further ordered by the Court that the receiver in this cause appointed, shall rent or lease<lb/> the premises described in the plaintiffs petition to some good and responsible tenant and collect<lb/> from him the rents and apply the same to the payment of any sum or sums of money which<lb/> may become due to the plaintiff under the lease aforesaid, and not paid from any other source,<lb/> further if it appear to be necessary, in order to pay the sums of money payable under said<lb/> lease, whenever the same may become due, then they said recover shall recover and collect from<lb/> the persons who subscribed to the capital stock of said City Bank of St Louis a sum suffi<lb/>cient to pay to the plaintiff the said several sums of money as the same become due and pay<lb/>able to him under the lease, and make report of his proceedings in this behalf to this Court;<lb/> and either party have liberty to move the Court from time to time for such other and further or<lb/>ders as may be necessary The plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Ferdinand Mayor</name>.<lb/> motion for a new trial and also a motion to modify decree filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Clinton</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <unclear><name>H Cuald</name></unclear>, <name>M French</name>, <name>Lesley Garnett</name>, <name>Vanleer,<lb/> A B Scuder</name>, <name>Peter Downey</name>, <name>N Richter</name>, <name>S Landecker</name>, <name>William<lb/> <unclear>McNeavy</unclear></name>, <name>John Sexton</name>, <name>A Stanton</name> and <name>C D Jerner</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to<lb/> try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland
                    </name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="595" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0598.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-18">Wednesday May 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment, Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>In the matter of<lb/> <name>Anne Davis</name> and<lb/> <name>Isham Davis</name></name></head>
            <p><name>Margaret Davis</name> comes and files a petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus,<lb/> wherefore it is ordered that a writ issue to <name>Cha Roderman</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> et al<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>Agreed Case filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>John T Watson</name><lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>Jacob Ringgold Co</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the defendants be notified that a civil action has been commended<lb/> against them for the sum of two hundred and sixty one dollars and<lb/> fifty five cents and interest founded on a note executed by the<lb/> defendants, and that their property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and on or before the third day thereof<lb/> answer the plaintiffs petition judgment will be rendered against them and their property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to<lb/> law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.<lb/> Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>Griffin P Theobald</name> garn.<lb/> of <name>Jacob Ringgold, Co</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come but the said garnishee although<lb/> called comes not nor hath he answered herein wherefore it is or<lb/>dered that the interrogations herein be taken as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Timothy Ryon</name></head>
            <p>Answer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1551,55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Kruse</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas B Hudson</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the petition and answer and the Court doth find there from<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen<lb/> hundred and fifty one dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and his cost herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment.<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Otto <unclear>Onken</unclear></name></head>
            <p><name>EP Gray</name> files an application for discharge from his trust as<lb/> assignee herein, and the Court doth refer said application to<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> as Commissioner, to examine the merits of<lb/> the same; and it is ordered that said Commissioner report his proceedings with all convenient<lb/> speed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cha H Saltmarsh</name> admr<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>W E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="596" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0599.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#120,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Clinton</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jury empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jury upon their oaths find for the plaintiffs and<lb/> assess the damages at the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#106,29</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Beste</name> and<lb/> <name>William McClelland</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>William Grassmuck</name> and<lb/> <name>peter Grassmuck</name></head>
            <p>Pet on account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>peter Grassmuck</name>, by their<lb/> attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>William<lb/> Grassmuck</name>; and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs doth<lb/> find for the plaintiffs and assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of<lb/> one hundred and six dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2648,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Jones</name><lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties day their attorneys, and submit this Cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty six hundred<lb/> and forty eight dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Saynish</name> et al<lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Thomas Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Hiram Crittenden</name>,<lb/> <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name> and<lb/> <name>James C Page</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>Smith</name> and <name>Crittenden</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendants,<lb/> <name>Issac W Mitchell</name>, and <name>James C Page</name>; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>H<lb/> <unclear>Eivald</unclear></name>, <name>A O French</name>, <name>Kenneth McKenzie</name>, <name>William <unclear>Gerion</unclear></name>, <name>A <unclear>Lervelbyn</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>H Reinecke</name>, <name>J Herzog</name>, <name>G Vetter</name>, <name>William H Dexter</name>, <name>J J Montgomery</name>, <name>Lek<lb/> Palmer</name> and <name>D Caughlan</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected,<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="597" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0600.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-19">Thursday May 19th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Harmond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 405<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>George M Zuary</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 407<lb/> <name>John O Fallon</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>W S Harney</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>James A Rogers</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 410<lb/> <name>Richard Graham</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Cha Chambers</name> et al</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>Louis C Hirschberg</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 413<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Ahern</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>Morris Carroll</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Henry Wiebling</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Jos H Lemothere</name></head>
            <p>By consent of the<lb/> parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that these causes be continued until the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> Vs<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a second bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 427<lb/> City Bank of St Louis</head>
            <p>By leave plaintiff withdraw the check suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Allisbach</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Valentine Lechner</name> and <name>Jacob Negman</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery<lb/> The plaintiff comes and files a petition and also an affidavit according<lb/> to law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described;<lb/> wherefore it is ordered that the defendants deliver said property in the<lb/> affidavit described to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff<lb/> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and<lb/> deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Devlin</name> et al<lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Morris D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court, is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> et al<lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob <unclear>Emsminjer</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="598" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0601.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Dan L Latourette</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Benton P Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, files a statement<lb/> from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under<lb/> the unit herein will be attended with much expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit and that the said property is likely to depreciate in value; therefore it is<lb/> ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said property, according to law, and report his proceedings<lb/> herein on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Turner</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Benton p Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, files a statement<lb/> from which it appears that keeping of the property attached herein will be<lb/> attended with much expense before the probable termination of this suit,<lb/> and that the same is likely to depreciate in value; therefore it is ordered that said Sheriff sell<lb/> said property according to law and report his proceedings herein on or before the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 536<lb/> <name><unclear>Nyllys</unclear> King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order for Production of Books.<lb/> The Court having heard and considered the plaintiffs petition for the pro<lb/>duction of certain books doth order that the defendants produce on the<lb/> trial of this cause the Cash Book, Day Book, Journal and Ledger of<lb/> the firm of <name>Doan King</name> and Company for the year eighteen hundred and fifty seven.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> and <name>Hiram Crittenden</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jury em<lb/>pannelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="599" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0602.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-20">Friday, May 20th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to New York for defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William <unclear>Azeliant</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Amended answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chalmer D Blossom</name><lb/> vs 587<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Amended answer of Nelson and martin filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac J Green</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>W H Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Smith</name> and <name>Hobbs</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">Steam Boat <name>W M Morrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elisha W Brown</name>, <name>Archibald<lb/> C Goddin</name>, <name>James J Johnson</name> and<lb/> <name>Barton S Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, and acknowledges<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered herein on the <date when="--04-14">fourteenth day of April</date> last past<lb/> for one hundred and fifty eight dollars and thirty one cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lyon</name> et al<lb/> vs 215<lb/> <name>James <unclear>Lellie</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, this cause is dismissed, and it is ordered that<lb/> execution issue therefore</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lyon</name> et al<lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>Rose A Masterson</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs discharge the garnishees and it is ordered that<lb/> execution issue against them for the costs. Ten dollars allowed each.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>Hiram Crittenden</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of<lb/> this cause progressed but not being finished further proceedings<lb/> are laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="600" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0603.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-21">Saturday May 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John M Fulton</name> is, on motion of <name>J K Knight</name>, admitted and enrolled as a<lb/> member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A M Clroy</name></head>
            <p>motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David M Kee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Boswell</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Job p Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J Murdock</name> and <name>Charles K Dickson</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs, by their attorney, in open Court acknowledge to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein on the <date when="1858-03-29">29th of March 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Hazard</name><lb/> vs?<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Zimmerman</name><lb/> vs 401<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Alias summons for <name>Bacon</name> and <name>Wyman</name> ordered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#8974,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Salomon Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>Hiram Crittenden</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial<lb/> progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum<lb/>of eight thousand nine hundred and seventy four dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in from afore<lb/>said as assessed and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="601" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0604.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-23">Monday, May 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1108,25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William J Hollister</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition, and<lb/> the defendants also come and waiving the issue and service of process<lb/> enter their appearance to this action, and file an answer herein;<lb/> and the parties, plaintiff and defendants, waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition note and answer, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find therefore that the defendants indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of eleven hundred and eight dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants to the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Semple</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Perry <unclear>Fenlason</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Newman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Pearce</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D M Kee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cha Boswell</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W R Martin</name> et al<lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Christian Setziq</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert B Bowler</name><lb/> vs 203<lb/> <name>W Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>W my Webb</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#299,21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert E Daniels</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph H Daniels</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants with<lb/>draws his answer herein leaving this suit undefended, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiffs, the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of wri<lb/>ting on which this action if found that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and ninety nine dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution. therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the mater of<lb/> <name>Annie Davis</name> and<lb/> <name>Isham Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Charles Roderman</name>, the respondent, with his return<lb/> on the unit herein and the bodies of said <name>Annie</name> and <name>Isham Davis</name>,<lb/> and thereupon the hearing of the matters in controversy are laid<lb/> over until to morrow morning. Demeurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="602" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0605.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>William Whitely, Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Haseltine</name>, and<lb/> <name>James C Haseltine</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the defendants be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against them for the sum of fifteen hundred<lb/> and sixty four dollars and thirteen cents and interest founded<lb/>on two promissory notes executed by them under the firm name<lb/> of <name>Whitely Haseltine and Company</name>, and that their property has been attached and unless<lb/> they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next and an on<lb/> before the third day thereof answer the petition herein judgment will be rendered against<lb/> them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy here of be<lb/> published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in<lb/> the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Robt B Clark</name> et al<lb/><lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment of <name>Joseph Rowell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>Petition for order on assignee filed. Separate affi<lb/>davit of <name>D A January</name>, <name>J D Osborne</name> and <name>ES Sloan</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri in the relation<lb/> and to the use of <name>Edward Hogg</name>.<lb/> vs 423<lb/> <name>Michael J C cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry G <unclear>Soulard</unclear></name>.</head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties <unclear>by</unclear> their attorneys and agree<lb/> that judgment may be rendered herein in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff and against the defendants for the<lb/> sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs in this behalf expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri in the relation<lb/> and to the use of <name>William L Weller</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Michael S Cere</name> <name>James H Lucas</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry G Soulard</name>,</head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys and agree that<lb/> judgment be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for<lb/> the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri in the relation and<lb/> to the use of <name>David M Smith</name>, <name>William<lb/> H Smith</name> and <name>Adam Smith</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry G Soulard</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and agree that<lb/> judgment be rendered herein favor of the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Cunningham</name><lb/> No155<lb/> <name>John A Williams</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and an application for leave to one as a poor person and the<lb/> Court upon consideration thereof, doth order that said application be granted.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="603" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0606.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G <unclear>Price</unclear></name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Bars G Leper</name>, <name>Evan Williams</name>,<lb/> <name>J B Bell</name>, <name>S H Fulton</name> and<lb/> <name>R W Bailey</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and an affidavit from which<lb/> it appears that the defendants are non residents, of this<lb/> State, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff by, his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the defendants be notified that<lb/> <unclear>a</unclear> civil action has been commenced against them for the<lb/> sum off two hundred dollars on account of the failure of the defendants to comply with a<lb/> contract made by them with the plaintiff for the piloting of the steam boat Stephen Decatur,<lb/> and that their property has been attached and unless they be and appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on<lb/> the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer to the<lb/> action aforesaid judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy<lb/> the same. It is further ordered that a copy, hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>Lyman Scott</name>, by his attorney, files and affidavit for an<lb/> appeal herein, wherefore the Court doth order an appeal be granted to<lb/> said defendant to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered;<lb/> Thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the plaintiffs costs. Leave given plaintiff<lb/> to withdraw depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#232,20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Russell Scarrett</name> and<lb/> <name>Paris H Mason</name><lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now the plaintiffs, and by their attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> called come not; no Jury being required the Court from the proofs<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and thirty two dollars and twenty cents. It<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear ten percent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander <unclear>Cruikshanks</unclear></name><lb/> vs 336<lb/> <name>Robert P Clark</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Berk</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>William Turton Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, but the plaintiff failing to<lb/> amend, therefore on motion of defendants, it is ordered that <unclear>judgment</unclear><lb/> on demurrer be made final. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence without<lb/> day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Paul Reinhard</name> et al garnishees<lb/> of <name>Henry Mc Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishees, <name>Samuel L Sawyer</name> and <name>Leander J Sharp</name>,<lb/> by attorney, it is ordered that they be discharged hence at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum often dollars is<lb/> allowed each for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="604" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0607.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#44,00 vs<lb/> <name>Jones</name> and<lb/> 1 cent against<lb/> <name>Barry Quigley</name>,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Reynolds</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Robert L Jones</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard Barry</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Quigley</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Jones</name>, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, but the defendants <name>Barry</name> and <name><unclear>Luigley</unclear></name>, although called come not there<lb/>upon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>J F Amelung</name>, <name>E Fisher</name>, <name>John Foy</name>, <name>William<lb/> H Long</name>, <name>Robert Runyan</name>, <name>C Crone</name> <name>I M Franciscus</name>, <name>R Michaelmore</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard Nome</name>, <name>Henry petring</name>, <name>P Lannert</name>, and <name>William Sensenderfer</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the<lb/> issues joined between the plaintiff and the defendant <name>Jones</name>, and also to inquire into and assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages against the defendants, <name>Barry</name> and <name>Luigley</name>, the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and against the<lb/> defendant, <name>Jones</name>, and assess the damages against him at the sum of forty four dollars, and assess<lb/> the damages against <name>Barry</name> and <name>Luigley</name>, at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed against them respectively, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalman Taylor</name>, <name>Harvey Hubbell</name>,<lb/> and <name>John W Knapp</name><lb/> vs 142,<lb/> <name>Morris D Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country,<lb/> files a statement from which it appears that the keeping<lb/> of the property attached herein will be attended with<lb/> much expense before the probable termination of this<lb/> suit, and that the same is likely to depreciate in value; therefore it is ordered that said<lb/> Sheriff sell said property according to law and make a report of his proceedings herein on or be<lb/>fore the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> Garn.</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss proceedings against garnishee filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Cornelius H Tunison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Charles Kick</name> is fined five dollars for non attendance as a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F <unclear>Hodzle</unclear></name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, <name>Robert M Funkhouser</name>,<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>William H Maurice</name>, <name>Ringrose<lb/> I Watson</name>, <name>Peter A Ladew</name>, <name>Augustus P<lb/> Ladew</name>, <name>Samuel Jacoby</name>, <name>John W Thornburgh</name>,<lb/> <name>Moses L pottle</name>, <name>Josiah G M Clellan</name>,<lb/> <name>James C Moody</name> and <name>William<lb/> S <unclear>Idillyer</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, except <name>Moses L Pottle</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this<lb/> suit as to said defendant, <name>Pottle</name>; thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>C W Woodworth</name>, <name>P A Berthold</name>, <name>Fle<lb/> Schmeirding</name>, <name>James Buckley</name>, <name>Henry Scharinghausen</name>,<lb/> <name>William M Samuel</name>, <name>William M Knight</name>, <name>peter<lb/> Graham</name>, <name>V Clause</name>, <name>A m Faster</name> and <name>J E Gilmore</name>,<lb/> eleven good and lawful men, who being by consent,<lb/> duly by elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but<lb/> not being finished is said over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o' clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="605" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0608.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-24">Tuesday May 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John S M Cune</name> and <name>Edward Bates</name>, two credible witnesses, examined under oath, prove<lb/> the acknowledgment and execution of a deed of emancipation by <name>Sarah Bates</name> to the<lb/> following Slaves, to wit: <name>Keziah</name> aged 63, <name>Henry</name>, a mulatto man, aged thirty nine, <name>Jarlton</name> aged<lb/> 26, <name>Angelina</name> aged about 55, <name>James</name> aged about 33, <name>Elizabeth</name> aged about 32, <name>Elizabeth</name> aged<lb/> about 13, <name>John James</name> aged about 10, <name>Robert Alfred</name> aged about 6, <name>Elijah</name> aged about 4, <name>Edward</name><lb/> aged about 1, <name>Franklin</name> aged 17, <name>John Thomas</name> aged 15, <name>Susan</name> aged about 48, <name>Angelina</name> aged<lb/> 23, <name>Melinda</name> aged 4, <name>George</name> aged 18 months, <name>May</name> aged 22, <name>Martha</name> aged 2, <name>Dinah</name> aged 19,<lb/> <name>Barthena</name> aged 17, <name>Fanny</name> aged 16, <name>Kesey</name>, aged 14, <name>Carnelia</name> aged 11, <name>pamelia</name> aged 9, <name>Clemenza</name>,<lb/> aged 7, <name>Harriet</name> aged 34, <name>William</name> aged 16, <name>Richard</name> aged 14, <name>Mary</name> aged 13, <name>Joshua</name> aged 11,<lb/> and <name>Joseph</name> aged 10.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>W Whitely Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dedimus to Indiana ordered for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> et al<lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Joacob Cammonn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of witness<lb/> Wood.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of <name>Anne</name> and <name>Isham Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Margaret Davis</name>, by attorney, and the respondent also<lb/> comes with the bodies of said <name>Anne</name> &amp; <name>Isham</name> and the matters in con<lb/>troversy being heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered<lb/> that said <name>Anne</name> &amp; <name>Isham</name> be remanded to the custody of <name>Charles Roderman</name>. the respondent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Alex Martin</name> is on motion admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> et al<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit for continuance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 510<lb/> <name>D A January</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name> et al<lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>Ino L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Franke</name> et al<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Voqtle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Lynch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ino W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Cha Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F <unclear>Hoelzle</unclear></name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, <name>Robert M Funkhouser</name>,<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>W N Maurice</name>, <name>Ringrose I Watson</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter A Ladew</name>, <name>A P Ladew</name>, <name>Sam Jacoby</name>, <name>Jno W<lb/> Thornburgh</name>, <name>Josiah G M Clellan</name>, <name>James C<lb/> Moody</name> and <name>W S Hillyer</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial progressed but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="606" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0609.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Bayse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, <name>May B Stewart</name>, and <name>Robert<lb/> Campbell</name>, withdraw their answer herein, and by consent, the said <name>Adam<lb/> D Stewart</name> and <name>Robt Campbell</name>, file and amended answer herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-25">Wednesday, May 25th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus ordered to Kentucky for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment of<lb/> <name>Bartlett M Comb Co</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State ex <unclear>rel</unclear> Brooks<lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andreas Birk</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>W Turton Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff failing to amend on motion of the defendants, by their attor<lb/>ney, this cause is dismissed at plaintiffs costs and it is ordered that<lb/> execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John OConnor</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Wm H Peacson</name><lb/></head>
            <p>On moyion of the plaintiff, it is considered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#667,55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lucking</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> called comes not, and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> six hundred and sixty seven dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#399,35.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B Graham</name><lb/> vs 493.<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, the petition is taken against the defendant as<lb/> confessed; and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of three hundred and ninety nine dollars and thirty five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="607" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0610.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Reder</name><lb/> vs 451<lb/> <name>Jno G Redemeyer</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and wife and <name>Robert Campbell</name><lb/> and <name>Danl M Frost</name> and wife withdraw their answers to the amended<lb/> petition, and by consent the said <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, <name>Campbell<lb/> Frost</name> and wife file amended answers herein</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John A McElroy</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#616,80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 440<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name>,<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles S Scott</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and the defendants <name>Frederick</name> and <name>Moses<lb/> Meyer</name>, by their respective attorneys, thereupon the plaintiff dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Scott</name>, and the other defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer herein leaving this suit undefended, wherefore on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff, the petition is taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and Sixteen dollars and<lb/> eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judg<lb/>ment to bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hodzle</name><lb/> vs 233.<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, <name>Robert N Funkhouser</name>,<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>William H Maurice</name>, <name>Ringrose<lb/> J Watson</name>, <name>Peter A<lb/> Laden</name>, <name>Augustus P Laden</name>, <name>Samuel Jacoby</name>, <name>John W<lb/> Thornburgh</name>, <name>Josiah G McClellan</name>,<lb/> <name>James C Moody</name> and <name>William S Hillyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also the Jury empannelled and<lb/> sworn herein, except <name>William McKnight</name>, and<lb/> thereupon, by consent of parties, the trial pro<lb/>gressed with the remaining ten Jurors, but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until tomorrow<lb/> morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Courd adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="608" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0611.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-26">Thursday May 26th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State ex rel <name>Robt B Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State ex rel <name>Same Brooks</name><lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Whitcher</name> et al<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>William H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Jno A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>Three Exhibits Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Geo J Brady</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Geo J Brady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Upton L Boyce</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>W L Hutchings</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property at<lb/>tached will be attended with great cop and expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit; therefore it is ordered that said Sheriff proceed to sell said property<lb/> according to law; and that he report his proceedings herein on or before the first day of<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bratenhal</name> and<lb/> <name>Lewis Bratenhal</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, files a state<lb/>ment from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached,<lb/> will be attended with much expense before the probable termination<lb/> of this suit, therefore it is ordered that said Sheriff sell said prop<lb/>erty according to law and report his proceedings herein on or before the first day of the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Givens</name> et al<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>Jno B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="609" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0612.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reynolds</name> et al<lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fallina <unclear>Hormann</unclear></name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>W <unclear>Hormann</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#578,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Meshack H Carroll</name><lb/> vs 655<lb/> <name>Wiley I Stratton</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defen<lb/>dant and files a statement in writing whereby he confesses him<lb/>self indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> eighteen dollars and seventy five cents, third consents that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against him for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten percent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#629,88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus W Dryer</name> and<lb/> <name>Rudolph Ulrici</name><lb/> vs 656.<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the<lb/> defendants and files a statement in writing whereby he confesses<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Six hundred<lb/> and twenty nine dollars and eighty eight cents. And authorizes<lb/> the Court to enter up judgment against him for that amount. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed, and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#189,54.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry K Sheldon</name><lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Frederick Rower</name> and <name>William Rower</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein favor of the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of one hundred and eighty nine dollars and fifty four cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hodzle</name><lb/> vs 233.<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, <name>Robert M<lb/> Funkhouser</name>, <name>Felix Coste</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Maurice</name>, <name>Ringrose<lb/> J Watson</name>, <name>Peter A Laden</name>,<lb/> <name>Augustus P Laden</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Jacoby</name>, <name>John W Thornburgh</name>,<lb/> <name>Josiah G McClellan</name>, <name>James C Moody</name> and <name>William S Hillyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein, thereupon the<lb/> trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jury retire to<lb/> consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Papin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>August Sohnyon</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery. The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit according to law claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him<lb/> to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="610" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0613.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#263,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sextus N Wilcox</name>, and<lb/> <name>James O Lyon</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the although called comes<lb/> not, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury, the Court from the proofs doth<lb/> find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and sixty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten per<lb/>cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chalmer D Blossom</name><lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name>,<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name>, and<lb/> <name>Jonathan Jones</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>Nelson</name> and <name>Martin</name>, by<lb/> their respective Attorneys, but the defendant <name>Jones</name> although duly called<lb/> comes not, and no Jury being required the Court doth from the pleadings<lb/> proofs and note, find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and sixty six dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235,32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andre F Carpenter</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their Attorneys, and submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty five dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A McElroy</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their Attorneys, and also a Jury to wit; <name>J F<lb/> Emelung</name>, <name>Conrad Fisher</name>, <name>John Fox</name>, <name>William H Long</name>, <name>Robert<lb/> Runmon</name>, <name>C Crone</name>, <name>James M Franciscus</name>, <name>B Michaelmore</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Pettring</name>, <name>Philip Lannert</name>, <name>William Sensenderfer</name> and <name>M Ticknor</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to<lb/> try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths find for the<lb/> defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take noting by his suit in<lb/> this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2088,80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre A Berthold</name> and<lb/> <name>Alfred C Bernoudy</name><lb/> vs 381<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> the defendant <name>Charles Belcher</name>, but the defendant <name>William H Belcher</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand and<lb/> eighty eight dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="611" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0614.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#430,70.<lb/> Set aside<lb/> <date when="--05-27">May 27th</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> and<lb/> <name>Josiah Fogg</name>.<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> files an affidavit and moves the Court for a continuance of this cause,<lb/> which being seen heard and fully understood, it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled, thereupon come a Jury to wit; <name>J F Emelung</name>,<lb/> <name>Coma</name> &amp; <name>Fisher</name>, <name>John Fox</name>, <name>William H Lone</name>, <name>Robert Runnion</name>, <name>C Crone</name>, <name>James M Francis<lb/>cus</name>, <name>B Michaelmore</name>, <name>Henry Petring</name>, <name>Philip Lannert</name>, <name>William Sensenderfer</name> and <name>M Ticknor</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected and empannelled to try the issues herein<lb/> joined, the trial progressed and being finished the Jury find for the plaintiff in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and thirty dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. The defendant files a motion for a new trial and also files a motion in<lb/> arrest of judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#207,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Gilbert</name>,<lb/> <name>Jonathan R Miles</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin O Stannard</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly called come not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury<lb/> the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seven dollars and fifty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name>, <name>Noah M<lb/> Ludlow</name> and <name>Francis M Ludlow</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>,<lb/> <name>Eliza G Frost</name>, <name>Mary B Stewart</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, and <name>Robert Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, except <name>William Wade</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, but the said <name>William Wade</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; thereupon come also a Jury to wit; <name>J F Emelung</name>,<lb/> <name>Conrad Fisher</name>, <name>John Fox</name>, <name>William H Long</name>, <name>Robert<lb/> Runnion</name>, <name>Richard Holmes</name>, <name>James M Franciscus</name>, <name>B Michaelmore</name>, <name>Henry Petring</name>, <name>Philip<lb/> Lannert</name>, <name>William Sensenderfer</name>, and <name>M Ticknor</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but<lb/> not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="612" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0615.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-27">Friday May 27th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <note>#2925,20.</note>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hodzle</name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, <name>Robert M<lb/> Funkhouser</name>, <name>Felix Coste</name>, <name>William<lb/> H Maurice</name>, <name>Ringrose J Watson</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter A Laden</name>, <name>Augustus<lb/> P Laden</name>, <name>Samuel Jacoby</name>, <name>John W<lb/> Thornburgh</name>, <name>Josiah G McClellan</name>,<lb/> <name>James C Moody</name> and <name>William S Hillyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also come the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> and being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of twenty<lb/> nine hundred and twenty five dollars and twenty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore. The defendants file a motion<lb/> for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> Peoples Savings Inst</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed. Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Levering use of <name>Thompson</name><lb/> vs 717<lb/> <name>Sigerson</name></head>
            <p>Motion to retax costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Leimer</name><lb/> vs 587<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> et al<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the Jury empanelled herein were not<lb/> sworn it is therefore ordered that the judgment rendered herein<lb/> be set aside and that this cause be set for trial for the 31st instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>State exrel Steveson</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as in affidavit at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the default herein taken against the defendant, <name>Bassett</name>,<lb/> be set aside and annulled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#633,46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Weise</name><lb/> vs 419<lb/> <name>Henry Bartold</name> and <name>Louis Bartold</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit this cause to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> six hundred and thirty three dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="613" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0616.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#264,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherell</name>, <name>Ann L<lb/> Poindexter</name>, and <name>Robert B Major</name><lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Horace R Patterson</name>, <name>Sylvester<lb/> H Laflin</name>, <name>John Warner</name>,<lb/> <name>E Crane</name>, and <name>M Roane</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also a Jury to wit; <name>C Crane</name>, <name>P A Berthold</name>, <name>F C Schmer<lb/>ding</name>, <name>James Buckley</name>, <name>H scharringhausen</name>, <name>W M Samuel</name>,<lb/> <name>Peter Graham</name>, <name>T Clause</name>, <name>A M Foster</name> and <name>J C Gilmore</name>,<lb/> ten good and lawful men, who being, by consent, duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try<lb/> the trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess the damages at the sum of two hundred and sixty four dollars and seventy<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the dam<lb/>ages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2337,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Woodward</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Moies</name>, although called comes not, and no<lb/> Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find the issues joined between the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Woodward</name>, in favor of the plain<lb/>tiff, and doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand three<lb/> hundred and thirty seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. The defendant, <name>Woodward</name>, files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Wm H Newman</name> et al<lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>Albert Pearce</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave. Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name>, <name>Noah M<lb/> Ludlow</name> and <name>Francis M Ludlow</name>.<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>,<lb/> <name>Eliza G Frost</name>, <name>Mary B Stewart</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and <name>Robert<lb/> Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jury empannelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trials<lb/> of his cause progressed and being finished the jury retire to<lb/> consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="614" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0617.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-28">Saturday May 28th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#503,39<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wade</name> and <name>E G Frost</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name>, <name>Noah M Ludlow</name>,<lb/> and <name>Francis M Ludlow</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>,<lb/> <name>Eliza G Frost</name>, <name>Mary B Stewart</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, and <name>Robert<lb/> Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also come the jury empanelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths find<lb/> for the defendants, <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, <name>Mary B Stewart</name><lb/> and <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, and also find in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs and against the defendants <name>William Wade</name><lb/> and <name>Eliza G Frost</name> and assess the damages against<lb/> them at the sum of five hundred and three dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs take noting by their suit against the defendants <name>Adam<lb/> D Stewart</name>, <name>Marry B Stewart</name> and <name>Daniel M Frost</name> but that they go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiffs their costs herein expended, and that the said plaintiffs recover of the defendants,<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> and <name>Eliza G Frost</name>, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherell</name> etal<lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Horace R Patterson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Jno A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> etal<lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>W Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fredk A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.<lb/> Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza S White</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>Henry White</name></head>
            <p>Motion for support <unclear>pendent</unclear> lite filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="615" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0618.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-30">Monday May 30th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> etal<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit and move the Court for a<lb/> a continuance which being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court it is ordered that the same be overruled. The defendant<lb/> <name>Bassett</name> by leave of Court files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob L Levinski</name><lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>Erastus Wells</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2651,81.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> withdraws his answer; and the parties consent that judgment may be<lb/> rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of twenty six hundred<lb/> and fifty one dollars and eighty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rower</name> etal<lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>August Johns</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Rosweiler</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Philip Seiler</name></head>
            <p>Continued<lb/> generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Waters</name>, <name>Silas M Barrett</name>,<lb/> and <name>Eben Dole</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name>, <name>Olive W<lb/> McKinney</name> and <name>J Elliott <unclear>Duryee</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the defendants be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against them<lb/> for the sum of five hundred and thirty six dollars<lb/> and fifty cents on account of goods wares and merchan<lb/>dise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants and that their property has been at<lb/>tached and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next,<lb/> and on or before the third day thereof plead to this action, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> them and their property sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in<lb/> the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Burklin</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>Heinrich Boernstein</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Burklin</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Adalbert Lochr</name> etal</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Burklin</name><lb/> vs 373.<lb/> <name><unclear>Jas</unclear> L Faucett</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff by attorney, withdraws<lb/> motions to set aside dismissal herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Eliza G frost</name>, by her attorney, files a motion for a<lb/> new trial herein and thereupon she also files a motion in arrest<lb/> of the judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="616" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0619.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a jury<lb/> to wit; <name>J A Englehard</name>, <name>Paul Kemp</name>, <name>F Singer</name>, <name>G W Kidd</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Michael</name>, <name>J W Seimers</name>, <name>F B Tucker</name>, <name>Fredk B <unclear>Gniseper</unclear></name>, <name>Geo Harvey</name>,<lb/> <name>A J Morrison</name> and <name>Clemens Hoppe</name>, eleven good and lawful men who<lb/> being, by consent, duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> progressed, but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-05-31">Tuesday May 31st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Receiver Appointed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs in certain executions issued from the Clerks<lb/> Office of this Court, it is ordered by the Court that <name>David R Powell</name><lb/> be appointed receiver of certain books of account and bills receivable which<lb/> have been levied upon as the property of said <name>Jacob Bensberg</name>, by the Sheriff of St Louis County<lb/> under said executions: and the said <name>Powell</name> accepts said appointment and being sworn files his<lb/> bond in the sum of five thousand dollars with <name>Samuel Stilwell</name> as security, which bond is<lb/> approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fredk A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#641,55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Bowman</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Louis A Welton</name> and <name>Richard F Sass</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants<lb/> withdraw their answer and agree with the plaintiff that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein for the plaintiff for the sum of six hundred<lb/> and forty one dollar and fifty five cents and costs. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution. The parties consent that issue<lb/> of execution herein be stayed until the <date when="--09-15">fifteenth day of September</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#196,25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Semple</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not; and the plaintiff waiving a jury submits this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of one hundred and ninety six dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="617" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0620.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#654,68<lb/> nunc pro tune<lb/> as of <unclear>Mch</unclear> 3 last</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the entry of judgment made herein on the <date when="1859-03-03">third day of March eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty nine</date> be set aside and the following entered nunc pro<lb/> tune as of that in lien thereof; Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiff the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; an the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty four dollars and sixty eight<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3310,00.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Marine Bank of Chicago</name><lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Richard J Tunstall</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard Holme</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by it attorney but the defendant<lb/> although called come not, and the plaintiff<lb/> waving a jury submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three thousands three hundred and ten dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants to the debt aforesaid in form as found and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1147,13.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial<lb/> of this cause progressed and being finished the jury aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess the dam<lb/>ages at the sum of eleven hundred and forty seven dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid assessed and also her costs in this behalf expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. The defendants file a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1266,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Kinsey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> and <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although called come not, and the plaintiff waiving a jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and sixty six dollars and ninety three cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest<lb/> at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Schnaider</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Andreas Knehler</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua B Brant</name> etal<lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="618" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0621.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1297, 50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> and<lb/> <name>Barksdale Davidson</name><lb/> vs 420<lb/> <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On check.</p>
            <p>Now comes the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agree<lb/>ment herein, which is as follows, to wit; "In this case it is agreed that<lb/> there shall be a trial by the Court, if the Court will consent to try<lb/> the same, and if not by a Jury, as if no garnishment or other procee<lb/>dings were pending in the Court of Common Pleas, and that whatever judgment may be rendered for<lb/> the plaintiffs shall be rendered subject to the following conditions, to wit; 1st. That no execution<lb/> shall be issued thereon until the final determination of a suit now pending in the St Louis Court<lb/> of Common Pleas in which <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> is plaintiff and <name>J B Gridley</name> is defendant,<lb/> in which said <name>Michael</name> is summoned as garnishee and one Parceveaux is interpleader. If any<lb/> final judgment or decree shall be rendered in any of said proceedings in said Court of Common<lb/> Pleas against said <name>Michael</name> in favor of said <name>Mackenzie</name> or in favor of said interpleader or any<lb/> other interpleader the amount of such judgment or judgments shall be entered as credits on the<lb/> judgment in this cause and execution issue for the balance, if any. If the proceedings against said<lb/> <name>Michael</name> in said Court of Common Pleas shall be dismissed or if final judgment shall go<lb/> in favor of said <name>Michael</name> so that he be finally discharged thereupon, then execution may<lb/> issue in this case for the full amount of the judgment that may be entered herein. This agreement<lb/> shall not be construed, however, to deprive any party to said proceedings in said Common<lb/> Pleas Court from any right of appeal or writ of error, and if any appeal or writ of error be<lb/> sued out in such proceedings the execution in this cause shall be stayed until the proceedings<lb/> in said Common Pleas Court be finally and effectually determined so as to be conclusive<lb/> upon the parties to said proceedings. This agreement is to be entered of record as a part of the<lb/> judgment of this Court in this case, and to be enforced as such. <name>F C Sharp</name> atto for plffs, <name>D W<lb/> Hill</name> atty for Deft:" and the parties waiving a jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find there from<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twelve hundred and ninety seven<lb/> dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor subject to the stipulations in the above agreement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Elliott</name><lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Woodford W. McCamant</name>, and<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name> and<lb/> <name>C W Kenworthy</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a jury to<lb/> wit; <name>J A Englehard</name>, <name>Paul Kemp</name>, <name>F Singer</name>, <name>G W Kidd</name>, <name>Samuel Michael</name>,<lb/> <name>J W Seimers</name>, <name>T B Tucker</name>, <name>Frederick Gruseper</name>, <name>George Harvey</name>, <name>A J<lb/> Morrison</name>, <name>Clemens Hoppe</name>, and <name>Henry M Woodward</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed, but the plaintiff says he will not further<lb/> prosecute his action in this behalf but voluntarily suffers a non suit. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the said plaintiffs their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 488<lb/> <name>Charles Baswell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit this cause to<lb/> the Court thereupon the trial progressed but the plaintiff says he will not<lb/> further prosecute his suit in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit<lb/> with leave to move to set the same aside. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and<lb/> recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. Leave<lb/> given plaintiff to move to set aside non suit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="619" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0622.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Lent</name> etal<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Continued at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> etal<lb/> vs 613.<lb/> <name>Fredk Spies</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benoni S Garland</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>Jno F A Sandfords</name> admr</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Sherman Spencer</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name>,<lb/> <name>John How</name> and<lb/> <name>Jess Arnot</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and thereupon<lb/> come also a jury, to wit; <name>John Lowry</name>, <name>Thomas Schomborn</name>,<lb/> <name>Frank Weise</name>, <name>Gladdin Gorrin</name>, <name>H L Ellis</name>, <name>J M Calvert</name>, <name>Peter<lb/> Gamache</name>, <name>J B Roy</name>, <name>Edward Leiber</name>, <name>Peter Berger</name>, <name>George<lb/> Hill</name> and <name>D Woestendick</name>, twelve good and lawful men who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-01">Wednesday June 1st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 108<lb/> <name>Michael Plunkett</name> and<lb/> <name>Patt Plunkett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that summons cannot be served upon<lb/> them, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that they be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>mmenced against them for the sum of one hundred and seventy five dollars and interest founded on<lb/> a note and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next<lb/> and on or before the third day thereof answer to this action, the plaintiffs petition will be taken<lb/> against them as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to<lb/> law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> etal<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, by his attorney, files an affidavit and moves the Court for<lb/> a continuance herein, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth order that said affidavit be stricken from the files.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William b lent</name> etal<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a Summons<lb/> issue herein returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="620" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0623.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Sherman Spencer</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name><lb/> <name>John How</name> and<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name></head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed and being finished the jury aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find for the defendants. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this<lb/> behalf but that the said defendants go hence without day and<lb/> recover of the said plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#788,71<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Streit</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Keener</name> and<lb/> <name>Fritz Keener</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>Andreas Reinstaedtler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>Reinstaedtler</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Streit</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed: and no jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein<lb/> joined between the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Reinsteadtler</name>, in favor of said defendant; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant,<lb/> <name>Streit</name>, is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and eighty eight dollars and seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by their suit in this behalf as against the said defendant, <name>Reinstaedtler</name>, but that the said defendant go hence with<lb/>out day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, <name>Streit</name>, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>almond L Richardson</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>J A Englehard</name>, <name>Paul Kempf</name>, <name>F Singer</name>, <name>G W Kidd</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Michael</name>, <name>T B Dutcher</name>, <name>F Griesseper</name>, <name>George Harvey</name>, <name>A J Marri<lb/>son</name>, <name>E Hoppe</name>, <name>B Larbold</name> and <name>Benjamin McCarthy</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the jury retire to consider<lb/> of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="621" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0624.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-02">Thursday June 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Fountain</name>,<lb/> <name>James C McPheeters</name><lb/> and <name>William W Mcpheeters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a petition and also an affidavit, according to<lb/> law, claiming the possession of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the defendant<lb/> deliver said property in said affidavit described to the Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby <unclear>desected</unclear> if said<lb/> property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#849,99.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name>.<lb/> vs 398.<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Almond S Richardson</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also come the jury empanelled and sown herein and being agreed<lb/> upon a verdict, upon their oaths, find for the plaintiff upon<lb/> his claim the sum of eleven hundred and sixty six dollars<lb/> and sixty six cents, and for the defendants upon their counterclaim<lb/> the sum of three hundred and thirty five cents, and assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of eight hundred and forty nine dollars and ninety nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid of assessed and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> The defendants file a motion for a new trial and also a motion in arrests of judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1090,77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>Adam Dieffenbach</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Dieffenbach</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Streit</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and no jury being<lb/> required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings note and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff and doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hun<lb/>dred and ninety dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#285,06.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubsdell</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Pierson</name>,<lb/> <name>William Barr</name> and<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs 584.<lb/> <name>Rufus B Benedict</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant with<lb/>draws his answer herein and consents and agrees with the plaintiffs that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein for the plaintiffs for the sum of two<lb/> hundred and eighty five dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as <unclear>agreed</unclear> upon and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name>, et al<lb/> garns. of Salisbury</head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="622" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0625.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note><date when="1862-09-13">Sept 13th 1862</date> hereby acknow<lb/>ledge and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment of which this<lb/> is the margin<lb/> attest<lb/> <name>A Rice</name> Clk <unclear>Jur. G. Hu 66 <name>John F Continued</name></unclear><lb/> for Plaintiff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> and<lb/> <name>Lee B Wallace</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> and<lb/> <name>William S M Knight</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>W Seimers</name>, <name>Thomas Schoenbaum</name>, <name>Frank Weis</name>, <name>G Gorin</name>,<lb/> <name>H L Ellis</name>, <name>J H Calvert</name>, <name>Peter Garnache</name>, <name>J B Roy</name>, <name>Edward Leber</name>,<lb/> <name>P Berger</name>, <name>Ger Hill</name> and <name>D Woestendick</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men; who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until to<lb/> morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-03">Friday June 3rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Francis P Blair, Jr.</name>, Who is personally known to the Court, acknowledge in open Court<lb/> the execution of a deed of emancipation to his slave <name>Henry Dapee</name>,<lb/> aged about forty nine years, dark color, thick set heavy built, six feet high.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Rodney Montague</name><lb/> vs 631<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Jno Stickel</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that said garnishee be<lb/> discharged at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 458<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Chas Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Chas Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed but the plaintiff says he evil not further prosecute his<lb/> action in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to move to set the same aside.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be non suited and that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. The plaintiff files a motion to set aside the non suit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger M Allister</name><lb/> vs 500<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the said plaintiffs costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="623" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0626.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1458, 48<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Streit</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Reinstaedtler</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Reinstaedtler</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Streit</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore plaintiffs peti<lb/>tion is taken against him as confessed; and no Jury being required<lb/> this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, thereupon the trial pro<lb/>gressed but the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf but<lb/> voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to move to set the same aside: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Streit</name>,<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and fifty eight dollars and<lb/> forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by<lb/> his suit in this behalf against the defendant, <name>Reinstaedetler</name>, but that the said defendant go<lb/> hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor,<lb/> and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, <name>Streit</name>, the debt aforesaid as found against him<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Motion to set aside non suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#971, 26<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sass</name> and<lb/> <name>Carson</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pitts burgh Life Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance company</name><lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name> and <name>Thomas<lb/> M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by it attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Springer</name> and <name>Wannall</name>,<lb/> and the defendants, <name>Sass</name> and <name>Carson</name>, withdraw their answer<lb/> herein, and saying nothing further in bar of the plaintiffs<lb/> demand the Court doth find from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> <name>Sass</name> and <name>Carson</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and seventy one<lb/> dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1384,06<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sass</name> and<lb/> <name>Carson</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Eureka Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name> and <name>Thomas<lb/> M Wannall</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the defendants withdraw their answer herein, thereupon<lb/> the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the said <name>Springer</name><lb/> and <name>Wannall</name>, and the said <name>Sass</name> and <name>Carson</name> saying<lb/> nothing further in bar of the plaintiffs demand the Court<lb/> doth find from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and eighty four dollars and<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1384,06<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sass</name> and<lb/> <name>Wannall</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Western Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name>, <name>James O Carson</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name>, and <name>Thomas<lb/> M Wannall</name>.</head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants<lb/> withdraw their answer herein, thereupon the plaintiff dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendants, <name>Springer</name> and <name>Wannall</name>,<lb/> and the defendants <name>Sass</name> and <name>Carson</name>, saying nothing further in<lb/> bar of the plaintiff demand the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of thirteen hundred and eighty four dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="624" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0627.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>See page 622 for Entry of<lb/> satisfaction of this judgment<lb/> <date when="1862-09-13">Sept 13th 1862</date> I hereby<lb/> <unclear rend="strikethrough">certify</unclear><lb/> acknowledge full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> of which this is the margin<lb/> <unclear><name>James G. Huward</name> M O by <name>John Henberg</name></unclear><lb/> atty for <unclear>reawillfs</unclear><lb/> attest <name>S Rice</name> Clk.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> and<lb/> <name>Lee B Human</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> and<lb/> <name>William S McKnight</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this<lb/> cause progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiffs and against the defendants<lb/> on their counterclaim and assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of four thousand four hundred and thirty one dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#227, 77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>John Brooks</name>, <name>Horace D Brady</name>,<lb/> <name>George J Brady</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> W Heitteman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants<lb/> <name>Horace D Brady</name> and <name>George J Brady</name>, although duly called<lb/> come not, and the defendants <name>John Brooks</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> W Heitteman</name>, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and twenty seven dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1834, 03.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knapp</name>, <name>Henry Carter</name><lb/> and <name>Jno W Butler</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name> and <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of eighteen hundred and thirty four dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use of<lb/> <name>Francis Lamblin</name><lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thomas H McNicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the<lb/> time allowed him as to do, therefore, on motion of the defendants,<lb/> by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally on affidavit of the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Anderson</name><lb/> vs 453<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>Amended answer filed by leaver. Agreement filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="625" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0628.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-04">Saturday June 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Human</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry J Cuniffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Paul Reinhard</name> et al garns of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>By consent the garnishee, <name>Peter Galleys</name>, <name>Thomas Walravens</name>, <name>Isaac<lb/> Stock</name> and <name>William Porter</name>, and discharged at the plaintiffs costs and<lb/> five dollars are allowed each of them for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin J Adams</name> and<lb/> <name>Eli M Bruce</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> and <name>Edgar Ames</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a petition and also an affidavit according to law,<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; where<lb/>fore it is ordered by the Court that the defendants deliver the property<lb/> in said affidavit specified to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said<lb/> Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to<lb/> take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>Petition for a divorce filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1841, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mashall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files his petition against the defendant, and there<lb/>upon comes <name>James M Hughes</name>, in behalf of said defendant, and by virtue of<lb/> a warrant of attorney, for that purpose executed by the defendant and now<lb/> produced in open Court and duly proved, waived the issue and service of process and acknowledge<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and forty one dollars,<lb/> in manner and form as the plaintiff in his said petition alledged and consented that judgment.<lb/> may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten percent interest.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="626" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0629.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-06">Monday June 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Paul Reinhard</name> etal garns of<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>By consent the garnishees, <name>Thomas Adamson</name>, <name>Daniel Williamson</name>,<lb/> <name>Walter M Smallwood</name> and <name>Garrot Tucker</name> and discharge and<lb/> five dollars allowed each for answering and the garnishee <name>Samuel</name> of<lb/> <name>Drysdale</name> is discharge and ten dollars allowed him for answering,<lb/> and the garnishee <name>Jacob Julian</name> is also discharged and five dollars allowed for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#434, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Lang Kopf</name>.<lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>Berthold Vennewitz</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendant withdraws his<lb/> answer herein and saying nothing further in bar of the plaintiffs de<lb/>mand the Court, on motion of plaintiff, doth find from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and thirty four dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 536.<lb/> <name>Wylls King</name>, <name>Richard Bigelow</name>,<lb/> <name>George P Doan</name>, <name>William A<lb/> Doan</name>, <name>Richard H Bigelow</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles E King</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit; <name>H Cordell</name>, <name>John<lb/> Vaugher</name>, <name>Thomas Jackson</name>, <name>Samuel Hale</name>, <name>J Gobert</name>, <name>A Peting</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel Cardman</name>, <name>Patrick Harney</name>, <name>J Wertell</name>, <name>J E<lb/> Boerinpold</name>, <name>H Burman</name>, and <name>M Dummond</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed but the plaintiff says he will not<lb/> further prosecute this action but voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to move to set the same<lb/> aside. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be non suited and that the defen<lb/>dants go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#232, 10.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zachariah W Tinker</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Tinker</name>,<lb/> <name>William Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>John O Withnell</name><lb/> vs 583.<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not, and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of two hundred and thirty two<lb/> dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Marston</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Order of Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a petition and also an affidavit, according to law, claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it<lb/> is ordered that the defendant deliver the property in said affidavit specified to<lb/> the Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said<lb/> property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the said<lb/> plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="627" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0630.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Rankin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Cornet</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz J Schilling</name> use &amp;c<lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>Peoples Savings Institution</name> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow, morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-07">Tuesday June 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marine Bank</name> of Chicago<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Richard J Tunstall</name> and <name>Richard Holme</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, by its attorneys, acknowledge to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--05-31">thirty first<lb/> of May</date> cast past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Boyse</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>The parties file an agreement herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nancy Edmondson</name> now Link<lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>Francis B Edmondson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her attorney, files a motion for an execution<lb/> herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth order that an execution issue for the amount<lb/> due on the <date when="--05-17">seventeenth day of May</date> last past as prayed for in said motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>James Patherson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name> etal<lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>Jas Patherson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Jos A Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Picot Knob Iron Co</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>St Louis J M R R Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>A Dentelmoser</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Paul Reinhar</name> &amp;c garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="628" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0631.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> etal<lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Leverett Bell</name>, the receiver herein and files his final report<lb/> which being seen heard and fully understood is confirmed; and on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> ten percent on the amount collected be allowed said Receiver for his services, and that said Re<lb/>ceiver after paying the costs herein and the amount allowed him pay the balance to the plaintiffs,<lb/> and that on filing receipts therefor he be discharged from his trust.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri use of <name>Jas J M Bride</name><lb/> vs 573.<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants demurer to the petition being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled. Ten days is given the defendants<lb/> to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 578.<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann E Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Samuel Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to<lb/> the Court that the order of publication made herein at the last term<lb/> has been published according to law.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-08">Wednesday June 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eli M Seago</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>Joseph Kerns</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Michael Werk</name> et al<lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally as on affidavit of defendants for<lb/> absence of witness <name>Chalmers</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Webster</name> et al<lb/> vs 495.<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammonn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Steinacker</name></head>
            <p>Affidavit of assignees as to final disposition of Sunday<lb/> accounts filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> et al<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit and moves the Court for a continuance herein,<lb/> which being heard and fully understood is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="629" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0632.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>William E Saltmarsh</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and withdraws<lb/> his motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert J Wilde</name> and<lb/> <name>John F Seaman</name><lb/> vs 173.<lb/> <name>Meyer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files<lb/> a statement from which it appears that the property attached<lb/> herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit; wherefore it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said Sheriff sell said property according to law and make report of his<lb/> proceedings herein on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Burrowes</name>,<lb/> <name>Levis A Burrowes</name> and <name>Egbert S Richards</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>Meyer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>Order of sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files<lb/> a statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property<lb/> herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the said Sheriff sell said property according to law and make are port<lb/> of his proceedings herein on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri which was to the use<lb/> of <name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>William J Kennedy</name>, <name>John Doyle</name>, and <name>Bernard Crickard</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also a Jury, to wit; <name>Harrison Cardwell</name>, <name>Caspar<lb/> Peets</name>, <name>George W Davis</name>, <name>J R Lake</name>, <name>M Donnelly</name>,<lb/> <name>James McGiff</name>, <name>Jacob Thies</name>, <name>William Idecker</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward McKale</name>, <name>B Noaker</name>, and <name>George C Bailey</name>,<lb/> eleven good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid until to morrow<lb/> morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth order that this cause be referred back to the Commissioners, <name>John Y Page</name><lb/> and <name>Jonathan Jones</name>, to as certain and report, if possible, who received the nett gains of the Steam<lb/> boat <name>Dresden</name> reported by them to have been earned.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="630" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0633.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-09">Thursday June 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Isham Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Isham Davis</name>, by his attorneys, and files a petition, which<lb/> being seen heard and fully considered, it is ordered by the Court that <name>Isham<lb/> Davis</name>, the above named petitioner, be allowed to see in this Court for his<lb/> freedom on giving security satisfactory to the Clerk for all costs that may be adjudged against<lb/> him; and it is further ordered that the said petitioner have reasonable liberty to attend<lb/> his counsel and the Court as occasion may require and that he be not removed out of the<lb/> jurisdiction of the Court and be not subject to any security on account of his application<lb/> for freedom: and it appearing to the Court that the said petitioner is about to be removed<lb/> out of the jurisdiction of this Court, it is further ordered that a warrant issue herein to the<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County according to the statute in such case made and provided re<lb/>turnable on the eleventh instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Anne Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Anne Davis</name>, by her attorneys, and files a petition, which being<lb/> seen heard and fully considered, it is ordered by the Court that the <name>Anne Davis</name>,<lb/> the above named petitioner, be allowed to see in this Court for here freedom<lb/> on giving security satisfactory to the Clerk for all costs that may be adjudged against her;<lb/> and it is further that the said petitioner have reasonable liberty to attend his counsel and<lb/> the court as occasion may require, that she be not removed, out of the jurisdiction of the<lb/> Court and be not subject to any security on account of her application for freedom; and it<lb/> appearing to the Court from said petition that the said petitioner is about to be removed<lb/> out of jurisdiction of this Court, it is further ordered that a warrant issue to the Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis County, according to the Statute in such case made and provided, returnable on<lb/> the eleventh instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Sandford B Kellogg</name>, who is personally known to the Court acknowledges the execution<lb/> of a deed of emancipation to his slave <name>Louis</name> aged about twenty years of dark color.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>I acknowledge full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the<lb/> Judgment of which this is<lb/> the margin, <date when="1839-07-07">July 7th 1839</date>.<lb/> <name>Seymour Voullaire</name> atty for peff<lb/> attest <name>S Rice</name> Clk</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri which sues<lb/> to the use of <name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs 546.<lb/> <name>William Kennedy</name>, <name>John Doyle</name>,<lb/> and <name>Bernard Crickard</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and also the Jury empannelled and sworn herein,<lb/> except <name>J R Lake</name>, and thereupon by consent of parties<lb/> the trial progressed with the remaining ten Jurors,<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at<lb/> the sum of nine hundred and thirty one dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid inform afore<lb/>said as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendants<lb/> filed motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschman</name><lb/> Vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Magehan</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and acknowledge to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Fenn</name><lb/> vs 592<lb/> <name>Francis Dudgales</name> admr</head>
            <p>Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="631" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0634.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson G Conner</name><lb/> vs 865<lb/> <name>James B Goff</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Benjamin H P Butler</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Receiver.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that <name>Asai S Jones</name> be and he is appointed Receiver herein to receive<lb/> settle and collect the notes and evidence of debt mentioned in the answer of said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> and<lb/> <name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Alexander McCurdy</name>, <name>Thomas Jackson</name>, <name>Samuel Hale</name>, <name>J E Court<lb/>nay</name>, <name>Joseph Gobert</name>, <name>Daniel Cardman</name>, <name>A Peting</name>, <name>J Greave</name>, <name>C Haitwig</name>, <name>J E Boernpold</name>, <name>William Gregory</name> and <name>Hilly Burman</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the tried progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-10">Friday June 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment and recall execution and affidavits of<lb/> <name>Frances Burk</name> and <name>Isaac J Wise</name> in support thereof filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G Bragg</name>,<lb/> <name>Oliver J Bragg</name>,<lb/> <name>Gerhard H Timmerman</name>, and <name>William Palm</name> and <name>Michael Burrowes</name>.</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by its attorney, and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein<lb/> for the sum of twenty seven hundred and seventy five dollars and<lb/> twenty two cents, on the <date when="1858-04-19">ninteenth day of April eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty eight</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G Bragg</name>, <name>Oliver J<lb/> Bragg</name>, <name>Gerhard H Timmerman</name> and <name>Michael Burrowes</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and acknowledges to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment<lb/> rendered herein on the <date when="1858-04-19">nineteenth day of April eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty eight</date> for the sum of thirteen hundred and thirty nine<lb/> dollars and thirty cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel S Brainard</name> and<lb/> <name>Solomon H Robbins</name></head>
            <p><name>William C Jamison</name>, one of the plaintiffs, acknowledges that<lb/> the plaintiffs have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the <date when="1857-12-01">1st of December, 1857</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Briesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Jas Kaufer</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>C F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Rower</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="632" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0635.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michel S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court acknowledges the execution<lb/> of a deed by him as Sheriff in favor of <name>Henry Dausch</name> for all the right<lb/> title, interest claim, estate and property of <name>Nicholas Dausch</name> of in and to the following described<lb/> real estate situate in the Country of St Louis, State of Missouri, t wit; a lot of ground situated<lb/> in Blow and La Beaume Addition to the City of St Louis, and being lot number five (5) in the<lb/> Western half of block number one (1) of said addition, a plat of which is on file in the Recorders of<lb/>fice of the Country of St Louis and bounded as follows; on the West by Carondelet Avenue, twenty<lb/> eight and a half feet, and on the West by and alley, and on the South by Victor street, it being the<lb/> same lot acquired by said <name>Nicholas Dausch</name> from <name>Francis Saler</name> and wife as appears by deed<lb/> dated <date when="1858-11-30">30th November, 1858</date>, and Recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Land Titles in book<lb/> vs 217 pages 287 and 288: Gold by virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of<lb/> the St Louis Circuit in favor of <name>Augustus W Louis</name> against said <name>Nicholas Daush</name> returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1859-09">September Term 1859</date> of said <name>Crish</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#383, 29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Fenn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> Administrative<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and eighty three dollars and twenty nine<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover for the estate of <name>Francis<lb/> Dugdale</name> in the hands of <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> his administratrix, the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and that a copy of this judgment be certified<lb/> to the St Louis probate Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Richardson</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant, <name>Woodward</name>, for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the said motion be<lb/> overruled; thereupon the said defendant, <name>Woodward</name>, files a bill of<lb/> exceptions and an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be<lb/> allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> and <name>Louis Winkelmeier</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>Harrison Cordell</name>, <name>Ins Vaughn</name>, <name>Caspar<lb/> Peetz</name>, <name>F Dinzs</name>, <name>Martin Drummond</name>, <name>Geo W Davis</name>, <name>M<lb/> Donnelly</name>, <name>Jacob Thies</name>, <name>William Idecker</name>, <name>Edward McKale</name>,<lb/> <name>George C Bailey</name>, and <name>B Noaker</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>We do hereby asking in to St Louis<lb/> after <name>J Theophils Papin</name> for <unclear>Vehree<lb/> reganised the Jaedyneared of which</unclear><lb/> this is the margin <unclear>Sep of 27139<lb/> well are hands and laclo</unclear> <name>Henry Clamorgan</name><lb/> <name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> attest <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clk</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name><lb/> and <name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come the Jury empanelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict<lb/> upon their oaths find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of<lb/> six thousand one hundred and twenty dollars, It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore Motion for a new trial and motion<lb/> in a next of judgment filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="633" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0636.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-11">Saturday June 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#450, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> and <name>Louis Winkelmeier</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and being agreed<lb/> upon a restrict find for the plaintiff and assess the damages at<lb/> the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore. Motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin G Noyes</name> et al<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Ahling</name> and <name>Affs</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this causes<lb/> be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of <name>Isam Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the said petitioner and the said respondents, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the said respondents failing and refusing to enter into<lb/> a recognizance as required by law, it is ordered by the Court that the Sheriff<lb/> take possession of the said <name>Is<unclear rend="strikethrough">l</unclear>am Davis</name>, the petitioner, and hire him out to the best advantage<lb/> from time to time during the pendency of his suit for freedom, and that the said Sheriff take a<lb/> bond from the herein payable to the State of Missouri in the penalty of fifteen hundred dol<lb/>lars with such security as said Sheriff shall approve, the bond so taken to be conditioned as<lb/> required by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Anne Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the said petitioner and the respondents, by their respe<lb/>tive attorneys, and the said respondents failing and refusing to enter into a<lb/> recognizance as required by law, it is ordered by the Court that the Sheriff<lb/> take possession of the said <name>Anne Davis</name>, the petitioner, and hirer her out to the best advantage<lb/> from time to time during the pendency of her suit for freedom, and that the Sheriff take a bond<lb/> from the hirer payable to the State of Missouri in the penalty of fifteen hundred dollars<lb/> with such security as said Sheriff shall approve, the bond so taken to be conditioned as the<lb/> law requires.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#722, 63.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> garnishee of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the said garnishee by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and submit the motion for judgment on<lb/> the answer for said garnishee to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth order that<lb/> said motion be sustained, and the Court finds from said<lb/> answer that the said garnishee at the time he was summoned herein as such was indebted<lb/> to the defendant in the sum of seven hundred and twenty two dollars and sixty three cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore, and that out<lb/> of said <unclear>dissem the appon</unclear> the costs as well of the original suit as in this suit expended. The sum<lb/> of ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="634" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0637.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#180,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> garnishee of the <name>Terre<lb/> Haute Alton and St Louis Rail Road<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the said garnishee, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and submit the plaintiffs motion<lb/> for judgment on the answer of said Garnishee to the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> order that said motion be sustained; and the Court finds<lb/> from the answer of said garnishee that at the time he was summoned herein as such he was in<lb/>debted to the defendant the sum of one hundred and eighty dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and have execution therefore and that out of said sum he pay the costs as well of the original<lb/> suit as this proceeding The sum of ten dollars is allowed said garnishee to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hodzle</name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, leave is given them to add<lb/> an additional reason to their motion for a new trial herein, which is<lb/> accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Fenn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdalis</name> admr</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o clock.
                <name>J R Lackland</name>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-13">Monday Morning June 13th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Mo use of <name>Haydon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#431, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> and<lb/> <name>Josiah Fogg</name><lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly called comes not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and thirty one dollars and seventy cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as formed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Norris</name><lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>James Prices</name> &amp; <name>William Wood</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery. The plaintiff files a petition and an affidavit accor<lb/>ding to law; claiming the possession of certain personal property therein<lb/> described; wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the defendants deliev<lb/>er the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> Country, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it<lb/> from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="635" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0638.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 415<lb/> <name>Henry Wiebling</name></head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the<lb/> said defendant as confessed; and no Jury being required the Court doth assess the damages<lb/> sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition mentioned at the sum of<lb/> one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> possession of the premises described in the petition as follows; to wit; the undivided interest of<lb/> one tenth part of the following portion of a tract of land of forty arpens lying in the City and<lb/> Country of St Louis known as the common field in the St Louis prairie confirmed to Luettes rep<lb/>representatives and served by the United States by Survey no 7479, to wit; that portion of<lb/> said recovery commencing at a point where the West time of Eighteenth sheet intersects the North<lb/> line of said survey, runs thence West eight claims and fifty links along North line, thence fourth<lb/> at night angles to said North line one hundred and ninety two feet six inches to the South<lb/> line of said Survey, thence East along said South line to the West line of eighteenth sheet, thence<lb/> North along said West line to the beginning, together with the damages aforesaid in for afore<lb/>said as assessed and his costs herein expended and have writ of possession therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>F C Sharp</name>, Esq, announces to the Court the death of <name>James S Thomas</name>, Esq, late a member<lb/> of this Bar and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that the following resolutions passed at a<lb/> meeting held by the members of the St Louis Bar on the tenth instant, be spread upon the<lb/> records of the Court of this day:</p>
            <p>Whereas, In the dispensation of an all wise Providence, our highly esteemed friend and profes<lb/>sional brother, Judge <name>James S Thomas</name>, has by the hand of death, been removed from among us,<lb/> and from the access of his useful ness in our midst, we, his late associates, having met to bear<lb/> tribute to his memory, do</p>
            <p>Resolve, that in the death of Judge <name>Thomas</name>, the bar has lost a highly useful and worthy<lb/> member, the community a valued and upright citizen; and we, who had daily inter course with<lb/> him, bear testimony to his many noble and excellent qualities, which distinguished him in all<lb/> his relations in life.</p>
            <p>2. That in the professional career a four departed friend, he was distinguished by his frank<lb/> honorable and upright conduct-always fair and courteous in his practice and manner. That<lb/> he was governed by the highest principles of moral integrity, and thus has left an example<lb/> worthy of invitation by those assess who survive him.</p>
            <p>3. That, although we feel deeply the lap of our friend, yet are cannot but remember that his<lb/> bereaved and stricken family most keenly feel the lop of him who bore to them the more<lb/> tender relations of husband and father, ever discharging those duties with kindness and affection<lb/> and we, hereby, tender to them our condolence and sympathy in this their sad bereavement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#645, 96</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wake Briarly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R Risley</name></head>
            <p>On award of arbitrators.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff files<lb/> an award of arbitrators, and moves the Court to confirm said award,<lb/> and, after hearing the argument of council, it appearing to the Court that<lb/> certain matters in controversy between the plaintiff and defendant were submitted to <name>Syden<lb/>ham R Clark</name> and <name>Thomas Ratcliffe</name>, as arbitrators, with the power to select a third person<lb/> to act in conjunction with them and that they selected <name>John W Clark</name>, and that the said<lb/> arbitrators, after being duly sworn, proceeded to hear and decide the matters in controversy and<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, determined and awarded that the said <name>David<lb/> R Risley</name> pay to the said <name>Wake Briarly</name> the sum of six hundred and forty five dollars and<lb/> ninety six cents, it is therefore ordered by the Court that the award of said arbitrators be confirmed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="636" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0639.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the said sum<lb/> of six hundred and forty five dollars and ninety six cents as awarded by said arbitrators and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisbury</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the garnishee, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>James Sanders</name>, <name>Leon<lb/> Block</name>, <name>George Bowman</name>, <name>Frederick Wolf</name>, <name>D Sheppard</name>,<lb/> <name>William Gahl</name>, <name>George Bert</name>, <name>F V P Fister</name>, <name>Henry Drucker</name>,<lb/> <name>C Hoffman</name>, <name>Charles Declercy</name>, and <name>William Curtain</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished this cause is submitted to the Jury and they retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1946, 28</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua Tevis</name>,<lb/> <name>William P Scotland</name><lb/> <name>John C Tevis</name><lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>Heyman Levin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> called comes not; and the plaintiffs warning a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of nineteen hundred and forty six dollars and twenty eight cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debit aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therfor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taylor Hubbell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Motion and notice of motion for a new bond filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning 9 at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-14">Tuesday June 14th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>James N Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 499.<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> and <name>Francis Burker</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of <name>Frances<lb/> Burke</name> to set aside the judgment herein and recall the execution issued,<lb/> and also the affidavits in support thereof, doth order that the<lb/> said motion be sustained, and that the judgment rendered herein on<lb/> the <date when="--03-14">fourteenth of March</date> last be set aside and the execution herein be recalled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> et al<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="637" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0640.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>George Wood</name></head>
            <p>Ordered that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name>.<lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name>, <name>Irwin S Smith</name>,<lb/> and <name>William D Sedgwick</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also come a Jury, to wit; <name>James Sanders</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Wolf</name>, <name>D Sheppard</name>, <name>William Gahl</name>, <name>J V P Fister</name>,<lb/> <name>C Hoffman</name>, <name>William Bast</name>, <name>J W Menge</name>, <name>George<lb/> Trott</name>, <name>John Warren</name>, <name>William Walker</name>, and <name>Paul<lb/> Dejarley</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until to morrow<lb/> morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisbury</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also come and<lb/> being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths find for<lb/> the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf against the said garnishee but<lb/> that the said garnishee go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution. The Court allows the said garnishee the sum of one hun<lb/>dred dollars for his trouble and expense herein to be taxed as costs. The plaintiff files a motion<lb/> for a new trial herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-15">Wednesday June 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> <name>Ann Biddle</name> Estate</head>
            <p>On motion of <name>John O Fallon</name>, Execution, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the appellant, <name>Louis G Picot</name> trustee under the<lb/> will of said <name>An Biddle</name>, exhibit and file his exceptions to the settlement of the said executor the<lb/> appeal in the cause shall be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mississippi Rail<lb/> Road Company</name><lb/> vs 894<lb/> <name>William M M Pherson</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find the issues herein joined in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six<lb/>teen hundred and forty six dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also its herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendant files a motion for<lb/> a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="638" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0641.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#400, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs 657<lb/> <name>George O Atherton</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by<lb/> affidavit where by he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of four hundred dollars and consents that judgment may be rendered<lb/> against him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled; thereupon the said<lb/> defendant files a bill of exception herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 427<lb/> <name>City Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name>, <name>Luther M<lb/> Kennett</name>, and <name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> garns of the City <name>Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the said<lb/> garnishees be discharged at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silvers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Melnotte</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that a Commission issue to the State of Pennsylvania to take<lb/> depositions to be used on the trial of this Case before Justice <name>Waite</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Briarby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R Risley</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Kirk</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hannah Kirk</name></head>
            <p>Order Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears<lb/> that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, thereupon<lb/> in motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against her to obtain a de<lb/>crce of divorce from her on the grounds of desertion and adultery and that unless she be and<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to the begun and held at the City of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth<lb/> day thereof, plead to the plaintiffs petition the same will be taken against her as confessed;<lb/> It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="639" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0642.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Merchants Mutual Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Davis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Isaac T Wise</name> and enters his appearance as counsel<lb/> of record for the defendant in this cause. Said appearance<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>William W Haydon</name>.<lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name>, <name>Chwin Z Smith</name>,<lb/> and <name>William D Sedgwick</name></head>
            <p>Petition on Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until<lb/> to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-16">Thursday June 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hussinger</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for the plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>William T Hollister</name>, files a motion to set aside the<lb/> judgment herein and also and affidavit an support thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>William T Hollister</name>, files a motion to set aside the judgment<lb/> herein and also and affidavit an support thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Newman</name><lb/> vs 604<lb/> <name>James Mierson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at as costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> and <name>Louis Winkelmeier</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and remits of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered the sum of two hundred<lb/> dollars.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel M Norcross</name>, <name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/>, and <name>William D Sedgwick</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jury<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein the trial progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="640" facs="rcdbook1858_28_0643.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2570, 45<lb/> to bear 1 per<lb/> cent per mo.<lb/> int</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel L Ross</name>,<lb/> <name>Chancy Y Dempster</name> and <name>John Falconer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>Confession.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a petition herein<lb/> and the defendants, in person, also come and file a statement duly<lb/> verified by affidavit where by they admit the statements contained<lb/> in said petition to be true and consent that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered herein favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for the<lb/> sum of twenty five hundred and seventy <unclear rend="strikethrough">six</unclear> dollars and fort five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.<lb/> Judgment to bear interest at the rate of one per cent per month from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pierre Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, and acknowledges to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein render on the <date when="1853-06-09">ninth of June<lb/> 1853</date>, which acknowledgement of satisfaction is filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
                For Continuation of <date when="1859-02">February Term A D 1859</date> see Record<lb/> Book Number 29.
                <signed>
                    <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clk Circuit Court.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0644.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0645.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0646.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0647.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0648.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0649.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0650.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0651.tiff"/>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb facs="rcdbook1858_28_0652.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>RECORD<lb/> 28<lb/> 1858<lb/> TO<lb/> 1859<lb/> CIRCUIT<lb/> COURT</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

</body>
</text>
</TEI>
