There are no known copyright restrictions on this item. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. Washington University Libraries does not assert copyright in reproduction scans of public domain materials made openly available on its websites. For more information on policies and procedures governing the use of materials, contact digital@wumail.wustl.edu.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
It is ordered that
the within named petitioner
be allowed to
poor person to
his right to freedom
It is also ordered
said petitioner have
liberty
and the Court as
may require
removed out of the
and that he be not
to any
his
freedom
It is further order that
the
Judge
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Your
complaining respectfully
that
he is a man of colour free from the following
facts to
he was sent by his master
work in
the state of
your
payment, that he
Monday
morning up to Saturday
said
the orders of his said master contrary
of state of
and that he is ever since said time
as a slave by the said
as a poor person your
bound
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Action
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
attorney
a
For that
of January in the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and
forty
and in the State aforesaid the said Defendant
with force
and arms an
make on the said plaintiff and
then and
there beat
said plaintiff and then and there imprisoned
him the said
and detained him in prison there from
the day
made and provided and against the peace
and dignity of the state. And the plaintiff
aforesaid
committing of the said several
he was and still is a free person and that
the Defendant aforesaid held and still
holds
him the said
wherefore he the said plaintiff says that
he is
greatly injured and
to the amount of six hundred dollars
And therefore he brings his
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to
if he be found in your
County, that
he be and appear
before the judge of our
held at the
of
to the damage of said plaintiff
dollars: And have you then there this writ.
It is ordered that
be allowed to
It is also ordered that the said petitioner have
liberty to attend his counsel and the Court as occasion may
require; that he be not
removed out of the
of the Court, and that he be not subject
It is further ordered that
as counsel for the above named petitioner
of
A true copy of the ordered
new trial
Mo to strike
by
Executed this writ in the county of
on the
it and the declaration to
the defendant
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
And the said defendant
by his attorney
force
he is not guilty of
imprisonment above
in
is
himself upon the county
plea
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Take notice that on the
day of December in the year of
one thousand eight hundred and
forty
between the
forenoon and
of that day at the office of
and for the
will be
read
on the trial of the
of the
plaintiff and that the taking of said
Depositions
will be continued from day to day
at the same place and between the same
hours
Notice to
Depositions
in behalf of Plaintiff
witness
Served the within notice by delivering
a true Copy thereof to
The
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to summon
that, all excuses and delays being set aside, he personally be and appear before the
undersigned, a Justice
of the Peace within and for the county aforesaid, on the
184
of a case wherein
plaintiff, and
defendant, on the part of the
and have you then there this writ.
Justice 18 3/4
Deposition to be
Decbr 6th
Depositions
of witness, produced, sworn and examined at the office of
the said Justice, in a certain came now
depending in the
between
examined on the part of the plaintiff, deposeth and saith:
I know
the defendant, two
in, at the same time, an old
of
residence in Saint
to be defective; and
to send his black man,
to make the necessary repairs, I preferred a
German, in the employ of
with him, but his family being sick, I could not
have him
and then said mulatto
do on the still and
their
arrival, leaving Louis at my house to complete the work.
Louis remained at work on the
and the son of
weight of the
to me an account of some
twenty or thirty dollars for said repairs,
and demanded of me payment for of the amount
thus
still,
He,
deducted
the value of the
balance
by law. I was sued
for this amount, and
my Endorser's
who afterwards sued
for the repairs done on the
and also an
to settle the Bill by
person
the settlement
made by Mr.
embraced all I owed Mr.
repairs done by
transactions with Mr.
know of Mr.
When the son of Mr.
until the repairs should be fully completed by him. I controlled him
in his work,
until he left; I paid his
the work of Louis, after the son of Mr.
Further
deponent saith not.
I Frederick Kretschmar, a Justice of the Peace for and within
the
whole truth of his knowledge, touching the matter in controversy in
the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed on A.
for 30th Decr
for
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
for
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
January
testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in
our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed
for the
on the Old
for 6th of
on new
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at ten OClock
A.
M.
testify and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed
behalf of Plaintiff
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to attach
by
before the Judge of our
the
and there to
testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy, now pending in
our said
Plaintiff, and
the
said
on the part of the said
Executed
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at 10 OClock
testify, and the
truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Not
House
Second Street
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Not
for Plaiff
for 18th Inst
Patriot
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
next
testify, and the truth to say
in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
on
Trial the
30th, instant
This
consequence of the
adjournment
of Court
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at 9 OClock A.
M.
testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in
our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
November
1843
Service 50
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at 9 OClock
testify, and the
truth to say, in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of the
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed the
1844
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
9 o clock
testify, and the truth to say, in a certain matter of controversy now pending in
our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
the 8th
at 9 O'Clock
on
Executed
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in
our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein
you are in no wise to fail.
January
Executed the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the city of
testify and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
(son of the
at
store at Main
& the
13th Jany
Exd the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to attach
by
before the Judge of our
the
and there to testify and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy, now pending in
our said
plaintiff, and
the said
on the part of the said
Executed this writ in the
on the
the within
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to attach
by
before the Judge of our
the
and there to testify
and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy, now pending in
our said
plaintiff, and
the said
on the part of the said
attachment
for
Executed
in open court.
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to attach
by
before the Judge of our
the
and there to testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of
controversy, now pending in
our said
plaintiff, and
the
said
on the part of the said
Executed
within witness in open court.
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed the
May 1844
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed the
May 1844
May
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
John
J. Renth
Exd the
1844
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded, that setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear
before the Judge of our
at the
testify, and the truth to say in a
certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court,
wherein
plaintiff and
defendant on the part of
and herein you are in no wise to fail.
Executed the
Sub. for
with for
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Now this day comes the said
to
grant him a
above entitled case for
the following reasons.
1st Because the Court
permitting the
the above cause to be
on their
effect
expressed
regard to the freedom of slaves
mind that might interfere with
your Verdict in this case-”
2nd Because the Court
in not permitting
the plaintiffs witness to have
an interpreter
in the
aforesaid, the said Smelter
being
a German
3rd Because the court's
instructions to the
said
the said cause was against law-
4th Because the Verdict of
the said
Motion for new trial
by Plaintiff
of May 1844
filed 15
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
above cause to writ on
the
May - A.
D. 1844
of the circuit court a jury was
and duly sworn on their
the plaintiffs
the
them
entertained
which in a suit for freedom
prevent them from
verdict
in several
refused to allow the question to be put
to
the
the
The plaintiff then produced
a German as a witness as in said cause who
on application for an interpreter of the
German
into English and
court for the reason that the court was of
opinion that an interpreter was not
necessary
after said witness
his
for
an interpreter for said witness on the
so imperfectly, which was again refused by the
Court. the said
witness gave the following
before the said Court the said cause
to wit that he had been
to this suit
a member,
found imperfect, and I called
at defendants shop in
partner said he would send
a yellow man to
I would prefer a
man,
on the occasion, the
on account of his family's sickness, defendant said that
the yellow man (the
as the
day of
February 1836
went over to
20th of
over a second time and
on said stills in the
not
who sent over the said yellow man
working on said stills, said
thirteen
or fourteen days in
was to have pay for the hire of said yellow
to
I finally cost the
to take the Kettles or
notes which he held, I sent
the
to give them to defendant, I was allowed 20 cents per pound
for them, defendant
Brought in the Bill for the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
of plaintiff for work in
and I was told if I would not pay
sent to jail, and I was put in jail for said
Bill I sent for
person in the matter but
I
and
defendant
hire was presented for payment about 4 month after
the
put to jail I paid two dollars per
week for the
Board of said
by deft's
the
first time, the last time
the
defendant to send plaintiff
Street in
account
was first presented shortly after the
work was done in
there by Burds Clerk
next time after
setting for the
himself he
said he
jail, I said I had
he was on a note
was on
the note. I was not
for a note as I
believe but for 30 dollars
Mr.
and the jailer let me go, I thought deft
did not treat me
towards defendant, young
have been over, I think he did not
in
interpreted
were made in last of
January
the
day of March
1835
counsel - I understood
that I was
put in jail for the hire of the yellow
man
I cannot
on behalf
of the plaintiff
following testimony to
not present when
Kettles
said to him that plaintiff had
him for his freedom,
plaintiff as his
contracts
for the services of plaintiff I
think that defendant told me some
suit was brought that he was at the
East when
in
that the
had been
Business was on
&
in
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
in behalf of the Plaintiff
he was
shop when plaintiff
sent to
the
witnesses in behalf of the defendant
was in the shop when
was absent defendant was Boss
he saw
shop defendant went to the east but
not at the time that plaintiff was
sent to
on the
how long defendant remained in
the east
he knew those facts from a Book he
saw the Book and it was kept
by
office Smelter showed
case, he had the letter in his
possession,
him for his time &
attending as a witness in said cause
behalf of the defendant being
on his
of the suit, when
he states that in
work for
composed
witness, they had
of doing
several
Pine
Shop of
have some work
stills were at that time in St. Clair
county in the
from
Smelter
shop to do said
but his family having
sick he could not go Witness
then sent
slave and the
plaintiff in
this
repairs on said Still, that
this
plaintiff
7 1/2
for which work
charged on the Books of
defendant
at $ 2,50
except one week in
attended to sales and
Plaintiff was usually there
when sick, Plaintiff is not healthy
the first time
the
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
believes at which time defendant
was on his away to the East defendant
left for the
1836
defendant was not present when
works in defendant shop
for
the account against
sent
son went over to complete the
work
and
time Witness went there himself
and
Smelter
in
was entered on
untill after Plaintiff brought
it was
and defendant
and work
copper and
Witness tried to get the
account
paid out of the proceeds of said
copper,
Counsel- Witness is a
law of defendant Deft left
of
Defendant may have
witness to collect the amount
for plaintiffs wages in
of said
plaintiff was
Plaintiff to
as agent for the said
himself being one of the
the amount of the bill for said
son went over at the
request of witness-
witness always considered the
said debt for 26 dollars a
bad one & would not be willing
to give much for it
after
was brought by plaintiff
defendant
from the Books--
and examined on part of defendant
stated that he was with
the
about one year before it dissolved
& continued afterwards with the
said
up to the present time, that
their salesman to have some
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
previously
of Andrews
was sent over to
said
days previously had
left
was asked by said Rucker
about said
was then sent to
there at work about for 8 days-
the plaintiff never went there
more
finished the work that
plaintiff
went over to
with Smelter or his partner defendant
was at
that time
on his way to the east, - defendant
as soon as he found out plaintiff's
claim to freedom, asked witness
how it was, & who sent him and
it was improper.
Thomas Andrews- being duly sworn and examined in behalf the
defendant States that he had
said Smelter
that was given to
he previously made several
efforts to collect it but
not do so witness knew of no
work done by
discharged from jail
because
he
The following testimony
was then produced by plaintiff
and given in
Adolph
he knew
the witness for six or seven
years
and that his
in like manner he said that
he knew said Smelter for
several years last past and
that his character is good for
truth and
Vergin
manner sworn on behalf
of Plaintiff
said he knew
that his character is good for
truth and
John
also in like manner
sworn and
examined said that they knew
years past
and that his
is good for truth and
several
to be sworn on the same
but the court considered it
The following instructions were then asked for by plaintiffs counsel (the
here insert instructions) the court
given
After trial in the above
cause and in the proper time
the plaintiff by his attorney moves
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
the court for a new trial for the
following reasons (Clerk will here
insert
reasons) but the court overruled
said motion to which
the plaintiff by his attorney excepts
and
exceptions in that
might be allowed
The following statement of facts
by Conduct of Counsel is added to the
of exceptions-
the
trial of the Cause aforesaid
called
the purpose of
exceptions in the above cause, & was
informed by the Partner of
July 1844
absent some time -
absent from the
of July
1844
& after he returned he
the City Constantly to this time- The Court adjoined from
regular
from said
the Court
October 1844
the evidence, until the
1844
Bill of
Exceptions
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Be it
that on the
eighteen hundred and
forty four
by his attorney made his motion
to strike out the
Bill of exceptions in this case
as no part of the record & filed his
therefor &
thereof which are in
the
the motion and
reasons & affidavits
The Court
to which decision of the
Court the
defendant by his
and prays
the Court to sign
his Bill of exceptions
which is
done accordingly this
of October
eighteen hundred forty
four
Bill of Exceptions
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
sworn on his oath Saith that
in this case; that nothing was ever said or
instructed
to him or to
to his knowledge or belief respecting a bll
of exceptions, until some time after the
that the plaintiff's
attorney had said to
P.D.
at
that, the case had finally
Deponent returned to
1844
any consent to
of the matter in his opinion, till on
or about the
the Judge of this Court handed to this
deponent, a draft of a Bill of
exceptions
in this case: This deponent then
the Court the
the
Court not to sign the
that account, but the
the objection & signed the
Bill after it has been
him,
And this deponent says he notified the
plaintiffs attorney,
immediately after the
said Bill of exceptions was
the Judge, of his objection to the same
But
P.
duly sworn on his oath
never gave any consent to the making
out or
in the foregoing
case
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
The defendant by his
counsel
the files
as a part of the record, or otherwise
on behalf of plaintiff on the 15th of October
1 Because the
signed by the judge & is not a part of the
record.
2. Because the
up
judge
trial
3. Because of the
the trial, & the making
of the Bill of
of
such
given by
4. Because the same was illegally
signed
to
of
Attys
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Error to
Now at this day comes again the said defendant
by
his
and therefore the said defendant submits this cause to the Court
the
record and proceedings of the said
therein rendered in
this cause; after
do consider and
adjudge that the judgment aforesaid in form aforesaid,
by the said circuit court
rendered, be in all things affirmed
and stand in full force.
I, Hampton L. Boon Clerk of the
of the
of the
of
the Records of said Court, now remaining in my Offices.
Filed
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
1 That the plaintiff is not entitled to his freedom
in
work
sent & remained there, without the knowledge,
or
given
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
2.That the plaintiff is not entitled to his freedom
consequence
to do work there by a member of the
to which defendant
to do
it, provided the
evidence that he
without the knowledge
consent or
of the defendant.
Deft
January 16/44
(
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
If the
that
named
that in Burd's
the State the establishment
was
present, and that his
in it
as before, and was by the
in authority in Burd's
establishment sent
repair copper works in
and that the slave
did
is an
into
the freedom of a
slave
This
given
trial
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
(On
If the
used his slave named
the state the Establishment was
as tho he were present and that his
it continued and that said
there working as before and was by
the person in
sent over
and that the slave did so go and work
in
the freedom of a slave- and the
Refused
Instruction asked
by plff- refused
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
On part of
1. That the plaintiff is not entitled to his freedom
in consequence of being sent
to
work &
thus sent
&
without the knowledge,
consent or connivance of the defendant.
(Given)
2 That the plaintiff is not entitled to his freedom
in consequence of his having been
belonged, and of his remaining
or
(Given)
3 If the
was
owner of the plaintiff &
a year
to a
was member, and that said plaintiff was sent
to the
to do work there &
that he was there sent &
the knowledge, consent or
said
defendant, they are
the
defendant.
(Given)
Instructions prayed
for by
Given by Court