<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="rcd1859.0029.494"><!--enter filename without extension for xml:id-->
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc> 
<titleStmt>
<title><!--example, take title from spine-->Record 29 1859 to 1860</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<publisher>Washington University Libraries</publisher>
<pubPlace>St. Louis, MO</pubPlace>
<date>2012</date>
<availability><p><ref target="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/</ref></p></availability>
<availability><p>data are freely accessible</p>
<p>This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.</p>
</availability>
<idno type="dls">rcd1859.0029.494<!--enter filename without extension--></idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<bibl><!-- example, use title-->Record 29 1859 to 1860 prepared by the St. Louis Circuit Court</bibl>
<bibl>The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2012-09-25" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-09-07" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-09-05" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-09-04" who="APJ">Transcribed and encoded</change>
<change when="2012-05-29" who="AGJ"></change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>

<text xml:id="rcd1859.0029.494T">
<body>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0000.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0001.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0002.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0003.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0004.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0005.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0006.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0007.tiff"/>
</div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="1" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0008.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head type="running"><date when="1859-02">February Term 1859</date>. continued from Record Book No 28.</head>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-17">Friday, June 17th 1859</date></dateline>.
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, and files an affidavit and <unclear>prays</unclear><lb/> the Court for an appeal herein; wherefore, it is ordered that an appeal be<lb/> allowed the defendant to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein<lb/> rendered; thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond with himself, as principal, and <name>John<lb/> B Carson</name> and <name>Edward Haren</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Knaus</name> etal<lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Charles S Coxe</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Greenfield Sluder &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Greenfield Sluder &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M L Hobart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shea</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> <unclear rend="strikethrough">etal</unclear></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Daugherty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew Park</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Stacy</name><lb/> <name>Geo W Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="2" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0009.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Stacy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thomas Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lut</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>George Buttner</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit from which it<lb/> appears to the Court that the defendant is a non resident of the State of<lb/> Missouri, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the<lb/> sum of five hundred and twenty five dollars and interest on account of money loaned and ad<lb/>vanced by the plaintiff to the defendant and four promissory notes executed by the defendant to<lb/> the plaintiff and which the plaintiff alleges are lost, and that unless he be and appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis<lb/> on the last Monday of September  next and on or before the sixth day thereof plead to the action<lb/> aforesaid, according to law, the plaintiffs petition will be taken against him as confessed. It is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Anzeiger des Westens,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Paul</name> etal<lb/> vs 294.<lb/> The <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>William H Newman</name> and <name>Edward Franks</name><lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>Albert Pearce</name>, <name>John J Roe</name> and<lb/> <name>Moiles Sells</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and thereupon the trial progressed but<lb/> the plaintiffs say they will not further prosecute their<lb/> suit in this behalf but voluntarily take a nonsuit. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the said defendants go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiffs their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Thaler</name><lb/> vs  289.<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Simsheuser</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name> etal<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Nathan W Jones</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="3" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0010.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Charles Buchard</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out the reply to the counterclaim herein<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name>, <name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/> and <name>William D Sedgwick</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and also come the Jury, empanneled and sworn herein,<lb/> and being agreed upon a verdict, upon their oaths, find<lb/> for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of<lb/> five hundred and thirty <unclear rend="strikethrough">one</unclear> dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damage aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Wilson</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>The St Louis Mutual Fire and<lb/> Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> etal</head>
            <p>On consideration of the plaintiffs and the defendants motion for a<lb/> new trial herein it is ordered that the same be sustained, and<lb/> that a new trial be had herein and the judgment herein set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fredk A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mears</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward S. Menager</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>William Crane</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes and<lb/> files a statement from which it appears that the keeping of the<lb/> property attached will be attended with great loss and expence<lb/> before the probable termination of this suit; therefore it is ordered that<lb/> the said Sheriff sell said property according to law and make a report of his proceedings<lb/> herein on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">#269,40.<lb/> <name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Martin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and warning<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and sixty nine dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Motion for a new trial file by defendants.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lacklaud</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="4" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0011.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-18">Saturday June 18th 1859</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>W W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Ann Biddle</name> estate</head>
            <p><name>Louis G Picot</name>, in compliance with the order heretofore made herein,<lb/> files exceptions to the settlements of the Executor herein, and thereupon the<lb/> said Executor, <name>John O Fallen</name>, files a motion to strike out said exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Oliver A Hart</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> etal</head>
            <p>Moto vacate order granting a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>The parties file a stipulation herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head><name>Rupell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bennett</name></head>
            <p>Dedimus awarded plaintiff to take deportions in Territory of New Mexico.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head><name>Taylor Nubbeell &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new bond herein<lb/> and being thereof fully advised doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head><name>James Waugh</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Leon J Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that <name>Leon<lb/> Papin</name> be appointed guardian ad litem of <name>James C Waugh</name>, <name>William W Waugh</name><lb/> and <name>Robert F Waugh</name>; thereupon the said Papin file his concert to act as such<lb/> guardian ad litem and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein and for a new trial is on<lb/> consideration by the Court sustained. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that a new trial be had herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglas</name> etal<lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Jno B Grady</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their motion to set side the judgment herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="5" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0012.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-20">Monday June 20th 1859</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <head rend="bracketed">#92,20<lb/> per month<lb/> #25000 for<lb/> council fee.<lb/> <name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>John Doyle</name>, by <name>William V N<lb/> Bay</name>, his attorney, and submit the plaintiffs application for an allowance for<lb/> temporary support and maintenance and for an allowance to retain counsel<lb/> to prosecute her suit and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that the<lb/> said application be sustained; and in accordance with the stipulation filed herein the Court<lb/> doth order that the defendant pay to the plaintiff, or her agent appointed under her hand, for<lb/> the temporary support and maintenance of herself and two daughters, <name>Mary Ann</name> and <name>Jane</name>, the<lb/> children of the defendant, the sum of ninety two dollars and twenty cents on the twenty fifth<lb/> of the present month and on the twenty fifth of each and every month thereafter until the<lb/> further order of this Court: and the Court, after hearing the proof offered by the parties, doth fur<lb/>ther order that the said defendant pay to the plaintiff, or her agent appointed under her hand,<lb/> or to <name>Samuel J Glover</name> for her on the twenty fifth of this month, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, for the purpose of<lb/> retaining counsel to prosecute her suit for divorce; and it is also ordered that the said <name>John<lb/> Doyle</name> file a bond with good and sufficient securities for the payment of the sums aforesaid,<lb/> forthwith. Leave is given the parties to apply to the Court for any modification of this de<lb/>cree, which may be deemed necessary.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use of<lb/> <name>Julius Voelker</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>John H Ganhart</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William McDonald</name> etal<lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Bamum</name> etal<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Washington J Adams</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled; the defendant<lb/> files a bill of exceptions and also an affidavit for an appeal herein, where<lb/>fore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein<lb/> rendered and thereupon the said defendant files an appeal bond in the sum of one thousand dol<lb/>lars with himself, as principal, and <name>Charles D Colman</name>, <name>Peter E Bland</name> and <name>Henry Stagg</name>, as se<lb/>curities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival S Drown</name> etal<lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="6" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0013.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Human</name> etal<lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Henry I Cuniffe</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled;<lb/> thereupon the said defendants file a bill of exceptions, and an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein, wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed them to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the judgment herein rendered, and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of eight<lb/> thousand nine hundred dollars, with <name>William S McKnight</name>, as principal, and <name>Marinus<lb/> W Warne</name> and <name>James W Richardson</name>, as securities, which bond is approved the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Wolf</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>W M Flaherty</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> vs 803.<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled; and the<lb/> defendants motion in arrest of judgment being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Rasweiler</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Philip Seiler</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>James J M Bride</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion of the defendants, <name>Jecko</name> and <name>MacDonald</name>, <unclear>apores</unclear> due consid<lb/>eration by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal<lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">#105,00<lb/> <name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name> garnishee of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and <name>St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the said garnishee, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and submit the plaintiffs motion for judgment<lb/> on the answer herein to Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the said motion doth sustain the same; and it appearing to<lb/> the Court that the said garnishee at the time he was sum<lb/>moned herein as such was indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars<lb/> and that the plaintiff has obtained judgment against the defendant for the sum of twelve hun<lb/>dred and seventy five dollars and twenty one cents, and that <name>George W Brackett</name> has also obtained<lb/> judgment against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and twenty eight dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the said garnishee the sum of one hundred and five dollars and have execution therefore,<lb/> and that out of said sum he pay the costs of this proceeding. The Court allows the said garnishee<lb/> the sum of twenty five dollars for answering herein to be taxed as costs. By consent of parties<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the issue of execution herein be stayed for the term of six months.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="7" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0014.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">#135,00 <name>George W Brackett</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name> garnishee of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and <name>St Louis Rail<lb/> Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the garnishee, by their respec<lb/>ctive attorneys, and submit to the Court the motion for<lb/> judgment on the answer herein and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth sustain the<lb/> said motion; and it appearing to the Court that the said<lb/> garnishee at the time he was summoned herein as such was indebted to the defendant in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and and fifty dollars and that the plaintiff obtained a judgment<lb/> against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy five<lb/> cents, and that <name>Edward P Tesson</name> has also obtained judgment against the defendant for the<lb/> sum of twelve hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty one cents, therfore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum<lb/> of one hundred and thirty five dollars and have execution therefor, and that out of said sum he<lb/> pay the costs of this proceeding. The sum of twenty five dollars is allowed said garnishee for<lb/> answering herein. By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the issue of execution herein<lb/> be stayed for the period of six months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">#166,02. <name>Percival S Drown</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Clinton</name><lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>Samuel K Hutchinson</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Francis Lancaster Sr</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and move the<lb/> Court for judgment upon the answer of said garnishee,<lb/> and it appearing to the Court from the answer of said<lb/> garnishee that at the time he was summoned herein<lb/> as such he was indebted to the defendant in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and ninety five dollars and fifty cents and it further apearing to the Court<lb/> that the amount of the judgment of the plaintiffs against the defendant with interest thereon to<lb/> the present date is the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars and seventy two cents and that<lb/> the costs as well of the original suit as of this proceeding together with the sum of ten dollars,<lb/> which is allowed for answering, amount to the sum of forty four dollars and thirty cents, therefore<lb/> it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum of one hun<lb/>dred and sixty six dollars and two cents and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geroge W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>On Petition of <name>D A January</name> and others.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit the<lb/> application for an order on the assignee to appoint a new<lb/> day for the hearing and allowance of demands not allowed<lb/> on the former day and to give notice thereof to creditors, according to the statute, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said application and also the affidavits in support thereof,<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phillip G Ferguson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the application for an in<lb/>junction herein doth refuse the same.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="8" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0015.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-21">Tuesday June 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Motion for an attachment against the defendant filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#60000 alimony<lb/> #25000 atty fees<lb/> #2500 for cents.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, by <name>Wiel Wright</name>, his attorney,<lb/> and submit to the Court the plaintiffs application for alimony pendente<lb/> lite and for the purpose of defraying the expences of her suit for divorce and for<lb/> the employment of counsel to prosecute the same, and the Court having duly heard and cosid<lb/>ered the same and also the petition of the plaintiff heretofore filed, doth order that the defendant pay<lb/> to the plaintiff, or her agent appointed under her own hand, for the temporary support of herself<lb/> and child the sum of six hundred dollar per annum payable in equal monthly instalments<lb/> of fifty dollars each on the first Monday of each and every month commencing on the first<lb/> Monday of July next, until the further order of this Court, and that on the first Monday of July<lb/> next, he pay over to the Clerk of this Court the sum of twenty five dollars to defray the expenses of<lb/> her suit and pay over to <name>Samuel F Glover</name>, plaintiffs attorney, the sum of two hundred and fifty<lb/> dollars for counsel fees, one hundred to be paid on the first Monday of July next and the residue<lb/> of said two hundred and fifty dollars to be paid on determination of the suit for divorce. Leave<lb/> is given the parties to apply to the Court for any modification of this order as they may deem<lb/> necessary.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>New Albany Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dyer</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>The motion of the plaintiff for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>National Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Montgomery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dwyer</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel H Gardner</name><lb/> vs 803.<lb/> <name>David H Armstrong</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions and also an affidavit for an appeal<lb/> herein wherefore it is ordered that an appeal be allowed him to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered and he thereupon files an appeal<lb/> bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip G Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 734<lb/> <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion of said plaintiff an order on the Sheriff to pay to him<lb/> the sum of one hundred and twenty five dollars is, on consideration by<lb/> the Court overruled; and it is ordered that said Sheriff apply said sum to the payment of an execution<lb/> issued from this Court in favor of <name>Ichabod Washburn</name> against said <name>Lucinda R Townsend</name>.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="9" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0016.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Bowell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>The assignee files the certified claims of <name>Henning</name> and <name>Wood<lb/>ruff</name>, <name>Bowker</name> and <name>Edwards</name>, <name>Wm H Numan &amp; Co</name>, <name>Jno J<lb/> Anderson Co</name>, <name>Moloney &amp; Bro</name> and <name>Goss Mc Ginnis &amp; Co.</name></p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Natham W Jones</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that an appeal be allowed them to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered and they thereupon file<lb/> an appeal bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hoelzle</name><lb/> vs 233.<lb/> <name>Henry Bounstein</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>new trial</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslein</name> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained<lb/> and that a new trial be had herein.</p>
            <p><name>John A Brounlee</name>, who is personally known to the Court acknowledges the execution of a<lb/> deed of emancipation to his slaves <name>Jane</name> aged twenty six and her child<lb/> <name>Charles</name> aged between three and four years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> from <name>Ann Biddles</name> Estate</head>
            <p>The motion of <name>John O Fallon</name> Executor, to strike out the exceptions of<lb/> <name>Louis G Picot</name>, the objector, being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is ordered that the said motion be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 536<lb/> <name>Wyllys King</name> etal</head>
            <p>The verbal motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Martin C Walker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is considered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Mouse of <name>Jas Castello</name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>William J Kennedy</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Septimus Lovering</name><lb/> vs 717<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to retain the costs herein being fully considered by the Court<lb/> it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="10" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0017.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2210,72<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C H Junison</name><lb/> <name>Same Knox</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Warren</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Cornlius H Junison</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore F Junison</name></head>
            <p>Judgment on forthcoming Bond.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and submits to the Court<lb/> his motion for judgment against <name>Cornelius N Junison</name> and <name>Samuel<lb/> Knox</name> the obligors in the forthcoming bond taken by the Sheriff<lb/> in this course: and it appearing to the Court that the Sheriff on<lb/> the <date when="1858-04-05">fifth day of April, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, took a forthcoming bond for the<lb/> property attached executed by <name>Cornelius N Junior</name>, as principal, and <name>Samuel Knox</name> as se<lb/>curity, according to law, and that the plaintiff on the <date when="1858-12-10">tenth day of December, eighteen hun<lb/>dred and fifty eight</date> recovered judgment against the defendants for the sum of seventeen hundred<lb/> and twenty two dollars and fifty five cents, and that execution was issued on said judgment<lb/> and duly returned by the Sheriff with his return of no property found endorsed thereon<lb/> and that in pursuance of an order heretofore made herein the Sheriff duly assigned said<lb/> forthcoming bond to the plaintiff, and that the amount due upon said execution is seven<lb/>teen hundred and forty nine dollars and eighty cents, and that the value of the property for<lb/> the forthcoming of which said bond was given is greater in value than the amount due<lb/> upon said execution, and that the amount due with interest thereon and twenty per dam<lb/>ages upon the value is twenty two hundred and ten dollars and seventy two cents, and that<lb/> the judgment against the defendants bears ten per cent interest, therefore it is considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of <name>Cornelius N Junison</name> and <name>Samuel Knox</name>, the oblijors<lb/> in said forthcoming bond, the sum of twenty two hundred and ten dollars and seventy<lb/> two cents, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date,<lb/>  and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-22">Wednesday June 22nd, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> etal</head>   
            <p>The plaintiff by its attorney, remits of the judgment herein<lb/> resolved the sum of two hundred and ten dollars; and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the defendants mo<lb/>tion for a new trial herein and being thereof fully advised doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled; and the court having also duly heard and considered the<lb/> defendants motion for arrest of judgment and being thereof fully advised doth order that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherell</name> etal<lb/> vs 333.<lb/> <name>Horace R Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Joseph Karfer</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs is, on consideration by the Court<lb/> sustained: until first of the next term of this Court is given the plaintiff<lb/> to file security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="11" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0018.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mipipippi Rail Road<lb/> Company</name> vs 894<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that<lb/> the same be overruled; therepon the said defendant<lb/> file an affidavit for an appeal herein wherefore an<lb/> appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgement herein ordered and he<lb/> file an appeal bond is the sum of thirty five hundred dollars, with himself as principal,<lb/> and <name>John R Sheply</name> and <name>Barton Bates</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wake Briarly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R Risley</name></head>
            <p>The defendat motion to set aside the judgment herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant file a bill of exception and also an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal, wherefore it is ordered that an appeal<lb/> be allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judg<lb/>ment herein ordered, and they thereupon file an appeal bond<lb/> in the sum off one thousand dollars, with themselves, as principals, and <name>John H Rankin</name><lb/> and <name>George P Strong</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file a bill of exceptions and also an affi<lb/>davit for an appeal huin, wherefore it is ordered that<lb/> an appeal be allowed them to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the judgement herein ordered, and they thereupon<lb/> file an appeal bond, in the sum of eight hundred and twenty dollars, with <name>William D<lb/> Sedgwick</name> and <name>Irwin Z Smith</name>, as principals, and <name>Charles C Whittelsey</name> and <name>John R<lb/> Shepley</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>William W Haydon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Joel W Norcross</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled; and the defendants file a bill of exceptions and<lb/> also an affidavit for an appeal, wherefore, an appeal is<lb/> allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered, and they thereupon<lb/> file an appeal bond, in the sum of the eleven hundred dollars, with themselves, as principals,<lb/> and <name>Alexander Hamilton</name> and <name>Melvin L Gray</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>The City Bank</name> of St Louis etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>James McBride</name><lb/> vs 573<lb/> <name>Wm B Watson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed by coment of parties.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="12" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0019.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> etal<lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled; and the defen<lb/>dants motion in arrest of judgment being also heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stillwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William J Hollister</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Hollister</name>'s motion to set aside the judgment herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sus<lb/>tained; and on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that a Summons issue herein for the defendant <name>Hollister</name><lb/> returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stillwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William J Hollister</name></head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant, <name>Hollister</name>, to set aside the judgment herein being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be<lb/> sustained; and on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that a summons issue herein for said defendant, <name>Hollister</name>, return<lb/>able to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisbury</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to vacate the order granting a new trial herein<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> said motion be sustained and that said order be set aside annuled<lb/> and vacated, and the judgment rendered herein be, in all respects, reinstated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motions of the plaintiffs and defendants for a new trial herein being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Fenn</name><lb/> vs 592<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administration<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled; thereupon the said defendant, by her attorney, files a bill of excep<lb/>tions and also an affidavit for an appeal herein, wherefore an ap<lb/>peal is allowed her to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein and for a new trial being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Cleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained<lb/> and that a new trial be had herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="13" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0020.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#6638,55<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno D Wilson</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>John D Wilson</name> administrator<lb/> of the Estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name><lb/> and <name>John Biddle</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court, having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, doth find; First, that on the <date when="1823-06-07">seventh<lb/> day of June, eighteen hundred and twenty three</date>, a judg<lb/>ment was rendered in favor of the United States against <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> S Hempstead</name>, the complainant herein, for the sum of thirteen thousand four hundred and<lb/> ninety seven dollars and twenty seven cents, on the official bond of said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>,<lb/> wherein said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> was principal, and said <name>Charles S Hempstead</name> as security:<lb/> Second, that said <name>John Biddle</name> obtained the control and ownership of said judgment with<lb/> power to release the same: Third, that said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> died and left one child<lb/> only, a daughter, his sole heir, <name>Cornelia V Hempstead</name>: Fourth, that said <name>John Biddle</name><lb/> on the <date when="1849-12-07">seventh day of December, eighteen hundred and forty nine</date> for good and sufficient con<lb/>siderations, one of which was the withdrawal and dismissal of certain suits that had been insti<lb/>tuted by the hier of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> against said <name>Biddle</name> and others, and the conveyance by<lb/> the heir of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> to <name>Biddle</name> of two certain tracts of land, the subject of said suit,<lb/> released by instrument of writing the heirs, executions and administrators of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name><lb/> from said judgment, except so far as it might be necessary to use it for the protection of the<lb/> title to the land which <name>Biddle</name> obtained by said conveyance from said heir: Fifth, That<lb/> said release was never entered of record but was kept by the agent of said <name>John D Wilson</name>;<lb/> that said <name>John D Wilson</name> was advised by counsel and believed that the paper called a release<lb/> was no release at all, and acted upon such hypothesis: Sixth, That said judgment was kept<lb/> a foot in fraud of the complaint in this cause; Seventh, That in the year eighteen hundred<lb/> and forty eight, said defendant <name>John D Wilson</name> married the said <name>Cornelia V Hempstead</name>,<lb/> the said sole heir of said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>. Eight, That in <date when="1850-06">June eighteen hundred and fifty</date>,<lb/> letters of administration were granted to defendant <name>Wilson</name> by the Probate Court in and for the<lb/> County of St Louis, State of Missouri, upon the estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>. Ninth, That in the<lb/> month of <date when="1851-03">March, eighteen hundred and fifty one</date>, the said judgment aginst said <name>Thomas</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Hempstead</name> was received in favor of the United States to the use of said <name>Biddle</name>, fraudulently.<lb/> Tenth, That said judgment as revived was presented in the Probate Court for allowance by the said <name>Biddle</name>,<lb/> the same was fraudulently procured to be allowed and was allowed on the <date when="1852-06-15">fifteenth day of June, eigh<lb/>teen hundred hundred and fifty two</date>, to the amount of thirty four thousand seven hundred and<lb/> seventy two dollars and thirty four cents, and placed in the fourth class of claims allowed against<lb/> the estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> in fraud of the plaintiffs rights: Eleventh, That at the <date when="1852-03">March<lb/> Term, eighteen hundred and fifty two</date>, of said Probate Court a claim was allowed by said Court<lb/> in favor of this complainant <name>Charles S Hempstead</name>, against the estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name><lb/> amounting to ten thousand two hundred and forty four dollars and sixty seven cents, for moneys<lb/> paid by this complainant upon the aforesaid judgment against said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> and this<lb/> complainant, and the said claim so allowed was placed in the fifth class of claims allowed against<lb/> said estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name>: Twelfth, That no other claims have been allowed against nor<lb/> are any other debts owing by said estate than the said judgments and allowances: Thirteenth,<lb/> That property to a large amount belonging to said estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> came into the<lb/> hands of said <name>John D Wilson</name> as administrator as aforesaid of said estate: Fourteenth, That<lb/> said <name>Wilson</name> as administrator as aforesaid procured an order from the said Probate Court to<lb/> sell real estate belonging to the estate of said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> and that at the <date when="1852-12">December<lb/> Term, eighteen hundred and fifty two</date>, of said Probate Court, in pursuance of said order he sold<lb/> such property and recovered therefor the sum of Seven thousand six hundred and thirty dollars and<lb/> that at the <date when="1855-09">September Term, eighteen hundred and fifty five</date> of said Probate Court, said <name>Wilson</name><lb/> sold the property belonging to said estate for which he received the sum of nine hundred and fifty<lb/> seven dollars: Fifteenth, That nothing has ever been paid upon said judgment allowed in favor<lb/> of said <name>Biddle</name>, by said administrator of said estate: Sixteenth, That at the March Term,</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="14" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0021.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>eighteen hundred and fifty seven of said Probate Court said defendant, <name>Nilson</name>, made a final<lb/> settlement of his administration of the estate of said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> and that there re<lb/>mains in his hands seven thousand four hundred and ten dollars and fifty five cents, assetts<lb/> of said estate, of which sum seven hundred and seventy two dollars are the proceeds of sale of<lb/> lands excepted in said instrument of release from the operation of said release. Seventeenth,<lb/> That there remains in the hands of the administrator, <name>John D Nilson</name> assetts of the estate of<lb/> <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> the sum of six thousand six hundred and thirty eight dollars and fifty<lb/> five cents, independent and exclusive of the proceeds of sale of said one by forty arpents of land<lb/> and said one by five arpents of land spoken of and excepted in said share: Eighteenth, That the<lb/> said Probate Court at the time of said final settlement ordered said <name>Nilson</name> to pay over said<lb/> assetts of said estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> to the creditors of said estate whose claims had been<lb/> placed in the fourth class of claims allowed against said estate: Nineteenth, that said judg<lb/>ment allowed agianst the estate in favor of said <name>Biddle</name> is the only claim allowed in said<lb/> fourth class and is much more than enough to exhaust all the assetts of the estate: Wherefore,<lb/> it is ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the order made by the Probate Court in<lb/> and for the County of St Louis directing said <name>John D Nilson</name>, administrator of the estate of<lb/> said <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> to pay to the creditors whose claims allowed are placed in the fourth<lb/> class the assetts in his hands, be annulled, set aside aside and revoked, except the payment of<lb/> seven hundred and seventy two dollars: and it is further ordered adjudged and decreed that the<lb/> judgment of thirty four thousand seven hundred and seventy two dollars and fifty four cents<lb/> allowed in favor of <name>John Biddle</name> in the Probate Court in and for the County of St Louis against<lb/> the estate of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> and placed in the fourth class of claims allowed against said<lb/> estate be postponed to the claim allowed against said estate in favor of <name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> placed in the fifth class and that the said <name>Nilson</name> be restrained from paying over any of the<lb/> assetts remaining and found in his hands at the time of said final settlement to said <name>John<lb/> Biddle</name> except said seven hundred and seventy two dollars: and it is further ordered adjudged and<lb/> decreed that said <name>Nilson</name> pay the said sum of six thousand six hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and fifty five cents in payment of said claim and allowance of said <name>Charles S Hampstead</name><lb/> the complainant in this cause, so far as the same will go and that the complainant have execution for the<lb/> same and his costs. Motions for a review and in arrest filed.</p>
            <p><name>James Castelle</name>, Esq, late Sheriff of St Louis County, in open Court acknowledge the execution<lb/> of a deed by him as such sheriff in favor of <name>Robert J Edmonson</name> for all<lb/> the night, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Francis S B Edmondson</name>, <name>Robert H Edmon<lb/>son</name>, <name>Lucinda R Edmonson</name>, <name>Benjamin Edmonson</name>, <name>Mary Edmonson</name>, <name>Elizabeth Edmonson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles Edmonson</name> of, in, and to the following described premises situated in the County of<lb/> St Louis, towit; beginning at a stake in the Western line of United States Survey No 168 and 34<lb/> chains 30 links North 82&#x00B0; 15&#x00B4; West from the North East corner of said survey No 168, thence South<lb/> 7&#x00B0; West along the central line of a road 40 feet wide 49 chains 8 links to a stone, thence South 82&#x00B0;<lb/> 75&#x00B4; East along the central line of said road 5&#x00B4; chains 42 links, to a post from which an elm tree 14<lb/> inches in diameter bears south 45&#x00BC;&#x00B0; East 123 links, thence along the central line of said road south<lb/> 7&#x00BE;&#x00B0; West 18 chains 88 links to a post from which an elm tree bears North 83&#x00BD;&#x00B0; East 59&#x00BD; links,<lb/> thence North 82&#x00BE;&#x00B0; West 30 chains 60 links to a post, the North West corner of <name>Charles Achley</name> 50 acres,<lb/> thence North 7&#x00BD;&#x00B0; East 67 chains 96 links to an old cedar post in the Northern line of servey 168, thence<lb/> along the Northern line of said survey South 82&#x00B0; 15&#x00B4; East 24 chains 95 links to the place of begining<lb/> containing 180 acres and 84 hundredths, and being part of United States survey 166, 167, 400, 408,<lb/> 401, 407, and 168 Town 46 North Range 6 East, bounded North by fractional Section 8, East by <name>John<lb/> Davis</name> and <name>Joseph Lakeman</name>, South by <name>Charles Ashby</name>, and West by <name>Thos Yosty</name> and <name>Thos G Thompson</name>, said tract of land lying and situate in <name>S Ferdinand Township</name>, St Louis County Missouri: sold<lb/> by virtue of an order of sale made by the St Louis Land Court in a certain cause wherein <name>Francis<lb/> S B Edmonson</name> is plaintiff and <name>Robert H Edmonson</name>, <name>Lucinda R Edmonson</name>, <name>Benjamin Ed<lb/>monson</name>, <name>Mary Edmonson</name>, <name>Elizabeth Edmonson</name> and <name>Charles Edmonson</name> and defendants.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="15" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0022.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant, <name>Eliza G Frost</name>, being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained<lb/> and that the judgment rendered herein be set aside and a new<lb/> trial had herein. On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, until the first day of the<lb/> next term of this Court is given them to amend their petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Donald</name> etal<lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Powell and Company</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Luthercord</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>C <unclear>Dumanes</unclear></name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-23">Thursday, June 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Legrand F Perce</name>, is on motion admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>William Henessey</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit according to law from<lb/> which it appears that the defendant is a non resident of the State of<lb/> Missouri, therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of martimony contracted with him by the<lb/> plaintiff on the ground of desertion and also for the restoration of her maiden name, and that<lb/> unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day there of plead to the peti<lb/>tion herein the same will be taken against him as confessed. This further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Hoelzle</name><lb/> vs 233.<lb/> <name>Henrey Bournstein</name> etal</head>
            <p>The parties file a stipulation herein and in accordance there with thirty<lb/> days from this date is given the defendants to file a bill of exceptions<lb/> herein; and the defendants file an affidavit for an appeal herein where<lb/>fore an appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered, and<lb/> they thereupon file an appeal bond with <name>James C Moody</name> as principal and <name>Josiah Thornburgh</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Barth</name> as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="16" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0023.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Morten C Walker</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file a bill of exceptions and also an affidavit for an ap<lb/>peal herein, whereupon and appeal is allowed them to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered, and they thereupon file an<lb/> appeal bond in the sum of eleven thousand dollars, with <name>James Moore</name>, as principal, and<lb/> <name>Charles W Jownsley</name>, <name>Edward A Damon</name> and <name>Anderson Arnot</name>, as securities, which bond is<lb/> approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Donald</name> etal<lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit for an appeal, wherefore an appeal<lb/> is allowed him to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein<lb/> rendered and he thereupon files an appeal bond which is approved<lb/> by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac C Cable</name> etal<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney it is orderd by the Court<lb/> that this cause be referred to <name>William H Osborn</name>, who to directed<lb/> to hear the proofs adduced before him, and to report to the Court<lb/> with all convenient with all convenient speed, what was the amount of the captial stock of<lb/> the <name>St Louis Marine Railway and Dock Company</name> actually paid in on the <date when="1851-08-17">seventeenth day<lb/> of August, eighteen hundred and fifty one</date>; what was the amount of the debits of said Company<lb/> on said day; what was the amount of the capital stock of said Company actually paid in<lb/> on the <date when="1853-11-23">twenty third day of November, eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>; and what was the amount<lb/> of the debts of said Company on said last named day:- And it is further ordered that said<lb/> referee have access to all the books and papers of said Company in order to enable him to<lb/> report herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ges H Fox</name><lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>Ameo H Ray</name></head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered to issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#9064, 50 vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Hancock</name><lb/> and <name>Chappell</name><lb/> #6067, 43<lb/> vs <name>Renick</name><lb/> and <name>Peterson</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H Benton Jr</name><lb/>, and <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>Daniel Hancock</name><lb/> <name>William Chappell</name>, <name>Robert M Renick</name><lb/> <name>Alexander Peterson Jr</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the orders made on the<lb/> <date when="1859-06-22">twenty second day of June eighteen hundred and fifty<lb/> nine</date> of this term in this cause as to the judgement<lb/> against the defendants be vacated and set aside,<lb/> and the Court proceeding to render in the cause such<lb/> judgment as is right and proper doth consider that<lb/> the said plaintiffs do recover against the said <name>Joshua H Alexander</name>, <name>Daniel J Hancock</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name> the sum of nine thousand and sixty four dollars and fifty cents, being the<lb/> amount of each of said bills of exchange in the petition described together with ten per cent damages<lb/> and interest, and that the said plaintiffs do recover against said <name>Robert M Renick</name> and <name>Alex<lb/>ander Peterson Jr</name> so much of said bills of exchange as will be equal to five thousand dollars and<lb/> ten per cent damages and interest thereon from the third day of <date when="1857-10">October eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty seven</date>, to this date, being the sum of six thousand and sixty seven dollars and forty three<lb/> cents, together with their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="17" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0024.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Thomas L Saliabury</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Salisbury</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion to retax the costs herrein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Knaus</name> etal<lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Charles S Coxe</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, thirty days is given them<lb/> to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the plaintiff motion for<lb/> an attachment against the defendant doth order that an attachment<lb/> issue against the defendant for failing to obey the order of injuction<lb/> herein, in accordance with the said application.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Ezral O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the judgment herein is, on consideration,<lb/> by the Court, overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>John D Wilson</name> admr etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Biddle</name> files a motion for a review, which being sum<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same<lb/> be overruled; and the motion of the defendant, <name>Wilson</name>, for a review<lb/> herein and also his motion in arrest of judgment being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> it is ordered that the said motion be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen H <unclear>Houses</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Judgment of the Supreme Court on motion to stay execution of sentence<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgan</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ohio and Mississippi RailRoad<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherell</name> etal<lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Horace R Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Solomon Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="18" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0025.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Jeghe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>The defendants' motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be sustained and<lb/> the judgment herein rendered be set aside and a new trial had herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use of<lb/> <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fredirick W Meister</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given him<lb/> to retake the depositions of <name>Robert H</name> and <name>Samuel L Campbell</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.<lb/> Bill of Exception filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns.</head>
            <p>Denial of Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a summons<lb/> issue herein for <name>Frances Burk</name> returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to monon morning at ten o' clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-06-24">Friday June 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournement. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Callaway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>George W Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit for an appeal whereupon an<lb/> appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment<lb/> herein rendered and they thereupon file on appeal bond with <name>George<lb/> W Clarke</name>, as principal, and <name>Daniel A Clark</name> and <name>Mathias Becker</name><lb/> as securities which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherill</name> etal<lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Horace R Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit for an appeal whereupon an appeal<lb/> is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein<lb/> rendered and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of<lb/> six hundred dollar, with <name>Charles P Warner</name>, as principal, and <name>Nicholas Wall</name> and <name>Robert L<lb/> M Ghee</name>, as securities which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> and <name>John C Powell</name></head>
            <p>On Petition of <name>D A January</name> and others.</p>
            <p>The petitioners file an affidavit for an appeal, wherefore an<lb/> appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the<lb/> decision herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="19" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0026.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased<lb/> vs 76.<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and<lb/> <name>Susan Bernicker</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Petition for Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties by this respective attorneys,<lb/> and submit to the Court upon the petition answer proofs, and<lb/> the Court being fully advised of and concerning the said cause<lb/> doth find the facts to be as follows, towit; that said <name>Louis<lb/> Engel</name> died in the City of St Louis in <date when="1852-10">October eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty two</date> and left the defendant <name>Susan Bernicker</name> his widow and <name>Catharine Engel</name>, <name>Phillip<lb/>ine Engle</name>, <name>Louis Engel</name>, and <name>Louisa Engel</name> his children by his marriage with said defendant<lb/> <name>Susan</name>, and his lawful distributers and heirs at law; that the defendant intermarried in the year<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty seven; that said <name>Louis Engel</name> died entilted to and possessed of the<lb/> personal property described in the petition being of the value of sixty four dollars and fifty cents;<lb/> that at the time of his death he was also entitled to and possessed of large amounts of money<lb/> the amount of which does not appear with exactness from the evidence but exceeds the sum of<lb/> one thousand dollars; that he also died entitled to and possessed of divers choses in action and of<lb/> the following described lease hold estate, towit; in <name>John O Fallon</name>'s addition to the City of St Louis,<lb/> in the County of St Louis in Block no 254 fronting ninety eight feet on the North side of<lb/> <name>Franklin</name> Avenue and running back of that width one hundred feet bounded North by ground<lb/> leased to <name>Warneke</name> and <name>Mette</name>, East by ground leased to <name>Philip Zimmerman</name> on the South by<lb/> Franklin Avenue, and on the West by a fifteen feet alley together with all the improvements<lb/> on the same; that at the time of the death of said <name>Louis Engel</name>, said defendant took into her<lb/> our possession and control in without any legal authority, all of said personal property, moneys,<lb/> choses in action and lease hold property and covered the same to her own use; that said leasehold<lb/> property was held by said <name>Louis Engel</name> at the time of his death under a lease from <name>John<lb/> O Fallon</name>; expiring <date when="1852-12-31">December thirty first, eighteen hundred and fifty two</date>, and that lease contained<lb/> a covenant for a renewal of the same for a renewal of the same for the space of five year longer<lb/> provided the coverant for the payment of rent and taxes therein reserved, were faithfully kept<lb/> and performed; that said degendant <name>Suoan</name>, although she had in her hand money of said <name>Louis<lb/> Engel</name> sufficient is to do, failed to pay to said <name>O Fallon</name> the rent due on the <date when="1852-10-01">first days of<lb/> October, eighteen hundred and fifty two</date> and <date when="1853-01">January eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>, during the<lb/> existence of the term of oresaid; that she not apply for any reneval of said lease, but that on<lb/> the <date when="1853-01-12">twelfth day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>, she induced the said <name>O Fallon</name><lb/> to lease and demise the leasehold premises aforesaid to her for the term of twenty year from<lb/> that date, at the annual rent of give hundred dollars, she paying all taxes and assessments;<lb/> that said <name>O Fallon</name> executed and delivered to her a lease of said premices dated the day and<lb/> year last afore said, for the term of twenty years; that said defendant, <name>Suoan</name> after the death<lb/> of said <name>Louis Engel</name>, up to the time of said learing to her and from that time up to the time<lb/> of her marriage with said <name>John L Berniker</name> has collected the rent and profit and enjoyed<lb/> the use of said leasehold cetate and has piad the ground rent and taxes reserved in said lease<lb/> and also after the <date when="1853-01-12">twelfth day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>, paid the ground<lb/> rent and taxes due in the <date when="1852-10-01">first day of October eighteen hundred and fifty two</date> and of <date when="1853-01">January,<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty three</date>, under said leaseto said <name>Louis Engel</name>, that after obtaining<lb/> said lease from said <name>O Fallon</name> and before her said marriage with said <name>John L Bernicker</name> she,<lb/> said <name>Lusan</name>, did assign and convey a portion of said leasehold premices, and received and<lb/> appropriated to her own use the purchase money and consideration therefor; that since her<lb/> said marriage wih said <name>John L Bernicker</name>, she, said <name>Suoan</name>, and said <name>John L have</name> jointly<lb/> collected said rent and profits, and paid said ground rent and taxes up to the date of the<lb/> institution of this suit; and that said <name>Suoan</name>, after the death of said <name>Louis Engel</name> and before<lb/> her marriage with said <name>John L Bernicker</name> and that she and said <name>John L since</name> said marriage<lb/> have used and lent the money belonging to the cotate of said <name>Louis</name> and have received to their<lb/> own use the interest and profit thereof: and the Court doth further find that the said defen<lb/>dant <name>Susan</name> up to the time of her marrige with said <name>John L Bernicker</name>, and that she and<lb/> and said <name>John L</name> since that time and up to the time of the institution of this suit have acted</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="20" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0027.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>as executrix and executor of the estate of said <name>Louis Engel</name>, in their own wrong and without<lb/> any legal authority in all the matters and things abovesaid and that the palintiff <name>George Lich</name><lb/> was on the <date when="1858-09-23">twenty third day of September, eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, and is now the<lb/> sole lawful administrator of the estate of said <name>Louis Engel</name>, deceased therefore the Court doth<lb/> order adjudge and decreas that the injunction heretofore granted against the said defendants and<lb/> their agents and servants be made perpetual excepting asto the collection of the rento and profits of<lb/> the leasehold estate and the use and occupation thereof; that the said defendant do deliver upto<lb/> said <name>George Lich</name> all choses in action, securities and personal property belonging to the estate of said<lb/> <name>Louis Engel</name>, and more particularly the note and deed of trust made by <name>Diederich Schumacker</name><lb/> so set forth in the pleadings; that <name>Samuel A Bennett</name> be and he is herby appointed a Com<lb/>missioner to take and state an account of all the money belonging to said estate and the use<lb/> and profits thereof which have come to the hands of said defendants or either of them and of<lb/> the rents and profits of the leasehold estate abovesaid up to <date when="1858-01-01">January first, eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty eight</date>, andof any sale, assignment or transfer of any portion of the same which<lb/> have come to the hands ofsaid defendant or either of them and of any money which defen<lb/>dants or either of them have expended in and about the premises; and said Commissioner shall<lb/> report the same to the Court with all conveneint speed: and the Court doth further order<lb/> adjudge and decree that the Receiver, heretofore appointed in this cause, do pay over to said<lb/> defendants all rents and money which he may have collected by virtue of his receivership<lb/> and upon such payment shall be discharged. The Court doth also reserve its final decree<lb/> in this cause until the incoming and approval of the report of said Commissioner.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlotte</name><lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>Gabiel &amp; Chouteau</name></head>
            <p>The Defendat files a bill of exceptions herein and also an affidavit and prays<lb/> the Court for an appeal, whereupon an appeal is allowed him to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgement herein rendered: and thereupon <name>Gabiel<lb/> S Chouteau</name>, as principal, and <name>Thomas J Gantt</name> and <name>Peter Fergusonas</name> as securities here in open<lb/> Court ackknowledge themselves to owe <name>May Charlotte</name> the sum of eight hundred dollars to be<lb/> levied of their respective goods and chattels lands and tenements, Yet, upon the following conditions,<lb/> towit; that if the appellant herein will prosecute his appeal with due diligence to a decision in<lb/> the Supreme Court, and shall perform such judgment so shall be given by the Supreme Court,<lb/> or such asthe Supreme Court may duict the Circuit Court to give; and if the judgment of such<lb/> Court, or any part thereof be affirmed, that he will comply with and perform the same so far<lb/> as it may be affirmed, and will pay all damages and costs which may be awarded against<lb/> the appillant by the Supreme Court, then this recognigance to be void else of full force and effect.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles &amp; Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>John D Wilson</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Thomas Hempstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Biddle</name> files a bill of exceptions herein, and the<lb/> defendant, <name>Wilson</name>, files a bill of exceptions and also an affida<lb/>vit for an appeal, wherefore an appeal is allowed him to the<lb/> Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> etal<lb/> NO 328<lb/> <name>Joshua N Alexander</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendats file a motion to set aside the judgment rendered on<lb/> the twenty third instant and a motion in arrest of said judgment<lb/> which being seen heard and fully understood by the Court it<lb/> is ordered that the said motions and each of them be and the are hereby overruled. Thereupon<lb/> the defendants file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="21" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0028.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>Jacob Ringgold &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
            <p><name>M D Lewis</name> is, on motion of <name>A W Lewis</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>The Court and its the accounts of the Commissioners appointed to exam<lb/>mine into the affairs of the Country of St Louis and allows <name>John Simonds</name><lb/> and <name>Edward Haren</name> the sum of four hundred and sixty four dollars<lb/> each and <name>Frederick Hyatt</name> the sum of four hundred and seventy two dollars for their services<lb/> to this date and orders that the said amounts be certified to the St Louis Country Court<lb/> for payment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the Sheriff of St Louis Country with the writ of attachment<lb/> issued herein and the body of said defendant, and the said defendant<lb/> having purged himself of contempt, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> he be discharged from custody under said unit upon the payment of the costs thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Bartlett M Comb &amp; Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the a assignee herein the Court appoints<lb/> <name>John H Chidester</name> and <name>D B Gaggers</name> appraisers to appraise<lb/> the property and effects assigned.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Coste</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Stipulation filed. Bill of Exceptions filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Thomas L Salisbury</name> garns</head>
            <p>By consent of parties twenty days is given the plaintiff to file<lb/> a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza S White</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>Henry White</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Knight</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>Thos Marshall</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jas Castello</name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>Wm J Kennedy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Saturday <date when="--07-02">July 2nd</date> at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>J R Lackland</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="22" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0029.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-07-02">Saturday July 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met persuant of adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> Steamboat Michigan.</head>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name> Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that he has seized the said<lb/> steamboat under certain warrants issued from this Court<lb/> and that five days have elapsed and no person has given bond according to law.<lb/> Therefore it is ordered that said Sheriff sell said boat by public auction to the<lb/> highest bidder for cash first giving twenty days public notice of the time and place<lb/> of sale by publication according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bunicker</name> and<lb/> <name>Susan Bernicker</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and on mo<lb/>tion of the defendants it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the entry made herein on the twenty fourth<lb/> instant be and the same is hereby amended<lb/> so as to disolve so much of the injuction as<lb/> restrains the defendants from collecting or receiving the rents and profits of the leasehold<lb/> property and buildings in the petition and answer mentioned and from in any wise<lb/> interfering or intermeddling with said leasehold property and buildings or disposing<lb/> thereof in whole or in part by sublease or otherwise and from occupy the same or<lb/> any part thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua N Owings</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>James J McBride</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants filed bill of exceptions and also an affida<lb/>vit for an appeal, whereupon an appeal is allowed them to<lb/> the supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered and<lb/> they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of six hundred dollars with <name>Jas Jecko</name> as<lb/> principal and <name>Jas J McBride</name> and <name>Jas J McBride</name> and <name>Jasp Marlow</name> as securities which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hunck</name> etal<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>William Provest</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants and the Commissionser <name>Charles K Dickson</name><lb/> and <name>George R Taylor</name> file sepearate applications for leave for<lb/> the Commissioners to withdrawn their report herein, which being<lb/> seen heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the same be sustained,<lb/> and that they have leave to withdrawn said report.</p>
            <p>The Court audits and allows an account of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff amounting to the<lb/> sum of one hundred and ninety three dollars and twenty five cents afort his attendanace<lb/> for stationary furnished to the Court during the present therein thereof and orders that<lb/> the same be certified to the Country Court for payment.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned to them in Course.
                <signed>
                    <name>James R Lackland</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="23" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0030.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head type="running">September Term <date>1859</date>.</head>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> vs.<lb/> Country of St Louis</head>
            <p>Be it Remembered, that at a term of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the last Monday of September, being the twen<lb/>ty sixth day of said month, in the year of our Lorde, one thousand eight hundred and fifty nine, were<lb/> present Honorable <name>Samuel M Breckinridge</name>, Judge, <name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk, and <name>Michael<lb/> S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis Country.</p>
            <p>The Honoroable <name>Samuel M Breckinridge</name> presents a Commission with the oath of office endorsed thereon<lb/> and orders that the same be entered upon thereand of this day.</p>
            <p>The State of Missouri.</p>
            <p>To all who shall see these presents, greeting: know ye that it having been<lb/> certified to me that <name>Samuel M Buckinridge</name> has been duly elected judge of the Circuit Court<lb/> within and for the Eighth Judicial Circuit now therefore in the name and on behalf of the State<lb/> of Missouri, <name>I R M Stewart</name>, Governor thereof, do hereby commission him Judge of the Circuit<lb/> Court within and for the Circuit aforesaid, and authorize and empower him to discharge the duties<lb/> of said Office according to law.</p>
            <p>In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused to be affixed the<lb/> Great Seal of the State of Missouri: Done at the City of Jefferson this ninth day of August in the<lb/> year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty nine, of the Independence of the United<lb/> State the eighty fourth, and of the State of Missouri the thirty eighth.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>R M Stewart</name>
                </signed>
                By the Governor. <name>B F Massey</name> Secretary of State.
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> Country of St Louis</head>
            <p>Be it remembered that on this the <date when="--08-11">eleventh day of August</date>, in the year of<lb/> our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty nine personally appeared before<lb/> me Samuel M Breckinridge of the Country aforesaid, personally known to me, and made oath as<lb/> a Judge of the Circuit Court within and for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, he would support the Consti<lb/>tution, of the United States and of the State of Missouri, and faithfully demean himself in said<lb/> office of judge of said Circuit Court.</p>
            <p>Certified the day and year aforesaid. <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clerk St Louis Circuit Court.</p>
            <p>On motion, <name>Charles W Buckis</name> admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2197, 54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Woode</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Warren W Tuttle</name> and <name>Warren W<lb/> Tuttle</name> administrater of the Estate<lb/> of <name>Nancy Tuttle</name> deceased</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, and files the statement<lb/> of the defendants confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of twenty one hundred and ninty seven dollars<lb/> and fifty four cents and authorizing the entering up of jud<lb/>ment for that amount: therefore it is considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed together with inter<lb/>est therein from this date at the rate of ten percent per annum and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor against the defendant, <name>Warren W Tuttle</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>James N Comfort</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the statement<lb/> of <name>James N Comfort</name> that <name>Reginald N Elliott</name>, trustee in a cer<lb/>tain deed of trust executed by <name>Francis Watkins</name> on the <date when="1851-01-02">second day of<lb/> January 1851</date> recorded in the Recorders Office of St Louis Country in book R No 5 page 274 of the<lb/> records of said Country, has departed this life without having completed the performance of the duties<lb/> imposed on him by said deed of trust; it is therefore orderd that <name>Michael S Cerre</name> Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County be and he is hereby appointed trustee in <unclear>his</unclear> of the said <name>Reginold H Elliott</name>, with the like pow<lb/>ers and trusts, according to the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="24" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0031.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Park</name> administration of<lb/> <name>Albon H Glasby</name>.<lb/> vs 808<lb/> <name>William C Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition herein,<lb/> and the defendant also comes and files his appearance herein as if<lb/> personally served with process twenty days before the commence<lb/>ment of the present term: wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be docketed as a return to this term.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D A January</name> etal<lb/> vs 599.<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Soloman H Robbins</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marine Bank</name> of Chicago<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>James R Bull</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Reading</name> trustee<lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Thos H Mc Vicker</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Wineland</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Wm Bennett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Mattenberger</name> etal<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Jno N Shalding</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas M Laren</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Jacob Rosenbaum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David F Goodfellow</name> Exrs etal<lb/> vs 496<lb/> <name>Morris Reariden</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Wambsgaust</name><lb/> vs 644<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo C Kerk</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Elizabeth Reis</name> admr of<lb/> <name>Bartholomew Reis</name> deed filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Davis</name><lb/> vs 396.<lb/> <name>Christian Freund</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security<lb/> for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gorman</name><lb/> vs 681<lb/> <name>Sam Gaty</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mears</name> etal<lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>William Crane</name></head>
            <p><name>Isaac Markley</name> files an interplea herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given them to file<lb/> an amended petition and an additional affidavit herein, and they<lb/> thereupon file the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S M Knight</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John F Boy</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given them to<lb/> file a property certified copy of the proceedings and judgment on<lb/> which this suit is founded, and they thereupon file the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Ballin</name><lb/> vs 666<lb/> <name>John C Wicks</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leakin D Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas O Sawyer</name> garns of <name>Mills</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Brannock Jones</name><lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>H C Bull</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="25" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0032.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rahlmann</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Frederick Rahlmann</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos A Eddy</name> etal<lb/> vs 36.<lb/> <name>Howarde A Livingston</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>H M Livingston</name> &amp; <name>Wm<lb/> Bell</name> file answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Jesson</name><lb/> vs 559<lb/> <name>William Sensenderfer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by attorney, the time for answering herein is<lb/> extended six days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kaltenbach</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottlob Held</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by attorney, the time for answering herein is exten<lb/>ded six days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamill</name> etal<lb/> vs 453<lb/> <name>William Poo</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Collins</name> etal<lb/> vs 458<lb/> <name>Wm Poo</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H Naters</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C Bull</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Hawkins</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Henry S Caton</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>William G Hawkins</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Clay</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robt Causse</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Bassett</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Robt Causse</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Jno Dean</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno B Valle</name><lb/> vs 474.<lb/> <name>M S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neunfre</name><lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Henrich Heisner</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernest A Solf</name><lb/> vs 742<lb/> <name>Henry Schlibaum</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>Jno Kinnard</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno Kinnard</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin C Sloan</name><lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Price</name><lb/> vs 153.<lb/> <name>Bart G Leiper</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew M Alpin</name> etal<lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>Charles Moarlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Catherwood</name> etal<lb/> vs 239.<lb/> <name>Julius Busch</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe Wiley</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Thomas Wiley</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published according<lb/> to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham O Brannen</name> etal<lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>Joseph Jones</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed. The judge of this Court being one of the<lb/> counsel in this cause, it is ordered that the venue be changed to<lb/> the St Louis Court of common Pleas, and that the Clerk of this<lb/> court caused to be filed in the Office of the Clerk of said Court<lb/> all the original papers herein, together with a certified copy of this entry.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="26" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0033.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Plahto</name><lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>Joseph Jones</name></head>
            <p>The Judge of this Court being of counsel in this cause, it is ordered that the<lb/> reduce herein be changed, to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, and that the<lb/> Clerk of this Court cause to be filed in the Office of the Clerk of said Court<lb/> all the original papers herein together with a certified copy of the proceedings herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leakin D Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs 297<lb/> <name>Thaddues K Moills</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein in vacation has<lb/> been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatis Clark</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given the Sheriff to<lb/> amende his return on the writ of attachement herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Schroeder</name><lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>John N Schaerff</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony Portington</name> etal<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to compel plaintiffs to consolidate suits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to compel plaintiffs to consolidatte suits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to compel plaintiffs to consolidate suits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hepsia B Mugle</name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alex Beal</name> etal<lb/> vs 602<lb/> <name>Chas Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson T Wright</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed. Affidavit for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony Portington</name> etal<lb/> vs 771<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to compel plaintiffs to consolidate suits filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 658<lb/> <name>Jas A Lee</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bank of State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Motion for additional bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernst C Anglerodt</name> etal<lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="27" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0034.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron A Fisher</name> etal<lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>Cahin H Frederick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by defendant <name>Frederick</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas <unclear>Campbell</unclear></name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Jos Farrell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Neil</name><lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Samuel Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bryan Cross</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Walter B Carr</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dines Carolin</name> etal<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Lewis</name> etal<lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Buster</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Schoeder</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Athens J M Creery</name> etal<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Eugene Papin</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine Dohena</name><lb/> vs 444<lb/> <name>Geo Leach</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>H M Woodward</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Darby</name><lb/> vs 533.<lb/> <name>John Reilly</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas F Small</name> etal<lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos E Elders</name><lb/> vs 97<lb/> <name>J Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno H Sparr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Athen Chicago RR<lb/> Co</name> garns of <name>Tenney</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Clamorgane</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Loughborough</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Isaac F Greene</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Southern Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumbermen &amp; M Insles</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah Buckley</name><lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>M Beachly's</name> admir</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Wm C Maloy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>P H St Cyr</name> admr of <name>Edward Stevens</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sunderland G Sears</name> etal<lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Isaac Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>United State Insles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm P Davis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jas O Carson</name><lb/> <name>Nicholas Springer</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo D Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Thomas B Ellis</name>, <name>H B Ellis</name> &amp; <name>Jas B Ellis</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Mandeville</name></head>
            <p>Transcript from St Louis Criminal Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="28" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0035.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Board of<lb/> County Commissioners of St Louis County<lb/> and<lb/> <name>Henry J Mudd</name> Auditor of the County<lb/> of St Louis</head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their attorneys,<lb/> and the Court being sufficiently advised of and concern<lb/>ing the law a using in this case, as agreed by the<lb/> parties, and submitted for decision, and having had<lb/> therefore mature deliberation is of the opinion the law<lb/> is with the said <name>Henry F Mudd</name>, Auditor of St Louis county, in his refusal to render and<lb/> give obedience to the said order of the said Board of County commissioners of St Louis County and<lb/> in his refusal to receive for issue County Warants as set out in said case as agreed. It is therefore<lb/> considered ordered and a judged that said order of the said Board of County Commissioners of<lb/> St Louis County so far as the same affects the said <name>Henry J Mudd</name> auditor of said County<lb/> in the dishcarge of his official duties, and so far as the same requires of him as such auditor to<lb/> receive and issue and take receipts for the County Warrants, be and the same is hereby annulled<lb/> and held for nought, and the said <name>Henry J Mudd</name>, Auditor, is hereby discharged from obeying<lb/> the same.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-09-27">Tuesday September 27th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Cormick</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Henry W Tracy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John E Blech</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>W Frederick Aderhold</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fredk Berby</name><lb/> vs 786<lb/> <name>Chas Curtis</name></head> 
            <p>By consent until the <date when="--10-09">ninth of Oct</date> is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bro G Falconer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas Curtis</name></head>
            <p>By concert until the <date when="--10-09">nineth of Octr</date> is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by attorney, until the <date when="--10-03">third of Oct</date> is given him to<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V Bogy</name> etal<lb/> vs 101<lb/> <name>Bennett P Voorhies</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, <name>Voorhies</name>, by attorney, thirty days additional<lb/> time is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="29" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0036.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert H Hodgson</name> etal<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>W L F Gage</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until the <date when="--10-01">first day of<lb/> October</date> next is given them to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ackerman</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Andrew Krauther</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, <name>Krauther</name>, by attorney, until the <date when="--10-01">first day of<lb/> October</date> next is given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Dunham</name><lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Hugh Dunham</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2,000,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Long</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Newstadh</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his duly shown statement confessing himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand dollars and authorizing the<lb/> entering up of judgment for that amount therefore it is considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of teh defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Kewan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeel</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. The plaintiff files a bond for costs with<lb/> <name>Samuel H Gardner</name> as secuirty, which is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Smith</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Thomas Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horatio N Heald</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas C Whitetlay</name><lb/> vs 415.<lb/> <name>John Siguson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sensenderfer</name> etal<lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>Jno Rokes</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant Rokes files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G B Swert</name> and <name>G E Hawley</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Chicago Ar St L RR Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff file interrogatories to said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G B Sweet</name> and <name>G E Hawley</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Chicago Ar St L RR Company</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff file enterogatories to and garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Carles S Greeley</name>, <name>A F Shapleigh</name>, <name>Matthew<lb/> Steitz</name> trustees of <name>State Savings Institution</name> garns<lb/> of <name>J F Death Co.</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hull Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Hertzheter</name> garns<lb/> of <name>H G Bilstein</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blevin</name> etal.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Hertzteter</name> garns of<lb/> <name>H G Bilstein</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Elleard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas L Hunt etal</name></head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J N Owings</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="30" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0037.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W E Dill</name><lb/> vs 800<lb/> <name>Geo N Stewart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Whitehill</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> City of St Louis garns of Kopp</head>
            <p>Motion to discharge garnishee and<lb/> dismiss proceedings filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Hausse</name> etal<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>W A Bassett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos H Locke</name><lb/> vs 545.<lb/> <name>Dane J Jeweth</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj Leiber</name><lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>Jas S Carlisle</name></head> 
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Matthews</name><lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>Jas Duncan</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Millerk</name></head> 
            <p>Answer of <name>Frances<lb/> Burke</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Geo W Hungerford</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Roy</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Jas H Morrison</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed by <name>Morrison</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno A Ubsdell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwd A Bates</name> &amp; <name>A M Alexander</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Rogers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo G Presbury</name> garns</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Mosbach</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Jno Kampeter</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Homan</name> etal<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Anton S Gay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer and exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Kuhl</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Jno Holmes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer and Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David M Kee</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Chas Boswell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John N Harris</name><lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Counter claim filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Wm Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>W Carson</name>, <name>R Saffarrans</name>, <name>J P C R Rule</name> and also answer<lb/> filed by same defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson E Bridge</name> etal<lb/> vs 647<lb/> <name>Dane J Hancock</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Hancock</name> and <name>Morris</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Hoffmeister</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>Jno Lady</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno F Thornton</name> etal<lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Lyman L Elliott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J H Alexander</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno H Schenck</name> etal<lb/> vs 33.<lb/> <name>Chas S Lynch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to dissolve<lb/> injuction filed. Answer<lb/> filed by <name>P Klein</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Building &amp; Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 452<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton &amp; Chicago RR Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Laeche</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Geo Mossbacherrex</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="31" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0038.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel A Holliday</name><lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>William Lings</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>R N Martin</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gaitano Foprano</name><lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>Louis Charleville</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 481<lb/> <name>Lorenss P Sanger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Siver</name><lb/> vs 792.<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos B Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Weston</name> &amp; <name>J F Weston</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Jacob &amp; S Williams</name></head> 
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Whitesadmn</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Chas N Avis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kingsland</name><lb/> vs 369.<lb/> <name>Jno S Thomson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>P Phillips</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B Hutchinson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>B C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>Jno S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josephine Gravier</name> etal<lb/> vs 593.<lb/> <name>Jno C Ivory</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by <name>Jno C Ivory</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos Jwales</name> etal<lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>H A Conant</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Erving</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>L Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frangcis H Krenning</name><lb/> vs 239.<lb/> <name>Francis Keegan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Keyan</name> filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Wall</name> etal<lb/> vs 473.<lb/> <name>Jas O Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Separate answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sams L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Jno H Oglesby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno H Oglesby</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Galucia B Smith</name>, <name>Geo E Hawley</name>, <name>Isaac L Downes</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Mancarty</name>, <name>Geo W Goodlett</name>, <name>Egbert B<lb/> Brown</name>, <name>Gustave Schwaberg</name>, &amp; <name>Albert L Sweet</name> garns of<lb/> <name>St Louis Athen Chicago Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob P Symonds</name><lb/> vs 526.<lb/> <name>Wm O Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno N Bofinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>M Burrowes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alenzo Child</name><lb/> vs 513<lb/> <name>O J Bragg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>M Burrowes</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>A A Le Beau</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas G M Pheeters</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>A A Let Beau</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carolin Bohn</name><lb/> vs 433.<lb/> <name>Fred K Bohn</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H Klutes adax</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>J G Shands</name></head>
            <p>Exhibits filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="32" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0039.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos S Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>Thos H Brierly</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno Porter</name> filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dexter B Britton</name> etal<lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Wm O Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno N Bofinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Nowlan</name><lb/> vs 803<lb/> <name>Jno Austwick</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 652<lb/> <name>Chas Hatz</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>E O English</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton &amp; Chicago R R Co</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>St Louis Alton &amp; Chicago Rail Road</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Goodrich</name> etal<lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Baylis Chamblin</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo D Hall</name><lb/> vs 667<lb/> <name>E O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>E O English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal<lb/> vs 633.<lb/> <name>A A Le Beau</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>E O English</name> &amp; <name>Jno Burns</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Penrod</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Marria F Brooks</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Downey</name><lb/> vs 405.<lb/> <name>E O English</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>E O Engish</name> &amp; <name>John Burns</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas J Norbury</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Jno Holmes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 769<lb/> <name>Richd F Sass</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos L Salisbury</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Michael Burrowes</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Heger</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>Jno Ludewig</name></head>
            <p>Exhibits A &amp; B filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fred K Stumpf</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Theodore A Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bermine</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Anna M Bermine</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W M Curdy</name><lb/> vs 743.<lb/> <name>Robt E M Carthy</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno F Outley</name>, <name>Mauntel Bulte &amp; C.</name> <name>Jno F<lb/> Mauntel</name>, <name>Jno A Thomson</name>, <name>Fred K M Kolburn</name><lb/> garns of <name>Jerre Haute A &amp; St L RR C</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W N White</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>Noble Kellogg</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E B Grune</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas Gage</name> garns of <name>Jas L Gage</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos Dillworth</name><lb/> vs 719<lb/> <name>Jas H Stephenson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Stenbenville</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Jno B Carson</name></head>
            <p><name>Martin</name> for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F P Corby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E Boyle</name> garns of Moies</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Saml A Turner</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Owen V Terrion</name><lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Chas L Freeman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="33" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0040.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm F Enders</name> etal<lb/> vs 772<lb/> <name>T M Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barry Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas B Wiggins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>N B Mullikens</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Bertoist</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos Rector</name> etal</head>
            <p>2d amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> etal<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thos Richards</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> etal<lb/> vs 296.<lb/> <name>Thos Richards</name></head> 
            <p>Plea in abatement<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Robt S Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Robert S Eddy</name>, <name>David W Hill</name> and <name>Geo B Michael</name><lb/> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Baskell</name> etal<lb/> vs 475<lb/> <name>Fedor Fedorow</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Engeler</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>Chas F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Duer</name> etal<lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Philip Hess</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Steinway</name> etal<lb/> vs 626<lb/> <name>Chas A Snell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Stienway</name> etal<lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Chas Fritz</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Chas Fritz</name> and <name>Jacob Fritz</name> file answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Ketchum</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Margaret A Ketchum</name></head> 
            <p>Answer and <name>Cross Bill</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H Niederreuther</name><lb/> vs 585<lb/> <name>Chas F Holzle</name></head> 
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos N Hinds</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Chas F Holzle</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas V Westtake</name> etal<lb/> vs 704<lb/> <name>Chas F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas B Hill</name><lb/> vs 623.<lb/> <name>K Mackenzie</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David H Evans</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Feder Fedorow</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno H Rolff</name>,<lb/> and <name>Lewis Erning</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Forster</name><lb/> vs 736.<lb/> <name>Anton Jayer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno Neff</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Bank</name><lb/> vs 716<lb/> <name>Hancock Alexander</name> etal.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckrindge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="34" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0041.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-09-28">Wednesday September 28th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, and file proof satisfac<lb/>tory to the Court that a copy of the petition herein with a no<lb/>tice of the commencement of this suit has been duly served<lb/> upon the defendant <name>James B Kimball</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> etal.<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmuker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by thier attorney, and file proof satisfac<lb/>tory the Court that a copy of the petition with a notice of the<lb/> commencement of this suit has been duly served upon the defen<lb/>dant <name>James B Kimball</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leander Lawrence</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Alexander L Tyler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by attoreny, but the defendant <name>William<lb/> Tyler</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the said plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against thesaid defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hackell</name> etal<lb/> vs 475<lb/> <name>Fedor Fedorow</name></head> 
            <p>Garnishees discharged.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it inordered that the garnishees<lb/> summoned herein be discharged attheir costs and that execution force therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carlos S Greeley</name> etal<lb/> vs 749<lb/> <name>Jno W Schaerff</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendants, <name>Charles Scheriff</name>,<lb/> <name>John Helmuth</name> and <name>William Zeller</name>, although duly summoned and called<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gaitans Foprians</name><lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>Louis Charleville</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of <name>Louis Charleville</name>, by attorney, leave is given him to verify<lb/> by affidavit his answer, and same is done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Burnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Roever</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion ten days given the defendants to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Lipphardt</name><lb/> vs 764<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendant, <name>Andrew Rein<lb/>staedtter</name>; although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Clemens</name><lb/> vs 765<lb/> <name>Francis J Milttenberger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants <name>Francis<lb/> J Miltenberger</name> and <name>Peter G Sell</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarance O Brooks</name> survg partner.<lb/> vs 565<lb/> <name>John D Daggett</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by attorney, three weeks additional<lb/> time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="35" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0042.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lohrman</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>L V Reed</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, <name>Frederick<lb/> Kerzinger</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Arthur Ohlshausen</name> etal<lb/> vs 696<lb/> <name>George P Liebeg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant <name>Charles En<lb/>gan</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Strubel</name>'s admr.<lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant <name>Bensberg</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Eckert</name><lb/> vs 693.<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants <name>Anton Jaeger</name> and<lb/> <name>John Neff</name> although duly summoned and called makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Rothenbucher</name><lb/> vs 619.<lb/> <name>U S Grant</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendants, <name>Frederick Dent</name><lb/> and <name>Harrison L Long</name>, although duly summoned and, called make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Haydon</name> etal<lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendants, <name>Henry W<lb/> Williams</name>, and <name>Anderson</name>, <name>Arnot</name>, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs, the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Charles H Ashby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant <name>Ashby</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called makes default, where<lb/> fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb N Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 752<lb/> <name>Bernard Rawee</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, <name>Herman Fette</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry A Fette</name> and <name>J L Weber</name>, come not but default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Oker</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and withdraws account mentioned<lb/> in the third count of the petition herein, and on his motion, leave is given<lb/> to withdraw the bill of items filed; but the defendant, <name>Dominick Urban</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of said<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <unclear>Dentalonder</unclear><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Jos Steeker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out fact of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="36" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0043.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh M Kelvy</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant <name>Daniel M Frost</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peirre A Berthold</name><lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed asto <name>Daniel M Frost</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert B Bowler</name><lb/> vs 203.<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed asto <name>Daniel M Frost</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hepsia B Mudge</name><lb/> vs 546.<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs herein with <name>Samuel H Gardon</name>, as security,<lb/> which bond is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 53<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the attorneys for plaintiff, and suggest to the Court the death of said<lb/> plaintiff; thereupon comes <name>Mary Jane Eddy</name> administratrix of <name>James H<lb/> Eddy</name>, and enters her appearance herein as plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo F Guenther</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Maria Guenther</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files proof if service of the petition herein upon the<lb/> defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 623<lb/> <name>Kenneth M Kenzie</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendants, by their attorney, and withdraw there demurrer and<lb/> by leave of Court, first had and obtained, file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 709<lb/> <name>Samuel Conway</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal<lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>Chas R Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor. Note with<lb/>drawn by plaintiffs, by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Upton L Royce</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>N L Hutchings</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>E H Wheedon</name></head>
            <p>Dermurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>Thos L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Dane W Wheeler</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson E Bridge</name><lb/> vs 648<lb/> <name>W Taussig</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David H Evans</name><lb/> vs 762.<lb/> <name>Fedor Fedorow</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court, first obtained, the plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry L Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eliza G Frost</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer to petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="37" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0044.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos M Taylor</name>, and <name>Oscar W Collett</name><lb/> garns of <name>Jno J Palmer</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno A Thompson</name> &amp;c<lb/> vs<lb/> Strauss garns of<lb/> <name>Mayer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Stewart</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>Geo Hartmann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Erving</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dane T Wright</name> and <name>Turner Maddox</name><lb/> garns of <name>Butterfield</name>.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt Causs</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F A Kennon</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Wm A Bassett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Mallace</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>N Simosheuser</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file seperate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Perpetual Ins Co &amp; Seth M Randett</name><lb/> garns of President of &amp; Bank of Louisville.</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files interrogatories herein against<lb/> the said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name>.<lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Motion for leave to bring notes sued on into Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Motion for leave to bring notes sued on into Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Goss M Ginnis &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Merritt Risley &amp; Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>N R Martin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H J Beers garns</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno J Murdock</name> <name>Chas K Dickson</name><lb/> garns of <name>Ins Levin</name> etal.</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files interrogatories herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Tillman</name> etal<lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>H L Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>Lorenzo H Cordy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh M Kelvy</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Amended petition filed, three demances to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs 716<lb/> <name>N H Chappell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="38" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0045.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>United States Insles</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Wm P Davis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor F Wilson</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Benj F Ball</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Ball</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos L Clarke</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno B Valle</name> garns of <name>Fitus</name></head> 
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos G Little</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>Geo Harvey</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ackerman</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Andrew Krautler</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Porter</name> &amp; <name>James Taussig</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Jacob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Peeter</name> &amp; <name>James Taussig</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Jacob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J H Fisse</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas A Poerter</name> &amp; <name>Jas Taussig</name><lb/> garns of <name>J W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas A Feichmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas H Poerter</name> &amp; <name>Jas Taussig</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Jacob N Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1807,30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter B Garesche</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Caroline Belt</name> deceased<lb/> vs 592<lb/> <name>Philip S Lanham</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, where<lb/> fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the notes on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and seven dollars and thirty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor and it is ordered that this judg<lb/>ment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#567,64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bruce</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin Bruce</name><lb/> vs 643.<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against then as confessed, and the court finds from the note on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of five hundred and sixty seven dollars and sixty four cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefore and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest<lb/> at ten per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235,19<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Corner Fullager</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 701<lb/> <name>Wesley Connor</name>, <name>William Fullager</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry Linhoff</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attoreney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Henry Linhoff</name>, but the defendants, <name>Connor</name><lb/> and <name>Fillager</name>, although duly summoned and called make<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="39" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0046.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and the Court finds from the note on which this action is founded that the defendedants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty five dollars and nineteen cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#425,56.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lohrmann</name><lb/> vs 695<lb/> <name>Nicol Raynor</name>, <name>George Kyler</name><lb/> and <name>George O Atherton</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty five dollars and fifty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said and his costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#190,69.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D'Oench</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas L Rives</name><lb/> vs 766<lb/> <name>Andrew F Nummitsch</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by thier attorney, but the defendant makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the note on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> ninety dollars and sixty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 734<lb/> <name>Edward W Shands</name>, <name>William<lb/> O Shands</name> &amp; <name>Cohas Fillson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be dismissed at his costs and that exectuion issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#6500</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cohick</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>Thomas Rutherford</name></head>
            <p>On Note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff attorney, but the defendant makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty dollars and seven cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> <unclear>his</unclear> costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest<lb/> after per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4100,17<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anderson</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 624<lb/> <name>Chales R Anderson</name> and<lb/> &amp; <name>J Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant <name>Smith</name>, but the defendant <name>Anderson</name> although summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of forty one hundred dollars and seventeen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#332,84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartshorn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nathan S Rannells</name> and<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, whrefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="40" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0047.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and thirty two dollars and eighty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judg<lb/>ment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#274,38.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry William Wissman</name><lb/> vs 444<lb/> <name>Patrik Driscoll</name> and<lb/> <name>Louis Bartold</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded, that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two<lb/> hundred and seventy four dollars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#247,72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Harder</name><lb/> vs 98<lb/> <name>Frederik Rover</name> and<lb/> <name>William Rover</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against them a confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty seven dollars<lb/> and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#972,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 768<lb/> <name>George Shaffrer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and seventy two dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Whereby acknowledge <unclear rend="strikethrough">this</unclear><lb/> receipt of full of entire <unclear rend="strikethrough">satisfac</unclear><lb/> of the judgment of which <unclear rend="strikethrough">this</unclear><lb/> is the margin, <unclear rend="strikethrough"><date when="1818-03-13">mch 13 1818.</date></unclear><lb/> attest<lb/> <name><unclear>Riecek</unclear></name><lb/> <name>Cline</name> &amp; <name>Garrison</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Jameson</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>John N Bofinger</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred and fifty six dollars and forty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and thier costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that<lb/> the judgement bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#91,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cohick</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Thomas Rutherford</name> and<lb/> <name>John L Ferguson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ninety one dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore and it is ordered that this judgement bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="41" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0048.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1060,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 586<lb/> <name>George O Atherton</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicoll Rayner</name> and<lb/> <name>George Kyler</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by its attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition is taken against then as confessed, and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and sixty<lb/> dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#309,86.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Canmann</name><lb/> vs 748<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and nine dollars and eighty six cents. Is it therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#228,72</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Nelson</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph J Meersman</name><lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>John H Jebbe</name> and<lb/> <name>Dorothea Lubbering</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by thier attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiff, the peitition herein is taken against them as confessed,<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefor considered<lb/> by the Court by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and thier costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Lyon</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Oliver A Hart</name></head>
            <p>On motiion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and the execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#989,54<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hassinger</name>.<lb/> set aside see<lb/> <date when="--10-13">Oct 13th</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 732<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> and<lb/> <name>John Peterson</name></head>
            <p>On Note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>John Peterson</name>, but the defendant <name>William Hassenger</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is<lb/> taken agianst him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of nine hundred and eighty nine dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#322,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert G Noble</name> and<lb/> <name>James</name> &amp; <name>Nilgus</name><lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>George N Davis</name> and<lb/> <name>George Hughes</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken agianst them as confessed, and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and twenty two dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debts aforesaid as found and theier costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="42" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0049.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#798, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Thompson</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Frederick Kerginger</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed, and the Court finds form the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> the deffendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and ninety eight dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#270, 44<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Boomer</name> and<lb/> <name>Hooper</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B P Pfeffer</name><lb/> vs 574<lb/> <name>George B Boomer</name>,<lb/> <name>George G Pride</name> and<lb/> <name>Clark Hooper</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, Pride, but the defendants, <name>Boomer</name> and <name>Hooper</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against then as confessed, and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy dollars and forty four cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#318, 35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Payne</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>Joseph K Speed</name> and<lb/> <name>George Shaffner</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaitiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and eighteen dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William <unclear>P Gerring</unclear></name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs and demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#389, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisa Heinrichs</name><lb/> vs 639<lb/> <name>John C G Heinrichs</name> and<lb/> <name>Elisa Heinrichs</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instruments in writing onwhich this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred eighty nine<lb/> dollars and eighty cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dents the sum aforesaid as found and her costs herein expended and have exectuion therefor; and it is<lb/> ordered that this judgement bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#238, 83.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Union Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 469<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, by the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, werefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty eight dollars and eighty three cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and its costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="43" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0050.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#318,25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name><lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Timothy M Namara</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Murphy</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard Tobin</name></head>
            <p>On Note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the motion which this<lb/> is founded the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and eighteen dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2599,29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Ladwere</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Alphonse Bourier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, althought duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded the defendent is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty five hundred and ninety nine dollars and<lb/> twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and her costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#224,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bulpin</name><lb/> vs 212<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and twenty four dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the difendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs herein expanded and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#253,83</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Nazard Powder Company</name><lb/> vs 540<lb/> <name>Michael Dolan</name> and<lb/> <name>Patrik Long</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two<lb/> hundered and fifty three dollars and eighty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1674,75.<lb/> vs<lb/> all except <name>Peay</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Moody</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Building and<lb/> Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>, <name>Philip Ganbatz</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert N Peay</name>, <name>Samuel Moody</name>,<lb/> and <name>Isaac J Greene</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, and dismisses this<lb/> suit as to the defendants <name>Peay</name> and <name>Moody</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Smith</name>, <name>Ganbatz</name> and <name>Greene</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not, but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Sixteen hundred and<lb/> seventy four dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defandants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#241,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Neil</name> and<lb/> <name>Max Neil</name><lb/> vs 729<lb/> <name>Gert Goebel</name></head>
            <p>On Note</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, whrerefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="44" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0051.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and forty one dollars and ninety three cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and thier costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#445,40<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stevenson</name> and<lb/> <name>Bevan</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Leonard</name><lb/> vs 728<lb/> <name>Abram Stevenson</name>,<lb/> <name>Washington J Bevanand</name><lb/> <name>Robert Hilton</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit acts the defen<lb/>dant <name>B Hilton</name>, but the defandants, <name>Stevenson</name> and <name>Bevan</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and forty five dollars and forty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#166,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Coates</name><lb/> vs 727<lb/> <name>John Derbin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, whrefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred<lb/> and sixty six dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant, the debt aforesaid, as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#290,14</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Schwarzkopf</name><lb/> vs 730<lb/> <name>Edward C Krausnick</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherfore, the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and ninety dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have there of execu<lb/>tion: and is ordered that this judgment bear interest at twelve per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#402,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Russell Scarrett</name> and<lb/> <name>Paris H Mason</name><lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by this Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and two dollars and seventy five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and thier costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3894,83.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>,<lb/> <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>, &amp;<lb/> <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Joseph Coglin</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Brooks</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by thier Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> warned and called, come not but make default; wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of thirty eight hundred and ninety four dollars <unclear rend="strikethrough">and<lb/> ninety four dollars</unclear> and eighty three cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that the Sheriff pay the proceeds of the sale<lb/> of the property attached to the plaintiffs, after paying the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="45" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0052.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#447,75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Ohnemuss</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Christian Brandt</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the defendant as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and forty seven dollars and seventy five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution: and it is ordered that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#579,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cable</name><lb/> vs 410<lb/> <name>Joseph C Parks</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/>ken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> five hundred and seventy nine dollars and thirty cents. It is therefor considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#275,62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emile Preetorius</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Wagner</name> and<lb/> <name>William Preetorius</name> vs 573.<lb/> <name>John C Henn</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy five dol<lb/>lars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1023,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The North Western Bank</name><lb/> of Virginia.<lb/> vs 243.<lb/> <name>Henry G Billstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Henekes</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of the hundred and<lb/> twenty three dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs in this behalf<lb/> expended have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1119,25<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kelsey</name> and<lb/> <name>Smith</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew L Kerr</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>John A Williams</name>,<lb/> <name>Alexander Kelsey</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis J Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Williams</name>, but the defendants <name>Kelsey</name> and <name>Smith</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Eleven hundred and nineteen dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgement bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#510,42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sensenderfer</name> and<lb/> <name>John Sensenderfer</name><lb/> vs 862<lb/> <name>George W Capell</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgement.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his sworn statement confess<lb/>ing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and ten dollars and forty two cents and authorizing the entering up</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>


    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="46" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0053.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>of judgment for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#566.25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Card</name> and<lb/> <name>George Grether</name><lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Richard S Raymond</name> and<lb/> <name>William O Wolf</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in wri<lb/>ting on which the action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and sixty six dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#211.98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John Justus Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 229<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and eleven dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that the judgment bear ten percent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1049.53<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Becker</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Young</name>, <name>Alexander Young</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel C Young</name>, <name>Charles H Woodland</name><lb/> <name>Charles Perrine</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name>, <name>Joseph S Stockton</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph A Fanning</name> and <name>Daniel W<lb/> Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Stockton</name>, <name>Fanning</name> and <name>Wheeler</name>,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Becker</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of ten hundred and forty nine dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2314.94</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin Hoyt</name>, <name>Philip Tillinghast</name>,<lb/> <name>Nehemiah Knight</name> and <name>William B Greene</name><lb/> vs 397<lb/> <name>True W Hoit</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thou<lb/>sand three hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#229.84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name>, <name>James S English</name><lb/> and <name>Homer H Dikeman</name><lb/> vs 460<lb/> <name>John Siguson</name> and <name>John Gilman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dollars and eighty four cents. It is</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="47" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0054.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended that have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2440,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name> assignee of<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name><lb/> and <name>Mary B Stewart</name><lb/> vs 407<lb/> <name>Joseph C Parks</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of two thousand four hundred and forty dollars and forty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#321;00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loyd A Haynes</name>,<lb/> <name>Richard D Fenby</name> and<lb/> <name>James O Haynes</name><lb/> vs 420<lb/> <name>Elloworth Miller</name> and<lb/> <name>A G Garett</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by thier Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Garrett</name>, but the defendant, <name>Miller</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and twenty one<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#619,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Twillman</name><lb/> vs 476<lb/> <name>Charles Bray</name> and<lb/> <name>Solomon H Robbins</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintif by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and nineteen dollars and eighty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#295,90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas B Flint</name> vs 419<lb/> <name>Elizabeth E O Giles</name> and<lb/> <name>John Loughborough</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ninety five dollars and<lb/> ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid so found and his costs herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#476,42.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Jackson</name> vs 304<lb/> <name>Frederick Mayer</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry W Dimon</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> seventy six dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="48" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0055.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#189, 49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D Booge</name><lb/> vs 76.<lb/> <name>Charles W Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty nine dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his cost herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#207, 60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Bekemeier</name><lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Edward C Krausnick</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seven dollars and sixty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#345, 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis P Corby</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Gossin</name><lb/> vs 220<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty five dollars and eighty<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#403, 82.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Conn</name> surviving executor of the<lb/> estate of <name>Joseph A Sire</name> deceased.<lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>Adrien Tetard</name> and <name>L Charles<lb/> Boislinere</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and three dollars and eighty two cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2129, 10.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau Jr</name>, <name>James<lb/> Harrison</name> and <name>Felix Valle</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name>, <name>Lorente<lb/> Schaeffler</name> and <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of twenty one hundred and twenty nine dollars and ten cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#317, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Bates</name><lb/> vs 442<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name>, <name>Mathew<lb/> Brady</name> and <name>Michael Donnelly</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="49" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0056.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and seventeen dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expanded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#182,57</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Normandi</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>O C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty<lb/> two dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#25,247.48.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles A Greeley</name>, <name>Augustus F<lb/> Shapleigh</name> and <name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> trustees for the <name>State Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 679<lb/> <name>Neree Valle</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs, the petition herein is<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty five thousand two hun<lb/>dred and forty seven dollars and forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear interest at the rate of<lb/> ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#197,59</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander P Kinnon</name> vs 611<lb/> <name>William D Field</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and ninety seven dollar and fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#321,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 796<lb/> <name>Francis Lunsman</name>, <name>Henry A<lb/> Fette</name> and <name>Bernard Ravic</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and twenty one dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#614,70<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Clarke</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Cruikshank</name><lb/> vs 661<lb/> <name>Robert P Clarke</name>, <name>R G<lb/> Park</name> and <name>James Cuddy</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>R G Park</name> and <name>James<lb/> Cuddy</name>, but the defendant, <name>Robert P Clarke</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition, herein be taken against the said defendant<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="50" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0057.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fourteen dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is<lb/> ordered that this judgement bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#283,88.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Eichermann</name>,<lb/> <name>August Neilze</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Strottmann</name><lb/> vs 710<lb/> <name>Jules L Cabanni</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by thier Attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty three<lb/> dollars and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2276,11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Friderich Schaefer</name> and<lb/> <name>Friderich Luepping</name><lb/> vs 711<lb/> <name>Henry C Katz</name>, <name>Nernard Kraft</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Saler</name> and <name>Philip Klein</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by thier Attorney, but the defendants al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of twenty two hundred and seventy six dollars and eleven cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#267,49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederik Timmerman</name><lb/> vs 553.<lb/> <name>Henry N Williams</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, the petition<lb/> herein is taken agianst him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and sixty seven dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that the judgment bear interest at the rate of ten<lb/> per cent per annum untill paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#327,41.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>Heinrich Busemeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Philipp Walther</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty seven dollars and forty one<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have excution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#242,68.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Taylor</name> and<lb/> <name>Oscar N Collet</name><lb/> vs 268<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> forty two dollars and sixty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and thier costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="51" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0058.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#3092,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>H D Bacon</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Furlong</name><lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis W Page</name>,<lb/> <name>David Chambers</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Haight</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On Certificates of Deposit.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Francis W Page</name>, <name>David Chambers</name> and <name>Henry Haight</name>, but the defendants<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Henry D Bacon</name>, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken agaisnt them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of three thousand and ninety two dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgement bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per<lb/> annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#441,69.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Kleekamp</name><lb/> vs 270<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and forty one dollars and sixty nine cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it in ordered that this judgment bear interest at the<lb/> rate of nine per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#902,60 vs<lb/> <name><unclear>Chas</unclear> Belcher</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 664<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Charles Bel<lb/>cher</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to <name>William H Belcher</name>; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Charles<lb/> Belcher</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and two dollars and sixty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#544,00<lb/> against all<lb/> except <name>Haas<lb/> <unclear>Petff</unclear></name> remits<lb/> #1357.100</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lohrman</name><lb/> vs 694<lb/> <name>Herman Haas</name>,<lb/> <name>John Schreiber</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry C Katz</name> and<lb/> <name>Irwin Z Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant <name>Haas</name>, but the other defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five hundred and forty four dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per<lb/> cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#240,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Sale</name> administrator of the<lb/> estate of <name>Samuel Anderson</name> deceased.<lb/> vs 550<lb/> <name>David Ziggler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed,<lb/> and the Court finds from the note herein that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty dollars and eighty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="52" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0059.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#374,40.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Richard Kenrick</name><lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>John Schiffmann</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy one dollars and forty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the note<lb/> of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#230,69<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>KirKham</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Corving</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry W Seymour</name> and<lb/> <name>John A Rumsey</name> vs 659<lb/> <name>John KirKham</name> and<lb/> <name>John Parkin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by thier Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the<lb/> defendant <name>Parkin</name>, but the defendant, <name>KirKham</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/>ken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and thirty dollars and sixty nine<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1426,29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Edward Haren Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas C Fletcher</name> and<lb/> <name>John Sutter</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his Attorney, bond dismiss this suit as to the de<lb/>fendant, <name>Sutter</name>, but the other defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and twenty six dollars and twenty nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#184,36.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cooke</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benhard Mayer</name><lb/> vs 707<lb/> <name>Isaac Cook</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Hopkins</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to <name>John W<lb/> Hopkins</name>, but <name>Isaac Cook</name> although duly summoned and called, makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty four dollars<lb/> and thirty six cents. This therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#13,440,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Persie</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of thirteen thousand four hundred and forty dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the said debt of thirteen thou<lb/>sand four hundred and forty dollars and thirty cents in form aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="53" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0060.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#916,81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abram French</name>,<lb/> <name>John T Wells</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert C Newman</name><lb/> vs 671<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and sixteen dollars and eighty one cents. It<lb/> is therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1086,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Bonner</name> and <name>James M<lb/> Corbett</name><lb/> vs 670<lb/> <name>Thomas B Ellis</name>, <name>Henry B Ellis</name>,<lb/> <name>James B Ellis</name>, <name>Walter E Sell</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, make default, where<lb/>fore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the note herein that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten hundred<lb/> and eighty six dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#435,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Gottschalk</name>,<lb/> vs 529<lb/> <name>Henrich Muller</name> and<lb/> <name>Lewis Winkelmayer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty five dollars. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#526,92.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua N Owings</name><lb/> vs 558<lb/> <name>N S Rannells</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles S Rannels</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, make default wherefore, the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> note on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty six dollars and ninety two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#976,64<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Houseman</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Taylor</name>, <name>William Gillespie</name><lb/> and <name>David B Taylor</name><lb/> vs 822<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name> and <name>Julius H Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Smith</name>, but the other defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the note herein that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and seventy six dollars and sixty four cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgement bear in<lb/>terest at ten per cent annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#328,06</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Fellows</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Horatis D Newitt</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="54" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0061.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty six dollars and eight cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#430,85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Bullitt</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Fairthorne</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>Patrick E Burke</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward M Haydel</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, make default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hun<lb/>dred and thirty dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this judgement bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#273,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Camp</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles E Maurice</name><lb/> vs 150.<lb/> <name>John W Rice</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward M Haydel</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy three dollars. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgement bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derrick A January</name> etal<lb/> vs 599.<lb/> <name>D Robert Barclay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and the defendant, <name>Barclay</name><lb/> also comes and files an answer herein, but the defendant, <name>>Caleb Ries</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant a dedimus is awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew L Kerr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno A Williams</name> etal</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Jno A Williams</name> and <name>A M Dary</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sensenderfer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Rokes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Alias Summons ordered for <name>Hugh Harkens</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno N Bofinger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J D Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On motion pluries summons ordered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>On motion <name>N C Meyers</name> <name>Geo D Shinn</name> and <name>E R Green</name> are admitted and en<lb/>rolled as members of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="55" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0062.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq,</head>
            <p>Sheriff of St Louis County, in Open Court, acknowledges the execution of<lb/> a deed as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Calvin F Burnes</name> for all the right, title,<lb/> interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Theodore Wolff</name> and <name>Sebastian Engert</name> of in and to the following<lb/> premises, to writ; Lots nos forty three (43) and forty four (44) in block no three (3) in rock point addition<lb/> to the City of St Louis; the two lots having an aggregate front of fifty feet on the East side of Fifth (5th)<lb/> street, and a depth of one hundred and ten feet to an alley fifteen feet wide; said lots are bounded North<lb/> by lot no forty two (42) in said Rock point addition, East by an alley fifteen feet wide, South by Dorcas<lb/> street; and West by Fifth street being the same lots acquired by said <name>Theodore Wolff</name> and <name>Sebastian Engert</name><lb/> from <name>Joseph Indest</name> and wife, by deed dated, <date when="1855-07-15">July 15th, 1855</date> and recorded in the office of the recorder of deeds<lb/> for St Louis County in book 205 page 256 and 7; also a certain price of land being lot in block No one as laid<lb/> down in a plat of suburban lots, made by <name>James C Page</name> and <name>William M McPherson</name> recorded in the<lb/> office of the Recorder of said County of St Louis; said lot containing one hundred feet front on the Eastside<lb/> of Prairie Avenue by a depth Eastwardly the same width of two hundred and seventy feet, bounded North<lb/> by <name>Henning Brauckman</name>, East by land now or formerly owned by <name>Page</name> and <name>McPherson</name>, South by<lb/> <name>Mary Sickendick</name> and <name>James Kaminsky</name> and West by said Prairie Avenue being the same lot conveyed<lb/> by <name>Mary Sikendick</name> and <name>James Kaminsky</name> and wife to <name>Sebastian Engert</name> by deed dated <date when="1857-06-19">June 19th 1857</date><lb/> and recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Said County of St Louis in book 187 at page 424, all lying and<lb/> being in the County of St Louis and City of St Louis State of Missouri; sold under and by unitee of two<lb/> executions; one issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas returnable to the<lb/> <date when="1859-11">November Term 1859</date> in favor of <name>Charles Stittmatter</name> against <name>Paul Reinhart</name>, <name>Theodore Wolff</name> and <name>Sebas<lb/>tian Engert</name>, the other issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court returnable to the<lb/> <date when="1859-09">September Term 1859</date> in four of <name>Oliver W Woodford</name> and <name>Jay C Simple</name> against <name>Theodore Wolff</name><lb/> and <name>Sebastain Engert</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Cerre</name> Esq.</head>
            <p>Sheriff of St Louis, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed as such Sheriff<lb/> in favor of <name>Patrik Blessing</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and<lb/> property of <name>Eleanor Erskine Gary</name> of in and to the following premises, towit; a certain lot of ground in<lb/> the County and City of St Louis State of Missouri, and at the time of the purchase of the same by <name>John<lb/> B Gay</name> <date when="1820-09-20">September 20th 1820</date> was described as follows, towit; all that piece or parcel of grounds situate<lb/> lying and being in the town of St Louis, County and State aforesaid and fronting Eastward on Main<lb/> Street twenty feet, French measure, bounded Southwardly by a lot occupied by <name>James B Gague</name>; North<lb/>wardly by the frame building now occupied and owned by the said <name>John B Gay</name>, and Westwardly by lands<lb/> of <name>Antoni Soulard</name>; the said lot being twenty feet in front as aforesaid by two hundred feet in depth<lb/>, French measure; sold by virtue of an Execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the Clerk of the<lb/> St Louis Circuit Court on the <date when="1859-03-22">twenty second day of March, A D 1859</date>, in favor of <name>Henry Ames</name> and<lb/> <name>Edgar Ames</name> against said <name>Eleanor Erskine Gary</name>.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="56" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0063.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-09-29">Thursday September 29th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Erving</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Valentine Reis</name> and <name>Michael Reis</name><lb/> garns of <name>Dessert</name> etal</head>
            <p>Interogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G Roberg</name> etal<lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>J Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#351.70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cazeaux</name> vs 510<lb/> <name>Christian Shaffler</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifty one dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 775<lb/> <name>Berthold Vennewitz</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#455,74.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Giram Johnson</name> and<lb/> <name>George P Whitelaw</name><lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>Joseph Jones</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and fifty five dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#224,40<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dent</name> and <name>Long</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Rothenbucher</name><lb/> vs 619<lb/> <name>U S Grant</name>,<lb/> <name>Frederik Dent</name>, and<lb/> <name>Harrison L Long</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit acts <name>U S<lb/> Grant</name>, but <name>Dent</name> and <name>Long</name>, still making default, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that they are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty four dollars<lb/> and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution there<lb/>for: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 232.<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion leave is given the Sheriff to amend herein, and same done by the<lb/> addition of a line between return and the name of the Sheriff. Leave is<lb/> given to file interrogatories is herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Neil</name><lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>Chas Marlow</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs herein, with <name>P B Garesche</name>, as security, which is<lb/> approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm P Rockhill</name> survg part<lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Simeon Downing</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm J Norris</name> vs 216<lb/> <name>Jas Price</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion, until the <date when="--10-12">twelfth of October</date><lb/> next is given the defendants to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="57" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0064.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J L Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno B Valle</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Bratenahl</name> etal<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A. R. Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Barbara Schnerr</name> etal<lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>Theodore P Greene</name></head>
            <p>Motion to reinstate cause filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Union Bank</name> of Louisiana<lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>A Situs</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, <name>W J Powell</name>, by Attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that he be discharged at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor. Five dollars is allowed him for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>William Gayle</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of <name>Wm L Ewing</name>, <name>Nathan Cole</name>, <name>A G Edwards</name> and <name>Philips W<lb/> Hermans</name>, garnishees summoned herein under execution, be discharged at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of five dollars is<lb/> allowed each of said garnishees for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Schnerr</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>P Schlatweiler</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Hermann</name> and <name>Hartmann</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#288,1343</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben L<lb/> Anderson</name> and <name>Erastus Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>George Wood</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned, and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty eight dollars<lb/> and thirteen and one third cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#190,44.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuber L<lb/> Anderson</name> and <name>Erastus Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Francis W Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by thier Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and ninety dollars and<lb/> forty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and thier costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#460,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>Peter Goest</name>, <name>Adolph Gebhardt</name>,<lb/> and <name>Frederick Maw</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and sixty dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="58" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0065.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#402,55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 321<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> in which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and two dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid and its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#237,57.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thompson J S Flint</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>James L Doyle</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1066,76.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Bowen</name>, <name>Theodore<lb/> M Namee</name>, <name>Samid Holmes</name><lb/> and <name>Anthony Gilkison</name><lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the pe<lb/>tition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and<lb/> sixty six dollars and seventy six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#287,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Watkins</name> and<lb/> <name>E B Owsley</name><lb/> vs 584<lb/> <name>William H Johnson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred eighty seven dollars and ten cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#544,54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Ross</name> and<lb/> <name>James Ballard</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by thier Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and forty four<lb/> dollars and fifty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#238,98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leon V Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 375<lb/> <name>David A Harper</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant owes the plaintiff the sum of two hundred and thirty eight dollars and ninety eight cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid are found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="59" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0066.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#210,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Schneider</name><lb/> vs 373.<lb/> <name>Gustavus Adolphus Pfau</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Loupke</name>, <name>William H<lb/> Scandan</name>, <name>Adam Hammer</name> and<lb/> <name>Dominic Urban</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ten dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 259.<lb/> <name>Jno W Shoemaker</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Konig</name><lb/> vs 380<lb/> <name>Jno W Shoemaker</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo J Hardcastle</name> etal<lb/> vs 672<lb/> <name>Luther Case</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Colt</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>Israel G Beaumont</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marine Bank</name> of Chicago<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>James R Bull</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>North Missouri Rail Road Company</name><lb/> garns of <name>A J McDowell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E B Brown</name> and <name>Isaac L Downs</name><lb/> garnishes of <name>Terre Haute</name> ASLRRC</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="60" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0067.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-09-30">Friday September 30th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment: present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Douglass Stirling</name> is, on motion admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs 171.<lb/> <name>Wm Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos G Mason</name> etal<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>F H M Ching</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Chas L Thompson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A Boyd</name><lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>M Mayer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>M and G Myers</name> file demurrers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt R Levik</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garns of <name>Richards</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Lache</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>G Mossbacker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Haydon</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs it is ordered by the Court that the garnishees summoned<lb/> herein be discharged at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pilot Knob Iron Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>On motion of garnishees, it is ordered by the Court that they be discharged at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The said garnishees <name>Geo Henrick</name><lb/> <name>A C Robinson</name> and <name>James B Low</name> are allowed five dollars each for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward D Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>C T Wright</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abigah Whiting</name><lb/> vs 384<lb/> <name>Ira Stout</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Marshall</name> etal<lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion ten days additional time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant fifteen additional days are given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#302,58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert W Hunt</name><lb/> vs 152<lb/> <name>Josiah W Kennedy</name> and<lb/> <name>Stephen Fine</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and two dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt of aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Harris</name><lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by Attorney, the time to reply herein is extended ten<lb/> days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="61" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0068.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert S Regor</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent one week additional time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name> etal<lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent of parties one week additional time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F W Hering</name><lb/> vs 322<lb/> <name>C C Simmons</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E B Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Jno H Dargin</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Christopher</name> etal<lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm P Christopher</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amelia Carman</name> admr<lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>Wm C Atherton</name></head>
            <p>Answer and exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Zengen</name> etal<lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>M S Mcpham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron A Fisher</name> etal<lb/> vs 853<lb/> <name>Calvin H Fredericks</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a copy of the petition herein with a notice of the commence<lb/>ment of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Hastings</name> etal<lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Henry S Parker</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, by Attorney, ten days additional time is given to answer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H Ulest</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>Chas M Elleard</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hunt</name> and <name>Albert</name><lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>Francis J Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Smith</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno A Ubsdell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwd R Bates</name> etal garns.</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Alexander</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Scott</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml Gaty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Goodlett</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Garnishes <name>Goodlett</name> and <name>Moriarty</name> file an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J A Thompson</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leopold R Straus</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Schuman</name><lb/> vs 325.<lb/> <name>Terre Hauthe</name> ArStLRR</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albertine Jacob</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>Teresa E Nolan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml L Hertz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>L H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Blevin</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A Hinzpeter</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Curier</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Saml B Low</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W R Martin</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H J Beer</name> and <name>H J Beerrles</name> garns of Young</head>
            <p>Interogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L Rothgerber</name> etal<lb/> vs 541<lb/> <name>S H Lawrence</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for<lb/> costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="62" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0069.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>N L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Reis</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno S Thompson</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno A Saturn</name><lb/> vs <name>Robt N Olear</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Haddingham</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition for a subpoena duces team whereupon it<lb/> is ordered that a subpoena duces team issue to <name>Margeret Thomas</name><lb/> as prayed for in said petition.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-01">Saturday October 1st, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met persuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> etal<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> etal</head>
            <p><name>John D B Clark</name> files an answer for himself and as guardian of <name>George Clark</name><lb/> and <name>Benjamin Clark</name>: and <name>John R Brown</name> files his appearance and answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Pfau</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>N A Schoemann</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by Attorney, file proof of service of notice of suit and copy of<lb/> petition which is satisfactory to the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>William C Malloy</name> etal</head>
            <p><name>Pascal H St Cyr</name> files an answer; and on motion the Court appoints<lb/> <name>William J Kribber</name> guardian ad litem of <name>H J Stevens</name>, minor defendants<lb/> who thereupon files his acceptance a such guardianship, and on his motion<lb/> ten days additional time is given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, the time for pleading herein is extended one<lb/> week: On motion dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Ohio.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lutt</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Buttner</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant fifteen days additional time is given to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Heyer</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>Geo Ludwig</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant the time to answer herein is extended one week.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="63" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0070.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Brahtenahl</name> etal<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus is awarded defendent to Ohio.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>H Gilsey</name><lb/> vs 273.<lb/> <name>Edward A Damon</name> etal</head>
            <p>One motion of defendants, one week additional time is given to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Huffman</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>Willam J F Denney</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney but the defendant, <name>Joseph A<lb/> Berry</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant time to and including tenth instant is given him<lb/> to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Cormerais</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant time to and including tenth instant instant is given<lb/> him to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Simpson</name> etal<lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant time to and including tenth instant is given<lb/> to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Renick</name> etal<lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant time to and including tenth instant is given<lb/> him to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Agreement filed and by consent until eight instant is given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#231,58.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abel S Downs</name> and<lb/> <name>Seabury S Gould</name><lb/> vs 430<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and thirty<lb/> one dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#899,31.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bayne</name> and<lb/> <name>William Bayne</name><lb/> vs 313.<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorneys, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plantiffs,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against him as<lb/> confessed, and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that defendent is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eigth hundred<lb/> and ninety nine dollars and thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="64" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0071.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Russell H Wescott</name>, who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of<lb/> emancipation to his slave <name>Aleck Giles</name>, of dark complexion, about thick set<lb/> about five feet eight inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas R Lamp</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>N Wall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A W McPherson</name><lb/> vs 569<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas G McPheeters</name><lb/> vs 517<lb/> <name>Jas P Langford</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barns</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a demurrer as to part and an answer as to remainder of petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagie Lee</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for time to reply herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos Boylan</name> etal<lb/> vs 798<lb/> <name>St Bt David Jatum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kathenbach</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottlib Held</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file seperate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm B Watson</name><lb/> vs 23.<lb/> <name>A A VanWorner</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Michael Burrowes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt Thornbungh</name><lb/> vs 759<lb/> <name>St Bt David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>James Harrison</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hirsch</name><lb/> vs 655<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> <name>St Bt David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Ellis</name> etal<lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>St Bt David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Idecker</name><lb/> vs 381<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Idecker</name><lb/> vs 382<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fredk Idecker</name><lb/> vs 379.<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John How</name>, who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation<lb/> to his slave <name>Wash</name>, aged about forty years, about six feet high, of dark complexion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 829<lb/> <name>Stephen H Hauser</name></head>
            <p>Murder in the first degree.</p>
            <p>Now at this day the said defendant being brought into Court assents to and<lb/> accepts to the conditions of the commutatory pardon from the Governor of this<lb/> Gate filed herein, whereby the sentence of death imposed upon said defen<lb/>dant is commuted to imprisonment in the Penitentiary of this State for life: therefore it is consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the said defendant in accordance with said commutation be imprisoned in<lb/> the Penitentiary of this State for and during the term of his natural life: and it is ordeded that the<lb/> Sheriff of the County convey the said defendant to the Penitentiary of this State.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#254,76.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Zwilling</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>Michael Hoch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="65" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0072.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifty four dollars and seventy six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#577,10<lb/> set aside<lb/> <date when="1859-10-07">Oct 7, 1859</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brown</name><lb/> vs 423.<lb/> <name>James S Bissell</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin K Stevens</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but make default, whrefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the notes herein that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and seventy seven dollars<lb/> and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#634,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herman Muller</name><lb/> vs 606<lb/> <name>Wenzeslaus Hankop</name> and<lb/> <name>John Muller</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this suit<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of six hundred and thirty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear nine per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L Bellas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Bellas</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed by three defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas E Maguire</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Jas Little</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Kelly</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>Jno E Cooke</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas J Watson</name> etal<lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Thos Behan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj H Miles</name> etal<lb/> vs 295<lb/> <name>St Bt Diurnal</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Left</name> etal<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>John Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Frederick Bergesch</name> and <name>John Wheeler</name> file answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth B Davis</name><lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>Wm H Haggerty</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Newmark</name><lb/> vs 763<lb/> <name>Geo S Mawson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos J Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>Thos H Brierly</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Frank Kercheval</name> and <name>Porter</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Prebury</name><lb/> vs 657<lb/> <name>Rovert G Moss</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed. Offer of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L D Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Sawyer</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalman Taylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernest C Anglerodt</name><lb/> vs 189.<lb/> <name>Edwd Dobyns</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>R H Hodsonxe</name><lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>W L J Gagere</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Wyllyaking</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Phelps</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>A G Edwards</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="66" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0073.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>Jno Kinnard</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>W L and Eliza S Sloss</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A W M Dowell</name><lb/> vs 225<lb/> <name>St Bt David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A Oberrather</name><lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>Geo J Barnett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>N Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Waddingham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea filed by the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name><lb/> vs 764<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno K Walker</name>'s admr<lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>Jas B Walker</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>K MacKenzie</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P Scanlan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Cleveland</name><lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J and A Arnot</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm W Harnaker</name><lb/> vs 673.<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S Fife</name> etal<lb/> vs 636.<lb/> <name>Richd C Shakelford</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Gallagher</name><lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Henry Kattelman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leicester Babock</name><lb/> vs 493.<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno C Evins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos M Adam</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>S Kehrman</name><lb/> vs 527<lb/> <name>Jno Ichtertz</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank</name> of Stubenville<lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Jno B Carson</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Wm C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Motion to amend answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W Darby</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Perry Connell</name></head>
            <p>Agreement filed and until the<lb/> Eighth instant to answer by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="67" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0074.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-03">Monday, October 3rd 1859.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>	
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> etal<lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by thier attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the Sheriff assign the bond, given for the production of the property<lb/> attached, to the said plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F Jacoby</name> etal<lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>F Lemay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H Cole</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> St Bt Editor</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marie Sinel</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Peter Wegman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A H VanWarmer</name><lb/> vs 784<lb/> <name>L S Elliott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer and Counterclaim and Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Mauntel</name> etal<lb/> vs 714<lb/> <name>Herman H Rolfes</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Teichmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 795<lb/> <name>Jacob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Plea is abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas N Fisse</name><lb/> vs 683<lb/> <name>Jacob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>Jacob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs 676<lb/> <name>Jocob W Hoge</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas D Johnson</name> etal<lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Langford</name> etal<lb/> vs 645<lb/> <name>Merrimack Toll Bridge Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Yore</name><lb/> vs 615<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Townsley</name><lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleager J Beard</name> etal<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Fred Meyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hober Livermore</name> etal<lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>High Lackey</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#425,33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Manter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michall Heitz</name> and<lb/> <name>George Heitz</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty five dollars and thirty three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kohr</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>Steam Boat Spread Eagle</name></head>
            <p>On motion until the sixth instant is given defendant to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Penberthy</name> etal<lb/> vs 309<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion until the tenth instant is given defendant to plead.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="68" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0075.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> etal<lb/> vs 326<lb/> <name>Benjamin W Grover</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1571,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings<lb/> Institution</name>.<lb/> vs 708<lb/> <name>Charles H Ashby</name> and<lb/> <name>Watter B Morris</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Morris</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes dafault, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confused: and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is found that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff, in the sum of fifteen hundred and seventy<lb/> one dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leakin D Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs 297<lb/> <name>Thaddeus K Mills</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Meyers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Malloy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, <name>William C Malloy</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> petition be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Stumpf</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Theodore Albert Thomas</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by Attorney, until the sixth instant is given<lb/> him to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name> etal<lb/> vs 640<lb/> <name>George Conch</name>,<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J Hutton</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them so confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caspar Wiegand</name><lb/> vs 449<lb/> <name>James Coff</name>, <name>Christian Kreuger</name>,<lb/> <name>John Whitehill</name> and <name>John W<lb/> Hathaway</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by Attorney, until the tenth instant<lb/> is given them to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Larkin</name><lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>Patrick M Cann</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, until tenth instant is given to plead, and he<lb/> thereupon files a motion for security for costs and also a demurrer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob W Kurtzborn</name><lb/> vs 605.<lb/> <name>Philip Burg</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by Attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Geo W Hungerford</name></head>
            <p>Until seventeenth instant is given to reply to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="69" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0076.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name></head>
            <p>Until Seventeenth instant is given plaintiff to reply to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Oker</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file a motion to dismiss, and the plaintiff files a bond for<lb/> costs with <name>James R Lackland</name>, as security, which bond is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Rodrig</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael O Bourke</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Hardaway</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Chatfield Hardaway</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lumira Jane Lipscomb</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Patrick H Lipscomb</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> etal<lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>St Bt Alongo</name> Child</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> called comes not nor has it answered herein whrefore the complaint<lb/> herein is taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis R Benoist</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lydia M Rector</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants, <name>Mary Garnier</name> and <name>John Hogan</name>, by leave of Court first<lb/> had and obtained file an additional and supplemental answer to plain<lb/>tiff second amended complaint.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eva Catharine Coring</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Peter H Coring</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name><lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>William Lingo</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but the defendant, <name>William Lings</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, the<lb/> petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Millimann</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Ignatz Becker</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him a confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 463<lb/> <name>Wendel Hoppe</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="70" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0077.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Schlosstein</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Philippine Schlosstein</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not, but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Wards Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 774<lb/> <name>Patrick E Burke</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, makes default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/>ken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew C Peckham</name><lb/> vs 650<lb/> <name>William W Farmer</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Coleman</name><lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>William W Farmer</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not, but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Lare</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>Joseph C Parks</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Louis</name><lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>John F Hague</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos Rees</name> etal<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Mary R Dupresne</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties until the eighth instant is given to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Hazard Powder Company</name><lb/> vs 541<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Andrews</name><lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Ariadne Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, total files proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Zimmerman</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Danl D Page</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff ordered that a pluries summons issue for <name>Edward Wyman</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea filed by City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="71" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0078.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#392.35.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Meriden Brittannia<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 698<lb/> <name>Corneluis D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jere T Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and ninety two dollars and thirty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs herein expended and have thereof execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#218,43.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Marmtel</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name> and<lb/> <name>Matthias Grassmuck</name><lb/> vs 712<lb/> <name>Peter Grassmuck</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighteen dollars and<lb/> forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#211,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Bulte</name>, and<lb/> <name>Matthias Becker</name> vs 713<lb/> <name>Francis H Zimmermann</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> eleven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#736,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Merchants Bank</name><lb/> of St Louis<lb/> vs 761<lb/> <name>Levi Van Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven<lb/> hundred and thirty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#306,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Bogert</name><lb/> vs 663<lb/> <name>Antoine Thebeau</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Burk</name>, and<lb/> <name>Joseph Thebeau</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not, but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and six dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#419,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Halliday</name><lb/> vs 685<lb/> <name>Eugene Longuemare</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and nineteen dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="72" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0079.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#576,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The first Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 777<lb/> <name>George Hauk</name> and<lb/> <name>George Eberle</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> seventy six dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#418,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 776<lb/> <name>Berthold Vennewitz</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Augustin</name> and <name>Charles Young</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four and eighteen dollars and ten cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#446,58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dillon</name><lb/> vs 100<lb/> <name>David Rowe</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and fifty six dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#960,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Berry</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Huffman</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>William T F Denny</name>,<lb/> <name>Samuel Denny</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph A Berry</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to <name>William T<lb/> F Denny</name> and <name>Samuel Denny</name>, and the defendant, <name>Berry</name>, still being in default,<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred<lb/> and sixty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid as found together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per<lb/> cent per annum from this date until paid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#284,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel F Dolman</name><lb/> vs 486<lb/> <name>Thomas Kelty</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas H M Entee</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighty four dollars and<lb/> seventy five. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235 72.<lb/> Set aside <date when="1859-10-05">Oct 5<lb/> 1859.</date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Westlake</name> and<lb/> <name>Appleton A Button</name><lb/> vs 471<lb/> <name>Samuel W Crawford</name><lb/>, <name>George B Boomer</name>, and<lb/> <name>George G Pride</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by thier Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to <name>George G<lb/> Pride</name>, but the other defendants although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from the note herein that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirty five dol<lb/>ars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten per cent interest.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>



    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="73" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0080.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Weil</name> etal<lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>August Buresch</name> and<lb/> <name>Louis Muff</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal. Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Buresch</name>, but the defendant, <name>Louis Muff</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1593,12.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Gaylord</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin B Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>Nicol Raynor</name> and<lb/> <name>George Kyler</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of fifteen hundred and<lb/> ninety three dollars and twelve cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>	
        <div2>
            <note>#562,67.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs 477.<lb/> <name>Heinrich Busemeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Philipp Walther</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and sixty two dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor,<lb/> and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#311,07<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jaeger</name> &amp; <name>Neff</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Fenton</name>, <name>Aaron<lb/> Fenton</name> and <name>Benjamin Fenton</name><lb/> vs 266<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name>, <name>John Neff</name>,<lb/> and <name>Bartholomew Reis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> <name>Bartholomew Reis</name>, but the defendants, <name>Jaeger</name> and <name>Neff</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not, but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and eleven dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#529,72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Lipphardt</name><lb/> vs 764<lb/> <name>A William Streit</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Reinstaedtler</name><lb/> and <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendants, <name>Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>Diefenbach</name>, although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of five hundred and twenty nine dollars and seventy two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#222,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francisca Deis</name><lb/> vs 292.<lb/> <name>John W Seubert</name> and<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants owe plaintiff two hundred<lb/> and twenty two dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid as found and her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Porter</name> etal<lb/> vs 177.<lb/> <name>William Tyler</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not,<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="74" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0081.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#602,68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick L Rogers</name> and<lb/> <name>Aaron Raymond</name><lb/> vs 363<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the notes on which this suit is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and two dollars and sixty<lb/> eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1159,74</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Fassett</name> and<lb/> <name>J W Fassett</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Charles Creley</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eleven hundred and fifty nine<lb/> dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1645,68</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name>, <name>Samuel T Hyde</name>,<lb/> <name>Edmund C Pike</name> and <name>George Erskine</name><lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton</name> and <name>St. Louis Rail<lb/> Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of sixteen hundred and<lb/> forty five dollars and sixty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Constantine Schnerr</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Philip Schlaltweiler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendants, <name>Charles Dewald</name><lb/> and <name>Philip Schlaltweiler</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name> etal<lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>Rice S M Cubbin</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor. By<lb/> leave plaintiffs withdraw notes and on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name> etal<lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Rice S M Cubbin</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs herein and that execution issue therefor. By leave<lb/> plaintiffs withdraw notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#895,01.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre E Brulatour</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition<lb/> herein be taken against the said defendants as confessed: and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and ninety five dollars and one cent.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="75" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0082.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#284,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Clemens</name><lb/> vs 765.<lb/> <name>Francis J Mittenberger</name>,<lb/> <name>John Peter G'Sell</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Hirtzlin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant <name>Hirtzlin</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default where<lb/>fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and eighty four dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recov<lb/>er of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and<lb/> it is ordered that this judgment bear ten percent interest until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name><lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>William B Olmstead</name>,<lb/> <name>Collins D White</name>, and<lb/> <name>A C Ketchum</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and on their motion, it is or<lb/>dered that the defendant, <name>Collins D White</name>, be notified that a civil<lb/> action has been commenced against for the sum of two hundred and<lb/> two dollars and thirty cents, on account of a promissory note of which<lb/> the plaintiffs are the holders; and that his property has been attached;<lb/> and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis, on the first Monday of February<lb/> next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment<lb/> will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same: and it is further ordered<lb/> that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the St. Louis Evening Bulletin, a newspaper prin<lb/>ted and published in the City of St. Louis: but the defendants, <name>William B Olmstead</name> and <name>A C<lb/> Ketchum</name>, although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, wherefore on motion of<lb/> said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defendants<lb/> as confessed. Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard R Sargent</name><lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>William W Morris</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, ordered that an alias summons issue for <name>Wm W<lb/> Morris</name> returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Schergens</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#304,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Schulenburg</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolphus Boeckeler</name><lb/> vs 638<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name> and<lb/> <name>John Philips</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs, in the sum of three hundred and four dollars and seventy cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carlos S Greeley</name> etal<lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> &amp; <name>Dominick Urban</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>John Levin</name> and<lb/> <name>John Corcoran</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="76" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0083.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#359,60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cohick</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>David M Martin</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>John B H Beale</name> and<lb/> <name>James C Edwards</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the Court finds from the note on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of three hundred and fifty nine dollars and sixty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1529,00.<lb/> Special.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Benton P Jackson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been published, according to law, but<lb/> the defendant, although duly warned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of fifteen hundred and twenty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and also ten<lb/> per cent per annum from this date until paid and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1483,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Turner</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Benton P Jackson</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been published according to law, but<lb/> the defendant although duly warned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> fourteen hundred and eighty three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Walker</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Walsh</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#320,42.<lb/> agst <name>Kerzinger</name><lb/> and <name>Krautter</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lohrman</name><lb/> vs 697<lb/> <name>Frederick Kerzinger</name> and<lb/> <name>Andreas Krautter</name> and<lb/> <name>L V Reed</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to <name>L<lb/> V Reed</name>, but the defendant, <name>Andreas Krautter</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the other defendant still<lb/> being in default, the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three<lb/> hundred and twenty dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Kalb</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Martin Stadler</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name><lb/> vs 542<lb/> <name>Peter Lang</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes, default, wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="77" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0084.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Klute</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Henry Klute</name><lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#417,90.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Arthur Olshausen</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Blattner</name> and<lb/> <name>Human Laumeier</name>, trustees<lb/> of the <name>United States<lb/> Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 696<lb/> <name>George P Liebig</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Engan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Liebeg</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed, and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> four hundred and seventeen dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St. Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>Charles L Tucker</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties aforesaid, by their respec<lb/>tive Attorneys, and the plaintiff files a petition, and no suf<lb/>ficient cause being shown against granting the prayer of the<lb/> said petitioner, it is therefore ordered that <name>Thomas W<lb/> Levant</name>, <name>John Maguire</name>, <name>Charles K Dickson</name>, <name>James B Eads</name> and <name>Henry Kayser</name>, be and they are<lb/> hereby appointed as commissioners to ascertain and appraise the compensation to be made to the<lb/> said defendant for the real estate proposed to be taken for the uses of the said Company, and<lb/> the Court doth further appoint the <date when="1859-10-17">Seventeenth day of October, eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>, at<lb/> the hour of ten o'clock in the forenoon of that day, on the premises, as the time and place for the<lb/> first meeting of said Commissioners.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kinnard Sr</name> etal<lb/> vs 134.<lb/> <name>J M Patton</name></head> 
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry L Clarke</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered, that the<lb/> defendant, be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of five thousand three hundred and fifteen dollars<lb/> and forty nine dollars on account of three hundred bags of coffee sold<lb/> and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant for which the defendant executed and delivered to<lb/> the plaintiffs his promissory note; and that his property has been attached; and unless he be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis,<lb/> on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action afore<lb/>said according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same.<lb/> And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat,<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="78" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0085.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Leonard</name><lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>John B Desmoulin</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christopher W Spalding</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>Chas E Salomon</name> County<lb/> Surveyor of St. Louis County.</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Weil</name> etal<lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Chas Landzettle</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but made default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#343,85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 668<lb/> <name>James H Gordon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant owes the plaintiffs the sum of three hundred and forty three<lb/> dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2687,46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Rauben<lb/> Beardslee</name>, <name>John K Field</name>,<lb/> <name>Isaac W Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Gerard H Sand</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Fischer</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the Court finds from the notes herein that the defendants are indebt<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty six hundred and eighty seven<lb/> dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#725,27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Hirschorn</name> and<lb/> <name>Louis Hirschorn</name><lb/> vs 699<lb/> <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the note herein that the defendant owes the plaintiffs Seven<lb/> hundred and twenty five dollars and twenty seven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#330,79.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Laureston R Livington</name>,<lb/> <name>William B Copeland</name>,<lb/> <name>James K Moorehead</name>,<lb/> <name>Calvin Adams</name> and<lb/> vs 700<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the note herein that defendants owe plaintiffs three hundred and<lb/> thirty dollars and seventy nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> etal<lb/> vs 744<lb/> <name>Jno B Bayer</name></head> 
            <p>On motion ordered that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="79" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0086.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#208,46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St. Louis Lumbermen and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 745<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward W Shands</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore the Court finds from the note herein that the defen<lb/>dants owe plaintiff two hundred and eighty dollars and forty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#183,09.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M Kelly</name><lb/> vs 286<lb/> <name>Edward Krausnick</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the Bill<lb/> of Exchange herein that defendant owes plaintiff one hundred and eighty three dol<lb/>lars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#260,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Lynch</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>Patrick Conway</name>.</head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the notes herein that defen<lb/>dant owes plaintiff twelve hundred and sixty dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of defendant the debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor,<lb/> and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten percent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4683,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Reese</name><lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>On certificates of deposit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of forty six hundred and<lb/> eighty three dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of defendants the debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is<lb/> ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1348,61</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leander Lawrence</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Alexander L Tyler</name> and<lb/> <name>William Tyler</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Alex L Tyler</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, and<lb/> the other defendant still being in default, the Court finds from the notes herein<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the Court of thirteen<lb/> hundred and forty eight dollars and sixty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#626,11.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert P Clark</name><lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>Isaac L West</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the note herein that<lb/> the defendant owes the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and twenty six dollars and eleven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor, and that<lb/> this judgment bear ten percent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2020,18.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Blake</name><lb/> vs 672<lb/> <name>William M Murtry</name></head>
            <p>On notes. Now comes the plaintiff, by its Attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the notes herein that the defendant owes the plain<lb/>tiff twenty hundred and twenty dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of defendant the debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="80" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0087.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#3166,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Gaylord</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin B Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 739<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> <name>Lorentz Schaffler</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of thirty one hundred and sixty six dollars and eighty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3406,55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bruce</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin Bruce</name><lb/> vs 642<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of thirty four hundred and six dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been<lb/> duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>The garnishees, <name>A L Sweet</name>, <name>Geo E Hawley</name>, and <name>G B Sweet</name>, file motions<lb/> and exceptions to interrogatories and also answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G B Sweet</name> etal garns</head> 
            <p>Answers of <name>G B Sweet</name>, <name>A L Sweet</name> and <name>Geo E Hawley</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name> etal<lb/> vs <name>Fredk M Colburn</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno F Mauntel</name> and <name>Mauntel Bulte &amp; Co</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Taussig</name> etal garns</head> 
            <p>Answer of <name>Chas H<lb/> Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C H Teichmann</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Chas H Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Chas H<lb/> Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G H Fisse</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garns</head> 
            <p>Answer of <name>Charles H Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj H Miles</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Bt Diurnal</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Road</name><lb/> vs 731<lb/> <name>M Ostertag</name> etal</head> 
            <p>Plaintiff files seven exhibits herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt Holmes</name><lb/> vs 691<lb/> <name>Fred K Maw</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rosenbaum</name><lb/> vs 543<lb/> <name>Chas Banmann</name></head> 
            <p>Answer Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Wetherill</name> etal<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>T A Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="81" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0088.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm J Norris</name><lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>James Price</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj F Edwards</name><lb/> vs 587<lb/> <name>Jas C Musick</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W, Johnson</name><lb/> vs 198<lb/> <name>Chas U Pebb</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Matthew</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs and also<lb/> demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Sandhelm</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Fredk Rohlfs</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs and demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Rogers</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos Grey</name>'s admr</head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Cooper</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On Execution.</p>
            <p>On motion of garnishees <name>Benj F Stout</name> and <name>Samuel Moody</name>,<lb/> by <name>Shreve</name> and <name>Boyce</name>, Attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that they be<lb/> discharged at plaintiff's costs and that execution issue therefor. Five<lb/> dollars allowed each of said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry White</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo J King</name> etal</head>
            <p>On Execution.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas Salisbury</name>, by <name>Grover</name> Attorney, files proof of service of garnishment, and<lb/> on his motion, it is ordered that he be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor: five dollars is allowed garnishee for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#590,01</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S M Knight</name>,<lb/> <name>Mathew S Fife</name> and<lb/> <name>James W Richardson</name><lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>John F Boy</name></head>
            <p>On Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and plaintiffs submit this cause to the<lb/> Court and the Court finds from the proofs that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and ninety dollars and one cent.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G T Theobald</name></head>
            <p>On Execution.</p>
            <p>On motion of garnishees, <name>E Miltenberger &amp; Co</name>, ordered that they be discharged at<lb/> plaintiffs and execution issue therefor. Five dollars allowed for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hammer</name><lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>Edward Morgan</name></head>
            <p>On motion until tenth instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hite</name><lb/> vs 612<lb/> <name>R F Bridwell</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff comes, by Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> etal<lb/> vs 772<lb/> <name>Thos M Taylor</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his demurrer and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="82" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0089.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name>,<lb/> <name>James Clemens</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and there<lb/>upon come also a jury, to wit; <name>William H Keller</name>, <name>Thomas H Buridge</name>,<lb/> <name>L D Holmes</name>, <name>Morris Pawley</name>, <name>Henry A Mueller</name>, <name>William W Jones</name>, <name>Chris<lb/>tian Rolfing</name>, <name>Archibald Woodruff</name>, <name>John J Adams</name>, <name>George Hill</name>, <name>William<lb/> A Sharkey</name> and <name>Philip P Berry</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, further proceedings were continued until to mor<lb/>row morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S W Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-04">Tuesday October 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs 563.<lb/> <name>Matthew Ashdown</name></head>
            <p>On note. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and three times solemnly called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#650,65<lb/> vs <name>Meyer</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Cash Jr</name><lb/> vs 600<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Joel Ballard</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> defendant, Ballard, but the defendant, <name>Meyer</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> owes the plaintiff the sum of six hundred and fifty dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy Conroy</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Margaret Conroy</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his Attorney, files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order<lb/> of publication made herein has been duly published according to law, but the<lb/> although duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> etal<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>Steamboat Laclede</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come, by Attorney, but the defendant comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore the complaint is taken against it as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Prescott</name> etal<lb/> vs 778<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Chandler</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed: On motion of plaintiffs ordered<lb/> that an alias Summons issue for <name>Geo Couch</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Carlos S Greeley</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>On motion until the fifteenth instant is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="83" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0090.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#507,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Althorf</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius Ahlborn</name><lb/> vs 724<lb/> <name>Moritz Schuster</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants owe the plaintiff five hundred and seven dollars and<lb/> eighty cents. It is therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#799,89.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Burrows</name>,<lb/> <name>Levis A Burrows</name>, and<lb/> <name>Egbert S Richards</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>Mayar Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the notes<lb/> herein that the defendant owes the plaintiffs seven hundred and ninety nine<lb/> dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution: and it is ordered that the Sheriff pay plaintiffs the amount arising from the sale of the property<lb/> attached herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#872,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert T Wilde</name> and<lb/> <name>John F Seaman</name><lb/> vs 173.<lb/> <name>Mayer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>On notes and Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the	plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and dismiss this suit as to third<lb/> count of petition, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant owes plaintiffs Eight Hundred and seventy two dollars and sixty<lb/> five cents: therefore the Court consider that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that the Sheriff pay the<lb/> plantiffs the proceeds of the sale of the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266.75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 669<lb/> <name>Thomas C Stroup</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant owes the plaintiff the sum of two hundred<lb/> and sixty six dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that they plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interests.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas D Ellis</name><lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>John W Davitt</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but make default, wherefore the petition herein to taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S Fife</name> etal<lb/> vs 283.<lb/> <name>John W Davitt</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>Geo W Goodlett</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff the<lb/> petition herein is taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="84" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0091.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann O Byrne</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>Martin O Byrne</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alex J Garesche</name><lb/> vs 690<lb/> <name>Thomas Bowe</name> etal</head>
            <p>Bry consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor; by consent defendants<lb/> withdraw the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louise J Labrecht</name><lb/> vs 184<lb/> <name>John Labrecht</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at her costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alex Beal</name> etal<lb/> vs 602<lb/> <name>Chas Marlow</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bond for costs with <name>S B Kellogg</name>, as security, which is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann C Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Samuel Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant although duly warned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Road</name><lb/> vs 731<lb/> <name>Michael Ostertag</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Francis Bechler</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Andrews</name><lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Ariadne Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against her as confessed. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Mepham</name> and<lb/> <name>William S Mepham</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, <name>Robert H Campbell</name><lb/> <name>Heny B Merritt</name> and <name>George W Kidd</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and it appear<lb/>ing to the Court that the defendants, <name>Robert H Campbell</name><lb/> and <name>Henry B Merritt</name>, cannot be served with process, therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered,<lb/> that the said defendants be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against them for the sum of eight hundred and ten dollars and fifteen cents on account<lb/> of a promissory note executed by the defendants, under the name of <name>Merritt Campbell and Co</name>, to the<lb/> plaintiffs; and unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the<lb/> City of St Louis, within and for the Country of St Louis on the first Monday of February next, and on<lb/> or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will be<lb/> taken against them as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according<lb/> to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis;<lb/> but the defendant <name>George W Kidd</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of plaintiffs, the petition herein is taken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml L Moses</name> etal<lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>John C F Ladew</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default. Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="85" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0092.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Blakeslee</name><lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is ordered that the defen<lb/>dant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him<lb/> for the sum of one hundred and sixty five dollars, on account of goods<lb/> sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant; and that his property has been attached; and unless<lb/> he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St. Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day<lb/> thereof, and to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according<lb/> to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Blakeslee</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>John C F Ladew</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against them for the sum of one hundred dollars on account of the rent<lb/> of the second and third stories of building sixty four North Fourth<lb/> street, and that their property has been attached; and unless they appear at the next term of this<lb/> Court, to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis, on the<lb/> first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action afore<lb/>said according to law, judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy<lb/> the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the Mis<lb/>souri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W M Camant</name><lb/> vs 705<lb/> <name>Dabney C Riddick</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by Attorney, leave is given the Sheriff to amend<lb/> his return herein, which is done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#723,25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs 850<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a duly verified statement confessing himself in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and twenty three dollars and<lb/> twenty five cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment therefor. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Billon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dabney C Riddick</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas C Fletcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and sixty six dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Strudel</name>'s admr<lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Order of Publication. Affidavit filed.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Otto Igel</name>, be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of seven hundred and ten dollars and sixty cents on account<lb/> of a promissory note, and unless he appear at the next term of the Court to begun and held at the City of<lb/> St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis on the first Monday of February next and on or before the<lb/> third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in<lb/> the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="86" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0093.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Bart</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> Doctor <name>Charles Hutawa</name>,<lb/> <name>Gustavus Waagner</name>, and<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the defendant, Doctor <name>Charles Hutawa</name>, cannot<lb/> be summoned herein, therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is or<lb/>dered that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him for the sum of three hundred dollars and interest on account of a<lb/> promissory note, and unless he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun<lb/> and held at the City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis, on the first Monday of February<lb/> next and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein<lb/> will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, accor<lb/>ding to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis: but the<lb/> defendant <name>George Smizer</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered that an<lb/> alias Summons issue for the defendant, <name>Wagner</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah Thornburgh</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>John W Darby</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Tiu</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#245,06.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name> and<lb/> <name>James S English</name><lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>Hiram A Pryor</name> and<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and forty<lb/> five dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#418,58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>John Ichtertz</name> and<lb/> <name>James R Bull</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the note herein that the defendants owe the plaintiffs the sum of four hundred<lb/> and eighteen dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#543.80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb W Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 752<lb/> <name>Bunard Rawie</name>,<lb/> <name>Herman Fette</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry A Fette</name> and<lb/> <name>J L Weber</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, <name>Bunard Rawie</name>, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the pe<lb/>tition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the other still being in default,<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff the sum of five hundred and<lb/> forty three dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor, and that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Porter</name> etal<lb/> vs 176<lb/> <name>Francis Jones</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at their costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Jobs White</name></head>
            <p>On motion until fourteenth instant is given plaintiff to reply.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="87" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0094.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#732,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Miguel A Otero</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant owes the plaintiff seven hundred and thirty two dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor, and that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#201,87.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Von Phul</name>,<lb/> <name>James L Waters</name>, and<lb/> <name>Abraham T Bird</name><lb/> vs 746<lb/> <name>George Heitz</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the note<lb/> herein that defendant owes plaintiffs two hundred and one dollars and eighty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherill</name> etal<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>F A Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lohrman</name><lb/> vs 694<lb/> <name>John Schreiber</name>, <name>Henry C Katz</name>,<lb/> and <name>Irwin Z Smith</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff remits of the judgment herein thirteen dollars and fifty<lb/> seven cents.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name> Trustee<lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>By Leave of Court first obtained the Sheriff amends his return.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>DeWitt C Sandford</name> etal<lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>By Leave of Court first obtained the Sheriff amends his return.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D English</name> etal<lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head> 
            <p>By Leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zebulon F Wetzell</name> etal<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>By Leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lowry</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>St. Bt Henrietta</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Levy</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>By Leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Harrison</name> etal<lb/> vs 684<lb/> <name>St Bt Henrietta</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernst C Anglerodt</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Edwd Dobyns</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and demurrer to counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Fountain</name> etal<lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed by consent and leave.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="88" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0095.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>On motion until the fifteenth instant is given garnishees, <name>Egbert B<lb/> Brown</name>, <name>Isaac L Downs</name> and <name>G Schwarberg</name>, to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 559<lb/> <name>Wm Sensenderfer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants, <name>Wm and Jno Sensenderfer</name> and <name>Alex Kiemlen</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Christopher</name> etal<lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Wm P Freeman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurrer to<lb/> part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt Caussere</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Wm A Bassett</name> etal</head> 
            <p>Plea in abatement filed by <name>David<lb/> P Clay</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Peter Lindell</name>, personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of Emancipation<lb/> to his slave <name>Paul Mosley</name>, aged twenty three, of light color, heavy set about five feet eight inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Anthony G Miller</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#175,36.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick K Lupping</name><lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Frederick Maas</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Rohle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants owe the plaintiff one hundred and seventy five dollars and thirty six cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens</name> etal</head> 
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="89" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0096.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-05">Wednesday October 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas R Robinson</name>, personally known to the Court, acknowledes the execution of a deed of emanci<lb/>pation to his slave <name>Thomas Edwards</name> aged about twenty one years of ordinary black color, about five<lb/> feet seven and three quarter inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt S Eddy</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Boylan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos Rees</name> etal.<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Mary R Dufresne</name></head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm B Reed</name><lb/> vs 396.<lb/> <name>C Freund</name></head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gorman</name><lb/> vs 681<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for leave to sue as a poor person filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph A Eddy</name> etal<lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Howard M Livinston</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication<lb/> herein has been duly published.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Westlake</name> etal<lb/> vs 471<lb/> <name>Samuel N Crawford</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their Attorney, ordered that the judgement herein on<lb/> the third instant be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs Attorney suggests the death of the plaintiff, and <name>Mary Jan Eddy</name>, admin<lb/>istrator of said plaintiff enters her appearance herein as such.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Thornton</name> etal<lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Elliott</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs, by Attorney, the petition is taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos Allen</name> etal<lb/> vs 830<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Until the twelfth instants is given that to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Hoffman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emelia Riehl</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the Attorney for the plaintiff and suggests the death of said plaintiff since<lb/> the commencement of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Partridge and Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name> garns</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs Attorney acknowledges the receipt of full and entire amount of<lb/> the judgement rendered herein <date when="1859-04-14">April 14th 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> etal<lb/> vs 93.<lb/> <name>Geo Trowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Exceptions to deposition of <name>Robt P Effinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephens Hoyt</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William King</name> etal</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgement to <name>Robt M Service</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="90" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0097.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> etal<lb/> vs 843<lb/> <name>Ira Todd</name> garns</head>
            <p>Denial of<lb/> Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kohe</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>St Bt Spread Eagle</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos B Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F Weston</name> &amp;c garns</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Johnston Jr</name> etal<lb/> vs 158<lb/> <name>St Bt Alonzo Child</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by this Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against it as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#435,27</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W M Camant</name><lb/> vs 705<lb/> <name>Dabney C Riddick</name> and<lb/> <name>Eliza M Riddick</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plainitiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants owe plaintiff four hundred and thirty five dollars and<lb/> twenty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that<lb/> this judgement bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kingston Coal COmpany</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>George Goodell</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by Attorney, ordered that this cause be dismissed at its costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#981,85</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Krautler</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>Francis Peterson</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes<lb/> plaintiff nine hundred and eighty one dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#539,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo Whitney</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Harry Bonfanti</name></head>
            <p>On note and account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication made herein has been duly published, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed: and the plaintiff dismisses this suit so far as the same con<lb/>tains an account; and the Court finds from the note herein that the defendant owes plaintiff five hun<lb/>dred and thirty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor against<lb/> the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Gregg</name><lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Robt Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Until twenty second instant is given plaintiff to reply.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="91" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0098.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#406,70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph Gebhardt</name><lb/> vs 562<lb/> <name>Peter Joest</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant owes the plaintiff four hundred and six dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Fox</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Amos H Ray</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Boyd</name><lb/> vs 577<lb/> <name>Henry Wilder</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#543,78.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dexter B Britton</name> and<lb/> <name>Walter W Webb</name><lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Alonzo Rice</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the note herein that the defendant owes the plaintiffs five<lb/> hundred and forty three dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#436,12.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyrus M Warren</name> and<lb/> <name>Herbert M Warren</name><lb/> vs 489<lb/> <name>L L Kelley</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant owes the plaintiffs four hundred and sixty three dollars and twelve<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#824,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Darby</name><lb/> vs 536<lb/> <name>John N Willard</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant owes the plaintiff eight hundred and twenty four dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten percent interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#670,80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Jane Eddy</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 53.<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> and <name>Elizabeth Eddy</name><lb/> administratrix of <name>Jabish P Eddy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and<lb/> seven dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and her costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor against the defendant <name>Joseph A Eddy</name>: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest<lb/> at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="92" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0099.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Dunham</name><lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Hugh Dunham</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her Attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#201,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 783.<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the<lb/> plaintiff two hundred and one dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by theCourt that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#768,24.<lb/> I acknowledge fact<lb/> and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment of<lb/> which this is the<lb/> margin. <date when="1860-08-22">Aug 22<lb/> 1860</date> <name>Henry Pettes<lb/> Jeff</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs 583.<lb/> <name>Matthew Ashdown</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the in<lb/>struments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the<lb/> plaintiff seven hundred and sixty eight dollars and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>Thomas H Brierly</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Frank Kircheval</name> and <name>John Porter</name>, but the defendants, <name>Thomas H<lb/> Brierly</name>, <name>Joseph Nanson</name>, <name>Holmes Nanson</name>, <name>John Shaw</name>, <name>Charles Baker</name>, <name>Dutch<lb/> Davis</name>, <name>Benjamin Hutchinson</name>, <name>James L Bissell</name>, <name>Patrick Yore</name>, and <name>John H Burke</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition and also the appearance of the<lb/> defendant acknowledging service of writ.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Riley</name> etal<lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>William Wible</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> The President and Directors of<lb/> the Bank of Louisville</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is ordered that the defendant<lb/> be notified that a civil action has been commenced against it for the sum<lb/> of thirty two hundred dollars on account of the wrongful seizure and<lb/> disposal of the interest of the plaintiff in the steamboat Cumberland<lb/> Valley; and that its property has been attached; and unless it be and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis, on the first Monday of<lb/> February next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to action aforesaid, according to law, judgment<lb/> will be rendered against it and its property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a<lb/> copy hereof be published accordingly to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Eugene Laveille</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="93" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0100.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#539,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 651<lb/> <name>Ferdinand G Sell</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the plain<lb/>tiff five hundred and thirty nine dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#308,19.<lb/> vs all except<lb/> English.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Oglesby</name><lb/> vs 652.<lb/> <name>Charles Heitz</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam Schreiker</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Heitz</name>,<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> and<lb/> <name>Abraham Wood</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and dismisses this suit as to <name>Ezra O<lb/> English</name>, but the other defendants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants owe the plaintiff three hundred and<lb/> eight dollars and nineteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor? and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1107,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hoel H Camp</name><lb/> vs 653.<lb/> <name>Christopher W Spalding</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant owes the plaintiff eleven hundred and seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>The St. Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is ordered that the de<lb/>fendant, be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> it for the sum of twenty seven hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> fifty three cents on account of two promissory notes, and that its prop<lb/>erty has been attached; and unless it appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the<lb/> City of St. Louis, within and for the County of St. Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or<lb/> before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered<lb/> against it, and its property solds to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendants, <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>John Nicolay</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff ordered that an alias Summons issue for <name>Fredk Pillman</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Fischer</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Adam Fischer</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her Attorney, files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of<lb/> publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published, accor<lb/>ding to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lut</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Buttner</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his Attorney, files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of pub<lb/>lication made herein has been duly published, according to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="94" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0101.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus W Lewis</name><lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>John J Hague</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside default and for leave to answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A A Van wormer</name><lb/> vs 784<lb/> <name>L S Elliott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurer to<lb/> answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>David</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>H N Hart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Richds</unclear> F Sass</name> etal<lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>W Mc Phersen</name></head>
            <p>Motion for bill of particulars filed.<lb/> Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reese J Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> <name>James Clemens</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empan<lb/>neled an sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Buckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-06">Thursday October 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Young</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Burnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Rower</name> etal</head>
            <p>answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Span</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>S F Tenny</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Span</name><lb/> vs 824<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name> garn</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff ordered that the garnishee be discharged at his<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Forster</name><lb/> vs 736<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, <name>Jaeger</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Ann Biddle</name> Estate</head>
            <p>Motion to refer filed by <name>Louis G Picot</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine H Radcliffe</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Fredk E Radcliffe</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="95" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0102.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#758,31.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles E Berrall</name><lb/> vs 857<lb/> <name>William C Whittingham</name></head>
            <p>On check.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files his petition and<lb/> also the appearance of the defendant, whereby the said defendant waives<lb/> the issue and service of process and enters his voluntary appearance to<lb/> this action and agrees that judgment may be rendered against him; and the Court finds from the<lb/> petition and the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the<lb/> plaintiff seven hundred and fifty eight dollars and thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1644,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herron</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name> and<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files his petition and also<lb/> the appearance of the defendants, whereby the said defendants waive the issue<lb/> and service of process and enter their voluntary appearance to this action<lb/> and consent that judgment be rendered if not settled by the present<lb/> term of this Court; thereupon the Court finds form the instruments in writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants owe the plaintiff sixteen hundred and forty four dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 137,91.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> <name>James M Carpenter</name><lb/> and <name>William S Cuddy</name>.<lb/> vs 129<lb/> Steam Boat <name>St Croix</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendant and file an agreement and agree<lb/> that judgment be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs for one hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollar and ninety one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of <name>James H King</name> principal, <name>Benjamin<lb/> F White</name> and <name>Lee P Shryock</name>, securities, in the bond given for the release of<lb/> the defendant the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor by consent of parties execution is stayed forty days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Keevil</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> <name>George Dunforcle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement herein<lb/> in the words and figures following to wit; St Louis <date when="1859-08-25">August 25th 1859</date>, <name>William<lb/> H Keevil</name>, plaintiff, vs <name>George Dunford</name> defendant. In the St Louis Circuit Court,<lb/> Missouri. <name>George Dunford</name>, plaintiff, vs <name>William H Keevil</name>, defendant. In St Louis Court of Common<lb/> Pleas Missouri. The plaintiff and defendant, in each of the above entitled, suits, anxious to end all litigation<lb/> and restore former relations of friendship, agree as follows, to wit; 1. That each of said suits be and the same<lb/> are hereby dismissed, each part to pay their respective costs. 2. And the said <name>Keevil</name>, being now satisfied<lb/> that he was in error, touching any written or verbal statements heretofore made by him which tended to im<lb/>peach the moral social or commercial standing and character of said <name>Dunford</name>, with pleasure doth<lb/> hereby withdraw any such statement. 3. And said <name>Dunford</name> accepts the explanation thus tendered him as<lb/> satisfactory. 4. And each of said parties promise in good faith to strive in future to forget and forgive<lb/> all matters of difference and restore their former relations in trade and business. <name>W, H Keevil</name><lb/> <name>Geo Dunford</name>. Test. <name>O G Gates</name>: and by consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed, each party paying his own costs, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p><name>William H Osbour</name>, Commissioner, files his report and exhibits, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I,</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Richard J Lockwood</name> who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of man<lb/>cipation to his slave, <unclear><name>Ezerilda Morris</name></unclear>, a negro man, aged about thirty nine years, of blacker dark mu<lb/>latts color.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="96" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0103.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name>, <name>Matilda Goss</name>,<lb/> <name>Frederick Goss</name>, <name>Mary Louisa Goss</name>,<lb/> and <name>David Goss</name>, by their guardian,<lb/> <name>Henry Goss</name>, <name>Elizabeth Hoke</name>, and<lb/> her husband <name>George W Hoke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> and <name>Emeline</name>, his wife,<lb/> <name>Therese Latimer</name> and her husband<lb/> <name>David Latimer</name>.</head>
            <p>In Partition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and file their petition<lb/> and also come the defendants and waiving the issue and service of<lb/> process file their appearance and answer herein; and the parties<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the petition and answer herein,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> as certain and determine that the said <name>Elizabeth Hoke</name> wife of<lb/> <name>George W Hoke</name>, <name>Emeline</name>, wife of <name>James Cohick</name>, <name>Therese</name>, wife<lb/> of <name>David Latimer</name> are each entitled in fee simple to one undivi<lb/>ded seventh, <name>James Cohick</name> is entitled in fee simple to three un<lb/>divided sevenths, <name>Adeline Goss</name>, <name>Matilda Goss</name>, <name>Frederick Goss</name>, <name>Mary Louisa Goss</name>, and <name>David Goss</name><lb/> are each entitled in fee simple to one thirty fifth of the real estate, situated in the County of St Louis<lb/> State of Missouri, described in the petition as follows, towit: a tract of land in St Ferdinand Town<lb/>ship, being Township 46 Range six East, containing one hundred and ten acres, more or less, and boun<lb/>ded Southwest by land of <name>Bernard McManemy</name>, Southeast by land of <name>Bernard McManemy</name>, North<lb/> east by land of said <name>M Manemy</name>, and Northwest by land of said <name>M Manemy</name>, being the same<lb/> tract on which <name>David M Martin</name> resided at the time of his death and the same acquired by him<lb/> of <name>William Hooper</name> by deed dated <date when="1827-03-12">March, 12th,1827</date>, and recorded in the Recorders Office of<lb/> St Louis County in Book N, page 348, in part, and also in part by deed of <name>Thomas Withington</name>,<lb/> dated <date when="1830-05-14">May, 14th 1830</date>, and recorded in said Office in Book D No 2 Page 12: Also, a certain other<lb/> a stone being the Southeast corner of <name>John Hentze</name>'s land running with said <name>Hentze</name> line ninety nine<lb/> and a half rods to a stone, the Northeast corner of <name>Fergus Ferguson</name> land, thence with said <name>Ferguson</name>'s<lb/> line sixty eight and one half rods to a stone, the Southeast corner of said <name>Ferguson</name> land, thence<lb/> running East with the old line to <name>Bernard McManemy</name> corner on the East of Cold Water creek,<lb/> thence down said creek with said <name>McManemy</name> line to the beginning corner, and being the same ac<lb/>quired by said <name>David M Martin</name>, of <name>Adam Martin</name> and wife by deed dated <date when="1838-01-27">January 27th, 1838</date>,<lb/> and recorded in said office in book D No 2 page 149. 3 also, another tract of land in said Town<lb/>ship and Range containing thirty five arpens, beginning at the Southeast corner of E Metzs Surveys<lb/> running up ten arpens, thence running a Northeastwardly course three arpens and a half across said tract<lb/> to the Southwest corner of <name>David Martins</name> lands, thence running with the line that separates the<lb/> same from Indian Rodger's Survey to the Northeast corner of said Metzer Survey, thence to the begin<lb/>ning being the same acquired by said <name>David M Martin</name> of <name>Thomas Washington</name> by deed dated<lb/> <date when="1845-08-29">August 29th 1845</date>, and recorded in said Office in Book V No3 page 184: 4 Also, a certain other<lb/> tract of land in the same Township and Range, containing twenty seven arpens, beginning on the lower<lb/> comer of <name>George Hall</name> land and winning thence one fourth of an arpen in width to the corner of land.<lb/> conveyed by <name>Thomas Withington Sr</name> to <name>John Hentz</name>, thence the same width between the said <name>Hall</name><lb/> and <name>Hentz</name> the distance of ten arpens, when it joins the land of <name>Samuel D Walton</name>, thence across said<lb/> land a width of two arpens and across the tract of land owned by <name>Thomas Withington Sr</name> to the outward<lb/> boundary of land conveyed by said <name>Thomas Withington Sr</name> to <name>Thomas Withington Jr</name>, thence one fourth<lb/> of an arpen in width to the lower corner of said <name>Hentz</name> lands, where the said space bounds upon the land<lb/> of <name>David Martin</name>, said tract of land being the same acquired by said <name>David Martin</name> of <name>Elizabeth<lb/> Withington</name>, <name>Wilson</name> <name>Withington</name>, <name>Thomas Withington, Jr</name>, <name>Thomas Hentz</name> and wife, <name>John Hentz</name> and wife,<lb/> 5 <name>John Hoke</name> and wife, <name>William Mayers</name> and wife <name>Joseph</name> spalding and wife, <name>Joseph Trendley</name> and wife<lb/> also, a certain other tract of land in Township 47, Range five East, being a part of United States<lb/> survey No 2038, being lot no five of the Subdivision of said Survey made by the Commissioners<lb/> appointed by the Circuit Court of said County, containing ninety six acres and thirty nine one hun<lb/>dreds of an acre and being the same acquired by said <name>David M Martin</name> of <name>Henry Chouteau</name><lb/> and wife by deed dated <date when="1840-04-01">April 1st, 1840</date>, recorded in the said Office in Book L No 2 Page 314:<lb/> 6 Also, a certain lot of ground in the town of Bridgton, fronting on St Charles street one hundred and<lb/> fifty feet, and running back three hundred feet, and bounded Southeast by <name>Thomas Withington Jr</name>,<lb/> Northwest by St Andrews street, and Northeast by lands of <name>Bernard McManemy</name> and the same</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="97" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0104.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>acquired by said <name>David M Martin</name> of <name>Thomas Wittington Sr</name> by deed dated <date when="1824-02-13">February, 13th,1824</date>,<lb/> and recorded in said office in book L page 495. 7 also, a certain other tract of ground situated<lb/> in the City of St Louis and in Christy Addition to said City and according to <name>G C Brown</name><lb/> Map in Block no forty three in said addition, fronting fifty four feet on Franklin Avenue and<lb/> running back Southwardly one hundred and forty four feet seven and one half inches to an alley<lb/> twenty feet wide and bounded East by <name>Van <unclear>Ranselaer</unclear></name> and <name>Rice</name>, South by an alley twenty feet<lb/> wide, West by <name>J T Sweringer</name> and North by Franklin Avenue and acquired by said <name>David M<lb/> Martin</name> by deed recorded in said Office in Book P No 4 page 242. 8 also, the unexpired term of<lb/> a lease on a lot of ground in said City of St Louis, in <name>William C Carr</name> addition to said City being<lb/> lot No five in block No 18, said lease being dated <date when="1853-01-01">January, 1st 1853</date>, and running eight years from<lb/> the date last aforesaid executed by <name>S D Barlow</name> as Executor of <name>William C Carr</name>. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that petition of said real estate be made among said parties according to their respective<lb/> rights and interests as above as curtained and determined: and the Court appoints <name>David Thomas</name>, <name>George Hall</name>,<lb/> and <name>Thomas Baker</name>, Commissioners to make the said partition in accordance with this judgment, and<lb/> orders that they report of their proceedings without delay.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Fischer</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Adam Fischer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but make defendant, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 752,26<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bensberg</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Sturdel</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>David Strudel</name> deceased<lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>Gerhards Bensberg</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto Igel</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Igel</name>, but the defendant, <name>Bensberg</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiff seven hundred and<lb/> fifty two dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Building Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs 502.<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>, <name>Philip<lb/> Ganbatz</name> and <name>Isaac J Greene</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>P A Ladew</name>, agent for plaintiff, and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 799<lb/> <name>Francis Lunsman</name>, <name>Henry A Fette</name><lb/> and <name>Bernard Rawie</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by its attorney, acknowledges to have received full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham,</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors empanneled and sworn herein, and the plaintiff files a motion for leave<lb/> to amend his declaration so as to enlarge the add annum to fifty thousand<lb/> to fifty thousand dollars, which motion, upon due consideration, is sustained<lb/> by the Court and the amendment made, and thereupon the trial progressed but not being finished is laid<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="98" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0105.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-07">Friday, October 7th 1859.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, acknowledge the execution of a deed in favor of<lb/> <name>Joseph R Wendover</name> for all the eight title interest, claim estate and property of <name>Baylis Chamblen</name><lb/> of in and to the following premises situated in the county of St Louis Gate of Missouri to wit; a lot in<lb/> City block No 505 in <name>James N Lucas</name> addition to the City of St Louis, beginning on the Northern line of Pine<lb/> street at the distance of fifty feet Westward from the Southeast corner of said block thence Westwardly<lb/> with the North line of said Pine Street twenty five feet then Northwardly and parallel to Thirteen street<lb/> one hundred and ninety nine feet one inch to and alley thence Eastwardly with the Southern line of said<lb/> alley twenty five feet thence Southward one hundred and nine feet one inch to the place of beginning,<lb/> it being the lot acquired by <name>Nelson Chamblin</name> from <name>James H Lucas</name> by deed recorded in book K<lb/> vs 4 page 106 of the records of St Louis County: also ten acres of land beginning at the Southwest corner of the<lb/> Sulphur Spring tract, a plat of which tract is one file in said Recorders Office running thence North<lb/> eight and a half degrees East thirteen chains and twelve links to a road forty feet wide, thence along said<lb/> road South three degrees East seven Chains and sixty two links, thence South eight and a half degrees<lb/> West thirteen chains and twelve links to a point in the Southern boundary line of said tract, thence North<lb/> eighty three degrees, West seven chains and sixty two links to the place of beginning containing ten acres being<lb/> the same premises of <name>David W Graham</name> conveyed to <name>Nelson Chamblin</name> by deed recorded in book P No 5 page 151 of said Recorders Office both of which purchases were made by the said <name>Nelson Chamblin</name> and<lb/> were held in trust by him for his own use; Sold by virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk<lb/> of the St Louis Circuit returnable to the <date when="1859-09">September Term 1859</date> said Court in favor of <name>Nathaniel N<lb/> Halsted</name> and <name>Joseph Brokaw</name> against <name>Baylis Chamblin</name>.</p>
            <p><name>Adam D Stewart</name>, who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of eman<lb/>cipation to his slave <name>Julia Ann Ray</name>, a mulatts, aged about twenty four, of medium height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1154,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brown</name><lb/> vs 423.<lb/> <name>James S Bissell</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin H Stevens</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and on his motion it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the judgment rendered herein be set aside and vacted, and<lb/> the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants owe the plaintiff eleven hundred and fifty four dollars and<lb/> twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover, of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 306,75.</note>
            <note>Set aside 29p114.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carlos S Greely</name> <name>Mathas Steitz</name><lb/>, and <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name><lb/> vs 749<lb/> <name>John W Schaerff</name>, <name>Charles Schaerff</name><lb/>, <name>John H Helmuth</name> and <name>William Zeller</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, <name>John<lb/> W Schaerff</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants owe plaintiffs three<lb/> hundred and six dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 431,12.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abel J Anderson</name><lb/> vs 131<lb/> <name>Walter E Sell</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars and twelve cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and also this costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="99" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0106.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 418,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>Luther C Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward Dodge</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs 799<lb/> <name>James Verdin</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes<lb/> the plaintiffs four hundred and eighteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs, recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2159,84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loyal P Kellogg</name> and<lb/> <name>William Parker</name><lb/> vs 780<lb/> <name>Edwin R Mason</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is found that the defendant owes<lb/> the plaintiffs twenty one hundred and fifty nine dollars and eighty four cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs, recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan L Rice</name><lb/> vs 184<lb/> <name>William C Berry</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that that the defendant be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and ninety nine dollars and twenty cents, on account of goods sold by the firm of <name>G P<lb/> Theobald</name> Co to the defendant, which is due plaintiff as assignee of the account; and that his property has<lb/> been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St<lb/> Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the<lb/> third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him<lb/> and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published accor<lb/>ding to law, in the St Louis Evening Bulletin, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1800,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Tamm</name><lb/> vs 854<lb/> <name>James Halpin</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his duly sworn statement, confessing himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred dollars and authorizing the entering up of<lb/> judgment against him for that amount. It therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Keys</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first obtained, Sheriff amends his return of the execution issued<lb/> herein returnable to the present term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zeb F Wetzell</name> etal<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Joseph Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication made herein has been duly published, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly warned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin A Williams</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant <name>Henry M Woodward</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; on motion of plaintiff ordered that an alias<lb/> Summons issue for Moies.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>W C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson T Wright</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="100" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0107.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blevin</name> etal<lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>A Hinzpeter</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard Rothgerber</name> etal<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Solomon K Lawrence</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas M Elleard</name><lb/> vs 561<lb/> <name>Chas L Hunt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>C L Hunt</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W Harris</name><lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 658<lb/> <name>James A Lee</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answered and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrell's</name> admr. etal<lb/> vs 43.<lb/> <name>Jas Brennon</name>'s admr &amp; etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Shuler</name><lb/> vs 665<lb/> <name>Henry Klunk</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs and answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Valentine Ries</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt N Martin</name><lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>W Truesdail</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="101" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0108.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-08">Saturday October 8th 1859.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93.<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Notice of motion filed. On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, a dedimus is<lb/> awarded them to take depositions in Indiana on the seventeenth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1366,73.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cabinet Makers Union</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> owes the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and sixty six dollars and seventy three cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and its costs<lb/> herein expended have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2394,28.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Closterman</name><lb/> vs 575<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange. Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the plain<lb/>tiff twenty three hundred and ninety four dollars and twenty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#614,85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Battelle M Jones</name><lb/> vs 223.<lb/> <name><unclear>Leroy</unclear> Griffin</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds form the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the plain<lb/>tiff six hundred and fourteen dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Judgment<lb/> revived.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David A Davidson</name> administrator<lb/> de bonis non of <name>Michael Null</name>.<lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>John Dillon</name></head>
            <p>Sir fa to revive judgment and lien.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Edward A Nickerson</name>, administrator de<lb/> bonis non of the estate of <name>Michael Null</name>, deceased, by his attorney,<lb/> and on his motion and it appearing to the Court that he is duly<lb/> qualified as such administrator, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> he be substituted as plaintiff, and the sad although duly summoned, and being three times solemnly<lb/> called, comes not, neither hath he answered the said writ, wherefore it is ordered that his default be<lb/> entered: and it is considered by the Court that the judgment aforesaid rendered in this Court, on the<lb/> <date when="1852-10-18">eighteenth day of October, eighteen hundred and fifty two</date>, for the sum of one thousand and eighty<lb/> two dollars and eighty five cents, with interest and costs, be revived, and the line thereof be continued for<lb/> a period of two years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#550,00<lb/> Special.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Gettys</name><lb/> vs 95.<lb/> <name>George W Jope</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and file proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been published according<lb/> to law, but the defendant, although duly warned and called, comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant owes plaintiffs five hundred and fifty dollars. It is there<lb/> fore considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor against<lb/> the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="102" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0109.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 618,05.<lb/> vs <name>Ruth</name> and<lb/> <name>Marsh</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>Charles G Ruth</name>, <name>William<lb/> Young</name> and <name>Frank Marsh</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to <name>William<lb/> Young</name>, but the other defendants, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the instr<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants owe<lb/> the plaintiff six hundred and eighteen dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1153,86.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 631<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but make default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants owe the plaintiffs eleven hundred and fifty three dollars and eighty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>William C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Heyer</name><lb/> vs 702<lb/> <name>Jno <unclear>Ludewig</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W Darby</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Perry Cornell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herron</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Putnam</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dan J Cleveland</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pat K Avery</name> etal<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Peter Harmon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Welling</name> etal<lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Robt P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Meyers</name>.<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>W C Molloy</name> etal</head>
            <p><name>William J Kribben</name> guardian ad litem of <name>H J Stevens</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David H Evans</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Robt Fedorow</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Rolf</name> and <name>Ernig</name> to amended petition filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas M Elleard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas L Hunt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Mary Hunt</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bauer</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo A Smith</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J Smith</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> The Steam boat <name>Brunette</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendant, although duly called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> it as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hanna</name><lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>Edward Morgan</name></head>
            <p>Six additional days are given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pacific Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Dewitt C Sanford</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J W Spalding</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="103" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0110.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 270,04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry L Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B Field</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a duly verified statement confessing himself<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy dollars and<lb/> four cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the petition<lb/> Of<lb/> <name>Peter L Vandeventer</name></head>
            <p>Now come the said <name>Peter L Vandeventer</name>, by attorney, and files a petitions,<lb/> upon consideration of which, it is ordered by the Court that a Commission<lb/> to perpetuate the testimony of <name>Francois Noise</name> dit <name>L Abbe</name> issue to<lb/> <name>Charles A Mantz</name> Clerk of the St Louis Land Court, or to any Court of Record or Judge or Justice of the Peace<lb/> of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files an affidavit and also a<lb/>bond which bond is approved, whereupon it is ordered that an attachment<lb/> in aid issue against <name>Frederick Pillman</name> to the Sheriff of St Louis County and<lb/> also to Lincoln County returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Phelps</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Albert G Edwards</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ino P Hunt</name> etal<lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>Benj <unclear>Slatern</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Slater</name> and<lb/> <name>Johnson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Samuel Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas R Lamp</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Nicholas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benj Mercadier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Gilsey</name><lb/> vs 273.<lb/> <name>Edwd A Damon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State us of <name>Midas</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Simon Meyberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed. Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Berby</name><lb/> vs 786.<lb/> <name>Chas Curtiss</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm C Walker</name> etal<lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Chas Curtiss</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno G Falconer</name> etal<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>Chas Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo B Cooper</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E B Brown</name>, <name>Isaac L Down</name> &amp; <name>G Swaberg</name><lb/> gain of St Louis Alton Chicago R Rules</head>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishee, by attorney, it is ordered that they<lb/> be discharged hence at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. Five dollars is allowed each of said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddeingham</name> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein, and thereupon trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="104" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0111.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-10">Monday October 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>Samuel W Eager</name>, Esq, Jury, Commissioner of St Louis County, and files his resigna<lb/>tion of such, to take effect on the twenty fourth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Labarge</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry W Smith</name><lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>William Whitely</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and files satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James</name> etal<lb/> vs 293<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas B Greene</name> etal<lb/> vs 845<lb/> <name>Chas Gage</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 703.<lb/> <name>Wm H Fackler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Clinton</name><lb/> vs 111<lb/> <name>John Blackburn</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer and motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Larker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patk M cann</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Currie</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>Geo E Currie</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but make default, wherefore petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Penberthy</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer and exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name></head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Jno Nicolay</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayden</name> &amp; <name>Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo L Salisbury</name> and <name>Jno J Guimsley</name><lb/> garn. of <name>Henry Eichar</name> and <name>Thornton<lb/> Ginsley</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Haydon</name> &amp; <name>Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo H Rea</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by<lb/> leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>One week additional time is given plaintiffs to except to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs 833<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>One week additional time is given plaintiffs to except to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gerhard H Fisse</name><lb/> vs 834<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>One week additional time is given plaintiffs to except to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="105" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0112.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Teichmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>Jas Taussig</name> etal garns.</head>
            <p>One week additional time is given plaintiffs to except to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 855,02</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Clark</name>, <name>Robt B<lb/> Clark</name> and <name>Manville Leymour</name><lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comesnot but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiffs eight hundred and<lb/> fifty five dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> etal<lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Michael Mullen</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> etal<lb/> vs 833<lb/> <name>Alvis Stieber</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-11">Tuesday October 11th 1859.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 414,28,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Tennent</name> and<lb/> <name>George A Kerr</name><lb/> vs 855<lb/> <name>John Boggs</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, and also comes the defendant and files his duly<lb/> verified statement confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sworn of<lb/> four hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty eight cents, and authorizing<lb/> the entering up of judgment therefor. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs, recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum after<lb/> the third day of December next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 543,95.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George J Pittman</name>, <name>Albert<lb/> Tennent</name> &amp; <name>George A Kerr</name><lb/> vs 856<lb/> <name>John Boggs</name>,</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment. Now comes the defendant and files a duly verified statement<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and forty three dol<lb/>lars and ninety five cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment therefor. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor, and that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="106" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0113.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>St Louis <date when="1863-08-15">augt 15th 1863</date><lb/> or value received hereby<lb/> assignee all my right little<lb/> and in this in the judgement<lb/> of which this is the margin<lb/> to <name>Charles G S</name> issue<lb/> attest <name>Joseph <unclear>Ross S Rice</unclear></name> clk</note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Oker</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> and<lb/> <name>Dominick Urban</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and it appearing to the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff has given security for costs, therefore on motion of plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered that the motion to dismiss be overruled; and the defendants<lb/> although duly called come not but make default, wherefore the petition is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants owe the plaintiff fourteen hundred and eighteen dollars and<lb/> fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John F Darby</name>, who is personally, known acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to <name>James<lb/> Madden</name>, of dark color, aged twenty seven years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>George J Camp</name> and <name>Charles Maurice</name>, who are personally known to the Court, acknowledge the execution<lb/> of a deed of emancipation to slave <name>Albert Honesty</name>, aged forty three years, about five feet eight inches in<lb/> height, black complexion, all the fingers on his night hand lost.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Geo W Hungerford</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert S Regor</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2414,74.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Little</name><lb/> vs 809<lb/> <name>John Brady Smith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his duly verified statement confessing himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty four hundred and fourteen dollars and seventy four<lb/> cents and authorizing the entering of judgment therefor. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expen<lb/>ded have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>W Jamison</name>, as security, which<lb/> is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs 841<lb/> <name>G E Hawley</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Time to answer herein is extended one week.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagie Lee</name></head>
            <p>Notice <unclear rend="strikethrough">of</unclear> to defendent filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Knauss</name> etal<lb/> vs 539<lb/> <name>Chas S Cox</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Turner</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff by his attorneys, acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J P Symonds</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W O Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions on behalf of <name>John N Bofinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J P Symonds</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W O Wheeler</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions on behalf of <name>John N Bofinger</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="107" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0114.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name> etal<lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Henry N Hart</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published ac<lb/>cording to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not being fin<lb/>ished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-12">Wednesday, October 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Louis Jean</name> <name>Q Verdier</name>, whose identity is proven by <name>E Hill</name> and <name>William Stevens</name>, exclaimed<lb/> under oath, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to Jury Whiting, aged about fifty nine<lb/> nine years, dark complexion, about five feet ten inches in height, small sear on forehead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2888,11.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Southern Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>William M George</name>, <name>Alfred J Moore</name>,<lb/> <name>William T Moore</name>, <name>Jury L Broadwater</name>,<lb/> <name>John Whitchill</name> and <name>John W Hathaway</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants one the plaintiff twenty<lb/> eight hundred and eighty eight dollars and eleven cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cox</name><lb/> vs 385<lb/> <name>Anthony Cunninghame</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against him, on account of a prom<lb/>issory note, for the sum two hundred and twelve dollars, and that his property<lb/> has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or be before<lb/> the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engels</name> admr<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bunicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Notice of Motion and motion for attachment against receiver filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="108" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0115.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 1658,53.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs 223<lb/> <name>William Whitely Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Haseltine</name>, and<lb/> <name>James C Haseltine</name>.</head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly warned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants owe the plaintiff<lb/> the sum of Sixteen hundred and fifty eight dollars and fifty three cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs 594<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> garns of<lb/> <name>Wm Whitely</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said garnishee although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff<lb/> the interrogatories be taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Enoch Sloan</name>, who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to <name>Henry</name>, a slave, aged forty years, light built, brown complexion, five feet five inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name>,<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanneled<lb/> and sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-13">Thursday, October 13th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjourned. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name><lb/> vs 837<lb/> <name>Thos M Taylor</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Marshall</name> et al<lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 199,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Walsh</name><lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiff one hun<lb/>dred and ninety nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 177,26</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Heber Livermore</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name><lb/> vs 537<lb/> <name>Hugh Lackey</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and move the Court for judgment upon the<lb/> answer herein, which, upon consideration is sustained; and the Court finds that the<lb/> defendant owes the plaintiffs one hundred and seventy seven dollars and twenty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="109" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0116.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Peter Richard</name> <name><unclear>Kenrick</unclear></name>, <name>Edward Walsh</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Withnell</name> executors of <name>John<lb/> Thornton</name> deceased.</head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the application of the said<lb/> petitioners that <name>James T Thomas</name>, one of the trustees in a<lb/> deed of trust executed by <name>Thomas Campbell</name> recorded in<lb/> the Recorders Office of St Louis County in Book 167 page<lb/> 416, has departed this life, and <name>John Hartnett</name>, the other<lb/> trustee in said deed of trust, has removed from this State without having completed the performance<lb/> of the duties imposed on them by said deed of trust; therefore it is ordered by the Court that <name>Michael S<lb/> Cerre</name> Sheriff of St Louis County, be appointed and substituted trustee to execute said deed of trust in<lb/> place of the said original trustee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>Charles Labarge</name></name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his Attorney, until the fourteenth day of November next<lb/> is given him to plead herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine W Livermore</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>George F Livermore</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and by leave of Court first obtained<lb/> amends her petition by striking out prayer for alimony and allowance penden<lb/>te lite, but the defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Hayden</name> and<lb/> <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be noti<lb/>fied that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of three<lb/> hundred and seventy eight dollars and seventy one cents, on account of a draft ac<lb/>cepted by the defendant, that his property has been attached; and unless he appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold<lb/> to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the<lb/> Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Haydon</name> and<lb/> <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p> Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of<lb/> one hundred and one dollars and ninety two cents on account of a promissory<lb/> note executed by the defendant; and that hi property has been attached, and<lb/> unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be gun and held at the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof<lb/> answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law,<lb/> in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Dietrich</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J Murdock</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles K Dickson</name><lb/> and <name>Nathan Komes</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery. The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to<lb/> law, claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said petition to the Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed, if said property be not delivered to him<lb/> to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="110" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0117.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name>, <name>James Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> and <name>Henry S Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James McQuoid</name> and <name>Louis<lb/> Charleville</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having filed a petition and also an affidavit sta<lb/>ting that the defendant, <name>James McQuoid</name>, is a non resident of this<lb/> State, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against him for the sum of two thousand dollars<lb/> on account of a bill of exchange executed by Louis Charleville and accepted by defendant <name>James McQuoid</name><lb/> and that his property has been attached; and unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be<lb/> begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of Febru<lb/>ary next, and in or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will<lb/> be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 770<lb/> <name>Thomas S Warne</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, ordered that this cause be dismissed at its costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 732<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the judgment herein be set aside and vacated and this cause be<lb/> dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Louis Engel</name> deceased.<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and <name>Susan Bernicker</name> his wife</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for an attachment being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court, it is ordered that an attachment issue against <name>Frederick W Engel</name><lb/> receiver returnable Tuesday 18th instant to answer a contempt for failing to<lb/> obey the order made herein requiring herein to pay over to defendants all<lb/> rents and moneys which have come to his hands as receiver in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empan<lb/>nelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed, but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="111" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0118.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-14">Friday October 14th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Kelly</name> etal<lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Richard Waters</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, its is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 624<lb/> <name>Chas R Anderson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Rebecca Fairman</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Charles M Fairman</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof that the order of publica<lb/>tion made herein has been duly published according to law; but the defendant,<lb/> although duly waived and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt R Lewick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Until November third is given garnishee to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A Hanna</name><lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>E Morgan</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Owen V Timon</name><lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>Cha L Freeman</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court, first obtained, defendants amends his answer by adding an affi<lb/>davit there to.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> etal</head>
            <p>On Execution 299 <date when="1859-09">Sept Term 1859</date>.</p>
            <p>On motion of garnishees <name>Isaac Rosenfeld, Jr</name>, <name>Jno How</name>, <name>Carlos Grealey</name>, <name>Augustus<lb/> F Shapleigh</name> and <name>Mathias Steitz</name> by their attorney, it is ordered that they de dis<lb/>charged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. Five dollars allowed each.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Cooper</name> trustee<lb/> vs 319<lb/> The <name>H M Vicker</name></head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W White's</name> admr<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Cha H Avis</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence O Brooks</name><lb/> vs 565<lb/> <name>Jno D Daggett</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Phillips</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B F Hutchinson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and thereupon the trial progressed, but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="112" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0119.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-15">Saturday October 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 470,97</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Pfau</name> and<lb/> <name>John M Pfau</name><lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>H A Schuermann</name> and <name>Frederick W Keferstein</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly waived and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants owe plaintiffs four hundred and seventy dollars and ninety<lb/> seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>The Commissioners, appointed to examine into the affairs of St Louis County, exhibit<lb/> and file their accounts for services, and the Court audits the same and allows to <name>John<lb/> Simonds</name>, Six hundred and ninety six dollars, to <name>Frederick Hyatt</name>, two hundred and<lb/> eight dollars, to <name>Edward Haren</name>, seven hundred and six dollars and fifty cents, for this services to this date,<lb/> and orders that the said amounts be certified to the Board of Commissioners of St Louis County for payment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs 841<lb/> <name>G E Hawley</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Homan</name> etal<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Newton S Gay</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm T Matters</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt H Hodgson</name> etal<lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Walter L F Gage</name> etal</head>
            <p>Replication filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sam Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Hastings</name> etal<lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Henry S Parker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Waddingham</name> &amp; Excr.<lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>H M Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 292,21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Balmer</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles G Weber</name><lb/> vs 628<lb/> <name>Charles Fritz</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> ninety two dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>Geo W Hungerford</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant a dedimus is awarded him to Texas.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="113" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0120.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 822<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Answers of <name>E B Brown</name> and <name>G Schwarberg</name> filed: also answer of<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Answers of <name>E B Brown</name> and <name>G Schwarberg</name> filed; also answer of<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Currie</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>Geo E Currie</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by attorney, and by consent of plaintiff, the interlocutory judgment<lb/> of default, herein is set aside and vacated; by consent and leave the defendant files an<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James clermens</name> for etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial progressed but<lb/> not being finished is laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-17">Monday October 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>J S Fullerton</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
            <p><name>Hary I Bodley</name> who is personally known to the Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emanci<lb/>pation to his slave Melinda, a negro woman of dark or black complexion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 341,56</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Maris</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Couch</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his duly verified statement confessing himself indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty one dollars and fifty six cents and<lb/> authorizing the entering up of judgment against him for that sum. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at seven per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 426,90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George F Staehlin</name> and<lb/> <name>Jnome Stachlin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolph P Faw</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Loepke</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants an file a statement in writing duly verified<lb/> by affidavit confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> four hundred and twenty six dollars and ninety cents and authorizing the<lb/> entering up of judgment against them for that sum. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="114" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0121.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 319,00.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl of S Greeley</name>, <name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> and <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name><lb/> vs 749<lb/> <name>John W Schaerff</name>, <name>Charles Schaerff</name>,<lb/> <name>John H Helmuth</name> and <name>William Zeller</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and, on their motion, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the judgment herein rendered be set<lb/> aside and vacated; but the defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court find<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and nineteen dollars. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name> and <name>William H Campbell</name><lb/> vs 398.<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> H Gratz</name>, <name>John M Kinnon</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Rathron</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication as to <name>Henry H Gratz</name>.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, file an additional affidavit, from which<lb/> it appears that the defendant <name>Henry H Gratz</name> is a non res<lb/>ident of this State, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs,<lb/> by their attorney, it is ordered that the said defendant<lb/> be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of five hundred and eighty nine dollars, on account of a bill of exchange, and that<lb/> unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof, an<lb/>swer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will be taken against him as confessed. And<lb/> it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper,<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Wright</name> &amp; etal<lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>R W Rogers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, <name>R W Rogers</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed; and on motion of the assignees, the Court appoints <name>Newton<lb/> L Greenfield</name>, and <name>George Mitchell</name> appraisers to appraise the assets so inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Peters</name> etal<lb/> vs 274<lb/> a</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by attorney, ordered that this cause be dismissed at their costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, fifteen days are given him to file excep<lb/>tions to Commissioners report.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno K Walkers</name> Exr<lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>James Walker</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Carlos S Greeley</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Answers filed by garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, until the twenty eight instant<lb/> is given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Meyers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="115" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0122.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name>,<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors empanneled and sworn, and the trial progressed <unclear>be stand</unclear> being<lb/> finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-18">Tuesday October 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Herman Stein</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Herman Stein</name> and files an application, duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, and also the affidavit of <name>Christopher Meyer</name>; and upon<lb/> satisfactory evidence presented to this Court it is ordered to be certified<lb/> that Land Warrant No 38011 for one hundred and sixty acres as issued to <name>Christopher Meyer</name><lb/> under the act of 1855 was regularly assigned to <name>Herman Stein</name>, that he is the absolute holder and<lb/> owner thereof having purchased it for a valuable consideration.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barney Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt H Renick</name> etal<lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by<lb/> consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The <name>Allen</name> etal<lb/> vs 830<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> et l garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Henry M Hart</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name> etal<lb/> vs 393.<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, ordered that an alias Summons issue to Lafayette<lb/> County for <name>Andrew J Alexander</name> returnable to next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Abram J Stevenson</name> etal<lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G H Fisse</name><lb/> vs 834<lb/> <name>Jas Taussing</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of<lb/> <name>Char H <unclear>Poertner</unclear></name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs 833.<lb/> <name>Jas Taussing</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Charles H<lb/> <unclear>Poertner</unclear></name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Char H Teichmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>Jas Taussing</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Char<lb/> <unclear>Poertner</unclear></name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Jas Taussing</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Charles<lb/> <unclear>Poertner</unclear></name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>


<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="116" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0123.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Jacob Lache vs Geo Mosbacher et al <!--"860" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Plaintiff files a bond for costs, with J Dornife, as security, which is approved.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Caspar Wiegand vs James Coff et al <!--"449" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>By leave of Court defendants file an answer and exhibit herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Ja<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> M Franciseux vs W<hi rend="superscript">m</hi> A Bassett &amp; Christian <unclear unit="chars" quantity="1" rend="overwrite">S</unclear>haffler et al</head>
    <p>Plaintiff files an assignment of the judgment herein to Franklin Weston</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application of Louisa, alias Louisa Lewis, and her minor son George.</head>
    <bibl><relatedItem target="ccr1859.06904.064.xml"/></bibl>
    <p>The said Louisa alias Louisa Lewis files her petition and upon con- <lb rend="hyphen"/> sideration thereof it is ordered by the Court that the said petitioner <lb/> be allowed to sue for the freedom of herself and of her child, George, <lb/> on giving security satisfactory to the Clerk for all costs that may <lb/> be adjudged against her; ordered further that they have reasonable to attend their counsel and the <lb/> Court as occasion may require, that they be not removed out of the jurisdiction of this Court, and be <lb/> not subject to any severity on account of their application for freedom.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">David M<hi rend="superscript">c</hi>Kee vs Cha<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Boswell <!--"482" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>On motion of plaintiff a dedimus is awarded him to Pennsylvania.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Louis G. Picot vs Miles G Moies et al</head>
    <p>Motion to apply money returned by Sheriff filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Michael Larkin vs Pat<hi rend="superscript">k</hi> M<hi rend="superscript">c</hi>Cann <!--"275" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Reply filed <lb/> by leave.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Louis Engel'<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> admr vs George L Bernicker et al</head>
    <p>Proof of Service of Attachment filed. <lb/> Now come the plaintiff, and defendants, by their Attorneys, and also comes <lb/> Frederick W Engel and files an answer to the attachment for contempt <lb/> and the Court, upon consideration of the premises, doth order that the said Engel pay over forthwith to the <lb/> Clerk of this Court all rents and moneys which he may have collected by virtue of his receivership in <lb/> this cause, and that upon the payment thereof and the costs of the writ of attachment herein he be discharged <lb/> from custody under said writ; thereupon the said Frederick W Engel pays over to Stephen Rice, Clerk <lb/> of this Court the sum of three hundred and eight dollars and eighty cents, on account of rents and moneys <lb/> received by him as receiver, and also the sum of one dollar and fifty cents, the costs of said writ of attachment <lb/> and takes his receipt therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <p>Peter Wegman, Marshall of St Louis County, in open Court acknowledges the execution of a deed <lb/> in favor of Edward Beckman and William Beckman for all the right title, interest, claim, es- <lb rend="hyphen"/> tate and property of Ewald Herweg in and to the following described property in the County of <lb/> St Louis State of <choice><orig>Mifsouri</orig><reg>Missouri</reg></choice>, to wit; Lot Number 22 in Block Number 22 in the town of Kirk- <lb rend="hyphen"/> wook, in St Louis County, as the same is laid down in the plat of said town on file in the office <lb/> of County Recorder of St Louis County, containing fifty feet front on Main street in said town <lb/> by a depth of one hundred and forty feet, bounded on the South by said Main street East by <lb/> lot number twenty three in said Block, North by an alley 20 feet wide, and West by lot Number <lb/> 20 in said block being the same lot which was conveyed to said Ewald Herweg by deed <lb/> from Kirkwood Association bearing date the <date when="1853-06-01"> first day of June, 1853</date>, and recorded in Book S</p>
</div2>
</div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="117" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0124.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>No 6 page 120 in the Recorders Office of St Louis County; sold under and by virtue of an<lb/> execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Law Commissioners Court on the<lb/> <date when="1859-07-20">twentieth day of July 1859</date>, on a judgment in favor of <name>Edward Beckman</name> and <name>William Beckman</name><lb/> against <name>Ewald Herweg</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanneled<lb/> and sworn herein, and the trial progressed, but not being finished is laid over until<lb/> tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-19">Wednesday, October 19th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Joseph Kaufer</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs, as ordered by the Court, therefore<lb/> on motion of the defendant, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
            <p><name>Abraham Newmark</name> files an assignment to <name>Morris Raphaelsky</name>, and the said <name>Raphaelsky</name><lb/> files an Inventory, and on his motion, the Court appoints <name>John q Meyers</name> and <name>Judah A Hart</name> ap<lb/>praisers to appraise the assets so inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tho C Fletcher</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Nehemiah Holmes</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sunderland G Sears</name> etal<lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Isaac Gregg</name>.</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Pennsyl<lb/>vania.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Siever</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants file an answer and counterclaim and also file, as exhibits, three due<lb/> bills or orders, two notes, one deed and a copy of a deed and also tax receipt.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 475,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, and the defendant also comes and files a<lb/> statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, confessing himself indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seventy five dollars and authorizing the<lb/> entering up of judgment against him for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 601,20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valli</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>John Deane</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and waiving claim for ten per cent interest, moves<lb/> the Court for judgment on the answer herein, which motion, upon due consideration by the<lb/> Court is sustained; and the Court finds that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="118" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0125.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>the sum of six hundred and one dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos Rees</name> etal<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Mary R Dufresne</name></head>
            <p>Agreement concerning depositions filed.</p>
            <p><name>E M Barnum</name>, whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>C H Branscomb</name> and <name>D C Tuttle</name>, examined<lb/> under oath, exhibits and files a power of attorney from <name>James B Orme</name>, and by Virtue of the power therein confessed,<lb/> in the name and behalf of said <name>James B Orme</name>, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to a negro<lb/> man named <name>David</name>, of yellow color, the property of said <name>Orme</name>, and aged about thirty four years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh McKelvy</name><lb/> vs 849<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Alex J P Gareschi</name>, attorney for the plaintiff, and files an order<lb/> from the plaintiff to dismiss this suit, and on motion of said attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plain<lb/>tiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jurors empanneled and sworn herein and the trial progressed and<lb/> being finished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-20">Thursday October 20th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed. The assignee files a bond in the sum of thirteen<lb/> thousand one hundred and fifty dollars and fourteen cents with <name>Geo Harvey<lb/> Edwin H Wheedon</name> and <name>Henry N Hart</name>, as securities; on motion of the<lb/> assignee <unclear>teirs</unclear> ordered by the Court that he proceed to sell the assets assigned at private sale until the first<lb/> Monday of December next.</p>
            <p><name>Francis P Blair, Jr</name>, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his negro woman, <name>Sarah</name>,<lb/> wife of <name>Henry Duppe</name>, aged about forty two or forty three years, light colored, medium size, also a negro girl<lb/> Courtenay, daughter of said <name>Sarah</name>, aged about fourteen years, also <name>Caroline</name>, daughter of said <name>Sarah</name>, age<lb/> about twelve years, <name>Sallie</name>, daughter of said <name>Sarah</name>, aged about nine years. Said <name>Blair</name> being personally known to Court</p>
            <p><name>Francis P Blair, Jr</name>, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his slave <name>Lewis Williams</name> aged<lb/> forty five years, five feet eight or nine inches, dark color and medium size. Said <name>Blair</name> being personally<lb/> known to the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="119" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0126.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> <name>Barge Grey Hoinel</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>Henry Kattelman</name>, Constable of St Louis Township files a state<lb/>ment from which it appears that he has seized the <name>Barge Grey <unclear>Houn</unclear> Cun<lb/>der</name> a writ issued by <name>C D Wolff</name> a Justice of the Peace within and for the Coun<lb/>ty of St Louis, and the five days have elaspsed since said seizure, and no person has given bond for the<lb/> release of said barge, therefore it is ordered that said <name>Constable</name> proceed to sell said barge, by publication<lb/> to the highest bidder for cash, first giving twenty days notice of the time and place of sale by publication<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Petition<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Addison G Bragg</name>, <name>Oliver T<lb/> Bragg</name>, and <name>Michael Burrowes</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the application of said<lb/> petitioners that <name>Fidelio C Sharp</name>, trustee in a deed of trust executed<lb/> by <name>William I Lockwoode</name>, dated <date when="1857-08-15">August 5th 1857</date>, has never exe<lb/>cuted or accepted the trust and declines to accept the same, therefore<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that <name>Arthur Hussey</name> be and he is hereby substituted trustee, to execute and<lb/> carry out the trusts created in and by said deed, in lien of the said <name>Sharp</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos H West</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Chas M Elleard</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Finnerty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James R Davis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Attachment.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias<lb/> summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Joseph Kaufer</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside dismissal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Pillman</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 818<lb/> <name>Leopold R Strauss</name> garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> he be discharged hence at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis P Corby</name> etal<lb/> vs 821<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the said garnishee although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the interrogatories herein<lb/> are taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Co</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Depositions for plain<lb/>tiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno P Gould</name> etal<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>Geo Trowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
            <p><name>Charles G Keyes</name> and <name>Frederick F Burlock</name>, having been licensed to practice law<lb/> in all of the Courts of the State of Missouri, on motion, are admitted and enrolled as mem<lb/>bers of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="120" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0127.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name> etal<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>Ann Brennan</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>James Brennan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Petition to set aside <name>Will</name>.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come<lb/> a jury, to wit; <name>Charles H Wood</name>, <name>Charles Pabst</name>, <name>P J Thompson</name>, <name>Tho<lb/> H Swain</name>, <name>James Wilson</name>, <name>John Woodcock</name>, <name>John Massey</name>, <name>A Bohlinger</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Leahey</name>, <name>Alexander M Curdy</name>, <name>D St Vrain</name> and <name>Milton<lb/> Craig</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over<lb/> until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marie Sinel</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore A Dame</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a petition for an injunction and the Court, after hearing the agree<lb/>ments of counsel, takes time to consider thereof.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-21">Friday October 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F Given</name> etal<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>John B S Lemoine</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement, and by their<lb/> consent it is ordered by the Court that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court cause all the original<lb/> papers, including pleadings, motions, exhibits, depositions, stipulation, to be filed in the Office of the Clerk of<lb/> said St Louis Court of Common Pleas, with a certified copy of the record entries herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 368,49</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>S F Atherton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W Harrold Smith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files the statement of the defendant<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty<lb/> eight dollars and forty nine cents, and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out and of the <name>John Nicolay</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>William Henessey</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa</name> alias <name>Louisa Lewis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a petition for freedom.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml Gaty</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of answer of <name>Egbert B Brown</name>, filed. Exceptions to answers of<lb/> <name>G B Sweet</name> and <name>Geo C Hawley</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="121" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0128.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>I, <name>Norman Cutter</name> hereby assignee the judgment of which this is<lb/> the margin to <name>Saml L M Barlow</name>, for value received <date when="1859-11-22">Oct<lb/> 22nd 1859</date>.<lb/> Attest.<lb/> <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clk Circuit Court <name>Norman Cutter<lb/> Verdict</name> and<lb/> Judgt for 11/15th,<lb/> of premises &amp;<lb/> #40,000,00 <unclear>dands</unclear></note>
            <note>&amp; # 73300 mo<lb/> value.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name>,<lb/> <name>James Clemens, Jr</name>, <name>Richard<lb/> Graham</name>, <name>Catharine Graham</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Chambers</name>,<lb/> <name>Jane Chambers</name>, his wife, <name>William S Harney</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary Harney</name>, his wife. <name>Octavia<lb/> Delany</name>, <name>Bryan M Clemens</name>, <name>Jeremiah W Clemens</name>, <name>Catharine<lb/> J Clemens</name>, <name>Helen J Clemens</name>, <name>Alice<lb/> B Clemens</name> and the City of St Louis.</head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and the<lb/> plaintiff suggests to the Court the deaths of <name>William Waddingham</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard Graham</name>, since the commencement of this suit; and also come<lb/> the Jurors, empanneled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict<lb/> upon their oaths find the defendants guilty of the trespass and ejectment<lb/> complained of as to eleven fifteenths undivided of the land and prem<lb/>isses demanded in plaintiff's declaration and assess the damages sus<lb/>tained by the plaintiff on account of said trespass and ejectment and<lb/> the with holding of the possession of said eleven fifteenths from the plain<lb/>tiff at the sum of forty thousand dollars and assess the monthly value<lb/> of said eleven fifteenths at the sum of seven hundred and thirty three<lb/> dollars per month. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the possession of eleven fifteenth (11/15ths) of the premises situate in the Coun<lb/>ty of St Louis, State of Missouri, mentioned and described in plaintiff's declaration as follows, to wit; a lot<lb/> or parcel of ground situated at a place called the prairie near St Louis or prairie La Grange de Terre<lb/> in said County, being a lot of one arpen, French measure, in width, by forty arpens, like measure, in length,<lb/> and the same tract in said prairie, which was originally granted to one Louis Lirette, and by the said Li<lb/>rette sold to one <name>John Baptiste <unclear>Vifvarrene</unclear></name>, deceased, being Survey number fourteen hundred and seventy nine,<lb/> [1479] as appears by the records of the office of the Surveyor General of Missouri and Illinois, and also the sum<lb/> of forty thousand dollars his damages assessed together with the accruing rents and profits of said premi<lb/>ses at the rate of seven hundred and thirty three dollars per month until possession of said premises be delivered<lb/> to him and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor. Motion to set aside verdict<lb/> and judgment and grant a new trial filed by defendants.</p>
            <p><name>Andrew W Mead</name>, having been regularly licensed to practice law in all the Courts of the State of<lb/> Missouri, is admitted and enrolled as an attorney of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>A M Elliott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A F Shapleigh</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrell</name> admrx etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Brennans</name> admr etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> jury empanneled and sworn herein and the trial progressed, but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>SM Buckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="122" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0129.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-22">Saturday October 22 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Patrick Gregory</name>, a witness in case of <name>Farrell</name> vs <name>Brennan</name>, is discharged from attachment on payment<lb/> of the costs thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Assignment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#116,09.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Shepley</name> and <name>William<lb/> Waddingham</name> Executors of<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> deceased<lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>H M Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly waived and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant owes the plaintiffs one hundred and sixteen dollars and<lb/> nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dines Caroline</name> etal<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given plaintiffs to withdraw<lb/> notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis M Faul</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, a dedimus is awarded them to Ohio to take deposi<lb/>tions in their behalf.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marie Sinel</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius Jonas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore A Dame</name>,<lb/> <name>Augustus F Barnes</name>,<lb/> <name>John F Barnes</name> and<lb/> <name>Anne Smith</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>The Court being now sufficiently advised of and concerning the application for an<lb/> injunction and the plaintiffs filing a bond in the sum of two thousand dollars<lb/> with <name>Adolph Basch</name> and <name>Philipp Tobias</name>, as securities, which bonds, is approved,<lb/> it is ordered that the defendants, and each of them, and their servants agents and<lb/> attorneys, be restrained and enjoined until the further order of this Court, from<lb/> selling or proceeding to sell the following Case hold estate, advertised for sale on<lb/> the twenty fourth instant, to wit; the balance of an unexpired term of lease of<lb/> twenty years, from the <date when="1844-05-28">28th day of May 1844</date>, of a certain lot, with all the buildings and improvements<lb/> thereon the South side of Market street in the City and County of St Louis State of Missouri<lb/> between Seventh and Eighth street described as follows; beginning at the West end of Wall of a row<lb/> of four houses built by one <name>John Largy</name>, running thence West on the South line of said Market<lb/> street twenty four (24) feet, thence Southwardly one hundred and thirty three feet more or less to an<lb/> alley running East and West twenty feet wide, thence along the North line of said alley, Eastwardly<lb/> twenty four (24) feet, thence Northwardly to the place of beginning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E W Barnes</name> and<lb/> <name>L H Clagstone</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition herein, it is ordered that the said defendants<lb/> appear before this Court on Tuesday next, the twenty fifth instant at nine oclock<lb/> A M and show cause why an injunction should not be granted against them;<lb/> and it is ordered that until said date the defendant, <name>E W Barnes</name>, his agents<lb/> and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined from using the firm name of <name>Farley Barnes and Company</name><lb/> for any purpose, whatever and from removing any of the books or papers or other property of said firm or<lb/> making any use or disposition thereof, and the said <name>L H Clagstone</name> his agents and attorneys, be enjoined</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="123" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0130.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>and restrained from collecting transferring or in any way using any notes, accounts, or other evidences of debt or<lb/> any property whatever conveyed to him individually or as the agent or representative of others by said<lb/> <name>Barnes</name> acting in the name of <name>Farley Barnes and Company</name>. The plaintiff files a bond in the sum of<lb/> fifteen hundred dollars, conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 339,20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Willer</name><lb/> vs 735<lb/> <name>John T Perghoff</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiff three hundred and thirty nine dollars and twenty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Meshack H Carroll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Carroll</name> garn.<lb/> of <name>Wiley J Stratton</name></head>
            <p>The Plaintiff, by leave of Court, files interrogatories against said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Swales</name> and <name>E P Costerlin</name><lb/> garn. of <name>Jos Coglin</name> etal</head>
            <p>The Plaintiff, by leave of Court, files separate interrogatories against<lb/> said garnishees.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander J P Gareschy</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>William Farrell Mary Farrell</name>,<lb/> widow and <name>Esther Farrell</name>, <name>Dennis<lb/> Farrell</name>, and <name>Christophe Farrell</name>, minor<lb/> children of <name>William Farrell</name>, by their next<lb/> friend <name>A J P Garesche</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ann Brennan</name> administratrix of <name>James<lb/> Brennan</name>, and guardian ad <unclear>tiem</unclear> of<lb/> <name>William Brennan</name>, <name>Mary Ann Brennan</name><lb/> and <name>Margaret Brennan</name>, minor children<lb/> of <name>James Brennan</name>, <name>James Cox</name>, <name>Esther Cox</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Larkin</name> and <name>Andrew Larkin</name>.</head>
            <p>Petition to set aside and annual Will.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jurors empanneled and sworn herein, and<lb/> the trial progressed, and being finished the jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid find the following verdict,<lb/> to wit; We the Jury finds that the writing produced is the<lb/> will of <name>Michael Farrell</name>. <name>C H Wood</name> foreman. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the writing produced<lb/> and admitted to probate by the Probate Court of St Louis<lb/> County is the Will of <name>Michael Farrell</name>, and that the<lb/> plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendants go hence without day and recover of the said<lb/> plaintiffs their costs and charges in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>SM Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="124" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0131.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-24">Monday October 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>A A Van Wormer</name> is, on motion of <name>N D Strong</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubsdell</name> etal<lb/> vs 813.<lb/> <name>Edward R Bates</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Said Bates files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W J Kountz</name> etal<lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>Ja Brannon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>N S Patterson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Smith</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>William Hart</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw bill sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Salisbury</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendant, <name>Edward Boyle</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Smith</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, a Commission to <name>John Lodon</name> Justice of<lb/> the <unclear>Peace</unclear>, in the town of Troy, Madison County Illinois, is awarded him to<lb/> take depositions and also a Commission to <name>Richard Mowdsley</name> Justice of the<lb/> Peace of the town <unclear>Marinstolon</unclear> Madison County Illinois for the same purpose.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustin P Ladew</name> etal<lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>H Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue for defendant <name>Clark</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of M use of <name>Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Bond of assignees filed and approved by the Court; on motion<lb/> of the assignees, it is ordered by the Court that they proceeds to sell<lb/> the effects assigned at private sale until March next at not less<lb/> than their appraised value.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Ja Taussig</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Reply of <name>Cha H<lb/> Poertner</name> filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isider Bush</name> etal<lb/> vs 833<lb/> <name>Ja Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Reply of <name>Cha H Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G H Fisse</name><lb/> vs 834<lb/> <name>Ja Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Reply of <name>Cha H<lb/> Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cha H Teichmann</name> etal<lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>Ja Taussig</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Reply of <name>Cha H Poertner</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Wm C Malloy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer of <name>Wm J Kribben</name>, guardian ad <unclear>licom</unclear>, filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="125" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0132.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John Lewis</name>, Esq Presents to the Court a Commission as Jury Commissioner of St Louis County<lb/> and it is ordered that the same be <unclear>ppreade</unclear> upon the records of this Court of<lb/> this date as follows, to wit;-</p>
            <p>We, the undersigned Judges respectively of the St Louis Circuit Court,<lb/> the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, the St Louis Land Court, and the St Louis Criminal<lb/> Court, acting under and by authority of An Act of the General Assembly of the State Of Missouri<lb/> approved <date when="1857-03-03">March 3, 1857</date>. entitled An Act to provide a Jury System in St Louis County, and<lb/> also of an act supplementary thereto approved <date when="1857-11-14">November 14th 1857</date>, do hereby appoint <name>John Lewis</name> to<lb/> be Jury Commissioner of St Louis County, to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of <name>Sam<lb/>uel W Eager Jr</name> The said <name>John Lewis</name> to hold the said office Jury Commissioner from the <date when="1860-10-24">24th<lb/> day of October instant until the first a of July A D, eighteen hundred and sixty</date>, unless sooner<lb/> removed there from according to law. Given under our hands, at the Court House, in the Cit and County<lb/> of St Louis this <date when="1859-10-18">Eighteenth day of October A D 1859</date>.</p>
            <p><name>S M Breckinridge</name> Judge St Louis Circuit Court.</p>
            <p><name>Sam Reber</name> Judge St Louis Court of Corn Pleas.</p>
            <p><name>C B Lord</name> Judge St Louis Land Court.</p>
            <p><name>H A Clover</name> Judge St Louis Criminal Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> vs.<lb/> County of St Louis</head> 
            <p><name>John Lewis</name> being duly sworn upon his oath easy that he will faithfully and<lb/> impartially discharge his duties as Jury Commissioner of St Louis County.<lb/> Sworn to and subscribed before me this twenty <date when="--10-14">fourth day of October. A D, 1859</date>. (seal) <unclear>Wilness</unclear> my hand and the seal of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas, hereto affixed<lb/> at office in the City of St Louis the day and year last above written. <name>C N Hicks</name> Clk.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>Jno Lewis</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2681, 29.<lb/> We all except<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Darby</name><lb/> vs 535<lb/> <name>William Risley</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Merritt</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry B Merritt</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Mudd</name> </head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant, <name>John J Mudd</name>,<lb/> also comes and waiving service of process enters his appearance to this action and<lb/> varies all right to plead or defend herein, but the defendants, <name>William Risley</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, although duly summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed,<lb/> thereupon the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to <name>Henry B Merritt</name>, and sub<lb/>mits this cause to the Court, and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty six hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="126" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0133.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-25">Tuesday October 25th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Joel R Burnett</name>, whose identity is proven by <name>John M Krum</name> and <name>John R Shepley</name>, examined<lb/> under oath, acknowledges the execution of a dud of emancipation to <name>Catharine Napier</name>, a light mulatto aged<lb/> about twenty nine years and her female child <name>Virginia</name> aged about two years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barkodale</name> etal<lb/> vs 380<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Childs Jr</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> etal<lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>North Missouri R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 843<lb/> <name>Elson T Wright</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given to file an amended petition.<lb/> Amended Petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitensdorfer</name></head>
            <p>Petition to condemn Land.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties aforesaid, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the plaintiff files a petition and no sufficient cause being <name>Shorn</name><lb/> against granting the prayer of the sad petitioner, it is therefore ordered<lb/> that <name>Thomas W Levant</name>, <name>Bernard Poepping</name>, <name>Napoleon B Franklin</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Stein</name> and <name>Charles Steffani</name> be and they are here by appointed Commissioners to as curtain and<lb/> appraise the compensation tot be made to the said defendant for the real estate proposed to be taken for the<lb/> used of the said Company and the Court doth further appoint the <date when="1859-11-02">second day of November, eighteen hun<lb/>dred and fifty nine</date>, at the hour of ten o'clock in the forenoon of that day on the premises as the time and<lb/> place for the first meeting of said Commissioners.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Joseph Coglin</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the garnishees <name>Thomas<lb/> <unclear>Faales</unclear></name> and <name>E Costerlin</name> be discharged at the plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>George W Hunger Ford</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at this costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caleb Rice</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at this costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1305, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cabin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 852<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On notes and Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly called,<lb/> comes not nor has he pleaded herein, wherefore on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition be taken against said defendant as confessed; and<lb/> the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and five dollars and ten cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also his cost<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mound City Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Milburn</name> et al<lb/> vs 18<lb/> <name>Thos C Reynolds</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="127" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0134.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 4946, 05</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob J Samuels</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Holzman</name> and<lb/> <name>George Holzman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Goldsmith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the statement of the defen<lb/>dant confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of forty nine hunr<lb/>dred and forty six dollars, and five cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 2850,67</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob J Samuels</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Holzman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Goldsmith</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the statement of the defendant<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty eight hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars and sixty seven cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that sum. It is therefore considered by<lb/>the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Beard</name> and <name>William C<lb/> Jamison</name> Executor and trustees under<lb/> the Will of <name>David F Goodfellow</name><lb/> and <name>Mary Goodfellow</name><lb/> vs 496.<lb/> <name>Morris Rearidon</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant in<lb/> proper person, also comes, and the parties file an agreement and<lb/> consent that judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> and against the defendant and the damages be assessed at<lb/> the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the Injunction granted herein be rendered perpetual, as therein reci<lb/>ved, and that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as agreed upon and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 734, 98</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Haydon</name>, and <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>Henry W Williams</name>. <name>Jesse <unclear>Arnot</unclear></name><lb/> and <name>Anderson Arnot</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendant <name>Jesse<lb/> Arnot</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the other defendants although called come not; and the Court<lb/> finds form the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and thrity four dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefor consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Fackler</name><lb/> vs 186.<lb/> <name>William H Fackler</name> administrator<lb/> de bonis non of <name>Henry Fackler</name></head>
            <p>The death of the plaintiff having been suggested to the Court at a<lb/> former turn and no steps having been taken to bring in the legal rep<lb/>resentatives of said plaintiff, it is therefore ordered by the Court that<lb/> this suit abate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153.<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Case.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>Samuel willi</name>, <name>Sylvester Watts</name>, <name>James Gilbraith</name>, <name>W J Fetter</name>, <name>H Richards</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Schroeder</name>, <name>Edward Leiber</name>, <name>James Vaughn</name>, <name>J W Bevere</name>, <name>C Wright</name>,<lb/> <name>C H Vance</name> and <name>John Bryan</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tied and<lb/> Sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but no being finished is<lb/> laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Farrell</name> admr etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ja Brennon</name> admix etal</head>
            <p>motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="128" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0135.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-26">Wednesday October 26th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubsdell</name> etal<lb/> vs 813<lb/> <name>Edward R Bates</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee <name>Augustus W Alexander</name>, by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that he be discharged hence at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is at,<lb/> Lowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them<lb/> to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 849,91</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles William Gauss</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>William Gallsher</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant also comes and files<lb/> a statement in writing confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> eight hundred and fort nine dollars and ninety one cents and authorizing the<lb/>entering up of judgment against him for that amount in favor of the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>Now at this day come <name>Frederick Hyatt</name>, <name>John Simonds</name> and <name>Edward Haren</name>, the<lb/> Commissioners appointed to examine into the affairs of St Louis County, and file a<lb/> report of their proceedings; and the said Commissioners also exhibit and file their<lb/> final accounts for services rendered, and the Court Examines the same and allows to <name>Frederick K Hyatt</name><lb/> the sum of eighty dollars, to <name>Edward Haren</name> the sum of seventy two dollars, and to <name>John Simonds</name><lb/> the sum of sixty four dollars, and orders that the said amounts be certified to the Board of Commis<lb/> sioner of St Louis County for payment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E W Barnes</name> and<lb/> <name>L H Clagstone</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and no cause having been shorn to the contrary,<lb/> and the plaintiff filing a bond in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars with <name>A K Grant</name><lb/> and <name>Thos J Hilton</name>, as securities, which is approved, it is ordered that the defendant, <name>E<lb/> W Barnes</name>, his agents and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined, until the further order of this<lb/> Court from using ht firm name of <name>Farley Barnes and Company</name> for any purpose whatever and from removing<lb/> any of the books or papers or other property of said firm or making any use or disposition thereof, and said <name>L H<lb/> Clagstone</name>, his agents and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined, until the further order of this Court, Form collecting<lb/> transferring or using in any way any noted, accounts, or other evidences of debt, or any property whatsoever conveyed to him<lb/> individually or as the agent, or representative of others, by the said <name>Barnes</name>, acting in the name of <name>Farley Barnes<lb/> and Company</name>; and the Court, being fully advised of and concerning the application for the appointment of a recei<lb/>ver, doth order and adjudge that <name>James E Blythe</name> be appointed Receiver of the books of account, papers and all the<lb/> goods, chattels and effects of the said form of <name>Farley Barnes and Company</name> and that he take possession of the same;<lb/> and it is further ordered that the said Receiver, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, file a bond in the<lb/> sum of two thousand dollars, conditioned according to law, and take the required oath for the faithful discharge<lb/> of his duties. Thereupon the said Receiver files a bond, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name> Assignee<lb/> of <name>J A Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>Reply and also Exhibit A filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="129" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0136.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Darby</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Perry Cornell</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened<lb/> and filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml L Hertz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lucien H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened<lb/> and filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm L Catherwood</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lucius Busch</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the mater of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Bright</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343.<lb/> <name>Elson T Wright</name></head>
            <p>affidavit of service of amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Furors, empanneled and sworn herein, and he trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-27">Thursday October 27th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel</name> admr<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, it is ordered that the Clerk of<lb/> this Court pay over to said defendants, or their attorney of record, the a mount<lb/> deposited in Court by the received in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolph Dertelmoser</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Reply to amended denial of answer filed by garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Now come the assignees and file a petition to pay off deed of trust on<lb/> personality, and the Court, upon due consideration thereof, doth order<lb/> that the assignees pay, out of the first moneys coming to their hands, the<lb/> notes mentioned in said petition, and for the payment of which a deed of trust was executed, and that said<lb/> notes when paid be returned and filed in this Court with the deed of trust as vouchers therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Robbins</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel F Appleton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Rowe</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a petition and also the<lb/> voluntary appearance of the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>Jas D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>The defendant filed exceptions to the Commissioners Report.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="130" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0137.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albertine Jacob</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>Teresa E Nolan</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm W Harnaker</name><lb/> vs 673<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed, and exhibit attached<lb/> thereto filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Ohis and Mississippi Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein and the trial of this cause progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at, nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S,M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-28">Friday October 28th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 344, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> and<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name><lb/> vs 871<lb/> <name>Erastus S Gee</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter R Black</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a duly verified statement confessing them selves<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty four dollars and<lb/> eight cents, and authorizing the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#316, 18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Patterson</name> and<lb/> <name>Gilford T Chamberlain</name><lb/> vs 872<lb/> <name>Erastus S Gee</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter R Black</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a duly verified statement confessing themselves<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and sixteen dollars and<lb/> eighteen cents, and authorizing the entering up of judgment against them in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 390, 32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aduah Sackett</name>, <name>George H Sackett</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Davis</name>, <name>Lauriston Torme</name> and<lb/> <name>George B Feio</name><lb/> vs 723<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, the petition herein is taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed; ad the Court finds from the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the<lb/> plaintiffs there hundred and ninety dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="131" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0138.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 642, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph N Hinds</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> and<lb/> <name>Dominie Urban</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and file the duly verified statement, where<lb/> by the defendants confess themselves indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred<lb/> and forty two dollars and sixteen cents, and authorize the entering up of judgment against<lb/> tem in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover for the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the mater of he assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the assignee herein, thirty days additional time is granted in<lb/> which to file an inventory and appraisement herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Jane Eddy</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>James N Eddy</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore,<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against said defen<lb/>dant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 676, 81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Marshall</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Dickinson</name>, <name>William Hargreaves</name><lb/> and <name>C Edward Smith</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and St Louis<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the Court finds form the instrument in writing or which<lb/> two action is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiffs the sum<lb/> of six hundred and seventy six dollars and eighty one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>224, 92.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Reynolds</name>,<lb/> <name>Ezra S Dodge</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Amsbury</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>Frederick A Kennon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> twenty four dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 159, 01.<lb/> Set aside 29th 137</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Martin</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Morrison</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> form the instrument in writing or which two action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant owes the plaintiffs one hundred and fifty nine dollars and one cent. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 5,649,79.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of the State of<lb/> Missouri</name><lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant over plaintiff fifty six hundred and forty nine<lb/> dollars and seventy eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and it costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="132" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0139.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 4,814,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State</name><lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>James H Comfort</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of forty eight hundred and fourteen dol<lb/>lars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 217,07</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of</name><lb/> Missouri<lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Alonzo D Fassett</name>, <name>Edward D<lb/> Crossman</name>, <name>Abram Stevenson</name><lb/> and <name>Washington J Bevan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Crossman</name>, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars<lb/> and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor,</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 361, 32.<lb/> Set aside 29th 137</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name>, <name>John Emory</name><lb/> and <name>J T Brown</name><lb/> vs 335.<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes but makes default, wherefore the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant owes the plaintiffs there hundred and sixty one dollars and<lb/> thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of he defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 837, 12.<lb/> Set aside 29th 137</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name>, <name>Samuel Moore</name>,<lb/> <name>William G Skillman</name>, <name>James M<lb/> Whitly</name>, <name>Edward A Adams</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Atkinson</name><lb/> vs 336<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiffs the sum<lb/> of eight hundred and thirty seven dollars and twelve cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 255, 53. Set aside 29th 137</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Bridge</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the note herein<lb/> that the defendant owes the plaintiff two hundred and fifty five dollars and fifty three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 160, 66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Chase</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Chase</name><lb/> vs 554<lb/> <name>John Edward Henn</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds from the<lb/> note herein that the defendant owes the plaintiff two hundred and sixty dollars and<lb/> sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Wm B Watson</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saml Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="133" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0140.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Jane Cantwell</name> by her<lb/> next friend <name>James M <unclear>Mcnenry</unclear></name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>John W Cantwell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files a petition<lb/> and also an affidavit, from which it appears that the defen<lb/>dant is a non resident of this State, therefore, on motion of said<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that on<lb/>civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce form the bonds of<lb/> matrimony existing between said plaintiff and defendant, on the founds of will full desertion and<lb/> cruel and barbarous treatment, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court, to the begun<lb/> and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County St Louis, on the first Monday of Febru<lb/>ary next, and, on or before the Sixth day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition<lb/> herein will be taken against him as confessed, And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be pub<lb/>lished, according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the City<lb/> of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nimrod Beck</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> and<lb/> <name>Philips Kingsland</name></head>
            <p>Order of Reference,</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff mores<lb/> the court to refer this cause, and the court upon due consideration thereof,<lb/> doth order that this cause be refused to <name>William H Stone</name> and <name>Basil<lb/> W Alexander</name>, who ma choose an umpire, to hear and determine the mat<lb/>ters in controversy herein, and that they report thereof as early as practicable.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shriver</name> etal<lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Albro</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly Aummoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herin is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Cresson</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Henry <unclear>Bilsterin</unclear></name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
            <p>Ordered by the Court that all cases set for trial on and after October, thirty first, be set<lb/> a head two weeks from the respective days on which they are now set.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederic R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="134" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0141.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-29">Saturday October 29th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lut</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Buttner</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Madison Y Johnson</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>C D Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Louis G z Picot</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Witherill</name> etal<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>F A Hunt</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, leave is given to amend the petition and<lb/> with herein; which is accordingly done by inserting the full name, <name>Francis</name>, of the<lb/> defendant herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Farrell</name> admr etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Brennan</name> admr etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thos B Wing</name><lb/> vs 846<lb/> <name>Franklin Weston</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p><name>Daniel</name> of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John <unclear>February</unclear></name><lb/> vs 533.<lb/> <name>Jno Reilly</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and<lb/> filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73.<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> default entered herein against the defendant <name>John Nicholay</name>, be set aside and<lb/> vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt H Hodgson</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W L F Gage</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff as dedimus is awarded them to Ohio.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Homan</name> etal<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Newton S Gay</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff as dedimus is awarded them to Ohio.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenn</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Chas H Sattmarsh</name> etal</head>
            <p><name>John G Page</name>, one of the Commissioners files a Report herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skule</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and filed a petition and also the ap<lb/>pearance of the defendant to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> no<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein and the trial progressed and being finished<lb/>the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="135" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0142.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-10-31">Monday October 31st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 501, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Eliza Michaw</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and the defendant, also comes and files<lb/> a duly verified statement confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five hundred and one dollars and fifty cents and authorizing the entering up of<lb/> judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also her costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Bright Jr</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the assignee, the Court appoints <name>James E Dudderidge</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Robinson</name> appraisers to appraise assets inventoried herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> etal<lb/> vs 93.<lb/> <name>Geo Trowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
            <p><name>Wm J Martin</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> etal<lb/> vs 99<lb/> <name>Joseph W Hoke</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismisses at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G M Murtry</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Harvey H Humphrey</name><lb/> vs 13.<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file an additional replevin bond within the<lb/> time given and required for him so to do, therefore, on motion of the defendant<lb/> by his attorney, it is offered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> etal<lb/> vs 933.<lb/> <name>James H <unclear>Laeas</unclear></name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Hoffman</name><lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Emelia Riehl</name></head>
            <p>The death of the plaintiff having been suggested at the present term, on motion of the attor<lb/>ney for said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that this suit abate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Henderson</name><lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>Edward A Goodrich</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Vantelbourgh</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the said garni<lb/>shee be discharged hence at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Broun</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer as to part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State if Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Cha Boswell</name><lb/> vs 191<lb/> <name>Isaac Rosenfeld Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Stare of Missouri<lb/> use of <name>Alex Riddle</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>Isaac Rosenfeld Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="136" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0143.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Lemuel</unclear> H Paxton</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment filed by the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Rainey</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Michael Bunk</name>,<lb/> <name>Austin Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Christy</name></head>
            <p>on account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit; <name>Louis<lb/> Krauthoff</name>, <name>August Frichtle</name>, <name>Frederick Barkhoffer</name>, <name>Carstan Hoffman</name>,<lb/> <name>Frank Herkemeier</name>, <name>August Hay</name>, <name>John Bowell</name>, <name>L R Wyman</name>, <name>John T Dow<lb/>dall</name>, <name>F Krage</name>, <name>Bernard M Sorley</name>, and <name>Charles Webb</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> etal<lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on for the coming bond filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-01">Tuesday November 1st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#182, 60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew M Alpin</name>,<lb/> <name>Benjamin P Himman</name><lb/> and <name>Henry M Alpin</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiffs file a bond<lb/> for costs with <name>James C Moody</name>, as security, which bond is approved, thereupon the<lb/> Court doth overrule the motion to dismiss this suit; and the parties consent and<lb/> agree that judgment be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against<lb/> the defendant for the sum of one hundred and eighty two dollars and sixty cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Wall</name> etal<lb/> vs 473.<lb/> <name>Jas O Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the plaintiffs withdraw the notes sued on and file a receipt therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>674,18.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Weil</name><lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant withdraws his<lb/> motion to dismiss this suit; and the parties consent and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered herein and favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of<lb/> six hundred and seventy four dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernst A Solf</name><lb/> vs 724<lb/> <name>Henry Schleibaume</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="137" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0144.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin T Babbitt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name> etal</head>
            <p>on motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given to withdraw the depo<lb/>sitions filed herein, which is accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnec</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out demurrer and answer and to take petition for confessed filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>The defendant filed an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Hedenberg</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit staying that the defendant<lb/> is a non resident of this State, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>menced against him for the sum of seven hundred and seventy six dollar and thirty one cents on<lb/>account of a promissory note executed by the defendant and that his property has been attach and<lb/> unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and<lb/> for the County of St Louis on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the thirds day three<lb/> of answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in<lb/> the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name> etal<lb/> vs 335<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and de file an agreement and by their consent it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the judgment herein be set aside and vacated and this cause<lb/> dismissed at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor. By like consent<lb/> the defendant withdraws the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name> et al<lb/> vs 336<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and de file an agreement, and by their consent,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the judgment herein be set aside and vacated and this cause<lb/> dismissed at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor. By consent<lb/> the defendant withdraws the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Bridge</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and de file an agreement, and by their consent, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the judgment herein be set aside and vacated and this cause dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and that execution issue therefor. By consent defendant withdraws the notes sued on.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Martin</name> etal<lb/> vs 436<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement, and<lb/> by their consent it is ordered that the judgment rendered herein be set aside<lb/> and vacated and this cause dismissed at the defendants costs and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor. By consent defendant withdraw notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Lyman</name>, <name>Jacob Stout</name><lb/> and <name>William Dimack</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George C Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name>.</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a petition and also<lb/> the voluntary appearance of the defendants to this action.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="138" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0145.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>87, 36<lb/> Against <name>Burk</name><lb/> and <name>Clark</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Rainey</name><lb/> vs 23.<lb/> <name>Michael Burk</name>,<lb/> <name>Austin Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Christy</name>.</head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors, em<lb/>pannelled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the defendant, <name>Alexander Christy</name>,<lb/> and also find in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, <name>Michael Burk</name><lb/> and <name>Austin Clark</name>, and assess his damages at the sum of eighty seven dollars<lb/> and thirty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this<lb/> behalf against the defendant <name>Christy</name> but that the said defendant go thereof without day, and that the said<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants, <name>Michael Burk</name> and <name>Austin Clark</name>, the damages a foresaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-02">Wednesday November 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed and<lb/> that each party pay his own costs and execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Upton L Boyce</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>W L Hutchings</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the de<lb/>fendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Henderson</name><lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>Edward A Goodrich</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>William Vantelbourgh</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the said garnishee, by his attorney, and, on his motion, the Court<lb/> allows him the sum of twenty five dollars for his trouble in appearing and<lb/> answering herein to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Grube</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>Fred K M Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A McDowell</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Boernstein</name> etal<lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Simon Eimer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jean C Thomassin</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Frances Thomassin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias<lb/> summons issue herein: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs 153.<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the Jurors, em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein, and upon their oaths say they are unable to agree upon<lb/>a verdict, wherefore it is ordered that the Jurors aforesaid be discharged from the<lb/> further consideration of this cause, and that this cause be continued t the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="139" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0146.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name><lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdale</name> admix</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss appeal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now come the attorneys for the plaintiffs, and suggest to the Court the death of<lb/> <name>William Leguerrier</name>, since the commencement of this suit, thereupon come <name>Leon<lb/> Longuemare</name>, <name>Isabella</name>, his wife, <name>Charles Longuemare</name>, and <name>Felicite</name>, his wife, and enter<lb/> their appearance as parties plaintiff to this action; and also come the attorneys for the defendants and sug<lb/>gest to the Court the death of <name>Joseph S Null</name>, since the commencement of this suit; thereupon comes <name>cor<lb/>neluis Voorhis</name>, Executor of said <name>Joseph S Null</name> and enters his appearance as a party defendant to this action;<lb/> and, on motion, the Court appoints the said <name>Corneluis Voorhis</name> guardian and listen of <name>William C Null</name>, and<lb/> the said <name>Voorhis</name> accepts the appointment, and enters the appearance of the said <name>William C Null</name> as a party<lb/> defendant to this action; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>August Frichtle</name>, <name>Augustus Hay</name>, <name>John Rerchers</name>,<lb/> <name>Leopold Schleicker</name>, <name>Patrick M Donaldo</name>, <name>S J Mullen</name>, <name>Daniel Byrne</name>, <name>Peter Pipenbrier</name>, <name>Jacob Albertz</name>,<lb/> <name>William Warrance W Shield</name> and <name>H S Reed</name>, twelve good and lawful en, who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed, but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann E Barnhurst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Barnhurst</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and the default of the defendant<lb/> having been hereto fore entered and the petition herein taken against him as con<lb/>fessesd, the Court proceed to hear the proof herein and having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is a person of good moral<lb/> character and an innocent and injured party doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be ab<lb/>solutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and re<lb/>stored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person: and it further appearing to the Court<lb/> that the defendant from his habits and cause of life is an unsuitable person to have the care, custody<lb/> and maintenance of the infant children, <name>John Henry</name>, <name>Joseph Samuel</name>, and <name>Mary Emma</name>, Men<lb/>tioned in the petition, who are of tender years, it is further ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiff have the care, custody and control and maintenance of the said infant children;<lb/> and that the said defendant be restrained and enjoined from interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf<lb/> until the further order of this Court. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and<lb/> that execution issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S.M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="140" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0147.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-03">Thursday November 3rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and fileds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 21<lb/> <name>John W Hedenberg</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 739,69<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Hassinger</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Presbury</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Taylor</name><lb/> vs 779<lb/> <name>George P Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>George P Field</name>, but the defendant, <name>William Hassinger</name>, although duly sum<lb/> moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said<lb/> defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred<lb/> and thirty nine dollars and sixty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution there<lb/> for: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum: By leave of Court<lb/> first had and obtained plaintiffs withdraw the note sued on, and file a copy therof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick <unclear>P fund</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barthold <unclear>Vennervitz</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and also comes the defendant and files a<lb/> statement in writing duly verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of five hundred dollars and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matte of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Solomon Meyer</name> and <name>Simon Lopez</name></head>
            <p>The assignees file an directory herein and on their motion the Court ap<lb/>point <name>Isaac Rosenstein</name> and <name>Louis Bawman</name> appraises to appraise<lb/> the assets as inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas I <unclear>Laurenson</unclear></name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>Thos F <unclear>Laweson</unclear></name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>paneled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed but not being finished is<lb/> laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.W Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="141" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0148.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-04">Friday November 4th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> and<lb/> <name><unclear>Spafford</unclear> C Field<lb/></name> vs<lb/> <name>J Clark Manchester</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles R P Wentworth</name></head>
            <p>Order of publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a petition, and also an affidavit from which it appears to<lb/>Court that the defendants are non residents of this state, therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendants be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of twenty two hun<lb/>dred and one dollars and sixteen cents, on account of a judgment obtained in the<lb/> District Court of the United States for the District of Wisconsin against the defendants in favor of <name>John<lb/> A Blanchard</name> and others of which the plaintiffs are the assignees, and that their property has been attached;<lb/> and unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and<lb/> for the Country of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer<lb/> to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy<lb/> the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Repub<lb/>lican, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> etal<lb/> vs 420<lb/> <name>George R Michael</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and acknowledge to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein for the sum of twelve hundred<lb/> and ninety seven dollars and fifty cents on the thirty first of May last past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W King</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>C C King</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having mad return that the defendant cannot be found and the Court<lb/> being satisfied the process cannot be served, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by his attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him for the sum of four hundred and fifty eight dollars and sixty four cents on account of three prom<lb/>issory notes executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff, and that his property has been attached; and unless<lb/> be approval the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the<lb/>Country of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to<lb/> the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy<lb/> the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Dem<lb/>ocrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al<lb/> vs 333.<lb/> <name>John Baker</name> and <name>John E Lockwood</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias<lb/> summoned issues herein: Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander <unclear>Cwiksharnk</unclear></name><lb/> vs 661<lb/> <name>Robert P Clarke</name>, <name>R G parke</name> and<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name>.</head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and acknowledges to have received full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--09-28">twenty eighth day<lb/> of September</date> last past.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambsgaust</name><lb/> vs 644<lb/> <name>Louis Stella</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff withdraws notes sued on and files copies thereof.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="142" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0149.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 666,16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Saler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barthold Venrewitz</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit,<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and sixty six<lb/> dollars and sixteen cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in form<lb/> of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore: and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V Bogy</name> et al<lb/> vs 101<lb/> <name>Bennett P Voorhies</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Voorhies</name> files a demurrer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elsen J Wright</name></head>
            <p>affidavit of partnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name></head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorney, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein and the trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S.W Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-05">Saturday November 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p>On motion, <name>George Partridge</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
            <p>On motion, <name>Samuel M Mills</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a Commission is awarded them to<lb/> take depositions in Illinois on the twelfth instant; and it is ordered that they<lb/> give the defendants notice forthwith of the time of taking said depositions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm B Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abraham A Vanl Dormer</name><lb/> and <name>James C Reed</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to<lb/> the State of Pennsylvania.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Joes</name> etal<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="143" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0150.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name>, <name>Marie Duroche</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> Philibert Sr</name>, <name>Joseph Philibert, Jr</name>, <name>Benjamin<lb/> Philbert</name>, <name>Julia</name> his wife, <name>John B Philibert</name>,<lb/> <name>August Philibert</name>, <name>Henry Philibert</name>, <name>Adolph<lb/> Philibert</name>, <name>Edward C Philibert</name>, <name>Andrew S<lb/> Barada</name>, <name>Eliza</name> his wife, <name>Charles Leguerrier</name>,<lb/> <name>Marie Philibert</name>, <name>Leon Longuemare</name>, <name>Isabella</name><lb/> his wife, <name>Charles Longuemare</name> and <name>Felicite</name> his wife<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name>, <name>John S M Cune</name>, <name>Peter L<lb/> Van Deventer</name>, <name>Cornelius Voorhis</name> Executor of <name>Joseph<lb/> S Hull</name>, and <name>William C Hull</name> by <name>Cormelius<lb/> Voorhis</name> guardian ad litem.</head>
            <p>Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come again the<lb/>parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Ju<lb/>rors empanneled and sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the follow<lb/>ing verdict, to wit; We the Jury find for the defendants.<lb/> <name>Henry S Reed</name>, <name>Foreman</name>. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their<lb/> suit in the behalf, but that the defendants go thereof<lb/> without day and recover of the said plaintiffs their<lb/> costs and charges in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
            <p>On motion, <name>Charles H Branscomb</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1103,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel Hillman</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles E Hillman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles N Brewster</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the statement of the defen<lb/>dant confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eleven hundred<lb/> and three dollars and fifty cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered<lb/>by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and their costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Solomon Meyer</name> and <name>Simon Lopez</name></head>
            <p>Now come the appraises and file an appraisement herein, and also<lb/> come the assignees and file a bond which is approved; and on mo<lb/>tion of said assignees, it is ordered that they proceed to sell the property<lb/> assigned at private sale for sixty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus M Dowell</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E E O Giles</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that an alias summon issue for<lb/> the defendant <name>John Loughborough</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name>, <name>Robert M Dubois</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Ritterskamp</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> Steam Boat <name>James C Woodruff</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit<lb/> to the Court the defendants motion to suppress the depositions of<lb/> <name>Liebe</name> and <name>Gorsh</name>, and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the said motion doth order that the same be sustained and<lb/> that said depositions be suppressed, and the plaintiffs file an affidavit and move the Court for a con<lb/>tinuance of this cause, which motion, after due consideration by the Court, is overruled; thereupon the<lb/> attorney for the plaintiffs, suggests to the Court the death of the plaintiff, <name>Robert M Dubois</name> since<lb/> the commencement of this suit, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that this suit proceed in the name<lb/> of the other and surviving plaintiffs, and thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>Louis Krauthoff</name>, <name>August<lb/> Frichtle</name>, <name>Frederick Barkhoffer</name>, <name>Carstin Hoffman</name>, <name>Frank Herkemeyer</name>, <name>John Borrell</name>, <name>L R Wyman</name>,<lb/> <name>J T Dowdall</name>, <name>F Krage</name>, <name>B M Sorley</name>, <name>Charles Webb</name> and <name>Frank Gennell</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial pro<lb/>gressed, but the said plaintiffs say they will not further prosecute their suit in this behalf but volun<lb/>tarily take amonsuit with leave to more to set the same aside. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> out day and recover of the plaintiffs, its costs and charges in this suit expended and have execution<lb/> therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="144" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0151.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-07">Monday November 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M Faul</name> and <name>Kelly</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 719<lb/> <name>Pelagie Lee</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff files a motion<lb/> for an attachment for contempt and also interrogatories to be answered by the defen<lb/>dant, together with a notice of said motion, and on motion of the defendant, until<lb/> Wednesday next the ninth instant is given him to answer said interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benoni S Garland</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>Charrvin V Lebeau</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>John F A Sanford</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent<lb/> and agree that the judgment rendered herein be affirmed. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the judgment rendered herein<lb/> in the Probate Court of St Louis Country be and the same is hereby af<lb/>firmed and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant his costs in this behalf expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 409,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Felix Ostheim</name>, <name>Albert Ostheim</name><lb/> and <name>Adolphus Ostheim</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dumont G Jones</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defen<lb/>dant and files a statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby he con<lb/>fesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> nine dollars and twenty five cents, and authorizes the entering up of judg<lb/>ment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H Oglesby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and files.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>W Dawson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Speck</name> etal<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>J B Jas E Woodruff</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Beard</name> etal<lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>William B Olmstead</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, <name>Collins D White</name>, and by leave of Court files an and<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="145" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0152.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> etal<lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit to<lb/> the Court the defendant motion to dismiss this appeal, and the Court,<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said motion, doth over rule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jackson</name> trustee<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants cost.</p>
            <p><name>John F Darby</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a<lb/> deed of emancipation by him to his slave <name>Agnes Mosely</name>, a negro woman, rather<lb/> tall aged about forty eight years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Kehoe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W manning</name>,<lb/> <name>Paul P Patchin</name> and<lb/> <name>William Halpen</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and an affidavit, according to law, claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendants deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis Country and said sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not<lb/> delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William S Hawken</name></head>
            <p><name>Christopher M Hawken</name>, the assignee herein, files and application to be<lb/> discharged from his trust as assignee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sevier</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, until the twenty third instant is given<lb/> him to reply herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S W Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-08">Tuesday November 8th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> etal<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elizah G Tuttle</name> et al Garn.</head>
            <p>Agreement of Counsel filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Union Bank of Louisiana</name><lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>Order of publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and by leave of Court, first had and<lb/> obtained files an amended petition herein, and on motion of the plaintiff, by<lb/> its attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against him for the sum of thirty five hundred and fifty nine dollars and eighty five cents<lb/> on account of money, paid and advanced by the plaintiff to and for the use of the defendant, and that his<lb/> property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the<lb/> City of St Louis, within and for the Country of St Louis, on the firs Monday of February next and on or<lb/> before the third day there of answer to the action aforesaid according to law judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy here of be published, according to law in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="146" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0153.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitensdorfer</name>.</head>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the commissioners ap<lb/>pointed to appraise the compensation to be made to the defendant failed<lb/> to make their appraisal, by consent of parties, the Court doth appoint<lb/> Thursday next, the tenth instant, at the how of ten o clock in the forenoon<lb/> of that day, on the premises, as the time and place for the meeting of said Commissioners to appraise the com<lb/>pensation to be made to the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Simpson</name> etal<lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not nor hath be pleaded to this action, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be ta<lb/>ken against the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahy</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter Nenan</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administrative<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> files a bill of exceptions herein; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>Charles<lb/> Awarner</name>, <name>Robert Simpson</name>, <name>Rudolph Hoge</name>, <name>Herman Wolf</name>, <name>Fred<lb/>erick Hartman</name>, <name>Charles Tiernan Louis Kunkle</name>, <name>Henry A Stine</name>,<lb/> <name>Edward M Hale</name>, <name>John King</name>, <name>J E D Diamond</name> and <name>William<lb/> Walter</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being day elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.W. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-09">Wednesday November 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff files a motion<lb/> to commit defendant for contempt and a notice of said motion and also interrog<lb/>atories to said defendant, and the parties file an agreement and until Saturday<lb/> the nineteenth instant is given said defendant to answer said interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 576,96<lb/> vs <name>Worthington</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Kelly</name> and<lb/> <name>George C Harding</name><lb/> vs 504<lb/> <name>James B Worthington</name><lb/> and <name>John P Denent</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>John p Denent</name>, but the defendant, <name>Worthington</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> seventy six dollars and ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel A Buckmaster</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="147" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0154.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James R Graham</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Kepner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver S Watt</name></head>
            <p>Order for Deliver.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit, according to law, claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit<lb/> to the Sheriff of St Louis Country, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said<lb/> property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Meyers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
            <p>On motion, <name>George N Leighton</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 157,46</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus M Dowell</name> and<lb/> <name>Partrick F Loughran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Edward Fraser</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant also<lb/> comes and files a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit,<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hun<lb/>dred and fifty seven dollars and forty six cents and authorizing the<lb/> entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the dependant the debt aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>Proceedings against <name>Henry M Barnes</name> for contempt.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant files his answer to<lb/> the interrogatories here to fore filed, and thereupon, by consent of parties, the Court doth or<lb/>der and adjudge that unless the said <name>Henry M Barnes</name> shall on or before the first Mon<lb/>day of December next fully comply with the order whole herein on the twenty first day of June last past<lb/> and pay over the several sums of money directed by the said order or decree to be paid as therein directed he shall<lb/> stand committed to the common jail of this country for the contempt which he has committed in not hereto fore<lb/> complying therewith; and it is further ordered, that in case of further non compliance on the part of said <name>Henry<lb/> M Barnes</name> as aforesaid, the proper process of commitment shall issues on the suggestion of the plaintiffs attorney.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter Nenan</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> <unclear>admir</unclear><lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name>.</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>paneled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> recite to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Whitehill</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew Zettel</name> garn<lb/> of <name>Jno kopp</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave of Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Berckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="148" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0155.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-10">Thursday November 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>George Cooper</name> garn.</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, until the twenty eight instant is<lb/> given him to reply to said garnishees answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hull R Jackson</name><lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Nathan C Covington</name></head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Vonphul</name> etal<lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Robert Stevens</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Wosdell</name> etal<lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>John Cunningham</name></head>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action it is ordered that the same be dismissed at<lb/>the plaintiffs costs and that execution issues therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Happer</name> etal<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>Henry N Setzer</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>229,32</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>Eleazer J Beard</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>William B Olmstead</name>,<lb/> <name>Collins D White</name>, and<lb/> <name>A C Ketchum</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, <name>William B<lb/> Olmstead</name> and <name>A C Ketchum</name>, although duly called, come and; and<lb/> plaintiffs file a motion for judgment against <name>Collins D White</name> as in default<lb/> of answer and submits the said motion to the Court, and the Court, after<lb/> due consideration thereof, doth sustain the same; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dollars and thirty two cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore: and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George J Camp</name> et al doing business under<lb/> the name and style of the <name>Belleville</name> and<lb/> <name>St Louis Coal Company</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Montgomery Schuyler</name>.</head>
            <p>On motion of the said <name>Montgomery Schuyler</name>, by <name>D J Iere<lb/>elt</name> his attorney, a Commission is awarded him to take deposi<lb/>tions in the State of Michigan to be used in the trial of this<lb/> cause before Justice <name>Johnstone</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Burke</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Edward F Dix</name></head>
            <p>This cause being called for trial, and no one appearing to prosecute the same, it is,<lb/> on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issues threfor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1076,49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> and <name>Peter Nenan</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come the Jurors, empanneled and sworn herein, and being agreed<lb/> upon a verdict, upon this oaths, find for the plaintiffs and assess<lb/> their damages at the sum of one thousand and seventy six dollars<lb/> and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert H Hodgson</name> etal<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>Walter L F Gage</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="149" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0156.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emile Block</name> <name>Leopold Block</name><lb/> and <name>Julius Block</name><lb/> vs 70<lb/> The Steam Boat Louisville</head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings exhibits<lb/>and proof and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant.<lb/>It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendants go hereof without day and recover of the plaintiffs it costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore. The plaintiffs file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Mervick</name><lb/> vs 34<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute, it is ordered that<lb/> the same be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issues therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Baker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph S Pease</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment to <name>M W Warnefiled</name>, and the said <name>M W Warne</name><lb/> as such assignee, acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the twenty second of May eighteen hundred and fifty five.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitenodorfer</name></head>
            <p>The Commissioners appointed to assess the defendants dam<lb/>ages file a report of their proceedings.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> etal<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Breckinridge.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-11">Friday November 11th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Kelly</name><lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Order for Delivery of property Attached.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and withdraw their<lb/> motion for judgment on the forth coming bond and file a motion<lb/> for an order on the obligors in said bond to deliver over property to<lb/> the Sheriff of St Louis Country, and submit the same to the Court,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth order<lb/> that <name>Egbert B Brown</name>, the principal, and <name>Jesse Arnot</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name>, the securities, in the bond giv<lb/>en for the production for the property attached when and where the Court shall direct, deliver said property,<lb/> to wit; four hundred and forty eight dollars in bank notes, commonly called currency, thirty two dollars and<lb/> eighty cents in gold and silver, five writing desks, ten chairs, two iron safes, one ticked safe, two clocks, three<lb/> maps, two letter presses, one carpet, one oil cloth carpet, one table, one counter, gas fixtures in office, three<lb/> books account, three stools, one lot of way bill books, one manifest book, two cash books, two letter books,<lb/> me table, one lot of pass books, one water cooler, one stove and pipe, one wash stand and one abstract<lb/> book to the Sheriff of St Louis Country, at his office, in the Country of St Louis, on or before<lb/> Monday next the fourteenth instant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="150" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0157.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> etal<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit to the Court the defen<lb/>dants motion for leave to file an amended answer and counter claim, which<lb/> motion, after due consideration by the Court, is sustained and leave is given<lb/> to file an amended answer and counter claim; which is accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Phebej</unclear> Allen</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>William Allen</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned<lb/> and solemnly called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against the said defan<lb/>dant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Labarge</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno P Gould</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo Trowbridge</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Laurenson</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>Thomas F Laurenson</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, <name>Jo Campbell</name>, it is ordered that a subpoena<lb/> duces tecum issue to <name>S D Barlow</name> to bring the original order from the defen<lb/>dants to said <name>Barlow</name>, dated <date when="1857-10-14">October fourteenth eighteen hundred and<lb/>fifty seven</date>, to be used on the trial of this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David A Burrows</name><lb/> vs 119<lb/> <name>Heyman Levin</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for<lb/>one cent and costs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Langhorne</name> etal<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name> et al garn of<lb/> <name>Francis</name> and <name>Walton</name></head>
            <p>By consent of the plaintiffs and the garnishees, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the said garnishees be did charged at the plaintiffs costs<lb/> without an allowance and that execution issue for the costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> etal<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Francis Dugdale</name>'s admr</head>
            <p>The dependent files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Hornbeck</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>George A Crawford</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Dinon</name>, and<lb/> <name>William R Judson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cere</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, comes and files a state<lb/>ment, from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with great lap and expense before the probable termi<lb/>nation of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property<lb/>according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order<lb/> on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah Buckley</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary Buckley</name> his wife<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter B Garesche</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>J M Bealey</name></head>
            <p>Deposition of <name>Hugh Clarkin</name> on behalf of the plaintiffs opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="151" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0158.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Hastings</name> etal<lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Henry S parker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Mo use of <name>Rob B Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-12">Saturday November 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
            <p><name>James O Broad</name> head is, on motion of <name>William J Wood</name>, admitted and enrolled as<lb/> a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis McFaul</name> etal<lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>St Louis alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road company</name>.</head>
            <p>Proof of service of order for delivery of property attached filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name><lb/> and <name>Mary B Stewart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit,<lb/> <name>Charles a Warner</name>, <name>Robert Simpson</name>, <name>Augustus Ken</name>, <name>Ira Stout</name>,<lb/> <name>Martin Harble</name>, <name>Philip Rothenbucher</name>, <name>Peter Berger</name>, <name>Bernards Hanses</name>,<lb/> <name>James Golway</name>, <name>R Strahle</name>, <name>John Storks</name> and <name>George M Wolfe</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected td and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by<lb/> their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hereof without day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs<lb/> and charges in this suit expended and have execution therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-14">Monday November 14th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and says he will not further prosecute his<lb/> suit in the is behalf but voluntarily suffers a non suit. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this be<lb/>half but that the said defendants go hereof without and recover of said, plaintiff their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="152" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0159.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Job M Wing</name> etal<lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Joseph Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Ripper</name><lb/> vs 829<lb/> <name>John Ripper</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute, it is ordered that the<lb/> same be dismissed a the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thompson Stout</name><lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>Anthony L Knapp</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G C Davis</name><lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>William M Stethem</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Joseph Ipold</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Matthew S Malony</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J <unclear>Lawenson</unclear></name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>Thomas F <unclear>Lawrenson</unclear></name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 411,49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Robbins</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel F Appleton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Rowe</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and eleven dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recov<lb/>er of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 5000,00<lb/> and<lb/> # 215,00<lb/> Dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name> President of the<lb/> <name>American Express Company</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Michael A O'Rourke</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by the irrespective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court, having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth find the issues herein joined in<lb/>favor of the plaintiff and doth assess his damages at the sum of two hundred<lb/> and fifteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of five<lb/> <unclear rend="strikethrough">the sum of five</unclear> thousand dollars, the penalty of the bond, and also the costs of this suit and that he have execution for<lb/> the sum of two hundred and fifteen dollars the damages aforesaid as assessed by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 355,50<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Halliday</name>,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs 668<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> and <name>Washington M<lb/> Olmstead</name> administrator of <name>Louis<lb/> Olmstead</name>.</head>
            <p>On Note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>Washington M Olmstead</name>, but the defendant, <name>Halliday</name><lb/> although duly called still making default, the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> fifty five dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendant, <name>John Halliday</name>, the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this<lb/> behalf expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="153" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0160.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note># 7,783,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marshall J Smith</name><lb/> <name>Thomas R Foster Jr</name>,<lb/> <name>Cavy W Bute</name> and<lb/> <name>Douglass Voss</name><lb/> vs 877<lb/> <name>Cary Grats</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew J Alexander</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the statement of the defendants<lb/>duly verified by affidavit confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of seven thousand seven hundred and eighty three dollars and eighty cents, and<lb/> authorizing the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 1080,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Schulerberg</name><lb/> Set aside<lb/> <date when="--11-16">Nov 16/59</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Railroad Company</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name> and<lb/> <name>Boeckler</name></head>
            <p>On Agreement or Contract.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>Boeckler</name>, but the defendant, <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Schu<lb/>lenberg</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and eighty dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendent the debt aforesid in form aforeasid as founde and also it into<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 578,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stigerwald</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Charles C Kubler</name> and<lb/> <name>F Steirgerwald</name></head>
            <p>On agreement. Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Kubler</name>, but the defendant, <name>F Steirgerwald</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition here<lb/>in be taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of five hundred and seventy eight dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 709<lb/> <name>Amos Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 758<lb/> <name>Thomas Lorenz</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered the by Court that<lb/> an alias Summons issue herein returnable at the next them.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P <unclear>Slvan</unclear></name><lb/> vs 883<lb/> <name>James C Parks</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwd Dobyns</name><lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>W C Null</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by<lb/> consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W B Lent</name> etal<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>W Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Triplett</name><lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>W C Hull</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="154" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0161.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Steam Boat <name>Ben Bolt</name><lb/> vs 862<lb/> <name>H A Conant</name> grant. Of<lb/> <name>S D Norman</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is ordered that said garnishee be<lb/> discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten<lb/> dollars is allowed said garnishee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Price</name>, <name>Charles L<lb/> Frost</name> and <name><unclear>Eplaraim</unclear> Converse</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>David T Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>S B Bullock</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court,<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same, doth find the issues herein joined<lb/> in favor of the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendants<lb/> go hereof without day and recover of the plaintiffs their costs and charge herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution. The plaintiffs file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and confess the demurrer herein and<lb/> by leave of Court files an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Elizabeth Louis</name><lb/> vs 603.<lb/> <name>James C P Louis</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned<lb/> and solemnly called, come not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiff, it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name> et al<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to<lb/> the State of Maryland.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to the<lb/> State of Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Jennings</name> et al<lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>Moses D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit for want of security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Replication to amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue from Common Pleas. Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys<lb/> and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Jacob Emick</name>, <name>S Lafountine</name>, <name>Wm T Selby</name>, <name>F T Harrington</name>, <name>John<lb/> D Stedgeman</name>, <name>Xavier Roser</name>, <name>J F Mauntel</name>, <name>Valentine Bollman</name>, <name>B F White</name>, <name>Wm F Finch</name>, <name>Nich<lb/>olas Astand John Murphy</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="155" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0162.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-15">Thursday November 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence D Burke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip H Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by affi<lb/>davit confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> dollars and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>John Nicholas</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered by the Court, it<lb/> is ordered that the same be sustained: then days is giver to file security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out part of the answer herein being heard and fully understood<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235,72<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Crawford</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Boomer</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Westlake</name> and<lb/> <name>Appleton A Button</name><lb/> vs 471.<lb/> <name>Samuel W Crawford</name><lb/> <name>George B Boomer</name> and<lb/> <name>George G Pride</name>.</head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Pride</name>, but the defendants, <name>Samuel W Crawford</name> and <name>Geo B Boomer</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs, the petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed:<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action if foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and thirty five dollar and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and suggests to the Court the death of <name>Joseph<lb/> Charles</name>, issue the commencement of this suit, and on h is motion, <name>Taylor Blow</name> and<lb/> and <name>William T Blow</name> are made codefendants herein in lieu of said <name>Claress</name>, and<lb/> the said <name>Taylor Blow</name> and <name>William T Blow</name> come, by their attorney, and waiving process enter their appear<lb/>ance to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bridget Sweeney</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>John Sweeney</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>Martin Hamerle</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, and being fully advised of and concerning the promised, doth<lb/> find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hereof without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiffs his costs and herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein is, after consideration by the Court, overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="156" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0163.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John <unclear>Whitehill</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 446<lb/> <name>John Kopp</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the garnishee, the City of<lb/> St Louis, be discharged at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#803,42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Hayward</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abraham Abrahams</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by affi<lb/>davit confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and three dollars and forty two cents and authorizing the entering up of judg<lb/>ment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid confessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefore: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> et al<lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Childs Jr</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, by his attorney, withdraws his motion for oyer of check men<lb/>tioned in the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gorman</name><lb/> vs 681<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security costs herein is, after due consideration by the Court, sus<lb/>tained; ten days is given plaintiff to file security.</p>
            <p><name>O H Pratt</name>, is, on motion of <name>Asa S Jones</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#191,05</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M <unclear>Kewan</unclear></name><lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>Edwin A <unclear>Skeele</unclear></name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and submits to the Court the defendants mo<lb/>tion for security for costs and also the demurrer to the petition herein and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the said motions doth overrule the same and<lb/> each of them; and the defendant failing further to plead herein it is, on motion of the plaintiff, ordered<lb/> by the Court the petition herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of one hundred and ninety one dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out parts of the petition herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court, is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and the attorney for the plain<lb/>tiffs suggests to the Court the death of the plaintiff, <name>Franklin Field</name>, since<lb/> the commencement of this suit, and the same is not denied; and by consent of<lb/> parties the plaintiffs amend their petition by striking out the name of the plaintiff, <name>Edward H Manger</name>;<lb/> and by like consent, it is ordered that this suit be discontinued as to the said Manger, and that this<lb/> suit proceed in the name of the surviving plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Chas Boswell</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="157" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0164.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm B Lent</name> et al<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>Wm Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loeb</name> and <name>Wile</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W P Shryock</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Motion to pay over money filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a dedimus issue<lb/> to the State of New York to take depositions to be used on the trial of this<lb/> cause on the behalf of the said plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed but not being finished laid<lb/> over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-16">Wednesday November 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that the judg<lb/>ment herein rendered be set aside and vacated and that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name> President of <name>American<lb/> Express Company</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>M A <unclear>ORourke</unclear></name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion in arrest of judgment and also a motion<lb/> for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#98,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth MacKenzie</name><lb/> vs 837<lb/> <name>Thomas M Taylor Oscar<lb/> W Collett</name> garnishees of <name>Jno J Palmer</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and moves the Court for judgment<lb/> upon the answer of said garnishees, and the Court finding from said an<lb/>swer that at the time of this garnishment the garnishees were indebted to<lb/> the defendant in the sum of ninety eight dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the debt aforesaid as found and have<lb/> execution therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed said garnishees for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State use of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their answer and by leave of Court file an amended answer herein.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="158" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0165.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe J Allen</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>William Allen</name></head>
            <p>Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and the defendant, although duly called, still<lb/> making default the Court proceeds to her the proof and having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is a person of good moral<lb/> character and an innocent and injured party and that the defendant from his habit and cause of life an<lb/> unsuitable person to have the control of the infant child, William Allen, who is of tender years; it doth or<lb/>der that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that she have the care cus<lb/>tody and control of the infant child William Allen mentioned in the petition; and it is also ordered that she<lb/> be allowed to resume her maiden name of Phebe J Russell, and that the same be hereafter deemed and taken<lb/> as her only true and lawful name, and also that she pay the costs of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson E Bridge</name> et al<lb/> vs 648<lb/> <name>William Taussig</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Collier White Lead and Oil Co.</name><lb/> vs 1023.<lb/> <name>Charles Blow &amp; Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillitts</name> et al<lb/> vs 1037<lb/> <name>Richd J Lockwood</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Gearhart</name> et al<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>State Savings Inst</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at<lb/> plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">City of <unclear>Cormbelet</unclear><lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>Wm M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Rufderheide</name><lb/> vs 968<lb/> <name>Casper Rufderheide</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute it is ordered that<lb/> this cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#371,18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name>,<lb/> <name>Oscar W Collett</name> and<lb/> <name>Elliot Duryee</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly warned<lb/> and solemnly called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of there hundred and seventy one dollars and eighteen cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward D Hill</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at<lb/> plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Natala Kahn</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1211,10<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myerson</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan D Allen</name><lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Andrew a Le Beau</name>,<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismiss this suit costs the defendants,<lb/> <name>Le Beau</name> and <name>English</name>, and also comes the defendant, <name>Myerson</name>, by his attorney; and<lb/> the parties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court upon due consideration thereof, doth find that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred eleven dollars and<lb/> and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this judgment bear interest at the note of ten percent per annum from this date un<lb/>til paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="159" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0166.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Chas W Barr</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dissolve injunction filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bunard M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors empannelled and sworn herein and the trial progressed and being fin<lb/>ished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name>, <name>John N Ginnis</name><lb/> and <name>R Easton Goodell</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name><lb/> and <name>William Risley</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name>, <name>John N Ginnis</name><lb/> <name>R Easton Goodell</name><lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name><lb/> and <name>William Risley</name></head>
            <p>Order of Consolidation.<lb/> By consent of parties<lb/> it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the fol<lb/>lowing entry be made<lb/> "nunc protune", as of the <date when="1858-02">February Term. A D eighteen hundred and fifty eight</date>, to wit; It is<lb/> ordered that the above entitled causes be consolidated into one action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Downing</name>,<lb/> <name>Lewis Downing Jr</name><lb/> and <name>Alonzo Downing</name><lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>John M Hockaday</name><lb/> and <name>William Liggitt</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file an additional affidavit from which it appears to the Court<lb/> that the defendants are non residents of this State, therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendants be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of thirty three<lb/> hundred dollars on account of goods wares and merchandize sold and deliv<lb/>ered by the plaintiffs to the defendants, and that their property has been<lb/> attached; and unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next and on or before,<lb/> the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered<lb/> against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published, according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in<lb/> the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="160" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0167.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-17">Thursday November 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>George P Doan</name> Is on motion of <name>John M Krum</name>, admitted and enrolled as a<lb/> member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wall</name> et al<lb/> vs 473.<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiffs file an amended petition herein; and on motion<lb/> ten day are given to answer the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagic Lee</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the plaintiff present to the Court<lb/> his petition herein, the defendant saying nothing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey H Humphrey</name> admr<lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that the dismissal of this cause be<lb/> set aside and vacated, provided however that the plaintiff pay all the<lb/> costs accrued herein to the present date and also file additional replevin<lb/> bond within twenty days from this date: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Allen H Glasby</name> administrator<lb/> vs 808<lb/> <name>William C Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2000,00<lb/> Judgment continued<lb/> see <date when="1980-01-29"><unclear>29/1/1980</unclear></date></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors empanelled and sworn herein; and, being agreed upon a verdict, upon<lb/> their oaths, find the following verdict, to wit; Me the Jury find verdict for plain<lb/>tiff and assess his damages in the sum of nine hundred and eighty seven dollars.<lb/> <name>F T Harrington Foreman</name>. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the sum of the two thousand dollars the penalty of the bond sued on, and also his costs in this behalf ex<lb/>pended and that be have execution for the sum of nine hundred and eighty seven dollars, the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the third amended petition having been mislaid in heir thereof, by<lb/> consent of parties, the defendant files a demurrer to said third amended petition<lb/> nunc protune.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Syms</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel R Syms</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace E Dimick</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Folson</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a petition and also the ap<lb/>pearance of the defendants to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Sam B Louis</name></head>
            <p>The dependants to the petition herein, being heard and fully considered by the Court, is sustained: ten days<lb/> is given plaintiff to amend: amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="161" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0168.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name>, <name>John H Ginnis</name><lb/> and <name>R Easton Goodell</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merrit</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name><lb/> and <name>William Risley</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and also a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>Thomas Lings</name>, <name>Charles Redfield</name>, <name>Geo S Pride</name>, <name>John A<lb/> Wilson</name>, <name>Meyer Freide</name>, <name>D T Card</name>, <name>Perry Turner</name>, <name>J H Singleton</name>,<lb/> <name>R T Puller</name>, <name>Theodore Schroeder</name>, <name>A G Gray</name> and <name>L M Coy</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid<lb/> over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> et al<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus is awarded plaintiffs to take depositions in the<lb/> State of Virginia.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas <unclear>Bratenahl</unclear></name>&amp;c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant<lb/> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagic</name>
                Lee</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out<lb/> answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Petition of <name>Gerarde B Allen</name> Filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-18">Friday November 18th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Wm C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>The defendant by leave of Court amends his answer and the plaintiff withdraws<lb/> his motion to amend said answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#838,10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversman</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Wernke</name><lb/> vs 756<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and the defendant withdraws his motion<lb/> to consolidate, leaving this suit undefended, and failing further to plead the petition<lb/> herein it taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty eight dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid and the costs of suit and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Price</name> et al<lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>David T Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>Motion in arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="162" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0169.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1631,39.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha W Brown Archibald C<lb/> Goddin</name>, <name>James T Johnson</name> and<lb/> <name>Barton S Wilson</name><lb/> vs 58<lb/> <name>William T M Miller</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Sherman</name> and <name>John T Washington</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six<lb/>teen hundred and thirty one dollars and thirty nine cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs herein expended and leave execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>William D Sedgwick</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name> and<lb/> <name>William Kelly</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and agree that judg<lb/>ment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs for profession of property<lb/> and one cent damages and that the costs of this suit be adjudged against the<lb/> plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs have and<lb/> retain the property delivered to them by the Sheriff and that they recover of<lb/> the defendant the damages aforesaid and have execution therefor, and further that the said plaintiffs<lb/> pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversman</name> et al<lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and the defendant withdraw his motion to<lb/> consolidate and failing to plead further herein, it is ordered that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph O Sawyer</name> et al<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Joseph Holland</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judg<lb/>ment rendered herein on the <date when="1858-10-11">11th day of October 1858</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T M Coun</name>, <name>George A Boyden</name>,<lb/> <name>Lucas E Schoonmaker</name>, and <name>Hiram<lb/> Schoonmaker Jr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name>, <name>Joseph Bocards</name>, and<lb/> <name>Andrew V S Melick</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having field a petition and an affidavit sta<lb/>ting that the defendants are in residents of this State, therefore<lb/> on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against them for the sum of twenty seven hundred dollars and<lb/> twenty eight cents, on account of goods sold and delivered by the<lb/> plaintiffs to the defendants and for money expended by the plaintiffs for the defendants; and that their property<lb/> has been attached and unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before<lb/> the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against<lb/> them and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Commissioners file a report and an account for services.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo d Winchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas F Baker</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return on Execution No 2 of <date when="1859-09">Septem<lb/>ber Term 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Rupell</name> et al<lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Chas F Baker</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return on Execution No 83 of <date when="1859-09">September Term 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="163" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0170.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this suit be dismissed<lb/> as to <name>James Hayden</name> and that an alias Summon issue for <name>Hudson</name>.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining Co</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>The motion to strike out part of the answer herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Answer to interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, and file a motion for a new trial<lb/> and afterwards also file a motion in arrest of judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>John Nicholas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for leave to sue as a poor person filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas Meyers</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter F Gage</name> et al<lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Perry</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.<lb/> On motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered, that this cause be dismissed at their costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Von Phul</name> et al<lb/> vs 128<lb/> <name>Thomas R Grady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.<lb/> This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute, it is or<lb/>dered that the same be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eva Catharine Coring</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Peter H Coring</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by her attorney and the defendant, although duly called<lb/> still making default, the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein and having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same and being satisfied therefore of the good con<lb/>duct of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth order adjudge and de<lb/>cree that the said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted<lb/> with said defendant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person also that the<lb/> said defendant pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry Bright Jr</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorney, and also the Jurors herein and the trial pro<lb/>gressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="164" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0171.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-19">Saturday November 19th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment, Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3507.95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hepsia B <unclear>Mudge</unclear></name><lb/> vs 546<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On notes and Bill of Exchange.<lb/> Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants withdraws his motion<lb/> to dismiss and saving nothing further in bar of the plaintiffs demand the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is found that the<lb/> defendants in indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirty five hundred and sworn dollars and ninety<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> et al vs <name>Citizens Savings Inst</name> 288<lb/> State use of <name>Mitchell</name> vs <name>Fredt W Meister</name> et al 303<lb/> <name>Citizens Savings Inst</name> vs <name>Charles Meyers</name> et al 318</head>
            <p>By consent of parties these causes are continued<lb/> to the next term of this Court.</p>
            <p><name>A L Holmes</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus W Louis</name><lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>John F Hague</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the default<lb/> herein and for leave to answer doth order that said motion be sustained answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Wetherill</name> et al<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>Francis H Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Order by the Court that the defendant file an amended answer herein within<lb/> ten days; and it also ordered that, if the said defendants fail as to do, Judgment<lb/> by default be entered against him on motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard Rothgerber</name> et al<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Solomon K Lawrence</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs being fully considered, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs file a bond for the costs which have assured and<lb/> which may accrue within ten days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry <unclear>Townsley</unclear></name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>The motion for addition security on the attachment bond being heard and fully<lb/> considered, by the Court, it is ordered that the plaintiffs file an additional attach<lb/>ment bond herein within twenty days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343.<lb/> <name>Elson F Wright</name></head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered, by the Court,<lb/> is sustained. Twenty day are given to file security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Mathews</name><lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court,<lb/> is sustained. Ten days are given plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered, by the Court,<lb/> is sustained. Ten day are given to file security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>A P Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent this cause is continued with leave to the defendants to answer within ten<lb/> days before the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="165" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0172.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jameson</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out part of the petition herein being heard fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jurors empan<lb/>neled and sworn herein and the trial progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Jno Nicholas</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit filed by plaintiff.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-21">Monday November 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment, Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt H Hodgson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Walter L F Gage</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Cleveland</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#567,82</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The City of St Louis<lb/> vs 438<lb/> <name>John C Smith</name> and <name>Richard King</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorneys, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and sixth seven dollars and eighty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T M Conn</name>, <name>George a Boyden</name>,<lb/> <name>Lucas E Schoonmaker</name>, and <name>Hiram</name><lb/> <name>Schoomaker Jr</name><lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>John D Harty Joseph Bocard</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew V S Melick</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>. Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> comes and files a statement in writing from which it appears<lb/> that the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with great loss and expense before the probable ter<lb/>mination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff<lb/> sell said property according to law; and that he makes report of<lb/> his property under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Levi J North</name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Anton Wiseman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and the execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="166" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0173.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William S Hawken</name></head>
            <p>The assignee having filed an application for his discharge and no<lb/> person interested having filed written objections to such discharge,<lb/> the Court doth refer the said application to <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> as Commissioner,<lb/> appointed for this case, to examine the merits of said application and report to the Court with all con<lb/>venient speed thereon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Bagging and<lb/> Rope Company</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James E Yeatman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit of plaintiff by consent, costs to abide the result.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Gate use of <name>A W Elliott</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> et al</head>
            <p>Agreement filed and cause continued by consent as on affidavit at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Boyd</name> et al<lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>The separate demurrer to petitions being heard and fully considered by the Court,<lb/> it is ordered that said demurrers, and each of them be overruled. On motion<lb/> fifteen days are given defendants to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#8,969,21.<lb/> set aside 29 #295.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name>, <name>John M Ginnis Jr</name><lb/> and <name>R Eaton Goodell</name><lb/> vs 370.<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name><lb/> and <name>William Risley</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come the Jurors, empannelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon<lb/> a verdict, upon their oaths, find for the plaintiffs and assess their dam<lb/>ages at the sum of Eighty nine hundred and sixty nine dollars<lb/> and twenty one cents, and also find against the defendants on their<lb/> counter claim. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants take nothing by their counter claim<lb/> herein and that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as as<lb/>sessed and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendants file a<lb/> motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Order Receiver.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and by their consent, it is ordered<lb/> that <name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, the receiver appointed in this cause, pay, out of the<lb/> assetts now in his hands and which he may here after collect, a certain judgment<lb/> rendered in the St Louis Court of Common Pleas in favor of the <name>Laclede Hotel Company</name> against<lb/> said <name>Smith</name> and <name>Houseman</name> rendered on the <date when="1859-06-24">twenty fourth day of June, eighteen hundred and fifty<lb/> nine</date> for the sum of four hundred and fifty sevenn dollars and fifty cents and costs, on which judg<lb/>ment an execution issued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Thatcher</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Nelson C Rowe</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion it is ordered that an alias issue herein, cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="167" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0174.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abner Cutter</name><lb/> <name>Henry M True</name> and<lb/> <name>James A C Miller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.<lb/> The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit, according to law, claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is or<lb/>dered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the<lb/> <name><unclear>Coroner</unclear></name> of St Louis County and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed if said<lb/> property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver<lb/> it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kaltenback</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottob Held</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Timothy Ryan</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiff and suggests to the Court the death of<lb/> the said plaintiff which is not denied, and it is ordered that this cause be continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham M Gardner</name> et al<lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>Benjamin B Barkelow</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lynch</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Walsh</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the attorney for the plaintiffs and suggests to the Court the death<lb/> of the plaintiff, <name>Thomas J Wood</name>, since the commencement of this suit, which is<lb/> not denied, wherefore it is ordered that this suit proceed in the name of the<lb/> other and surviving plaintiff; thereupon come the defendants by their attorney, and<lb/> also a Jury, to wit; <name>August Meier</name>, <name>Leroy Kingsland</name>, <name>E J Glasgow</name>, <name>J C Hogan</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Shield</name>, <name>George W Thomas</name>, <name>James Grace</name>, <name>H Wasson</name>, <name>Louis Bottischer</name>, <name>William Vogel</name>, <name>J B<lb/> Dean</name> and <name>Jacob Kearth</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue here<lb/>in joined well and truly to trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <unclear><name>S M Breckinridge</name></unclear>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-22">Tuesday November 22nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Frederick Eschmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Eschmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Schnake</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery of Property attached.<lb/> Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files motion for an order on the<lb/> obligors in the bond given for the release of the property attached to deliver said<lb/> property and the Court, upon due consideration thereof, doth order that <name>Frederick<lb/> Eschmann</name> and <name>Deitrich Woestondick</name>, the obligors in said bond deliver said<lb/> property to wit; fifty sacks of com. Seventeen bb Co liquor, twenty five boxes cor<lb/>dial four port boxed of liquor, fourteen kegs of liquor and fifty five sacks of oats, to the Sheriff of St Louis,<lb/> County, at his office, in said County, over before Monday next the twenty eighth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry <unclear>Cormerais</unclear></name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>The defendants files an answer herein</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="168" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0175.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekiel M Campbell</name>, <name>John Crain</name>,<lb/> and <name>Wallace W Blackman</name><lb/> vs 413.<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry H Gratz</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant, <name>Henry H<lb/> Gratz</name>, cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that pro<lb/>cess cannot be served upon him, therefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the said defendant be<lb/> notified that a civil action had been commenced against him<lb/> for the sum of nineteen hundred and seventy eight dollars and five cents on account of a bill a Exchange<lb/> drawn by said <name>Henry H Gratz</name> upon <name>Cary Gratz and Company</name> in favor of the plaintiffs, and that unless<lb/> he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, Within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the third day thereof answer of the action<lb/> aforesaid according to law, the petition herein will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered<lb/> that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and pub<lb/>lished in the City of St Louis. On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias Sum<lb/>mons issue to LaFayette County for the defendant, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name> cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekeil M Campbell</name> et al<lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue to LaFayette County for <name>Andrew J Alexander</name>: continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Sorrell</name> and<lb/> <name>Hampson S Christian</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew Tainter</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit according to law, claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore is con<lb/>sidered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed, if said property<lb/> be not delivered to him, to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Henry S Gee</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter R Black</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Receiver.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the Sheriff of St Louis County, under and by virtue of<lb/> Execution No 196 and 197, returnable to <date when="1860-02">February Term 1860</date> of this Court, has<lb/> lived upon certain account book, journal. Ledger, bills receivable and payable and one<lb/> Cash Book and one note of T L Conan for #63,73/100, the property of said <name>Gee</name> and <name>Black</name> therefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs in said execution, by <name>Francis Minor</name>, their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> <name>Jacob H <unclear>Vraland</unclear></name> be and he is hereby appointed Receiver of said account books, journal, ledger, bill recuir<lb/>able and payable, and said note and cash <unclear>book</unclear> and that he proceed with diligence to settle and collect same; and it is<lb/> also ordered that the receiver before entering upon the discharge of his duties file a bonds in the sum of eight<lb/> hundred dollars, conditioned according to law: thereupon the said Receiver files a bond, as ordered by the Court,<lb/> with himself as principal, and <name>Jacob S Merrill</name>, as security, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Order of Assignees.</p>
            <p><name>Gerard B Allen</name> having filed his petition herein praying that the assignees of<lb/> said <name>Marlow</name> be ordered to pay him the sum of Sixteen hundred and eighty<lb/> nine dollars and twenty six cents, out of the proceeds of the also of the property<lb/> assigned before applying any of said proceeds to the purpose of the assignment, and the court having considered<lb/> said petition and being satisfied from the proofs made by the petitioner, that the allegations in said petition are<lb/> true, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that said assignees pay to said petition, out of the proceeds of the<lb/> sales of said assigned, property, the sum aforesaid, with interest from the <date when="1859-11-21">21st day of November, 1859</date>, and<lb/> that such payment be made before applying any of said proceeds to the payment of the claims of creditors claim<lb/>ing under the assignment, and the said assignees file as a voucher the note described in said petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Saml B Lowe</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lut</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Buttner</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="169" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0176.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wolff</name><lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>Benjamin G Thomas</name><lb/> and <name>George A W August</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered herein for the plaintiff for one cent damages and possession of<lb/> the personal property and that the cost herein except the Sheriffs costs for re<lb/>moving said property out of the possession of the defendants, be adjudged<lb/> against the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff retain the possession of the<lb/> personal property mentioned in the affidavit to the petition and that he recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid as agreed upon together with the costs of this suit, except the Sheriffs costs for removing the said<lb/> property out of the possession of the defendants, and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James K Fisher</name><lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>R J Tunstall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Azariah Connelly</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Haggerty</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed: On motion of the assignees herein, the Court appoints<lb/> <name>Garrett O Rourke</name>, <name>Richard Wiseman</name>, and <name>H F Lammers</name>, appraisers<lb/> to appraise the effects inventoried.</p>
            <p><name>William Bliss Clarke</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Phillips</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B F Hutchinson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T M Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 1021<lb/> <name>Jno Arnold</name> and <name>Jno Ray</name><lb/> gran. of <name>Rockwell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that the said garnishees be discharged<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#800,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Sutton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James McCamant</name> and<lb/> <name>William McCamant</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants and file a statement in writing confessing themselves<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred dollars and authorizing<lb/> the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiff for that<lb/> amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid in confessed and also his costs herein expended ad have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeol D Smith</name>, <name>Walter W Barton</name>,<lb/> and <name>Chawncy H Barton</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>John J Mitchell</name> and <name>Samuel A<lb/> Buckmaster</name></head>
            <p>On Contract.</p>
            <p>No come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come a Jury, to wit; <name>E Currie</name>, <name>William H Glasgow</name>, <name>William<lb/> Lawson</name>, <name>William Moetz</name>, <name>D Provanciere</name>, <name>T Townville</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Campon</name>, <name>Phil Woldorf</name>, <name>Daniel Wind</name>, <name>Michael Schislert</name>,<lb/> <name>J C Marshall</name>, and <name>E Vaughn</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial pro<lb/>gressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon them oaths aforesaid say they find their verdict<lb/> in favor of the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their<lb/> suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hereof without day and recover of the plaintiffs their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Elliott</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapliegh</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>David A<lb/> Reed</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="170" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0177.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lynch</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Walsh</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein and the trial being finished the Jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit<lb/> in this behalf but that the defendants go hereof without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff their costs and charge herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Collins</name><lb/> vs 219<lb/> <name>Thos G Collins</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorneys, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Blevin</name> et al<lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>A Hinzpeter</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Reply to denial of answer filed by said garnishee herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert Koch</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, leave is given to file a<lb/> supplemental answer forth with, Supplemental answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Additional answer to interrogatories filed. Bond filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion on the part of the Commissioners filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-23">Wednesday November 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit according to law from<lb/> which it appears that the defendant is a men resident of this State, therefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of four hundred and seventy seven dollars<lb/> and fifty cents on account of balance due on a note made by defendants to one <name>S Brady</name> of which plaintiff<lb/> is the holder as endorses, and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this<lb/> Court to be begun and held the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis on the first<lb/> Monday of February next and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law,<lb/> judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. Ands it is further ordered<lb/> that a copy hereof be published, according to law; in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs and leave given him to amend petition within thirty days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="171" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0178.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Philips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benj F Hutchinson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna C Weber</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Christian Weber</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Norman</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Thos J Norman</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rebecca Myers</name> by her next<lb/> friend <name>Charles R Hoelzle</name><lb/> vs 473<lb/> <name>Charles Myers</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although duly warned and called comes, not but make default, wherefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against the<lb/> defendant as confessed: and the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same and being satisfied there<lb/>from that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff<lb/> be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be<lb/> restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person and that she pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick M Aneny</name> et al<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Peter Harman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled. On motion ten days are given defendants to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed: On motion of the assignee the Court appoints <name>S C Jett</name>,<lb/> <name>A C Peckham</name>, <name>Edward Storrs</name> and <name>W H Maurice</name> appraisers to appraise<lb/> property and effects inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Joseph Kaufer</name></head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the dismissal of this cause is, after due consideration by the Court<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Knapp</name> et al<lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>The Chippewa Falls Lumbering<lb/> Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the cause<lb/> by dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Marine Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>The St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at its costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#422,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Gorla</name><lb/> vs 878<lb/> <name>Francis A Perrier</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly verified by a affidavit, con<lb/>fessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty two dollars<lb/> and forty five cents, and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plain<lb/>tiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Logan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Wigman</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the possession of certain<lb/> personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property<lb/> specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if<lb/> said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno C Spencer</name><lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Spencer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="172" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0179.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Hart</name><lb/> vs 98<lb/> <name>Christian Vogler</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that this cause dismissed at his costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Michael Burke</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard A Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 652<lb/> <name>Henry F Cross</name> et al</head>
            <p>On file 449 Sept T 159. Dismissal.<lb/> On motion of the garnishee, <name>T T Rubey</name>, by his attorneys it is ordered that he be<lb/> discharged at plaintiff costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Wright</name><lb/> vs 1029<lb/> <name>Charles K Dickson</name> garnt of<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishee, by his attorneys it is ordered that he be<lb/> discharged at plaintiff costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of<lb/> ten dollars is allowed for answer to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Augustus W Eberhard</name></head>
            <p>Order of Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed, if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the<lb/> defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Exchange Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs 716<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney a dedimus is awarded it to New<lb/> York, and leave is given it to withdraw the bill of Exchange sued on, which<lb/> is accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#174,11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew Alexander Crozier</name>,<lb/> and <name>Samuel Baxter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Walther</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant also comes and<lb/> files a statement duly verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seventy four dollars and eleven cents,<lb/> and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff<lb/> for that amount, at the costs however of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and have execution therefore, and that the<lb/> plaintiffs pay the costs herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Sargent</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>J E Currie William H Glasgow</name>, <name>William Lawson</name>, <name>D Provin<lb/>ciere</name>, <name>T Townsville</name>, <name>Henry Campen</name>, <name>Phil Woldorf</name>, <name>Danl Wind</name>, <name>Michall<lb/> Schisler</name>, <name>J C Marshall</name>, <name>Louis Patterson</name>, and <name>Enoch Vaughn</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the matter in controversy upon the<lb/> plea in abatement well and truly to try, the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over<lb/> until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Phillips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benj F Hutchinson</name> and<lb/> <name>James A Hutchinson</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the order of continuance made herein<lb/> on this day be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="173" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0180.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sandbach</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to<lb/> him to take it from the defendants deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 773<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a motion for an order that the money returned into<lb/> Court by the Sheriff be applied to the execution herein, and the Judge of this Court<lb/> being counsel for <name>William H Tasker</name>, a person interested therein; it is ordered<lb/> that said motion and all further proceedings thereon be transferred to the<lb/> St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-24">Thursday November 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1141,75.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hyman</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William T Hollister</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismissed this suit as to the dependant<lb/> <name>William T Hollister</name>, and mores the Court for judgment on the answer herein, which<lb/> motion after due consideration by the Court, is sustained; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/> debted to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and forty one dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, <name>Joseph Hyman</name>, the debt aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1093,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hyman</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Stilwell</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>William T Hollister</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismissed this suit as to the dependant<lb/> <name>William T Hollister</name>, and moves the Court for judgment on the answer herein,<lb/> which motion after due consideration by the Court, is sustained; and the<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and ninety three dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, <name>Joseph Hyman</name>, the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Pentland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas J Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>David G Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law,<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said affidavit<lb/> to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property<lb/> be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="174" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0181.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#300,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> and <name>Edgar Ames</name><lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name>, <name>John Clemens</name>,<lb/> and <name>Alexander Kelsey</name>.</head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs and doth<lb/> assess their damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of three hundred<lb/> dollars, the penalty of the bond suedon, and also their costs and charges herein expended and the they have<lb/> execution for the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/>sessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Jno Nicholay</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for leave to sue as a poor peson, being heard and fully considered by the Court,<lb/> is overruled; thereupon the plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>Henry Buesemeyer</name> as se<lb/>curity, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Johnson</name> et al<lb/> vs 783.<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert P Clarke</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>R g Parks</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal of Garnishees.</p>
            <p>On motion of the garnishees, <name>J E Elder</name> and <name>Jno H Hunter</name>, by their attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> they be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. Five dollars is allowed<lb/> them for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pilot Knob Iron<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 550<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpin</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>B Midas</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein, being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained. Ten days are given to file security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name><unclear>Azauah</unclear> Connelly</name> &amp; <name>William H Haggerty</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed. Bond filed and approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fred K Eschman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Service of order for delivery of property attached filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name> et al<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>Jno Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>Jno Slaymaker</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Capp Jr</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> St Louis County</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendant costs for absence of <name>A H Hackney</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="175" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0182.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Walter C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiff costs for absence of <name>Henry Greffen Kamp</name> and<lb/> a <name>Sanford</name> witnesses.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Haydon</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed, and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined upon the plea in abate<lb/>ment in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered and adjusted by the<lb/> Court that the defendant had not, at the time of the commencement of this suit, fraudulently conveyed<lb/> or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors; wherefore it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> and<lb/> <name>Cotton Greene</name>.<lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>R M Scanlan</name> and<lb/> <name>A W Webber</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that the Keeping of the property attached<lb/> under the writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense before<lb/> the probable termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said sheriff<lb/> sell said property, according to law, and that he make a report of his procee<lb/>dings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion three days further time given defendant to plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chat Bratenahl</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>R R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Notice to plaintiffs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Notice to defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downs</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>The garnishees, <name>Michael Moriarty</name> and <name>Geo Goodlett</name>, by consent and<lb/> leave file supplemented answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joe M Hanson</name> and<lb/> <name>James Mansur</name><lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>J Chase Dow</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs files petition and also an affidavit from which it appears to the<lb/> Court that the defendant is a non resident of this State, therefore on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and sixty three dollars and ninety six cents on account of a balance due plaintiffs on an order and<lb/> certain drafts made by defendant and accepted and paid by plaintiffs, and that has property has been<lb/> attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the sixth<lb/> day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to<lb/> law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Brecknridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="176" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0183.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-25">Friday November <unclear rend="strikethrough">25th</unclear> 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p>Ordered by the Court that all cases set for trial on and after Tuesday last the 28th in<lb/>stant be set ahead one week from the days on which they are respectively set.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Arariah Connelly</name> and <name>William<lb/> H Haggerty</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Upon the application of <name>John Decker</name> and <name>Robert S Voorhis</name>, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that the said <name>Decker</name> and <name>Voorhis</name>, assignees here<lb/>in, have full power and authority to sell the personal property con<lb/>tained in said inventory of appraisement, here to fore filed herein, un<lb/>der said assignment, at public or private sale for cash, as may seem to the said assignees for the best<lb/> interest of the parties; and the said assignees may employ such agents as they shall deem necessary in<lb/> making such sales, and at such times and places as may seem best.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe Wiley</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Thomas Wiley</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name>, <name>Sally Long</name>, <name>John Lawrence Long</name>,<lb/> <name>Clarissa Long</name>, <name>William E Ferguson</name>, <name>Lucy<lb/> Levis</name>, and her husband, <name>Robert Lewis</name>, <name>Alton<lb/> Long</name>, <name>John W Long</name>, <name>Gabriel Long</name>, <name>Margaret<lb/> Orr</name> and her husband, <name>John Orr</name>, <name>Clara V<lb/> Alexander</name>, and her husband, <name>Maurice W Alexander</name>,<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name>, and her husband, <name>Preston<lb/> Gordon</name>, <name>William Bacon, Sr</name>, <name>James Bacon,<lb/> Jr</name>, <name>Park Bacon</name>, <name>William Bacon, Jr</name>, <name>Elizabeth<lb/> Bacon</name>, <name>Phebe M Clintock</name>, <name>John D B Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>George Clark</name>, <name>Benjamin O Clark</name>, <name>John R<lb/> Brown</name>, <name>John S Penrice</name>, <name>Alice A Perrice</name>,<lb/> <name>Mary E Payne</name>, and her husband, <name>Elbridge<lb/> Payne</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants,<lb/> <name>John S Penrice</name> and <name>Alice A Penrice</name>, cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served<lb/> upon them, on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that the said <name>John S Penrice</name> and <name>Alice A Penrice</name> be<lb/> notified that a civil action has be on commenced against<lb/> them in this Court the object and general mature of which<lb/> is to obtain a division and partition of the following real<lb/> estate, to wit; situate in the Court of St Louis and State of<lb/> Missouri; a certain tract of land containing four hundred<lb/> and thirty three 75/100 acres, more or less, being the Western<lb/> part of Survey No 415 in the name of <name>John Long</name> in Town<lb/>ship 45 North Ranger 4 East and described as follows,<lb/> to wit; beginning at the South West corner of said Survey<lb/> vs 415 a port from which a White oak 12 inches in<lb/>dia bears S 20 E 7 links distant, and a hickory 12 in in dia bears N 5 W 9 links distant, thence<lb/> East along the Southern line of said original Survey No 415 one hundred and twenty eight 32/100 chains to<lb/> a post corner, from which a white oak 8 in dia bears N 45 E 22 links distant and a hickory 4 in dia<lb/> bears S 60 E21 links distant thence N 57 E along old line of said Survey No 415, 5, 52/100 chains to a white<lb/> oak 28 in dia corner, thence N 33 &amp;#x00BE; W along Hills land 46 87/100 chains to a post old South East corner<lb/> of survey to Coontz a black walnut 12 in dia bears N 41, E 18 links and an Elm 9 in dia bears S 70 W 48<lb/> links distant; thence S 77, W along the Northern line of said old Survey 69 chains to a post corner and<lb/> the S W corner of Coontz, thence North along said Coontz Western line 10 chains, corner, thence S 89 &amp;#x00BD;<lb/> W along the Northern line of said old Survey No 415, 40, 19 chains to a post the N W corner of said<lb/> original Survey, thence South along the Western boundary line of said old Survey No 415, 36, 34 chains<lb/> to the place of beginning: and for a sale of said premises, if it shall appear that partition cannot be made<lb/> without great prejudice to the owners. And that unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be<lb/> begun and holden at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday<lb/> of February next, and on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law the<lb/> petition herein will be taken against them as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be pub<lb/>lished according to law in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="177" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0184.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described: wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the <name>Coroner</name> of St Louis<lb/> County and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the<lb/> defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name> trustee<lb/> of<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the pos<lb/>session of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defen<lb/>dant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the <name>Coroner</name> of St Louis County,<lb/> and said <name>Coroner</name> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it<lb/> from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albertine Jacob</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>Teresa E Nolen</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, by her attorney, with draws her motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name> et al<lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>Herman S Allen</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name> et al<lb/> vs 123.<lb/> <name>Herman S Allen</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name><lb/> vs 837<lb/> <name>Thomas M Taylor</name> and <name>Oscar W<lb/> Collett</name> garn. of <name>Jno St Palmer</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and acknowledge to have received<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Reynolds</name> et al<lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the defen<lb/>dants costs and that execution issue therefor. By like consent defendant withdraws the<lb/> instrument of writing suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Homan</name> et al<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Newton S Gay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>S G Sears</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened<lb/> and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Walker</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>William Walker</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed an additional affidavit from which it appears that the defen<lb/>dant is a men resident of this State, therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him to obtain a decree of divorce on the ground that the defendant had a wife living at the time of his<lb/> marriage with the plaintiff, and that he has absented himself without a reasonable cause for the space of<lb/> two years, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and on or before the Sixth<lb/> day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, the petition herein will be taken against him<lb/> as confessed, And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the Mis<lb/>souri democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="178" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0185.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Peters</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>Luther M Shreve</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Edward J Castello</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Nicolay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Deis</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>Jno W Seubert</name> et al</head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>Wm Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>Objections to application of Commissioners filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos Leitensdorfer</name></head>
            <p>Waiver of notice filed by defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion to strike out defendants exceptions to referees report,<lb/> and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth overrule the said motion.<lb/> Defendant files a motion for a rule on Receiver.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <unclear><name>S M Breckinridge</name></unclear>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-26">Saturday November 26th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2010,54</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>David E Hatch</name> and <name>David P Buckner</name>,<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit<lb/> to the Court the plaintiffs motion to strike out defendants answer and<lb/> for judgment, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the<lb/> said motion, doth order that the same be sustained; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand and ten dollars and<lb/> fifty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendants file<lb/> a motion to set aside the judgment herein and for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Ahrens</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>August Ahrens</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfaction to the Court that the order of<lb/> publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albertine Jacob</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>Teresa E Nolan</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and file an agreement, and by their consent, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="179" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0186.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> et al<lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the plaintiffs withdraw the exhibits herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H M <unclear>Hartassgee</unclear></name> of <name>Schuerman</name> vs <name>Pacific RRCo</name> 424<lb/> <name>Nathaniel W Floyde</name> vs <name>Jessa Dean</name> et al 197<lb/> <name>Timothy O Riordan</name> vs <name>Henry Brundy</name> 196</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that these cases be<lb/> continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey H Humphreys</name> admr<lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files an additional Replevin bond, which is approved and<lb/> by leave of Court withdraws the original bond.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neun Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinrich Heissner</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is sus<lb/>tained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Chollar</name> and<lb/> <name>John H Peters</name><lb/> vs 63.<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> Bocarde</name> and <name>Andrew V S Melick</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs file an additional affidavit from which it appears to the Court<lb/> that the defendants <name>John D Harty</name> and <name>Andrew V S Milick</name>, are non resi<lb/>dents of this State, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, by the attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that the said defendants be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against them for the sum of thirty four hundred and fifty<lb/> five dollars and twenty seven cents on account of goods and merchandize sold and delivered by plaintiff to de<lb/>fendants, and that their property has been attached and unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun<lb/> and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the First Monday of February next<lb/> and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law judgment will be rendered<lb/> against them and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of<lb/> St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine H Radcliff</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Frederick E Radcliff</name></head>
            <p>The motion to strike out parts of the petition herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court, is sustained as to that part which refers to the following words, to wit;<lb/> "plaintiff further states that said defendant has offered such indignities to her<lb/> as to render her condition intolerable:" and the Court doth order that the said words be stricken out of said<lb/> petition: and the Court doth overrule the rest of said motion to strike out parts of the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5112,66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard H Smith</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>Thomas Seaverson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant, although duly called, still<lb/> making default, the plaintiff waives a Jury and submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of five thousand one hundred and twelve dollars and sixty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the prop<lb/>erty attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herron</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name> and<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
            <p>Judgment set aside with a proviso.</p>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the judgment<lb/> herein is sustained and the Judgment herein set aside and vacated upon condition that<lb/> the defendants appear and file their answer to the petition filed within ten days from this<lb/> date; otherwise said motion is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="180" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0187.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#859,14.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pelagie Morin</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>Antoine Morin</name> decd<lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Daniel Perreault</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit, <name>August</name>,<lb/> <name>Meier</name>, <name>Leroy Kingsland</name>, <name>E J Glasgow</name>, <name>J C Hogan</name>, <name>Thomas Shields</name>, <name>James<lb/> Grace</name>, <name>H Wasson</name>, <name>Louis Bottischer</name>, <name>William Vogel</name>, <name>Jacob Kearth</name> and<lb/> <name>Michael Flynn</name>, eleven good and lawful men, who being, by consent, duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff the sum of eight hundred and fifty nine dollars and fourteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Walsh</name><lb/> vs 419<lb/> <name>Symmer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute, it is ordered that the same<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hunter</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Ann Hunter</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action it is ordered that this same be dismissed at the plain<lb/>tiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
            <p><name>Marshall Brotherton</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> of Emancipation to his female slave <name>Betsey</name> aged about forty years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Christopher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>John Christopher</name>, by their attorneys, and on<lb/> motion of said <name>Christopher</name>, it appearing to the Court that the order made upon the plain<lb/>tiff to answer the interrogatories filed by said defendant with his motion and statement<lb/> of facts has not been complied with within the time designated in said order, it is or<lb/>dered that the facts stated and contained in the said statement of facts do stand admitted: thereupon the plain<lb/>tiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to more<lb/> to set the same said. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this be<lb/>half but that the defendants go thereof without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#777,14 &amp;<lb/> 10per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Wright</name><lb/> vs 198<lb/> <name>Peter Ambs</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Ambs</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> herein; and the parties consent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff for seven hundred and seventy seven dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest<lb/> at ten percent per annum until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Major C Cheatham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac J Price</name> and<lb/> <name>James Scarberry</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files his petition and it is ordered by the Court that the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County take possession of the corn and produce grown on the farm described in said<lb/> petition in the year 1859 and sell the same or so much thereof as will make eighty<lb/> dollars and interest and the costs of this suit and hold the proceeds subject to the fur<lb/>ther order of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Thomas Richeson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert W Hunt Augustus W<lb/> Lewis</name> and <name>Sherry C Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tully D Bowen</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name><lb/> <name>Jabez P Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="181" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0188.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Bast</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>David Jamison</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered that an alias Summons issue<lb/> for the defendant, <name>James Gormley</name>: Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#540,00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>St L &amp; J M<lb/> R R Co.</unclear></name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitensdorfer</name></head>
            <p>Petition to Condemn Land.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defen<lb/>dant having here to fore filed a waiver of the notice required by law to be<lb/> given him, and it appearing to the Court that the Commissioners have<lb/> duly proceeded according to the orders heretofore made herein, and in<lb/> pursuance of the Statute in such case made and provided, and have ascertained and determined the<lb/> compensation to which said defendant is entitled for the following real estate proposed to be taken by the<lb/> plaintiff, to wit; a portion of the following lot of ground situated in the City of Carondelet, County of St Louis<lb/> and State of Missouri, to wit; a lot of ground in said City of Carondelet fronting seventy feet on the East side<lb/> of Main Street in Block number nine of said City and in the Survey of said former town made by<lb/> <name>Lawrence M Eiler</name> in the year 1832 and running back Eastwardly of that South one hundred and<lb/> sixty feet and five inches to the middle of said block bounded on the North by the Northern boundary<lb/> of said Block number nine, on the West by Main street, on the South by a lot of <name>Joseph Shoultz</name> and<lb/> on the East by a line parallel with said Main street and one hundred and sixty feet five inches<lb/> therefrom: which portion of said lot is a strip off the Eastern side of said lot of thirty feet one width by<lb/> seventy feet in length, or so much thereof as is included within the track and surveyed lines of the said<lb/> plaintiff all which appears by the Report filed herein by the Commissioners and the Court, being fully<lb/> advised in the premises, and no cause being shown to the contrary, doth confirm the said Commissioners Report,<lb/> and doth order that the plaintiff pay to the defendant the sum of five hundred and forty dollars, the<lb/> compensation awarded by the Commissioners to made by the plaintiff to the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob L ache</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Geo Mossbacher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Syme</name> et al<lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>St Bt Indiana</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiffs to file an<lb/>amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Glenn</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Charles H Saltmarsh</name>,<lb/> <name>Movis Brady</name>, <name>Elia<lb/> A Raymond</name> and <name>Daniel<lb/> Raymond</name> her husband</head>
            <p>On account.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same, doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendants. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in<lb/> this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the plain<lb/>tiff their costs and charges in this suit expended and have execution therefor. Fin<lb/>ding and decision of the Court filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="182" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0189.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-28">Monday November 28th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Atlanta</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Lewick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>George Cooper</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Thos Richards</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, until third of December next is given<lb/> him to reply.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pacific Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine H Radcliff</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Fredk E Radcliff</name>.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D W Barnard</name> et al<lb/> vs 662<lb/> <name>Richard W Bender</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that an alias Summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Providence Tool Co</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Wiles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a motion for an order directing the money returned into<lb/> Court by the Sheriff to be applied in part satisfaction of the execution herein, and<lb/> the judge of this Court being counsel for <name>William H Fasker</name>, a party interested<lb/> therein, it is ordered that said motion, and all further proceedings thereon, be transferred to the St Louis<lb/> Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#336,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>George W Goodlett</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant, although duly called,<lb/> still making default, the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant owes the plaintiff three hundred and thirty<lb/> six dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <p><name>Anthony G Thornton</name> Who is personally known to the Court in open Court, acknowledges the execution<lb/> of a deed of emancipation to his Slaves Rimy, aged about twenty one, bright mulatto color, about<lb/> five feet in height and her child <name>Zella</name> of dark mulatto color aged, about three years &amp; eight months.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>On False Warranty.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>L B Trafton</name>, <name>Joseph Stout</name>, <name>Thomas Ryan</name>, <name>L Sambelson</name>, <name>John J Wright</name>,<lb/> <name>H B Bryan</name>, <name>William Matthews</name>, <name>Charles Smith</name>, <name>Henry Downey</name>, <name>P Lewis</name>,<lb/> <name>Anton Marquis</name> and <name>N Cochran</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="183" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0190.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-29">Tuesday, November 29th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al<lb/> vs 843<lb/> <name>Ira Todd</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>King</name> and <name>Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the said garnishee<lb/> be discharged at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Bauer</name> and wife<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>George A Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> Receiver<lb/> vs 770<lb/> <name>John Nichols</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney, it is ordered that interlocutory<lb/> judgment by default rendered against the defendant be set aside and vaca<lb/>ted and that an alias Summons issue for said defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tallmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Charles Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and file an agreement herein; and by consent the<lb/> defendant withdraws his offset, without prejudice, and also withdraws his supplemental<lb/> answer; and by further consent the original answer herein is substituted as the answer<lb/> of the defendant to this action; Cause continued by consent.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luinnebaug Bank</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>Order for Subpoena Duces <unclear>Tecuin</unclear>.<lb/> On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered that a subpoena duces teucm<lb/> issue to the President and Cashier of the Bank of the State of Missouri to bring in<lb/> papers deposited with them by Rexford and Dimick or the holders of the note in this<lb/> action suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Nicholay</name><lb/> vs 728<lb/> <name>W Priesmier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and suggests to the Court the death of the defendant<lb/> <name>Louis Bartold</name>, and the same is not denied; and on motion of said plaintiff, it is ordered that<lb/> a scire facias issue to bring in the legal representatives of said deceased defendant return<lb/>able to the next term of this Court. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>William P Shryock</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court<lb/> the plaintiffs withdraw the bill of exchange sued on and file a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Fisher</name><lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Henry Kattleman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The death of the plaintiff having been suggested at a former term and no steps hav<lb/>ing been taken to bring in his representatives, therefore on motion of the attorney for<lb/> said plaintiff, it is ordered that this suit abate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Christopher</name> et al<lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>William P Freeman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the counterclaim herein, being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court, is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="184" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0191.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143.<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>The dependants motion for a rule on Receiver being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court, it is ordered that <name>Augustus N Berthoud</name>, the Receiver in<lb/> this cause, file a report of his proceedings herein and an account of all moneys<lb/> received and paid out by him as such receiver, without delay. And the Court, having duly heard and<lb/> considered the defendants exceptions to the Commissioners Report, doth overrule the same; and, on motion<lb/> of plaintiff, by attorney, the Court doth further order that said Report be confirmed.</p>
            <p><name>Edward Wills</name>, Who is personally known to the Court, in open Court acknowledge the execution<lb/> of a deed of emancipation to his slaves Ann and her three children Thomas, aged about five years,<lb/> <name><unclear>Milly</unclear></name> aged about three years and baby aged about one year.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>On False Warranty.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward A Filley</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel R Filley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Trent</name></head>
            <p>Order of publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs having filed a petition and also an affidavit, according to law,<lb/> from which it appears to the Court that the defendant is a non resident of this<lb/> State, therefore on motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him<lb/> for the sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and fifty eight cents on account of a note executed by<lb/> the defendant, and that his property has been attached and unless he appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of<lb/> February next and on or before third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, judgment<lb/> will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a<lb/> copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published<lb/> in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin D Theobald</name><lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>Frederick Eschmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, <unclear>the</unclear> ordered that attachments<lb/> issue against <name>Frederick Eschmann</name> and <name>Dietrich Woestendick</name> returnable<lb/> Friday next to answer a contempt in failing to obey the order for the delivery<lb/> of the property attached.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="185" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0192.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-11-30">Wednesday November 30 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Babcock</name> et al<lb/> vs 90<lb/> <name>Chippewa Falls Lumbering Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at their costs and the execution issues therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>set aside and <unclear>vacated 29 p 280</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order for production of Books.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition for production of<lb/> books of account, and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth order<lb/> that <name>William G Miller</name>, one of the defendants in the above entitled cause,<lb/> produce, on or before Saturday next, <date when="1859-12-03">December 3rd, 1859</date>, at 10 o'clock, am, the Day Book, Journal,<lb/> Ledger, Cash, Bill or note and Invoice Books, mentioned in the plaintiffs petition as the books of the<lb/> firm of <name>Miller</name> and <name>Boisanbin</name>; or that the said <name>William G Miller</name> then and there show cause why the<lb/> prayer of the said petition should not be granted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Thomas Wall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Quo Warranto.</p> 
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles G Mauro</name>, Circuit attorney of the<lb/> Eighty Judicial Circuit, who prosecutes for the State of Missouri<lb/> in this behalf, on the relation of <name>Thomas Wall</name>, and files the affida<lb/>vit of said <name>Wall</name>, and upon the facts stated therein leave is given<lb/> the said Circuit Attorney to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto at the relation of said<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name> against said <name>James Coff</name>, which is accordingly filed; and on motion, it is ordered that<lb/> the writ prayed for issue returnable on <date when="1859-12-12">Monday December 12th A D 1859</date>, at ten o'clock. am.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Bulte</name>,<lb/> and <name>Matthias Backer</name>.<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>William Bender</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p> 
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files<lb/> a statement, from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached<lb/> under the writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense be<lb/>fore the probable termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the<lb/> said Sheriff sell said property, according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this<lb/> order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bell</name>, <name>David W Bell</name>,<lb/> <name>John B Telden</name> and <name>Noah D Bell</name><lb/> vs 75.<lb/> <name>Henry B Maxey</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p> 
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement, from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached<lb/> under the writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense be<lb/>fore the probable termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the<lb/> said Sheriff sell said property, according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this<lb/> order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#212,18</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Johnson</name> and<lb/> <name>George P Whitelaw</name><lb/> vs 783<lb/> <name>William K Wilson</name></head>
            <p>On Note and Account.</p> 
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and the defendant, although duly called<lb/> still making default, the plaintiffs submit the assessment of their damages to the<lb/> Court, and the Court, after heaving the proof, doth assess their damages at the sum of<lb/> two hundred and twelve dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wall</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas O Carsen</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="186" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0193.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#355,15<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Langford</name> and<lb/> <name>Stephenson</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Willoughby</name><lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name><lb/> <name>J W Stephenson</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Grimm</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Grimm</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Henry Grimm</name> and <name>Jacob Grimm</name>, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and fifty five dollars and fifteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the<lb/> rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Tatum</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Robt H Ober</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants by leave of Court with draw their answer and file a demurrer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Cause</name> et al<lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>William H Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias writ<lb/> issue against defendant <name>David P Clay</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Kasten</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>Daniel Lobenstein</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered that the same be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rower</name> et al<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>C Albers</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered that the same be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Olcott</name> surviving<lb/> partner et al<lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Walter S Dann</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered that the same be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 489<lb/> <name>J W Chenoweth</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered that the same be dismissed at<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mark Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 682<lb/> <name>John M Carthy</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered that the same be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#685,45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Leopolt Mayer</name></head>
            <p>On account and note.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly called,<lb/> makes default; and no Jury being required, the Court from the proofs, doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages at the sum of six hundred and eighty five dollars and forty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; against the property attached and it is ordered that<lb/> five hundred and ninety dollars and twenty five cents bear interest at ten percent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Kingsland</name> et al<lb/> vs 668<lb/> <name>Lewis Hall</name>, <name>J C<lb/> Hull</name> and <name>Edwd Gray</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="187" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0194.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name> et al<lb/> vs 596<lb/> <name>Chamberlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the plain<lb/>tiffs costs and that execution issue therefor: The defendants waive all claim<lb/> for damages under the attachment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name> et al<lb/> vs 830<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> and <name>Henry N<lb/> Hart</name> garn. of <name>Chamberlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent it is ordered that the said garnishees, be discharged at<lb/> plaintiffs costs, without an allowance, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Thomas</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>F Stevens</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#162,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver of the<lb/> partnership credits and effects of the late<lb/> firm of <name>Houseman</name> and <name>Smith</name> composed<lb/> of <name>James D Houseman</name> and <name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 805<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the<lb/> plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of sixty two dollars. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#278,48</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Leisse</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Bernard Rawie</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same finds for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of two hundred and seventy<lb/> eight dollars and forty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#187,42.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> and <name>Frederick W Meister</name><lb/> surviving partners of the late firm of <name>Meyer<lb/> Krug</name> and <name>Meister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis G Woltge</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files a statement in writing duly<lb/> verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of one hundred and eighty seven dollars and forty<lb/> two cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against<lb/> him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt a foresaid a confessed and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#203,19.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis G Woltge</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p> 
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant also comes and files a<lb/> statement in writing duly verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two hundred and three dollars and nineteen cents and authorizing<lb/> the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the<lb/> <name>Barge Grey<lb/> Hound</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of <name>Henry Kattelman</name>, upon whose application an order for<lb/> the sale of said <name>Barge</name> was made, it is ordered by the Court that all further procee<lb/>dings herein be discontinued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="188" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0195.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 707<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion this cause is continued at plaintiffs costs, and leave until the <date when="--01-02">second<lb/> day of January</date> next is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 351<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>On False Warranty.</p> 
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jurors empanelled and sworn<lb/> herein, except <name>D Lewis</name>, and thereupon the trial progressed with the remaining eleven Jurors, by<lb/> consent, and the parties file an agreement, and by their consent it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the Jurors aforesaid be discharged from the further consideration of this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Catherina Weber</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Christian Weber</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs 951<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">City of St Louis<lb/> vs 438<lb/> <name>John C Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckenridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-01">Thursday December 1st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Jennings</name> et al<lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>Moses D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a bond for costs with <name>Francis H<lb/> Manter</name>, as security, which bond is approved by the Court: and the motion to dismiss,<lb/> after due consideration by the Court, is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name> et al<lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> et al<lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="189" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0196.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> et al<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name> et al<lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name> et al<lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund Hendricks</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#7856,33</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rudolph Bircher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A Beard</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant also comes and files a state<lb/>ment in writing, duly verified by affidavit, confessing himself indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of seven thousand eight hundred and fifty six dollars and thirty three<lb/> cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benj Leiber</name><lb/> vs 850<lb/> <name>St Louis Agricultural and<lb/> Mechanical Association</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>On False Warranty.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>P Lewis</name>, <name>J H Conn</name><lb/> <name>William G Miller</name>, <name>T H Larkin</name>, <name>William Gossman</name>, <name>William G Mepham</name>, <name>Roger<lb/> Malaby</name>, <name>Robert Wasson</name>, <name>R E M Carthy</name>, <name>S Meyer</name>, <name>James Stuart</name>, and <name>Fayatte<lb/> Moore</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected and tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Mosbach</name><lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>John Kampeter</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of Contempt.</p> 
            <p>The said defendant having purged himself of contempt by paying over the several<lb/> sums as directed in the order allowing alimony, and also paying the costs of the pro<lb/>ceedings for contempt, by consent it is ordered that all further proceedings for contempt<lb/> be discontinued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="190" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0197.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-02">Friday December 2nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhammer</name>, <name>Mary Korhammer</name>,<lb/> his wife and <name>Anna Korhammer</name> by her<lb/> next friend <name>Henry Korhammer</name>.<lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the<lb/> plaintiffs by leave of Court and by consent files an amended peti<lb/>tion and the defendant files an amended answer herein; and the<lb/> parties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition answer and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, and being fully advised of and concerning the premises, doth find the issues herein<lb/> in favor of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the instrument<lb/> of writing described in the original and amended petition be set aside cancelled and declared null and void<lb/> and that the said defendant be and he is hereby released from all and every liability ausing out of the<lb/> same and that the said defendant deliver up to the plaintiffs the peomissory notes described therein and<lb/> that upon such delivery he be discharged from the trust mentioned therein, and that the plaintiffs pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rogers Brothers Manufacturing<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 634<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that an alias<lb/> Summons issue herein for defendant <name>J S Jett</name> returnable to the next term<lb/> of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard Rothgerber</name> et al<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Solomon K Lawrence</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>The plaintiffs having failed to file security for costs within the time required<lb/> for them so to do, on motion of the defendants, by their attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Greiner</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed: Exhibits there to attached filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Bratenahl</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney a dedimus is awarded him to Indiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 863<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.<lb/> of <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 866<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn. of<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="191" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0198.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Carroll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jas Carroll</name></head>
            <p>Motion for support filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#221,23.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Moses</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius L Moses</name><lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>John C F Laden</name> and<lb/> <name>John Laden Jr</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p> 
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> called, still make default, and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and twenty one dollars and twenty<lb/> three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>McCormick</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Tracy</name> and <name>Papin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given him to withdraw the<lb/> notes sued on, on leaving a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed. <name>Lucian Eaton</name>, assignee herein, files a bond, con<lb/>ditioned according to law, with himself, as principal, and <name>George Par<lb/>tridge</name>, <name>George D Smith</name> and <name>John McKrum</name>, as securities, which bond is<lb/> in the sum of six thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars and is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Virginia W Mulhoeffer</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Peter Mulhoeffer</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a jury, to wit; <name>L B<lb/> Trafton</name>, <name>Joseph Stout</name>, <name>Thomas Ryan</name>, <name>L Samelson</name>, <name>John J Wright</name>, <name>H B Bryan</name>,<lb/> <name>William Matthews</name>, <name>Charles Smith</name>, <name>Henry Dockring</name>, <name>Anton Marquis</name>, <name>Michael<lb/> Cook</name> and <name>James Donahoe</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over<lb/> until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>On False Warranty.</p> 
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the jurors em<lb/>pannelled and sworn herein and the trial progressed and being finished<lb/> the jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="192" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0199.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-03">Saturday December 3rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chauncey I Bliss</name> and<lb/> <name>Wyman Leonard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p> 
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit according to law claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff<lb/> of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not<lb/> delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first obtained defendants add an additional reason to<lb/> the motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Eleanor Davis</name><lb/> vs 576<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name> and<lb/> <name>Louis Winkelmeier</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the time allowed<lb/> so to do, it is, on motion of the defendants, by their attorney, ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#514,33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Gordon</name>, <name>Temple O Harris</name><lb/> <name>W O Harris</name> and <name>F P Harris</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Azariah Connelly</name> and <name>William H Haggerty</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p> 
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and the defendants<lb/> also come and file a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit<lb/> confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and fourteen dollars and thirty three cents and authorizing<lb/> the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount and costs. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Indiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>Mistrial.</p> 
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the jurors, em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein and upon their oaths aforesaid say they are an able to<lb/> agree upon a verdict, wherefore it is ordered that the jurors be discharged from the<lb/> further consideration of this cause, and that this cause be continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer to rule filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin J Adams</name> et al<lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
            <p><name>William Glasgow, Jr</name>, who is personally known to the Court, comes in<lb/> open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation by him to his negro<lb/> slave <name>James Bales</name> who is a mulatto slight frame five feet seven inches in height and<lb/> about forty five years of age.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="193" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0200.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a severance as to <name>Becker</name> Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Wetherill</name> et al<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>F A Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Answer of the defendant filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors herein<lb/> and the trial being finished the jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-05">Monday December 5th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James</name> use re<lb/> vs 293<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a subpoena duces<lb/> tecum issue to Jas H Garrett to bring a certain bond.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 112<lb/> <name>Edwd W Holloway</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a Pluries Summons issue<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff amends his amended petition by filing and adding there to an affi<lb/>davit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>J H Roberts</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick McAneny</name> et al<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Peter Harman</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion one week additional time is given to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name><lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Chas L Heywood</name> et al</head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="194" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0201.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ira H Stout</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Edward S Holliday</name> and<lb/> <name>William D Holliday</name></head>
            <p>Charge of Venue.</p> 
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>J M Tyler</name>,<lb/> a witness. The Judge of this Court having advised one of the parties in the<lb/> premises, by consent of parties, appearing by their respective attorneys, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be transferred to the Court of Common<lb/> Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court file the original papers, and a certified copy of the record entries<lb/> herein, in the Office of the Clerk of said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>For<lb/> costs.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Americus V Potter</name><lb/> vs 129<lb/> <name>Edwin R Skeele</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the plaintiff waiving the assessment of his damages,<lb/> consents that judgment may be rendered against the defendant for the costs herein. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amelia Carman</name> admr<lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>Wm Etherton</name></head>
            <p>Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Boyd</name><lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Drake</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Edward H Gratiot</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Mistrial. Jury discharged.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein and upon their oaths say they are unable to agree upon a<lb/> verdict, wherefore it is ordered that the jurors aforesaid be discharged from the further<lb/> consideration of this cause, and that this cause be continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm T Matter</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply to Counterclaim files.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Geo Scott</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer of <name>Wheeler</name> filed. Motion to strike<lb/> out answer of <name>Becker</name> and <name>Fanning</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward A Filley</name> et al<lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>William Trent</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#10 00/100</note>
            <p><name>James A Guion</name>, a deputy sheriff of St Louis County, is fined ten dollars for a contempt by him com<lb/>mitted in saying that if he were directed by the Court to serve the writ of attachment on Capt<lb/> <name>John Reilley</name>, a witness, he would refuse as to do.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T M Coun</name> et al<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney a dedimus is awarded them to the<lb/> State of New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Chollar</name> et al<lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorneys, dedimus is awarded them to the State of<lb/> New York.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="195" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0202.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a continuance filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-06">Tuesday December 6th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius W Weber</name> by next<lb/> friend <name>George Weber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C Degenhart</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of next friends.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, <name>Julius W Weber</name>, files a petition for the appointment of next<lb/> friend, and the Court appoints <name>George Weber</name>, next friend of said plaintiff,<lb/> who files his acceptance of said appointment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Todd</name><lb/> vs 104<lb/> <name>Charles L Heywood</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that the continuance herein be set<lb/> aside and that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#269, 87.<lb/> Dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by this respective attorneys, and waiving a jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being fully advised of an concerning the same, doth<lb/> find for the plaintiff upon his claim the sum of two hundred and eighty nine dollars<lb/> and eighty seven cents, and for the defendant upon his set off the sum of twenty dollars, and doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and sixty nine dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of two hundred and sixty nine dollars and<lb/> eighty seven cents, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed, and also its costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1066, 66 Dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Grinner</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly called, comes not;<lb/> thereupon come a jury, to wit; <name>James Lancaster</name>, <name>N Robinson</name>, <name>Christopher Lidloff</name>, <name>Jacob Casper</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Oerter</name>, <name>George W Davis</name>, <name>B Delisle</name>, <name>J J Reger</name>, <name>Herman Harmann</name>, <name>Gregua<lb/> Rubuchon</name>, <name>Herman Mardorf</name>, and <name>Lewis Myers</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of ten hundred and<lb/> sixty six dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum of ten hundred and sixty six dollars and sixty six cents, the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed, by the jury, and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="196" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0203.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> et al<lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bercher</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herron</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Putnam</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret S Evington</name><lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Thomas C Evington</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter G Camden</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a statement from<lb/> which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with great loss and expense before the probate termination of this suit;<lb/> it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said property, according to law, and that<lb/> he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached, or<lb/>der the writ herein will be attended great loss and expense before the probate<lb/> termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that said Sheriff sell said prop<lb/>erty, according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this<lb/> order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and by leave withdraws his prayer for an<lb/> injunction and for the appointment of a receiver herein and dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>Increase C Miller</name> and <name>Solomon Parmele</name>, and the court hav<lb/>ing duly heard and considered the motion for a continuance of this cause, doth overrule the same.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>Lucien Eaton</name>, the assignees herein, and files a petition for an or<lb/>der of sale, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> doth order that the said assignee sell the stock of jewelry assigned en<lb/>tire at public or private sale as shall sum best on the following terms, to wit; one fourth part of the purchase<lb/> money cash in hand, the balance, one fourth in two months, one fourth in four months, and one fourth in six<lb/> months, or in monthly payments for the last three fourths, as shall suit the purchaser, the last payment not<lb/> to exceed six months, secured by the promissory notes of the purchaser or purchasers with at least two good<lb/> and sufficient endorsers upon each note: and it is also ordered that he include in the sale of said stock<lb/> the property covered by deeds of trust: and it is further ordered that the said assignee sell the equipment<lb/> of the establishment known as the Oak Hall Billiard Saloon and Pistol Gallery in St Louis and<lb/> the rest of the property in the same manner and mode and on the same terms as those herein before<lb/> named for the sale of the stock of jewelry, with the addition of security by deed of trust on the billiard<lb/> tables, if he shall deem it expedient to add to the security of the notes given.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Nicholson</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Jonathan Chesley</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out motion of defendants to strike out petition and for<lb/> judgment by nil dicit filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="197" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0204.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wittigh</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Peter Bressau</name> otherwise<lb/> <name>Breschauer</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial the defendant comes by his attorney, but<lb/> the plaintiff, although called, comes not, wherefore, it is considered that the<lb/> plaintiff be non suited and that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Y Reeder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas P Shallcross</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit claiming the possession of<lb/> certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defen<lb/>dant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County<lb/> and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant<lb/> and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Monell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles M Monell</name>,<lb/> <name>John B Henden</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Constable Jr</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit claiming the possession of certain<lb/> personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendants deliver<lb/> the property described in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff<lb/> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 826<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Answer fileds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann E Dillon</name>'s admr<lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Barton Bates</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>R W Brewer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by this respective attorneys, and the plaintiff files an additional<lb/> affidavit for the attachment herein and the defendant files a plea in the nature of a<lb/> plea in abatement there to, and thereupon come a jury to wit; <name>James Lancaster</name>, <name>N<lb/> Robinson</name>, <name>Christian Lidloff</name>, <name>L E Forsythe</name>, <name>Z Day, Jr</name>, <name>Charles Jonas</name>, <name>E Williams</name>, <name>W H Vandmarter</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Benken</name>, <name>J C Essex</name>, <name>Joseph Aubuchon</name>, and <name>D H Preston</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy upon the plea in abatement herein well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to dismiss<lb/> this suit, doth overrule the same; the motion for leave to bring in bills<lb/> or notes sued on being heard and fully considered by the Court,<lb/> the Court doth order that the plaintiff file with the Clerk the notes mentioned in the petition. On mo<lb/>tion seventeen days from the time filing said notes are given the defendant to answer demur or otherwise plead.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to dismiss this suit being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled; and the plaintiffs motion for leave to bring in bills sued<lb/> on being heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the plaintiff file<lb/> the bills mentioned in the petition with the Clerk Seventeen days from the filing of said bills are given defendant to answer,<lb/> demur or otherwise plead.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="198" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0205.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-07">Wednesday December 7th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe Wiley</name><lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Thomas Wiley</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly called, still<lb/> making default, the Court proceeds to hear the proofs and having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured party it doth<lb/> order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her<lb/> contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person; and the Court<lb/> being satisfied that the defendant is an unsuitable person to have the care and control of the infant child Virginia<lb/> W who is of tender years, it is further ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have the care custody<lb/> and control of the said infant child: and it is also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name> as<lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L Papin</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> overruled; and the defendants motion in arrest of judgment, being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court, is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Price</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>James Lusk</name><lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James B Colt</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same, doth finds the issue herein joined in<lb/> favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Cashman</name> etal<lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Thomas Durrell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and the execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Eads</name> etal<lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at their costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Death suggested.</p>
            <p>The attorney for the plaintiff suggests to the Court the death of said plaintiff since the<lb/> commencement of this suit, and the same is not denied: and this cause is continued<lb/> until the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin J Brown</name> etal<lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion and by consent of parties it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the defen<lb/>dants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#154, 90<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Keferstein</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Cully</name> and <name>Mark W Watson</name><lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>Henry A Schuermann</name> and <name>Frederick W Keferstein</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to <name>Henry A Schuermann</name>, but the defendant<lb/> <name>Fredk W Keferstein</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed and<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant owes the plain<lb/>tiffs one hundred and fifty four dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and<lb/> it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at Eight percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="199" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0206.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Bernhard Midas</name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Simon Meyberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, ten days are given to file security<lb/> for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Farmers Bank</name> of <name>Orwell</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>Isaac W Taylor</name>'s admr</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 108<lb/> <name>Michael Plunkett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jermina A Crisman</name><lb/> vs 168<lb/> <name>William Crisman</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant although called,<lb/> still makes default, and the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein and having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same and being satisfied there from that the plain<lb/>tiff is an innocent and injured party it doth order that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and be restored to all the nights and privilegas<lb/> of an unmarried person; and it is ordered that the said plaintiff pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John J Covert</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Reply to answer to Rule of Court to produce books.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empan<lb/>neled and sworn herein and the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over<lb/> until Friday Morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Friday Morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-09">Friday December 9th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitenodorfer</name></head>
            <p>Prayer for appeal from judgment of confirmation of Commissioners Report<lb/> and to at aside same filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C McAllister</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Richard Phillips</name><lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>Ephraim Abbott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 326<lb/> <name>P A Champion</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="200" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0207.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#276, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson Cunningham</name>,<lb/> <name>David Cunningham</name>,<lb/> <name>Dominic Jhonsen</name> and<lb/> <name>George Duncan</name><lb/> vs 604<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy six dollars and seventy five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files an additional attachment bond<lb/> herein in the sum of Eight thousand six hundred dollars with <name>Obadiah H<lb/> Platt</name>, as principal, and <name>William H Reed</name> and <name>Melvin L Gray</name>, as securities,<lb/> which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward H Mead</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>John A Bart</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a state<lb/>ment from which it appears that the keeping of the property, attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the probable ter<lb/>mination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said prop<lb/>erty according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this<lb/> order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph F Myer</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan K Sullivan</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Dennis Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garns</head>
            <p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors em<lb/>panneled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find the issue herein joined in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that, at the date of the commencement of this suit,<lb/> the defendant had fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his<lb/> creditors, and fraudulently concealed, removed or disposed of his property or effects so as to hinder or delay<lb/> his creditors and was about fraudulently to conceal, remove or dispose of his property or effects so as to hinder<lb/> or delay his creditors.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name><lb/> Vs<lb/> <name>John D Daggett</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson T Wright</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff file a bond for costs which is approved.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="201" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0208.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual Fire<lb/> and Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name>, <name>Cornelius W Small</name><lb/> <name>Thomas W Wells</name> and <name>John G Wells</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come a Jury, to wit; <name>Jacob Casper</name>, <name>Henry Oerter</name>, <name>George W<lb/> Davis</name>, <name>B Delisle</name>, <name>J J Reger</name>, <name>William Fine</name>, <name>C Heisler</name>,<lb/> <name>H Garvins</name>, <name>Turner Maddox</name>, <name>William D'Oench</name>, <name>D W<lb/> Hitchcock</name> and <name>Thomas Haywood</name> twelve good and lawful men, who is being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid<lb/> over until tomorrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-10">Saturday December 10th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Stumpf</name><lb/> vs 53<lb/> <name>Frederick Luppeng</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a statement<lb/> from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the writ<lb/> herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the probable termination<lb/> of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that<lb/> he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Kimbrough</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard F Toomer</name><lb/> vs 112<lb/> <name>David Love</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a<lb/> statement from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached un<lb/>der the writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the<lb/> probable termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell<lb/> said property according to law, and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name>, <name>Cornelius W Small</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas W Wells</name> and <name>John G Wells</name><lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>On account. Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> the Jurors empanneled and sworn herein, and the defendant moves the<lb/> Court to strike out the petition herein on account of the absence of<lb/> <name>Cornelius W Small</name>, one of the plaintiffs, who having been duly sub<lb/>poenaed by the defendant and, being called, answers not; which motion, after due consideration by the Court, is<lb/> sustained, to which ruling of the Court the plaintiff except and say they will not further prosecute their suit in<lb/> this behalf but voluntarily suffer a non suit with leave to move to set the same aside. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hereof<lb/> without day and recover of said plaintiffs their costs and charges in this suit expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. Motion to set aside said non suit filed by plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="202" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0209.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1794, 03</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander L Tyler</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant failing to plead further<lb/> herein leaving this action undefended, on motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the petition herein be taken against said defendant as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of seventeen hundred and ninety four dollars and three cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and his costs here<lb/>in expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#270, 33.<lb/> Set aside 29 p 205.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Seemuller</name>, <name>John R<lb/> Seemuller</name> and <name>Augustus seemuller</name><lb/> vs 158.<lb/> <name>Timothy Van Link</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis X Zimmerman</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although called<lb/> come not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and seventy dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name> Trustee<lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Additional abstract of plaintiffs title filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Additional abstract of plaintiffs title filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dietz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mound City M F &amp; M Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Mudd</name>, <name>Alexis Mudd</name><lb/> and <name>Graham L Hughes</name><lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Gayle</name> and <name>Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the default of said<lb/> garnished having been entered herein, and no Jury being required by<lb/> plaintiffs, on motion of the plaintiffs, the Court finds and assess against<lb/> said garnishee the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of said garnishee the damages aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#417, 31.<lb/> &amp;<lb/> 10 per cent per an</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name> and<lb/> <name>Herman H Laumeier</name><lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>August Johns</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit the mat<lb/>ter in controvery upon the plea in abatement to the Court and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find the issue joined in said plea in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs; and the defendant failing further to pleads herein, leaving this suit undefen<lb/>ded, on motion of the plaintiffs, the petition herein is taken against said defendant as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of four hundred and seventeen dollars and thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate<lb/> of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Hubbell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to law, claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to Coroner of<lb/> St Louis County and said Coroner is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from<lb/> the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
   
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="203" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0210.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Ferdinand B Houck vs Michael Leonardi et al <!--"180" next to bracket--></head>
    <p><choice><orig>Dismifsal</orig><reg>Dismissal</reg></choice>. <lb/> On motion of the plaintiff, by his Attorney, it is ordered by the Court <lb/> that this cause be <choice><orig>dismifsed</orig><reg>dismissed</reg></choice> at plaintiff's costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifsue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Quinnebaugh Bank vs John L Chandler <!--"199" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Agreement filed and cause continued at defendants costs by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Malcom Turner et al vs William Hassinger <!--"243" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Theresia Pereles vs Joseph Pereles <!--"143." next to bracket--></head>
    <p><choice><orig>Dismifsal</orig><reg>Dismissal</reg></choice>. <lb/> On motion of the plaintiff, by Attorney, it is ordered that this cause be <choice><orig>dismifsed</orig><reg>dismissed</reg></choice>.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Samuel L Hertz vs Lucius H Fuller <!--"230" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>On account. <lb/> Now at this day come the parties, by their respective Attorneys, and also come a <lb/> Jury to wit; Herman Kahrman, Gregua Aubuchon, Herman Mardorf, Louis <lb/> Myers, LE Forsyth, Z Day, Charles Jonas, E Williams, WH Vandewater, <lb/> James Benken, JC Essex and DH Preston, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected <lb/> tried and sworn the <choice><orig>ifsues</orig><reg>issues</reg></choice> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but the plaintiff says <lb/> he will not further prosecute this action but voluntarily takes a non suit. It is therefore considered <lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf by that the defendant go hence <lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. <lb/> Leave is given plaintiff to move to set aside non suit.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Franklin Field vs Charles W Barr <!--"299" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiff, and suggests to the Court the death of said <lb/> plaintiff since the commencement of this suit, which is not denied, and this cause <lb/> is continued until the next term of this Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Henry Bussmeyer vs John Nicolay et al <!--"247" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>The plaintiffs motion for judgment on the answers herein being heard and fully con- <lb rend="hyphen"/> sidered by the Court is overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Charles Gruner vs Thomas Allen <!--"56" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Agreement filed and by consent of plaintiff one week further time is given defendant <lb/> to file herein a motion for new trial and motion in arrest of judgment.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Boatmans Savings Institution vs Bank of the State of <choice><orig>Mifsouri</orig><reg>Missouri</reg></choice> <!--"689" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Motion to dismiss suit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Boatmans Savings Institution vs Bank of the State of <choice><orig>Mifsouri</orig><reg>Missouri</reg></choice> <!--"722" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Motion to <choice><orig>dismifs</orig><reg>dismiss</reg></choice> suit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Richard Clinton (of color) commonly called Clinton vs John Blackburn et al <!--"111" next to bracket--></head>
    <bibl><relatedItem target="ccr1859.06903.022.xml"/></bibl>
    <p>The answer of John T Blackburn and others is amended by leave of Court by ad- <lb rend="hyphen"/> ding an affidavit thereto: and the plaintiff by his attorney <choice><orig>dismifses</orig><reg>dismisses</reg></choice> this suit as <lb/> to Edward Hall.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="204" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0211.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> and <name>Henry J Moore</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name>, <name>John G Glenn</name>,<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name>, <name>Joseph A Fanning</name>,<lb/> <name>James A Stockton</name> <name>Daniel Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the motion for severance as to<lb/> the defendant <name>Becker</name>, doth overrule the same; thereupon come a Jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>Jacob Casper</name>, <name>Henry Oerter</name>, <name>George W Davis</name>, <name>B Delisle</name>,<lb/> <name>J J Reger</name>, <name>Charles Jonas</name>, <name>William Fine</name>, <name>Henry Boggs</name>, <name>C Heisler</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name>, <name>H Garvins</name> and <name>D W Hitchcock</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but being finished is laid<lb/> over until Monday Morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-12">Monday December 12th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#700, 00 value<lb/> 50, 00 dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name> administrator<lb/> of the Estate of <name>Mason Converse</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Phebe Bassett</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the default although<lb/> called still makes default, and no Jury being required the court<lb/> from the proofs doth assess the value of the property at the sum<lb/> of seven hundred dollars, that is to say five hundred dollars<lb/> the value of the slave <name>Harriett</name> and two hundred dollars the value of the slave, Isabel, and doth assess the<lb/> damages of said plaintiff for the detention thereof at the sum of fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the defendant return the said slaves, <name>Harriet</name> and <name>Isabel</name>, or pay the value aforesaid as as<lb/>sessed, at the election of the plaintiff, and also pay the damages assessed and the costs of this suit and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1521, 72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Syms</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel R Syms</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace E Dimick</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Folsom</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although called<lb/> comes not nor have they pleaded to this action leaving the same undefended where<lb/>fore on motion of plaintiffs, the petition is taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed: and the Court find from the instruments in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of fifteen hundred and twenty one dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V Bogy</name> et al<lb/> vs 101<lb/> <name>Bennett P Voorhies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Lumbermen</name> and<lb/> <name>Mechanics Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 538<lb/> <name>Joseph Shinkle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is<lb/> said ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Count<lb/> plaintiff withdraw the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="205" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0212.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William R Martin</name> et al<lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Christian Letzig</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H Russell</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marry E Chaddick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James B Chaddick</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears to<lb/> the Court that the defendant is a non resident of this State therefore, on mo<lb/>tion of the plaintiff, by her attorney it is ordered that the defendant be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce on account of wilful<lb/> desertion and adultery, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held<lb/> at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the first Monday of February next, and<lb/> on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published,<lb/> according to law, in the St Louis Evening News, a newspaper printed and publication in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>659, 80.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus December</name>, <name>John R<lb/> Seemuller</name> and <name>Augustus Seemuller Jr</name><lb/> vs 153.<lb/> <name>Timothy Van Link</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis X Zimmerman</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and on their motion the<lb/> judgment rendered herein on the tenth instant is set aside and<lb/> vacated; but the defendant although duly called come not and<lb/> the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and fifty nine dollars and eighty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1063, 08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony Portington</name><lb/> <name>Robert C Portington</name><lb/> and <name>Francis Portington</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defendant, by his attor<lb/>ney, and withdraw his motion to consolidate and saying nothing further in bar<lb/> of the plaintiffs demands the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of ten hundred and sixty three dollars and eight cents on ac<lb/>count of the instruments in writing on which this action is founded. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#708, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony Portington</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert C Portington</name><lb/> and <name>Francis Portington</name><lb/> vs 771<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant with<lb/>draws his motion to consolidate, and saying nothing further in bar of the plain<lb/>tiffs demands the Court doth finds that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of seven hundred and eight dollars and eleven cents on account<lb/> of the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri at the<lb/> relation of <name>Thomas Wall</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>On motion of <name>James Coff</name>, by his attorney, ten days are given him to<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="206" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0213.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza R Chappelle</name> by her next<lb/> frisked <name>Allison Stickney</name><lb/> vs 444<lb/> <name>William C Chappelle</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that this<lb/> cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Inter lineation made by order<lb/> of count. <name>J M B DO</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and by leave of Court first<lb/> had and obtained amends the petition herein by inserting in the desecrip<lb/>tion of five hundred and two notes, dated <date when="1859-05-02">May, 2nd 1859</date>, and lettered<lb/> D number twenty seven hundred and seventeen, and by changing in the description of five hundred and<lb/> forty five notes dated <date when="1858-09-01">September 1st 1858</date> lettered A, Numbers 639 to 637, 879 to 896, 1155 to 1154<lb/> and 2349, to 2347, and changing in description of two hundred and thirty six notes dated <date when="1858-09-01">September 1st<lb/> 1858</date> Lettered D number 1425, and by changing in description of five hundred and two notes dated<lb/> <date when="1859-05-02">May 2nd 1859</date> Lettered D numbers 2832 to 2833 and 2867 to 2869, and changing in description<lb/> of five hundred and thirteen notes Lettered C dated <date when="1859-05-02">May 2, 1859</date>, number 3153 to 3150, also by changing<lb/> in description of five hundred and ten notes dated <date when="1859-05-02">May 2 1859</date>, Lettered A number 3047 to 3045.<lb/> and further by changing in description of five hundred and forty five notes number 1453 to 1455; and the<lb/> plaintiff brings into Court and files with the Clerk the notes or bells sued on and the said notes are filed by developing the same in paper packages and enduring the packages thus made filed and attached to said packages on list made and attached by the clerk a description of said notes and it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that <name>Sullivan Blood</name> be and he is hereby appointed <name>Receiver</name> of the notes or bills so brought into Court and<lb/> filed subject to the further orders and directions of this Court, and that said <name>Receiver</name> before entering<lb/> upon the discharge of his duties file a bond in the sum of seventy five thousand dollars with good and suf<lb/>fiecient security, which bond with <name>Sullivian Blood</name> as principal and <name>Adolphus meien</name>, <name>Robert Holmes</name><lb/> and <name>James Smith</name> as securities is accordingly filed; and it is also ordered that the Clerk of<lb/> this Court make out a complete copy of that portion of the petition which describes the said notes or bills and<lb/> deliver the same together with said notes or bills to the Receiver hereby appointed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Inter lineation made by order<lb/> of Court, <name>J M B DO</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and brings into Court and<lb/> files with the notes or bills sued on and the said notes are filed by enveloping the same in paper packages and find using the packages this made filed and attach<lb/>ing to said packages offset made and tested by the Clerk respective of said notes and it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that <name>Sullivan Blood</name> be and he is hereby appointed <name>Receiver</name> of the<lb/> notes or bills so brought into Court, subject to the further orders and directions of this Court, and that<lb/> said <name>Receiver</name> before entering upon the discharge of his duties file a bond in the sum of seventy five<lb/> thousand dollars with security, which bond is according field; and it is ordered that the Clerk of this<lb/> Court make out a complete copy of that portion of the petition which describes the said notes or bills<lb/> and deliver the same together with said notes or bills to the Receiver hereby appointed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Best</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Rutherford</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, in person and acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jurors herein and the<lb/> trial progressed but being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>


<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="207" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0214.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="horizontal">Tuesday <date when="1859-12-13">December 13th 1859</date>.</head>
    <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Richard clinton (of color) commonly called "Clinton" vs John Blackburn, Edward M Blackburn, Martha A Blackburn, Charles A Blackburn and Rufus C Blackburn <!--"111" next to bracket--></head>
    <bibl><relatedItem target="ccr1859.06903.022.xml"/></bibl>
    <p>Petition for Freedom. <lb/> Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and submits to the Court <lb/> his motion for judgment herein, and the Court having duly heard and <lb/> considered the same and the petition answer and proofs doth order <lb/> that the said motion be sustained. It is therefore considered and <lb/> adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever <lb/> set free from the said defendants and all persons claiming under <lb/> them by title derived after the commencement of this suit and that <lb/> the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">The Boathmans Savings Institution vs The Bank of the State of <choice><orig>Mifsouri</orig><reg>Missouri</reg></choice> <!--"689" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>The defendants motion to <choice><orig>dismifs</orig><reg>dismiss</reg></choice>, being heard and fully considered <lb/> by the Court, is overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">The Boatmans Savings Institution vs The Bank of the State of Missouri <!--"722" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>The defendants motion to <choice><orig>dismifs</orig><reg>dismiss</reg></choice> being heard and fully considered <lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed"><note place="margin">$712.97 <lb/> Special.</note> Zebb F Wetzell and Otho Wetzell vs Joseph Murphy <!--"282" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>On account. <lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, but the defendant still makes default, <lb/> and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assessment of their damages to the <lb/> Court, and the Court, from the proofs, doth <choice><orig>afsess</orig><reg>assess</reg></choice> the plaintiffs damages at the <lb/> sum of seven hundred and twelve dollars and ninety seven cents. It is there- <lb rend="hyphen"/> fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form <lb/> aforesaid as <choice><orig>afsefsed</orig><reg>assessed</reg></choice>, and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property at- <lb rend="hyphen"/> tached herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">Citizens Bank of Steubenville vs John B Carson <!--"327" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>On motion of defendant, by his Attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Ohio.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <p>James R Lackland and William H Lackland, two credible <choice><orig>witnefses</orig><reg>witnesses</reg></choice>, examined under oath, prove <lb/> the execution and acknowledgment of a deed of emancipation by Richard E Bland to slaves <lb/> Rosetta alias Rosetta Bradshaw aged about thirty five years of a bright mulatto color, and her <lb/> infant child aged about six months; and Peter E Bland who is personally known to the Court ack- <lb rend="hyphen"/> nowledges the execution by him of said deed of emancipation to said slaves Rosetta and her infant child.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <p>Charles JF Allen is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">State use of David P Clay vs Robt Causse et al <!--"210" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Motion for security <lb/> for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">State use of W<hi rend="superscript">m</hi> A Bassett vs Robert Causse et al <!--"211" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Motion for security for <lb/> costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <head rend="bracketed">John J Roe et al vs Thomas L Moore et al <!--"254" next to bracket--></head>
    <p>Now come again the parties, by their Attorneys, and also the Jurors herein and the trial <lb/> progressed and it is ordered by the Court that the answer of defendant Wheeler <lb/> be stricken out and by leave of Court the other defendants file an amended an- <lb rend="hyphen"/> swer herein; but the trial not being finished further proceedings are laid over until <choice><orig>to morrow</orig><reg>tomorrow</reg></choice>.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
    <p>Court adjourned until <choice><orig>to morrow</orig><reg>tomorrow</reg></choice> morning at nine o'clock.</p><signed>SM Breckinridge</signed>
</div2>
</div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="208" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0215.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-14">Wednesday, December 14th, 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered that a dedimus issue<lb/> in their behalf to Louisiana and also to New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalman Taylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to<lb/> Louisiana and also to New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas E Tutt</name><lb/> vs 446<lb/> <name>Christian E Letzig</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#256, 35</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rene Guillon</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles P Anderson</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiffs, and also comes the defendant by his at<lb/>torney, and the attorney for the plaintiffs suggests to the Court the death of <name>Charles<lb/> P Anderson</name> since the commencement of this suit, which is admitted; and the<lb/> parties consent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein against the defen<lb/>dant in favor of Rene Guillon, the surviving plaintiff, for the sum of two hundred and fifty six dollars<lb/> and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. By<lb/> consent of parties execution of parties execution is stayed sixty days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Close</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>Louisa Close</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly called,<lb/> still makes default; and the Court proceeds to hear the proof and having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is an<lb/> innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever<lb/> divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and be re stared to all the<lb/> rights and privileges of an unmarried person: and it is also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of<lb/> this suit and that executive issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#7916, 51.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name>, <name>Samuel N Kellogg</name>,<lb/> and <name>Eliah B Kirby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, and file the statement<lb/> of the defendants confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Seven thousand nine hundred and sixteen dollars and fifty<lb/> one cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against them in<lb/> favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick M Aneny</name> etal<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Peter Harmon</name><lb/> and <name>Harmon</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the defendants although duly called<lb/> come not, nor have they pleaded further herein, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs,<lb/> the petition herein is taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Robert B Clarke</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="209" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0216.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Milburn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Cable</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by <name>Francis H Manter</name>, his attorney, and acknowl<lb/>edges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein<lb/> on the <date when="1859-05-17">17th day of May 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on account of the absence of<lb/> <name>Henry A Ische</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2095, 31.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> and <name>Henry J Moore</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name>, <name>John G Glenn</name>,<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name>, <name>Joseph A Fanning</name><lb/> <name>James A Stockton</name> and <name>Daniel W<lb/> Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jurors empanelled and sworn herein, and the trial<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> say they find a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum<lb/> of two thousand and ninety five dollars and thirty one cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs and charges<lb/> in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J M Coun</name> et al<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to<lb/> Iowa and also to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Saymish</name> etal<lb/> vs 213.<lb/> <name>Thomas Burke</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed an<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> etal<lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed an<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside<lb/> 29p 269</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Boellert</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>The Franklin Savings<lb/> Institution</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial the defendant comes, by attorney, but plaintiff<lb/> although duly called comes not, wherefore, on motion of the defendant, it is<lb/> ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non suited and that the<lb/> defendant go hereof without day and receiver of the plaintiff its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Co Skinner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Holmes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Gruner</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name><lb/> and <name>William G Mepham</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>Henry W Sears</name>, <name>Sebastian</name>, <name>Burgy</name>, <name>Frederick Tummermeister</name>,<lb/> <name>Adolph Isaac</name>, <name>John Williams</name>, <name>William Power</name>, <name>Louis Latz</name>, <name>Louis<lb/> Leduc</name>, <name>Samuel Jacks</name>, <name>John Dunlap</name>, <name>Daniel Eilers</name> and <name>Wm C<lb/> Goodwin</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try and the trial being finished, the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say<lb/> the find for the plaintiff the sum of two hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also his costs and charge herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="210" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0217.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sebastian Bopp</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnott</name> and<lb/> <name>Andersen Arnot</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and an affidavit according to law, claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not<lb/> delivered to him to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-15">Thursday December 15th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>David M Gibben</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>G A Finkeluburg</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs 268<lb/> <name>J Richard Barrett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#137, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis M Faul</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary A M Faul</name><lb/> vs 206<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find for the plaintiffs upon the claim the sum of two hundred and<lb/> and fifteen dollars and for the defendant upon his counterclaim the sum of seventy<lb/> seven dollars and seventy cents and the doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and thirty seven<lb/> dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges in the behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisanbin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the Court being satisfied from evidence<lb/> produced, that the order for production of books should not have been granted.<lb/> doth order that said rule be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> etal<lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William J Mather</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>Geo B Hoge</name> a<lb/> witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> etal<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="211" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0218.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#190, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph W Kinnear</name><lb/> vs 894<lb/> <name>William Moore</name> and<lb/> <name>Jane Moore</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendants also come<lb/> and file a statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, confessing<lb/> themselves to be indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and<lb/> ninety dollars and seventy eight cents and authorizing the entering up of<lb/> judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>John<lb/> W Yeates</name>, <name>J M M Fadden</name>, <name>William Oloheeler</name>, <name>Joseph White</name>, <name>J B Roy</name>, <name>J Y Ruckle</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel Patterson</name>, <name>August Leisse</name>, <name>Vincent Guion</name>, <name>Henry Stratton</name>, <name>Joseph Aubuchon</name><lb/> and <name>George W Davis</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid say they finds the matters in controvery upon the plea in abatement in favor of the<lb/> defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that, at the date of the commencement of this suit, the<lb/> defendant had not absconded or absented himself from his usual place of abode in this state<lb/> so that the ordinary process of law could not be served upon him: wherefore it is ordered and adjudged<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and of <name>Andrew Johnson</name> the princi<lb/>pal and <name>James Smith</name>, the security, on the attachment bonds herein, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wall</name> etal<lb/> vs 473.<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Nicholas Springer</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engels</name> admr<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>Ino L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for an order on receiver filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-16">Friday December 16th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#207, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pilot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 550<lb/> <name>Charles L Gilpen</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and waiving a Jury submits the<lb/> assessment of damages herein to the Court and the Court, from the proofs,<lb/> doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and<lb/> seven dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also its costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use of<lb/> <name>Abram J Stevenson</name> etal<lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>George Hart</name><lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="212" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0219.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to the<lb/> State of New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>J J M Bride</name><lb/> vs 573.<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stacy B Barcroft</name> etal<lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Elijah Hawkens</name></head>
            <p>On motion plaintiffs, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Boylan</name><lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>Roberts Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, ordered that an alias Summons issue for <name>Robts<lb/> Eddy</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Brown</name><lb/> vs 654<lb/> <name>Chester D Stevens</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, ordered that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Mildred A Glover</name>, wife of <name>Samuel J Glover</name>, who is personally known to the Court, ack<lb/>nowledges the execution of a deeds to <name>John H Ferguson</name> in trust for <name>Maria R Ferguson</name> for a mulatto<lb/> girl slave named <name>Anne Gayle</name>, whereby the said <name>Anne Gayle</name> is emancipated and set free from bondage<lb/> when she attains the age of twenty five years until which time she is to remain the slave of the said<lb/> <name>Maria R Ferguson</name>, which deed is dated <date when="1859-12-12">December 12th 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Burchard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Talmadge Stevens</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition, and also comes<lb/> the defendant, by his attorney, Charles D Colman, and, waiving the issue and ser<lb/>vice of process, enters his appearance to this action; by consent of parties until the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court is given the defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman W Brockelmann</name><lb/> vs 577<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> etal</head>
            <p>The attorney for the plaintiff suggests the death of said plaintiff since<lb/> the commencement of this suit which is not deviced: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new<lb/> trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Injuries.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also a Jury, to wit,<lb/> <name>H W Sears</name>, <name>Sebastian Bergy</name>, <name>John W Yates</name>, <name>Adolph Isaacs</name>, <name>John<lb/> Williams</name>, <name>William Power</name>, <name>L Kennerly</name>, <name>Martin crole</name>, <name>J J Reger</name>, <name>William<lb/> Fine</name>, <name>B Delisle</name>, and <name>Louis Latz</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="213" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0220.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-17">Saturday December 17th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq Sheriff of St Louis County, acknowledges in open Court the execution by<lb/> of a deed by him, as Sheriff, in favor of <name>Daniel R Garrison</name> for all the right title interest, claim,<lb/> estate and property of <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Deborah N Page</name>, in and to the following described<lb/> premises situated in the County of St Louis and State of Missouri; to wit; all that certain lot, price<lb/> or parcel of land lying situated and being in the County of St Louis, State of Missouri, described as a<lb/> piece or parcel of lands situated in what is called the grand prairie Common Fields and within the<lb/> survey of a New Madrid Location in the name of <name>Martin Coons</name>, as made by <name>Joseph C Brown</name>, in the<lb/> year eighteen hundred and eighteen, as Deputy Surveyor of the United States, commencing the survey<lb/> on an arpent lot (as surveyed by <name>William H Cozzens</name> in the year eighteen hundred and forty six) where<lb/> the New Madrid survey made by Cozzens for <name>Des Hetre</name>; thence eastwardly by one arpent wide about<lb/> thirty six chains to across road recently laid out from the Olive Street Plank Road to Page avenue, which<lb/> road runs nearly north and South, containing about eleven acres, more or less; bounded South by a lot one<lb/>half arpent in width surveyed to the legal representatives of <name>Francis Marechal</name>; West by the West<lb/> line of said New Madrid Location in the name of <name>Martin Coons</name>; North by land that was surveyed to<lb/> <name>Francis Boquet</name>, and East by the road as aforesaid, being the same tract on which there is erected<lb/> a large lain and a brick house occupied by one <name>Abel Mathews</name>; Sold by virtue of an Execution issued<lb/> from the Office of the Clerk of St Louis Court of Common Pleas in favor of <name>Oliver Garrison</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel R Garrison</name> against <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Deborah O N Page</name>, returnable to the <date when="1860-04">April Term, 1860</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and acknowledges the execution of a deed by<lb/> him as Sheriff in favor of <name>William Morrison</name>, <name>Edwin C Sloan</name> and <name>Charles F Tracy</name> for all the right, title,<lb/> interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Deborah N Page</name> of in and to the following<lb/> described premises, to wit; All that certain lot, piece or parcel of ground situate lying and being in the city<lb/> of St Louis and State of Missouri, commencing at a point in the southern line of Spruce street, distant<lb/> westwardly forty five feet from the intersection of the Southern line of Spruce street with the eastern<lb/> edge of Sixth street, and running thence Southwardly and parallel with Sixth street along land occu<lb/>pied by St John Church, one hundred and ten feet, thence Eastwardly and parallel with Spruce<lb/> street eighty two feet to an alley; thence Northwardly along the Western line of said alley one hundred and<lb/> ten feet to Spruce street, and thence to the beginning: Sold by virtue of and Execution issued from the office<lb/> of the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas returnable to the <date when="1860-04">April Term, 1860</date>, in favor of <name>Oliver Garrison</name><lb/> and <name>Daniel R Garrison</name>, against <name>Daniel Page</name> and <name>Deborah N Page</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#187, 24.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hite</name><lb/> vs 612<lb/> <name>R F Bridwell</name></head>
            <p>On Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although called still make<lb/> default; and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at one hundred and eighty seven dollars and twenty four cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#969, 29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyrus Bentley</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name></head>
            <p>On Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly called comes not;<lb/> and the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at nine hundred and sixty<lb/> nine dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> damaged aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wall</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J O Carson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel</name>'s admr<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>Geo L Bernicker</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="214" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0221.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Lich</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Louis Engel</name><lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and<lb/> <name>Susan Bernicker</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Order on Receiver.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, and submit to the Court the<lb/> motion for an order on the receiver and the Court after due consideration thereof<lb/> doth order that <name>Frederick W Engel</name>, the receiver in this cause, on or before<lb/> <date when="1860-01-03">Tuesday the third day of January, eighteen hundred and sixty</date>, make and<lb/> and file with the Clerk of this Court a full true and specific report, account<lb/> and statement of all moneys and rents which have come to his hands or under his control as receiver herein,<lb/> showing from whom, on what account and in what sums all such money has been received by him.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>M S Mepham</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Gilsey</name><lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Edward A Damon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for security<lb/> for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 510<lb/> <name>D A January</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Peter Beroch</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#124,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles B Fallenstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Wm Gauss</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alban Treutler</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, and files a duly verified statement confessing<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and twenty four<lb/> dollars and fifty cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him<lb/> in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear interest at<lb/> the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles N Lockwood</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Horace B Osborn</name>,<lb/> <name>John P Camp</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Worde</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to <name>Horace B<lb/> Osborn</name>, but the defendants, <name>John P Camp</name> and <name>Theodore Ward</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be taken against<lb/> the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Mistrial.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come the Jurors empanneled and sworn herein, and say they are unable<lb/> to agree upon a verdict, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the Jurors aforesaid be discharged from the further consideration of<lb/> this cause be continued until the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> Pacific Rail Road</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fallina Harrman</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>William Harrman</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>James Castello late<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis Co</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Waters</name> etal<lb/> vs 871<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Benjamin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
    <pb n="215" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0222.tiff"/>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H Parkinson</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> et al</head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno J Parkinson</name><lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> et al</head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>H N Hart</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Jno Schiffman</name></head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hager</name><lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
        <p>Dismissal.</p>
        <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry J Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name> &amp; al<lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>Jas Patterson</name> &amp; al</head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 261<lb/> <name>Jas Patterson</name> et al</head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustaves Bauemann</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Jas Boulting</name> house</head>
        <p>Continued.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>H J Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>F Hudson</name></head>
        <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        <closer>
            Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
            <signed>
                <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
            </signed>
        </closer>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <opener>
            <dateline><date when="1859-12-19">Monday December 19th1859</date>.</dateline>
        </opener>
        <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob L Levinski</name><lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>Erastus Wells</name>.</head>
        <p>Dismissal.</p>
        <p>And now at this day come the parties to this suit and by agreement and<lb/> for value received by plaintiff from the defendant this suit is dismissed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno Co Spalding</name> et al</head>
        <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Purvis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eliza A Purvis</name></head>
        <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos Stettinius</name> et al<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>James Hughes</name></head>
        <p>Agreement filed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
        <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt S Eddy</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Boylan</name></head>
        <p>Continued by Consent.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Lynch</name><lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
        <p>Dismissal.</p>
        <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed and that each<lb/> party pay one half of the costs herein and that execution issue therefor.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Michael Werk</name> et al<lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name>, <name>Wm, H<lb/> Barksdale</name> and <name>Samuel Bonner</name></head>
        <p>Continued by consent.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2>
        <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Samuel Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael J Cerre</name> et al</head>
        <p>Continued by consent.</p>
    </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="216" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0223.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>390,77.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Sowers</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name><lb/> and <name>Henry Henneke</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants still make<lb/> and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and ninety dollars and seventy<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brooks</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>George J Brady</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, twenty days are given him to file<lb/> an amended petition herein, and this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engels</name> admr<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno L Bernicker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Receiver files an account.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Trustee of Methodist Episcopal<lb/> Church South<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew King</name> Exr of <name>E Basye</name></head>
            <p>Transcript from Probable Court filed.<lb/> Deposition of <name>Wm S Holliday</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James L Gage</name><lb/> vs 489<lb/> <name>St Louis Mutual Fire and Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas N Franke</name> et al<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Caspar</name>.<lb/> <name>Brechtler</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#473,62 1/2</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Bristow</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and also come a Jury to<lb/> wit. <name>William Heaps</name>, <name>S H Smith</name>, <name>Peter Ambo</name>, <name>Charles Morris</name>, <name>Ralph<lb/> Wilson</name>, <name>A Jamison</name>, <name>James Shannon</name>, <name>B F Jennings</name>, <name>James Bullo</name>, <name>George<lb/> M Phetridge</name>, <name>SR Newson</name> and <name>FB James</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected tried sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the following verdict, to wit;<lb/> "We the Jury find for the plaintiff amount four hundred fifty dollars and interest at six percent per<lb/> annum from date of this suit. <name>B F Jennings</name>, <name>Foreman</name>." It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars and the interest aforesaid as<lb/>sessed by the Jury, to wit; twenty three dollars and sixty two and one half cents, making the sum total four<lb/> hundred and seventy three dollars and sixty two and one half cents damages, together with his cost and<lb/> charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>Proceedings against <name>John Doyle</name> for contempt.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties and the Court being fully advised of and concerning the<lb/> matters in issue on the application to commit the said <name>John Doyle</name> for a contempt in not<lb/> paying the plaintiff the sum of ninety two dollars and twenty cents, monthly, in money un<lb/>der the decree made herein on the twentieth day of June last past, finds that by the true intent and<lb/> meaning of said decree the said sum of ninety two dollars and twenty cents was to be paid to the said <name>Jane<lb/> Doyle</name> per month, in money, at the times mentioned in the decree, exclusive of any diminution for the house<lb/> or any other property of the defendant in possession of said <name>Jane Doyle</name> at the time of and King said decree,<lb/> but the Court further finds that the said <name>John Doyle</name> has not willfully and contumaciously refused to</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="217" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0224.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>comply with said decree, and that said <name>John Doyle</name> was advised in good faith by his counsel<lb/> that he was not bound to perform said decree further than he did; therefore it is ordered that the<lb/> rule for committing the defendant is discharged at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Verginia W Mulhoeffer</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Peter Mulchoeffer</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, still makes de<lb/>fault, and the Court proceeds to hear the proof and having heard and<lb/> considered the same, and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is an<lb/> innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that the said plaintiff be absolutely and<lb/> forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and be restored to<lb/> all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that her present name be altered and charged<lb/> to her maiden name of <name>Virginia W Mookerk</name> and that the same be her after deemed and taken<lb/> as her only true and lawful name: and it is also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Michael Devoy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurer to the petition herein is, after due consideration by the Court, sustained.<lb/> Ten days are given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammonn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>Thos Webster</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitensdorfer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, but the plaintiff comes not<lb/> nor has it prosecuted the appeal from the judgment of confirmation of<lb/> the Commissioners report, wherefore it is ordered, one motion of the<lb/> defendant, that said appeal be dismissed, and the judgment of confir<lb/>mation of said Commissioners Report the affirmed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>George Cooper</name> garn.</head>
            <p>By consent until the twenty fourth instant is given the garnishee to reply to the<lb/> denial of his answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name></head>
            <p>For Malicious Prosecution.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Thomas Thompson</name>, <name>A Lewellen</name>, <name>N Schaeffer</name>, <name>Joseph Street</name>, <name>George W Bremeyer</name>,<lb/> <name>C Sutter</name>, <name>Stephen Zeisler</name>, <name>S C Menser</name>, <name>A J Latz</name>, <name>J F Fratter</name>, <name>J C Oliver</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Henwood</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="218" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0225.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-20">Tuesday December 20th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carofine Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>W C Malloy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>D Hoken</name><lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine H Radcliff</name><lb/> vs 81<lb/> <name>Frederick E Radcliff</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant by<lb/> leave of Court withdraws his answer herein, wherefore it is ordered that the default<lb/> of said defendant be entered herein; and by leave of Court the plaintiff files a sup<lb/>plemental petition, and by consent this cause is now submitted to the Court for final hearing; and the plain<lb/>tiffs petition and her proof being duly heard and considered, the Court finds that the plaintiff is a person of good<lb/> moral character and is in this cause the innocent and injured party and that she is for the causes stated in<lb/> said petition entitled to admire from defendant and to the restoration of her maiden name. It is therefore<lb/> ordered adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant be dissolved on<lb/> account of and for the fault of defendant, that the plaintiff be restored to her maiden name of <name>Catherine<lb/> H Bonesteel</name> and that both plaintiff and defendant be and are by this decree left free to many again and<lb/> that the defendant pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Hall</name><lb/> vs 667<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Siever</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#992,30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Parker</name>, <name>Turnbull Y Russell</name><lb/> and <name>Reuben Beman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the state<lb/>ment of the defendants, confessing themselves indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and ninety two dol<lb/>lars and thirty cents and authorizing the entering up of jud<lb/>gment against them for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#216,26</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Woltman</name>, survivor of<lb/> <name>Edward Eggers</name>, and <name>Statius Eggers</name><lb/> late partner as <name>Edward Eggers Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, and files the statement<lb/> of the defendants, confessing themselves indebted to the plaintiffs as sur<lb/>viver in the sum of two hundred and sixteen dollars and twenty<lb/> sixty cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment against<lb/> them for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>499,93<lb/> and 10 percent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Haywood</name>, <name>Philip Crow</name>,<lb/> and <name>William A Crow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file their affidavit<lb/> and comes <name>George W Parker</name>, in behalf of said defendants, and<lb/> by virtue of a warrant of attorney, for that purpose executed by<lb/> the defendants, and now produced and filed, confesses judgment in<lb/> favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for the sum of four hundred and ninety nine dollars<lb/> and ninety three cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against said defendants for that<lb/> amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs in this behalf expended and have execution<lb/> therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per an<lb/>num from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="219" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0226.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#485, 61.<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Goodrich</name>, <name>Peter H Willard</name><lb/> and <name>Albert A Child</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file their affi<lb/>davit, and also comes <name>Philips Crow</name> and files a power of at<lb/>torney and virtue of the authority therein conferred, in the<lb/> name and behalf of said defendants, confesses judgment<lb/> in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for the sum of four hundred and eighty five dollars<lb/> and sixty one cents and authorizes the entering of judgment against the defendant for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at ten percent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#235, 97.<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger E Harding</name>, and<lb/> <name>Walter P Harding</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney and file their affidavit, and also<lb/> appears<name> Philips Crow</name>, in behalf of said defendants, and, by virtue of a<lb/> warrant of attorney executed by the defendants, and now produced and<lb/> proved and filed, waives the issue and service of process and says he can<lb/> not deny the demand of the plaintiffs, nor that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs, in the sum of two hundred and thirty five dollars and ninety seven cents, and con<lb/>fesses judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for that amount and authorizes<lb/> the entering up of judgment against said defendants for the same. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs<lb/> and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor: and this ordered that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at ten per cent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#431, 02<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Kelly</name> and<lb/> <name>George E Harding</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and file their affidavit, and<lb/> also comes <name>Philips Crow</name> and files a power of attorney from the defendants<lb/> and by virtue of the authority therein conferred, confesses judgment in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs against the defendants for the sum of four hundred and<lb/> thirty one dollars and two cents authorizes the entering up of judgment against<lb/> said defendants for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#162, 79<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elijah G Tuttle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.<lb/> Now come the plaintiff, by his Attorney, and files on affidavit, and also come<lb/> <name>Philips Crow</name> and files a power of attorney from the defendants, and by virtue<lb/> of the power thereby conferred, confesses judgment in favor of the plaintiff<lb/> against the defendants for the sum of one hundred and sixty two dollars and<lb/> seventy nine cents, and authorizes the entering up of judgment against the defendants for that amount.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1051, 01<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert H Stone</name>.</head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, and file their affidavit, and<lb/> also comes <name>Phillips Crow</name>, and files a power of attorney executed by the defen<lb/>dants and by virtue of the power therein conferred, confesses judgment in fav<lb/>or of the plaintiff against the defendant for ten hundred and fifty one dollars<lb/> and one cent and authorizes the entering up of judgment for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="220" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0227.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#131,10<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S Fife</name>, <name>George T Hubbard</name><lb/> and <name>Henry J Vogel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and files the duly<lb/> verified statement of the defendants confessing themselves indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and thirty one dol<lb/>lars and ten cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against them for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have thereof execution;<lb/> and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#753,61<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S Fife</name>, <name>George T Hubbard</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry T Vogel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> and <name>Robert H Stone</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and file their affi<lb/>davit, and come <name>Phillips Crow</name> and files a power of attorney exe<lb/>cuted, by the defendants, and, by virtue of the power therein con<lb/>fered, in the name and behalf of defendants, acknowledges that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and fifty three dollars and<lb/> sixty one cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against the defendants for that amount. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at ten per cent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George T Brady</name></head>
            <p>For Malicious Prosecution.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-21">Wednesday, December 21st 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name> and <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, in person, and also come the defendants, by<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name>, their attorney, and waiving the issue and service of pro<lb/>cess, enter their appearance to this action; and by consent until the fifth<lb/> day of the next term of this court is given defendants to pleads.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffer</name>, <name>John H Fisher</name> and <name>Lorenz Schaffer</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, and also come the defendants, by<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name>, their attorney, and enter their appearance to this action with<lb/> with leave to plead on or before the fifth day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Thomas Wall</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno S Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 543<lb/> <name>Wm A Bennett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at<lb/> plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>A Lonergan</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="221" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0228.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Archange M Dowell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert B M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having filed a petition and also an affidavit from which<lb/> it appears that the defendant is a non resident of this State, therefore,<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a decree<lb/> of divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the ground of desertion, and that unless he appear at<lb/> the next September term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the<lb/> Country of St Louis on the last Monday of September, eighteen hundred and sixty, and on or before<lb/> the sixth day of said term, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will be<lb/> taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to<lb/> law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#79,09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> called comes not; and the plaintiff waving a Jury submits this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of seventy nine<lb/> dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs and charges in the behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Farley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C W Barnes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>James C Blythe</name>, the receiver herein, files a petition for an order of sale, and the<lb/> Court after due consideration thereof, doth order that the said Receiver sell the property<lb/> specified in said petition by public auction.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz J Schilling</name> use<lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Triob</name> and <name>Kaltenbach</name>,<lb/> witnesses.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Roding</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael O Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Motion and also an affidavit to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside<lb/> 29p 291</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>D A January</name>,<lb/> <name>Septimus Levering</name><lb/> and <name>H M Lindel</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit,<lb/> <name>William Heaps</name>, <name>A H Smith</name>, <name>Charles Morris</name>, <name>Ralph Wilson</name>, <name>A Jamison</name>, <name>James<lb/> Shannon</name>, <name>B F Jennings Joseph Bulls</name>, <name>William Harris</name>, <name>Joseph Mees</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Karle</name> and <name>J C Tutt</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but<lb/> the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit, with<lb/> leave to move to set the same aside. It is therefore considered by the Court that the Jurors aforesaid be<lb/> discharged from the further consideration of this cause, and that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in<lb/> this behalf but that the defendants go here of without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefore. Leave is given plaintiff to move to set aside non suit.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow Morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.W. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="222" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0229.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-22">Thursday December 22nd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Reed</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained the plaintiffs file an additional<lb/> affidavit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Goodrich</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained the plaintiffs file an ad<lb/>ditional affidavit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S File</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained the plaintiffs file an additional affi<lb/>davit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Kelly</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained the plaintiffs file an additional<lb/> affidavit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elijah G Tuttle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained the plaintiffs file an additional<lb/> affidavit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brook</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>George J Brady</name></head>
            <p>For Malicious Prosecution.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the Jurors,<lb/> empanelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict, upon their oaths,<lb/> say they find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>Peoples Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Morris Raphaclsky</name>.<lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Correlia Morton</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> etal<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>I N Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress defendants depositions filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="223" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0230.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-23">Friday December 23rd 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court acknowledges the execution<lb/> by him of a deed as such sheriff in favor of <name>John R Patton</name>, for all the night, title, interest, claim<lb/> estate and property of <name>James Smith</name>, <name>Permelia Smith</name>, <name>John Smith</name> for himself and as guardian<lb/> of <name>Mary Louise</name>, <name>Levi</name>, <name>Permelia</name> and <name>Malinda Watts</name>, <name>Maicah Smith</name> Widow of <name>Levi Smith</name>,<lb/> and guardian of <name>Ellen A</name> <name>Louisa V</name> <name>Joseph S</name>, <name>Daniel M</name>, and <name><unclear>Lania</unclear> A R Smith</name> of in and<lb/> to the following described real state, being one hundred and thirty five 67/100 acres in the St Ferdinand<lb/> Common Fields in said Country of St Louis described and bounded as follows, to wit beginning at a<lb/> stone in <name>Peter Pyants</name> most Southern corner, then at N 37 Ealong his S Eastern line and near the middle<lb/> of a lane 20,11 chains to a post corner, near the roof of an Elm 24 inches in diameter, corner on<lb/> James Smith line thence &amp; 53 C along Smiths Southern line 23,96 Chains to a post at Madam<lb/> Menards corner thence South 37 W 290 chains to s stone corner of said Menard, thence J 53 C<lb/> along said Menards line 13,50 chains to a stone, thence N 37 C 2,92 chains to a stone in James<lb/> Smith land thence 53 C along Smith line 43,74 chains to a post in Flonsant Road from<lb/> which a gate post bears N 53 W C links distant thence &amp; 13 W along said road 6,722chains to a post<lb/> thence &amp; 10 3/4 W 600 chains to a post in Peter Manter line 24 links N 53 C of a stone in his line<lb/> 10,78 chains to a post in Jack Perreau line thence N 53 W along perreau line 75,83 chains to a <lb/> post, the most northern corner of perreau land from which an Elm 30 inches in diameter bears<lb/> &amp;55 C,150 links distant thence &amp; 37 West along perreau line 425 chains to a stone in Utz line<lb/> thence N53 W along Utz line 12,95 chains to the beginning: sold under and by virtue of an order<lb/> of sale made by the St Louis Land Court in the cause wherein <name>James Smith</name> <name>Permelia Smith</name>, <name>John<lb/> Smith</name> for himself and as guardian of<name> Mary Louise</name>, <name>Levi</name>, <name>Permelia</name> and <name>Malinda Watts</name> were<lb/> plaintiffs and <name>Mariah Smith</name> widow of <name>Levi Smith</name> and guardian of <name>Ellen A</name> <name>Louise V</name> <name>Joseph</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Daniel M</name> and <name><unclear>Lacia</unclear> A R Smith</name> were defendants.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name> Sheriff of St Louis Country, in open Court acknowledge the execution of a deed<lb/>by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>John A Smith</name> for all the right title interest claim estate<lb/> and property of <name>James Smith</name>, <name>Permelia Smith</name>, <name>John Smith</name>, for himself and as guardian of <name>Mary<lb/> Louise</name>, <name>Levi Permelia</name> and <name>Malinda Watts</name> and <name>Mariah Smith</name> widow of <name>Levi Smith</name> and guardian<lb/> of <name>Ellen A</name>, <name>Louise V</name> <name>Daniel M</name> and <name>Lorna A R Smith</name> of in and to the following described real<lb/> estate, to wit; a track of land containing one hundred and eighty two 25/100 acres in the St Ferdin and<lb/> Common Fields in term her and described and bounded in a Survey made by Isaac Woods on the<lb/> <date when="1854-08-23">23rd day of August 1854</date> and filed in the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Land Court in said<lb/> Country as follows, to wit; in township 47 N R C 6 C beginning at a white oak tree 12 inches in di<lb/>ameter at the N C corner of lands belonging to the estate of <name>Levi Smith</name> thence with the N C boun<lb/>dary line of said track N 53 W 148 chains to 50 links to a post on the right bank of the Missouri river<lb/> said stake being the most Northerly corner of said track, thence up the said river with the meanders<lb/> thereof &amp; 50" 30 W 15 chains 71 links to the most westerly corner of said track, thence with the South<lb/> Westerly line of said track &amp;53 C 93 chains 79 links to a corner from which a walnut 20 inches diam<lb/>eter Bears N40 C 20 links an honey locust bears N 58 W 25 links distant thence N 37 C 150 links<lb/> to a white walnut stump at corner from which a walnut bears &amp; 85 C 39 links and a walnut 40<lb/> inches diameter bears N 75 W 25 links distant, thence &amp; 52 30 C 17 chains 50 links a post corner from<lb/> which a black oak 28 inches diameter bears &amp; 18 W 16 links distant and a Lynn 12 inches diameter<lb/> bears N 26 30 C 49 links distant thence N 37 C 8 chains and 8 links to a post comes from which a<lb/> white walnut bears &amp;32 C 12 links distant and a white walnut 16 inches diameter bears N 22 W 37<lb/> links distant thence &amp; 53 C 34 chains 88 links to a post corner from which a sugar tree 20 inches di<lb/>ameter bears &amp;30 30 C 14 links distant thence N 37 C 5 chains 86 links to the place of beginning: Sold<lb/> by virtue of an order of sale made by the St Louis land Court in a suit for partition wherein <name>James Smith</name> <name>Permelia Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>John Smith</name> for himself and as guardian of <name>Mary Louise</name>, <name>Levi permelia</name> and <name>Malinda</name> were plaintiffs and <name>Mariah Smith</name><lb/> widow of <name>Levi Smith</name> guardian of <name>Ellen A</name> <name>Louis V</name> <name>Daniel M</name> and <name>Larra R A Smith</name> were defendants.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="224" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0231.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#155,21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Levis J Clausson</name><lb/> vs 675<lb/> <name>Jacob William Huge</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant<lb/> withdraws his plea in a statement and the parties consent and agree that<lb/> Judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs for one hun<lb/>dred and fifty five dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debit aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#138,75<lb/> And satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Levis Clawson</name><lb/> vs 832<lb/> <name>James Taussig</name> and <name>Charles H<lb/> Poertner</name> garnishee of <name>Jacob W Huge</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorney, and the consent the said garni<lb/>shee <name>James Taussig</name> is discharged a plaintiffs costs; and the plain<lb/>tiff and the garnishee, <name>Charles N Poertner</name>, consent and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered herein for one hundred and thirty eight<lb/>dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the said <name>Charles N Poertner</name> the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and have ex<lb/>ecution therefore and that out of said sum the pay the costs herein expended; and the plaintiffs acknowledge<lb/> to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#197,35<lb/> agst</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Taussig Sr</name><lb/> vs 676<lb/> <name>Jacob William Huge</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their attorneys, and the defendant withdraws his plea in<lb/> abatement and consents and degrees with the plaintiffs that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered herein against him for the sum of one hundred and ninety seven dollars<lb/> and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/> cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and their costs herein expended and have execution thereupon</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#172,69<lb/> agst <name>Poertner</name><lb/> satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isidor Bush</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Taussig Sr</name><lb/> vs 833<lb/> <name>James Taussig</name> and <name>Charles H<lb/> Poertner</name> Garnishee of <name>Jacob W Huge</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and by consent the said <name>James<lb/> Taussig</name> is discharged at plaintiffs cost: and by consent and agreement<lb/> of parties, it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the <lb/> said <name>Charles H poertner</name> the sum of one hundred and seventy two<lb/> dollars and sixty nine cents, debt, and that at of said amount they pay<lb/> the costs of this proceeding: and plaintiffs acknowledge full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156,25</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gerhard H Fisse</name><lb/> vs 683<lb/> <name>Jacob William Huge</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorney and the defendant withdraws his plea in<lb/>abatement and consents and agreed with the plaintiff that judgment may be ren<lb/>dered herein in favor of the plaintiff for one hundred and fifty six dollars<lb/> and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the de<lb/>fendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#136,75<lb/> agst <name>Poertner</name><lb/> satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gerhard H Tisse</name><lb/> vs 534<lb/> <name>James Taussig</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles H<lb/> poertner</name> garnishee of <name>Jacob W Huge</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment. Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and by consent of parties,<lb/> the said <name>James Taussig</name> is discharged at plaintiffs costs; and the<lb/> parties consent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff against <name>Charles H poertner</name> for the sum of<lb/>one hundred and thirty six dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee <name>Charles H Poertner</name> the sum aforesaid as agreed upon and<lb/> have execution therefore; and that out of said sum he pay the wets herein; and the plaintiff ack<lb/>nowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Bucter</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patk Keegan</name></head>
            <p>amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="225" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0232.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#107,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Feichman</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Cinstmann</name><lb/> vs 795<lb/> <name>Jacob William Huge</name></head>
            <p>On account.<lb/> Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendant with<lb/>draw his plea in abatement and consents and agrees with the<lb/> plaintiffs that judgment may be rendered herein for the sum of<lb/> one hundred and seven dollars against the defendant. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed<lb/> upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#93,79<lb/> Aged <name>Poertner</name><lb/> satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Feichmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Einstmann</name><lb/> vs 835<lb/> <name>James Taussig</name> and <name>Charles H<lb/> Poertner</name> garnishees of <name>Jacob W Huge</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.<lb/> Now come the parties by their attorneys, and by consent <name>James<lb/> Taussig</name> is discharged at plaintiffs costs; and the parties consent<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of<lb/>the plaintiffs and against said <name>Charles H Poertner</name> for ninety<lb/>three dollars and seventy nine cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee, <name>Charles H Poertner</name>, the debt aforesaid as<lb/> agreed upon and have execution therefore; and that out of said sum they pay the costs herein; and<lb/> the plaintiffs acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to suppress the depositions of <name>John Fitch</name> and <name>S R Dolbee</name> is sus<lb/>tained: and on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, leave is given to withdraw said<lb/> depositions and leave is also given the officer who took said depositions to amend his<lb/> certificates to the same as to conform to the facts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>At aside<lb/> #29 p 291</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Charles Holmes</name>,<lb/> <name>Gladdin Gorin</name> and<lb/> <name>Melvin L Gray</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and also come a Jurry, to wit; <name>William Heaps</name>,<lb/> <name>A N Smith</name>, <name>Charles morris</name>, <name>Ralph Wilson</name>, <name>A Jamison</name>, <name>James Shannen</name>, <name>B J<lb/> Jennings</name>, <name>Joseph Bulls</name>, <name>William Harvis</name>, <name>Joseph Mees</name>, <name>Edward Karle</name>, and <name>J E</name><lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but the plaintiff says<lb/> he will not further prosecute his suit this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in the behalf but that the defendants go<lb/> hereof without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefore. Leave<lb/> is given plaintiff to move to set aside above non suit, and plaintiff files a motion for that purpose.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lynch</name><lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial herein, being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled; On motion during the present teem is given plaintiff to file a bill<lb/> of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State a Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Thomas Wall</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>James Coff</name>.</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained: Leave is given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name> assignee of <name>J A Smith</name><lb/> vs 794<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Indiana and to Canada West.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Gerring</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein is, after due consideration by the Court, sustained.<lb/> until <date when="1860-01-03">January 3rd, 1860</date>, is given to file security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="226" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0233.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#681,08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Lent</name>,<lb/> <name>Benjamin South</name> and<lb/> <name>William C Shipman</name><lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file stipulation and sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court and in accordance with said stipulation the Court,<lb/>being fully advised in the premises, doth find that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and eighty one dollars and eight cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel G Taylor</name> and <name>Sarah A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>On reading and filing the petition and the plaintiffs filing a bond in the sum of<lb/> five hundred dollars with <name>George W Willard</name>, as principal, and <name>James Luttry</name>, as<lb/> security, which bond is approved by the Court, it is ordered that the defendant her<lb/> servants agents and attorneys be and they are hereby restrained and enjoined from<lb/> selling or proceeding to sell at tax sale, until the further order of this court, the following described real es<lb/>tate in the City and Country of St Louis State of Missouri, to wit; fronting twenty four feet on Thirteenth<lb/> street and running through to Centre street in Block No 208 of the City of St Louis and bounded<lb/> North by Luttry, East by Thirteenth sheet, South by pratt and West by Centre sheet.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caspar Kuendig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John N Dietert</name> or <name>Detert</name><lb/></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and an affidavit according to law<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affi<lb/>davit to the Sheriff of St Louis Country and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered<lb/> to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sallie B Dimick</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>Heraa E Dimick</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although called still<lb/> making default the Court proceeds to hear the proof and having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is of good<lb/> normal character and an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be<lb/> absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be re<lb/> stored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is also ordered that the defendants pay<lb/> the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Roding</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael O Rourke</name></head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the default herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained upon the payment by the defendant of the costs accrued to this<lb/> date. Until the third day of January next is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Fountain</name> etal<lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus to Illinois is awarded plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, ten days are given to file an amended<lb/> answer herein; and the Court doth thereupon overrule the motion for judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Siever</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> and <name>John C Rust</name></head>
            <p>The motion for security for us to herein is, after due consideration by the Court,<lb/> sustained: Until the third day of January next is given plaintiff to file security<lb/> for costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="227" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0234.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stepherd</name> and <name>Spence</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>St Charles Western Plank Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Order for Subpoena Duces Tecum.<lb/> On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a subpoe<lb/>na dues tecum issue to the Secretary of the defendant ordering him to pro<lb/>duce on the trial of this cause the records of said Company, also the con<lb/>tract made by the defendant with plaintiffs for the grading of said Road<lb/> dated about <date when="1852-05-17">May 17th 1852</date> also the final estimates of work done under said contract, also all<lb/> papers, orders and records relating to the same or to any work done on said road by the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Charles S Hempetead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Filix Coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for judgment being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled: the demurrer to the amended petition herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is sustained. Ten days are given the<lb/> plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 510<lb/> <name>D A January</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside non suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1859-12-24">Saturday December 24th 1859</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p>The fine imposed upon James A Guison, for contempt, is remitted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Gruner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and Remits to the defendant the sum of<lb/> four hundred and ninety nine dollars and sixteen cents part and parcel of the Judg<lb/>ment herein rendered. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the defendant be<lb/> discharged from the payment of said sum remitted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment of <name>Meyer</name> and <name>Lopez</name></head>
            <p>The assignees file a petition and the Court, after due consideration thereof,<lb/> doth order that the time for selling and disposing of the stock assigned<lb/> be extended sixty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William B Ward</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Iowa.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="228" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0235.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rural Platt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B Ward</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Iowa.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out the petition herein being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court is overruled: and the plaintiffs motion for Judg<lb/>ment being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled. Time to and<lb/> including the third day of January next is given defendants to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Herman Gilsey</name><lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Edward A Damon</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court is sustained: Twenty days are given to file security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harding</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stone</name> etal</head>
            <p>Additional affidavit filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neun Jr</name> etal<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinrich Heisner</name></head>
            <p>amended petition filed demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cha H Welling</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>affidavits on motion to strike out filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F P Whitcher</name> etal<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>W H Kidd</name> etal</head>
            <p>Exhibit filed.</p>
            <p><name>Richard Henry Spencer</name> is on motion of <name>C F Burnes</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 769<lb/> <name>R F ass</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and<lb/> for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Syme</name> etal<lb/> vs 60<lb/> St Bt Indiana</head>
            <p>amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>Griffin P Theobald</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> vs 594<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> garn</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Barnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Rower</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Cairns</name><lb/> vs 547<lb/> <name>Leon Block</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fired K P Whitcher</name> etal<lb/> vs 544<lb/> <name>W H Kidd</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Thorp</name> etal<lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>Jno Baker</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Afexis Mudd</name> etal<lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>Thos Ratcliffe</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David S Bigham</name><lb/> vs 106<lb/> <name>Geo Gletzinger</name> admr</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name> etal<lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>W B Hall</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ja F Donaldson</name> etal<lb/> vs 723<lb/> <name>Henry W Marston</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence R Wohlien</name><lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>Ins Wolff</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 405<lb/> <name>Ja Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>Ja Clemens Jr</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="229" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0236.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 407<lb/> <name>Jno O Fallon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>William S Harney</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Ja A Rogers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 410<lb/> <name>Richd Graham</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Cha Chambers</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>Louis C Hirschberg</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 413<lb/> <name>Jeremiah <unclear>alun</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>Morris Carroll</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Ja H Lemotte</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>Geo M Quay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Caroline C Austin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>James S Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until <date when="1860-01-03">Tuesday the third day of January, 1860</date>, at ten<lb/> o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-03">Tuesday January 3rd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J W Harris</name><lb/> vs 649<lb/> <name>D N Evans</name></head>
            <p>affidavit of defendant filed. Amended answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>Ja D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Receivers <name>Robert</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M Cann Schoonmaker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harty Bocarde</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs<lb/>opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick P Sanguinette</name><lb/> vs 289<lb/> <name>James Co Reilly</name> etal</head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, but the plaintiff, although<lb/> duly called comes not wherefore, on motion of defendants, it is considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but<lb/> that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name> etal<lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name> etal</head>
            <p>proof of Service.</p>
            <p>Come the plaintiffs, by attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court of service<lb/> of petition and notice of suit upon defendant, <name>Henry H Gratz</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jobs White</name></head>
            <p>On motion the time for answering is extended to the fifth instant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="230" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0237.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#2560,64<lb/> Debt<lb/> and costs</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Goulding</name><lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and<lb/> <name>Harvey W Smith</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find that the said garnishees, at the time they were summoned<lb/> herein as such, were indebted to the defendant <name>William Renth</name> in the sum<lb/> of Seven thousand one hundred and thirty two dollars and fifty cents,<lb/> and that the plaintiffs have recovered of the said <name>Renth</name> the sum of<lb/> two thousand two hundred and four dollars and that the interest there on and the costs on a <name>Renth</name><lb/> sum total twenty five hundred and sixty dollars and sixty four cents; therefore it is considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishees the sum of twenty five hundred and sixty<lb/> dollars and sixty four cents together with the costs of these proceedings and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1511,58 Debt<lb/> and costs.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert</name> &amp; <name>Armstrong</name><lb/> and <name>Robert Casey</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find that the said garnishees, at the time<lb/> they were summoned herein as such, were indebted to the defendant <name>William<lb/> Renth</name> in the sum of seven thousand one hundred and thirty two dol<lb/>lar and fifty cents and that the plaintiffs have recovered judgment against<lb/> said <name>Renth</name> for twelve hundred and ninety seven dollars and seventy eight cents, and that the<lb/> interest thereon and the costs of suit make the sum total fifteen hundred and eleven dollars and<lb/> fifty eighty cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of said garnishees<lb/> the sum of fifteen hundred and eleven dollars and fifty eight cents together the costs of these<lb/> proceedings and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Anderson</name><lb/> vs 453<lb/> <name>Freeman Little</name></head>
            <p>petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit this cause to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein<lb/> joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial being heard, and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 769<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out defendants answer and for judgment<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Syme</name> etal<lb/> vs 60<lb/> St Bt Indiana</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>G p Theobald</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> etal</head>
            <p>By consent it is ordered that this cause be continued and that the defendant<lb/> pay all the costs that have accrued herein to this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Milliman</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Ignatz Becker</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="231" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0238.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mircardier</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants file answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-04">Wednesday January 4th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>H Renard</name>, whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>Leon J Papin</name> and <name>C Harding Jr</name>, two<lb/> credible witnesses, examined under oath, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to his<lb/> mulatto boy slave <name>John</name>, son of <name>Hyacinthe</name>, of light mulatto complexion about five feet me or two<lb/> inches in height.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#194,80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Jane Eddy</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>James H Eddy</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant still<lb/> makes default, and this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court,<lb/> after due consideration thereof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at<lb/> the sum of one hundred and ninety four dollars and eighty cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and her costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#194,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>John Levin</name> and <name>John Corcoran</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still make default<lb/> and no Jury being required this cause to submitted to the Court for assessment<lb/> of damages and the Court, form the proofs, doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of one hundred and ninety four dollars and seventy five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#213,08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Ellis</name><lb/> vs 166<lb/> <name>John W Davitt</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, still makes default; and<lb/> no Jury being required the Court, form the proofs, doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of two hundred and thirteen dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#787,61</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Fox</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Amos H Ray</name></head>
            <p>On Notes and account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and no Jury being required, the Court, form the proofs, doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of seven hundred and eighty seven dollars and sixty one cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as as<lb/>ssessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="232" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0239.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> etal<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs a dedimus is awarded them to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Siever</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>John M Wimer</name>, as security, which<lb/>is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine W Livermore</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>George F Livermore</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly called<lb/> till makes default; and the Court proceeds to hear the proof and having duly.<lb/> heard and considered the same and being satisfied there from that the plaintiff<lb/> is a person of good moral character and an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree<lb/> that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person and that she have the<lb/> care custody and control of the child <name>Frederick</name>, mentioned in the petition, who is of tender years; and it<lb/> is also ordered that her maiden name of <name>Catherine W Gore</name> be restored to her and be hereafter deemed<lb/> and taken as her only true and lawful name, and that she pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Southern Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The St Louis Lumberman and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by its attorney and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#294,50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S <unclear>Fise</unclear></name>, <name>George T Hubbard</name> and <name>Henry J Vogel</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>John W Davitt</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and no Jury being required the Court from the proofs, doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and ninety<lb/> four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1605,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Clark</name>, <name>William Thaw</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Kountz</name><lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>Thomas H Brierly</name>, <name>Joseph Nanson</name>,<lb/> <name>Holmes Nanson</name>, <name>John Shaw</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> Baker</name>, <name>Dutch Davis</name>, <name>Benjamin<lb/> Hutchinson</name>, <name>James L Bissell</name>,<lb/> <name>Patrick <unclear>yoro</unclear></name>, and <name>John H Brook</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants still make default, and no Jurry being required this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court for assessment of damages<lb/> and the Court being fully advised of and concerning the<lb/> premises doth asses the plaintiffs damages at the sum of<lb/> sixteen hundred and five dollars. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#240,65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Weil</name> and<lb/> <name>Max Weil</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Clemens Landzettel</name> and<lb/> <name>Bernhard Landzettel</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants still make<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of their damages to the<lb/> Court and the Court, after hearing the proofs, doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of two hundred forty dollars and sixty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also<lb/> their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="233" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0240.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dentelmoser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mathew Rippey</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery, The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law,<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; where<lb/>fore it is ordered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said<lb/> affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis Country an said Sheriff is hereby direc<lb/> ted if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and delver it to the plaintiff</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C Fischer</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>A Fisher</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abram G Marble</name><lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>St Bt Mariner</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> and that the defendant pay all the costs herein not already paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard C <unclear>Weirick</unclear></name> et al<lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Goodspeeds</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs 621<lb/> <name>Calvin C Burt</name> and <name>Geo W Bechtner</name> garnishees of <name>Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> said garnishees be discharged at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mortland</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Michael Mepham</name> and<lb/> <name>William G Mepham</name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and remits to the defendants<lb/> the sum of sixty one dollars part and parcel of the judgment rendered<lb/> herein: and the defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5682,09.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 151<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles L Hobbs</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lankershine</name></head>
            <p>On notes and account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although called,<lb/> still make default, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause<lb/> to the Court and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same,<lb/> doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of five thousand six<lb/> hundred and eighty two dollars and nine cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover for the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name> admr of <name><unclear>Presly</unclear> Phillips</name><lb/> vs 604<lb/> <name>Wood W M Clamant</name> garn of abbott et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that the said<lb/> garnishee be discharged at his costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> etal<lb/> vs 607<lb/> <name>John C Brookes</name> garn of <name>Geo W Goodell</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that the said garnishee<lb/> be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Scheffelmann</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>Frederick Tiemann</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="234" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0241.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Reed</name>, and<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name><lb/> vs 654<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
            <p>On plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury,<lb/> to wit: <name>J P White</name>, <name>Joseph Roy</name>, <name>Louis Motion</name>, <name>A K Nesbit</name>, <name>Henry von<lb/><unclear>dereaw</unclear></name>, <name>Gustavus Haenschen</name>, <name>C Rennekamp</name>, <name>W C Hyatt</name>, <name>J B <unclear>Dyer</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas A Anderson</name>, <name>John Smith</name> and <name>J D Fine</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined<lb/> upon the plea in abatement the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find the issue herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendants at the date of the commencement of this suit had fraudulently conveyed or assigned<lb/> their property or effects so as to hinder or delay their creditors.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus P Ladew</name> et al<lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>H Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>answer of <name>H Clark</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W D Simpson</name> etal<lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>MS Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G Bauerman</name><lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> garn</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Robt M Renick</name> re gain</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>A Dentelmoser</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 611<lb/> <name>Thos Brown</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>Thos Brown</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cha H Welling</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robt P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Depositions of plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk elect of this Court, Presents to the Court his official bond in the sum of ten<lb/> thousand dollars, conditional according to law, with himself as principal, <name>Edward M Haydel</name>, <name>John<lb/> W Rice</name> and <name>James Castello</name>. As securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="235" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0242.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-05">Thursday January 5th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment.<lb/> Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Winslow L Bowker</name> and<lb/> <name>James F Edwards</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The assigned estate of <name>John C<lb/> Powell</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name><lb/> <name>Josiah G M Clellan</name> assignee</head>
            <p>now come said <name>M Clellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and the said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> come not, and a Jury being<lb/> waived this cause is submitted to the Court and the plaintiffs proofs<lb/> being heard the Court finds that there is due from said <name>John C</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> to plaintiffs Eleven thousand five hundred eleven dollars<lb/> and seventy six cents and interest thereon from <date when="1859-04-28">April 28th 1859</date><lb/> making together the sum of sum of Eleven thousand nine hundred and eighty six dollars and sixty two cents: <lb/> and it is ordered that said assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said estate an equal prorate share<lb/> upon the sum last named with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben L<lb/> Anderson</name> and <name>Erastus H Gaylord</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The assigned Estate of <name>John Powell</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> <name>Josiah G McClellan</name> assignee</head>
            <p>Now come said <name>McClellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> come not; and no Jury being<lb/> required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the proofs and<lb/> the Court finds there from that there is due from said <name>John C</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Powell</name> to plaintiffs the sum of twenty six hundred and twenty six dollars and eighty cents: and it is ordered that said<lb/> assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said estate an equal pro rate share upon the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Newman</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Franks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Assigned Estate of <name>John C<lb/> Powell</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> <name>Josiah G McClellan</name> Assignee</head>
            <p>Now come said <name>McClellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> come not; and no Jury being<lb/> required this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same finds that there is due from said <name>John C</name><lb/> seventy eight dollars and eighteen cents: and it is ordered that said<lb/> assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said assigned estate an equal prorate share upon the debt aforesaid as<lb/> found with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Joss</name>, <name>R Eaton Goodell</name><lb/> and <name>John McGinnis Jr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Assigned Estate of <name>John C<lb/> Powell</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> <name>Josiah G McClellan</name> assignee</head>
            <p>Now come said <name>McClellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their attorney<lb/> but the said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> come not, and no Jury<lb/> being required this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same finds that there is du<lb/>ly from said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> to plaintiffs the sum of four<lb/> thousand four hundred and seventy three dollars and four cents;<lb/> and it is ordered that said assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said assigned estate an equal prorate<lb/> share upon the debt aforesaid with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Henning</name>, <name>John O Woodruff</name>,<lb/> <name>Marcus P Woodruff</name> and <name>Albert Pearce</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Assigned Estate of <name>John C Powell</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph Powell</name>; <name>Josiah G McClellan</name> assignee</head>
            <p>Now come said <name>McClellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> but the said <name>John C</name> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> come not; and no Jury being<lb/> required this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court, after<lb/>due consideration thereof, finds that there is due from said <name>John C</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph Powell</name> to the plaintiffs the sum of eight thousand seven hun<lb/>dred and eighty six dollars and sixty nine cents: and it is ordered that said assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said<lb/> assigned estate an equal pro rata share upon the debt aforesaid with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="236" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0243.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mather S Moloney</name>, <name>William P<lb/> Moloney</name>, and <name>Theodore Bandhomme</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Assigned Estate of <name>John C<lb/> Powell</name> and <name>Josiah G M Clellan</name> assignee</head>
            <p>Now come the said <name>M Clellan</name> and the plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but the said <name>Jno C</name> and <name>Jo Powell</name> come not; and<lb/> no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> and the Court, after due consideration thereof, finds that there<lb/> is due from said <name>Jno C</name> And <name>Jo Powell</name> to plaintiffs<lb/> the sum of four thousand one hundred and forty six<lb/> dollar and nineteen cents: and it is ordered that said assignee pay to plaintiffs out of said estate<lb/> an equal pro rata share up to the debt aforesaid with the other allowed debts of said estate.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#587, 52<lb/> aget <name>Rogers</name></note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Wright</name> and<lb/> <name>Turner Maddox</name><lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>R W Rogers</name> and<lb/> <name>Andy Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, bad dismiss this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Anderson</name>, but the defendant <name>Rogers</name> although called still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court and<lb/> the Court after hearing the proofs doth assess the plaintiffs damage at the sum<lb/> of five hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifty two cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156, 20<lb/> No <name>Ryland<lb/> Springer</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Johnston Jr</name><lb/> and <name>Margaret Davis</name><lb/> vs 158<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Alonzo Child</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants still makes<lb/> default, and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> for assessment of damages and the Court after hearing the proof doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty six dollars<lb/> and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of <name>Stanley Ryland</name> the principal, and <name>Nicholas Springer</name> the security in the bond given for the release of the defendant, the<lb/> damages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#199, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Porter</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward C White</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>William Tyler</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants still makes<lb/> default, and no Jury being required the assessment of damages is submitted<lb/> to the Court and the Court after hearing the evidence doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages a the sum of one hundred and ninety nine dollars and seventy five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1199,81<lb/> xo percent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name><lb/> vs 654<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pellletier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendants although<lb/> duly called come not nor have they pleaded further herein, leaving this<lb/> action undefended, wherefore on motion of the plaintiffs the petition<lb/> herein is taken against said defendants as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> eleven hundred and ninety nine dollars and eighty one cents on account of the note on which<lb/> this action is founded. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/>defendants the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefore<lb/> and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten Percent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> etal<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>E G Tuttle</name> etal garn.</head>
            <p>Motion for<lb/> ne trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robts Armstrong</name> etal<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>E G Tuttle</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Motion for a new<lb/> trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="237" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0244.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#125, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J Smith</name><lb/> vs 2<lb/> The Steamboat <name>Burnette</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default and no Jury being required the Court form the proofs doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and twenty five<lb/> dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> the principal and <name>Philipp Walther</name> and <name>Jno C Winter</name> the securities in the bond given<lb/> for the release of the defendant, the damages aforesaid in from aforesaid as assessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann O Byrne</name><lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Martin O Byrnes</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but he defendant, although duly called still makes<lb/> default; and the Court proceeds to hear the proof and having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and<lb/> an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever di<lb/>vorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the nights<lb/> and privileges of an unmarried person; and the Court being satisfied that the defendant from his habits<lb/> and cause of life is an unsuitable person to have the custody and control of he infant children, <name>George</name> and<lb/> <name>Mary Ann</name>, mentioned in the petition, who are of tender years, it is further ordered adjudge and decreed that<lb/> the plaintiff have the care custody and control of the infant children aforesaid, and that the said defendant<lb/> be restrained and enjoined from interfering with the plaintiff in that behalf; and it is also ordered that the<lb/> said plaintiff pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> etal<lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their plea in abatement leaving this suit undefended, wherefore on motion of<lb/> plaintiffs the petition herein is taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles I Gill</name> etal<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> etal</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants withdraw their plea<lb/> in abatement leaving this suit undefended, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs, the<lb/> petition herein is taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>T L Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth B Davis</name><lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>Wm H Haggerty</name> etal</head>
            <p>The motion for Security for costs is, after due consideration by the Court,<lb/> sustained, Until the fourteenth is given plaintiff to file security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>On motion a dedimus is awarded defendant to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Shuman J Bacon</name> etal<lb/> vs 815<lb/> <name>Fredk M Colburn</name>, <name>Jno J Mauntel</name>,<lb/> <name>Mauntel Bulte &amp; Co</name> etal garnishees.</head>
            <p>On motion of said <name>Mauntel Bulte &amp; Co</name>, by attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that they be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed them for answering.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="238" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0245.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Radford</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Sarah Radford</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to<lb/> the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law; but the defendant although duly warned and called,<lb/>comes not but makes default wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the petition herein be taken against said defendant as confessed, Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Shepherd</name> and <name>Spence</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>St Charles Western Plank Road Company</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained, plaintiffs amend their<lb/> petition herein by inter lining the words, thirty eighty (38), two, six hun<lb/>dred, seventy six, and figures (126 7618/100), and the words forty<lb/> ninety four and eighty in specifying the amount of damages or com<lb/>pensation for excavating the indurated earth and gravel, in the place of the sums now claimed and<lb/>inserted in the said petition; and this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis P James Constable</name> of St Ferdin and<lb/> Township St Louis County to the use of<lb/> Victor Forest<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Frederick</name>, <name>Joseph H Garrett</name><lb/> and <name>Antoine Dchaitre</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also come a Jury, to wit; <name>J P White</name>, <name>Ja Roy</name>, <name>Louis Motier</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Patterson</name>; <name>Samuel Hale</name>, <name>Frank Von Phul</name>, <name>A B<lb/> Williams</name>, <name>W Havis</name>, <name>M Higgins</name>, <name>A Caffarata</name>, <name>Leor<lb/> Deno</name> and <name>James Kean</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein<lb/> jointed well and truly to try the trial progresses and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant <name>Samuel Frederick</name>, and the trial being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> say they find for the defendants. It is therefore considered C by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing<lb/> by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambgaust</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>amended answer filed.</p>
            <p><name>Michael S Cerre</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County having this day departed this life, and<lb/> the Court being now thereof informed, and deeply regretting his death, it is therefore, Ordered that<lb/> this Court do now, as a tribute of respect for the many verities and for the memory and the official<lb/> capacity of the said deceased, adjourn until Monday morning next at ten o'clock.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="239" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0246.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-09">Monday January 9th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present, Hon <name>Sam<lb/>uel M Breckinridge</name>, Judge, <name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk, and <name>Charles L Bois<lb/>liniere</name>, <name>Cornor</name>, acting Sheriff of. St Louis County.</p>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name> appoints <name>William A Pennington</name> a deputy Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court<lb/> Which appointment is approved by the Court and the Pennington takes the oath required by law.</p>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk of this Court, appoints <name>Waryn Montfort</name>, a deputy of said Court, which appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Montfort</name> takes the oath required by law.</p>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name> Clerk appoints <name>Robert Brent</name> a deputy clerk of this Court, which appointment is<lb/> approved by the Court, and the said <name>Bent</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk, appoints <name>John M Boyle</name> a deputy Clerk of this Court, which appoint<lb/>ment is approved by the Court, and the said <name>Boyle</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William N Branson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Scott</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit claiming the possession of certain<lb/> personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that defendant<lb/> deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the <name>Coroner</name>, acting Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County and said Coroner is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take inform the<lb/> defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and suggests to the Court that the said defendant has de<lb/> parted this life since the commencement of this suit, which is not denied, and<lb/> this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christopher W Spalding</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>Cha C Salomon</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#362, 85.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Weil</name> and<lb/> <name>Max Weil</name><lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>Louis Muff</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by this attorney, but he defendant still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of three hundred and sixty two dollars and eighty five cents. It is there<lb/> fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156, 79.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Boyd</name><lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Henry Wilder</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiff submits the assessment of damages to the Court and the Court<lb/> after due consideration of the evidence doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of one hundred and fifty six dollars and seventy nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs <lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L J Lipscomb</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>P H Lipscomb</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ray</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Ja H Morrison</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D Hastellere</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>V S Jourdan</name></head>
            <p>Petition for<lb/> Injunction filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="240" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0247.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#126, 48</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Walker</name><lb/> vs 530<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Walsh</name></head>
            <p>On motion.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but he defendant still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiff submits the assessment of damages to the Court and the Court, having<lb/> duly heard and considered the proof, doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of one hundred and twenty six dollar and forty eight cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#564, 78</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Wenke</name><lb/> vs 597<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the evidence, doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of five hundred and sixty four dollars and seventy eight cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carlos S Greeley</name>,<lb/> <name>Matthias Steitz</name> and<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name><lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>Adam Hammer</name> and<lb/> <name>Dominic Urban</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> called come not, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and eleven dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin J Adams</name> et al<lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issues therefor: defendants waive all<lb/> claim for damages arising out of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis P Corby</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Gossing</name><lb/> vs 821<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but said garnishee still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit this cause to the Court and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find that said garnishee at the time<lb/> he was summoned herein as such was indebted to said <name>Miles G Moies</name> in<lb/> the sum of two hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee the debt aforesaid as found <unclear>and also their costs herein expended</unclear><lb/> and have execution therefor; and that out of said sum they pay the costs of this proceeding.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#162, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Crozier</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Alonzo Child</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and sixty two dollars and<lb/> ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of <name>David De Haven</name>, the<lb/> principal, and <name>Joseph Holland</name>, the security given for the release of the defendant the damages afore<lb/>said as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Martin</name> and<lb/> <name>Simeon M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 168<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="241" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0248.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Selfridge</name><lb/> vs 200<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff, by leave of Court, withdraws the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Selfridge</name><lb/> vs 601<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff, by leave of Court, withdraws the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons<lb/> issue for <name>WM H Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons issue<lb/> for <name>WM H Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons<lb/> issue for <name>William H Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons<lb/> issue for <name>William H Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bank of State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 194<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons<lb/> issue herein for <name>William H Belcher</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#349,86.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Colman</name><lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>William W Farmer</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendant still makes default, and<lb/> the plaintiff submit the assessment of damages tot the Court, and the Court having<lb/> heard and considered the evidence doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum<lb/> of three hundred and forty nine dollars and eighty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cox</name><lb/> vs 385<lb/> <name>Anthony Cunningham</name></head>
            <p>Proof Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by attorney, assesses and files proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#522, 44</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
            <p>On motion and account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants still make<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages herein to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the proof, doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of five hundred and twenty two<lb/>dollar and forty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Campbell</name> etal<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Thos M Wolf</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by order of Court at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="242" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0249.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#173, 81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Gill</name> and<lb/> <name>George H Gill</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendants still make<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages herein to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and seventy three dollars<lb/> and eighty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#121,47</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Woods</name>, <name>William T Christy</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert K Woods</name>, <name>William T Gentry</name>,<lb/> and <name>Andrew Woods</name><lb/> vs 640<lb/> <name>George Couch</name>, <name>John L Chandler</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas J Hatton</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendants still<lb/> make default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages<lb/> herein to the Court and the Court, after hearing the proof, doth<lb/> asses the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and twenty<lb/> one dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#177, 85.<lb/> agst <name>Parker</name> and<lb/> <name>N M Ludlow</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Hastings</name> and <name>G Hastings</name><lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Henry S Parker</name>, <name>Noah M Ludlow</name><lb/> and <name>Francis M Ludlow</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> <name>Francis M Ludlow</name>, but the other defendants, <name>Noah M Ludlow</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry S Parker</name>, still make default, and the plaintiffs submit the<lb/> assessment of there damages to the Court and the Court after hearing<lb/> the proof dot asses the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and seventy seven dollar and eighty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Gerring</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs herein within the time required <unclear>for</unclear><lb/> him so to do, therefore on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Schroeder</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out plea in abatement and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress deposition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress deposition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Purvis</name><lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>Eliza A Purvis</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but he defendant still makes default, and the<lb/> Court proceeds to hear the proof and having duly heard and considered the same and<lb/> being satisfied there from that the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and an<lb/> innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and<lb/> forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and be restored<lb/> to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is also ordered that the plaintiff pay the<lb/> costs of this suit.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at half past nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S, M, Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="243" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0250.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-10">Tuesday January 10th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>B Hysinger</name>.</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed. The defendant refilled the depo<lb/>sitions which were withdraw for the purpose of amendment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 658<lb/> <name>James A Lee</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiffs by<lb/> leave of Court withdraw the note sued on and file a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James T Scott</name><lb/> vs 509<lb/> <name>Jacob L Levinsky</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick A Vallette</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Griffin P Therbald</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt N Martin</name><lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>Wm Truesdale</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Jas Oglesby</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas N Lockwood</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>John Camp</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lavenia Bellas</name><lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>Hugh Bellas</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Tillman</name> etal<lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>Henry L Patterson</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bermine</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Anna M Bermine</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#195, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Riley</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward E Curtis</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>William Wible</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assessment of damages<lb/> herein to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> <unclear>proofs</unclear> doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred<lb/> and ninety five dollar and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amedee A Mellier</name>,<lb/> <name>James Richardson</name> and<lb/> <name>William B English</name><lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>J W Plummer</name></head>
            <p>On Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and agree that judg<lb/>ment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of one<lb/> cent, debt, and for the costs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and also<lb/> their herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Bush</name><lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>Juliet Bush</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="244" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0251.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#209,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Cole</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Editor</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of two hundred and nine<lb/> dollars and costs. It is therefore conserved by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> <name>James P Saxton</name>, the principal, and <name>Solomon H Robbins</name>, the security in the bond given for the release of the<lb/> defendant, the damages aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#543, 72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>William Carson</name>, <name>Joseph B Holland<lb/> R Saffarrans</name>, <name>J P Rule</name><lb/> and<lb/> <name>E B Rule</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent and<lb/> agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for the sum of five hundred and forty three dollars and seventy two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid as agreed upon an its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Watson</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>A A VanWormer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continue as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W White</name> administrator<lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Charles H Avis</name></head>
            <p>Continue on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Watson</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Thomas Pehan</name> and <name>John Pehan</name></head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, and the plaintiff having failed to reply<lb/> to the defendants counter claim within the time required by law so to do, therefore on mo<lb/>tion of the defendants, it is ordered by the Court that the said counter claim be taken against<lb/> said plaintiff as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3499, 43</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name>, and <name>John W Luke</name>,<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas A Reese</name>, <name>William A Jones</name><lb/> and <name>David Reese</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the duly verified<lb/> statement of the defendants confessing themselves indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of thirty four hundred and ninety nine dol<lb/>lars and forty cents and authorizing the entering up of judgment<lb/> against them in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#700,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name>, and <name>John W Luke</name>,<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas A Reese</name>, and <name>David Reese</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the duly veri<lb/>fied statement of the defendants confessing themselves indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred dollars and author<lb/>izing the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#112, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah Thornburgh</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>John W Darby</name> and <name>John H Tice</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiff submits the assessment of damage herein to the Court and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth asses the plaintiffs dam<lb/>ages at the sum of one hundred and twelve dollars and fifty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="245" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0252.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Ferd<lb/> Kuhne</name>, <name>S H Little</name>, <name>J R Dobyms</name>, <name>E C Brown</name>, <name>C J Davis</name>, <name>W W Heas</name>, <name>B Her<lb/>man</name>, <name>T Y Birks</name>, <name>Julius Herter</name>, <name>Phil Klein</name>, <name>John O Maley</name> and <name>John Sharp</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy upon the plea<lb/> in abatement herein well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> defendant, at the date of the commencement of this suit, was a non resident of this State.</p>
            <p><name>Peter Wegman</name>, Esg, Marshall of St Louis County, in open Court acknowledge the execution of a deed<lb/> by him as such Marshall in favor of <name>Edward C Kehr</name> for all the night, title, interest, claim, estate<lb/> and property of <name>Gabriel Georges</name> of in and to the following described premises situated in the county<lb/> of St Louis State of Missouri, to wit; a certain lot of ground with the improvements thereon lying in <name>Foulard</name><lb/> addition to the City of St Louis, beginning at t permit in the Southern <unclear>esse</unclear> of Park avenue the North East<lb/> corner of Block 3 of said addition running thence Westwardly with the south line of said avenue<lb/> seventy eights Feet, more or less, to a point forty Feet East of the north West corner of said Block<lb/> thence running Southwardly and parallel to Rosatti street ninety five feet seven inches, more or<lb/>less, to the north line of lot 5 of said <name>Block Thence</name> running Eastwardly with the Northern line of said<lb/> lot seventy five feet to an alley; thence running Northwardly along the Western <unclear>esse</unclear> of said alley one<lb/> hundred and sixteen feet and three and half inches to the place of beginning; Sold by virtue of an<lb/> execution issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Law Commissioners Court dated the <date when="1859-10-07">Seventh<lb/> day of October A D, 1859</date>, in favor of <name>Margaret George</name> against <name>Gabriel Georges</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Cha G Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brook</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Geo T Brady</name> etal</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
            <p>Amended petition filed by consent off parties. Motion to strike<lb/> out amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 151<lb/> <name>Wm H Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit to set aside judgment by default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kohr</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>St Bt Spread Eagle</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Cleveland</name> and<lb/> <name>John K Russell</name><lb/> vs 85<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Sidney Smith</name>. <name>P Mitchell</name>, <name>A Miller</name>, <name>John A Frank</name>, <name>D W Graham</name>,<lb/> <name>Jas Cortoise</name>, <name>J R Berg</name>, <name>John Runkle</name>, <name>J Davidson</name>, <name>Richard Walsh</name>,<lb/> <name>David Ryan</name> and <name>E C Brown</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being fin<lb/>ished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defen<lb/>dant do hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs his cost herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Milliman</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Igratz Becker</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the default herein, being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court, is overruled.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="246" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0253.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#72, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theron Barnum</name> and<lb/> <name>Josiah Fogg</name><lb/> vs 326<lb/> <name>Benjamin W Grover</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs submit the assessment of damages herein to the<lb/> Court and the Court after Leaning the proof doth assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/>ages at the sum of seventy two dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered<lb/>by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at half past nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S. M. Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-11">Wednesday January 11th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Lyman W Potter</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside 29 p 252.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> etal</head>
            <p>Report of Commissioners confirmed. Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and, on their motion, and no cause<lb/> being shown to the contrary, it is ordered by the Court that the report of<lb/> the commissioners herein be confirmed; and it appearing to the Court that par<lb/>tition in kind of the real estate described in petition and judgment cannot be made without great<lb/> prejudice to the owners thereof, it is therefore ordered that the Sheriff of St Louis County proceed to sell<lb/> said real estate, at public auction, to the highest bidder, upon the following terms, to wit; one third of the<lb/> purchase money to be paid in cash and the balance in two equal payments of one and two year with<lb/> interest at the rate of six per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#255, 00<lb/> And<lb/> Percent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Hill</name><lb/> vs 909<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files an affidavit, and also comes <name>Albert<lb/> N Sterling</name>, me of the attorneys of this Court, and exhibits and files a warrant of<lb/> attorney duly executed by the defendant, and by virtue of the power therein conferred,<lb/> in the name and behalf of the defendant, waives the issue and service of process and acknowledges that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifty five dollars and au<lb/>theorizes the entering up of judgment in favor of plaintiff and against said defendant for that amount.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum form this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside 29 p 273.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Carlos S Greeley</name>, <name>A J Shapleigh</name><lb/> and <name>Mathias Steitz</name>, trustees of<lb/> <name>State Savings Association</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>James J Death</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the said garnishees, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that they be discharged hence at plaintiffs costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed each of said garnishees for answering herein to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="247" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0254.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselimeyer</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by attorney, a dedimus is awarded them<lb/> to the State of Ohio.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Rahlmann</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Fred K Rahlmann</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by her attorney, a dedimus is awarded her to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Epenetus B Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John H Dargin</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion to strike out the answer herein, and by leave of Court<lb/> defendant amends his answer by adding thereto the name of his attorney, and<lb/> this cause is continue at plaintiffs costs as on affidavit; and the motion to strike the answer is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kohr</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Spread Eagle</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> etal<lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>The L Moore</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 130, 20<lb/> set aside<lb/> page 285</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kelley</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>John E Cook</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>J Kuhn</name>, <name>S H Little</name>, <name>J R Dobyns</name>, <name>C J Davis</name>, <name>W N Keas</name>, <name>B Herman</name>, <name>J Y<lb/>Birks</name>, <name>Julius Herter</name>, <name>Phil Klein</name>, <name>John O'Malley</name>, <name>John Sharp</name> and <name>Sidney Smith</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say<lb/> they find for the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and thirty dollars and twenty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Watson</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Thomas Pehan</name> and <name>John Pehan</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and on motion of plaintiff, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the interlocutory judgment on the counter claim rendered<lb/> herein on yesterday be set aside and vacated; thereupon come a Jury, towit; <name>E C<lb/> Brown</name>, <name>P Michell</name>, <name>A Miller</name>, <name>J a Frank</name>, <name>D W Graham</name>, <name>Js Cortoise</name>, <name>J R Berg</name>,<lb/> <name>John Runkel</name>, <name>James Davidson</name>, <name>R Walsh</name>, and <name>David Ryan</name>, <unclear>aleven</unclear> good and lawful men who being, by<lb/> consent of parties, duly elected tried an sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> etal<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered that the said motion be overruled. During the present<lb/> term of this Court is given the plaintiffs to file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Wm C Molloy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> etal<lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Thos <unclear>Richards</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="248" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0255.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas C Courtenay</name>, Esq, presents to the Court a Commission from His Excellency<lb/> <name>Robert M Stewart</name>, Governor of the State of Missouri, whereby he is commissioned Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County to fill the vacancy occasioned by the death of <name>Michael S Cure</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis Coun<lb/>ty, and Files his bond in the sum of fifty thousand dollars, conditioned according to law, with himself<lb/> as principal, and <name>John M Wimer</name>, <name>P A Lanham</name>, <name>William M Walton</name>, <name>Henry B Belt</name> and <name>B W<lb/> Alexander</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints <name>Jesse S Martin</name> a deputy sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said martin takes the oath required by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints <name>James A Guion</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Guion</name> takes the oath required by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints <name>Thomas M Bauon</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Barron</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints <name>George N Stevens</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Stevens</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints <name>John S Wilkins</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Wilkins</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints, <name>Martin J Walsh</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Walsh</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints, <name>Eugene Alcan</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which appoint<lb/>ment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Alcan</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints, <name>John B Grady</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which appoint<lb/>ment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Grady</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff appoints, <name>Daniel R Grace</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Grace</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S. M. Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="249" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0256.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-12">Thursday January 12th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present, <name>Horn Samuel<lb/> M Breckinridge</name>, Judge, <name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk, and <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>,<lb/> Sheriff of St Louis County.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>. Sheriff, appoints <name>James Owens</name> a deputy sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Owens</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W McCurdy</name> etal<lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Robt E McCarthy</name></head>
            <p>Proof of partnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>State Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Certified claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert S Regor</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Chas Maurice</name> a<lb/> witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin C Sloan</name><lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, It is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> etal<lb/> vs 97<lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, It is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas F Smith</name><lb/> vs 531<lb/> <name>James Pitcher</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein.<lb/> Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Wetherill</name> etal<lb/> vs 122<lb/> <name>Francis a Papin</name>.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ray</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>James H Morrison</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit of defendant <name>Morrison</name> at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Challar</name> etal<lb/> vs 63<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorneys, It is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Smith</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>R Hysinger</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion and by consent off Parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed and that the plaintiff pay all costs not already paid and that execution issue<lb/> therefore; the plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Schroeder</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion of strike out the plea in abatement herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that said motion be sustained and<lb/> the said plea in abatement is accordingly stricken out; Leave is given the plaintiff<lb/> to file an amended petition herein within ten days; and until the first day of the next turn of this<lb/> Court is given the defendant to plead to the said action; and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be continued at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="250" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0257.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Atreus J M <unclear>Creery</unclear></name>, <name>William H Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard H <unclear>Mckay</unclear></name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Eugene Papin</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name><unclear>Fredin</unclear></name> and <name>Kuhne</name>, <name>S H Little</name>, <name>J R Dobyns</name>, <name>C J Davis</name>, <name>W W Keyes</name>, <name>Bernard<lb/> Hermann</name>, <name>Thomas Y Birks</name>, <name>Julius Hertler</name>, <name>Philip Klein</name>, <name>John O Malley</name>, <name>John<lb/> Sharp Sidney Smith</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected trial<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suite in this behalf but that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs his herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Papin</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Anton <unclear>Soheryon</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissal at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>United State Ins co</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>Wm P Davis</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Price</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Bart G Leper</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs fir absence of <name>W W Tompkins</name> and<lb/> <name>R J Powell</name>. Witnesses.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Waters</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C Bull</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lut</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Butter</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#700, 50<lb/> And 10 per cent,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> and<lb/> <name>James Kinkead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Lowery</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the duly verified statement<lb/> of the defendant confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> seven hundred dollars and fifty cents and authorizing the entering up of<lb/> judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore, and it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant that king by his suit in this<lb/> behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="251" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0258.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine M Cupp</name><lb/> vs 43.<lb/> <name>William H Cupp</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement herein<lb/> and the plaintiff withdraws from the petition all allegations of a dultery come<lb/> mitted by the defendant, and the Court proceeds to hear the proof and<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is a person<lb/> of good moral character and an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that<lb/> the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person and that she have<lb/> the care custody and control of the infant children <name>George B Cupp</name>, <name>Kate H Cupp</name> and <name>Ann Cupp</name>,<lb/> free from molestation by the defendant; and in accordance with the aforesaid agreement the Court doth<lb/> allow the plaintiff as alimony, the sum of fifteen hundred dollars per year, commencing on the first<lb/> day of January, eighteen hundred and sixty, payable quarterly, for the support of said plaintiff and<lb/> the children aforesaid; and it is also ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this suit and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#136,75.<lb/> New trial<lb/> granted 29 p 289</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name>, <name>Harry Gray</name>,<lb/> and <name>Milton Gray</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name>, <name>Charles L<lb/> Thompson</name> and <name>Charles J McChing</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the defendants <name>Frank<lb/>lin H McChing</name> and <name>Charles J McChing</name>, enter their appearance<lb/> to this action and by leave of Court join in the answer filed herein,<lb/> and the plaintiffs file an affidavit and more the Court for a<lb/> continuance of this cause and the Court being fully advised in<lb/> the premises doth overrule said motion; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>Ferdinand Kishne</name>, <name>S H Little</name>,<lb/> <name>J R Dobyns</name>, <name>C J Davis</name>, <name>W W Keyes</name>, <name>Bernard Human</name>, <name>Thomas Y Birks</name>, <name>Julius Hertler</name>, <name>Philip Klein John<lb/> O Malley</name>, <name>John Sharp</name> and <name>Sidney Smith</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and thirty six dollars<lb/> and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the<lb/> damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kelly</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>John E Cook</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Gilsey</name><lb/> vs 273<lb/> <name>Edwd A Damon</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issue filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Watson</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Thomas Pehan</name> and<lb/> <name>John Pehan</name></head>
            <p>Mistrial.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanneled<lb/> and sworn herein, and the trial progresses and the defendants withdraw their counter<lb/> claim herein and the trial being finished, the Jurors aforesaid, after due consideration<lb/> of the premises, upon their oaths say they are unable to agree upon a verdict; wherefore<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the Jurors be discharged from the further consideration of this cause and that<lb/> this cause be continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of <name>Moexrel Wall</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Agreed case filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm C Holmes</name><lb/> vs 109<lb/> <name>A G Gauett</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>William W Wimer</name> a deputy sheriff of St Louis County,<lb/> which appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Wimer</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="252" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0259.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-13">Friday January 13th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>McCann Schoonmaker</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harty Bocarde</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
            <p><name>James D Walton</name> is, on motion, admitted and on rolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gorman</name><lb/> vs 681<lb/> <name>Samuel Gaty</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, and the plaintiff having failed to file a bond for costs within<lb/> the time allowed by the Court for him so to do, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Cormerais</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and suggests to the Court the death of the<lb/> defendant since the commencement of this suit; which is not denied: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet Hardaway</name><lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Chatfield Hardaway</name>.</head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant still makes default<lb/> and the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein and having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is a person<lb/> of good mural character and an innocent and injured party, it doth order adjudge and decree that the<lb/> plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defen<lb/>dant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is also ordered that<lb/> the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name> <name>Charles J Gill</name> and<lb/> <name>George H Gill</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
            <p>Order to pay over money.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that <name>James Castello</name><lb/> late Sheriff of St Louis County pay to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the above entitled causes the sum of<lb/> five hundred and twenty dollars and forty<lb/> nine cents being the balance of proceeds of sale of property attached after deducting expenses.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Reed</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Gates</name><lb/> vs 654<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
            <p>Order to pay over money.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> <name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, pay over to said plaintiffs the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and thirty nine dollars and ninety three cents, being the bal<lb/>ance of proceeds of sale of property attached after deducting expenses.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> entry made in this cause on Wednesday, the eleventh instant, <unclear>confiming</unclear> the<lb/> Commissioners Report and ordering the Sheriff to sell the property described<lb/> in the petition and judgment, be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Lamp</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Nicholas Wall</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files an affidavit and moves the Count<lb/> for a continuance of this cause and the Court after due consideration of the<lb/> premises, doth overrule the said motion.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="253" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0260.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bratenahl</name> etal<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs delivered by notary and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Carran</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Wm C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> etal<lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James E Crop</name>, <name>Mary Brown</name><lb/> and <name>Elizabeth Brown</name><lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>Felix Reynolds</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and<lb/> files a statement, from which it appears that the keeping of the prop<lb/>erty attached under the writ herein will be attended with great loss<lb/> and expense before the probable termination of this suit; it is therefore<lb/> ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property according to law, and that he make a report of his<lb/> proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Lamp</name><lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Nicholas Wall</name> and <name>John Shaw</name></head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and says he will not further prosecute<lb/> his suit in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non Suit. It is therefor considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendants go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name>, <name>Matilda Goss</name>, <name>Frederick Goss</name>, <name>Mary Louisa Goss</name>, and <name>David Goss</name> by their guardian <name>Henry Goss</name>, <name>Elizabeth Hoke</name> and her husband <name>George W Hoke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> and <name>Emeline</name> his wife, and <name>Therese Latimer</name> and her husband <name>David Latimer</name></head>
            <p>Report of Commissioners confirmed.</p>
            <p>Order of Sale.<lb/> Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and on their motion<lb/> and no cause being shown to the contrary, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the Report of the Commissioners here to fore filed<lb/> herein be confirmed: and the Court being satisfied that the<lb/> said Commissioners Report is just and correct and that par<lb/>tition in kind of the real estate described in the petition and<lb/> judgment herein cannot be made without great prejudice to<lb/> the owners thereof; It is therefore ordered by the Court that<lb/> the Sheriff of St Louis County sell said real estate at public<lb/> a action, to the highest bidder, upon the following terms, to wit; one third of the purchase money to be<lb/> paid in cash and the balance in two equal payments of one and two years with interest at the rate of<lb/> six percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carl Schlosstein</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Philippine Schlosstein</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default<lb/> and the Court proceeds to hear the proof herein and having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the plaintiff is a person of good moral<lb/> character and an innocent and injured part. It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed that the<lb/> plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with<lb/> said defendant and be restored to all the nights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is also<lb/> ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>Sylvester Chouteau</name> a deputy sheriff of St Louis County which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Chouteau</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="254" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0261.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Thompson</name> etal<lb/> vs 147<lb/> <name>Mayer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> etal<lb/> vs 843<lb/> <name>Ira Todd</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant by attorney the Court allows the said garnishee the sum<lb/> of ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#764,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Alton and Chicago Rail Road Company</name> and <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant <name>Saint Louis Alton and<lb/> Chicago Rail Road Company</name> by their attorneys, but the defen<lb/>dant <name>Miles G Moies</name> although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiff it is ordered that the petition be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed; and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth find that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and sixty four dollars and thirty cents, on account of<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>D P Clay</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robt Causes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Wm A Bassett</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Robt Causes</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name> and<lb/> <name>Eurotas W Barnes</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/><name> Thomas S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>F Kuhne</name>, <name>S H Little</name>, <name>P Michel</name>, <name>A Miller</name>, <name>J A Frank</name>, <name>D W Graham</name>, <name>Jas<lb/> Cortois</name>, <name>F R Berg</name>, <name>John Runkle</name>, <name>James Davidson</name>, <name>Richd Walsh</name>, and<lb/> <name>David Ryan</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bratenahl</name> and<lb/> <name>Lewis Bratenahl</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>E C Brown</name>, <name>C J Davis</name>, <name>W W Keays</name>, <name>B Herman</name>, <name>Thomas Y Birks</name>, <name>Julies<lb/> Herter</name>, <name>John O Malley</name>, <name>John Sharp</name> and <name>Sidney Smith</name>, nine good and<lb/> lawful men, who being, by consent of parties, duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> matters in controversy upon the plea in abatement herein well and truly to try the trial progresses but<lb/> not being finished further proceedings are laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="255" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0262.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-14">Saturday January 14th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Joseph W Stryker</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
            <p><name>Joseph K Sumrall</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name> etal<lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Thomas S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside verdict filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Ross</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823.<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garn of<lb/> <name>Thos Richards</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, by his attorney twenty days are given him to file a re<lb/>ply to the denial of his answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#116,60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Leonard</name><lb/> vs 406<lb/> <name>John B Desmoulin</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default, and no<lb/> Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court for assessment of damages<lb/> and the Court, after hearing the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of<lb/> one hundred and sixteen dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the damages as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Schulher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Corner of St Louise<lb/> County and said Coroner is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#150,65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Mason</name> and<lb/> <name>William I Caner</name><lb/> vs 455.<lb/> <name>William A Nelson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs,<lb/> the petition herein is taken against the defendant as confessed: and a Jury being<lb/> waived this cause is submitted to the Court for assessment of damages, and the<lb/> Court, after hearing the proof, doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars<lb/> and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the dam<lb/>ages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2308,93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name> surviving<lb/> partner of <name>Thomas O Flaherty</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>Eugene Laveille</name> and <name>Richard<lb/> M Henderson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendants, although duly<lb/> called come not but still make default; and the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submits the assessment of damages herein to the Court, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the evidence, doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages at the sum of twenty three hundred and eight dol<lb/>lars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs and charges in this behalf<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="256" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0263.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W McCurdy</name> et al<lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Robert Emmet McCarthy</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiffs, and files an affidavit and sug<lb/>gests to the Court the death of the plaintiff <name>John W M Curdy</name> since the<lb/> commencement of this suit, and also comes <name>Eliza McCurdy</name>, administratrix<lb/> of said <name>John W McCurdy</name>, by her attorney, and enters her appearance as a party plaintiff; and by leave<lb/> of Court, first obtained, the plaintiffs file an amended petition herein: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#382,66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass James B<lb/> Gazzam</name> and <name>James E Breading</name><lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Michael Mullin</name> and <name>S H Woodson</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants still make<lb/> default, and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court for<lb/> assessment of damages, and the Court, after hearing the proofs, doth assess<lb/> the plaintiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and eighty two dollars<lb/> and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit of defendants; costs to abide result of suit.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>Wilson</name>, <name>P Wells</name> a deputy, sheriff of St Louis County, which ap<lb/>pointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Wells</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Duer</name> et al<lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Philip Hess</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bond for costs with <name>Johnson</name> and <name>Tucker</name>, as securities, which is approved,<lb/> and the Court doth thereupon overruled the motion to dismiss this suit; and by leave of Court,<lb/> the plaintiffs amend their petition by adding an affidavit thereto and also file the drafts<lb/> suedon in this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benson G Connor</name><lb/> vs 865<lb/> <name>James B Goff</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Benjamin H P Butler</name></head>
            <p>Changed of Venue.</p>
            <p>The Judge of this court having been of counsel herein, it is ordered that this cause and<lb/> all further proceedings herein together with a certified copy of the record entries herein<lb/> be transferred to the St Louis Court of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Barbara Schnerr</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Ernest Schnerr</name><lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>Theodore P Greene</name></head>
            <p>The motion to reinstate this cause for trial being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Myers</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>William C Malloy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out the answer of <name>William J Kilbben</name>, guardian ad litem<lb/> of <name>H J Stephens</name> being heard and fully considered by the court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The G Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed. Motion in arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>J A Michel</name> a deputy Sheriff of St Louis County, which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court, and the said <name>Michel</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="257" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0264.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Hostetter</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Victor S Jourdan</name></head>
            <p>Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and submit the plaintiffs<lb/> bill for an injunction to the Court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being fully advised in the premises, doth<lb/> order that said bill for an injunction be refused and the bill be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiffs file a motion to rein<lb/>state cause and grant injunction.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-16">Monday January 16th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>W Henessey</name></head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Rahlmann</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Fred K Rahlmann</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Sam Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno A M Elroy</name></head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm J Norris</name><lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>Jas Price</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Gelfort</name> and <name>Thomas Tiney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C Ivory</name> and <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs come and file a petition and affidavit, according to law; <lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that the defendants deliver the property specified in said affi<lb/>davit to the Coroner of St Louis County and said Coroner is hereby directed if<lb/> said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendants and de<lb/>liver it to the plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#135,66.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and <name>William P Gettys</name><lb/> vs 20<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Laclede</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although called,<lb/> still makes default, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assessment of<lb/> damages herein to the court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and thirty<lb/> five dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> <unclear>margin</unclear> in the bond given for the release of the defendant, to wit; <name>Spencer J Ball</name> the principal and <name>Josiah<lb/> P Morten</name> and <name>R M Allister</name>, the securities in said bond, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as as<lb/>ssessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="258" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0265.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Wright</name> et al<lb/> vs 182<lb/> <name>Henry <unclear>Fruienfeld</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue herein to Greene County for the defendant, <name>Henry Fruienfeld</name>,<lb/> returnable to the next term: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Mo use of <name>Chas Boswell</name><lb/> vs 191<lb/> <name>Isaac Rosenfeld Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Mo use of <name>Alex Biddle</name><lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>Isaac Rosenfeld Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anthony Oberreither</name><lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>Geo J Barnett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Boylan et al<lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>St B Michigan</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Felton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, ten days are given him to file affidavits in support<lb/> of motion for new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>William C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bratenahl</name> and<lb/> <name>Levis Bratenahl</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimes</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Ju<lb/>rors empanneled and sworn herein, and the trial progresses and being finished<lb/> the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defen<lb/>dant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant, at the Late<lb/> of the commencement of this suit, was not about to remove his property or effects out of this state with the<lb/> intent to defraud hinder and delay his creditors and that he was not about to remove out of this Gate<lb/> with the intent to change his domicil: wherefore it is ordered by the court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>Geo Y Bast</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an<lb/> alias Summons issue herein for <name>Geo Y Bast</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent and<lb/> satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name> and <name>Thomas Marston</name><lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Perry Brown</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent and agree<lb/> that judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the<lb/> defendant for possession of property and one cent damages and that the plain<lb/>tiffs pay all the costs herein except costs of defendants depositions. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs retain the possession of the personal property delivered to him<lb/> by the Sheriff and that they recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as agreed upon and have execu<lb/>tion therefor; and that plaintiffs pay the costs of this suit except the costs of defendants depositions. The plain<lb/>tiffs acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="259" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0266.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Rannells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard a Vinger</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by his attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons<lb/> issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#100,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Milliman</name><lb/> vs 646<lb/> <name>Ignatz Becker</name></head>
            <p>Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement and con<lb/>sent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein favor of the plaintiff and<lb/> against the defendant for the sum of one hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3624,95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 185.<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and on its motion the order<lb/> for the issuing of an alias summons herein be set aside; but the de<lb/>fendants although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court doth find that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand six hundred and twenty four dollars and<lb/> ninety five cents on account of the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3008,31</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>William H Belcher</name> and <name>Charles Belcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, and on its motion the order<lb/> for the issuing of an alias summons herein be set aside and vacated;<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff the sum of three thousand and eight dollars and thirty one cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Guion</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Leitensdorfer</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit according to law, claiming the possession<lb/> of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the de<lb/>fendants deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him<lb/> to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#45,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Fountain</name>,<lb/> <name>James C M Pheeters</name><lb/> and <name>William W Pheeters</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name>, <name>Louis <unclear>Thibeau</unclear></name>, <name>Thomas Fox</name>, <name>J Russell</name>, <name>C B Tilden</name>, <name>P M Lock<lb/>wood</name>, <name>J Mackoy</name>, <name>J Dunifant</name>, <name>Peter Wenger</name>, <name>N F Aymond</name>, <name>L Schlenker</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles L Kuhne</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial pro<lb/>gresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plain<lb/>tiffs and assess their damages at the sum of forty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs retain the possession of the property of the property delivered to them by the Sheriff and that they recover<lb/> of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="260" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0267.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the continuance herein<lb/> be set aside and this suit be dismissed as to the defendant, a <name>Johnson</name>; and it is also<lb/> ordered that this cause be set for trial at the foot of the docket.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Stump</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Theodore A Thomas</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his demurer herein and leave of Court files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William N White</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>Noble Kellogg</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-17">Tuesday January 17th1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>William H Stickney</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louise Rahlmann</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Fred K Rahlmann</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alex Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>A H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Exhibit A filed by plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louise Burgdorf</name><lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>Wm Burgdorf</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bellows</name> et al<lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth B Davis</name><lb/> vs 568<lb/> <name>Wm H Haggerty</name> et la</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file a bond for costs herein within the time allowed here<lb/> so to do, it is therefore, on motion of the defendants, by attorney, ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Red</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, until the twenty third instant is given him to<lb/> answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Duer Jr</name> et la<lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Philip Hesse</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Gusav Pons</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="261" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0268.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron A Fisher</name> et al<lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>Calvin H Frederick</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurrer of the defendant, <name>Frederick</name>, to the petition being heard and Fully<lb/> considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Louis <unclear>Heder</unclear></name> administrator<lb/> vs 203<lb/> <name>Charles Klausmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and the execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Edwin N Whedon</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Norbury</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that a dedimus issue to Illi<lb/>nois in his behalf. Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Otis<lb/> West</name>, <name>A Fisher</name>, <name>C E King</name>, <name>John Griffith</name>, <name>F Ringling</name>, <name>Peter Sharkey</name>, <name>C Muller</name>, <name>N<lb/> Covington</name>, <name>Patrick Haut</name>, <name>A L Roland</name>, <name>William H Finch</name>, and <name>F Suhr</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn to enquire into and assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/>ages the trial progresses and by leave of Court plaintiff amends his account by verifying the same by affidavit<lb/> wherefore it is ordered by the Court that the interlocutory decree herein be aside and vacated; and on motion<lb/> of the defendant leave is given him to file an answer and counter claim, which are accordingly filed, thereupon<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff leave is given him to file an amended petition herein, and by consent of parties the<lb/> Jurors, empanelled and sworn herein, are discharged from the further consideration of this cause; and this cause<lb/> is continued until the next teem of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#402,05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Hazard Powder Company</name><lb/> vs 541<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiff submits the assessment of damages herein to<lb/> the Court and the Court, after heaving the proof, doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of four hundred and two dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William <unclear>Johnstone</unclear></name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Charles Webb</name> and <name>Melvin L Gray</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the Court, having duly heard and<lb/> considered the demurrer to the petition, doth overrule the same and the defendants<lb/> failing further to plead herein leaving this action undefended, therefore, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed; and<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment of damages herein to the Court, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of twelve hundred and forty six<lb/> dollars and thirty three cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum of twenty five hundred dollars, the penalty of the bond sued on, and also his costs and charges<lb/> in this behalf expended, and that he have execution against the defendants for the sum of twelve hundred<lb/> and forty six dollars and thirty three cents, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="262" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0269.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>I hereby acknowledge full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment of which this<lb/> in the margin<lb/> <date when="--08-02">august 2nd</date> = 62<lb/> attest.<lb/> <name>S Rice</name> clk<lb/> <name>James C <unclear>Muodes</unclear></name> <unclear>atty issue issue of<lb/> judge</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> and <name>John MacCracken</name><lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>Gorge Trowbridge</name> and <name>John G Priest</name></head>
            <p>On bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiv<lb/>ing a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty seven hundred<lb/> dollars and thirty two cents: and the plaintiffs file an indemnity bond, conditioned according to law, in the<lb/> sum of five thousand five hundred dollars, which is approved by the Court. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of twenty seven hundred dollars and thirty<lb/> two cents, the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William B ward</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the third amended petition herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court, it is ordered that the said demurrer be and is hereby overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>amended answer filed by leave by Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 107<lb/> <name>W H Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Counter affidavit of plaintiff filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cyprian Clamorgan</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Samuel Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion and by consent of parties, it is ordered that the cause be dismissed at plain<lb/> tiffs costs and that execution issue therefore. The plaintiff by leave of Court with<lb/>draws the note sued on.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Breckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-18">Wednesday, January 18, 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name> et al<lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Michael S Curve</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the defendants and suggests to the Court the<lb/> death of the defendant, <name>Michael S Cure</name>, since the commencement of<lb/> this suit, which is not denied: and this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Larkin</name><lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>Patrick M Cann</name></head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court it is ordered that the plaintiff file a bond for costs herein within ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Lynch</name><lb/> vs 233<lb/> <name>Joseph Farrell</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name><unclear>Hy</unclear> Hart</name>, witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>Motion for attachment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>W Dawson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="263" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0270.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#583,10<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Wheeler</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Dexter B Britton</name>, <name>Walter W Webb</name><lb/> and <name>Shuman Paris</name><lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and <name>John N Boffinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses<lb/>this suit as to the defendant, <name>John N Boffinger</name>, but the<lb/> defendant <name>William O Wheeler</name>, although duly sum<lb/> moned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that the petition herein be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and eighty three dollars and<lb/> ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#392,40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>John J Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>Jacob S Child</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of three hundred and ninety two dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#226,08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pacific Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>John W Carroll</name> and <name>A W Nason</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant <name>Nason</name>, but the defendant, <name>Carroll</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not, but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name><unclear>Heratis</unclear> Clark</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney and waiving science of process files his ap<lb/>pearance and answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name><unclear>Burhard Midas</unclear></name><lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>J B Gray</name><lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor F Wilson</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Benj F Ball</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Stumpf</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Theodire A Thomas</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J <unclear>Norbury</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 259<lb/> <name>John W Shoemaker</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John L Rose</name><lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files and affidavit, and on his mo<lb/>tion, an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court from the decision herein<lb/> rendered, and he thereupon files an appeal bond with Francis O Sawyer agent<lb/> as principal, and <name>James Smith</name> and <name>Nathaniel Holmes</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by<lb/> the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="264" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0271.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1733,64<lb/> Against<lb/> <name>Slater</name> and<lb/> <name>Johnson</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Hunt</name> and <name>John Albert</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Slater</name>, <name>Mason Johnson</name>,<lb/> <name>John A Williams</name>, <name>Jasper M peery</name>,<lb/> and <name>Francis J Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this<lb/>suit as to the defendants, <name>Francis J Smith</name>, <name>John a Williams</name>,<lb/> and <name>Jasper M Peery</name>, but the defendants <name>Benj Slater</name> and <name>Mason<lb/> Johnson</name>, although called come not; and the plaintiffs submit this<lb/> cause to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth find that the defendants <name>Salter</name> and <name>Johnson</name>, are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of Seventeen hundred and thirty three dollars and sixty four cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of said defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#464,10<lb/> 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Kenning</name> and<lb/> <name>William Kenning</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name> and<lb/> <name>Reiner <unclear>Bueter</unclear></name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>Keegan</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, but the defendant <name>Reiner Bueter</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and no Jury being required this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find the issues herein joined between plaintiffs and defendant, <name>Keegan</name>, in favor of the plaintiffs and doth also<lb/> find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore: and it is ordered that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> et al<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, <name>Phebe M Clintock</name>, and waiving the service of process<lb/> files her appearance and answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kingsland</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Bueter</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patk Keegan</name></head>
            <p>answer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Harris</name><lb/> vs 049<lb/> <name>David H Evan</name></head>
            <p>Reply to counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#650,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Labarge</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <lb/> <name>Louis Thibeaue</name>, <name>Thomas Fox</name>, <name>Isaiah Russell</name>, <name>Cha R Jilden</name>, <name>P M Lock wood</name>,<lb/> <name>James M Coy</name>, <name>Joseph Dunnivant</name>, <name>peter Wenger</name>, <name>N F Aymond</name>, <name>L Schlenker<lb/> Charles L Kuhne</name>, and <name>Otis West</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished, the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff for the sum of Six hundred and<lb/> fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assesses by the Jury and also his costs and charges in this<lb/> behalf expended and have execution therefore against the property attached and against all other property of the defendant.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="265" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0272.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-19">Thursday January 19th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>Henry P Taylor</name> a Deputy Sheriff of St Louis Country which<lb/> appointment is approved by the Court and the said <name>Taylor</name> takes the oath prescribed by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the petition<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph Weppermann</name></head>
            <p>Order on Sheriff to execute and acknowledge deed.<lb/> Now comes the said <name>Joseph Wippermann</name> and files his petition for an<lb/> order on the Sheriff to execute and acknowledge deed to purchaser of real<lb/> estate in lien of the late Sheriff, and submits the same to the Court, and<lb/>the Court, being satisfied that the purchase money for said real estate has bun paid to the Sheriff,<lb/> doth order that <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, now in office, execute and acknowledge<lb/> a deed to the said <name>Joseph Wippermann</name>,. reciting the facts, for a certainlot of ground being in <name>Julia<lb/> C <unclear>Soulard</unclear></name><unclear>'s</unclear> second addition to the City of St Louis, State of Missouri, being lot no 7 in Block 73<lb/> of said addition containing a front of 30 feet on the north side of Soulard sheet by a depth of 140<lb/> feet more or less to Market Lane or Market Square, sold under and by virtue of two executions, one issued<lb/> from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas being no 140 <date when="1860-04">April term 1860</date>,<lb/> the other issued from the office of the clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court being no 258 returnable<lb/> to the <date when="1860-04">February term 1860</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name> and <name><unclear>Amso</unclear> page<lb/></name> no 231<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> and <name>Joshua W Owings</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>Joshua W Owings</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and on motion of the plaintiff it<lb/> is ordered that the continuance of this cause entered on yester<lb/>day be set aside and vacated; thereupon the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Michael S Cerre</name>:<lb/> and this cause is continued as on affidavit at defendants for absence of <name>Maurice</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah Buckley</name> and <name>Mary Buckley</name><lb/> vs 162<lb/> <name>Peter B Garesche</name> administrator of the estate of <name>J M Bealey</name>.</head>
            <p>petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the <lb/> sum doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs and charges in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#532,50<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miller</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C M Allister</name><lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> and <name>Frances Burk</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendant, <name>Frances Burk</name>, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Ellsworth Miller</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed: and no Jury being required this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> cloth find the issues herein between the plaintiff and defendant, <name>Burk</name>, in favor of said defendant; and the<lb/> Court doth find tht the defendant, <name>Miller</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> thirty two dollars and fifty cents on account of the instrument of writing on which this action is founded.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf against<lb/> the defendant, <name>Frances Burk</name>, but that the said defendant go hence without day and recover of the plain<lb/>tiff her costs herein expended and have execution therefor, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant,<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name>, the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="266" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0273.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Renick</name> et al<lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Michael J Cure</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and suggest and show to the satis<lb/>faction of the Court that the defendant has departed this life since the com<lb/>mencement of this suit; and this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al<lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Catherwood</name> et al<lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Julius Bush</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Academy of the Christian Brothers</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>Andri Martin</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Leonard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Leonard</name> and<lb/> <name>Seymour Voullaire</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery, The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit, according to law; claiming the possession<lb/> of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defen<lb/>dants deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to<lb/> him to take it from the defendants and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> et al<lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of costs paid by attorney for defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Cleveland</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>M W Manning</name> a<lb/> witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Walker</name> et al<lb/> vs 251<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#104,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Bueter</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>A<lb/> Fisher</name>, <name>Cha E King</name>, <name>John Griffith</name>, <name>J Ringling</name>, <name>Peter Sharkey</name>, <name>C Mullen</name>, <name>N<lb/> Covington</name>, <name>a L Roland</name>, <name>William H Finch</name>, <name>J Suhr</name>, <name>S P Kerr</name>, and <name>William L<lb/> Salisbury</name>, twelve food and lawful men who being duly elected trial and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths afore<lb/>said say they find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of one hundred and four dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/>in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B <unclear>Geving</unclear></name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside dismissed and reins state cause filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S,M,<unclear>Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="267" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0274.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-20">Friday, January 20th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John O Mellen</name> and <name>John P Hawkins</name>.</head>
            <p>Now come <name>Emile Longuemare</name>, assignee herein, and files an<lb/> inventory; and the Court appoints <name>Anthony Lonergan</name> and <name>William<lb/> Fulton</name> appraisers to appraise the property so inventoried, and<lb/> the said appraises take and file he oath required by law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#330, 50<lb/> set aside<lb/> 29 p 458</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Samuel A Turner</name></head>
            <p>on account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant, although called, comes<lb/> not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and doth assess his damages sustained by reason of the<lb/> premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of three hundred and thirty dollar and fifty cents. It is these<lb/>foe considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Edwin H Whedon</name></head>
            <p>Judgment on Demurrer.</p>
            <p>The Demurrer to the Petition herein having been heretofore sustained, therefore, on<lb/> motion of he defendant, by his attorney, it is considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the said defendant go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abijah Whiting</name><lb/> vs 384<lb/> <name>Ira H Stout</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Owen B Timon</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Cha L Freeman</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Wineland</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiff and suggests and how to the satisfaction<lb/> of the Court that the said plaintiff has departed this life since the commencement<lb/>of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin H Miles</name> et al<lb/> vs 295<lb/> <name>St Bt Diurnal</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm B Davis</name><lb/> vs 396<lb/> <name>Christian Freund</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#263, 25<lb/> Set aside<lb/> 29 p 294</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Enst C Angebrodt</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Edward Dobbyns</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Rent.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit to the Court<lb/> the motion to strike out the defendants answer and demurrer to the counter claim<lb/> which motion and demurrer is, after due consideration by the Court, sustained; <lb/> and the defendant failing further to plead herein, the petition, on motion of plaintiff, is taken against him<lb/> for confessed; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the cause to the Court for assessment of damages,<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the<lb/> sum of two hundred and sixty three dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant damages aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Kountz</name> et al<lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>James Brannon</name> et al</head>
            <p> Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Wm Armstrong</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="268" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0275.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Robert B Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and defendants, by their attorneys, and the<lb/> plaintiffs suggest to the Court the death of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, one of<lb/> the defendants, since the commencement of this suit, and by consent<lb/> of parties <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name>, Executor of said <name>Cerre</name>, is substituted<lb/>in lien of said <name>Cerre</name>, and also comes said <name>Chauvin V L Beau</name>, Executor as aforesaid, by <name>Thomas C Rey<lb/>nolds</name>, his attorney and enter his appearance as a party defendant herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Samuel Brooks</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>Lucas</name> and <name>Soulard</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the plaintiff suggests to the Court the death of<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, one of the defendants herein, since the commencement<lb/> of this suit; and same is not denied; and also comes <name>Chauvin V<lb/> L Beau</name>, Executor of said <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, by <name>Thomas c Reynolds</name>, his attorney, and waiving issue<lb/> and service of process, centers his appearance as a party defendant herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M Renick</name> et al<lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Chauvin V L Beau</name> Executor of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, by <name>thos<lb/> C Reynolds</name>, his attorney, and waives service of proves and cents his ap<lb/>pearance as defendant herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Margaret J Mighells</name>, administratrix of said <name>Cleander Mighells</name>,<lb/> by her attorney, and enters her appearance as plaintiff herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#580, 04<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno M D</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Little</name><lb/> vs 447<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Dowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>William M Dowell</name>, but the defendant, <name>John M Dowell</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; an the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and eighty dollar and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W McCamant</name><lb/> vs 726<lb/> <name>John M Kellop</name>,<lb/> <name>David Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis W Tappan</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendants cannot be found and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon them, therefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the defendants be no<lb/>tified that a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of<lb/> two hundred and fifty dollars, on account of a balance due for service ren<lb/>dred and performed by the plaintiff for the defendants, and that their property has been attached and<lb/> that unless they appear at the next September Term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the Last Monday of September, eighteen hundred an sixty,<lb/> and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according t law, judgment will be ren<lb/>dered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same; and it is further ordered that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the St Louis Evening Bulletin, a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Darby</name><lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Perry Cornell</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties at parties at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="269" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0276.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Labarge</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Stewart</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>Geo Hartmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>E Birch</name> assignee<lb/> vs 794<lb/> <name>Enno Sarider</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J Smith</name><lb/> vs 625<lb/> <name>Alexander Kelsey</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schuman</name><lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton and<lb/> St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esq., Sheriff of St Louis County, in open Court acknowledged the execut<lb/>tion of a deed be him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Joseph Wippermann</name><lb/> for all night, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Francis A Perrier</name> of in and to the following<lb/> described real estate, to wit; a certain lot of ground being <name>Julia C Soulards</name> second addition the City of<lb/> St Louis, State of Missouri, being lot No 7 in block No 73 of said addition, containing a front 30 feet on<lb/> the North side of Soulard street b depth of 40 feet, more of less, to Market lane or Market square, it<lb/> being the same lot which <name>Frederick Rahlman</name>, acquired of <name>Henry Rather</name> by deed dated <date when="1856-06-09">9th June, 1856</date>,<lb/> recorded in book 179 page 54 and conveyed to said Perrier by said <name>Rahlman</name> by deed recorded in Book<lb/>205, page 515, darted <date when="1858-08-30">august 30th 1858</date>; Sold by authority of two executions one issued from the Office<lb/> of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, returnable to the <date when="1860-02">February Term, 1860</date>, of said Court in favor of <name>Joseph<lb/> Gorla</name> against <name>Francis A Perrier</name>; one form the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court of Common Pleas,<lb/> returnable to the <date when="1860-04">April Term 1860</date> of said Court in favor of <name>Joseph Wippermann</name> against <name>Francis a Perrier</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron A Fischer</name> et al<lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>Calvin H Fredericks</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Calvin G Fredericks</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Boelbert</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>The Franklin Savings<lb/> Institution</name>.</head>
            <p>Non Suit set aside.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by their consent it is ordered<lb/> that the entry of non suit be set aside and vacated and his cause continue to<lb/> the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff file a petition and affidavit claiming the possession of certain personal prop<lb/>erty therein described, wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property spec<lb/>ified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby di<lb/>rected is said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butte</name> field</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Bueter</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="270" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0277.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement Now come the parties by this attorneys and the Court after<lb/> due consideration, doth overrule the motion to strike the plea herein and also come a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>Louis Thibeaw</name>, <name>Thomas Fox</name>, <name>Russell</name>, <name>Charles B Tilden</name>, <name>Post<lb/> Lockwood</name>, <name>James M Coy</name>, <name>Joseph Dunneivant</name>, <name>Peter Wenger</name>, <name>N J<lb/> aymond</name>, <name>L Schlenker</name>, Otis West and <name>Charles E King</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected trial and sworn the issue herein joined upon the plea in abate<lb/>ment well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. <unclear>Breckinridge</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-21">Saturday, January 21st 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#187, 62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 816<lb/> <name>John J Murdock</name> and <name>Charles K<lb/> Dickson</name> garnishee Of <name>John Levin</name><lb/> and <name>John Corcoran</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the said<lb/> garnishee file an answer herein and the plaintiff moves the Court<lb/> for judgment thereon, and the Court finding form said answer that<lb/> the said garnishees at the time they were summoned herein as such<lb/> were indebted to the defendants <name>Levin</name> and <name>Corcoran</name> in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and eighty dollars and sixty two cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said garnishees the debt aforesaid as confessed and have execution therefor, and<lb/> that of said sum be pay the costs of this proceeding: the Court allows the said garnishees the sum of<lb/> ten dollars for answering herein to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louise Rahlmann</name><lb/> vs 170<lb/> <name>Frederick Rahlmann</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished and the Court being satisfied from the evidence that plain<lb/>tiff is a person of good moral character and an innocent and injured party,<lb/> It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the nights and<lb/> privileges of an unmarried person; an the Court, being satisfied of the propriety thereof, doth grant<lb/> the defendant leave to marry at any time after the rendition of this decree: and it is also ordered<lb/> that defendant pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine A Norran</name><lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>Lorenzo H Cordey</name>,<lb/> <name>Lester Pattee</name> and<lb/> <name>Harvey James</name></head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the trial pro<lb/>gresses but he plaintiff say she will not further prosecute her suit in this<lb/> behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to more to set the same aside.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by her<lb/> suit in this behalf but that the defendants go have without day and recover of the said plaintiff their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Leave is given to more to set non suit aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The City of St Louis<lb/> vs 438<lb/> <name>John C Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the judgment by default herein being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="271" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0278.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>John Kinnard Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leicester Babcock</name><lb/> vs 493<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Smith</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, <name>William Sigerson</name>, by <name>A S Hart</name>, his attorney, and<lb/> waiving service of process enters his appearance to this action. Cause continued<lb/> by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus M Dowell</name> and<lb/> <name>John F Loughran</name><lb/> vs 225<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and waiving a jury<lb/> submit this cause to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues<lb/> herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Ellis</name> and <name>Henry B Ellis</name><lb/> vs 277<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and waiving a jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined<lb/> in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiffs its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Lache</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Geo Mosbacher</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Markham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John R Richards</name><lb/></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to low; claim<lb/>ing the possession of certain personal property therein described, wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit<lb/> to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to<lb/> him to take it from the defendant and delivered to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Shaw</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Freedom.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files a petition for freedom, and the<lb/> Court, being of opinion that the said petition contains sufficient matter to authorize<lb/> the commencement of a suit, doth order that the said petitioner be allowed to sue as<lb/> a poor person, and that she have reasonable liberty to attend her counsel and the Court as occasion may<lb/> require, and that the be not removed out of the jurisdiction of this Court and be not subjected to any<lb/> seventy on account of her application for freedom.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Wickersham</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Edwin H Whedon</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="272" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0279.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#307,50<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert A Barnes</name><lb/> vs 914<lb/><name> Brannock Jones</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant and files his<lb/> statement duly verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and seven dollars and fifty cents and authorizes the<lb/> entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate<lb/> of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isham Shaw</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Freedom.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition for freedom, and<lb/> the Court being of opinion that the said petition contains sufficient matter to au<lb/>theorize the commencement of a suit, doth order that the said petitioner be allowed<lb/> to sue as a poor person and that he have reasonable liberty to attend his counsel and the Court as occasion<lb/> may require and that he be not removed out of the jurisdiction of this Court and be not subjected to<lb/> any severity on account of his application for freedom.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#301,50<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>Thomas E Mason</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney an also comes the defendant and<lb/> files his duly verified statement confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and one dollars and fifty cents and authorizes the<lb/> entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as confessed and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at the rate often percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of<lb/> <name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix <unclear>Coste</unclear></name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion for judgment being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is overruled; the demurrer to the amended petition<lb/> herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled: Until<lb/> the first day of the next term is given the defendants to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>George Cooper</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Reply to denial of garnishees answer filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="273" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0280.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-23">Monday January 23 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Carlos J Greeley</name>, <name>A F Shapleigh</name><lb/> and <name>Mathias Steitz</name> trustees of State<lb/> Savings Association garnishees of<lb/> <name>James F Death</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the order discharging said garnishees be set aside<lb/> and vacated and this cause be reinstated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Account filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kingsland</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendant costs for absence of <name>E M Young</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered that a commission issue to<lb/> the State of Maryland to take depositions to be used on his behalf in the trial of<lb/> this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, and remit to the defendants<lb/> the sum of one hundred and eighty two dollars and sixty four cents<lb/> part and parcel of the judgment herein rendered. Therefore it is consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the defendants be discharged from the payment of<lb/> sum aforesaid as remitted: and the defendants motion to set aside the judgment and for a new trial<lb/> herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name> et al<lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>Z Moore</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and<lb/> <name>John W Bigelow</name> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jurors empanelled and sworn herein, and by consent of parties <name>Louis<lb/> <unclear>Thibeaw</unclear></name>, one of the Jurors, is excused from further service, and the trial<lb/> progresses with the remaining eleven Jurors and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find the issue joined upon the plea in abate<lb/>ment in favor of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant, at the<lb/> date of the commencement of this suit, had fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to<lb/> hinder or delay his creditors.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S Fife</name> et al<lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Richard C Shackelford</name></head>
            <p>Petition for production of book filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed. Demurrer filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="274" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0281.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-24">Tuesday January and 24th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bell</name> &amp;<lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name> &amp; c</head>
            <p>Now at this day come, the plaintiff, and file an affidavit<lb/> and on their motion an appeal from the judgment herein<lb/> is granted them to the Supreme Court, and thereupon said<lb/> plaintiffs file an appeal bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#320. 54<lb/> Dam.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> and <name>John W. Bigelon</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On note &amp; account</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff,<lb/> by their attorneys, but the defendant<lb/> failing to file an answer herein<lb/> make, default, wherefore it is considered that the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed, and said plaintiff,<lb/> not requiring a jury, this cause is submitted to the Court which being<lb/> heard the Court doth assess the damage, of said plaintiff, sustained by<lb/> reason of the premise on their petition at the sum of Three Hundred<lb/> and twenty dollars, and fifty four cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann E Dillon</name> admr<lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Barton Bates</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is ordered<lb/> that a <unclear>plurie</unclear> summons issue return able to the<lb/> next September Term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline <unclear>Mzer</unclear></name><lb/> vs 272.<lb/> <name>William C. Molloz</name> <unclear>&amp; c</unclear></head>
            <p>Defendant by attorney file a motion to make infant<lb/> children parties to the suit which motion being heard<lb/> the same is by the Court overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1386,30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Lare</name><lb/> vs 637<lb/> <name>Joseph C Parks</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant and<lb/> file his stipulation whereby he consents and agrees that judgment may be<lb/> rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed<lb/> in the petition at the present term of this Court, as upon personal service, waiving all objec<lb/>tions there to, and the Court doth, on motion of plaintiff, assess the plaintiff damages sustained<lb/> by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of thirteen hundred and eighty<lb/> six dollars and thirty cents: and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs demands was filed<lb/> on a lien against certain property situate in the County of St Louis, State of Missouri, described<lb/> as follows to wit; a certain house and lot situate on the West side of North Eleventh street, be<lb/>tween Wash and Carr Streets in the City of St Louis being the house situated on the West side<lb/> of said Eleventh street, numbered one hundred and fifty six, and the lot upon which said<lb/> house is situated having a front of twenty five feet on the West side of said Eleventh street and<lb/> running through the same width to an alley on the West side thereof and the building being a<lb/> two story brick dwelling house with a front hall therein, with a side alley leading to the back<lb/> yard in the South side of the front building and said house being situate about one hundred<lb/> feet North of Wash street and between Wash street and the Engine House on said Eleventh street<lb/> and being the second house and lot South of said Engine House. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="275" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0282.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>agreed upon and also his costs herein expended, and if no sufficient property of the defendant can<lb/>not be found to satisfy this judgment and costs then the residue thereof to beloved out of the property<lb/> above described on which the demand was filed as a lien, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Lache</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Mossbacher</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Lent</name> et al<lb/> vs 588<lb/> <name>William Baugh</name></head>
            <p>Notary certificate of costs of the defendant filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside<lb/> 29 p 296.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>David P Clay</name> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> and <name>James M Gardiner</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the motion for security for costs herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court is overruled and the parties<lb/> having argued the motion to strike out parts of the answer herein,<lb/> submit the same to the Court, and the motion to strike out part of the defendants answer being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is sustained; thereupon come a jury to wit; <name>George M Phetridge</name>,<lb/> <name>James Bray</name>, <name>J P Cassilley</name>, <name>Wilson Duty</name>, <name>William Scaeffer</name>, <name>Frederick Peters</name>, <name>R M Lane</name>,<lb/> <name>Andrew Collins</name>, <name>J Rowen</name>, <name>P Helgenberg</name>, <name>L F Hastings</name>, and <name>Edward Haren, Sr.</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try<lb/> the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say the find<lb/> for the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit<lb/> in this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff and of <name>A M <unclear>Gardner</unclear></name><lb/> the security, their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>William a Bassett</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defen<lb/>dants motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court is sustained and the plaintiff files a bond<lb/> for costs herein with <name>A M Gardner</name> as security which bond is ap<lb/>proved, and the motion to strike out part of the defendants answer being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#53,750,60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John o'Fallon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant, in person,<lb/> and files his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he<lb/> confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifty three thousand<lb/> seven hundred and fifty dollars and sixty cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against him<lb/> in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs in this behalf<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Christopher</name> et al<lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>William P Freeman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Masterson</name> &amp; <name>Maginnis</name></head>
            <p>Inventory filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Stewart</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>George Hartmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Thornton<lb/> Grimsley</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="276" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0283.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Little</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>George Harvey</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> et al<lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Inter plea of <name>Stanley M Breed</name> filed by leave of Court. Exhibit A Filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A McDowell</name> et al<lb/> vs 225<lb/> <name>St Bt David Fatum</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A A Fisher</name> et al<lb/> vs 353<lb/> <name>C H Fredericks</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Penberthy</name> and<lb/> <name>William S Hawkin</name><lb/> vs 307<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> and<lb/> <name>William W Almand</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a jury<lb/> to wit, <name>Henry Schuman</name>, <name>Patrick Fletcher</name>, <name>G W Clark</name>, <name>Lesley</name>, <name>Doggett</name>,<lb/> <name>J K Philibert</name>, <name>J P Noies</name>, <name>Daniel Credon</name>, <name>G O Rourke</name>, <name>Jacob Weber</name>, <name>J C<lb/> G <unclear>Hinerich</unclear></name>, <name>William J Powell</name> and <name>John Culbertson</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until ten o clock tomorrow morning.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-25">Wednesday January 25th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcross</name> et al<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#219,82.<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward D Crossman</name><lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file a stipulation<lb/> and the defendant withdraws his plea in abatement and the parties consent<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> and against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and nineteen<lb/> dollars and eighty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per<lb/> cent per annum from this date until paid: and <name>David C Woods</name> files his dissent from the<lb/> agreement made herein by the parties, and the plaintiffs file a motion to strike but the inter plea herein</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an amended petition herein and also files an Exhibit there with.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="277" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0284.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rose A Masterson</name> and<lb/> <name>James A Maginnis</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Edward A Meaney</name> the assignee herein and files<lb/> a prayer for the appointment of appraisers, and the Court, after<lb/> due consideration thereof, doth appoint <name>John T G Miller</name>, <name>Adolph<lb/> Heineke</name> and <name>Samuel R Filley</name> appraisers to appraise the property<lb/> and effects inventioned herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Little</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>George Harvey</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#400,00 value<lb/> #50,00 dam. defts remit<lb/> #49,99<lb/> set aside 29 p 292</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Penberthy</name> and <name>William S Hawken</name><lb/> vs 307<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> and <name>William W Almand</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> also come the Jurors empanneled and sworn herein and<lb/> the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants and assess the value of the property taken at<lb/> the sum of four hundred dollars and the damages for the taking and detention of the same at the sum of<lb/> fifty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs and <name>John E D Couzins</name> and<lb/> <name>John Hall</name>, the securities in the replevin bond, return the property taken by the Sheriff, to wit; One engine<lb/> boiler and furnace, one portable engine unfinished and drill machine and drills, <unclear>I screw</unclear> machine unfinished<lb/> one black smith bellows, one wood hoisting wheel, lot old steel, three grind stones, two wood lathe frames,<lb/> three wood benches, one small writing desk, fifteen letter presses unfinished, one fly wheel, three angers,<lb/> lot shafts pulleys and belts, lot babbit mental on broken coal stove, three screw plates, one iron drill brace<lb/> five pieces old shafting, lot wood engine patterns, letter press patterns, one circular saw, lot old gass<lb/> pipe, lot wire, one piece sheet iron, lot paint cups, lot old iron, one sheet iron forge, one lot old chisels<lb/> and drills, lot old steel and brass springs, piece old belt, lot iron brass (new) three tin signs, lot old spring<lb/> steel and files, two prices cast iron, lot old brass, lot steam pipe (old) one screw cutting lathe, three black<lb/> smiths hammers, one sledge, one barrel and contents one iron planning wheel; or pay the value as assessed<lb/> by the jury, at the defendants, and also pay the damages as assessed and the costs of this<lb/> suit, and that the defendants have execution therefore. Thereupon the defendants remit to the plaintiffs the<lb/> sum of forty nine dollars and ninety nine cents part and parcel of the damages assessed by the jury; therefore<lb/> it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs be discharged from the payment of the sum this remitted: <lb/> and the plaintiffs file a motion for a new trial and after filing the same file a motion in arrest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#333,50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial the plaintiff comes, by his counsel, and waiving a<lb/> jury submits this cause to the Court upon the petition and answer and the Court<lb/> doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and thirty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name> et al<lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Joshua W Owings</name></head>
            <p>Defendants files a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="278" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0285.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Goodwin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H <unclear>Kneues</unclear></name><lb/> vs 308<lb/> <name>E A <unclear>Kneues</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Cleveland</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>George M Phetridge</name>, <name>James Bray</name>, <name>J P Cassilley</name>, <name>W Duty</name>, <name>William Schaeffer</name>,<lb/> <name>Frederick Peters</name>, <name>R M Love</name>, <name>Andrew Collins</name>, <name>J Rowen</name>, <name>P Helgenberg</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Haren, Sr</name>, and <name>A J Noble</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name> Executor<lb/> of <name>Henry S Geyer</name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L Geyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Bernard M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Order of Injunction.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their attorneys, and the plaintiff files a<lb/> a petition for an injunction, and it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> upon the plaintiff filing a bond in the sum of one thousand dol<lb/>lars, conditioned according to law, the said defendants, their ser<lb/>vants agents and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined from re<lb/>moving out of the jurisdiction of this Court a certain mulatto slave named <name>William</name> until the<lb/> hearing of the application of the plaintiff for an order of injunction and the further order of<lb/> the Court in the premises. The plaintiff files a bond as above directed with <name>James F Small</name> as<lb/> principal and <name>W J Alkire</name> as security which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="279" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0286.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-26">Thursday January 26th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zebulon F Wetzell</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside<lb/> 29 p 286</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri at is sues<lb/> to the use of <name>William A Bassett</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> and <name>James M<lb/> Gardiner</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent<lb/> and agree that this cause shall abide by the result and be<lb/> governed by the judgment and decisions rendered in the case<lb/> of the State of Missouri to the use of <name>David P Clay</name> against<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> and <name>James M Gardiner</name>; and the Court procee<lb/>ding to render judgment herein, doth consider that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this be<lb/>half but that the defendants go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. The plaintiff files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus W Louis</name><lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>John F Hague</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiff and suggests to the Court the death of<lb/> said plaintiff since the commencement of this suit, which is not denied, thereupon<lb/> come <name>John F Darby</name> administrator of said <name>Augustus W Lewis</name>, by his attorney,<lb/> and enters his appearance as party plaintiff herein.</p>
            <p><name>James Castello</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in open Court and acknowledges the exe<lb/>cution of a deed by him as such sheriff in favor of <name>Louis A Benoish</name> for all the night, title, interest, claim,<lb/> estate and property of <name>Louis F Curtis</name> of in and to the following described real estate, to wit, Lots 19 and<lb/> 20 in Block one of <name>P M Dillon</name>'s third addition the City of St Louis being in block 479 of said City be<lb/>ginning in the East line of Dillon street, 100 feet South from the South line of Hickory street, thence<lb/> East parallel with Hickory street 127 &#x00BD; feet to an alley 15 feet wide; thence South with the West<lb/> line of said alley 50 feet, thence West parallel with Hickory street 127 &#x00BD; feet to Dillon Street;<lb/> thence North with the Eastern line of Dillon street 50 feet to the place of beginning: also lot in<lb/> St Louis County, to wit; lot no 33 in Block No 10 of the East Union addition to the City of St Louis<lb/> being 30 feet on Lucas street by 160 feet 9 inches in depth and bounded South by Lucas street,<lb/> West by lot No 34 of said Block No 10, North by an alley, and East by lot No 32 in said Block<lb/> vs 10 being one of the lots heretofore assigned and set apart to <name>Catharine A Benoist</name>: Sold by vir<lb/>tue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of <name>Louis<lb/> A Benoist</name> against <name>Louis F Curtis</name> returnable to the <date when="1858-10">October Term 1858</date> of said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Sinel</name><lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>Peter Wegman</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Thos S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Motion for assessment of damages and value of property filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="280" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0287.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1092,00<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent<lb/> and all except <name>Jett E</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Roberts S Eddy</name>, <name>James H Eddy</name>,<lb/> <name>David W Hill</name> and <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, except, <name>James H Eddy</name>, by their re<lb/>spective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the said <name>James H Eddy</name>, and a jury being waived this cause<lb/> is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and ninety two dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at the rate of ten pert cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2046,20</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel B Lowe</name></head>
            <p>On award of arbitrator.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find that certain matters in controversy<lb/> were submitted to <name>James S Roberts</name>, as arbitrator, who proceeded to hear and decide the matters<lb/> in controversy, between the parties to this suit and awarded to the plaintiff the sum of nineteen hundred<lb/> and six dollars and eighty five cents together with one half the arbitrators charges amounting to the<lb/> sum of fifty dollars, that the same is still due and owing from defendant to plaintiff, and that the<lb/> interest on said sum to this date makes the sum total twenty hundred and forty six dollars<lb/> and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum of twenty hundred and forty six dollars and twenty cents, the debt aforesaid, as found, and also<lb/> his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor. The defendant files a mo<lb/>tion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default as to <name>Heggi</name> and <name>Vogel</name>.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, <name>Theophile<lb/> Heggi</name> and <name>Edward Vogel</name>, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, the<lb/> petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2023,12<lb/> Set aside 29 p 293</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empanneled and sworn herein, and the trial being finished the Jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid find the following verdict, to wit; <name>Alexander<lb/> Williams</name> vs <name>Augustus H Evans</name>. We the jury in said case find for the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> nineteen hundred and fifty dollars with interest from the <date when="1859-06-09">ninth day of June 1859</date>. <name>John P<lb/> Casilly</name> foreman. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the sum of twenty hundred and twenty three dollars and twelve cents the damages found<lb/> by the jury and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendant files a motion<lb/> for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Wineland</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Cooper</name> trustee of <name>Geo Reading</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Thos H M Vicker</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff and also <name>William Reeves</name> file separate affidavits in sup<lb/>port of motion for new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pacific Ins co.</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Dewitt C Sanford</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="281" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0288.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#218,05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Konig</name><lb/> vs 380<lb/> <name>John W Schoimaker</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>Henry Schurman</name>, <name>L F Hastings</name>, <name>Patrick Fletcher</name>, <name>Lesley Doggett</name>,<lb/> <name>J K Philibert</name>, <name>J P Noyes</name>, <name>Daniel Credon</name>, <name>Frederick Grapevine</name>, <name>Jaw M Weber</name><lb/> <name>B F Moore</name>, <name>Joseph o'Brien</name> and <name>Nicholas Irvig</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the following verdict, to wit; We the Jury find for the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred eighteen 05 dollars with interest #218,05/11 <name>Patrick Fletcher</name><lb/> Foreman. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Small</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Henry S Geyer</name> deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jane L Geyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Bernard M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants<lb/> file a demurer to the petition which being seen heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-27">Friday January 27th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Geyer</name>'s Executor<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L Geyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file an answer and a motion to dissolve injunction.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1550,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Idecker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name>, <name>Rudolph Hackmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Gottieb Schaefer</name> and <name>William Stenkel</name></head>
            <p>Assault.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, and also come<lb/> the attorney for the defendants and with draws his appear<lb/>ance as attorney herein, and the defendants although duly<lb/> called come not; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>George<lb/> M Phetridge</name>, <name>Wilson Duly</name>, <name>William Schaeffer</name>, <name>Frederick Peters</name>, <name>R M Lane</name>, <name>Andrew Collins</name>,<lb/> <name>J Rowen</name>, <name>A J Noble</name>, <name>J P Noies</name>, <name>William J Powell</name>, <name>John Culbertson</name>, and <name>G O Rourke</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of fifteen hundred and fifty dollars damages. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Farmers Insurance Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="282" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0289.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#217,77<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sunderland G Sears</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Whitmore</name> and<lb/> <name>Elbridge Goddard</name><lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Isaac Greeg</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorney, and submit the issue joined<lb/> upon the plea in abatement to the court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> considered the same doth find said issue in favor of the plaintiffs; and the<lb/> defendant failing further to plead herein makes default, wherefore the peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have thereof execution: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#500,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Idecker</name><lb/> vs 382<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name>, <name>Rudolph Hackmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Gottlieb Schaefer</name> and <name>William Stenkel</name></head>
            <p>Assault.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorneys, and the attor<lb/>ney for the defendants and withdraws his appearance herein as such<lb/> thereupon the defendants being duly called come not; also come as Jury <name>Henry<lb/> Schurman</name>, <name>P Helgenberg</name>, <name>L F Hastings</name>, <name>Patrick Fletcher</name>,<lb/> <name>Lesley Doggett</name>, <name>J K Phillibert</name>, <name>Daniel Credon</name>, <name>Frederick Grapevine</name>, <name>Jacob Weben</name>, <name>B J Moore</name>, <name>James<lb/> o'Brien</name> and <name>N Owig</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein<lb/> joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jury aforesaid upon their oaths afore<lb/>said say they find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of five hundred dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#312,00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Idecker</name><lb/> vs 379<lb/> <name>Henry</name>, <name>Hackmann</name> and<lb/> <name>Gottieb Schaefer</name></head>
            <p>Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorneys and also comes the attorney for the de<lb/>fendants and withdraws his appearance as such, but the defendants being duly<lb/> called come not; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of three hundred and twelve dol<lb/>lars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages afore<lb/>said as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John M Cooper</name> and <name>James Johnston</name></head>
            <p>Appointment of Appraisers.</p>
            <p>Now come <name>James M Gardiner</name> and <name>Richard M Scruggs</name> the assignees<lb/> herein, and file and inventory, and on their motion the Court appoints<lb/> <name>Isaac W Gibbons</name> and <name>William Adriance</name> appraisers to appraise<lb/> the property and effects so inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#593,69</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Lyman</name>, <name>Jacob Stout</name><lb/> and <name>William D Dimock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George C Reed</name> and <name>Theodore Yates</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendants<lb/> failing to answer herein make default, wherefore the petition,<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and ninety three dollars<lb/> and sixty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their cost in the behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac J Greene</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>Robert W Reay</name> in support of motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="283" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0290.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-28">Saturday January 28th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrell</name> administrator et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>James Brennan</name> administratrix et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the judgment for costs<lb/> herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> overruled: The plaintiff motion for a new trial being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#283,95.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> and<lb/> <name>Barksdale Davidson</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Childs Jr</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by consent, a Jury being<lb/> waived, this cause is submitted to the court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that<lb/> the defendants is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> eighty three dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael Fallon</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The parties file an agreement and by their consent this cause is dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and it is ordered that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Value of property<lb/> #128,94<lb/> cent dams<lb/> vs plff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick W Hering</name><lb/> vs 322<lb/> <name>Cyrenius C Simmons</name>, <name>J Gabriel Woemer</name>,<lb/> <name>James A Billings</name> and <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney and also come the<lb/> attorneys for the plaintiff and withdraw their appearance as<lb/> such, but the plaintiff although duly called comes not wherefore,<lb/> on motion of the defendants, it is considered by the court that<lb/> the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and the defendants waiving a Jury<lb/> submit the assessment of the value of the property and the damages herein to the Court, and the Court<lb/> after hearing the proof doth assess the value of the property at the sum of one hundred and twenty eight<lb/> dollars and ninety four cents, and, the defendants consenting to take nominal damages, doth assess the damages<lb/> for the taking and detention of said property at the sum of one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff and <name>Louis Hoke</name>, <name>Henry Kutz</name> and <name>John B Gross</name>, the securities in the replevin bond herein,<lb/> return the property taken, to wit; one grey horse, on one horse wagon, three kegs of nails and one bag of flour<lb/> on pay the value as assessed at the election of the defendants, and also pay the damages assessed and the<lb/> cost of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M Coun Schoonmaker</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harty Bocarde</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="284" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0291.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson J Wright</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by leave of Court, files and amended petition and an exhibit there with.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#154,53.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos Rees</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard R Rees</name><lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Mary R Dupeane</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although called<lb/> comes not; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court, after consideration thereof, doth find for<lb/> the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty four<lb/> dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 769<lb/> <name>Richard F Sass</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Kenning</name> et al<lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name> and<lb/> <name>Reiner Bueter</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, acknowledge to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein. By leave of Court the defendants<lb/> withdraw the note suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert H Hodgson</name> et al<lb/> vs 91<lb/> <name>W L F Gage</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at his costs and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court<lb/> plaintiff withdraws the note suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Hostetter</name> and <name>George W Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Victor S Jourdan</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the motion to reinstate<lb/> this cause being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled. The<lb/> plaintiffs file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Robt S Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a<lb/> new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Cooper</name> and <name>Johnston</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="285" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0292.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-30">Monday January 30th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Michael Concannon</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> et al<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishee of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>The separate motions of said garnishee for a new trial being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court are overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> et al<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>The separate motions of said garnishees for a new trial herein being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court are overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kelly</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>John E Cook</name></head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the Court is sus<lb/>tained and the judgment herein rendered set aside and vacated. The defendant files<lb/> an offer of judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus McDowell</name> et al<lb/> vs 225<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name>, <name>Philibert Barioz</name>,<lb/> <name>George Bauer</name>, <name>William Bira</name>, <name>Gaspard<lb/> Blaise</name>, <name>Jean Louis Bierre</name>, <name>Julius Cledes</name>,<lb/> <name>Alexander Droussent</name>, <name>Jule Fagris</name>, <name>Pierre<lb/> Favercau</name>, <name>Paul Garnier</name>, <name>Theophile Heggie</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Mesnier</name>, <name>Rornard Denis</name>, <name>Jean<lb/> Baptiste</name>, <name>Roy</name>, <name>Noel Salarnier</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Vogel</name></head>
            <p>Order for production of looks and papers.</p>
            <p>Now at this date comes the plaintiff, by <name>Glover</name> and <name>Rich<lb/>ardson</name>, his attorneys, and also come the defendant <name>Benja<lb/>min Mercardier</name>, <name>Philibert Barioz</name>, <name>George Bauer</name>, <name>William<lb/> Bira</name>, <name>Gaspard Blaise</name>, <name>Jean L Brienne</name>, <name>Julius Cledes</name>,<lb/> <name>Alexander Droussent</name>, <name>Jules Fagres</name>, <name>Pierre Favereau</name>, <name>Paul<lb/> Garnier</name>, <name>Renard Denis</name>, and <name>Paul Salarnier</name>, by <name>Voullaire</name><lb/> and <name>Faure</name>, their attorneys and the plaintiff files and presents<lb/> to the Court his petition praying that the defendants shall<lb/> produce certain books or papers containing the proceedings of<lb/> the committee of gerance and of the general assembly of<lb/> the <name>Icarien Community</name>; and after due consideration thereof, It is now here ordered by the court that<lb/> the said defendants shall produce to the plaintiff, or his attorneys, all books and papers containing<lb/> proceedings of the committee of gerance or proceedings of the general assembly of the said <name>Icarien<lb/> Community</name>, at the office of <name>Vollaire</name> and <name>Faure</name> in the City of St Louis on Thursday next, <date when="1860-02-02">February,<lb/> second, eighteen hundred and sixty</date>, by ten o'clock A M, for examination by plaintiffs attorneys, and<lb/> also to produce the same on the trial of this cause or that they show cause why they shall not pro<lb/>duce such books and papers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Stewart</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>George Hartmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion of the defendants for security for costs herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the plaintiff file a good<lb/> and sufficient bond for costs herein on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="286" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0293.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained and the judgment herein set aside and<lb/> vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>William A Bassett</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion for a new trial being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is sustained and the judgment herein set aside and<lb/> vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the petition<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Calvin F Burnes</name></head>
            <p>Order on Sheriff to execute and acknowledge deed.<lb/> Now comes the said <name>Calvin F Burnes</name> and files a petition for an order on<lb/> the Sheriff toe execute and acknowledge a deed for certain property therein men<lb/>tioned, and the Court being satisfied that the purchase money for said<lb/> property has been paid doth order that <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, the present sheriff of St Louis County, executed<lb/> and acknowledge a deed to the said <name>Calvin F Burnes</name>, reciting the facts, for the following described property<lb/> to wit; the North half of the north west quarter of Section Eleven of township No forty four of Range<lb/> Now five East Of the fifth principal meridian containing Eighty acres Situated in the County of St Louis State<lb/> of Missouri; and by <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County, under and by virtue of an execu<lb/>tion issued from the office of the Clerk of the St Louis Court in the case of <name>Robert H Smith</name><lb/> against <name>Thomas Seaverson</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>John Kinnard Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Geving</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the dismissal herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained and said dismissal set aside. The plaintiff files an addition<lb/>al bond for costs which is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derrick A January</name> et al<lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Barclay</name> by leave of Court files are amended answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> et al<lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>The motion to strike out he interplea of <name>Stanley M Breed</name> being hear and<lb/> fully considered by the Court is sustained, and said interplea is accordingly<lb/> stricken out.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sunderland G Sears</name> et al<lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Isaac gregg</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a release of the sure<lb/>ties on the bond given by the defendant for the return of the property at<lb/>tached, waiving all claim for damages under said bond.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Waver Currier</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Samuel B Lowe</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Jno Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="287" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0294.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>229, 62<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Clark</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolph F Meyer</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Andrew Johnson</name></head>
            <p>On notes and Due Bill.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by this attorney, and on his motion the order of<lb/> continuance is set aside and vacated, and the plaintiff dismisses their suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Johnson</name>, and files the statement of the defendant,<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name>, duly verified by affidavit whereby the said defendant con<lb/>fesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dollars and<lb/> sixty two cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for<lb/> that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Julius Glade</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>John Haetmann</name>, assignee, and files an inventory<lb/> and on his motion the Court appoints <name>Albert Albertson</name>,<lb/> <name>L R Wohlien</name> and <name>Lafayette M Sleeth</name>, appraisers to appraise<lb/> the property and effects so inventoried.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W D Marshall</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J Cuddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>William Hennessey</name></head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant to set aside the default herein being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the court, it is ordered that the said motion be sustained<lb/> and the default set aside upon the payment by said defendant of all costs<lb/> accrued herein to this date. Until and including the first day of the next term of this Court is<lb/> given the defendant to answer.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-01-31">Tuesday January 31st 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Vanderslicer</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John A McElroy</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1265, 61.<lb/> Debt</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find there from that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of twelve hundred and sixty five dollars and sixty one cents on account of the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also it costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="288" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0295.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#803,42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Willam L Ewing</name>, <name>Albert G Edwards</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name>, <name>Philip W Heermans</name>,<lb/> <name>Clinton Briggs</name> and <name>Thomas Heermans</name><lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> eight hundred and three dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#73,75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name>, <name>Albert G Edwards</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name>, <name>Philip W Heermans</name>, <name>Clinton<lb/> Briggs</name> and <name>Thomas Heermans</name><lb/> vs 826<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> and <name>Turner Maddox</name><lb/> garnishee of <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and moves<lb/> the Court for judgment on the answer of said gar<lb/>nishees, and the Court finding from said answer that<lb/> the said garnishees are indebted to the defendant, <name>Louis<lb/> Butterfield</name>, in the sum of seventy three dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents, therefore it is considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishees the debt aforesaid as found and have execution<lb/> therefor; and that out of said sum the plaintiffs pay the costs of this proceeding. The sum of<lb/> ten dollars is allowed said garnishees for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 826<lb/> <name>Theron Barnum</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name>.</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but he said garnishee although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore on motion of plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> interrogatories herein be taken against said garnishee as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reiner Bucter</name><lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Patrick Keegan</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> Trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>This cause and the motion for judgment are continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name> and<lb/> <name>Eurotus W Barnes</name><lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Thomas S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>The motion in this cause for the assessment of damages and the<lb/> value of the property being called the parties come, by their attorneys,<lb/> and the defendant announces himself ready, but the plaintiffs de<lb/>manding a Jury and the panel of the Jury summoned for the term<lb/> having been discharged and the Court deciding that the plaintiffs are entitled to a Jury for the<lb/> assessment, the motion of said assessment is continued to the next term of this Court by consent<lb/> of the parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Schenek</name> et al<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>Charles S Lynch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Joseph B Holland</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered by the Court that the said motion be and the<lb/> same is hereby overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="289" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0296.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Price</name> et al<lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>David T Wheiler</name> et al</head>
            <p>The Motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is overruled; and the motion in arrest of judgment being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard F Sass</name> et al<lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is overruled: The defendants motion for a bill of particular<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion in arrest of judgment being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court is overruled; and the motion of a new trial herein being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the<lb/> judgment herein be set aside and a new trial had in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>The motion for a new trial herein upon the plea in abatement being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Masterson and Maginnis</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed. Assignees bond filed and approved.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-01">Wednesday February 1st 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>Calvin F Burnes</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim estate and<lb/> property of <name>Thomas Seaverson</name> of in and to the following described property, to wit; all that certain<lb/> tractor parcel of land lying and being in Saint Louis County and Stare if Missouri and being the<lb/> Norte half of the North west quarter of section Eleven, township forty four, North of Range five East of<lb/> fifty principal meridian, the said tract containing eighty acres being the same purchased by <name>Thomas<lb/> Seaverson</name> and conveyed to him by <name>Benoni Seaverson</name> and wife by deed dated <date when="1842-07-21">July 21st 1842</date>, and re<lb/>corded in the Recorders Office of said St Louis County in book X No 2 page 149; Sold under and by<lb/> virtue of an execution issued from the Office of he Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of<lb/> <name>Robert H Smith</name> against <name>Thomas Seaverson</name> returnable to the <date when="1860-02">February Term, 1860</date>, of said Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Albert C Koch</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elijah G Tuttle</name><lb/> vs 286<lb/> <name>John Brooks</name> et al</head>
            <p>This cause and the demurrer herein are continued to the next turn.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="290" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0297.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name><lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>Thomas Rector</name>, sole heir of <name>Lydia M Rector</name>,<lb/> <name>Ellen Lee Rappanick</name>, <name>Leontine Lee</name>, <name>Oscar<lb/> Lee</name>, <name>Gustave S Rousseau</name>, <name>Emily Rousseau</name>,<lb/> <name>Mary Garnier</name> and <name>John Hogan</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Specific Performance.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Mary Garnier</name> and <name>John Hogan</name>, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss their suit without<lb/> prejudice as to <name>Gustave S Rousseau</name> and wife and as to<lb/> <name>Ellen Lee Rappanick</name>, and the said <name>Thomas Rector Le<lb/>ontine Lee</name> and <name>Oscar Lee</name>, although duly called come<lb/> not but make default; and the matters in controversy herein<lb/> are submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, and being fully<lb/> advised of and concerning the premises, makes the following finding, to wit; That the Spanish Government on<lb/> the <date when="1770-01-10">10th January 1770</date> conceeded a tract of land of two by forty arpents to august Condi, which conces<lb/>sion was recorded in Levre Terrein No 1 page 31 and is as follows; On the <date when="1770-01-10">tenth of January one thousand<lb/> seven hundred and seventy</date> upon the request of <name>August Condi</name>; surveyor in St Louis, we have conceded and<lb/> we do concede to him, his heir or assigns, in fee simple, a piece of ground situated in the Grand prairie of<lb/> the post of the said village of St Louis, having tow arpents in width by forty arpents in depth, bounded on<lb/> one side by the land of <name>M Hervieux</name>, and on the other side by the land of Louis Deshetres, so that the said<lb/> <name>Conde</name> and his assigns may enjoy the same in full property; under the condition of setting the said land<lb/> within one year and one day and of its being liable to the public, and other charged tat his majesty might<lb/> impose therefor. Given in St Louis the same day and year as above; and we have signed <name>St Ange Labuxiere</name>.<lb/> That the same land was confirmed to the legal representatives of <name>Auguste Conde</name> in accordance with proof<lb/> taken before <name>Theodore Hunt</name>, Recorder of Land Titles for Missouri under act of 1824 of the Congress of<lb/> the United State and was recorded in the record and minutes of said United State Recorder of Land Titles<lb/> in book No 2 page 100: and that the same tract was surveyed by the United States<lb/> Survey No 1660. The Court doth further find that <name>Auguste Conde</name> died many years ago leaving sur<lb/>viving him his two daughters, one named <name>Marie</name> married to <name>Charles Sanguinet</name> and the other <name>Constance</name><lb/> married to <name>Patrick Lee</name>, that <name>Patrick Lee</name> and <name>Constance</name>, his wife, both died about the year 1825 leaving<lb/> surviving them <name>Lydia M</name>,<lb/> who had intermarried with <name>Stephen Rector</name>, <name>Patrick Oscan Lee</name>, <name>Constance</name>, who had intermarried with <name>Zalmon C Palmer</name>, <name>Sophia</name> who had intermarried with <name>Benjamin O Fallon</name>,<lb/> <name>Ellen Lee</name>, who afterwards intermarried with <name>Rappenick</name>, <name>Emily</name> Who had intermarried with <name>Gustave S<lb/> Rousseau</name>; that <name>Stephen Rector</name> the husband of <name>Lydia M Rector</name> died before, 1831; that <name>Patrick Osear<lb/> Lee</name> died a about the year 18 Leaving surviving him his widow <name>Leontine Lee</name> and his only son <name>Oscar<lb/> Lee</name>. The Court doth further find that said <name>Patrick <unclear>stain</unclear> Lee</name> and said <name>Lydia M Rector</name> did execute the<lb/> instrument to <name>Louis A Benoist</name> dated the <date when="1831-08-30">30th day of august, 1831</date>, and described in plaintiffs petition:<lb/> that the land therein described is the same land proved up before said <name>Recorder Hun</name> and afterwards<lb/> surveyed a Survey 1660; that said instrument was by mistake of the said granters not sealed as<lb/> it purported to be. The Court doth further find that said <name>Lydia M Rector</name> made the deed to said<lb/> <name>Mary Garnier</name> dated the <date when="1847-10-29">29th day of October 1847</date> in said second amended petition described; that there<lb/> was no valuable consideration passed from said <name>Mary Garnier</name> to said <name>Lydia actor</name> for said<lb/> conveyance; that said <name>Mary Garnier</name> and her husband executed to defendant, <name>John Hogan</name>, the deed<lb/> dated the <date when="1857-05-19">19th day of May, 1857</date>, and in said petition described whereby they conveyed all their in<lb/>terest in said tract to two by forty arpents except a bout six arpents in the Eastern and thereof; that<lb/> no valuable consideration was given by said <name>Hogan</name> to said <name>Garnier</name> and wife for said conveyance; that said<lb/> <name>Hogan</name> was the agent of <name>Mary Garnier</name> in obtaining and procuring the deed of said <name>Lydia M Rector</name> to<lb/> be made to said <name>Mary Garnier</name>. The Court doth further find that neither said <name>Mary Garnier</name> nor said<lb/> <name>John Hogan</name> had any knowledge of he making or existence of the instrument dated the <date when="1831-08-30">30th day of au<lb/>gust, 1831</date>, from <name>Lydia M Rector</name>, <name>Patrick Oscar Lee</name> and others to said <name>Benoist</name> at the time of the<lb/> said deed of <name>Lydia M actor</name> to said <name>Mary Garnier</name> and of the deed of <name>Garnier</name> and wife to said <name>Hogan</name><lb/> The Court doth further find that said <name>Louis A Benoist</name> by the deed if himself and wife dared the<lb/> <date when="1844-06-11">11th day of June, 1844</date>, conveyed to said plaintiff, <name>Page</name>, and undivided half of said two by forty arpents.<lb/> The Court doth Further find that said <name>Mary Garnier</name> was one of the herein of <name>Marie Sanguinet</name> who<lb/> with her husband died long before 1825 and that said <name>Marie Garnnier</name> and her husband by their deed<lb/> dated the <date when="1835-08-13">13th day of August, 1835</date>, conveyed to Louis a Benoist all the interest or property they then had</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="291" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0298.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>in said tract of two by forty arpents proved before said <name>Recorder Hunt</name> and surved by the United<lb/>States as Survey No 1660. The Court doth further find that there has been no possession of any portion of<lb/> said land in controversy by said defendants, <name>Hogan</name> or <name>Garnier</name>, or either of them before the year 1850 or 1851,<lb/> and that as early as 1850 said plaintiff <name>Benoist</name> was in possession of a portion of said land in controversy<lb/> and has been in possession of the same ever since. The Court doth thereupon declare the law to be that the<lb/> plaintiffs are entitled to have decreed to and rested in them the interest and share in said track of land<lb/> as surveyed by the United States as Survey No 1660 Which said <name>Lydia M Rector</name> and <name>Patrick Oscar Lee</name><lb/> held and owned at the time of the execution of said instrument to said <name>Benoist</name> being one undivided one<lb/> twelfth each and together making one undivided sixth part thereof. And thereupon the Court doth order<lb/> adjudge and decree that the undivided sixth part of the track of land in said petition described being a<lb/> track of land lying on the Country of St Louis and State of Missouri at the place commonly called the<lb/> Grand prairie containing two arpents in front by forty arpents in depth confined by laws of the United State<lb/> to the legal representatives of <name>August <unclear>Cond</unclear></name> and claimed and proved up before <name>Theodore Hunt</name> Recorder of<lb/> Land Titles of the United States for said State and surveyed by the United States of America by United<lb/> States Survey numbered sixteen hundred and sixty be passed to and be vested in the said plaintiffs their<lb/> herein and assigned forever, and that they recover of the defendants their costs and charges in that the behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefore. Finding of the Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Faull</name> administrator et al<lb/> vs 43<lb/> <name>James Brennon</name>'s administrative et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and file a bill of exceptions and also come the<lb/> defendants and file a bill of exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Robert S Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank of Steubenville</name><lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for a new trial herein which being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name></head>
            <p>Now come <name>Thomas L Clarke and Bro</name>, by their attorney, and file their application to<lb/> be made co defendants, wherefore it is ordered they made co defendants herein and<lb/> leave is given them to file an answer at the next tem of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, by their attorney, and file the consent of the plaintiffs, where<lb/> by they consent that the defendants may file an affidavit bond and bill of excep<lb/>tions for an appeal within ten day from this date, nine pro tune, waiving objections<lb/> to the same not being filed at this teem.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 510<lb/> <name>D A January</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained, and said non sit is accordingly set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Charles Holms</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained, and said non suit is accordingly set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Labarge</name><lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Peter Locke</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="292" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0299.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson J Wright</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant, by brave of Court,<lb/> withdraws his set off and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the<lb/> issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by<lb/> his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff this costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel penberthy</name> et al<lb/> vs 307<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> sustained; and the judgment herein se aside and new trial granted. The plaintiffs with<lb/>draw their motion inanest of judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court it is<lb/> ordered that said motion be sustained upon the payment of all the costs on or before the first<lb/> day of the next teem of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to dismiss this suit being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled: <lb/> and the demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to suppress the defendants depositions being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to suppress the plaintiffs depositions being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John O <unclear>Mcellen</unclear></name> and<lb/> <name>Henry P Hawkens</name></head>
            <p>appraisement filed. Assignees bond filed. Additional inventory filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remitttitur.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Idecker</name><lb/> vs 381<lb/> <name>Henry Hackmann</name>, <name>Rudolph Hackmann</name>,<lb/> <name>Gottlieb Schaefer</name> and <name>William <unclear>Stenkel</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and remits to<lb/> the defendants the sum of five hundred and fifty dollars part<lb/> and parcel of the judgment herein. Therefore it is considered<lb/> that the defendants be discharged from the payment of the<lb/> sum as above remitted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Rallman</name> et al<lb/> vs 325<lb/> <name>Francis Fusz <unclear>ral</unclear></name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Rallman</name> et al<lb/> vs 326<lb/> <name>George Geist</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> their costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Breckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="293" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0300.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-02">Thursday February 2nd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Julies Glade</name></head>
            <p>Appraisement filed. Assignees bond filed and approved.<lb/> <name>John Hartmann</name>, assignee, files a petition for an order of sale and<lb/> after due consideration thereof by the Court. It is ordered that the<lb/> said assignee do proceed to sell and dispose of the stock of goods waves and merchandise assigned at pri<lb/>vate sale for cash for the period of sixty days. It is further ordered that at the end and termination of<lb/> sixty days from this date whatever assets then belonging to said estate un disposed of the store no 188<lb/> Broadway St Louis together with the fixtures in the store shall be sold by said assignee for cash at<lb/> public auction.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4836,45<lb/> 7 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Ewing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nerce Valle</name></head>
            <p>Confession of judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files his petition and also comes <name>James H<lb/> Carlisle</name> and exhibits and files a power of attorney duly executed by the defendant and in<lb/> the name and behalf of the defendant confesses judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of four thousand eight hundred and thirty six dollars and forty five cents and authorizes the entering<lb/> up of judgment against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefore And it is ordered that this judgment bear interest<lb/> at the rate of seven per cent per annum form the date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#254,22.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B <unclear>Sanclerson</unclear></name><lb/> vs 839<lb/> <name>The North Missouri Rail Road<lb/> Company</name> garnishee of <name>A J M Donald</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes said gar<lb/>nishee and files an answer and the plaintiff moves the Court for<lb/> judgment thereon and it appearing to the Court that said<lb/>garnishee at the time he was summoned herein as such was indebt<lb/>ed to the defendant, <name>M Donald</name>, in the sum of two hundred and fifty four dollars and twenty two cents,<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and have execution therefore and that out of said sum he pay the costs of this proceedings. The sum of<lb/> ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>Thomas Rector</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a motion for review herein which motion being seen heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is overruled: thereupon the defendants file a<lb/> bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained and the judgment herein is accordingly set aside and a new trial granted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valli</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the order making <name>Thomas<lb/> L Clark and Bro co</name> defendant to set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Grace L Barnes</name><lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Henry M Barnes</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer of the defendant of the plaintiffs petition being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court it is ordered that the said demurrer be and the same<lb/> is hereby overruled. On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, at the Court strikes<lb/> Out of the petition so much thereof as is included in brackets.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="294" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0301.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> The Steam Boat <name>Jas E Woodruff</name></head>
            <p>The motion to set aside the non suit herein is continued to the next<lb/> term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Erst C Angelrodt</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Edward Dobbyns</name></head>
            <p>The parties file an agreement and by their consent the judgment here in is set<lb/> aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> et al<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administrative<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name>.</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled. The plaintiffs file their consent that a bill of<lb/> exceptions may be settled and filed herein in the course of the coming va<lb/>cation and that a bond may be filed and an appeal taken at the same time.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Currier</name><lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Samuel B Lowe</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions and also an affidavit for an appeal, and on<lb/> his motion an appeal is allowed him to the supreme Court from the judgment therein<lb/> rendered, and he thereupon files an appeal bond in the sum of forty two hundred dol<lb/>lars, with himself as principal and <name>Alfred C Robertson</name> and <name>Chester Harding Jr</name> as securities which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Bank</name> of Steubenville<lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>John B Carson</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions and an a affidavit for an appeal, and on his<lb/> motion, an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court form the judgment therein<lb/> rendered and he thereupon files and appeal bond with himself as principal, and<lb/> <name>William M Morrison</name>, <name>James O Carson</name> and <name>James F Small</name>, as securities, which bond is in the sum of twenty<lb/> six hundred dollars and is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lynch</name><lb/> 502<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> and<lb/> <name>James B Walsh</name></head>
            <p>The parties file an agreement whereby it is agreed that a bill of exceptions may be signed<lb/> and files at any time within three months form this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel W Norcorss</name> et al<lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bill of exceptions and an affidavit for an appeal, and on their mo<lb/>tion, an appeal to the supreme Court is granted them form the judgment herein rendered, <lb/> and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of two hundred dollars, with <name>Joel<lb/> W Norcross</name>, as principal, and <name>Irvin Z Smith</name> and <name>William D Sedgwick</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Herron</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>George NW Putnam</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="295" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0302.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#749, 32<lb/> agst <name>Jewitt</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph H Locke</name><lb/> vs 545<lb/> <name>Daniel T Jeivett</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles H Bond</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the demurrer herein being called is sub<lb/>mitted to the Court and the Court being fully advised of and concerning the prem<lb/>ises as to the defendant <name>Charles</name> expend doth sustain said demurrer, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the de<lb/>fendant, <name>Charles H Pond</name>, and the defendant, <name>Daniel T Jevett</name>, failing to plead fur<lb/>ther makes default, wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and forty nine dollars and thirty two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name><lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to set aside the verdict and judgment and grant a new trial herein<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the said motion be and<lb/> the same is hereby overruled: thereupon the defendants file a bill of exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order for production of Books and paper renewed<lb/> Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, except <name>Theophile Heggi</name> and <name>Edward Vogel</name>, <lb/> by their respective attorneys, and it appearing to the Court that the order for production<lb/> of books and papers has not been fully executed, it is therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, <lb/> ordered by the Court that the defendants, <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name>, <name>philibert Bariz</name>, <name>George Bauer</name>, <name>William Rira</name>, <lb/> <name>Gaspard Blaise</name>, <name>Jean L Bienne</name>, <name>Julius Cledes</name>, <name>Alexander Droussent</name>, <name>Jules Fagres</name>, <name>Pierre Favereau</name>, <name>Paul Gar<lb/>nier</name>, <name>Renard Denis</name>, and <name>Paul Salarnier</name>, shall produce to the plaintiff or his attorney all books and papers<lb/> containing proceedings of the committee of gerance or proceedings of the general assembly of the Icarien Communi<lb/>ty at the Office of Voullaire and Favor on the City of ST Louis on Friday, <date when="1860-02-03">February third, eighteen hundred<lb/> and sixty</date>, at ten o clock, A M, for examination by plaintiffs attorney, also to produce the same on the<lb/> trial of this cause or that they show cause why they should not produce such books and papers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name>, <name>John M Ginnis</name>,<lb/> and <name>R Eaton Goodell</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>H B Merritt</name>, <name>Jacob Merritt</name><lb/> and <name>William Risley</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained; and the judgment herein rendered is accor<lb/>dingly set aside and a new trial granted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for a new trial.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="296" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0303.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-03">Friday February 3 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Carson</name> and<lb/> <name>John E Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dymes Chambers</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Capell</name></head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a motion and<lb/> notice of motion for an execution against said defendants, on a judgment<lb/> rendered in this Court on the <date when="1853-05-19">19th of May, 1853</date>, which motion is<lb/> after due consideration by the Court sustained; and an execution is accor<lb/>dingly ordered to issue in accordance with said application.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>John Mathews</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs is overruled: the demurer to<lb/> the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Joseph Stecker</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out part of the petition herein being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Robert S Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a bill of exceptions and an affidavit for an appeal and, on their<lb/> motion, an appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the decision<lb/> herein rendered, and they thereupon file and appeal bond, in the sum of twenty<lb/> three hundred and fifty dollars, with <name>Robert S Eddy</name> and <name>David W Hill</name>, as principals, and <name>James<lb/> S Wilgus</name>, <name>D Preston</name> and <name>R H Ross</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John O Mellen</name> and <name>Henry P Hawkins</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>Emile Longuemare</name>, assignee herein, and files his<lb/> petition for an order of sale, and after due consideration thereof,<lb/> it is ordered that the said assignee sell the goods conveyed<lb/> to him at private sale for cash in parcels from the stand lately occupied by said <name>John O Mellen &amp; Co</name><lb/> and from time to time, not to exceed sixty days from this date, as purchasers may apply: Leave is<lb/> also given, should and opportunity present itself, during the above named period to sell the whole of said<lb/> goods so remaining unsold for cash or at sixty days with undoubted personal security said sale to<lb/> be either public or private.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered that he have leave to<lb/> file an answer on or before the sixth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Marshall</name> et al<lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, two Commission<lb/> are awarded them to take depositions in Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Homan</name> et al<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Newton S Gay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="297" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0304.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of <name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> of note &amp;c attached in the case of<lb/> <name>Bennett S Aden</name>, plaintiff<lb/> against<lb/> <name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clingan Scott</name>, and <name>William<lb/> C Scott</name> garnishees of <name>Dick</name> and <name>McClure</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the said <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, heretofore duly appoin<lb/>ted and qualified as <name>Receiver</name> in this behalf, and presents to the<lb/> Court his first report, of his procedings and actions as such Re<lb/>ceiver, and prays that said report, and his acts and proceedings<lb/> as such <name>Receiver</name> as therein set forth, be approved, and that the<lb/> Court make such orders and allowances in this behalf as in said<lb/> report asked: and the Court upon examination of said Report and the vouchers therein filed doth order, that<lb/> said report be received and filed and that the same stand approved together with the acts and proceedings of<lb/> said <name>Receiver</name> as therein set forth: and the Court doth further order, in accordance with the prayer of said <name>Hitchcock<lb/> Receiver</name>, that said <name>Receiver</name> enter upon the record of the judgment heretofore obtained by him in this Court<lb/> against <name>James L Gage</name>, on the <date when="1859-03-02">2nd day of March, A D, 1859</date>, for the sum of four hundred and seventeen dol<lb/>lars and two cents, a credit as of the <date when="1859-05-19">19th day of May AD 1859</date> of two hundred and seventy seven, dollars and<lb/> ninety cents, being the amount recovered and collected upon a certain note held as collateral - as by said report<lb/> appear - to said claim against <name>James L Gage</name>: and further that said <name>Receiver</name> enter upon the record of the<lb/> judgment obtained by him in this Court on the <date when="1859-03-08">8th day of March AD 1859</date> against <name>Ezra O English</name>,<lb/> <name>John Burns</name>, and <name>Jacob Johann</name>, for the sum of sixteen hundred and twenty eight dollars and sixteen cents a<lb/> remittitur as of the date of the rendition of said judgment in and for the sum of five hundred and thirty<lb/> two dollars, being the amount of excess for which said judgment was taken by said <name>Receiver</name> by mistake as in<lb/> said Report set forth: and further that the said <name>Receiver</name> be and he is hereby authorized to accept the proposi<lb/>tion of <name>Mathias Steitz</name> and <name>Hiram Shaw</name> for the purchase and assignment to them of the said judgment<lb/> against <name>English Burn</name> and <name>Johann</name> in said report mentioned; and that upon the receipt by him, said <name>Receiver</name>,<lb/> from said <name>Mathias Steitz</name> and <name>Hiram Shaw</name> of their joint and several obligation for the amount due upon<lb/> said judgment Cafter entry of remittitur thereon as above ordered said amount payable therein to the order of<lb/> said <name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name>, in two equal instalments, without interest, one of said instalments, to wit; the<lb/> sum of five hundred and forty eight dollars and eight cents, payable on or before the <date when="1860-09-20">20th day of September<lb/> A D 1860</date> and the other of said instalments, to wit; the sum of five hundred and forty eight dollars and eight<lb/> cents, payable on or before the <date when="1861-09-20">20th day of September, AD 1861</date>, that said <name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name> in<lb/> this behalf, thereupon be and he is hereby authorized and required to execute and deliver to said <name>Mathias<lb/> Steitz</name> and <name>Hiram Shaw</name> an assignment of the said judgment and of all night, title, interest and demand<lb/> thereunder by him held together with all the right of him, the said <name>Receiver</name>, to demand or receive such<lb/> divided if any as may be declared upon the claim or notes upon which such judgment is founded, by<lb/> <name>William R Riddlecome</name>, <name>James M Corbitt</name> and <name>Charles Bayha</name>, assignees of <name>English Burn and company</name>,<lb/> and to enter the assignment of such judgment upon the margin of the record thereof: the said obligation of<lb/> said <name>Steitz</name> and <name>Shaw</name>; if received by said <name>Receiver</name>, to be held collected and accounted for by him in like<lb/> manner as other evidences of debt heretofore received by him: and further, that the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and fifty dollars be and the same is hereby allowed to said Receiver out of the moneys in his hands<lb/> as compensation for his services heretofore rendered in this behalf: and further that the said <name>Receiver</name> be and<lb/> he is hereby authorized and required to apply the further sum of forty two dollars and thirty five cents out of<lb/> the moneys in his hands to the payment of the several amounts due for costs as specified in said report and<lb/> in Exhibit B filed therewith; and that said <name>Receiver</name> proceed to collect so far as he may be able all other<lb/> claims held by him as such and that he make further report of his acts and proceedings in this behalf.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#100, 00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kennard</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>W L Sloss</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Kennard Sr</name>, <name>William L Sloss</name>,<lb/> and <name>Eliza S Sloss</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the trial progresses and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to<lb/> <name>Eliza S Sloss</name> and the trial being finished the Court doth find for<lb/> the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of one hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="298" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0305.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#546, 39<lb/> vs<lb/> Harley.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Koerner</name> and <name>Theodore Engelman</name><lb/> vs 125.<lb/> <name>John P Harley</name> and <name>Elias Wilmot</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>John P Harley</name><lb/> by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses their<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>Elias Wilmot</name>, and no Jury being<lb/> required this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of five hundred and<lb/> forty six dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the damages aforesaid inform aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. The defendant files a motion for a new trial which motion, by consent of parties<lb/> is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer to order for production of books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron A Fisher</name> et al<lb/> vs 353.<lb/> <name>Calvin H Fredericks</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of partnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Independence Mining Company</name><lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>Alber C Koch</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit for an appeal and also a bill of ex<lb/>ceptions, and, on his motion, an appeal is allowed him to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein rendered and he thereupon files on<lb/> appeal bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrell</name>'s administrator et al<lb/> vs 43.<lb/> <name>James Brennons</name> administratrix et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff file an affidavit and on their motion an appeal is<lb/> allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein<lb/> rendered, and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of three<lb/> hundred dollars with <name>Alexander</name>, <name>J P Garesche</name>, as principal, and <name>Edward J Farish</name> and <name>Robert A Bake<lb/>well</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Colt</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>Israel G Beaumont</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same and being fully advised of and concerning the premises doth<lb/> find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The plaintiff files a motion for a<lb/> new trial which being seen heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled. By consent of parties until<lb/> the <date when="--02-13">13th day of February</date> instant is given plaintiff to file a bill of exceptions and perfect his appeal.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant file an affidavit for an appeal, and on their motion, and appeal<lb/> is allowed them to the Supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered<lb/> and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of five thousand five<lb/> hundred and one dollars, with <name>John G Priest</name>, as principal, and <name>Henry B Belt</name> and <name>John J Anderson</name>,<lb/> as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> et al<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administratrix of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties twenty days are given defendant to file a bill<lb/> of exceptions and take an appeal herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="299" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0306.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name>, <name>James Clemens Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file an affidavit and also a prayer for an appeal, and on<lb/> their motion, the Court doth grant them an appeal to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the decision herein rendered, whereupon <name>James Clemens Jr</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> Chambers</name>, a principals, and <name>John O Fallon</name> and <name>Edward Walsh</name>, as securities,<lb/> severally acknowledge themselves indebted to <name>Norman Cutter</name> in the sum of one hundred thousand<lb/> dollars, to be levied of their respective good and chattels, land and tenements; yet upon the condition<lb/> that if the said appellants will prosecute their appeal with due diligence, to a decision in the Supreme<lb/> Court; and that if the judgment appealed from is affirmed, other appeal dismissed, they will pay what<lb/>ever of debt, damages and costs, have been recovered against by the judgment of the Circuit Court, together<lb/> with the interest that shall grow due thereon, or that they will otherwise perform the judgment of the<lb/> Circuit Court, and that they will also pay the costs and damages that may be adjudged against them<lb/> in the Supreme Court upon their appeal, and that they will also stay waste, then this recognizance to<lb/> be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a bill of exceptions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Prince</name> et al<lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>D J Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning t ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-04">Saturday February 4th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac J Greene</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles L Hobbs</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Lankershine</name></head>
            <p>The motion of <name>Lankersham</name> and the affidavits to set aside default and<lb/> judgment being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained; and<lb/> the default against the said <name>Lankershine</name> and the judgment to against all of the<lb/> defendants are accordingly set aside and vacated. Until the first day, and in<lb/>cluding said day, is given defendant <name>Lankershine</name> to answer. Said default and<lb/> judgment set aside on payment of all costs. Answer of <name>Lankersham</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Tatum</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Robt H Ober</name> et al</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the order sustaining the demurrer herein be and the<lb/> same is hereby vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Windland</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for plaintiff a dedimus is awarded plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="300" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0307.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bryan Cross</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Walter B Carr</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>Napoleon B Mulliken</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled. Until the eleventh instant is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>Charles S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> et al</head>
            <p>Until the eleventh instant is given the defendants to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Order for Production of Books and Papers.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that the order for production of books and<lb/> papers has not been fully executed, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> by his attorney, it is ordered that the defendant, <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name>,<lb/> shall produce to the plaintiff or his attorney, all books and papers containing proceedings of the committee<lb/> of geranee or proceedings of the general assembly of the Icarien Community, at the office of <name>Voullaire</name><lb/> and <name>Farre</name> in the City of St Louis on Monday next <date when="1860-02-06">February, 6th 1860</date> at ten o clock and for examination by palin<lb/>tiffs attorney, also to produce the same on the trial of this cause or that he show cause why he shall<lb/> not produce such books and papers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter J Hurck</name> et al<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>William Provost</name> et al</head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next teem of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#6874, 45.<lb/> to bear 8 per<lb/> cent</note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Insurance Company</name><lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nerce Valle</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and also comes the defendant<lb/> and filed his statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confessed<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six thousand eight hun<lb/>dred and seventy four dollars and forty five cents and authorized the en<lb/>tering up of Judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for the amount. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also its costs herein expended and have thereof execution: and it is ordered that this judgment bear<lb/> interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from the date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2372, 47</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alanson Dickson</name>, <name>William C Orr</name><lb/> and <name>Dabney Carr</name><lb/> vs 922<lb/> <name>Thornton B Kemper</name> and <name>John T Kemper</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the state<lb/>ment of the defendants duly verified by affidavit, whereby<lb/> they confess themselves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of twenty three hundred and seventy two dollars and forty<lb/> seven cents and authorize the entering up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefore :and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest as follows: four hundred<lb/> and ninety three dollars and eighty three cents thereof at the rate of ten per cent per annum from<lb/> this date: four hundred and ninety three dollars and twenty one cents, at the rate of ten per<lb/>cent per annum from the <date when="1860-02-04">fourth day day of February, eighteen hundred and sixty</date>; and thirteen<lb/> hundred and eighty five dollars and forty three cents, at the rate of ten per cent per annum from<lb/> the <date when="1860-03-19">nineteenth day of March eighteen hundred and sixty</date>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="301" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0308.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Maddock</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Elson J Wright</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion for a new trial which motion by consent of<lb/> parties is continued to the next teem.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> et al<lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Thomas L More</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file an affidavit for an appeal and an appeal is granted them<lb/> to the supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bratenahl</name> et al<lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>A R Grimex</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for an order on Sheriff <name>Cerre</name> which motion is continued.<lb/> to the next term.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Casey</name><lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by leave of<lb/> Court file an agreement for extension of time to file bill of excep<lb/>tions and perfect appeal, thereupon the said garnishees file separate<lb/> affidavits for appeal, and on their motion an appeal is allowed<lb/> each of them to the supreme Court from the judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Goulding</name><lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by leave<lb/> of Court file an agreement extending the time for filing bill of<lb/> exceptions and perfecting appeal and also file, by leave, an agree<lb/>ment to abide in the supreme Court the decision rendered<lb/> in the case of <name>Armstrong</name> and <name>Casey</name> against same garnishees,<lb/> and thereupon said garnishees file separate affidavits for appeal, and an appeal is allowed each of them to<lb/> the supreme Court from the judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Leahey</name> et al<lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Bridget Dugdale</name> administrative<lb/> of <name>Francis Dugdale</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit for appeal, and on her motion an appeal is<lb/> allowed her to the supreme Court from the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gardner M Peck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bayless Chamblin</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by <name>Smith</name> and <name>Sedgwick</name>, his attorneys, and acknowledges to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein on the <date when="1846-11-16">16th day of<lb/> November, A D 1846</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Welling</name> et al<lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Charles P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Hogg</name><lb/> vs 395<lb/> <name>John Kennard Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file a motion for a new trial which being seen heard and fully con<lb/>sidered by the Court is overruled: and the defendants file a bill of executions<lb/> and an affidavit for appeal and an appeal is allowed them to the Supreme Court<lb/> from the judgment herein, and they thereupon file an appeal bond in the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, with<lb/> <name>John Kennard</name>, as principal, and <name>Alexander Finley</name>, and <name>N L Greenfield</name>, as securities, which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="302" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0309.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus M Dowell</name> et al<lb/> vs 225<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a bill of exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer and a counter claim herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Set aside 29 p 303</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> receiver of the<lb/> partnership credits and effects of the<lb/> firm of <name>Houseman</name> and <name>Smith</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William H Hayden</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waving a<lb/> Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> for the plaintiff on the claim against the defendant the sum of<lb/> one hundred and forty one dollars and thirty seven cents but doth<lb/> further find that there is due the defendant upon his set off an amount exceeding the claim of the plaintiff<lb/> which excess amounts the sum of seventy nine dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Herman Stein</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the petitioner <name>Human Stein</name> and files his petition<lb/> praying for a certificate of the Court that Land Warrant No 58011 (fifty<lb/> eight thousand and eleven) for 160 acres issued to <name>Christopher Meyer</name><lb/> <date when="1857-02-12">February 12, 1857</date>, has been assigned to the petitioner for a valuable consideration and in form prescribed<lb/> by the Commissioner of the Geneva C Land Office, and he also files his amended affidavit in aid of his<lb/> application: and it appearing to the Court from the proof so offered that a clerical error had been<lb/> committed in the proof presented to this Court hereto fore un this matter as also in the certificate granted<lb/> by the Court hereto fore, to wit; on the <date when="1859-10-18">18th day of October 1859</date> the number of said Warrant being therein<lb/> given as 38011, instead of 58011, which now is shown to the Court to be the correct number of and Warrant;<lb/> Whereupon it is ordered to be certified and the Court does herby certify in correction of the certificate<lb/> granted on the <date when="1859-10-18">18th day of October, 1859</date>, that Land Warrant Number fifty eight thousand and<lb/> eleven (58011)for 160 acres issued to <name>Christopher Meyer</name> <date when="1857-02-12">February 12th 1857</date> has been assigned by said<lb/> <name>Christopher Meyer</name> to <name>Human Stein</name> for a valuable consideration and in due form.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>Thomas Richard</name></head>
            <p>The defendant, by <name>David C Woods</name>, files a bill of exceptions and also an af<lb/>fidavit for an appeal and on his motion an appeal is allowed him to the supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment herein and he thereupon files an appeal bond in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and fifty dollars, with <name>George Reading</name> as principal, <name>James Blackman</name>, <name>James Porter</name><lb/> and <name>Gorge partridge</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brook</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Samuel A Turner</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files motion to set aside judgment and an affidavit and also motion in arrest.<lb/> until and including the first day of next term is given him to file affidavits. Motions continued.<lb/> until the next teem of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                The Court this day examines the execution docket.
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="303" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0310.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that all causes and motions remaining an disposed of at the present<lb/> term be continued to the next teem of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> Receiver<lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William H Hayden</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the entry of judgment made herein<lb/> on this day set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus N Berthoud</name> Receiver of the<lb/> partnership credits and effects of the<lb/> late firm of <name>Houseman</name> and <name>Smith</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>William H Hayden</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth find for the plaintiff on his claim the sum of<lb/> one hundred and forty one dollars and thirty seven cents but<lb/> doth find that there is due the defendant upon his set off a sum equal to the claim of the plaintiff.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant nothing by his suit<lb/> in their behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of plaintiff his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Court in Course.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="304" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0311.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head type="running"><date when="1860-04">February Term A D 1860</date>.</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> County of St Louis</head>
            <p>Ss; Be it remembered, that at a term of the St Louis Circuit<lb/> Court begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the first Monday of February, being the sixth day of said<lb/> month, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty, were present Hon <name>Samuel M<lb/> Bruckinridge</name>, Judge, <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, and <name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>James McDonough</name><lb/> vs 401.<lb/> <name>Pierre Chouteau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al<lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>Robert M Scanlan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a Plea in abatement.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Nicholson</name><lb/> vs 52<lb/> <name>Robert M Scanlan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a Plea in abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al<lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Robert M Scanlan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a Plea in abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 301<lb/> <name>The Commercial Insurance<lb/> Company</name>.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered hat this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The<lb/> plaintiffs by leave of Court withdraw the policy sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>New England Server Company</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>William W Miller</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered hat this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The<lb/> plaintiffs by leave of Court withdraw the exhibit sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Goodlett</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleazer G Pettes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm G Ashdown</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Schulherr</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Peabody</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Danl D Page</name> et al</head>
            <p>Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert L Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>T Clark Manchester</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Fraser</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>J A Ubsdell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph O Marsh</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Edward C White</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Broun</name><lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>E C Bosworth</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary R Dufresne</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Henry Dilam</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Answer and cross bill filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="305" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0312.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dutchman</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Matthew Rippey</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer and exhibit and motion for security for cost filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Zeil</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Human Bergesch</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs and demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sutter</name> et al<lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Thomas</name> and <name>Papin</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Thomas</name> and <name>Papin</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Hargadine</name><lb/> vs 200<lb/> <name>Rollin Clark</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Charles Boswell</name> filed an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P Harves</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Parker</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis building and Savings association</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>Joseph Labarge Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of several of the defendants filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Scanlan</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Bretz</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>M R McDonald</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Richard F Sass</name>, filed an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Mercardier</name>, files an answer to the order for the production<lb/> of books and papers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Comstock</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants. <name>Rosenheim</name> and <name>Collins</name>, file separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Conway</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant. <name>Campbell</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Asa S Jones</name><lb/> vs 333<lb/> <name>Thomas Compbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants, <name>Owings</name> and <name>Campbell</name>, file separate answers.</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="306" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0313.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Camp</name> et al<lb/> vs 335<lb/> <name>Henry T Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Thomas Campbell</name> files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>Benjamin T Winchester</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Thomas Campbell</name> files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 475<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Rosenheim</name> and <name>Collins</name> file separate answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles G Mauro</name><lb/> vs 436<lb/> <name>Henry F Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Thomas Campbell</name> files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cha H Todd</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Seleg Myers</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 504<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Thomas Campbell</name> files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emma P Garneau</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Louis Garneau</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Calm</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>M Rosenbaum</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave of Court files an amended affidavit, and defendant file a mo<lb/>tion to dismiss.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Card Dietz</name> et al<lb/> vs 502<lb/> <name>Human Wiener</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al<lb/> vs 198<lb/> <name>Herman Wiener</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Matthew Ashdown</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Brockman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Murphy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Samuel</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fred K M Meyers</name><lb/> vs 158<lb/> <name>John Packer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James E Cross</name> et al<lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>Felix Reynolds</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiffs by leave of Court file an amended affidavit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J W Newland</name><lb/> vs 152<lb/> <name>Singleton Paxton</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a Plea in abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Leonard</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>Stephen Leonard</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at her costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name><lb/> vs 68<lb/> <name>Henry S King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof Service.</p>
            <p>Comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court of<lb/> service of notice of suit and copy of petition upon defendant, <name>Henry S King</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="307" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0314.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abner Cutler</name> et al<lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of he plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> et al<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that<lb/> the order of publication hereto for made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri which sues to<lb/> the use of <name>John Mathew</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, until the thirteenth in<lb/>stant us given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>T Clark Manchester</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A J Coons</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>B H Batte</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, ten days additional time are given him to<lb/> answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wouner Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County<lb/> and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Walter E Wills</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Service.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> of service of notice of suit and copy of petition upon the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>L R Sargent</name><lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>Geo W Scollay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer and motion to dismisses filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Js O Sawyer</name><lb/> vs 342<lb/> <name>John Hogan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannibal</name> and <name>St Joseph Rail Road Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel G Cabbell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jess M Harrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J chase Dow</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Samuel A Turner</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files affidavits in support of motions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Leavenworth</name><lb/> vs 295<lb/> <name>P C Reiley</name>'s Admr</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Orange County Bank</name><lb/> vs 211<lb/> <name>Arthur Latham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rollin Richmond</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>Hugh K Wagner</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Wagner</name>, files answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="308" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0315.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Clark Hooper</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file separate answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>Hugh K Wagner</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file separate answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Hugh K Wagner</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file separate answers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Hugh K Wagner</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants file separate answers.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-07">Tuesday February 7th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Stewart</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> <name>George Hartmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>Charles Keemde</name>, as security, which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Harnaker</name><lb/> vs 673<lb/> <name>Stephen Gaskell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Pierce</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>Edwin May</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, <name>J D Low</name>, by his attorney, one week additional time is<lb/> given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Wood Wilson</name> et al<lb/> vs 74<lb/> <name>Thomas J Martin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of he plaintiffs, by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor, and<lb/> this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Jane Cantwell</name> by next friend<lb/> vs 19<lb/> <name>John W Cantwell</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorneys, and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publi<lb/>cation heretofore made herein has been duly published accor<lb/>ding to law.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="309" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0316.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Dill</name><lb/> vs 808<lb/> <name>Washington Stewart</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to<lb/> Tennessee.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Alexander Riddle</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, <name>J Whitney Farlin</name>, by attorney, seven days additional<lb/> time are given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>John B Parsons</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, <name>J Whitney Farlin</name>, by attorney, seven days additional<lb/> time are given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> et al<lb/> vs 491<lb/> <name>George N Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, <name>Daniel J Hancock</name> and <name>Samuel T Morris</name>, by<lb/> their attorney, ten days additional time are given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard H Wilkery</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>The Illinois River Packet Company</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, <name>Illinois River Packet Company</name><lb/> <name>Danl J Hancock</name> and <name>Samuel T Morris</name>, by their attorney,<lb/> ten days additional time are given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Bokes</name> et al<lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney the time for answering herein is exten<lb/>ded ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, by attorney, the time for answering is extended ten<lb/> days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by attorney, the time for answering herein is extended<lb/> ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley S Horn</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>George W Thomas</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained plaintiff amends his petition by<lb/> changing the name of plaintiff from "<name>Wesley</name>" to "<name>William</name>".</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F S Griesmer</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Frederick Luppeng</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 309<lb/> <name>Geo B Boomer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Mitchell</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="310" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0317.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Jno a Williams</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Burke</name> and <name>M Allister</name> file separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 492<lb/> <name>Martin Burke</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Higgins</name><lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>F H Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>Thomas Wall</name><lb/> vs 889<lb/> <name>James Coff</name>.</head>
            <p>Quo Warrants.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings proofs and agreed case and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the<lb/> issues herein joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by its suit in this behalf but that the defendant go<lb/> hence without day and recover of said relater, <name>Thomas Wall</name>, his cost herein expended and have exe<lb/>cution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 310<lb/> <name>Geo P Boomer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants, <name>Westlake</name> and <name>Button</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 364<lb/> <name>Delaware Mutual Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H W Wood</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Constantine P Ralle</name> et al<lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>William W Holliday</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Downing</name> et al<lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>Jno M Hockaday</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#10,518, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Pollock</name><lb/> vs 512<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defendant, imperson,<lb/> and files his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit confessing himself in<lb/>debted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten thousand five hundred and eighteen dol<lb/>lars and authorizing the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their cost herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Hendricks</name> treasurer<lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>Charles Lewis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boston Belting Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Causse</name> et al<lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for additional security on the attachment bond.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 469<lb/> <name>Silas B Sifers</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Sifers</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Edwd Boyle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Boyle</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="311" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0318.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Thomas F Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants, <name>C D</name> and <name>J T Sullivan</name>, file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Holdane</name> et al<lb/> vs 327<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Thirlwell</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Geo W Putnam</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Moore</name> et al<lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Maddock</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Coleman</name><lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow Sr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Charles Marlow, Jr</name>, files a demurrer to plaintiffs petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brickley</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>John Powell</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for security for costs and an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Napoleon Savoney</name> et al<lb/> vs 183<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Walsh</name><lb/> vs 473<lb/> <name>Amos H Shultz</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius W Weber</name><lb/> vs 116<lb/> <name>Jno C Degenhart</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D Booge</name><lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>James L Bissell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John McCaffrey</name><lb/> vs 272<lb/> <name>Patrick Gregory</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for security for costs and an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas E Mason</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bruce</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert L McGhee</name><lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Benj G Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm P Prescott</name> et al<lb/> vs 93<lb/> <name>Jno L Chandler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Couch</name>, files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas Wild</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>Geo Couch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Bart</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Geo Couch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Couch</name>, files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ozro Collins</name><lb/> vs 493<lb/> <name>Jas M Clark</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Boram</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>E Nicholls</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gamaliel Bartlett</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="312" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0319.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Heinrich Buesmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno B Valle &amp; co</name><lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sutter</name> et al<lb/> vs 144<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Compton</name>, files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Goode</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm A Smizer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chauncey S Bliss</name> et al<lb/> vs 105<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Answer and Exhibit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno M Krum</name> et al<lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Herman Busin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>Morris Cahn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>W P</name> and <name>L R Shryock</name> file an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannibal</name> and <name>St Joseph Rail Road Co</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>Samuel G Cabbell</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo A Cox</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>Joe Davis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthias Mentrep</name><lb/> vs 249<lb/> <name>Geo W Putnam</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Adams</name> files an answer. Motion to set aside service filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Ferd Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings Inst</name><lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Co</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>Ozro Collins</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>O Collins</name>, files an answer</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas L Tucker</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Jo Hyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Co</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Bosse</name> files an answer to plaintiffs petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Co</name> &amp;c</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion to dismiss this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno F Mense</name><lb/> vs 225<lb/> <name>K Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 375<lb/> <name>Charles F Blattan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Gebhart</name> filed. Answer of <name>Blattan</name> and <name>Bosse</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Louis Bosse</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Gebhardt</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Samuel</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>Security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lafayette Banking Company</name><lb/> vs 500<lb/> <name>Horatio Page</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Wicks</name> et al<lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Jno J Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="313" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0320.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name> et al<lb/> vs 501<lb/> <name>Amand Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 237<lb/> <name>Andrew A Lebeau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 348<lb/> <name>Andrew A Lebeau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Fallon</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>John Shechan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for security for costs and separate answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo B Murray</name><lb/> vs 359<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Boone</name><lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Holliday</name><lb/> vs 384<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Cavaroe</name> et al<lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rufus K Sanders</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>B Rice</name> admr<lb/> vs 497<lb/> <name>Louis Hofmeister</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthias Steitz</name><lb/> vs 481<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Boylan</name><lb/> vs 227<lb/> <name>Robt S Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 811<lb/> <name>John Mandeville</name></head>
            <p>Continued to next term on application of State.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs 509<lb/> <name>Michael Kemp</name> and <name>Philip Gabhart</name></head>
            <p>On Indictment for Rioting.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles G Mauro</name>, Esq, Circuit Attorney, who prose<lb/>cutes for the State and by leave of Court says he will not further prosecute said<lb/> indictment against said defendants but voluntarily suffer the same to be discon<lb/>tinued: therefore it is considered by the Court that the said defendants be acquitted<lb/> and go hence without day.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="314" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0321.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-08">Wednesday February 8th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>C W Decker</name> is, on motion of <name>Chester Harding, Jr</name>, admitted and enrolled as member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S Fife</name>, <name>George J Hubbard</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry F Vogel</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Richard C Shackelford</name></head>
            <p>Order for production of book.</p>
            <p>The defendants petition for an order for production of book being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court, it is ordered that the<lb/> plaintiff <name>Mathew S Fife</name>, produce on the trial of this cause<lb/> the book containing their account with defendant or show cause<lb/> why the same should not be produced.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Metzgar</name><lb/> vs 248<lb/> <name>Peter Wegman</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended to the eleventh instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Sun Mutual Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>Sigismund R Mendell</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended to the thirteenth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ruben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>Morris Cahn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof Service.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file satisfactory proof of service of copy<lb/> of petition and notice of suit upon defendant, <name>Cahn</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication made herein has been published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loring P Hawes</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Patterson</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>James H Parker</name></head>
            <p>Until the eighteenth instant is given said garnishee to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, <name>Henry Pilkington</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel P Pilkington</name>, although duly summoned and called, come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition<lb/> herein is taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>Luther Case</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, <name>Henry Pilcher</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>German Saving Institution</name><lb/> vs 438.<lb/> <name>Louis Rosse</name> et al</head>
            <p>One week additional time is given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Mutual Marine Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 285<lb/> <name>Louis Pechmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, <name>Louis Pech<lb/>mann</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="315" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0322.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Scanlan</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs file a bond for costs with <name>William Thomas</name>, as security, which bond<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Peabody</name> et al<lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defaults, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhammer</name><lb/> vs 173<lb/> <name>Frederick A Garlichs</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants <name>Frederick A<lb/> Garlichs</name> and <name>Nimrod Beck</name>, although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore the petition is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Curie</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>Geo E Curie</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 119<lb/> <name>Edward W Holloway</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Kreienheder</name><lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>August H George</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause dismissed<lb/> at the costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Larkin</name><lb/> vs 275<lb/> <name>Patrick M Cann</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the time allowed him as<lb/> to do, therefore on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, it is ordered that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri upon the<lb/> relation of <name>James McDonough</name><lb/> vs 400<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this suit be dis<lb/>missed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff, by<lb/> leave of Court, withdraws the bondsuedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri upon the<lb/> relation of <name>James McDonough</name><lb/> vs 401<lb/> <name>Pierre Chouteau</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff, by leave of<lb/> Court, withdraws the bond sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The demurer to the petition being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered that said demurer as to jurisdiction be<lb/> overruled and as to form of pleading be sustained. Six days are<lb/> given the plaintiff to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name> amend.</head>
            <p>The demurer to the petition being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered as to jurisdiction and as sustained as<lb/> to the form of pleading. Six days are given the plaintiff to<lb/> amend.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    

    
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="316" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0323.tiff"/>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">George C Sorrell et al vs Andrew Jainter <!--"58" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Dismissal <lb/>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that <lb/>this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Isham Shaw vs Augustus H Evans<!--"456" next to bracket--></head>
        <bibl><relatedItem target="ccr1860.06905.058.xml"/></bibl>
        <p>Now come the parties and file an agreement, and the Court appoints John Jackson <lb/>next friend and gaurdian ad liten of plaintiff and said Jackson files his acceptance <lb/>of said appointment</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Julia Shaw vs Augustus H Evans<!--"457" next to bracket--></head>
        <bibl><relatedItem target="ccr1860.06906.020.xml"/></bibl>
        <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and file an agreement and the <lb/>Court appoints John Jackson next friend and guardian ad liten of plaintiff and <lb/>said Jackson files his acceptance of said appointment.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">James M Franciscus vs Bernard M Smith et al<!--"237" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Dismissal <lb/>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this <lb/>cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor. Plaintiff <lb/>by leave of Court withdraw the note sued on.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Richard R Field et al vs Charles Rludas et al<!--"353" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>On motion of plaintiffs it is ordered that an alias summons <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> for defendants <lb/>Rludas and Rurrach</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Richard R Field et al vs Charles Packhaus<!--"354" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>On motion of plaintiffs it is ordered that an alias summons <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> herein</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Mary Cayward vs George F Hartwell<!--"506" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Dismissal <lb/>On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is ordered that this cause be <choice><orig>dismisfed</orig><reg>dismissed</reg></choice> <lb/>at plaintiffs costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor. Plaintiff by leave of Court <lb/>withdraws the original order sued on.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">The Southern Bank of St Louis vs Alfred G Moore et al<!--"58" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>The plaintiff files a motion for writ of rendition expends by which being <lb/>seen heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that a  <lb/>writ of rendition exponas <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> to the sheriff of Gallaway County <lb/>as prayed in said <del><unclear unit="chars" quantity="6" rend="overwrite"></unclear>ion</del></p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">The German Saving Institute vs Charles Altinger et al<!--"427" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Dismissal <lb/>On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is ordered by the Court that <lb/>this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">The German Savings Institution vs Charles Altinger et al<!--"430" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Dismissal <lb/>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause <lb/>be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution <choice><orig>ifue</orig><reg>issue</reg></choice> therefor.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">Mechanis Bank vs Charles Altinger et al<!--"304" next to bracket--></head>
        <p>Answer filed.</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">John N Straat vs Wm Nible</head>
        <p>Interrogatories filed</p>
    </div2>
    <div2 rend="horizontal">
        <head rend="bracketed">John W Nederberg vs Benjamin Mercardier et al</head>
        <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
    </div2>
</div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="317" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0324.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> vs 562<lb/> <name>James L Gage</name>.</head>
            <p>In compliance with an order of this Court made in the matter and<lb/> upon filling of the first report of said receivership, to wit, on the <date when="1860-02-03">3rd<lb/> day of February A D 1860</date> said plaintiff comes and acknowledges<lb/> to have received on account of the judgment in the above entitled cause<lb/> the sum of two hundred and seventy seven dollars and ninety cents, being the proceeds of a judgment obtained<lb/> by him as such Receiver in said Circuit Court against <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road<lb/> Company</name> and <name>James L Gage</name> as defendants, on the <date when="1859-03-08">8th day of March, AD, 1859</date>, and it is ordered<lb/> that a credit be entered upon said judgment first above mentioned of two hundred and seventy seven<lb/> dollars and ninety cents as of the <date when="1859-05-19">19th day of May AD 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name>, <name>John Burns</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day the said plaintiff come in Court and in pur<lb/>suance of the order heretofore made by the Court upon him as<lb/> such <name>Receiver</name> upon motion of said plaintiff a remittitur is<lb/> entered upon the judgment heretofore obtained in this cause in<lb/> this court, to wit; upon the <date when="1859-03-08">8th day of March 1859</date>, which remittitur is of and for the sum of five<lb/> hundred and thirty two dollars as of the date of rendition of said judgment and said plaintiff further<lb/> shows to the Court that in compliance with the further order of the Court upon him as such <name>Receiver</name><lb/> he has assigned to <name>Mathias Steitz</name> and <name>Hiram Shaw</name> all his right interest and demand of in and to<lb/> said judgment and the remaining amount due thereon, and acknowledge to have received from said <name>Steitz</name><lb/> and Shaw their obligation for ten hundred and ninety six dollars and sixteen cents payable in said<lb/> order required as the consideration of said assignment; which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amedee Valle</name> et al<lb/> vs 131<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Compton</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Compton</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 373.<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Company</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Missouri Spinning Company</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Louis Bosse</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm W Holloway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nelson H Powers</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Common</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philipp Walther</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Norbury</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Deposition for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm O Osborne</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="318" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0325.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Parmenic Marbow</name>, whose identity is proven by <name>M L Gray</name> and <name>W S Glanville</name>, examined under oath<lb/> for that purpose, acknowledges in open Court the execution of a deed to <name>Ann Broadwater</name> for the purposes<lb/> in said deed mentioned.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Heinrich Busemeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>Jas Hyman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knobelsdorff</name> et al<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out parts of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Picot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moies</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 304<lb/> <name>Chas Altinger</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for<lb/> judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Bourgoin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W Seubert</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs interrogatories, and the Pacific Rail Road, garnishee, files on<lb/> answer thereto, and the plaintiff files a denieal of said answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 373<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Co</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant files an<lb/> answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a motion to strike out the answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 375<lb/> <name>Charles F Blatton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answers filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Bailey</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of Jones filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Jno B Parsons</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Nard Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rollin Richmond</name><lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="319" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0326.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Geist</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Said defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5055, 84.<lb/> to bear 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Humphreys</name>, <name>Lucius H Terry</name>,<lb/> <name>Dent G Tutt</name> and <name>John F Baker</name><lb/> vs 42<lb/> <name>Elias Barbee</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of first thousand and fifty five dollars and eighty four<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#340, 67.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 477<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>, <name>Caspar Schmelter</name>,<lb/> <name>Johann Schmitz</name> and <name>Bernard Heidecker</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but make default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty dol<lb/>lars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#243, 00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Couch</name>.<lb/> #1, 87 remitted<lb/> 29p283</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Bart</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>George Couch</name>, <name>John L Chandler</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas J Patterson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendants <name>John L Chandler</name> and <name>Thomas J Patton</name>, and confessing the<lb/> counterclaim of forty three dollars and fifty cents set up in the answer of<lb/> defendant, moves the Court for judgment said answer, which after due<lb/> consideration by the Court is sustained: and the Court finds that after deducting the said Counter claim, the<lb/> defendant, <name>George Couch</name>, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty three dollars on ac<lb/>count of the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. And the plaintiff files an assignment of said judgment to <name>George Marshall</name><lb/> Thereupon comes the defendant <name>Couch</name> and files a motion to set aside judgment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#396, 65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 440<lb/> <name>Joseph Strautman</name>, <name>Ferdinand Stouvener</name>,<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name> and <name>Caspar Smelter</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition is taken against them as confessed: and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and ninety six dollars and<lb/> sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#229, 75.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John N Straat</name><lb/> vs 130<lb/> <name>William Wible</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, in person, but the defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which the action is</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="320" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0327.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dol<lb/>lars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Bulte</name><lb/> and <name>Mathias Backer</name><lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>William Bender</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of two hundred and seventy five dollars and<lb/> thirty three cents on account of goods waves and merchandize sold<lb/> and delivered by the plaintiffs to the firm of <name>Bender</name> and <name>Rohlhas</name> and for rent, and that his property has<lb/> been attached and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day<lb/> thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered against him and his property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the St Louis<lb/> Herald a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#120, 65</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emile Blome</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Lindenschmidt</name><lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>John Higgins</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff by their attorney, and also comes the defendant and files an answer<lb/> confessing himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars<lb/> and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#314, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The German Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Berthold Vennewitz</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Phend</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of three hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also the costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name> et al<lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Heinrich Schmitz</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Esq, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a statement<lb/> from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein will<lb/> be attended with great lose and upon before the probable termination of this suit and<lb/> the said property is like to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property accor<lb/>ding to law and that he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#366, 03.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and <name>Jon W Luke</name><lb/> vs 432<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed: and the Court find from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and sixty dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#294, 01.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Eads</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Ralph P Voorhis</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert C Totter</name> and<lb/> <name>Levis Morris</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and ninety four dollars and one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="321" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0328.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1024, 43.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Humphreys</name>, <name>Thomas E Tutt</name><lb/> and <name>Lucius H Terry</name><lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>J H Singleton</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of ten hundred and twenty four dollars<lb/> and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#323, 55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Zimmermann</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name>, <name>Henry D Bacon</name>,<lb/> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty three dollars and fifty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1480, 58</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Henry Thayer</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and eighty<lb/> dollars and fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1379, 46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William P Rockhill</name> surviving<lb/> partner of <name>Rockhill and Company</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Simon Downing</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and seventy nine dollars and forty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#163, 62</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Ellis</name><lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>John Finnerty</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and sixty three dollars and sixty two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#205, 33.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spotswood Josiah Dodge</name><lb/> vs 347<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and five dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="322" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0329.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#505, 09</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernst C Anglerodt</name><lb/> and <name>Robert Barth</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant withdraws<lb/> his answer herein and the parties agree that judgment may be rendered in favor of<lb/> the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the sum of five hundred and five<lb/> dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this be<lb/>half expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#173, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leo Lepere</name><lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>Joseph K Bent</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seventy three dollars<lb/> and eleven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#231, 05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Downey</name><lb/> vs 405<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name><lb/> <name>John Burnes</name> and<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also come the defendants <name>English</name> and<lb/> <name>Burns</name> and withdraw their answer, thereupon the defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and being now solemnly called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and thirty one dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3360, 00<lb/> set aside<lb/> 29 p 370</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Dougherty</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>S Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand three hundred<lb/> and sixty dollars. It is therefore considered that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1055, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Jackson</name><lb/> vs 410<lb/> <name>Daniel Able</name> and<lb/> <name>Barton Able</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten<lb/> hundred and fifty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#248, 85<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name><lb/> and <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs 235<lb/> <name>James W Wren</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and forty eight dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs in this behalf expended and have execution thereof and it is ordered that this judg<lb/>ment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="323" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0330.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#315, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Loker</name> and <name>William N Loker</name><lb/> vs 252<lb/> <name>Charles R Anderson</name>, <name>Ralph P Voorhees</name><lb/> <name>Robert C Totter</name> and <name>Morris</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum or three hundred and fifteen dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#210, 25.<lb/> asset<lb/> <name>Thornburgh</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marshall P Sangiunett</name><lb/> vs 219<lb/> <name>J B Joseph</name> and<lb/> <name>Josiah Thornburgh</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses this suit as to<lb/> the defendant, <name>J B Jessup</name>, but the defendant, <name>Josiah Thornburgh</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum or two hundred and ten dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#554, 08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jeremiah D Law</name><lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>Joseph K Bent</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fifty four<lb/> dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#639, 57<lb/> agst all except<lb/> <name>McK &amp; R</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name> and <name>William H Campbell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew H Alexander</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> H Gratz</name>, <name>John McKinnon</name> and <name>Jacob<lb/> Ratheon</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and file satis<lb/>factory proof that the order of publication has been pub<lb/>lished, according to law, and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>John McKinnon</name> and <name>Jacob Rathvon</name>, but the<lb/> defendants, <name>Carry Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name>, and <name>Henry<lb/> H Gratz</name>, although duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Six hundred and thirty nine<lb/> dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#177, 42</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Mitchell</name>, <name>Frederick Rammelsberg</name>,<lb/> and <name>William Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>William O Wolf</name> and <name>John Gunsollis</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and seventy dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="324" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0331.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#415, 121/2<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Thomas</name><lb/> vs 394<lb/> <name>Henry Greise</name>,<lb/> <name>Valentine Doll</name> and<lb/> <name>Charlotte Griese</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes he parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement and<lb/> consent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plain<lb/>tiff for the sum of four hundred and fifteen dollars and twelve and one half<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per<lb/> annum from this date. By consent of parties execution is stayed four months from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#544, 50<lb/> &amp; 8 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Sumpf</name><lb/> vs 372<lb/> <name>Henry Koch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fort four dollars and fifty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of her defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have thereof execution; and it is ordered that this judgment<lb/> bear interest at the rate of eight percent per annum for this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200, 94.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand A Reuss</name> and<lb/> <name>Constance J Peipers</name><lb/> vs 371<lb/> <name>George Kleiburg</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred dollars and ninety four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of her defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#565, 39<lb/> agst.<lb/> <name>Outley</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marc Vaissier</name><lb/> vs 208<lb/> <name>John J Outley</name> and<lb/> <name>Leonard R Sargent</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant <name>Leonard R Sargent</name>, but the defendant, <name>John J Outley</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called cones not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and sixty five<lb/> dollars and thirty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is<lb/> ordered that this judgment bear at the rate often percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#789, 47.</note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mahlon Williamson</name>, <name>Oliver H Williamson</name><lb/> <name>Samuel M Anderson</name>, and <name>Henry C Potter</name><lb/> vs 271<lb/> <name>John Cooper</name> and <name>James Johnston</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hund<lb/>dred and eighty nine dollars and forty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#438, 60</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>John P Callahan</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Haden</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick A Hasselmann</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrment in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="325" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0332.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty eight dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of her defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1117, 64<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gaitans Fopians</name><lb/> vs 417<lb/> <name>Louis Charleville</name>,<lb/> <name>Solomon H Robbins</name><lb/> and <name>Conrad Mast</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant, <name>Louis<lb/> Charleville</name>, by leave of Court amends his answer by adding an affidavit thereto,<lb/> and the parties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court doth find thereform that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and seventeen dollars and sixty<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution; and it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#274, 23.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Pike</name> and<lb/> <name>Philipp Pike</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>M A O'Rourke</name></head>
            <p>On Bills of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy four dollars and twenty three cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of her defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#408, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Fisse</name> and <name>Theodore Kalb</name><lb/> vs 453.<lb/> <name>James Sullivan</name>, <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>,<lb/> <name>Caspar Schmelter</name> and <name>Johann Schmitz</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, where<lb/>fore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and eight dollars and sixteen cents. It<lb/> in therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#264, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 267<lb/> <name>John Bowell</name> and<lb/> <name>Christoph Nieman</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrum<lb/>ent in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are<lb/> indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two hundred and sixty four dollars and ninety cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#735, 77.<lb/> agst all except<lb/> <name>Gisler</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Fisse</name> and <name>Theodore Kalb</name><lb/> vs 452<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>, <name>Caspar Schmelter</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam Diefenbach</name>, <name>Michael Sutter</name><lb/> and <name>Peter Gisler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, an dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Peter Gisler</name>, but the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Michael Diefenbatch</name>, <name>Caspar Schmeltor</name>, <name>Adam<lb/> Diefenbach</name> and <name>Michael Sutter</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> seven hundred and thirty five dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="326" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0333.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#4663, 35.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernst C Angelrodt</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Barth</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four thousand six hundred and sixty three dollars and thirty five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1268, 80<lb/> 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Parsons</name> and<lb/> <name>J Whitney Farlin</name><lb/> vs 407<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/>ken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of twelve hundred and sixty eight dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. and it is ordered by the Court that this judg<lb/>ment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#222, 00<lb/> agst <name>Voorhies</name><lb/> and <name>Totter</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Moses T Meeker</name><lb/> vs 479<lb/> <name>Ralph P Voorhies</name>, <name>Robert C Totter</name>,<lb/> and <name>Lewis Morris</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>Louis Morris</name>, but the defendants, <name>Voorhies</name><lb/> and <name>Totter</name>, although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty two dollars. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#424, 59.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 419<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name>, <name>Caspar Smelter</name>,<lb/> and <name>Johann Schmitz</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney,<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty<lb/> four dollars and fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#638, 00<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Porter</name> and <name>Edward C White</name><lb/> vs 230<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and thirty eight dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. and it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#267, 25<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander McKean</name><lb/> vs 471<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="327" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0334.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and sixty seven dollar and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor. and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten percent per annum<lb/> interest form this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#566, 66<lb/> 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caneira Watts</name><lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>Herman Fette</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry A Fette</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and sixty six dollars and sixty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that<lb/> this judgment bear interest at the rate often percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1137, 00,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of<lb/> <name>Edward B Phelps</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Albert G Edward</name>, <name>Ferdinand Rozier Jr</name>,<lb/> and <name>Richard P HanenKamp</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> a Jury, to wit; <name>Thomas M Yates</name>, <name>B H Batte</name>, <name>Wm Boothe</name>,<lb/> <name>Hermann Eisenhart</name>, <name>W L Hickmann</name>, <name>Robert Anderson</name>,<lb/> <name>B Venewitz</name>, <name>Geo Alvires</name>, <name>A L Hamilton</name>, <name>Thomas Martin</name>,<lb/> <name>F Stilwell</name> and <name>Amos Currie</name>, Twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progresses<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid as they find for the plaintiff and assess<lb/> his damages at the sum of four hundred and ninety five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of eleven hundred and thirty seven dollars, the penalty of the<lb/> bond sued on, and also his costs and charges herein expended and that he have execution for the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#508, 50.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Rice</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Bartholomew Rice</name><lb/> vs 498<lb/> <name>Julius Uhlenhuth</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and eight dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1111, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Clark</name>, <name>Luther C Clark</name>.<lb/> <name>Edward Dodge</name> and <name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs 408<lb/> <name>John W Wimer</name>, <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>,<lb/> and <name>Rassin E Smith</name></head>
            <p>On Bill Of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of eleven hundred and eleven dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#630, 33.<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent<lb/> set aside 29p 440</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander McKean</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but make<lb/> default, wherefore</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="328" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0335.tiff"/>
        <p>the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred<lb/> and thirty dollar and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest.</p>
        <div2>
            <note>#1273, 00<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name><lb/> vs 293<lb/> <name>James Castello</name>, <name>John M Wimer</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twelve hundred and seventy three dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that by the Court that<lb/> this judgment bear interest at the rate often percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#582, 32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William N Suitzer</name>, <name>Abraham G Switzer</name><lb/> and <name>John M platt</name><lb/> vs 308<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>, <name>William Haight</name>,<lb/> <name>John O'Brien</name> and <name>Michael O Brien</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as con<lb/>fessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and eighty two dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#557, 80<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Conway</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name>, <name>James D Houseman</name><lb/> and <name>Henry F Watson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> fifty seven dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and<lb/> it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate often percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#557, 50<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Conway</name><lb/> vs 233.<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name> and<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and fifty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten per cent percent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Hedenberg</name><lb/> vs 411<lb/> <name>Benjamin Mercardier</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the parties, except <name>Heggi</name> and <name>Vogel</name>, by their respective attor<lb/>ney, and the said defendant to having filed answer to rule for produc<lb/>tion of books and papers denying on oath the possession or control<lb/> thereof, and the Court heaving heard the evidence offered by the parties, doth order that the said<lb/> rule for the production of books and paper be vacated.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="329" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0336.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as<lb/> such Sheriff in favor of <name>Oliver Joyal</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Dan<lb/>iel Perreault</name> of in and to the following decribed real estate situate lying and being in the City and County<lb/> of St Louis, State of Missouri; eighteen (18) Feet front on the Western line of Second Street, and running<lb/> tack Westwardly from said Second Street one hundred and fifty feet more or less, bounded on the East<lb/> by Second Street, on the North by an alley eight (8) feet wide, as required to be opened by the terms of the<lb/> will of <name>Elizabeth Morin</name>, <name>Cora Aubuchon</name>, widow of the late <name>Baptiste Morin</name>, on the West by one<lb/> <name>Smith</name>, and on the South by the remainder of the lot of ground acquired by <name>Antoine Morin</name> by will<lb/> from <name>Elizabeth Morin</name> aforesaid recorded in Book M page 60 and being the same premises acquired<lb/> by said <name>Daniel Perreault</name> of <name>Antoine Morin</name> by deed dated <date when="1856-08-25">25th of august, 1856</date>; Sold under and<lb/> by virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of St Louis Circuit Court in favor of <name>Pelagie<lb/> Morin</name> adminisratrix of <name>Antoine Morin</name> against <name>Daniel Perreault</name> returnable at the <date when="1860-02">February Term<lb/> 1860</date> ofsaid Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes in Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> by him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>William Cuddy</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and property<lb/> of <name>Isaac T Greene</name> of in and to the following described real estate to wit lying and being in the City of St Louis<lb/> County of St Louis State of Missouri; four lots of ground in East Union addition numbered 39, 40,<lb/> 41 and 42, of Block no 2 ofsaid addition, ninety seven feet eleven inches on Wright street, by a depth<lb/> of one hundred and thirteen feet ten inches to an alley fourteen feet wide, bounded North alley, West<lb/> Eighteenth Street, South Wright Street, East lot No 38 belonging to <name>J S M Cune</name>; Sold under and by<lb/> virtue of an execution issued from the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court in favor of <name>James A<lb/> Monks</name> against <name>Isaac T Greene</name> and <name>Franklin Weston</name> returnable to the <date when="1860-02">February Term 1860</date>. </p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff of St Louis County, in open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed by<lb/> him as such Sheriff in favor of <name>William Clark</name> for all the right, title, interest, claim, estate and<lb/> property<lb/> of <name>Isaac T Greene</name> of in and to the following described property Situate in the County of St Louis<lb/> State Of Missouri; to wit; a lot of land known as Survey 1,909, as confirmed to <name>William Massey</name> under<lb/> <name>Ezekiel Lard</name> and lying in Ferdinand Township; also, forty seven feet on the east side of Main street by a<lb/> depth of one hundred feet un Block No 233, bounded South Spaulding, North Brotherton, East self, and West<lb/> Main Street; also fort three feet more or less fronting on Florida street in said block by a depth of one<lb/> hundred thirty seven feet and six inches, bounded North McKee, South Florida street, East Gorey, and<lb/> West Spaulding, Brotherton and self; Sold under and by virtue of an execution issued from the<lb/> Office of the Clerk of he St Louis circuit Court in favor of <name>James A Monks</name> and against<lb/> <name>Isaac T Greene</name> and others, returnable to the <date when="1860-02">February Term 1860</date> of said Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="330" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0337.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-09">Thursday February 9th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#98, 65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Ford</name><lb/> vs 280<lb/> <name>John W Rice</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ninety eight<lb/> dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Branson</name><lb/> vs 260<lb/> <name>Robert Scott</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa</name> alias <name>Louisa Lewis</name><lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Swales</name> et al<lb/> vs 508<lb/> <name>Henry Quatman</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boston Belting Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2111, 20.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mackenzie</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and<lb/> <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, <name>Stewart</name> and <name>Michael</name>, but the defendant, <name>Mackenzie</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Two thousand one hundred and eleven dollars, and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3166, 80<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mackenzie</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> and<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants, Stewart but the defendant, <name>Mackenzie</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand one<lb/> hundred and sixty six dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2058, 88</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fretelin Senn</name><lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Hermann Pohll</name> and<lb/> <name>Hermann Nethe</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said<lb/> defendants as confessed; and the Court finds the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and five dollars and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="331" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0338.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanic Bank</name><lb/> vs 265.<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name>, <name>George B Michael</name>,<lb/> <name>Rassin E Smith</name> and <name>David H Bishop</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed; on motion this ordered<lb/> that the foregoing interlowtory judgment be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#950, 04</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 265<lb/> <name>Kenneth MacKenzie</name>, <name>George B Michael</name>,<lb/> <name>Rassin E Smith</name> and <name>David H Bishop</name></head>
            <p>on note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and moves the<lb/> Court for judgment not with standing the answer herein, which<lb/> motion, is taken due consideration by the Court, sustained;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars and four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Louis Bosse</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, and on its motion the demur<lb/>rer of the defendant <name>Blattau</name> is stricken out, and the said defen<lb/>dant <name>Charles F Blattau</name>, failing to answer makes default, and<lb/> the defendant <name>Louis Bosse</name> although duly summoned and called comes but makes default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1182, 58<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bissell</name>,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D Booge</name><lb/> vs 30<lb/> <name>James L Bissell</name> and<lb/> <name>Edwin K Stevens</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismissed this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant Stevens, and moves the Court for Judgment notwithstanding the demurrer herein<lb/> which motion is after due consideration by the Court sustained; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and eighty two dollars and fifty eight cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt a foresaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>The President and Directors of the<lb/> Bank of Louisville</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#404, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip S Justice</name>, <name>John V Beam Jr</name><lb/> <name>Philip Wilson</name> and <name>J How</name> and <name>Metchell</name><lb/> vs 398<lb/> <name>Thomas J Albright</name> and <name>William A Albright</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not but<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and four dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt a foresaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 315<lb/> <name>The Merchants Insurance<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 316<lb/> <name>City Fire Insurance<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="332" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0339.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#213, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zeb F Wetzell</name> and<lb/> <name>Oths Wetzell</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>George B Field</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their respective attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and thirteen dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2590, 64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac L Falk</name> and <name>George Falk</name><lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>Samuel Michal</name> and <name>Isaac Michael</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of twenty five hundred and ninety dollars and sixty four cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#709, 70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin E Cole</name><lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Charles D Ellis</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and nine dollars and<lb/> seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#241, 33</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name><lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty one dollars and thirty three cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1312, 51</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leroy M Wiley</name>, <name>Hugh R Banks</name><lb/> <name>William G Lane</name>, <name>Henry Vandergre</name><lb/> and <name>Edward H Lane</name><lb/> vs 192<lb/> <name>Charles Creely</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although<lb/> duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen<lb/> hundred and twelve dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>M D Palmer</name><lb/> vs 476<lb/> <name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, <name>Fassett</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default. Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, <name>John Reilly</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="333" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0340.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#372, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Schneider</name> and <name>Leon Vion</name><lb/> vs 458<lb/> <name>Griffin P Theobald</name>, <name>Edgar R Montgomery</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel C Sayers</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dants, although duly summoned and called, come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/> ken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy two dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore consid<lb/> ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#842, 07</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Overstolz</name><lb/> vs 296<lb/> <name>Frederick Maw</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighty hundred and forty<lb/> two dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#210, 43.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Enders</name><lb/> vs 284<lb/> <name>Adolph Gudath</name> and<lb/> <name>William Balz</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is ta<lb/>ken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and ten dollars and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant to the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note># 516, 23.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles C Whittelsey</name><lb/> vs 415<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and<lb/> <name>William Sigerson</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and sixteen dollars and<lb/> twenty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 334<lb/> <name>Thomas F Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the defen<lb/>dants <name>Thomas F Smith</name> and <name>George Weissinger</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1182, 30<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moore</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>James Moore</name> and <name>Martin O Walker</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, land dis<lb/>miss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Walker</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>James Moore</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against the said defendant, <name>James Moore</name>, as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> said defendant, <name>James Moore</name>, is indebted to said plaintiffs in just and full sum of one<lb/> thousand one hundred and eighty two dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the said plaintiffs, <name>Stephen Haskell</name> and <name>James M Franciscus</name>, recover of said defendant, <name>James<lb/> Moore</name>, the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="334" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0341.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#324, 37</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>George A Phegley</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and<lb/> twenty four dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the dependant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Eliza Michaw</name><lb/> vs 873<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that <name>P B Garesche</name> and<lb/> <name>R A Bakewell</name> summoned herein garnishee be discharged plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#402, 40<lb/> vs<lb/> Arnot</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name>, and <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 380<lb/> <name>George B Boomer</name>, <name>George G Pride</name> and<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendants, <name>Boomer</name> and <name>Pride</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>Jesse Arnot</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not that make default, wherefore the petition<lb/>herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and two<lb/> dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#523, 68<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>McIlvain</name><lb/> and <name>Ross</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah A Gaylord</name><lb/> vs 405<lb/> <name>Robert McIlvain</name>,<lb/> <name>Archidemus R Ross</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas F Smith</name></head>
            <p>on note</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant Smith, by the defendants, <name>Robert McIlvain</name>, and <name>Archidenus<lb/> R Rose</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty three dollars and sixty<lb/> eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#715, 52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Schenek</name><lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifteen dollars and fifty two cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#715, 52</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Schenck</name><lb/> vs 463<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff the petition herein is taken against said defendant as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifteen dollars and fifty<lb/> two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="335" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0342.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Porter Stewart Co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Moto discharge garnishee <name>James F Gules</name> filed.</p>
            <p>Motion to discharge garnishee <name>A O Brannin &amp; Co</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J W Newland</name><lb/> vs 152<lb/> <name>Singleton Paxton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of garnishees <name>Francis Whittaker</name> and <name>S H Jenkens</name>, by attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that they be discharged hence at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefore. Five dollars is allowed each for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2145, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekiel M Campbell</name>, <name>John Crain</name>,<lb/> and <name>Wallace W Blackman</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name>,<lb/> and <name>Joseph O Shelly</name></head>
            <p>On bill of exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/>that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two<lb/> thousand one hundred and forty seven dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants to the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2145, 26</note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekiel M Campbell</name>, <name>John Crain</name>,<lb/> and <name>Wallace W Blackman</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Cary Gratz</name>, <name>Andrew J Alexander</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry H Gratz</name></head>
            <p>On bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory<lb/> to the Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly<lb/> published according to law, but the defendants although duly warned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of twenty one hundred and forty five dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name> trading under the name style<lb/> of <name>John B Valle and Company</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and suggests to the<lb/> Court the death of the defendant, <name>Michael S Cure</name>, since to<lb/> commencement of this suit which is not denied; thereupon<lb/> comes <name>Chavin V Le Beau</name> Executor of said <name>Cere</name>, by his<lb/> attorney, and enters his appearance as defendant in this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, a dedimus is awarded it to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburgh</name> et al<lb/> vs 759<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, a dedimus is awarded it to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs 798<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, a dedimus is awarded it to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Geist</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Philip Walther</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave of Court files interrogatories herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="336" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0343.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#654, 51<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Comstock</name><lb/> vs 186<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name> and<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty four dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore consider<lb/>ed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#564, 70<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hassinger</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Billon</name><lb/> vs 336<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> and<lb/> <name>George J Ring</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>George J King</name>, but the defendant, <name>William Hassinger</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court find from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and sixty four dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Neptune Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 328<lb/> <name>Conway Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 329<lb/> <name>State Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Cline</name> et al<lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>John Mathew</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Y Reeder</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Thomas P Shallcross</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleager P Pettes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W Cook</name> and <name>Geo Matthews</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Heinrich Buesmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p><name>Maria Inn Zimmerer</name> garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W Cook</name> &amp; <name>Geo Matthew</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt Davis</name> et al<lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>Jas S Sullivan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis Building Savings Association</name><lb/> vs 378<lb/> <name>Joseph La Barge Jr</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a motion to strike out part of answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel T Wright</name> and <name>Turner Maddox</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and acknowledge to<lb/> have received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno P Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno G Priest</name> et al</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>E W Barnes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="337" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0344.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph O Sawyer</name><lb/> vs 342<lb/> <name>John Hogan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney and with the consent of defendants, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefore. Plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the note and<lb/> protest herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittiter</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Borell</name> and <name>Christopher Nieman</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, by attorney, remits to defendants the sum of one dollar<lb/> part and parcel of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W C Walker</name> et al<lb/> vs 80<lb/> <name>Chas Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amelia Carman</name> admr<lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>Wm Etherton</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Graham</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachman</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>John Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Chilton</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachman</name><lb/> no. 172/2<lb/> <name>John Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>Otis<lb/> West</name>, <name>A Fisher</name>, <name>C E King</name>, <name>John Griffith</name>, <name>F Ringling</name>, <name>Peter Sharkey</name>, <name>C Muller</name>, <name>N<lb/> Covington</name>, <name>Patrick Hart</name>, <name>A L Roland</name>, <name>William H Finch</name>, &amp; <name>F Suhr</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to by the trial pro<lb/>gress and being finished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="338" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0345.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-10">Friday February 10th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horatio N Heald</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton Y Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 423<lb/> <name>The Great Western Fire and<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton Y Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>The Farmers Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eben Goodwin</name> et al<lb/> vs 273.<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marine Bank of Chicago</name><lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>James R Bull</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants cost.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Bohn</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Fredk Bohn</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#17, 00<lb/> vs<lb/> Pltff.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>West Richardson</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>James George</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors, empanelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict upon<lb/> their oaths say they find for the defendant and assess his damages at seventeen<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by hi suit in this be<lb/>half but that the defendant go thereof without day and recover of the plaintiff the damages aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application of<lb/> <name>William E Wilson</name> for Deed<lb/> from<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff for<lb/> property sold by <name>M S Cure</name> late<lb/> Sheriff, deceased</head>
            <p>Order on Sheriff to execute Deed.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>William E Wilson</name> and the Court having heard<lb/> his application at this day filed for a deed herein and being satis<lb/>fied that the purchase money for the real estate sold as men<lb/>tioned in said application has been properly paid doth order<lb/> that <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> now Sheriff of St Louis Country<lb/> do proceed to execute and acknowledge a deed to the said<lb/> <name>William E Wilson</name> for the said real estate which said deed shall recited the facts pertaining to<lb/> this proceedings.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno A Goodlett</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> et al<lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 136<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="339" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0346.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Whitehill</name> and <name>John W Hathaway</name><lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>John Kopp</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is order<lb/> that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him for the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and sixty me dollars and forty nine cents, on account of three promissory notes executed and delivered<lb/> by the defendant to the plaintiffs, under the name of <name>John Whitehill and Company</name>, and that his proper<lb/>ty has been attached, and unless he appear at the next teem of this Court to be begun and held at the City<lb/> of St Louis within and for the Country of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next and on or before<lb/> the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered<lb/> against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published according to law in the Missouri Republican a newspaper printed and published in the<lb/> City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Hoffmeister</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> <name>John Lady</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> et al<lb/> vs 829<lb/> <name>John B Valle</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caspar Wieganel</name><lb/> vs 449<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lemuel H Paston</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bussmeyer</name></head>
            <p>On motion of garnishees, <name>John Nicholi</name> and <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name>, by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered that they be discharged hence, for want of interrogatories, at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of five dollars is<lb/> allowed each of them for appearing herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Peabody</name> et al<lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Daniel D page</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the interlocutory judgment herein be set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Matthews</name><lb/> vs 566<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file an answer and an exhibit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Fitzgerald</name><lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Maguire</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh McKown</name> et al<lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Maguire</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Rennell</name><lb/> vs 176<lb/> <name>Adam Kilbnger</name></head>
            <p>On motion of garnishee, <name>Bernard Rice</name>, by his attorney, it is ordered that he<lb/> be discharged, for want of interrogatories, at plaintiffs costs and that execution<lb/> issue thereof. Five dollars are allowed for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Walker</name><lb/> vs 385<lb/> <name>J W Farlin</name> and<lb/> <name>John B parsons</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, <name>Farlin</name>, by his attorney, one week additional time<lb/> is given him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="340" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0347.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Davis</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>John W Thornton</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, ten days are given them to an<lb/>swer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Homan</name> et al<lb/> vs 450<lb/> <name>Newton S Gay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>George W Jope</name> et al</head>
            <p>Affidavit of <name>Thomas A Reese</name> lairing property attached filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas K Baker</name> et al<lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>John Bucter</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>John Cool</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#426, 35<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Reilly</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Parker</name> and <name>James H Parker</name><lb/> vs 344<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name> and <name>John Reilly</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Edward Boyle</name>, but the<lb/> defendant, <name>John Reilly</name>, although duly called still makes <lb/> default, wherefore the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and twenty six dol<lb/>lars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have ex<lb/>ecution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#635, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cohick</name> administrator of the<lb/> estate of <name>David M Martin</name><lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>Robert N Martin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of six hundred and thirty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1052, 66<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Conway</name><lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and by leave of Court first had<lb/> files an amended petition, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Thomas<lb/> Campbell</name>, but the defendant, <name>George B Michael</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and fifty two dollars<lb/> and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Horatio N Heald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sigerson</name> and <name>Taylor</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer of <name>Jones</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="341" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0348.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>4<lb/> #851, 40</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Louis Building and Savings<lb/> Association</name>.<lb/> vs 452<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of eight hundred and fifty one dollars and forty cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also its herein expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D Devlin</name> et al<lb/> vs 660<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefore: by leave of Court<lb/> Plaintiffs withdraw the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> et al<lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>A Fitus</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication made herein has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engle</name> administrator<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and wife</head>
            <p><name>Samuel A Bennett</name> Commissioner, files his report notes of testimony<lb/> and exhibits.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Tennille</name><lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>James E Munford</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Cypican M Clamorgan</name> and<lb/> <name>Magennis Clamorgan</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, fifteen days addi<lb/>tional time are given him to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt M Barclay</name><lb/> vs 891<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumbermen Mechanics Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno Lowry</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>St Bt Henrietta</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Naughton</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Francis P Burke</name></head>
            <p>Answer Counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno F Mauntel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carlos S Greelay</name> et al<lb/> vs 449<lb/> <name>The Southern Bank of St Louis</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jno M Krum</name> et al<lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Herman Beisson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and<lb/> for judgment fileds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Cavaroc</name> et al<lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> unless the defendant answers herein within three days a judgment by<lb/> default shall be rendered against him.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="342" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0349.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-11">Saturday February 11th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard A Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Justus Held</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt M Barclay</name><lb/> vs 891<lb/> <name>St Louis Lumbumen &amp; Mechanics Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Curran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Felix Shields</name> and<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Order for Deliver.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendants deliver the property in said affidavit specified to the Sheriff of St Louis Country<lb/> and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it<lb/> from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name> assignee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michel Bourgoin</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> The Pacific Railroad garnishee<lb/> of <name>John W Seubert</name></head>
            <p>Order of Citation.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court, from an inspection of the garnishees answer, that it<lb/> is therein admitted that the defendant <name>John W Seubert</name>, prior the garnish<lb/>ment, recovered a judgment against the garnishee for two thousand dollars, and<lb/>it being alleged that said judgment was by said Seubert, prior to the gar<lb/>nishment, assigned to one <name>Thomas Gauss</name>, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff disputes the valid<lb/>ity of said assignment, it is therefore, on motion of plaintiffs attorney, ordered by the Court, that the said<lb/> <name>Thomas Gauss</name> appear on or before the first Monday of April next and sustain his claim to said judgment<lb/> alleged to have been assigned to him.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa A Gilmore</name><lb/> vs 188<lb/> <name>Andrew Gilmore</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this suit be<lb/> dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Scanlan</name> et al<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, fifteen days additional time are given<lb/> them to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name><lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>Augustus W Eberhard</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cornwell Sage</name><lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Giese</name><lb/> vs 178<lb/> <name>Philip Walther</name></head>
            <p>Plea in statement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Corn</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Benj H Batte</name></head>
            <p>Answer and set off filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Waldron</name> et al<lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>William Dixon</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C Leach</name><lb/> vs 323<lb/> <name>Philip Walther</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Geo Bailey</name><lb/> vs 382<lb/> <name>C Rodney Montague</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Galen Eastman</name><lb/> vs 366<lb/> <name>Perry Fenlason</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="343" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0350.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P Theobald</name> et al<lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Caesar R Montague</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan O Pierce</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>Edwin May</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>J D Low</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Lear</name><lb/> vs 229<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Napoleon R Mullikin</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#197, 71<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Fesseth</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Moses D Palmer</name><lb/> vs 476<lb/> <name>Alonzo D Fassett</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward D Crossman</name></head>
            <p>On Draft.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant <name>Crossment</name>, but the defendant, <name>Fassett</name>, although duly called still makes<lb/> default, wherefore the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of a one<lb/> hundred and ninety seven dollars and seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James R Graham</name> et al<lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Oliver Y Watt</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, one week additional time is given him<lb/> to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos H Yates</name><lb/> vs 215<lb/> <name>Charter D K Life Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Dietrich</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>John I Murdock</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Murdock</name> and <name>Dickson</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh F O Conner</name><lb/> vs 361<lb/> <name>Peter I Hurck</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files an answer and a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W Owings</name><lb/> vs 481<lb/> <name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave of Court files an amended petition and defendant file a de<lb/>murrer thereto.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hitchcock Receiver</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et al</head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 266<lb/> <name>Philipp Schladtweiler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Klein</name> and <name>Wegnnan</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="344" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0351.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 460<lb/> <name>George W Davis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, one week additional time is given<lb/> him to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Penelope Allen</name><lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>George W Davis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, one week additional time is given him<lb/> to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Ferguson</name><lb/> vs 351<lb/> <name>Joseph Garneau</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their, respective attorneys, and in accordance with the agree<lb/>ment hereto fore filed herein it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> each party paying his own costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to the State<lb/> of Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to the State<lb/> of Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel A Bennett Receiver</name><lb/> vs 201<lb/> <name>Alexander L Tyler</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Bailey</name><lb/> vs 194<lb/> <name>Jno Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannibal</name> and <name>St Joseph Rail road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name>, <name>Common wealth Ins Co</name>,<lb/> <name>Quaker City Ins Co</name>, <name>Neptune Ins Co</name>, and <name>Geo K<lb/> Budd</name> garnishees.</head>
            <p>Now come the said garnishees and file answers to<lb/> the interrogatories propounded to them.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isham Shaw</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Shaw</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer to amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 362<lb/> <name>Wilson Guion</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded<lb/> them to Kansas Territory.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Schuler</name><lb/> vs 665<lb/> <name>Henry Klunk</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled. Leave is given the defendant to sue as a poor person.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Francis J Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="345" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0352.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamill</name> et al<lb/> vs 453<lb/> <name>William Poos</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the plaintiff file a goods and sufficient<lb/> bond for costs within ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caspar Kuendig</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>John H Detart</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Russell Scarrett</name> et al<lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Henry E Rhoads</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Fox</name><lb/> vs 442<lb/> City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey Jones</name><lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>Lorenzo H Cordry</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard R Sargent</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>WM W Morris</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Fraser</name><lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>J A Ubsdell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ozro Collins</name><lb/> vs 493<lb/> <name>James M Clark</name> Et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Glenny</name><lb/> vs 866<lb/> <name>Cornelius Voorhies</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pennsylvania Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>Geo W Willard</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Costs</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name> et al<lb/> vs 120<lb/> <name>Thomas S Bryant</name></head>
            <p>The motion for assessment of damages and the value of property being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is sustained, and it is ordered that this<lb/> cause be set for trial on the trial docket for such assessment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> et al<lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Louis Butterfield</name></head>
            <p>The defendant motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas J Norbury</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary R Dufresne</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Henry Dirlam</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 783<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave withdraws the note sued on and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J Glasgow</name> et al<lb/> vs 250<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="345" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0353.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dutchman</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Matthew Rippey</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendant motion for security for costs being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained. Fifteen days are given to file security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Hilton</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>Henry Tirrell</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Kehoe</name><lb/> vs 29<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sandbach</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>John Cool</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert L McGhee</name><lb/> vs 263<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Compton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas C Bailey</name> et al<lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Horace A Conant</name></head>
            <p>Answer fileds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Mutual Marine Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 285<lb/> <name>Louis Pechmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties, the interlocutory judgment herein against the de<lb/>fendant, <name>Louis Pechmann</name>, is set aside and vacated; and by like<lb/> consent said <name>Pechmann</name> files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Said defendant files a plea in abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Said garnishee files an answer to Interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Said garnishee files an answer to Interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Said garnishee files an answer to Interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>August Geise</name><lb/> vs <lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Said garnishee files an answer to Interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John O Fallon</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>John Sheehan</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs herein is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The St Joseph Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 416<lb/> <name>Henry Switzer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Switzer</name> and <name>Carson</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Fitzgerald</name><lb/> vs 387<lb/> <name>Branneck Jones</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of defendant <name>Jones</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="347" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0354.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#290, 01</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J Ulrich Weiss</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defendant<lb/>and file a statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he con<lb/>fesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> ninety dollars and one cent and authorizes the entering up of judgment against<lb/> him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucy Ann Bradley</name><lb/> vs 5<lb/> <name>Charles Bradley</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and affidavit from which it appears to the Court that<lb/> the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri therefore on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil ac<lb/>tion has been commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the ground<lb/> of desertion, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City<lb/> of St Louis within and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next, and on or before<lb/> the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law the petition herein will be taken against<lb/> him as confessed; And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 321<lb/> <name>John Cool</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Service.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court of service<lb/> of notice of suit and copy of petition upon defendant, <name>Abel Janney</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Peter Wegman</name>, Marshall of St Louis County, comes in open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as such Marshall in favor of <name>Archibald Carr</name> and <name>Mortimer Kenneth</name> for all the right,<lb/> title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Roger Scannell</name> of in and to a certain piece or parcel of ground<lb/> situated in the City and County of St Louis State of Missouri viz, Lot number twenty (20) in Block<lb/> four (4) in <name>William C Carr</name> addition to the City of St Louis containing twenty five (25) feet front by one<lb/> hundred and fifty three ten inches (153 11/12) feet deep more or less on the South side of Biddle Street,<lb/> between nineteenth and twentieth streets in the City and County of St Louis together with all the improve<lb/>ments and appurtenances thereon: Sold under and by authority of an execution issued from the Office of the<lb/> Clerk of the St Louis Law Commissioners Court in favor of <name>Archibald Carr</name> and <name>Mortimer Kenneth</name><lb/> against <name>Roger Scannell</name> dated the <date when="1859-09-20">20th day of September A D 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allan</name> et al<lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Roads</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by its attorney, two weeks additional time are<lb/> given said defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Muetzgar</name><lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>Peter Wegman</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anson Carty</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>Ann Carty</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marguerite Penier</name><lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Francis A Bevier</name></head>
            <p>Petition for alimony, pendent lite filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Heinrich Bruesmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return on the execution herein by showing ser<lb/>vice of summons as garnishee upon <name>Marie A Zimmermann</name>, and plaintiff<lb/> files interrogatories to said garnishee.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="348" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0355.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-13">Monday February 13th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2248, 41.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wall</name>, <name>Samuel W Truslow</name><lb/> and <name>William Wall Jr</name><lb/> vs 473<lb/> <name>James O Carson</name> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defen<lb/>dants withdraw their answers and the parties consent and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered against the defendant in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs for the sum of twenty two hundred and forty eight dollars<lb/> and forty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5248, 02<lb/> Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Luther Case</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Pitcher</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by its attorney, but the defendant, <name>Luther Case</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the other defendant, <name>Pitcher</name>, although called still<lb/> makes default; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty four dollars and<lb/> eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt the debt afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and the plaintiff ack<lb/>nowledges the receipt of full and entire satisfaction of the above judgment, and by leave of Court first obtained with<lb/>draws the protest and note suedon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Wallace</name><lb/> vs 462<lb/> <name>William Simshauser</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Dentelmoser</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Joseph Stecker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#168, 30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adolphus Meier</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Rust</name><lb/> vs 413<lb/> <name>Philip Werber</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and sixty eight<lb/> dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Causse</name> et al<lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>William H Bassett</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, fifteen days are given to file an additional<lb/> attachment bond herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#470, 12<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Goodrich</name>, <name>Peter H Willard</name>,<lb/> and <name>Albert A Child</name><lb/> vs 456<lb/> <name>Baylis Chamblin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the defendant by his at<lb/>torney, also comes and withdraws his answer, and the parties agree<lb/> that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for the sum of four hundred and seventy dollars and twelve cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> agreed, upon and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from the date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="349" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0356.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>George W Tope</name> et al</head>
            <p>By leave of Court the Sheriff amends his return herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William F Hazard</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed. On motion of the garnishees, <name>Harding Given and Company</name>, by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered that they be discharged for want of interrogatories, at the plaintiffs costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Major C Cheatham</name><lb/> vs 82<lb/> <name>Isaac J Price</name> and<lb/> <name>James Scarberry</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#735, 49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Korhammer</name><lb/> vs 173<lb/> <name>Frederick A H Garlichs</name>,<lb/> <name>Nimrod Beck</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, <name>Fisher</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the other defendants still make default; whereupon the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and thirty five dol<lb/>lars and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and here execution therefor; and it is ordered<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#161, 80<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hanson</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and <name>John W Luke</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>S M Tinsley</name>, <name>Benjamin Bartlett</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles Hanson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> the defendant <name>S M Finsley</name> and <name>Benjamin Bartlett</name>, but the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Charles Hanson</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and sixty one dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Pentland</name><lb/> vs 72<lb/> <name>Thomas J Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>David G Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court for assess<lb/>ment of damages consenting that nominal damages be assessed and the Court doth<lb/> accordingly assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> retain the possession of the property delivered to him by the Sheriff and that he recover of the defendants the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 266<lb/> <name>Philip Schladtweiler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for judgment by default not with standing answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>Morris Cahn</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a motion to strike out the answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="350" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0357.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sebastian Bopp</name><lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Jesse Arnot</name> and<lb/> <name>Anderson Arnot</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant <name>Anderson<lb/> Arnot</name>, but the defendant <name>Jesse Arnot</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment of damages to the Court, consenting that the<lb/> same be nominal, and the Court doth accordingly assess his damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor, and that he retain possession of property delivered to<lb/> him by the Sheriff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Booth</name> and son<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name></head>
            <p>Leave is given the Sheriff to amend his return, which is accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Downing</name> et al<lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>John M Hockaday</name> et al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P Haws</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Patterson</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Samuel</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2558, 16<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M Quaid</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name>, <name>James Smith</name>,<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> and <name>Henry S Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M Quoid</name> and <name>Louis Charleville</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made<lb/> herein has been duly published, according to law, and dis<lb/>miss this suit as to the defendant, <name>Louis Charleville</name>, but<lb/> the defendant, <name>James M Quoid</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of twenty five hundreds and fifty eight dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also their costs and charge herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">City of Carondelet<lb/> vs 51<lb/> <name>William M McPherson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#549, 61<lb/> to bear 10 per cent<lb/> against<lb/> Fine</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Murray</name><lb/> vs 360<lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name> and<lb/> <name>Joshua Fine</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Philip D Gordon</name>, but the defendant, <name>Joshua Fine</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of five hundred and forty nine dollars and sixty one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William O Oborne</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="351" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0358.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Mutual Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 286<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schlenker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant, <name>Dominique<lb/> Stock</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Mutual Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 285.<lb/> <name>Louis Pechmann</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant <name>Dominique Stock</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Missouri A B McDonald</name><lb/> by her next friend <name>Wm McCaw</name><lb/> vs 209<lb/> <name>William McDonald</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel G Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 182<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against it as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 145<lb/> <name>Ozro Collins</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, <name>Daniel Miller</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#151, 82.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Schergens</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>William H Gilman</name>, <name>Nicholas Enoch Vaughn</name>, <name>Frank Overstottz</name>,<lb/> <name>L A Riddle</name>, <name>Hugh M Kittrick</name>, <name>Theodore Bartel</name>, <name>Henry P Sherburne</name>,<lb/> <name>D Scharinghavsen</name>, <name>John Brohanemer</name>, <name>John Paul</name> and <name>William Koenig</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to enquire into and assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say<lb/> they assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and fifty one dollars and eighty two cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed, and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The defendant<lb/> files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Keep</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles M Monell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Bodenhammer</name><lb/> vs 447<lb/> <name>Charles H Shaafe</name>></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachmann</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a bond for costs with<lb/> <name>Joseph Mussler</name> as security, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="352" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0359.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachmann</name><lb/> vs 17242<lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for cents with <name>Joseph Mussler</name>, as security which<lb/> and is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5427, 10</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clark</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry L Clark</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and or their motion it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the continuance herein be set aside and vacated, but<lb/> the dependant, although duly warned and called, comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that the peti<lb/>tion herein be taken against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five<lb/> thousand four hundred and twenty seven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles G Mauro</name><lb/> vs 436<lb/> <name>Henry F Watson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, an person, but the defendants <name>Henry F Watson</name> and<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name>, although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default wherefore the petition herein taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius Starge</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>H Hildenandt</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Davis</name> et al<lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>James S Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Simon F Noyes</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default wherefore the pe<lb/>tition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1713, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Walter H Wills</name> and<lb/> <name>Luther L Mills</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by his attorneys but the<lb/> Defendants although duly summoned and cal<lb/>led comes not the makes default wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as con<lb/>fessed: And the Court find from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the Defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One<lb/> Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirteen Dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the Defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have<lb/> Execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chaw</name><lb/> Trustee of<lb/> <name>Eunice D Bull</name><lb/> vs 29<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney and suggests<lb/> and them to the satisfaction of the Court that the<lb/> Defendant has departed this life since the commence<lb/>ment of this suit and an motion of plaintiff. If<lb/> is ordered by the Court that a summons issue to the<lb/> legal representative of the said Defendant to the next term<lb/> of this Court until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="353" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0360.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney and suggests<lb/> and show to the satisfaction of the Court that<lb/> the Defendant herein has departed this life since<lb/> the commencement of this suit and on motion of plaintiff. It is<lb/> ordered by the Court that a summons issue to the legal representa<lb/>tives of the said Defendant to the next Term of this<lb/> Court until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nelson Russell</name>.<lb/> vs 190<lb/> <name>Margaret Russell</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the<lb/> Defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default wherefore the pe<lb/>tition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#421. 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Louis Winkelmaier</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by his attorney, but<lb/> the Defendant, although duly summoned and called,<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, the<lb/> petition herein is taken against him as confessed: And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the Defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and twenty one dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the Defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also their costs charges herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#930, 53</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephens Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 745<lb/> <name>Feder Federan</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by the respective<lb/> Attorneys and waiving a Jury submit the is<lb/>sues tried upon the Defendants plea in abate<lb/>ment to the Court upon the pleading and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find the issues joined upon said plea in abatement in form of the plain<lb/>tiff and the Defendant failing to plead further herein makes default<lb/> wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed And the<lb/> Court find from the instruments in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the Defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Nine Hundred and Thirty Dollars and fifty three cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the De<lb/>fendant the Debt aforesaid in from aforesaid an found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have Execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Heiten</name><lb/> vs 185<lb/> <name>Morris Rosenheim</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefore. By<lb/> leave of Court plaintiff withdraw the protest and rate sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Conurais</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>The Callaway Mining &amp; Manuf'g Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="354" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0361.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> garns<lb/> and <name>Quaker City Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>On of the said <name>Quaker City Ins Co</name>, by attorney, one week addi<lb/>ttional time is given to answer the interrogatories.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>On motion of the <name>Quaker City Ins Co</name>, one of the garnishee<lb/> herein, one week additional time is given it to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff files now and additional interrogatories<lb/> herein. On motion the <name>Quaker City ins Co</name>, one of the garnishee<lb/> herein, one week additional time is given it to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Merritt</name> et al<lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>John Squire</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs 480<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> vs 481<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs 485<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed. On motion of garnishees, <name>Harding Given<lb/> and Company</name>, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court they be dis<lb/>charged hence, for want of interrogatories, at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum<lb/> of five dollars is allowed said garnishees for appearing to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#979, 56.<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Waterman</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shriver</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Fink</name><lb/> vs 484<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name><lb/> and <name>Francis Webster</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange and Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Francis Webster</name>, but the defendant, <name>Waterman</name> although duly<lb/> called comes not but still make default; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury<lb/> submit the assessment of damages to the Court upon the proofs and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of nine hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifty six cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Kuhl</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Porter Slew &amp; Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Said garnishees file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="355" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0362.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#595, 90<lb/> 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name>, <name>Albert G Edward</name>,<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name> and <name>Philip W Herman</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>Thomas Fitzsimmons</name> and <name>Cornelius Lynch</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the de<lb/>fendants, although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#546, 62.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William S Horn</name><lb/> vs 121<lb/> <name>George W Thomas</name> and<lb/> <name>Raymond A Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange and Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and forty six dollars and sixty two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marguerite Perrier</name> by her next<lb/> friend <name>Mare Gautier</name><lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Francis Auguste Perrier</name></head>
            <p>Order allowing alimony.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit the<lb/> plaintiffs application for an allowance of alimony pendent lite to<lb/> the Court and the Court having duly heard and concidered the<lb/> same doth order that the defendant pay to the plaintiff for her<lb/> support and maintenance, the sum of twenty five dollars on the first Monday of March next and<lb/> a like amount on the first Monday of each and every month there after, until the further orders this court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Catharina Weber</name><lb/> vs 132<lb/> <name>Christian Weber</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#633, 98<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Papin</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter M Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Brannock Jones</name>, but the defendant, <name>Peter M Papin</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrumention<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six<lb/> hundred and thirty three dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Galleger</name><lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Henry Kattelman</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>J J Decker</name>, <name>William C Orr</name>, <name>Isaac McPherson</name>, <name>J J Holmes</name>, <name>W McGee</name>,<lb/> <name>Phil Gebhardt</name>, <name>Charles Weber</name>, <name>Peter Gamache</name>, <name>Charles Beck</name>, <name>J B Monsette</name>,<lb/> <name>W Watson</name> and <name>William Horn</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they are unable to agree upon a verdict; wherefore it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the Jury empanelled and sworn herein be discharged form the further conside<lb/>red of this cause, and that this cause be continued until the next term of his Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="356" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0363.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>May Hoppe</name><lb/> vs 463<lb/> <name>Wendel Hoppe</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorneys, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alonzo Child</name> et al<lb/> vs 573<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue herein for defendant, <name>Oliver T Bragg</name>, returnable to the next<lb/> term of this Court, until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, leaveris given it to withdraw<lb/> the amended petition herein for the purpose giving it to the defendant<lb/> to answer; and it is ordered by the Court that the same be refilled by<lb/> the twenty first instant, Said amended petition is accordingly withdrawn.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, leave is give it to withdraw<lb/> the amended petition herein for the purpose of giving it to the defendant<lb/> to answer, and it is ordered by the Court that the same be refiled<lb/> by the twenty first instant; Said amended petition is accordingly withdrawn.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1113, 18.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs 292<lb/> <name>William Fullagar</name> and<lb/> <name>Wesley Corner</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and thirteen dollars and eighteen cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Chaddick</name><lb/> vs 129<lb/> <name>James B Chaddick</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published according<lb/> to law; but the defendant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gerard B Allen</name><lb/> vs 755<lb/> <name>Edward C Krausnick</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, by their respective attorneys, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#197, 20,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Engeler</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defen<lb/>dant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and ninety seven dol<lb/>lars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> et al<lb/> vs 448<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Robert Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>Adam Stewart</name> and file answers herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="357" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0364.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bachmann</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachmann</name><lb/> vs 172 1/2<lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Waters</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C Bull</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James F Gyles</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Roger C McAllister</name> garns</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Charles Boswell</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>Samuel<lb/> Black</name>, <name>Ira T Green</name>, <name>J W Hathaway</name>, <name>John Hunter</name>, <name>J R Boyce</name>, <name>William H<lb/> Gilman</name>, <name>M Hanson</name>, <name>S A Riddle</name>, <name>William Koenig</name>, <name>Hugh McKittick</name>, <name>Theodore<lb/> Bartell</name>, and <name>Enoch Vaughn</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progress but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> et al<lb/> vs 829<lb/> <name>Jno B Valle</name> garn.</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the continuance of this cause be set aside and<lb/> vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>M S Cerre</name>'s Exr</head>
            <p>Agreement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Mathews</name><lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Koerner</name> et al<lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>John P Harley</name></head>
            <p>The defendant motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="358" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0365.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-14">Tuesday February 14th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#241, 05<lb/> Special.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cox</name><lb/> vs 385<lb/> <name>Anthony Cunningham</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition is taken against him<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty one dollars and<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor against the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Walker</name><lb/> vs 385.<lb/> <name>J W Farlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Farlin</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>John B Parsons</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Farlin</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Alex Riddle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Farlin</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel G Hatch</name> and <name>David P Buckner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M Buckner</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>,<lb/> <name>Daniel G Hatch</name> and <name>David P Buckner</name>.<lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bowman C Baker</name>, <name>Nimrod H Sinclair</name><lb/> <name>Joel Baker</name> and <name>James P Garvey</name><lb/> vs 9<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> and<lb/> <name>Stephen G Norrel</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Poland</name> and<lb/> <name>John Henry</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Hill</name>, <name>David H Hunnewill</name>,<lb/> and <name>Joseph S hill</name><lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W Tiers</name>, <name>Frank Tiers</name> and <name>John W White</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hendricks</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri on the relation and to the use<lb/> of <name>Samuel Brooks</name>.<lb/> vs 429<lb/> <name>Chauvin V LeBeau</name> Executor of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>,<lb/> <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry G Soulard</name></head>
            <p>It appearing to the Court that <name>Michael S<lb/> Cerre</name>, late Sheriff of St Louis County made<lb/> on the sales made in the above entitled causes<lb/> the net sum of Six thousand six hundred<lb/> and forty six dollars and ninety eighty cents<lb/> exclusive of the amount of his costs retained by<lb/> him out of the gross amount of said sales, the Court, by consent of all the parties to the above suits, by<lb/> their attorneys, adjudges and orders that said suits be finally disposed of as follows, to wit; out of said<lb/> money received by said Sheriff said plaintiffs are respectively entitled to the following sums; to wit;<lb/> <name>Henry M Bucker</name>, <name>Benjamin E Hall</name>, <name>Daniel G Hatch</name> and <name>David P Buckner</name>, two cases, the sum</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="359" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0366.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>Of eleven hundred and fifty one dollars and forty two cents; <name>Bowman C Baker</name>, <name>Nimrod H Sinclair</name>,<lb/> <name>Joel Baker</name> and <name>James P Garvey</name>, the sum of four hundred and sixty eight dollars, and ninety nine cents;<lb/> <name>Stephen D Grofflin</name> and <name>Samuel G Norvell</name>, the sum of five hundred and ninety five dollars and eighty cents;<lb/> <name>Patrick Poland</name> and <name>John Henry</name>, the sum of eighty one dollars and six cents; <name>George H Hill</name>, <name>Daniel H<lb/> Hunnewell</name> and <name>Joseph S Hill</name>, the sum of one hundred and seventy four dollars and fifty eight cents; <name>Edward<lb/> W Tiers</name>, <name>Frank Tiers</name> and <name>John W White</name>, the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars; <name>Edmund Hendricks</name>,<lb/> the sum of Six hundred and thirty six dollars; and said defendants, <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B<lb/> Kimball</name>, are entitled to the balance of said sum made by said Sheriff, being a balance of three thousand one<lb/> hundred and eighty nine dollars and thirteen cents: the Court also, by like consent, adjudge and orders that said<lb/> defendant, <name>Frederick A Schmucker</name> and <name>James B Kimball</name>, pay all the costs of these suits. It is also by<lb/> like consent and also the consent of the present parties to the suit of the State of Missouri on the relation of <name>Samuel<lb/> Brooks</name> against <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name> Executor of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry G<lb/> Soulard</name>, in said Court, adjudged that said plaintiff recover of said defendants, <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name>, exec<lb/>cutor of <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry G Soulard</name>, one cent for his debt and damages and<lb/> that said plaintiff, <name>Samuel Brooks</name>, pay the Costs of the said suit. It is also ordered and adjudged, by like<lb/> consent, that the damages adjudged in said last mentioned suit are in full satisfaction of all damages<lb/> suffered by said <name>Brooks</name> or by said <name>Schmucker</name> and <name>Kimball</name>, or any of them, by reason of any proceeding or act<lb/> of said <name>Cerre</name>, or his deputies, or any of them, in any suit heretofore brought against said <name>Schmucker</name> and<lb/> <name>Kimball</name>, or either of them.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Wharf</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G Steininger</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis University</name><lb/> vs 494<lb/> <name>George M Moore</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein<lb/> returnable to the next term, until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis University</name><lb/> vs 493<lb/> <name>William Magill</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> returnable to the next term until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name> et al<lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Heinrich Schmitz</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>St Louis University</name><lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Theresa Dickenson</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kaltenbach</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottlob Held</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out the defendant to answers and for judgment being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Hornbeck</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>George A Crawford</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Dimon</name>, and<lb/> <name>William a Judson</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff by leave of Court files an amended petition and also an<lb/> exhibit therewith, and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that an<lb/> alias writ issue herein returnable to the next term of this Court, until<lb/> which this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="360" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0367.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#511, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David McKee</name><lb/> vs 482<lb/> <name>Charles Boswell</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanneled<lb/> and sworn herein and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at five hundred<lb/> and eleven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the dam<lb/>ages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The<lb/> defendant files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 203<lb/> <name>George Frederick</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiff by<lb/> leave of Court withdraws the exhibit sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#327, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Blattner</name><lb/> vs 174<lb/> <name>John Brooks</name> and<lb/> <name>Horace D Brady</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and twenty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and it his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, leave is given him to file an amended affi<lb/>davit to the petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>Francis Beehler</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#184, 51<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Hardmann</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 478<lb/> <name>Joseph K Bent</name>, <name>James Sullivan</name><lb/> and <name>J R Hardmann</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Joseph K Bent</name>, but the defen<lb/>dants, <name>James Sullivan</name>, and <name>J R Hardmann</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of one hundred and eighty four dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also its costs have herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#363, 65<lb/> 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenz Hartmann</name><lb/> vs 404<lb/> <name>Wilhelm Mugger</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that the petition herein be<lb/> taken against the said defendant as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and sixty three dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff recover of said defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="361" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0368.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 90,<lb/> against Stock.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Constantine Schnew</name><lb/> vs 468<lb/> <name>Dominique Stock</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Pfeiffer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendant, <name>Joseph Pfeiffer</name>, but the defendant, <name>Dominique Stock</name><lb/>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty six dollars and ninety cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also the costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#156, 89.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian G Lohman</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry Lohman</name><lb/> vs 441<lb/> <name>James L Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and fifty six dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also the costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#414, 36.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 179<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name>, <name>Samuel B Pilkington</name><lb/> and <name>Albert K Haltsman</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Albert K Haltsman</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the other defen<lb/>dants, although called, still make default; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and<lb/> fourteen dollars and thirty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also the costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 350<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an<lb/> alias Summons issue herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1449, 35<lb/> to bear 10 per cent<lb/> Agst<lb/> <name>Bart</name>,<lb/> at set aside 29p397.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>John A Bart</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the de<lb/>fendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default; wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and forty nine dollars and thirty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Booth</name> and son<lb/> vs 33<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Hempstead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S Scott</name> garns</head>
            <p>Said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="362" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0369.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rogers Brothers Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs 163<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and <name>J S Jett</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called, come not but make<lb/> default, wherefore the petition is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Brown</name><lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>E C Bosworth</name></head>
            <p>The defendants demurer to the plaintiffs petition being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Zeil</name><lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>Herman Bergesch</name></head>
            <p>The defendants demurer to the plaintiffs petition being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#10444, 50<lb/> Pliff remits<lb/> #580, 80 29 p 395</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten<lb/> hundred and forty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lemuel H Paston</name> et al<lb/> vs 185.<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, <name>Joseph Kaufer</name>, by his attorney, it is ordered that he<lb/> be discharged hence for want of interrogatories, at the plaintiffs costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor. Five dollars are allowed for appearing.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#185, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James T Scott</name><lb/> vs 306<lb/> <name>Jacob L Lewinsky</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and eighty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Zumsteg</name><lb/> vs 412<lb/> <name>Johanna Zumsteg</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against her as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name>, <name>Samuel N Kellogg</name>,<lb/> <name>Elias B Kirby</name>, <name>Charles B Kirtland</name> and<lb/> <name>Bernard Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Pooe</name></head>
            <p>On Note. Now suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause by consent to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the trial thereupon progresses but<lb/> the plaintiffs say they will not further prosecute their suit<lb/> in this behalf but voluntarily suffer a non suit with leave<lb/> to move to set the same aside. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take<lb/> nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover<lb/> of said plaintiffs his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have thereof execution.<lb/> Thereupon plaintiffs file a motion to set aside nonsuit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="363" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0370.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#315, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Building and Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 379<lb/> <name>L J Suart</name>, <name>Michael Chartrand</name>, and<lb/> <name>Richard J Howard</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by its attorney, and on its motion<lb/> leave is given the Sheriff to amend his return by showing service<lb/> upon defendant, <name>Howard</name>, which amendment is accordingly<lb/> made; but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Laven</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Jacob Rosenbaum</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>H P Sherburne</name>, <name>D O Schaning Hausen</name>, <name>J Bohannon</name>, <name>John Paul</name>, <name>J J Decker</name>,<lb/> <name>Isaac McPherson</name>, <name>J J Holmes</name>, <name>W McGee</name>, <name>Phil Gebharadt</name>, <name>Peter Gamache</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Becker</name> and <name>J B Monsette</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that defendant go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The plain<lb/>tiffs files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sun Mutual Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 298<lb/> <name>Sigismund R Mendell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jos E Elder</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A O Brannon &amp; Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Asa S Jones</name><lb/> vs 833<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Michael</name>, by leave of Court files answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#474, 55<lb/> agst<lb/> <name>Papin</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Rollin Richmond</name><lb/> vs 377<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> and<lb/> <name>P M Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name>, But the defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against the said defen<lb/>dant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seventy<lb/> four dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#316, 66<lb/> to bear 10 per cent<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wimer</name><lb/> and <name>Campbell</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George T Camp</name> and <name>Charles E Maurice</name><lb/> vs 335<lb/> <name>Henry F Watson</name>, <name>John M Wimer</name>,<lb/> and <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this<lb/> suit as to the defendant, <name>Thomas Campbell</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Henry F Watson</name> and <name>John M Wimer</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and sixteen dollars<lb/> and fifty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants to the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor: Judgment<lb/> to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 504<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant, <name>Michael</name>, by leave of Court, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="364" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0371.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#434, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence Pegolt</name><lb/> vs 381<lb/> <name>George B Field</name> and<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and thirty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>William Henessey</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default nor has he answered herein, wherefore the plaintiffs<lb/> petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-15">Wednesday February 15th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#575, 93.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Burrowes</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben L Anderson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Erastus Gaylord</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Burrows</name>, and <name>Addison G Bragg</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and on their mo<lb/>tion the attachment maid is dismissed; and the suit is dis<lb/>missed as to the defendant, <name>Bragg</name>, and the plaintiffs con<lb/>fessing the counterclaim set up in defendants answer, moves<lb/> the Court for judgment, which motion is after due consideration by the Court sustained; and the Court<lb/> finds that, after deducting the counterclaim, the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and seventy five dollars and ninety three cents on account of the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Fenton</name> et al<lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Andrew Tainter</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#540, 80</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Thornton</name> and <name>John O Pierce</name><lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name> and <name>Joshua H Alexander</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, and the defendant, <name>Joshua H<lb/> Alexander</name>, by their respective attorneys, but the defendants<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name>, although duly called, still makes<lb/> default; and a Jury being waived this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined between the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>Alexan<lb/>der</name>, in favor of the plaintiffs, and the Court doth further find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of five hundred and forty dollars and eighty cents, on account of the instrument in writing on which this<lb/> action is founded. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="365" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0372.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Marshall</name> et al<lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed,<lb/> Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#370, 13.<lb/> to bear 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G M Pheeten</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Andrew A LeBeau</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants, with<lb/>draw their answer herein, and saying nothing further in bar or preclusion of<lb/> plaintiffs demand the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy dollars and thirteen cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick M Aneny</name> and<lb/> <name>Jane M Aneny</name> his wife<lb/> vs 511<lb/> <name>Peter Harmon</name> and<lb/> <name>Harmon</name> his wife</head>
            <p>Slander.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>William H Gilman</name>, <name>E Vaughn</name>, <name>S A Riddle</name>, <name>William Koenig</name>, <name>W Watson</name>,<lb/> <name>William Horn</name>, <name>Samuel Black</name>, <name>J T Green</name>, <name>J W Hathaway</name>, <name>John<lb/> Hunter</name>, <name>N Hanson</name>, and <name>J R Boyce</name>, twelve good and lawful men who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to inquire into and assessed<lb/> the plaintiffs damages &amp; the trial being finished the sums aforesaid upon their oaths aforeaid say they<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendents this damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#316, 30</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Kalb</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Martin Shadler</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default,<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment of damages to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and sixteen dollars and thirty<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1250, 46.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Partridge</name><lb/> vs 68<lb/> <name>Henry S King</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which the action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of twelve hundred and fifty dollars and forty six cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#187, 57<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Hildenbrand</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Schaefer</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard A Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name>,<lb/> <name>John K Field</name>, <name>Isaac N Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardslee</name><lb/> vs 500<lb/> <name>H Hildenbrand</name>, <name>Louis Schiemer</name>,<lb/> and <name>Frederick Schaefer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss<lb/> this suit as to the defendant, <name>Schiemer</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Hildebrand</name> and <name>Schaefer</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/>herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and eighty<lb/> seven dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in the behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="366" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0373.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent<lb/> Dams</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lyman S Elliott</name><lb/> vs 522<lb/> <name>J M Convers</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment of damages<lb/> to the Court consenting to take nominal damages and the Court doth accordingly assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff retain the possession of<lb/> the property delivered to him by the Sheriff and that the recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin Wilkenson</name></head>
            <p>Motion for an alias execution filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George G Mathews</name><lb/> vs 804<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a demurer to amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Bretz</name><lb/> vs 290<lb/> <name>M A M Donald</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that an alias Summons issue<lb/> for defendant <name>Donald</name>. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Hilton</name><lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>Henry Terrill</name></head>
            <p>Bill of particulars filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#368, 55<lb/> Against<lb/> <name>Papin</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Geist</name><lb/> vs 169<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> and<lb/> <name>Peter M Papin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name>, but the defendant, <name>Peter W Papin</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and sixty eight dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob P Symonds</name><lb/> vs 526<lb/> <name>William O Wheeler</name> and<lb/> <name>John N Bofinger</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Bofinger</name>, by their respective attor<lb/>neys, but the defendant, <name>William O wheeler</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore on motion of plaintiff,<lb/> the petition herein is taken against the said <name>Wheeler</name> as confessed; and also<lb/> come a Jury, to wit; <name>Hugh M Kittrick</name>, <name>J Bartel</name>, <name>HP Sherburne</name>, <name>D Scharinghausen</name>, <name>J Bohan<lb/>non</name>, <name>John Paul</name>, <name>J J Decker</name>, <name>William C Our</name>, <name>Isaac M Pherson</name>, <name>J J Holmes</name>, <name>W M Gee</name> and<lb/> <name>Phil Gebhart</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues joined<lb/> between the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Bofinger</name>, well and truly to try and also to enquire into and<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages against the defendant, <name>Wheeler</name>, the trial progresses, whereupon for good<lb/> reasons appearing, by consent of parties, <name>Hugh M Kittrick</name>, one of the Jurors, is withdraw from the<lb/> panel, and the remainder of said panel are discharged from the further consideration of this causes<lb/> and this cause is continued until the next term of this Court at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Luft</name> et al<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>John Wheeler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at the costs of the defendants.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="367" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0374.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Elleard</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#232, 00<lb/> Dams.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine Klute</name> administratrix<lb/> of <name>Henry Klute</name><lb/> vs 552<lb/> <name>Joseph G Shands</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit the assessment of<lb/> damages to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned at the sum of two hundred and<lb/> thirty two dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also her costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>The Hope Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Gelfort</name> et al<lb/> vs 358<lb/> <name>John C Ivory</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rosenbaum</name><lb/> vs 543<lb/> <name>Charles Baumann</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>Geo Y Bast</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1413, 08</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name><lb/> vs 542<lb/> <name>Peter Lang</name></head>
            <p>On Notes and account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney still makes default; and the plain<lb/>tiff waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs for assess<lb/>ment of damages and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of fourteen hundred and thirteen dollars and eight cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is order that<lb/> eleven hundred and twenty four dollars of this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Harris</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Duer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Hess</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 207<lb/> <name>The Arctic Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 258<lb/> <name>Metropolitan Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John N Straat</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Jackson</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Said garnishee by consent files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David M Martin</name> admr<lb/> vs 443<lb/> <name>Robt N Martin</name></head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit to set aside judgment by default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Colt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Israel G Beaumont</name></head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="368" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0375.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Sylvester V</name> and <name>Theophile Papin</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Amended affidavit filed by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Carr</name> and <name>Kennett</name><lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Cronin</name> admr.</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss appeal filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#169, 57,<lb/> Dams,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Simon</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement and agree<lb/> that judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant<lb/> for the sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and fifty seven cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and have there off execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 218<lb/> <name>The Hampden Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 264<lb/> <name>Irving Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 259<lb/> <name>Manhattan Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Annie Martin</name><lb/> vs 551<lb/> <name>Geo F Martin</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion and affidavit in support thereof to suppress deposition filed. <lb/> Agreement as to depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Darby</name><lb/> vs 582<lb/> <name>Daniel Shattuck</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G M Pheeters</name><lb/> vs 587<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued on a affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loury</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>St Bt Heniretta</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Steiner</name> et al<lb/> vs 560<lb/> <name>William Hollister</name> et al</head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, <name>Joseph<lb/> Hyman</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as con<lb/>fessed; and this cause is continued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="369" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0376.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-16">Thursday February 16th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Peabody</name> et al<lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called, come not but make default, wherefore, on motion of the plain<lb/>tiffs, the petition is taken against the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Miller</name><lb/> vs 270<lb/> <name>A J Miller</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein taken against him<lb/> as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John N Straat</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Jackson</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Summer</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Default,</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, but said garnishee, <name>Joseph summers</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the interrog<lb/>atories are taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>W C P Cannington</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#230, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George N Lynch</name>, <name>Jesse Arnot</name>,<lb/> and <name>Anderson Arnot</name><lb/> vs 125<lb/> <name>George H Kennerly</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and thirty dollars. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#50, 77</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Statius Keheman</name><lb/> vs 527<lb/> <name>John Ichtertz</name></head>
            <p>On account</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>William H<lb/> Gilman</name>, <name>Charles Weber</name>, <name>Peter Gamache</name>, <name>Charles Becker</name>, <name>John B Monsette</name>, <name>Wesley<lb/> Watson</name>, <name>William Horn</name>, <name>Samuel Black</name>, <name>Ira J Green</name>, <name>I W Hathaway</name>, <name>John Hunter</name>, <lb/> and <name>J R Royce</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try and the trial being finished the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid upon their oaths say they<lb/> find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of fifty dollars and seventy seven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R Marsh</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Edward C White</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained. Twenty days are given the plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joe M Hanson</name> et al<lb/> vs 60<lb/> <name>J Chase Dow</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias attachment<lb/> issue herein for defendant returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine Dohera</name><lb/> vs 444<lb/> <name>George Leach</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this this cause be dismissed as to <name>Henry M Woodward</name>, and that an alias<lb/> Summons issue herein for the other defendants returnable to the next term of this<lb/> Court, until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="370" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0377.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Howell Sparks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to law claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> Country, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1176, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Darby</name><lb/> vs 533<lb/> <name>John Reilly</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of eleven hundred and seventy six dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry S Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 145.<lb/> <name>Ozro Collins</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bruce</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John How</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Answer field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Napoleon Savory</name> et al<lb/> vs 183<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and on their motion, this cause is dis<lb/>missed as to the defendant <name>Addison G Bragg</name>, and the plaintiffs file a <lb/> motion for judgment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to use of<lb/> <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>Thomas H Sevain</name>, as security,<lb/> which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stettinius</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Hughes</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs by consent file an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 510<lb/> <name>D A January</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion for leave to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>Cha Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion for leave to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Dougherty</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>S Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties the judgment herein rendered is se aside and vacated.<lb/> and by like consent defendant files and answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Human Boker</name> et al<lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton Y Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Actua Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">Daniel C Ketchum<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Margaret A Kelcham</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham A Keeman</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Andrew Krautler</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="371" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0378.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Biurowes</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#262, 65.<lb/> set aside<lb/> 29 p 478</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Zengen</name>, <name>Adolph Schimmel</name>,<lb/> and <name>A Berlyn</name><lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Michael S Mepham</name> and<lb/> <name>William G Mepham</name></head>
            <p>On account</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury to wit; <name>Hugh M Kittrick</name>, <name>Theodore Bartel</name>, <name>H P Sher<lb/>boune</name>, <name>D Scheringhausen</name>, <name>J Bohammer</name>, <name>John Paul</name>, <name>J J Decker</name>, <lb/> <name>William C Orr</name>, <name>J J Holmes</name>, <name>Washington M Gee</name>, <name>Phil Gebhart</name><lb/> and <name>Isaac McPherson</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and sixty two dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas E Souper</name><lb/> vs 401<lb/> <name>Henry C Lynch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Albro</name><lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>Chas Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan Penrod</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>Maria F Brooks</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Benjamin O Brooks</name><lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#659, 56<lb/> 10 per cent<lb/> The judgment of which this is the<lb/> margin is satisfied is full this<lb/> <date when="1840-09-10">10th day of September AD 1840</date><lb/> <name>Gacacekir Barauce</name> attest of Peff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 559<lb/> <name>William Sensenderfer</name>, <name>John Sensenderfer</name>,<lb/> <name>Alexander J Kicklen</name> and <name>Joshua Cheever</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>William</name> and<lb/> <name>John Sensenderfer</name>, and <name>Alexander J Kienlen</name>, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Joshua Cheever</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and a Jury being waived this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues<lb/> joined between plaintiff and defendants, <name>W and Jno Sensenderfer</name>, and <name>Alex J Kienlen</name>, in favor of the plain<lb/>tiff and doth further find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty<lb/> nine dollars and fifty six cents on account of the instrument in writing on which this action is founded. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from the date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Colt</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>Israel G Beaumont</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files an affidavit, and on his motion an appeal<lb/> is allowed him from the judgment herein to the Supreme Court and thereupon the<lb/> plaintiff files an appeal bond which is approved by the Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="372" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0379.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-17">Friday February 17th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J C Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Enrich F Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition and also the appearance of the<lb/> defendants whereby the said defendants enter their appearance to this action as if personally<lb/> served with original unit and copy of petition fifteen days before the first day of the<lb/> present teem of the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#175, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Boyd</name><lb/> vs 555<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name> and<lb/> <name>Gandless Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and assess his damages<lb/> at the sum of one hundred and seventy five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Lieber</name><lb/> vs 581<lb/> <name>James S Carlisle</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Norris</name> et al<lb/> vs 638<lb/> <name>Callaway Mining &amp; Manufacturing Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#278, 13.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sidney Pulsifer</name> and <name>E D Hardin</name><lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>, <name>Michael O Brin</name><lb/> and <name>John O Brin</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the pe<lb/>tition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy eight dollars and thirteen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence O Brooks</name><lb/> vs 565<lb/> <name>John D Daggett</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>Samuel Single</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Peter Wegman</name> Marshall of St Louis Country, comes in Open Court and acknowledge the execution of a deed by him<lb/> as such Marshall in favor of <name>Charles G Mauro</name> and <name>William C Jones</name> for all the right title interest,<lb/> claim, estate and property of <name>Columbus Montgomery</name> of in and to the following described property; the<lb/> lease hold interest of the said <name>Columbus Montgomery</name> in a lot of ground in Block 588 of the City of<lb/> St Louis beginning at a point on the West line of Eleventh street one hundred feet South of the Centre<lb/> line of survey 3003, running thence Southwardly with the West line of Eleventh Street thirty two feet nine<lb/> inches thence Westwardly and parallel with the Centre line of Survey one hundred and twenty seven feet six<lb/> inches to an alley thence northwardly with said alley, thirty two fact nine inches thence Eastwardly and<lb/> parallel with the Centre line of said Survey one hundred and twenty seven feet six inches to the beginning<lb/> being the same lat leased by the Board of President and Directors of the St Louis Public Schools to <name>Mary<lb/> Meecham</name> by Deed dated <date when="1858-09-27">September 27th 1858</date>. Sold under and by virtue of two executions issued from<lb/> the Office of the Clerk of the St Louis Criminal Court in favor of the Sate of Missouri and against<lb/> said <name>Columbus Montgomery</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Wyllys King</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="373" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0380.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 589<lb/> <name>M W Ward</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court plaintiff with<lb/>draws the protest and note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Paige</name><lb/> vs 594<lb/> <name>George W Hall</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1100, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name>, <name>John How</name> and<lb/> <name>William Pretorcus</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury to wit; <name>William H Gilman</name>, <name>E Vaughn</name>, <name>S H Riddle</name>, <lb/> <name>William Koenig</name>, <name>Hugh M Kittrick</name>, <name>Theodore Bartelle</name>,<lb/> <name>H B Sherbourne</name>, <name>J Bohammer</name>, <name>John Paul</name>, <name>William C Orr</name>,<lb/> <name>Nicholas Hansen</name> and <name>D Scharinghassen</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess the damages<lb/> at the sum of four hundred and seventeen dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of eleven hundred dollars, the penalty of the bond sued<lb/> on, and also the costs of this suit, and that it have execution for the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Mathew</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>James Coff</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Maguire</name><lb/> vs 457<lb/> <name>James Little</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Emile Blome</name> et al<lb/> vs 256<lb/> <name>John Higgins</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and acknowledge to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered in the cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Exchange Bank of St Louis</name><lb/> vs 716<lb/> <name>William H Chappell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard H Wilkey</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>The Illinois River Packet Co</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Illinois River packet Company</name>, <name>Daniel Hancock</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel T Morris</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Barksdale</name> et al<lb/> vs 491<lb/> <name>Geo N Walker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants <name>Hancock</name> and <name>Morris</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S File</name> et al<lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Richd C Shackelford</name></head>
            <p>Proof of service of order for production of books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Bourgoin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Proof of Service of order of Citation filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Harrris</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="374" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0381.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Downing</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W H Barksdale</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bartholomew Rice</name> admr<lb/> vs 332<lb/> <name>Nemorid Snyder</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleager J Beard</name> and <name>Judson Beard</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>Isaac McPherson</name>, <name>Philip Gebhart</name>, <name>Charles Weber</name>, <name>Peter<lb/> Gamache</name>, <name>Charles Becker</name>, <name>John B Monsette</name>, <name>Wesley Watson</name>, <name>William<lb/> Horn</name>, <name>Samuel Black</name>, <name>Ira T Green</name>, <name>J W Hathaway</name> and <name>John Hunter</name>, twelve good and lawful men,<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to by the trial progresses but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until to morrow morning.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bevard</name></head>
            <p>The defendant withdraws his motion to dismiss for want of amended petition.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-18">Saturday February 18th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>James Taylor</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this Bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Adams</name><lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>John B Grady</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an<lb/> alias summons issue for the defendant H P Smith returnable to the next teem of this<lb/> Court, until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James E Cross</name> et al<lb/> vs 216<lb/> <name>Felix Reynolds</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue herein returnable to the next teem until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Gering</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff confesses the demurrer herein and on his motion ten days are given him<lb/> to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George F Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William J Lewis</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Wiley J Stratton</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue. The plaintiff by leave first obtained files interrogatories against said<lb/> garnishee and the Judge of this Court having been of counsel for plaintiff<lb/> it is ordered that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court<lb/> of Common Pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Five days additional time are given to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="375" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0382.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name></head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended five days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F S Giesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Frederick Luppeng</name></head>
            <p>The motion to dismiss this suit for want of security for costs being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court it is ordered that the defendant file a good and sufficient bond for costs<lb/> herein within ten days from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neun Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinrich Heissner</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the amended petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleazer J Beard</name> and <name>Judson Beard</name><lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyer</name> and <name>Moritz Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors herein and the trial progresses and by leave of Court plaintiffs<lb/> file an amended petition thereupon by consent of parties the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> are discharged from the further consideration of this cause, and this cause continued at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Calm</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>M Rosenbaum</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to dismiss this suit and also his motion to strike out amended<lb/> affidavit being heard and fully considered by the Court are overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Randolph Peters</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Althorf</name> et al<lb/> vs 725<lb/> <name>August Bencke</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#645, 70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Cavaroc</name> and<lb/> <name>Emile Seignorette</name><lb/> vs 433<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange. Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of six hundred and forty five dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> et al<lb/> vs 595<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammonn</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsly</name><lb/> vs 757<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Welling</name> et al<lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Charles P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Alexander Riddle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer of <name>Farlin</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="376" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0383.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#270, 72.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus M Dowell</name> and<lb/> <name>Patrick F Loughran</name><lb/> vs 27<lb/> <name>E E O Giles</name> and<lb/> <name>John Loughborough</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from there in<lb/>strument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and seventy dollars<lb/> <lb/> and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name> assignee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G Lare</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for an injunction, upon the facts and for the reasons set out in petition,<lb/> is continued to Saturday the twenty fifth instant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William O Osborne</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and confesses the motion for security for costs and files a bond for costs<lb/> with <name>N N Sleeth</name> as security which bond is approved by the Court. The defendant files<lb/> a motion for additional security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Zengen</name> et al<lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Michael Y Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Thornton</name> et al<lb/> vs 499<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>The Missouri Spinning Company</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the papers on file<lb/> be and they are hereby substituted for the originals: and the defendant<lb/> withdraws its motion to dismiss this suit, and ten days are given de<lb/>fendant to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P Tesson</name><lb/> vs 559<lb/> <name>William Sensenderfer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard Boram</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>E Nicholls</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment on answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> St Bt <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James R Graham</name> et al<lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Oliver S Watt</name></head>
            <p>One week additional time is given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The mechanics Bank</name><lb/> vs 304<lb/> <name>Charles Altinger</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out answer and for judgment being heard and fully consid<lb/>ered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engels</name> administrator<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> and wife</head>
            <p>Exceptions to part of Commissioners Report and motion to strike<lb/> out same filed by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for security for costs being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained; thereupon the plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>William N<lb/> Macqueen</name> as security which bind is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="377" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0384.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>John Cool</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff confesses the demurrer to the petition and by consent of parties two weeks time are<lb/> given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 321<lb/> <name>John Cool</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff confesses the demurrer to the petition and by consent of parties two weeks time are<lb/> given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#162, 21</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Hall</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Amelia Carman</name><lb/> vs 678<lb/> <name>William Etherton</name></head>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the plaintiffs motion for judgment on the defendants answer doth sus<lb/>tain the same; and the Court finds that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of one hundred and sixty tow dollars and twenty one cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester Carding Jr</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Hermann Biesen</name> and <name>William Poos</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, al<lb/>though duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; on<lb/> motion it is ordered the above interlocutory judgment he set aside and vacted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#528, 30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester Harding Jr</name><lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Herman Biesen</name> and <name>William Poos</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, and submit to the Court the mo<lb/>tion is after out the answer herein and for judgment which<lb/> motion to after due consideration by the Court sustained; and<lb/> the Court finds that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> twenty eight dollars and thirty cents, on account of the instrument in writing on which this action is founded.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsey</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>John R Parsons</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer of defendant <name>Farlin</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James M Campbell</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick Heidemann</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore on motion of the plaintiff the<lb/> petition is taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>C W Barnes</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants withdraw their demurrer and twenty days are given them to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 460<lb/> <name>Geo W Davis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Penelope Allen</name><lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>Geo W Davis</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="378" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0385.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-20">Monday February 20th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maire Sinel</name> et al<lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Theodore A Dame</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Anne Smith</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William O Osbourne</name><lb/> vs 213<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an assignment herein to <name>B A Hill</name> for the benefit of certain creditors.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#439, 29.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Beal</name> and<lb/> <name>George K Hooper</name><lb/> vs 602<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and submit to the Court the<lb/> defendants motion to dismiss this suit which motion is, after due consideration by the<lb/> Court overruled; and the defendant failing further to plead herein makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and thirty nine dollars and twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>David Hirsch</name><lb/> vs 655<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robt M Renick</name> et al<lb/> vs 656<lb/> <name>Michal S Cerre</name> Exr</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Steinway Sr</name> et al<lb/> vs 626<lb/> <name>Charles A Snell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Alfred E Gregory</name><lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Steinway Sr</name> et al<lb/> vs 627<lb/> <name>Charles Fritz</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Alfred E Gregory</name><lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Schergens</name><lb/> vs 454<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and remits to the defendant the sum of three dollars<lb/> and seventy two cents part and parcel of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Wambogaust</name><lb/> vs 644<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno G Lare</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for an injunction filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bailey</name><lb/> vs 194<lb/> <name>John Bryant</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, a dedimus is awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D A January</name> et al<lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>D Robt Barclay</name> et al</head>
            <p>Statement of <name>A Krekel</name> filed with agreement that the same may to<lb/> read in evidence on the trial of this cause.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="379" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0386.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Bourgoin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss proceedings filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Francis J Smith</name> et al</head>
            <p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2588, 91</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Closteeman</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> the defendant as confessed; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment<lb/> of damages to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages at the sum of twenty five hundred and eighty eight dollars and ninety one cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1400, 61.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cabinet Makers Union</name><lb/> vs 582<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorneys, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment<lb/> of damages to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence doth assess the plain<lb/>tiffs damages at the sum of fourteen hundred and ninety dollar and sixty one cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also its<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Boyd</name><lb/> vs 509<lb/> <name>Moses Meyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial and motion in arrest filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>F B Parsens</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of answer of <name>Farlin</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Naughton</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>F P Burke</name></head>
            <p>Reply to Counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Higgins</name><lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>F H Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Presbury</name><lb/> vs 657<lb/> <name>Robert G Moss</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Baldwin</name><lb/> vs 666<lb/> <name>Jno C Wicks</name></head>
            <p>Supplemental answer<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Yore</name><lb/> vs 615<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendant costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>P Kraft</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Covrwell Sage</name><lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>Jno M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part of counter claim filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="380" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0387.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Todd</name><lb/> vs 474<lb/> <name>Seleg Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#120, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Evins</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Thomas McAdams</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Rent.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>George<lb/> Wishman</name>, <name>William Williamson</name>, <name>Richard Stevens</name>, <name>F A McDonald</name>, <name>William<lb/> Hanna</name>, <name>Walter Williams</name>, <name>Henry H Belden</name>, <name>J M Overs</name>, <name>J C Rives</name>, <name>A Harrington</name>,<lb/> <name>Dennis Brennen</name> and <name>J J Musman</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and<lb/> sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and twenty<lb/> dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages of aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Carson</name> et al<lb/> vs 718<lb/> <name>James Bissell</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#365, 85<lb/> to bear 10 per ct</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph N Hinds</name><lb/> vs 598<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and sixty five dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of he defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per an<lb/>num form this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#299, 60.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Niederrethor</name><lb/> vs 585<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, by their respective attorneys, and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ninety nine dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of he defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1027, 42.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Brown</name>, <name>George T Peabody</name>,<lb/> and <name>J Johnson Brown</name><lb/> vs 607<lb/> <name>John M Dowell</name> and <name>George McDowell</name></head>
            <p>on note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make de<lb/>fault, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; ad the Court finds form the instruments in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> often hundred and twenty seven dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alanson Dickenson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>T B Kemper</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Rodrig</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael O Burke</name></head>
            <p>Continued at the costs of said plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="381" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0388.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial field.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas H Welling</name> et al<lb/> vs 590<lb/> <name>Robt P Cady</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>John Young</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Theodore Hesselmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion in arrest of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neun Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinrich Husner</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#229, 11</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Godard Raberg</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Thomas</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredow</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and twenty nine dollars and eleven cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of he defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#302, 65.<lb/> 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs 633.<lb/> <name>Andrew A LeBeau</name>, <name>Ezra O English</name>,<lb/> and <name>John Burnes</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also come<lb/> the defendants, <name>English</name> and <name>Burnes</name>, by their attorneys and<lb/> withdraw their answer and the defendant <name>LeBeau</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes default<lb/> and the defendants <name>English</name> and <name>Burns</name> saying nothing further in bar of plaintiffs demand, this peti<lb/>tion herein is taken against all the defendants confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and two dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of he defendant the debt aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#663, 65<lb/> &amp; 10 Per ct<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Burrowor</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Boyle</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Salisbury</name><lb/> vs 591<lb/> <name>Oliver T Bragg</name>,<lb/> <name>Michal Burrows</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Burrows</name>, by their respective at<lb/>tourneys, but the defendant, <name>Boyle</name>, still makes default, and the plaintiff dis<lb/>misses this suit as to the defendant <name>Bragg</name>; and no Jury being required this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and cor<lb/>sidered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Six hundred and sixty three dollars and sixty five cents on account of the instrument in wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution:<lb/> and it is ordered that this judgment bear ten per cent per annum interest.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#377, 23.<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 564<lb/> <name>Andrew A LeBeau</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and also come the defendant by their<lb/> attorney, and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court, and<lb/> the Court having duly hear and considered the same doth find that the<lb/> defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy<lb/> seven dollars and twenty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Eads</name><lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Thomas F Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of he plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor,<lb/> By leave of Court plaintiff withdraws the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="382" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0389.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Wharf</name><lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>John G Steininger</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#260, 35.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Rupert</name><lb/> vs 221<lb/> <name>Wesley Connor</name> and<lb/> <name>William Fullager</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing one which this action as founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty dollars and<lb/> thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2113, 35.<lb/> For value received &amp; hereby<lb/> assign the judgment of<lb/> which this is the margin<lb/> to <name>Perter Wenger</name> St Louis<lb/> <date when="1860-04-06">April 6 1860</date>.<lb/> Attest <name>S Rice</name> UK <name>K C Remte</name> and attorney in <unclear>fact</unclear> of First Ward as Inst.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 181<lb/> <name>Louis Bosse</name>, <name>Charles F Blattau</name>,<lb/> and <name>Peter Wenger</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the de<lb/>fendant, <name>Peter Wenger</name>, but the defendants, <name>Bosse</name> and <name>Blattau</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned still makes default, and on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty one hundred and thirteen dollars and<lb/> thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also it herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#3208, 40<lb/> I acknowledge full assess<lb/> asstrre falis for atrin of the<lb/> judgment of which this is<lb/> the morrgni St Louis <date when="1860-06-23">June<lb/> 23, 1860</date><lb/> Attest <name>S Rise</name> by<lb/> <name>Wm A Pumngton</name> Dpy<lb/> <name>T R Shepley</name><lb/> act for 19/A</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Hill</name><lb/> vs 623<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name>,<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name>,<lb/> and <name>George B Michael</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of thirty two hundred and eight dollars and forty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Defendants file<lb/> a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagie Lee</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out parts of the defendants answer being heard and fully considered by<lb/> the Court it is ordered that said motion be sustained as to all that cant of said answer on the<lb/> first page thereof between A and b enclosed in brackets as marked in said answer, and that<lb/> that the said motion be overruled as to the residue of said answer. The defendant files a bill of exception.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S Fife</name>, <name>George T Hubbard</name>,<lb/> and <name>Henry T Vogel</name><lb/> vs 636<lb/> <name>Richard C Shackelford</name></head>
            <p>On account. Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also comes<lb/> Jury to wit, <name>James Bauer</name>, <name>W R Hynes</name>, <name>J M Calvert</name>, <name>Gothard<lb/> Shingle</name>, <name>J C Kohr</name>, <name>G F Ehrens</name>, <name>F Kenning</name>, <name>E P Price</name>,<lb/> <name>William Reilly</name>, <name>Leonard S Chartrand</name>, <name>J M Turley</name>, and <name>William<lb/> Boglehaus</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progresses but the plaintiffs say they will not further prosecute their suit<lb/> in this behalf but voluntarily take a non suit. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plain<lb/>tiffs his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D Devlin</name><lb/> vs 660<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="383" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0390.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin F Edwards</name><lb/> vs 507<lb/> <name>James C Musick</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavits costs for absence of Dr <name>Benton</name> of Florissant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Boston Betting Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name> garn.</head>
            <p>Denial of said garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Adam</name><lb/> vs 609<lb/> <name>J B Grady</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff it is ordered that an alias writ issue herein to the next term of this<lb/> Court Until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2628, 26<lb/> to bear 10 per<lb/> cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward F Pittman</name>, <name>William H Pittman</name><lb/> and <name>George T Pittman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thornton B Kemper</name> and <name>John T Kemper</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file the duly verified<lb/> statement of the defendants whereby the said defendants confess them<lb/>selves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty six hundred<lb/> and twenty eight dollars and twenty six cents and authorize the enter<lb/>ing up of judgment against them in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor; judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-21">Tuesday February 21 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>William D Dorme</name> is, on motion of <name>P B Garesche</name>, admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Randolph Peters</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>Edwin a Skeele</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a bond for costs herein with <name>W B Clarke</name> as security which bond is approved<lb/> by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>The Arctic Fire Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, Commissioners to take deposi<lb/>tions to be used in their behalf on the trial of this cause are awarded them<lb/> to the States of Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, and<lb/> two Commissions for the like purpose to the State of New York are awarded them.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Remittitur</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Bart</name><lb/> vs 36<lb/> <name>George Couch</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that the execution issued herein be recalled and the plaintiff re<lb/>mits to the defendant the sum of one dollar and eighty seven cents part and parcel of the<lb/> judgment herein. Assignment of judgment to George Marsh all filed; assignment by Mar<lb/>shall to Jones filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Schuler</name><lb/> vs 665<lb/> <name>Henry Klunk</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Ballin</name><lb/> vs 666<lb/> <name>John C Wicks</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="384" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0391.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#421, 74<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Rogers</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L Rogers</name><lb/> vs 435<lb/> <name>Peter Singer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as<lb/> confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded,<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and twenty<lb/> one dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution: and it is or<lb/>dered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hanna</name><lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>Edward Morgan</name></head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that a subpoena duces tecum issue to Justice <name>Covert</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#785, 167<lb/> I acknowledge full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment of which this<lb/> is the margin<lb/> <date when="1860-08-22">Augt 22nd 1860</date><lb/> <name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> plaintiff</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Cook</name> and <name>George Matthews</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>Matthew Ashdown</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and moves the Court for judgment<lb/> on the answer of said garnishees and the Court sustains said motion, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court that the garnishees at the time they were sum<lb/>moned herein as such were indebted to the defendant, Ashdown, in the sum<lb/> of nine hundred and twenty five dollars, and that judgment has been rendered against said Ashdown in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff and that the amount thereof with interest to this date is seven hundred and eighty five dollars<lb/> and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said garnishees the debt to wit<lb/> Seven hundred and twenty five dollars and sixteen cents, together with the original suit and this proceedings and<lb/> have execution therefor. The Court allows said garnishees the sum of twenty dollars to be taxed as costs. The<lb/> issue of execution herein is stayed until the <date when="--12-28">twenty eighth day of December</date> next.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 249<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant <name>Putnam</name>, to set aside service of copy of petition and<lb/> notice of suit being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Rogers</name> et al<lb/> vs 434<lb/> <name>William H Miller</name> et al</head>
            <p>It is ordered that an alias writ issue herein to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>Answer and also a petition for alimony filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name> &amp; garn.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Sivales</name> et al<lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Horace A Conant</name></head>
            <p>Amended answer filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josephine Garvier</name> et al<lb/> vs 393<lb/> <name>John C Ivory</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take noting by their suit in<lb/> this behalf but that the defendants go hence without day and receiver of the plaintiffs<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri to the use<lb/> of <name>John L Bernicker</name> &amp; wife<lb/> vs 437<lb/> <name>Frederick W Engel</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Lich</name></head>
            <p>Defendants by leave of Court file an answer and exhibit herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="385" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0392.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The time for refilling the amended petition herein is extended twenty<lb/> days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatman Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>The time for refilling the amended petition herein is extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Davis</name><lb/> vs 278<lb/> <name>John W Thornton</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>Thornton</name> and <name>Pierce</name> and <name>Johann Sigdow</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Langford</name>, <name>James N Stephenson</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Grimm</name> and <name>Henry Grimm</name><lb/> vs 645<lb/> <name>The Merrimack Toll Bridge Company</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come<lb/> a Jury to wit; <name>George Wishman</name>, <name>Richard Stevens</name>, <name>F A McDonald</name>,<lb/> <name>Walter Williams</name>, <name>H H Belden</name>, <name>J M Ores</name>, <name>J C Revis</name>, <name>A Haring<lb/>ton</name>, <name>Dennis Bronnen</name>, <name>J J Musman</name>, <name>C F Lauman</name> and<lb/> <name>James Bauer</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-22">Wednesday February 22 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#176, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Wharf</name><lb/> vs 567<lb/> <name>John G Steininger</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this cause to the Court for assessment of damages and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiff damages<lb/> at the sum of one hundred and seventy six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Marx</name> et al<lb/> vs 677<lb/> <name>Augustus Muison</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, it is ordered that an alias summons issue to the next term<lb/> until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Davidson</name><lb/> vs 518<lb/> <name>Henry M Matthews</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by attorney, these commission to take depositions in his behalf<lb/> are awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Wyllys King</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion for security for costs being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained:<lb/> During the twenty third instant is given plaintiff to file security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Stumpf</name><lb/> vs 753<lb/> <name>Fred Lupping</name></head>
            <p>Defendant by leave of Court files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="386" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0393.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry N Hart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Roger C McAllister</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered that he be discharged<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed<lb/> said garnishee for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Harris</name><lb/> vs 669<lb/> <name>David H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#739, 06<lb/> against<lb/> <name>Jarger</name> and <name>Neff</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Eckert</name><lb/> vs 693<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name>, <name>John Neff</name> and<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Rico</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>Bartholomew Rico</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Rico</name> administratrix of <name>Bartholomew Rico</name>, but the defendant, <name>Anton<lb/> Jagger</name> and <name>John Neff</name>, although duly called still make default, wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and<lb/> thirty nine dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Mead</name><lb/> vs 109<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney but the defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#171, 30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew C Pickham</name><lb/> vs 652<lb/> <name>William W Farmer</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default, and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a jury submit the assessment of damages to the Court and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages<lb/> at the sum of one hundred and seventy one dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchman</name> et al<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kathinbach</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottlob Held</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Geo Couch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Assignment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Langford</name>, <name>James N Stephenson</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Grimm</name> and <name>Henry Grimm</name><lb/> vs 645<lb/> <name>The Merrimack Toll Bridge Company</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jurors empanneled and sworn herein and the defendant files an affi<lb/>davit and by leave of Court files an amended answer herein thereupon<lb/> by consent the Jurors are discharged from the further consideration of<lb/> this cause and this cause is continued at the defendants costs: Leave is given the plaintiffs to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Gerring</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court first obtained plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Tennille</name><lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>Cyprian M Clamorgans</name> admr et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties the time for answering herein is extended three<lb/> weeks.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="387" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0394.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Culbertson</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Noah H Whitmore</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Kepp</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles M Monell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pettes</name><lb/> no<lb/> <name>Wm Cook</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anson Carty</name><lb/> vs 159<lb/> <name>Ann Carty</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>T Clark Manchester</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Renfrew</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p><name>The Quaker City Ins Co.</name> one of the garnishees, files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John D Daggett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p><name>The Quaker City Ins Co</name>, one of the garnishees herein, files an answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Pennsylvania Ins Co</name> et al garn.</head>
            <p><name>The Quaker City Ins Co</name>, one of the garnishees files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James W Saymisch</name></head>
            <p>Interrogatories to <name>Eli M Bruce</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayden</name> and <name>Wilson</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order<lb/> of publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayden</name> and <name>Wilson</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court that order of<lb/> publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#514, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Swales</name>, <name>Edward P Casteline</name>,<lb/> and <name>Eugene B Sheridan</name><lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Herace A Conant</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury to wit; <name>William Williamson</name>, <name>William Hanna</name>, <name>W R Hines</name>,<lb/> <name>J M Colbert</name>, <name>G Schingle</name>, <name>G F Ehrens</name>, <name>F Krenning</name>, <name>E P Rico</name>,<lb/> <name>William Ruby</name>, <name>L Chartrand</name>, <name>J M Tinley</name>, and <name>William Boglehaus</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to<lb/> try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Jacoby</name> and <name>Jacob Feichart</name><lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>Francis Le May</name> and <name>John Fitzgerald</name></head>
            <p>Trespass. Now come the parties, by their attorneys, also come a Jury to wit; <name>Geo<lb/> Wischman</name>, <name>R Stevens</name>, <name>F A McDonald</name>, <name>W Williams</name>, <name>H H Belden</name>, <name>J M Oves</name>, <name>J<lb/> C Rives</name>, <name>A Harrington</name>, <name>D Brennon</name>, <name>C F Lauman</name>, <name>Jas A Bauer</name>, and <name>T F Keane</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tired and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial pro<lb/>gresses and being finished the Jurors retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
   
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="388" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0395.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-23">Thursday February 23 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment, Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary R Dufresne</name><lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>Henry Derlam</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Jacoby</name> et al<lb/> vs 622<lb/> <name>Francis le May</name> and<lb/> <name>John Fitzgerald</name></head>
            <p>Trespass.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the Jurors empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein and being agreed upon a verdict upon their oaths say they find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of one dollar. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also their costs in this behalf expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>On motion of the garnishee, <name>Emil Ulrici</name>, by his attorney, it is ordered that he be discharged<lb/> hence, for want of interrogatories, at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> The sum of five dollars is allowed said garnishee to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau Jr</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 688<lb/> <name>John Marshall</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that an alias summons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau Jr</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 684<lb/> Steam Boat <name>Henrietta</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at the defendants costs on account of the absence of <name>Dennis W<lb/> Mc Guire</name> as witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Hargadine</name><lb/> vs 200<lb/> <name>Robert Clark</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that a Dedimus issue<lb/> to the State of New York in his behalf, and by leave the plaintiff withdraws from the files<lb/> the bill of exchange for the purpose of taking depositions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Wylly King</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>This cause is continued by consent of parties and thirty days are given the plaintiff to file a bond<lb/> for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1747, 20<lb/> aget <name>Barelay</name>,<lb/> <name>Robbins</name>, and<lb/> <name>Rice</name>.<lb/> set aside 29/458</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derrick A January</name>, <name>James S Robbins</name>,<lb/> <name>Gerard R Allen</name> and <name>Thomas F January</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>D Robert Barclay</name>, <name>Solomon A Robbins</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Hungerford</name> and <name>Caleb Rice</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendants, <name>Barclay</name> and <name>Robbins</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Caleb Rice</name>, still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>George<lb/> W Hungerford</name>; thereupon come a Jury, to wit; <name>William Williamson</name>,<lb/> <name>William Hanna</name>, <name>J. J. Nersman</name>, <name>J M. Calbert</name>, <name>G Schingle</name>, <name>F<lb/> Krenning</name>, <name>E P Rice</name>, <name>William Reilly</name>, <name>L Chartrand</name>, <name>J M Tinly</name>, <name>H T Blow</name> and <name>William Roglehaws</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined<lb/> between the plaintiffs and the defendants, <name>Barclay</name> and <name>Robbins</name>, and also to enquire into and assess the plaintiffs<lb/> damages against the defendant, <name>Rice</name>, the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid say they find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Seventeen hundred and forty<lb/> seven dollars and twenty cents. It is therefor considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the de<lb/>fendants, <name>D Robert Barclay</name>, <name>Solomon H Robbins</name>, and <name>Caleb Rice</name>, the damages aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="389" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0396.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Fenton</name>, <name>Aaron B Fenton</name>,<lb/> and <name>Benjamin Fenton</name><lb/> vs 59<lb/> <name>Andrew Tainter</name></head>
            <p>Replwin.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant still makes<lb/> default, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assessment of dam<lb/>ages to the Court consenting that nominal damages may be assessed,<lb/> the Court doth accordingly assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one<lb/> cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs retain the possession of the property delivered to<lb/> them and that they recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name> trading under the<lb/> name and style of <name>John B Valle &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 35<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1217, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kearns</name><lb/> vs 686<lb/> <name>Peter Finan</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Thomas Finan</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement and consent and<lb/> agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the<lb/> defendant for the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as agreed and also his costs herein expended and that this judgment be certified to the Probate Court<lb/> of St. Louis County for payment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#947, 55</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kearns</name><lb/> vs 687<lb/> <name>Peter Finan</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Thomas Finan</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file an agreement and consent<lb/> and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and<lb/> against the defendant for the sum of nine hundred and forty seven dollars and<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs herein expended and that this judgment be certified<lb/> to the St. Louis Probate Court for payment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#188, 10<lb/> set aside 30per45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N Holliday</name><lb/> vs 616<lb/> <name>William Lingo</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert N Martin</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Martin</name>, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>Lingo</name>, still makes default, also come a Jury, to writ; <name>Richard<lb/> Steven</name>, <name>Walter Williams</name>, <name>H H Belden</name>, <name>J M Owers</name>, <name>J C Rives</name>, <name>A Harrington</name>,<lb/> <name>Dennis Brennin</name>, <name>C F Lauman</name>, <name>J A Bauer</name>, <name>W R Hynes</name>, <name>G F Ehrens</name> and <name>T F<lb/> Kean</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn as well the issues herein joined<lb/> well and truly to try as also to assess the damages against the defendant <name>William Lingo</name>, the trial progresses<lb/> and being finished the jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess the dam<lb/>ages at the sum of one hundred and eighty eight dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Swales</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Horace A Conant</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John M Krum</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 402<lb/> <name>Herman Besin</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Evins</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Tho Mc Adams</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="390" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0397.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Carson</name> and <name>John E Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac C Cable</name>, <name>Dynes Chambers</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Capell</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a motion and notice of motion for execution and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order<lb/> that an execution issue on the judgment rendered herein in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs and against the defendants at the <date when="1853-04">April Term<lb/> 1853</date> of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2114, 215<lb/> agst all except<lb/> <name>DeWald</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Constantine Schnerr</name><lb/> vs 692<lb/> <name>Philip Schlaltweder</name>, <name>John Hermann</name>,<lb/> <name>Philip Hartmann</name>, and <name>Charles Dellald</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Hermann</name> and <name>Hartmann</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as<lb/> <name>Charles Dellald</name>, but the defendant <name>Schlattiveiler</name>, still makes<lb/> default; and a Jury being waived this cause is submitted to the<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined between<lb/> the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Hermann</name> and <name>Hartmann</name>, in favor of the plaintiff and doth further find that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and<lb/> also the costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>set aside 29/394</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name> etal</head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial the defendants <name>Sylvester V Papin</name> and <name>Theophile<lb/> Papin</name> come by their attorney, but the plaintiff comes not, wherefore on motion of said<lb/> defendants, it is ordered that the plaintiff be nonsuited and that defendants go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Holmes</name><lb/> vs 691<lb/> <name>Frederick Naw</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="391" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0398.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-24">Friday February 24th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment, Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goes</name> etal<lb/> vs 370 &amp; 525<lb/> <name>H B Mevitt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal. Two causes consolidated.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#410, 05<lb/> to bear 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 124<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and ten dollars and five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 249<lb/> <name>George W Putnam</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>George W Putnam</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W M Curdy</name>'s Admrx etal<lb/> vs 743<lb/> <name>Robert Emmet</name>, <name>M Carthy</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiffs withdraw the amended petition and substitute<lb/> the original petition herein, and cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#280, 06<lb/> to bear 10 per ct<lb/> agst<lb/> <name>Facklen</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucian H Fuller</name><lb/> vs 703<lb/> <name>Ellsworth Miller</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Fackler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Fackler</name>, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>Ellsworth Miller</name>, and the par<lb/>ties waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the<lb/> defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars and six cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear inter<lb/>est at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peck Smith Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and files a petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#184, 90</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James O Carson</name>, <name>Nicholas Springer</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas M Wanall</name><lb/> vs 718<lb/> <name>James Bissell</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant still<lb/> makes default and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the<lb/> assessment of damages herein to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and eighty four dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said defendant the damages aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="392" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0399.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#391, 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Buthe</name><lb/> and <name>Theodore Backer</name><lb/> vs 714<lb/> <name>Herman H Rolfes</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and defendant by their respective Attorneys<lb/> and waiving a jury submit this cause to the Court upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> and assess their damages at the sum of Three hundred and ninety one dollars and fifteen cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#447, 37.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James V Westlake</name> and<lb/> <name>Appleton A Button</name><lb/> vs 704<lb/> <name>Charles F Hoelzle</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and forty seven dollars and thirty seven cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#284, 76</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">J C Bates<lb/> vs<lb/> Emile F Kraft and<lb/> Otto C Kraft</head>
            <p>On Note and Account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants having failed to answer<lb/> make default, wherefore the petition is taken against them as confessed; and the plain<lb/>tiff waiving a Jury submit the assessment of damages to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at<lb/> the sum of two hundred and eighty four dollars and seventy six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants to the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Dilworth</name><lb/> vs 719<lb/> <name>James M Stephenson</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Althorf</name> etal<lb/> vs 725<lb/> <name>Augustus Beneke</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 785<lb/> <name>William O Shands</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at plaintiff costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Chat S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>Abstract of issues filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Armstrong Myer</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>Nathan Cole</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court defendants file an answer and this cause is continued to the foot of<lb/> the docket at the costs of the defendants.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Dougherty</name><lb/> vs 403<lb/> <name>S Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court defendant withdraws from the files the original answer herein and<lb/> files another answer in lieu thereof, and on motion of said defendant a Dedimus is awarded<lb/> him to the State Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney, a Dedimus is awarded him to Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="393" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0400.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kingsland</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, a Dedimus is awarded him to Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Johann Hermann Tenting</name><lb/> vs 747<lb/> <name>Matta Tenting</name>.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be found and the Court being<lb/> satisfied that process cannot be served upon her therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by<lb/> his attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>menced against her to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between her and the plaintiff<lb/> on the ground that she has absented herself without a reasonable cause for the space of two years, and also to obtain<lb/> the control of the infant children mentioned in the petition, and that unless she appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis within and of the County of St. Louis, on the last Monday of Septem<lb/>ber next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, the petition herein will be<lb/> taken against her as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Dem<lb/>ocrat, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Allen</name> etal<lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties thirty days additional time are given the defendants answer<lb/> herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Wireland</name><lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff this cause is dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1000, 00<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Buhler</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Road</name><lb/> vs 731<lb/> <name>Michael Ostertag</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Buhler</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Michael Ostertag</name>, but the defendant, <name>Francis Beehler</name>, still makes default, and<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit the assessment of damages to the Court and the<lb/> Court after hearing the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages a the sum of two<lb/> hundred and eighty eight dollars and eleven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendant the sum of one thousand dollars, the penalty of the bond sued on, and also the costs of this suit, and<lb/> that the plaintiff have execution for the damages aforesaid as assessed and also the costs of this suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a motion to set aside the non suit herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood W M Camant</name><lb/> vs 726<lb/> <name>John M Kellopp</name> etal</head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stettinius</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Hughes</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Farmers Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Valentine Reis</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Reply to denial of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="394" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0401.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#342, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Marguard Forster</name><lb/> vs 736<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name> and<lb/> <name>John Neff</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendant, Neff, by their respective attorneys, but the defendant<lb/> <name>Jaeger</name> still makes default, and a Jury being waived this cause is submitted to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings exhibit and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and doth find that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and forty two dollars and twenty five cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckminidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-25">Saturday February 25th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff, appoints <name>James H Douglass</name> a deputy sheriff of St. Louis County, which appointment<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Russell</name><lb/> vs 680<lb/> <name>Nicholas Devoy</name> etal</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to set aside the non suit herein being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained, and this cause is continued at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Boernstein</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick E Schoefer</name><lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Simon Eimer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>And now at this day come the plaintiffs and dismiss this suit and releases all actions right<lb/> of action and claim on the delivery bond given by <name>Andreas Krug</name> and <name>John Kun</name> in said<lb/> cause and the defendant also comes and releases all actions rights of action and claim in the<lb/> attachment bond given by <name>Frederick Schaefer</name> and <name>P H Ewald</name> in said cause; and it is ordered<lb/> that execution issue for the costs herein. Stipulation filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Otto Oncken</name></head>
            <p>Assignee files a petition for discharge from trust.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> etal<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Julia A Gordon</name>, <name>Preston Gordon</name> and <name>W Bacon Sr</name> file an answer.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dutchman</name><lb/> vs 224<lb/> <name>Matthew Rippey</name> etal</head> 
            <p>Bond for costs filed and approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James R Graham</name> etal<lb/> vs 31<lb/> <name>Oliver S Watt</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> Cooper and Johnston</head>
            <p>The assignee files a bond herein which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="395" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0402.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Lindell</name><lb/> vs 715<lb/> <name>Pelagie Lee</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court first had and obtained defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Shepherd</name> and <name>Spence</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>St Charles Western Plank<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Order for Subpoena Duces Tecum.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a subpoena duces<lb/> tecum be issued to the Secretary of said defendant, <name>John K Mc Dermory</name>, requiring<lb/> him to produce on the trial of this cause the records of the said Company or of the<lb/> Board of Director thereof, also the final estimates of the work done by plaintiff<lb/> in grading the road of the defendant, particularly the final estimates of the work done on Sections eight and<lb/> nine of said road by plaintiffs, also the contract between plaintiff and defendent for the grading ofsaid road<lb/> dated about <date when="1852-05-17">May 17th 1852</date>, also all papers orders and records relating to said work or to said contract<lb/> or to any of the matters in dispute in this cause relating to said road.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>D A January</name> etal<lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>D Robert Barclay</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs 64<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Remittitur.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff remits to the defendant the sum of five hundred and eighty dollars and eighty<lb/> cents part and parcel of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckminidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-27">Monday February 27th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William G Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reese J Thomas</name><lb/> vs 843<lb/> <name>Henry S Eaton</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs 844<lb/> <name>George G Presburry</name> garns</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff the said garnishee is discharged at plaintiffs costs without<lb/> an allowance.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#423, 20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Jennings</name>, <name>Benjamin F Robinson</name>,<lb/> and <name>James T Pettis</name><lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and by consent<lb/> and leave plaintiffs amend their petition by striking out Moses<lb/> and inserting Morris in given name of defendant; and the par<lb/>ties agree that judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> and against the defendant for the sum of four hundred and twenty three dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as agreed upon and also their<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Gerring</name><lb/> vs 467<lb/> <name>William Brown</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a demurrer to the amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="396" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0403.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charless</name> etal<lb/> vs 840<lb/> <name>George E Hawley</name> and <name>G B Sweet</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Chicago Alton &amp; St Louis RR Co</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishees, by their attorney, it is ordered that they be dis<lb/>charged at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten<lb/> dollars is allowed each for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Charles</name> etal<lb/> vs 840<lb/> <name>George E Hawley</name> and <name>G B Sweet</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Chicago A &amp; St L R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishees, by Attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> they be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The<lb/> sum of ten dollars is allowed each for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>Napoleon B Mulliken</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on account of the absence of A Christy<lb/> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Causse</name> etal<lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an additional on attachment bond the name of <name>Gilbert A Pryor</name>,<lb/> and the said Pryor acknowledges the same and the same is accordingly as approved.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Causse</name> etal<lb/> vs 820<lb/> <name>F A Kinnon</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Bassett</name> and <name>Clay</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the said garnishee although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default wherefore he interrogatories are<lb/> taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick K Berby</name><lb/> vs 786<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Falconer</name> etal<lb/> vs 787<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Clarke</name> etal<lb/> vs 418<lb/> <name>A Titus</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the Union Bank of Louisiana, by attorney, and files a motion to set<lb/> aside the judgment and to dissolve the attachment herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Union Bank of Louisiana<lb/> vs 428<lb/> A Titus</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and files proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published accor<lb/>ding to law, but the defendant although duly warned and solemnly called<lb/> comes not but makes default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against said defen<lb/>dant as confessed; Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name><lb/> vs 773<lb/> <name>Bernard Midas</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein<lb/> returnable to the next term, until which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Y Reeder</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>Thomas P Shallcrofs</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a bond for costs which is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Scanlan</name> etal<lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Stephen Hoyt</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendants files an answer by consent.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="397" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0404.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#55, 55<lb/> satisfied<lb/> 29/399</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nelson H Powers</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and moves the Court for judgment<lb/> on the answer of said garnishee and it appearing to the Court from the answer<lb/> that the said garnishee at the time he was summoned herein as such was i<lb/>debted to the defendant <name>George S Thompson</name> in the sum of fifty five dollars and<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said garnishee the debt aforesaid as con<lb/>fessed and that out of said sum he pay the costs of this suit; The Court allows the plaintiff the sum of ten dollars for<lb/> answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leopold Peppenheimer</name> etal<lb/> vs 801<lb/> <name>John Leiver</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Siever</name><lb/> vs 792<lb/> <name>Adolphus Meier</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Rust</name></head>
            <p>Order of Reference.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be and the same is hereby referred to<lb/> <name>Samuel A Bennett</name> to hear and decide the matters in controvery, and that he make a<lb/> report of his proceedings as early as practicable.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Blwin</name> etal<lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Albert Heingheter</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Newmark</name><lb/> vs 763<lb/> <name>Geo S Mawson</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants<lb/> costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyon</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>,<lb/> <name>Stephen C Jett</name> and<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered that the judgment by default against<lb/> defendant, <name>Bart</name>, and the dismissal as to the defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, be<lb/> set aside and vacated; thereupon come said defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by<lb/> their attorney, and file an answer and enter their appearance herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter G Camden</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by their attorney, and enter their appear<lb/>ance to this action and file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyon</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now come the defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by their attorney, and enter their<lb/> appearance to this action and file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A A Van Wormer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stettinius</name> etal<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>James Hughes</name></head>
            <p>Exhibit being Copy of Chater, filed by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Roswell S Benedict</name> etal<lb/> vs 494<lb/> <name>Francis Sawslayer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elijah C Emerson</name> etal<lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Francis Sawslayer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that<lb/> execution therefor issue.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="398" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0405.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard A Edey</name><lb/> vs 496<lb/> <name>David Dunham</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>George Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>E H Reinheimer</name>, <name>William Lingo</name>, <name>William Palmer</name>, <name>Alfred Slea</name>, <name>Perry Turner</name>, <name>W W C<lb/> Perry</name>, <name>John Graham</name>, <name>Geo S Chard</name>, <name>J D Bascom</name>, <name>H H Freese</name> and <name>George Boecher</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go<lb/> hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name><lb/> vs 794<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deitz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mount City Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Kelsey</name> etal<lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>H M Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#379, 56<lb/> agst<lb/> Pous.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Duer Jr</name>, <name>C Sidney Norris</name><lb/> and <name>Alexander T Johnson</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Philip Hess</name> and <name>Gustav Pous</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as to<lb/> <name>Philip Hess</name>, he not having been served with process, and this cause being now<lb/> called for trial between plaintiffs and the other defendant, <name>Gustav Pous</name>, and<lb/> neither party requiring a Jury all and singular the matters and things in contro<lb/>versy are submitted to the Court and the Court after hearing the evidence in the cause doth find that the plaintiffs<lb/> are entitled to recover of and from the defendant the sum of three hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of and from the defendant the said sum of<lb/> three hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifty six cents so as aforesaid found to be due together with their costs and<lb/> charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have execution therefor. It is ordered that<lb/> the drafts mentioned in plaintiffs petition and filed therewith be delivered to said defendant, <name>Pous</name>, to be cancelled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The First Ward Savings Institution<lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>The Missouri Spinning Company</name> etal</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained; Leave is given the plaintiff to file an amended petition.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>William<lb/> Lother</name>, <name>J J Gill</name>, <name>James Smith</name>, <name>Henry Swerding</name>, <name>Henry Schuster</name>, <name>Ernst Schmidt</name>,<lb/> <name>James Donivant</name>, <name>Samuel Knight</name>, <name>Jacob Etting</name>, <name>J H Buchoath</name>, <name>Isaac T Greene</name>,<lb/> and <name>Aug Twillman</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the matter in con<lb/>troversy upon the plea in abatement well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid<lb/> over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknimidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="399" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0406.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-28">Tuesday February 28th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham A Vanllloumer</name><lb/> vs 754<lb/> <name>Lyman S Elliott</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs 827<lb/> <name>Valentine Reis</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Watson</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Abraham A Vanllloumer</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W E Dill</name><lb/> vs 800<lb/> <name>Washington Stewart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Ewing</name> etal<lb/> vs 317<lb/> <name>Joseph Dessert</name> etal</head>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, <name>Henry Cate</name>, and waiving the issue and service of process and<lb/> enters his appearance to this action. Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William W Holloway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nelson H Powers</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>George S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by attorney, in open Court acknowledges to have received full and entire satis<lb/>faction of the Judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Union Bank of Louisiana<lb/> vs 428<lb/> A Titus</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff a Dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Louisiana.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Whiting</name> files a motion to recall execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Mittenberger</name>, <name>Camille Miltenberger</name>,<lb/> and <name>Charles Miltenberger</name><lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name> and <name>Gallitzen A Horrell</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court, upon the plea<lb/>dings and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, and being fully advised of and concer<lb/>ning the premises, doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendants<lb/> go hereof without day and recover of said plaintiffs their costs and charges in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John M Cooper</name> and <name>James Johnston</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p>Now come into Court <name>James M Gardiner</name> and <name>Richard M Scruggs</name>, assignees<lb/> in this behalf, and file and present to the Court their petition for an order<lb/> approving the acceptance by them as such assignees of a proposition made<lb/> to them by <name>Pierce</name> Brothers and <name>Flanders</name>, to wit; for the purchase of the remainder of the leasehold term assigned<lb/> to said petitioner and of all the fixtures fin the said deed of assignment mentioned, and of the remaining goods<lb/> and merchandize unsold and in the hands of said assignees, all for the sum of Seven thousand five hundred<lb/> and eighty eight dollars and forty four cents in cash : Whereupon the Court upon examination of the said petition and<lb/> the affidavits filed therewith and being fully advised of and concerning the premises doth order that the said proposition be ac<lb/>cepted by said assignees and the said proposed sale made by them as above stated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Calm</name><lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>M Rosenbaum</name> etal</head>
            <p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs 374<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Company</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="400" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0407.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#172, 35.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Richardson</name><lb/> vs 61<lb/> <name>Azariah Connelly</name> and<lb/> <name>William H Haggerty</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but he defendants, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is found that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and seventy two dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Bruguire</name> etal<lb/> vs 346<lb/> <name>Thomas M Taylor</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor. Plaintiffs by leave withdraw the notes sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"> <name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorney, and also the Jurors empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknimidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-02-29">Wednesday February 29th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Asa Wilgus</name><lb/> vs 390<lb/> <name>Benjamin Ames</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor. Plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the note sued on from the files.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caw</name> and <name>Kennett</name><lb/> vs 908<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Cronen</name> Admrx</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Wild</name><lb/> vs 340<lb/> <name>George Couch</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff withdraws from the files the bill of exchange<lb/> sued on by leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#299, 67<lb/> 140 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William James</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Patterson</name></head>
            <p>Confession.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and also comes the defendant and files his statement<lb/> in writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and ninety nine dollars and sixty seven cents and authorizes<lb/> the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="401" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0408.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Meshack H Carroll</name><lb/> vs 911<lb/> <name>John W Carroll</name> garnishee of<lb/> <name>Wiby J Stratton</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the said garnishee although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the interrogatories are taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles S Rannells</name><lb/> vs 370<lb/> <name>Richard Allnger</name> etal</head><lb/> 
            <p>Defendant, Unger, files an answser herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Leiber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James S Carlisle</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#16, 68<lb/> I acknowledge full<lb/> entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgement which<lb/> this is the margin<lb/> <date when="--06-27">june 27</date> attest<lb/> C. J. Brirnes <unclear>off</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseh J Clark</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Charles Athinger</name>, <name>Julius Schrick</name><lb/> <name>Emil Schrick</name> and <name>Richard Schrick</name></head> 
            <p>On Note.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not but make default wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixteen dollars and sixty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor; Judgment to bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Samuel</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> etal</head> 
            <p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name> etal<lb/> vs 549<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head> 
            <p>Said garnishees file and appeal bond in the sum of fifty three hundred<lb/> dollars with themselves, as principals, and <name>William H Benton</name> and <name>E<lb/> Williams Fox</name>, as securities, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> etal<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> and <name>Harvey W Smith</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>William Renth</name></head> 
            <p>Said garnishees file an appeal bond in the sum of thirty two hundred dol<lb/>lars with themselves as principals and <name>E Williams Fox</name> and <name>William H<lb/> Benton</name> as securities which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2370, 08<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M Barret</name></note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jefferson S Jerman</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Mary L Barret</name>, <name>Joseph A Barret</name>,<lb/> and <name>Anapias Rice</name></head> 
            <p>On Note.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendants, <name>Mary L Barrett</name> and <name>Anapias Rice</name>, but the defendant <name>Joseph<lb/> A Barrett</name> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of twenty three hundred and seventy dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant <name>Joseph A Barret</name> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> etal<lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head> 
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Ivory</name><lb/> vs 409<lb/> <name>Francis J Smith</name> etal</head><lb/> 
            <p>Defendant <name>Smith</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="402" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0409.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#176, 02.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Clark</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus P Ladew</name>, <name>Valentine J Peers</name><lb/> and <name>William Bright</name><lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>Horatio Clark</name>, <name>Johnson</name><lb/> and <name>Ross</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit as<lb/> to the defendants <name>Johnson</name> and <name>Ross</name>, and move the Court for judgment<lb/> on the answer of <name>Clark</name>, which motion is, after due consideration by the<lb/> Court, sustained, and the Court finds from said answer and from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and seventy six dollars and two cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, leave is given him to file an amended petition; and<lb/> it is ordered that the furnish the defendant a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Chas S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside continuance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein and the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at nine o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-01">Thursday March 1st 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the Petition<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Thomas Allen</name></head>
            <p>Order Substituting Sheriff Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the petition of <name>Thomas Allen</name> now filed<lb/> that <name>Benjamin B Dayton</name>, trustee in a certain deed of trust executed by <name>George Bauman</name><lb/> and <name>Elizabeth</name> his wife recorded in Book C 5 page 264 and following of the<lb/> Recorders office, has departed this life without having completed the performance of the<lb/> trust imposed upon him by said deed of trust, it is therefore ordered that <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> Sheriff of<lb/> St. Louis County be and he is hereby substituted trustee in place of the said <name>Benjamin B Dayton</name> with<lb/> the like powers and trusts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Downing</name> etal<lb/> vs 41<lb/> <name>John M Hockaday</name> etal</head><lb/> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias attach<lb/>ment and summons issue herein returnable to the next term of this Court until<lb/> which time this cause is continued.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Downing</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Barksdale</name> and<lb/> <name>Barksdale Davidson</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Jno M Hockaday</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the said gar<lb/>nishees be discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="403" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0410.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan Colman</name><lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow Sr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court plaintiff withdraws from<lb/> the files the note and protest herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 751<lb/> <name>Job S White</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William L Catherwood</name> etal<lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Julius Busch</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by attorney, a Dedimus is awarded him to Prussia.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name><lb/> vs 797<lb/> <name>William Scanlan</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein, and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> defendant, at the date of the commencement of this suit, had secretly removed his property on effects into this State.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Nowlan</name><lb/> vs 803<lb/> <name>John Austwick</name></head>
            <p>Non suit.</p>
            <p>Now at this day this cause being called for trial, the defendant comes, by attorney, but the<lb/> plaintiff although duly called comes not, wherefore on motion of defendant it is considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff be non suited and that the defendant go hence without<lb/> day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Kathenbach</name><lb/> vs 806<lb/> <name>Gottlob Held</name> etal</head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial, the defendants <name>Muller</name> and <name>Scherzinger</name>, come by their<lb/> attorney, but the plaintiff, although called comes not, wherefore on motion of said defen<lb/>dants is considered by the Court that the plaintiff be nonsuited and that the defendants<lb/> go hence without day and recover of plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph A Sweetzer &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs 791<lb/> <name>Michael Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Novis</name> etal<lb/> vs 635<lb/> <name>The Calloway Mining and<lb/> Manufacturing Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at their costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>Missouri Spinning Company</name> etal</head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A W Lewis's</name> admr<lb/> vs 781<lb/> <name>Jno F Hague</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
            <p><name>Alexander J P Garesche</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the<lb/> execution of a deed of emancipation by him to his negro slave named <name>John Nelson</name> alias <name>John<lb/> T Williams</name>.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="404" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0411.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Herron</name><lb/> vs 858<lb/> <name>Geo W Putman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Meshack H Carroll</name><lb/> vs 911<lb/><name>Jno W Carroll</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Green</name><lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, in person, and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Hanna</name><lb/> vs 721<lb/> <name>Edward Morgan</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>Geo Lynch</name>,<lb/> <name>E H Reinheimer</name>, <name>William Palmer</name>, <name>Alfred Slea</name>, <name>John Graham</name>, <name>George Schard</name>, <name>J D<lb/> Bascom</name>, <name>H H Freese</name>, <name>W R Haclan</name>, <name>J D Fine</name>, <name>David Ryan</name> and <name>E H Wheedon</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial<lb/> progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go thereof<lb/> without day and recover of plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknmidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-02">Friday March 2nd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolf</name> etal<lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>John B Bayer</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 487<lb/> <name>Joseph Hyman</name> etal</head>
            <p>The garnishees <name>Harding Gwin &amp; Co</name> waive the allowance heretofore made them herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew L Kerr</name><lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>Jno A Williams</name> etal</head> 
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that an alias summons issue herein and this cause is con<lb/>tinued. On motion of <name>Nr J K Knight</name>, attorney for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Coens</name><lb/> vs 189<lb/> <name>Benjamin H Batte</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, the time to reply herein is extended twenty days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>F S Griesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Frederick Luppeng</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff having failed to file security for costs within the time allowed him to todo,<lb/> It is therefore, on motion of the defendant, by his attorney, ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>James Clemens Jr</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G Picot</name><lb/> vs 8<lb/> <name>Henry P Wortman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="405" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0412.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elisha B Greene</name> etal<lb/> vs 845<lb/> <name>Charles Gage</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>James L Gage</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee, by attorney, it is ordered by the Court that he be discharged<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed<lb/> him for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri upon the relation of<lb/> <name>James Mc Donough</name> Collector of St. Louis County<lb/> vs 399<lb/> <name>Albert Hinzpeter</name>, <name>Henry Heneke</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry G Bilstein</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the<lb/> defendants, <name>Albert Hinzpeter</name> and <name>Henry G Bilstein</name>, but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Henry Heneke</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against<lb/> the said defendant as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1unit.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G M Murtry</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Harvey H Humphrey</name><lb/> vs 13<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and that the damages be assessed at one cent<lb/> and the costs remaining unpaid be taxed equally between plaintiff and defendant.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff retain the possession of the<lb/> property taken by the Sheriff and delivered to plaintiff and that he recover the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> by agreement and also one half of the costs remaining unpaid and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that one half of<lb/> said costs be taxed against said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> etal<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>T Clark Manchester</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, a Dedimus is awarded them to Wisconsin.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B Sanderson</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, a dedimus is awarded them to Wisconsin.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#102, 50.</note> 
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Lacy</name>, <name>Levi Defoe</name>, <name>William D Bacon</name>,<lb/> and <name>Enoch Berry</name> Trustee of the Methodist Episcopal<lb/> Church South<lb/> vs 917<lb/> <name>Andrew King</name> Executor of <name>Elizemund Basye</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come a Jury, to wit; <name>R M Hubbard</name>, <name>Paul Degarly</name>, <name>William<lb/> Lingo</name>, <name>P Turner</name>, <name>W W C Perry</name>, <name>George Boecker</name>, <name>William<lb/> Lother</name>, <name>J J Gill</name>, <name>James Smith</name>, <name>H Severding</name>, <name>H Schuster</name> and<lb/> <name>Ernst Schmidt</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried ans sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of one hundred<lb/> and two dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant<lb/> the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and that this judgment be<lb/> certified to the Probate Court of St. Louis County for payment. Defendant files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Thomas H Lockin</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of emanci<lb/>pation to his slave woman, <name>Lydia</name> wife of Carter, a free mulatto man, said <name>Lydia</name> is of light mulatto<lb/> color, about five feet seven inches in height, rather slightly made and aged about forty two years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Armstrong</name> etal<lb/> vs 556<lb/> <name>Elijah G Tuttle</name> &amp; <name>Harvey W Smith</name> garns of Renth</head>
            <p>Bill of Exceptions filed by consent and leave of Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial on plea in abatement filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="406" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0413.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#668, 07<lb/> vs<lb/> Sanford and<lb/> Shalding.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pacific Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 244<lb/> <name>Delllit C Sanford</name>, <name>John W Spalding</name><lb/> <name>Golitzen A Horrell</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and dismisses this suit<lb/> as to the defendant <name>Glitzen A Horrell</name>, but the defendants,<lb/> <name>Delllit C Sanford</name> and and <name>John W Spalding</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds form the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and<lb/> sixty eight dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A M Waterman</name> etal<lb/> vs 175<lb/> <name>Stafford</name> etal</head>
            <p>Amended petition filed by leave.</p>
        </div2>
        <note>Satisfaction</note>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert P Clarke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac L West</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff by his attorney comes and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Darrieux</name> and <name>Picard</name><lb/> vs 11<lb/> <name>Paul Mestayer</name> and <name>Omer Pergeline</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esq, Sheriff of St. Louis County, comes and files a state<lb/>ment from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the<lb/> writ herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the probable termi<lb/>nation of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property according to law and make a report of his<lb/> proceedings under this order over before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 16</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Curley</name><lb/> vs 892<lb/> <name>William L Sloss</name> Executor<lb/> of <name>Susan Talbot</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also comes a Jury to wit; <name>R M<lb/> Hubbard</name>, <name>Paul Degarley</name>, <name>Joseph Donwant</name>, <name>P Turner</name>, <name>W W C Turner</name>, <name>George<lb/> Bocker</name>, <name>William Lother</name>, <name>J J Gill</name>, <name>Samuel Knight</name>, <name>H Swerding</name>, <name>H Schuster</name>, and<lb/> <name>Ernst Schmidt</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the<lb/> issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until 10 o'clock AM tomorrow.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknmidys.</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="407" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0414.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-03">Saturday March 3rd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward H Mead</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward H Mead</name><lb/> vs 105<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name> file an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Waterman</name> etal <lb/>vs 175<lb/> <name>Stafford</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at their<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor, and that the Sheriff release the property attached.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>C H Wiegman</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>Patrick Morris</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> etal<lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>Porter Steward and Company</name> etal<lb/> garnishees of <name>Jos Hyman</name> etal</head>
            <p>On motion of <name>James F Gyles</name>, one of the garnishees, by attorney, it is ordered that he be<lb/> discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefore The sum of ten dollars is<lb/> allowed him for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#391, 45.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burns</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>,<lb/> and <name>John H Fischer</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the defendants failing to answer make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and ninety one dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#66/34.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name>, <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name>,<lb/> and <name>John H Fisher</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants failing to answer<lb/> make default wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six<lb/> hundred and sixty one dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name> etal<lb/> vs 815<lb/> <name>Frederick M Colburn</name>, <name>John J Outley</name>,<lb/> and <name>John A Thompson</name> garnishees of the<lb/> <name>Terre Haute Alton &amp; St. Louis Rail Road Co.</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> said garnishees <name>Fred M Colburn</name> and Jno of Outley be discharged<lb/> at plaintiffs costs without an allowance, and that the said <name>John A<lb/> Thompson</name> be discharged at plaintiffs costs with an allowance of ten<lb/> dollars for answering and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Exchange Mutual Marine<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 285<lb/> <name>Louis Pechmann</name> etal</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that an alias summons issue herein for the<lb/> defendant, <name>Joseph Pfeiffer</name>, returnable to the next term of this Court and until<lb/> which time this cause is continued. On motion of <name>Mr. John Decker</name><lb/> attorney for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="408" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0415.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Exchange Mutual Insurance<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs 286<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schlenker</name> etal</head>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that an alias summons issue herein for the defendants<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schlenker</name> and <name>Joseph Pfeiffer</name>, returnable to the next term of this court until<lb/> which time this cause is continued. On motion of <name>Mr. Decker</name> one of plaintiffs attorneys.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Priscilla Baltimore</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jackson Bodkins</name></head> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by <name>R F Wingate</name>, her attorney, and also comes the defendant, by <name>William<lb/> L Sloss</name>, his attorney, and by their consent this cause is continued at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Answer and counterclaim filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>John M Krum</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">First Ward Savings Institution<lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>The Missouri Spinning Company</name> etal</head>
            <p>Defendant <name>Louis Bosse</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Dill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Stewart</name> etal</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#864, 20.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Burwell Peck</name><lb/> vs 519<lb/> <name>William Peck</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant and files his statement in writing<lb/> duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and sixty four dollars and twenty cents authorizes the entering up of judgment against him in favor of plaintiff<lb/> for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#4356, 02<lb/> 7th <unclear>claf</unclear></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Rogers and Company</name><lb/> vs 848<lb/> <name>Augustus P Ladew</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Thomas Grey</name>.</head>
            <p>Appeal from Probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of four thousand three hundred and fifty six dol<lb/>lars and two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor, and that the same be classified and placed<lb/> in the seventh class of demands against the said estate, and that this judgment be certified to the St. Louis Probate<lb/> Court there to be proceeded on according to the Statute in such case made and provided. The plaintiffs file a motion<lb/> to set aside classification of demand.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Percival Platt</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>William Bward</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant, by his attorney, leave is given him to file a motion to compel plaintiff to<lb/> elect between the several and inconsistent causes of action and relief sought by said plaintiff and<lb/> in default thereof to strike out petition, and said motion is accordingly filed, and time, until after<lb/> the determination of said motion to compel plaintiff to elect, is given the defendant to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph J Clark</name><lb/> vs 254<lb/> <name>Chas J Altinger</name> etal</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment and affidavit in support thereof filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="409" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0416.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Petition for production of books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#266, 16.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Curley</name><lb/> vs 892<lb/> <name>William Sloss</name> Executor<lb/> of <name>Susan Talbot</name></head>
            <p>Appeal from probate Court.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective; attorney, and also the jurors empanelled<lb/> and sworn herein and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of two hun<lb/>dred and sixty six dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the Estate of Susan Talbot in the hands of <name>William L Sloss</name> per executor the damages afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and that this judgment be certified to the St Louis<lb/> probate Court there to be proceeded on according to the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton &amp; Bros</name><lb/> vs 414<lb/> <name>De Haven &amp; Barton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias writ issue to St. Louis County for<lb/> defendant <name>De Haven</name> and to Cooper County for defendant Barton.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2549, 95</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Shepherd</name> and <name>Thomas Spence</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>St Charles Western Plank Road<lb/> Company</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue from St Charles County Circuit Court.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Isaac J Greene</name>, <name>Augustus T Willman</name>, <name>J H Bucksath</name>, <name>Jacob Etting</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Knight</name>, <name>Joseph Dorwant</name>, <name>Ernst Schmidt</name>, <name>Henry Schuster</name>, <name>Henry Severding</name><lb/> <name>James Smith</name>, <name>John J Gill</name> and <name>William Lother</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being fin<lb/>ished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of<lb/> twenty five hundred and forty nine dollars and ninety five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name><unclear>S M Buckumick</unclear></name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="410" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0417.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-05">Monday March 5th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#869, 28.<lb/> Dam</note>
            <head rend="bracketed">First Ward Savings Institution<lb/> vs 774<lb/> <name>Patrick E. Burke</name></head>
            <p>Petition for money had and received.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, but the defendant still makes default, and<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the assessment of damages to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiff dam<lb/>ages at the sum of Eight hundred and sixty nine dollars and twenty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also its costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Motion to set aside petition filed.</p>
            <p>The Plaintiff files an additional affidavit for further attachment herein and the Court after<lb/> due consideration thereof doth order that a further attachment issue herein returnable<lb/> to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A B Fenton</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Affidavit in support of motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent <lb/>Dam.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Madison Y Johnson</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>John Beakey</name></head>
            <p>Petition in Ejectment.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file the following<lb/> agreement; "Now come the parties to this suit by their respective attorneys and agree<lb/> upon the following facts, to wit; That at the commencement of this suit the original<lb/> plaintiff, <name>Harrah Johnson</name>, was entitled to the land sued for; that since the com<lb/>mencement of this suit she died and the present, plaintiff, <name>Madison Y Johnson</name>, succeeded to last nights as her<lb/> sole heir to said land and continued entitled thereto as such heir until the <date when="1858-07-02">second day of July, 1858</date>, when by a<lb/> Sheriffs sale under an execution upon a Judgment in favor of said <name>Sullivan</name> against said <name>Madison y Johnson</name><lb/> the said <name>Sullivan</name> became entitled to said land. It is therefore further agreed that Judgment be now rendered<lb/> in this case in behalf of said plaintiff against said defendants herein for one cent damages and all costs made<lb/> and accrued in this suit. <name>Albert Jodd</name> atty for peff. <name>Thos J Gantt</name> for <name>C D Sullivan</name>. ral:" and the parties, in open<lb/> Court consent and agree that judgment be now rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for the<lb/> sum of one cent and costs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant to the damages afore<lb/>said as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H waters</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C. Bull</name></head>
            <p>A dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Louisiana. On motion of <name>Mr Gray</name> attorney for plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loring P Hawes</name> et. al. vs <name>James Batterson</name> garns of <name>James H Barker</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee it is ordered that he be discharged at plaintiffs costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. Ten dollars allowed for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac gearhart</name> et. al. vs 20 The State Savings Institution</head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by attorney, but the defendants come not wherefore, on motion<lb/> of defendant, it is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be non suited and that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of plaintiffs its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 898<lb/> <name>Charles W. Herbert</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>No one appearing for plaintiffs this cause is continued at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>



    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="411" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0418.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Southern Bank of St. Louis<lb/> vs 916<lb/> <name>The St. Louis Lumberman and<lb/> Mechanics Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Transfer of Stock.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorney, and file an agreed<lb/> case and submit this cause to the Court on the case as stipulated and agreed<lb/> in writing and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, and being<lb/> fully advised of and concerning the premises, doth find adjudge and decide that<lb/> said sale and transfer of said stock certificates numbered respectively nine and three hundred and twenty eight by<lb/> and from said <name>George O Atherton</name> to plaintiff was legal and valid in law subject to said stock notes with the credits<lb/> on the same, and that defendant had and has no lien on said stock and stock certificate numbered nine and three<lb/> hundred and twenty eight so cold and transferred to plaintiff to secure the payment of the said note of <name>N Raynor</name><lb/> and company dated the twenty <date when="1859-03-08">eight day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty nine</date>, for the sum of three hundred<lb/> dollars, and that plaintiff is not bound to pay or assume to pay or secure said note of <name>N Raynor and Company</name>. It<lb/> is therefore considered ordered adjudged and decreed that the defendant on being sufficiently secured by the plaintiff in the<lb/> remainder due or said stock notes according to the by laws of the Company in such cases the transfer of said eight<lb/> shares of stocks to be registered on the books of the defendant vesting rights and ownership in the plaintiff, and failing<lb/> to do so this judgment and decree shall operate to pass to plaintiff such full right and ownership in said eight shares<lb/> of stocks together with all the privileges of share and stock holders in the capital stocks of the defendant; and that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant its costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H waters</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H waters</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 871<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> gains</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E. Louis</name><lb/> vs 603<lb/> <name>James C. P Louis</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Venphul</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Robert Stevens</name> gains</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W King</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>C C King</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>Reply filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hull R Jackson</name><lb/> vs 47<lb/> <name>Nathan C Covington</name></head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial comes the defendant, by his attorney, but the plaintiff al<lb/>though duly called comes not wherefore, on motion of defendant, It is considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant<lb/> go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Kimbrough</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard F Toomer</name><lb/> vs 112<lb/> <name>David Love</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the defen<lb/>dant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of one<lb/> hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifteen cents on account of a promissory note<lb/> executed and delivered by him to the plaintiffs, and that his property has been attached<lb/> and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be began and held at the City of St. Louis within and for the<lb/> Country of St. Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer to the ac<lb/>tion aforesaid according to law judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same.<lb/> And it is further ordered that a copy here of be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat a news<lb/> paper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P Sanger</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>The North Missouri Rail<lb/> Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial plaintiffs although duly called come not<lb/> but fail to prosecute their suit, wherefore it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="412" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0419.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Berby</name><lb/> vs 191<lb/> <name>William O Osborne</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stacy Bancroft</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 228<lb/> <name>Elijah Hawkens</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein. Cause<lb/> continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Fisher</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>Auguste Bencke</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#348, 64.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pilot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 172<lb/> <name>Nicoll Rayner</name> and <name>George Kyler</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default wherefore the petition herein is taken against them<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instruments in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand four hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Syme</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 60<lb/> Steam Boat Indiana</head>
            <p>Continued on application of the plaintiffs at their costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Spencer</name><lb/> vs 127<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Spencer</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Emmons</name><lb/> vs 26<lb/> <name>A P Fenton</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to suppress the deposition of <name>A B Fenton</name> being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained, and said deposition is accordingly suppressed; and this cause is con<lb/>tinued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E. Norman</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>Thomas J Norman</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>This cause being called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute, it is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Gillett</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John R Shepley</name> et. al<lb/> vs 67<lb/> <name>James C Musick</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Amy Shire</name><lb/> vs <name>Michael Shire</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears to the Court that the<lb/> defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between him and plaintiff, on the grounds of habit<lb/>ual drunkenness and that he has absented himself from the plaintiff without a reasonable cause for the space of two<lb/> years and also to obtain a decree vesting in the plaintiff the title to certain premises mentioned and described in the<lb/> petition, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St. Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St. Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day thereof answered the ac<lb/>tion aforesaid according to law the petition herein will be taken against him as confessed, And it is further ordered that a<lb/> copy hereof be published according to law in the St. Louis Dailey Express, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St. Louis.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="413" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0420.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs 842<lb/> <name>Mallet C Jackson</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Peter J Peters</name><lb/> vs 750<lb/> <name>Luther M Shreve</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by Consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A M Dowell</name> vs 61 <name>Geo I King</name></head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1449, 00<lb/> 10per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter G Camden</name><lb/> vs 87<lb/> <name>John R Bart Stephen</name> <name>C Jett</name> and <name>James S Jett</name></head> 
            <p>On note,</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by their attorneys,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>John R Bart</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and on<lb/> motion of plaintiff the Court doth find from the answer of defendants, <name>Stephen C</name><lb/> and <name>James S Jett</name>, that they are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and forty nine dollars, and doth,<lb/> find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant <name>John R Bart</name> is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and forty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate often percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1443, 66.<lb/> 10per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 110<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>, <name>Stephen C Jett</name><lb/> and <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by attorneys,<lb/> but the defendant <name>John R Bart</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and on motion of plaintiff, the Court finds from the answer of <name>Stephen C</name><lb/> and <name>James S Jett</name>, and from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and forty three dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at the rate often percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1449, 00<lb/> 10per cent.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin M Runyan</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>, <name>Stephen C Jett</name><lb/> and <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>On Note,</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by attorneys, but<lb/> the defendant <name>John R Bart</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the answer of <name>Stephen C.</name> and <name>James S. Jett</name>, and from the instrument in writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and forty nine dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1471, 65.<lb/> 10per cent<lb/> agst all except<lb/> <name>Richop</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward H Mead</name><lb/> vs 108<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>, <name>Stephen C Jett</name>,<lb/> <name>James S Jett</name> and <name>David H Bishop</name></head>
            <p>On Note,</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by attorneys, but<lb/> the defendant <name>John R Bart</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not but<lb/> makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the plaintiff dismisses this suit as to defendant, <name>David H Bishop</name>; and<lb/> the Court finds from the answer of <name>Stephen C.</name> and <name>James S. Jett</name> and from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and seventy one dollars<lb/> and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that<lb/> this judgment bear interest at the rate often per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighell's</name> administratrix<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Jones</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a plea in abatement herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="414" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0421.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1452, 50<lb/> mopherc cnt</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward H Meade</name><lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name>, <name>Stephen C Jett</name><lb/> and <name>James S Jett</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, and defendants, <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, by their attorneys,<lb/> but the defendant, <name>John R Bart</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed;<lb/> and the Court finds from the answer of <name>Stephen C</name> and <name>James S Jett</name>, and from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four<lb/>teen hundred and fifty two dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor: Judgment<lb/> to bear interest at the rate often per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of Jackson's trustee<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on account of absence of <name>J J<lb/> Reddy</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Pierson</name> assignee of <name>Geo White</name><lb/> vs 220<lb/> <name>John Murrin</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Chilton</name><lb/> vs <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for the plaintiff received opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of 58<lb/> <name>Ann Biddle's</name> Estate</head>
            <p>Exceptions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Rucling</name><lb/> vs 975<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Holmes</name> wife</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#415, 80.<lb/> against<lb/> <name>I W Davis</name> and<lb/> Roger C M Allister</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and assess his<lb/> damages at the sum of four hundred and fifteen dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of <name>James W Davis</name>,the principal, and <name>Roger C M Allister</name>, the security, on the bond given for the<lb/> release of said Steamboat, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#518, 76. <lb/>against<lb/> <name>J M davis</name>and <lb/> <name>Roger C M Allister</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert C</name> and<lb/> <name>William A Thornburgh</name><lb/> vs 759<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs and assess their dam<lb/>ages at the sum of five hundred and eighteen dollars and seventy six cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of <name>James W Davis</name>, the principal, and <name>Roger C M Allister</name>, the<lb/> security, on the bond given for the release of said Steamboat, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>John p Callahan</name> et. al.</head>
            <p><name>William H Hayden</name> files a motion to set aside judgment and also an affidavit in<lb/> support thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E Triplett</name><lb/> vs 788<lb/> <name>William C Hull</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Dobbyns</name><lb/> vs 789<lb/> <name>Wm C Hull</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued generally.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="415" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0422.tiff"/>
        <note>#1452, 50.<lb/> mopercnt</note>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 151<lb/> <name>William H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Curley</name><lb/> vs 892<lb/> <name>Susan Talbotts</name> Exr</head>
            <p>Motion for a new trial filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Gettys</name><lb/> vs 798<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Complaint.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury this<lb/> submit cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs and assess<lb/> their damages at the sum of One hundred and forty five dollars and eighty eight cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of <name>James W Davis</name>, the principal, and <name>Roger C M Allister</name>,<lb/> the security, on the bond given for the release of the said Steamboat, the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Boker</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 195<lb/> <name>J H Alexander</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Affidavit of plaintiffs partnership filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files an answer and setoff herein. </p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry F M Cour</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> et. al</head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now come th plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file proof satisfactory to the Court<lb/> that the order of publication made herein has been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satsifaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John G Milliman</name> vs <name>Ignatz Becker</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff, by attorney, comes and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="416" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0423.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-06">Tuesday March 6th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name><lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>P M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the attorney for the plaintiff and suggests and shows to the satisfaction of the Court that the<lb/> said plaintiff has departed this life since the commencement of this suit, and that <name>James Andrews</name> has<lb/> been duly appointed administrator of said plaintiff, wherefore it is ordered that this action stand revived<lb/> and be continued in the name of said administrator, and also comes <name>James Andrews</name>, administrator as aforesaid, and<lb/> enter his appearance as plaintiff to this action and thereupon comes said defendant, <name>P M Lynch</name>, by his attorney, and enters<lb/> his appearance as defendant herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Brown</name><lb/> vs 226<lb/> <name>Chester D Stevens</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Vincent Boisaubin</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>William G Miller</name></head>
            <p>Order appointing Referee.</p>
            <p>The Plaintiff petition and the defendants answer in the above entitled cause having been examined<lb/> and considered and evidence having been heard by the Court in support of the allegation of<lb/> partnership between the plaintiff and defendant and the dissolution thereof as contained in said<lb/> petition, and due deliberation being had in the premises, it appears to the satisfaction of the Court that the said partnership<lb/> was formed and dissolved as therein alleged, It is therefore ordered and decreed that this cause be referred to <name>Samuel<lb/> A Bennett</name>, Esq, as referee to take a mutual account of all dealings and transactions between the plaintiff and defen<lb/>dant touching and appertaining to said co partnership; for the better taking the said account and discovery of the matters<lb/> aforesaid, the parties are to produce before the said Referee upon oath all books papers and writings in their custody on<lb/> power relating thereto, and all other testimony material in the examination of the matters aforesaid, as the said referee<lb/> shall direct, who in taking the said account is to make unto the parties all just allowances, and to report to he Court<lb/> what upon the balance of said account shall appear to be due from either party to the other, and the Court doth<lb/> reserve the consideration of the costs of this suit and of all further directions until after the referee shall have made<lb/> his report, when either side is to be at liberty to apply to the Court as occasion may require.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a motion for leave to verify petition and on his motion a dedimus is awarded him<lb/> to the State of New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah Wetherill</name> et. al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A Hurt</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 798<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburgh</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 759<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gamaliel Bartlett</name> vs <name>Benj Jno Compton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="417" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0424.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#881, 70.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S Mepham</name> and <name>William G Mepham</name><lb/> vs 6<lb/> <name>Jacob Merritt</name>, <name>Robert H Campbell</name>, <name>Henry B<lb/> Merritt</name> and <name>George W kidd</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by their attorney, and file proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made<lb/> herein has been duly published, according to law, but the<lb/> defendants although duly warned and called come not<lb/> but make default wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred<lb/> and eighty one dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Lieber</name><lb/> vs 850<lb/> <name>St. Louis Agricultural and Mechanical Association</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Answer filed. Motion for Judgment an answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#687, 05.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name>, <name>Augustus S Mermod</name>, and <name>D Constant Jaccard</name><lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Louis Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by <name>William T Mason</name>, Esq, their attor<lb/>ney, and files a petition and also comes the defendant, in person, and files<lb/> his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses<lb/> himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty<lb/> seven dollars and five cents and authorizes the entering up of Judgment against him in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Miltenberger</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 421<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph S Hastings Sr</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 489<lb/> <name>Rose A Masterson</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor. Said plaintiffs, by leave of Court first had and obtained withdraw<lb/> from the files the notes sued on.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="418" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0425.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-07">Wednesday March 7th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>John W Stephens</name> is admitted and enrolled as a member of this bar.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>John M Krum</name></head>
            <p>Order for Subpoena Duces Tecarn.</p>
            <p>The defendant files an affidavit and the Court, after consideration thereof, doth order that a<lb/> subpoena duces tecarn issue to the plaintiff to compel him to produce on the trial of this cause the<lb/> books and writings mentioned in said affidavit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Loring B Hawes</name> et. al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Palluson</name> garns</head>
            <p>By consent of parties the discharge of said garnishee heretofore entered is set aside and vaca<lb/>ted and ten days are given plaintiffs to reply.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 193<lb/> <name>George W Iope</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>By leave of Court first obtained the Sheriff amends his return on the wit herein by adding<lb/> a return of no service upon defendants, and on motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> that an alias summons and attachment issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Delaney</name><lb/> vs 161<lb/> <name>James P Langford</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>The parties having, at the last term of this Court, filed an agreement continuely this<lb/> cause, yet upon the condition that if the plaintiff should fail to pay the costs of said term,<lb/> together with the costs of the previous term, on or before the first day of the present term of<lb/> this Court, this cause should be dismissed, and the plaintiff having failed to comply with said condition, therefore<lb/> on motion of the defendants, by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles F Meyer</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 235<lb/> The Citizens Savings Institution</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State use of <name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>Frederick W Meister</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Citizens Savings Institution<lb/> vs 318<lb/> <name>Charles Myers</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent of parties at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State use of <name>Thomas Richeson</name><lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>Robert W Hunt</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal. Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Augustus W Lewis</name>, but the defendants, <name>Robert w Hunt</name> and <name>Sherry C Hunt</name>,<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore<lb/> on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said defendants as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Tully D Bowen</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff and files a notice of application for an allowance pendent to lite and also<lb/> an additional affidavit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="419" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0426.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William T Hazard</name><lb/> vs 253<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> and<lb/> <name>William A Whiting</name></head>
            <p>The motion of the defendant, <name>William A Whiting</name>, to set aside and recall execution being<lb/> heard and fully considered by the Court it is ordered that the execution issued herein be<lb/> set aside and recalled and all proceedings there under set a side and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Buck Smith Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>E W Decker</name>, attorney of this bar, and in behalf of said<lb/> defendants waives the issue and service of process herein and enters the<lb/> appearance of said defendants to this action. Appearance filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Mauzy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Mauzy</name>,</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears that the defendant<lb/> is a non resident of the State of Missouri therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it<lb/> is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him to<lb/> obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant on the ground of desertion<lb/> and also to obtain the restoration of her maiden name and the custody and control of the child mentioned in petition and<lb/> that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County<lb/> of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next and on or before the Sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid<lb/> according to law, the plaintiffs petition will be taken against him as confessed, And it is further ordered that a copy<lb/> herein be published according to law in the Tages Chronic a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of <name>Otto Oncker</name></head>
            <p>Order referring application of Assignee for discharge to Commissioner.</p>
            <p>The Assignee herein, <name>Edward B Gray</name>, having heretofore filed an application for discharge<lb/> from his trust, and no person having within the time required by law, filed written<lb/> objections thereto, it is ordered that the said application be referred to <name>Joseph S<lb/> Fullerton</name>, Esg, as a commissioner of this Court, to examine into the merits of said application and report to the Court,<lb/> with allconvencent speed, thereon.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> admr<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>Ind L Bermcker</name> wife</head>
            <p>Motion to confirm commissioners<lb/> Report filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benj S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Motion to quash attachment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Estate<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Ann Riddle</name><lb/> <name>John O Fallon</name> Executor</head>
            <p>Order of reference.</p>
            <p>It is ordered in this case that the matter of the settlement appealed from to wit; the set<lb/>tlement of the executor of said estate made before the St Louis probate Court at the<lb/> <date when="1856-09">September term, in the year, 1856</date>, be referred to <name>Samuel A Bennett</name> to hear the<lb/> proofs and allegations touching and of and concerning all the matters embraced in said<lb/> settlement and none others. It is further ordered that said referee after hearing the proofs shall state the ac<lb/>count of said settlement with debits and credits with his decision thereon and report the same with all the proofs<lb/> heard by him with all convenient diligence to this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> and <name>Jonas Meyberg</name><lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>The Farmers Union Insurance Company</name> of<lb/> Athens Bradford County Pennsylvania</head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendant with<lb/>draws the second reason of its motion to suppress plaintiffs depositions,<lb/> and the other part of said motion is, after due consideration by the Court,<lb/> overruled, and the parties file a stipulation, and thereupon come a Jury<lb/> to wit; <name>Stephen Balton</name>, <name>William N Wilke</name>, <name>M Stephenson</name>, <name>George Brickham</name>, <name>T J Henley</name>, <name>Jacob Rubell</name>,<lb/> <name>David Thomas</name>, <name>Frederick Sternberg</name>, <name>John Susston</name>, <name>F W Johannig</name>, <name>William Kerr</name> and <name>D F Nooran</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="420" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0427.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-18">Thursday March 8th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mears</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>William Crane</name></head>
            <p>Come the defendant and enter his appearance and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T M Coun</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>John D Harty</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Default.</p> 
            <p>Now comes the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendants, although duly warned and<lb/> called come not but make default wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as<lb/> confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Rud REED</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Frederick R Conway</name></head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs on account of absence of <name>Major Wright</name> plaintiffs counsel.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius Stange</name><lb/> vs 240<lb/> <name>W Hildenbrand</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties defendant files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 918<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Sheriff files a report of sale herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>James Boultinghouse</name></head>
            <p>Proof of Publication.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication made in this cause<lb/> have been duly published according to law.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> and <name>Jonas Meyberg</name><lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>The farmers Union Insurance Company</name> of<lb/> Athens Bradford County Pennsylvania</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> Jurors empanelled and sworn herein and the trial progresses but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="421" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0428.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-09">Friday March 9th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Nicholay</name><lb/> vs 728<lb/> <name>W Prismeyer</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, it is ordered that a saw facias issue to bring in the legal representatives<lb/> of <name>Louis Berthold</name>, Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#368, 64</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aldolphus Meier</name> and<lb/> <name>John C Rust</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M Murtry</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defendant and files his state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and sixty eight dollars and sixty four cents and<lb/> authorizes the entering up of Judgment against him in favor of plaintiffs for that amount.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Southern Bank of St Louis<lb/> vs 916<lb/> <name>The St Louis Lumbermen and Mechanics<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Order granting appeal.</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff con<lb/>senting that an appeal, with supersede as, be allowed to the defendant from<lb/> the Judgment herein rendered without the formality of exceptions, motion for<lb/> new trial, affidavit or bond, thereupon, on motion of the defendant, an appeal<lb/> is allowed it to the Supreme Court from the Judgment herein rendered, with stay of proceedings in this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs 870<lb/> <name>David Hirsch</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebeneger G Lawson</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 376<lb/> <name>John H Hall</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James F Donaldson</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 723<lb/> <name>Henry C Marston</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>H M Hart</name> assgnll<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>The Pacific Rail Road Co.</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent<lb/> at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jalmadge Stevens</name><lb/> vs 523<lb/> <name>Chas Burchard</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J D Low</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J K Bent</name></head>
            <p>Assignment of Judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order of delivery. The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to law claiming<lb/> the possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant<lb/> deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby<lb/> directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#5287, 50<lb/> Setaside 30s 84</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> and <name>Jonas Meyberg</name><lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>The Farmers Union Insurance Company</name> of<lb/> Athens Bradford County Pennsylvania</head>
            <p>On Policy of Insurance.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors<lb/> empannelled and sworn herein, and the trial progressed and being finished<lb/> the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Five thousand two hun<lb/>dred and eighty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defen<lb/>dant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs and charges in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="422" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0429.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-10">Saturday March 10th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Causse</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>William A Bassett</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file an additional attachment bond in the sum of Two hundred and<lb/> twenty five dollars with <name>Robert Causse</name>, as principal, and <name>Philip Rush</name>, as security,<lb/> which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Engel's</name> administrator<lb/> vs 76<lb/> <name>John L Bernicker</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Motion to confirm Commissioners Report filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bailey</name><lb/> vs 194<lb/> <name>John Bryant</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for the defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Goodfellow</name> for, <name>Robert William</name> <name>Goodfellow</name>,<lb/> by his curator <name>Peter Wiles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Jamison</name>, <name>John W Burd</name> as trustees<lb/> and <name>Eliza A Burd</name> and <name>John W Burd</name></head>
            <p>In Partition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a petition for<lb/> partition and also come the defendants and file an answer thereto;<lb/> and the parties submit this cause to the Court upon said pe<lb/>tition and answer, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth as certain and determine that the<lb/> said <name>Eliza A Burd</name>, wife of <name>John W Burd</name>, said <name>John Goodfellow</name> and said <name>Robert William</name> <name>Goodfellow</name> are<lb/> each entitled in fee simple to one undivided third part of the real estate mentioned and described in said petition<lb/> as follows, to wit; A certain lot of ground, with a brick dwelling house thereon, situated in the City of St Louis<lb/> in the County of St Louis and State of Missouri and described as follows, to wit; beginning at a point in the South line<lb/> of East Mound street distant one hundred and fifty two feet Eastwardly from the North West corner of Block<lb/> No two hundred and forty eight said North West corner being the intersection of the Eastern line of Broadway with<lb/> the Southern line of East Mound street, thence Southwardly and parallel with Broadway one hundred and nineteen<lb/> feet and a half to an alley, thence Eastwardly along the Northern line of said alley thirty feet, thence Northwardly<lb/> and parallel with said first line one hundred and nineteen feet and a half to the Southern line of East Mound street<lb/> and thence Westwardly thirty feet along the South side of said Mound to the place of beginning. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that partition of said real estate be made among said parties according to their respective rights and<lb/> interests as above ascertained and determined by the Court; and it appearing to the Court that partition in kind<lb/> of the above described real estate cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners thereof, it is ordered that<lb/> the Sheriff sell said real estate, at public auction, to the highest bidder, for cash.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>W H Haydon</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Meyberg</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>The Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E Elder</name> and <name>John H Hunter</name><lb/> vs 520<lb/> <name>Porter Stewart and Company</name>, <name>A O Brannin<lb/> and Company</name> garnishee of <name>Joseph Hyman</name><lb/> and <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Discharge of Garnishee. Order of Citation.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and on their motion<lb/> the said garnishee <name>Porter Stewart and Company</name> are discharged,<lb/> with an allowance of ten dollars for answering herein, at the costs<lb/> of said plaintiffs: and the plaintiffs file a traverse of the<lb/> answer of said <name>A O Brannin and Company</name> denying that<lb/> the balance of two hundred and ninety five dollars and twenty one cents arising from the sale of flour including</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="423" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0430.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>proceeds 193 sacks of corn in due to one <name>James F Gyles</name>, as disclosed in said answer, and it is ordered that<lb/> the said <name>James F Gyles</name> appear before this Court on <date when="1860-03-26">Monday the twenty sixth day of March, eighteen hundred and<lb/> sixty</date> at ten O'clock, A M, and sustain his claim, if any he have, to said sum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Graham</name><lb/> vs 113<lb/> <name>Joseph Davis</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,a dedimus is awarded him to New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>William C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney,a dedimus is awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bryan Cross</name><lb/> vs 140<lb/> <name>Walter Blearr</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy O Riordan</name><lb/> vs 196<lb/> <name>Henry Brundy</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>No one appearing to prosecute this action it is ordered that the same be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>A W Elliott</name><lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit of the defendants, costs to abide result of suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#393, 83</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Haydon</name> and <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs 355<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>On Bill of exchange.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> warned and called comes not but make default wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and ninety Three dollars and eighty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the debt aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#109, 01<lb/> as per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Hayden</name> and <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs 356<lb/> <name>Henry Eichar</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> warned and called comes not but make default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred<lb/> and nine dollars and one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt<lb/> aforesaid as found and also have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jerome R Ward</name><lb/> vs 740<lb/> <name>Wyllys King</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a bond for costs with <name>James Spore</name>, as security, with the acceptance of<lb/> the defendants thereon, which bond is approved by the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> The President and Directors<lb/> of the Bank of Louisville</head>
            <p>By leave and consent plaintiff amends his petition by changing name of defendant<lb/> to president Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="424" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0431.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Presley Philips</name><lb/> vs 146<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name> and<lb/> <name>James A Hutchinson</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Benjamin F Hutchinson</name>, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Stephen Bolton</name>, <name>William N<lb/> Wilke</name>, <name>J W Fuller</name>, <name>John N Temple</name>, <name>J B Sadler</name>, <name>Stephen Polite</name>, <name>Henry Roscoe</name>,<lb/> <name>F G Russell</name>, <name>William C Harris</name>, <name>James Stein</name>, <name>A Rice</name> and <name>C Userlander</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the<lb/> trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go<lb/> hence without day and recover of plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward James</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>James Cohicks</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs.</p> 
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Tighe</name><lb/> vs 343<lb/> <name>Francis Tighe</name></head>
            <p>Continnued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Spencer A Turner</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Timothy Ryan</name></head>
            <p>Non Suit.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant, by his attorney, but no one appearing to prosecute this suit, it is<lb/> therefore, on motion of defendant, considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by<lb/> his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of plaintiff his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="425" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0432.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-12">Monday March 12th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Tennille</name><lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>James E Munford</name> administrator of<lb/> <name>Crprian M Clamorgan</name> &amp; <name>Magennis Clamorgan</name></head>
            <p>On motion of defendant the time for answering herein is extended<lb/> ten days.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#340, 32.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Quinnebaugh Bank</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>John L Chandler</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney, and the parties having, at the last term of this Court, filed<lb/> an agreement continuing this cause, with a condition that if the defendant should fail to pay all<lb/> costs accrued to the date of the filing of side agreement, on or before the first day of the present<lb/> term of this Court, Judgment should be rendered as prayed for in said petition of plaintiff, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and forty dollars and thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#562, 87.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustavus Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>James Boultinghouse</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and sixty two dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David S Bigham</name><lb/> vs 106<lb/> <name>Dietrich Niermann</name> and administrator<lb/> of <name>George Gletzinger</name></head>
            <p>Order of Reference.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is referred to <name>Samuel A Bennett</name> to<lb/> hear and decide the matters in controversy herein; and it is ordered that he<lb/> make a report of his proceedings as soon as practicable.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 96<lb/> <name>Jacob Ensminger</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wayman Crow</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 17<lb/> <name>William B Hall</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Drake</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>Edwd H Gratiot</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Armelder F Pack</name><lb/> vs 15<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Sarah A Collier</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed of eman<lb/>cipation to <name>Jacob Dunnica</name>, aged about forty eight years, of very dark color five feet three or four inches in<lb/> height, rather heavily built or thick set.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Sarah A Collier</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a deed<lb/> emancipation to her slave <name>Maria Pipkin</name>, aged about forty seven years, of dark color about four feet<lb/> eleven inches in height, has a downward scar, of a cut at the outer end of the left eyebrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>Sarah A Collier</name>, who is personally known to the Court, in open Court, acknowledges the execution of a<lb/> deed emancipation to her negro slave <name>William Brown</name> aged about twenty five years is a mulatto<lb/> of medium color about five feet six inches in height, whiskers, when worn, rather thin, complexion uni<lb/>form and quite clear approaching to light mulatto.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="426" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0433.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#495 00<lb/> Debt</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Sappington</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Linton Sappington</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney and also comes the defen<lb/>dant and files his statement in writing, duly verified by<lb/> affidavit, confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Four hundred and ninety five Dollars, and authorizing the entering<lb/> up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff therefor. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, the debt aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#200, 00<lb/> Dams<lb/> Satisfaction<lb/> 29 p 428</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of two<lb/> hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 689<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition refiled and answer of defendant filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs 722<lb/> <name>The Bank of the State of Missouri</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition refiled and answer of defendant filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name> etal<lb/> vs 78<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name></head>
            <p>Sheriff files satisfactory proof of service of scire facias.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name> etal<lb/> vs 79<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>Sheriff files satisfactory proof of service of scire facias.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Birch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Enno Sander</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neur</name> etal<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinnich Heisner</name></head>
            <p>Demurrer to second amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Doyle</name><lb/> vs 927<lb/> <name>John Doyle</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#119, 53.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucien Eaton</name><lb/> vs 522<lb/> <name>William A Gibberson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, and also comes the defendant and files his duly verified state<lb/>ment in writing whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> One hundred and nineteen dollars and fifty three cents and authorizes the entering up of<lb/> judgment against him in favor of plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="427" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0434.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name>, <name>Henry Eastman</name>,<lb/> and <name>Ballon M Mellon</name><lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come a Jury to wit; <name>William H Smith</name>, <name>C E Loring Antone Barada</name>,<lb/> <name>J J Snook</name>, <name>H A Koener</name>, <name>H F Watson</name>, <name>James Stewart</name>, <name>Fred K<lb/> Haurtel</name>, <name>Francis Cherot</name>, <name>J Wem Klemeyer</name>, <name>Thomas Gaurs</name>, and <name>Hypo<lb/>lite Tayon</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished further proceedings are laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-13">Tuesday March 13th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>At the hour appointed for the meeting of the Court, were present <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Sheriff of St. Louis<lb/> County, and <name>P Stephens</name>, <name>Rice</name>, Clerk of said Court. The Court failing to be held on this day, according to its<lb/> adjournment, by reason that the Judge was unable to attend, it doth accordingly stand adjourned, together<lb/> with all proceedings pending therein, until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.</p>
            <closer>
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="428" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0435.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-14">Wednesday March 14th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>J A Eddy</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Waugh</name><lb/> vs 514<lb/> <name>Leon J Papin</name>, <name>Alphonse Dupre</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert F Waugh</name>, <name>William W<lb/> Waugh</name>, <name>James C Waugh</name>, <name>Eugene<lb/> Papin</name>, and <name>Josephine Papin</name></head>
            <p>Petition for confirmation of proceedings in partition and sale.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant <name>Leon<lb/> J Papin</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed; and also come the defendants, <name>James C Waugh</name>, <name>William<lb/> W Waugh</name>, and <name>Robert F Waugh</name>, by <name>Leon J Papin</name>, their guardian ad litem,<lb/> and also the defendants, <name>Alphonse Dupre</name>, <name>Eugene Papin</name> and <name>Josephine<lb/> Papin</name>, by <name>Joseph L Papin</name>, their guardian; and this cause being called for trial is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same and being fully advised of and concer<lb/>ning all the facts connected with the original proceedings in partition and sale of the premises in the plaintiff petition<lb/> described as follows, to wit; a lot in the former town, now City, of Carondelet, in the County of St Louis State of Mis<lb/>souri, to wit; the South West quarter of Block No Six in <name>Eiler's</name> Survey of said former town fronting one hundred<lb/> and sixty feet nine and one forth inches on the East side of Main street and running back of that width one hun<lb/>dred and sixty feet and five inches to the middle of said Block and bounded West by Main Street, South by<lb/> E street, East and North by the remainder of said block, being United States Survey No 40 in said former<lb/> town; and of the value of said land sold and the amount paid therefor on the sale in partition, and being satisfied<lb/> that the original proceedings and sale in partition were hand in good faith and the land was sold upon legal<lb/> notice and for a fair consideration, It doth therefore consider, adjudge and decree that the original proceedings<lb/> and sale in partition shall be valid and binding on all the parties thereto, and that the full and perfect title<lb/> of the said defendants in and to the lands described above and in the plaintiffs petition and purchased by said<lb/> plaintiff at said partition sale be vested in said plaintiff: and the Court doth further order that the plaintiff<lb/> pay the costs of these proceedings and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mears</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>William Crane</name></head>
            <p>Depositions in behalf of <name>Isaac markley</name> interpleader filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Stewart</name><lb/> vs 177<lb/> <name>Margaret Casey</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>Calvin F Burnes</name><lb/> vs 548<lb/> <name>Louis Rower</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Collins</name>, <name>Samuel N Kellogg</name>,<lb/> <name>Eliab Kirby</name>, <name>Charles B Kirtland</name><lb/> <name>Bernard Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs 458<lb/> <name>William Poos</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs withdraw their motion to set aside the non suit<lb/> herein and by leave of Court withdrawn from the files the note<lb/> sued on.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="429" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0436.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#523, 60,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David H Evans</name><lb/> vs 762<lb/> <name>Fedor Fedorow</name>, <name>John H Rohlf</name>,<lb/> <name>Lewis Emig</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>John H Rohlf</name> and <name>Lewis Emig</name>,<lb/> by their respective attorneys, but the defendant, <name>Fedor Fedorow</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein<lb/> is taken against him as confessed; and no Jury being required this cause is sub<lb/>mitted to the Court upon the pleadings proofs and exhibit and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find the issues herein joined between the plaintiff and the defendants, <name>Rohlf</name> and <name>Emig</name>, in favor of the plain<lb/>tiff, and doth also find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty three<lb/> dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid<lb/> as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Aretic Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin</name> Filed<lb/> vs 299<lb/> <name>Chas w Ban</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Hargadine</name><lb/> vs 200<lb/> <name>Rollin Clark</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W W Farmer</name><lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> RailRoad Company</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the defendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#57, 46<lb/> apt<lb/> pliff.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name>, <name>Henry Eastman</name>,<lb/> and <name>Pallon M Mellon</name><lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Petition for Damages.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorney, and also the<lb/> jurors empannelled and sworn herein and the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they<lb/> find for the defendant the sum of fifty seven dollars and forty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant recover of the plaintiffs the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H Mason</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name> garns of <name>Thos C Mason</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p> 
            <p>On Motion of said garnishee, by attorney, it is ordered that he be discharged at the plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. Ten dollars allowed for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Albert Kelsey</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein.<lb/> Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>P J<lb/> Hannon</name>, <name>Charles Annis</name>, <name>Henry M Gee</name>, <name>Patrick Tully</name>, <name>J C Brown</name>, <name>P J<lb/> Comby</name>, <name>Simon O'Connel</name>, <name>Adam Dresler</name>, <name>L Bompart</name>, <name>Samuel Treadway</name>,<lb/> <name>C W Bramsen</name>, and <name>HypoliteTyon</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until<lb/> to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="430" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0437.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-15">Thursday March 15th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#323, 35<lb/> as per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Comstoc K</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Lowery</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant and files his state<lb/>ment in writing duly verified by affidavit confessing himself indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of three hundred and twenty three dollars and twenty five cents and authorizing<lb/> the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his<lb/> costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear interest at ten percent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Suan Kelly Sullivan</name><lb/> vs 319<lb/> <name>Dennis Sullivan</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Boellert</name><lb/> vs 255<lb/> <name>The Franklin Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at plaintiffs costs on account of absence of <name>Louise<lb/> Weigman</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name> et. al</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs by leave of Court file an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Robert B Clark</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 424<lb/> <name>Michael S Cure</name> Exr et. al.</head>
            <p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John A Goodlett</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>George W Goodlett</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee it is ordered that the said garnishee be discharged at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed<lb/> said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>George Couch and company</name></head>
            <p>The Court appoints <name>G Gonzelman</name>, <name>F W Rosenthal</name> and <name>Robert Dunham</name><lb/> appraisers to appraise property and effects assigned herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clemens Jr</name><lb/> vs 202<lb/> <name>Joseph Shannon</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L Gray</name> trustee<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Albert Albertson</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorneys, and also the Jurors empan<lb/>nelled and sworn herein and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess his<lb/> damages at the sum of one cent. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff have and retain the<lb/> possession of the property delivered to him under the order made herein at the commencement of this suit and<lb/> that he recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have execution therefor, motion to set aside verdict filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sandbach</name><lb/> vs 69<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the defendant, by his attorney, a dedimius is awarded him to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="431" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0438.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>The president Directors and<lb/> Company of the Bank of Louisville</name></head>
            <p>Answer and motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Marshall</name> et. al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cuddy</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Buchanan</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 187<lb/> <name>John Meyer</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs file a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs 143<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
            <p>Commissioners motion for allowance of counsel fees filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 320<lb/> <name>John Cool</name></head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Loler</name><lb/> vs 321<lb/> <name>John Cool</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Williams</name><lb/> vs 737<lb/> Steam Boat <name>David Tatum</name></head>
            <p>Defendant by leave of Court withdraws from the files the original bill of sale<lb/> and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#366, 55.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Juliette V Reyburn</name> Executrix of the<lb/> Estate of <name>Thomas Reyburn</name> deceased<lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>Thomas A Lonergan</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by their respective attorneys, and by their consent<lb/> this cause is referred to <name>Charles D Colman</name> to hear and decide the<lb/> matters in controversy herein and it is ordered that he report with all<lb/> convenient speed; and afterwards comes said Referee <name>Chas D Colman</name><lb/> and files his report, and by consent of parties said report is confirmed; and the Court doth find therefore that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty six dollars and fifty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and also her costs herein expended and have execution therefor. The sum of five dollars is allowed said<lb/> refer for his services to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>John M Krum</name></head>
            <p>Order of Reference.</p>
            <p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney, this cause is referred to <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> to hear and<lb/> decide the matters in controversy herein, and it is ordered that he make report of his procee<lb/>dings as early as practicable.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm C Jamison</name><lb/> vs 915<lb/> <name>James Costello</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard F Sass</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 294<lb/> <name>Wm M M Pherson</name></head>
            <p>Answered filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Brockmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Lyon</name> Garns</head>
            <p>Answered filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Andrews</name> admr<lb/> vs 720<lb/> <name>B M Lynch</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#152, 50</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Mead</name><lb/> vs 109<lb/> <name>John R Bart</name></head>
            <p>Rent</p> 
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file a stipulation and consent<lb/> and agree that judgment be rendered herein in favor of plaintiff and against the</p> 
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="432" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0439.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>defendant for the sum of one hundred and fifty two dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Rice</name> and <name>Ellen Rice</name> by their guardian<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Rice</name> and <name>Elizabeth Rice</name> widow of <name>Van R<lb/> Rice</name> and <name>Joshua Fine</name> and <name>R Goodridge Woodson</name> trustee<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Cohick</name> and <name>Emiline Cohick</name> his wife, <name>David<lb/> Latimer</name> and <name>Therese Latimer</name>, his wife, <name>George W Hoke</name><lb/> and <name>Elizabeth Hoke</name>, his wife, and <name>Adeline Goss</name><lb/> <name>Matilda Goss</name>, <name>Frederick Goss</name>, <name>Mary Louisa Goss</name>, and <name>David<lb/> Goss</name> infants whose guardian is <name>Henry Goss</name>.</head>
            <p>In Partition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and file a peti<lb/>tion for partition and also come the defendants and file answers<lb/> thereto, and the parties submit this cause to the Court upon<lb/> said petition and answers, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find there from that the plaintiffs and<lb/> defendants are the own us as tenants in common of the lot of<lb/> ground described in the petition as follows, to wit; a certain trait<lb/> of parcel of land situate in the City &amp; County of St. Louis<lb/> in Christy's Addition to the City of St. Louis, according to Brown's<lb/> map lying in block forty three (43) of said Addition, fronting twenty seven (27) feet Northwardly on Franklin avenue<lb/> and running back Southwardly one hundred and forty four 7/12 feet (144 7/12) to an alley twenty feet wide, bounded North<lb/> by Franklin Avenue, South by an alley, West by lands of the estate of <name>David M Martin</name>, deceased, and east by lands<lb/> heretofore conveyed by <name>Van R Rice</name> to <name>Philip Heis</name>, being the Western half of a larger lot conveyed by <name>R F Logan</name> and<lb/> wife to <name>Van R Rice</name> by deed dated <date when="1845-01-14">14th of January, 1845</date>, and recorded in the office of the Recorder of St Louis County<lb/> in Book P No 3 page 10: And the Court doth as certain and determine that <name>Elizabeth Rice</name>, Widow of <name>Van R Rice</name>,<lb/> is entitled to an estate for her natural life in one third of two thirds that is to say in two ninths for her dower, in the said<lb/> lot of ground, and <name>Joshua Fine</name> and <name>R G Woodson</name> trustee are entitled to have paid out of the proceeds of the sale of<lb/> said dower interest the note of one hundred dollars executed by said <name>Elizabeth Rice</name> to <name>Joshua fine</name> dated <date when="1859-04-16">16th day of<lb/> April, 1859</date>, payable fifteen days after date, bearing interest at ten per cent per annum, with such interest as may have<lb/> accrued thereon; that <name>Ellen</name> and <name>Elizabeth Rice</name>, infants, are each entitled to one half of two thirds, that is to say to one<lb/> third part of said lot of ground, subject to the dower of the said <name>Elizabeth Rice</name> widow as aforesaid; that the said <name>Elizabeth<lb/> Hoke</name>, <name>Emeline Cohick</name> and <name>Therese Latimer</name> are each entitled in fee simple to one undivided seventh of one third that is to<lb/> say to one twenty first part, of the said lot of ground; that the said <name>James Cohick</name> is entitled in fee simple to three<lb/> sevenths of one third, that is says to one seventh part of said lot of ground; that the said <name>Adeline</name>, <name>Matilda</name>, <name>Fred<lb/>erick</name>, <name>Mary Louisa</name>, and <name>David Goss</name> are each entitled in fee simple to one fifth of one seventh of one one third, that is<lb/> to say to one one hundred and Fifth part of said lot of ground. It is therefore considered by the Court that partition<lb/> of said lot of ground be made among said parties according to their respective rights and interests as above ascertained and<lb/> determined; and it appearing to the Court that partition thereof in kind cannot be made without great prejudice to the<lb/> owners thereof, it is therefore ordered that the Sheriff of St Louis County sell said lot of ground at publication to the<lb/> highest bidder upon the following terms; one third of the purchase money to be paid in cash, and the balance in equal<lb/> payments of one and two years, deferred payments to be secured by notes and deed of trust, and to bear interest at the<lb/> rate of Six per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri in the relation<lb/> and to the use of <name>Robert R Clarke</name><lb/> and <name>Mathew B Chappell</name><lb/> vs 428<lb/> <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry G Soulard</name></head>
            <p>Order Changing Venue.</p>
            <p>Said Defendant, <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name>, Executor, files a petition for<lb/> a change of venue, and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth order<lb/> that the venue of this cause be changed to the St Louis Court of Courmen<lb/> Pleas, and that the Clerk of this Court file all the original papers<lb/> together with a certified copy of the record entries herein, in the office of<lb/> the Clerk of said St Louis Court of Common pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the use of <name>Abram<lb/> J Stevenson</name> and <name>Washington Bevan</name><lb/> vs 579<lb/> <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name> Executor of <name>Michael<lb/> S Cerre</name>, <name>James H Lucas</name> and <name>Henry G<lb/> Soulard</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue to Common Pleas.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs by attorney and suggest and show to the<lb/> satisfaction of the Court that the defendant, <name>Michael S Cerre</name>,<lb/> has departed this life since the commencement of this suit and that<lb/> <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name> has been duly appointed and qualified<lb/> as his executor, it is therefore ordered that said <name>Le Beau</name> be Sub</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="433" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0440.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>stituted as a defendant in lien of said Cure, and thereupon comes said <name>Chauvin V Le Beau</name>, Executor as aforesaid<lb/> and enters his appearance as on a co-defendant herein: and by consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that the venue of<lb/> this cause be changes to the St Louis Court of common pleas and that the Clerk of this Court file all the original papers,<lb/> together with a certified copy of the records entries herein, in the Office of the Clerk of said St Louis Court of common pleas.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#700, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Copp jr</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> St Louis County</head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit: <name>William H Smith</name><lb/> <name>Antone Barada</name>, <name>J J Snook</name>, <name>H A Koerner</name>, <name>H F Watson</name>, <name>James Stewart</name>, <name>Fredrick Haurtel</name>,<lb/> <name>Francis Chenot</name>, <name>J Winklemayer</name>, <name>Thomas Gaus</name>, <name>Henry Glover</name> and <name>Philip Karst</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses<lb/> and being finished the Jurors afore upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff in sum of seven<lb/> hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>Charles E Loring</name>,<lb/> <name>B J Hannan</name>, <name>H Tyon</name>, <name>Charles Annis</name>, <name>Henry M Gee</name>, <name>Patrick Tully</name>, <name>J C Brown</name>, <name>B J<lb/> Comby</name>, <name>Adam Dressler</name>, <name>L Bompart</name>, <name>Samuel Treadway</name>, and <name>C W Bramsch</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Copy</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas C Parrish</name><lb/> vs 37<lb/> <name>Walter Hendry Huish</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that<lb/> a civil action has been commenced against him /insert/ for the sum of nine hundred and sixteen dollars and seventy five cents/insert/ on account of a promissory note executed<lb/> by the defendant to the plaintiff, and that his property has been attached and unless he<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis, on the Last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action afore<lb/>said according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it<lb/> is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="434" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0441.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-16">Friday March 16th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H Abrams</name><lb/> vs 39<lb/> <name>Marshall Ford</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empannelled and<lb/> sworn herein, and by consent of parties <name>L Bompart</name>, one of said Jurors, is withdrawn from the panel<lb/> and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they<lb/> find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but<lb/> that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M Farley</name><lb/> vs 14<lb/> <name>E W Barners</name> and<lb/> <name>L H Clagstone</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant failing to answer make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Snyder</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 147<lb/> <name>Rutger Teal</name></head>
            <p>A dedimus is awarded plaintiffs to New York. On motion of <name>William Bliss Clarke</name><lb/> attorney for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pennsylvania Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 148<lb/> <name>George W Willard</name></head>
            <p>A dedimus is awarded plaintiff to Pennsylvania. On motion of<lb/> <name>William Bliss Clarke</name>, attorney for plaintiffs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> wt. al.<lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammann</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The motion to dismiss for want of security for costs being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court, it is ordered that unless the plaintiffs file a good and sufficient bond for costs within<lb/> twenty days from this date, this cause shall stand dismissed at plaintiffs costs: and this<lb/> cause continued as upon affidavit at plaintiffs costs for absence of <name>John Gordon</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> The Pacific RailRoad</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney, a subpoena duces tecum is ordered to issue to <name>F M<lb/> Billon</name> commanding him to produce certain books and papers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Riordan</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>The Ohio and Mississippi<lb/> Rail Road Company</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff, by attorney, files an affidavit, and the Court after due consideration thereof<lb/> doth grant the plaintiff leave to sue as a poor person, and thereupon doth overrule the<lb/> defendants motion for security for costs; and this cause is continued by consent of par<lb/>ties at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Copp jr</name><lb/> vs 439<lb/> St Louis County</head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Linkemeyer</name><lb/> vs 108<lb/> <name>Michael Plunkett</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Now comes <name>Thomas C Chester</name> and withdraws his appearance as attorney for defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William E Wilson</name> assignee<lb/> of <name>William Wade</name> et. al<lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>John G lare</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs application for an injunction being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="435" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0442.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Boker</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 195.<lb/> <name>Joshua H Alexander</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> and <name>Isaac L Lyon</name><lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> and <name>Stephen Clary</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>William H Smith</name>, <name>Antone Barada</name>, <name>J J Snook</name>, <name>H A Koerner</name>,<lb/> <name>H F Watson</name>, <name>James Stewart</name>, <name>Fredrick Haurtel</name>, <name>Francis Chenot</name>,<lb/> <name>J Winklemayer</name>, <name>Thomas Gaus</name>, <name>Henry Glover</name> and <name>Philip Karst</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elec<lb/>ted tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and truly to try further proceedings are laid over until tomorrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-17">Saturday March 17th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Decree ordering account to be taken, and appointing Referee.</p>
            <p>This cause having hereto fore been submitted to the Court upon the amended petition, answer,<lb/> and proofs and fully argued by counsel and taken under advisement by the Court, Now at<lb/> this day again come the respective parties, by their attorneys, and the Court being fully advised<lb/> of and concerning the premises doth order and adjudge that all settlements of accounts between plaintiff and defendant<lb/> based upon the agreements mentioned in plaintiffs petition be opened, and that a new and correct account be taken<lb/> disallowing all the charges made by defendant against plaintiff for interest and services as charged in defendants<lb/> account as usurious, and that instead of the charges their made the defendant be allowed ten per cent per annum<lb/> on the sum advanced by him under the agreement dated <date when="1857-03-27">27th May 1857</date> recited in said petition, and at the<lb/> rate of six per cent per annum on all the other advances made by him for plaintiff, That defendant be allowed<lb/> a commission of five percent on all rents collected by him according to said agreement and a reasonable sum for<lb/> the services rendered by him in the charge of the leasehold property described in the petition, and paying taxes thereon,<lb/> and redeeming the same from tax sales and other services connected with the same, that defendants counter claim<lb/> for three hundred dollars for horse buggy and harness set up in his answer be disallowed, that in stating said<lb/> account the full amount of the judgment of Whitehill and Company against plaintiff of two hundred and thirty<lb/> dollars be allowed to defendant that in estimating interest the same be calculated on both sides of the account<lb/> with annual rests on all the advances and receipt of defendant from the date of the first advance to the com<lb/>mencement of this suit, and that interest at the rate of six percent per annum be allowed on whatever balance<lb/> may be found to have been due from defendant to plaintiff at that date. It is further ordered and adjudged<lb/> that <name>Samuel A Bennett</name> be and hereby is appointed a Referee to hear the proofs and state the accounts be<lb/>tween the parties in accordance with the principles stated in this order, and that he report his proceedings herein to<lb/> this Court as soon as the same can be conveniently done. It is further ordered that the defendant file in this cause<lb/> within twenty days of the filing of this decree a bill of particulars of the services for which he claims compensation<lb/> under the proceedings in this cause; and the Court reserves the right to make such other and further order or Judg<lb/>ment in the Cause upon the coming in of the report of said Referee as the justice of the case may require.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nelson H Powers</name><lb/> vs 12<lb/> <name>Samuel M Cartney</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalman Tayler</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Maoris D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="436" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0443.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Higgins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F X Meyer</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#152, 63</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peck Smith Manufacturing Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emile F Kraft</name> and <name>Otto C Kraft</name></head>
            <p>Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by its attorney, but the defendants failing to<lb/> answer herein make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; the Court finds from the instrument in writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and fifty<lb/> two dollars and sixty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> debt aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> and <name>Isaac L Lyon</name><lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> and <name>Stephen Clary</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> jurors empannelled and sworn herein and the trial progresses but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S M Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-19">Monday, March 19th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>D A January</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiff motion for leave to amend being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained; and the amendment is accordingly made by insertion in the caption of the<lb/> petition and making the same read "The State of Missouri to the use of <name>John W Skinner</name>";<lb/> and this cause is continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>J N Stephenson</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John W Skinner</name><lb/> vs 571<lb/> <name>Charles Holmes</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for leave to amend being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> sustained; which amendment is accordingly made by inserting in the caption of the<lb/> petition, immediately above the name of the plaintiff the words "The State of Missouri to<lb/> the use of," and making the State plaintiff herein; and this cause is continued as on affidavit at the defendants<lb/> costs for absence of <name>N Stephenson</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Keep</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles M Montell</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>By consent of parties, plaintiff is given leave to amend his petition and affi<lb/>davit by interlineations so as to make defendants names read, wherever they<lb/> occur therein, "<name>Charles M Montell</name>," "<name>John F Herdlen</name>" and "<name>Nathaniel</name><lb/> constable jr,"; and by like consent the interlocutory judgment heretofore entered herein is set aside and<lb/> vacated; and defendants withdraw their motion to set aside interlocutory judgment, and six days from<lb/> this date are given defendants to answer. Aguement filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret S Evington</name><lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Thomas C Evington</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her attorney, comes and dismisses this suit.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="437" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0444.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Yore</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 160<lb/> <name>Thomas Anderson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by attorney, it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein.<lb/> Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Hite</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R F Bidwell</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Plaintiff by his attorney, in open Court acknowledges to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Conway</name><lb/> vs 431<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Motion to set aside judgment by default filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gamaliel Bartlett</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 281<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs a dedimus is awarded them to New York, and by leave of<lb/> Court they withdrawn from the files the note herein and files a copy thereof. Said note<lb/> is withdrawn for the purpose of taking depositions.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1500, 00<lb/> Dam.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> and <name>Isaac L Lyon</name><lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> and <name>Stephen Clary</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the<lb/> jurors empannelled and sworn herein, and the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say<lb/> they find for the plaintiffs the sum of fifteen hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et. al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Arctic Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stettinius</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>James Hugheo</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit;<lb/> <name>Aaron Boyd</name>, <name>Andrew Smith</name>, <name>A W Tilman</name>, <name>J M Gardiner</name>, <name>A H Christian</name>,<lb/> <name>J G Helmerichs</name>, <name>Charles Romain</name>, <name>Benjamin Delisle</name>, <name>J S Rice</name>, <name>J B Creely</name>,<lb/> <name>John Dunlass</name>, and <name>F Wonderly</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="438" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0445.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-20">Tuesday March 20th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>The parties file an agreement and by their consent eight days from this date are given<lb/> the defendants to file exceptions to the decree entered herein or any motions in relation<lb/> thereto.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Order allowing plaintiffs counsel fees.</p>
            <p>In the matter of <name>Hannah Chilton</name> against <name>John Chilton</name>, it appearing to the satisfac<lb/>tion of the Court both by the original petition. petition in this cause and also by the an<lb/>swer and eross bill of defendant as well as by the affidavit filed by the plaintiff upon<lb/> which her motion and application for a decree against the defendant for money to enable her to prosecute<lb/> her suit against the defendant for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony now subsisting between her and the<lb/> defendant rests that she is the lawful wife of said defendant, that she is poor and without means to prosecute<lb/> her suit, and it further appearing by the admission of the said defendant that he is at this time north and<lb/> the owner of property of the value of three thousand dollars. It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed by the<lb/> Court that the defendant pay to the plaintiff for the use of her solicitors, <name>J G C Davis</name> and <name>G C Grammer</name>,<lb/> the sum of one hundred dollars, and that all others questions both of law and fact be reserved until the<lb/> final disposition of the suit.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre A Berthold</name><lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> defendants costs and that execution issue therefor. By like consent defendants withdraw<lb/> from the files the notes sued on and file a receipt therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert B Bowler</name><lb/> vs 203<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the defendants<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. By like consent defendants withdraw from the files<lb/> the notes sued on and file a receipt therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name><lb/> garns of <name>Jos Hyman</name> etal</head>
            <p>Leave is given plaintiff to amend which amendment is accordingly made<lb/> by adding an additional interrogatory herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name><lb/> garns of <name>Jos Hyman</name> etal</head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff adds an additional interrogatory herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham H Hoge</name> etal<lb/> vs 887<lb/> <name>William T Mather</name> etal</head>
            <p>The defendants come and file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry G Soulard</name><lb/> vs 570<lb/> <name>Samuel H Peake</name> etal</head>
            <p>Account of trustee is this day filed herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sandbac K</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
 
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="439" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0446.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael S.Cene</name> Exr et al</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files a motion for summary judgment for amount<lb/> levied on execution in favor of plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for the garnishee opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dietz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual Fire and Marine Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Petition and affidavits for production of books filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Cathrine A Norman</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empannelled<lb/> and sworn herein and the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until to<lb/> morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O'Clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-21">Wednesday, March 21st 1860.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dietz</name><lb/> vs 241<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual Fire<lb/> and Marine Insurance Company</name></head>
            <p>Order for production of proofs.</p>
            <p>And now at this day come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and on the peti<lb/>tion of the defendant and affidavits filed, it is ordered by the Court, that the<lb/> plaintiff produce and deposit in the Clerks office of this Court, for the inspec<lb/>tion of the defendant, and for use on the trial of this cause, all the books of account<lb/> of the plaintiff kept by him in his furniture store at the City of Weston in this State, and also all the books of ac<lb/>count of the plaintiff kept by him in his furniture store at Atchison, in Kansas Territory, during the years, 1856,<lb/> 1857 and 1858; and also all accounts of goods sold and delivered in either and both of said stores, in said years;<lb/> and also all accounts of cash received and paid during said years by plaintiff and his agents; and also all his, plain<lb/>tiffs, invoice of goods wares and merchandise and furniture purchased for either of said stores and for both of<lb/> said stores and also invoices of goods and furniture on hand in 1856, 1857 and 1858; and also notes<lb/> due by or to said plaintiff during said years either and both of said stores on or before the <date when="1860-05-01">first day of May,<lb/> 1860</date>, and suffer to remain in said Clerks Office until the trial of this cause, or show cause before the<lb/> Court on the said <date when="1860-05-01">first day of May,1860</date>, why the player of the said defendant should not be granted.<lb/> Cause continued at the defendant's costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#265, 65<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mo Spinning Co</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed">The First Ward Savings Institution<lb/> vs 180<lb/> <name>The Missouri Spinning Company</name><lb/> and <name>Louis Bosse</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by its attorney,and dismisses this suit as to the defen<lb/>dant, <name>Louis Bosse</name>, but the <name>Missouri Spinning Company</name>, although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is<lb/> taken against it is confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty five dollars and<lb/> sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant that debt aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and also its costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="440" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0447.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#454, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs 389<lb/> The pacific RailRoad</head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of four hundred and fifty four dollars. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid inform aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1418, 70<lb/> &amp; 10per cent<lb/> entered as of <date when="1860-02-08">8th<lb/> of Febry 1860</date>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander McKean</name><lb/> vs 470<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> and<lb/> <name>John M Wimer</name></head>
            <p>On note</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney and it appearing to the Court that there is an error in<lb/> the judgment rendered herein on the <date when="--02-08">Eighth day of February</date> last past is ordered that<lb/> the entry made on said day be set aside and vacated and the following entered as of said<lb/> <date when="1860-02-18">Eighth day of February, 1860</date>, nunc pro-tunc, towit; Now comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fourteen hundred and eighteen dollars and<lb/> seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor; and it is ordered that this<lb/> judgment bear interest at ten percent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Reeves</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>William Fulton</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at the defendants costs for absence of <name>Bernard Kessen</name> a witness</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Helm</name> et al<lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Daniel Wolf</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Graves</name><lb/> vs 513<lb/> <name>John W Graves</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Franz J Schilling</name> for use<lb/> vs 528<lb/> <name>Albert Feger</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>set aside 30p 93.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom C Turner</name>, <name>Thomas C Turner</name>,<lb/> <name>James Turner</name>, <name>Archibald Turner</name> and <name>Robert<lb/> Turner</name><lb/> vs 243.<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys and also a Jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>J J Ganard</name>, <name>William Mentz</name>, <name>George Reinhard</name>, <name>Conard<lb/> Pfeister</name>, <name>John C Shepherd</name>, <name>J P Bailey</name>, <name>Calvin Farris</name>, <name>John<lb/> Newcomb</name>, <name>J Mc Turley</name>, <name>Peter Purcell</name>, <name>james Kay</name> and<lb/> <name>Nimrod Snyder</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trail progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> take nothing by their suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 461<lb/> <name>Thomas Ratcliffe</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Thorp</name> et al<lb/> vs 464<lb/> <name>John Baker</name></head> 
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry R Hammond</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pacific RailRoad</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="441" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0448.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#1211, 91,</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Fox</name></head>
            <p>Onaccount.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein and the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid say they find judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand two hundred<lb/> and eleven dollars and ninety one cents and costs. It is Therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also her costs herein expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Franke</name> and <name>Frederick Llasing</name>,<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name>, <name>Joseph Vogtle</name>, <name>Jacob Vogtle</name><lb/> and <name>Florean Vogtle</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by the respective attorneys, and also come a<lb/> Jury to wit: <name>George F Gleason</name>, <name>Levis Meyer</name>, <name>Aaron Boyd</name><lb/> <name>A W Tillman</name>, <name>J M Gardiner</name>, <name>A H Christian</name>, <name>J G Helmerichs</name>,<lb/> <name>Charles Romain</name>, <name>Benjamin Delisle</name>, <name>J T Rice</name>, <name>J B Creely</name>, and<lb/> <name>John Dunlap</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue herein joined well and<lb/> truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until tomorrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adeline Goss</name>, <name>Matilda Goss</name>, <name>Frederick Goss</name>, <name>Mary Louisa Goss</name>,<lb/> &amp; <name>David Goss</name>, by guardian <name>Henry Goss</name>, <name>Elizabeth Hoke</name> and her<lb/> husband <name>George W Hoke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ja Cohick</name> &amp; his wife <name>Emeline Cohick</name> &amp; <name>Therese Latimer</name> &amp; <name>David Latimer</name></head>
            <p><name>Jho E Courtenay</name> Sheriff, having filed his report of sale &amp; no exceptions<lb/> having been filed within the time specified so to do,&amp; it appearing to the Court<lb/> that said the sale has been in all respects legally conducted. It is ordered that said the re<lb/>port be confirmed &amp; that said Sheriff execute deeds to purchasers of the property sold,<lb/> &amp; that after paying the costs herein repay the balance of proceeds of sale to the<lb/> parties entitled thereto. Three hundred dollars are allowed plaintiffs attorneys for their services to be taxed as costs. Agreement filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-22">Thursday, March 22nd A D 1860.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#135, 00.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Franke</name> and <name>Frederick Klasing</name><lb/> vs 465.<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name>, <name>Joseph Vogtle</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Vogtle</name>, and <name>Florean Vogtle</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by the respective attorneys, and<lb/> also the Jurors empannelled and sworn herein and the trial pro<lb/>gresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid say they find judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and thirty five dollars and costs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Campbell</name> et al<lb/> vs 242<lb/> <name>Tho M Wolf</name> et al</head> 
            <p>Continued, and continuance<lb/> set aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Tennille</name><lb/> vs 141<lb/> <name>Ja C Muford</name> admr</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name>, <name>William Dean</name>,<lb/> <name>William Rea</name>, <name>J</name> alias <name>John</name> <name>H<lb/> Lightner</name>, and <name>John A Caughey</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant, <name>Jesse Dean</name>, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and the plaintiff dismisses the suit as to the defendants, <name>William Dean</name>, <name>William<lb/> Rea, J</name>, alias <name>John, H Lightner</name>, and <name>John A Caughey</name>; and the parties waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issue herein<lb/> joined in favor of the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit<lb/> in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff is costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>189</note>
            <p><name>A J Coons</name> vs <name>B H Batte</name>; Reply filed in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="442" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0449.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Malcom Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs 243<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiffs file a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name>, <name>George A Reichenecker</name>,<lb/> <name>Joshua Mitchem</name> and <name>George W Bowman</name><lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>David L Latourette</name>, <name>Edward Wyman</name><lb/> and <name>James A Grant</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>Petition</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the defendant, <name>Edward Wyman</name>,<lb/> and the plaintiffs dismisses this suit as to the defendants, <name>David L<lb/> Latourette</name> and <name>James A Grant</name>; and also come a Jury towit; <name>Andrew<lb/> Smith</name>, <name>F Wonderly</name>, <name>J J Ganard</name>, <name>William Metz</name>, <name>Geo Reinhard</name>,<lb/> <name>Conrad Pfeister</name>, <name>J P Bailey</name>, <name>C Farris</name>, <name>John Newcomb</name>, <name>J M<lb/> Judly</name>, <name>Peter Purcelle</name> and <name>James Ray</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> say they find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in<lb/> his behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs his costs and charges in this be<lb/>half expended and have execution therefor.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-23">Friday, March 23rd 1860.</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Simpn Meyberg</name> et al<lb/> vs 802<lb/> <name>The Farmers Union Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiffs file the affidavits of <name>Lewis Reich</name>, <name>Michael Goettler</name>, <name>Jno Orleman</name>,<lb/> <name>John Kessler</name>, <name>Moses Lyon</name>, <name>Jno R Kattwasser</name>, and <name>Solomon marx</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Ching</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file separate demurrer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Rodig</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Defendant files a motion for security for costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel W Floyd</name><lb/> vs 197<lb/> <name>Jesse Dean</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff files herein a motion for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Gwin &amp; Co</name> garn</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Gwin &amp; Co</name> garn</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Jacobs</name> et al<lb/> vs 503<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name></head> 
            <p>Plaintiffs, by their attorney, file a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>343</note>
            <p><name>Edward Maddock</name> vs <name>Elson T Wright</name>: affidavit of <name>Ira T Garrison</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="443" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0450.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J G Goodrich</name> et. al.<lb/> vs <name>Baylies Chamblin</name> </head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by <name>Samuel Knox</name>, their attorney, and acknowledge to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Lowry</name><lb/> vs 505<lb/> <name>St Bt Hinuetta</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out the defendants answer being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is sustained; and said answer is accordingly stricken out; Ten days are given defendant<lb/> to file amended answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R Field</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Justus Held</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled, Five<lb/> days are given the defendant to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs 459<lb/> <name>James Coff</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out the petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing Co.</name><lb/> <name>Michael S Cerres</name> Exr et. al. </head>
            <p>Notice of motion for summary judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by her attorney, a dedimus is awarded her to Illinois.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Thos E Mason</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties, the discharge of said garnishee heretofore entered is set aside and<lb/> vacated and ten days are given plaintiff to reply or deny.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Franke</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for a new trial and on their motion four days are given them<lb/> to file affidavits in support of said motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine A Noonan</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>John H Tighe</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Defendants file motion for a new trial herein.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="444" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0451.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-24">Saturday March 24th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chauvin V Le Beam</name> Exr et. al.</head>
            <p>Exceptions to motion for summary Judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Randolph peters</name><lb/> vs 422<lb/> <name>Edwin A Skeele</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion to dismiss this suit being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> overruled; Ten days are given the defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Otis West</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Brannock Jones</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out answer of defendant <name>Jones</name> being heard and fully considered by the<lb/> Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Webster</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 495<lb/> <name>Jacob Cammonn</name> et. al</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs file a bond for costs with <name>D. W Hill</name> as security which is approved.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hannah Chilton</name><lb/> vs 138<lb/> <name>John Chilton</name></head>
            <p>Defendant comes, by his attorney, and files a bill of Exceptions herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Rodrig</name><lb/> vs 620<lb/> <name>Michael O Rourke</name></head>
            <p>Comes the plaintiff and confesses the motion for security for costs and until the <date when="--04-16">16th of April</date><lb/> next is given him to file such security.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 425<lb/> <name>Alexander Riddle</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Plaintiffs motion to strike out part of answer of defendant, <name>Farlin</name>, being heard and<lb/> fully considered by the Court is sustained; and twenty days are given said defen<lb/>dant <name>Farlin</name> to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Lindsay</name><lb/> vs 426<lb/> <name>John B Parsons</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to strike out part of answer of defendant, <name>J Whitney Farlin</name>,<lb/> being heard and fully considered by the Court is sustained; and twenty days are given<lb/> said defendant <name>Farlin</name> to amend.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Knobelsdorff</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 391<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The defendants motion to strike out part of petition being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled; Ten days are given the defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Watson</name><lb/> vs 23<lb/> <name>Abraham A Van Wormer</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion to suppress the deposition of <name>Leonard R Sargent</name> being heard<lb/> and fully considered by the Court is sustained, and the said deposition is<lb/> accordingly suppressed: cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Presbery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thos Campbell</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant <name>Michael</name> opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Tayler</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>M D Meyers</name></head>
            <p>Mo to suppress part of depositions filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="445" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0452.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Deitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mound City Mutual Fire<lb/> and Marine Insurance Co</name>, of<lb/> <name>Saint Louis</name></head>
            <p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of plaintiff,<lb/> filed in this cause, to suppress the deposition of <name>Hugh Robinson</name>, taken<lb/> in this cause, and being thereof fully and sufficiently advised, doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained. Bill of Exceptions, filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Keep</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles M Montell</name> et. al.</head> 
            <p>On motion of the defendants, by attorney, five days additional time are given them<lb/> to answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago Rail Road Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bruce</name> et. al.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>St Louis Railway Company</name> et. al. garns</head>
            <p>Said Garnishee <name>St Louis Railway Co</name> files an answer.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-26">Monday March 26th 1860</date></dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Cuddy</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip Kingsland</name><lb/> vs 369<lb/> <name>John S Thompson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin Z Smith</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Order of Reference, Order for <name>Subpoena Duces Tecum</name></p>
            <p>By consent of parties the defendants withdraw their answer and file a supplemental an<lb/>swer herein; and on motion of the defendants, this cause is referred to <name>Samuel A<lb/> Bennett</name> as referee to hear and decide the matters in controversy herein, and it is ordered<lb/> that said referee make report of his proceeding as soon as practicable. Defendants file a motion for a sub<lb/>poena duces tecum and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth order that a subpoena duces tecum issue<lb/> to <name>Walter E Sell</name> commanding him to produce, before said Referee, at such time and place as side Referee<lb/> may designate, all the books of account, in his possession, of the late firms of <name>Sell Ward</name> and <name>Sheppard</name><lb/> and <name>Sell Sheppard and Company</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name> vs <name>Louis J Ranken</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Guenther</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Cornet</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>A R M Nair</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Now come the parties and file an agreement herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="446" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0453.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gustav Bauermann</name><lb/> vs 632<lb/> <name>Jesse Aerot</name> and <name>Wiley J Stratton</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>James Boultinghouse</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that said garnishees be<lb/> discharged at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Mentrup</name><lb/> vs 580<lb/> <name>The Peoples Savings Institution</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1812.50<lb/> &amp; 10 percent<lb/> I the undesigned assigned<lb/> hereby acknowledge<lb/> and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgement herein<lb/> enterily of which this<lb/> is the margin of the<lb/> record thereof <date when="1862-06-20">June 20. 1862</date>. <unclear><name>Jal S Rice</name></unclear>, <name>Theodore Bersch</name></note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew F Hummitsch</name><lb/> vs 123<lb/> <name>Jacob Beroch</name>, <name>Adam Richtocheid</name> and <name>Philipp Kraft</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the defendants with<lb/>draw their answer and failing further to plead make default, wherefore the<lb/> petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument in writing on which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eighteen hundred and twelve dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have execution therefor: and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of<lb/> ten percent per annum. Assignment of judgment to <name>B M Runyan</name> filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James J Kelly</name><lb/> vs 610<lb/> <name>Robert M Renick</name> etal garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> etal<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G P Theobald</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pilot Knob Iron Company</name><lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>The St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Co</name> garnishee ex</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Wilson King</name><lb/> vs 611<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> etal garns of <name>Ohio M R R Co</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Indiana vs <name>Joshua W Owings</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the<lb/> possession of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis<lb/> County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defen<lb/>dant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jacoby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Manning</name></head>
            <p>Order of Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit, according to law, claiming the possession<lb/> of certain personal property therein described; wherefore it is ordered that the defendant de<lb/>liver the property specified in said affidavit to the Sheriff of St Louis County, and said<lb/> Sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to<lb/> the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles M Laren</name><lb/> vs 490<lb/> <name>Jacob Rosenbaum</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiffs motion for a new trial herein being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Homeyer</name> etal<lb/> vs 557<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at defendants costs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383<lb/> <name>Wm G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Defendant to files exception to the decree entered herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="447" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0454.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A Keep</name><lb/> vs 117<lb/> <name>Charles M Montell</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Garrison</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 578<lb/> <name>Wm A Bassett</name> et. al.</head>
            <p>Stipulation filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et. al.<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Frederick Spies</name> et. al. garns</head>
            <p>The Garnishee, <name>George Geisel</name>, files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Backmann</name><lb/> vs 172/2<lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit the demurrer to the petition to<lb/> Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth order that all that<lb/> portion of the plaintiffs petition on the second and third pages thereof, inclosed in brackets<lb/> be and the same is hereby striken out, and that said demurrer be and is hereby overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Kessler</name><lb/> vs 612<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this proceeding be dismissed at<lb/> his costs and that execution issue therefore.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hadson E Bridge</name> and<lb/> <name>Walter L F Gage</name><lb/> vs 46<lb/> <name>John H Young</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be no<lb/>tified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and sixty five dollars and eighty four cents, on account of goods wares and merchan<lb/>dise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs, under the style of <name>W L F Gage and Company</name>,<lb/> to the firm of <name>R F Perry and Company</name> of which firm the defendant was a member, and that his property has<lb/> been attached and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis on the last Monday of September next and on or before the third day thereof answer<lb/> to the action aforesaid according to law judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the<lb/> same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Republican,<lb/> a newspaper printed and publishes in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name>, <name>William Wade</name>, <name>John D Osboine</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Goode</name>, <name>Stephen F J Trabue</name>, <name>Jules C Dennis</name><lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lot</name>, <name>Michael Fie</name>, <name>Conrad P Feiffer</name>, <name>Wilhelmina</name><lb/> <name>Treuberger</name> widow of <name>Joseph Treuberger</name>, decd, <name>Frederick Eberhardt</name>,<lb/> <name>William Topping</name>, <name>John Gutting</name>, <name>William Koenig</name>, <name>Adam Knoepp</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Mc Adams</name>, <name>James Breckinise</name>, <name>William H Harshaw</name>,<lb/> <name>John Britch</name>, <name>William Hiem</name>, <name>Jacob Britcher</name>, <name>Henry Scherges</name>, <name>William<lb/> Waldrew</name>, <name>William Meeker</name>, <name>Amons Andrews</name>, <name>John H Glein</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Charless</name>, <name>John A Brownlee</name>, <name>Louis A Labeaume</name>, and<lb/> <name>Peter E Blow</name></head>
            <p>Change of Venue from Land Court.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings exhibits and<lb/> proofs and thereupon the trial progresses but<lb/> not being finished is laid over until to<lb/> morrow morning.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="448" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0455.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-27">Tuesday March 27th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Preset as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Eddy</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Boylan</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas Wiggins</name><lb/> vs 807<lb/> <name>Napoleon Mulliken</name></head>
            <p>Motion for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Griggin P Theobald</name> et al<lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Caesar R Montague</name></head>
            <p>The demurrer to plaintiffs petition being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled;<lb/> Ten days are given defendant to answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William S Hawken</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of Application of Assignee for Discharge.</p>
            <p>Now comes <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, <name>Esguire</name>, an attorney of this Court,<lb/> heretofore appointed by the Court a commissioner to examine the merits<lb/> of the application for a discharge from his said trust heretofore made by<lb/> <name>Christopher M Hawken</name>, assignee of <name>William S Hawken</name>, and files and presents to the Court his report as such<lb/> Commissioner: and the Court having examined said Report and being advised of the merits ofsaid application doth<lb/> approve the said Report, and thereupon doth order that the said assignee pay into Court the sum of thirty five dollars<lb/> and seventy cents being the balance of dividends unclaimed in his hands, to wit; dividend due <name>Portley Nelson and<lb/> Company</name>, Sixteen dollars and seventeen cents, and dividend due <name>William F Kelly</name> nineteen dollars and fifty three<lb/> cents; and also that said assignee return here into Court the due bill of <name>Alexander Snell</name>, for twenty six dollars,<lb/> and the note of <name>W A Bruce</name> for one hundred and seventy four dollars and twenty eight cents, both mentioned in<lb/> the application of said assignee and in the Report of said Commissioner: and that said assignee also deliver into Court<lb/> all the books of account and papers relating to said assignment or the business thereof, and that he pay all costs accused<lb/> therein, including the sum of fifteen dollars which is allowed to said Commissioner.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the note herein and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs 337<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws exhibit C and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#301, 04<lb/> &amp; 10 pe cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Battuson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lewis Battuson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files the statement of the defendant duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby the defendant confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and one dollars and four cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against<lb/> him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor; and it is ordered that this judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum from this date.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>76, 87<lb/> &amp; 10 per cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Cozzens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lewis Battuson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files the statement of the defendant duly verified by affi<lb/>davit, whereby the defendant confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seventy six<lb/> dollars and eighty seven cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against him in favor of the<lb/> plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor, Judgment bear interest at ten per cent per annum.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gilbert Deacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Fisher's</name> Ex</head>
            <p>Transcript from St Louis Brobate Court filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="449" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0456.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Swales</name> et al<lb/> vs 572<lb/> <name>Horace A Conant</name></head>
            <p>The defendant motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William S Hawken</name></head>
            <p>In the matter of application for Discharge. Order of Discharge.</p>
            <p>Now comes the said <name>Christopher M Hawken</name> and shows<lb/> to the satisfaction of the Court that he hath obeyed and fully performed the<lb/> order heretofore made by the Court in pursuance of the report of <name>Henry<lb/> Hitchcock</name>, <name>Esguire</name>, Commissioner in this behalf: And that he hath paid into Court the said sum of thirty five<lb/> dollars and seventy cents, balance of dividends unclaimed in his hands, and hath delivered to the Clerk the several<lb/> books and papers in said order mentioned, and that paid all costs accrued in this behalf: Whereupon, it is further<lb/> ordered that the said <name>Christopher M Hawken</name>, assignee of <name>William S Hawken</name>, be and he is hereby discharged from<lb/> all further duty or obligations under said assignment.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Wiles</name> and <name>Daniel Horning</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Bircher</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find the issues herein joined in favor of<lb/> the plaintiffs and assess their damages sustained by reason of the promises in the petition mentioned at the sum of fifty<lb/> dollars and assess the value of the property in dispute at the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the defendant and <name>G A Kerr</name> and <name>Albert Tennet</name>, has securities on the bond herein, return<lb/> said property, towit; a certain black Morgan horse, a stallion, aged about six years, or pay the value aforesaid as assessed,<lb/> at the election of the plaintiffs, and also pay the damages aforesaid as assessed and the costs of this suit, and that the plaintiff<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bachmann</name><lb/> vs 172 1/2 <lb/> <name>Joseph Schneider</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out part<lb/> of petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p><name>Denial</name> of answer and offset &amp; filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo G Samuel</name><lb/> vs 445<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
            <p>The motion to strike out the defendants answer being heard and fully considered by the Court is over<lb/> ruled, to which action of the Court plaintiff excepts.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Franke</name> et al<lb/> vs 465<lb/> <name>Frantz Vogtle</name> et al</head>
            <p>Five days additional time are given defendants to file affidavits in support of motion<lb/> for a new trial.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name>, <name>William Wade</name>, <name>John D Osborne</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Goode</name>, <name>Stephen F J Trabue</name> and <name>Jules C Dennis</name>,<lb/> vs 269.<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name>, <name>Michael Fie</name>, <name>Connard Pfeiffer</name>, <name>Wilhelmina<lb/> Treuberger</name>, widow of <name>Joseph Treuberger</name>, <name>Frederick Eberhardt</name>, <name>William<lb/> Topping</name>, <name>John Gutting</name>,<name>William Koenig</name>, <name>Adam Knoepp</name>, <name>Tho's McAdams</name>,<lb/> <name>James Breckineidge</name>, <name>William H Harshaw</name>, <name>John Britch</name>, <name>William Hiem</name>,<lb/> <name>Jacob Brichter</name>, <name>Henry Scherges</name>, <name>William Waldrew</name>, <name>William Meeker</name>,<lb/> <name>Amos Andrews</name>, <name>John H Glien</name>, <name>Joseph Charless</name>, <name>John A Brownlee</name>, <name>Louis<lb/> A Labeaum</name> and <name>Peter E Blow</name>.</head>
            <p>Change of Venue from Land Court.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the trial progresses but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="450" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0457.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-28">Wednesday March 28 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Preset as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Lutt</name><lb/> vs 114<lb/> <name>Geo Buttner</name></head>
            <p>Motion for security for costs fileds.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josepha Brown</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Anton Brown</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit according to law from which it appear to the Court<lb/> that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, therefore on motion of the plaintiff, by<lb/> her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant on the ground that<lb/> the defendant has offered such indignities to the plaintiff as to render her condition intolerable, and also to obtain a<lb/> decree restoring to plaintiff her maiden name, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of Stt Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and nor<lb/> before the Sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the plaintiffs petition herein will be taken<lb/> against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the <name>H Louis</name><lb/> Morning Herald a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L M Barlow</name><lb/> vs 7<lb/> <name>Joseph H Oglesby</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Epenetus B Kellozz</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John H Dargin</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Dorter</name> et al<lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>Albert S Johnson</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff it is ordered that an alias summons issue herein, Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christina Earl</name><lb/> vs 205<lb/> <name>William Earl</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files an additional affidavit from which it appears to the Court that the de<lb/>fendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced<lb/> against him to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff as to render<lb/> her condition into levable, and has been convicted of felony, that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be<lb/> begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September<lb/> next, and on before the Sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, the petition herein will<lb/> be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a copy here of be published, according to law in<lb/> the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of Tillman &amp;e vs 42<lb/> <name>Henry L Battuson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richd R Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 282<lb/> <name>Justus Held</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Ja's A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>The plaintiff, by his attorney, comes and files a reply to the Counterclaim.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given &amp; Co</name> garnishee</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files a denial of the answer of said garnishee.</p>
            <p><name>Mathias Steitz</name> vs <name>Harding Given &amp; Co</name> garns; . . Denial ofsaid garnishees answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="451" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0458.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Eddy</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Boylan</name></head>
            <p>By leave of Court plaintiff withdraws the depositions taken in his behalf for the purpose of<lb/> having the paper and exhibits properly attached together and certified by the Officer taking the<lb/> same and it is ordered that the Clerk seal up and direct the same to said Officer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L Mortland</name><lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>Walker Hegaeman</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Irwin</name> of <name>Smith</name><lb/> vs 630<lb/> <name>Henry Hitchcock</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a motion for a subpoena duces tecum directed to <name>Miles G Moies</name> for<lb/> the production of certain books before the Referee herein and the Court after due consid<lb/> evation thereof doth order that a subpoena duces tecum issue as prayed for in said motion.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the trail progresses<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-29">Thursday March 29th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Bennett S Aden</name><lb/> vs 103<lb/> <name>David Dick</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert W M Clure</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by <name>Henry Hitchcock</name>, his attorney in fact, and exhibits and<lb/> presents to the Court, an assignment of the Judment herein to <name>James C M Neil</name>,<lb/> and it is ordered that said assignment be filed, which is accordingly done.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Berrendina R Croker</name><lb/> vs 66<lb/> <name>Charles Croker</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit, from which it appears that the defen<lb/>dant is a non resident of the State of Missouri, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him to obtain a decree of divorce from the lands of matrimony existing between plaintiff and<lb/> defendant on the ground that the defendant has offered such indignities to the plaintiff as to render her condition<lb/> intolerable, and also to obtain a decree obtaining the restoration of her maiden name, and that unless he appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and hold at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, or the<lb/> last Monday of September next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the County of St Louis, or the<lb/> to law the plaintiffs petition will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further advised that a copy<lb/> hereof be published, according to law, in the St Louis Evening News a newspaper printed and published in the<lb/> City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Arctic Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>578</note>
            <p><name>John Garrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W A Bassett</name> et al; Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="452" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0459.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Rieser</name><lb/> vs 248<lb/> <name>Adam Munk</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by attorney it is ordered that an alias Summons issue herein Cause<lb/> continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Steller</name> garns</head>
            <p>The plaintiff files adenial of said garnishees answer.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Little</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harvey</name> and <name>Wheedon</name></head>
            <p>Depositions this day received opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Keamer</name> and<lb/> <name>Adolph Loth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacques Blum</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the defendant and files his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby<lb/> he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twenty eight hundred and seventy<lb/> dollars and sixty five cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against him in favor of<lb/> the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269.<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the trial progresses but<lb/> not being finished further proceedings herein are laid over until Saturday<lb/> Morning. Motion to permit non suit as to interest of <name>A R M Nair</name> filed.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="453" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0460.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-30">Friday March 30th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Schulherr</name><lb/> vs 44<lb/> <name>Josephine C Smith</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>Lucius H Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Order for Production of Books and Papers.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition for the production of certain books and papers therein mentioned<lb/> and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth order that the defendant produce, on Mon<lb/>day next <date when="1860-04-02">April 2nd 1860</date>, at twelve o'clock, at the office of Jones and Sherman, in the<lb/> City of St Louis, the following bookds and papers, to wi; Inscription books of 1857, 1858 and 1859, Collection books<lb/> of 1857, 1858 and 1859, the contract of <name>H P Fuller</name>, <name>L Drury</name>,<lb/> <name>E Thomas</name>, <name>J Sear</name>, <name>R Shearlock</name>, <name>M C White</name>, <name>J W Bett</name>, <name>Walter Nutter</name>, <name>J Halligan</name>, <name>E C White</name>,<lb/> <name>Hannah McCray</name>, <name>W P Sewright</name> and <name>G A Anderson</name>, which contracts were made between <date when="1857-08-01">1st of August, 1857</date>,<lb/> and <date when="1858-04-01">1st of April, 1858</date>, by the above named persons with the said defendant, <name>Fuller</name>, by or through said plaintiff<lb/> <name>Hertz</name>, for the purchasing order or delivery of marble monuments, tombstones or gravestones; or that on said day he<lb/> show cause why the petition of plaintiff should not be granted.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Freudenberg</name><lb/> vs 28<lb/> <name>John Freudenberg</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly warned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default; wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein be taken<lb/> against the defendant as confessed; and the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth find that the plaintiff is a person<lb/> of good moral character and an innocent and injured party. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored<lb/> at all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person, and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that exe<lb/> cution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Arctic Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions taken in New York opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Simon</name><lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>Henry Simon</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Ahrens</name><lb/> vs 5.<lb/> <name>August Ahrens</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not but makes default; wherefore, on motion of plaintiff, the petition herein is taken<lb/> against the defendant as confessed: and the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the plaintiff is a<lb/> person of good moral character and an innocent and injured party. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and<lb/> be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Ja's A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs, on account of the absence of plaintiffs counsel.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="454" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0461.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Fischer</name><lb/> vs 10<lb/> <name>Adam Fischer</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly called still makes<lb/> defendant, and the Court having duly heard and considered the proofs, and being satisfied of the good<lb/> conduct of the plaintiff and that she is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge<lb/> and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered that the<lb/> plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo P Fein</name><lb/> vs 614<lb/> <name>Adolphus Dentelmoser</name> garns</head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued at the plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stettinius</name> et al<lb/> vs 75<lb/> <name>James Hugheo</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs leave is given them to relate the deposition of <name>Samuel L Campbell</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David W Hill</name><lb/> vs 71<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that ascire facias issue for the legal<lb/> representatives of the defendant. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2096, 00<lb/> agst all except<lb/> <name>Stockton</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Roe</name> and <name>Henry J Moore</name><lb/> vs 55<lb/> <name>Thomas L Moore</name>, <name>John G Glenn</name>,<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name>, <name>Joseph A Fanning</name>,<lb/> <name>James A Stockton</name>, and <name>Daniel W Wheeler</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and file a stipulation<lb/> and the plaintiffs dismiss this suit as to the defendant, <name>James A<lb/> Stockton</name>, and the defendant, <name>Daniel W Wheeler</name>, withdraws his<lb/> answer herein and failing further to plead makes default, where<lb/> fore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed: and the<lb/> plaintiffs and defendants, <name>Thomas L Moore</name>, <name>John G Glenn</name>, <name>Albert Becker</name> and <name>Joseph A Fanning</name>,<lb/> consent and agree that judgment may be rendered against said defendants and in favor of the plaintiffs for<lb/> the sum of twenty hundred and ninety six dollars; and the Court finds from the instrument in writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant, <name>Daniel W Wheeler</name>, is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of twenty hundred<unclear rend="strikethrough">dollars</unclear> and ninety six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/> tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and agreed upon and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Stevens</name><lb/> vs 70<lb/> <name>Grainard William</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plantiff it is odered that this cause dismissed at the plani<lb/>tiff costs and that execution issue threfor</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Kohr</name><lb/> vs 83<lb/> <name>St Bt Spread Eagles</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the plaintiff withdraw his motion for<lb/> judgment on the answer herein, and also a Jury, to wit; <name>George W Sparhaw</name>, <name>K, J O<lb/> Clark</name>, <name>Paschal St Cyr</name>, <name>Charles Becker</name>, <name>James Hogan</name>, <name>James Mentrup</name>, <name>Chas S Blood</name>,<lb/> <name>Louis Wise</name>, <name>Leslie Doggett</name>, <name>Geo Miller</name>, <name>Henry Renicke</name>, and <name>A B M Thompson</name>, twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progressed<lb/> but the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit this behalf but voluntarily takes a n suit with<lb/> his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff its costs herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor Motion to set aside non suit filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schaeffer</name> et al<lb/> vs 57<lb/> <name>Robt Montgomery</name></head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a Pluries Summons<lb/> issue herein, Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="455" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0462.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua Bennett</name><lb/> vs 56<lb/> <name>William C Wagley</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a pluries Summons<lb/> issue: Court continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Haley</name> et al<lb/> vs 613<lb/> <name>Frederick K Spies</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Said Garnishee files a second amended answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert N Martin</name><lb/> vs 62<lb/> <name>William Truesdale</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs for absence of <name>Stephen Haskell</name> a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#263, 75</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubodell</name>, <name>Charles Pierson</name><lb/> <name>William Ban</name> and <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs 89<lb/> <name>Harvey G Eastman</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly<lb/> summoned and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition<lb/> herein is taken against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jurt, sub<lb/>mit this cause to the Court for assessonent of damages and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of two hundred and sixty three dollars<lb/> and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recovery of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis H Schroeder</name><lb/> vs 77<lb/> Thedore Bredow</head>
            <p>Continued at the plaintiffs costs on account of absence of plaintiffs counsel.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Manly</name><lb/> vs 73<lb/> <name>Henry Buesmeyer</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued to the next term of the Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph C Irvin</name> et al<lb/> vs 68<lb/> <name>Albert S Johnson</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>United States Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 88<lb/> <name>William P Davis</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Johnson</name><lb/> vs 92<lb/> <name>Gustavus Klier</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>

    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="456" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0463.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-03-31">Saturday March 31st 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leonard H Wilkery</name><lb/> vs 133.<lb/> <name>The Illinois River Packet<lb/> Company</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Berlin</name><lb/> vs 629<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties, the continuance of this cause is set aside and vacated and this<lb/> cause placed upon the law docket for trial.</p>
            <p><name>E C Slvan</name> and <name>Edward F Tracy</name>, two credible witnesses, examined under oath, prove the execution<lb/> and acknowledgment of a deed of emancipation by <name>George Morton</name> to his slave <name>Jesse Henry</name> a bright mulatte<lb/> boy aged about four years.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry H Radford</name><lb/> vs 84<lb/> <name>Sarah Radford</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant still makes default; and the plain<lb/>tiff submits this cause to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find therefrom that the plaintiff is a person of good moral char<lb/>acter and an innocent and injured party. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the<lb/> rights and privileges of an unmarried person and that he pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the petition<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Robert Campbell</name></head>
            <p>Substitution of Sheriff as Trustee.</p>
            <p>It appearing to the Court from the petition of <name>Robert Campbell</name> the day filed,<lb/> that he is an interested party in a deed of trust executed by <name>Edwin R Yates</name>, now<lb/> deceased, on or about the <date when="1857-04-15">15th day of April, 1857</date>, recorded in the Office of the Recorder<lb/> of St Louis County in Book no 185 p 282, and that <name>Henry Cabot</name>, the trustee therein named, has removed from<lb/> the State of Missouri without having performed the duties imposed on him by said deed, It is therefore ordered<lb/> deed of trust in place of the said <name>Henry Cabot</name>, the original trustee therein named.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri use of <name>Michael Werk</name> et al<lb/> vs 533.<lb/> <name>David Anderson</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent, plaintiffs to pay witness fees and costs<lb/> of attachments for witnesses accused at this term.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfac<lb/> tion of the judgment rendered herein <date when="1859-11-18">November 18th, 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hepsia B Mudge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by his attorney, comes and acknowledge to have received full and entire satisfaction<lb/> of the judgment rendered herein <date when="1859-11-19">November 19th, 1859</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Eversmann</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>The plaintiffs, by their attorney, come and acknowledge to have received full and entire<lb/> satisfaction of the judgment rendered herein <date when="1860-01-09">January 9th, 1860</date>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H wates</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C Bull</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed. Motion to suppress depositions<lb/> filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="457" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0464.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Conrad Neun Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 483<lb/> <name>Heinuch Heissner</name></head>
            <p>Second amended petition filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the trial progresses<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until Monday.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday Morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-02">Monday April 2nd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M D Myers</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#181, 81</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Fredrick Meise</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lewis Battuson</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and also comes the defendant and files his statement<lb/> in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of one hundred and eighty one dollars and eighty one cents and authorizes the en<lb/>tering up of judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>Carlof S Greeley</name>, <name>A F Shapleigh</name>, and<lb/> <name>Mathias Steitz</name> trustees of State Savings<lb/> Association garns of <name>James F Death</name> et al</head>
            <p>Garnishee Discharged.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishees, by their attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> they be discharged at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. The sum of ten dollars is allowed each of said garnishees<lb/> for answering to be taxed as costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Cromercuis</name><lb/> vs 126<lb/> <name>Michael S Cerre</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that a scire facias issue for the<lb/> legal representatives of the said defendant.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Berreau</name><lb/> vs 133<lb/> <name>Joseph H Perreau</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed and<lb/> that execution issue against the defendant for the costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William R Martin</name> et al<lb/> vs 137<lb/> <name>Me L Young</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that an alias sum<lb/>mons issue herein.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="458" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0465.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs 247<lb/> <name>John Nickolay</name> and<lb/> <name>Fritz Billman</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit; <name>B<lb/> G Brown</name>, <name>Edward Sebert</name>, <name>James Hale</name>, <name>G E O Van Name</name>, <name>John Roberts</name>, <name>Alferd<lb/> Dix</name>, <name>William Reilly</name>, <name>J R Daniel</name>, <name>H S Ring</name>, <name>William B Stanard</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Asbrook</name> and <name>Thomas Johnson</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progresses and, by consent, <name>B G Brown</name>,<lb/> one of the Jurors, is withdrawn from the panel, and the<unclear rend="strike through">the</unclear>being incomplete, the remaining Jurors are dis<lb/>charged from the further consideration of this cause, and the plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his<lb/> suit in this behalf but voluntarily takes a non suit with leave to more to set the same aside. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendants go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and have execution therefor. Leave is given<lb/> the plaintiff to move to set the above non suit aside.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac T Greene</name><lb/> vs 157<lb/> <name>William H Smith</name> etal</head>
            <p>Continued on application of plaintiff at his costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Bermine</name><lb/> vs 40<lb/> <name>Anna Maria Bermine</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the Court proceeds to hear<lb/> the proofs of the parties, and having duly heard and considered the same doth find that<lb/> the plaintiff is a person of good moral character and an innocent and injured party.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of mat<lb/>rimony by him contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and priviledge of an unmarried per<lb/> son and that he pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Clarence M Brooks</name><lb/> vs 287<lb/> <name>Samuel A Turner</name></head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained; and the defendants motion in arrest being heard and fully considered<lb/> by the Court is overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derrick A January</name> etal<lb/> vs 599<lb/> <name>D Robert Barclay</name>, etal</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court<lb/> is sustained; and the Judgment herein is accordingly set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis Zenger</name> et al<lb/> vs 521<lb/> <name>Michael T Mepham</name> et al</head>
            <p>The defendants motion for a new trial being heard and fully considered by the Court is<lb/> sustained; and the Judgment herein is accordingly set aside and vacated.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>Default.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his Attorney, but the defendant failing to plead further makes default,<lb/> wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff, the petition herein is taken against the said defendant as con<lb/>fessed. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>The President, Directors and<lb/> Company of the Bank of Louisville</name></head>
            <p>On motion leave is granted to file an amended answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther C Clark</name> etal<lb/> vs 102<lb/> <name>James F Death</name> etal</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their Attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at plaintiffs costs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. Plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the bill of Exchange sued on.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="459" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0466.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Valle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eli M Bruce</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Said <name>Eli M Bruce</name> files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs 147<lb/> <name>Mayer Goldsoll</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David Cunningham</name><lb/> vs 155<lb/> <name>John A Williams</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs 156<lb/> <name>Leverett Mills</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William H Waters</name><lb/> vs 164<lb/> <name>John C Bull</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court by consent of parties.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#119, 57.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennard Sr</name> and<lb/> <name>John Kennard Jr</name><lb/> vs 134<lb/> <name>J M Patton</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defendant, although duly called, still<lb/> makes default, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assessment of damages herein<lb/> to the Court upon the proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one hundred and nineteen dollars and<lb/> fifty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ray</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>James H Mouison</name> et al.</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and dismisses this suit as to the defendant, <name>George<lb/> W Miller</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah Norton</name><lb/> vs 68<lb/> <name>The President Directors and Company<lb/> of the Bank of Louisville</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit from which it appears<lb/> to the Court that the defendant is a non resident of the State of Missouri,<lb/> therefore, On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against it<lb/> for the sum of thirty two hundred dollars on account of loss sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged wrong<lb/>ful seizure and sale of the Steamboat Cumberland Valley, by the defendant, in which said boat plaintiff claims<lb/> to have held an interest of one half, and that its property has been attached and unless it appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday<lb/> of September next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law judgment<lb/> will be rendered against it and its property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof<lb/> be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michel Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the motion to permit<lb/> a non suit as to the interest of <name>Antoine R M Nair</name> being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court is overruled, and the trial progresses but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until Thursday next.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="460" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0467.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-03">Tuesday April 3rd 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name> et al</head>
            <p>The separate demurrers to the plaintiffs amended petition being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court are overruled.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Snuth</name> et al<lb/> vs 345<lb/> <name>John Sigeison</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismisses and that each<lb/> party pay his own costs herein, and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiff by leave of Court<lb/> withdraws from the files the note sued on.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Silas Reed</name><lb/> vs 1<lb/> <name>George Scott</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esg, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a statement in writing<lb/> from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under the writ herein will be attended<lb/> with great loss and expense before the probable termination of this suit, and that the said property<lb/> is likely to depreciate in value; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property, according to law; and that<lb/> he make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>1 cent</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James P Watson</name><lb/> vs 65<lb/> <name>Thomas Pehan</name> and<lb/> <name>John Pehan</name></head>
            <p>Replevin.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Edward<lb/> Sebert</name>, <name>James Hale</name>, <name>G E O Van Name</name>, <name>John Roberts</name>, <name>A Dix</name>, <name>William Reilly</name>,<lb/> <name>J R Daniel</name>, <name>H S Ring</name>, <name>Henry Ashbrook</name>, <name>Thomas Johnson</name> and <name>William Gregon</name>, eleven<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn, by consent of parties, the<lb/> issues herein joined well and truly to try the trail progresses and, being finished, the Jury retire from the bar here to<lb/> consider of their verdict, to be rendered of and, concerning the premises, and having considered thereof, and agreed<lb/> among themselves, return to the bar here, and, upon their oaths aforesaid, say they find for the plaintiff and assess his<lb/> damages, sustained by reason of the unlawful detention of the property by the defendants, at the sum of one cent. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff retain the possession of the property delivered to him under the<lb/> order of delivery herein, and also that he recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>set aside 30 to 12</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kelly</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>John S Cook</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>B G Brown</name>,<lb/> <name>J J Sylvester</name>, <name>J A Rile</name>, <name>A Woodruff</name>, <name>Hy Stackenberg</name>, <name>A Merschmeire</name>, <name>F Barnum</name>,<lb/> <name>J D Barry</name>, <name>John Daugherty</name>, <name>J P Norton</name>, <name>Isaac Eddings</name> and <name>A R Bowman</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial pro<lb/> gresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendant. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendant go hence<lb/> without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throop</name><lb/> vs 330<lb/> <name>The President Directors &amp; Co of Banks of Louisvelle</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and file. Depositions<lb/> for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kellerman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin F Burnes</name></head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition, and also comes the defendant and waiv<lb/>ing the issue and service of process enters his appearance to this action and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bike</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Amand Schnaider</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and filed in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="461" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0468.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Byrne Jr</name><lb/> vs 45<lb/> <name>Robert Emmet M Carthy</name></head>
            <p>Order of Sale.</p>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courtenay</name>, Esg, Sheriff of St Louis County, comes and files a state<lb/> ment from which it appears that the keeping of the property attached under<lb/> the unit herein will be attended with great loss and expense before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit; it is therefore ordered that the said Sheriff sell said property, according to law, and<lb/> make a report of his proceedings under this order on or before the first day of the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Ray</name><lb/> vs 118<lb/> <name>James H Marrison</name></head>
            <p>Continued on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Mary E Gimlin</name> et al</head>
            <p>Appointment of Guardian AD Litem.</p>
            <p>The defendant, <name>Mary E Gimlin</name>, files a petition for the appointment of a guardian<lb/> for the infant defendants, <name>Henry Gimlin</name> and <name>John Gimlin</name>, and the Court, after due<lb/> consideration thereof, doth appoint the said, <name>Mary E Gimlin</name>, guardian ad litem<lb/> for the said infant defendants, <name>Henry Gimlin</name> and <name>John Gimlin</name></p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Order of Discharge on payment of money into Court.</p>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that a payment into Court by said garnishees<lb/> of the amounts confessed, in their answer, to be in their hands, they be dis<lb/> charged from any further liability on account of said money or as such<lb/> garnishees, or from any costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Joseph Hyman</name> and <name>Nathaniel Gunn</name></head>
            <p>Order of discharge upon payment of money in Court.</p>
            <p>It is ordered by the Court that on payment into Court by said<lb/> garnishees of the amount confessed in their answer, they be discharged<lb/> from any further liability on account of said money, or as such gar<lb/>nishees, or from any costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> et al<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Answer of <name>James Bacon, Jr</name>, <name>Parks Bacon</name>, <name>William Bacon</name>, and <name>Elizabeth Bacon</name>,<lb/> by their guardian, <name>Lydia Jane Bacon</name>, filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann Rebecca Fairman</name><lb/> vs 115<lb/> <name>Charles M Fairman</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, although duly called,<lb/> still makes default; and the Court proceeds to hear the proofs and having finished<lb/> the hearing thereof, and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is a person of<lb/> good moral character and an innocent and injured party, It doth order adjudge and decree<lb/> that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is further ordered<lb/> that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesemyer</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Petiton.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury to wit;<lb/> <name>Edward Sebert</name>, <name>John Roberts</name>, <name>William Reilly</name>, <name>J R Daniel</name>, <name>J J Sylverster</name>,<lb/> <name>John A Rile</name>, <name>A Woodruff</name>, <name>A Meischmeier</name>, <name>J D Barry</name>, <name>John Dougherty</name>, <name>J P<lb/> Norton</name> and <name>Isaac Eddings</name>, twelve good and lawfulmen, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues<lb/> herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at nine o'clock
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="462" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0469.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-04">Wednesday April 4th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs 814<lb/> <name>John M Krum</name></head>
            <p><name>Stephen Rice</name>, Clerk of this Court, files a motion for security for costs herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sensenderfer</name> et al<lb/> vs 3<lb/> <name>John Rokes</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that a pluries summons<lb/> issue to <name>Jackson County</name> for defendant <name>High Harkins</name>. Cause Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Susannah E Ivers</name>, by her next<lb/> friend <name>Reuben M Cord</name>.<lb/> vs 38<lb/> <name>Milton L Glasby</name>, <name>Maria F Glasby</name>,<lb/> <name>John Glasby</name>, <name>Nancy Glasby</name>, <name>Alban Glasby</name>,<lb/> <name>William Glasby</name>, and <name>Louisa Glasby</name>, minor<lb/> heirs of <name>Alban H Glasby</name>, deceased, and <name>Gerard<lb/> B Allen</name> guardian of said minors.</head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff, by her attorney, files an additional affidavit from<lb/> which it appears to the Court that the defendant, Milton <name>L<lb/> Glasby</name>, is a non resident to the State of Missouri, therefore, On<lb/> motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that the said<lb/> defendant, <name>Milton L Glasby</name>, be notified that a civil action<lb/> has been commenced against him in the St Louis Circuit Court<lb/> the object of which is to obtain a decree approving a trustee in<lb/> Lieu of Alban <name>H Glasby</name>, deceased, with the like powers and<lb/> limitations as were possessed by said <name>Alban H Glasby</name>, deceased, to fulfill and carry out the trusts in a certain<lb/> deed executed by <name>Eliphalet Hewit</name> and <name>Martha Hewit</name>, his wife, to said <name>Alban H Glasby</name>, his heirs and<lb/> assigns, forever, in trust for the sole and separate use of the said plaintiff; and also to obtain a decree divesting out<lb/> of the defendants the legal title to the premises in said deed, described in the petition as follows, to wit; a certain<lb/> lot or parcel of ground situated in the addition to the City of St Louis, called North St Louis, and bounded and<lb/> described as follows, to wit; beginning at a point of Fifth Street, alias Tenth street, fifty feet from the inter<lb/>section of said Fifth Street with Spring street, and running Northwardly thirty feet along the line of said Fifth,<lb/> alias Tenth street, thence Eastwardly eighty feet to an alley, thence Southwardly along the line of said alley<lb/> thirty feet to a lot owned by <name>Isaac Snodgrass</name>, thence Westwardly along the line of said lot eighty feet to the<lb/> place of beginning, being a part of lot three hundred and sixty two in Block sixty three, according to the plot<lb/> made by <name>Joseph C Brown</name>, and filed with the Commissioners Report in partition among the heirs of <name>William<lb/> Christy</name>, deceased, and vesting the legal title in said premises in the trustee so appointed: and that unless he ap<lb/>pear at the next term of this Court to begun and held at the City of St Louis, within and for the County of<lb/> St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action<lb/> aforesaid, according to law, the plaintiffs petition will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further or<lb/> dered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed<lb/> and published in the City of St Louis. On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that an alias summons issue<lb/> for all of the defendants, except <name>John Glasby</name> and <name>Alban Glasby</name>, returnable to the next turn of this Court, until<lb/> which time this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Gamabiel Barblett</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Deposition for plaintiffs opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Fraser</name><lb/> vs 368<lb/> <name>J A Ubodell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files an amended petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Chase</name> et al<lb/> vs 25<lb/> <name>Rolph M Campbell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="463" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0470.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Townsley</name><lb/> vs 760<lb/> <name>Benjamin S Compton</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiff opened and files in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard F Sass</name> et al<lb/> vs 274<lb/> <name>W M M Phuson</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for plaintiffs opened and files this day in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Chas J Norbury</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed this day in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S Gay</name> et al<lb/> vs 257<lb/> <name>Arctic Fire Ins Co</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed this day in this cause.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#332, 00</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buessmyer</name><lb/> vs 283.<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>Petition.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also the Jurors empannelled<lb/> and sworn herein and the trial progresses and being finished, the Jurors aforesaid retire<lb/> and having considered thereof, and being agreed among themselves, return to the bar here and upon their oaths afore<lb/> said say they find for the plaintiff the sum of three hundred and thirty two dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the petition recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jas W Dougherty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Mordecai</name></head>
            <p>Depositions for defendant opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>G P Theobald</name> et al<lb/> vs 150<lb/> <name>Caesar R Montague</name></head>
            <p>Answer filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name>, <name>Harvey Hubbell</name>,<lb/> and <name>John W Knaph</name><lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come a Jury,<lb/> to wit; <name>James Hale</name>, <name>G E O Van Name</name>, <name>A Dix</name>, <name>H S King</name>, <name>W B<lb/> Barnum</name>, <name>A R Bowman</name>, <name>F Hersch</name>, and <name>B G Brown</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue joined upon the plea in abatement well and<lb/> truly to try the trail progresses but not being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="464" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0471.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-05">Thursday April 5th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesemyer</name><lb/> vs 283<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name>.</head>
            <p>Plaintiff files an assignment of the judgment herein to <name>U L Boyce</name>.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Simon</name><lb/> vs 4<lb/> <name>Henry Simon</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The Sheriff having made return that the defendant cannot be found and the Court<lb/> being satisfied that process cannot be served upon him, therefore, on motion of the plaintiff,<lb/> by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/> menced against him to obtain a decree of dwince from the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and<lb/> the defendant, on the ground of desution and also to obtain the care and control of the infant child mentioned<lb/> in the petition, and that unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St<lb/> Louis within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and on or before the Sixth<lb/> day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law the petition herein will be taken against him as con<lb/>fessed. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law, in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs 20<lb/> <name>James W Saynisch</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#775, 65.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles N Lockwood</name><lb/> vs 16<lb/> <name>John P Camp</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Ward</name></head>
            <p>On Note and Account.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendants still make default; and<lb/> the plaintiff submits the assessment of damages to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court, after due consideration thereof, doth assess the plaintiffs dam<lb/> ages at the sum of Seven hundred and seventy five dollars and sixty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Davis</name><lb/> vs 396<lb/> <name>Christian Freund</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at his costs<lb/> and the execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assigment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Juluis Glade</name></head>
            <p>Order extending time for selling at private sale.</p>
            <p>Upon reading the petition of <name>John Hartmann</name> assignee of <name>Juluis Glade</name>, and<lb/> and advising with regard to the same. It is ordered that the said assignee<lb/> do proceed to sell and dispose of the stock of goods wares and merchandise<lb/> assigned at private sale for cash for the further period of sixty days. It is further ordered that at the end and<lb/> termination of Sixty days from this date whatever assets then belonging to said estate undisposed of at the store<lb/> No 188 Broadway St Louis together with the fixtures in the store shall be sold by said assignee for cash at<lb/> publication.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs 868<lb/> <name>M B Cox</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Gayle</name> and <name>Wilson</name></head>
            <p>Discharge of Garnishee.</p>
            <p>On motion of said garnishee, by his attorney, it is ordered that he be discharged<lb/> hence at the plaintiffs costs, without an allowance for answering, and that<lb/> execution issue for said costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred L Field</name> et al<lb/> vs 22<lb/> <name>T Clark Manchester</name> et al</head>
            <p>Motion to dismiss suit for want of security for costs filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="465" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0472.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles L Tucker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Jas Hyman</name> and <name>Nathaniel</name> Gunn</head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathias Steitz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Harding Given and Company</name> garns<lb/> of <name>Jas Hyman</name> and <name>Nathl</name> Gunn</head>
            <p>Order Discharge. Receiver Appointed.</p>
            <p>Now come the said garnishees, and pay<lb/> into Court the sum of Seven hundred<lb/> and sixty two dollars and thirty seven cents,<lb/> the amount confessed by them in their answer,<lb/> Whereupon the said garnishee are discharged from any further liability as garnishees herein; and the Court appoints<lb/> <name>Robert M V Kercheval</name> Receiver of the said amount as paid and deposited into Court by said garnishees, the<lb/> same to keep and preserve subject to the order of this Court, and the said Receiver files a bond in the sum of<lb/> one thousand dollars with himself, as principal, and <name>Chas L Tucker</name> an <name>Mathias Steitz</name>, as securities, which<lb/> bond is approved by the Court: and the amount so paid into Court is accordingly delivered to said Receiver,<lb/> who files his receipt therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick M Maas</name><lb/> vs 524<lb/> <name>Juluis Schrik</name> et al</head>
            <p>Comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, and files a petition and also the acknowledgment of<lb/> service of petition and writ, by defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1268, 86</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hull Clark</name>, <name>James C Wilson</name>,<lb/> and <name>Thomas C Van Hoesen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew J Morrison</name></head>
            <p>Confession of Judgment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and also comes the defendant and files<lb/> his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses him<lb/>self indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twelve hundred and sixty eight<lb/> dollars and eighty six cents and authorizes the entering up of judgment against<lb/> him in favor of the plaintiffs for that amount. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name><name>Alfred L Field</name></name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B Sanderson</name> garns</head>
            <p>Said garnishee comes and files an answer herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs 142.<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On Plea in Abatement.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorney,<lb/> and the trial progressed and being finished the Jury retire to consider of their verdict.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their attorney, and further proceedings are<lb/> laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="466" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0473.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-16">Friday April 6th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Burgdorf</name><lb/> vs 214<lb/> <name>William Brugborf</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, this cause is dismissed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#188, 35<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Neywod</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James W Davenport</name>, <name>Lewis H Drake</name><lb/> vs 183.<lb/> <name>Charles H Heywood</name> and <name>James Morris</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and dismiss this suit<lb/> as to the defendant, <name>James Morris</name>, but the defendant, <name>Charles<lb/> H Heywood</name>, although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> him as confessed; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court for assessment of damages<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of one<lb/> hundred and eighty eight dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/> tiifs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#76, 90.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Cline</name> and <name>William C Jameson</name><lb/> vs 204<lb/> <name>John Matthews</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and con<lb/>sent and agree that judgment may be rendered herein in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs for the sum of Seventy Six dollars and ninety<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid<lb/> as agreed upon and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris D Myers</name><lb/> vs 167<lb/> <name>Zalmon Taylor</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Aaron B Fenton</name> et al<lb/> vs 165<lb/> <name>Huggins</name> and <name>Van Dom</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Williams</name><lb/> vs 236<lb/> <name>Augustus H Evans</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Mason</name> et al<lb/> vs 139<lb/> <name>Franklin H M Clung</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued no one<lb/> answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1513, 44.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Zalmon Taylor</name>, <name>Harvey Hubbell</name><lb/> and <name>John W Knopp</name><lb/> vs 142<lb/> <name>Morris D Myers</name></head>
            <p>On Notes.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and also come the<lb/> Jurors, empannelled and sworn herein, and being agreed upon a verdict,<lb/> upon their oaths say they find for the plaintiffs upon the issue joined<lb/> upon the defendants plea in abatement. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that, at the date of the commencement of this suit, the defendant was about fraudulently to conceal<lb/> remove or dispose of his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors: and the defendant failing to<lb/> answer makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of fifteen hundred and thirteen dollars and forty four cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therfor. The defendant files a motion<lb/> for a new trial a plea in abatement.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kelley</name><lb/> vs 50<lb/> <name>John E Cook</name></head>
            <p>The plaintiff at this day comes and files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>242</note>
            <p><name>Grace L Barnes</name> vs <name>Henry M Barnes</name>; Agreement of parties this day filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="467" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0474.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Walker</name> et al<lb/> vs 251<lb/> <name>Charles Curtis</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>By consent of parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at defendants<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Boone</name><lb/> vs 367<lb/> <name>Kenneth Mackenzie</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at his costs and that execution issue therefor. Plaintiff by leave of Court<lb/> withdraws from the files the note sued on and files a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteaw Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs 688<lb/> <name>John Marshall</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered that analias<lb/> summons issue herein. Cause continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Exchange Mutual<lb/> Marine Ins Co</name><lb/> vs 54<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schlenker</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff, by its attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Mears</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward S Menager</name><lb/> vs 217<lb/> <name>William Crane</name></head>
            <p>On Inter plea of <name>Isaac Markley</name>.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the interpleader, <name>Isaac Markley</name>, by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and also come a Jury, to wit; <name>Edward Sebert</name>, <name>John Roberts</name>,<lb/> <name>William Reilley</name>, <name>J J Sylvester</name>, <name>John A Kyle</name>, <name>A Woodreeff</name>, <name>J D Barry</name>,<lb/> <name>John Dougherty</name>, <name>J P Norton</name>, <name>Isaac Eddings</name>, <name>James M Dermot</name> and<lb/> <name>J R Daniel</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issue joined between<lb/> the plaintiffs and said interpleader well and truly to try the trial progresses and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find the issue joined upon said interplead of <name>Isaac<lb/> Markley</name> take nothing by his interplead herein but that the plaintiffs go thereof without day and recover<lb/> of said interpleader their costs and charges in that behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morton</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Cornelia Morton</name></head>
            <p>Allowance of alimony pendants lite.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their respective attorneys, and submit to the Court the<lb/> application of the defendant for an allowance for temporary support and<lb/> maintenance and for an allowance to retain counsel to prosecute her suit, and<lb/> the Court, having duly heard and considered the same, doth order that the plaintiff pay to the defen=<lb/> dant, or her agent appointed under her hand, for the temporary support and maintenance of<lb/> herself, and the two children in her custody, the sum of forty one dollars and sixty five<lb/> cents on the Second Tuesday of each and every month thereafter, until the further order<lb/> of this Court; and also that the plaintiff pay to the defendant, or to <name>Messr's Glover</name> and <name>Rich<lb/>ardson</name>, her attorneys of record, for her, the sum of one hundred dollars on or before the 15th of<lb/> this month, for the purpose of retaining counsel to prosecute her suit. Leave is given the par<lb/> ties to apply to this Court for any modification of this decree which may be deemed necessary.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files a bill of particulars herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L Hertz</name><lb/> vs 151<lb/> <name>L N Fuller</name></head>
            <p>Answer to Order for production of books filed by the defendant.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="468" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0475.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Fraser</name><lb/> vs 386<lb/> <name>J A Ubsdell</name> et al</head>
            <p>Defendants file a demurrer to the petition herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine K M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys, and the trial pro<lb/> gresses but not being finished is laid over until Monday next.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S. M. Bucknieidge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-07">Saturday April 7th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1768, 00.<lb/> &amp; 10 prcent<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rice</name>.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Derrick A January</name>, <name>James S Rollins</name>,<lb/> <name>Gerard B Allen</name> and <name>Thomas T January</name><lb/> vs 399.<lb/> <name>D Robert Barclay</name>, <name>Solomon H Robbins</name>,<lb/> <name>George W Hungerford</name> and <name>Caleb Rice</name></head>
            <p>On Note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and<lb/> dismiss this suit as to the defendants, <name>D<lb/> Robert Barclay</name>, <name>Solomon H Robbins</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Hungerford</name>; but the defendant,<lb/> <name>Caleb Rice</name>, although duly called still<lb/> makes default; and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this cause to the Court upon the<lb/> proofs for assessment of damages; and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of Seventeen hundred and sixty eight dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs in this behalf expended and have<lb/> execution therefor: and it is ordered by the Court that this judgment bear interest at<lb/> ten per cent per annum from this date until paid.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">State use of <name>Chas S Hempstead</name><lb/> vs 738<lb/> <name>Felix Coste</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of plaintiff leave is given him to amend and<lb/> it is ordered that he deliver a copy of amendment to defendants.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 232<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton &amp; Chicago R R C</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Campbell</name><lb/> vs 822<lb/> <name>Isaac L Darns</name> et al garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Owen V Timon</name><lb/> vs 392<lb/> <name>Charles L Freeman</name></head>
            <p>Motion to strike out answer and for judgment filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Davis</name> et al<lb/> vs 276<lb/> <name>James S Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Simon F Noyes</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, and by their consent it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at de<lb/>fendants costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="469" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0476.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Tams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas E Courtenay</name></head>
            <p>Order for Delivery.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit<lb/> according to law, claiming the possession of certain<lb/> personal property therein described, wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant deliver the property specified in said affidavit to the Coroner<lb/> of St Louis County, and said Coroner is hereby directed if said property be not<lb/> delivered to him, to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to the<lb/> use of <name>David P Clay</name><lb/> vs 210<lb/> <name>Robert Causse</name> and <name>James M Gardiner</name></head>
            <p>On Bond.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also come a Jury;<lb/> to wit; <name>B G Brown</name>, <name>William Reilly</name>, <name>J R<lb/> Daniel</name>, <name>J J Sylvester</name>, <name>John A Kile</name>, <name>A<lb/> Woodruff</name>, <name>J D Barry</name>, <name>John Dougherty</name>, <name>J P Norton</name>, <name>Isaac Eddings</name>, <name>John Rob<lb/>erts</name> and <name>James M Demott</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried<lb/> and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they are unable<lb/> to agree upon a verdict; Wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid be discharged from the further consideraton of this cause, and that<lb/> this cause be continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#72, 15.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name>, <name>William H White</name>.<lb/> and <name>Hiram A Bryor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bennett</name> and <name>Abraham M Thompson</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>This cause coming on for<lb/> trial, the parties come, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and waiv<lb/>ing a Jury, submit this cause to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court, having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, doth find upon the plaintiffs cause of action against<lb/> the defendants the sum of Six hundred and seventy two dollars and fifteen cents,<lb/> and the Court doth further find upon the counterclaim of defendants against<lb/> the plaintiffs the sum of Six hundred dollars, which leaves a balance in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs against the defendants upon the respective demands as found<lb/> by the Court of Seventy two dollars and fifteen cents: and the Court finding<lb/> from the evidence that the defendants on the fourteenth day of February, eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty nine, served upon the plaintiffs an offer, in writing, pursu<lb/> ant to the statute in such case made and provided, to allow the plaintiffs<lb/> to take judgment against the defendants in this suit for the sum of Seventy<lb/> two dollars and fifteen cents and their costs incurred in this suit up to the time<lb/> of service of said offer at the time as above stated, which was not accepted<lb/> by the plaintiffs; The Court doth therefore consider and adjudge that the said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the said defendants in this suit the sum of Seventy two<lb/> dollars and fifteen cents and their costs of suit to be taxed up to the time of<lb/> service of said offer made on the 14th day of February eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty nine; and it is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the<lb/> defendants recover of the plaintiffs their costs incurred in this suit to be taxed<lb/> from and after the said 14th day of February, eighteen hundred and fifty nine.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>211</note>
            <p>The State use of <name>W A Bassett</name> vs <name>Robt Causse</name> et al; . . . . Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>250</note>
            <p>The State use of <name>Bernhard Midas</name> vs <name>Simon Meyberg</name> et al; . . . Continued to<lb/> the next term of this Court, on account of the<lb/> absence of <name>Edward J Castello</name>, a witness, at plaintiffs costs.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="470" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0477.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#310, 22<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jno and Wm<lb/> M. Dowell</name></note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>J Ringold Wilmer</name>, <name>S W Cannell</name>,<lb/> <name>Lewis Lewis Jr</name> and <name>John Lordner</name><lb/> vs 100<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name> <name>William McDowell</name>,<lb/> and <name>George W McDowell</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come said plaintiffs, by their<lb/> attorney, but dismisses this suit as<lb/> to the defendant, <name>William Mc<lb/> Dowell</name>, but the defendants, <name>John<lb/> McDowell</name> and <name>George W<lb/> McDowell</name>, although duly summoned and called, come not but make default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against them as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the defen<lb/>dants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and ten dollars<unclear rend="strikethrough">and</unclear><lb/><unclear rend="strikethrough">ten dollars</unclear> and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1236, 22<lb/> vs<lb/> Reed.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Leonard</name> and <name>Alfred Baker</name><lb/> vs 101.<lb/> <name>George C Reed</name> and <name>Theodore Yates</name></head>
            <p>On notes.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney,<lb/> and dismisses this suit as to the defendant,<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name>, but the defendant, <name>George<lb/> C Reed</name>, although duly summoned and called, comes not but makes default,<lb/> wherefore the petition herein is taken against him as confessed; and the Court finds<lb/> from the instruments in writing on which this action is founded that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of twelve hundred and thirty six dollars<lb/> and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Buesmeyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Stuckenberg</name></head>
            <p>The defendant files a motion for a new trial herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 149<lb/> <name>St Louis Alton and Chicago B R C</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Gaty</name><lb/> vs 819<lb/> <name>Isaac L Downsetal</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James G Price</name><lb/> vs 153<lb/> <name>Bart G Leper</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued at plaintiffs costs on account of absence of<lb/> plaintiffs counsel.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William N White</name><lb/> vs 199<lb/> <name>Noble Kellogg</name></head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs on ac<lb/>count of absence of <name>Musick</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas S Bage</name><lb/> vs 135<lb/> <name>Albert Becker</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Gregg</name><lb/> vs 154<lb/> <name>Robert Gregg</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until Monday morning at ten o'clock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="471" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0478.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-09">Monday April 9th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth A Dunham</name><lb/> vs 314<lb/> <name>Hugh Dunham</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> but the defendant, although solemnly called, still<lb/> makes default; and the Court proceeds to hear the<lb/> proofs, and having finished the hearing thereof, and being satisfied therefrom that<lb/> the plaintiff is a person a good moral character, and an innocent and injured party;<lb/> It doth order, adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever di<lb/>vorced from the bonds of matrimony, by her contracted with said defendant and<lb/> be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person; and it is also<lb/> ordered and decreed that the plaintiff have the care custody and control of the two<lb/> infant children of the plaintiff and defendant, mentioned in the petition: and it is further<lb/> ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Tatum</name><lb/> vs 311<lb/> <name>Robert H Ober</name> et al</head>
            <p>The demurrer to the plaintiffs petition being heard and fully<lb/> considered by the Court is overruled. By consent of par<lb/>ties this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Epenetus G Kellogg</name><lb/> vs 48<lb/> <name>John H Dargin</name></head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, a dedimus is awar<lb/> ded him to New York.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Cresson</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Henry Bilstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiffs, by his attorney, a dedimus is<lb/> awarded him to Bennsylvania.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#199, 25.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Walton</name><lb/> vs 171<lb/> <name>William C Murphy</name></head>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by his attorney, but the defendant,<lb/> although called comes not; and the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submits this cause to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred<lb/> and ninety nine dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Lumina Jane Lipscomb</name><lb/> vs 305<lb/> <name>Patrick H Lipscomb</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff, by her attor<lb/>ney, but the defendant, although duly called, still<lb/> makes default; and the Court proceeds to hear<lb/> the proof, and having finished the hearing thereof and being satisfied therefrom<lb/> that the plaintiff is a person a good moral character, and an innocent and<lb/> injured party: It doth order adjudge and decree that the plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony, by her contracted with said<lb/> defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person;<lb/> and it is also ordered and decreed that the plaintiff have the care, custody<lb/> and control of the infant child of the plaintiff and defendant, mentioned in<lb/> the petition: and it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this<lb/> suit and that execution issue thereof.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="472" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0479.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Penberthy</name> et al<lb/> vs 307<lb/> <name>John Stewart</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued generally on motion of plaintiffs for<lb/> absence of <name>E D Dickenson</name>, a witness.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Victor F Wilson</name><lb/> vs 222<lb/> <name>Benj F Ball</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued<lb/> by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>W L Catherwood</name> et al<lb/> vs 239<lb/> <name>Juluis Busch</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> et al<lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>William Bradley</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> et al<lb/> vs 301<lb/> <name>William Bradley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 238<lb/> <name>Thomas Richards</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the defendant be notified that a civel ac<lb/>tion has been commenced against him for the sum of five<lb/> hundred and thirty dollars on account of a promissory note executed and delivered to<lb/> the plaintiff by the defendant and that his property has been attached, and unless<lb/> he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of St Louis,<lb/> within and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and<lb/> on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judg<lb/>ment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same.<lb/> And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law, in<lb/> the Missouri Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the City of St Louis.<lb/> And this cause stands continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Fate</name> et al<lb/> vs 231<lb/> <name>Joshua W Owings</name></head>
            <p>Continued by consent at the defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Goodfellow</name> et al<lb/> vs 525<lb/> <name>William C Jamison</name> et al</head>
            <p><name>Thomas E Courteny</name>, Sheriff, files his report<lb/> of Sale herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Margaret Gritten</name><lb/> vs 302<lb/> <name>George W Gritten</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George Scott</name><lb/> vs 288<lb/> <name>James W Hookev</name> et al<lb/></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Walker</name><lb/> vs 262<lb/> <name>William Walker</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Gorgdon</name><lb/> vs 246<lb/> <name>Michael Adams</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Reuben Loeb</name> et al<lb/> vs 94<lb/> <name>Morris Cahn</name> et al</head>
            <p>On motion of defendants, <name>W P</name> and <name>L R Shryock</name>, a ded<lb/>imus is awarded them to the State of Indiana and<lb/> also to the State of Kentucky.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Little</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Harvey</name> et al</head>
            <p>Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p><name>W O Osborne</name> vs <name>L Lawrence</name>: Depositions for defendants opened and filed.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="473" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0480.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert R Levick</name><lb/> vs 823<lb/> <name>Geo Cooper</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Kirk</name><lb/> vs 234<lb/> <name>Hannah Kirk</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>B G Thomas</name></head>
            <p>The assignee files his final report and appli<lb/>cation for discharge and also his vouchers.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T Cleveland</name><lb/> vs 291<lb/> <name>Charlotte Lay</name></head>
            <p>Continued <unclear rend="strikethrough">at plaintiffs costs</unclear> on account of absence<lb/> of plaintiffs counsel. Costs to abide result.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Christopher</name> and <name>Eben Richards Jr</name><lb/> vs 303<lb/> <name>William P Freeman</name> and <name>Charles P Shephard</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the parties, by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and also<lb/> come a Jury, to wit; <name>J H Bergess</name>,<lb/> <name>J H Logsden</name>, <name>J O Clark</name>, <name>John Harbert</name>, <name>J R Triplett</name>, <name>Joseph Crane</name>, <name>J R Dobyns</name>,<lb/> <name>C R Bramel</name>, <name>George Nuticke</name>, <name>George D Hall</name>, <name>William B Turner</name> and <name>Conrad<lb/> Schmit</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> the issues herein joined well and truly to try the trail progresses but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the trial progresses but not<lb/> being finished is laid over until to morrow.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Buckinridge</name>
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="474" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0481.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <opener>
                <dateline><date when="1860-04-10">Tuesday April 10th 1860</date>.</dateline>
            </opener>
            <p>Court met pursuant to adjournment. present as before.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Henessey</name><lb/> vs 245<lb/> <name>William Henessey</name></head>
            <p>Decree of Divorce.</p>
            <p>Now comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, but the defendant, al<lb/>though duly called still makes default; and the Court pro<lb/>ceeds to hear the proof and having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the same and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is a person of good<lb/> moral character and an innocent and injured party; It doth order consider adjudge and<lb/> decree that the plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of mat<lb/>rimony, by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the rights and<lb/> privileges of an unmarried person, and that her maiden name of <name>Mary Hayden</name>,<lb/> be restored and be hereafter taken as her only true and lawful name. And it is<lb/> also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> et al<lb/> vs 300<lb/> <name>William Bradley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at their<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court<lb/> plaintiffs withdraw from the files the note sued on and file a copy thereof.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name> et al<lb/> vs 301.<lb/> <name>William Bradley</name> et al</head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of plaintiffs, by their attorney, it is or<lb/>dered that this cause be dismissed at their costs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#2271, 27.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leaken D Baker</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert McIlvaine</name><lb/> vs 297<lb/> <name>Thaddeus K Mills</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the<lb/> defendant, although duly called, still makes default;<lb/> and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the assess<lb/>ment of damages herein to the Court and the Court, hav<lb/>ing duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the<lb/> sum of twenty two hundred and seventy one dollars and twenty seven cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the dam<lb/>ages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs in this behalf ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#1081, 70</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Leaken D Baker</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert McIlvaine</name><lb/> vs 825.<lb/> <name>Joseph O Sawyer</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Thaddeus K Mills</name></head>
            <p>Garnishment.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs and the garnishee, by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and the plaintiffs move<lb/> the Court for judgment on the answer herein, and<lb/> the Court, after due consideration, doth sustain<lb/> the said motion; and the Court finds from the<lb/> answer herein that the said garnishee is indebted to the defendant, Mills, in the<lb/> sum of ten hundred and eighty one dollars and seventy cents. It is therefor<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said garnishee the debt<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as founded and have execution therefor, and that<lb/> out of said sum they pay the costs of this proceeding as well as of the original suit.<lb/> The sum of ten dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>330</note>
            <p><name>J V Throop</name> vs <name>President Directors &amp; Co of Bank of Louisville</name>: . . . . Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="475" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0482.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#606, 34<lb/> St Louis <date when="1862-11-28">Nov 28th 1862</date> I hereby acknowledge<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the<lb/> judgement of which this is the margin<lb/> attest <name>Christopher Richard</name><lb/> by <name>Chri Richards Co</name></note>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>John Christopher</name> and<lb/> <name>Eben Richards Jr</name><lb/> vs 303.<lb/> <name>William P Freeman</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles P Shephard</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> and also the Jurors empannelled and sworn herein,<lb/> and the trail progresses and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Six hun<lb/>dred and eight dollars and thirty four cents: And it appearing to the Court that the defen<lb/>dants heretofore served upon the plaintiffs an offer to allow judgment to be renderd<lb/> in this case in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of Six hundred and eight dollars<lb/> and thirty four cents, which was not accepted by the plaintiffs, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the damages aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Jury assessed together with their costs herein expended up to the<lb/> date of said offer of judgment, to wit; the <date when="1859-09-29">29th day of September, 1859</date>, and have exe<lb/>cution therefore, and that the defendants recover of the plaintiffs their costs herein expended<lb/> since said date and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert S Eddy</name><lb/> vs 49<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Boylan</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at his costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Rhodes</name><lb/> vs 383.<lb/> <name>William G Webb</name></head>
            <p>Defendant, by leave of Court, files an additional bill of<lb/> particular herein.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph V Throop</name><lb/> vs 828<lb/> <name>The St Louis Perpetual Ins Co</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua V Throof</name><lb/> vs 831<lb/> <name>S A Ranlett</name> garns</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#647, 10.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pacific Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs 349<lb/> <name>Dc Witt C Sanford</name>, <name>John W Spalding</name><lb/> and <name>Golitzen A Horrell</name></head>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <p>On note.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiff and the defendant,<lb/> <name>John W Spalding</name>, by their respective attorneys,<lb/> but the defendants, <name>Dewitt C Sanford</name> and<lb/> <name>Golitzen A Horrell</name>, although duly summoned<lb/> and called, come not but make default, wherefore the petition herein is taken against<lb/> them as confessed; and no Jury being required this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings exhibit and proofs and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/> ered the same doth find the issues joined between the plaintiff and defendant, <name>John<lb/> W Spalding</name>, in favor of the plaintiff, and doth further find that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and forty seven dollars and ten<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also its costs in this behalf<lb/> expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>James Long</name> et al<lb/> vs 472<lb/> <name>Julia A Gordon</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come <name>John S Penrice</name>, <name>Caldwell M Grath</name> and<lb/> <name>Alice E McGrath</name>, and, waiving the issue and service<lb/> of process herein, enter their appearance as defendants herein<lb/> and also file an answer to this action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William J Kountz</name> et al<lb/> vs 331<lb/> <name>James Brannan</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter Cresson</name><lb/> vs 352<lb/> <name>Henry Bilstein</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="476" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0483.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <note>#328, 49.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Oscar Tibbals</name>, <name>William H<lb/> Tibbals</name> and <name>Bernard Travis</name><lb/> vs 364<lb/> <name>Owen J Rice</name></head>
            <p>On Account.</p>
            <p>Now come the plaintiffs, by their attorney, but the defen<lb/>dant, although duly summoned and called, comes not<lb/> but makes default, wherefore the petition herein is taken<lb/> against him as confessed; and the plaintiffs waiving a<lb/> Jury submit the assessment of damages herein to the Court and the Court, after hearing<lb/> the proofs, doth assess the plaintiffs damages at the sum of three hundred and twenty eight<lb/> dollars and forty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recov<lb/>er of the defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs<lb/> in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Anne Hudson</name>, by her next<lb/> friend <name>William Crosby</name>.<lb/> vs 86<lb/> <name>William Hudson</name></head>
            <p>Order of Publication.</p>
            <p>The plaintiff files a petition and also an affidavit from which<lb/> it appears to the Court that the defendant is a non resident of<lb/> the State of Missouri therefore, On Motion of the plain<lb/>tiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be<lb/> notified that a civil action has been commenced against him to obtain a decree of di<lb/>vorce from the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant on the<lb/> ground of desertion, and also to obtain an allowance of alimony, and that unless he<lb/> appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis, within<lb/> and for the County of St Louis, on the last Monday of September next, and on or<lb/> before the Sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, the plaintiffs<lb/> petition will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a<lb/> copy here of be published, according to law, in the St Louis Express, a newspaper<lb/> printed and published in the City of St Louis.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>#217, 30.</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S Douglass</name>, <name>James B<lb/> Gazzam</name> and <name>James E Breeding</name><lb/> vs 333.<lb/> <name>Alois Stieber</name></head>
            <p>On account.</p>
            <p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs, by their at<lb/>torneys, but the defendant, although duly called, comes<lb/> not but still makes default, and the plaintiffs waiv<lb/> ing a Jury submit the assessment of damages herein to<lb/> the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the proof doth assess the<lb/> plaintiffs damages, sustained by reason of the premises in the petition mentioned, at<lb/> the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the damages aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>David C Andrews</name><lb/> vs 341<lb/> <name>Ariadne Andrews</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs 312<lb/> <name>D R O Neil</name></head>
            <p>Continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Antoine R M Nair</name> et al<lb/> vs 269<lb/> <name>Michael Lott</name> et al</head>
            <p>Now come again the parties, by their respective at<lb/>torneys, and the defendants file a motion to compel<lb/> the plaintiffs to elect, and the trial progresses and<lb/> being finished the Court takes time to consider what judgment and decision<lb/> shall be rendered in the premises.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <note>Satisfaction</note>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>William B Scaife</name><lb/> vs 173.<lb/> <name>James B Woods</name></head>
            <p>Satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Comes <name>James C Moody</name> and files a power of attorney<unclear rend="strikethrough">from<lb/> the defendant,</unclear> by virtue of the authority thereby confessed acknowl<lb/> edges full and entire satisfaction of the judgment herein rendered.</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="477" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0484.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G Little</name><lb/> vs 354<lb/> <name>George Harvey</name> et al</head>
            <p>Continued as on affidavit at defendants costs.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Sinel</name><lb/> vs 388<lb/> <name>Beter Wegman</name></head>
            <p>Dismissal.</p>
            <p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the plaintiffs costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Abejah Whiting</name><lb/> vs 384<lb/> <name>Jra H Stout</name></head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Norbury</name><lb/> vs 365<lb/> <name>John Holmes</name> et al</head>
            <p>By consent of parties this cause is continued.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2>
            <head rend="bracketed"><name>George F Guenther</name><lb/> vs 357<lb/> <name>Maria Guenther</name></head>
            <p>This cause is continued to the next term of this Court.</p>
            <closer>
                Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten oclock.
                <signed>
                    <name>S.M. Bukinridge</name>
                </signed>
                For Continuation of the proceedings of the <date when="1860-02">February Term, 1860</date><lb/> see Record Book No 30.
                <signed>
                    <name>Stephen Rice</name> Clerk of the St Louis Circuit Court.
                </signed>
            </closer>
        </div2>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="478" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0485.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="479" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0486.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="480" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0487.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="481" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0488.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="482" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0489.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="483" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0490.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="484" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0491.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="485" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0492.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="486" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0493.tiff"/>
        <p>[no content]</p>
    </div1>
    <div1 rend="handwritten">
        <pb n="487" facs="rcdbook1859_29_0494.tiff"/>
        <div2>
            <p>RECORD<lb/>29<lb/>1859<lb/> TO<lb/>1860<lb/> CIRCUIT<lb/> COURT</p>
        </div2>
    </div1>


</body>
</text>
</TEI>
