There are no known copyright restrictions on this item. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. Washington University Libraries does not assert copyright in reproduction scans of public domain materials made openly available on its websites. For more information on policies and procedures governing the use of materials, contact digital@wumail.wustl.edu.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
The president
of bank of
of
For that whereas
1822
note in
by which said note he the said
there
dollars for
the
in the said Willian Clark to
year foresaid at the county aforesaid
said note in
said
ed the said sum of money in the said note speci
fied to be paid to the said plaintiffs; And the said
plaintiffs in fact say that afterwords when the said
note
of september
the said note was
of
sum of money
other person on
at the
or at any other time before or
of
neglected and refused
county aforsaid
said
said plaintiffs the said
be
to the said
wards to wit on the day and year last afousaid at
the
faithfully
the said
should be
And whereas afterwords to wit on the
year first
note in
year aforesaid which to the
by which said note he the said
days after the date thereof to the said Willam
or order the
at the bank of
afterwards to
it
note in
said
said
opperated the said
note specified to be paid to the said plaintiffs
And the said plaintiffs
the payment of the said sum of money
end on the day it becomes
year 1822
thousand dollars specified in the said
could
at
note paid the said sum of money
any part
case
then and there because
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
the said sum of money in the said note specified
when he the said
unto afterwards requested and being
said
wards to wit on the day and year but for and at
the county of
then and there faithfully promised the said
plaintiffs to pay them their said sum of money in
the said note specified when
requested
And whereas afterwards to wit on the
in the year 1822
note in
and
date thereof to pay to the said
the sum of one thousand dollars for balm
at the last of
the said
the said sum of money in the said note specified
was to be made after the
and before the payment of the said sum of money therein
specified to wit on the day & year aforesaid at the
county of
by which said indorsement he the said
sum of money in the said note specified to he
to the Plaintiff and then and there at
note to the said plaintiffs and the said plaintiffs
sums that after
said note specified became
wit on the day of in the year at
the county
sum of money specified in the said note with
therein and
that payment of said promissory note might he had
let the said
lords and
satisfied and discharged. By
there became
the said sum of money in the the said note speci
fied, when he the said
he the said
afterwards to wit on the
1829
then and there faithfully promised the said plain
tiffs to pay them the
specified when he the said
be thereunto afterwards requested
And whereas also the said
wards to wit on the
the said
cial instance and request and being so indebited
he the said
of afterwards to wit on the day & year aforesaid at
St Louis County aforesaid under then & there
the said plaintiffs to pay them the last mentioned
sum of money when he the said
should be thereunto afterwards requested. Yet the
said
do hath not
do saith hitherto to wholly infused and still doth in
form to the damages of the said plaintiffs
and therefore they
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
We command you to summon
the Judge of our
of
November next then and there to answer unto the President Directors and
Company of the
of the said plaintiffs two thousand Dollars and have you then there this
writ
Executed the writ
and acknowledges
vs
of trespas on the case
issue on summons
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
And the said
the
that he did not undertake and pro
mise in manner and force as the said
President Directors & Company of the
he puts himself whom the Country
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded to summon
that, setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, he be and appear in proper person before the Judge
of our
then and there to testify and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our
said Court, wherein
and
on the part of the
vs
Wml Clark
for T F Riddick
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
You are hereby commanded to summon
that, setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, he be and appear in proper person before the Judge
of our
then and there to testify and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy, now pending in our
said Court, wherein
and
on the part of the
Executed the writ on
27. 1828
vs
for Mol
This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.
The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
I claim three