<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="rcd1858.0027.492"><!--enter filename without extension for xml:id-->
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc> 
<titleStmt>
<title><!--example, take title from spine-->Record 27 1858</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<publisher>Washington University Libraries</publisher>
<pubPlace>St. Louis, MO</pubPlace>
<date>2012</date>
<availability><p><ref target="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/</ref></p></availability>
<availability><p>data are freely accessible</p>
<p>This electronic document is published as part of the St Louis Circuit Court historical records project.</p>
</availability>
<idno type="dls">rcd1858.0027.492<!--enter filename without extension--></idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<bibl><!-- example, use title-->Record 27 1858 prepared by the St. Louis Circuit Court</bibl>
<bibl>The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2012-05-29" who="AGJ"></change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>

<text xml:id="rcd1858.0027.492T">
<body>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0000.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0001.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0002.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0003.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0004.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="npn" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0005.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1>
<pb n="001" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0006.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-22">Monday, February 22nd 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> County of Saint Louis</head>
<p>Is it remembered that at a term of the Circuit Court, held at the City of Saint<lb/> Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis, State of Missouri, it being the twenty-<lb/>second day of February, Eighteen-hundred and fifty-eight, there were present the Honorable <name>James<lb/> R. Lackland, Judge</name>; <name>James Castelle</name>, <name>Sheriff</name> and <name>Stephen Price, Clerk</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J. Glasgow</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Inluis Jones</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Jones</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Joveshack</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Garnean</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Garnean</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Morris</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Lee</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M. Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Morsis</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendant Inslee files an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sheridan C. Hunt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Cartan</name> et al</head>
<p>Proof of Publication. Now at this day come the plaintiffs and<lb/> file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publica<lb/>tion heretofore made in this behalf, has been duty publis<lb/>hed, according to law.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D. Ford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Beard &amp; Brother</name></head>
<p>The defendants come and file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. Pollity</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin H. McClung</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Archer</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendant <name>Archer</name> files an answer.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Collier</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thomson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Tygack</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendant Reisen files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="002" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0007.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rezin Davidge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>President Directores and Company of the Bank of Lousivelle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Cahn</name></head>
<p>The Plaintiff, by leave of Court, files an amended petition.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>405.48.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin C. Gates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph S. Hull</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. in Now at this day comes the said defendant and files his<lb/> statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the such of Four hundred and five dollars and<lb/> forty-eight cents and consents that Judgment be rendered against him for said<lb/> sum. His, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid, in form aforesaid as confessed, and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver Guinette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles J Carpenter</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mechanic's Bank</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file a lemurrer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>H. Grundl</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file a lemurrer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph S. Swes</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file a lemurrer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Dowdall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John F. Lay</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hashell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>King'n F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hashell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Carr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for security for costs and lemurrer to petition filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="003" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0008.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas J. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Castell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benj'n F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George G. Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Haymun Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George S. Nichells</name> et al</head>
<p>Exhibit filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Palli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank Hudson</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name>, President et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Rourke</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Canway</name>, admr et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John K. Hempeteal</name>, admr et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Wickersham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. H. Menkins</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John G. Gay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Crowley</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Bellings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore N. Becker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Page</name> &amp; <name>Racon</name></head>
<p>Amended Petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Natale Kahn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter St Cin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mury St Cin</name></head>
<p>answer and Crossbill filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Hauel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Suphen Haskell</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Devins</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
<p>Motion for additional bond filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M. Morrisen</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name> et al.</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitl Van Evard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hynian Levin</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Dur kee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Carr</name> &amp; <name>Kennett</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W.. Clark</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. S. Roberts, Jr</name></head>
<p>Plea in abate<lb/>ment filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Logan D. Dameron</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carroll</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="004" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0009.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph S Foster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen A. Whitehouse</name></head>
<p>Alligations and Interrogatories</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hanenkamp</name> &amp; <name>Hynes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshn Nevison</name></head>
<p>Proof of publication in Now at this day come the plaintiffs and file proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this<lb/> behalf has been duly published according to law.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thomson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Proof of publication. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff and files<lb/> proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore<lb/> made in this behalf has been duty published according to law.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Reed</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles G. Gill</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William F. Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert K. Wright</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Willing</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fx M. Meyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. W. Fisher</name> et al</head>
<p>Agreement files.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Wilgus</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Steam Boat David Tatum</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Hall</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>P. Hogan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph K. Rent</name></head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Anios C. Paxon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. S. Nashell</name></head>
<p>Allegations and Interrogatories filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Collier White Lead Oil Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Keller</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillito</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Gormley</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>E. M. Clellan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S. M. Whitehouse</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President and Directors &amp; Company<lb/> of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Kahn's</name> gar</head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri, to use et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Meyers</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William R. Callody</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. Cutter</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Craden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Catharine Creaden</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="005" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0010.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>C. K. Racon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Plant</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucien Carr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Pileher, Sr</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Owens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Smith</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Robertson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John All</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Walsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Caston</name> and <name>Dennis Fennessy</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and<lb/> on his motion, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Calhoun</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Frederick</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John A. Hall</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rutherford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac J. Kelfcham</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President Directors and<lb/> Company of the Bank of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ellen J. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elius abraham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Raphael Keiler</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John A. Singleton</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M. Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel M Cartney</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jerre Hunte</name>, <name>Allon, Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Motion to dismiss<lb/> suit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Walker Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick K. Conway</name></head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Little</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emnut Mc Donald</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Anthony</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Fitzgibbon</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>Answer and<lb/> Counter claim, filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Cone</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Linard Forhes</name></head>
<p>answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph R. Halland</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick McKenna</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Molloy</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Cartney</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name> et al</head>
<p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Russing</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Willing</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="006" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0011.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sangunette H. Renoish</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Solomon H. Robbins</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Car Wheel Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M. Schieffelin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace G. Brady</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, if is ordered<lb/> by the Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said <name>William<lb/> K. Brady</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Catter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed as to the said Defendant <name>Thomas Braun</name><lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
<p>Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, at this day, comes in open Court, and acknowledges the<lb/> execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above Lucy, aged about twenty four years, of black<lb/> color.</p>
<p>Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, at this day, comes in assen Court, and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above <name>Peter</name>, aged about sixteen years, of<lb/> black color.</p>
<p>Now at this day, in open Court, comes Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above <name>Marie</name><lb/> aged about forty-five years of black color.</p>
<p>Now at this day, in open Court, comes Aime Pernod, who is personally know to the Court, and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above <name>James</name>, aged<lb/> about three years, mulatti</p>
<p>Now at this day, in Open Court, comes Aime Pernod who is personally known to the Court and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above <name>John</name> aged about<lb/> Fourteen years, of black color.</p>
<p>Aime Pernod, comes in Open Court, and acknowledges the execution the execu<lb/>tion of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above <name>Nelly</name>, aged about five years,<lb/> mulatti.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes in Open Court, Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the<lb/> Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of <name>Martha</name><lb/> aged about twenty years of black color.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes in Open Court, Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his slave <name>Tom</name>, aged about twenty-eight<lb/> years, mulatti.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J. Bacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver F. Pragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>S. G. Seans</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal On motion of<lb/> said plaintiff, if is ordered<lb/> that this cause he dismissed<lb/> as to the said <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="007" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0012.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stouvenal</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charlis M. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant <name>Thomas<lb/> B. Baker</name>, at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution above<lb/> therefore.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>D. G. Tieman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William D. W. Barnard</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Charlis Bernard</name>, at the costs of said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J. Bacon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver T. Pragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Oliver T. Pragg</name>, at the costs of said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue there for.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Gerhard H. Sand</name><lb/> <name>Francis H. Pee</name>, assignee</head>
<p>Upon the application of said assignee it is ordered that he be do<lb/> proceed to sell the personal property conveyed by said as<lb/>signment at private sale, for cash, for all sums under one hun<lb/>dred dollars, and for all sums over one hundred dollars, the said<lb/> assignee may sell upon a credit not exceeding three-months,<lb/> the Purchase money to the secured by note with a good endorser. All personal property re<lb/>maining unsold at the expiration of three months shall be sold at public auction, for each<lb/> The real estate conveyed by said assignment, shall be sold at public auction upon<lb/> twenty days notice; terms, and third cash, and the balance at three and six months, secured<lb/> by notes and deeds of trust upon the property.</p>
<p><name>C. C. Simmons</name> announced to the Court the death of <name>Richard S. Blenner hassett</name>, and<lb/> presented the proceedings had at a meeting of the Members of the Saint Louis Bar, and<lb/> on his motion it is ordered by the Court that the same be entered of record.</p>
<p>At a meeting of the members of the saint Louis Bar, held at the Common Pleas Court.-Room<lb/> on the Twenty-seventh day of December Eighteen hundred and fifty-seven, to give expressions<lb/> to their sentiments relative to the death of <name>Richard J. Blenner</name> hassitt Easy the follow<lb/>ing preamble and resolutions were unanimously adapted.</p>
<p>Whereas it has pleased <unclear>provideack</unclear><lb/> to remove from amongst as our distinguished be other <name>Richard J. Blenner hassett</name> Esq. and<lb/> whereas it is due to the great talents and abilities manifested in his professional career<lb/> that a fitting tribute he paid to his memory, therefore, be it Resolved, that use hold<lb/> in the greatest respect and regard the many eminent qualifications that adorned<lb/> his career as a lawyer and the amiable traits of personal character, that so largely<lb/> commended him to the love and friendship of his friends and personal associates<lb/> Resolved, That me deeply and sincerely sympathize and condole with the bereaved family of<lb/> the deceased in the great loss they have sustained. Resolved, that as a testimony of respect to the<lb/> memory of our professional brother and of our sorrow for his loss we will attend his funeral in a body<lb/> and wear the usual badge of mourning for thirty days. Resolved that the secretary of this meeting he<lb/> requested to furnish the family of our departed associate with a easy of these resolutions</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="008" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0013.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>and also to cause the same to be published in the several City papers.</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Four O. Clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-23">Tuesday, February 23. 1858</date>.<lb/> The Courtmet pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeray</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Alexander</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown admr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Headerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>R. J. Guthridge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lockwood</name> &amp; <name>Pierson</name> gar et al</head>
<p>Dismissal. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney in this<lb/> behalf and on his motion, if is ordered by the Court that the said garnishees<lb/> be his charged hence, at the Cost of said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Squeri Hall for<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Crawford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aruvs H. Shulty</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Thornton</name></head>
<p>Motion to discharge defendant filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward G. Sloan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. D. Gorlon</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M. Kehey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A. H. Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rusoill Scarritt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfried Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Richardson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Gilpin</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Riney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Burk</name> et al</head>
<p>Reply filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand A. Rauss</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. D. Gordon</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hagh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. J. Peter</name> et al</head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="009" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0014.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Nelen</name></head>
<p>answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State Bank of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel B. Wiggins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Grone</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Petterson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Simmons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Burkard</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin H. Hatten</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George T. Pettman</name> and<lb/> <name>Albert Tennent</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, if is ordered<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amalu Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilphin</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry <unclear>Piter</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morley J. Levi</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dallon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Wightman</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. Comstock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Mckee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Mc. Gully</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Champaigne County Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Inluis Berseh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helginberg</name><lb/> <name>Frederick Pecker</name> and<lb/> <name>Philip J. Helginberg</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion<lb/> of said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, if is<lb/> ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of plaintiff and that execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L. Hale</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion<lb/> of plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, if is ordered that<lb/> this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward C. Iloan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James C. Parks</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M. Taylor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rickwell &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>affidavit of<lb/> a partnership<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W. Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. J. W. Laughlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Buchanan</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>H. Baxter</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Schultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="010" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0015.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George P. Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>L. A. Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Aartman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Largue</name> &amp; <name>Aunt</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bernstein</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H. Sturdy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Palmer</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dallon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S. Maloney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bernstein</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Ellis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard C. Schakelford</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court,<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Newman N. Ross</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>L. J. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>L. A. Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. G. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Anderson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G. Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Bank of the state of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Wellon</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Carson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Nelson</name> gar et al</head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Than</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennedy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles D. Gilpin</name> gar et al</head>
<p>Interrogatories<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Bridgford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Charleville</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="011" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0016.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Molair</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B. Michael</name>, <name>Kenneth<lb/> McKenzie</name> and <name>Charles Bobb</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and in his<lb/> motion, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Heiter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward A. Owens</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, if is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel T. Tiemann</name>, <name>Inluis Tiemann</name><lb/> and <name>Peter G. Treimann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William D. W. Barnard</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Barnard</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Owen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A. Eddy</name>, <name>Joseph A. Jamison</name><lb/> <name>Jabez P. Eddy</name>, <name>Amos Cotting Jr</name>, <name>Anson<lb/> M. Bissell</name>, <name>Charles C. Hellmers</name> and<lb/> <name>Werner Meyers</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plain<lb/>tiff by his attorney, and on his motion, if is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Ridgoray</name> and <name>William Fling</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A. Eddy</name>, <name>Joseph A. Jamison</name><lb/> <name>Jabez P. Eddy</name>, <name>Amos Cotting, Jr</name>, <name>Anson<lb/> M. Bissell</name>, <name>Charles C. Hellmers</name> and<lb/> <name>Werner Meyer</name></head>
<p>Dismisseal</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, and on their<lb/> motion, it is ordered by the board<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the said plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>J. P. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Garne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Petterson</name> aim</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew Park</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David C. Tardy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis H. Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis F. Curtes</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheadon</name> et al</head>
<p>Anwer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. S. White</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="012" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0017.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>L. H. Simpson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Bredon</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George G. Presbury</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of defendant Waugh, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. Moffit</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. S. Lauham</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles C. Hant</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William W. Glenny</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pacific Insurance Company garnishee<lb/> of James B. Townsend</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the said garnisher he hence discharged, at the<lb/> costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel C. Michael</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac T. Wise</name> and <name>John<lb/> M. Krum</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff, and with the consent of the<lb/> parties hereto, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Cohen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M. Hanter</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Henry</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Globe Insurance Company</name></head>
<p>Dismisseal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the said garnisher he discharged hence at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Ryan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Roger C. McAllister</name></head>
<p>Ten days for the time is given the said defendant to plead herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Inluis H. Gerhard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlon</name></head>
<p>Dismisseal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Marrier Steinbach</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt Van Evard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hayman Levin</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George S. Nichelts</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hayman Levin</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="013" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0018.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al no 227<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The time for answering, is, by leave of Court, extended ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al no 228<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The time for answering, is, by leave of Court, extended ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Banjamin F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The time for answering is extended ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>E. J. Glasgon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name></head>
<p>Defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis F. Graff and others</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>M. T. Miller</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis T. Graff</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Inluis Beisch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> <name>Frederick Picker</name><lb/> and <name>Philip J. Helgenberg</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>Ten days further time allowed to the said defendant <name>Robert<lb/> Sterling</name> to file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The <name>Wood-book Hardin</name></head>
<p>Leave is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition<lb/> herein, within thirty days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William V. A. Ray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt r</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ryan</name> &amp; <name>Lanthan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fenn and Hunt</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dweight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Chonteau</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to quash<lb/> return filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion by defendant<lb/> <name>Wallace</name> to quash<lb/> affidavit re filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L. Salisbury</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hughes</name> &amp; <name>Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fenn</name> &amp; <name>Hunt</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffmann</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W. F. Denny</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="014" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0019.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D. Gage</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Ragers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oaul Garlin</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The First Ward Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgerberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers</name>, <name>Anderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles B. Anderson</name> the assignee of said<lb/> <name>Rogers</name>, <name>Anderson and Company</name> and files an application<lb/> praying that he may be discharged from his trust aforesaid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Fritsch</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeray</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out Petition filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>United States Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>United States Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert C. Gordon</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Murray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jail Nourse</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. F. C. Champain</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The People's Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Bayle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Inluis Buchnan</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm H. Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anapen's Rree</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. M Pleeters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Singerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel C. Meyers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A. M. Watermann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Fay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="015" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0020.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Covenant Life Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Logan D. Camerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carroll</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfried Kleinmunn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W. Green</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The People's Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S. Guy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Clark Jr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. S. Roberts Jr</name> gar et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, if<lb/> is ordered that the firm of <name>Bogy</name> &amp; <name>Miltenberger</name>, garnishees<lb/> herein be discharged, at the costs of said plaintiffs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Corneny</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael L. Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Clark</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Trumball</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Mitchill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Simmons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Me, to use of Spols<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anapins Rice</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citzens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Darrah</name> &amp; <name>Pomeroy</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emanuel D. Holiamanh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Shackleford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>State of Missouri</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A. Capaire</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>C. G. Manso</name><lb/> Circuit Attorney, if is<lb/> ordered that this<lb/> cause be dismissed<lb/> upon the payment of costs by the defendant</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="016" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0021.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fideli C. Sharp</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>S. H. Benaist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonus Moore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chalres L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dallon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. Hayden</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Boatmen's Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C. Boardman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritsch</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Ombray</name>, dit Soulouque<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Vaclair</name></head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritsch</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Bruke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Chen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. Vandermale</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathan D. Allen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. H. LeKenn</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jr C. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley D. Alkerie</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Reed</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Darrah</name> &amp; <name>Pomeroy</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. Hargadine</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Darrah</name> &amp; <name>Pomeroy</name></head>
<p>Answer of <name>Darrah</name> &amp; <name>Pomeroy</name><lb/> filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R. Risley</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>M. Goldsoll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="017" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0022.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bellas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Kachler</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D. Muller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gordon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abament filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Franciseus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John G. Evans</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H. Pond</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Berck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Camphell </name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. Williams</name></head>
<p>Answer and set off filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James E. Gall</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. F. Crass</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hashell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Harren</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>Camphell</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward W. Tryon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. F. Crass</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick L. Rillon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fisrnin A. Cousinery</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel G. Haviland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H. West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James A. Monks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hughes</name> &amp; <name>Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Largue</name> &amp; <name>Hunt</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Almon Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Mutual Life Ins Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="018" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0023.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chalres L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. Catlin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fidelis C. Sharph</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>L. G. Dickinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pomeroy</name>, <name>Benton &amp; Co</name> <lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moses Pfeiffer</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benvist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles M. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Bonner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abeles Taussig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adelph L. Komick</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frunklin Field</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Quaker City Insurance Company of Pennsylvania</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin H. Wheadon</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac A. Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. A. LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayden</name> &amp; <name>Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Segirson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Canway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph <unclear>Kater</unclear></name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pomeroy</name>, <name>Benton &amp; Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Myerson</name> files an<lb/> answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. M Pleeters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. A. LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Myerson</name> files an answer<lb/> herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. J. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. W. Hebert</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Cartney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. William Street</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel S. Sanderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Fire &amp; Murine Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pennsylvania Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos C. Paxon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. S. Haskell</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="019" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0024.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaeffler</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Michanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. W. Street</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Holmes</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. F. Reasley</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Rolker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. G. Miller</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Heaskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Peters</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E. Barrm</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph B. Holland</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph E. Busson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph B. Holland</name></head>
<p>Demurrer and Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Mc Fadlin</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert L. Green</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anton Jarger</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Myerson</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Mauntel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Mc Fadlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylun</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benj F. Reasly</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John M. Meyers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Angel S. Meyers</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A. R. Albett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. A. LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver Labadie</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W. Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Cone</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Chen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. A LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Samuel<lb/> Myerson</name> files an answer<lb/> herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. A. LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Samuel<lb/> Myerson</name> files an<lb/> answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rohkohl</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Caesar</name> et al</head>
<p><name>Myerson</name> files an<lb/> answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John E. Cook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamen F. Reasly</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Ivory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="020" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0025.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletur</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, if is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plain<lb/>tiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Ragers</name>, <name>Anderson &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and fully Considered the applica<lb/>tion of <name>Charles R. Anderson</name>, assignee is this behalf, doth order that<lb/> said assignee be discharged from his said trust; and the Court doth<lb/> further order that all the books, papers, effects, moneys and evidences of<lb/> left be delivered by him to his successor or successors in the trust, as seen as the Court shall designate<lb/> the persons to receive the same, and discharge the trust.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J. R. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>526.115</note>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-24">Wednesday, February 24th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Courtmet pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Murray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Nugent</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard King</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and Solemnly called come not Wherefore, on motion of said<lb/> plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and twenty six dollars<lb/> and five costs. If is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended together<lb/> with ten percent interest on said Judgment until paid, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>448.94</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frirre E. Brulatour</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Gratiaa</name></head>
<p>On Bell of Exchange.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that said petition be taken as<lb/> confessed, against said defendant. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Four hundred and forty-eight dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>541.75</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Murray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name> and<lb/> <name>James B. Dobyns</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff but the said defendants al<lb/>though duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth order that said petition be taken against said de<lb/>fendants as confessed And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of Five hundred and forty-one dollars and Seventy five cents. If is, therefore Con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="021" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0026.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>form aforesaid, with interest from maturity at the rate of ten per cent per annum, until paid, and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>655.45</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bussy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Dobyns</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as<lb/> Confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty-five<lb/> cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>522.611</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Hughes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said de<lb/>fendants although duly summoned and called come not. Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff his petition is taken against said defendant as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred<lb/> And twenty-two dollars and Sixty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Cable</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said<lb/> defendants <name>George W. Cable</name> and Ira Stout, although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of<lb/> said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R. Risley</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants <name>David R. Risley</name> and <name>William Risley</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, Where<lb/>fore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said<lb/> defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Chen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> Picker</name> although duly summoned and solemnly called come<lb/> not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against them as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name> and<lb/> <name>C. H. Barton</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name> and <name>C. H. Barton</name> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition<lb/> of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="022" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0027.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Roe</name> and <name>Henry J. Moore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Thompson</name>, <name>Joseph W. Thompson</name>, <name>Peter J. Somers</name><lb/> and <name>James M. Hughes</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the<lb/> said defendants <name>William H. Thompson</name>, <name>Joseph W. Thompson</name> and <name>Peter<lb/> J. Somers</name> although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default Wherefore the Court cloth order the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> be taken against then as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles C. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>419.411</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Thayer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Hoelzle</name>, <name>Anthur<lb/> Olshausen</name>, <name>James V. Westtake</name><lb/> and <name>Appleton A. Britton</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition<lb/> of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants confessed.<lb/> And finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and nine<lb/>teen dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>613.81</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name>, <name>James Patrick</name><lb/> and <name>Griswold E. Wasner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C. Payler</name> and <name>John D.<lb/> Stone</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore, the Court doth order the,<lb/> petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.<lb/> And finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and thirteen<lb/> dollars and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>2138.27</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Patrick</name> <name>James Patrick</name> and<lb/> <name>Griswold E. Wasner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Bersch</name>, <name>Adum R. Richtscheid</name><lb/> and <name>Philip Krass</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against<lb/> them as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of Two Thousand One hundred and thirty-eight dollars and twenty seven cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary L. Lamargue</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Simonds</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="023" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0028.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1373.911</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Wimer</name>, <name>James<lb/> A. Rogers</name>, <name>Charles Rogers</name><lb/> and <name>Henry F. Watson</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand-Three-hundred and Seventy-three dollars and ninety cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>741.83</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Wimer</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Gibson</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plain<lb/>tiff be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this suit is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and forty one dollars and eighty<lb/> three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>545.30.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Hughes</name> and <name>Thomas<lb/> Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Giles</name> and <name>Robert W. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and forty-five dollars and thirty cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name>, <name>David<lb/> D. Mitchell</name> and <name>James<lb/> H. Comfort</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff but the said defendants<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> and <name>James H. Comfort</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff, his petition is taken against said<lb/> defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>644.28</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Curtis A. Cromwell</name><lb/> and <name>Carrline Cromwell</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff his peti<lb/>tion is taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Six-hundred and forty-four dollars and twenty-eight cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="024" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0029.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1580.80</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> and<lb/> <name>James H. Comfort</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>419.78.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Kirkman</name> and <name>John W. Luke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> and <name>John O. Brien</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the<lb/> petition of said plaintiffs he taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and nineteen dollars and seventy-eight cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Gabson</name> <name>Joseph W. Cheeseman</name><lb/> and <name>Henry Groveten Kemper</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. Stout</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Hughes</name> and <name>Thomas<lb/> Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name> and <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed a the costs of the said defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Hughes</name> and <name>Thomas<lb/> Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cook</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said defendants and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>224.40</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rensalear W. Lee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Gratiaa</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the<lb/> petition of said plaintiff be taken against said de<lb/>fendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty four dollars and forty-cents<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="025" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0030.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3.172.37</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Woodward</name>, <name>William H. Baldwin Jr</name><lb/> and <name>Christopher C. Baldwin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John T. Chappell</name> and <name>Vetal Francis Valli</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the pe<lb/>tition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand One hundred and seventy two dollars and thirty seven cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>7.669.65</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eli Mygatt Jr</name>, <name>George Mygatt</name> and<lb/> <name>John Ingraham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>True W. Hoit</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes de<lb/>fault, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the<lb/> petition of said plaintiffs be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Seven thousand, Six hundred and sixty nine dollars<lb/> and sixty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>173.94.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Tennant</name> and <name>George T. Pittman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Brinn</name> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. Thereupon come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the other said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of One hundred and seventy-three dollars and ninety four cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have there<lb/> of execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>268.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M. Waterman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lester</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty-cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and that he have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="026" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0031.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>281.94</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name>, <name>Graham C. Hughes</name><lb/> <name>John J. Mudd</name>, <name>Henry F. Mudd</name><lb/> and <name>Amstead O. Grubb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Humann Moll</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes de<lb/>fault, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he<lb/> taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and eighty-one dollars and<lb/> ninety-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>187.11.67.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William P. Rekhill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>True W. Hoit</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendant as<lb/> confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand eight hundred and seventy dollars<lb/> and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof ex<lb/>ecution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>434.11</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dominick J Mc Laughlin</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Four hundred and twenty four dollars and eleven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>242.38</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Allriance</name> and <name>Parker L Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julius Jonas</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plain<lb/>tiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Two-hundred and forty-two dollars and thirty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>581.87</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel N. Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph J. Tourville</name> and<lb/> <name>A. S. Leone</name></head>
<p>On Draft</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendants,<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five<lb/> hundred and eighty-one dollars and eighty seven cents It is therefore, considered by the Court that sum plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="028" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0033.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>by her attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defen<lb/>dants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and ninetynine Dollars and forty-five<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs, and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3711.23.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Liker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Ganter</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Where<lb/>fore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Three hundred and seventy dollars and Twenty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>287.35</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman Spencer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James K. B. Rice</name> and<lb/> <name>Griffin Theebold</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and Eighty seven dollars and thirtyfive<lb/> cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said defendants pay to the<lb/> said plaintiff the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and that said defendant have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>509.78</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomson Maylan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of Five Hundred and nine dollars and seventy eight cents It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1.3711.03</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Armstrong Beattie</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry L. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Bacon</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Henry L. Bacon</name>. Thereupon, comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against them in confessed.<lb/> And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of On thousand Three hundred and seventy dollars and three cents It is, therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="029" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0034.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Margeret Davis</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication.-</p>
<p>The Sheriff having made return that said defendant cannot be found<lb/> and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process, it is, on<lb/> motion of said plaitniff by his attorney, ordered that said defendant be notified<lb/> of the commencement of this suit, the abject of which is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the said defen<lb/>dant on the grounds of desertion and adultery, and unless she he and appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, on the First Monday of October next, and<lb/> an a before the sixth day thereof, answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against<lb/> her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law, in the<lb/> St Louis, Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>11.364.46.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Josiah G. McClellan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. But the other said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eleven<lb/> Thousand, three hundred and sixty four dollars and forty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court hat said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof exe<lb/>cution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>260.93</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Morgan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed as to the said <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>.<lb/> Thereupon comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said other<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but<lb/> make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred<lb/> and Sixty dollars and ninety-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> And his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>2083.69</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Burteh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>On Notes.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. Thereupon comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument or wri<lb/>ting on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Two-Thousand and eighty-three dollars and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="030" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0035.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>211.12</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Harris D. Booge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter S. Schyler</name> and<lb/> <name>Abram A. Van Womer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make de<lb/>fault, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and<lb/> eleven Dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>265.85.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Anderson</name>, <name>Reuben<lb/> Anderson</name> and <name>Erastus H. Gaylord</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eugene Laveille</name>, <name>A. Michael</name><lb/> and <name>J. W. Roberts</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-hundred and sixty-five dollars and<lb/> eighty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>336.15</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles A. Wrisert</name> and <name>Lebananon<lb/> B. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorneys, and on their motion, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. But the other defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court, that the petition of said<lb/> plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty six dollars and fifteen cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>11157.33</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Dent</name> and <name>Kenneth<lb/> MacKenzie</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default, Wherefore, on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and fifty-seven dollars<lb/> and thirty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found, and its<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="031" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0036.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>926.08</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lemons Gimble</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> and <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his mo<lb/>tion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the<lb/> said <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. But the said other defendants although<lb/> duly summonel and called come not, but make default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and twenty six dollars and<lb/> eight. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>429.71</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Anderson</name>, <name>Erastus<lb/> Gaylord</name> and <name>Reuben J. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James A. Felps</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summonel and called comes<lb/> not but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred<lb/> and Twenty-nine dollars and Seventy one cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>265.76</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ernest C. Angelradt</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert Barth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul P. Patchin</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> Attorney, but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>monel and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Two- hundred and sixty-five dollars and seventy six cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1872.80</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J M Kenny</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name>, <name>Thomas Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>On Notes.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as<lb/> to the said defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name> and there<lb/>upon, it appearing to the Court that the said other de<lb/>fendants have been duly summoned and called<lb/> and come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ments of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and seventy two dol<lb/>lars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Merrit</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff, in his run proper person,<lb/> It is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as<lb/> to the said defendant <name>George F. Rootes</name>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="032" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0037.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>12211.47.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Beuvist</name> and<lb/> <name>James Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chester W. Pomeroy</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry T. Darrah</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Where<lb/>fore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of One thousands-Two-hundred and twenty dollars and forty-seven<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges here<lb/>in expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>837.33.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William J. Horstman</name>, <name>Sigismund<lb/> H. Horstman</name> <name>John G. Frunklin</name><lb/> <name>George O. Evans</name> and <name>William<lb/> S. Hassall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hiram A. Pryor</name> and <name>John S.<lb/> Thomson</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorneys, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default: Wherefore, the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollars and thirty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1585.00</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriett O. Vancourt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> and<lb/> <name>James H. Comfort</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred<lb/> and eighty-five dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> her costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>335.911.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James A. Monks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh K. Wagner</name> and<lb/> <name>George B. Field</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Three-hundred and thirty-five dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>415.411.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lachariah W. Tinker</name> and <name>George<lb/> Tinker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Human</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="033" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0038.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred<lb/> and fifteen dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>326.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Garrett</name> and <name>Eli Garrett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hiram A. Pryor</name> and <name>John S.<lb/> Thomson</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summonel and<lb/> called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing in which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty<lb/> six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>530.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Picker</name> and <name>Alexander Guenandon</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summonel and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty<lb/> dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>180.90.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Stachler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Pausback</name> and<lb/> <name>John C. Degenhart</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty dollars and ninety cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>1119.111</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mount Vernon Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry B. Merrit</name>, <name>William<lb/> Risley</name> and <name>Jacob Merrit</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three Thousand and nineteen<lb/> dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>610.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sharman J. Bacon</name>, <name>Samuel J. Hyde</name><lb/> <name>Edward E. Pike</name> and <name>George Erskine</name><lb/> # 151 Feb Isn 58<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John P. Chappell</name> <name>V. Frank Valli</name>, <name>John B. Valli</name> and <name>Nerie Valli</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not,</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="034" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0039.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-thousand-six hundred<lb/> and ten dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with their costs<lb/> and charges in this behalf expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ludewig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Renz</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant <name>John Renz</name> although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default: Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>407.76</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis P. Payne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Curtis A. Cromwell</name>, <name>Carrline J.<lb/> Cromwell</name> and <name>Joseph E. Elder</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default: Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and seven dollars and seventy-six<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1076.41.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Meyer Friede</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George N. Lynch</name>, <name>Samuel S.<lb/> Brainerd</name>, <name>Charles H. Heywood</name><lb/> <name>James Morris</name>, <name>William A. Lynch</name><lb/> and <name>John C. Cannon</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> form the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of One Thousand six hundred and seventy<lb/> six dollars and forty-one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>511.47</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Wells</name> and<lb/> <name>Stephen H. Provost</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dominick J. McLaughlin</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and eleven Dollars and forty-seven<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>264.55.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Grisbeck</name>, <name>John Kilgour</name><lb/> and <name>John C. Culbertson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A. Nelson</name> and <name>F. W.<lb/> Atheam</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order that the peti<lb/>tion of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="035" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0040.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-<lb/>hundred and sixty-four dollars and fifty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that sum<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>515.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benvist</name> and <name>James Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Predick K Dent</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and fifteen dollars. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Baylon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Bersly</name> and<lb/> <name>Pleasant Devinney</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendant <name>Pleasant Devinney</name> Although duly sum<lb/>monel and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken<lb/> against said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Baylon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> Washington Westand <name>John L. Harbinson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and come not, but make default;<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against the defendants<lb/> as confessed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John E. Cook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> and<lb/> <name>Pleasant Devinney</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Henderson</name><lb/> and <name>Edward Rice</name></head>
<p>On Note.-Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not: Wherefore the Court doth order that<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David C. Pandy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summonel and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as<lb/> confessed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="036" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0041.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>446.82</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W. Green</name> and <name>Jonas W. Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Amos Green</name> and <name>Franklin Field</name></head>
<p>On Note. Default.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed us to<lb/> the said defendant <name>Amos Green</name>. But the other<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said<lb/> plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and forty six dollars and<lb/> eighty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover or said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> >herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>248.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John M. Krum</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph G. Shands</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed and the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and forty-eight dollars and<lb/> twenty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1812.114</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bogue</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David W. Graham</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand eight hundred<lb/> and twelve dollars and four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>962.61</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W. Green</name> and <name>Jonas W. Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>On Motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> as to the said defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>.<lb/> And thereupon, the other said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned called come not, but default; Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and<lb/> sixty-two dollars and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Thomas</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Inles G. Kingsbury</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="037" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0042.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Mills</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Wellon</name>, <name>Barton<lb/> Able</name>, <name>Richard P. Sass</name>,<lb/> <name>James O. Carson</name>, <name>John J. Anderson</name><lb/> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants <name>Louis A. Wellon</name> <name>Barton Able</name>, <name>James O. Carson</name><lb/> <name>John J. Anderson</name> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shea</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name>, <name>Augustus<lb/> Fritschle</name>, and <name>George W. Campbell</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney, and<lb/> by leave of Court with draw the demurrer herein filed<lb/> by them. On motion of said defendants by their attorney leave<lb/> in given them until the 27th instant to file answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>193.20</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goodell</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and ninety three dollars and twenty cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>283.35</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name>, as administrator<lb/> of <name>Volney C. Musick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jehvilla G. Musick</name> and<lb/> <name>James Castells</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but<lb/> make default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Two-hundred and eighty-three Dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>2119.85</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Merrit</name>, <name>William Risley</name><lb/> <name>Henry B. Merrit</name>, <name>Robert C.<lb/> Gordon</name> and <name>George F. Rootes</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff in<lb/> his own proper person, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not, but<lb/> make default; Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Two-thousand one hundred and nineteen dollars and eighty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid, in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="038" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0043.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>533.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> and<lb/> <name>James H. Comfort</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default: Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said, with interest after maturity at the rate of ten per cen tum per annum, until paid, and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1511.35</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name> as administrator of<lb/> <name>Volney C. Musick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Hyatt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff in<lb/> his own proper person, but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Where<lb/>fore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of One hundred and fifty dollars and thirty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>324.36.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Baxter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Dozier</name> and <name>Richard Dozier</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty four dollars and thirty six<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>415.66</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Goodlett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> and<lb/> <name>William Finney</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four-hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>452.114.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Goodlett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and<lb/> <name>Frunklin Weston</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four-hundred and fifty-two dollars and four cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="039" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0044.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jamison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendants <name>John Largue</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3711.30.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David C. Tandy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Goodfellow</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition<lb/> of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as Con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred<lb/> and seventy dollars and thrity cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>241.45</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Munnel J. DeFranca</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note. Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-<lb/>hundred and forty-one dollars and forty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> from aforesaid, together with interest at the rate of ten present per annum, until paid<lb/> and also, his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>525.411</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fretrick Lauman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis J. Miltenberger</name> and<lb/> <name>John P. G. Sill</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sun of Five hundred and twenty five dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>839.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles B. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William McDonald</name> and<lb/> <name>William Singe</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney but that said defendants although duly sum<lb/>monel and called come not but make default;<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Eight-hundred and thirty nine dollars and eighty cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="040" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0045.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>533<unclear>.</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas P. Saunders</name> and<lb/> <name>Jonathan Jones</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Default.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> its attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred<lb/> and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A.</unclear>856.44</p>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline><date when="1859-06-25">June 25th 1859</date> at the request of <name><unclear>Way</unclear><lb/> O. Shaudi</name> <unclear>I acknowledge satisfaction</unclear><lb/> of this judgment of which I am <unclear>auipnee</unclear><lb/> <unclear>(See auipnment</unclear> files with <unclear>accution uol.</unclear><lb/> 1876 or 1858</dateline>
<signed><name><unclear>BaBakewell</unclear></name></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>lootband</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and <name>William O. Shands</name></head>
<p>Default.- On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plain<lb/>tiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make default<lb/> wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eight<lb/> hundred and fifty-six dollars and forty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>529.65</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Walter E. Sell</name>, <name>Thomas Sheppard</name><lb/> <name>James E. Yeatman</name>, <name>George R.<lb/> Robinson</name> and <name>James J. Garrard</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and Twenty nine dollars and sixty five<lb/> cents. It is there fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>187.45.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Phelps</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> or writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and eighty-seven dollars and forty five cents. It<lb/> is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with ten percent per annum, until<lb/> paid, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="041" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0046.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>965.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Wood</name></head>
<p>On Notes.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and sixty five<lb/> dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>265.20</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William O. Shands</name> and <name>Edward<lb/> W. Shands</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney but The said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred<lb/> and sixty five dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>551.94.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William O. Shands</name> and <name>Richard<lb/> Ivers</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> to attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not; Where<lb/>fore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that Said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and fifty-one Dollars and ninety four cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>230.50.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jonathan Jones</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty dollars and fifty cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>729.92</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Milanie Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H. Harber</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney, but said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default;<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and twenty nine dollars and ninety-two cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="042" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0047.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> and <name>Fretrick<lb/> Welcker</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but<lb/> the said defendant <name>John Halliday</name> being duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and <name>Theodore<lb/> Hequembourg</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendant <name>Richard Ivers</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be<lb/> taken again said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>266.<unclear>05/180</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W. Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. Haden</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and Sixty-sex dollars and five cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>476.62</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D. Muller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abner Hopton</name> and<lb/> <name>John B. Hopton</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> the said defendants also come by their attorney; and the said defen<lb/>dants consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against<lb/> them and in favor of said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and<lb/> seventy six dollars and sixty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, together with ten<lb/> per cent interest on the same until paid, and also his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution. By consent of parties, It is ordered by the Court that execution<lb/> be etayed herein for six months from this date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>314.80</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Van studdiford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abner Hopton</name> and<lb/> <name>John B. Hopton</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and the<lb/> said defendants also come by their attorney and the said defen<lb/>dants consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered<lb/> against them and in four of said plaintiff for the sum of<lb/> Three-hundred and fourteen dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as agreed upon, together with ten percent interest upon the sume, until paid, and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. By consent of par<lb/>ties the execution herein is etayed for six months from this date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rensalear W. Lee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David H. Evans</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="043" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0048.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>492.711.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fleming Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sides</name>, <name>John Valentine</name><lb/> and <name>Hrischfeld</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default; Where fore, the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and ninety-two dollars and<lb/> seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>283.61</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry M. Schieffelen</name><lb/> <name>Frederick M. Fowler</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick K. Tailer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace G. Brady</name>, <name>William<lb/> K. Brady</name> and <name>Samuel S.<lb/> Brainerd</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken<lb/> against said defendants as confessed. And the Court<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and Eighty-three dollars and sixty<lb/> one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>315.38</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>Renber S. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Saungrain Michael</name> and<lb/> <name>William C. Taylor</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default; Wherefore,<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and fifteen<lb/> dollars and thirty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have there<lb/>of execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>513.09</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McNeilly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eleazer J. Beard</name> and<lb/> <name>George W. Beard</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default; Where<lb/>fore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Five hundred and thirteen dollars and nine cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>291.92</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob D. Kurllaum</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Nakers</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="044" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0049.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>called comes not but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument or writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Two-hundred and ninety one dollars and ninety-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>I acknowledge to have<lb/> received full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the judgment of which<lb/> <unclear>This is</unclear> the margin <date when="1859-07-09">July 9 1859</date></dateline>
<signed><name><unclear>Attest<lb/> S Riceek</unclear></name></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>Durkeet Bullook</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> and <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anthony M. Foster</name>, <name>Frederick Heman</name><lb/> and <name>John W. Thornburg</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not, but make default; Where<lb/>fore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which the action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of Two-hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty six cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>232.911.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> and <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Gelfort</name>, <name>John D. White</name>, <name>James<lb/> G. Stewart</name>, <name>Josiah Parks</name>, <name>John S. Thomson</name><lb/> <name>William H. White</name> and <name>Herain A. Pryor</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorneys and on their motion this cause is dis<lb/>missed as to the said defendants <name>James G.<lb/> Stewart</name> and <name>Josiah Parks</name>; but the other said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty-two dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>316.17.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin Ellis</name> and<lb/> <name>James Hutton</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default;<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Three-hundred and sixteen dollars and seventeen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>509.111</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William F. Stary</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Chynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not.<lb/> but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and nine dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and ten percent interest on the same, until paid, together with<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="045" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0050.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>617.39</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William F. Sracy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Lunch</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default: Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and seventeen dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found, with percent interest on the same until paid, together<lb/> with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>653.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Meissner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dorr</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but said defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned and called comes not: Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this suit<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> six hundred and fifty-three dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>695.63.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthen T. Miller</name> and <name>Allen<lb/> B. Miller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Morris</name> and <name>Charles H.<lb/> Heywood</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default: Wherefore, the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and ninety five dollars and<lb/> sixty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>322.55.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thomson</name>, <name>William H. White</name><lb/> and <name>Hiram A. Pryor</name>, composing<lb/> firm of <name>Thomson White &amp; Pryor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name> and <name>Frank<lb/> Fox </name> doing business under the style of<lb/> <name>Schaeffler</name> and <name>Fox</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not; Where<lb/>fore, the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred<lb/> and twenty two dollars and fifty five cents. It is, thereof, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>610.55</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mutthen T. Miller</name> and <name>Allen B. Miller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Morries</name> and <name>Charles Heywood</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now At this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court, doth find from the instrument of</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="046" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0051.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of six hundred and the dollars and fifty-five cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>504.81</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James V. Westtake</name>, <name>Appleton A. Button</name><lb/> and <name>Charles F. Hoelzle</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney but the said defendants although duly summonel<lb/> and called come not; Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five<lb/> hundred and four dollars and eighty-one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>514.85.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Butte</name><lb/> and <name>Mathius Baecker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Schmitt</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Cart<lb/> finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Five hundred and fourteen dollars and eighty five cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>418.55.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William W. Keach</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J. Carpenter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Nathun</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not; Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and<lb/> eighteen dollars and fifty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>3211.23.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Overstolz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Lueders</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed: and the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty dollars and twenty three cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="047" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0052.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>386.40.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Blakesley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of Three-hundred and eighty-six dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, consid<lb/>ered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2143</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Welton</name>, <name>James<lb/> O. Carson</name>, <name>Nicholas Springer</name><lb/> and <name>Richard F. Sass</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand one hundred and forty three<lb/> dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>238.68</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. King</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Rodgers</name> and <name>David J. Beattie</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defen<lb/>dants as confessed: and the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty eighty dollars and sixty eight cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, ordered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and the costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>467.57</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Capell</name>, <name>Adrien<lb/> Michel</name>, <name>James W. Roberts</name><lb/> and <name>Kenneth M Kenzie</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney,<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One-hundred and sixty seven dollars and<lb/> fifty-seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> its costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>336.05</note>
<head rend="bracketed">Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Goodin</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> make default; Wherefore, the Court find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> in indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty six dollars and<lb/> five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="048" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0053.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>111611.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bergesch</name> and <name>Theodore<lb/> Bresikurth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of One thousand and sixty dollars. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>#</unclear>728.75.</p>
<p>Error</p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M. Woodward</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of seven hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy five cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have therefore execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>845.58</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin R. Mason</name> and <name>Josephus W. Hall</name></head>
<p>On Bond.- Now at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and the said defendants consent and<lb/> agree that the Court may render judgment in favor of said<lb/> plaintiff and against then for the sum of Eight hundred and<lb/> forty five dollars and fifty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs and charges in this behalf expended<lb/> and have therefore execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>210.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Fider</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Haemmerle</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Gunss</name></head>
<p>On Note <unclear>in</unclear> Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Five-hundred and ten dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>824.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau Jr</name>, <name>James Harrison</name><lb/> and <name>Felix Vallil</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Singleton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendant, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of eight hundred and<lb/> twenty four dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>415.15.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Franke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. William Street</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="049" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0054.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and fifteen dollars and fifteen cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>252.711.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Roever</name> and <name>Herman H. Laumeier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Siever</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-hundred and fifty-two dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>252.12</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Beste</name> and <name>Felix Grima</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Rochkaff</name> and <name>L. S.<lb/> Bargen</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff be taken against said defendants as con<lb/>fessed, And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty-two dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid us found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>John D. Taylor</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth order the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>536.95</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Sparks</name> and <name>William Wright</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name> and <name>Frane Fox</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default, Wherefore the Court doth order the<lb/> petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the<lb/> Court finds from the instrument of writing on which they action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and<lb/> thirty six dollars and ninety-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said is found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George G Presbury</name></head>
<p>Dedimus.-</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered<lb/> that a dedimus issue herein to the District of Columbia<lb/> to take depositions of witnesses, to be used in evidence<lb/> in the trial of this cause.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="050" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0055.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>6.550.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Moore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> <name>Henry<lb/> D. Bacon</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Certificate Deposit.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, But the said other defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not, but make default<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of Six thousand, five hundred and fifty dollars. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin H. McClung</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. McClung</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, and it appearing to the<lb/> Court, that the Clerk of this Court omitted to append his name<lb/> to the furat attached to the affidavit, in this cause, the same is<lb/> now ordered to be done as of the <date when="1858-01-05">fifth day of January 1858</date>.<lb/> ``nune protune''</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>212.75.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Bach</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barthold Vennewitz</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and twelve dol<lb/>lars and seventy-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>169.85</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Bach</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Waugh</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and sixty nine dollars and eighty<lb/> five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David W. Fenton</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaeffler</name> et al</head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sylvester M. Morrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. Gibson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court, that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="051" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0056.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants<lb/> <name>Thomas B. Ellis</name>, <name>Henry Ellis</name> and <name>James Ellis</name>, although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court, doth order that the<lb/> petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Barton Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin R. Mason</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name></head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendant<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name>, and that the costs of this proceeding abide<lb/> the determination of this action.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>706.61</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel S. Dauglass</name><lb/> <name>James B. Gazzam</name>, <name>James<lb/> E. Breading</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver Greene</name>, <name>William Wade</name><lb/> <name>James S. Wilson</name> and <name>Samuel<lb/> S James</name></head>
<p>Dismissal &amp; Judgment.</p>
<p>On motion of the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as<lb/> to the said defendants <name>James S. Wilson</name> and <name>Samuel S<lb/> James</name>. Thereupon come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants <name>Oliver Greene</name> and <name>William Wade</name><lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and six dollars and sixty one cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>882.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore H. Recker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elijah Eubank</name> and <name>W. H.<lb/> Stovalt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>W. H. Stovalt</name>.</p>
<p>Thereupon comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendant <name>Elijah Eubank</name><lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> eight hundred and eighty-two dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution. It further appearing to the Court that the said defendant<lb/> gave bond and security to the Sheriff conditioned according to law, for the forth<lb/>coming of the property attached at the commencement of this suit, whenever the<lb/> Court shall direct Now, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered that said defendant deliver the said property to the Sheriff<lb/> of the County of Saint Louis, forthwith.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Sell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>The said defendant comes and files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="052" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0057.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>800.47.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Conrun</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin Townsley</name></head>
<p>Deposition on part of plaintiff filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> and <name>Adolphus G. Braun</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhart</name> and <name>Fred Morathe</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney but the said defendant <name>Peter Reinhart</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plain<lb/>tiff be taken against him as confessed, But the said other defendant comes by his attorney, and<lb/> thereupon the said parties submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find form the answer of the said defendant<lb/> <name>Morath</name> that the said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> eight-hundred dollars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> (no 383)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> (384)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edgar Sprague</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D. Houseman</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiffs by their counsel, consent that the defendants in the<lb/> above entitled causes may have one week further time to file their<lb/> answers therein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs (no 143)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs (no 188)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry McKelvy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiffs in the above entitled causes, by their respective attorney, consent<lb/> that the defendants <name>Daniel M. Frost</name> and <name>Eleza Graham Frost</name>, may have thirty<lb/> days further time to answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>267.18</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>George W. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred<lb/> and sixty seven dollars and eighteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> together with ten percent per annum upon The same, until paid, and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="053" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0058.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>64.68.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Burke</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of sixty-four dollars and sixty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said plaintiff the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> together with ten percent interest on the same, until paid, and that he have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>138.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but<lb/> make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> thirty-eight dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, with interest on the<lb/> same, at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, and also his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>136.21</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name> and<lb/> <name>George W. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of one hundred and thirty-six dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and interest<lb/> thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, together with his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri, which sues to the use<lb/> of <name>Peter J. Peters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Luther M. Shreve</name> and others</head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney, but the said defendant <name>George Sonizer</name><lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nathaniel C. Myers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>George Smizer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney but the said defendant <name>George Smizer</name><lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against the said defendant as confessed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halatead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W. D. W. Bernard</name> et al garnishees<lb/> of <name>Ezra Easterly</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said garnishees by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that said garnishees<lb/> be discharged hence, at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="054" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0059.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter O. D. Byrne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rose Ann Masterson</name><lb/> and <name>James A. Maginnis</name></head>
<p>Order of Injunction.-</p>
<p>On hearing the petition in this case, it is ordered, that<lb/> <name>Rose Ann Masterson</name> and <name>James A. Maginnis</name> the defendants, be<lb/> enjoined from all further proceeding on partnership account, as mem<lb/>bers of the mercantile firm of Masterson, <name>Byrne and Co.</name>, and from<lb/> selling, buying or exchanging any wares or merchandize on said account; and from collecting<lb/> or compromising or changing any debt, account as due of said firm, and that they be re<lb/>quired to surrender on oath all the stock in trade, books, notes, accounts and dues<lb/> of every description to the Receiver hereby appointed, and to render a true and such<lb/> account of all assets and of all business transactions when called so to do before said<lb/> Receiver. It is further ordered that be appointed Receiver in this case to<lb/> adjust all the interests involved, subject to the further orders and directions of this Court.<lb/> And the said defendants are hereby required to surrender on oath all the books notes ac<lb/>counts, dues and papers of every description now in their possession and belonging to<lb/> the late firm of Masterson, <name>Byrne &amp; Co</name>, to the Receiver hereby appointed; and it is<lb/> further ordered that the said plaintiff execute a bond to the said defendants in<lb/> the penal sum of Twenty-five thousand dollars, conditioned that said plaintiff<lb/> will abide the decision which shall be made in the premises and pay all sums<lb/> of money, damages and costs that shall be adjudged against him, if said in<lb/>junction be dissolved.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>181.15.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendant although duly Summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> fifteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found with interest<lb/> at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, together with his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended And have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>4000.34</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W. Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Welton</name>, <name>William<lb/> M. McPherson</name>, <name>James O.<lb/> Carson</name> and <name>Nicholas Springer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default, Wherefore the Court finds from the instru<lb/>ment or writing on which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four Thousand Dollars and Thirty four cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have therefore execution.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock. <signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="055" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0060.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-25">Thursday, February 25. 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Reed</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Boyle</name> et al <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion to discharge garnishees filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J. Gill</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Bayle</name> et al <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion to discharge garnishees filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Schuermann</name> &amp; <name>Kefferstein</name></head>
<p>On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Meyer</name>, <name>John McDowell</name> and <name>Robert Scott</name>, be and<lb/> they are hereby appointed appraisers herein, to appraise the property<lb/> and effects assigned.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G. Bryan</name></head>
<p>Motion for Judgment upon answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Burke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward F. Dix</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rohland H. Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert L. McGhee</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt Van Evard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Uhrici gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Answer of <name>Uhrici</name>, filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Gilpin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of defendant <name>Gilpin</name> filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Catherine Heisick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Heisick</name></head>
<p>Motion for special execution filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Separate answer of <name>Gilpin</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Foster</name></head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Fay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Wasson</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out<lb/> answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="056" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0061.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John D. Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel A. Buckmaster</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Devitt VanEvard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dryer gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the said garnishee, and it appearing to the Court that no<lb/> allegations and interrogatories have been exhibited against him, it is,<lb/> therefore, ordered that said garnishee be discharged hence at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George L. Micholls</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dryer gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On Motion of the said garnishee, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> he be discharged hence, at the costs of the plaintiffs and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>563.58.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Thornburn</name>, <name>Grant<lb/> Thornburn Jr</name>, <name>William H.<lb/> Elphinstone</name> and <name>Frederick W.<lb/> Bruggerhoff</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore,<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five<lb/> hundred and sixty three dollars and fifty-eight cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2744.83.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Udolphs Wolfe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William D. W. Barnard</name>, <name>Rudolph<lb/> Adams</name> and <name>Charles Barnard</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants<lb/> <name>Rudolph Adoms</name> and <name>Charles Burnard</name>. Thereupon the<lb/> plaintiff comes by his attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> <name>William D. W. Burnard</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-<lb/>Thousand, Seven hundred and forty-four Dollars and eighty-three cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>3811.73.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Helmbacker</name>, <name>Daniel Wolff</name><lb/> <name>Alexander McDonald</name>, <name>Caleb<lb/> Broomal</name> and <name>Michael Hehubacher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Walter Sell</name> and <name>Thomas Sheppard</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said Defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty dollars<lb/> and Seventy-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Olwir Luinette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles J. Curpenter</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer<lb/> and for Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="057" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0062.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary E. Louis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James C. O. Louis</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ<lb/> of summons, issue herein, returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>533.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Balmer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Vandermale</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Five hundred and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>586.50</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorentz Shaffler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name> and <name>William<lb/> G. Goodale</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiff by his attorney, the Court doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred<lb/> and eighty six dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges expended and have thereof execu<lb/>tion.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>320.32.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Long</name> and<lb/> <name>J. W. Sherman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said de<lb/>fendant <name>J. W. Sherman</name>. Thereupon comes the plaintiff<lb/> but the said defendant <name>Patrick Long</name> although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes default<lb/> Wherefore, on motion of plaintiff by his attorney, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and Twenty dollars ad thirty-two<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>542</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not, Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and forty-two<lb/> Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="060" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0063.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. McDawell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>771.54</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F. Burns</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaefler</name> and <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven-hundred and seventy one dollars and<lb/> fifty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>517.46.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James D. Houseman</name> and <name>Inluis<lb/> H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Eneas Mc. Faul</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of Five hundred and seventeen dollars and forty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>163.57.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James D. Houseman</name> and <name>Inluis H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Gradtiaa</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of One-hundred and sixty-three dollars and fifty seven cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein Expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1223.72</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin Stigleman</name>, <name>Nathan Johnson</name><lb/> and <name>Richard Emerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Parks</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and the said defendant also comes by his attorney, and<lb/> by virtue of a warrant of attorney for that purpose executed<lb/> by the said defendant and now produced, in Open<lb/> Court, and duly proved, waives the issuing and service<lb/> of process, and acknowledges that the said defendant in indebted in manner and form as<lb/> the said plaintiffs has in their said petition mentioned and confessed that said de<lb/>fendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and twenty-three<lb/> dollars and seventy-two cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1783.70.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin Stigleman</name>, <name>Nathan Johnson</name><lb/> and <name>Richard Emerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Willer</name>, <name>Mores Marshall</name><lb/> <name>Esward Reynolds</name> and <name>John Oatman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and the said defendants by their attorney<lb/> appeared in Open Court, and by virtue of a warrant<lb/> of attorney for that purpose executed by the said defen<lb/>dants, and now produced in Open court, and duly proved</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="061" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0064.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>waived the issuing and service of process, and acknowledged that the said defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Seventeen-hundred and eighty three dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Messuri</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dorr</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1062.10.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Peoples Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Picker</name>, <name>William Stewart</name>, <name>Joshua Parks</name><lb/> and <name>John M. Young</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by its attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed as to<lb/> the said defendants <name>William Stewart</name>, <name>Joshia Parks</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> Park</name> and <name>John M. Young</name>. Thereupon comes the plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney but the said other defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty-two dollars and<lb/> ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1249.13.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ulrich Roethlisberger</name> and <name>Simon Girber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry A. Shuerman</name> and <name>Frederick W.<lb/> Kefferstein</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and forty nine dollars<lb/> and thirteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>535<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Pilot Knol Iron Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Singleton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty five dollars. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in from aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1757.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogg</name>, <name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> and <name>William Poulterer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Stevers</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Seventeen hundred and fifty-seven dollars and twenty five<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="062" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0065.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>334.54</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ulrich Roethlisberger</name> and <name>Simon Girber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry A. Schaermann</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> W. Keferstein</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not but make<lb/> default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and thirty four<lb/> dollars and fifty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1065.40.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name>, <name>Eugene Miltenberger</name><lb/> and <name>William Poulterer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenandon</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said Defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One-<lb/>thousand and sixty five dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>235.48.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W. Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. Hayden</name> and <name>Henry Hudson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> thirty five dollars and forty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>335.90.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James A. Monks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh K. Wagner</name> and <name>George B. Field</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find firm the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Three hundred and thirty five dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Gill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. King</name></head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. A. Childress</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Patterson</name> and <name>William C. Patherson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Camden</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Norman Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Waddingham</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="063" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0066.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Patterson</name>, <name>James E. Negus</name><lb/> and <name>William C. Patterson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Camden</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Veitch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Eberle</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that an alias<lb/> writ of summons issue against said defendant, returnable to the next term of this<lb/> Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>903<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P. Tesson</name> and <name>Antoine L. Danjen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Schaerff</name>, <name>Christian Schaerff</name><lb/> and <name>J. G. Heinrichs</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and dismiss this cause as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>J. G. Heinrichs</name>, but the said<lb/> other defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default, Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and three dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="064" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0067.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>327.92</note>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-26">Friday February 26th 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Schaerff</name>, <name>Christian Schaerff</name><lb/> and <name>J. C. Justave Heinrichs</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed as to the said defendant <name>J. C. Gustave Heinrichs</name>, but the other said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and twenty seven dollars and ninety-two<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>323.29</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Landry Charleville</name>, <name>Philip D. Gordon</name><lb/> and <name>George W. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed as to the said defendant <name>Landry<lb/> Charleville</name>, but the other said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and twenty<lb/> three dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Ridgley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alner Stone</name>, <name>Charles H. Pond</name><lb/> and <name>Anthony M. Foster</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>364.711</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William D. Glenn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court finds from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and<lb/> sixty four dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Bellings</name> and <name>George<lb/> W. Billings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James B. Ricords</name> and <name>John A.<lb/> Smithers</name> garnishees of <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said defendants, and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to<lb/> file allegations and interrogatories, within the time they<lb/> are required so to do, it is, on motion of said garnishees<lb/> by their attorney, ordered by the Court, that they be dis<lb/>charged as such, at the costs of the said plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="065" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0068.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>779.69.</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred De Clausel</name>, <name>A. A. Vanwormer</name><lb/> <name>George Trowbridge</name> and <name>William Palm</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her<lb/> attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant<lb/> <name>Alfred De Clausel</name>, But the said other defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven<lb/> hundred and seventy nine dollars and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J. Tunstall</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Keokuck Packet Company</name><lb/> gar of <name>Joseph Shinkle</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- Now at this day comes the said garnishee, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed<lb/> to file allegations and interrogtories within the time in<lb/> which they are required so to do, it is, on motion of said<lb/> garnishee by its attorney ordered by the Court, that the said<lb/> garnishee be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>346.24</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas C. Wales</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert E. McCarthy</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Three hundred and forty-six dollars and twenty six cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name></head>
<p>Answer and counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Mories</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>328.08</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas W. Glisan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard J. Compton</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the<lb/> said defendant and files a written statement,<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses him<lb/>self indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Three hundred and twenty eight dollars and eight cents, and consents and<lb/> agree that Judgment may be rendered against him for that sum and in<lb/> favor of said plaintiff. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="066" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0069.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen Wilgers</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. A. Bryan</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name> et al</head>
<p><name>Watson</name> and <name><unclear>Jullis</unclear></name> file answers herein</p>
<p><name>Beard &amp; Bro.</name>, also file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Finch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Tarleton</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnswroth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute, Alton and Saint Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dweight Durkee</name> and <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Archibuld Carr</name> and <name>Hortemer Kennett</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> and <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas H. Brreily</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>387.50.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Davis</name> and <name>Noel Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Michael</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Michael</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Three-hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Schilitter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Noel Tillbert</name></head>
<p>The Defendant, by leave of Court, has fifteen days additional time<lb/> to file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lyman W. Patchin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Silcott</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shea</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Separate answer of <name>Augustus<lb/> Fritschle</name>, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D. Colman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>C. E. Solomon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward W. Shands</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="067" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0070.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N. Hart</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Marquard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Renter</name></head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Building Association</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D. Gage</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William F. Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Bayle</name> and <name>Isaac E. Wolff</name> garnishees of <name>F. A. Pelleteer</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said garnishee by their<lb/> attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> have failed to file allegations and interrogatories, within<lb/> the time in which they are required so to do, it is on motion<lb/> of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered that they be<lb/> discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J. Gill</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Bayle</name> and <name>Isaac<lb/> E. Wolff</name> garnishees of <name>F. A. Pelleteer</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have<lb/> failed to file allegations and interrogatories, within the time<lb/> in which they are required so to do, it is, on motion of said<lb/> garnishees by their attorney, ordered that they be discharged<lb/> as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George E. Reed</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hugh Boyle</name> and <name>J. E. Holff</name><lb/> garnishees of <name>F. H. Pelleteer</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogatories<lb/> in the time in which they are required so to do, it is<lb/> on motion of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered<lb/> that they be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Warren Reed</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. R. Conway</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court,<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anthony H. Menkins</name> and <name>Bernard Menkins</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the said defen<lb/>dants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard J. Turrstall</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Heininger &amp; Co</name>, garnishees<lb/> of <name>Joseph Shinkle</name></head>
<p>On motion of said garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that they be discharged as such garnishees, at the<lb/> costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor. The sum of Five Dollars, is allowed to<lb/> said garnishees for appearing herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="068" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0071.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel B. Allen</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thee Breckenridge Oil &amp; Coal Company</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> a Commission issue herein to the State of Ohio, to take the<lb/> depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause, on<lb/> the park of the said plaintiffs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Belknaphh</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Breckenridge Oil &amp; Coal Company</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that<lb/> a Commission issue herein to the state of Kentucky, to take<lb/> depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause<lb/> on the park of plaintiffs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Zachariah W. Tinker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elizabeth Tinker</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Order of Publication. The Sheriff having made return that the<lb/> said defendant cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied<lb/> that the ordinary process of lair cannot be served upon said defendant<lb/> it is, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered, that<lb/> that the said defendant be notified of th commencement of this suit, the object of which<lb/> is to obtain a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of desertion and<lb/> adultery, and unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and<lb/> held at the City of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before<lb/> the sixth day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against<lb/> her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law,<lb/> in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Woodson</name>, <name>Alvira Cottle</name><lb/> <name>William Lewis Jr</name>, <name>Benyn F. Todd</name><lb/> <name>William Sempson</name>, <name>John Haren</name>, <name>Andrew<lb/> J. Cruch</name> and <name>Charles H. Murtin</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said applicants by their attorney<lb/> and pray the Court for on order of allowance in the<lb/> case of the <name>Collier White Lead Company</name> against<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> and <name>B. F. C. Champion</name>; and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that the said applicants were<lb/> summoned to appear at this term of the Court, as<lb/> the garnishees of the said defendants, in the aforesaid<lb/> mentioned suit; and that in obedience to said summons the said defendants left their<lb/> home in the County of Lincoln, State of Missouri, on the <date when="1858-02-22">twenty second day of February 1858</date><lb/> and arrived in this City on the night of the twenty fifth of the same month, without having<lb/> been notified of the dismissal of the said suit, in vacation; and it further appearing<lb/> to the Court that the applicants herein have been subjected to much expense thereby, therefore<lb/> it is, ordered that the sum of ten dollars be allowed each of said garnishees; and<lb/> that the defendants in the case of <name>The Collier White Lead and Oil Company</name> vs <name>Joseph<lb/> L. Papin</name> and <name>Benjamin J. C. Champion</name> pay to the said applicants the allowance in<lb/> from as allowed, and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>384.28.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Davis</name> and <name>Noel Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Michael</name> and<lb/> <name>Isaac Michael</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the<lb/> petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed, And the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of Three-hundred and eighty-four Dollars and twenty-eight cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the court that said plaintiffis recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="069" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0072.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="070" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0073.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-02-27">Saturday, February 27th 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennedy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name> gar et al</head>
<p>The said garnishee files an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> garnishee of <name>William H. Deriar</name></head>
<p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank W. Tillay</name>, to use et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Bennett's</name> garnishee</head>
<p>On motion of <name>William Bernard</name>, garnishee herein, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that he discharged hence, for want of allegations<lb/> and interrogatories being filed against him by the plaintiff,<lb/> <name>Henry Hitcheock</name> comes and states to the Court, that since<lb/> the institution of this suit by him, as attorney for the plaintiff, the entire claim of said<lb/> plaintiff as trustee, has been assigned; therefore on his motion the Court doth permit<lb/> the said attorney to withdraw from said cause as attorney of record for plaintiff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Barrow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph B. Holland</name></head>
<p>Agreement to dismiss filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellew J. Wilgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steamboat Flying Cloud</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castelle</name></head>
<p>Motion for additional security filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dewitt Van Evard</name></head>
<p>Motion to quash return filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G. Nicholls</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to guash return filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Sommerville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>Motion for Security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Wasterman</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of affidavit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Welgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steamboat Allegheny</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="071" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0074.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward W. Williams</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of affidavit, and plea in abate<lb/>ment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of affidavit, and plea in abate<lb/>ment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James W. Sherman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Noel</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman W. Patchin</name></head>
<p>Motion for additional security on bond filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri, to use of Ipold<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilgus, Noble &amp; Company</name></head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Gorgerty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bruckmann</name></head>
<p>Answer and motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Hays</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hull</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Deriar</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement withdraw and answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ephraim Ball</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James F. Death</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A. W. Crenshaw</name></head>
<p>Agreement filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjn A. Albright</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Ubodell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Gillespie</name></head>
<p>Plea in the nature<lb/> of a plea in abatement, filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="072" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0075.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernandine Florez</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Able S. Merritt</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin McClung</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Thompson</name></head>
<p>The defendant files a motion to guash notice, service &amp; c.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Myers</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. Hargadine</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry P. Darrah</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>A. M. Waterman</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Groesback</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Kee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff<lb/> to strike out the answer of the said defendant, doth order that<lb/> said motion be sustained. On motion of the said defendant<lb/> by his attorney, leave is given him to file an amended answer.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name> admr &amp; c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Henderson</name> et al</head>
<p>The time for answering herein is, by leave of Court, ex<lb/>tended five days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Biebusch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bussemeyer</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended two-weeks from<lb/> date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henirich</name> and <name>Rhinehart</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended one week, from to day.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Hammerle</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended one week.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thomson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterting</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the<lb/> defendant <name>Detrick</name>, at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Barton Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name> and <name>Edwin Mason</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="073" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0076.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Conway</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. Barnett</name> and<lb/> <name>M. Weber</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>4.237.34</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Bellamy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the said defendant<lb/> and files a written statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he con<lb/>fesses himself indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Four Thousand<lb/> two hundred and thirty seven dollars and thirty four cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as confessed and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion, one week's further time is given to <name>George W. Thatcher</name><lb/> to file abjections to the bond of indemnity given by the<lb/> plaintiff to the Sheriff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion, on one week further time is given to <name>George W. Thatcher</name><lb/> to file objections to the bond of indemnity given by the plain<lb/>tiff to the Sheriff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizins Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of <name>George W. Thatcher</name>, the time for his filing<lb/> exceptions to the bond of indemnity taken by the<lb/> Sheriff, is extended one week.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abial R. Abbott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave if Court the note sued on in this cause is withdrawn<lb/> and an attested copy left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Nisbit</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhart</name>, <name>Theodore<lb/> Wolff</name> and <name>Sebastian Engert</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. By leave<lb/> of Court the note sued on is withdrawn, and an attested copy<lb/> left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Austin</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney but the said defendants <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> and <name>George<lb/> W. Campbell</name>, although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against the said defendants as con<lb/>fessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. Cattin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and <name>Wm M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="074" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0077.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and confesses the demurrer<lb/> herein filed by the defendants; and on application of the plaintiff<lb/> by her attorney, leave is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>339.48</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Tanzberger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Stock</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty nine dollars and forty-eight<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> filed by the said defendants to strike and out parts of<lb/> plaintiffs petition, and being thereof sufficiently<lb/> advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Emerson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Jones</name></head>
<p>Motion to dismiss filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>648.80</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward C. Sloan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. D. Gordon</name>, <name>James H.<lb/> Gordon</name>, <name>Richard Dozier</name><lb/> and <name>Benjamin R. Tyler</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>James H. Gordon</name>. The other said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty-eight dol<lb/>lars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.<lb/> It is further ordered that the said Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent<lb/> per annum, until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name>, <name>John Kirkpatrick</name><lb/> and <name>Eneas McFaul</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> filed by the said defendants to the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff, and being thereof fully advised, it<lb/> doth order that said demurrer be overruled Leave is<lb/> given to said defendants to file an answer herein within<lb/> five days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Little</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emmet McDonald</name>, <name>James<lb/> W. Mac Donald</name>, <name>Andrew<lb/> C. Peckham</name>, <name>James F. Small</name><lb/> <name>Josiah H. Obear</name> and <name>John<lb/> C. Joory</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants <name>Emmet Mc Donald</name>, <name>James W. Mac Donald</name><lb/> <name>Andrew C. Peckham</name>, <name>James F. Smull</name> and <name>Josiah<lb/> Obear</name>, although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the<lb/> petition of the plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="075" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0078.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Sommerville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. Lowrenson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Campbell</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>836.21</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hall</name>, <name>A. R. Hynson</name><lb/> <name>John H. Hall</name>, <name>Clark J. Worton</name><lb/> and <name>Leonidas A. Hall</name></head>
<p>On Note.- The Court having duly heard the demurrer<lb/> of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said<lb/> demurrer be overruled, And it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on<lb/> motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, order that<lb/> its petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this Court finds from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty six dollars and twenty one cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>261.65</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rine Guillon</name> and <name>Charles P.<lb/> Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John L. Chandler</name></head>
<p>On Note.- The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer of said defendant to the petition<lb/> of said plaintiff and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth order that the same be overruled.<lb/> And it appearing to the Court there is no answer filed in<lb/> this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order that the petition of said<lb/> plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed, And this cause being submitted to<lb/> the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> sixty one dollars and sixty five cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>488.88.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. Comstock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> filed to the petition of said plaintiff, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be<lb/> overruled; And it appearing to the Court that there<lb/> is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the<lb/> petition of the plaintiff be taken against the defendants as confessed. And this<lb/> cause being submitted to the Court it doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and eighty eight Dollars and<lb/> eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as<lb/> found, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="076" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0079.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Foy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>George Smizer</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant <name>George Smizeet</name> although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of the plain<lb/>tiff be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Collius</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike<lb/> out parts of the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1483.40</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joshua W. Owings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dominie McLaughlin</name> and<lb/> <name>Terrence Scully</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the said<lb/> defendants by their attorney withdraw the demurrer filed herein by them. And it appearing<lb/> to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth, therefore, on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff by his attorney order that his petition be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed; And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of Fourteen hundred and eighty-three dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1080.56</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William D. Sedgwinck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holliday</name>, <name>Ferdinand<lb/> Wilcker</name>, <name>Eleazer Sherman</name><lb/> <name>James H. McCullick</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Webb</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants <name>John Holliday</name><lb/> and <name>Ferdinand Welcker</name>. And it appearing to the Court that there is no<lb/> answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being<lb/> submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty dollars and fifty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>381.78.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bohler</name> and <name>George K. Zeigler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lucas C. Topping</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said Defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendant is indebted to Said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty-one<lb/> dollars and seventy-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>7.421.111.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benvist</name> and <name>James Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Gano Bryan</name></head>
<p>On Note.- the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of the said plaintiffs to strike out the answer<lb/> of said defendant, and being thereof fully advised,<lb/> it doth order that the same be sustained. And this cause<lb/> being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs on the sum of seven<lb/> thousand four hundred and twenty-one dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="077" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0080.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>549.96</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William O. Shands</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward Shands</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defen<lb/>dants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as<lb/> confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Five hundred and forty nine dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>225.48</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and twenty five dollars and forty-eight cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found, together with ten percent interest on said judgment, until said,<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>273.05</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andren Lyons</name> and <name>Samuel Boyd</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Wightman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> seventy-three and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>644.42</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos S. Foster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emilus F. Kraft</name> and<lb/> <name>Otto C. Kraft</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six-hun<lb/>dred and forty four dollars and forty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court,<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1711.52</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hughes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Wightman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and seventy dollars and<lb/> fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael J. Breitenback</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="078" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0081.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>371.56</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Building and<lb/> Savings Institution Association</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Fritch</name>, <name>Charles Fritz</name><lb/> <name>William F. Holske</name>, <name>Herman G.<lb/> Bohm</name>, <name>Charles F. Meyer</name>, <name>Andren<lb/> King</name> and <name>F. W. Meister</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-<lb/>hundred and seventy one dollars and fifty-six cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Henderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Time to answer extended five days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>218.55</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>C. Gibson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Bechler</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Bechler</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> eighteen dollars and fifty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>302.91</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>C. Gibson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ed. Augustine</name>, <name>David Daniel</name><lb/> <name>Frederick Bushman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Three hundred and two dollars and ninety are cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>250.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Barton Bates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin Wason</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hun<lb/>dred and fifty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="079" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0082.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-01">Monday, March 1st 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Smiger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C. Taylor</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and consent<lb/> and agree that the Court may render judgment in this cause in favor of<lb/> said plaintiff and against said defendant for the sum of seven hundred<lb/> and three dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and agreed upon and his costs and charges herein and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Scott</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M. Goldwell</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the Court,<lb/> that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause<lb/> has been duly published, according to law. Thereupon come<lb/> the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although<lb/> duly notified and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Scott</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M. McFaddin<lb/> gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney the time for filing<lb/> allegations and interrogatories is extended, until the fourth day<lb/> of the month.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>280.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M. Barclay</name>, <name>Levi Hinkle</name><lb/> and <name>John Shields</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel Gale</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> order the petition of said plaintiff be<lb/> taken against him as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court<lb/> it doth find that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of Two-hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It doth therefore<lb/> order that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>244.21</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Williams</name> and <name>George Brobstone</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Breckenridge Cannel Coal Company</name><lb/> alias <name>The Breckenridge Coal and Oil Company</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Two-hundred and forty-four dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L Benson</name> and <name>Wm T. Hazard</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="080" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0083.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>200.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William D. Kerr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Wollman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and<lb/> agree that the Court may render Judgment against said defendant and<lb/> in favor of said plaintiff for the sum of Two-hundred Dollars. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>11162.511</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Tourville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. Vandemale</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of One Thousand and sixty-two dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>318.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Gehrke</name> and <name>Francis<lb/> A. Lorenz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas J. Meier</name> and<lb/> <name>Alwine Meier</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in<lb/> the sum of Three-hundred and eighteen dollars and thirty-<lb/>eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>213.19</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Haiw</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William W. Phillips</name> and<lb/> <name>James F. Allright</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court, doth, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff by his attorney order that his petition be taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being<lb/> submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Two-hundred and thirteen dollars and nineteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution. It is further ordered that said Judgment bear interest at the<lb/> rate of ten percent per annum, until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Ohio and Mississippi Transfer Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Human H. Wamke</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nichilas Schaeffer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> order the petition of the plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="081" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0084.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>430.35</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Suss</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Simon Block</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and thirty<lb/> five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<note><unclear>#</unclear>610.14</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Rensselaer W. Lee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name><lb/> and <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comed the plaintiff by his <unclear rend="strikethrough">respective</unclear> attorney,<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and ten dol<lb/>lars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>664.33.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillitto</name> and <name>William Woods</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Gormley</name></head>
<p>On Note and Account. Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, except as to so<lb/> much of said petition as relates to the account sued on, as the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney dismiss their suit as to the account sued on. And this cause being submitted<lb/> to the Court, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> suit is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of six-hundred and sixty-four dollars and thirty three cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>533.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Carpenter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Vandemale</name> and<lb/> <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty three Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>862.23.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name><lb/> <name>John K. Field</name> , <name>Isaac M. Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Thineas Reardslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Baum</name></head>
<p>On Note and Account Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion<lb/> this cause is dismissed as to the account<lb/> sued on; and it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this cause, it<lb/> doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, order that their petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And<lb/> this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="082" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0085.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>on which this action is founded that said defendants is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight<lb/> hundred and sixty-two dollars and twenty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1611.111</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardelee</name><lb/> <name>John K. Field</name>, <name>Isaac N. Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phineas Beardelee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. W. G. Bolmes</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant it indebt<lb/>ed to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> sixty dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>3112.96.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert M. Renick</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Peterson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Singleton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded.<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Three hundred and two dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Brooks</name> and <name>J. W.<lb/> Sherman</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> as to the said defendants, at the costs of the plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>604.67.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Thursby</name>, <name>Robert G.<lb/> Thursby</name>, <name>James S. C. Thursby</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel T. Thursby</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of six-hundred and four dol<lb/>lars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1873.32</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Josthene Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin Ellis</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and seventy-three dollars and thirty<lb/> two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="083" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0086.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>396.85</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lessack H. Simpson, Jr</name> <name>Solomon<lb/> L. Simpson</name> and <name>Joel L. Simpson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin Ellis</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three<lb/> hundred and ninety six dollars and eighty-five cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Anton Franz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Margaret Fraz</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this law comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>653.72</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Butte</name><lb/> and <name>Matthias Backer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James McMullen</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and fifty-three dollars and seventy two cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>157.98</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Swales</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and fifty-one<lb/> dollars and ninety eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H. Hackney</name></head>
<p>Revival of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default, and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that the plaintiff on the twelfth<lb/> day of December Eighteen hundred and fifty-three obtained a Judgment<lb/> against said defendant, in this Court, it is now, on the application of<lb/> the said plaintiff, and no one appearing to show cause to the contrary,<lb/> ordered by the Court that said Judgment be and the same is hereby<lb/> revived, according to the statute in such cause made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>ReniPaul</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Aaron H. Hackney</name></head>
<p>Revival of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff on the<lb/> on the twenty ninth day of April Eighteen hundred and fifty-one obtained a</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="084" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0087.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>a Judgment against said defendant, in this Court, it is now, on the application of the said plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> and no appearing to slow cause to the contrary, ordered by the Court, that the said Judgment be and the<lb/> same is hereby revived; according to the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William R. Martin</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles G. Martin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Clearwater</name> and<lb/> <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>Attachment.- Order of Publication.- The Sheriff having made return<lb/> that said defendants cannot be found, and the Court being satis<lb/>fied that process cannot be served upon them; therefore, on motion of the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendants be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of Two-<lb/>hundred and forty-dollars and eighty cents, on account account of a<lb/> promissory note, and execution and delivered by them to plaintiffs for the sum aforesaid; which<lb/> and the interest thereon are yet due plaintiffs, and that their property has been attached; and<lb/> unless they appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis,<lb/> within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or<lb/> before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will<lb/> be rendered against them, and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed<lb/> in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1048.65.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Narren Outten</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington West</name>, <name>Thomas<lb/> H. West</name> and <name>Isaac T. Greene</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of One-thousand And forty right dollars and sixty<lb/> five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found And his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>269.57.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jesse Lee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John V. Schenck</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty-nine dollars and<lb/> fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>5044.32</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hiram Mills</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Welton</name>, <name>Barton Able</name><lb/> <name>Richard F. Sass</name>, <name>James O.<lb/> Carson</name>, <name>John J. Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>Nicholus Springer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and<lb/> on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> as to the said defendant <name>Richard F. Sass</name>. And it appearing<lb/> to the Court, that there has been no answer filed in this cause,<lb/> it is, on motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney ordered<lb/> that this cause be submitted to the Court, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same, it<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five Thousand and forty<lb/> four dollars and thirty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="085" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0088.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>485.13</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter L. Vandeventer</name>, <name>Thomas Stringer</name><lb/> <name>Lewis L. L. Allen</name> and <name>Jacob<lb/> Van Vorstrand</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred<lb/> and eighty five dollars and thirteen cents. It is, therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>441.30</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Manny</name>, <name>George S. Drake</name><lb/> and <name>William Dawning</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> and <name>Bryant S. Steele</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of<lb/> said plaintiffs be taken against said de<lb/>fendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and forty one dollars<lb/> and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found<lb/> and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>568.78</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau Jr</name> <name>James Harrison</name><lb/> and <name>Felix Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George N. Lynch</name>, <name>Jessi Arnot</name>, and<lb/> <name>Anderson Arnot</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but the said de<lb/>fendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Five hundred and sixty eight dollars and seventy eight cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>295</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottllieb Hebrock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Meissenmeyer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, order<lb/> this petition be taken against said defendant as Confessed, And this<lb/> cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and ninety-five<lb/> dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al vs <name>Benjamin T. C.</name> Champion</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="086" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0089.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel M Cartney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the draft said on in this cause in withdrawn, and an attested<lb/> copy left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Hazard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scatt</name> et al</head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S. Wepham</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken<lb/> against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt C. Sandford</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said<lb/> plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendant <name>William Wade</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>The dependant <name>William Wade</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said<lb/> defendant <name>Beasley</name> to the petition of said plaintiff and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said demurrer be sustained.<lb/> Leave is given to said plaintiffs to file an amended petition herein<lb/> within five days from this date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the<lb/> said defendant <name>Beasley</name> to the petition of said plaintiff,<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sus<lb/>tained. Leave is given said plaintiffs to file an amended petition<lb/> herein, within five days from this date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sheridan C Hunt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Cartan</name> et al</head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but<lb/> the defendants to although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition<lb/> of said plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="087" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0090.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gordon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall</name>, <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said garnishees file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said garnishees file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen G. Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William R. Brown</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert A. Anvil</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Default. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendants <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Edward Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name><lb/> although duly summoned and called come not, but make default.<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed. It is further ordered that an alias writ of sum<lb/>mons issue herein against <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, returnable to the next term.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Rosenheim</name> and<lb/> <name>Martha Collins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leopold Fisher</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
<p><name>James Castelle</name>, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis comes in Open Court and ac<lb/>knowledges the execution of a deed by him, as Sheriff as aforesaid to <name>Daniel Rehoe</name><lb/> being all the night title, interest, claim, estate and property of <name>Frederick Picker</name> and<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> in lot Number Ten and lying and being in Trum's<lb/> subdivision and as is represented on the plat of said addition on file in<lb/> the Recorders Office of the County of Saint Louis. Sold by vertue of an execution<lb/> issued from the office of the <name>Clark</name> of the Saint Louis Circuit Court, returnable to<lb/> the <date when="1858-02">February term 1858</date> of said Court and directed in favor of <name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> and against <name>Frederick Picker</name>, <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> and <name>Frederick Richard</name></p>
<p><name>James Castelle</name>, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis comes in Open Court<lb/> and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as Sheriff as aforesaid<lb/> to <name>Jacob B. Wall</name>, of in and to the following described property, to wit: Lot<lb/> number seven containing six and fifty-nine hundreths acres lying and being in <name>Fred<lb/>erick W. Heidorns</name> subdivision of part of Survey nineteen hundred and fifty-three<lb/> as represented on the plat of said sub-division on file in the Recorders Office<lb/> of Saint Louis County, and being in the City and County of Saint Louis, State of Missouri<lb/> Sold by authority of an execution issued from the office of the <name>Clark</name> of the<lb/> Saint Louis Circuit Court, returnable to the <date when="1858-02">Februrary Term 1858</date>. of said<lb/> Court, and in favor of <name>Joseph Farrell</name> and against <name>Frederick Picker</name><lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> and <name>Frederick Richard</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Gill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said de<lb/>fendant to in be the plaintiff for security for costs and being thereof advised<lb/> doth order said motion be sustained. Leave given plaintiff to file same within ten days.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="088" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0091.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Madison Y. Johnson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> r</head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James D. Denegre</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>O. Wales</name>, <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson B. Powell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Buckley</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>S. Cathorine Heisick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Heisick</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard the application of the said plaintiff for<lb/> a special execution against the property of the said defendant for her<lb/> alimony up to this date, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> said motion be sustained, and that a special execution do forthwith<lb/> issue against any property which may be found belonging to the said defendant, for the alimony now<lb/> due and owing her.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="089" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0092.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="090" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0093.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Mechanic's Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D Sullivan &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel M Cartney</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant<lb/> to the petition of the plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that<lb/> the same be over-ruled. Leave is given said defendant to file an answer<lb/> herein</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at Ten O Clock
<signed><name>J R. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-02">Tuesday, March 2d 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Collier White Lead and Oil Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Keller</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attor<lb/>ney and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication heretofore made in this cause<lb/> has been duly published according to law. Thereupon<lb/> comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly notified and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>927.31</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President Directors and Company<lb/> of the Bank of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Norris Cahn</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attorney and file proof<lb/> satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication hereto<lb/>fore made in this cause has been duly published according<lb/> to law. Thereupon come the plaintiff by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly notified and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Nine hundred and twenty seven dollars and thirty one cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>4.482.16</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Brownlee</name>, <name>Thomas J. Homer</name><lb/> <name>David Brownlee</name>, <name>James Riordan</name><lb/> and <name>John Rex</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James J. Todd</name> and <name>James McMahan</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the<lb/> account sued on; and it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth<lb/> on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order<lb/> that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this<lb/> cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instruments of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> Four thousand, Four hundred and eighty-two dollars and sixteen cents. It is, therefore, considered</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="091" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0094.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution against the property<lb/> attached at the commencement of this suit, as well as against any other property which may be found<lb/> belonging to the said defendant <name>James J. Todd</name>. It is further ordered by the Court that the<lb/> Judgment herein rendered bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wait Barton</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Brennan's</name> admx</head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>Ann Brennan</name> and files her appearance herein for<lb/> the said infant defendants.</p>
<p>Motion to set said appearance of <name>P. B. Gareschi</name>, to guash writ and to dismiss suit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bernheimer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
<p>On motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that a commission issue herein to the State of New York to<lb/> take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause.<lb/> on the park of said defendant.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>T. G. Comstock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>Motion in arrest of Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Mogridge</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the trial<lb/> of this cause progressed, and the Court having heard<lb/> the same doth order that the plaintiff be nonsuited.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit in<lb/> this behalf but that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of said<lb/> plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Gresla</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emanuel Gresla</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney and<lb/> files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore<lb/> made in this cause has been duly published, according to law, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff by her attorney order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said de<lb/>fendant is confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1505.44</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simson D. Gratiaa</name>, <name>Louis Commagere</name><lb/> and <name>Paul Longis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not. Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against<lb/> him as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the<lb/> Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of Fifteen hundred and five dollars and forty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="092" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0095.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>529.18.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building and Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Picker</name> and <name>Louis Schirmer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken<lb/> against them as confessed. And this cause being submitted<lb/> to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Five hundred and twenty nine dollars and eighteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The <name>Terre Hante Alson</name> and<lb/> Saint Louis Rail Road</head>
<p>On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, leave is given said<lb/> plaintiff to amend the affidavit attached to his petition.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Schuermann</name> and <name>Keferstein</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>Henry N. Hart</name>, assignee herein, and files a bond<lb/> conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court; and on the<lb/> application of said assignee for an order of sale, the Court doth<lb/> order that the estate and effects assigned be sold at publication<lb/> for cash in hand to the highest and best bidder</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the<lb/> assignment of<lb/> <name>Henry Bodeman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>Henry N. Hart</name>, assignee herein and files a bond, conditioned<lb/> according to law, which is approved by the Court, and on his motion for<lb/> an order of sale, the Court doth order the estate and effects assigned be<lb/> sold at public auction, to the highest and best bidder for cash</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>208.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hart</name> and <name>Henry Levi</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> eight dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in firm aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John E. Cook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V. Bryan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. Jr Michael</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="093" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0096.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2411.211</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name>, <name>Michael Jones</name><lb/> and <name>John P. Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maurice Steinback</name></head>
<p>On Draft.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> the defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> forty dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>191.511.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Stouvenal</name>, <name>Francis Stouvenal</name><lb/> and <name>Charles Stouvenal</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name>, <name>Thomas B. Baker</name><lb/> and <name>James Moore</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> ninety one dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>576.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sunderland G. Sears</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plain<lb/>tiff and on his motion, this cause is dismissed<lb/> as to the said defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>;<lb/> And it appearing to the Court that there is<lb/> no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff by his attorney, order the petition of said plaintiff to be taken against the<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and<lb/> seventy-six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>426.80.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Cutter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, this suit is<lb/> dismissed as to him; And it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this cause, it is on<lb/> motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that said<lb/> plaintiff petition be taken against them as confessed. And the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty six<lb/> dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof ex<lb/>ecution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Cupples</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L. Benson</name> and<lb/> <name>Wm T. Hazzard</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="094" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0097.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>381.50</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Dougherty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Lunch</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and Called come not, but make Default, Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of Three hundred and eighty one dollars and fifty cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants to the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Fenner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maria D. Fenner</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benvist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lydia M. Rector</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Laurence Myers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Muroe</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term<lb/> of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George P. Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at Ten O. Clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="095" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0098.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-03">Wednesday March 3d 1858</date>. The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hanen Kamp</name> &amp; <name>Hynes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison's</name> gar</head>
<p>On motion of <name>Daniel Glasgow</name> by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> he be discharged hence for the want of Interrogatories, at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiffs. Five dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel Glasgow gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>Daniel Glasgow</name>, garnishee herein, by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the said garnishee be discharged hence<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs. The sum of five dollars is allowed<lb/> said garnishee for appearing.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>964.111</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomery</name>, <name>William H.<lb/> Benton Jr</name>and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hall</name> <name>A. R. Hynson</name><lb/> <name>John H. Hall</name>, <name>Clark J. Morton</name><lb/> and <name>Leonidas A. Hall</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties the petition is amended by the<lb/> insertion of the words ``negotiable and payable without<lb/> defalcation or discount'' inserted after the word<lb/> ``date'' in the fifteenth line from the top of said<lb/> petition. thereupon on motion of the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, this cause is dismissed as to<lb/> the said defendant <name>Leonidas A. Hall</name>. And it<lb/> appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth on motion<lb/> of said plaintiffs by their attorney order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken<lb/> against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court<lb/> it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and<lb/> sixty four dollars and Ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Munroe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Barnard</name><lb/> <name>Wm D. W. Barnard</name><lb/> and <name>Rudolph Adams</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his<lb/> motion, this cause is dismissed As to the said defendants<lb/> <name>Charles Barnard</name> and <name>Rudolph Adams</name>. And it appearing<lb/> to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the<lb/> Court doth on motion of said plaintiffs by his attorney order<lb/> that his petition be taken against said defendant as<lb/> confessed, And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<unclear>-</unclear> It is, thereof, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>840</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Little</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emmet McDonald</name>, <name>James W. McDonald</name><lb/> <name>Andrew C. Peckham</name>, <name>James F. Small</name>, <name>Issiah<lb/> H. Obear</name> and <name>John C. Ivory</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said defendant<lb/> <name>John C. Ivory</name> and withdraws the answer<lb/> filed herein by him; thereupon the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, dismiss this<lb/> cause as to the said defendant <name>John<lb/> C. Ivory</name>: And it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed herein, it doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="096" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0099.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight-hundred and forty dollars. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis M Faul</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>797.56.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John N. Frank</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Ehlert</name></head>
<p>Now at this cay comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said de<lb/>fendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and ninety seven dol<lb/>lars and fifty six cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>293.113.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William R. McCord</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>. And it appearing to<lb/> the Court that there is no answer filed in this case,<lb/> it doth on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed. And this cause being<lb/> submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Two hundred and ninety-three Dollars and three cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. Williams</name></head>
<p>Demurrer to counter-claim filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William W. Wakelam</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H. Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and asks leave of the Court to file<lb/> an amended petition herein and the Court having<lb/> heard said application, doth grant the same.</p>
<p>Amended petition filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bacon, Hyde &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. G. Bragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Reply to counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Simon Eimer</name></head>
<p>Reference.</p>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be referred to <name>Charles<lb/> D. Drake</name>, to settle the matters in controversy between the parties.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="097" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0100.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>Amended answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Harmsen gar</name> et al</head>
<p>answer of garnishee filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President, Directors and Company<lb/> of the Bank of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. G. Smith</name> and others</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> the said defendant to strike out the answer of the said<lb/> defendants, and being thereof fully and sufficiently<lb/> advised, it doth order that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J. Short</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castells</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not but makes default. Wherefore, the Court orders the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Barron</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph B. Holland</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel M Cartney</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>448.94</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre E. Brulatour</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Gratiaa</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that the Judgment heretofore<lb/> taken in this behalf, on the Twenty-fourth day of Feb<lb/>ruary last, was irregularly taken, the same is, therefore, on<lb/> motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, set aside and for nought held<lb/> Thereupon comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the<lb/> petition of said plaintiff is taken against said defendant as confessed.<lb/> And this cause being submitted to the Court by the plaintiff upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, the Court doth find from such proofs that said plaintiff<lb/> is entitled to recover of the said defendant the sum of Four hundred and<lb/> forty-eight dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henderson</name> &amp; <name>Rice</name></head>
<p>The Defendant <name>Rice</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="098" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0101.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Etezens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out the answer of <name>Darrahand Pomroy</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out the answer of <name>Darrahand Pomroy</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>530.411.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> and<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Picker</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and<lb/> on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>Samuel Myerson</name>. And it appear<lb/>ing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this<lb/> cause, the Court doth on motion of the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty dollars and<lb/> forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>430.85</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> and<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Censon</name>, <name>Caspar Herget</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and dismiss this cause as to the said defendant<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name>. And it appearing to the<lb/> Court that there is no answer filed in this cause<lb/> it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> order their petition be taken against said defendant as<lb/> confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and eighty five<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with ten per<lb/> cent interest upon the same, until paid, and also their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James W. Paige</name> and<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore R. Porey</name></head>
<p>Dismissal- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue there<lb/>for.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> The Steamer <name>James E. Woodruff</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued<lb/> until the next term of the Court, at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Langhorne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> gar et al</head>
<p>By consent of parties this cause is continued until the next term<lb/> of this Court.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="099" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0102.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rinehart</name> and <name>Catherine Rhinehart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Corad Okel</name> and <name>Eliza Rhinehart</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Conway admr &amp; c</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John K. Hempstend</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the<lb/> said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hall</name>, <name>A. R. Hynson</name> <name>John H. Hall</name>, <name>Clark J. Worton</name> and <name>Leonidas A. Hall</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the<lb/> Judgment heretofore rendered in this cause be and<lb/> the same is hereby set aside. Thereupon come the said<lb/> parties by their attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss<lb/> this cause as to the said defendant <name>Leonidas A Hall</name><lb/> and the said defendant withdraw the demurrer herein<lb/> filed by them. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause<lb/> it doth on motion of the plaintiff by its attorney order that its petition be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty eight dol<lb/>lars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis G. Picat</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry P. Hortmann</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until<lb/> the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Magnus</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale.- Now at this day comes <name>James Castells</name>, Sheriff of<lb/> Saint Louis County and files a statement, whereby it appears<lb/> to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue and authority<lb/> of the attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to<lb/> depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the<lb/> same would be attended with much expense. It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the<lb/> said <name>James Castells</name>, Sheriff as aforesaid, do proceed to sell said property so levied<lb/> upon, in conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry F. Crass</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiffs, it appearing to the Court that the<lb/> original writ and petition in this cause were lost by the<lb/> Sheriff, after due service thereof according to law, upon<lb/> all the defendants, it is ordered that the record in this<lb/> cause be supplied, and that to that end the Clerk of this Court make out a writ and<lb/> petition in strict conform its with the originals in this cause, as nearly as the same can be done-further that the Sheriff of this Court endorse upon said writ, when so<lb/> made out his service thereof and that said writ and petition when so made out<lb/> and endorsed with service be filed in this Cause, and the same shall stand<lb/> in all respects for the originals.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri - vs - <name>Francis M Faul</name> et al on Answer filed.</head>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="100" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0103.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Knauer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Blank</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court, this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>845.27</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edgar Sprague</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D. Houseman</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Loury</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Eight hundred and forty five dollars and twenty seven cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name>, <name>Eliza Frost</name> by her<lb/> Trustee <name>Daniel M. Frost</name> and <name>Mary B. Stewart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Mutual Fire and Morine Ins Company</name></head>
<p>Dismissaul.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. Leave is given said plaintiffs to withdraw<lb/> the exhibits filed herein by them.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow-morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>2657.211</note>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-04">Thursday, March 4th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Roe</name> and <name>Henry J. Moore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Thompson</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> W. Thompson</name>, <name>Peter J. Sowers</name><lb/> and <name>James M. Hughes</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and dismiss this cause as to the Said defendant <name>James M.<lb/> Hughes</name>. And it appearing to the Court that there is no<lb/> answer filed in this cause, it doth, on motion of said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, order that their petition be taken against<lb/> said other defendants as confessed. And the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-thousand six hundred and fifty seven dollars<lb/> and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p>Remitteter.-</p>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>132.25.</p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Remettiter.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and remits the sum of One hundred and thirty two<lb/> Dollars and twenty five cents off the Judgment hereto<lb/>fore obtained by him in this behalf against the said<lb/> defendants.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emister McClellan</name> <unclear>r.</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Ames gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="101" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0104.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1595.93</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name>, <name>Reuben Beardslee</name><lb/> <name>John K. Field</name>, <name>Isaac N. Field</name> and<lb/> <name>Phincus Beardslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry F. Cross</name>, <name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> and <name>Thomas Simpson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiffs by their attorney, find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fifteen<lb/> hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety three cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry W. Bellings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Norton</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause by referred to <name>Thomas<lb/> T. Gantt</name> and <name>John M. Krum</name>, to determine the matters in<lb/> controversy between the said parties.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Interplea filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. W. Waterman</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name> et al</head>
<p>In each of the<lb/> writing entitled<lb/> causes the time<lb/> for propounding<lb/> interrogatories to garnishees is extended until the fifteenth day of the present month.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Tillman</name>, <name>Ferdinand Rozier</name><lb/> <name>Wiliam Fullagar</name> and <name>Amade<lb/> Berthold</name> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Attachment.- Order of Publication. The Sheriff having<lb/> made return that the said defendant cannot be found, and<lb/> the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon<lb/> said defendant, it is, on motion of the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, ordered that the defendant be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against him<lb/> for the sum of Four hundred and fifty-five dollars and ninety nine cents, on account of a<lb/> promissory note executed by the said defendant to the plaintiffs for the sum of Three hundred<lb/> and thirty-three Dollars and seven cents; and also for the sum of One hundred and twenty one<lb/> dollars and thirty seven cents, on account of goods wares and merchandize by plaintiffs sold<lb/> and delivered to the said defendant, and that his property has been attached; and unless<lb/> he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis<lb/> within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the First Monday of October next, and on or<lb/> before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment<lb/> will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof will be published according to law, in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Clark</name> et al <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said garnishees come and file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="102" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0105.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Ubsdell</name>, <name>Charles Pierson</name><lb/> <name>William Bass</name> and <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Kaufman</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiffs and that Execution issue thereof.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>F. Dattelzwig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. W. T. Black</name></head>
<p>Plea filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>159.911</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name>, <name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> and <name>Lemuel S. Pardee</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and the<lb/> said <name>John Sigerson</name>, one of the within named defendants also<lb/> come and with draws the answer filed by him in this cause,<lb/> Thereupon the said plaintiff dismisses his said suit as<lb/> to the said defendant <name>John sigerson</name>. And it appearing to<lb/> the Court that there is no answer filed herein, by the said other defendants, it is, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that his petition be taken against them as con<lb/>fessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred<lb/> and fifty-nine dollars and ninety cents. it is, therefore, considered by the court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>420.16.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A. Barret</name><lb/> <name>Mary L. Barret</name> and<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and<lb/> twenty dollars and sixteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Milburn</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas C. Reynolds</name></head>
<p>Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of<lb/> the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Graesback</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Miller</name> et al</head>
<p>Withdrawal of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M. Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thomson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison's</name> garnishee<lb/> <name>Daniel Glasgow</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>Daniel Glasgow</name>, garnishee herein, and it appearing<lb/> to the Court that no Interrogatories have been filed in this<lb/> cause, it is ordered that he be discharged hence, at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiffs. The sum of Five Dollars is allowed said<lb/> garnishee for appearing herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="103" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0106.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard P. Hanenkamp</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel Glasgow</name>, garnishee of<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>Daniel Glasgow</name>, the garnishee herein, and it appearing<lb/> to the Court that no allegations and interrogatories have been filed<lb/> herein, it is ordered that he be discharged hence, at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs. The sum of Five Dollars is allowed said garnishee for appear<lb/>ing herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel A. Halliday</name> administrator<lb/> of Mason Converse, died<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philander Bassett</name> and <name>Phebe Basset</name></head>
<p>Dismissaul.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow-morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-05">Friday March 5th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ebon G. Smith</name> and <name>Wm K. Sherwood</name></head>
<p>The Defendants by leave of Court file an amended<lb/> answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>E. J. Glasgow</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Morriso</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James K. Philliber</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and suggests<lb/> to the Court the intermarriage of said plaintiff with<lb/> <name><unclear>Noes</unclear> Yennon</name> and the same is not denied, and by consent<lb/> of parties he is joined with the plaintiff in this action. Motion to quash depositions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>265.45</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Harmson gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name>, <name>William<lb/> White</name> and <name>Hiram A. Pryor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Josiah W. Tyzach</name>, <name>Jacob<lb/> Frank</name> and <name>Hermen Beisen</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and dismiss this cause as to the said defendants <name>Josiah<lb/> W. Tyzack</name> and <name>Herman Beison</name>; But the other defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that their petition be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. Thereupon the plaintiffs submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="104" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0107.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty five Dollars and forty five cents. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said Defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A447.52y</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry W. Billings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Norton</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come <name>Thomas T. Gantt</name> and <name>John M. Krum</name>, the referees in<lb/> this cause and file their report. And no one appearing to object to the<lb/> said report, it is ordered by the Court that said report be confirmed<lb/> Thereupon the Court doth on motion of said plaintiff find from<lb/> said report that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four hundred and forty-seven Dollars and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>The Defendants <name>Sterling</name> and <name>Wallace</name> file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Deriar</name></head>
<p>Reply to counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Zorada Reynolds</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elisha S. Reynolds</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Where<lb/>fore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court, that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed. And the Court having leaving proceeded to hear the testimony in this<lb/> cause and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent<lb/> and injured party, It doth consider adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant<lb/> ant that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person.<lb/> It is, further ordered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and<lb/> the execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Klauenberg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Carl Abel</name>and <name>Anton<lb/> Jaeger</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but<lb/> make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and fifty-three Dollars and forty-cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execu<lb/>tion.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Shillito</name> and <name>Woods</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>State Saving's Institution<lb/> garnishee of Gormley</name></head>
<p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="105" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0108.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name> et al</head>
<p><name>John J. Anderson</name> garnishee in this cause files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia Williams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Williams</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, on alias writ of summons is ordered to<lb/> issue herein returnable to the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Billings</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James B. Ricords</name> and<lb/> <name>John A. Smithers</name>, garnishees<lb/> of <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>On motion of the said garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that they be discharged hence as such garnishees, at the costs<lb/> of the said plaintiffs. The sum of Five dollars is allowed to each<lb/> of said garnishees for appearing herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>694.44.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D. Anter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington West</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes de<lb/>fault. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and ninety four Dollars and forty-four<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>August Setzer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Franklin Iron Company</name></head>
<p>Dismissaul.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Heintz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mary Heintz</name></head>
<p>Dismissaul.- This cause having been called for trial and no one<lb/> appearing to prosecute the same it is ordered by the Court, that<lb/> it be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sol Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>Objections filed by<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher</name>,<lb/> to the bond of<lb/> indemnity taken and<lb/> returned by the Sheriff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Bauduy Gareschi</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Joseph P. Scull</name>. discused</head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find the issue joined in<lb/> favor of the said defendant. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit in this behalf expended<lb/> but that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="106" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0109.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-06">Saturday, March 6th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Logan D. Dameron</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carrall</name></head>
<p>Amended petition filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexis Mudd</name>, <name>Graham L. Hughes</name><lb/> <name>John J. Mudd</name>, <name>Henry M. Mudd</name> and<lb/> <name>Armstead O. Grubb Jr</name>.<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Austin</name> and <name>C. H. Albers</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Long</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jeremiah Cronin</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H. Lucas</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The County of Saint Louis gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein is extended twenty days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Sommerville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>The Defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>Demurrer to counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George B. Sanderson</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. B. Gareschi</name> admr et al</head>
<p>Motion for new troal filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Mogride</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside nonsuit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Billings</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>On motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that a Commission issue herein to the State of Mis<lb/>consin, to take depositions of witnesses, to be used in the trial<lb/> of this cause, on the part of the said defendant.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="107" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0110.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>434.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> and <name>Henry M.<lb/> Woodward</name>, <name>Thomas B. Ellis</name><lb/> <name>Henry Ellis</name> and <name>James Ellis</name></head>
<p>The court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> the said plaintiff to strike out the answer of the said<lb/> defendant, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> said motion be sustained, And it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this case. it doth on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff order that his petition be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and thirty four dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>John<lb/> Helgenberg</name> and <name>Henry<lb/> Gronhesin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be<lb/> sustained. By leave of Court the plaintiff amends his said<lb/> petition by interlining the same with the words, in the fifth<lb/> line on first page the sum of six hundred dollars.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3:601.69</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Riley</name> and <name>Edward<lb/> E. Cartes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Archibuld B. Earle</name> and<lb/> <name>James Findley</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney and dismiss this cause as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>James Findley</name>. Thereupon<lb/> the said other defendant comes and enters<lb/> his voluntary appearance, to this cause, and<lb/> this same cause is, thereupon submitted to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand, six hundred and one dollars<lb/> and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Hazzard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said defendants by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that a Commission issue herein to the State<lb/> of Maryland to take depositions of witnesses, to be used<lb/> on the trial of this cause, on the part of said defendants.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Carr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendants to the petition of the plaintiffs<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled. On motion, the defendants have<lb/> five days to file an answer herein. Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Washington F. Adams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John T. Chappell</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="108" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0111.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W. C. Jackson</name></head>
<p>Replication to the defendants aff-set filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elias Abrahams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Raphael Keiler</name>,<lb/> <name>Adolphus Isaacs</name> and<lb/> <name>William Keiler</name></head>
<p>On Note.- The Court having duly heard and considered the de<lb/>murrer of said defendants to plaintiffs petition and being<lb/> there of fully and sufficiently advised, it doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Hogan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph K. Rent</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said defendant to rule the plaintiff for security for costs and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be and<lb/> the same is hereby sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Henderson</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of<lb/> the said defendant <name>Rice</name> to the petition of the said plain<lb/>tiff, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer of said defendants to the petition<lb/> of said plaintiff and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, it doth order the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>T. G. Comstock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said defendant in arrest of the Judgment herein<lb/> rendered, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Hammerle</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Wicker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. King</name></head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William McDowell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. King</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas T. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer of said defendants to the petition<lb/> of said plaintiffs to the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff, it doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until Monday morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="109" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0112.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-08">Monday, March 8th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles K. Bacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Plant</name> et al</head>
<p>Replication to defendants counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooker</name>, to use &amp; c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Ryan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. C. Mcallister</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. Maffit</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard the motion of said plaintiffs<lb/> to strike out the answer of said defendants and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said<lb/> motion be, and the same is hereby sustained.<lb/> Leave is given said defendants to file another answer herein, within<lb/> five days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Thornton</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of the said defendant to be discharged hence, and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion<lb/> be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Harmsen</name>, <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion to dismiss proceedings against garnishee, filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas G. C. Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Stelham</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Leave is given said plaintiff to withdraw the exhibit said on, on his leaving an<lb/> attested copy therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1182.06</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L. Salisbury</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Janshir</name>, <name>William<lb/> Hassinger</name>, <name>John Ruedi</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Spindeer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hun<lb/>dred and eighty-two dollars and six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="110" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0113.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Carr</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. D. Sullivan</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Shillits</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Gormley's gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Interplea of <name>Benjamin Coursin</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Waxer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Smith</name> &amp; <name>Wilmot</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said de<lb/>fendant <name>Wilmot</name> although duly Summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>172.90</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C. McAllister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name> and <name>Lewis Lemaitre</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> seventy-two dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>4116.39.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Roger C. McAllister</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lewis Lemaitre</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said Defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes default.<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and six dollars and thirty nine<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name></head>
<p>Replication to answer and counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennedy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. L. Gilpin gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="111" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0114.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lyman W. Patchin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Sallcott</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendant to<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that it has no Juris<lb/>diction of the cause of action set forth in the petition, it doth order that said<lb/> demurrer be sustained, and That this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Caldwell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Contract.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Herman Diefen<lb/>brun</name>, <name>Henry Holeman</name>, <name>William H. Reid</name>, <name>George Shade</name>, <name>Richard<lb/> Jones</name>, <name>George W. Parker</name>, <name>John B Longenoth</name>, <name>Henry Barkaefer</name>, <name>J. B Dickson</name>, <name>John<lb/> Hellenkamp</name>, <name>Franz Blatseg</name> and <name>Fleming Bates</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and recover well and truly to try the matters in controversy<lb/> between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed, But the said<lb/> plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf; Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth order that the Jury empannelled and sworn herein be discharged<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said defendant go hence without<lb/> day and recover of said plaintiff her costs and Charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution. Leave is given the plaintiff to file a motion to<lb/> set aside the non suit herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>1073.32</p>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>For value in face received <unclear>l,</unclear><lb/> the <unclear>assignee</unclear> of the Judgment of<lb/> which this is the maid in ack<lb/>nowledge full and <unclear>sutmo.</unclear><lb/> <unclear>satisfaction</unclear> of the <unclear>same-</unclear>assign<lb/>ment filed-this <date when="1859-09-21">21st Sept 1859</date>.</dateline>
<signed><name><unclear>mom knight</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Voorhies</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George N. Lynch</name>, <name>William<lb/> A. Lynch</name>, <name>Jesse Arnot</name><lb/> and <name>Anderson Arnot</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their attorneys, and<lb/> the said defendants waive the issuing and service of process<lb/> and enter their voluntary appearance to this suit. And it<lb/> appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it<lb/> doth, on motion of said plaintiff order that his petition be taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand and seventy three Dollars and<lb/> thirty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John P. Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Trowbridge</name> and <name>Priest</name></head>
<p>Affidavit for continuance filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Death</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A. W. Crensheew</name></head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Valli</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C. G. Henirich</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="112" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0115.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date>.</head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeray</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Bitts</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the affidavit to the petition, in this cause, is amended by inter-<lb/>living the words ``attorney for plaintiffs'' in the first line of said affidavit.<lb/> The defendants <name>Bitts</name> and <name>Millen</name> file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayman Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dewitt Van Evera</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the motion herein filed, to quash the return of the Sheriff made in<lb/> this cause, is withdrawn; and the plaintiffs have fifteen days to have the same<lb/> amended.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayman Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George S. Nicholls</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the notion herein filed, to quash the return made by the Sheriff in<lb/> this cause, is withdrawn, and the plaintiffs have fifteen days to have the same<lb/> amended.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Ames</name> et al</head>
<p>Amend petition filed.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>Jas R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="113" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0116.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-09">Tuesday March 9th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. McCullough</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said<lb/> defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being thereof<lb/> fully and sufficiently advised, doth order that the same be overruled<lb/> Leave is given said defendants to file an answer herein within ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary L. Tarr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Will Tarr</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publica<lb/>tion heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to lair.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lagan D. Dameson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carrall</name> et al</head>
<p>The Defendants <name>Sass</name> and <name>Stratton</name> file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>The Defendants <name>Helgenberg</name> and <name>Gronheim</name> file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Frank</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franz Nassal</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed; and by agreement of parties, it is ordered that each<lb/> party pay his own costs, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells</name>, <name>President &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael O. Rourke</name></head>
<p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1073.69/<unclear>x</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wills Sawyer</name> and <name>William <unclear>Piclersgill</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Hall</name> and <name>Clark A. Morton</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day come the said defendant<lb/> and file a statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby it<lb/> appear to the Court that the said defendants are indebted<lb/> to the said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand and<lb/> Seventy-three dollars and sixty nine cents; and the said defendant consent and agrees that Judg<lb/>ment may be rendered against them for that sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Bayle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jalia Buchanan</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Grundt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornduis D. Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="114" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0117.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Ubsdell</name>, <name>Charles Person</name><lb/> <name>William Barr</name> and <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Cunningham</name></head>
<p>Attachment- Order of Publication.- The Sheriff having made return that<lb/> said defendant cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied<lb/> that said defendant cannot be served with process, therefore, on<lb/> motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the<lb/> defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of Three-hundred and forty nine dollars and five cents on account of goods, wares<lb/> and merchandize sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the said defendant, and which<lb/> remains due and unpaid, and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for<lb/> the County of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the sixth day<lb/> thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against<lb/> him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published in the Missouri Democrat, a news-paper printed in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin gruble</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Myers</name> et al</head>
<p>By consent of parties this cause is continued until the next term of the<lb/> Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Murray</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas O. Lawrenson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Campbell</name> and <name>Lawrenson</name></head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Schuermann</name> and <name>Kefferstein</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the assignee herein and renounces the trust<lb/> and assignments conferred to him; and which said renunciation<lb/> is approved by the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matilda McDowell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George H. McDowell</name></head>
<p>The said defendant comes and files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri, to use &amp; c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>August Riebschlager</name></head>
<p>Motion to suppress depositions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>218.05</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dominique Urban</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. Jansen</name> and <name>Philip<lb/> Ceasar</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and eighteen<lb/> Dollars and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="115" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0118.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A T. Shart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment by default, filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver Quinette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles J. Carpenter</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike<lb/> out the answer of the said defendant and being thereof fully advised, doth order<lb/> that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Ringwalt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1003.03.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George F. Boulier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Hunt</name><lb/> and <name>Edward Hunt</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Anton Farrel</name>, <name>Peter Gomasch</name>, <name>W. T. Guion</name>, <name>Nicholus Spond</name><lb/> <name>Michael Pourcelli</name>, <name>David Anderson</name>, <name>Bernard Spickerman</name>, <name>P. B. Dickson</name>, <name>John<lb/> Rippy</name>, <name>Jack Jaeffry</name>, <name>John B. Longenoth</name> and <name>Edward Mitchell</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and room well and truly to<lb/> try the matters in controversy, the trial of this cause progressed, and being now finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their on the aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess<lb/> his Damages at the sum of One Thousand and Three Dollars and three cents. It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Gallagher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Taussig</name></head>
<p>Dismissal-</p>
<p>On motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A. J. Carpenter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Wall</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the<lb/> next term of the Court, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lydia Young</name></head>
<p>Dimissal.- This cause being called for trial, and no one appearing to prose<lb/>cute the same, the Court doth order that the same be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Ellis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard C. Shackelford</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the said parties, it is ordered that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defen<lb/>dant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>200.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Christopher Crone</name>, <name>Frederick Dermon</name><lb/> <name>Nicholas Hatch</name> and <name>Louis Bartold</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas A. Pickering</name> and <name>Howard<lb/> M. <unclear>Churchball</unclear></name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: <name>Herman Dissuburne</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry Hobman</name>, <name>William A. Reed</name>, <name>George Shade</name>, <name>George W.<lb/> Parker</name>, <name>A. G. <unclear>Snitzer</unclear></name>, <name>Henry Barkoefer</name>, <name>A. P. Johnson</name><lb/> <name>John Hellenkamp</name>, <name>Frank Blatzig</name>, <name>Fleming Bates</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard Jones</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being<lb/> duly elected, tried and proven, well and truly to try the matters in controversy between<lb/> the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue soined in favor of the said plaintiffs and</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="116" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0119.tiff"/>
<head type="running">Feby Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>against said defendants and assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their<lb/> petition mentioned at the sum of Two-hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as by the<lb/> Jury assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>300.57</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>John Theeman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly notified and called come not, Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of the plaintiff this cause is submitted to the Court upon the plead<lb/>ings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason<lb/> of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Three hundred Dollars and fifty seven cents<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maurice Stimback</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Hammer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Schneider</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterting</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at. Ten O'Clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-10">Wednesday, March 10th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>646.71.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Mayer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come not<lb/> but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred<lb/> and forty six Dollars and Seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1347.52</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name></head>
<p>On Notes.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Thirteen hundred<lb/> and forty seven and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="117" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0120.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Valentine Moller</name> and<lb/> <name>Nicholas Moller</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff, but the said defendants although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but make default, Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said Defendant is indebted to Said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Two-hundred and seventy-eight dollars and twenty one cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of Said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>789.30.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John O. Neil</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes,<lb/> default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this cause is founded that<lb/> said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and eighty nine dol<lb/>lars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered by the Court that the said Judgment<lb/> bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Gill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles G. Martin</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hall &amp; Smith gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said garnishees file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousinery</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Plea in abatement filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshua W. Alexander</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M. Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment. filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alvin West</name> -vs- <name>Andrew H. Downing</name> et al.-</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this suit be dismissed as to the defendant <name>Andrew H. Downing</name>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="118" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0121.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hartman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>191.211.</p>
<p>Dismissed as to<lb/> <name>A. H. Downing.</name></p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alvan West</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew H. Downing</name>, <name>James Downing</name><lb/> and <name>Elizabeth Worthington</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one-<lb/>hundred and ninety one dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Anton Farrel</name>, <name>Peter Gomasch</name>, <name>W. Guion</name>, <name>Nicholas Spore</name><lb/> <name>Michael Paurcelli</name>, <name>David Anderson</name>, <name>Bernard Spickermann</name>, <name>P. B.<lb/> Dickson</name>, <name>John Aippy</name>, <name>Jacob Joeffry</name>, <name>John B. Langenoth</name> and <name><unclear>Edw-</unclear><lb/>Mitchell</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and<lb/> truly to try the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed,<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andelina Lotze</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C. Lotze</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an<lb/> alias writ of summons issue herein, returnable to the next term of this Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Mauntel</name>, <name>Henry Butti</name><lb/> and <name>Mathias Baker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James McFadin</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Marin E. Stillman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Wickham</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Nicholas Boilvin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said<lb/> plaintiff for an order on the said defendant to pay over certain<lb/> money in his hands, belonging to said estate, and being thereof<lb/> fully advised doth order that said motion be over ruled. It is, also<lb/> further ordered by the Court that the said application be dismissed<lb/> and that the said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Moria H. Boilvin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Wickham</name>, administrator<lb/> of <name>Nicholas Boilvin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said plaintiff for an order on the said defendant to pay<lb/> over certain money which he now has in hands, belonging to the<lb/> estate of <name>Nicholas Boilvin</name>, deed, and the Court being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.<lb/> And it is, further considered that the plaintiff take nothing by her said motion and that said<lb/> defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="119" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0122.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas D. Gage</name>, <name>James L. Gage</name> and <name>Joshua Fine</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of said defendant to strike<lb/> out the answer of said defendants and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, it doth order the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary J. Shultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander M. Mitchell</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Jones</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this Cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-11">Thursday, March 11th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">The President Directors of the Bank of Louisville<lb/> vs<lb/> <unclear>-</unclear> <name>E. G. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>4227.69.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lloyd R. Coleman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip D. Gordon</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney as well as the<lb/> said defendant; and the said defendant files a statement<lb/> duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four Thousand two hundred<lb/> and twenty seven Dollars and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Bogle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julia Buchanan</name></head>
<p>By leave of Court the original answer filed in this cause<lb/> is withdrawn; and another answer is filed instead.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>803.84</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David M. Wagner</name> &amp; <name>Wm A. Thomas Jr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Rogers</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not, but make<lb/> default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are is indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and three dollars and eighty four cents. It<lb/> is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their Costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="120" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0123.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Gill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
<p>It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has failed to file se<lb/>curity for costs, within the time prescribed by the Court, Therefore, on<lb/> motion of said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>317 50/x</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Long</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick W. Heiteman</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and seventeen dollars<lb/> and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henrietta Myers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Myers</name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly notified and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney this cause is dismissed as to<lb/> the said defendant <name>Henry D. Racon</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant <name>H. D. Bacon</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H. Sturdy</name> et al<lb/> <name>Lewis Palmer</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to defendant <name>Wm Myers</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>122.99</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Hirsch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Rockwell</name>, <name>George W. Morris</name><lb/> and <name>August P. Guibert</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called come not, but make default, Where<lb/>fore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and twenty two dollars and ninety nine<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name> and <name>L. Matthews</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles R. Lamb</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and thereupon come also a<lb/> Jury to wit <name>Herman Diefenbrun</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Hofman</name>, <name>William H. Reid</name>, <name>George Shade</name>, <name>George<lb/> W. Parker</name>; <name>A. G. Switzer</name>, <name>Henry Barkoefer</name>, <name>A. P. Johnson</name>, <name>John Hellenkamp</name><lb/> <name>Franz Blatzig</name>, <name>Fleming Bates</name> and <name>Richard Jones</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="121" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0124.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, and now being finished the Jurror aforesaid<lb/> upon their oath aforesaid find the issue soined in favor of the said defendant. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without Day and recover<lb/> of said plaintiff this costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1125.23</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Antoine Michael</name> and<lb/> <name>James W. Roberts</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and twenty five<lb/> dollars and twenty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and <name>Joseph<lb/> Magehan</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again the said parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and<lb/> <unclear>scoorn</unclear> herein also Come, and the trial of this cause being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and<lb/> assess his damages at the sum of one cent. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the damages aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found by the Jury and his Costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John Ruedi</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> application of <name>John Ruedi</name>, for an order on the<lb/> Sheriff to stay further proceedings under the execution<lb/> issued at the last term of this Court in favor of one<lb/> <name>Carl Wittig</name> and against said defendant <name>John Ruedi</name> for the sum of Two-hundred<lb/> and ten dollars, It doth, therefore, order that <name>James Castello</name>, <name>Esquire</name>, Sheriff of the<lb/> County of Saint Louis, be, and his servants, agents and attorneys are hereby restrained<lb/> from further proceeding under said execution, as aforesaid, until the further order of<lb/> this Court. The petitioner files a bond, conditioned according to law, in the sum<lb/> of Four hundred Dollars, which is approved by the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Balz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Balz</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, an on<lb/> his motion this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same such proofs<lb/> and being satisfied from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent<lb/> and injured party, It doth, consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant<lb/> and restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing<lb/> to the Court that the said defendant from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person<lb/> to have the care, custody and control of the infant child mentioned in the petition, who is of<lb/> tender years, It is, therefore, further considered that the said plaintiff have the care, custody and<lb/> maintenance of the said child, and that said defendant be restrained and enjoined from<lb/> interfereing with the plaintiff in this behalf, until the further order of this Court. It is further ordered<lb/> that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="122" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0125.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louise Ekel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Ekel</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called, comes not,<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against said defendant as<lb/> confessed. The plaintiff waiving a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs, And the Court having proceeded to hear such proofs, and being satisfied<lb/> therefore that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it is, therefore considered adjudged<lb/> And decreed that said plaintiff be absolutely and for ever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by her contracted with said defendant and that she he restored to all the rights and privileges<lb/> of an unmarried person. It is, further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs<lb/> and charges of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>R. Barbara Koch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andreas Koch</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, in<lb/> motion of said plaintiff by her attorney this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the petition and proofs, And the Count having proceeded to hear the<lb/> testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an inno<lb/>cent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and<lb/> that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the<lb/> defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof<lb/> fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given<lb/> the said plaintiff to file an amended petition herein.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-marrow morning at Ten O. Clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-12">Friday, March 12th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for non trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Russill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Syluester H. Laflin</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Bayle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Cowan</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="123" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0126.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>253.74</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Boylan</name> and <name>Wm P. Gettys</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington West</name> and <name>John L. Harbinson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendants although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty three<lb/> Dollars and seventy four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>185.88</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Shendan C. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>James R. Wiseman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Cartan</name> and <name>Denm's<lb/> Fennisey</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly notified<lb/> and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs by their attorney this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their<lb/> petition stated at the sum of One hundred and eighty five dollars and eighty-eight<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that Said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> said defendants to the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1332.75</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver Quinette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles J. Carpenter</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it<lb/> doth order that the petition of Said plaintiff be taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed; And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth<lb/> find from such proofs that said Defendant is indebted to said plaintiff, and<lb/> assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One-<lb/>Thousand Three hundred and thirty-two dollars and seventy five cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam Hammer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Schneider</name></head>
<p>Change of Venue.- Now at this day comes the defendant <name>George Schneider</name><lb/> and files an affidavit, stating that the plaintiff in this cause has undue<lb/> influence over the mind of the Judge of this Court It is, therefore,<lb/> ordered that a change of venue be awarded to him, and that the<lb/> Clerk of this Court immediately make out a full transcript of the record and proceedings<lb/> together with all the original papers in this cause, and transmit the same duly certified<lb/> to the Clerk of the Saint Louis Court of Common Oleas.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>J. Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Pawers exr &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said de<lb/>fendant to rule the plaintiff for security for costs, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Sullivan</name>, <name>Exr &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said defendant for security for costs herein, doth order<lb/> that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="124" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0127.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Clark</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lachariah T. Caffin</name></head>
<p>Attachment.- Order of Publication.- On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered<lb/> that the defendant be notified that a civil action been commenced against<lb/> him for the sum of Four hundred and thirty seven dollars and twelve cents, on<lb/> account of a promissory note executed by the said defendant and<lb/> delivered to plaintiff and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next<lb/> term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint<lb/> Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to<lb/> the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him, and his<lb/> property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Rogers</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Lamb</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Shaffner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Gass</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. R. Merritt</name> et al</head>
<p>The defendants file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis Car Wheel Factory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Lowry</name></head>
<p>Publication filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John L. Harbinson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Solomon J. Lettlefield</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit:<lb/> <name>Harman Diefinbrune</name>, <name>Henry Holeman</name>, <name>William H. Reid</name><lb/> <name>George Shade</name>, <name>A. G. Switzer</name>, <name>George W. Parker</name>, <name>Henry Barkoe<lb/>fer</name>, <name>A. P. Johnson</name>, <name>John Hellen Kamt</name>, <name>Franz Rlatzig</name>, <name>Fleming Bates</name> and <name>Richard<lb/> Jones</name>, twelve good and Lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and seven, the<lb/> matters in controversy well and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed, but<lb/> now being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, retire to con<lb/>sult of their verdict.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert De Shacke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Klein</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the<lb/> next term of the Court, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis W. Crane</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Hewitt</name> et al</head>
<p>Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next<lb/> term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Chamberlain</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julin M. Chamberlain</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- No one appearing to prosecute this suit, it<lb/> is ordered by the Count that it be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="125" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0128.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Milton W. M Lean's</name> administrator<lb/> <name>James B. Ricords</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Brundy</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that the said cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P. Sanger</name>, <name>William D. Sanger</name><lb/> <name>James G. Sanger</name>, <name>Hugh A. Clark</name><lb/> <name>Hart L. Stewart</name>, <name>Wilson King</name><lb/> and <name>Irwin Camp</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Harber</name></head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said plaintiffs and that Execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Rainey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Burk</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be continued until the next term<lb/> of the Court, as on affidavit of said plaintiff, at his<lb/> costs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Engene Jacoard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander M. Mitchell</name></head>
<p>Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the<lb/> next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Walsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Cartan</name> and <name>Denms Fennessy</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles C. Whittelsey</name> admr de bonis non<lb/> of <name>Thomas F. Smith</name>, de <unclear>e l</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Tullia C. Beckwith</name>, <name>admx &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion of said defendants to compel the<lb/> plaintiff to file an amended petition herein, and<lb/> being thereof fully advised doth order that said<lb/> motion be overruled. Leave is given said de<lb/>fendants to file an answer in this cause.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Hogan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph K. Bent</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files security for costs herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Gill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George King</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that the Judgment of dismissal heretofore rendered<lb/> in this cause be, and the Same is hereby set aside, upon the<lb/> plaintiffs paying all the costs which has accrued in this cause.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten. O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="126" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0129.tiff"/>
<head type="running">Feby Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-13">Saturday, March 13th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Otts Stephan</name><lb/> vs 114Oct'56<lb/> <name>Amani Louise Stephan</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the said defendant although duly notified and called comes<lb/> not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having<lb/> proceeded to hear the testimony in said cause, and having been satisfied from such<lb/> testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, ad<lb/>judge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and for ever divorced from the bonds of<lb/> matrimony by him contracted with said defendant, and that he be restored to all the<lb/> rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Interragatories field.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Job. T. Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McFee</name></head>
<p>The Plaintiffs file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order<lb/> of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published<lb/> according to law.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>949.02.</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John L. Harbinson</name> and <name>Francis B. Atherton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Solomon J. Littlefield</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes again said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and the Jury sworn and<lb/> empannelled herein also come and the trial<lb/> of this cause progresses and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiffs<lb/> and assess their damages at the sum of Nine hundred and forty nine dollars and two cents<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Genge W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Interrogatories filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Harvey H. Humphrey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castells</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>G. McMurtry</name> administrator of the said<lb/> <name>Harvey H. Humphrey</name>, deceased, and files his appearance as<lb/> party plaintiff in this behalf. Thereupon this cause is continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Ames</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="127" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0130.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Griffin P. Theobold</name>, <name>William Cook</name><lb/> and <name>James K. B. Rice</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Saint Louis Lumbermen</name> and <name>Mechanics<lb/> Insurance Company</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said defendant by its attorney, but<lb/> the said plaintiffs although solemnly called come not, Where<lb/>fore, on motion of the said defendant by its attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the said plaintiff be nonsuited.<lb/> It is, therefore considered by the Court that said defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of the said plain<lb/>tiffs its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>726.28.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M. Taylor</name> and <name>Osear W. Collet</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Moriis</name>, <name>George Rockwell</name><lb/> <name>Augustus P. Guibert</name> and <name>J. A. Inslee</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this<lb/> action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of seven<lb/> hundred and twenty six dollars and twenty eight cents. it is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1356.34</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Skinker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert W. Hunt</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this Day comes the said defen<lb/>dant and files a statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit<lb/> whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Thirteen hundred and fifty-six Dollars and thirty four<lb/> cents, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against him for<lb/> that sum and in favor of said plaintiff. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and Charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Thomas</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jules C. Kingsbury</name></head>
<p>Motion to quash Sheriffi return filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Finch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Tarleton</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said defendants for security for costs herein and being<lb/> thereof fully and sufficiently advised, doth order that said<lb/> motion be sustained. Leave is given said plaintiff to file<lb/> said security for costs, within ten days from this date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William W. Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel T. Rawlings</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hall R. Jackson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nathan C. Corington</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, this cause is continued, until the next<lb/> term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Anna Buckoltz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Backoltz</name></head>
<p>Dimissal.- No one appearing to prosecute this cause, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the same be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="128" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0131.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1291.61</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Job. T. Doun</name> and <name>John H Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McFee</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly notified and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney this cause<lb/> is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand, Two hundred<lb/> and ninety one and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>231.81</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George G. Presbury</name></head>
<p>On Land Warrant. Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and consent and agree that Judgment<lb/> may be rendered in favor of said plaintiff and against<lb/> said defendant for the sum of Two hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as agreed upon and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3.712.93.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Melvin L. Gray</name>, <name>Josiah H. Obear</name><lb/> administrators of <name>Wm</name> vs <name>F. Kent</name>, died<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carroll</name> and <name>Alonzs W. Nason</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the<lb/> defendants and file a written statement duly verified<lb/> by affidavit, whereby they confess themselves indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand<lb/> seven hundred and twelve dollars and ninety three<lb/> cents, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against them for that<lb/> sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John P. Gould</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Trowbridge</name> and <name>Priest</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued, on<lb/> the affidavit of said defendants, until the next term<lb/> of the Court, at their costs, and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Stevens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Brainard Million</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said defendants for security for costs, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be<lb/> sustained; and it is further ordered that unless said<lb/> said security is filed within ten days from this date, the said cause will stand<lb/> dismissed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>300<unclear>-</unclear></p>
<p><unclear>Doms</unclear></p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Hogan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph K. Bent</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury to wit: <name>Herman Diefenbrune</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Holeman</name>, <name>William Reid</name>, <name>George Shade</name>, <name>George W. Parker</name><lb/> <name>A. G. Switzer</name>, <name>Henry Barkeofer</name>, <name>Frunz Blatzeg</name>, <name>John Hellen<lb/>kent</name>, <name>Flaming Bates</name>, <name>Richard Jvers</name> and <name>A. P. Johnson</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matter in controversy well and truly to try, the<lb/> <unclear>al</unclear> trial of this cause progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="129" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0132.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages by reason of the pre<lb/>mises in his petition stated at the sum of Three hundred dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James R. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. G. Tuttle</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue thereof.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>143.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William V. N. Bay</name>, trustee<lb/> of <name>Flora Byrne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Wescott</name> and <name>Corneluis<lb/> D. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by respective attorney<lb/> and thereupon come a Jury to wit. <name>Anton Farrell</name>, <name>Peter<lb/> Gomash</name>, <name>W. Guion</name>, <name>Nicholas Spond</name>, <name>Michel Pourcelli</name><lb/> <name>David Anderson</name>, <name>Bernard Speickerman</name>, <name>P. B. Drickson</name><lb/> <name>John Rippy</name>, <name>Jacob Joeffry</name>, <name>John B. Langenoth</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Mitchell</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed and being finished, the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the<lb/> issue in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages by reason of the premises<lb/> in his petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and forty three dollars.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>8.293.52.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore Wolff</name> and <name>Sebastian<lb/> Engert</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhart</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes<lb/> the said defendant and files a statement duly<lb/> verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight<lb/> Thousand, Two hundred and ninety three dollars<lb/> and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> confessed and their costs And charges herein expended and have thereof execu<lb/>tion.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A. Lee</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas J. Broadwell</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until Monday morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="130" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0133.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-15">Monday, March 15th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J. Coons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W. Taylor</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Pate</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George D Moore</name></head>
<p>Depositions on the part of the defendant filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Patterson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maria Patterson</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, Wherefore<lb/> on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted to the<lb/> Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court being satisfied<lb/> from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider<lb/> adjudge and decree, that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant, and restored to all the<lb/> rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further adjudged by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nicholas Schaeffer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>The plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the<lb/> Court that the order of publication heretofore made<lb/> in this behalf has been duly published, according to<lb/> law.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. P. Mallory</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Wood Boat Hardin</head>
<p>The plaintiff files an amended petition herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>3.767.411.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F. Shapleigh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>Anapias Rice</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys, and neither party requiring a Jury<lb/> this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-<lb/>Thousand, seven hundred and sixty seven dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution. It is further ordered by the Court that said Judgment been interest at the<lb/> rate of ten percent until paid.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="131" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0134.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S. Gay</name> and <name>George Gay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Milford Smith</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the said parties by their re<lb/>spective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>John H.<lb/> Garnhard</name>, <name>Henry Harting</name>, <name>Frederick Berg</name>, <name>Joseph Rippy</name><lb/> <name>Reinhart Baese</name>, <name>Edward Coffee</name>, <name>John Buschmann</name>, <name>Frederick<lb/> Stendeman</name>, <name>Orlands Fish</name>, <name>Joseph Walenfechtler</name>, <name>Nelson Tindal</name> and <name>James Dickey</name><lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to<lb/> try the matters in controversy, the Trial of this cause progressed and not being finished is<lb/> laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah L. Mortimer</name> by her next<lb/> friend <name>George Lewis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard R. Mortimer</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although solemnly<lb/> called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff<lb/> by her attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court, and<lb/> the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in said<lb/> cause and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and<lb/> injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant<lb/> and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person<lb/> And it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this<lb/> proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Phebe Brondley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Brondley</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff files proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication heretofore made in this cause has<lb/> been duly published according to law. Thereupon comes<lb/> the plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Where<lb/>fore the petition is taken against him as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>261.211</note>
<head rend="bracketed">State to use, of <name>Abram Inslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>August Reipschlaeger</name>, <name>Frank<lb/> Thias</name>, <name>Henry Langing</name> and<lb/> <name>Hem's Th: Wilde</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of said defendants to suppress<lb/> the depositions of <name>Stephen D. Gould</name> and <name>Ezra<lb/> Gould</name>, filed herein, in behalf of said plaintiff<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, it doth order<lb/> that said motion be sustained. Thereupon come<lb/> the said parties by their respective attorneys and and thereupon also come a Jury<lb/> to wit: <name>James Quickley</name>, <name>Josiah Alkire</name>, <name>C. W. Anderson John Bugg</name>, <name>Richard<lb/> Landy</name>, <name>Benjamin Philebert</name>, <name>D. O'Brien</name>, <name>John Grosbert</name>, <name>Josiah Hlzinger</name><lb/> <name>W. W. C. Perry</name> and <name>Charles Haren</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy well<lb/> and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor<lb/> of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the Sum of Two hundred and<lb/> sixty one dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="132" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0135.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J. Anderson</name>, gar of<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the said garnishees herein, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> they be discharged hence, at the costs of the said plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor. The sum of Ten dollars is allowed<lb/> said garnishees for filing answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Hazard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the time for<lb/> filing an answer herein on the part of the said defendant <name>Lyman<lb/> Scott</name> be extended until the tenth day of May. next.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sarah A. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C. B. Smith</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>2600</p>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>1165.</p>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>710.25</p>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>1747.40.</p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Barnhill</name> and <name>James M. Brush</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Waldo Marsh</name><lb/> <name>William H. Ewing</name> and <name>William Dilworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Waldo Marsh</name><lb/> <name>Robert E. Sellers</name> and <name>Egbert S. Weaver</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Waldo Marsh</name><lb/> <name>James Rees</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Waldo Marsh</name></head>
<p>Foreclosure of mortgage.</p>
<p>This day comes <name>Waldo<lb/> Marsh</name> and voluntarily enters his appearance as de<lb/>fendant and files his answer herein. And neither<lb/> party requiring a Jury submit this cause with all<lb/> the matters in the said petition and answer set<lb/> forth to the Court for Judgment thereon. And<lb/> the Court being fully advised of and concerning<lb/> the premises doth find that the statements in<lb/> the said petition, are true, and that the said<lb/> mortgage was executed in the manner and for<lb/> the purposes therein set-forth. And the Court doth<lb/> further find that there is now due to <name>James Rees</name><lb/> the sum of seventeen hundred and forty seven<lb/> dollars and forty cents; that there is now due<lb/> <name>William Barnhill</name> and <name>James M. Brush</name> the sum<lb/> of twenty six hundred dollars; that there is now due <name>William H Ewing</name> and <name>William Dilworth</name><lb/> the sum of eleven hundred dollars and sixty five cents; that there is now due <name>Robert E. Jellers</name><lb/> and <name>Egbett S. Weaver</name> the sum of seven hundred and ten dollars and twenty five cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered that the plaintiff <name>James Rees</name> recover of the said defendant<lb/> <name>Waldo Marsh</name> the sum of seventeen hundred and forty seven dollars and forty cents,<lb/> together with his costs and charges in this behalf expended. It is further considered<lb/> that the said plaintiffs <name>William Barnhill</name> and <name>James M. Brush</name> recover of the said<lb/> defendant <name>Waldo Marsh</name> the sum of Twenty six hundred Dollars, together with their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended. It is further considered that <name>William H. Ewing</name> and<lb/> <name>William Dilworth</name> recover of the said defendant <name>Waldo Marsh</name> the sum of eleven<lb/> hundred dollars and sixty five cents together with their costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded. It is further considered that <name>Robert E. Sellers</name> and <name>Egbert S. Weaver</name> recover of<lb/> said defendant <name>Waldo Marsh</name> the sum of seven hundred and ten dollars and<lb/> twenty-five cents. It is further ordered and decreed by the Court that the said plain<lb/>tiffs above named respectively recover of the said defendant the said several<lb/> amounts recovered as aforesaid together with their costs and charges in this behalf<lb/> to be levied of the mortgaged property in the said mortgage and petition described, to wit:<lb/> The Steam Boat Ocean Spray ``together with her furniture, apparel, tacked &amp; c And if the<lb/> said mortgaged property be not sufficient to. satisfy said debt, damages and costs, then<lb/> the residue to be levied of other goods, chattels, lands and tenements of the said defendant <name>Waldo Warsh</name>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="133" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0136.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Pate</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George D. Moore</name></head>
<p>Deposition filed on the part of said plaintiff.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-16">Tuesday, March 16th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter O. D. Byrne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. A. Masterson</name> and<lb/> <name>James A. Maginnis</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S. Gay</name> and <name>George Gay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mipford Smith</name></head>
<p>Now at this come again said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also the Jury sworn<lb/> and empannelled herein and the trial of this<lb/> cause progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of the<lb/> said defendant. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiffs his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs no 188<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>E. G. Frost</name>, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs no 383<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. M. Frost</name> and wife filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs (No 382)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. M. Frost</name> and wife. filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs (no 384)<lb/> <name>Wm Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. M. Frost</name> and wife, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs (no 386)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. M. Frost</name> and wife filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs (no 143)<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. G. Frost</name> filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="134" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0137.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry McElroy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of <name>D. M. Frist</name> and wife, filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Tourville</name> and <name>Leoni</name></head>
<p>On motion of the assignee, it is ordered that <name>Werbert<lb/> Forster</name> and <name>Wilhelm Roemheld</name> he, and they are hereby<lb/> appointed to appraise the property, estate and effect assigned</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Graff</name> and <name>Hammerstein</name></head>
<p>Demurrer to set-off filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>380.35.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H. Lucas</name>, <name>Henry L.<lb/> Patterson</name>, <name>Henry S. Turner</name><lb/> <name>Robert N. Nisbet</name> and<lb/> <name>William J. Sherman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R. Risley</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange. Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of Three hundred and eighty dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Biebusch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bussmeyer</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Benjamin M. Bunyan</name>,<lb/> <name>James Quickley</name>, <name>C. W. Anderson</name>, <name>John Burg</name>, <name>Richard Lundy</name><lb/> <name>Benjamin Philibert</name>, <name>D. O. Brien</name>, <name>John Engbert</name>, <name>Josiah Holzinger</name><lb/> <name>W. C. Perry</name>, <name>Charles Haren</name> and <name>Josiah Alkier</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to<lb/> try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being concluded is laid over until<lb/> to-morrow morning at Ten O Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Carsbine Betzold</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George F. Betzold</name></head>
<p>Slader.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the said defendant withdraws the answer<lb/> filed by him; and thereupon it appearing to the Court that there<lb/> is no answer filed in this cause, on motion of said plaintiff<lb/> by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against said de<lb/>fendant as confessed. Thereupon, on motion of the plaintiff come a Jury, to wit:<lb/> <name>John O: Garnhardt</name>, <name>James Supple</name>, <name>James Quickley</name>, <name>Henry Hartwig</name>, <name>Frederick Berg</name>,<lb/> <name>Joseph Rippy</name>, <name>J. B. Featherstone</name>, <name>Reinhart Boese</name>, <name>Edward Coffie John Buchaman</name><lb/> <name>Fred Steudeman</name>, Orlanda fish twelve good and lawful men who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to assess the damages of</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="135" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0138.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>said plaintiff, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Juros aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid, <unclear>assesso</unclear> the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in her<lb/> petition stated at the sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed by the Jury and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>Substitution of Trustee.</p>
<p>It appearing to the Court from the statement of<lb/> <name>James Castello</name>, duly verified by affidavit, that <name>John H. Watson</name>,<lb/> trustee in a certain deed of trust executed by <name>Francis P. Blair</name>, and ac<lb/>knowledged, <date when="1858-07-17">July 17th. 1858</date>. which said deed is recorded in the Recorder's Office of said County in<lb/> Book 192. page 420., hath departed this life, without having completed the performance of the<lb/> duties imposed upon him by the said deed of trust, It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that <name>James<lb/> Castello</name>, Eog. Sheriff of Saint Louis County, be and he is hereby appointed and substituted<lb/> trustee in place of said <name>John H. Watson</name>, deceased, with the like trusts and powers, accor<lb/>ding to the Statute in such Case made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Boyland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Boyland</name></head>
<p>Divorce- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney,<lb/> but the said defendant although solemnly called comes<lb/> not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her<lb/> attorney this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court<lb/> having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied by such<lb/> testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge<lb/> and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds<lb/> of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored<lb/> to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further considered<lb/> that said plaintiff pay the costs and charges of this proceeding and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Catharine Seiler</name> by her next friend<lb/> <name>William H. Cols</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Seiler</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> her attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly <unclear>&amp;</unclear> solemnly called comes not, Wherefore,<lb/> on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney this<lb/> cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in said cause<lb/> and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an inno<lb/>cent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said<lb/> plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her<lb/> contracted with said defendant, and that she be restored to all the rights<lb/> and privileges of an unmarried person. it is further considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that Execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emiston McClelland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen M. Whitehouse</name><lb/> <name>Warner W. Oglesby</name> and <name>John<lb/> Whitehouse</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication and Alias writ of Attachment. the Sheriff<lb/> having made return that the said defendants cannot be found and<lb/> the Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served<lb/> with process, it is, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> ordered that said defendants be notified of the commencement</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="136" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0139.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>of this suit, the object of which is to recover of said defendants the sum of Four Thousand, one hundred<lb/> and twenty four Dollars and twenty nine cents. on account of a bill of exchange executed by the<lb/> defendants, and for the said sum, and unless they be and appear at the next term of the Court to<lb/> he begun and held at the City of Saint Louis on the First Monday of October next, and on or<lb/> before the third day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken<lb/> against them as confessed, Judgment rendered against them, and the property attached at the<lb/> commencement of this suit as belonging to the defendants will be sold to satisfy the said<lb/> sum, interest and costs. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof he published<lb/> according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of<lb/> Saint Louis, It is further ordered by the Court that an alias writ of attachment<lb/> issue herein returnable to the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas D. Gage</name>, <name>James L. Gage</name> and <name>Joshua Fine</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of said plaintiff to strike out<lb/> the answer of said defendants and<lb/> being thereof fully and sufficiently ad<lb/>vised doth order that said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lyman Patchin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Sillcott</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of<lb/> said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be<lb/> overruled.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="137" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0140.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-17">Wednesday, March 17th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles C. Whittelsey</name> administrator de bonis<lb/> non of <name>Thomas F. Smith</name>, deceased<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Tullen C. Beckwith</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>Frederick W. Beckwith</name>, deceased,<lb/> <name>Marshall Brotherton</name>, Executor of <name>Rine Paiel</name><lb/> deceased, <name>David Thomas</name>, <name>Joseph H. Garrett</name><lb/> administrator of <name>Joseph Garrett</name> deceased,<lb/> <name>James M. Bucklin</name> and <name>Walter H. Dorseth</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and neither party requiring<lb/> a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered such proofs<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth find<lb/> the issue joined in favor of said defendants.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> the defendants go hence without day and<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their Costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>500<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Henby</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come and the trial of this cause being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and<lb/> assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the<lb/> sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Jeffies</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. D. Denton</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, as<lb/> on the affidavit of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said<lb/> defendant for additional security upon the bond for the delivery of the<lb/> property mentioned in the plaintiffs petition, and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, it doth order that said motion be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Layman W. Patchin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said<lb/> defendant for additional security upon the bond for the delivery<lb/> of the property mentioned in the plaintiffs petition, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Ames</name> et al</head>
<p>Demurrer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri, to use of <name>Inslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>August Reipschlaeger</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="138" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0141.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Willard</name><lb/> vs (no 211)<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the exhibit sued on in this cause is withdrawn,<lb/> and a copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Willard</name><lb/> vs (No 850)<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>By leave of Court the exhibits sued on in this cause is withdrawn, and a<lb/> copy is left therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow-morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-18">Thursday, March 18th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew T. Short</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the motion of said defendant to set aside the Judgment<lb/> by default heretofore rendered against him, and being thereof fully advised, it<lb/> doth order that said motion be overruled. Thereupon this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the<lb/> damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in the petition stated at the<lb/> sum of It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended. This Judgment is erroneously<lb/> rendered, the cause having been tried by a Jury and not by the Court as is<lb/> herein stated, and is, therefore set aside.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew T. Short</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of the said defendant to set aside the Judgment by<lb/> default rendered in this cause and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.<lb/> Thereupon come the said parties and also a Jury, to wit: <name>James Castello</name>,<lb/> <name>John H. Garnhart</name>, <name>Henry Hartwig</name>, <name>Frederick Berg</name>, <name>Joseph Rippy</name>, <name>Reinhard Boese</name><lb/> <name>Edward Coffie</name>, <name>John Buchanan</name>, <name>Frederick Studeman</name>, <name>Orlenda Fish</name>, <name>Joseph<lb/> <unclear>Walesfechtter</unclear></name>, <name>Nelson Tindall</name> and <name>Richard Landy</name>, twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected, tried and sworn, the matters in controversy well and<lb/> truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid, assess the damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the<lb/> premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two-hundred and eighty seven dollars<lb/> and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="139" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0142.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said de<lb/>fendant Waterman to strike out part of the affidavit of said plaintiff<lb/> upon which the attachment herein was issued, and being thereof fully ad<lb/>vised, it doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said defendant Waterman, to strike out part of the affidavit<lb/> of said plaintiff, upon which the attachment herein was<lb/> issued and being thereof fully advised, doth order that<lb/> said motion be and the same is hereby sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said defendant to strike out part of the affidavit of<lb/> said plaintiff upon which the attachment was issued and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be<lb/> sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Muroe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Barnard</name><lb/> <name>William D. W. Barnard</name><lb/> and <name>Budolph Adams</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said<lb/> defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not but make default. Wherefore the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff is taken against them as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Muroe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Barnard</name><lb/> <name>William D. W. Barnard</name><lb/> and <name>Rudolph Adams</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>A</unclear>2202.92.</p>
<p>Dams.</p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Scott</name>, <name>Clinghan Scott</name><lb/> and <name>William C. Scott</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M. Caldwell</name>, <name>James<lb/> F. Cummings</name> and <name>John C.<lb/> Coldwell</name>, partners &amp; c</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come the said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly<lb/> notified and called come not, Wherefore, Wherefore<lb/> on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the petition of said plaintiffs be<lb/> taken against said defendants as confessed. And<lb/> the plaintiffs waiving a Jury this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs; and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs, by reason of<lb/> the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Five-Thousand-two hundred and<lb/> two dollars and ninety-two Cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Inluis H. Gerhardt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlon</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="140" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0143.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary F. Beller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Beller</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now, at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not<lb/> Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that her petition be taken against him as confessed; and the Court having<lb/> proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause and having been satisfied from such proofs<lb/> that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth, consider adjudge and<lb/> decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by<lb/> her contracted with said defendant and restored to all her rights and privileges<lb/> of an unmarried person. It is further considered adjudged and decreed that said plain<lb/>tiff be restored to her maiden name and that all the property which she possessed<lb/> before and at the time of her marriage, be restored to her by the said defendant It<lb/> is further ordered by the Court that said defendant pay the costs of this proceeding and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>664.68.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name>, <name>Russell<lb/> Scarritt</name> and <name>Paris H. Mason</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default.<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of six hundred and sixty-four dollars and sixty eight cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria C. Grunkemeier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Charles Grunkemeier</name></head>
<p>Divorced.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not but makes default. Wherefore, on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that her petition<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having proceeded<lb/> to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied from such testimony that<lb/> said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and<lb/> decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony<lb/> by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights<lb/> and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered, adjudged<lb/> and decreed that said plaintiff be restored to her maiden name. ``<name>Warza C. Westerkamt</name>''<lb/> and it is also ordered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this<lb/> proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>411.39</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Collir White Lead and Oil Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Keller</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not: but makes default. Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four hundred and eleven dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid<lb/> as found and his costs and charges herein expended and that he have execution<lb/> therefor against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="141" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0144.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>14.412.14.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James McGregor</name> and <name>Thomas F. Stewart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert H. Betts</name><unclear>-</unclear></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at This day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is<lb/> founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fourteen Thousand<lb/> Four hundred and twelve dollars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and Charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>391.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Block</name> and <name>Adolph Schlensinger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> and <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default. Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and<lb/> ninety one dollars and twenty five cents. it is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execu<lb/>tion.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1428.85</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert J. Averill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name>, <name>Edward Wyman</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed as to the defendant<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, Thereupon this cause is<lb/> submitted to the Court and it doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Fourteen hundred and twenty eight dollars and eighty five cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>354.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore H. Becker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> and <name>Henry D. Bacon</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said<lb/> defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>; and it appearing to<lb/> the Court, there is no answer filed in this cause,<lb/> it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-<lb/>hundred and fifty-four Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of Said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam H. Dickbreder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Kohler</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order<lb/> the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed. Thereupon comes the plaintiff as well as a Jury, to wit: <name>James Supple</name>, <name>James</name></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="142" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0145.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p><name>James Quickley</name>, <name>C. W. Anderson</name>, <name>John Bugg</name>, <name>J. B. Fetherstone</name>, <name>Benjamin Philibert</name>, <name>D. O.<lb/> Brien</name>, <name>John Groler</name>, <name>Josiah Holzinger</name>, <name>W. W. C. Perry</name>, <name>Charles Haren</name> and <name>Josiah<lb/> Alkier</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly<lb/> to try the issue joined between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed, but<lb/> not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Henley</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Baylan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pleasant Devinney</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Beasley</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John E. Cook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pleasant Devinney</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Beasley</name> files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Marquard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael <unclear>Relter</unclear></name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff, doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled. Whereupon comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney and the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> be taken against said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said plaintiff to the defendants amended answer, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Leiber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Ganter</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that a Commission<lb/> issue to the State of Pennsylvania, to take depositions of witnesses to<lb/> be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Wason</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney a Commission as awarded<lb/> to the state of Pennsylvania, to take depositions of witnesses on<lb/> the part of said plaintiffs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H.<lb/> <unclear>Berton</unclear></name> and <name>George H. Chase</name> (no 329)<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington West</name>, <name>Thomas H. West</name><lb/> <name>John J. Anderson</name> and <name>Reuben<lb/> Anderson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the<lb/> petition of said plaintiff is taken against them<lb/> as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Reuton</name><lb/> and <name>George Chase</name> (no 329)<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington West</name>, <name>Thomas H. West</name>, <name>John J<lb/> Anderson</name> and <name>Reuben Anderson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="143" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0146.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1453.79</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Belknap</name> and <name>Morris S. Belknap</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Breckinridge Cannel Coal Company</name><lb/> alias <name>The Breckinridge Coal and Oil Company</name></head>
<p>On Draft and Account. Now at this day Come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore the Court doth order the plaintiffs<lb/> petition be taken against it as confessed. And this<lb/> cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find from such proofs that the said defen<lb/>dant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fourteen hundred and forty-three<lb/> Dollars and seventy nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>9611.30</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel B. Allen</name>, <name>Charles H. Allen</name><lb/> and <name>Alfred F. Allen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Breckinridge Oil and Coal Company</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition<lb/> of said plaintiffs be taken against Said defendant<lb/> as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess<lb/> the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in their petition stated<lb/> at the sum of nine hundred and sixty dollars and thirty Cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H. Dubs</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that said demurrer<lb/> be sustained. Leave is given said plaintiff to amend<lb/> his petition within ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>226.42</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Bohler</name> and <name>George K. Zeigler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Abrahams</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two hundred<lb/> and twenty six Dollars and forty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid As found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sebastian Berberick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On account.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, Wherefore the Court doth order that the<lb/> petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defen<lb/>dant as confessed; and this cause being submitted to the Court upon the petition<lb/> and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth<lb/> assess the damages of said plaintiff at the sum of Thirteen hundred and</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="144" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0147.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>forty-three dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1020.29</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kohn</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon<lb/> the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, it doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his<lb/> petition stated at the sum of One thousand and twenty dollars and twenty nine<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>2035.35.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Fabic</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And the Court doth assess the damages of said<lb/> plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two-thousand and<lb/> thirty five dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>A</unclear>1166.<unclear>-</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Steffin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order that the plaintiffs petition be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed. And the Court doth assess the damages of said<lb/> plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of eleven<lb/> hundred and sixty-six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Anton Franz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Margaret Franz</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> the said defendant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of said<lb/> plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken<lb/> against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having proceeded to hear<lb/> the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied by such testimony that said<lb/> plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and<lb/> decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds<lb/> of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and that he be restored to<lb/> all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs and charges of this proceeding and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="145" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0148.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name>, <name>Thomas V. Strode</name><lb/> and <name>Anaclet L. Lacrix</name> (no 23)<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name>, <name>Luther C. Clark</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Chase</name>, <name>Edward Dodge</name> and <name>Jay Cook</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Walsh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Walsh</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed At the costs of said plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name>, <name>Thomas V. Strode</name><lb/> and <name>Anaclet L. Lacroix</name><lb/> vs (no 59)<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Clark</name>, <name>Luther C. Clark</name>, <name>Edward<lb/> Chase</name>, <name>Edward Dodge</name> and <name>Jay Cook</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dexter T. Wales</name> <name>Joseph C. Cabot</name><lb/> and <name>Oliver H. Wales</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name> and <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Rosenheim</name> and <name>Martin Collius</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leopold Fisher</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald C. Goddin</name>, <name>James T. Johnson</name><lb/> <name>Barton S. Wilson</name> and <name>Elisha W. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Attachment. Order of Publication.- The<lb/> Sheriff having made return that the said<lb/> defendant cannot be found and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that said defen<lb/>dant cannot be served with process.<lb/> therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified<lb/> that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of Four hundred<lb/> and fourteen dollars and ninety five cents on account of goods, wares and<lb/> merchandize sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the said defendant,<lb/> and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term<lb/> of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, on the First Monday<lb/> of October next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action<lb/> aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him<lb/> and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in<lb/> the City of Saint Louis.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="146" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0149.tiff"/>
<p>[no content]</p>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="147" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0150.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<note><unclear>#</unclear>500-</note>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-19">Friday, March 19th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Marquard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Reiter</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by his <unclear rend="strikethrough">respection</unclear> attorney<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>James Supple</name>, <name>James<lb/> Quickley</name>, <name>C. W. Anderson</name>, <name>John Bugg</name>, <name>J. B. Featherstone</name>, <name>Ben<lb/>jamin Philibert</name>, <name>John Grobert</name>, <name>Josiah Holzenger</name>, <name>Charles Haren</name><lb/> <name>Josiah Alkier</name>, <name>Joseph Walenfechtler</name>, <name>James Dickey</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the<lb/> the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find in favor of<lb/> said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is,<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>338.24</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F. Maintel</name>, <name>Henry F. Bulte</name><lb/> and <name>Mathias Baecker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John M. Schmitt</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default. Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and thirty eight Dollars and<lb/> twenty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>205.50</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Moder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Singleton</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes de<lb/>fault, Wherefore the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and<lb/> five Dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1311.92</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip C. Morehead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore the Court Doth assess the damages<lb/> of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the<lb/> sum of One hundred and thirty dollars and ninety two cents. It is, therefore,<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="148" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0151.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>131.07</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William R. Riddlecome</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason<lb/> of the premises in his petition stated, at the sum of One hundred and thirty one dollars<lb/> and seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>131.30</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Decker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default: Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by season<lb/> of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>268.46.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elias Abrahams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Abrahams</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes default.<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said<lb/> plaintiff, by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two hundred<lb/> and sixty eight dollars and forty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>125.46</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri, to the use of<lb/> <name>Eugene Jaccard</name>, <name>Augustus Mermod</name><lb/> and <name>Constunt Jaccard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Myers</name>, <name>Nathaniel C. Myers</name><lb/> and <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
<p>On Penal Bond.- Now at this come the said parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and Neither Party re<lb/>quiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth assess the damages sustained<lb/> by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in<lb/> their petition stated at the sum of One hundred and twenty five dollars and forty<lb/> six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>203.35.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bender</name>, <name>Theodore Hildewbraudt</name><lb/> and <name>Frederick Etzel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Cramer</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the said:<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called comes not<lb/> but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess<lb/> the damages of said plaintiff by them sustained<lb/> by reason of the premises in their petition mentioned at the sum of Two-hundred and<lb/> three Dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="149" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0152.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>5.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Adam H. Dickbreder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Kohler</name></head>
<p>Slander. Now come again said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein<lb/> also come and the trial of this cause being finished<lb/> the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue<lb/> joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Five<lb/> dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>323.16</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Conran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin Townsley</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at This day comes the Said plaintiff but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and Called comes not, but makes default.<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said<lb/> plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the<lb/> sum of Three hundred and twenty three Dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff Recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>453.14</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Dow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plain<lb/>tiff by his attorney, but the Said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages of said plain<lb/>tiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Four hundred and<lb/> fifty three Dollars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said Defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1238.40.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Casper Warms</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff<lb/> by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Twelve hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>8211.08</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Simons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day comes Said plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney, but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes default. Where<lb/>fore the Court doth assess the damages sustained by<lb/> said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of eight<lb/> hundred and twenty dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A. LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>The Defendant <name>Myerson</name> files an answer, by leave<lb/> of Court.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="150" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0153.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2176.91</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John G. Roker</name>, <name>John Boker</name> and<lb/> <name>Louis Funke</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David H. Evans</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney but the said defendant although duly sum<lb/>moned and called comes not, but makes default.<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-Thousand one<lb/> hundred and seventy six Dollars and ninety one cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>593.38</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City Bank of Saint Louis</head>
<p>On Check.- Now at this day come the said parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring<lb/> a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred<lb/> and ninety-three dollars and thirty eight cents. It is, therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>184.98.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Blasksley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing a which this action is founded that said de<lb/>fendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty-<lb/>four dollars and ninety-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>355.58.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Harrison Williams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C. Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Conn</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that cause be dismissed as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>William C. Anderson</name>; and it appearing<lb/> to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it<lb/> doth order that said plaintiffs petition be taken against<lb/> said other defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and fifty-five dollars and fifty-eight<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2.437.97.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Milne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>True Worthy Hoit</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-thousand four<lb/> hundred and thirty seven dollars and ninety seven cents. It is, therefore, considered</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="151" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0154.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>162.22.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James D. Houseman</name> and <name>Julius H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H. Heywood</name> and <name>James Morris</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> come not, but make default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred<lb/> and sixty two dollars and twenty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Terre Haute Alton &amp; St Louis Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw the<lb/> note sued on in this cause, upon his<lb/> leaving a receipt and an attested copy<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H. Dubs</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>The time for filing an amended petition herein,<lb/> is, on the application of said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney extended twenty five days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1613.63</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nelson Chamblin</name></head>
<p>On Notes and Account.- Now at this<lb/> day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant<lb/> is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of sixteen hundred and<lb/> thirteen dollars and sixty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1537.67</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Michael</name> and <name>Isaac Michael</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the<lb/> said defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiffs in the sum of Fifteen hundred and thirty seven dollars.<lb/> and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="152" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0155.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>249.21</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Dietrick</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day comes the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called comes<lb/> not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court<lb/> doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated<lb/> at the sum of Two hundred and forty nine dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>679.93</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Augustus Brazean</name> and <name>Samuel<lb/> A. Brazean</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants<lb/> although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of six hundred and seventy-nine dollars and ninety-three<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>390.56</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moses Pfeiffer</name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the<lb/> Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises<lb/> in their petition stated at the sum of Three hundred and ninety dollars and<lb/> fifty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Slevin</name> and <name>Charles Slevin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gerhard H. Sands</name> and <name>J. H. Fisher</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come<lb/> said plaintiffs by their attorney, but<lb/> said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not,<lb/> but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said<lb/> plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of eight hundred<lb/> and forty five dollars and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="153" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0156.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-20">Saturday, March 20th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Quight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Chouteau Jr</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said defendants to quash the writ issued in this case,<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same<lb/> be overruled. The defendants, thereupon, by leave of Court<lb/> file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Pollitz</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Pitts</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elijah Cody</name> and <name>John F. Baker</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dis<lb/>missed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor. By leave of Court the<lb/> exhibit said on is withdrawn and a copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>315.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>United States Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> and <name>Henry Gronheim</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the motion of said defendant<lb/> to strike out the name of the said petition<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth<lb/> order that said motion be overruled. Thereupon, it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth, on motion of<lb/> said plaintiff, order that its petition be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred And fifteen dollars, It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Maas</name> and <name>Frederick<lb/> Maas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Weil</name> and <name>William Meyer</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plain<lb/>tiff by their attorney, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eleanor Erskine Guy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Ames</name> and <name>Edgar Ames</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the demurrer of said de<lb/>fendants to the plaintiffs petition<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, it<lb/> doth order that said demurrer be sustained, and that the said petition<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="154" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0157.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles C. Whittelsey admr &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Tullin C. Beckwith admr &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maurice Steinback</name></head>
<p>Exhibit filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Rogers</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles B. Lamb</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said for a new trial of this cause and being thereof<lb/> fully advised, it doth order that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Graham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Ingraham</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Marianna Krebs</name></head>
<p>Habeas Corpus. The Court having duly heard and considered the applica<lb/>tion of the said <name>Ulrich Krebs</name> for the custody and possession of the said<lb/> infant <name>Marianna Krebs</name> and being thereof fully advised doth consider<lb/> that the said <name>Ulrich Krebs</name> from his habits and course of life is an un<lb/>suitable person to have the care, custody and control of the said <name>Marianna Krebs</name>, who is of<lb/> tender years, It is, therefore, ordered, adjuded and decreed that <name>Frederick Wengler</name> have the<lb/> care custody and maintenance of the said infant, and that said <name>Ulrich Krebs</name> be<lb/> restrained and enjoined from interfering with the <unclear>/</unclear> said <name>Wengler</name> in this behalf until<lb/> the further order of this Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt Van Evard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Ulrici gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer of garnishee filed. And Motion to strike<lb/> out same filed</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="155" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0158.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-22">Monday, March 22d 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Powell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name>and<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come <name>Thomas Marshall</name> and <name>George B. Sanderson</name>,<lb/> the assignees of the Judgment in this case, and enter full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the Judgment obtained by said plaintiff<lb/> against said defendants.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John K. Brettelle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Molloy</name></head>
<p>Order of Replevin.</p>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files A statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described, wherefore<lb/> it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in the pe<lb/>tition to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed<lb/> if said property to not delivered to him, to take it from the defendant and deliver it to<lb/> the plaintiff.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hayt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Harmson gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of the said garnishee to be discharged hence, and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hosteller</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin A. Albright</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the<lb/> same he overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hosteller</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward W. Williams</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the<lb/> same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William T. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Mogridge</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion of said defendants to set aside the Judgment<lb/> of nonsuit herein, and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri at the relation<lb/> of <name>George Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>On application of <name>Charles G. Mauro</name>, Circuit<lb/> Attorney, leave is given him to file an information<lb/> in the nature of a quo-warranto, returnable to the<lb/> first Monday in april next.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Fitzgerrald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Saint Louis Alton and Chicago Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Motion for security For costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand Meyer</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhart</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiffs leave is given them to withdraw the<lb/> exhibit said on; and an attested copy is left therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="156" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0159.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John P. Schenck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Timothy Ives</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion, and by consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Betts</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Disfenbach</name></head>
<p>Depositions on the part of the defendant filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel Ryan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Roger C. McAllister</name></head>
<p>Depositions on part of plaintiff filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hughes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Crane</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury, to wit: <name>William P. Cowels</name>, <name>John Hoelker</name>, <name>Samuel<lb/> Pilkington</name>, <name>T. Slevin</name>, <name>John F. Hostedt</name>, <name>Joseph Nolte</name>, <name>William R.<lb/> Hynes</name>, <name>S. M. Gray</name>, <name>John Simon</name>, <name>R. L. Garvin</name>, <name>William Wasterbrock</name><lb/> and <name>Michael S. Cerre</name>, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected,<lb/> tried and sworn well and truly to try the matters in controversy, the trial of this<lb/> cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths<lb/> aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said defendant. It is, there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence and recover<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended of the said plaintiff and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis H. Munter</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- By consent of parties it<lb/> is ordered by the Court that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use of <name>H. Stemp</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chester W. Pomeroy</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> he continued, on the affidavit of said<lb/> defendant, at his costs and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Schroeder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Schoerff</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abraham Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adams Express Company</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Thorp</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Baker</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that an alias writ of summons issue herein, returnable to<lb/> the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="157" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0160.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Keokuck Packet Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steam Boot <name>W. S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Fitzgerrald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Saint Louis Alton and Chicago R. R. Company</name></head>
<p>Continued at the costs of the plaintiff with leave<lb/> to amend.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Iulia M. Guitar</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Guitar</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that an alias writ issue herein returnable<lb/> to the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George E. Madden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louisa Madden</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the defendant and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Pearson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Marrin</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Barret</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lieat Weed</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued<lb/> until the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Howison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas L. Rives</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Darton Garnee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W. W. Chappelear</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Dollar Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John A. W. Williams</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="158" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0161.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-23">Tuesday, March 23. 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benvist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G. Biyan</name></head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John K. Brettelle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Molloy</name></head>
<p>Motion for order on plaintiff to file additional bond filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anthony H. Menkins</name> and <name>Bernard Menkins</name></head>
<p>Dismissaal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the defendants and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard P. Barada</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that ex<lb/>ecution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Raid Road Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Inlein Gamache</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Beeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McFaul</name></head>
<p>On motion of said defendant a Commission is awarded him<lb/> to take depositions of witnesses in the State of Indiana.<lb/> to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said<lb/> defendant.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M. Taylor</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Morris</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion of said plaintiff for Judgment upon the<lb/> answer of said defendants, and being thereof<lb/> fully advised, it doth order that said motion be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Pierre Chouteau</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Woodson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Rannels</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Charles G. Martin</name><lb/> <name>Samuel Pilkington</name>, <name>Henry Miller</name>, <name>John T. Martin</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> A. Allendoerfer</name>, <name>George Buhr</name>, <name>John Simon</name>, <name>George W.<lb/> Link</name>, <name>James Kirk</name>, <name>John Wheeler</name>, <name>John F. Edmondson</name> and <name>James Eaton</name>, twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn, the matters in con<lb/>troversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being<lb/> finished is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="159" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0162.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Prosser</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ann Prosser</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, Wherefore,<lb/> on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the petition answer and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, doth find from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured<lb/> party, It doth, therefore, consider adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and<lb/> forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and<lb/> restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further ordered<lb/> that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Schulenberg</name>, <name>Adolphus Baeckler</name><lb/> and <name>Louis C. Hirschberg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Maguire</name>, <name>David B. Dayton</name>, <name>Sarah<lb/> H. Ladd</name>, <name>Harriex Clapp</name> and <name>Mary F. Dayton</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor<lb/> Agreement of parties filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nimrod Beck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kingeland</name> &amp; <name>Caddy</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name> et al</head>
<p>Replication filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L. Gage</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said defendant and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail R. Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David H. Armstrong</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Same<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C. Ivory</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain R. R. Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gustavus Fisher</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, this cause is ordered<lb/> to be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Gilfort</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="160" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0163.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. McPherson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defen<lb/>dant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William A. Dietz</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said defendant and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph M. Brown</name> and <name>Thomas H. Thatch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S. McCune</name>, <name>Samuel Gaty</name>, <name>Henry<lb/> Whitmore</name>, <name>Kenneth McKenzie</name>, <name>William<lb/> H. Hazzard</name>, <name>Richard Philips</name>,<lb/> <name>Christopher Rhodes</name>, <name>William H. Gore</name><lb/> <name>George Knapt</name> and <name>Asa Farr</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit.<lb/> <name>Samuel Pilkington</name>, <name>Henry Miller</name>, <name>Charles G.<lb/> Martin</name>, <name>John F. Martin</name> <name>Charles Allendoefer</name><lb/> <name>George Buhr</name>, <name>John Simon</name>, <name>George W. Link</name>, <name>James<lb/> Kirk</name>, <name>John Wheeler</name>, <name>John J. Edmondson</name> and<lb/> <name>James Eaton</name>, twelve good and lawful men<lb/> who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters<lb/> in controversy between the parties well and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed,<lb/> But the said plaintiffs suy they will not further prosecute their said suit in<lb/> this behalf; Wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that the Jury empannelled<lb/> herein be discharged; and that said plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this<lb/> behalf, but that said defendants go hence without day and recover of said plain<lb/>tiffs their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-24">Wednesday March 24th. 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met Pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Justus Finch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Parleton</name> and<lb/> <name>Catharine Parleton</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said defendants by their attorney, and it<lb/> appearing to the Court that said plaintiff has failed to file<lb/> security for costs, as required by rule heretofore made in<lb/> this behalf, it is ordered, that this cause be dismissed for<lb/> want of security for costs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of said garnishee by his attorney, the time for an<lb/>swering herein is extended ten days.<lb/> Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of said garnishee by his attorney the time for answering<lb/> is extended ten days. Bill of exceptions filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="161" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0164.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The time for answering herein on the part of said garnishee, is<lb/> extended ten days. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1139.12</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John H. Singleton</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the Said parties by their attorneys, and<lb/> neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, it doth find from the answer of said<lb/> defendant that he is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of on thousand one hundred and<lb/> thirty nine dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have hereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road C.</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isadore Busch</name> and <name>Charles Taussig</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the costs of said<lb/> defendants and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Betts</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name> et al</head>
<p>Replication filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Schulenberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Issac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Wood Boat <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Grether</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>266:111</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. D. Gordon</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but said<lb/> defendant although duly notified and solemnly called comes<lb/> not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded that said defen<lb/>dant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty six dollars<lb/> and one cent. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="162" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0165.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Hanel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant<lb/> to the plaintiffs petition and being thereof fully advised it doth order that<lb/> said demurrer be sustained. Thereupon plaintiff by leave of Court<lb/> amends his petition, as follows, in the Twenty first line from the top<lb/> of the first page insert the words ``for a reasonable consideration'' after the word ``promised''<lb/> in said line; also in the seventh line from the top of second page after the word.<lb/> ``dollars'' insert the words ``which amount was so received by defendants for the use and<lb/> benefit of the plaintiff.''</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Woodson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Rannels</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and the Jury Empannelled and sworn herein also come<lb/> and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O'Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Meredith Martin</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. C.</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Taussig</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is or<lb/>dered by the Court, that this cause be<lb/> dismissed at the costs of the defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George <unclear>Rauchenstrouch</unclear></name></head>
<p>Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isadore Busch</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> Taussig</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney, and in <unclear>of</unclear> his motion it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said defendant and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip Stremmel</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> defendant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. H. Stone</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the said defendant and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="163" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0166.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p><name>Alexander Jefferson</name>, (a man of color) whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>William Glasgan</name> and <name>Evaus<lb/> Casselberry</name>, two credible witnesses, comes in Open Court, and acknowledges the execution of certain<lb/> deeds of emancipation to <name>Gilead Jefferson</name> and <name>Thomas Jefferson</name>.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-25">Thursday, March 25. 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman's</name> garnishee<lb/> <name>Geo W. Thatcher</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out the allegations and Interragatories filed<lb/> Answer of garnishee filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher</name>, <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out allegations and interrogatories<lb/> and answer of garnishee filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Motion to strike out allegations and interrogatories<lb/> filed; and the answer of garnishee filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Hauel</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>4.713.55</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lorenzo P. Sanger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed as to the said Defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>.<lb/> and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed<lb/> in this cause, it doth therefore, on motion of said plain<lb/>tiff by his attorney order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against Said defendants<lb/> as confessed, and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this cause<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Four thousand, seven hundred and thirteen dollars and fifty-five cents It is, therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph M Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S. McCune</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="164" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0167.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. A. Goodrich gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Replication to answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Bussing</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Willing</name></head>
<p>The plaintiffs in this cause withdraw the exhibit said<lb/> on in this behalf, and leave an attested copy therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>43.67</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Woodson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Rannels</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again said parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come, and the trial of this cause progresses<lb/> and being now finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his<lb/> damages at the sum of Forty-three Dollars and sixtyseven cents. it is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Sullivan</name>, <name>Exr &amp; c</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Sullivan</name>, <name>exr &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Security for costs filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theophile Schaefer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John G. Mack</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>468.74</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. H. Vogt</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles J. H. Vogt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name><lb/> and <name>James Moore</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and sixty eight dollars and seventy four<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="165" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0168.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-26">Friday, March 26th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W. Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A. LeBeau</name>, <name>Ezra O. English</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said de<lb/>fendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A. LeBeau</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed hence at the costs of the said<lb/> defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name> and <name>Andrew<lb/> A. LeBeau</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this case be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Nerie Valli</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John T. Chappell</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that a Commission issue to the State of Loui<lb/>siana, to take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the<lb/> trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiffs.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Feder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A. LeBeau</name> and<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name> and <name>Andrew<lb/> A. LeBeau</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Dalton</name>, <name>garnishee &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said garnishee files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Henderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jos G. Goodrick</name> gar of<lb/> <name>William A. Vantilburgh</name></head>
<p>On motion, it is ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> garnishee be discharged hence, at the costs of the<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> The sum of Ten Dollars is allowed said garnishee<lb/> for answering herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman W. Patchin</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="166" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0169.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>531.41</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Davis</name> and <name>Noel<lb/> Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Abrahams</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the said defendant<lb/> and files a written statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby<lb/> he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> Five hundred and thirty-one Dollars and forty one cents<lb/> and consent and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against<lb/> him for that sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered by the<lb/> Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles W. Hebert</name>, <name>Henry J. Darrah</name><lb/> <name>Chester W. Pomeroy</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney, and on his motion it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> as to the said defendant <name>Charles W. Herbert</name>.<lb/> Thereupon the said other defendants by their<lb/> attorney withdraw the answer herein filed by them. And this cause being submitted to the Court<lb/> it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said other<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand and<lb/> seventy Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burnes</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties<lb/> by respective attorneys and consent agree that this<lb/> cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defen<lb/>dants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-27">Saturday, March 27. 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H. Deriar</name></head>
<p>Depositions filed, on part of said defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Henderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. A. Goodrich gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David T. Wheeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S. B. Bullock</name></head>
<p>Report of Referee filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maurice Steinback</name></head>
<p>Exhibit filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="167" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0170.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander Young</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Webster</name>, <name>William Anderson</name>, <name>Emory<lb/> P. Seymore</name>, <name>John G. Cornelle</name> and<lb/> <name>Edward W. Shands</name></head>
<p>Change of Venue. The Judge of this Court having been<lb/> of counsel in this cause, it is, therefore, ordered that<lb/> this cause be transferred to the Saint Louis Court of Com<lb/>mon Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk of this Court<lb/> make out a full and complete transcript of the<lb/> record and proceedings herein and deliver the same<lb/> duly certified to the Clerk of said Court of Common Pleas</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Webster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Anderson</name> and <name>Emory P. Seymour</name></head>
<p>Change of Venue. The Judge of this Court having<lb/> been of counsel in this cause, it is, therefore, ordered<lb/> that this cause be transferred to the Saint Louis Court<lb/> of Common Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk<lb/> of this Court make out a full and complete<lb/> transcript of the record and proceedings herein and deliver the same duly certified<lb/> to the Clerk of the said Court of Common Pleas.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>274.97</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Hollacher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Gennera</name> and<lb/> <name>William Holzke</name></head>
<p>On Transcript.- Now at this day come the said parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and neither party requiring a<lb/> Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same doth find the issue<lb/> joined in favor of said plaintiff and against the said defendant <name>William Holzke</name><lb/> and assess the damages of said plaintiff and against said defendant at the<lb/> sum of Two-hundred and seventy-four Dollars and ninety seven cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended And have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Gorgerty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Beckmann</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said<lb/> defendant for security for costs and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that the same be sustained. It is further ordered that<lb/> unless the plaintiff file security for the costs of this action, within<lb/> twenty days from this date, the same will stand dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2.419.81</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and<lb/> it appearing to the Court that there is no answer files herein<lb/> it is ordered that the petition be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed, and the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to the<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand four hundred and nineteen dollars<lb/> and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.<lb/> Thereupon the defendant files a motion for a review herein, which being heard <unclear>x</unclear> by<lb/> the Court fully understood, it is ordered that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="168" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0171.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Summerville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>It is ordered that said plaintiff be allowed to sue as a poor person,<lb/> and that he have all necessary process and other proceedings, as<lb/> in other cases, without fees, tax or charge.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Kenneth Hankinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jane Hankinson</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted<lb/> to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having proceeded to hear<lb/> the proofs in this cause, and having been satisfied from such proofs that said<lb/> plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, therefore it doth considered adjudge<lb/> and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from<lb/> the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and that<lb/> he be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person.<lb/> And it is further considered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs<lb/> of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eliza Moran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Moran</name></head>
<p>Divorce.- Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called comes not, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiff her petition<lb/> is taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court<lb/> having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied<lb/> by such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It is<lb/> considered, adjudged and decreed that said plaintiff be absolutely<lb/> and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said<lb/> defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an<lb/> unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court that the said defendant<lb/> from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care,<lb/> custody and control of the said infant children <name>John</name> and <name>Robert</name> men<lb/>tioned in plaintiffs petition, who are of tender years, it is further adjudged<lb/> and decreed that said plaintiff have the care, custody and control of<lb/> the said children and that said defendant be restrained and enjoined<lb/> from interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf, until the further order of<lb/> this Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Pourville</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that <name>John Eidman</name>, be and he is hereby<lb/> substituted as an appraiser in this behalf, in the place<lb/> of <name>Norbert Forster</name>, who declines to act.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry A. Homeyer</name> and <name>Lewis G. Clauson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andren A. LeBean</name> and <name>Ezra O. English</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the defendants and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Chen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andren A. LeBean</name>, <name>Ezra O. English</name><lb/> <name>John Bunns</name>, <name>Jacob Johann</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="169" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0172.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emanuel De Hodiamant</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A. LeBeau</name>, <name>Ezra<lb/> O. English</name> and <name>Lewis M. Prince</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gordon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall</name> et al <name>gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri, to use of <name>Inslee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. Reipschlager</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick Hogan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph K. Bent</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said<lb/> defendant for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Sleeper</name> and <name>Rest Feuner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A. Eddy</name>, <name>Joseph A. Jameson</name><lb/> <name>Amos Cotting</name>, <name>A. M. Bissell</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> C. Hellmer</name> and <name>Werner Mayer</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed At the costs of<lb/> the plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor. Leave is given plaintiffs to with<lb/>draw the exhibits said upon in this cause,<lb/> and an attested copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Buschman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and <name>Jos. Magehan</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of said for a new<lb/> trial of this cause and being thereof<lb/> fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Corneluis D Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christopher H. Oatman</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs<lb/> of the plaintiffs and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="170" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0173.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-29">Monday, March 29th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albrecht C. Cordes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Buns</name> and <name>J. Johaun</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> the said defendants and that execution issue there<lb/> for The note sued is withdrawn and an attested copy<lb/> is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Louderback</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The North Missouri Rail Road</head>
<p>Amended petition filed by leave of Court, and<lb/> the affidavit thereto is waived by the defendant.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernandine Florez</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Able S. Werctt</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of<lb/> said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained<lb/> Ten days is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. H. Voght</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial and in arrest of Judgment filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Young</name> and <name>Nathan<lb/> C. Covington gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the said garnishee <name>Nathan C. Covington</name><lb/> it is ordered by the Court. that he be discharged<lb/> hence at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor. Five dollars is allowed said garnishee for<lb/> appearing herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrik Sullivan</name> Executor of<lb/> <name>James Powers</name>, deceased.</head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: <name>Andrew<lb/> Geisel</name>, <name>Marquart Forster</name>, <name>Joseph Suss</name> <name>J. E. Pirce</name>, <name>J. H.<lb/> Alexander</name>, <name>Frederick W. Meyer</name>, <name>John Tilton</name>, <name>Philip Kuhl</name><lb/> <name><unclear>P.</unclear> Hussey</name>, <name>Richard H. Mulligan</name>, <name>Peter Cook</name> and<lb/> <name>F. A. Oeters</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn<lb/> the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progresses, but not<lb/> being concluded is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hatfield Halstend</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Charless</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry J. Blow</name> garnishees<lb/> of <name>Ezra Easterly</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney, and on his motion, It is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles C. Whittelsey admr &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Tullin C. Beckwith admx &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said plaintiff for a new trial of this cause and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be and<lb/> the same is hereby overruled.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="171" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0174.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernard McAnulty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. Schneider gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>H. Halstead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Farrell</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Goulding</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. G. Tuttle gar &amp; c</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Armstrong</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. G. Tuttle</name> et al gar</head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> that these causes be continued<lb/> until the next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>521.27</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Job P. Doan</name> and <name>John H<lb/> Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J Murdoch</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles K. Dickson</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>John McFee</name></head>
<p>Garnishment. Now at this day come the plaintiffs but the<lb/> defendants although duly notified and called come<lb/> not, Wherefore this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find from the answer of said garni<lb/>shee that at the time they were summoned herein<lb/> as such, they were indebted to the original defen<lb/>dant in the sum of Five hundred and twenty one Dollars and twenty seven cents<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum of aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor. Ten Dollars is allowed said garnishees<lb/> for answering herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>#</unclear>107.</p>
<p><unclear>#</unclear>77.97.</p>
</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sheridan C. Hunt</name> and <name>James<lb/> R. Wiseman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Henry</name> and <name>William<lb/> Malone</name> garnishees of <name>Robert Cartan</name><lb/> and <name>David Fennessy</name></head>
<p>Garnishment on Attachment.- Now at this day comes<lb/> as well said plaintiffs as said garnishees by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and it appearing to the Court from the answer of<lb/> said garnishee <name>James Henry</name>, that at the time he was sum<lb/>moned herein as such he had in his possession belonging to<lb/> said defendants the sum of One hundred and seven dollars<lb/> and it also appearing to the Court from the answer of said<lb/> <name>William Malone</name> that at the time he was summoned herein as garnishee he was indebted to said<lb/> defendants in the sum of seventy seven Dollars and ninety seven cents, It is, on motion<lb/> of said plaintiffs, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said garnishees<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed, and that out of said sum<lb/> they pay the costs and well of the original proceedings as of this, and that the have<lb/> execution therefor. The sum of Ten Dollars is allowed to the said <name>William<lb/> Malone</name> for answering herein.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="172" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0175.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>340.77</note>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-30">Tuesday, March 30th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Sullivan</name>, Executor<lb/> of <name>James Powers</name>, deed</head>
<p>Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue<lb/> joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess the damages<lb/> of said plaintiff at the sum of Three hundred and forty Dollars and Seventy Seven cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and his costs in this behalf expended.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>255.20</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Cunningham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Sullivan</name> executor of<lb/> <name>James Powers</name>, deceased</head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and neither party requiring a Jury, submit this cause to<lb/> the Court, and the Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the same, doth assess the damages of said plain<lb/>tiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the<lb/> sum of Two-hundred and fifty-five Dollars and twenty cents, It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher gar &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The said<lb/> plaintiffs<lb/> in each of the foregoing cause come and file exception to the answer of said garnishee.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Little</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank W. Armstrong</name> et al</head>
<p>Plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the<lb/> order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been day<lb/> published according to lan.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin C. Estes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph S. Hull</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and enters<lb/> full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment heretofore<lb/> obtained by him against said defendant.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Albert Billings</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>Depositions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isabella Irwin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Atchison Irwin</name></head>
<p>On Habeas Corpus. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and submit all and singular the matters in controversy<lb/> between the parties, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth order that the said <name>Isabella Irwin</name> have the custody, con<lb/>trol and maintenance of the infant mentioned in the petition, and that the same be not<lb/> removed out of the Jurisdiction of this Court; and it is further considered that the said<lb/> <name>Atchison Irwin</name> be permitted from time to time, to visit the said infant, whilst the same<lb/> remain in the custody and control of said <name>Isabella Irwin</name>, to mother, until the further order<lb/> of this Court.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="173" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0176.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p><name>Mary Kasson</name> comes in, Open Court, and acknowledges the execution by her of a deed of emanci<lb/>pation to <name>Ambrose Smith</name>, a negro man, aged about forty-three years; and whose height is<lb/> about five feet, ten inches.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McKee</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph H. White</name></head>
<p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney on appeal is allowed him to<lb/> the Supreme Court from the Judgment herein; thereupon the defendant<lb/> files an appeal bond with himself as principal and <name>Charles Marlow</name><lb/> as security, which bond is approved by the Court. Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>594.36</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B. Ricords</name> administrator<lb/> of <name>Milton McLean</name> died<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: <name>Andrew Geissel</name><lb/> <name>Marquart Forster</name>, <name>Joseph Sass</name>, <name>J. E. Pierce</name>, <name>J. H. Alexander</name><lb/> <name>Frederick W. Meyer</name>, <name>John Tilton</name>, <name>Philip Kuhl</name>, <name>B. Hassey</name><lb/> <name>Richard H. Halligan</name>, <name>Peter Cook</name> and <name>T. F. Peters</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy<lb/> will and truly to try, the trial of this cause progresses and being concluded the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue-joined in favor of said plaintiff and<lb/> assess his damages at the sum of five hundred and ninety four Dollars and<lb/> thirty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-03-31">Wednesday, March 31st 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Hostetter</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward W. Williams</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants file an answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Hollacher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William F. Holske</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David T. Wheeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S. B. Bullock</name></head>
<p>The time for filing exceptions to the report of referees is extended<lb/> ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Theodore E. Dickerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis Lumbermen and Mechanics Ins Co</name></head>
<p>The defendant files an answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. McNair</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="174" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0177.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William W. Wakelam</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff leave is given him to file an amended petition<lb/> herein, which is accordingly done.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayman Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George S. Nicholls</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to quash return of service filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hayman Levin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dewitt Van Evera</name></head>
<p>Motion to quash return of service filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name> and <name>Edward Bayle</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said de<lb/>fendants and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney withdraws the note said on in this cause<lb/> an attested copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Levertt Mills</name>, <name>Carlos W. Mills</name><lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said defendants and that execution issue therefor.<lb/> Leave is given said plaintiff to withdraw the note said<lb/> on in this cause, and an attested copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name>, <name>Jacob<lb/> Johann</name>, <name>Thomas B. Ellis</name>, <name>James<lb/> Ellis</name> and <name>Henry Ellis</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the defendants and that execution<lb/> issue therefor. Leave is given plaintiff to withdraw<lb/> the note said on, an an attested copy is left therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defen<lb/>dants and for Judgment, and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that said motion be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name>, to use &amp; c<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said<lb/> plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defendants and<lb/> being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be<lb/> overruled. Leave is given said defendants to file an amended<lb/> petition herein, on or before Tuesday next.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Washington T. Adams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank V. Valli</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said defendants for security for costs herein, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained.<lb/> Ten days is allowed to plaintiff to file the same.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="175" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0178.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name></head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Watermann</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having<lb/> duly heard and<lb/> considered the objections by <name>George W. Thatcher</name> to the bonds of Indemnity taken in the foregoing causes<lb/> by the Sheriff, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained; and<lb/> leave is given said Sheriff to file additional bonds in the above causes on or before the seventh day<lb/> of April next. It is further considered that said bonds, so required to be taken and returned<lb/> amount to, in the aggregate, the sum of nine thousand five hundred Dollars.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ebenezer Higgins</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cushman Caldwell</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale. Now at this day comes <name>James Castello</name>, Sheriff of the County of<lb/> Saint Louis and files a statement in writing, where by it appears to the<lb/> Court that the property levied upon by virtue and authority of the attach<lb/>ment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in<lb/> value before the probable termination of this suit, and that the keeping of the same would be<lb/> attended with much expense, It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the said <name>James Castello</name><lb/> Sheriff as aforesaid, do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in conformity to the<lb/> Statute in such case made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John M. Meyers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Angel S. Meyers</name><lb/> and <name>Benjamin Lithauer</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney<lb/> but the said plaintiff although duly notified and called<lb/> comes not, Wherefore on motion of said defendants by their<lb/> attorney it is ordered by the Court that said plaintiff be<lb/> nonsuited. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf, but that said defendants<lb/> go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff their costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. William's</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said<lb/> plaintiff to the defendants counter claim, and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given<lb/> said defendants to file and amended answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis S. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Ames</name>, <name>Francis<lb/> Hofelman</name> and <name>Leander Laurence</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer<lb/> to the amended petition herein, and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth order that the same be sustained. Leave<lb/> is given plaintiff to amend, and thereupon plaintiff files<lb/> a second amended petition.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Wood Boat <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of<lb/> said defendant and being thereof fully advised, it<lb/> doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. McCullough</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs to strike out the answer<lb/> of said defendant and for Judgment, and being<lb/> thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="176" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0179.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Murphy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Archie Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said de<lb/>fendants for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth order that the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dewitt Van Evera</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rudolph Ulrici</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Hayman Levin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of<lb/> said garnishee to be discharged hence as such, and<lb/> the Court having fully and sufficiently understood the<lb/> same, doth order that said motion be sustained. The<lb/> sum of Five Dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit:<lb/> <name>Andren Geissel</name>, <name>Marquart Foster</name>, <name>Joseph Suss</name>, <name>Adam<lb/> Swiffel</name>, <name>Frederick W. Meyer</name>, <name>John Pilton</name>, <name>B. Hussey</name>, <name>F.<lb/> F. Oeters</name>. <name>S. O. Smith</name>, <name>David C. Anderson</name>, <name>Andren Johnson</name> and <name>Benjamin F. Crane</name><lb/> twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn, the matters<lb/> in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being con<lb/>cluded is laid over until the next meeting of Court.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="177" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0180.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-06">Tuesday, April 6th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Harriet N. Barnard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edwin R. Barnard</name><lb/> alias <name>Edwin Dean</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff<lb/> to set aside the Judgment of dismissal in this cause and being thereof<lb/> fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained, upon the payment of all<lb/> costs which have accrued in this case.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>#</unclear>2460.12</p>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>Judgment assigned to<lb/> <name>Elbridge <unclear>Elelarko</unclear><lb/></name> <date when="1858-12-22">Dec. 22<unclear>c</unclear> 1858</date><lb/> assignment filed</dateline>
<signed><unclear><name>S Rice</name> et al</unclear></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emery Livermore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D. Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Edword Wyman</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the<lb/> said defendant <name>Henry D. Bacon</name>, and it appearing to<lb/> the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it is<lb/> on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that<lb/> his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand four hundred and sixty<lb/> dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover<lb/> of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abjah Whiting</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Vathan W. Jones</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be continued until the term of this court next ensuing, at the<lb/> costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin Hammerle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Buhler</name> and <name>Frederick Miche</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Wood Boat <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>Leave is given plaintiff to file a reply to counter claim within ten days.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Gordon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. F. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Agreement of parties filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="178" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0181.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Wells President &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael O. Rourke</name></head>
<p>The time for filing an answer herein is extended until the next term.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>238.30.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles E. Solomon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward W. Sheads</name>, <name>Thomas<lb/> W. Strode</name> and <name>William C. Inks</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but<lb/> said defendant although duly notified and called comes not.<lb/> Wherefore, the plaintiff submits this cause upon the petition,<lb/> answer and proofs, to the Court, and the Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said<lb/> plaintiff at the sum of Two-hundred and thirty eight dollars and thirty cents It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Choutean Jr</name>, <name>James Harrison</name> and <name>Felix Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name>, <name>Jacob Johann</name><lb/> <name>James B. Ellis</name>, <name>Henry B. Ellis</name> and<lb/> <name>James B. Ellis</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said defendants and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. B. Meritt</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert P. Hall</name> and <name>Eustache<lb/> H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Milton Hawley</name> and <name>Robert Herrin</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Eaccord</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander M. Mitchell</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files a notice to shorten ten time to take depo<lb/>sitions of witness, to be used on the trial of this cause, and the<lb/> Court having heard said application, doth consider that it be granted.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and<lb/> the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished<lb/> is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis W. Tillay</name>, who sues as<lb/> trustee of <name>Puplett</name>, <name>McFaddin &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Bennett</name></head>
<p>Dismissal. This cause having been called for trial, and no<lb/> person appearing to prosecute the same, the Court doth<lb/> order that it be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="179" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0182.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p><name>Charles A. Lascoste</name>, whose identity is proven by the testimony of <name>James Walsh</name> and <name>John McCallin</name>, comes<lb/> in Open Court, and acknowledge the execution of a deed of emancipation by him to the following<lb/> persons, to wit: to <name>Delia White</name>, a slave, aged thirty four years; <name>Samuel Berthe</name> aged thirty-two years; <name>Abram<lb/> Berthe</name> aged twenty eight years; <name>Louise Berthe</name> aged twenty three years; <name>James Berthe</name> aged twenty one years;<lb/> <name>Heloise Berthe</name> aged thirteen years; <name>Carlone Berthe</name> aged eleven years-all mulattoes in color and being<lb/> all brothers and sisters by the same mother. He also acknowledges a deed of manumissouri to <name>Edward<lb/> Augustine</name> and <name>James Henry</name> aged respective by seven and three years, who are children of <name>Delia<lb/> White</name> and are bright mulattoes.</p>
<p><name>Elizemond Basey</name>, who is personally known to the Court acknowledges the execution of a deed of eman<lb/>cipation to ``<name>Betsey</name>,'' a slave aged about forty years; to <name>William</name> aged about twenty-two years;<lb/> <name>Sarah Ann</name> aged twenty years; ``<name>Morris</name> aged about seventeen years; <name>Adonijah</name> aged about<lb/> fifteen years; <name>Elizabeth</name> aged about thirteen years; <name>Jane</name> aged about eleven years;<lb/> <name>Allenzo</name> aged about eight years; <name>Mary Eliza</name> aged about five years; Yearly aged about<lb/> two years. The latter nine children are the issue of <name>Betsy</name>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Gottfried Kleinmann</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued (on the affidavit of the defendant <name>Henry Boernstein</name>, on account<lb/> of the absence of <name>John Valentine</name>, a material witness on the part of<lb/> the defendants) at the costs of the defendants and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to morrow morning of Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-07">Wednesday, April 7th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President, Directors and Company<lb/> of the Bank of Louisville</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. G. Smith</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of said plaintiff to strike out parts of the answer<lb/> of said defendants, and being thereof fully advised<lb/> doth order that said motion be sustained.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers</name>, <name>Anderson &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by the<lb/> Court that <name>O. C. Kraft</name> and <name>Henry Miller</name> be<lb/> appointed appraisers, to appraise, to appraise the property effects<lb/> and things inventoried.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernandino Florez</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Able S. Merrett</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff, leave is given him until<lb/> Saturday next, to file an amended petition<lb/> herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>New Indemnity bond filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="180" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0183.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>272.71</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucien Carr</name> and <name>Alfred Carr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Pilcher</name>, <name>William Pilcher</name><lb/> and <name>Henry Pilcher Jr.</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorney, but the said defendants although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default.<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and seventy<lb/> two dollars and seventy one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Graff</name> and <name>Hammerstein</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>William J. Romyn</name>, assignee herein, it appearing<lb/> also, to the Court, that it will be to the interest of all in<lb/>terested, it is ordered that said assignee proceed to sell<lb/> at private sale, to the highest and best bidder for cash,<lb/> for ninety days, the property and effects assigned.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman's</name> gar<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee<lb/> to strike out the allegations and Interrogatories filed by the said plaintiff<lb/> against said garnishee and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that<lb/> the same be overruled. And the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee it doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained, except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory.</p>
<p>Leave is given said garnishee to file an amended answer herein within one week from date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher</name>, <name>garnishee &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said<lb/> garnishee to strike out the allegations and interrogatories files by the<lb/> said plaintiff against said garnishee, and being thereof fully<lb/> advised, doth consider that the same be overruled. And the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee, it doth<lb/> order that the same be sustained, except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory. Leave is given<lb/> said garnishee to file an amended answer herein within a week from date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Thatcher garnishee &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee<lb/> to strike out the allegations and interrogatories filed in this cause<lb/> and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the same<lb/> be overruled. And the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee, it doth order that the same be sustained<lb/> except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory. Leave is given said garnishee to file<lb/> an amended answer herein within a week from date.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also<lb/> come and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being<lb/> concluded is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten<lb/> O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>D. P. Wheeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S. R. Rullock</name></head>
<p>Exceptions to the report of referees filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="181" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0184.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note>
<p><unclear>#</unclear>7.518.25</p>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer><dateline>I acknowledge to have received<lb/> full <unclear>&amp; entire</unclear> satisfaction of the<lb/> judgment of which this is the<lb/> margin. <date when="1859-06-25">June 25 1859.</date></dateline>
<signed><name>Attest<lb/> S Ruice</name> <unclear>et al</unclear></signed>
<signed><name>C. F. <unclear>Broresi</unclear><lb/></name></signed> also for plaintiffs</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles A. Perry</name>, <name>Clias H. Perry</name><lb/> <name>James E. Walker</name>, <name>Francis J. Marshall</name><lb/> <name>Theodore F. Warner</name>, <name>Daniel P. Wallingford</name><lb/> <name>Benjamin Hollady</name>, <name>John S. Mitchell</name>,<lb/> <name>Dent G. Tutt</name>, <name>John F. Baker</name> and<lb/> <name>James A. Burnes</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed as to the said defendants <name>Francis J. Marshall</name><lb/> and <name>Elias H. Perry</name>. And it appearing to the Court that<lb/> there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion<lb/> of said plaintiff order that the petition of said<lb/> plaintiff be taken against said defendants as con<lb/>fessed, and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven Thousand, five hundred and eighteen dollars and<lb/> twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have thereof fully execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2.673,23</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M. Frost</name><lb/> <name>Eliza J. Frost</name>, <name>Adam D. Stewart</name><lb/> <name>Mary B. Stewart</name>, <name>Robert Campbell</name><lb/> trustee of <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> and<lb/> <name>Joshua B. Brant</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by his attorney<lb/> and on their motion, this cause is dismissed as to the said<lb/> <name>Eliza Graham Frost</name>. Thereupon come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and submit this cause to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, doth find from the instrument of writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-<lb/>thousand, six hundred and seventy three dollars and<lb/> twenty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>3.195.92</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Eliza G. Frost</name>, <name>Adam D. Stewart</name><lb/> <name>Mary B. Stewart</name>, <name>Robert Campbell</name><lb/> trustee for <name>Mary B. Stewart</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause<lb/> be dismissed as to the defendant <name>Eliza G. Frost</name>. Thereupon<lb/> come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit<lb/> this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same, it doth find from the in<lb/>strument of writing on which this action is founded<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of Three Thousand- one hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sanguinette Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Solomon H. Robbins</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> (no 504)<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="182" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0185.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name>, <name>Thomas Chudburn</name><lb/> <name>Matthew Little</name>, <name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> <name>Thomas W. Strode</name> and <name>Anuclet L. Lacroix</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Stewart</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Knapt</name>, <name>John Knapt</name><lb/> and <name>Nathaniel Paschall</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wood</name> and <name>Lynch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Barke</name> and <name>Walsh</name></head>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> a Commission issue herein to the state of Illinois, to take depositions of witnesses<lb/> to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiffs</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wade</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Holland</name></head>
<p>Continued at the costs of the defendant.</p>
<closer>
The Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-08">Thursday, April 8th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew T. Miller</name> and<lb/> <name>Allen B. Miller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis F. Graffand</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.-</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Inlin</unclear> Moriso</name> (now <name>Julia Yenon</name>)<lb/> and <name>Moses Yenon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James K. Philiber</name></head>
<p>Now at this day this cause come on to be heard upon the amended<lb/> petition, answer and proofs and evidences therein, and by consent<lb/> of parties herein appearing by their attorneys before this Court, a Jury<lb/> was waived, and this cause was tried before this Court. Wherefore this<lb/> Court proceeded to hear this cause upon the amended petition<lb/> answer, proofs and thereupon this Court found the following facts: ``By consent of the parties<lb/> orally declared before the Court and entered upon the minutes of this Court, a Jury was waived and<lb/> this cause was tried before the Court, upon the trial this Court found the following facts'' It was<lb/> admitted by the parties and the Court found, that <name>Moses Yenon</name> married <name>Julia Moriso</name>, on the<lb/> first day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty eight; that the lot in question, on the corner of<lb/> Green and fifth streets was worth the sum of Five Thousand dollars, on the thirteenth day of<lb/> March Eighteen hundred and fifty and that <name>Henry J. Backus</name> was the agent of <name>James<lb/> K. Philiber</name> at the time of the procuring of said deed from <name>Julia Moriso</name> to <name>James K. Philiber</name><lb/> of the thirteenth day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty. From the evidence in this cause<lb/> this Court finds the further facts following: that said <name>Julia</name> on the eleventh day of March<lb/> eighteen hundred and thirty seven was an infant of the age of fourteen years; that said<lb/> <name>Iulia</name> on the thirteenth day of March, Eighteen hundred and fifty was a widow living<lb/> in the State of Michigan, where she has lived ever since she left Saint Louis, which was about</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="183" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0186.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, except a year or so she lived in Fort Wayne, Indiana; that <name>William<lb/> Moriso</name> her first husband was then dead; that at the time of the execution of said deed by <name>Julia Moriso</name><lb/> to <name>James K. Philiber</name> of the thirteenth of March eighteen hundred and fifty, one <name>Samuel Mulholland</name><lb/> acted as the agent of said <name>Julia</name> for the sale of her interest in said premises described in said<lb/> deed of the thirteenth day of March eighteen hundred and fifty, to <name>James K Philiber</name> and at<lb/> the same time the said <name>Mulholland</name> acted as the agent of said <name>Philiber</name> in making the purchase<lb/> of said premises described in said deed from said <name>Julia</name>. <name>Mulholland</name> having been employed by said<lb/> <name>Bacchus</name> who was the agent of the defendant; that the said <name>Julia</name> had been a servant for said mul<lb/>holland in his family before the said time, and was greatly under his influence and control; that the<lb/> said Mulholland received from the defendants agent <name>Henry T. Backus</name> on behalf of the de<lb/>fendant, the sum of twenty five dollars, for procuring the said <name>Julia</name> to make the said deed to<lb/> said defendant, and paid over to said <name>Julia</name> as the consideration for the said deed the<lb/> sum of seventy-five dollars; that the said <name>Julia</name> was ignorant of the true value of said<lb/> lot of land conveyed by the said deed, that she had no correct knowledge thereof, that she<lb/> could not read or write, and had lived near said <name>Mulholland's</name> place in the State<lb/> of Michigan from the time she was sixteen years old, except a short time she resided in Fort<lb/> Wayne, Indiana, until the said year eighteen hundred and fifty, that at the time of the ne<lb/>gotiation for the execution of said deed of the thirteenth of March eighteen hundred and<lb/> fifty, the said <name>Mulholland</name> acting as the agent for both the said <name>Julia</name> and defendant,<lb/> represented to the said <name>Julia</name> that the premises to be conveyed by her might be sold for taxes;<lb/> and that, that would embarass the title, and did not disclose to her the value of her interest<lb/> in the said land; that no one disclosed to said <name>Julia</name> the value of her interest in the<lb/> said lot of land before the execution of said deed of the thirteenth of March<lb/> eighteen hundred and fifty. That said Deed of the Thirteenth day of March eighteen hundred<lb/> and fifty was procured by the agents of the defendant from the said <name>Julia</name> and she executed<lb/> the same for a grossly in adequate consideration. And this Court declares the law to be and the<lb/> conclusions of law upon the foregoing facts, to be, that the said deed of the thirteenth day of<lb/> March eighteen hundred and fifty from <name>Julia Moriso</name> to <name>James K. Philiber</name> for the said premises<lb/> on the corner of Fifth and Green sheets in the City of Saint Louis, described in said deed<lb/> is fraudulent and void in law and in equity; that all the title and interest of the said<lb/> <name>James K. Philiber</name> which the said deed purports to convey to said defendant <name>Philiber</name><lb/> shall reinvest in the said <name>Julia Moriso</name>, now the wife of <name>Moses Yenon</name> and that the plain<lb/>tiff shall pay into this Court the sum of seventy five dollars, paid to said <name>Julia</name> for the<lb/> execution of said deed and that the defendant is bound to pay all the costs of this<lb/> suit, out of the said seventy five dollars, if the same shall be sufficient to pay the<lb/> costs, and if any balance of said seventy-five dollars remain after the payment of<lb/> the costs, the said balance shall be paid over to said defendant. Now, therefore,<lb/> this Court in consideration of the premises, doth order, adjudge and decree that the deed<lb/> of <name>Julia Moriso</name> to <name>James K. Philiber</name>, acknowledged the thirteenth day of March, Eighteen<lb/> hundred and fifty and recorded in the Recorder's Office of Saint Louis County<lb/> on the twenty first day of March eighteen hundred and fifty, in Book L. number<lb/> five page three hundred and twenty seven, in the words and figures following''<lb/> This Deed made and entered into this thirteenth day of March in the year of<lb/> our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty by and between <name>Julia<lb/> Moriso</name>, window of <name>William Moriso</name>, deceased late <name>Julie Couzineau</name> of the Township<lb/> of Erie, County of <unclear>Nunroe</unclear> and state of Michigan, partie of the first part and <name>James K.<lb/> Philiber</name> of the City and County of Saint Louis and State of Missouri party of the<lb/> second part, Witnesseth; that the said party of the first part in consideration of one<lb/> hundred dollars to her paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt of which is</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="184" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0187.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>hereby acknowledged does by these presents grant, bar gain and sell, convey release and quit claim and con<lb/>firm unto the said party of the second part, all here right, title and interest in law and inequity<lb/> of in and to a certain lot of of ground situate lying and being in the City of Saint Louis in Block<lb/> number ninety-five of said City containing and fronting forty-five feet southwardly on Green<lb/> street of said City and boundary westwardly thirty five feet on fifth street of said<lb/> City and running back thirty-five feet in depth from the front on Green street, the same<lb/> being part of lot number twenty two of <name>William Christy's</name> Addition to the City of Saint<lb/> Louis, being part of a lot which <name>Stewart McKee</name> derived from <name>William Christy</name> and wife<lb/> by deed dated the tenth day of December in the year eighteen hundred and twenty three<lb/> and recorded in Book L. page four hundred and eighty seven, the same land<lb/> conveyed by said <name>Stewart McKee</name> to <name>Buzile Mary</name> and <name>Julie Couzineau</name>, infant<lb/> children of <name>Tossaint</name> and <name>Marie Conzineau</name>, by deed dates the thirtieth day of March in<lb/> year eighteen hundred and twenty four and recorded in Book M. page two hundred<lb/> and eighty four and derived to said party of the first part, party by this last<lb/> deed and party by inheritance from her sister <name>Mary</name>, her mother and here brother <name>Bazile</name><lb/> by the said <name>Julie</name>. To have and to hold the same together with all and singular the<lb/> rights, immunities, privileges and appurtenances to the same belonging unto the said<lb/> party of the second part and to him his heirs and assigns forever. The said <name>Julie<lb/> Moriso</name> widow of the said <name>William Moriso</name> as aforesaid hereby covenanting that she and<lb/> her heirs executors and administrators shall and will warrant and defend the<lb/> title to the premises to the said party of the second part and to his heirs and assigns<lb/> forever against the lawful claims of all persons claiming under her on any persons<lb/> whatever. In witness Whereof the said part of the first part has hereunto set her<lb/> hand and seal the day and year first above written. <name>Julie Moriso</name> late <name>Julie</name> her mark<lb/> <name>Couzeneau</name> <unclear>seal</unclear> widow of <name>William Moriso</name>, decease. Signed, sealed and delivered in<lb/> presence of <name>J. Babcock</name>. <name>Samuel Mullolher</name>. was and is fraudulent and void in<lb/> law and in equity and that the same be and hereby is cancelled and anmelled forever.<lb/> and this Court doth further order, adjudge and decree that all the title, estate and<lb/> interest of the said <name>James K. Philiber</name> which the said deed purports to convey to<lb/> him and his heirs in the said premises shall reinvest in the said <name>Julie Moriso</name> and<lb/> her heirs now the wife of <name>Moses Yenon</name>, and that she he seized of her former estate<lb/> in the said premises described in said deed, in like manner as if the said deed<lb/> had never been made by her to said <name>Philiber</name>, and that the said plaintiff pay<lb/> into the Court the sum of seventy five dollars paid to said <name>Julie</name> for the execution of<lb/> said deed and that the defendant pay all the costs of this suit out of the<lb/> said seventy five Dollars, if the same be sufficient to pay the costs, and if any balance<lb/> of said seventy-five dollars remain after the payment of the costs the said balance<lb/> shall be paid to said defendant.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousinery</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. Williams</name></head>
<p>Amended answer<lb/> filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name>, <name>John Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by<lb/> the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> defendants, and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="185" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0188.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezia O. English</name>, <name>John<lb/> Burns</name>, <name>Jacob Johann</name> and<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties and consent and agree<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants. It is, therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of<lb/> said defendants and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Wicker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J. King</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon<lb/> come also a Jury to wit: <name>J. H. Alexander</name>, <name>Philip Kuhl</name>, <name>Richard Willigan</name><lb/> <name>Lucien Dumaine</name>, <name>Peter Willard</name>, <name>W. C. Baker</name>, <name>W. A. Gregory</name>, <name>Conrad R.<lb/> Stinde</name>, <name>John Steer</name>, <name>W. P. Fisher</name> and <name>L. C. Taylor</name>, eleven good and<lb/> lawful men, who by consent of parties, serve as a panel herein, and being only elected<lb/> tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>251.07</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Baylan</name> and <name>William R. Gettys</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> and <name>Pleasant Devinney</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys, and the said de<lb/>fendants withdraw the answer herein filed by<lb/> them. Thereupon the plaintiffs submit this cause<lb/> to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are<lb/> indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty-one Dollars and seven<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dants, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>234.09</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John E. Cook</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. Beasley</name> and<lb/> <name>Pleasant Devinney</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the said defendants withdraw the answer<lb/> filed by them. Thereupon the plaintiff submits this cause<lb/> to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same, doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty four dollars and nine<lb/> cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Barbetta Hoffman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Hoffman</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William H. Russell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Syl H. Laflin</name></head>
<p>Continued by consent.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N. Hart</name></head>
<p>Replication filed.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="186" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0189.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amos C. Paxon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. S. Haskell</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a<lb/> Jury, submit this cause to the Court, and thereupon the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed, But said plaintiff says that he will not further prosecute<lb/> his suit in this behalf, It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the<lb/> plea in abatement herein, be taken against said plaintiff as confessed, and that said defen<lb/>dant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Schlitter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Noel Toilbert</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dattelzwig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. W. F. Black</name></head>
<p>Nonsuit.- Now at this day comes the said defendant by his attorney, but<lb/> the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not, Wherefore<lb/> on motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff be nonsuited; and that be take nothing by his said<lb/> suit in this behalf, but that said defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and that he have execution therefor. And it further appearing to the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff has executed a bond conditioned according to law for the forth<lb/>coming of the property attached ``when and where the Court shall direct.'' Now, therefore<lb/> on motion of said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the property and<lb/> effects attached at the commencement of this suit be delivered to the said defendant<lb/> according to the provisions of the statute in such case made and provided.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Alexander</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James J. Todd</name>, <name>William Kay</name><lb/> and <name>James McMahan</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. The Sheriff having made return that the defendants<lb/> <name>William Ray</name> and <name>James McKahan</name> cannot be found, and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that the ordinary process of law cannot<lb/> be served upon them, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the defendants be notified that a civil action<lb/> has been commenced against them for the sum of Two-thousand two hundred and ninety-four dollars<lb/> and forty five cents, on account of a promissory note made by said defendants, as co-partners<lb/> under the name of <name>James J. Todd &amp; Co</name> and payable to the order of plaintiff and that<lb/> their property has been attached; and unless they appear at the next term of the Court, to be<lb/> begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis on the first<lb/> Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action<lb/> aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against them, and their property<lb/> sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published<lb/> <unclear rend="strikethrough">according to law,</unclear> in the Missouri Democrat, a news paper printed in the City of<lb/> Saint Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come again said parties by their<lb/> attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn<lb/> herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> but not being finished is laid over until to morrow<lb/> morning at Ten O. Clock.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="187" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0190.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-09">Friday, April 9th 1858</date>.<lb/> The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Grone</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Petterson</name> administratrix of<lb/> <name>John Petterson</name>, deceased and<lb/> <name>Jacob Schleer</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, this cause is sub<lb/>mitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find from the instrument<lb/> of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Three hundred and sixty on Dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as found, and it is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the<lb/> costs of the proceeding and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>274.45</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Ludewig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Reuss</name>, <name>H. Esenann &amp; Co</name><lb/> and <name>George Martin</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be<lb/> dismissed as to the said <name>H. Esenann &amp; co.</name> Thereupon the said<lb/> plaintiff submits this cause to the Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted<lb/> to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and seventy four Dollars and forty<lb/>five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of<lb/> said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Bernandino</unclear> Florez</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Able S. Meritt</name> et al</head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files an amended petition herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Engler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and the Jury empannelled and<lb/> sworn herein also come and the trial of this<lb/> cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid say they cannot agree upon a<lb/> verdict. Wherefore the Court doth order that the said Jury be discharged, It is<lb/> further ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next<lb/> term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>F. Cousinery</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>2 cases</p>
<p>The plaintiffs come and file an affidavit of co-partnership</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Gogerty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Beckman</name></head>
<p>Damages. Nonsuit.- Now at this day comes the said defendant by his attorney<lb/> but the said plaintiff although duly summoned and called comes not,<lb/> Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion of the said defendant order<lb/> that the said plaintiff be nonsuited. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his<lb/> costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="188" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0191.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>367.97.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Wilgns</name>, <name>Albert J. Noble</name><lb/> and <name>James S. Wilgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward A. Byron</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore on<lb/> motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that their petition. be taken against said defendant<lb/> as confessed. And the plaintiffs waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of<lb/> the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Three hundred and sixty seven<lb/> Dollars and ninety seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1066.88.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name>, <name>Cornelius D.<lb/> Sullivan</name> and <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys, and the said defendants withdraw the<lb/> answer filed by them in this cause. Thereupon comes the<lb/> plaintiff and submits this cause to the Court, and<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing<lb/> on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of one-thousand and sixty six dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is,<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and<lb/> charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1.599.88.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the said defendant <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> withdraws the<lb/> answer filed by him in this behalf. And it appearing to the Court<lb/> that there is no answer filed herein, it doth on motion of said plain<lb/>tiff order that his petition be taken against said defendants<lb/> as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one-<lb/>thousand five hundred and ninety nine dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1598.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and the said defendant <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> withdraws<lb/> the answer filed by him, and it appearing to the<lb/> Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it<lb/> doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken<lb/> against said defendants as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred and ninety eight Dollars. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moses Pfeiffer</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the attachment<lb/> herein be dissolved at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="189" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0192.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Parkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> as well as the defendant <name>Charles L. Hunt</name>, who withdraws the<lb/> answer filed by him. Thereupon this cause is submitted to the<lb/> Court, and the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One thousand and sixty four dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof exe<lb/>cution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1456.87</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Rannels</name></head>
<p>On agreement. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> its attorney, but the defendant although duly<lb/> summoned and called comes not, but makes<lb/> default. Wherefore the Court doth assess<lb/> the damages of said plaintiff by reason<lb/> of the premises in its petition stateds at the sum of Fourteen hundred and fifty six<lb/> dollars and eighty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as<lb/> found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>385.26.</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name>, <name>William H. Benton</name><lb/> and <name>George H. Chase</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Moses Pfeiffer</name></head>
<p>Attachment. Now at this day come said parties and submit<lb/> this action on petition answer and exhibits to the Court,<lb/> and the Court having fully heard and considered<lb/> the same, it doth find from the proofs in said case<lb/> that said defendant is indebted to said plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty six cents. It is<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein ex<lb/>pended and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>-</unclear>William Weber<unclear>-</unclear></name></head>
<p>On agreement.- Now at this day comes the<lb/> plaintiff by his attorney, but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called comes not, but makes default,<lb/> Wherefore, this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in its petition<lb/> stated at the sum of One hundred and forty- dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore, con<lb/>sidered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and<lb/> have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>-</unclear>Philip Schmitt<unclear>-</unclear></name></head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day<lb/> comes said plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney, but the said defendant<lb/> although duly summoned and<lb/> called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore this cause is submitted to the Court<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the<lb/> damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in her petition stated at<lb/> the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and twenty six cents. It is, therefore,</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="190" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0193.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<p>considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum foresaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as assessed and its costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H. Hayden</name>, <name>H. Hadson</name><lb/> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney and the said defendants withdrawn the answer<lb/> filed by them in this behalf; and it appearing to<lb/> the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause<lb/> it doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken<lb/> against said defendants as confessed, and the Court<lb/> doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars. It is there<lb/>fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended<lb/> and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name><lb/> and <name>Joseph C. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and the said defendants withdraw the answer filed herein<lb/> by them. Thereupon this cause is submitted to the Court, and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and thirty-three<lb/> Dollars and eighty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff<lb/> recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and<lb/> his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Littlefield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same, doth find from the petition, exhibits and<lb/> proofs that the said defendant is indebted to<lb/> said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and four Dollars and forty seven cents. It is,<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Schultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by his attorney but the said de<lb/>fendants <name>John Valentine</name> and <name>Charles Frank</name>, although duly<lb/> summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff to be taken against<lb/> said defendants as confessed. On motion of said plaintiff it is ordered that an alias<lb/> writ issue herein against <name>M. Hirschfeld</name>. Thereupon this cause is continued to the<lb/> next term of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Balmer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name>, <name>H. Gronheim</name><lb/> and <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the<lb/> said defendants although duly summoned and called come<lb/> not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the<lb/> instrument of writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="191" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0194.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>sum of seven hundred and forty four Dollars and forty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by<lb/> the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name>, <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name> and <name>Thomas Brown</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney,<lb/> and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that <name>Henry D.<lb/> Bacon</name> be discharged from this proceeding. And the said<lb/> other defendants although being duly summoned and<lb/> called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth<lb/> find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants<lb/> are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy-three dol<lb/>lars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chorles Hays</name></head>
<p>Motion for Judgment and counter claim filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain<lb/> Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Zepp</name></head>
<p>On agreement.- Now at this day comes the said<lb/> plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defen<lb/>dant although duly summoned and called<lb/> comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the<lb/> Court doth find from the proofs in this<lb/> cause that said defendants is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Thirty nine Dollars and eighty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court<lb/> that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road<lb/> Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Rauchenstraoch</name>, defendant</head>
<p>On Agreement. Now at this day comes the<lb/> plaintiff by its attorney but the said<lb/> defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default.<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the proofs in said cause that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of one hundred and forty eight dollars and eighty cents. It is<lb/> therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein<lb/> expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William R. Price</name></head>
<p>On Agreement. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff<lb/> by its attorney, but the said defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, but<lb/> makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from<lb/> the proofs in said cause that said defendant is in<lb/>debted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and ninety seven Dollars and seventy cents.<lb/> It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="192" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0195.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hiram W. Leffingwell</name> and<lb/> <name>Richard S. Eliott</name></head>
<p>On Agreement.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its<lb/> attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned<lb/> and called come not, but make default. Wherefore<lb/> the Court doth find from the proofs in said cause<lb/> that said defendants are indebted to said<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty seven<lb/> dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Courr that said plaintiff recover of said defen<lb/>dants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges<lb/> herein expended and have thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Wilgus</name>, <name>Albert J. Noble</name><lb/> and <name>James S. Wilgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steam Boat Flying Cloud<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Robinson</name> and<lb/> <name>Roger C. McAllister</name> (secy's)</head>
<p>On Account.- Now at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury, submit this cause<lb/> to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and the<lb/> Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth assess<lb/> the damages of said plaintiffs at the sum of Two hundred<lb/> and forty nine dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of<lb/> said defendant and of <name>Joseph M. Robinson</name> and <name>Roger C. McAllister</name> the<lb/> securities in the bond for the return of the boat, the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> thereof execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Wilgus</name>, <name>Albert J. Noble</name><lb/> and <name>James S. Wilgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steamboat Allegheny<lb/> <name>Clifford G. Wayne</name> and<lb/> <name>Roger C. McAllister</name> (securities)</head>
<p>On Note and Account.- Now at this day come the said par<lb/>ties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit<lb/> this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and<lb/> proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same, doth find that the said defendant is indebted<lb/> to said plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and<lb/> thirty four dollars and fifty six cents. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant and of <name>Clifford G. Wayne</name> and<lb/> <name>Roger C. McAllister</name> the securities in the bond for the return of the boat, the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have<lb/> execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris Rosenheim</name> and <name>Marten<lb/> Collins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leopold Fisher</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the<lb/> said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James W. Sherman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Noel</name> and <name>Charles<lb/> Noel</name></head>
<p>Dimissal.</p>
<p>On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George L. Pollard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Bower</name>, <name>Francis Mayer</name><lb/> <name>Frank Solar</name> and <name>John W. Seubert</name></head>
<p>Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed<lb/> at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution<lb/> issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="193" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0196.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<note><unclear>#</unclear>181.45</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Ubsdell</name>, <name>Charles Peirson</name><lb/> <name>William Barr</name> and <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Gillespie</name></head>
<p>Attachment.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their<lb/> <unclear rend="strikethrough">respective</unclear> attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit:<lb/> <name>Andrew Geissel</name>, <name>Marquard Foster</name>, <name>Joseph Suss</name>, <name>Adam Swefel</name><lb/> <name>Frederick W. Meyers</name>, <name>John Tilton</name>, <name>B. Hussy</name>, <name>F. F. Oeters</name><lb/> <name>S. O. Smith</name>. <name>David C. Andrews</name>, <name>Andrew Johnson</name><lb/> <name>B. F. Crane</name>, twelve and good lawful new who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy<lb/> upon the plea in abatement, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered<lb/> and adjudged by the Court that said defendant at the date of the commencement of this suit<lb/> was a non resident of the state of Missouri. Thereupon come the plaintiffs as well as the Jury<lb/> sworn and empannelled herein and the trial of this cause progressed, and the Jurors afore<lb/>said upon their oaths aforesaid assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises<lb/> in their petition stated at the sum of one hundred and eighty one dollars and forty-five<lb/> cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of said defen<lb/>dant the debt aforesaid in form as assessed and also their costs and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> &amp;</head>
<p>This day come the defendants by their attorney and<lb/> withdraw their answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name><lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Raymon Apapin</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorneys but the said defendants, although duly<lb/> summoned and solemnly called coming not make default.<lb/> Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> One thousand six hundred and fifty eight dollars<lb/> and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Fox</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George <unclear>Suriyer</unclear></name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come The said parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court, whereupon the Court doth find from<lb/> the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty seven dollars<lb/> and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have<lb/> execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to use<lb/> of <name>Joseph Spold</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacob</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> and<lb/> <name>Moncus Phate</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their attor<lb/>ney and upon his motion It is ordered that<lb/> a writ of <unclear>Dedimus</unclear> issue herein for the taking<lb/> of depositions an the part of the defendant<lb/> in the city of Vienna in the Empire of<lb/> austria.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="194" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0197.tiff"/>
<head type="running">February Term <date when="1858">1858</date></head>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Somerville</name><lb/> who <unclear>Sues</unclear> in forma <unclear>pankins</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas J. Nelson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and<lb/> moves the Court to grant him Judgment against the plain<lb/>tiff upon the setoff herein filed and the Court being<lb/> satisfied that he is entitled there to It is therefore<lb/> considered that the defendant have judgment against the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of one cent and for his costs herein expended</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Ubsdell</name><lb/> <name>Charles Pierson</name><lb/> <name>William Barr</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Duncan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Gillespie</name></head>
<p>On Plea in the nature of Plea in abatement<lb/> Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and thereupon this case being called for hear<lb/>ing upon the Plea in abatement came a Jury viz<lb/> <name>Fred Wm Meyer</name><lb/> twelve good and lawful men who, being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue joined upon said plea and<lb/> having heard the evidence and the argument find the issue therein joined<lb/> for the plaintiff and the defendant although solemnly called and coming not<lb/> fails and refuses further to plead herein but makes default, whereupon the<lb/> Jury doth find from the proofs in the case that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty one dollars and<lb/> forty five cents, It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and there costs herein expended and thereof have execution.</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until to-morrow morning at ten O. Clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="195" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0198.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-10">Saturday April 10th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Dattelywig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. N. Black</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files motion to set<lb/> aside the nonsuit herein and affidavit in suport of said motion</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjn F. C. Champion</name> &amp;</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>neys and on his motion It is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed as to defendant <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> and the<lb/> plaintiffs by leave of Court file amended petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H. Wicker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and also the Jury empaneled herein and<lb/> the Jury representing to the Court that they cannot agree<lb/> upon a verdict herein, It is ordered by the Court that<lb/> they be discharged and this case be continued generally.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Bridgfox</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Charleville</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Solomon H. Robbins</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court having seen and heard<lb/> the proofs and being advised of and concerning the<lb/> premises doth find that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thousand two hundred and ninety four<lb/> dollars and nineteen cents with interest thereon from this date at the rate of<lb/> ten percentum per annum until paid. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found together with interest thereon as aforesaid<lb/> and also his costs herein and thereof have execution.</p>
<p>The death of the Non <name>Thomas Hart Benton</name> was announced to the Court<lb/> by <name>C. A Kannegan</name> Esq whereupon in respect to the memory of the deceased<lb/> It <unclear>is</unclear></p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court to adjourned until monday morning next at ten Oclock.
<signed><name>J r. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="196" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0199.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-12">Monday April 12th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Crawford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Amos H. Shultz</name></head>
<p>On note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and here in open court consent that judgment may<lb/> be entered against the defendant for the sum of two hundred<lb/> and forty dollars and forty four cents, wherefore It is considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by consent found and also his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Calvin F. Burns</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer to the plaintiffs petition, whereupon, the defend<lb/>ants although called coming not and failing further to<lb/> plead herein make default, on motion It is considered by the court that the<lb/> petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the court doth find from<lb/> the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defend<lb/>ants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and<lb/> fifty two dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Willi</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and the defendants withdraw their answer and failing<lb/> and refusing further to plead herein. It is considered by<lb/> the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for<lb/> confessed. And the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and eighty seven dollars and seventy there cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew Park</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name><lb/> <name>Francis Rogers</name><lb/> <name>Lowrey Mathew</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Lowrey</name></head>
<p>On note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants, withdraw<lb/> their answer, and failing and refusing further &amp; plead<lb/> herein, It is considered by the Court that the petition<lb/> of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and seventy two dollars and nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover against the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="197" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0200.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward V Bryan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry S. Martin</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney It is order<lb/>ed that an alias writ issue against the defend<lb/>ant <name>H S. Bryan</name> directed to the sheriff of pike County</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> A. N. Street<lb/> <name>Adam Diefenbach</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>One Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer and<lb/> failing and refusing further to plead herein It is consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiffs petition be taken<lb/> for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and forty two dollars and Eighty seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred D Green</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M M Fadin</name><lb/> <name>Peter Mueller</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jacob Raeder</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney and on motion It is ordered that this case<lb/> be dismissed as a defendants <name>Peter Mueller</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Reader</name><unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred D Green</name><lb/> <name>Edward H Thomas</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Fity Henry Narren</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M M Fadin</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendant withdraws<lb/> his answer and failing and refusing further to plead<lb/> It is considered by the Court that the petition of<lb/> the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand<lb/> seven hundred and seventeen dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>M. Sousa</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Calvin Townsley</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the defend<lb/>ant by <name>Henry Hitchcook Esq</name> his attorney and files a<lb/> written statement duly verified by affidavit whereby<lb/> he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> twenty three dollars and thirty cents and consents and agrees that Judgment<lb/> may be entered against him and in favor of plaintiff for that sum.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Morisso</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. K. Philiber</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning ten O'clock <signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="198" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0201.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-12">Monday April 12th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ephraim Ball</name>,<lb/> <name>Cornelius Altemus</name><lb/> <name>Thomas R. Jones</name><lb/> <name>Louis Miller</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Miller</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Cook Mann</name><lb/> Facturing &amp; Trading under<lb/> the name and Style of<lb/> <name>Ball <unclear>alteruna</unclear> &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and<lb/> <name>William Sigerson</name>, Trading<lb/> under the name &amp; Style<lb/> of <name>John Sigerson &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>On account.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendants withdraw<lb/>ing their answer consent and agree that<lb/> judgment may be rendered against them<lb/> for the sum of two thousand eight hundred<lb/> and ninety there dollars and ninety one cents<lb/> in favor of the plaintiffs. It is there<lb/>fore considered and agreed that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid consented to<lb/> and also their costs and charges in and<lb/> about this suit expended and thereof<lb/> have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">Mechanics Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah J. Sullivan</name><lb/> partners trading under<lb/> the name of <name>C D Sullivan<lb/> &amp; Co</name> &amp; <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer whereupon the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submits this case to the Court upon the<lb/> petition and proofs and the Court doth find<lb/> from the instrument of writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty six<lb/> dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and also her costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles D Coleman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of S Louis</head>
<p>On account and award</p>
<p>Now at this day come to parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendant withdrawn<lb/>ing her answer consents and agree that Judgment<lb/> may be rendered against her and in favor of the plaintiff for the<lb/> sum of Two thousand nine hundred and sixty nine dollars and fifty<lb/> six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented<lb/> to and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Shultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and files motion to set aside the Order setting aside<lb/> the default herein and to reaffirm the judgment of default</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sophia <unclear>Aufterheid</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Caspar <unclear>Aufterheid</unclear></name></head>
<p>The sheriff of S Louis County having made re<lb/>turn that the defendant cannot be found in his Coun<lb/>ty, On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It<lb/> is ordered that the defendant be notified by the publication</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="199" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0202.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<p>according to law of this order, that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him in the Circuit Court of S Louis County the object of<lb/> which is to procure a divorce from the bonds of matrimoney and that<lb/> unless he be and appear at the next term of the said Court to be begun<lb/> and held at the Court house in the city S Louis on the first monday of<lb/> October next and on or before the sixth day of the said term answer to<lb/> the said petition the same will be taken for confessed, and a decree of<lb/> divorce rendered against him<unclear>.</unclear> <unclear rend="strikethrough">and</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Lawless</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Hughes</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Dukes</name></head>
<p>Dismissal</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and by consent It is ordered<lb/> that this case be dismissed at the cost of the defend<lb/>ants and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. Partkinson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw<lb/>ing their answer the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits<lb/> this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is<lb/> founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of One thousand and sixty three dollars and forty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>Entry<lb/> unfinished</note>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the<lb/> assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Wm M. Stephenson</name></head>
<p><name>Jacob M Bixler</name> assignee of <name>Wm M Stephenson</name><lb/> comes into Court and files an <unclear>invention</unclear> of the effects<lb/> assigned and thereupon the Court appoints <name>John<lb/> Sexton</name> and <name>Frank Overstaltz</name></p>
<p>The day came in Open Court <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> of S Louis County and acknowledged deed to <name>James Johnson</name> by<lb/> him here presented to be his act and deed for the purposes<lb/> therein mentioned<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin L. Neber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Haryig</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day come the sheriff<lb/> of St Louis county and files his application<lb/> stating that the property levied on by him under<lb/> the attachment herein is perishable and liable to great damage<lb/> and prays the Court to grant an order of Sale herein It is there<lb/>fore Ordered by the Court that the sheriff proceed to sell said<lb/> property according to law after having duly advertised the same<lb/> and that he make due report of his proceeding under this<lb/> Order on the first day of the next term of this Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="200" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0203.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-12">Monday April 12th 1858</date></dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter T. Hatch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred Willonghly</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the Sheriff of<lb/> S Louis county and files his application repre<lb/>senting to the Court that the property seized by<lb/> him under the attachment issued herein is perishable and liable to<lb/> great damage and prazo the Court to grant an order of Sale herein.<lb/> Wherefore It is ordered by the Court that the sheriff proceed after duly<lb/> advertising the same according to Law to Sell the said property and<lb/> that he make due report of his proceeding under this order on the<lb/> first day of the next term of this Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Lefferts</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph A Eddy</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiffs by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered that this case be dismissed. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the defendants<lb/> recover of the plaintiffs their costs herein expen<lb/>ded and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred W. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On bill of Exchange. Attachment.</p>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and this case being<lb/> called for trial and both parties being ready thereupon came a Jury<lb/> by <name>John H. Garnhart</name>, <name>Henry Hartwig</name> <name>Frederick Berg</name>, <name>Joseph Pippen</name><lb/> <name>Reinhart Boese</name>, <name>Edward Coffie</name>, <name>John Buschman</name>, <name>Frederick Stendeman</name><lb/> Orlando Fish <name>Joseph Walenfechtler</name>, <name>Nelson Tindall</name> and <name>James Dickey</name><lb/> twelve good and lawful men who were duly elected tried and sworn<lb/> well and truly to try the issues joined upon the plea in abatement herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial progressed but not being concluded at the<lb/> hour of adjournment, further proceeding herein are continued until<lb/> tomorrow morning at ten O Clock. Court adjourned to some time</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="201" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0204.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-13">Tuesday April 13th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before<unclear>.</unclear></dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>F. Cousinem</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and files his petition and prays the Court to make<lb/> an order on the defendants to produce in Court<lb/> their books of account relating to the <unclear>matteres</unclear> in<lb/> controversy herein, and the Court having heard the said petition and being<lb/> advised of and concerning the premises doth order that the defendants do<lb/> upon the trial of this case produce in and the said books of account<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Nacker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Smith</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Elias Nilmot</name></head>
<p>Defendant <name>Smith</name> by his attorney comes and<lb/> files his separate answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> <name>Thomas N Strode</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Anaclette L. Lacroix</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. William Streit</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Andreas Reinstudtler</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their at<lb/>torney and the defendants withdrawing their answer<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court upon the petition and proofs and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three thousand one hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollars and Twenty nine cents It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin P. Searcy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward R. Threekeld</name></head>
<p>By Consent of parties It is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed at the cost of defendant<lb/> and that execution issue therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J Anderson</name><lb/> <name>Reuben Anderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Erastus Gaylord</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G Moris</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry M. Woodward</name></head>
<p>On Notes</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and the defendants<lb/> withdrawing their answer, the plaintiffs waiv<lb/>ing a Jury submit this case <unclear>or</unclear> the Court upon<lb/> the petition and proofs and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writings upon which<lb/> this action to founded that the defendants on indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of six hundred and thirteen dollars and forty one<lb/> cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and their costs in this suit expended<lb/> and that they have thereof execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="202" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0205.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-13">April 13th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Merrick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Smith</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and file their written agreement<lb/> whereby they consent and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for<lb/> the sum of one cent, and for the costs of this suit. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid consented to and also the costs in this behalf<lb/> expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hudson E Bridge</name><lb/> <name>John H Beash</name><lb/> <name>Henry B. Holland</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Leonard B. Holland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adam Schoen</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney and on their motion It is<lb/> ordered that this case be dismissed It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the defendant re<lb/>cover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Stevens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John L. Millian</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney<lb/> and whereby motion It is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed for want of security for costs<lb/> and the plaintiff by his attorney comes and files<lb/> motion to set aside dismissal<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ellen J. Wilgus</name><lb/> <name>Albert J. Noble</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James S. Wilgus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Steamboat <name>David Tatum</name><lb/> and <name>W. S. Harper</name> and<lb/> <name>William P Davis</name><lb/> <name>H. W Childs</name><lb/> <name>Samuel L. McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>A B. Earle</name></head>
<p>On Steamboat Warrant</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorney and the defendants withdrawing<lb/> their answer the plaintiffs waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court upon the petition<lb/> and proofs and the Court having seen and<lb/> heard the Same and being thereof advised doth<lb/> find that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of seven hundred and twenty five<lb/> dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the court that the plaintiffs recover<lb/> of the defendant and <name>Wm P. Davis</name>, <name>H. W. Childs</name>, <name>Samul L. McKinney</name> and<lb/> <name>A. B. Earle</name> the Securities in the bond of release herein, the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein, and thereof<lb/> have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the par<lb/>ties by their respective attorney and also the<lb/> Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial<lb/> of this case progressed but not being concluded at the hour of<lb/> adjournment It is ordered that further proceeding herein be continued<lb/> until to-morrow morning at ten O Clock</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="203" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0206.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="204" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0207.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-14">Wednesday April 14th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Billings</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George W. Billings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Fink</name></head>
<p>Attachment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorneys and an their motion It is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed at the cost of the<lb/> plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the attachment herein be dissolved and that the defendant recover<lb/> of the plaintiffs this costs herein expended</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Billings</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George W. Billings</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Boatman's Saving<lb/> Institution</name> garnishee<lb/> of <name>Chas. Fink</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the garnishee by<lb/> its attorney and an his motion It is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the garnishee be discharged<lb/> and be allowed the sum of ten dollars for<lb/> the trouble had in answering to the garnishment<lb/> and It is considered by the Court that the<lb/> garnishee go hence and recover of the plaintiffs<lb/> the costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooker</name> to use &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shnikee</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Alexander</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James J. Todd</name><lb/> <name>William Ray</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James McMahaw</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney and the Sheriff having made return<lb/> that the defendants <name>William Ray</name> and <name>James McMahaw</name><lb/> cannot be found in his county, On motion It is Ord<lb/>ered that they be notified by the publication accord<lb/>ing to law of this order that a civil suit has been commenced against them<lb/> in this court the object of which is to obtain a judgment against them for<lb/> the sum of two thousand two hundred and ninety four dollars and forty five<lb/> cents together with interest <unclear>thereso</unclear> at the rate of ten percent per annum from<lb/> the <date when="1857-10-01">first day of October 1857</date> until paid, and that unless they be and appear<lb/> at the next term of this Court to be begun and held on the first monday<lb/> at october next at the Court house in the city of S Louis, and an or before<lb/> the third day of said term answer to the said action, the petition of the<lb/> plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment rendered against them<lb/> and their property sold to satisfy the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousiney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. T. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs<lb/> It is ordered that <name>Mepro Hughes</name> &amp; <name>Marshall</name>. produce<lb/> here in court on tomorrow morning at ten O Clock<lb/> the bill books and cash book of the firm of<lb/> <name>Benj F. C. Champion</name> of, the same being in their custody, in order that<lb/> said books may be used as evidence upon the trail of this Case</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="205" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0208.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley. J. Alkire</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Reid</name></head>
<p>Motion for Judgment an bond filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the<lb/> assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William Wade</name></head>
<p>The appraiser appointed herein by the Court<lb/> come and file herein a report of their apprais<lb/>ment<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Dubb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>amended petition filed<unclear>.</unclear> and<lb/> Demurrer to amended petition filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin H. McClung</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm H. Thompson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and consent and agree that Judgment<lb/> may be rendered against the defendant for the sum<lb/> of Five thousand One hundred and thirty dollars and forty seven cents of<lb/> which said same two thousand seven hundred and thirteen dollars and twenty<lb/> nine cents shall bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum<lb/> and the sum of Two thousand four hundred and seventeen dollars and<lb/> eighteen cents shall bear interest at the rate of six per centum per annum<lb/> from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid consented to and also his costs herein expended and it is further<lb/> by consent ordered that execution hereon be stayed until <date when="1858-10">Oct Term 1858</date>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and also come the Jury<lb/> sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case<lb/> progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment It is<lb/> ordered that further proceeding herein be continued until tomorrow<lb/> morning at ten O Clock. Court adjourned <unclear>k Same</unclear> time.</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="206" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0209.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-15">Thursday April 15th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Mo to use <name>Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>Defendant files his answer herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Cooper</name> to use &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Shinkle</name></head>
<p>Defendant by leave of Court files Supplement at<lb/> answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Lieber</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B. Ganter</name></head>
<p>Depositions an part of plaintiff filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H. Calhoun</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Frederick</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the Court having heard<lb/> and being sufficiently advised of and concerning<lb/> the motion to suppress the depositions herein doth overrule the same<lb/> and by agreement filed It is ordered that this case be continued at the<lb/> cost of defendant on account of the absence of Witness <name>L. Howell</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Emilia</unclear> Guinget</name> by her<lb/> next friend <name>Wm Harbinger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Albert Guinget</name></head>
<p>Order Publication</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> her attorney and On his motion and the Sheriff of S Louis<lb/> County having made return that the defendant cannot<lb/> be found in his county. It is ordered that said defend<lb/>ant be notified by the publication of this order according to law, that a civil<lb/> suit has been commenced against him in the circuit Court of S Louis County<lb/> the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of Matri<lb/>money, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of the said Court<lb/> to be begun and held at the Court house in the City of S Louis on the first<lb/> monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer<lb/> to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for Confessed<lb/> and decree of divorce as prayed for will be rendered<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephin Hoyt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdin</name> and <name>Hahn</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney and on his motion and the Sheriff of S Louis County<lb/> having made return that the defendant cannot be found<lb/> is his county It is ordered that the defendant be notified by the publication<lb/> according to law of this order that a civil suit has been commenced<lb/> against him in the circuit Court of S Louis County, the object of which<lb/> is to obtain judgment against him for the sum of six hundred and nine<lb/> dollars and eighty six cents. On account of notes bond and money loanes<lb/> as per petition stated, and that his property has been attached and that<lb/> unless he be and appear at the next October term of the said Court to</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="207" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0210.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>be begun and held at the Court house in the city of S Louis on the<lb/> first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of<lb/> said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will<lb/> be taken for confessed and Judgment will be rendered against herein<lb/> and his property sold to satisfy the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of<lb/> the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William Wade</name></head>
<p>Bond of assignees filed and approved by<lb/> the Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and also the Jury<lb/> sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case<lb/> progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment It is<lb/> ordered that further proceeding herein be continued until tomorrow<lb/> morning at ten O clock. Court adjourned to same time</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="208" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0211.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-17">Saturday April 17th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Alexander</name></head>
<p>answer of defendant filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>E. Guinget <unclear>by</unclear> &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. guinget &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff be has<lb/> leave to file amended petition herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo to use <name>Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> time until the 23 instant is granted him to plead<lb/> to the answer of defendant filed herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John K Bretelle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Mallon</name></head>
<p>motion for a new bond and additional security<lb/> withdrawn</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Hayes</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Ombrey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Vanclaire</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and by consent It is ordered that this<lb/> base be continued and that plaintiff have time un<lb/>til the first day of next term to file bond with<lb/> approved security for the costs in this case</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>S Louis Car Wheil Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Dormy</name></head>
<p>By agreement of parties this case is continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. McNari</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Wm M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorney and the Court being sufficiently advised of and<lb/> concerning the motion to strike out the answer of the de<lb/>fendants, doth sustain the same and thereupon on motion<lb/> of the attorney for the plaintiff and the defendants failing and refusing further to<lb/> plead herein It is considered by the Court the Court that the petition of the plaintiff<lb/> be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> One thousand one hundred and forty four dollars and twenty two cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of<lb/> One thousand one hundred and forty four dollars and twenty two cents as<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this<lb/> behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="209" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0212.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley J. Alkire</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. <unclear>x</unclear> F. Nagel</name> <unclear>gars</unclear> of<lb/> <name>James Reed</name></head>
<p>The plaintiffs by attorney come and file denial<lb/> of the answer of the garnishee herein</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred Odenwalder</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Madeline Odenwalder</name></head>
<p>For divorce</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the said defendant although duly summoned and<lb/> solemnly called coming not makes default, Wherefore<lb/> It is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff petition herein be taken against<lb/> said defendant as confessed and the plaintiff <unclear rend="strikethrough">waiving a Jury</unclear> submits this<lb/> cause to the Court, and the Court being satisfied from the pleading and<lb/> proofs herein that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured person, doth<lb/> order adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever di<lb/>vorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said de<lb/>fendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried<lb/> person. It is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs herein<lb/> and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Wood</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Burk</name> et al</head>
<p>By agreement of Counsel Continued until the<lb/> next term of this Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick. Dattelywig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. W F. Black</name></head>
<p>The Court having heard and being sufficiently<lb/> advised of and concerning the motion to set aside<lb/> the nonsuit herein doth overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Freederick Heaman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin Hammele</name></head>
<p>By Consent Continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernandind Florey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of defendants by their attorney<lb/> further time until the 24th instant is allowed<lb/> them to file answer to this action<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Brown</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John S. McClane</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and being advised of<lb/> and concerning the motion to set aside Judgment<lb/> and grant new trial herein doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm V. N. Bay</name><lb/> Trustee of <name>Flora Byrne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Wescott</name> and<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties and the<lb/> Court having heard and being advised of and<lb/> concerning the motion for new trial herein<lb/> doth overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>State Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Graff</name> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> <name>Hammerstein</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their<lb/> attorney and withdraw their demurrer to the petition<lb/> of the plaintiff<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="210" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0213.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-17">Saturday April 17th 1858</date></dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>M. Hollacher</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm F. Holske</name></head>
<p>The Court having heard and being sufficiently<lb/> advised of and concerning the motion for new<unclear>-</unclear><lb/>trial herein doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. Meyer</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and being sufficiently<lb/> advised of and concerning the demurrer to the pe<lb/>tition of the plaintiff doth sustain the same<lb/> and on motion of the plaintiff he is allowed<lb/> ten days time in which to file amended petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frank Marquard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michalas Ruter</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and<lb/> the Court having heard and being advised of and Con<lb/>cerning the motion to set aside the judgment and<lb/> grant now trial herein doth overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm W. Walkelam</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chal. H. Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of defendants It is ordered that they<lb/> be allowed thirty days additional time in which<lb/> to file answer to amended petition herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklein H McClung &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Arches &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff It is ordered that this case<lb/> be dismissed as to defendant <name>Thomas J Madell</name><unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Franklin H McClung</name><lb/> <name>Charles L. Thompson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Amon H McDonald</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Arches</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney but the defendant although duly summoned<lb/> and Solemnly called, coming not makes default and<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the<lb/> Court, upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One-<lb/>thousand three hundred and seventy two dollars and thirty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defend<lb/>ant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Daniels</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Selcott</name> and<lb/> <name>Robert McDonald</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and also come the referees herein and file their<lb/> report whereupon the attorney for the plaintiff moves the<lb/> Court to confirm the same and render judgment there<lb/>on and the Court doth sustain said motion and find<lb/>ing from the said report that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of six hundred and sixty form dollars and ninety five cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants <name>Wm Selcott</name> and <name>Robt McDonald</name> the sum of six hun<lb/>dred and sixty form dollars and ninety five cents as aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid found and also his costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="211" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0214.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and thereup<lb/>on the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and that the<lb/> said defendant at the time of the bringing of this suit had not fraudulently conveyed or<lb/> assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors and that the<lb/> defendant had not fraudulently concealed removed or disposed of his property or effects<lb/> so as to hinder or delay his creditor It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the said defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein and have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>The defendant by his attorney comes and files mo<lb/>tion for new trial together with reasons therefor<unclear>.</unclear><lb/> Court adjourned until Monday morning <unclear>set</unclear> at ten O clock</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="212" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0215.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-19">Monday April 19th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President, Directors &amp;<lb/> Company</name> of the Bank<lb/> of Louisville<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elow G. Smith</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William K. Sherwood</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and agree and consent to submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having heard the same doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of four hundred and ninety two dollars and<lb/> fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution and by<lb/> consent It is further Ordered that Execution be stayed ninety days</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John McKnight</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Orleana C. Schaumburg</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> upon agreement filed and the Court having <unclear>seem</unclear> and heard the same doth<lb/> find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand<lb/> seven hundred and fifty eight dollars and twenty two cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Mutual Life<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorneys for the plaintiff It is ordered<lb/> that this case as to defendants, <name>Eliya G. Frost</name>, <name>A D.<lb/> Stuart</name> and <name>Robert Campbell</name> be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Mutual Life<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name><lb/> <name>James Moore</name><lb/> <name>William Made</name><lb/> <name>Daniel M Frost</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Mary B. Stuart</name></head>
<p>On Notes</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by there attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having sum<lb/> and heard the same doth find that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hun<lb/>dred and ninety two dollars and sixteen cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and also its costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> to use of Spold<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacoby</name> &amp; <name>Valentine</name></head>
<p>Continued as on affidavit of defendants<lb/> and at their costs<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="213" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0216.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name><lb/> <name>Oliver J Bragg</name><lb/> <name>Michael Burrows</name><lb/> <name>Gerhard H Temmerman</name><lb/> and <name>William Palm</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> attorney and waiving a sum submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two thousand seven hundred and seven<lb/>ty five dollars and twenty two cents. It is therfore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Authony M Foster</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> It is ordered that this case as against defendants<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Heman</name> and <name>Jno W Thornburg</name> be<lb/> dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> and<lb/> <name>Saml. B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>anthony M Foster</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having seen and heard<lb/> the same doth find therefrom that the defendants is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty-<lb/>six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name> and<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer to the plaintiffs petition and thereupon<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to<lb/> the Court and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of Six hundred and fifty four dollars and fifty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Wiggun</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A Ubsdell</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Kanfman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorneys and on their motion It is ordered<lb/> that this case be dismissed at plaintiff costs<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="214" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0217.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-19">Monday April 19th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of<lb/> Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name><lb/> <name>Oliver J. Bragg</name><lb/> <name>Michael Burrows</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Gerhard H. Timmerman</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court doth find from the same that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of one thousand three hundred and thirty nine<lb/> dollars and thirty cents, It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein ex<lb/>pended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Johnston</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits<lb/> the case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred<lb/> and forty two dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D Shackeeford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraws their answer and there<lb/>upon the plaintiff waiving a jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of one thousand and nineteen dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form a<lb/>foresaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W. Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name><lb/> <name>August Fritschle</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Schiffman</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand<lb/> and fifteen dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and also <unclear rend="strikethrough">him</unclear> costs and thereof have execution and it is further<lb/> adjudged and ordered by the Court that the said sum as aforesaid found<lb/> bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the date<lb/> hereof until paid</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="215" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0218.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George D. Shackleford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys and the defendants withdraw their answer to the petition<lb/> of the plaintiff and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and sixty seven dollars and twenty cents. It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in from aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and on motion of the plaintiffs It is ordered that this<lb/> case as against <name>Samuel Myerson</name> be dismissed and<lb/> the defendants withdraw their answer to plaintiff petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>Charles Frity</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attor<lb/>ney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and<lb/> nineteen dollars and ten cents. it is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Champagne<lb/> County Bank<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Mories</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry M. Woodward</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the<lb/> Court having seen and heard the same doth find there<lb/>from that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of seven hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifty four cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charls H Baxter</name><lb/> <name>Alfred T Baxter</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Franklin Bell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Mories</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs,<lb/> and the Court having seen and heard the same doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eight dol<lb/>lars and eighty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have<lb/> execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="216" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0219.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-19">Monday April 19th 1858</date></dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J. Gleasgow</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William H. Gleasgow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W Taylor</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having seen and heard the same doth<lb/> find that the defendant as indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Two Thousand<lb/> two hundred and thirty dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The State Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis F. Graff</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jacob Hammerstein</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having seen and heard the same doth find that the defend<lb/>ants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hun<lb/>dred and ninety eight dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick L. Billon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and the defendants; withdraw their<lb/> answer to the plaintiffs petition and thereupon the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of from hundred<lb/> and one dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Cochran</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>-</unclear> attachment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and by their consent It is<lb/> ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be<lb/> dismissed, and the defendant withdraws his plea in abatement filed<lb/> herein and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of two hundred and two dollars and fifty three cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">St B<unclear>r</unclear> City of Memphis<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leonard Muthews &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Depositions on the part of plaintiff filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="217" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0220.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Valli &amp; Co</name> a<lb/> firm Composed of<lb/> <name>John B Valli</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Neice Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Heinrich</name> &amp; <name>Reinhard</name> &amp;<lb/> firm Composed of<lb/> <name>John C. G. Heinrich</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhard</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff<lb/> by their attorney, but the defendants coming not<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and<lb/> the Court having heard the same doth find that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of three hundred and one dollars and thirty<lb/> eight cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defend<lb/>ants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Price</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Callier</name><lb/> <name>Daniel R. Parsons</name><lb/> <name>George <unclear>Simyer</unclear> </name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Roger</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective. Attorneys, and the Defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer and thereupon the defendant waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this ac<lb/>tions is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand two hundred and thirty six<lb/> dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the defendants recover of the plaintiff the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Jr Cooke</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the petition and<lb/> answer wherefrom the Court doth find that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand<lb/> three hundred and twenty Seven dollars and twenty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Mason</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William J. Counor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Shaffler</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Frank Fox</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney but the defendant coming not the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> seen and heard the same doth find therefrom<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> Five hundred and forty three dollars and seventeen cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> as the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court as aforesaid found and also their costs in this<lb/> behalf expended and that they have thereof exe<lb/>cution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="218" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0221.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-19">Monday April 19th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edmund W Tryon</name><lb/> <name>Edwin S. Dryden</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Francis W Tryon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. F. Crass</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas A. Simpson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendants coming not the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of six hundred and thirty nine dollars and sixty eighty cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the defend<lb/>ants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their<lb/> costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonathan W. Wilson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Stephen H. Shallcross</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>D. W. Sanford</name> and<lb/> <name>H. C. Crane</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and<lb/> heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two Thousand seven<lb/> hundred and ninety six dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum. Aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James E Goll</name> <name>Samuel D addison</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph Addison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. F. Cross</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas A Simpson</name></head>
<p>On account &amp; notes</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and<lb/> heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand four<lb/> hundred and forty one dollars and five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court founded and also their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Geatman</name> and<lb/> <name>Lucretia</name> his wife &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Geatman</name> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> by<lb/> <name>James E Geatman</name> his friend<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nathaniel Pope</name><lb/> <name>Douglas Pope</name><lb/> <name>Cornelia Pope</name><lb/> <name>Lucretia Pope</name><lb/> <name>Kenneth McKenyie</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James H Lucas</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication</p>
<p>The Sheriff having made return that said defend<lb/>ants, <name>Cornelia Pope</name> <name>John Pope</name> &amp; <name>Lucretia Pope</name>, Can<lb/>not be found, and the Court being satisfied that said de<lb/>fendants herein named cannot be served with process, it is<lb/> On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorneys ordered that<lb/> said defendants be notified of the commencement of this<lb/> suit the object of which it to quiet title to and <unclear>procure</unclear> the<lb/> sale of certain premises heretofore occupied by plaintiffs as<lb/> a residence, situate in the city of St Louis in block two hundred<lb/> and seventy four, beginning at a point in South line of Olive Street, dis<lb/>tant fifty fat eastwardly from the the northwest Comes of the block<lb/> Thence along the South line of Olive Street, eastwardly fifty fat; Thence Southwardly one<lb/> hundred and nine fat two inches to an alley; Thence westwardly along said alley fifty fat;<lb/> Thence northwardly and paralled with Tenth shut one hundred and nine fat two inches</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="219" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0222.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>to the point of beginning and that unless they be and appear at the next term of<lb/> the said Court to be begun and held at the city of St Louis on the first monday<lb/> of October next, and on or before the sixty day thereof answer the petition of<lb/> said plaintiff, the same will be taken against them an confessed. It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the missouri dem<lb/>ocrat a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Firmin Cousnery &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> &amp;</head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and on motion of the defendant It is ord<lb/>ered that this case be continued at the costs of<lb/> said defendants an account of the absence of<lb/> <name>James C. Hopkins</name> a witness matinal on the part of said defendants<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. Meyers</name> et al</head>
<p>amended petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raignel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Womer &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and the Court having heard and being advised of<lb/> and concerning the motion to strike and parts of the<lb/> plaintiffs petition herein doth sustain the same and thereupon the plain<lb/>tiff by leave of Court struck out the following parts of their petition to writ<lb/> <unclear>all</unclear> that part of said petition beginning at the word plaintiff on the<lb/> eighteenth line of the first page thereof and ending at the word plaintiff<lb/> on the cast line of said page inclusive<unclear>-</unclear> also all the endorcements<lb/> on said <unclear>promissary</unclear> note sued on</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings<lb/> Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. W. Thatcher gar <unclear>re</unclear> &amp; c</name></head>
<p>answer of garnishee filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. W. Thatcher</name> <unclear>garco</unclear><lb/> of <name>A M Waterman &amp;c</name></head>
<p>answer of garnishee filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Wood boal Honding</head>
<p>Demurrer to amended petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm D Herring</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kate Herring</name></head>
<p>Depositions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Shulty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The Court having heard the motion to set aside the<lb/> order setting aside the default herein doth sustain the<lb/> same and doth adjudge that the Judgment</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="220" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0223.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-19">April 19th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<p>of default entered herein on the <date when="1858-02-23">23th February 1858</date> be reinstated</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A. Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Mories</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
<p>Plaintiff by attorney comes and files amended<lb/> petition herein<unclear>.</unclear> and the Court having heard<lb/> and being advised of and Concerning the motion to<lb/> suppress the deposition of <name>William S. Woodward</name><lb/> doth sustain the same, and doth order and adjudge<lb/> that said deposition be suppressed Court adjourned as before</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="221" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0224.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1856-04-20">Tuesday April 20th 1856</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas McAdams</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Muegge</name> impleaded<lb/> with <name>Paul Carlin &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Satisfaction</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by <name>Wm J. Romyn Elis</name> attorney and acknowledges full and<lb/> entire satisfaction of the Judgment heretofore<lb/> rendered herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm J Dinar</name></head>
<p>On motion of defendant by his attor<lb/>ney leave is granted him to file an amended<lb/> answer herein.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Morham ex &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Simley &amp;c</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney It is<lb/> ordered that an alias writ issue herein against<lb/> defendant <name>Lumley</name> and this case is continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abram Goldsmith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adams Epress Co.</name></head>
<p>Depositions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>J Mayer &amp;C</name><lb/> vs<lb/> Equitable <name>Fin Jwen<lb/>rance</name> leo of London</head>
<p>Depositions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm D. Herring</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kate Herring</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> on motion the Court doth grant leave to the<lb/> plaintiff to amend his petition herein by interlin<lb/>ing on the eighth line from the <unclear>to is</unclear> of the<lb/> first page thereof an additional allegation in these words <unclear>to writ</unclear><lb/> ``That he was in fact insaire at the time'' which is done</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucuis A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Mories &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and Waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and<lb/> the Court having seen and heard the same<lb/> and being hereof advised doth find that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and twenty eight dollars and<lb/> seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Bellas</name> of<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Rochler &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>Carl <unclear>Wehrle</unclear></name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>neys, but the defendants although called come<lb/> not where upon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="222" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0225.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom<lb/> the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of one hundred and twenty seven dollars and eighteen cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob S. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis G. Henderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Edward Rice</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this Case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom<lb/> the Court doth find that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty eight dol<lb/>lars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and also his costs herein and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J. Lawrenson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Campbell</name></head>
<p>Petition for Trespass.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and this case being called for<lb/> trial and both parties being ready, thereupon came a Jury<lb/> viz <name>matthew Rippey</name> <name>Bernard Buette</name>, <name>George Clemans</name> <name>C Vail</name>, <name>Thos A. Dryden</name><lb/> <name>Geo F. Hill</name> <name>Geo Parker</name> <name>Joseph Cain</name>, <name>Samuel Wiggins</name>, <name><unclear>W.</unclear> Morton</name> <name>Frank Berg<lb/>feild</name> and <name>John Bellerson</name> twleve good and lawful men who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn, well and truly to try all the matters in controversy in this action<lb/> the trial of this case progressed and being now concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and<lb/> assess the damage by him sustained at the sum of ninety six dollars and fifty five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and also his costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J. King</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Herpich</name> and<lb/> <name>George Stadlmain</name></head>
<p>Attachment</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney and on their motion It is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue<lb/> therefore<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Jameson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the<lb/> Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of seven hundred and one dollars thirty five cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="223" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0226.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Fulfow</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proof whereupon the Court doth<lb/> find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty six dollars<lb/> and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the<lb/> State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis A. Welton</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney<lb/> and on their motion and upon affidavit filed It is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this case be continued at<lb/> defendants casts<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael Owens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm C. Smith</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by <unclear rend="strikethrough">their</unclear> attorney<lb/> and on motion and upon affidavit filed It is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this case be continued at the costs of<lb/> the defendant<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac H Sturgcon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jerome B. Brown</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the par<lb/>ties by their respective attorney and the defendant<lb/> files an instrument of writing from which it appears<lb/> to the Court that he doth acknowledge and confess that he is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and fifty two dollars and doth<lb/> come at ant agree that Judgment may rendered against him and in favor<lb/> of said plaintiff for the same. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the defendant confessed and his costs herein and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward P. Tesson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Autoine L. Danyen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Horace D Brady</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George T. Brady</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys<lb/> but the defendants although duly summoned and solemnly<lb/> called coming not make default. wherefore on motion<lb/> It is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> petition be taken against <unclear rend="strikethrough">their defendants</unclear> as confessed<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit the case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing. On which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants an indebted to the plaintiff in the sum one thousand and six<lb/> Dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Brooks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Allen Brown</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be continued at defendants costs</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="224" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0227.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-20">April 20th 1858</date>.</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David W. Tenton</name><lb/> <name><unclear>Aurow</unclear> B. Tenton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Benjamin Tenton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Shaffler</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Frank Fax</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and here in open Court Consent<lb/> and agree that Judgment may be rendered herein in<lb/> favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for<lb/> the sum of six hundred and nineteen dollars and<lb/> eleven cents and for costs of suit. It is therefore<lb/> considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also the<lb/> costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Peters</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs It<lb/> is ordered that this case as to defendants <name>James W.<lb/> Sherman</name> and <name>Samuel Myerson</name> be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Peters</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court on the pleadings and proofs, and the Court<lb/> having sum and heard the sum doth find therefrom<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and sixty seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Steam boat City of<lb/> Memphis by <name>Wm J. Konuty</name><lb/> Master<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name><lb/> <name>Charles W. Levering</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William H. Matthews</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and by consent of parties and this case being<lb/> called for trial thereupon come a Jury viz <name>Joseph Cain</name><lb/> <name>Samuel Wiggins</name>, <name>Andrew Pierce</name>, <name>Frank Bergfield</name>, <name>George<lb/> Braeden</name>, <name>N. Mortow</name> six good and lawful men, who<lb/> being duly elected trial and sworn well and truly to try the<lb/> issues joined herein and having heard the evidence and<lb/> the trial hereof being concluded, the Jurors aforesaid upon<lb/> their oaths aforesaid do find for the plaintiff and assess the damages sustained<lb/> at the sum of two hundred and six teen dollars and forty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Jury found and also the costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob. S. Williams</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys and this case being called for trial, let a Jury come<lb/> and thereupon came a Juru viz <name>George Clemens</name>, <name>C. Vail</name><lb/> <name>James Meegan</name> <name>Cornelius S. Dailey</name>, <name>Thomas Dryden</name> <name>George Parker</name> <name>John Bellerson</name><lb/> lawful men who having been duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the<lb/> issues joined herein, thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being con<lb/>cluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="225" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0228.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Three hundred and<lb/> seventy one dollars fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Jury found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear><lb/> seed the plaintiff here in open Court <unclear>remits</unclear> of said account the sum of<lb/> one dollars and sixty nine cents</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Bobb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edw S. Wheaton</name><lb/> <name>Benj F. Champion &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>G L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> herein, whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits<lb/> this case to the Court, and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and<lb/> eighty five dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Wagley</name><lb/> <name>Jule C. Kingsbury</name><lb/> <name>Darius H <unclear>Cox</unclear> &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>Daniel G. Eligrity</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>On Bills exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and this case being called<lb/> for trial and both parties being ready set a Jury Come,<lb/> and thereupon came a Jury <unclear>viz</unclear> <name>Matthen Rippy</name> <name>Bernard<lb/> <unclear>Buelte</unclear></name> <name>George Clemans</name>, <name>C Vail</name>, <name>James Dryden</name> <name>John<lb/> Bellerson</name>, <name>James W Roberts</name>, <name>George F. Hill</name> <name>Thomas<lb/> Rutherford</name> and <name>George Parker</name> by consent ten good and lawful men who<lb/> being duly elected tried and sworn will and truly to try the issue joined herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded<lb/> at the horn of adjournment further proceeding herein are continued until<lb/> tomorrow morning at ten oclock. Court adjourned as before</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="226" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0229.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-21">Wednesday April 21st 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">The St B<unclear>r.</unclear> City of Memphis<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by<lb/> their attorney and file motion and reasons for<lb/> new trial herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W. Mitechell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>English Bruns &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>amended answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J King</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Findley Robb Gar<unclear>er</unclear> &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the garnishees by his attorney<lb/> and the court being advised of and concerning the<lb/> premises It is ordered that said Garnishee be<lb/> discharged from the garnishment herein and<lb/> that he be allowed the sum of ten dollars for his trouble in answering<lb/> herein to be paid by the plaintiff<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Jerre Hante, Alton<lb/> &amp; S Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> attorneys and the Court having heard and being<lb/> advised of and concerning the premises upon<lb/> the plea in abatement herein doth find the<lb/> issues therein in favor of the plaintiff, and an motion of the defendant<lb/> leave to answer further herein is granted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger &amp; c</name></head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> It is ordered that this case as against defendants<lb/> <name>Charles W. Graeff</name> &amp; <name>Samuel Myerson</name> be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anton Jaeger</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney and waiving a Jury submits this case to<lb/> the Court and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and seventy two dollars and six cents<lb/> together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum<lb/> from date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<lb/> and on motion ordered by the Court that execution<lb/> hereon be stayed until the first day of September next<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="227" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0230.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Maria Larrisa Guerette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Largue</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> herein and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard<lb/> the proofs doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of one thousand and sixty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form a<lb/>foresaid by the Court found and her costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William D. Herring</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kate Beittel</name> alias<lb/> <name>Kate Herring</name></head>
<p>Pet for divorce<unclear>-</unclear> Trial decree</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by <name>Thomas C Johnson</name> his attorney, an it appearing to the<lb/> Court that the defendant has been duly summoned accord<lb/>ing to the laws of this state; That she hath not answered<lb/> the petition and a default hath been regularly entered, and the said defend<lb/>ant being again solemnly called comes not. It is ordered that this cause be<lb/> heard without further delay, thereupon the same came on for hearing upon<lb/> the petition, and upon <unclear>oral</unclear> and written evidence adduced by plaintiff to sur<lb/>tain the allegation thereof. Upon consideration whereof the Court doth find<lb/> that on the <date when="1854-11-21">21st of november 1854</date> the plaintiff and defendant were by legal<lb/> ceremonies married to each other;- That at the time of said marriage the<lb/> plaintiff was in in such a condition of mind as to be utterly incapable of<lb/> consenting to or making the contract of marriage. That after said plaintiff<lb/> came to a knowledge of said marriage he repudiated it. That the mar<lb/>riage has not been consummated by cohabitation, and that he has never<lb/> affirmed or consented thereto, and that plaintiff is now a citizen of this state<lb/> It is therefore adjudges and decreed that the marriage of plaintiff with<lb/> defendant, in his condition of mind at the time was a fraud upon him<lb/> and was from the beginning and shall from hence forth be held will and <unclear>void</unclear><lb/> and of no validity in all Courts and places whatsoever; and it is further ad<lb/>judged and decreed that the plaintiff and defendant shall be considered to<lb/> each other and to all the world as of said <unclear>pretended</unclear> marriage had not<lb/> taken place. It is further ordered that plaintiff pay the costs of this<lb/> suit and that execution issue therefor<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Robt Mc. OBlenis</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by attorney<lb/> and on motion It is ordered by the Court that <name>Basil<lb/> W. Alexander</name> &amp; <name>Robert M. Renick</name> be and they are hereby<lb/> appointed trustees of the said <name>Robert Mc. OBlenis</name><lb/> and thereupon the said Trustee file a bond in the sum of Thirty Thousand<lb/> dollars, conditioned according to law which bond is approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles W Green</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jonas W. Green</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer herein<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and ninety four dollars and forty five</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="228" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0231.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> also their costs herein and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>26780<unclear>0</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Danl M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> his wife<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name> &amp; <name>Mary B.<lb/> Stewart</name> his wife <name>Robert Camp<lb/>bell</name>, trustee for <name>Mary B. Stewart</name><lb/> and trading under style of <name>Wm<lb/> Wade &amp; Co</name> <name>Thomas B Graham</name> and <name>William E. Wilson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and by consult It is ordered<lb/> that the continuance herein be set aside<lb/> and the defendants <name>William Wade</name>, <name>D M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Mary B<unclear>e</unclear> Stewart</name>, <name>Thomas B Graham</name> and <name>William<lb/> E. Willson</name> withdraw their answers herein, and<lb/> on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> It is ordered by the Court that this case as<lb/> against defendants <name>Adam D Stewart</name>, <name>Eliya<lb/> Graham Frost</name> and <name>Robert Campbell</name> be<lb/> dismissed, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this actions is founded that<lb/> the defendants <name>William Made</name>, <name>D. M Frost</name>, <name>Mary B. Stewart</name>, <name>Thomas B. Graham</name> and<lb/> <name>William E. Wilson</name> and indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand six<lb/> hundred and seventy eight dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution, agreem<lb/>ent of parties by their Counsel filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>874.60</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Made</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> his wife<lb/> <name>Adam D. Stewart</name> and <name>Mary B.<lb/> Stewart</name> his wife, and <name>Robert Camp<lb/>bell</name> Trustee for <name>Mary B Stewart</name><lb/> Trading under the style of <name>William<lb/> Wade &amp; Co</name> and <name>James D. Leonard</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorney and by consent of parties It is ordered that<lb/> the continuance herein be set aside<unclear>.</unclear> and on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this<lb/> case as against defendants <name>Adam D Stewart</name><lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> and <name>Robert Campbell</name> and<lb/> the other defendants withdraw their answers herein<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that said defendants <name>Wm Wade</name>, <name>D M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> and <name>James D Leonard</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand<lb/> eight hundred and seventy four dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and here costs herein expended and have thereof execution. Agreement filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>3645.08</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Eliza Graham Frost</name> his wife, <name>Adam<lb/> D. Stewart</name> and <name>Mary B. Steward</name> his<lb/> wife, <name>Robert Campbell</name> trustee for<lb/> for <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> trading under<lb/> Style of <name>Wm Wade &amp; Co</name> &amp; <name>George<lb/> W. Goode</name> and <name>William E. Wilson</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys, and on motion of the at<lb/>torney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case<lb/> as to defendants <name><unclear>Addam</unclear> D Stewart</name>, <name>Eliya Graham<lb/> Frost</name> and <name>Robert Campbell</name> be dismissed<unclear>.</unclear> and the<lb/> Other defendants withdraw their answer herein, and<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded, that the defendants</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="229" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0232.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p><name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M. Frost</name>, <name>Mary B. Stewart</name>, <name>George W. Goode</name> and <name>William E.<lb/> Wilson</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thousand six hundred<lb/> and forty five dollars and eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and her costs herein expended and thereof have execution. Agreement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>2681.25</note>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name>, <name>William<lb/> Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> his wife<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name> and <name>Mary<lb/> B. Stewart</name> his wife and<lb/> <name>Robert Campbell</name> trustee for<lb/> <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> all but first<lb/> mentioned trading under style<lb/> of <name>William Wade &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by there<lb/> respective attorney, and on motion of the attor<lb/>ney for the plaintiff. It is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this case as to the defendants <name>Adam D. Stew<lb/>art</name> <name>Robert Campbell</name> and <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> be<lb/> dismissed<unclear>-</unclear> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this ac<lb/>tion is founded that the defendants <name>George<lb/> W Goode</name>, <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name>, and<lb/> <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two thousand six hundred and eighty one dollars and twenty two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear> agreement<lb/> of Counsel filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Daniel M Frost</name><lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> his wife<lb/> <name>Adam D Stewart</name> &amp; <name>Mary B. Stew<lb/>art</name> his wife &amp; <name>Robert Campbell</name><lb/> Trustee for <name>Mary B Stewart</name> and<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and on motion of<lb/> the attorney for the plaintiff. It is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this case as to defendants<lb/> <name>Adam D. Stewart</name>, <name>Robert Campbell</name> and<lb/> <name>Eliya Graham Frost</name> be dismissed and<lb/> the Other defendants by their attorney with<lb/>draw their answers herein; and the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded that the said defendants<lb/> <name>William Wade</name>, <name>Danl. M. Frost</name>, <name>Mary B. Stewart</name> and <name>George W. Goode</name> are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three Thousand six hundred and<lb/> thirty four dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution, agreement of counsel filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Rutherford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac S. Ketchum</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and this case coming its for<lb/> hearing and decision upon the plea in abatement here<lb/>in, let a Jury come and thereupon came a Jury viz, <name>A Miltenberger</name>, <name>Andrew<lb/> Pierce</name>, <name>H. A Pryow</name>, <name>Frank Bergfield</name> <name>D. J. Hancock</name> <name>George Breaden</name><lb/> <name>James Meegan</name>, <name>Edwin A. Skeele</name> <name>William <unclear>OWheeler</unclear></name> <name>Leonard Scollay</name> <name>John</name></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="230" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0233.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<p><name>Williams</name> and <name>Cornelius S. Dailsy</name> twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn to try the issues herein joined <unclear rend="strikethrough">the</unclear><lb/> progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> find the issues herein for the defendant, and that the defendant was not<lb/> at the date of the bringing of this suit about to remove from this State with<lb/> the interest to Change his domicil. It is therefore considered and adjudged<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ herein but that<lb/> the defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs on their<lb/> behalf expended, and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard Emerson</name> and<lb/> <name>Nathan Johnson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Jones</name><lb/> <name>J. Covell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>G. W. Morrison</name></head>
<p>Attachment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and the proofs and the Court<lb/> having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom<lb/> for the plaintiffs and doth assess their damages at the<lb/> sum of five hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety three<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs re<lb/>cover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also their costs herein expanded and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name><lb/> <name>Inle C Kingsburn</name> and<lb/> <name>Daniel G. Elifrity</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>On Bills Exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and also the jurors sworn herein<lb/> save <name>James Roberts</name>, who being sick and unable to attend;<lb/> By Consent of parties the trial herein progressed notwith<lb/>standing the absence of Said Juror</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John T. Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F. Benjamin</name><lb/> <name>Orange W. McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J. Elliott Duryee</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James Castells</name> Sheriff<lb/> of S Louis County and files a Statement whereby it appear<lb/> to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the<lb/> attachment issued in the above submitted causes is likely to<lb/> depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit<lb/> and that the keeping of the same would be attended with<lb/> much expense, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said <name>James Castells</name><lb/> Sheriff as aforesaid do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in<lb/> Conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H. Waters</name><lb/> <name>Silas M. Barrett</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Eben Dole</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F. Benjamin &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James Castells</name> Sheriff<lb/> of S Louis County and file a Statement whereby it appears<lb/> to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the<lb/> attachment issued in the above entitted cause is likely<lb/> to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this<lb/> suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much excuse<lb/> It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said <name>James Castells</name> Sheriff as<lb/> aforesaid do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in conformity with<lb/> the statute in such case made and provided<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="231" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0234.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John T. Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F. Benjamin</name><lb/> <name>Oscar W McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J Elliott Duryel</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> of S Louis county and files a statement whereby it appears<lb/> to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the<lb/> attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely<lb/> to depreciate in value before the probable termination<lb/> of the suit and that the keeping of the same would<lb/> be attended with much expense. It is therefore ordered by the Court that the<lb/> said <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff as aforesaid so proceed to sell said property<lb/> so levied upon in conformity with the statute in such case made and<lb/> provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name><lb/> <name><unclear>Oscar</unclear> W McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J Elliatt Duryee</name></head>
<p>Order of sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James Castello</name><lb/> Sheriff of S Louis County and files a Statement whereby<lb/> it appear to the Court that the property levied upon<lb/> by virtue of the attachment issued in the above entitled<lb/> cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable<lb/> termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended<lb/> with much expense. It a therefore ordered by the Court that the said<lb/> <name>James Castello</name> sheriff as aforesaid do proceed to sell said property<lb/> so levied upon in conformity with the statute in such case made and<lb/> provided<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cement P. Mallory</name></head>
<p>Petition</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and this cause being called for trial and both<lb/> parties being ready, thereupon came a Jury viz</p>
<p>twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well<lb/> and truly to try the issues joined herein the trial of this case progressed<lb/> but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceeding herein<lb/> are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock.</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until same time<unclear>.</unclear>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="232" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0235.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-22">Thursday April 22c 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the<lb/> assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers Anderson &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and on motion It is ordered by the Court that <unclear>th</unclear><lb/> <name>John M Krum Esq</name> and <name>Chester Harding Esq</name> be<lb/> substituted as assignees of the property assigned<lb/> in place of <name>Charles Anderson</name> heretofore appointed<lb/> and thereupon said <name>Krum</name> and <name>Harding</name> file herein an Inventory and<lb/> an appraisment of the said estate and property assigned and also file<lb/> bond, with good and sufficient security, which is approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p>We acknowledge full and<lb/> entire satisfactory <unclear>of the Judgment</unclear><lb/> recorded <unclear>affonts</unclear> this margin</p> 
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline><date when="1865-08-08">aug 8 1865</date></dateline><lb/> <signed><name><unclear>Testfatl Sohnrider</unclear></name> <unclear>et al</unclear></signed>
<signed><name>Thomas</name> &amp; <name>Papin</name></signed>
<signed>by <name>R. A. Papin</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George M Thomas</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Raymond A Papin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Inles C. Kingsburn</name></head>
<p>On Note and account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and the Court having heard and<lb/> being advised of and concerning the premises doth<lb/> sustain the motion to strike out the answer herein-<lb/>and doth order that said answer be struck out, and that the petition<lb/> of the plaintiffs be taken for confessed, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the<lb/> Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and thirty three dollars<lb/> and fifteen cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
<p>Attest<lb/> <name>Stephen Rice</name> et al</p>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>I hereby assign this<lb/> Judgment to <name>Hugh</name><lb/> a Garland for value<lb/> <unclear>received after</unclear> <date when="1860-09-07">7th September<lb/> 1860</date></dateline><lb/> <signed><unclear>Witness</unclear><lb/> <name>Robt <unclear>Brear</unclear></name></signed> 
<signed><name><unclear>Kyes</unclear> Cuming</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Corning</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendants come not and the plaintiff waiving<lb/> a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs, wherefrom the Court doth find that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and<lb/> sixty three dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Mutual Life<lb/> Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Baker Moore</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Polity</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendant <name>Berg</name> files separate answer to amended<lb/> petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>John N. Straat</name></head>
<p>Ordered by the Court that the five of fifty dollars<lb/> imposed upon <name>John N Straat Esq</name> by the Court for <unclear>Contempel</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="233" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0236.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. P. Mallory</name></head>
<p>On Petition</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<unclear>.</unclear> and<lb/> being concluded, the Jury aforesaid retire to consider of their verdict</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name><lb/> <name>Charles W Herbert</name><lb/> <name>Henry J Darrah</name> and<lb/> <name>Chaster W. Pomeroy</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> this cause coming up for hearing and<lb/> decision upon the plea in abatement<lb/> herein, thereupon came a Jury to writ</p> 
<p>twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and<lb/> truly to try the issue joined between the parties upon the plea in<lb/> abatement herein thereupon the trial progressed but not being conclu<lb/>ded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding are continued<lb/> until tomorrow morning at tem Oclock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until same time
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="234" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0237.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-23">Friday April 23d 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jerre Hunte Alton</name> and<lb/> <name>S Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Simmons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and<lb/> admits the demurrer of the defendants and<lb/> by leave of Court the plaintiff amends his<lb/> petition on its face</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Max Wacker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Smith</name> and<lb/> <name>Elias Wilmot</name></head>
<p>Petition- attachment</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney but the defendant comes not<lb/> and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and the<lb/> Court doth find from the answer of the defendants that they are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and sixty five dollars and seven<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> his costs and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Susan Walker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cement T. Mallory</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn<lb/> herein and the Jurors aforesaid on their oaths<lb/> aforesaid say they cannot agree upon a verdict here<lb/>in It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said Jury be discharged<lb/> and this case be continued until the next term of this Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R Anderson</name> assignee<lb/> of <name>Charles Rogers &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name></head>
<p><name>Charles R Anderson</name>, the plaintiff har<lb/>ing resigned the trusts reposed in him as<lb/> assignee of <name>Rogers Anderson &amp; Co</name>, <name>Chester<lb/> Harding Jr</name> and <name>John M Krum</name> assignees &amp;<lb/> are substituted plaintiffs in his stead</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles R. Anderson</name> assignee<lb/> of <name>Rogers Anderson &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name> et al</head>
<p><name>Charles R. Anderson</name>, the plaintiff having<lb/> resigned the trust reposed in him as assignee<lb/> of <name>Rogers Anderson &amp; Co</name>, <name>Chester Harding Jr.</name><lb/> and <name>John M Krum</name> assignees &amp; are substituted<lb/> plaintiffs in his Stead</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John P. Cabanne</name><lb/> vs<lb/> ``<name>Mary</name>''</head>
<p>Now at this day comes into Court<lb/> <name>John P. Cabanne</name> who is personally known<lb/> to the Court and acknowledge a deed of<lb/> emancipation to his Slave <name>mary</name> a bright<lb/> mulatto woman about forty one years of age</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="235" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0238.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> and<lb/> <name>John T. Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F. Benjamin</name><lb/> <name>Orange W McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J Elliott Duryee</name></head>
<p>Attachment Order of Publication</p>
<p>The Sheriff having made return<lb/> that said defendants cannot be found and the Court<lb/> being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served<lb/> with process, on motion of the plaintiff by their at<lb/>torney It is ordered that the defendants be notified<lb/> of the commencement of this suit, the object of which<lb/> is to recover of said Defendants the sum of two hundred and eighty two dol<lb/>lars and seventy four cents, on account of a promissory note executed by<lb/> said defendant and delivered to the said plaintiff, and that unless they be<lb/> and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at<lb/> the city of S Louis on the first monday of October next, and on or before<lb/> the third day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be<lb/> taken against them as confessed and the property attached at the commence<lb/>ment of this suit as belonging to the said defendants will be sold to sat<lb/>isfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereby be published<lb/> according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the<lb/> city of S Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Anderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John T. Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Myron F Benjamin</name><lb/> <name>Orange W. McKinney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J. Elliott Duryee</name></head>
<p>Attachment<unclear>.</unclear> Order of Publication</p>
<p>The Sheriff having made return<lb/> that said defendants cannot be found and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot<lb/> be served with process, it is ordered, that the<lb/> defendants be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against them for the sum of<lb/> Thirteen hundred and eighty eight dollars and thirty five cents on account of four<lb/> certain promissory notes executed by the said defendants to the plaintiffs and<lb/> that their property has been attached and unless they appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis<lb/> within and for the County of S Louis on the first monday of October<lb/> next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action<lb/> aforesaid according to law Judgment will be rendered against them<lb/> and their property sold to satisfy the same And It is further<lb/> ordered that a copy hereof be published in the missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rofe Neil</name></head>
<p>Petitioner by his attorney files an application<lb/> for a writ of Habeas Corpus and the Court<lb/> having heard the same refuses to grant the<lb/> prayer of the petition<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julia Buchanan</name></head>
<p>On motion It is ordered that a <unclear>subpoena</unclear><lb/> decrees <unclear>recum due</unclear> herein, directed to <name>Wm M.<lb/> McPheeten</name> execution of the will of <name>George Buch<lb/>anan</name> deceased, and Commanding him to pro<lb/>duce in Court the will of said <name>George Buchanan</name> deceased on<lb/> the twenty seventh day of the present month</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="236" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0239.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Bernardered Florey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Manning</name> et al</head>
<p>Separate answer of A S merritt filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob. S. Williams</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A. F. Shapleigh &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Corsen</name> and<lb/> <name>F. W. Bailey</name></head>
<p>This day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> and on his motion It is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come again<lb/> the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and also the Jury sworn herein and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this case pro<lb/>gressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, further<lb/> proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name><lb/> <name>Jules C. Kingsburn</name><lb/> <name>Davius H Cox</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Daniel G. Elifrity</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>On Bills Exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the par<lb/>ties by their respective attorney and by Consent<lb/> It is ordered that the Jury sworn herein be dis<lb/>charged and by further consent this case is sub<lb/>mitted to the Court upon all the issues therein<lb/> and the Court being advised of and concerning<lb/> all and singular the premises doth find that the defendant is indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiffs in the sum of one thousand and nineteen dollars<lb/> and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="237" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0240.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-24">Saturday April 24th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David B. Hill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and the<lb/> defendants <name>Helgenberg</name> and gronheim by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the said defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> herein but the defendant <name>Carlin</name> although duly summon<lb/>ed and solemnly called coming not, makes default wher<lb/>fore It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken against<lb/> him as confessed, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which said action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the defendant in the sum of six hun<lb/>dred and thirty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver Labadie</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> It is ordered by the Court that this case be<lb/> dismissed and the plaintiff by leave of Court<lb/> withdraws the exhibit by him filed herein and<lb/> leave upon file an attested copy thereof<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>328.72</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Landry Charleville</name><lb/> <name>Philip D Gordon</name><lb/> <name>George W Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and on his motion It is ordered that<lb/> this case as against defendant <name>charleville</name> be<lb/> dismissed and the plaintiff waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mits this case to the Court and the Court doth<lb/> doth find from the writing on which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants <name>gordon</name> an <name>Lynch</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of three hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Watter L. F. Gage</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Perry</name> &amp; <name>Chs Tallman</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by their attorney<lb/> It is ordered by the Court that this case<lb/> be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas F. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Autoine R. McNari</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court upon the petition and proofs<unclear>-</unclear> and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand<lb/> four hundred and thirty one dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="238" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0241.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also the<lb/> costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Moto use <name>Geo Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>On motion of the defendant by his<lb/> attorney leave <unclear>his</unclear> granted him to withdraw<lb/> his pleas herein and to file amended<lb/> pleas herein on or before the 29th day<lb/> of the present month<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Bernardired</unclear> Florey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>G. W. Manning</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to dissolve injunction filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come a<lb/>gain the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and also the Jury sworn herein, and<lb/> thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being concluded<lb/> the jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein<lb/> for the defendant and that the said defendant <name>waterman</name> had not<lb/> at the commencement of this suit fraudulently conveyed or assigned his<lb/> property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors as alleged in<lb/> the affidavit, and that he had not fraudulently concealed remover<lb/> or disposed of his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his<lb/> creditors. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that<lb/> the said plaintiff take nothing by the writ of attachment herein but<lb/> that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of<lb/> the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="239" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0242.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-26">Monday April 26th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W. Thatcher</name> gar.</head>
<p>Answer of garnishee filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Morrison</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Rufus J Lackland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and consent and agree that Judgment may be<lb/> rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against<lb/> the defendant for the sum of seven thousand five hun<lb/>dred and sixty six dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid consented to and also their costs therein expended and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Choutean Harrison</name> &amp; <name>Valle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>English Burns &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>By consent of Parties It is ordered that this cause<lb/> be dismissed at the cost of defendants</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John F Sill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The S Louis and Iron<lb/> Mountain Rail Road Co</name></head>
<p>For damages</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and consent and agree that a<lb/> Judgment may be rendered herein against said de<lb/>fendant and in favor of said plaintiff for the sum<lb/> al One hundred dollars It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to<lb/> and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>English Burns &amp; Co</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties. It is ordered<lb/> by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the<lb/> costs of said defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>W F. Adams</name></head>
<p>Deposition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Myers</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for security for costs filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by their attorney<lb/> leave is granted their to amend the petition<lb/> herein by inserting in the same the fol<lb/>lowing words ``That <name>B F. C. Champion</name> under<lb/> the style of <name>B. F. C. Champion <unclear>&amp;c;</unclear> executed &amp;c</name>''</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="240" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0243.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm M. Morrison</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Saml M Cartney</name></head>
<p>Motion to Strike out parts of answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Patrick McKenna</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Patrick Malloy</name></head>
<p>On account.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court and the Court having heard<lb/> the proofs and being advised of the premises doth find for the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of one dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear> and It is ordered that the costs here<lb/>in expended be taxed against the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Ryan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Franklin K. Louthan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Willaim P. Fenn</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their at<lb/>torneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the<lb/> Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and fifty three dollars and sixty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defend<lb/>ant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William H. Smith</name><lb/> <name>Isaac Laukershiun</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hobbo</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name> and<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their at<lb/>torney but the defendant comes not, whereupon the<lb/> plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs, wherefore the Court<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and seventy<lb/> two dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Betts</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt &amp;</name><lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective at<lb/>torneys and the defendants withdraw their answer and<lb/> thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty one dollars and sixty six<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Mewman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Mierson</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney It is ordered that an<lb/> alias summons returnable at the next term of this Court issue<lb/> herein and this case is Continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="241" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0244.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Jones</name><lb/> <name>Michael Jones</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John P. Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Maurice Steinbach</name></head>
<p>On Draft</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney but the defendant come not, whereupon the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing on which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of two hundred and forty dollars and twenty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs here<lb/>in expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C. Broadman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name><lb/> <name>August Fritschle</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry Pilkington</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the plea<lb/>ding and proofs that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty dollars<lb/> and fifty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George H Bussing</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George C Glass</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M Willing</name></head>
<p>On Note.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendant withdraws his<lb/> answer herein, and thereupon on motion It is<lb/> considered by the Court that the petition of the plain<lb/>tiff be taken for confessed. And the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which said action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty five dollars and seventy<lb/> four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Layton C. Dickenson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer herein, and thereupon the plaintiff waiving<lb/> a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the plead<lb/>ing and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing said on that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and eighteen<lb/> dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William McCully</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Mark W. Watson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Hassinger</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John OBrien</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer and thereupon on motion It is considered<lb/> by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed,</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="242" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0245.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>681.43</note>
<p>and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is brought that the<lb/> defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of. six hundred &amp; eighty one<lb/> dollars and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have<lb/> execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel Nouvse</name><lb/> <name>Peter Harvey</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and<lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respec<lb/>tive attorneys and the defendants withdraw their ans<lb/>wer herein, whereupon the plaintiffs waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court upon the petition and<lb/> proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and ninety nine dol<lb/>lars and ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that that<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Rogers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> and<lb/> <name>John D Taylor</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> seen and heard the same doth find that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred<lb/> and fifty seven dollars and forty cents, It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have<lb/> exeuction<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William B. Betts</name> and<lb/> <name>William H. Couway</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Ewing C. Ketchum</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Diefenbach</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Casper Smetter</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and this case being called for trial<lb/> and both parties being ready thereupon came a Jury<lb/> to wit <name>Henry T. Darrah</name> <name>Ferdinand Miller</name> <name>Daniel<lb/> Dillinger</name>, <name>Theodore Schulte</name>, <name>John H Banker</name> <name>George H.<lb/> Otto</name>, <name>Francis <unclear>Hafkemmeyer</unclear></name> <name>D W Stone</name>, <name>Chas Babbington</name><lb/> <name>George Handy</name>, <name>W. W Hauston</name> <name>William Magener</name> twleve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues<lb/> joined herein, there trial of this cause progressed and being concluded the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by his<lb/> suit but that the defendants go thereof hence without day and recover of the<lb/> plaintiffs their costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Newman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Mierson</name></head>
<p>By Consent of parties It is ordered that this case<lb/> be continued and that also summons issues against<lb/> the defendant, returnable at next term<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="243" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0246.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1069.50</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Trumbull</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer herein and the plaintiff waiving a Jury sub<lb/>nuts this case to the Court and the Court having seen<lb/> and heard the proofs doth find, from the writing on which this action is foun<lb/>ded, that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one<lb/> thousand and sixty nine dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Logan D Dameron</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John W. Carroll</name><lb/> <name>Richard F. Sass</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Wiley J. Stratton</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein.<lb/> And the plainitff waiving a Jury submits this case to<lb/> the Court and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action to founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One hundred one forty<lb/> three dollars and ninety five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form a<lb/>foresaid by the Court found and this costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas L. Salisbury</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants <unclear>withdraw</unclear><lb/> their answer herein, and the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants one indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred<lb/> and fifty two dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended<lb/> and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>For value <unclear>received</unclear><lb/> <unclear>I</unclear> assign this<lb/> <unclear>Judgment</unclear> to <name>Robt A. Wott</name><lb/> <date when="1868-10-13">Oct 13. 1868</date></dateline>
<signed><name>Geo, Bailey</name></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>Jes v J. Ssinan.</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
<closer>
<dateline>For Value <unclear>re ed</unclear><lb/> <unclear>I</unclear> assign this<lb/> <unclear>Judgment</unclear> to<lb/> <name><unclear>Basil Hearto,</unclear></name><lb/> <date when="1868-10-13">Oct 13. 1868</date></dateline>
<signed><name><unclear>Robt A Natt</unclear></name></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>est J. Louis</unclear></name> <unclear>et al</unclear></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Barley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer herein, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury<lb/> submits this case to the Court, and the Court doth<lb/> find from the writing upon which said action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and<lb/> and ninety nine dollars and seventy cents, with interest thereon at the<lb/> rate of ten per centum per annum from this date until paid. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="244" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0247.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohol</name><lb/> <name>James Kinkead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by<lb/> their attorneys but the defendants coming not<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court upon the petition answer and proofs<lb/> and the Court having seen and heard the same<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand two hundred<lb/> and thirty one dollars and seventy five cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein ex<lb/>pended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name><lb/> <name>James Kinkead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> </head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorneys but the defendants come not, and the<lb/> plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the petition answer and proof and<lb/> the Court having seen and heard the same doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of Five hundred and sixty four dol<lb/>lars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and their costs and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alfred M. Waterman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court, and the Court doth find that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of five hundred and fifty six dollars and fourteen cents, It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. McPheeters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> <name>Anapias Rice</name><lb/> <name>David W. Graham</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their<lb/> attorneys and withdraw their answer herein, and<lb/> the plaintiff by his attorney comes and it appear<lb/>ing to the Court that there is no answer herein, and<lb/> the defendants although called, Coming not makes<lb/> default. It is therefore on motion considered by the Court that the petition of<lb/> the plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed, and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hun<lb/>dred and thirty dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="245" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0248.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Sr Cin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mary Sr Cin</name></head>
<p><unclear>for</unclear> Divorce</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and this cause coming on for trial<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and being advised<lb/> of and concerning the pleading and proofs doth find that the defendant<lb/> as an injured and innocent party and that she is entitled to a divorce as<lb/> prayed for in her answer and crossbill. It is therefore considered adjudg<lb/>ed and decreed by the Court that the defendant be absolutely and forever divorced<lb/> from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the plaintiff and that<lb/> she be restored to all the right and privileges of an unmarried woman</p>
<p>It is ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="246" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0249.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-27">Tuesday April 27th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Langedorf</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Isaac Rosenstein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David P. Thomas</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the par<lb/>ties by <name>Messrs Krum</name> and <name>Harding</name> attorneys<lb/> and file a statement from which it appears<lb/> that the defendant confesses an indebtedness to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and sixteen dollars, and<lb/> consents and agrees that judgment may be entered against him<lb/> and in favor of the plaintiffs for said sum It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defend<lb/>ants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed to and thereof<lb/> have execution as also for the costs herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Petere Choutean <unclear>Jr.</unclear></name><lb/> <name>James Harrison</name> and<lb/> <name>Felix Valli</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> It is ordered that this case be dismissed<lb/> at the cost of the plaintiffs and that execution<lb/> issue therefor<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John M. Cashman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sylvester Ball</name> et al</head>
<p>Report of Commissioners filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis J. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry G. Hamlin</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> <name>N. Holmes Esq</name> and file a statement from which<lb/> it appears to the Court that the defendant confesses<lb/> that he is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and ninety one<lb/> dollars and sixty three cents, <unclear>and</unclear> consents and agrees that Judgment there<lb/>for may be entered against <unclear>him</unclear> and in favor of the plaintiff. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed to and thereof have execution<lb/> as also for his costs herein expended</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julia Buchanan</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and consent and agree that judgment may be entered here<lb/>in against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for<lb/> the sum of Eight hundred and eighty nine dollars and seventy five cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the parties consented to and his costs herein appended and have exeuction therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="247" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0250.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hugh Boyle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis S. Buchanan</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and agree and consent that Judg<lb/>ment may be entered against the defendant and in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff for the sum of one hundred. And twenty four dollars and<lb/> eighteen cents<unclear>.</unclear> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to<lb/> and there costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear> Execution<lb/> Stayed until the <date when="1859-01-01">1st day of January 1859</date>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Krum</name> &amp; <name>Harding <unclear>asses &amp;c</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B. Watson</name> et al</head>
<p>2 cases.<lb/> Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>For value <unclear>Rear<lb/> &amp;</unclear> assign this<lb/> judgment to<lb/> <name><unclear>Anne L Jdunt</unclear></name>. <date when="1869-04-07">April 7. 1869</date></dateline>
<signed><name><unclear>Michael L. Kelly</unclear></name></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>Jes.</unclear></name> &amp; <name><unclear>J Lewis</unclear></name> <unclear>et al</unclear></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Michael S. Kelly</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and the defendants<lb/> withdraw their answer. herein, and upon motion<lb/> of the plaintiff and the defendants although called<lb/> coming not It is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken<lb/> for confessed, and the Court doth find from the writing this<lb/> action is founded upon that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty seven Dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recov<lb/>er of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Mosery J Levi</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Solomon J Levi</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Goode</name></head>
<p>Continued by Consent</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Dwight Durkee</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name><lb/> <name>Henry M. Woodward</name><lb/> <name>Watter E. Sell</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Sheppand</name><lb/> <name>John S. Thomson</name><lb/> <name>William H White</name> and<lb/> <name>Hiram A Pryor</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defend<lb/>ants by their attorney and withdraw their<lb/> answer filed herein, and the plaintiff by<lb/> their attorney come, but the defendants<lb/> make default, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the petition of the plain<lb/>tiff be taken for confessed. And the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> an indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> nine hundred and twenty four dollars and ninety five cents, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="248" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0251.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joel D Smith</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John J. Mitchell</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant <name>John<lb/> J Mitchell</name> by his attorney and enters his appear<lb/>ance to this action and Joins in the demurrer<lb/> filed by the other defendants</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm A Hargadine</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry T. Darrah</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney but the defendant <name>waterman</name>, although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called comes not<lb/> but makes default, Wherefore on motion It<lb/> is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff as<lb/> to said defendant <name>Waterman</name> be taken for confessed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Roland H Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McCloy</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert S. McGhee</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George G Bast</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by<lb/> their attorneys and withdraw their answer<lb/> herein, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes<lb/> but the defendants make default, and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety seven dollars<lb/> and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name> &amp;<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Webb</name> &amp; <name>McCullough</name></head>
<p>Answer of defendants filed and case continued<lb/> by consent<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>F. E. Baumgarten</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louisa A Baumgarten</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Haviland</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Chas F Baker &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Continued on affidavit at cost of the<lb/> defendants</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles S. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their attor<lb/>ney and withdraw their answer and the plaintiff comes<lb/> but the defendants make default wherefore It is ordered<lb/> that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand six hundred and fifty<lb/> seven dollars and forty one cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="249" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0252.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>inform aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this<lb/> behalf expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name><lb/> <name>Walter H. Dorsett</name><lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name><lb/> <name>Richard H. Stevens</name><lb/> <name>Robert W Walton</name><lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but The defendant <name>Robert Walton</name> <unclear>altho</unclear><lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes<lb/> default, wherefore on motion It is ordered by the Court<lb/> that the petition of the plaintiff as to said defendant<lb/> be taken for confessed, and the plaintiff waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this case to the Court, and the<lb/> Court doth find that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thou<lb/>sand and fifty dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elias Abraham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Raphael Keiler</name><lb/> <name>Adolphus Isaacs</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Keiler</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty<lb/> two dollars and eighty eight cents it is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sheridan C Hunt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Father James Henry</name><lb/> Garnishee of <name>Cartan</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> and acknowledge full and entire satisfac<lb/>tion of the Judgment obtained by their<lb/> against Father <name>James Henry</name> Garnishe<lb/> of<unclear>-</unclear> <name>Cartan</name><unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Renben J. Guthridge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank W Fillay</name><lb/> <unclear>Garce</unclear> of <name>Jas McFadden</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> but the garnishee although duly summoned<lb/> and Solemnly called comes not. It is<lb/> therefore on motion considered by the Court<lb/> that the interrogatories filed against him <unclear rend="strikethrough">be</unclear><lb/> taken for confessed and that inquiry of the indebtedness of the said<lb/> Garnishee to the defendant be hereafter had</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Renben J Gathridge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles Sells</name> <unclear>Garce</unclear><lb/> of <name>Jas McFadden</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the garnishee although duly summon<lb/>ed and solemnly called <unclear>comes</unclear> not, It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the interrogatories filed against<lb/> him be taken for confessed and that inquiry of the<lb/> indebtedness of the said garnishee to the defendant be here after had</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="250" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0253.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter<lb/> of<lb/> The Steamboat <name>Orim</name></head>
<p>Constable report filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A M Waterman</name></head>
<p>Additional reasons in support of motion<lb/> for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A M Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George N Beard</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Eleager J Beard</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the pleadings and proofs that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred<lb/> and sixty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs<lb/> in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Richard Ivers</name> and<lb/> <name>Theodore Hequembourg</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defend<lb/>ants by their attorney and withdraw<lb/> their answer herein, and the plaintiff<lb/> comes but the defendant coming not and<lb/> three being no answer herein It is considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs petition be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty eight<lb/> dollars and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Company</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Holliday</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is<lb/> ordered that alias summons issue<lb/> against defendant <name>Welcker</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Ann Coover</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Martin O. Walker</name> and<lb/> <name>James Moore</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication</p>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff, by her<lb/> attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be<lb/> notified that a Civil action has been Commenc<lb/>ed against them for the sum of five thousand<lb/> dollars, and on account of the death of the husband <name>George W Coover</name> by the<lb/> careless driving and upsetting of one of defendants stage coaches on the <date when="1857-05-29">29th<lb/> of May 1857</date>, in Benton County Missouri whilst said <name>George W Coover</name></p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="251" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0254.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>was a passenger on said stage coach, and that unless they appear at the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis, within<lb/> and for the county of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on<lb/> or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according<lb/> to law, judgment will be rendered against them. And it is further ord<lb/>ered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the St Louis<lb/> Missouri Democrat</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Walter J. Hatch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred Willoughby</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at the<lb/> cast of plaintiff an that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Greene</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Cone</name> and<lb/> <name>Auguste Cone</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the par<lb/>ties by their respective attorney and this case coming<lb/> on for trial upon the plea in abatement herein there<lb/>upon came a Jury viz <name>George Handy</name> <name>John Betts</name><lb/> <name>Z. J. Knatt</name>, <name>Gerhaid H Snedh</name> of <name>John E Hen</name> <name>August Bade<lb/>man</name>, <name>James M. Franciscus</name>, <name>J. F. Comstock</name>, <name>John Wasson</name>, <name>al<lb/>bert Blackwill</name> <name>Frank H Greif</name>. <name>Edward W Crapster</name> twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and<lb/> truly to try the issues joined upon said plea in abatement the trial of<lb/> this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of<lb/> adjournment further proceeding are continued until tomorrow<lb/> morning at ten Oclock - Court adjourned to same time<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="252" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0255.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-28">Wednesday April 28th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph W Greene</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Cone</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>August Cone</name></head>
<p>On note and Plea in abatement.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and also the Jury<lb/> sworn herein, and thereupon the third of this case<lb/> progressed, and being concluded the Jurors<lb/> aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues for the plain<lb/>tiff and that the defendants at the time of the bringing of this Suit<lb/> had fraudulently conveyed or assigned their property or effects so as<lb/> to hinder or delay their creditors. And the defendants failing<lb/> to answer further herein. And coming. Not although solemnly called<lb/> make default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plain<lb/>tiff be taken for confessed and the court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of nine hundred and forty two dollars and twelve cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and there costs herein ex<lb/>pended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name><lb/> <name>James Kinkead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and<lb/> on motion and the Court being satisfied that the<lb/> amount of the Judgment entered herein on the 26th<lb/> instant is erroneous, It is ordered that the same be set<lb/> aside, and the Court being now hereof fully advised<lb/> doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiffs in the sum of two thousand and seventy two dollars<lb/> and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The United States<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert C. Gordon</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant by his<lb/> attorney and withdraws his answer filed herein<unclear>.</unclear><lb/> And the plaintiff by his attorney comes but the<lb/> defendant altho called comes not but makes<lb/> default It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be<lb/> taken for confessed, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and nine dollars It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and <unclear>his</unclear> costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Christopher</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is<lb/> ordered that an alias summons returnable to next term be<lb/> issued against defendant <name>Christopher</name></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="253" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0256.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver T. Bragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit of defendant <name>Burrows</name> for continuance<lb/> filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Bazil W Alexander</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer to the plaintiffs petition and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of one thousand and fifty six dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein ex<lb/>pended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman Gelpeke</name><lb/> <name>Frederick W. Keretger</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Adolph Reichelt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenz Schaffler</name> and<lb/> <name>Christian Schaffler</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and the defend<lb/>ants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs<lb/> petition and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of eight hundred and fifty four dollars forty eight cents It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles K Bacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. Plant &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>Samuel Plant</name></head>
<p>On Account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and thereupon come a Jury<lb/> viz <name>Henry T. Darrah</name> <name>Ferdinand Miller</name>, <name>Daniel<lb/> Dillinger</name> <name>Theodore Schulte</name>, <name>John H Banker</name><lb/> <name>Francis Hafkenmeyer</name> <name>D W Stone</name> <name>Charles Babbington</name> <name>Aaron Jacks</name><lb/> <name>J. T Knatt</name> <name>William Magener</name>, <name>George H. Ott</name> twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly<lb/> to try the issues joined between the parties, the trial progressed, du<lb/>ring which the plaintiff <unclear>days</unclear> he will not further prosecute his<lb/> suit in this behalf, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that defendants<lb/> go hereof hence without day and recover of plaintiff their costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear> And an motion of plaintiff<lb/> he has leave to move to set said nonsuit aside,<unclear>-</unclear> Motion to set<lb/> aside nonsuit filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William R. Colladay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alonzo Cutter</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and the defendant with<lb/>draws his answer. And the Court doth found from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="254" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0257.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>four hundred and sixty seven dollars, and twenty five cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Razin Davidge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his<lb/> answer herein and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand one hundred and<lb/> twelve dollars and fifty seven cents, It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George P. Fein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Sigmund Hirshfeldt</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the proofs that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand one<lb/> hundred and nine dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward J Gay</name><lb/> <name>William T. Gay</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Edwards</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Heywood</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Morris</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court and that Court doth<lb/> find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and<lb/> fifty nine dollars and twelve cents, It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs here<lb/>in expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Elizabeth Clark</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer to the plaintiffs petition, and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand two hundred and five dollars<lb/> and seventy four cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per<lb/> annum until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid an form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and also her costs and charges in and about<lb/> this suite expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="255" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0258.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Janssig</name><lb/> <name>Moris Janssig</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Amelia Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Adolph L. Kornick</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and eighty four dollars and eighty three cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lewis E. Jones</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hint</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer, and the Court doth find from the writing on<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand<lb/> two hundred and ninety one dollars and sixty eight cents.<unclear>-</unclear> It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also<lb/> his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear> and it is further<lb/> ordered that said sum bear interest at the rate of ten per centum<lb/> per annum from the date hereof until paid</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Shea</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name><lb/> <name>Augustus Fritschle</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George W Campbell</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and <unclear rend="strikethrough">the de</unclear>fendants withdraw their<lb/> answer, and the court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the de<lb/>fendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of One thousand and two dollars and twenty five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amadee Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name><lb/> <name>G. J. Barnett</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this case be dismissed at the costs of defend<lb/>ant <name>Gilpin</name> and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Moffatt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. S. Sanham</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to strike out defendants answer<lb/> and for judgment on petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S Thompson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J H McCullough</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by Consent</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo to<lb/> use of <name>Cone</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Green</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued upon affidavit filed<lb/> at the cost of the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="256" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0259.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Boatmans Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> and the Court having heard the proofs<lb/> doth find that the defendants are in<lb/>debted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and seven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs<lb/> therein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Philip C Mauro</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and the defend<lb/>ants withdraw their answer, and the plaintiff<lb/> submits the case to the Court, and the Court doth<lb/> find from the proofs that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty nine dollars<lb/> and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the court found and his costs and thereof have execution and it<lb/> is further ordered that the said sum bear interest at the rate of<lb/> ten per centum per annum from date until paid</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>For Value received we assign<lb/> this <unclear>paidsment</unclear> to <name><unclear>Corld</unclear> L Benoist</name><lb/> this <date when="1871-11-21">21st day of O Nober 1871</date>.</dateline>
<signed><name>S. H. Benoist</name> <unclear>siae</unclear></signed>
<signed><name><unclear>M C Sanguin</unclear></name> <unclear>sias</unclear></signed>
<signed><unclear>Attest</unclear> <name><unclear>Merrisak</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sanguinette H Benoist</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Marshall Sanguinette</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and the Court having<lb/> heard and being advised of and Concerning the<lb/> motion to strike out the answer of defendants<lb/> doth Sustain the same and order that said<lb/> answer be <unclear>strick</unclear> out, and the plaintiffs sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand nine hundred and sixty two<lb/> dollars and eleven cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have<lb/> execution<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attor<lb/>ney and file herein a remittitur of the sum<lb/> of twenty dollars and seventy two cents of<lb/> the Judgment entered against the defendant<lb/> herein on the twenty third day of the present month</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Rogers</name><lb/> <name>James Sanderson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William L. Salisbury</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant <name>Salisbury</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> solemnly called, comes not, but makes default, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the petition<lb/> of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed<lb/> and on motion of the plaintiff it is further</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="257" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0260.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>ordered that alias summons issue herein against the defendants<lb/> <name>Charles Royers</name> and <name>Jas. Sanderson</name> returnable to the next term of<lb/> this Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louis F. Curties</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiff by his at<lb/>torney but the defendant <unclear>altho</unclear> solemnly called comes<lb/> not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the case<lb/> to the Court, and the Court having heard and being advised<lb/> of the premises doth fired that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five thousand six hundred and eighty three dollars and thirty six cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defend<lb/>ant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court Found and his costs<lb/> in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> <name>Thomas V Strode</name><lb/> <name>Anaclet L. Lacroix</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D. Page</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney and on their motion<lb/> it is ordered that this case as to defend<lb/>ant <name>Bacon</name> be dismissed<unclear>.</unclear> And the def<lb/>endant page by his attorney comes and the<lb/> parties consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and<lb/> against the defendant for the sum of five hundred and seventy<lb/> one dollars and twenty five cents It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the parties consented to and their costs<lb/> herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Grossbeck</name><lb/> <name>John Kilgrove</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John C Culbartson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange Now at this day come<lb/> the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and consent and agree that judgment<lb/> may be entered herein in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs and against the defendant for<lb/> the sum of two hundred and ninety one<lb/> dollars and seventy Cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid consented and their costs of sent and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>State Marine Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Callaway <unclear>hining</unclear> &amp; Manufacturing Co</name></head>
<p>On Motion it is ordered that alias<lb/> summons issue against the defendant<lb/> and this case be continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>State fire and Marine Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name></head>
<p>Continued at cost of defendant<lb/> as upon affidavit</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Quaker Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Wheaton</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued at cost of defendant as<lb/> on affidavit</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="258" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0261.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Commercial Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name></head>
<p>Continued at costs of defendant as an<lb/> affidavit</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pennsylvania Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued as an affidavit at cost<lb/> of defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holliday</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered that alias summons<lb/> issue herein against the defendants who<lb/> have not been served with process<lb/> Court adjourned until tomorrow morning ten O Clock</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="259" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0262.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-29">Thursday April 29th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo<lb/> to use of <name>Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Beny F. Farrar</name></head>
<p>On motion of the defendant by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered that he have six days further time<lb/> in which to plead herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Leicester Babcock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheatow</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph S Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants<lb/> by their attorney and withdraw their answer<lb/> herein, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes<lb/> and submits this case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of seven hundred and sixty nine dollars and seventy five<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Saint Louis Building &amp;<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Gage</name><lb/> <name>James S. Gage</name><lb/> and <name>Jashua Fine</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the attorney<lb/> for the defendants, <name>Messro Knox</name> &amp; <name>Kellogg</name><lb/> and State to the Court that they had no<lb/> authority to enter an appearance here<lb/>in for <name>James D Gage</name> and that the<lb/> appearance herein before entered for him<lb/> was by mistake, whereupon on motion of plaintiff attorney the<lb/> name of said <name>James D Gage</name> is stricken from the answer and<lb/> this suit as against him is dismissed. And the defendants by<lb/> their attorney move the Court to continue this case on the ground<lb/> that plaintiff has failed to comply with rule no 29 of this Court<lb/> which motion the Court doth overrule, and defendants except</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David R. Risley</name><lb/> <name>Saw Hager</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Risley</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defend<lb/>ants by their attorney and withdraw<lb/> their answer, and the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney comes and submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five<lb/> hundred and thirty four dollars and twenty cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit<lb/> and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="260" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0263.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel B Wiggins</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Smith</name><lb/> <name>Elias Wilmot</name><lb/> <name>Jacob Bensberg</name><lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Otto J gel</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney and on his motion it is order<lb/>ed that this case as against defendants<lb/> <name>John Smith</name> and <name>Jacob Bensberg</name> be<lb/> dismissed, and the other defendants by their<lb/> attorneys come, and the connect for the<lb/> plaintiff and defendants consent and agree<lb/> that Judgment may be entered against defendants <name>Elias Wilmot</name><lb/> <name>Gerhard Bensberg</name> and <name>Otto J gel</name> for the sum of twelve hundred<lb/> and thirty nine dollars and forty cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid agreed and his costs of suit and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert K Weight</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M. Willing</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit filed<unclear>.</unclear><lb/> Bond, with Security, for cost filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney it is ordered that this case<lb/> as against defendant <name>Robert A. Walton</name><lb/> be dismissed, and this case continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>1166,66</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Hughes</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Largue</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>This day come the defendants by<lb/> their attorney and withdraw their answer<lb/> herein and the plaintiffs by their attorney come<lb/> and submit this case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing on which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of Eleven hundred and sixty six dollars<lb/> and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and have<lb/> execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Hughes</name> and<lb/> <name>Thomas Marshall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants<lb/> by their attorney and withdraw their answer<lb/> and the plaintiffs by their attorney come<lb/> and submit this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty form<lb/> dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his<lb/> costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="261" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0264.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George Brook</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>J W. Sherman</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> It is ordered that this case be dismissed at<lb/> the costs of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants answer to plaintiff amended<lb/> petition petition, and counter claim filed.<lb/> Demurrer to counter claim filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C S. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas D Ford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Beard</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Plaintiff by their attorney <unclear>course</unclear><lb/> and withdraw the motion heretofore filed<lb/> by their to strike out certain specified<lb/> parts of the answer filed by the defendant<lb/> herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> to the use of <name>Meyer Goldsoll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B Watson</name><lb/> <name>Joshua B Brant</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. McPheeters</name></head>
<p>Petition for Damages</p>
<p>Now at this day come the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> this case being called for trial, thereup<lb/>on cause a Jury viz <name>George Handy</name><lb/> <name>John Betts</name> <name>W W Hanston</name> <name>Gerhard H.<lb/> Suedhoff</name> <name>John E Henn</name> <name>August Bode<lb/>man</name>, <name>Theodore Schutte</name> <name>J. F Comstock</name> <name>John Wasson</name>, <name>Albert<lb/> Blackwell</name> <name>Frank H Greefe</name> <name>Edward W. Grapeter</name>, twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well<lb/> and truly to try the issues joined herein, the trial progressed<lb/> but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, further<lb/> proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned to same time<unclear>-</unclear>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="262" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0265.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-04-30">Friday April 30th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Robertson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Alt</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and on his motion it is order<lb/>ed that this case be dismissed at the<lb/> cost of the plaintiff and that execu<lb/>tion issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri to<lb/> the use of <name>Meyer Goldsoll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William B. Watson</name><lb/> <name>Joshua B. Brant</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. McPeeters</name></head>
<p>Petition for Damages</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the<lb/> parties by their respective attorneys and<lb/> also the Jury sworn herein and<lb/> the plaintiff by his attorney says he will<lb/> not further prosecute this suit. It is<lb/> therefore ordered by the Court that the Jury<lb/> sworn herein be discharged, and it is considered and adjudged by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that<lb/> the defendants go thereof hence without day and recover of the plaintiff<lb/> their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear><lb/> and an motion of plaintiff he has leave to move to set aside the non<lb/>suit herein. Motion to set aside nonsuit filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mathew S. Maloney</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of defendants by their attorney it<lb/> is ordered that a Commission to take deposi<lb/>tions in the state of Louisiana on the part<lb/> of said defendants, issue herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington F. Adams</name></head>
<p>Motion and affidavit for Continuance filed, and<lb/> the Court having heard and being advised doth<lb/> Overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>R J Harck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Provost</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas H Wist</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Stewart</name></head>
<p>On account</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and consent and<lb/> agree that judgment may be entered herein in<lb/> favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of<lb/> One hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid consented to and also his costs and charges in this<lb/> behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="263" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0266.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David C. Tandy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by his attorney and also the defendant <name>Papin</name><lb/> by his attorney but the defendant <name>Wheaton</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called coming<lb/> not makes default wherefore it is considered by the Court that the pe<lb/>tition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, and the defend<lb/>ant <name>Papin</name> by his attorney withdraw his answer herein, whereby this<lb/> suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of two hundred and sixty eight dollars and six cents, It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert K Wright</name><lb/> <name>Horace J Smith</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomton Pike</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George M Willing</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George M Willing</name> &amp;</head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> the defendants withdraw their answer herein<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended<lb/> and the plaintiff submit the case to the Court<lb/> and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars<lb/> and seventy cents It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit<lb/> and have execution therefor.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Moffitt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Schrocter</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham</name><lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name><lb/> <name>William C. Woodson</name><lb/> <name>William P. Fenn</name><lb/> <name>Richard H Stevens</name><lb/> <name>Walter H Dorsett</name><lb/> <name>Robert A. Walton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John McDowell</name></head>
<p>Petition</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff this case as to defendant<lb/> <name>Robert A Walton</name> is ordered to be dismis<lb/>sed, and the Court having considered the<lb/> motion to strike out the answer of<lb/> defendants doth sustain the same and<lb/> doth order that said answer be stricken<lb/> out and this action being now un<lb/>defended the plaintiffs submit the<lb/> same to the Court upon the petition<lb/> and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand<lb/> six hundred and eighty one dollars and eighty cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs in this suit expended and thereof<lb/> have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="264" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0267.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State<lb/> of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name><lb/> <name>John Kirkpatrick</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Eueas McFaul</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and waiving<lb/> a jury submit this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the proofs that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of six thousand three hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> her costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Samuel J Hyde</name><lb/> <name>Edward C Pike</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Erskine</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver T. Bragg</name><lb/> <name>Michael Burrows</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court hav<lb/>ing seen and heard the same doth find<lb/> therefrom that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred<lb/> and forty dollars and forty cents, It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Abigail Walther</name><lb/> vs 629 <unclear>Iet</unclear> 3.58<lb/> <name>Charles F. Walther</name></head>
<p>for Divorce</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and submit this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and the proofs<lb/> and the Court having heard the same and being satisfied therefrom<lb/> that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured person, doth order<lb/> adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced<lb/> from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant<lb/> and be restored to all the right and privileges of an unmarried<lb/> person, and also to her maiden name to wit <name>Abrigail Tiernan</name>. And<lb/> it is ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this suit, and also<lb/> fifty dollars counsel fees for the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Buck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and the defend<lb/>ants withdraw their answer, whereby this<lb/> suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff<lb/> submits the same to the Court and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the defendants in the sum of Eleven hundred<lb/> and twenty four dollars and thirty seven cents, It is therefore con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of Suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="265" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0268.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Buck</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Michael</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended, and the<lb/> plaintiff submit the case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred<lb/> and fifty four dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benjamin Leibert</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John B Ganter</name></head>
<p>An account</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but the defendant comes not, and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the defendants is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy four<lb/> dollars and eighteen Cents, It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman</name> <unclear>adw</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William F Denny</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff by attorney<lb/> he had leave granted to file an amended<lb/> petition herein and this case is continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Authorny</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Filygibbon</name></head>
<p>On bills exchange</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard and Con<lb/>sidered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty six dol<lb/>lars and ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit<lb/> and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Holines</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John H Dickey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name><lb/> <name>James H Whitelan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Robert Scott</name></head>
<p>On Note<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> but the defendants <name>B F Beasley</name> and <name>James H Whitelaw</name><lb/> altho duly summoned and solemnly called come not<lb/> but make default, wherefore it is considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff petition be taken against them as confes<lb/>sed, and the defendant <name>scott</name> by his attorney comes<lb/> and withdraws his answer herein, whereby this action remains unde<lb/>fended and the plaintiff submit this case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="266" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0269.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of<lb/> three hundred and fifty five dollars and eight cents, It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defend<lb/>ants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and their costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
<p>Petition</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defend<lb/>ant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and seventy<lb/> six dollars and sixty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The S Louis Buildings &amp;<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James L. Gage</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joshua Fine</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by her<lb/> attorney but the defendants coming not the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court<lb/> upon the petition answer and proofs and<lb/> the Court having heard the same doth find that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and<lb/> thirty four dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and her costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas Cohen</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis H Manter</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defend<lb/>ant comes not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and<lb/> one dollars and sixty six cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten percentum per<lb/>annum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Joory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Ezra O. English</name></head>
<p>Petition</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the<lb/> Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> having heard the same doth find that the defendants are<lb/> indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty three dollars<lb/> and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> his costs and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Devine</name> et al vs <name>Louis Davis</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be continued</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="267" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0270.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Warren</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney<lb/> but the defendant <name>Warren</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> solemnly called comes not wherefore It is considered<lb/> by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken<lb/> against him as confessed, and the defendant <name>Campbell</name><lb/> by his attorney comes and withdraws his answer herein, whereby this suit remains<lb/> undefended and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Seven hundred<lb/> and fifty dollars and seven cents It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof<lb/> have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name><lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Benjamin F C Champion</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the proofs<lb/> that the defendants Are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety two dollars and fifty<lb/> nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emannel de Hodeamont</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and the defend<lb/>ants by their attorney withdraw their answer<lb/> herein whereby this suit remains undefend<lb/>ed and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writings upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand<lb/> one hundred and seventy eight dollars and eighty two cents. One thous<lb/>and one hundred and one dollars and fifty five cents of said sum<lb/> to bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this date<lb/> until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and his costs of suit and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. S. Lanham</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo to<lb/> use of <name>Peters</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>L. M. Shruve</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="268" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0271.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Rolker</name><lb/> <name>Augustus Mollmann</name><lb/> <name>Alphouse Perier</name> and<lb/> <name>Felix Cateaux</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Increase Miller</name><lb/> <name>William G. Miller</name> and<lb/> <name>Vincent Boisaubin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and on motion of<lb/> the plaintiffs it is ordered that this case<lb/> be dismissed as to defendant <name>William G.<lb/> Miller</name> and plaintiffs by leave of Court amend<lb/> their petition by striking out the name of<lb/> <name>William G. Miller</name> and inserting the word<lb/> <name>Vincent</name> instead of the letter `V' before the<lb/> name of <name>Boisaubon</name>, and the parties waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs<lb/> that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and thirty five dollars and forty eighty cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name> et al</head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed<lb/> at the cost of defendant be <name>L. Gilpin</name> and<lb/> that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Bonner</name> and<lb/> <name>James M. Corbilt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ezro O. English</name> <name>John <unclear>Burns</unclear></name><lb/> and <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and by consent it is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed at the cost of defendants and that exe<lb/>cution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Madden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Moore</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney and on his motion it is ordered that this case<lb/> be dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that<lb/> execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B Ghio</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William L. Cooke</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name></head>
<p>On Note.-</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys<lb/> and the defendants by their attorney withdraw their<lb/> answer herein whereby this suit remains undefended, and<lb/> the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth<lb/> find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are undebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand two hundred and ten dollars and<lb/> six cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this<lb/> date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and also his costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James A Monks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer herein, whereby this suit remains inde<lb/>fended; and the plaintiff submits the case to the</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="269" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0272.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff the seen of sixteen hun<lb/>dred and twenty three dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and have execution therefore<unclear>-</unclear> and<lb/> it is further ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of<lb/> ten per centum per annum from this date until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff sub<lb/>mits the case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are undebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and three<lb/> dollars and fifty five cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>-</unclear> and<lb/> it is further ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of<lb/> ten per centum per annum from date until paid<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fidelis C. Sharpe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants with<lb/>draw their answer whereby this suit remains<lb/> undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is foun<lb/>ded that he defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and one dollars and seventy cents. it is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and<lb/> have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward s. Wheaton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer whereby this suit remains undefend<lb/>ed, and the plaintiff submits this case to the<lb/> Court and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of four hundred and six dollars and seventy cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of<lb/> suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fidelio C Sharpe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorney and on motion of the plaintiff<lb/> this suit is ordered to be dismissed as to the note<lb/> drawn by defendant <name>Wm M Cooke</name> <unclear>suit</unclear> upon in this</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="270" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0273.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>petition and the plaintiff by leave of Court, and leaving a Copy of said note<lb/> withdraws the same, and the defendants come and withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of one thousand and eighty two dollars and ninety cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defend<lb/>ants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs<lb/> of suit and thereof have execution. And it is further ordered that this<lb/> Judgment bear interest from this date until paid at the rate of ten per cen<lb/>tum per Annum</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel McCartney</name><lb/> <name>Thomas V. Strode</name> and<lb/> <name>Anactet L. Lacroix</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. William Streit</name> and<lb/> <name>Andres Reinstadler</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and<lb/> the plaintiffs submit the case to the Court and the<lb/> Court doth find from the writing upon which this<lb/> action is founded that the defendants are indebt<lb/>ed to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty five dollars and sixty cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit, and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Morrison</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Rufus J. Lackland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>On Draft</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and this case being called for<lb/> trial thereupon came a Jury viz <name>Frank H Greefe</name><lb/> <name>Henry T. Darrah</name>, <name>Ferdinand Miller</name>, <name>Daniel Dilling<lb/>er</name> <name>John H Banker</name>, <name>George H Otto</name>, <name>Francis Hafkenmeyer</name>, <name>D W Stone</name>, <name>Charles<lb/> Babbington</name>, <name>Aaron Jacks</name>, <name>Z. T. Knott</name> and <name>William Magener</name> twelve good<lb/> and lawful men who being duly sworn well and truly to try the issues<lb/> joined between the parties, the trial hereof progressed but not being<lb/> concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceedings herein an<lb/> continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned to same time
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="271" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0274.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-01">Saturday May 1st 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Ann Wright</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Howard F. Christy</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside default filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Rolker</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Increase C. Miller</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The S Louis Buildings &amp;<lb/> Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Gage</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Shulty</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion to set aside Judgment by default and<lb/> affidavit in support thereof filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Morrison</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Rufus J. Lackland</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>On draft</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this case progressed and being<lb/> concluded the Jurors aforesaid on their oaths aforesaid find for the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seventy one dollars and thirty<lb/> five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury as aforesaid<lb/> found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Hargadine</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry T. Darrah</name>,<lb/> <name>Chester W Pomeroy</name> and<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two thousand eight hundred and forty six<lb/> dollars and twenty five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until monday morning next at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="272" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0275.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-03">Monday May 3<unclear>d</unclear> 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William M. Stephenson</name></head>
<p>Appraisement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alraham Kramer</name> and <name>Adolph Loth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>David P. Thomas</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and file a written<lb/> statement herein from which it appears to the Court that the defendant confesses<lb/> that he is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and eighty six<lb/> dollars and forty two cents, and consents that Judgment may be rendered against<lb/> him and in favor of the plaintiffs for the same, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid confessed and their costs herein and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Septimus Levering</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendant withdraws his answer herein whereby<lb/> this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the<lb/> case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred<lb/> and ninety three dollars sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B Davis</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Job Stockton White</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving<lb/> a jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defend<lb/>ant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and ten dollars and<lb/> eighty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. Brown</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Wilson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John H. Avery</name></head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered<lb/> that this case he dismissed at the cost of plaintiff<lb/> and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Gass</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. B. Merritt</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney they<lb/> have leave to withdraw the drafts said upon by<lb/> leaving a receipt therefor and the plaintiffs withdraw<lb/> the said drafts and receipt to the clerk for the same</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="273" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0276.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jonas Moore</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> and<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer where<lb/>by this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff sub<lb/>mits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from<lb/> the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and ninety four dollars and sixteen cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof<lb/> have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James T. Death</name><lb/> <name>Absolom Death</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Wilson Death</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A W. Crenshan</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney, and thereupon came a<lb/> Jury viz <name>C. D. Larnard</name>, <name>Andrew Wood</name> <name>Henry H Clark</name><lb/> <name>John Sibby</name>, <name>William Vogel</name> <name>William Roach</name>, <name>James<lb/> Adams</name> <name>Thos. Clark</name>, <name>James Croock</name> <name>John Fallon</name><lb/> <name>L. Longuemer</name> <name>Wm Brass</name> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected<lb/> tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined upon the plea in a<lb/>batement herein the trial of the same progressed and being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues joined in<lb/> favor of the plaintiffs, It is therefore ordered that the defendant plead<lb/> further herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Valli</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Hudson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Hayden</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and thereupon came a Jury<lb/> viz <name>B. Madden</name> <name>John Bell</name> <name>Samuel C. Cochran</name><lb/> <name>A Mc Murtry</name> <name>Juo. W Schwegman</name>, <name>Wm Brown</name> and<lb/> <name>C B Eachs</name>, by consent, seven good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined between the<lb/> parties upon the plea in abatement herein the trial progressed And being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the said<lb/> issues for the defendants, and that the said defendants at the time of<lb/> the sueing out of the writ of attachment herein were not non residents<lb/> of the state of Missouri and that the said defendants were not about<lb/> fraudulently to convey their property and effects so as to hinder and delay<lb/> their creditors. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> take nothing by this writ but that the defendants go there of hence and<lb/> recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Beste</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph T <unclear>Tourville</unclear></name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered that alias summons issue here<lb/>in against defendant <name>Adolph S. Leone</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Anthony</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James H Fiygibbons</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="274" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0277.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. <unclear>Gones</unclear></name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John McNeil</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Midas</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James<lb/> Castello</name> Sheriff of St Louis County and files a statement<lb/> whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied<lb/> on by virtue and authority of the writ of attachment issued herein is likely<lb/> to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that<lb/> the Keeping of the same would be attended with much expense It is<lb/> therefore ordered by the Court that the said <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff as<lb/> aforesaid proceed to sell said property as levied upon in conformity with<lb/> the statute in such case made and provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Motion for New trial filed and the<lb/> Court having heard and considered said<lb/> motion doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The St B<unclear>r</unclear>. City of Memphis<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein<lb/> doth overrule the same<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff it is ordered by the Court that this case be<lb/> dismissed as to defendant <name>Samuel Myerson</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James G. Cattin</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>C. L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa Ripper</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Ripper</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. On motion of the Attorney for the plaintiff, and<lb/> the Court being satisfied that the defendant cannot be served with process. It<lb/> is Ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been com<lb/>menced against him in this Court the object of which is to procure a divorce<lb/> and the custody of the child of the plaintiff and defendant And that unless he be and appear of the<lb/> next term of this Court to be begun and held at the Court house in the City of St Louis, <unclear>and</unclear><lb/> the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer<lb/> to the said Action, the petition will be taken for confessed and a Decree of div<lb/>orce will be rendered<unclear>.</unclear> And it is further ordered that a Copy hereof be published<lb/> in the Missouri Democrat a news paper printed and published in the City of S Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth over<lb/>rule the same</p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="275" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0278.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-04">Tuesday May 4th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John T. Dowdall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John F. Lay</name> et al</head>
<p>Replication to answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Hoffman adw. &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm F. F. Denny</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended petition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Hoyt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Hahon</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff attorney it is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and<lb/> that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit for continuance filed<unclear>-</unclear> and the Court<lb/> having heard and considered the affidavit doth<lb/> Overrule the same<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edwin H Munger</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name><lb/> <name>Henry D Bacon</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Brown</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Edward Wyman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but<lb/> the defendants <name>D D Page</name> <name>Tho Brown</name> &amp; <name>Ed Wyman</name><lb/> although duly summoned and solemnly called come<lb/> not but make default, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the petition betaken against<lb/> them as confessed and the defendant <name>H D Bacon</name><lb/> not having been served with process it is ordered<lb/> that an alias summons issue against him herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M Tompkins</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>David D Mitchell</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney but the defendant <name>Tompkins</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called comes<lb/> not but makes default It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff betaken<lb/> against him as confessed, and the defendant <name>mitchell</name> not having been<lb/> served with process it is ordered by the Court that alias summons issue<lb/> against him and this case is continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Block</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles W Hebert</name> et al</head>
<p>It is ordered that Alias summons issued<lb/> against defendant <name>hebert</name> to <name>Jefferson</name><lb/> County and this case is continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ferdinand A. Reuss</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>P. D. Gordon</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney but the defendant <name>P. D.<lb/> Gordon</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> solemnly called coming not, makes<lb/> default. Wherefore It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken<lb/> against him as confessed And the defendant <name>S B. Widson</name> not having been served<lb/> with process it is ordered that alias summons issue against him</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="276" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0279.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Chouteau</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J Rutherford</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Pierre Choutea</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Valentine Reis</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiffs attorney it is<lb/> ordered that this case be dismissed at the<lb/> cost of plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Richardson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Gilpin</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed at the<lb/> cost of defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Daniel C Michael</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac T. Wise</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed at the<lb/> cost of the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julian Dausche</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nicholas Dausche</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Almon Thomson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein<unclear>-</unclear><lb/>whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing<lb/> upon which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and eighty six dollars and fifty cents, It<lb/> is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Almon Thomson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>David D Mitchell</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys<lb/> and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this said remains<lb/> undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of two thousand one hundred and seventy three dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrill</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name><lb/> <name>Augustus Fritschle</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>C A Wurth</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that<lb/> the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum<lb/> of Nine hundred and forty nine dollars and<lb/> twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution<lb/> motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="277" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0280.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henitt O. Vancornt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and their defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff<lb/> submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and eighty six dollars and<lb/> seventy four cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of<lb/> suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William V. N. Bay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>ney and the defendants by their attorney withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this<lb/> case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and seventy dollars and seventy three cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court of found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name><lb/> <name>William M. Cooke</name><lb/> <name>John Lady</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney<lb/> and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended<lb/> and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defend<lb/>ants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and<lb/> thirteen dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have thereof execution, and it is further ordered that the said sum bear interest at the rate of ten<lb/> percentum per annum from date until paid.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry M Woodward</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the<lb/> defendants come not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to<lb/> the Court upon the pleading and proofs and, the Court doth find from<lb/> the same that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of seven hundred and seven dollars and ten cents.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution, motion for here trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A. Benoist</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James Moore</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come the plaintiff by their<lb/> attorney but the defendants come not and the<lb/> plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleading and proofs and the Court<lb/> doth find from the same that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four<lb/> hundred and ninety eight dollars and twenty nine cents, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="278" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0281.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lawrence Wesseld</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C. Smith</name></head>
<p>The Plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit<lb/> according to law, claiming the possession of<lb/> certain personal property therein described,<lb/> wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliv<lb/>er the property specified in said petition to the sheriff of S Louis County<lb/> and said sheriff is hereby directed, of said property be not delivered<lb/> to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S. Moloney</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William P. Moloney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name></head>
<p>On petition- Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> Attorneys and the Court having heard and considered<lb/> the motion for Continuance doth overrule the same.<lb/> And the parties waiving a Jury submit the case to<lb/> the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth<lb/> find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs<lb/> in the sum of five hundred and thirty five dollars and fifteen cents It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution. Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dalton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name><lb/> <name>George Smizer</name><lb/> <name>Joseph R. Wondover</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Judson Allen</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court and the Court doth find from<lb/> the proofs that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and<lb/> seventy eight dollars and eighty eight cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dalton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George Smizer</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth<lb/> find from the same that the defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty two<lb/> dollars and forty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The People Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Philip Helgenberg</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis Saler</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes this plaintiff by &amp;<lb/> but the defendant <name>John Helgenberg</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called comes not<lb/> but makes default wherefore it is considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken<lb/> against him as confessed, And the defendants<lb/> <name>Philip Helgenberg</name> and <name>Francis Saler</name> withdraw their answer whereby this Suit remains<lb/> undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and three dollars and forty three cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="279" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0282.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Peoples Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Grundt</name><lb/> <name>Edward Mead</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney<lb/> and on his motion it is ordered that this case as to defend<lb/>ant mead be dismissed, and the defendant <name>grundt</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default<lb/> wherefore it is considered by the Court that the petition of the<lb/> plaintiff be taken against him as confessed and the plain<lb/>tiff files herein a stipulation whereby it appears that the<lb/> defendants <name>CD</name> and <name>J. T. Sullivan</name> consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against<lb/> their and submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One thousand and seventy five dollars and thirty five cents It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants<lb/> the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs in this<lb/> behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Reed</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletier</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
<p>On plea in abatement. Now at this come the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and there<lb/>upon also came a Jury to writ, <name>C D Larnard</name><lb/> <name>Andrew Wood</name> <name>Henry H Clark</name> <name>John Sibby</name><lb/> <name>William Vogel</name> <name>William Roach</name> <name>James Adams</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Clark</name> <name>James Croock</name> <name>John <unclear>Renz</unclear></name><lb/> <name>William Brass</name> and <name>L. <unclear>Longuernere</unclear></name> twelve good and lawful<lb/> men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly <unclear>a</unclear> try<lb/> the issues joined herein, the trial of this cause progressed but not<lb/> being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding are<lb/> continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="280" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0283.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-05">Wednesday May 5th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Riggin</name></head>
<p>Motion to transmit papers &amp; filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Sturdy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lewis Palmer</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John A. Brownlee</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James J Todd</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that the Judg<lb/>ment heretofore entered herein be set aside<lb/> and that this case be dismissed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Brungard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas H. Caranaugh</name></head>
<p>Ordered that Alias summons issue against<lb/> the defendant<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff Attorney leave in given the<lb/> sheriff to amend his return herein accord<lb/>ing to the facts<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the<lb/> Application of<lb/> <name>John Maguire</name></head>
<p>On motion of said petitioner <name>James<lb/> Castello</name> is substituted as trustee in place<lb/> of <name>B B Dazton</name> deceased</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Francis Hamilton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Meyers</name> et al</head>
<p>Bond for costs with approved security filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington F Adams</name></head>
<p>Bill of executions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman <unclear>Grimdt</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelins D Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff attorney it is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed it is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm F. Enders</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles J Gill</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A. Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="281" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0284.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name> by <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> to<lb/> <name>Gabriel S Chontean</name></head>
<p><name>James Castello</name> sheriff of S Louis county<lb/> comes into Court and acknowledges the execu<lb/>tion by him as sheriff of a deed to <name>Gabriel<lb/> S. Chontean</name> fore property of <name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> sold by said <name>Castello</name> as sheriff under execution against said <name>Myerson</name> and<lb/> purchased by said <name>Chontean</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Wesbit</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Peter Reinhardt</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is<lb/> ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of<lb/> the plaintiff and that execution issue therefore</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Simmons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George B. Michael</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their<lb/> answer whereby this action remains undefended and the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court<lb/> doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty one<lb/> dollars and seventy cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recov<lb/>er of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his<lb/> costs of suit and thereof have execution. Judgment to bear ten per cent per annum interest</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Wickersham</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Authony H Menkires</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Diedrick B. Menkins</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective Attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard the<lb/> proofs doth find that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifty one dollars<lb/> fifty five cents. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit<lb/> and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten per cent per annum interest and execution by consent<lb/> stayed until 1st Sept next.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Newton S. Gay</name> and<lb/> <name>George Gay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff<lb/> submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of six hundred and twelve dollars, It is therefore considered and adjudged<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this behalf expended and<lb/> have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name><lb/> <name>Engene Mittenberger</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Poulterer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S Wheaton</name><lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants<lb/> withdraw their answer, whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiffs sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this suit is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eight<lb/> hundred and seventy eight dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="282" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0285.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis V. Bogy</name><lb/> <name>Eugene Mittenberger</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William Poulterer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F Beasley</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Sanderson</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorneys and defendant <name>Beasley</name> withdraws his answer, whereby<lb/> the suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which the action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and nine dollars and<lb/> seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their<lb/> costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John H Gay</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Dawius Crowley</name></head>
<p>Petition &amp; <unclear>Juyn</unclear>-. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered in favor<lb/> of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of<lb/> one Court and making perpetual the injunction herein before intend<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and his costs of suit and have execution therefor.<lb/> And it is further adjudged and decreed by the Court that the order of injunction heretofore<lb/> entered herein be made absolute and perpetual.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>65.70<lb/> <unclear>Rewittiter</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry M. Woodward</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> by leave of Court <unclear>remits</unclear> sixty five dollars and ten cents of the<lb/> Judgment of seven hundred and seven dollars and ten cents ren<lb/>dered against defendants on <date when="1858-05-04">may fourth 1858</date>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter Hayden</name> and<lb/> <name>Pollock Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Sigerson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Wallace Sigerson</name></head>
<p>On Bill of Exchange- Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered<lb/> that this case be dismissed as to defendant <name>Wallace Siger<lb/>son</name> and the defendant <name>John Sigerson</name> withdraws his<lb/> Answer herein whereby this action remains undefended<lb/> And the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that<lb/> the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and four<lb/> dollars twenty eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dalton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Wightman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> but the defendant <name>Wightman</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> solemnly called comes not but makes default wherefore<lb/> it is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff<lb/> be taken against him as confessed, And the plaintiff waiving<lb/> a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court<lb/> in the sum of one thousand and ninety eight dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> doth find therefrom that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his<lb/> costs it this behalf expended and thereof have execution. And it is fur<lb/>ther ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per centum<lb/> per annum from the date hereof until paid<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<p>Motion in arrest of Judgment filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="283" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0286.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name> by <name>Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> to<lb/> <name>Gabriel S. Chontean</name></head>
<p><name>James Castello</name> Sheriff of S Louis county comes into Court and<lb/> acknowledges the execution of a deed of this date from himself<lb/> as said sheriff to <name>Gabriel S. Chontean</name> for property of <name>Samuel<lb/> myerson</name> sold by said sheriff under execution to said <name>Chontean</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name> by <name>Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> to<lb/> <name>Gabriel S. Chontean</name></head>
<p><name>James Castello</name> Sheriff of S Louis County comes into Court and acknowledge<lb/> the execution of a deed of this date from himself as said Sheriff to <name>Gabriel S Chon<lb/>tean</name> for property of <name>Samuel Myerson</name> sold by said sheriff under execution to said <name>Chontean</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel Myerson</name> by <name>Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gabriel S. Chontean</name></head>
<p><name>James Castello</name> Sheriff of S Louis County comes into Court and acknowledge the<lb/> execution of a deed of this date from himself as said Sheriff to <name>Gabriel S. Chontean</name> for<lb/> property of <name>Samuel Myerson</name> sold by said Sheriff under execution to said <name>Chontean</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Peter D Muller</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward S. Wheaton</name><lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> and<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby<lb/> this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submit<lb/> this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the<lb/> writing upon which this action is founded that the<lb/> defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> four hundred and seven dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Pality</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney but the defend<lb/>ant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but<lb/> makes default, and Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and Seven dollars. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and her costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Reed</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Theodore Yates</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis A Pelletier</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John D Pelletier</name></head>
<p>On Plea in abatement. Now at this day come again the par<lb/>ties by their respective Attorney and also the Jury sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their<lb/> Oaths aforesaid find the issues herein joined in favor of the<lb/> plaintiffs It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court<lb/> that said defendants at the commencement of this suit had fraudulently conveyed or concealed<lb/> their property so as to hinder or delay their creditors in manner and form as is in the plain<lb/>tiffs petition charged, And the Court doth assess the damages of said<lb/> plaintiff by reason of the premises mentioned in the petition of said plaintiff<lb/> at the sum of one thousand and thirty seven dollars and sixty eight cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs<lb/> and charges herein expended and have thereof execution against<lb/> the property attached at the commencement of this<lb/> suit<unclear>. . .</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="284" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0287.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N. Hart</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and thereupon came also<lb/> a Jury viz <name>C. D Larnard</name>, <name>Andrew Wood</name>, <name>Henry Clark</name>,<lb/> <name>John Libby</name>, <name>William Vogel</name>, <name>William Roach</name>, <name>James Adams</name>,<lb/> <name>Thomas Clark</name>, <name>James Croock</name>, <name>John Reng</name>, <name>Wm Bross</name>, <name>L. Longueman</name> twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn will and<lb/> truly to try the issues joined the trial hereof progressed but not being con<lb/>cluded at the horn of adjournment further proceedings and continued<lb/> >until tomorrow morning at ten O clock.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Polity</name></head>
<p>Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff<lb/> by her attorney but the defendant although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called coming<lb/> not makes default. Whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this<lb/> Case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the<lb/> Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of three hundred and seven dollars, It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and also his costs herein and have execution therefor</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="285" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0288.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-06">Thursday May 6th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Oliver T Bragg</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Denius Barnes</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff ordered that <unclear>dedriners</unclear> issue to the<lb/> state of New York to take depositions to be read an the<lb/> part of the plaintiff on the trial of this cause before peter<lb/> it <name>Johnstone</name> Justice of the peace of S Louis county<unclear>-</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Mo to use <name>George Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>Defendants plea filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Job T. Doan</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John McFee</name></head>
<p>Proof of publication filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> <name>William<lb/> H Benton</name>, &amp; <name>George H Chase</name><lb/> <unclear>Partnud</unclear> trading under Style<lb/> of <name>Pomeroy Benton &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Betts</name>, <name>John D<lb/> Mellen</name>, <name>Joshua Jackson</name><lb/> <name>John O. Mellen</name> &amp; <name>A.A.K.<lb/> Sawyer</name>, <unclear>partners</unclear> trading under<lb/> Style of <name>Betts mellen &amp; Co</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Thomas Orr</name> &amp; <name>Lewis Hull</name></head>
<p>Amended Petition filed-</p>
<p>Order of Publication.</p>
<p>Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiff by their Attorney and on their<lb/> motion and the Court being now satisfied that<lb/> the defendants <name>Orr</name> and <name>Hull</name> are now residents<lb/> of the State of Missouri, and the Court being<lb/> further satisfied that process cannot be served<lb/> on said defendants <name>Orr</name> &amp; <name>Hull</name> it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that said defendants <name>Orr</name><lb/> and <name>Hull</name> be notified of the commencement of<lb/> this suit the object of which is to recover of said defendants the sum of eleven hundred<lb/> and ninety mine and sixty five hundredths dollars on account of a certain bill of exchange<lb/> whereby the defendants, <name>Betts Mellen &amp; Co</name> promised to pay eight months after date<lb/> to the order of plaintiff the sum of eleven hundred and ninety eight and sixty five<lb/> hundredths dollars and dated <date when="1857-03-12">March 12'' 1857</date>. And which Bill of exchange was<lb/> protested for nonpayment on the <date when="1857-11-12">12th day of November AD 1857</date>, which bill<lb/> of exchange and the interest thereon remain unpaid, and that unless said defendants be<lb/> and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of<lb/> St Louis On the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third<lb/> day thereof answer the petition of plaintiffs, the same will be taken against<lb/> them as confessed. It is further ordered, that a copy hereof be published<lb/> according to law, in the missouri Democrat a paper printed in the city<lb/> and county of S Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James S. Chew</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name><lb/> <name>Frederick Picker</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the petition and answer<lb/> and the Court having heard the same doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of One thousand and seventy five dollars</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="286" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0289.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court<lb/> found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>41266</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry M Hart</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come again the parties by<lb/> their respective Attorneys and also the Jury sworn<lb/> herein and thereupon the trial hereof progressed and<lb/> being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths<lb/> aforesaid find for the plaintiff upon the counterclaim of the defendant<lb/> and also find for the plaintiff and that he hath sustained damage in the<lb/> sum of four hundred and twelve dollars and sixty six cents, It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the defendant take nothing by his counterclaim herein<lb/> and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Jury found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C Reed</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F A Pelletin</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>535.74</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Francis H Manter</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day Comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> attorney but that defendant <name>Manter</name> although duly summoned<lb/> and solemnly called comes not, wherefore It is con<lb/>sidered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff<lb/> be taken against him as confessed, and the<lb/> defendant <name>Nelson</name> by his attorney comes and the parties waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the petition Answer and proofs, and the Court doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred are<lb/> thirty five dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>211.22</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward T. Glasgow</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>William H Glasgow</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Julius Jonas</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Francis W Thompson</name></head>
<p>On Note Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attor<lb/>ney but the defendant <name>F. W Thompson</name> although duly<lb/> summoned and solemnly called comes not, wherefore<lb/> it is considered by the Court that the petition of<lb/> the plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed<lb/> and the defendant of <name>Jonas</name> by his attorney comes and<lb/> the parties waiving a Jury submit this case of the Court upon the petition Ans<lb/>wer and proofs And the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eleven dollars twenty two cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and<lb/> their costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Theodore Walff</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and on<lb/> his motion It is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their<lb/> costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="287" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0290.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Ames</name><lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney<lb/> but the defendant <name>Leander Lawrence</name> although duly warned<lb/> and called comes not but makes default wherefore It is order<lb/>ed by the Court that he plaintiffs petition be taken against said<lb/> defendant as confessed, <unclear rend="strikethrough">and the Court doth find from the instru<lb/>ment of writing on which this action is founded that said<lb/> defendant <name>Lawrence</name> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty<lb/> three dollars and fifty eight cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found<lb/> and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</unclear>, And<lb/> thereupon come the defendants, <name>Joseph M. Ames</name> and <name>Francis Hofelman</name> by<lb/> their Attorney, and also a Jury to writ <name>B madden</name>, <name>John Bell</name>, <name>Samuel C Coch<lb/>ran</name>, <name>A McMurtry</name>, <name>Wm Brown</name>, <name>C. B. Eaches</name>, <name>Henry Fallon</name>, <name>James B Kelly</name>,<lb/> <name>M Castello</name>, <name>William Vogel</name>, <name>C D Larnard</name> and <name>Andrew Wood</name> twelve good<lb/> and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well<lb/> and truly to try, the trial progressed but not being finished is said over until to<lb/>morrow morning<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>538.72</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Holliday</name><lb/> <name>Ferdinand Welcker</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Francis Mayer</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his at<lb/>torney and on his motion It is ordered that this<lb/> case as to defendant <name>Welcker</name> be dismissed And<lb/> the plaintiff submits this case to the Court on<lb/> the pleading and proofs and the Court doth find<lb/> that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of five hundred and thirty eight dollars seventy two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the Sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of<lb/> suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>478.75</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Theodore Wolf</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Sebastian Eugert</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney, and the defendants withdraw<lb/> their answer Whereby, this suit remains undefended<lb/> And the plaintiff submits this case to the Court<lb/> And the Court doth find from the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff, in the sum of four hundred<lb/> and seventy eighty dollars seventy five cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and<lb/> thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney<lb/> and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this suit remains<lb/> undefended and the plaintiff submit this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action<lb/> is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> seven hundred and ninety three dollars fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="288" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0291.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their Answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff<lb/> submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of five hundred and eighty dollars ninety seven cents It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of<lb/> suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name><lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name></head>
<p>On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorneys and the defendants withdraw their Answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended, And the plaintiffs<lb/> submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find<lb/> from the writing upon which this action is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the<lb/> sum of six hundred and thirty two dollars and nine cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have<lb/> execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name><lb/> <name>John Helgenberg</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry Gronheim</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby this<lb/> suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case<lb/> to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which<lb/> this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plain<lb/>tiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty dollars. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in<lb/>form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="289" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0292.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-07">Friday May 7th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Ames</name><lb/> <name>Francis Hofelman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Leander Lawrence</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come again the parties by their res<lb/>pective Attorney and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein<lb/> and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and being<lb/> finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid<lb/> say they find for the plaintiff and assess her damages sus<lb/>tained by reason of the premises in her petition mentioned<lb/> at the sum of five hundred and thirty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore<lb/> considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum afore<lb/>said as found and also her costs and charges herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor<unclear>.</unclear> Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Evans</name> and<lb/> <name>Henry L. Parker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective Attorney and the defendant files <unclear rend="strikethrough">his</unclear> affidavit and<lb/> moves the Court to continue this case and the Court having<lb/> heard and considered the affidavit and motion doth overrule<lb/> the same, And the parties waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court and the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and fifty one dollars fifteen<lb/> cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Delaygare</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>Therese</unclear> Bowers</name> <unclear>Admx</unclear> of<lb/> <name>Aaron Bowers</name> deceased</head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the pleading and<lb/> proofs and the Court having heard the Same<lb/> doth find that the defendant is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of Eighty eight dollars fifty two cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and<lb/> have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charlotte Wead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Augustine</name> &amp; <name>George Hanck</name></head>
<p>By Consent of parties it is ordered that this<lb/> case be dismissed at the cost of defendants</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo to use of<lb/> <name>George Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff six days further time is allowed<lb/> him to file reply to the plea of the defendant<lb/> filed herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name></head>
<p>By consent of parties it is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed at the cost of<lb/> the defendant<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="290" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0293.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorneys and also come a Jury to wit<lb/> <name>B. Madden</name>, <name><unclear>Juo</unclear> Bell</name>. <name>Samuel C. Cochran</name><lb/> <name>A McMurtry</name> <name>Wm Brown</name> <name>C. B. Eaches</name> <name>Henry<lb/> Fallon</name>, <name>James B. Kelly</name>, <name>M. Castello</name> <name>Wm Vogel</name><lb/> <name>C. D. Larnard</name> <name>Andrew Wood</name> twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined<lb/> herein the trial progressed but not being concluded at the horn of<lb/> adjournment, further proceedings are continued until tomorrow<lb/> morning at ten O clock. Court adjourned to same time</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="291" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0294.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-08">Saturday May 8th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm T. Hazzard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al</head>
<p>Answer of defendant <name>Scot</name> filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Pality &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Fanell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry N Hart</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Evans</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Eddie</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Green Parks Exor &amp;c</name></head>
<p>By leave of Court the defendant withdraw his answer<lb/> and files demurrer and motion to strike out<lb/> portion of plaintiffs petition</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dalton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Marlow &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Schaffnor</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of S Louis</head>
<p>Exhibits filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas J Lawrenson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Lawrenson</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for new trial herein doth ordere that said<lb/> motion be and the same is hereby sustained</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>F. Dattelywig</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>M. W Black</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to set aside the nonsuit herein doth order that<lb/> the Same he Overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Stevens</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Willion</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> to set aside the dismissed herein doth order<lb/> that the same be sustained and that said<lb/> dismissed be set aside<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Hays</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion to Strike Out the counter<lb/> claim herein doth order that said motion<lb/> be Overruled</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="292" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0295.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lamaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Woodboat <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the Demurrer herein doth order that the<lb/> same be sustained</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth order<lb/> that the same be Overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Life Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and considered the<lb/> motion to Setaside the Judgment herein doth<lb/> order that said motion be Overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry C. Lynch</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come again the parties<lb/> by their respective Attorneys and also the Jury<lb/> sworn herein and the trial of this case pro<lb/>gressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid<lb/> retire to consider of their verdict, And afterward<lb/> the jurors aforesaid come into Court and say they cannot agree upon<lb/> a verdict herein, It is therefore ordered that they be discharged and<lb/> that this case be continued<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Jerre Hante Alton and<lb/> St Louis Raid Road Co</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion of the defendant herein filed to<lb/> set aside the Judgment rendered upon the<lb/> plea in abatement and being thereof fully<lb/> advised doth order that the same be over<lb/>ruled. And Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attor<lb/>ney but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called<lb/> comes not; And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed<lb/> in this cause, it doth, on motion of said plaintiff by his Attorney.<lb/> order that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed<lb/> And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth Assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of<lb/> the premises mentioned in his petition at the sum of fifteen hundred<lb/> and ninety three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expen<lb/>ded and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas M Avery</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Washington F. Adams</name></head>
<p>The defendant, by Attorney files an affidavit<lb/> for an appeal herein and on his motion<lb/> an appeal is allowed him to the supreme<lb/> Court from the Judgment herein and thereupon<lb/> the defendant files an appeal bond herein with <name>Washington F. Adams</name> as principal<lb/> and <name>George A. <unclear>Putnam</unclear></name>, <name>Charles D Coleman</name>, <name>Joseph G Shands</name> <name>E Base</name> <name>J H Whitelan</name><lb/> and <name>John Byrue J.</name> as sureties which bond is approved by the Court</p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="293" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0296.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-10">Monday May 10th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David T. Wheeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S. B. Bullock</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions<lb/> to the report of the referes herein doth order that<lb/> the said exceptions be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H. Dubs</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> demurrer to the plaintiff petition doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Amadre Berthald</name><lb/> <name>Ferdinand Rogier Jr.</name><lb/> and <name>William Fullager</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Chilton</name><lb/> <name>Benjamin F Johnson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John Cole</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day<lb/> come the defendants and files statement herein<lb/> sworn to, whereby it appears to the Court that<lb/> the defendants confess that they are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiffs in the sum of Two thousand<lb/> three hundred and fifteen dollars eighty five cents<lb/> and consent and agree that Judgment<lb/> may be entered against them and in favor<lb/> of the plaintiffs for said sum, It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein and thereof have execution.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Lainaster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The Woodboat <name>Hardin</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon the<lb/> pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> heard the same doth find for the defendant It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff<lb/> her costs in this behalf expended and thereof have thereof execution<lb/> Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The <unclear>St Br</unclear> City of Memphis<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Matthen Levering &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for new trial herein doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman J. Hasbrock</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Hulbertine F. Hasbrock</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication</p>
<p>The Sheriff of St Louis County<lb/> having made return that the defendant<lb/> cannot be found in his county and</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="294" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0297.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>it appearing to the Court that the defendant cannot be served<lb/> with process, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that the defend<lb/>ant be notified of the commencement of this suit the abject of which<lb/> is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony by<lb/> the plaintiff contracted with the defendant and that unless she<lb/> be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held<lb/> at the City of S Louis within and for the county of S Louis on the<lb/> first monday of october next and then and their on or before the<lb/> sixth day of said term Answer to the said action, the petition of<lb/> the plaintiff will be taken for confessed against her and it is<lb/> further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat<lb/> a newspaper printed and published in the City of S Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="295" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0298.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-11">Tuesday may 11th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm H Deriar</name></head>
<p>Amended answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>518.70</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James T. Death</name><lb/> <name>Absolom Death</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Wilson Death</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert A. W. Crenshan</name></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorney and consent and agree that judgment may<lb/> be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the def<lb/>endant for the sum of five hundred and eighteen dollars<lb/> and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and their costs in this behalf<lb/> expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
<p>Inventory filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> &amp; <name>James Christy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Rogers</name>, <name>James Sanderson</name><lb/> and <name>William L. Salisbury</name></head>
<p>On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs<lb/> It is ordered that this case be dismissed<lb/> at the cost of the plaintiffs</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William D Sedgwick</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Halliday</name> <name>Ferd<lb/>inand Welcker</name><lb/> <name>Eleager<lb/> Sherman</name><lb/> <name>James H. McCullock</name><lb/> &amp; <name>Charles Webb</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>James S. Catlin</name> attorney<lb/> for <name>Wm D. Sedgwick</name>, and acknowledges full<lb/> and entire satisfaction of the Judgment rendered<lb/> On the <date when="1858-02-27">27th February 1858</date> herein, for One thousand<lb/> and eighty dollars fifty six cents in favor of<lb/> plaintiffs and against said defendants</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name><lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and<lb/> on his motion it is ordered that this case as to the<lb/> defendant <name>Myerson</name> be dismissed. And the other<lb/> defendants by their Attorney come and the parties<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleadings and proofs and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the same doth find<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred<lb/> and thirty seven dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John R. Shepley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James C. Musick</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="296" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0299.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be continued on the<lb/> application of defendant and at his cost on<lb/> account of the sickness of <name>C D Drake</name> Esq<lb/> Counsel for the defendant</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="297" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0300.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-12">Wednesday May 12th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac W Mitchell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Defendants Bill of exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be continued at the cost<lb/> of defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Isaac Bernheimer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Abraham Newmark</name></head>
<p>Application for continuance filed and case con<lb/>tinued at the cost of defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
<p>Ordered that <name>Zuckweller</name>, <name>Wm D. Henry</name> and <name>Hugh<lb/> McDone</name> who are hereby appointed appraisers for<lb/> that purpose do proceed after being duly sworn<lb/> to appraise the property described in the inventory here<lb/>in filed, and make due report of their said appraisement</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm T. Hazzard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lyman Scott</name> et al.</head>
<p>Depositions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James D Honseman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Hewitt</name> et al</head>
<p>Continued by Consent</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Charlatte</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gabriel Chontean</name></head>
<p>Continued.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wesley J. Alkire</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Reid</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph B Henderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. Goodrich <unclear>Garee</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A McDowell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George J King</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be continued at the<lb/> cost of defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Wilson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jesse K. Wilson</name></head>
<p>Order of publication<unclear>.</unclear> The Sheriff of S Louis County<lb/> having made return that the defendant cannot<lb/> be found in his county and the Court being.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="298" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0301.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>satisfied that the defendant cannot be served with process, on motion of<lb/> the plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified of<lb/> the commencement of this suit the object of which is to process a decree<lb/> of divorce from the bonds of matrimoney contracted by the plaintiff with<lb/> the defendant, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of<lb/> this Court to be begun and held at the City of S Louis within and for<lb/> the County of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or<lb/> before the sixth day said term answer to the said action the petition of<lb/> the plaintiff will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further<lb/> ordered that a Copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of S Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The St B<unclear>r</unclear> City of Memphis<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant and<lb/> files an affidavit and prays an appeal to the<lb/> supreme Court from the judgment rendered here<lb/>in, And the Court doth allow the appeal<lb/> prayed for and thereupon the defendant files an appeal bond herein with<lb/> <name>Leonard Matthews</name> as principal and <name>Alexander Hamilton</name> and <name>Isaac E.<lb/> Jones</name> as sureties which bond is approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S. Moloney</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Jacoby</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and file an<lb/> affidavit and pray an appeal to the supreme<lb/> Court from the judgment rendered herein, and the<lb/> Court doth grant the appeal prayed for and<lb/> thereupon the defendants file an appeal bond herein<lb/> with <name>Henry Boernstein</name> as principal and <name>Samuel Simmons</name> and <name>Gustaous<lb/> Boernstein</name> as sureties which bond is approved by the Court</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="299" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0302.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-13">Thursday May 13th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Ernst Baumgarten</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Louisa Amalia Baumgarten</name></head>
<p>Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of<lb/> plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W Thatcher</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear> of <name>Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion it is ordered that the said Garnishee<lb/> be discharged and that he be allowed fifteen dollars<lb/> for his trouble had in answering herein, to be taxed as<lb/> costs against the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W. Thatcher</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear> of <name>Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion it is ordered that the said Garnishee be<lb/> discharged and that he be allowed fifteen dollars to be<lb/> taxed as costs against the plaintiff, for his trouble<lb/> in answering herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Geo W. Thatcher <unclear>Garee</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Continued until next term of this Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Louderback</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The North Missouri Rail Road</head>
<p>Continued by Consent</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Gibson</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B Stout</name></head>
<p>On motion of <name>Thomas H Noble</name> the Garnishee herein he<lb/> is discharged and he is allowed five dollars for<lb/> appearing herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Clark</name> et al <name>Gars &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Replication to answer filed.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Lucas</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The County of S Louis Gar &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Boggs</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel H. Leathe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Co</name></head>
<p>Petition on Policy. Now at this day come the par<lb/>ties by their respective attorneys and thereupon cause also<lb/> a Jury viz <name>Adolph Gebarth</name>, <name>Wm Curran</name>, <name>Geo <unclear>Carmelick</unclear></name>,<lb/> <name>J. W. Spalding</name>, <name>L. Moser</name>, <name>J. F. Shurist</name>, <name>Jacob Littig</name>,<lb/> <name>Wm Hanlan</name>, <name>Geo W Bushey <unclear>Sr</unclear></name>, <name>D Branch</name>, <name>J DeBus</name>, and<lb/> <name>Charles Pomeroy</name> twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and Sworn<lb/> the issue herein joined will and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed but<lb/> not being finished further proceeding are continued until tomorrow morning</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="300" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0303.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-14">Friday May 14th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Solomon Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff he has leave to with<lb/>draw his bill of exchange from the files</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Hamilton Bill</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Dawson</name></head>
<p>The death of <name>William Le Guerrier</name> one<lb/> of the plaintiffs is suggested to the Court and<lb/> this case is continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Boggs</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel H. Leathe</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Company</name></head>
<p>Petition on Policy<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come<lb/> again the said parties by their respective<lb/> attorneys, and the Jurors empanelled and<lb/> sworn herein also come and thereupon<lb/> the trial of this cause progresses and<lb/> being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find<lb/> the issues in favor of the plaintiffs and assess their damages by reason<lb/> of the premises in their petition mentioned at the sum of five thousand<lb/> two hundred dollars. It is Therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form afore<lb/>said by the Jury aforesaid found and their costs in this behalf ex<lb/>pended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name> et al</head>
<p>Stipulation filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew Lemmon</name><lb/> to<lb/> <name>Andrew Jackson</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes into Court <name>Andrew Lemmon</name><lb/> to the Court personally known and acknowledges<lb/> the execution of a deed of emancipation to<lb/> <name>Andrew Jackson</name> of Color and his Slave<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Mo to use <name>Geo Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>Replication filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion of Plaintiff she<lb/> has leave to withdraw her bill of exchanges<lb/> from the files herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alfred M Waterman</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> Attorney and on his motion it is ordered that<lb/> this case be dismissed, It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the defendant recover<lb/> of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor and<lb/> the plaintiff on further motion has leave to withdraw his bill of<lb/> exchange from the files</p> 
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="301" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0304.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James C. Page</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Thatcher</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear> of<lb/> <name>Alfred M. Waterman</name></head>
<p>On motion of the Attorney for the plaintiff it is<lb/> ordered that the garnishment herein be dismissed<lb/> and it is ordered by the Court that <name>C D Drake<lb/> Esq</name> be allowed the sum of fifteen dollars for hav<lb/>ing filed are answer herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Bunneman</name></head>
<p>Grand Larceny. Now at this day comes the attorney<lb/> for the State and also comes the prisoner and the<lb/> attorney for the State page that he will not further<lb/> prosecute the indictment herein. It is therefore con<lb/>sidered and adjudged by the Court that the prisoner go hereof hence with<lb/>out day<unclear>.</unclear> and it is ordered that the costs herein be certified as is by<lb/> the Statute provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Inles Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander <unclear>Guenandon</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetans Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interpleader of <name>Louis <unclear>Sangrinetti</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective Attorneys And thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury to writ <name>Ferdinand Kerna</name>, <name>James Spore</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Watkins</name>, <name>William Curran</name> <name>James Shaw</name>, <name>J. T.<lb/> Sherrick</name>, <name>William Hanlan</name> <name>Samuel Willing</name>, <name>Wood Dickens</name>, <name>John Hickley</name><lb/> <name>B. Herman</name> and <name>F M Willond</name> twelve good and lawful men who being<lb/> duly elected tried and Sworn will and truly the issues joined between<lb/> the parties aforesaid to try, the trial of this cause progressed but not<lb/> being finished at the hour of adjournment the same is said over until<lb/> tomorrow morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="302" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0305.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-15">Saturday May 15th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thom B <unclear>Wing</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. Williams</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff<lb/> and suggests to the Court that since the beginning<lb/> of this suit the plaintiff has died, and <name>Peter<lb/> B. Garesche</name> public administrator of St Louis County<lb/> and by <unclear>virtuee</unclear> of his office administrator of the plaintiff deceased enters his<lb/> appearance herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and being advised of<lb/> and concerning the motion to set aside the Judgment<lb/> herein doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moies</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and being advised of<lb/> and concerning the motion to set aside the Judgment<lb/> herein doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squire Brown</name><lb/> to<lb/> Lydia</head>
<p><name>Squire Brown</name> comes into Court and acknowledges deed<lb/> of emancipation of his Negro Slave Lydia</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Harrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Hays</name> and<lb/> <name>Drury Hall</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their motion for<lb/> Judgment upon their Counter Claim, And the Court<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff doth order that this case be<lb/> dismissed. It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and that<lb/> execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Mary Peppers</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Emanuel</name></head>
<p><name>Mary Peppers</name> Comes into Court and acknowledges deed of<lb/> emancipation to her Negro Slave <name>Emanuel</name></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the<lb/> Assignment of<lb/> <name>Louis Mayer</name></head>
<p>Assignment filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Boggs &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Co</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Frederick Picker</name></head>
<p>Default on Note<unclear>.</unclear> It appearing to the Court<lb/> that Judgment by default was rendered herein<lb/> on the sixth day of march last and the same<lb/> was omitted in the record of that day. it is<lb/> therefore on motion of the attorney for the plain<lb/>tiff ordered that said Judgment be entered now as of said <date when="1858-03-06">sixth day of March 1858</date>.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="303" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0306.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>to writ. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defend<lb/>ants although duly warned and called comes not but make default wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed against them and<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> thirty dollars and sixty six cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>R. M. Barclay</name> <name>Levi Hinckle</name><lb/> and <name>John Shield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B. Watson</name> Gar<lb/> of <name>Daniel Gale</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the interrogatories and answer, from which<lb/> the Court doth find that the said Garnishee<lb/> is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars<lb/> and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found. And have Execution therefor. And on motion it<lb/> is ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars<lb/> for answering herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexandier Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetand Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interplea of <name><unclear>Sangrimatte</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come again the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also<lb/> come, the trial of this case progressed<lb/> but not being finished at the horn of adjournment the same is <unclear>laid</unclear><lb/> over until monday morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until next monday morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="303" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0306.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>to writ. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defend<lb/>ants although duly warned and called comes not but make default wherefore it is<lb/> ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed against them and<lb/> the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is foun<lb/>ded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> thirty dollars and sixty six cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>R. M. Barclay</name> <name>Levi Hinckle</name><lb/> and <name>John Shield</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B. Watson</name> Gar<lb/> of <name>Daniel Gale</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the interrogatories and answer, from which<lb/> the Court doth find that the said Garnishee<lb/> is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars<lb/> and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found. And have Execution therefor. And on motion it<lb/> is ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars<lb/> for answering herein</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexandier Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetand Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interplea of <name><unclear>Sangrimatte</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come again the<lb/> parties by their respective attorney and<lb/> the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also<lb/> come, the trial of this case progressed<lb/> but not being finished at the horn of adjournment the same is <unclear>laid</unclear><lb/> over until monday morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until next monday morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="304" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0307.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-17">Monday may 17th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The Terre Hante Alton &amp; S Louis Rail Road Co</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Juliane Dausch</name> <unclear>admx</unclear> of <name>Geo Dausch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Nicholas Dausch</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiffs attorney its is ordered<lb/> that this case be dismissed, and the plaintiff by<lb/> leave of Court withdraws the exhibit filed herein<lb/> and leaves receipt therefor<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jacob Meyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Equitable Fire Insurance Co</name></head>
<p>Continued on application of defendant at<lb/> its costs</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edgar Sprague</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel H Lowrey</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and on his motion it is ordered<lb/> that this case as to defendant <name>Houseman</name> be<lb/> dismissed and the defendant <name>Lowry</name> although<lb/> duly summoned and solemnly called, coming not<lb/> makes default, it is therefore ordered by the Court that the petition be taken<lb/> against him as confessed, And the Court doth find from the the writing upon<lb/> which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of seven hundred and eighty two dollars and seventy five cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that that the plaintiff recover of the defend<lb/>ant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs<lb/> herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Hoge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Henry D. Bacon</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their res<lb/>pective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer<lb/> whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plain<lb/>tiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth<lb/> find from the writing upon which this suit is founded<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum twelve hundred and<lb/> seventy five dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
<p>This day comes the defendant and files notice and proof of service thereof<lb/> upon the plaintiff, that he, the defendant will on the 24th Instant move the Court<lb/> to assess the value of the property taken from the defendant by virtue of the order of<lb/> delivery herein and delivered to the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetano Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interplea of <name><unclear>Sangunitte</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come again<lb/> said parties by their respective Attorneys and the<lb/> Jury empanneled and sworn herein also come</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="305" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0308.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>and the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished at the horn<lb/> of adjournment the same is <unclear>laid</unclear> over until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock</p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-18">Tuesday May 18th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Theodore R. Posey</name></head>
<p><name>R. S. Eddy</name> assignee files a report of settlement<lb/> herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. D English</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit for continuance filed and the Court<lb/> having duly heard and considered the same doth<lb/> order that the motion for continuance be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Francis Mayer</name><lb/> <name>John W Siebert</name><lb/> <name>John Holliday</name><lb/> <name>Philip Ceasar</name> and<lb/> <name>George W Sherrick</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorney and upon motion It is ordered<lb/> that <name>George W Sherrick</name> be discharged upon<lb/> his answer herein, and the parties waiving a<lb/> Jury submit this case to the Court upon the<lb/> pleading and proofs and the Court having duly<lb/> heard the same doth find that the defend<lb/>ants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum<lb/> of five hundred and thirty seven dollars, It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the de<lb/>fendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor, <name>Sherrick</name> allowed <unclear>from</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>President Directors &amp;<lb/> Company</name> of the Bank of Louisville<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William C Watts</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear><lb/> of <name>Morris Cahn</name></head>
<p>Judgment on Garnishment. Now at this day<lb/> come the parties by their attorneys and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court<lb/> upon the interrogatories and answer filed<lb/> and the Court having duly heard the same<lb/> doth find from the answer that the Garnishee<lb/> is indebted to the defendant in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty seven</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="306" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0309.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>dollars twenty three cents It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the said Garnishee the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found. And that they have execution<lb/> therefor, And it is further ordered that the said garnishee be allowed<lb/> the sum of ten dollars for his trouble has in answering herein, to be<lb/> taxed as costs against the said defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Burke</name></head>
<p>On Indictment for Burglary &amp; Larceny. Change Venne from Crim Court<lb/> Now at this day come as will the Circuit Attorney who<lb/> prosecutes for the State as the defendant in his own<lb/> proper person; thereupon come also a Jury to wit<lb/> <name>Thomas Cummings</name>, <name>George M Willing</name> <name>Jud Mullingan</name>, <name>Saml K Wilson</name>, <name>Robt Montgomery</name>, <name>James Hughes</name>,<lb/> <name>John M Pfeiffer</name>, <name>H B Merritt</name>, <name>E J Roberts</name>, <name>M B. Humphreys</name>, <name>H A Conant</name>, <name>B Burback</name>,<lb/> twelve good and lawful new who being duly elected tried and sworn well and<lb/> truly to try, thereupon the trial of the Cause progressed but not being con<lb/>cluded at the hour of adjournment further proceedings herein are deferred<lb/> until the meeting of the Court tomorrow morning<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetano Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interplea of <name><unclear>Sangunette</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come again the parties by their respect<lb/>ive attorney and the Jury empanneled and Sworn herein also<lb/> come, and the trial of this cause being finished the<lb/> Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find the<lb/> issue joined in favor of said plaintiffs and against the said Interpleader. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said<lb/> defendant their costs and charges by their in this suit expended and have<lb/> therefor execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alexander Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetano Pittaluga</name></head>
<p>On Interplea of <name><unclear>Sangunette</unclear></name></p>
<p>Now at this day come the said parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and Consent and<lb/> agree that the Court may render Judgment<lb/> herein for the plaintiff and against said Interplea<lb/>der as per agreement heretofore filed. It is therefore considered and adjudged<lb/> by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said Interpleader their<lb/> costs and charges by their in this behalf expended and that Execution<lb/> Issue therefor<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="307" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0310.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-19">Wednesday May 19th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The Citizens Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Dent</name> and <name><unclear>Kenneth</unclear> McKenzio</name></head>
<p>Assignment of Judgment filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Matthew S. Maloney</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Boernstein</name> et al</head>
<p>Deposition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Sherman J Bacon</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Oliver T. Bragg</name> et al</head>
<p>Deposition filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Porter White &amp; Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M. Taylor Gar &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Denial of answer, and replication filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>H Bodeman</name></head>
<p><name>Henry N. Hart</name> assignee files a report<lb/> of sale herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles Webb</name><lb/> <name>Benjamin Brison</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James H McCulloch</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James Castello</name></head>
<p>Judgment. Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and consent and<lb/> agree that Judgment may be rendered against<lb/> the defendant and in favor of the plaintiffs<lb/> for the sum of one cent damages. It is<lb/> therefore considered by the Court that the plain<lb/>tiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the<lb/> Court found and that the plaintiff have and retain possession of the<lb/> property delivered to them by the coroner at the commencement of<lb/> this suit and it is further ordered that the plaintiffs pay the<lb/> costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="308" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0311.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-20">Thursday May 20th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alex<unclear>r</unclear> Guenandon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetano Pittaluga<unclear>-</unclear></name><lb/> <name>Louis Sanguinette</name> interpleader</head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Thornburgh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm Clark</name> et al</head>
<p>Supplemental answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Squrie Hall</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William H Deriar</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff he has further time<lb/> until the the first day of next term allowed<lb/> him to file reply to the amended answer herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the application<lb/> of<lb/> <name>William Herkins</name> &amp; <name>Hervin<lb/> McGrory</name> alias <name>Webster Shaw</name></head>
<p>Habeas Corpus<unclear>.</unclear> The Court having duly<lb/> heard and considered the application<lb/> of the petitioners doth order that the<lb/> same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Dalton</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas F. Wightman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Charles Marlon</name></head>
<p>The Plaintiff by his attorney comes and<lb/> acknowledges full and entire satisfaction of<lb/> the judgment rendered against said defendants<lb/> on the <date when="1858-05-05">5th day of May 1858</date> for one thousand<lb/> and ninety eight dollars and thirty cents</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Burke</name></head>
<p>Motion for new trial filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph S. Foster</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edgar Ames</name> Gar of<lb/> <name>Stephen M Whitehouse</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered that the garnishee herein be<lb/> discharged</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emiston McClellan</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edgar Ames</name> Gar &amp;</head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> it is ordered that the garnishee herein be dis<lb/>charged<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther M. Shreeve</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick W Jugle</name> et al</head>
<p>Report of referee filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennedy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name> <unclear>Gain</unclear> &amp;</head>
<p>Replication of Garnishee filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="309" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0312.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note>error</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Montgomery</name><lb/> <name>Henry H. Breffenmeyer</name><lb/> <name>Alexander Evans</name><lb/> <name>Robert L. Crawford</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery Jr</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Stevens</name> Gar of<lb/> <name>R. W. Pucker</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective attor<lb/>neys and by consent It is ordered that the judgment by<lb/> <unclear>refanet</unclear> heretofore entered herein be set aside and<lb/> the said Garnishee files an answer herein. And the<lb/> parties submit this case to the Court upon the interrog<lb/>atories and answer, and the Court doth find from the<lb/> answer of the said Garnishee that he is indebted<lb/> to the defendant in the sum of sixty two dollars and<lb/> nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found due and oweing by him to the defendant and thereof<lb/> have execution. And the said garnishee is allowed five dollars for his<lb/> trouble had in answering</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The Bank of the State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Dalton</name> Garnishee of<lb/> <name>Daniel Shattuck</name>., <name>Jules<lb/> Hebert</name>, <name>Alonzo H. Wood</name><lb/> and <name>Anapias Rice</name></head>
<p>Garnishment<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court upon the interrog<lb/>atories and answer, and the Court doth find<lb/> from the answer of the said garnishee that<lb/> he is indebted to the defendants in the sum<lb/> of two hundred dollars, It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>214<unclear>rd</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Renben J. Guthridge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles Sells</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear><lb/> of <name>James M McFadin</name></head>
<p>Garnishment<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and by consent It is ord<lb/>ered that the Judgment by default heretofore entered<lb/> herein be set aside and the said garnishee<lb/> files an answer herein and the parties waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer and<lb/> the Court having duly heard the same doth find from the answer of the<lb/> garnishee that he is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and<lb/> fourteen dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by<lb/> the Court found, And have execution therefore, And it is further ordered that<lb/> the said garnishee be allowed ten dollars for his trouble in answering herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>267.74</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Renben J. Guthridge</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frank. W Tillay</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear> of<lb/> <name>James M. McFadin</name></head>
<p>Garnishment. Now at this day come the<lb/> parties by their respective attorneys and by Consent<lb/> It is ordered that the Judgment by default<lb/> heretofore entered herein be set aside, and the<lb/> said garnishee files an answer herein and the<lb/> parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court <unclear>oathe</unclear> interrogatories<lb/> and answer and the Court having duly heard the same doth find from<lb/> the answer of the said garnishee that he is indebted to the defendant in the sum<lb/> of two hundred and sixty seven dollars and seventy form Cents. It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said Garnishee the sum aforesaid in form<lb/> aforesaid by the Court found and have execution therefor, and it is further ordered that<lb/> the said garnishee be allowed ten dollars for his trouble in answer herein</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="310" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0313.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Joseph Wallace</name></head>
<p>On Note Judgment<unclear>-</unclear></p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury sub<lb/>mit this case to the Court upon the pleading<lb/> and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the<lb/> plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and sixty five dollars.<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the<lb/> defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor<lb/> And It is further ordered that the defendants return and deliver to<lb/> the sheriff the property levied on by him by virtue of the writ of attach<lb/>ment herein, and retained in possession by the defendants by virtue of<lb/> the forth coming bond given herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Goss</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. B. Merritt</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and<lb/> on their application it is ordered that this<lb/> cause be continued on account of the<lb/> absence of Penfield and Kernan<lb/> material witnesses on the part of the defence, and at defendants costs<lb/> And it is ordered that the motion to strike out the answer of the<lb/> defendants remain on the motion Docket of this term for hearing</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Shultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the Court having<lb/> duly heard and considered the motion of defendant <name>Hirschfeld</name> to set aside<lb/> the default entered against him doth sustain the same, and thereupon<lb/> on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that this case be dismissed<lb/> as to defendant <name>Hirschfeld</name> and that this case be continued</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James M. Porter</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Edward White</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas M. Taylor</name> <unclear>garce</unclear> of<lb/> <name>Matthew Shaffner</name></head>
<p>Judgment<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their Attorney, and the garnishee comes not, and Plaintiffs<lb/> waiving a Jury submit the cause to the Court; and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence adduced<lb/> doth find the issue joined in favor of the plaintiff, the Court finding the fact to be that said defendant <name>Shaffner</name> was insolvent at<lb/> the time of the assignment of stock mentioned in the answer of Garnishee and that said transfer was infraud of Creditors and<lb/> trial and find the stick described in answer of the Garnishee is held by and Garnishee in trust for said defendant <name>Matthew<lb/> Shaffner</name> and it further appearing to the Court that Judgment was recovered by plaintiffs in the original cause<lb/> against defendant for the sum of three hundred and thirty three 96/100 dollars on <date when="1857-11-04">november 4th 1857</date>, therefore the Court doth allon judgment in<lb/> favor of said plaintiffs against said Garnishee and order that said garnishee deliver to the Sheriff of S Louis County the certificates of the stock<lb/> described in the answer of Garnishee as twenty Shares in the <name>Globe Mutual Insurance Company</name> Ten shares in the <name>Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company</name><lb/> of St Louis and ten shares in the <name>Quiney Gas light Company</name> of Quiney <unclear>Illinois,</unclear> And it is ordered that the Sheriff of S Louis County sell the aforesaid Certificates of<lb/> Stock at the Court hence door of S Louis County first giving legal notice of said sale, and that on such sale he hand over to the purchaser<lb/> the said certificates of stock with <unclear>-</unclear> bill of sale therefor reciting the facts, and out of the proceed of said sale he pay the costs of said<lb/> suit and the amount of the judgment in the original cause in favor of the plaintiffs with interest from the date of said judgment<lb/> or so much thereof as can he paid from the proceed of said sale, and the balance if any shall be held for the use of<lb/> the defendant and subject to the further order of this Court and that said sheriff report to this court his proceedings<lb/> herein without delay</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="311" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0314.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>Note by clerk</p>
<p>The fallowing entry should have been made in the<lb/> record of the 19th day of may, but owing to an error in the minutes was<lb/> omitted. The entry is now made as of the <date when="1858-05-19">19th may 1858</date>.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Burke</name></head>
<p>On Indictment for <unclear>Burglary</unclear> &amp; Larceny.</p>
<p>Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid<lb/> as also the Juror aforesaid who having heard all the<lb/> evidence in the cause and the argument of counsel<lb/> upon their oaths aforesaid say they find the said defendant guilty of <unclear>Burglary</unclear><lb/> in the second degree, and larceny as charged in the first Court of the indict<lb/>ment and assess his punishment for <unclear>burglary</unclear> in the second degree by im<lb/>prisonment in the penitentiary for the space of five years, and for the Lar<lb/>ceny by imprisonment in the penitentiary for the space of two years. Therefore<lb/> it is considered by the Court that said defendant for his offence of <unclear>Burgla<lb/>ry</unclear> in the second degree aforesaid and in pursuance of the verdict herein<lb/> rendered be imprisoned in the penitentiary of this state for the space of<lb/> five years, and it is further considered by the Court that said de<lb/>fendant for his offence of Larceny aforesaid be imprisoned in the<lb/> penitentiary of this state for the additional space of two years,<lb/> that he pay the costs of this prosecution and stand committed until<lb/> this sence be complied with<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="312" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0315.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-21">Friday May 21st 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David T. Wheeler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel B. Bullock</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorneys and the defendant with<lb/>draws his exceptions to the report of the referee<lb/> herein, and thereupon the Court doth order that said<lb/> report be and the same is hereby confirmed, and the Court doth find from<lb/> the said report that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of<lb/> one hundred and nine dollars and forty eight cents, It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in<lb/> form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof<lb/> have execution. And it is further ordered that <name>A. M. Gondner Esq</name> be allowed<lb/> the sum of thirty dollars for his services as referee herein, to be taxed against defendant</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H Dubb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Campbell</name></head>
<p>For Damages<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> Attorney but the defendant comes not, and the plaintiff<lb/> waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the<lb/> pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find for the plaintiff and that he hath sustained<lb/> damage by reason of the promises in his petition mentioned in the sum of<lb/> two hundred and sixty three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid<lb/> by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A LeBean</name><lb/> <name>Ezra O English</name><lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name><lb/> <name>John Burns</name> and<lb/> <name>Jacob Johann</name></head>
<p>On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court <unclear>and</unclear><lb/> the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the same doth find that the defendants<lb/> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand<lb/> two hundred and fourteen dollars and fifty nine cents. It is<lb/> therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended<lb/> and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Benedict Shultz</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Kennedy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name> Garnishee<lb/> of <name>Joseph Larkin</name></head>
<p>Garnishment<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and thereupon come also<lb/> a Jury viz <name>John C Bull</name>, <name>Geo M Willing</name>, <name>John Mullingan</name>,<lb/> <name>Henry B. Merritt</name>, <name>Robert Montgomery</name>, <name>John M Pfeiffer</name><lb/> <name>E. G. Roberts</name>, <name>M. B. Humphreys</name>, <name>H. A. Conant</name> <name>Wm Wade<lb/> Henry Stagg</name> &amp; <name>Alexander Suss</name>, twelve good and lawful men who being duly<lb/> elected tried and sworn will and truly to try the issues joined the trial hereof progressed<lb/> and the plaintiff saying he will not further prosecute his action in this</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="313" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0316.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>behalf but valuntarily take nonsuit, it is ordered by the Court that the Jury sworn<lb/> herein be discharged and that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this<lb/> behalf but that the garnishee go hence without day and recover of the plain<lb/>tiff the costs herein expended, And have execution therefor, and it is further<lb/> ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for his trouble in<lb/> answering herein</p>
<p>Ordered that <name>William Heinty</name> a Juror in this Court be fined the sum of<lb/> five dollars for non attendance as such Juror<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John G. Priest</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name></head>
<p>On account Now at this day come the said parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and thereupon come also a Jury to writ <name>Thomas<lb/> Cummings</name>, <name>B Burback</name>, <name>Samuel K. Wilson</name>, <name>Alex. Murdoth</name>, <name>David<lb/> Lutch</name>, <name>W. P. thayer</name>, <name>George A Baner</name>, <name>G. F. Tower</name>, <name>Geo B.<lb/> Murry</name>, <name>James Scoley</name>, <name>Ernet Schenk</name>, <name>J. L. Adams</name> twelve<lb/> good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the<lb/> matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progresses<lb/> and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find upon the<lb/> Counter Claim in favor of said defendant and assess his damages at the<lb/> sum of forty eight dollars and ninety cents It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said<lb/> plaintiffs the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as assessed by the Jury<lb/> and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W Thornton</name></head>
<p>Grand Larceny. Change Venne from Criminal Court<lb/> Now at this day come As well the circuit<lb/> attorney who prosecutes for the state as the defendant<lb/> in his own proper person, and thereupon cause also<lb/> a Jury to writ <name>John C Bull</name>, <name>George M Willing</name>, <name>John Mulligan</name>, <name>Geo J Barnett</name>,<lb/> <name>Robert Montgomery</name>, <name>John M <unclear>Pfeiffer</unclear></name>, <name>Henry B Merritt</name>, <name>H. A Conant</name>, <name>William<lb/> Wade</name>, <name>Henry Stagg</name>, <name>Alexander Suss</name>, and <name>J. L. Adams</name> twelve good and<lb/> lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try<lb/> the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of<lb/> adjournment further proceedings are continued until the meeting of the Court<lb/> tomorrow morning. Court adjournment until ten Oclock tomorrow morning</p>
<closer>
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="314" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0317.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-22">Saturday May 22d 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D. Houseman</name></head>
<p>Order of Injunction and appointment of a receiver</p>
<p>The application of the plaintiffs petition having<lb/> been considered by the Court and the said Court being fully advised<lb/> thereof, it is ordered by said Court that <name>James D Houseman</name> he<lb/> enjoined from proceeding further in the collection of any of the assetts or from any<lb/> way interfering in the matters of the late forms of <name>Houseman Smith &amp; Co</name> and <name>Houseman</name><lb/> and <name>Smith</name> until the further order of this Court provided however that the said<lb/> <name>Julius H Smith</name> first execute a bond to said <name>James D. Houseman</name> in the penal sum<lb/> of twenty three thousand dollars. with <name>Pierre A Berthold</name> and <name>Samuel Harvill</name><lb/> as securities conditioned that if the said <name>Julius H. Smith</name> shall pay all damages<lb/> occasioned by said restraining order and abide the decision which shall be<lb/> made therein, and pay all sums of money, damages and costs that shall be<lb/> adjudged against him if said injunction be dissolved</p>
<p>And the Court having also considered the application of said petitioners, it is<lb/> ordered that <name>Augustus H Berthond</name> be and he is hereby appointed Receive<lb/> in this cause to adjust the matters involved, subject to the further direction<lb/> and order of this Court. And the said defendant <name>Houseman</name> is hereby required to<lb/> surrender on oath all the books, notes, accounts, <unclear>duly</unclear> money, credits, effects, chattels,<lb/> goods and papers of every description now in his possession belonging to the <unclear>lobe</unclear><lb/> firms of <name>Houseman Smith &amp; Co</name> and <name>Houseman</name> &amp; <name>Smith</name> to the receiver hereby appointed<lb/> and to render whenever called upon a just account of all business transactions<lb/> of such above mentioned firms as for as the same may have come within his Knowledge</p>
<p>It is further ordered that said Receiver before entering on his duties, file a<lb/> bond with sufficient securities in the sum of twenty three thousand dollars<lb/> conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C. Boardman</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney<lb/> and remits ninety five cents of the Judgment rendered<lb/> herein in his favor and against the defendants<unclear>.</unclear> and<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for new trial herein doth overrule the same, Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for new trial herein doth overrule the same<lb/> Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph W. Thornton</name></head>
<p>For Grand Larceny</p>
<p>Now at this day come again the said<lb/> parties as aforesaid and also the Jury sworn<lb/> herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause<lb/> progressed and the Jurors aforesaid having heard all the evidence and<lb/> the argument of Counsel upon their Oaths aforesaid say that the de<lb/>fendant is not guilty as charged in the indictment It is therefore<lb/> considered and adjudged by the Court that said defendant be acquit and<lb/> go hereof hence without day</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="315" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0318.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Parker</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Proof of Publication filed</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until Tuesday morning next at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-25">Tuesday May 25th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Raiguel</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Herman Weiner</name> &amp; <name>O. Schum</name></head>
<p>By Consent of Parties It is ordered by the Court that this case<lb/> be dismissed at the cost of defendants and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther M Shreeve</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick Jugle</name> et al</head>
<p>Motion for judgment on report of referee filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William N Laker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Arthin T. Hollister</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come<lb/> the defendant and files a statement whereby it ap<lb/>pears to the Court that he confesses that he is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand dol<lb/>lars and consents and agrees that judgment may be rendered against him<lb/> and in favor of the plaintiff for said sum. It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum<lb/> aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed and his costs and charges<lb/> in this behalf expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshua W. Alexander</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion to Strike out defendants answer doth<lb/> sustain the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm M. Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Morrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. K. Philiber</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for new trial herein doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled.</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="316" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0319.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>David W Shepperd</name></head>
<p>On the application of <name>David W Shepperd</name> It is<lb/> ordered that <name>Thomas C. Chester</name> assignee of said<lb/> <name>David W Shepperd</name>, appear before this Court on<lb/> the <date when="1858-05-27">27th day of may 1858</date> and exhibit on oath<lb/> the accounts of his trust or shew cause to the contrary</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff <unclear>dedinus</unclear> is awarded him<lb/> to take the depositions of witnesses in the State<lb/> of Ohio to be read on the trial of this cause</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>P. <unclear>McKennel</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Molloy</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for a relaxation of costs herein doth<lb/> overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Emerson Johnson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jones Covill &amp; c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard <unclear rend="strikethrough">and</unclear> considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth overrule<lb/> the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>C. K. Bacon</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Plant</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule<lb/> the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>J. D. Ford</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Beard &amp; Bro</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein doth<lb/> sustain the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State to use of<lb/> <name>Meyer Goldsalt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B. Watson</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion to set aside the nonsuit herein doth<lb/> overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>S Louis Building &amp; Savings Institution</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John D Gage</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein<lb/> doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus Rolker</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Increase Miller</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein doth<lb/> overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Ivory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion in arrest of Judgment herein<lb/> doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>366.50</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Sandhelm</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Elias Lyons</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the defendant and<lb/> files a Statement whereby it appears that he confesses that he is indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty six dollars and fifty cents<lb/> and consents and <unclear>agras</unclear> that Judgment therfor many be rendered against<lb/> <unclear>him</unclear> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum afore<lb/>said in form aforesaid confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="317" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0320.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George C. Reid</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. A. Pelletier</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for a new trial herein doth order that<lb/> the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Ames &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for a new trial herein doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Fred D. Pality</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for a new trial herein doth order<lb/> that the same be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Charles H. Thornton</name> admr<lb/> of <name>Francis M Huffaker</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Granville Kimball</name><lb/> <name>James Moore</name> and<lb/> <name>Martin O. Walker</name></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by<lb/> his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that<lb/> this case as to defendant <name>Granville Kimball</name> and<lb/> <name>Martin O Walker</name> be dismissed and the defend<lb/>ant <name>James Moore</name> although called coming not,<lb/> the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleading and proofs where<lb/>from the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in<lb/> the sum of one hundred and forty four dollars twenty nine cents. It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of<lb/> suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo W Parker</name><lb/> <name>Reuben Berman <unclear>&amp;c</unclear></name><lb/> <name>Trumbull G. Russell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Petition<unclear>.</unclear> Default<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day come the plain<lb/>tiffs by their attorney but the defendant although duly<lb/> warned and solemnly called comes not, wherefore on<lb/> motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered that the petition<lb/> of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Mayherg</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Bernard Midas</name> &amp;<lb/> <name><unclear>Menillus</unclear> Carl</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale<unclear>.</unclear> Now at this day comes <name>James<lb/> Castello</name> Sheriff of Saint Louis County and files a State<lb/>ment whereby it appears to the Court that the property<lb/> levied on by virtue and authority of the writ of attach<lb/>ment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to de<lb/>preciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that<lb/> the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense, It is<lb/> therefore ordered by the Court that the said <name>James Castello</name> Sheriff as<lb/> aforesaid proceed to sell the same in conformity to the Statute in<lb/> such case made and provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis Carr</name><lb/> <name>David S. Carr</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>George A. Haynes</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Cornelius D Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name></head>
<p>On Account. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and<lb/> waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs<lb/> wherefrom the Court doth find for the plaintiffs and doth assess<lb/> their damages at the sum of two hundred and eighty nine<lb/> dollars eighty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> also their costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="318" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0321.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George B. Sanderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Franklin Field</name><lb/> <name>C H Barton</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and on<lb/> his motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant<lb/> <name>Saml Myerson</name>. And the defendants <name>Field</name> and <name>Barton</name>, although duly<lb/> warned and called coming not make default wherefore on motion<lb/> of plaintiff it is ordered that his petition be taken against there<lb/>as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing<lb/> sued upon that said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hundred<lb/> and fifty nine dollars sixty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the<lb/> plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of<lb/> suit and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus T. Shapleigh</name><lb/> <name>Thomas D Day</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Woodward Crittenden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Carson</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>F. N Bailer</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. Now at this day comes the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiffs and on his motion and it appear<lb/>ing to the Court that the defendant are not reci<lb/>dents of the state of Missouri, it is therefore ordered<lb/> that the said defendants be notified of the Commence<lb/>ment of this suit, the object of which is to obtain judg<lb/>ment against them for the sum of twenty five hundred<lb/> and eighty six dollars and nine cents due from the defendants to the plaintiffs on<lb/> the note sued upon, and that unless they he and appear at the next term of this Court<lb/> to be begun and held on the first monday of october next at the city of saint<lb/> Louis within and for the county of St Louis, And on or before the third day of said<lb/> term Answer to the said action, the petition of the plaintiffs will be taken for<lb/> confessed against them and judgment rendered against them and their prop<lb/>erty sold to satisfy the same, And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of<lb/> Saint Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name><lb/> <name>Thomas D. Day</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Woodward Crittenden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Augustus Galliard</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Jules Farmishon</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication, Now at this day comes the attorney<lb/> for the plaintiff and on his motion, and it appear<lb/>ing to the Court that the defendants are not residents<lb/> of the state of Missouri, it is therefore ordered that<lb/> the defendants be notified of the commencement of this<lb/> suit the object of which is to obtain a Judgment<lb/> against them for the sum of four hundred and ninety<lb/> five dollars seventy two cents upon a note of the defendants in the hands of the plaintiffs<lb/> and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and<lb/> held at the city of S Louis in and for the County of Saint Louis on the first mon<lb/>day of october next and on or before the third day of said term answer to<lb/> the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and<lb/> judgment rendered against them. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be<lb/> published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the city of S Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Thomas B. Wing</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob S. Williams</name></head>
<p>On motion for new trial</p>
<p>Now at this day come the<lb/> parties, and the Court having duly heard and consid<lb/>ered the motion for new trial herein doth order that<lb/> the said motion be overruled<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="319" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0322.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> and<lb/> <name>James M. Franciscus</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin F. C. Champion</name><lb/> <name>Raymond A Papin</name><lb/> <name>Cornelius D. Sullivan</name><lb/> <name>Jeremiah T. Sullivan</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Samuel Myerson</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney<lb/> and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon<lb/> the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth<lb/> find that the defendants <name>B. F. C. Champion</name> and <name>Saml.<lb/> Myerson</name> are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen<lb/> hundred and forty three dollars seventy five cents, It is there<lb/>fore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of<lb/> the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and<lb/> their costs of suit and thereof have execution, And<lb/> it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the note sued upon was <unclear>altered</unclear><lb/> and changed after the endorsement thereof by the defendants <name>R. A. Papin</name> and <name>C. D.</name> and<lb/> <name>J. t. Sullivan</name>, it is therefored ordered that they be discharged from all liability and <unclear>saw note-</unclear><lb/> to the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William S. Grant</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and con<lb/>sidered the motion for new trial herein doth<lb/> overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brent</name> by his <unclear>Guardian</unclear><lb/> and next friend <name>John Garnett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander J P <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name> adm<lb/> of <name>Pierce C. Grace</name> <unclear>deed.</unclear></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleading and<lb/> proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for<lb/> the defendant. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the defendant go hereof hence and<lb/> recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have thereof execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Brent</name> by his <unclear>guardian</unclear><lb/> and next friend <name>John Garnett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander J P <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name> <unclear>adm.</unclear><lb/> of <name>Pierce C Grace</name> <unclear>deed</unclear></head>
<p>Petition Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for<lb/> the defendant, It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the defendant go hence and<lb/> recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Jam</unclear> Brent</name> by her next friend<lb/> &amp; Guardian <name>John Garnett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander P <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name><lb/> <unclear>adm</unclear> of <name>Pierce C Grace</name> <unclear>deed</unclear></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleading and<lb/> proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for<lb/> the defendant, It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the defendant go hereof hence<lb/> and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Timothy</unclear> L. Papin</name> and<lb/> <name>Margaret Papin</name> his wife<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alex. J. P. <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name> <unclear>adm</unclear><lb/> of <name>Pierce C. Grace</name> <unclear>deed</unclear></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case<lb/> to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs where<lb/>from the Court doth find for the defendant <unclear rend="strikethrough">and</unclear><lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the defendant go hereof hence and recover of<lb/> the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="320" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0323.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Turner</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin H Batte</name></head>
<p>The plaintiffs come and acknowledge entire satisfaction<lb/> of the Judgment obtained by them against the defendant<lb/> on the <date when="1852-01-05">5th day of January 1852</date> for three thousand<lb/> three hundred and seventy nine dollars forty one cents</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John B. Osborne</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Alexander C Anderson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin H Batte</name><lb/> <name>William Schluter</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Ernest Schluter</name></head>
<p>Satisfaction</p>
<p>Now at this day come the said<lb/> plaintiff and acknowledge fall and entire sat<lb/>isfaction of all judgments rendered against the<lb/> defendants on any or either or all of them in<lb/> the above entitled cause<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Samuel L. Moses</name> and<lb/> <name>Julius L. Moses</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>R. F Bridwell</name> and<lb/> <name>S. L. Norris</name></head>
<p>On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attor<lb/>ney and on his motion it is ordered that this case be<lb/> dismissed as to defendant <name>S L. Norris</name>, And the<lb/> defendant <name>Bridwell</name> although duly summoned and<lb/> called coming not makes default wherefore on motion of<lb/> plaintiff their petition is taken for confessed against said<lb/> defendant and the Court find from the instrument of writing sued on that the said defendant<lb/> is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty two dollars fifty cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant<lb/> the sum aforesaid as found and their costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo Pomeroy</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joshua W Alexander</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and Considered the motion<lb/> to strike out the answer of <name>Renick</name> doth sustain the<lb/> same. Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F Shapleigh</name><lb/> <name>Thomas D. Day</name> and<lb/> <name>Woodward Crittenden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Boutcam</name> and<lb/> <name>Point Carway</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. The Sheriff of Saint Louis County<lb/> having made return that the defendant cannot be<lb/> found and the Court being satisfied that said defendant<lb/> cannot be served with process, on motion it is ordered<lb/> that the said defendant be notified that a civil action<lb/> has been commenced against their in this Court the<lb/> object of which is to obtain judgment against them<lb/> for the sum of two hundred and ten dollars fifty eight cents <unclear rend="strikethrough">on</unclear> account of a note<lb/> and that their property has been attached, and that unless they be and<lb/> appear at the next term of said Court to he be gun and held at the Court<lb/> house within and for the County of Saint Louis on the first monday of october<lb/> next and on or before the third day of said term answer to the said action<lb/> the petion of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment will be<lb/> rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same and it<lb/> is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the<lb/> Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of Saint Louis</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Augustus F. Shapleigh</name><lb/> <name><unclear>Thos</unclear> D Day</name> &amp; <name>Woodward Crittenden</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Bontcam</name> and<lb/> <name>Point Carway</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. The Sheriff of S Louis<lb/> County having made return that the defendants<lb/> cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that<lb/> the said defendants cannot be served with<lb/> process, on motion it is ordered that said defendants</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="321" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0324.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<p>be notified that a civil suit has been commenced against them the object<lb/> of which is to <unclear rend="strikethrough">obtain</unclear> judgment against them for the sum of one hundred and <unclear rend="strikethrough">sixty</unclear><lb/> three dollars and sixty one cents, on account of a note, and that their property <unclear>to</unclear> as<lb/> been attached and that unless they be and appear at the next term of said<lb/> Court to be begun and held at the city of Saint Louis within and for the county<lb/> of Saint Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the<lb/> third day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff<lb/> will be taken for confessed and Judgment will be rendered against them<lb/> and their property sold to Satisfy the same, and it is further ordered that<lb/> a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper<lb/> printed in the city of St Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the<lb/> assigment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Theodore R. Porey</name></head>
<p>Order of Sale</p>
<p>The Assignee this day come and produced<lb/> to the Court his report of the Settlement of said<lb/> estate and returned to the Court certain Accounts<lb/> as uncollectable. It is therefore ordered by the<lb/> Court that Said assignee sell and assign said accounts at pub<lb/>lic <unclear>rendue</unclear> to the highest bidder for cash, first advertising said<lb/> rate in some newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis ten days<lb/> before the day of Sale</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="322" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0325.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-26">Wednesday May 26th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob Fritschle</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and file<lb/> an affidavit and appeal bond which is acknowl<lb/>edged before and approved by the Court and<lb/> pray an appeal to the supreme Court from<lb/> the Judgment of this Court rendered herein, wherefore it is ordered<lb/> that said appeal be granted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Alexander M. McNickle</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Edward Boyle</name></head>
<p>Petition Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this<lb/> case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at three<lb/> hundred and sixty five dollars and eighty three cents, It is therefore consid<lb/>ered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> in form aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Bernardind</unclear> Florey</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Able S. Merritt</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and considered<lb/> the motion to dissolve the injunction here<lb/>in doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>W. V. N. Bay trustee &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Wescott</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Martin D. Hickman <unclear>admr</unclear> &amp; c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John C. Bull Exor &amp; c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
<p>By consent of parties the appearance<lb/> of <name>James Rumbold</name>, <name>Susan Rumbold</name> his wife<lb/> and <name>James A Reed</name> as plaintiff is entered of<lb/> record as if done on the day the Judgment was rendered</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
<p>Answer and motion to dissolve injunction<lb/> and to vocate order appointing Receiver<lb/> filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for new trial herein doth overrule the same.<lb/> Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A. Maffitt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lauham</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same<lb/> Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John M. Cashman</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Sylvester W. Ball</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion It is ordered by the Court that<lb/> the report of the <unclear>Commissioners</unclear> filed herein<lb/> be and the same is hereby Confirmed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="323" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0326.tiff"/>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>802.75</note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T. Mudd</name><lb/> <name>John J. Mudd</name><lb/> <name>Graham L. Hughes</name> &amp;<lb/> <name><unclear>Arnistead</unclear> O. Grubb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>B. M. Veatch</name></head>
<p>Judgment. Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> by their attorney and file herein proofs of publication<lb/> of the order of publication hereto fore made in this<lb/> case, and the defendant although duly notified and<lb/> called, failing to come makes default wherefore<lb/> on motion it is ordered that plaintiffs petition<lb/> be taken for confessed against him, and the plain<lb/>tiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and<lb/> proofs and the Court having heard and considered the same doth find for the<lb/> plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Eight hundred and two<lb/> dollars seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R. Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="324" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0327.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-27">Thursday May 27th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Morrison</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant and files his<lb/> affidavit and an appeal bond with security which<lb/> is acknowledged before and approved by the Court<lb/> and pray an appeal to the supreme Court And<lb/> it is ordered by the Court that said appeal be granted<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Stephen Haskell</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benj. F. C. Champion</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth overrule<lb/> the same. Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Evans</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for new trial herein doth<lb/> overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<note>
</note>
<p></p>
<closer>
<dateline>St Louis <unclear rend="strikethrough">Marc</unclear> <date when="1862-04-11"><unclear>April</unclear> 11th 1862</date><lb/> <unclear>J</unclear> hereby <unclear>assigne</unclear> all <unclear>my</unclear> right<lb/> <unclear>title</unclear> and interest to the <unclear>until</unclear><lb/> judgment of which this <unclear>is the</unclear><lb/> <unclear>in Ergnie to</unclear> <name>John G Priest</name><lb/> <unclear>Sher</unclear> judgment <unclear>is</unclear> credited with <unclear>$41111.</unclear> <date when="1860-06-28"><unclear>June</unclear> 28th 1860</date></dateline>
<signed><unclear>Attest</unclear><lb/> <name><unclear>S Rice Clk.</unclear></name></signed>
<signed><name>A. <unclear>J. Cory</unclear></name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Coons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac M Taylor</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Edwin R. Mason</name></head>
<p>On Note, Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their Attorney and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court upon the pleading and<lb/> proofs and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth find that the defend<lb/>ants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and<lb/> six dollars and fifty cents It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and <unclear>the</unclear> costs of suit and have execution therefor,</p>
<p>And the defendants come and file a motion for new trial here<lb/>in and the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion<lb/> doth overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>The President Directors and<lb/> Company</name> of the Bank of Louisville<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Morris Cohn</name></head>
<p><name>Charles D Drake</name>, Attorney for the<lb/> plaintiff comes, in open Court and<lb/> acknowledges to have realized on the<lb/> execution issued in this cause against<lb/> <name>William C Watt</name>, the garnishee herein<lb/> the sum of seven hundred and ninety dollars forty one cents, and<lb/> enters a credit upon the Bill of Exchange sued on for said amount.<lb/> And by leave of Court the said Attorney withdraws the said Bill of<lb/> Exchange and leave a receipt for the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Morris <unclear>Langsdon</unclear></name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Isaac Rocenstein</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Seligman Hohenthal</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the<lb/> defendant an files in Court a Statement in writing<lb/> sworn to whenby it appears to the Court that he<lb/> confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiffs in the<lb/> sum of five hundred and twenty three dollars eighty<lb/> four cents and consents that Judgment may be entered against him for said amount<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the<lb/> sum aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="325" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0328.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name><unclear>Jam</unclear> Brent</name> by <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A J P. <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files motion for new<lb/> trial herein and the Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the same doth order that said mo<lb/>tion be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert</name>, <name>Brent</name> By <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A J. P. <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files motion for new trial herein<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth order that said motion be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brent</name> by <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. J. P. <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files motion for new trial herein<lb/> and the Court having duly heard and considered the same<lb/> doth order that said motion be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy L. Papin &amp; Wife</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. J. P. <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and file motion for new trial<lb/> herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> same doth order that said motion be overruled</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob <unclear>Fritschle</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Motion for an additional appeal bond filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Ivory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>W. V. N. Bay trustee &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph Wescott</name> et al</head>
<p>Appeal to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Defendants file a bond herein conditioned<lb/> according to law with <name>G. B. Richardson</name> and<lb/> <name>Joseph Farrell</name> as securities and thereupon on<lb/> their motion an appeal to the supreme Court is granted them from<lb/> the decision herein rendered</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<note><unclear>#</unclear>27.50<lb/> <unclear>Reuntted</unclear></note>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B. Ricords</name> <unclear>adm</unclear> of<lb/> <name>Milton N. McLean</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff and<lb/> <unclear>remits</unclear> twenty seven dollars and fifty cents of<lb/> the Judgment rendered in this behalf on the<lb/> <date when="1858-03-30">30th day of march 1858</date> for five hundred<lb/> and ninety four dollars thirty six cents. And<lb/> the Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein<lb/> doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the motion for a new trial herein doth<lb/> overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State to the use<lb/> of <name>Meyer Goldsoll</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm B. Watson</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="326" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0329.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Daniels</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Selcott</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Robert McDonald</name></head>
<p>Judgment. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his<lb/> Attorney and on his motion it is ordered that the<lb/> Judgment <date when="1858-04-17">seventeenth day of April 1858</date> be and<lb/> the same is hereby set aside and made <unclear>mull.</unclear><lb/> And it is further ordered on his motion<lb/> that the report of the referce, filed herein be and the same is here<lb/>by confirmed, and the Court doth find from the said report<lb/> that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six<lb/> hundred and sixty seven dollars seventy seven cents It is therefore<lb/> on further motion of plaintiff considered by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of<lb/> suit and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa S. Friligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M Ames</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants by their<lb/> Attorneys and file an affidavit for an appeal<lb/> herein and an appeal is allowed them to the<lb/> supreme Court from the judgment herein, There<lb/>upon the defendants file an appeal bond with <name>Francis Hofelman</name> as<lb/> principal And <name>George Geisel</name> and <name>F. W. Prauge</name> as securities which<lb/> bond is acknowledged by the <unclear>obligon</unclear> and approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> of plaintiff to continue the ``motion to dissolve injunction''<lb/> until the next tum doth sustain the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Cleander Mighells</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D Jones</name></head>
<p>On motion the Court doth order that the order of de<lb/>livery made in this cause on the tenth day of march<lb/> last be set aside and that this cause be <unclear>neinstated</unclear><lb/> and continued for further proceedings</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Boggs</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Co</name></head>
<p>The Court having heard and considered the<lb/> motion for new trial herein and being thereof<lb/> advised doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John S. Thompson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Robert Sterling</name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for new trial herein and being thereof ad<lb/>vised doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>E. Anthony</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. H. Fitzgibbon</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion to set aside the judgment herein doth<lb/> order that the same be overruled</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>J. R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="327" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0330.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-28">Friday May 28th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ezekiel W. Parson</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Brevard</name></head>
<p>Depositions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Simon Abeles</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wilson Henly &amp;c</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the motion<lb/> for a new trial herein and being thereof advised<lb/> doth sustain the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis A Benoist</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Gano Bryan</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion for a new trial herein and being thereof<lb/> advised doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
<p>The plaintiff comes and files motion and<lb/> affidavit in support thereof for rule upon the<lb/> defendant to <name><unclear>shew</unclear></name> cause why a writ of<lb/> attachment should not be issued against him</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Jacob <unclear>Fritschle</unclear></name> et al</head>
<p>It appearing to the Court that the appeal<lb/> bond taken in this cause is insufficient with<lb/> the securities given, it is on motion ordered<lb/> that the defendants file on new and sufficient<lb/> appeal bond herein forthwith<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Lucius A. Willard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Miles G. Moris</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and file<lb/> their appeal bond with security, which is acknowledged<lb/> before and approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Eugene Jaccard</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander Mitchell</name></head>
<p>On motion of plaintiff a <unclear>dedinans</unclear><lb/> to take depositions in the District of Columbia<lb/> to be read on their behalf on the trial of this<lb/> cause is awarded them</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Herman H. Brugrach &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Ferdinand Vandermale</name></head>
<p>Receipt for exhibits withdrawn filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Bogg &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Co</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant by its<lb/> Attorney and files the affidavit of <name>S. R. Clarke</name><lb/> its secretary, and also files an appeal bond<lb/> with <name>James M Hughes</name> its president as principal<lb/> and <name>D. R. Garrison</name> &amp; <name>Robert Fisher</name> as securities which bond being<lb/> acknowledged before and approved by the Court, on motion an ap<lb/>peal is granted the defendant to the supreme Court from the<lb/> Judgment rendered herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="328" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0331.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William <unclear>Docuch</unclear></name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Rives</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Rush Heintzelman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>James M. Clark</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the defend<lb/>ants and file a written statement, sworn to from<lb/> which it appears to the Court that the defendants<lb/> confess that they are indebted to the plaintiff<lb/> in the sum of six hundred and twenty dollars seventeen<lb/> cents and consent that Judgment may be ren<lb/>dered against them for said sum It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as Confessed<lb/> and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William <unclear>Docuch</unclear></name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Thomas L. Rives</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James M. Clarke</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the<lb/> defendant and files a written statement sworn to from which<lb/> it appears to the Court that the defendants confess that<lb/> the is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hun<lb/>dred and two dollars seventy two cents and consents that<lb/> Judgment may be rendered against him for said sum It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found<lb/> and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Richard R. Field</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>H. F Cross</name> et al</head>
<p>On motion It is ordered that <name>Leveritt Bill</name><lb/> be appointed receiver in this cause and<lb/> thereupon the said Bell files his bond as<lb/> such receiver with security approved by the<lb/> Court and conditioned according to the statute in such case made provided</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Luther M Shreeve</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Frederick W. Jugle</name><lb/> <name>George Lich</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Christian Kribben</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their attorney and the Court being advised<lb/> of and concerning the report of the referce<lb/> herein doth confirm the same, and having<lb/> further considered the same doth find for<lb/> the defendants. It is therefore considered by<lb/> the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by their suit herein but that<lb/> the defendants go hence and recover of the plaintiff their costs in<lb/> this behalf expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Archibald J. Somewille</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas S. Nelson</name></head>
<p>Affidavits in support of motion for <unclear>him</unclear><lb/> trial filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry T. Mudd</name><lb/> <name>John J. Mudd</name><lb/> <name>Graham L. Hughes</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Armistead O Grubb</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William M. <unclear>Lotimer</unclear></name> <unclear>Garee</unclear><lb/> of <name>B. M. Veatch</name></head>
<p>Judgment. Now at this day come the plaintiff<lb/> by their Attorney but the said Garnishee although<lb/> duly summoned and called comes not, and having<lb/> failed to answer herein, the plaintiff waiving a<lb/> Jury submits this case to the Court upon the<lb/> interrogatories and proofs and the court doth<lb/> find that the said garnishee is indebted to the<lb/> defendant in the sum of five hundred and<lb/> nineteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff re<lb/>cover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid as found and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="329" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0332.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Duermeyer</name></head>
<p>On motion for Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties<lb/> by their respective attorneys and submit to the Court<lb/> the motion herein and the Court having duly heard<lb/> and considered the said motion and being thereof advised doth sustain the<lb/> same. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff<lb/> recover of the defendant the sum of three hundred and forty dollars the<lb/> amount in said motion claimed, and his costs and charges herein and<lb/> have execution therefor</p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="330" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0333.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-29">Saturday May 29th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B Ricords <unclear>admr</unclear> &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name></head>
<p>Appeal to Supreme Court. Now at this day comes the<lb/> defendant by his attorney and files an affidavit for<lb/> appeal and also files an appeal bond with<lb/> <name>A G Bragg</name> as principal and <name>Michael Burrous</name><lb/> and <name>G. B. Richardson</name> as securities which bond being acknowledged before<lb/> and approved by the Court an appeal is granted the defendant to the<lb/> supreme Court from the Judgment of the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Marquard</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Michael Reiter</name></head>
<p>Appel to Supreme Court. Now at this day comes<lb/> the defendant and files an appeal bond with<lb/> <name>Michael Reiter</name> as security and <name>Andrew H Wing</name> and<lb/> <name>C. Gibson</name> as securities which bond being acknowl<lb/>edged before and approved by the Court, an appeal is granted the defend<lb/>ant to the supreme Court from the judgment of the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julia Morrise</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J. K. Philiber</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>John G. Priest</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W. Goode</name></head>
<p>It is ordered by the Court that the Judg<lb/>ment rendered upon the verdict of the Jury in<lb/> favor of the defendants Counter claim for forty eight<lb/> dollars and ninety cents be and the same is remitted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Geo C Reed</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>F. A Pelletin</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louisa L. Freligh</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph M. Ames &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Caddy</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charlotte Caddy</name></head>
<p>For Divorce. Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and thereupon the Court<lb/> proceeds to hear the pleadings and proofs herein<lb/> and the Court having heard the same and being<lb/> thereof advised doth order that this case be dismissed at the cost<lb/> of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H. Lucas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>The County of S Louis Garnishee<lb/> of the Central Plank Road Company</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by<lb/> their respective attorney and waiving a Jury<lb/> submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs and the Court having heard and consid<lb/>ered the same doth order that the said<lb/> Garnishee be discharged from the garnishment herein, and go hence</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="331" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0334.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>and recover of the its costs in this behalf expended and have execution<lb/> therefor. Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John J. H Vogt</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F. Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit for Appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Covenant Life Insurance Co</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles F Baker</name> et al</head>
<p>Affidavit for Appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W. Parker</name><lb/> <name>Reuben Berman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Trumbull G. Russell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Petition. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their<lb/> attorney and waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court<lb/> upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having<lb/> heard and considered the same doth <unclear rend="strikethrough">find for the plain<lb/>tiffs and</unclear> assess their damages at the sum of one<lb/> hundred and ninety six dollars and seventy nine cents<lb/> It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the<lb/> defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also their costs of suit and<lb/> thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George W Parker</name><lb/> <name>Reuben Berman</name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Trumbull G. Russell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Kenneth McKengee</name> <unclear>Garee</unclear><lb/> of <name>John Nevison</name></head>
<p>Garnishment. Now at this day come the<lb/> plaintiffs by their attorney but the garnishee<lb/> comes not and the plaintiff submits this case<lb/> to the Court upon the allegations and answer<lb/> of the said garnishee, wherefrom The Court<lb/> doth find that the garnishee is indebted to<lb/> the defendant in the sum of One hundred and<lb/> thirty nine dollars thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the<lb/> Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum afore<lb/>said as found and have execution therefore And it is further ordered<lb/> that the said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for<lb/> answering herein, to he taxed against said defendant as costs</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Edward Pate</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George D Moore</name><lb/> <name>Thomas Clarke</name><lb/> <name>William Shan</name><lb/> <name>William Ackley </name> &amp;<lb/> <name>Rass W Doyle</name></head>
<p>Order of Publication. the Sheriff of <unclear>Sr</unclear><lb/> Louis County having made return that the<lb/> defendants <name>Thomas Clarke</name> <name>William Shan</name> &amp; <name>William<lb/> Ackley</name> cannot be found in his county and the<lb/> Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot<lb/> be served with process, On motion of the plain<lb/>tiff by his attorney, it is ordered that said de<lb/>fendants be notified that a civil action has<lb/> been commenced against them the object of which is to obtain a<lb/> judgment against them and their Co defendants for the sum of seven<lb/> hundred dollars damages for injury <unclear>done</unclear> to <unclear>Wharf</unclear> boat of plaintiff, and that<lb/> unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun<lb/> and held at the city of <unclear>Sr</unclear> Louis within and for the County of S Louis<lb/> and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said<lb/> action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken against them for</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="332" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0335.tiff"/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<p>confessed against them and judgment will be rendered against them<lb/> and their property sold to satisfy the same And it is further or<lb/>dered that <unclear rend="strikethrough">the</unclear> a copy of this order be published in the Missouri<lb/> Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of Saint Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jules Gre</name> and<lb/> <name>Alex<unclear>r</unclear> <unclear>Gevenandon</unclear></name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Gaetand Pittaluga</name> deft<lb/> <name>Louis Sanguinette</name> Interpleader</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the parties by their<lb/> Attorney and the Court having heard and<lb/> being advised of and concerning the mo<lb/>tion for new trial herein doth overrule the<lb/> same. And by consent of parties it is<lb/> ordered that the Bill of Exceptions, when<lb/> offend herein shall be filed ``nine pro time'' as of to day</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until next monday morning at O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="333" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0336.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-05-31">Monday May 31st 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>A J Coons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>E. R. Mason &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Wakelam</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Valentine</name> et al</head>
<p>Amended Answer filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Joseph L. Papin &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Ivory</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Paul Carlin &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Appeal to Supreme Court. Now at this day come<lb/> the defendants and file an affidavit and pray an<lb/> appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment<lb/> herein and the Court having heard the same<lb/> doth grant the said appeal and thereupon the said defendants file<lb/> an appeal bond which is approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>David Rokohl</name> and<lb/> <name>Charles Kinkead</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name> and<lb/> <name>Egra O. English</name></head>
<p>On motion It is ordered by the Court<lb/> that this case be dismissed at this cost<lb/> of the defendant <name>Charles L. Gilpin</name><lb/> and that the plaintiffs recover of his their<lb/> costs and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C. Evans &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and<lb/> files herein an appeal bond which is ack<lb/>nowledged before and approved by the Court.</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Moffitt &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and<lb/> file herein an appeal bond which is acknowl<lb/>edged before and approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and<lb/> file herein an appeal bond which is ack<lb/>nowledged before and approved by the Court</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="334" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0337.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-01">Tuesday June 1st 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles L. Hunt</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendants by<lb/> their Attorney and file an affidavit for ap<lb/>peal herein, and the defendants having filed<lb/> Appeal bond herein, said appeal is granted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William A Moffitt</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Philip S. Lanham</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and<lb/> file an affidavit for appeal herein, and they having<lb/> filed an appeal bond herein said Appeal is granted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brent</name> by <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. J. P. <unclear>Garesche admr</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Brent</name> by <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A J P <unclear>Garesche admr</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Brent</name> by <name>Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A J P <unclear>Garesche admr</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>J. S. Papin &amp; Wife</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. J. P. <unclear>Garesche admr</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnsworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Terre Hunte Alton</name> &amp; S Louis Rail Road</head>
<p>The defendant by her agent <unclear>leland</unclear><lb/> files an affidavit for appeal to the<lb/> supreme Court herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="335" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0338.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-02">Wednesday June 2<unclear>c.</unclear> 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry W. Hart</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their respective<lb/> attorney and the Court having heard and considered the<lb/> motion for <unclear>here</unclear> trial herein doth overrule the same<lb/> and the defendant files herein his affidavit and prays<lb/> are appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court and the Court<lb/> having duly heard the same doth grant the said appeal and thereupon the<lb/> defendant files on appeal bond with himself as principal and <name><unclear>Borns<lb/>ondrid Florez</unclear></name> and <name>James F <unclear>Segnaige</unclear></name> as securities which bond being is<lb/> acknowledged before and approved by the Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A <unclear>LeBean</unclear></name> et al</head>
<p>The Court having heard and being advised of and<lb/> concerning the motion for new trial herein<lb/> doth overrule the same<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>D T. Card</name></head>
<p>Motion to discharge Assignees filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C Wagley &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Thomas Grant</name> et al</head>
<p>Agreement filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farnworth</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>S Louis Alton &amp; <unclear>Ten</unclear> Hante R R. Co</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the defendant<lb/> and files herein an appeal bond<lb/> which is acknowledged before and<lb/> approved by the Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="336" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0339.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-03">Thursday June 3c 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Andrew A LeBean</name> et al</head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants English <name>Burns</name><lb/> and <name>Johann</name>, and file an affidavit and prag<lb/> an appeal to the Supreme Court herein from the<lb/> Judgment of this Court and the Court having heard<lb/> the same doth grant the said Appeal, and thereupon the said defendants<lb/> file an appeal bond with <name>E O English</name> as principal and <name>Hiram Shan</name> and<lb/> <name>Matthias steitz</name> as securities which bond <name><unclear>king</unclear></name> acknowledged before and<lb/> approved by the Court<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Andrew J Coons</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Isaac W Taylor &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come the defendants and file<lb/> their appeal bond with <name>J W Taylor</name> and <name>E. R.<lb/> Mason</name> as principal and <name>David S Bigham</name><lb/> <name>Henry B. Belt</name> and <name>John G <unclear>Priest</unclear></name> as securities<lb/> which bond being acknowledged before and approved by the Court, the<lb/> Court on motion doth grant the defendants an appeal to the Supreme<lb/> Court from the decision of this Court</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John C Evans</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Charles H Pond</name></head>
<p>The defendant comes and files an affidavit<lb/> and pray an appeal to the supreme Court<lb/> from the Judgment of this Court and the<lb/> Court having heard the same and the defend<lb/>ants having heretofore filed bond said appeal prayed for is granted</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry Blaksley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Kellar</name></head>
<p>On motion of the plaintiff by him attorney be has leave<lb/> to file an amended petition herein during the Vacation<lb/> after this present term and the Sheriff of Saint<lb/> Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot<lb/> be found in his county and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served<lb/> with process on motion it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been<lb/> commenced against him in this Court that object of which is to obtain Judgment for the sum of<lb/> six hundred and seventy dollars on account of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the<lb/> defendant and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to he begun and held<lb/> at the city of Saint Louis within and for the county of S Louis and an or before the sixth day<lb/> of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for<lb/> confessed and judgment will be rendered against him. And it is further ordered<lb/> that a Copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed<lb/> in the city of S Louis<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William M. Morrison</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Samuel McCartney</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and acknowl<lb/>edge full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment rendered<lb/> herein in his favor at the present term of this Court</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until to morrow morning at ten O clock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name>.</signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="337" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0340.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-04">Friday June 4th 1858</date>.<lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James B. Ricords <unclear>adw</unclear> &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Addison G. Bragg</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Burke</name></head>
<p>Now at this day come again as well the Circuit attorney<lb/> who prosecutes for the State as the said defendant<lb/> by his attorney and thereupon the defendants motion<lb/> for a new trial heretofore filed herein being by said<lb/> parties argued and submitted to the Court and by the Court here fully un<lb/>derstood, therefore it is considered by the Court that said motion for<lb/> a new trial be overruled, Whereupon the defendant files a motion in ar<lb/>rest of Judgment herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William. S. Hillyer</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Daniel D Page</name> et al</head>
<p>This day comes the plaintiff and assigns the Judg<lb/>ment obtained by him against said defendant on the<lb/> <date when="1857-10-30">30th day of October 1857</date> for five hundred and<lb/> for dollars and sixty eight cents to <name>Harris D Boogs</name><lb/> and files herein a written assignment thereof<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Julius H. Smith</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James D Houseman</name></head>
<p>Stipulation of parties as to deposition of<lb/> Witness <name>Bowles</name> filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="338" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0341.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-05">Saturday June 5th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the<lb/> assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>D. T. Card</name></head>
<p>The motion of <name><unclear>Melvin</unclear> L Gray</name> the assignee in<lb/> this behalf having been duly heard and considered<lb/> by the Court is sustained and it is ordered<lb/> by the Court that the said assignee be hence dis<lb/>charged</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James H Lucas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>Eusas</unclear> McFaul</name> and<lb/> <name>Francis McFaul</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at this day<lb/> come the defendants and file a statement in<lb/> writing, sworn to, from which it appears that<lb/> the defendants confess that they are indebted to<lb/> the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and twenty<lb/> dollars and consent and agree that judgment may be rendered against them<lb/> and in favor of said plaintiff for said sum It is therefore considered<lb/> by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Fitz Henry Warren &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>E. N. Thomas</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name><unclear>Eneas</unclear> McFaul</name></head>
<p>Confession of Judgment. Now at their day<lb/> comes the defendant and files a statement in writing<lb/> sworn to from which it appears to the Court<lb/> that the defendant confesses that her is indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty one thou<lb/>sand dollars, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered<lb/> against him for said <unclear>same.</unclear> It is therefore considered by the Court, on<lb/> motion, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid<lb/> as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution<lb/> therefor<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Jane Brent by Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander J P <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name> <unclear>adm</unclear> &amp;</head>
<p>Affidavit for appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Brent by Guardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander J P <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Affidavit for Appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Timothy L. Papin &amp; Wife</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Alexander J. P. <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Affidavit for Appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Robert Brent by Gardian &amp;c</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A J P <unclear>Garesche adm</unclear> &amp;c</name></head>
<p>Affidavit for appeal filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Frederick Marquard</name> vs <name>Michael Reiter</name></head>
<p>Affidavit for appeal filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="339" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0342.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter<lb/> of<lb/> <name>George Williams</name></head>
<p><name>Habeas Corpus</name>. Now at this day come the par<lb/>ties and the Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the premises and being advised of and concerning the<lb/> same doth order that the prayer of the petition be<lb/> refused and that the said petitioner be remanded again into custody<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Louis C. Garnier</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Egra O. English</name> et al</head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until Tuesday morning next at ten Oclock
<signed><name>J R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="340" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0343.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-08">Tuesday June 8th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Caroline Renling</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Lorenzo D. Holmes &amp; Wife</name></head>
<p>On motion it is ordered by the Court that<lb/> <name>William A. Alexander</name> be substituted as<lb/> Guardian ad litern of <name>Caroline Renling</name> in<lb/> place of <name>Sir W. Rice</name> deceased<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Eddie</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Greene Parks</name></head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered<lb/> the demurrer herein doth sustaine the same and<lb/> on motion doth order that this suit be dismissed<lb/> at the cost of the plaintiff and <unclear>that</unclear> execution issue therefor</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph R. Bogg</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>America Insurance Company</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William C. Wagley</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Wm S. Grant</name></head>
<p>Bills of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Shaffner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
<p>Judgment. Now at this day come the<lb/> parties by their respective Attorney and waiving<lb/> a Jury submit this case to the Court and<lb/> the Court having heard and being advised of<lb/> and concerning the <unclear>premises</unclear> doth find for the plaintiff And doth assess<lb/> his damages at the sum of Eighteen thousand one hundred and thirty<lb/> four dollars twenty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that<lb/> the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his<lb/> costs of suit and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry C. Stocks</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Christian Schumacher &amp;c</name><lb/> <name>Christian Piper</name></head>
<p>Judgment on report of Referce<lb/> Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective Attorney and, the Court having duly<lb/> considered the report of the Referce herein doth<lb/> On motion Confirm the same and the Court<lb/> doth find from the said Report that the said defendants are indebted<lb/> to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ten dollars thirty two<lb/> cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover<lb/> of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his Costs herein<lb/> expended and thereof have execution<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of<lb/> the assignment<lb/> <name>David W Shepperd</name></head>
<p>Answer of assignee filed and motion<lb/> for order of sale of real estate filed</p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="341" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0344.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Wm Farrells</name> <unclear>adm</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>J <unclear>Baennans</unclear></name> <unclear>adw</unclear> et al</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and<lb/> considered the motion to quash the<lb/> writ of sine facias issued herein, The<lb/> motion <unclear>of</unclear> set aside the appearance of<lb/> <name>P. B Garesche</name>, and the motion of the defendant to dismiss And<lb/> being of said motions fully advised doth overrule the same</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John Wolff</name> <unclear>surviwing</unclear><lb/> administrator of <name>Diederich<lb/> W. <unclear>Nohlien</unclear></name> and <name>Ann C.<lb/> Speck</name> plaintiffs<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Riggin Archibald</name><lb/> <name>Gamble Charles Gibson</name><lb/>, <name>Wm C Jamison</name> &amp; <name>Barton<lb/> Bates</name> defendants</head>
<p>Appeal from Probate Court to Land Court<lb/> Change of Venne from Land Court</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs<lb/> <name>John Wolff</name> surviwing administrator of <name>Diedrich W.<lb/> Wohlein</name> and <name>Ann C Speck</name>, and come also the defendants<lb/> <name>John Riggin</name>, <name>Archibald Gamble</name>, <name>charles Gibson</name>, <name>William C Jamison</name><lb/> and <name>Barton Bates</name> and submit to the Court upon the pleadings<lb/> and proofs the application in writing of said <name>Wolff</name> and<lb/> <name>Speck</name> to approve a certain sale made by <name>John Wolff</name><lb/> administrator and <name>Ann Wohlein</name> administratrix of the estate<lb/> of <name>Diedrich W. Wohlein</name> on the <date when="1845-06-02">second day of June eighteen hundred and forty five</date> of the<lb/> following described real estate in S Louis County to wit, lot number five in block num<lb/>ber fourteen of the S Louis common, according to the plat thereof made by <name>Charles DeWard</name><lb/> on file in the Recorders office of S Louis County which lot contains three acres and fifty<lb/> seven hundred the of an <unclear>were,</unclear> bonded north by <name><unclear>Lafayette arenne,</unclear></name> east by <name>McNair <unclear>Avenne</unclear></name><lb/> South by the Comboo tract and west by lot number four in said block, the said <name>salt</name> having been<lb/> made to said <name>Ann Wohlein</name> the said Administratrix and a report of which sale was filed in the<lb/> S Louis Probate Court on the <date when="1845-06-06">sixth day of June eighteen hundred and forty five</date>. And the<lb/> said defendants also submit to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs their objections<lb/> to said sale and to any approval thereof by the Court, and thereupon the Court being fully<lb/> advised of and concerning the same doth find that the said sale was irregular informal and con<lb/>trary to the Statute in such case made and provided and that the same was fraudulently<lb/> brought about and concluded by said administrator and administratrix. to the great prejudice of the<lb/> creditor and heirs of said estate And for these and other good and sufficient rea<lb/>sons unto this Court appearing this Court doth disapprove of the said sale and<lb/> doth declare it to be <unclear>well</unclear> and void And doth order and decree that the<lb/> defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<closer>
Ordered that Court be adjourned until Thursday morning next at ten<lb/> Oclock
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="342" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0345.tiff"/>
<div2>
<opener>
<dateline><date when="1858-06-10">Thursday June 10th 1858</date><lb/> Court met pursuant to adjournment Present as before</dateline>
</opener>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Joseph Farrell</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry W. Hart</name></head>
<p>Bill of Exceptions filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>William Farrells</name> <unclear>adm</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>James <unclear>Brennaus</unclear></name> <unclear>adm</unclear></head>
<p>Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">In the Matter of the Assignment<lb/> of<lb/> <name>Rogers Anderson &amp; C.</name></head>
<p>On motion It is ordered that <name>Charles R.<lb/> Anderson</name> late assignee of <name>Rogers Anderson<lb/> &amp; Co</name> deliver to <name>John M Krum</name> and <name>Chester<lb/> Harding</name> appointed by the Court his Suc<lb/>cessors in said trust all the books papers and effects moneys and evi<lb/>dences of debt belonging to Said Assigned estate<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>George Schaffner</name><lb/> vs<lb/> The City of St Louis</head>
<p>The Court having duly heard and considered the<lb/> motion in arrest of Judgment herein and being thereof<lb/> advised doth overrule the same. And the defendant<lb/> by her attorney comes and files and affidavit and also<lb/> an appeal bond and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court from the<lb/> Judgment of this Court and the Court doth approve the bond filed and grant<lb/> the appeal prayed for<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>William Burke</name></head>
<p>On Indictment for <unclear>Burglay</unclear></p>
<p>Now at this day come as well the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for<lb/> the state as the said defendant by his attorney and thereupon the defendants mo<lb/>tion in arrest of Judgment being by the said parties argued and<lb/> submitted to the Court and by the Court here fully understood therefore it is considered<lb/> by the Court that said motion be overruled; whereupon the defendant by his counsel<lb/> prays an appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court rendered against<lb/> him and the Court being of opinion that there is probable cause for said appeal, Grants<lb/> the same and orders that it operate as a stay of proceeding herein, Thereupon <name>William<lb/> Burke</name> as principal and <name>Louis Howard</name> and <name>Michael Devoy</name> as his securities here<lb/> in Court acknowledge themselves to <unclear>own</unclear> the State of Missouri the sum of two Thous<lb/>and dollars to be levied of their respective goods and Chattels land and tenements<lb/> Yet upon condition that if the said <name>William Burke</name> Shall appear before the Sup<lb/>reme Court of this State and the next term thereof to be begun and held at<lb/> the City of St Louis on the Monday of next to receive<lb/> Judgment on the appeal herein taken and shall also appear before<lb/> this Court at such time and place as said Supreme Court Shall<lb/> direct and shall render himself in execution and obey every order and<lb/> Judgment that shall be made in the premises them this recogni<lb/>zance to be voide else of full force. Whereupon the defendant<lb/> files his bill of Exceptions herein<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="343" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0346.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Henry B. Belt</name> and<lb/> <name>John G. Prest</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>George W Goode</name></head>
<p>Appeal allowed</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiff and file an affidavit<lb/> herein and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court which the<lb/> Court doth allow and thereupon the said plaintiff file<lb/> an appeal bound with sufficient security conditioned according<lb/> to law which bond is approved by the Court. Bill of Exception filed</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Ann C Speck</name> et al<lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Riggin</name> et al</head>
<p>Appeal</p>
<p>Now at this day come the plaintiffs and file an affi<lb/>davit and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court herein and<lb/> the Court being thereof advised doth grant the appeal prayed for</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>Christian Kribben</name> <unclear>adw.</unclear><lb/> of <name>William Valland</name> <unclear>deed.</unclear><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Henry Frahm</name></head>
<p><unclear>Judgh.</unclear> Now come the said parties and thereupon the<lb/> defendant <unclear>moves</unclear> the Court for Judgment against the plain<lb/>tiff for the <unclear>amount</unclear> of the certificate of deposit described in<lb/> the petition with interest thereon from their respective<lb/> dates and <unclear>inasmuch</unclear> as it appears to the Court<lb/> that three years <unclear>had claped since</unclear> the grant of letter of administration on<lb/> said estate of <name>William Volland</name> and that no claims have been allowed<lb/> against the same, therefore the Court in <unclear>pursuance</unclear> of the agreement <unclear>J</unclear><lb/> the parties made in writing and heretofore files in <unclear>this</unclear> cause doth<lb/> order and adjudge that the defendant recover of the plaintiff Six hundred<lb/> and ninety four dollars and ninety four cents, being the amount of the<lb/> principal of the certificates of <unclear>depost</unclear> in the petition described, and also<lb/> his costs and charges in this behalf expended<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>John D S. Haslett</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>John Decker</name></head>
<p>Order of Delivery<unclear>.</unclear></p>
<p>The plaintiff comes and<lb/> files <unclear>as</unclear> petition and affidavit according to law<lb/> claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described and<lb/> on his motion it is ordered that the defendant Deliver the property spec<lb/>ified in the petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said sheriff<lb/> is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from<lb/> the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff</p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Riley</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>A. J. P. <unclear>Garesche</unclear></name> <unclear>adm</unclear><lb/> of <name>William Farrell</name></head>
<p>Judgment</p>
<p>Now at this day come the parties by their<lb/> respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit<lb/> this case to the Court, <unclear>upon</unclear> the pleading and<lb/> proofs and the Court having heard the same<lb/> doth find for the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and twenty four<lb/> dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court<lb/> that the plaintiff recover of the estate of the deceased in the hands of<lb/> his administrator the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found<lb/> and his costs herein expended, and it is ordered that this Judgment<lb/> be certified according to law to the Probate Court of St<lb/> Louis County<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="344" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0347.tiff"/>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed"><name>James Castello</name> Sheriff<lb/> to<lb/> <name>A K Marshall</name> et al</head>
<p>Acknowledgment of deed</p>
<p><name>James Castello Esq.</name> Sheriff of<lb/> St Louis County Comes into Court and acknowl<lb/>edges herein open Court, the execution by him<lb/> as said Sheriff of deed to <name>Alexander K Marshall</name>, <name>Thomas Marshall</name><lb/> <name>James M Hughes</name>, <name>George B Sanderson</name> and <name>Jesse Holliday</name> for<lb/> all the right title and interest of <name>John Sigerson</name> and <name>William Sigerson</name><lb/> of in and to certain property of said sigerson sold by him as said Sheriff<lb/> under and by virtue of Execution issued against said sigerson in favor<lb/> of <name><unclear>Ephraim</unclear> Ball</name>, <name><unclear>Cornetius Altemus</unclear></name> <name>Thomas R. Tanner</name> <name>Louis Miller</name> <name>Jacob<lb/> Miller</name> and <name>George Cook</name>, said property being described as follows<lb/> <unclear>lato numbered</unclear> 37. 39. 40. 41. 42. 46. 47. 48, 49. 50. 57. 83. 85. 2. 4. 5. 6. 38. 80. 81.<lb/> 82. And 84 in the Commons of the City of <unclear>Carondelet</unclear> South of the River<lb/><unclear>des</unclear> Pires<unclear>.</unclear></p>
</div2>
<div2>
<head rend="bracketed">The State of Missouri<lb/> Ex rel <name>Geo Kyler</name><lb/> vs<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name></head>
<p>Now at this day comes <name>Charles G. Manro</name> Circuit<lb/> attorney of the Eighth Indicial Circuit of the State of Mis<lb/>souri who prosecutes for and on behalf of the said State<lb/> as the said <name>Benjamin Farrar</name> by his attorney aforesaid<lb/> whereupon all and singular the premises being seen and fully understood by the<lb/> Court here and motine deliberation had thereon it is considered and adjudged<lb/> by the said Court <unclear>ten</unclear> that the said Plea of the said <name>Benjamin Farrar</name><lb/> so by him pleaded as aforesaid is not sufficient in law and that the<lb/> said <name>Farraros</name> adjudged guilty of <unclear>usonpation</unclear> of and <unclear>intrinsevn</unclear> into the office<lb/> and Franchise of Director of the <name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain Rail Road<lb/> Company</name>, and of unlawfully holding and execution the same And it is<lb/> hereupon further considered and adjudged by the Court now here, that the said<lb/> <name>Benjamin Farrar</name> do not in any manner intermeddle with or concern himself in or about<lb/> the said office of Director of the <name>St Louis &amp; Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name> or in or about<lb/> the holding or exercising the duties of Said Office, on any of them in the said Inform<lb/>ation Specified in virtue of his supposed election by him mentioned in his Plea in <unclear>Bar</unclear><lb/> as aforesaid But that the said <name>Benjamin Farrar</name> be absolutely prejudged and ex<lb/>cluded from <unclear>ever</unclear> holding using or exercising the same office or any of the duties<lb/> thereof in future; and that the Said <name>Benjamin Farrar</name> pay to the State of Missouri<lb/> a five of One cent for his <unclear>usonpation</unclear> of <unclear>intruding</unclear> into and unlawfully holding and<lb/> exercising the office and franchise of Director of the said <name>St Louis and<lb/> Iron Mountain Rail Road Company</name>, and that <name>George Kyler</name>, the said<lb/> Relator in such information shall recover his costs of such prosecution<lb/> to the taxed; and that the process of this Court issue for the execution of<lb/> this judgment and for the collection of such fine and costs in accordance<lb/> with the provision of the Statute in such case made and provided</p>
<closer>
Court adjourned until Court in Course<unclear>.</unclear>
<signed><name>James R Lackland</name></signed>
</closer>
</div2>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="345" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0348.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="346" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0349.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="347" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0350.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="348" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0351.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="349" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0352.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="350" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0353.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="351" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0354.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="352" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0355.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="353" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0356.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="354" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0357.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="355" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0358.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="356" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0359.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="357" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0360.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="358" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0361.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="359" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0362.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="360" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0363.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="361" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0364.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="362" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0365.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="363" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0366.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="364" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0367.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="365" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0368.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="366" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0369.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="367" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0370.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="368" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0371.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="369" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0372.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="370" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0373.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="371" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0374.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="372" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0375.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="373" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0376.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="374" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0377.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="375" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0378.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="376" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0379.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="377" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0380.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="378" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0381.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="379" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0382.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="380" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0383.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="381" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0384.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="382" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0385.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="383" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0386.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="384" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0387.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="385" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0388.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="386" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0389.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="387" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0390.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="388" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0391.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="389" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0392.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="390" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0393.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="391" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0394.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="392" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0395.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="393" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0396.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="394" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0397.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="395" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0398.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="396" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0399.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="397" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0400.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="398" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0401.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="399" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0402.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="400" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0403.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="401" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0404.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="402" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0405.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="403" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0406.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="404" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0407.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="405" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0408.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="406" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0409.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="407" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0410.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="408" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0411.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="409" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0412.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="410" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0413.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="411" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0414.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="412" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0415.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="413" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0416.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="414" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0417.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="415" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0418.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="416" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0419.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="417" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0420.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="418" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0421.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="419" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0422.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="420" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0423.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="421" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0424.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="422" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0425.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="423" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0426.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="424" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0427.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="425" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0428.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="426" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0429.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="427" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0430.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="428" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0431.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="429" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0432.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="430" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0433.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="431" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0434.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="432" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0435.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="433" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0436.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="434" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0437.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="435" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0438.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="436" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0439.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="437" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0440.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="438" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0441.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="439" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0442.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="440" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0443.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="441" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0444.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="442" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0445.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="443" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0446.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="444" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0447.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="445" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0448.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="446" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0449.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="447" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0450.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="446" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0451.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="447" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0452.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="448" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0453.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="449" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0454.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="450" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0455.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="451" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0456.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="452" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0457.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="453" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0458.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="454" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0459.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="455" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0460.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="456" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0461.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="457" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0462.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="458" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0463.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="459" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0464.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="460" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0465.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="461" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0466.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="462" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0467.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="463" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0468.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="464" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0469.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="465" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0470.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="466" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0471.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="467" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0472.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="468" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0473.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="469" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0474.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="470" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0475.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="471" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0476.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="472" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0477.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="473" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0478.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="474" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0479.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="475" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0480.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="476" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0481.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="477" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0482.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="478" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0483.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="479" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0484.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="480" facs="rcdbook1858_27_0485.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0486.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0487.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0488.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0489.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0490.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0491.tiff"/>
</div1>
<div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb facs="rcdbook1858_27_0492.tiff"/>
<div2>
<p>RECORD<lb/> 27</p>
<p>1858</p>
<p>CIRCUIT<lb/> COURT</p>
</div2>
</div1>

<!--div1 rend="handwritten">
<pb n="" facs=""/>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><!-\-person v. person-\-></head>
<bibl><relatedItem target=""/></bibl><!-\-filename of related court case-\->
<p><!-\-entry-\-></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="horizontal">
<head rend="bracketed"><!-\-person v. person-\-></head>
<bibl><relatedItem target=""/></bibl><!-\-filename of related court case-\->
<p><!-\-entry-\-></p>
</div2>
<div2 rend="vertical">
<p><!-\-entry-\-></p>
</div2>
</div1>-->
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
